Notice of Opportunity and Procedures To Request Assistance on Tariff Classification and Customs Valuation Treatment by Other Customs Administrations Affecting United States Exports, 34924-34926 [2015-14968]
Download as PDF
34924
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 117 / Thursday, June 18, 2015 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Opportunity and Procedures
To Request Assistance on Tariff
Classification and Customs Valuation
Treatment by Other Customs
Administrations Affecting United
States Exports
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: General notice.
AGENCY:
This document describes
opportunities available to U.S. exporters
to obtain assistance from U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to resolve
matters concerning the tariff
classification and customs valuation
applied to U.S. exports by other
governments. By publication of this
notice, CBP invites U.S. exporters to
submit requests for such assistance.
DATES: June 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Requests for assistance may
be addressed to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Office of
International Trade, Regulations &
Rulings, Attention: Commercial and
Trade Facilitation Division, 90 K St.
NE., 10th Floor, Washington, DC 20229–
1177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
tariff classification matters, please
contact Jacinto Juarez, Tariff
Classification and Marking Branch, at
(202) 325–0027, or Greg Connor, Tariff
Classification and Marking Branch, at
(202) 325–0025. For matters involving
customs valuation, please contact
Yuliya Gulis, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, at (202) 325–0042.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Background
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) has direct responsibility for
enhancing U.S. economic
competitiveness through the
enforcement of the laws of the United
States and the fostering of lawful
international trade and travel. By
reducing costs for industry and
enforcing trade laws against counterfeit,
unsafe, and fraudulently imported
goods, CBP is working to facilitate
legitimate trade, contribute to American
economic prosperity, and protect
against risks to public health and safety.
As part of CBP’s mission to secure
and facilitate lawful international trade,
CBP applies a number of legal
requirements to goods imported into the
customs territory of the United States. In
almost all cases, imported goods must
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jun 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
be ‘‘entered’’ (that is, declared to CBP),
and are subject to detention and
examination by CBP officers to ensure
compliance with all laws and
regulations enforced and administered
by CBP. As part of the entry process,
goods must be classified under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) and their
customs value must be determined. CBP
is responsible for fixing the final tariff
classification and customs valuation of
entered goods through a process called
‘‘liquidation.’’ In making classification
and valuation determinations, CBP
applies two international instruments:
The Harmonized Commodity
Description Coding System (also known
as the Harmonized System (HS)), and
the Agreement on Implementation of
Article VII of the General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 (also
known as the World Trade Organization
(WTO) Agreement on Customs
Valuation or the ‘‘WTO Valuation
Agreement’’). Both international
instruments share a similar goal of
ensuring, at the technical level, a
standard or uniform approach to the
interpretation and application of tariff
classification and valuation principles,
respectively.
Tariff Classification
Pursuant to the International
Convention on the Harmonized
Commodity Description and Coding
System (the ‘‘HS Convention’’), the
World Customs Organization (WCO)
developed the HS. The HS is an
internationally-standardized product
nomenclature used to classify traded
products by name and number, and is
intended to ensure, at the technical
level, a uniform approach to the
interpretation and application of tariff
classifications. The WCO, established in
1952 as the Customs Co-operation
Council (CCC), is an independent,
intergovernmental body whose mission
is to enhance the effectiveness and
efficiency of customs administrations.
The United States, along with 149 other
countries and the European Union, is a
contracting party to the HS Convention
and uses the HS as a basis for its
customs tariffs and the collection of
international trade statistics.
Subtitle B of title I of the Omnibus
Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988
(Sec. 1201, Pub. L. 100–418, 102 Stat.
1147, Aug. 23, 1988 (19 U.S.C. 3001))
(the Act) provides for the approval and
implementation in the United States of
the tariff classification principles set
forth in the HS Convention and its
associated Harmonized System
nomenclature. More specifically, the
Act provides for congressional approval
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of U.S. accession to the HS Convention
(section 1203), enactment of the HTSUS
(section 1204), and the publication of
foreign trade statistics in conformity
with the HS nomenclature (section
1208). In addition, under section 1209,
the United States Trade Representative
(USTR) is made responsible for
coordinating trade policy concerning
the HS Convention.
