Final National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges From Industrial Activities, 34403-34407 [2015-14792]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Notices
the Commission and open to public
inspection.
Any questions regarding this
application should be directed to Kelly
Allen, Manager, Regulatory Affairs
Department, Trans-Pecos Pipeline, LLC,
1300 Main Street, Houston, Texas
77002, or by calling (713) 989–2606
(telephone) or (713) 989–1205 (fax)
Kelly.Allen@energytransfer.com.
Pursuant to section 157.9 of the
Commission’s rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the
Commission staff will either: Complete
its environmental assessment (EA) and
place it into the Commission’s public
record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or
issue a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review. If a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review is
issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the
Commission staff’s issuance of the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS)
or EA for this proposal. The filing of the
EA in the Commission’s public record
for this proceeding or the issuance of a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental
Review will serve to notify federal and
state agencies of the timing for the
completion of all necessary reviews, and
the subsequent need to complete all
federal authorizations within 90 days of
the date of issuance of the Commission
staff’s FEIS or EA.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date
stated below, file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426,
a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)
and the Regulations under the NGA (18
CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list
maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies of
all documents filed by the applicant and
by all other parties. A party must submit
5 copies of filings made with the
Commission and must mail a copy to
the applicant and to every other party in
the proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to
intervene in order to have comments
considered. The second way to
participate is by filing with the
Secretary of the Commission, as soon as
possible, an original and two copies of
comments in support of or in opposition
to this project. The Commission will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
consider these comments in
determining the appropriate action to be
taken, but the filing of a comment alone
will not serve to make the filer a party
to the proceeding. The Commission’s
rules require that persons filing
comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to
the party or parties directly involved in
the protest.
Persons who wish to comment only
on the environmental review of this
project should submit an original and
two copies of their comments to the
Secretary of the Commission.
Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission’s
environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents,
and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission’s
environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be
required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties.
However, the non-party commentors
will not receive copies of all documents
filed by other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests
and interventions in lieu of paper using
the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file
electronically should submit an original
and 5 copies of the protest or
intervention to the Federal Energy
regulatory Commission, 888 First Street
NE., Washington, DC 20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time on June 30, 2015.
Dated: June 9, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–14740 Filed 6–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34403
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OW–2012–0803; FRL–9920–21–
OW]
Final National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) General
Permit for Stormwater Discharges
From Industrial Activities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final permit issuance.
AGENCY:
The EPA’s Regions 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 are issuing their final
2015 National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) general
permit for stormwater discharges from
industrial activity, also referred to as the
Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP).
This permit replaces the existing permit
covering stormwater discharges from
industrial facilities in the EPA’s Regions
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, and 10 that expired
September 29, 2013, and provides
coverage for industrial facilities in areas
where the EPA is the NPDES permitting
authority in the EPA’s Regions 7 and 8.
The MSGP consists of 44 separate
regional EPA general permits that may
vary from each other based on state or
tribal certifications and water qualitybased requirements. As with earlier
permits, this permit authorizes the
discharge of stormwater associated with
industrial activities in accordance with
the terms and conditions described
therein. Industrial dischargers have the
option to instead seek coverage under
an individual permit. An individual
permit may be necessary if the
discharger cannot meet the terms and
conditions or eligibility requirements in
this permit. The EPA is issuing this
permit for five years.
DATES: The permit became effective on
June 4, 2015. This effective date is
necessary to provide dischargers with
the immediate opportunity to comply
with Clean Water Act requirements in
light of the expiration of the 2008 MSGP
on September 29, 2013. In accordance
with 40 CFR part 23, this permit shall
be considered issued for the purpose of
judicial review on June 22, 2015. Under
section 509(b) of the Clean Water Act,
judicial review of this general permit
can be requested by filing a petition for
review in the United States Court of
Appeals within 120 days after the
permit is considered issued. Under
section 509(b)(2) of the Clean Water Act,
the requirements in this permit may not
be challenged later in civil or criminal
proceedings to enforce these
requirements. In addition, this permit
may not be challenged in other agency
proceedings. Deadlines for submittal of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
34404
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Notices
notices of intent are provided in Part 1.2
of the 2015 MSGP. The 2015 MSGP also
provides additional dates for
compliance with the terms of these
permits.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information on the final NPDES
MSGP, contact the appropriate EPA
Regional Office listed in Section I.C., or
Bryan Rittenhouse, EPA Headquarters,
Office of Water, Office of Wastewater
Management at tel.: 202–564–0577 or
email: rittenhouse.bryan@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
supplementary information is organized
as follows:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. How can I get copies of these documents
and other related information?
