Notice of Submission for Approval: Information Collection 3206-0106; Interview Survey Form, INV 10, 34936-34937 [2015-14972]

Download as PDF 34936 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 117 / Thursday, June 18, 2015 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration [Docket No. OSHA–2013–0026] Executive Order 13650 Improving Chemical Facility Safety and Security Webinar: Implementation Updates Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor ACTION: Notice of listening session Webinar. AGENCY: The Department of Labor (DOL), in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is announcing a Webinar to update stakeholders on action items since the June 6, 2014 release of ‘‘Executive Order [EO] 13650: Actions to Improving Chemical Facility Safety and Security—A Shared Commitment.’’ DATES: The Webinar will take place on June 19th, from 1:00 to 2:30 p.m. EDT. Registration to Participate: To register, please email your contact information (first name, last name, company, title) to eo.chemical@hq.dhs.gov. As time permits, questions will be taken on a first-come, first served basis—please let us know if you wish to participate. You will be provided a separate email with webinar connection and call-in instructions. There is no fee to register. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information on the EO, visit the Web site at: https://www.osha.gov/ chemicalexecutiveorder/. For questions regarding the EO, please contact: eo.chemical@hq.dhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES I. Background On August 1, 2013, President Obama issued EO 13650 to improve chemical facility safety and security. The Working Group charged with implementing the EO is co-chaired by DHS, DOL, and EPA, and includes participation from the Departments of Justice, Agriculture, and Transportation, all of whom play a role in chemical facility safety measures. The Working Group gathered concerns, comments, feedback, suggestions, and best practices from stakeholders over the course of several Webinars and listening sessions which culminated in a Report to the President released in May 2014, as well as an Action Plan contained therein. The Working Group has made significant progress on the implementation of the Action Plan since the release of the report by initiating community planning preparedness VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jun 17, 2015 Jkt 235001 measures, increasing Federal coordination, improving data management techniques and technology, revising regulations, issuing guidance and advisory documents, and creating a best practices repository, among other initiatives. II. Scope of Webinar The purpose of this Webinar is to update stakeholders and the public on progress made on action items since the June 6, 2014 release of ‘‘Executive Order [EO] 13650: Actions to Improving Chemical Facility Safety and Security— A Shared Commitment’’, and to raise awareness of the EO 13650 Working Group Web site, located at: www.osha.gov/chemicalexecutiveorder/. We encourage participation from the broad range of stakeholders who have an interest in chemical facility safety and security to include, but not limited to, chemical producers, chemical storage companies, agricultural supply companies, State and local regulators, chemical critical infrastructure owners and operators, first responders, labor organizations representing affected workers, environmental and community groups, and consensus standards organizations. III. Public Participation This Webinar will accommodate over 600 participants. As time permits, participants will be able to ask questions on a first-come first-served basis. We will do our best to accommodate all persons who wish to ask questions during the session. We request that participants refrain from making statements, and use this time to ask questions. Should time run out, participants may submit questions or statements to: eo.chemical@hq.dhs.gov. Authority and Signature David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, authorized the preparation of this notice. Signed at Washington, DC, on June 15, 2015. David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION Information Security Oversight Office [NARA–2015–048] State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector Policy Advisory Committee (SLTPS– PAC) National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meeting. AGENCY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 2) and implementing regulation 41 CFR 101–6, NARA announces the following committee meeting. SUMMARY: The meeting will be on July 22, 2015, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EDT. DATES: National Archives and Records Administration; 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.; Jefferson Room; Washington, DC 20408. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Skwirot, Senior Program Analyst, by mail at ISOO, National Archives Building; 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20408, by telephone at (202) 357–5398, or by email at robert.skwirot@nara.gov. Contact ISOO at ISOO@nara.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this meeting is to discuss matters relating to the Classified National Security Information Program for State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector Entities. The meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and access procedures, you must submit the name and telephone number of individuals planning to attend to the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than Friday, July 17, 2015. ISOO will provide additional instructions for accessing the meeting’s location. ADDRESSES: Dated: June 11, 2015. Patrice Little Murray, Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. 2015–15033 Filed 6–17–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7515–01–P OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT [FR Doc. 2015–15010 Filed 6–17–15; 8:45 am] Notice of Submission for Approval: Information Collection 3206–0106; Interview Survey Form, INV 10 BILLING CODE 4510–26–P PO 00000 U.S. Office of Personnel Management. AGENCY: Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM 18JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 117 / Thursday, June 18, 2015 / Notices 60-Day notice and request for comments. ACTION: Federal Investigative Services (FIS), U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is notifying the general public and other Federal agencies that OPM is seeking Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval of a revised information collection control number 3206–0106, Interview Survey Form, INV 10. OPM is soliciting comments for this collection as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35), as amended by the ClingerCohen Act (Pub. L. 104–106). The Office of Management and Budget is particularly interested in comments that: 1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; 2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; 3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and 4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submissions of responses. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted until August 17, 2015. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.8(d). ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the proposed information collection to the Federal Investigative Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20415, Attention: Donna McLeod or by electronic mail at FISFormsComments@ opm.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of this information collection, with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by contacting Federal Investigative Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20415, Attention: Donna McLeod or by electronic mail at FISFormsComments@opm.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Interview Survey Form, INV 10 is mailed by OPM, to a random sampling tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:53 Jun 17, 2015 Jkt 235001 of record and personal sources contacted during background investigations when investigators have performed fieldwork. The INV 10 is used as a quality control instrument designed to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the investigative product. The form queries the recipient about the investigative procedure exhibited by the investigator, the investigator’s professionalism, and the information discussed and reported. In addition to the preformatted response options, OPM invites the recipients to respond with any other relevant comments or suggestions. OPM proposes the following changes. To prevent confusion as to the meaning of the current question ‘‘Were you interviewed in private?’’ OPM proposes to ask, ‘‘Were you interviewed alone (no third party present)?’’ and ‘‘Were you interviewed in a private setting or private, enclosed space?’’ To provide the respondent the opportunity to explain the circumstances of interviews conducted by phone, OPM is replacing the current series of checkboxes (‘‘My Request,’’ ‘‘Investigator’s Request,’’ ‘‘No Reason Given’’) with two questions, ‘‘Were you offered to be interviewed in person?’’ and ‘‘Please explain why the interview was conducted by telephone.’’ OPM proposes to amend Question 7 to be more concise by combining the series of two questions into one, so that Question 7 will now read ‘‘Please provide any additional comments or concerns you have about the investigator and/or the interview, and indicate if you require additional contact from an OPM representative.’’ OPM is also making non-substantive changes to page one of the form for conciseness. Analysis Agency: Federal Investigative Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Title: Interview Survey Form, INV 10. OMB Number: 3206–0106. Affected Public: A random sampling of record and personal sources contacted during background investigations when investigators have performed fieldwork. Number of Respondents: 61,973. Estimated Time per Respondent: 6 minutes. Total Burden Hours: 6,197. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Katherine Archuleta, Director. [FR Doc. 2015–14972 Filed 6–17–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6325–53–P PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 34937 POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. R2013–11R; Order No. 2540] Rate Adjustment Remand Postal Regulatory Commission. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: The Commission is noticing a proceeding to address the methodological approach for accounting for volume losses in calculating the exigent surcharge, as well as other relevant issues. This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps. DATES: Comments are due: June 26, 2015; reply comments are due: July 6, 2015. SUMMARY: Submit comments electronically via the Commission’s Filing Online system at http:// www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202–789–6820. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Background III. Commission Action on Remand IV. Ordering Paragraphs I. Introduction On June 5, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued its opinion in Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers v. Postal Regulatory Commission, 2015 WL 3513394 (D.C. Cir. June 5, 2015). In that opinion, the court granted in part a Postal Service petition for review of the Commission’s December 24, 2013 order that had approved in part a Postal Service request for an exigent rate adjustment under 39 U.S.C. 3622(d)(1)(E).1 2015 WL 3513394 at 10. Although the court largely affirmed Order No. 1926, it vacated the count once portion of the Commission’s order and remanded the case for proceedings consistent with its opinion. Id. On June 8, 2015, the Postal Service filed a motion requesting the Commission expeditiously implement remand proceedings and take a number 1 Docket No. R2013–11, Order Granting Exigent Price Increase, December 24, 2013 (Order No. 1926). E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM 18JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34936-34937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14972]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Notice of Submission for Approval: Information Collection 3206-
0106; Interview Survey Form, INV 10

AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

[[Page 34937]]


ACTION: 60-Day notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Federal Investigative Services (FIS), U.S. Office of Personnel 
Management (OPM) is notifying the general public and other Federal 
agencies that OPM is seeking Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
approval of a revised information collection control number 3206-0106, 
Interview Survey Form, INV 10. OPM is soliciting comments for this 
collection as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (Pub. L. 
104-13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35), as amended by the Clinger-Cohen Act 
(Pub. L. 104-106). The Office of Management and Budget is particularly 
interested in comments that:
    1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of 
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
    3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and
    4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those 
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submissions of responses.

DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted until August 17, 
2015. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.8(d).

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on 
the proposed information collection to the Federal Investigative 
Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20415, Attention: Donna McLeod or by electronic mail at 
FISFormsComments@opm.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of this information collection, 
with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by contacting 
Federal Investigative Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 
1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20415, Attention: Donna McLeod or by 
electronic mail at FISFormsComments@opm.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Interview Survey Form, INV 10 is mailed 
by OPM, to a random sampling of record and personal sources contacted 
during background investigations when investigators have performed 
fieldwork. The INV 10 is used as a quality control instrument designed 
to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the investigative product. The 
form queries the recipient about the investigative procedure exhibited 
by the investigator, the investigator's professionalism, and the 
information discussed and reported. In addition to the preformatted 
response options, OPM invites the recipients to respond with any other 
relevant comments or suggestions.
    OPM proposes the following changes. To prevent confusion as to the 
meaning of the current question ``Were you interviewed in private?'' 
OPM proposes to ask, ``Were you interviewed alone (no third party 
present)?'' and ``Were you interviewed in a private setting or private, 
enclosed space?'' To provide the respondent the opportunity to explain 
the circumstances of interviews conducted by phone, OPM is replacing 
the current series of checkboxes (``My Request,'' ``Investigator's 
Request,'' ``No Reason Given'') with two questions, ``Were you offered 
to be interviewed in person?'' and ``Please explain why the interview 
was conducted by telephone.'' OPM proposes to amend Question 7 to be 
more concise by combining the series of two questions into one, so that 
Question 7 will now read ``Please provide any additional comments or 
concerns you have about the investigator and/or the interview, and 
indicate if you require additional contact from an OPM 
representative.''
    OPM is also making non-substantive changes to page one of the form 
for conciseness.

Analysis

    Agency: Federal Investigative Services, U.S. Office of Personnel 
Management.
    Title: Interview Survey Form, INV 10.
    OMB Number: 3206-0106.
    Affected Public: A random sampling of record and personal sources 
contacted during background investigations when investigators have 
performed fieldwork.
    Number of Respondents: 61,973.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 6 minutes.
    Total Burden Hours: 6,197.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Katherine Archuleta,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2015-14972 Filed 6-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-53-P