Section 1210 of the Act provides that,
subject to the policy direction of USTR,
the Departments of Treasury and
Commerce and the United States
International Trade Commission (the
Commission) shall have responsibility
for formulating U.S. positions on
technical and procedural issues relating
to tariff classification under the HS
Convention, and for representing the
United States government at the WCO
with respect thereto.
To foster international uniformity in
tariff classification matters under the
HS, contracting parties have vested the
WCO with responsibility for securing
uniform interpretation of the HS and its
periodic updating in light of
developments in technology and
changes in trade patterns. See Article 7
of the HS Convention. The WCO
manages this process through the
Harmonized System Committee (HSC), a
committee composed of contracting
parties to the HS Convention which
meets twice a year to examine policy
matters, take decisions on classification
questions, settle disputes, and prepare
amendments to the HS nomenclature
and its Explanatory Notes. In accord
with procedures established by the
WCO governing body (the WCO
Council), the HSC also prepares
amendments updating the HS every four
to six years.
On November 10, 1988, the Office of
the U.S. Trade Representative published
in a Federal Register notice procedures
to implement sections 1209 and 1210 of
the Act. See 53 FR 45646. Therein,
USTR designated the Treasury
Department, represented at the time by
legacy U.S. Customs Service (now CBP,
as part of the Department of Homeland
Security), to lead the U.S. delegation at
meetings of the HSC at the WCO in
Brussels, Belgium. Accordingly,
Regulations and Rulings, within CBP’s
Office of International Trade, leads U.S.
delegations at semi-annual meetings of
the HSC at the WCO. CBP also serves
with the Commission on U.S.
delegations at meetings of the
Harmonized System Review
Subcommittee, which occur twice per
year at the WCO.
Article 10 of the HS Convention
provides that any dispute between
contracting parties concerning the
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 117 / Thursday, June 18, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
interpretation or application of the HS
Convention is to be settled by
negotiation between the contracting
parties to the extent possible. If this
cannot be accomplished, the parties
(that is, the governments concerned) are
to refer the dispute to the HSC for its
consideration and recommendations.
The HSC, in turn, is to refer
irreconcilable disputes to the WCO
Council for its recommendations.
Customs Valuation
With respect to customs valuation, the
WTO Valuation Agreement established
a standard system for the valuation of
imported goods. The WTO Valuation
Agreement ensures that determinations
of the customs value for the application
of duty rates to imported goods are
applied in a neutral and uniform
manner, precluding the use of arbitrary
or fictitious customs values. As one of
160 Members of the WTO, the United
States uses the Valuation Agreement as
the basis for proper customs valuation
methodology.
Merchandise imported into the
United States is appraised for customs
purposes in accordance with Section
402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended by the Trade Agreements Act
of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 1401a) (TAA).
Consistent with principles set forth in
the WTO Valuation Agreement, the
primary method of appraisement is
transaction value, which is defined as
‘‘the price actually paid or payable for
the merchandise when sold for
exportation to the United States,’’ plus
amounts for certain statutorily
enumerated additions to the extent not
otherwise included in the price actually
paid or payable. See 19 U.S.C.
1401a(b)(1). When transaction value
cannot be applied, then the appraised
value is determined based on the other
valuation methods in the order specified
in 19 U.S.C. 1401a(a).
The WTO Valuation Agreement
established the Technical Committee on
Customs Valuation (TCCV), which
operates under the auspices of the WCO,
with a view to ensuring the uniform
interpretation and application of
internationally agreed upon customs
valuation principles. The TCCV is
responsible for the examination of
technical problems arising in the day-today administration of the customs
valuation systems of WTO Valuation
Agreement signatories. In addition, the
TCCV renders advisory opinions on
appropriate solutions based upon the
facts presented. The TCCV meets twice
a year at the WCO to discuss issues
concerning the interpretation and
application of the WTO Valuation
Agreement.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jun 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
Pursuant to Annex II to the WTO
Valuation Agreement, the United States
has the right to be represented at the
TCCV to examine specific problems
arising from the administration of the
customs valuation systems of Members.