C. Who are the EPA regional contacts for
this final permit?
II. Background of Permit
III. Scope and Applicability of the MultiSector General Permit
A. Geographic Coverage
B. Categories of Facilities Covered
C. Summary of Significant Changes From
the 2008 Multi-Sector General Permit
IV. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
V. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and
Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
VI. Analysis of Economic Impacts
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This MSGP regulates stormwater
discharges from industrial facilities in
the 30 sectors shown below:
Sector A—Timber Products.
Sector B—Paper and Allied Products
Manufacturing.
Sector C—Chemical and Allied Products
Manufacturing.
Sector D—Asphalt Paving and Roofing
Materials Manufactures and Lubricant
Manufacturers.
Sector E—Glass, Clay, Cement,
Concrete, and Gypsum Product
Manufacturing.
Sector F—Primary Metals.
Sector G—Metal Mining (Ore Mining
and Dressing).
Sector H—Coal Mines and Coal MiningRelated Facilities.
Sector I—Oil and Gas Extraction.
Sector J—Mineral Mining and Dressing.
Sector K—Hazardous Waste Treatment
Storage or Disposal.
Sector L—Landfills and Land
Application Sites.
Sector M—Automobile Salvage Yards.
Sector N—Scrap Recycling Facilities.
Sector O—Steam Electric Generating
Facilities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Sector P—Land Transportation.
Sector Q—Water Transportation.
Sector R—Ship and Boat Building or
Repairing Yards.
Sector S—Air Transportation Facilities.
Sector T—Treatment Works.
Sector U—Food and Kindred Products.
Sector V—Textile Mills, Apparel, and
other Fabric Products Manufacturing.
Sector W—Furniture and Fixtures.
Sector X—Printing and Publishing.
Sector Y—Rubber, Miscellaneous Plastic
Products, and Miscellaneous
Manufacturing Industries.
Sector Z—Leather Tanning and
Finishing.
Sector AA—Fabricated Metal Products.
Sector AB—Transportation Equipment,
Industrial or Commercial Machinery.
Sector AC—Electronic, Electrical,
Photographic and Optical Goods.
Sector AD—Reserved for Facilities Not
Covered Under Other Sectors and
Designated by the Director.
Coverage under the 2015 MSGP is
available to operators of eligible
facilities located in areas where the EPA
is the permitting authority and has
made this general permit available for
use. A list of eligible areas is included
in Appendix C of the 2015 MSGP.
B. How can I get copies of these
documents and other related
information?
1. Docket. The EPA has established an
official public docket for this action
under Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–
OW–2012–0803. The official public
docket is the collection of materials that
are available for public viewing at the
Water Docket in the EPA Docket Center,
(EPA/DC) WJC West Building, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Although all
documents in the docket are listed in an
index, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in hard copy at the EPA
Docket Center Public Reading Room,
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744
and the telephone number for the Water
Docket is (202) 566–2426.
2. Electronic Access. You may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the United States
government on-line source for federal
regulations at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Electronic versions of the final permit
and fact sheet are available on the EPA’s
NPDES Web site at https://water.epa.gov/
polwaste/npdes/stormwater/EPA-MultiSector-General-Permit-MSGP.cfm.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
An electronic version of the public
docket is available through the EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA
Dockets at https://www.regulations.gov to
view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are
available electronically. For additional
information about the EPA’s public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets. Although not all docket
materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any
of the publicly available docket
materials at the EPA Docket Center.
C. Who are the EPA regional contacts
for this final permit?
For EPA Region 1, contact David Gray
at tel.: (617) 918–1577 or email at
gray.davidj@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 2, contact Sergio
Bosques at tel.: (787) 977–5838 or email
at bosques.sergio@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 3, contact Kaitlyn
Bendik at tel.: 215–814–2709 or email at
bendik.kaitlyn@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 5, contact Brian Bell
at tel.: (312) 886–0981 or email at
bell.brianc@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 6, contact Nasim
Jahan at tel.: (214) 665–7522 or email at
jahan.nasim@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 7, contact Mark
Matthews at tel. 913–551–7635 or email
at matthews.mark@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 8, contact Gregory
Davis at tel.: (303) 312–6314 or email at
davis.gregory@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 9, contact Eugene
Bromley at tel.: (415) 972–3510 or email
at bromley.eugene@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 10, contact Margaret
McCauley at tel.: (206) 553–1772 or
email at mccauley.margaret@epa.gov.
