Factors To Consider When Making Benefit-Risk Determinations for Medical Device Investigational Device Exemptions; Draft Guidance for Investigational Device Exemption Sponsors, Sponsor-Investigators, and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Availability, 34909-34910 [2015-14982]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 117 / Thursday, June 18, 2015 / Notices
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
Food and Drug Administration
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than July 13, 2015.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas
City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice
President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas
City, Missouri 64198–0001:
1. Southwest Bancorp, Inc., Stillwater,
Oklahoma; to acquire 100 percent of the
voting shares of First Commercial
Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly
acquire voting shares of First
Commercial Bank, both in Edmond,
Oklahoma.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, June 15, 2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015–14985 Filed 6–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jun 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
[Docket No. FDA–2015–D–1777]
Factors To Consider When Making
Benefit-Risk Determinations for
Medical Device Investigational Device
Exemptions; Draft Guidance for
Investigational Device Exemption
Sponsors, Sponsor-Investigators, and
Food and Drug Administration Staff;
Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of the draft guidance
entitled ‘‘Factors to Consider When
Making Benefit-Risk Determinations for
Medical Device Investigational Device
Exemptions (IDEs).’’ The purpose of this
draft guidance is to provide greater
clarity for FDA staff and IDE sponsors
and sponsor-investigators regarding the
principal factors that FDA considers
when assessing the benefits and risks of
IDE applications for human clinical
study. The draft guidance also
characterizes benefits in the context of
investigational research, which includes
direct benefits to the subjects and
benefits to others (to the extent they are
indirect benefits to subjects or reflect
the importance of knowledge to be
gained). This draft guidance is not final
nor is it in effect at this time.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency
considers your comment of this draft
guidance before it begins work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
either electronic or written comments
on the draft guidance by September 16,
2015.
ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the
guidance document is available for
download from the Internet. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
information on electronic access to the
guidance. Submit written requests for a
single hard copy of the draft guidance
entitled ‘‘Factors to Consider When
Making Benefit-Risk Determinations for
Medical Device Investigational Device
Exemptions (IDEs)’’ to the Office of the
Center Director, Guidance and Policy
Development, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5431, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002; or the Office of
Communication, Outreach, and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34909
Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist that office in processing your
request.
Submit electronic comments on the
draft guidance to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Identify
comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sugato De, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5435, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6270; or
Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301,
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 240–402–
7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A primary goal of this guidance is to
clarify the factors that FDA considers
when assessing risks and anticipated
benefits for IDE studies, and how
uncertainty may be offset by a variety of
risk mitigation measures that can assure
appropriate patient and participant
protections in investigational research
settings. At earlier stages of device
development, FDA considers
appropriate mitigation measures for
anticipated possible risks and
unanticipated risks, whereas in later
stages, risk mitigation focuses
increasingly on the most probable risks.
Another important goal of this guidance
is to characterize benefits in the context
of investigational research, which
includes direct benefits to the subjects
and benefits to others (to the extent they
are indirect benefits to subjects or reflect
the importance of knowledge to be
gained).
As with the benefit-risk framework for
evaluating marketing applications, FDA
assessment of benefits and risks for an
IDE application takes into account the
contextual setting in which the study is
being proposed, including but not
limited to characterization of the disease
or condition being treated or diagnosed,
the availability of alternative treatments
or diagnostics, and the risks associated
with them. When available, information
characterizing subject tolerance for risk
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
34910
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 117 / Thursday, June 18, 2015 / Notices
and perspective on benefit may provide
useful context during this assessment.
FDA believes use of this benefit-risk
framework in an IDE application will
facilitate the incorporation of evidence
and knowledge from different
domains—clinical, nonclinical, and
patient—to support a comprehensive,
balanced decision-making approach.
FDA envisions this will facilitate a
common understanding between FDA
and sponsors/sponsor-investigators by
highlighting which factors are critical in
the benefit-risk assessment for a specific
application, and clearly explaining how
these factors influence a regulatory
decision. FDA also believes
implementation of this guidance
document will improve the
predictability, consistency, and
transparency of the review process for
IDE applications.