The United States, which currently
serves as Chair to the TCCV, may
nominate one delegate and one or more
alternates to be its representatives on
the TCCV at semi-annual meetings in
Brussels. CBP represents the United
States at the semi-annual meetings of
the TCCV at the WCO.
Additionally, under Article 19 of the
WTO Valuation Agreement, the United
States may request consultation with a
Member or Members if the U.S.
considers any benefit to it under the
Agreement is being nullified or
impaired, or that the achievement of any
objective of the Agreement is being
impeded, directly or indirectly, as a
result of the actions of another Member.
Disputes arising under Article 19 of the
WTO Valuation Agreement may be
referred to the TCCV for an examination
of any questions requiring technical
consideration.
CBP Participation at Meetings of the
Harmonized System Committee and the
Technical Committee on Customs
Valuation
Accordingly, at meetings of the HSC
and TCCV at the WCO, the United
States and other customs
administrations participate and
communicate regularly on issues
concerning the interpretation and
application of the HS and the WTO
Valuation Agreement. Historically, it
has been useful for CBP to conduct
discussions with other customs
administrations at the WCO with a view
to reaching a common understanding
and interpretation of these instruments.
Such discussions can often serve to
eliminate or resolve export issues for
U.S. traders.
For example, in 2014 CBP was
contacted by a U.S. exporter who
believed that its textile article was being
misclassified by another customs
administration. The company brought to
CBP’s attention the analysis applicable
to the merchandise under published
CBP rulings available at https://
rulings.cbp.gov. The company requested
that CBP contact the foreign customs
administration to resolve the tariff
classification matter, and if the matter
could not be resolved, the U.S. company
requested that CBP refer the matter to
the HSC at the WCO.
Within 30 days of receiving the
technical assistance request, attorneys
from the Tariff Classification and
Marking Branch and import specialists
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34925
from the National Commodity Specialist
Division, within the Office of
Regulations and Rulings (R&R), Office of
International Trade reviewed the
underlying classification issue and
determined that the foreign customs
administration’s treatment of the
merchandise was inconsistent with the
proper interpretation of the HS.
Following CBP’s determination of the
correct classification of the
merchandise, R&R attorneys raised the
issue bilaterally with the foreign
customs administration and asked them
to consider the matter.
Following this bilateral exchange, and
within seven months of the initial
technical assistance request, CBP
secured a favorable decision by the
foreign customs administration to
classify the merchandise in a manner
consistent with the U.S. position and as
requested by the exporter. As a result of
CBP’s engagement with the foreign
customs administration, the U.S.
company was able to obtain the correct
tariff treatment of its imported
merchandise in the foreign country.
Inquiries Concerning Tariff
Classification or Customs Valuation by
Other Customs Administrations
Affecting U.S. Exports
By publication of this notice, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection
emphasizes that opportunities exist to
strengthen communication and
coordination between industry, CBP,
other customs administrations, and the
WCO to advance the shared goal of
facilitating international trade. Greater
collaboration with industry promotes
improved technical understanding
among contracting parties and helps to
foster uniformity in the interpretation
and application of the HS Convention
and WTO Valuation Agreement.
On matters involving non-uniform
tariff classification or customs valuation
treatment by other customs
administrations, individual parties or
firms do not have standing to initiate
dispute settlement procedures or
consultations under the HS Convention
or the WTO Valuation Agreement.
Consequently, for a U.S. individual or
firm to raise a tariff classification or
customs valuation dispute, that party
must file an inquiry or complaint with
the U.S. government and provide, or
assist in the collection of, any
information relating to the matter which
may be required.
Accordingly, CBP hereby invites U.S.
exporters to file with CBP requests for
assistance in resolving any tariff
classification or customs valuation
treatment by other customs
administrations affecting U.S. exports.
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
34926
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 117 / Thursday, June 18, 2015 / Notices
Of course, as a threshold technical
matter, in order to provide the requested
assistance, CBP must agree with the
position of the exporter with regard to
the specific matter brought to CBP’s
attention.