II. Background of Permit
Section 405 of the Water Quality Act
of 1987 added section 402(p) of the
Clean Water Act (CWA), which directed
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to develop a phased approach to
regulate stormwater discharges under
the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) program.
The EPA published a final regulation on
the first phase on this program on
November 16, 1990, establishing permit
application requirements for
‘‘stormwater discharges associated with
industrial activity.’’ See 55 FR 48063.
The EPA defined the term ‘‘stormwater
discharge associated with industrial
activity’’ in a comprehensive manner to
cover a wide variety of facilities. See 40
CFR 122.26(b)(14). The EPA is issuing
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Notices
the MSGP under this statutory and
regulatory authority. The 2015 MSGP
replaces the 2008 MSGP covering
stormwater discharges from industrial
facilities in the EPA’s Regions 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 9 and 10 that expired September 29,
2013, and provides coverage for
industrial facilities in areas where the
EPA is the NPDES permitting authority
in the EPA’s Regions 7 and 8.
Dischargers choosing to be covered by
the MSGP must certify in their Notice of
Intent (NOI) that they meet the requisite
eligibility requirements described in
Part 1 of the permit. In addition,
dischargers must install and implement
control measures to meet the effluent
limits required in Part 2 and any sectorspecific effluent limits in Part 8, and
develop a stormwater pollution
prevention plan (SWPPP) consistent
with Part 5 describing their control
measures used to achieve the effluent
limits. The MSGP requires dischargers
to conduct routine facility inspections
(Part 3.1) and quarterly visual
assessments of stormwater discharges
(Part 3.2). Dischargers are also required
to review and revise, as necessary, their
SWPPP in order to meet the permit’s
effluent limits when certain triggering
conditions occur (Part 4). Dischargers
subject to benchmark monitoring are
required to submit to the EPA quarterly
benchmark monitoring results (Part
6.2.1). The EPA notes that Part 6.2.1
emphasizes that the benchmark
thresholds used for monitoring are not
effluent limits themselves, but rather
information that is primarily for the use
of the industrial facility to determine
the overall effectiveness of its control
measures and to assist in understanding
when corrective action(s) may be
necessary. Where applicable,
dischargers must also submit to the EPA
stormwater effluent data relating to
impaired waters (Part 6.2.4) and
compliance with numeric effluent
limitations guidelines (Part 6.2.2). In
addition, dischargers are required to
submit an annual report containing
permit compliance information
generated from the past calendar year
(Part 7.5).
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. Scope and Applicability of the
Multi-Sector General Permit
A. Geographic Coverage
The 2015 MSGP provides coverage for
sectors of industrial point source
discharges that occur in areas not
covered by an approved state or tribal
NPDES program. The geographic
coverage of the 2015 MSGP is listed in
Appendix C of the permit, and includes
the states of Idaho, Massachusetts, New
Hampshire, and New Mexico as well as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
all Indian Country lands (except in
Region 4), and facilities operated by a
federal operator in selected states.
Permit coverage is also provided in
Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia,
and the Pacific Island territories. The
EPA notes that, unlike the 2008 MSGP,
facilities located in certain areas in the
EPA’s Regions 7 and 8 may be covered
by this permit.
Because certifications required by
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act were
not received in time, operators of
industrial facilities in the following
areas are not yet eligible for coverage
under the 2015 MSGP:
• The State of Idaho (except Indian
country);
• The State of Washington (except
Indian country) if operated by a federal
operator; and
• Spokane Tribe of Indians lands.
The EPA will announce the
availability of coverage under the 2015
MSGP for these areas in separate
Federal Register notice(s) as soon as
possible after the certifications are
completed. In the meantime, existing
dischargers in these areas that were
authorized for coverage under the 2008
MSGP will remain covered under the
2008 MSGP until the 2015 MSGP has
been issued. Once the permit is
available, existing dischargers will be
given 90 days to file an NOI for coverage
under the 2015 MSGP.
B. Categories of Facilities Covered
This permit regulates stormwater
discharges from industrial facilities in
30 sectors, as shown above in section
I.A.
C. Summary of Significant Changes
from the 2008 Multi-Sector General
Permit
The 2015 MSGP replaces the 2008
MSGP, which was issued for a five-year
term on September 29, 2008 (see 73 FR
56572) and expired September 29, 2013.
