Naming of Drug Products Containing Salt Drug Substances; Guidance for Industry; Availability, 34677-34678 [2015-14884]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 116 / Wednesday, June 17, 2015 / Notices
References
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The following references have been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, and are available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov. (FDA has verified
the Web site address in this reference
section, but we are not responsible for
any subsequent changes to the Web site
after this document publishes in the
Federal Register.)
1. Singh, S. N., D. Linville, and A.
Sukhdial, ‘‘Enhancing the Efficacy of Split
Thirty-Second Television Commercials: An
Encoding Variability Application,’’ Journal of
Advertising, 24, pp. 13–23 (1995).
2. Haugtvedt, C. P., et al., ‘‘Advertising
Repetition and Variation Strategies:
Implications for Understanding Attitude
Strength,’’ Journal of Consumer Research, 21,
pp. 176–189 (1994).
3. Naples, M. J., ‘‘Effective Frequency:
Then and Now,’’ Journal of Advertising
Research, 37, pp. 7–12 (1997).
4. https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/
CentersOffices/
OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CDER/
ucm090276.htm.
5. Janis, I. L. and S. Feshbach, ‘‘Effects of
Fear-Arousing Communications,’’ Journal of
Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, pp. 78–
92 (1953).
6. Liberman, A. and S. Chaiken, ‘‘Defensive
Processing of Personally Relevant Health
Messages,’’ Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 18, pp. 669–679 (1992).
7. Smith, S. M. and R. E. Petty, ‘‘Message
Framing and Persuasion: A Message
Processing Analysis,’’ Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 22, pp. 257–268 (1996).
8. Krosnick, J. A., A. L. Holbrook, M. K.
Berent, et al., ‘‘The Impact of ‘No Opinion’
Response Options on Data Quality: NonAttitude Reduction or an Invitation to
Satisfice?’’ Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, pp.
371–403 (2002).
9. Woloshin, S. and L. M. Schwartz,
‘‘Communicating Data About the Benefits
and Harms of Treatment: A Randomized
Trial,’’ Annals of Internal Medicine, 155, pp.
87–96 (2011).
10. Cacioppo, J. T. and R. E. Petty, ‘‘The
Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition,’’
Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, pp.
306–307 (1984).
11. Chew, L. D., J. M. Griffin, M. R. Partin,
et al., ‘‘Validation of Screening Questions for
Limited Health Literacy in a Large VA
Outpatient Population,’’ Journal of General
Internal Medicine, 23, pp. 561–566 (2008).
12. Horne, R., J. Weinman, and M.
Hankins, ‘‘The Beliefs About Medicines
Questionnaire: The Development and
Evaluation of a New Method for Assessing
the Cognitive Representation of Medication,’’
Psychology & Health, 14, pp. 1–24 (1999).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
Dated: June 11, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–14880 Filed 6–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–D–1566]
Naming of Drug Products Containing
Salt Drug Substances; Guidance for
Industry; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance for industry
entitled ‘‘Naming of Drug Products
Containing Salt Drug Substances’’
which replaces the draft guidance of the
same title that published on December
26, 2013. This guidance describes the
United States Pharmacopeia’s (USP’s)
‘‘Monograph Naming Policy for Salt
Drug Substances in Drug Products and
Compounded Preparations,’’ which
became official on May 1, 2013, and
how the Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research (CDER) is implementing it.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10001 New
Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Building,
4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive
label to assist that office in processing
your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the guidance document.
Submit electronic comments on the
guidance to https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mamta Gautam-Basak, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (CDER), Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD
20993, 301–796–0712.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a guidance for industry entitled
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34677
‘‘Naming of Drug Products Containing
Salt Drug Substances’’ that replaces the
draft of the same title that published on
December 26, 2013 (78 FR 78366). This
guidance is being published to explain
how CDER is implementing the USP’s
policy entitled ‘‘Monograph Naming
Policy for Salt Drug Substances in Drug
Products and Compounded
Preparations.’’ It is a naming and
labeling policy applicable to drug
products that contain an active
ingredient that is a salt. The policy
stipulates that USP will use the name of
the active moiety, instead of the name
of the salt, when creating a drug product
monograph title and the strength will be
expressed in terms of the active moiety.
The policy allows for exceptions under
specified circumstances. CDER is now
applying this policy to new prescription
drug products under development
under section 505 of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act)
(21 U.S.C. 355).