CBP will endeavor to provide an
initial response to such requests within
60 days of their receipt. Thereafter, in
cooperation with the appropriate
agencies, CBP will consider the
appropriate course of action, including
but not limited to the initiation of
consultations or dispute settlement at
meetings of the HSC or TCCV at the
WCO. The inquirer or complainant will
be informed of the progress achieved in
resolving the matter. Requests for
assistance on tariff classification or
customs valuation treatment by other
customs administrations affecting U.S.
exports should be addressed to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, Office
of International Trade, Regulations &
Rulings, Attention: Commercial and
Trade Facilitation Division, 90 K St.
NE., 10th Floor, Washington, DC 20229–
1177.
Confidentiality
Information submitted by U.S.
exporters concerning requests for
assistance may, in some instances,
include confidential commercial or
financial information, the disclosure of
which could result in competitive harm
to the business submitter. Such
information is, generally, protected
under the provisions of the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) (FOIA),
the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), and the
Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. 1905). If
confidential treatment is requested,
submitters should specifically designate
the information it considers
confidential. Such requests will be
handled in accordance with CBP
Regulations (19 CFR 103.35) regarding
the protection of such information.
Dated: June 12, 2015.
Brenda B. Smith,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of
International Trade.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–4222–
DR; Docket ID FEMA–2015–0002 4222]
Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major
Disaster Declaration
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice amends the notice
of a major disaster declaration for the
State of Oklahoma (FEMA–4222–DR),
dated May 26, 2015, and related
determinations.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective Date: June 4, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2833.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that the incident period for
this disaster is closed effective June 4,
2015.
The following Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used
for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora
Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034,
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA);
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant;
97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to
Individuals and Households In Presidentially
Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—
Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals
and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals
and Households—Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants—Public Assistance
(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2015–14978 Filed 6–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–23–P
Notice.
This is a notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the Territory of Guam
(FEMA–4224–DR), dated June 5, 2015,
and related determinations.
DATES: Effective June 5, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2833.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that, in a letter dated June
5, 2015, the President issued a major
disaster declaration under the authority
of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act, 42
U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ‘‘Stafford Act’’),
as follows:
SUMMARY:
I have determined that the damage in
certain areas of the Territory of Guam
resulting from Typhoon Dolphin during the
period of May 13–16, 2015, is of sufficient
severity and magnitude to warrant a major
disaster declaration under the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the
‘‘Stafford Act’’). Therefore, I declare that such
a major disaster exists in the Territory of
Guam.
In order to provide Federal assistance, you
are hereby authorized to allocate from funds
available for these purposes such amounts as
you find necessary for Federal disaster
assistance and administrative expenses.
You are authorized to provide Public
Assistance and Hazard Mitigation throughout
the Territory. Consistent with the
requirement that Federal assistance be
supplemental, any Federal funds provided
under the Stafford Act for Hazard Mitigation
will be limited to 75 percent of the total
eligible costs. Federal funds provided under
the Stafford Act for Public Assistance also
will be limited to 75 percent of the total
eligible costs, with the exception of projects
that meet the eligibility criteria for a higher
Federal cost-sharing percentage under the
Public Assistance Alternative Procedures
Pilot Program for Debris Removal
implemented pursuant to section 428 of the
Stafford Act.
Further, you are authorized to make
changes to this declaration for the approved
assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.
Guam; Major Disaster and Related
Determinations
The Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that
pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order
12148, as amended, Rosalyn L. Cole, of
FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal
Coordinating Officer for this major
disaster.
The following areas have been
designated as adversely affected by this
major disaster:
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
[FR Doc. 2015–14968 Filed 6–17–15; 8:45 am]
The Territory of Guam for Public
Assistance.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–4224–
DR; Docket ID FEMA–2015–0002]
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Jun 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34924-34926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14968]
[[Page 34924]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Opportunity and Procedures To Request Assistance on
Tariff Classification and Customs Valuation Treatment by Other Customs
Administrations Affecting United States Exports
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: General notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document describes opportunities available to U.S.
exporters to obtain assistance from U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to resolve matters concerning the tariff classification and
customs valuation applied to U.S. exports by other governments. By
publication of this notice, CBP invites U.S. exporters to submit
requests for such assistance.