II. Significance of Guidance
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent the Agency’s current thinking
on ‘‘Factors to Consider When Making
Benefit-Risk Determinations for Medical
Device Investigational Device
Exemptions (IDEs).’’ It does not create or
confer any rights for or on any person
and does not operate to bind FDA or the
public. An alternative approach may be
used if such approach satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statute
and regulations.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. Electronic Access
Persons interested in obtaining a copy
of the draft guidance may do so by
downloading an electronic copy from
the Internet. A search capability for all
Center for Devices and Radiological
Health guidance documents is available
at https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
DeviceRegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/default.htm.
Guidance documents are also available
at https://www.regulations.gov or from
CBER at https://www.fda.gov/Biologics
BloodVaccines/GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/default.htm.
Persons unable to download an
electronic copy of ‘‘Factors to Consider
When Making Benefit-Risk
Determinations for Medical Device
Investigational Device Exemptions’’ may
send an email request to CDRHGuidance@fda.hhs.gov to receive an
electronic copy of the document. Please
use the document number 1783 to
identify the guidance you are
requesting.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jun 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This draft guidance refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations.
These collections of information are
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The collections
of information in 21 CFR part 812 have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0078; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 50.23
(Exception from general requirements
for informed consent) have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0586; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 56.115 (IRB
records) have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0130; and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 50, subpart B (Informed Consent of
Human Subjects) and 56 (Institutional
Review Boards) have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0755.
V. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: June 12, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–14982 Filed 6–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2015–N–1968]
Non-Microbial Biomarkers of Infection
for In Vitro Diagnostic Device Use;
Public Workshop; Request for
Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice of public workshop;
request for comments.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
following public workshop entitled
‘‘Non-Microbial Biomarkers of Infection
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for In Vitro Diagnostic Device Use.’’ The
purpose of this workshop is to receive
input from stakeholders and discuss
approaches to the study of nonmicrobial biomarkers for differentiating
viral from bacterial infections and for
diagnosis and assessment of sepsis.
Comments and suggestions generated
through this workshop will facilitate
further development of regulatory
science for establishing appropriate
comparator methods and clinically
relevant performance standards for nonmicrobial based in vitro diagnostics for
infection.
DATES: The public workshop will be
held on October 16, 2015, from 8 a.m.
to 5 p.m. Registration to attend the
meeting must be made by 4 p.m. on
October 6, 2015. Registration from those
individuals interested in presenting
comments should be received by
September 16, 2015. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
instructions on how to register for the
meeting. Submit either electronic or
written comments by 4 p.m. on
November 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The public workshop will
be held at the FDA White Oak Campus,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Building
31 Conference Center, the Great Room
(Rm. 1503), Silver Spring, MD 20993.
Entrance for the public meeting
participants (non-FDA employees) is
through Building 1 where routine
security check procedures will be
performed. For parking and security
information, please refer to https://
www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/
WorkingatFDA/BuildingsandFacilities/
WhiteOakCampusInformation/
ucm241740.htm.
Submit electronic comments to
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville MD 20852.
All comments should be identified with
the docket number found in brackets in
the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Natasha Townsend, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5525, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–5927, FAX:
301–847–2512, email:
natasha.townsend@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
There has been increasing interest in
the development of non-microbiological
biomarkers to aid in determining
whether patient signs and symptoms
consistent with infection are attributable
to an infectious or non-infectious cause,
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34909-34910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14982]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2015-D-1777]
Factors To Consider When Making Benefit-Risk Determinations for
Medical Device Investigational Device Exemptions; Draft Guidance for
Investigational Device Exemption Sponsors, Sponsor-Investigators, and
Food and Drug Administration Staff; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of the draft guidance entitled ``Factors to Consider When
Making Benefit-Risk Determinations for Medical Device Investigational
Device Exemptions (IDEs).'' The purpose of this draft guidance is to
provide greater clarity for FDA staff and IDE sponsors and sponsor-
investigators regarding the principal factors that FDA considers when
assessing the benefits and risks of IDE applications for human clinical
study. The draft guidance also characterizes benefits in the context of
investigational research, which includes direct benefits to the
subjects and benefits to others (to the extent they are indirect
benefits to subjects or reflect the importance of knowledge to be
gained). This draft guidance is not final nor is it in effect at this
time.
DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment of this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by September 16, 2015.
ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the guidance document is available for
download from the Internet. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for information on electronic access to the guidance. Submit written
requests for a single hard copy of the draft guidance entitled
``Factors to Consider When Making Benefit-Risk Determinations for
Medical Device Investigational Device Exemptions (IDEs)'' to the Office
of the Center Director, Guidance and Policy Development, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5431, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002;
or the Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002.
Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in
processing your request.
Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sugato De, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5435, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-6270;
or Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301,
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 240-402-7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A primary goal of this guidance is to clarify the factors that FDA
considers when assessing risks and anticipated benefits for IDE
studies, and how uncertainty may be offset by a variety of risk
mitigation measures that can assure appropriate patient and participant
protections in investigational research settings. At earlier stages of
device development, FDA considers appropriate mitigation measures for
anticipated possible risks and unanticipated risks, whereas in later
stages, risk mitigation focuses increasingly on the most probable
risks. Another important goal of this guidance is to characterize
benefits in the context of investigational research, which includes
direct benefits to the subjects and benefits to others (to the extent
they are indirect benefits to subjects or reflect the importance of
knowledge to be gained).
As with the benefit-risk framework for evaluating marketing
applications, FDA assessment of benefits and risks for an IDE
application takes into account the contextual setting in which the
study is being proposed, including but not limited to characterization
of the disease or condition being treated or diagnosed, the
availability of alternative treatments or diagnostics, and the risks
associated with them. When available, information characterizing
subject tolerance for risk
[[Page 34910]]
and perspective on benefit may provide useful context during this
assessment.
FDA believes use of this benefit-risk framework in an IDE
application will facilitate the incorporation of evidence and knowledge
from different domains--clinical, nonclinical, and patient--to support
a comprehensive, balanced decision-making approach. FDA envisions this
will facilitate a common understanding between FDA and sponsors/
sponsor-investigators by highlighting which factors are critical in the
benefit-risk assessment for a specific application, and clearly
explaining how these factors influence a regulatory decision. FDA also
believes implementation of this guidance document will improve the
predictability, consistency, and transparency of the review process for
IDE applications.
II. Significance of Guidance
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the Agency's current thinking on ``Factors to
Consider When Making Benefit-Risk Determinations for Medical Device
Investigational Device Exemptions (IDEs).'' It does not create or
confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA
or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach
satisfies the requirements of the applicable statute and regulations.
III. Electronic Access
Persons interested in obtaining a copy of the draft guidance may do
so by downloading an electronic copy from the Internet. A search
capability for all Center for Devices and Radiological Health guidance
documents is available at https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm. Guidance
documents are also available at https://www.regulations.gov or from CBER
at https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm. Persons unable to
download an electronic copy of ``Factors to Consider When Making
Benefit-Risk Determinations for Medical Device Investigational Device
Exemptions'' may send an email request to CDRH-Guidance@fda.hhs.gov to
receive an electronic copy of the document. Please use the document
number 1783 to identify the guidance you are requesting.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This draft guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information in 21 CFR part 812 have been approved under
OMB control number 0910-0078; the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 50.23 (Exception from general requirements for informed consent)
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0586; the collections
of information in 21 CFR part 56.115 (IRB records) have been approved
under OMB control number 0910-0130; and the collections of information
in 21 CFR part 50, subpart B (Informed Consent of Human Subjects) and
56 (Institutional Review Boards) have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0755.
V. Comments
Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to https://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: June 12, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-14982 Filed 6-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P