The USP Salt Policy became official
on May 1, 2013, and USP is now
applying it to all new drug product
monographs for products that contain
an active ingredient that is a salt. It
affects the development of new drug
products because a USP monograph title
for a new drug product, in most
instances, serves as the nonproprietary
or ‘‘established’’ name of the related
drug product (section 502(e)(3) of the
FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 352(e)). If a drug
product’s label or labeling contains a
name that is inconsistent with the
applicable monograph title, it risks
being misbranded (section
502(e)(1)(A)(i) of the FD&C Act).
This guidance describes the USP
policy and discusses how CDER and
industry can implement the policy.
Following the policy will help reduce
medication errors caused by a mismatch
between the established name and
strength on the label of drug products
that contain a salt. In addition, we
anticipate that this policy will help
health care practitioners calculate
equivalent doses when changing from
one dosage form to another, even if the
products contain active ingredients that
are different salts, because the strengths
and names will both be based on the
active moiety.
In the Federal Register of December
26, 2013 (78 FR 78366), this guidance
was published as a draft guidance. We
have carefully reviewed and considered
the comments that were received on the
draft guidance and have made changes
for clarification.
This guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation 21 CFR 10.115. This
guidance represents CDER’s current
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
34678
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 116 / Wednesday, June 17, 2015 / Notices
thinking on drug product naming
nomenclature for new drugs that
contain a salt as the active ingredient. It
does not establish any rights for any
person and is not binding on FDA or the
public. You can use an alternative
approach if it satisfies the requirements
of the applicable statutes and
regulations.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This guidance includes information
collection provisions that are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information
referenced in this guidance that are
related to the burden for the submission
of investigational new drug applications
are covered under 21 CFR 312 and have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0014. The collections of
information referenced in this guidance
that are related to the burden for the
submission of new drug applications
that are covered under 21 CFR 314 have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0001. The submission of
prescription drug product labeling
under 21 CFR 201.56 and 201.57 is
approved under OMB control number
0910–0572.
The guidance also references 21 CFR
201.10 ‘‘Drugs; Statement of
Ingredients.’’ In the Federal Register of
December 18, 2014 (79 FR 75506), FDA
published its proposed rule on the
electronic distribution of prescribing
information for human prescription
drugs, including biological products. In
Section VII, ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995,’’ FDA estimated the burden to
design, test, and produce the label for a
drug product’s immediate container and
outer container or package, as set forth
in 21 CFR part 201, including §§ 201.10,
201.100(b), and other sections in
subpart A and subpart B.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at either
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 Jun 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/default.htm or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: June 10, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–14884 Filed 6–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2014–D–1242]
Content and Format of Abbreviated
510(k)s for Early Growth Response 1
Gene Fluorescence In-Situ
Hybridization Test System for
Specimen Characterization Devices;
Guidance for Industry and Food and
Drug Administration Staff; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of the guidance entitled
‘‘Content and Format for Abbreviated
510(k)s for Early Growth Response 1
(EGR1) Gene Fluorescence In-Situ
Hybridization (FISH) Test System for
Specimen Characterization Devices.’’
This guidance provides industry and
Agency staff with recommendations for
the suggested format and content of an
abbreviated 510(k) submission for EGR1
gene FISH test system for specimen
characterization devices.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on this guidance at
any time. General comments on Agency
guidance documents are welcome at any
time.
ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the
guidance document is available for
download from the Internet. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
information on electronic access to the
guidance. Submit written requests for a
single hard copy of the guidance
document entitled ‘‘Content and Format
for Abbreviated 510(k)s for Early
Growth Response 1 (EGR1) Gene
Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization
(FISH) Test System for Specimen
Characterization Devices’’ to the Office
of the Center Director, Guidance and
Policy Development, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5431, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002. Send one selfSUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
addressed adhesive label to assist that
office in processing your request.
Submit electronic comments on the
guidance to https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shyam Kalavar, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5568, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6807.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This guidance document was
developed to provide industry and
Agency staff with recommendations for
the suggested format and content of an
abbreviated 510(k) submission for EGR1
gene FISH test system for specimen
characterization devices and
recommendations for addressing certain
labeling issues relevant to the review
process specific to these devices. An
EGR1 gene FISH test system for
specimen characterization is a device
intended to detect the EGR1 probe target
on chromosome 5q in bone marrow
specimens from patients with acute
myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic
syndrome. The assay results are
intended to be interpreted only by a
qualified pathologist or cytogeneticist.
These devices do not include automated
systems that directly report results
without review and interpretation by a
qualified pathologist or cytogeneticist.