DATES: June 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Requests for assistance may be addressed to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Office of International Trade, Regulations &
Rulings, Attention: Commercial and Trade Facilitation Division, 90 K
St. NE., 10th Floor, Washington, DC 20229-1177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For tariff classification matters,
please contact Jacinto Juarez, Tariff Classification and Marking
Branch, at (202) 325-0027, or Greg Connor, Tariff Classification and
Marking Branch, at (202) 325-0025. For matters involving customs
valuation, please contact Yuliya Gulis, Valuation and Special Programs
Branch, at (202) 325-0042.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has direct responsibility
for enhancing U.S. economic competitiveness through the enforcement of
the laws of the United States and the fostering of lawful international
trade and travel. By reducing costs for industry and enforcing trade
laws against counterfeit, unsafe, and fraudulently imported goods, CBP
is working to facilitate legitimate trade, contribute to American
economic prosperity, and protect against risks to public health and
safety.
As part of CBP's mission to secure and facilitate lawful
international trade, CBP applies a number of legal requirements to
goods imported into the customs territory of the United States. In
almost all cases, imported goods must be ``entered'' (that is, declared
to CBP), and are subject to detention and examination by CBP officers
to ensure compliance with all laws and regulations enforced and
administered by CBP. As part of the entry process, goods must be
classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) and their customs value must be determined. CBP is responsible
for fixing the final tariff classification and customs valuation of
entered goods through a process called ``liquidation.'' In making
classification and valuation determinations, CBP applies two
international instruments: The Harmonized Commodity Description Coding
System (also known as the Harmonized System (HS)), and the Agreement on
Implementation of Article VII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade (GATT) 1994 (also known as the World Trade Organization (WTO)
Agreement on Customs Valuation or the ``WTO Valuation Agreement'').
Both international instruments share a similar goal of ensuring, at the
technical level, a standard or uniform approach to the interpretation
and application of tariff classification and valuation principles,
respectively.
Tariff Classification
Pursuant to the International Convention on the Harmonized
Commodity Description and Coding System (the ``HS Convention''), the
World Customs Organization (WCO) developed the HS. The HS is an
internationally-standardized product nomenclature used to classify
traded products by name and number, and is intended to ensure, at the
technical level, a uniform approach to the interpretation and
application of tariff classifications. The WCO, established in 1952 as
the Customs Co-operation Council (CCC), is an independent,
intergovernmental body whose mission is to enhance the effectiveness
and efficiency of customs administrations. The United States, along
with 149 other countries and the European Union, is a contracting party
to the HS Convention and uses the HS as a basis for its customs tariffs
and the collection of international trade statistics.
Subtitle B of title I of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act
of 1988 (Sec. 1201, Pub. L. 100-418, 102 Stat. 1147, Aug. 23, 1988 (19
U.S.C. 3001)) (the Act) provides for the approval and implementation in
the United States of the tariff classification principles set forth in
the HS Convention and its associated Harmonized System nomenclature.
More specifically, the Act provides for congressional approval of U.S.
accession to the HS Convention (section 1203), enactment of the HTSUS
(section 1204), and the publication of foreign trade statistics in
conformity with the HS nomenclature (section 1208). In addition, under
section 1209, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is made
responsible for coordinating trade policy concerning the HS Convention.
Section 1210 of the Act provides that, subject to the policy
direction of USTR, the Departments of Treasury and Commerce and the
United States International Trade Commission (the Commission) shall
have responsibility for formulating U.S. positions on technical and
procedural issues relating to tariff classification under the HS
Convention, and for representing the United States government at the
WCO with respect thereto.
To foster international uniformity in tariff classification matters
under the HS, contracting parties have vested the WCO with
responsibility for securing uniform interpretation of the HS and its
periodic updating in light of developments in technology and changes in
trade patterns. See Article 7 of the HS Convention. The WCO manages
this process through the Harmonized System Committee (HSC), a committee
composed of contracting parties to the HS Convention which meets twice
a year to examine policy matters, take decisions on classification
questions, settle disputes, and prepare amendments to the HS
nomenclature and its Explanatory Notes. In accord with procedures
established by the WCO governing body (the WCO Council), the HSC also
prepares amendments updating the HS every four to six years.
On November 10, 1988, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
published in a Federal Register notice procedures to implement sections
1209 and 1210 of the Act. See 53 FR 45646. Therein, USTR designated the
Treasury Department, represented at the time by legacy U.S. Customs
Service (now CBP, as part of the Department of Homeland Security), to
lead the U.S. delegation at meetings of the HSC at the WCO in Brussels,
Belgium. Accordingly, Regulations and Rulings, within CBP's Office of
International Trade, leads U.S. delegations at semi-annual meetings of
the HSC at the WCO. CBP also serves with the Commission on U.S.
delegations at meetings of the Harmonized System Review Subcommittee,
which occur twice per year at the WCO.
Article 10 of the HS Convention provides that any dispute between
contracting parties concerning the
[[Page 34925]]
interpretation or application of the HS Convention is to be settled by
negotiation between the contracting parties to the extent possible. If
this cannot be accomplished, the parties (that is, the governments
concerned) are to refer the dispute to the HSC for its consideration
and recommendations. The HSC, in turn, is to refer irreconcilable
disputes to the WCO Council for its recommendations.
Customs Valuation
With respect to customs valuation, the WTO Valuation Agreement
established a standard system for the valuation of imported goods. The
WTO Valuation Agreement ensures that determinations of the customs
value for the application of duty rates to imported goods are applied
in a neutral and uniform manner, precluding the use of arbitrary or
fictitious customs values. As one of 160 Members of the WTO, the United
States uses the Valuation Agreement as the basis for proper customs
valuation methodology.
Merchandise imported into the United States is appraised for
customs purposes in accordance with Section 402 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended by the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 1401a)
(TAA). Consistent with principles set forth in the WTO Valuation
Agreement, the primary method of appraisement is transaction value,
which is defined as ``the price actually paid or payable for the
merchandise when sold for exportation to the United States,'' plus
amounts for certain statutorily enumerated additions to the extent not
otherwise included in the price actually paid or payable. See 19 U.S.C.
1401a(b)(1). When transaction value cannot be applied, then the
appraised value is determined based on the other valuation methods in
the order specified in 19 U.S.C. 1401a(a).
The WTO Valuation Agreement established the Technical Committee on
Customs Valuation (TCCV), which operates under the auspices of the WCO,
with a view to ensuring the uniform interpretation and application of
internationally agreed upon customs valuation principles. The TCCV is
responsible for the examination of technical problems arising in the
day-to-day administration of the customs valuation systems of WTO
Valuation Agreement signatories. In addition, the TCCV renders advisory
opinions on appropriate solutions based upon the facts presented. The
TCCV meets twice a year at the WCO to discuss issues concerning the
interpretation and application of the WTO Valuation Agreement.
Pursuant to Annex II to the WTO Valuation Agreement, the United
States has the right to be represented at the TCCV to examine specific
problems arising from the administration of the customs valuation
systems of Members. The United States, which currently serves as Chair
to the TCCV, may nominate one delegate and one or more alternates to be
its representatives on the TCCV at semi-annual meetings in Brussels.
CBP represents the United States at the semi-annual meetings of the
TCCV at the WCO.
Additionally, under Article 19 of the WTO Valuation Agreement, the
United States may request consultation with a Member or Members if the
U.S. considers any benefit to it under the Agreement is being nullified
or impaired, or that the achievement of any objective of the Agreement
is being impeded, directly or indirectly, as a result of the actions of
another Member. Disputes arising under Article 19 of the WTO Valuation
Agreement may be referred to the TCCV for an examination of any
questions requiring technical consideration.
CBP Participation at Meetings of the Harmonized System Committee and
the Technical Committee on Customs Valuation
Accordingly, at meetings of the HSC and TCCV at the WCO, the United
States and other customs administrations participate and communicate
regularly on issues concerning the interpretation and application of
the HS and the WTO Valuation Agreement. Historically, it has been
useful for CBP to conduct discussions with other customs
administrations at the WCO with a view to reaching a common
understanding and interpretation of these instruments. Such discussions
can often serve to eliminate or resolve export issues for U.S. traders.