These devices also do not include any
device intended for use to select patient
therapy, predict patient response to
therapy, or to screen for disease as well
as any device with a claim for a
particular diagnosis, prognosis, and
monitoring or risk assessment.
In the Federal Register of September
26, 2014 (79 FR 57939), the Agency
issued the draft guidance entitled
‘‘Content and Format for Abbreviated
510(k)s for Early Growth Response 1
(EGR1) Gene Fluorescence In-Situ
Hybridization (FISH) Test System for
Specimen Characterization Devices.’’
The Agency received no comments on
the draft guidance dated September 26,
2014.
II. Significance of Guidance
This guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The guidance represents the current
thinking of FDA on ‘‘Content and
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34677-34678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14884]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-D-1566]
Naming of Drug Products Containing Salt Drug Substances; Guidance
for Industry; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance for industry entitled ``Naming of Drug
Products Containing Salt Drug Substances'' which replaces the draft
guidance of the same title that published on December 26, 2013. This
guidance describes the United States Pharmacopeia's (USP's) ``Monograph
Naming Policy for Salt Drug Substances in Drug Products and Compounded
Preparations,'' which became official on May 1, 2013, and how the
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) is implementing it.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance to
the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave.,
Hillandale Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one
self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the guidance document.
Submit electronic comments on the guidance to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mamta Gautam-Basak, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (CDER), Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-0712.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry
entitled ``Naming of Drug Products Containing Salt Drug Substances''
that replaces the draft of the same title that published on December
26, 2013 (78 FR 78366). This guidance is being published to explain how
CDER is implementing the USP's policy entitled ``Monograph Naming
Policy for Salt Drug Substances in Drug Products and Compounded
Preparations.'' It is a naming and labeling policy applicable to drug
products that contain an active ingredient that is a salt. The policy
stipulates that USP will use the name of the active moiety, instead of
the name of the salt, when creating a drug product monograph title and
the strength will be expressed in terms of the active moiety. The
policy allows for exceptions under specified circumstances. CDER is now
applying this policy to new prescription drug products under
development under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355).
The USP Salt Policy became official on May 1, 2013, and USP is now
applying it to all new drug product monographs for products that
contain an active ingredient that is a salt. It affects the development
of new drug products because a USP monograph title for a new drug
product, in most instances, serves as the nonproprietary or
``established'' name of the related drug product (section 502(e)(3) of
the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 352(e)). If a drug product's label or labeling
contains a name that is inconsistent with the applicable monograph
title, it risks being misbranded (section 502(e)(1)(A)(i) of the FD&C
Act).
This guidance describes the USP policy and discusses how CDER and
industry can implement the policy. Following the policy will help
reduce medication errors caused by a mismatch between the established
name and strength on the label of drug products that contain a salt. In
addition, we anticipate that this policy will help health care
practitioners calculate equivalent doses when changing from one dosage
form to another, even if the products contain active ingredients that
are different salts, because the strengths and names will both be based
on the active moiety.
In the Federal Register of December 26, 2013 (78 FR 78366), this
guidance was published as a draft guidance. We have carefully reviewed
and considered the comments that were received on the draft guidance
and have made changes for clarification.
This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation 21 CFR 10.115. This guidance represents CDER's
current
[[Page 34678]]
thinking on drug product naming nomenclature for new drugs that contain
a salt as the active ingredient. It does not establish any rights for
any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This guidance includes information collection provisions that are
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information referenced in this guidance that are related
to the burden for the submission of investigational new drug
applications are covered under 21 CFR 312 and have been approved under
OMB control number 0910-0014. The collections of information referenced
in this guidance that are related to the burden for the submission of
new drug applications that are covered under 21 CFR 314 have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0001. The submission of
prescription drug product labeling under 21 CFR 201.56 and 201.57 is
approved under OMB control number 0910-0572.
The guidance also references 21 CFR 201.10 ``Drugs; Statement of
Ingredients.'' In the Federal Register of December 18, 2014 (79 FR
75506), FDA published its proposed rule on the electronic distribution
of prescribing information for human prescription drugs, including
biological products. In Section VII, ``Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995,'' FDA estimated the burden to design, test, and produce the label
for a drug product's immediate container and outer container or
package, as set forth in 21 CFR part 201, including Sec. Sec. 201.10,
201.100(b), and other sections in subpart A and subpart B.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to https://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: June 10, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-14884 Filed 6-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P