For example, in 2014 CBP was contacted by a U.S. exporter who
believed that its textile article was being misclassified by another
customs administration. The company brought to CBP's attention the
analysis applicable to the merchandise under published CBP rulings
available at https://rulings.cbp.gov. The company requested that CBP
contact the foreign customs administration to resolve the tariff
classification matter, and if the matter could not be resolved, the
U.S. company requested that CBP refer the matter to the HSC at the WCO.
Within 30 days of receiving the technical assistance request,
attorneys from the Tariff Classification and Marking Branch and import
specialists from the National Commodity Specialist Division, within the
Office of Regulations and Rulings (R&R), Office of International Trade
reviewed the underlying classification issue and determined that the
foreign customs administration's treatment of the merchandise was
inconsistent with the proper interpretation of the HS. Following CBP's
determination of the correct classification of the merchandise, R&R
attorneys raised the issue bilaterally with the foreign customs
administration and asked them to consider the matter.
Following this bilateral exchange, and within seven months of the
initial technical assistance request, CBP secured a favorable decision
by the foreign customs administration to classify the merchandise in a
manner consistent with the U.S. position and as requested by the
exporter. As a result of CBP's engagement with the foreign customs
administration, the U.S. company was able to obtain the correct tariff
treatment of its imported merchandise in the foreign country.
Inquiries Concerning Tariff Classification or Customs Valuation by
Other Customs Administrations Affecting U.S. Exports
By publication of this notice, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
emphasizes that opportunities exist to strengthen communication and
coordination between industry, CBP, other customs administrations, and
the WCO to advance the shared goal of facilitating international trade.
Greater collaboration with industry promotes improved technical
understanding among contracting parties and helps to foster uniformity
in the interpretation and application of the HS Convention and WTO
Valuation Agreement.
On matters involving non-uniform tariff classification or customs
valuation treatment by other customs administrations, individual
parties or firms do not have standing to initiate dispute settlement
procedures or consultations under the HS Convention or the WTO
Valuation Agreement. Consequently, for a U.S. individual or firm to
raise a tariff classification or customs valuation dispute, that party
must file an inquiry or complaint with the U.S. government and provide,
or assist in the collection of, any information relating to the matter
which may be required.
Accordingly, CBP hereby invites U.S. exporters to file with CBP
requests for assistance in resolving any tariff classification or
customs valuation treatment by other customs administrations affecting
U.S. exports.
[[Page 34926]]
Of course, as a threshold technical matter, in order to provide the
requested assistance, CBP must agree with the position of the exporter
with regard to the specific matter brought to CBP's attention.
CBP will endeavor to provide an initial response to such requests
within 60 days of their receipt. Thereafter, in cooperation with the
appropriate agencies, CBP will consider the appropriate course of
action, including but not limited to the initiation of consultations or
dispute settlement at meetings of the HSC or TCCV at the WCO. The
inquirer or complainant will be informed of the progress achieved in
resolving the matter. Requests for assistance on tariff classification
or customs valuation treatment by other customs administrations
affecting U.S. exports should be addressed to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Office of International Trade, Regulations & Rulings,
Attention: Commercial and Trade Facilitation Division, 90 K St. NE.,
10th Floor, Washington, DC 20229-1177.
Confidentiality
Information submitted by U.S. exporters concerning requests for
assistance may, in some instances, include confidential commercial or
financial information, the disclosure of which could result in
competitive harm to the business submitter. Such information is,
generally, protected under the provisions of the Freedom of Information
Act (5 U.S.C. 552) (FOIA), the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), and the
Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. 1905). If confidential treatment is
requested, submitters should specifically designate the information it
considers confidential. Such requests will be handled in accordance
with CBP Regulations (19 CFR 103.35) regarding the protection of such
information.
Dated: June 12, 2015.
Brenda B. Smith,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2015-14968 Filed 6-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P