The 2015 MSGP is similar to the 2008
MSGP, and is structured in nine parts:
General requirements that apply to all
facilities (e.g., eligibility of discharges,
effluent limitations, stormwater
pollution prevention plan (SWPPP)
requirements, monitoring and reporting
requirements) (Parts 1–7), industrial
sector-specific conditions (Part 8), and
specific requirements applicable to
facilities within individual states or
Indian country (Part 9). Additionally,
the appendices provide forms for the
submittal of a paper Notice of Intent,
Notice of Termination, Conditional No
Exposure Exclusion, Discharge
Monitoring Report, and annual report,
as well as step-by-step procedures for
determining eligibility with respect to
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34405
protecting historic properties and
threatened and endangered species, and
for calculating site-specific, hardnessdependent benchmarks.
This 2015 MSGP includes several new
or modified requirements from the 2008
MSGP. These changes are summarized
below and are discussed in more detail
in the 2015 MSGP fact sheet.
1. NEPA Review for Dischargers
Subject to any New Source Performance
Standards (NSPS). For the issuance of
the 2015 MSGP, the EPA prepared an
Environmental Assessment (EA)/finding
of no significant impact (FONSI) that
analyzed the potential environmental
impacts of the permit. The EA
considered the potential environmental
impacts from the discharge of new
source pollutants in stormwater
discharges associated with industrial
facilities where the EPA is the
permitting authority (see the permit’s
docket for a copy of the EPA’s EA and
FONSI).
2. Information Required for Notices of
Intent. The 2015 MSGP revises the
information required in NOIs to provide
the EPA with more complete
information to determine eligibility and
to enable the EPA to inform the operator
of its specific monitoring requirements.
Operators now need to include in their
NOI location information for each
stormwater outfall they discharge from,
whether the facility discharges to
saltwater, the hardness of the receiving
water (if subject to benchmark
monitoring for metals), whether the
facility discharges to a federal
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) site identified in
Appendix P, as well as general
information from their SWPPP if the
SWPPP is not posted online. The EPA
NPDES electronic Reporting Tool (NeT)
will use latitude and longitude
information for each outfall to
automatically determine the receiving
waters the facility discharges to and the
receiving water’s or waters’ impairment
status.
3. Electronic Reporting Requirements.
Electronic reporting is required in the
2015 MSGP. Electronic reporting will
create efficiencies and burden reduction
regarding information submittal to the
Agency. Recognizing there may be cases
that make electronic submittals of
information not possible, the EPA has
included a waiver that an operator can
receive from their EPA Regional Office.
Waivers must be approved by the EPA
Regional Office on a case-by-case basis
and are not intended to cover
information submittals for the entire
permit term.
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
34406
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Notices
4. Threatened and Endangered
Species Requirements. The EPA has
finalized changes to the procedures
operators must follow to establish their
eligibility with regard to protection of
threatened and endangered species and
critical habitat (Appendix E) as a result
of the EPA’s consultation under Section
7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
These changes are necessary to ensure
that the endangered and threatened
species eligibility criteria in Part 1.1.4.5
are adequately protective of such
species, and to ensure that operators are
making accurate determinations of
which eligibility criterion they qualify
under.
5. Effluent Limit Clarifications.
Several of the effluent limits in Part 2
of the 2015 MSGP include a greater
level of specificity in order to make the
requirements more clear and
transparent. These clarifications will
help permittees better understand how
to comply with the effluent limits. The
effluent limits in Part 2 for which the
EPA has made clarifications include
requirements for minimizing exposure,
good housekeeping, maintenance, spill
prevention and response procedures,
and employee training.
6. Inspections. The EPA has
consolidated the comprehensive site
inspection and routine facility
inspection procedures into one set of
procedures to eliminate redundancies.
7. Corrective Actions. Although the
2008 MSGP required corrective actions,
the EPA has provided greater detail
about how these actions are to be
handled. In the 2015 MSGP, the EPA
clarified which conditions require a
SWPPP review, modified the deadlines
to further specify the EPA’s expectations
for what actions must be taken by the
deadlines, and rewrote and clarified the
reporting requirements following
corrective actions.
8. SWPPP Documentation. To reduce
permittee burden, the EPA identified
the effluent limit requirements in Part
2.1.2 that are the most straightforward,
i.e., the ones that do not involve the sitespecific selection of a control measure
or are specific activity requirements
(e.g., ‘‘Plainly label containers . . . that
could be susceptible to spillage or
leakage to encourage proper handling
and facilitate rapid response if spills or
leaks occur’’). Permittees can comply
with the documentation requirements
regarding these particular effluent limits
by including the effluent limits verbatim
in their SWPPP without providing
additional information, thereby
reducing the burden associated with
SWPPP development (see Part 5.2.4).
Requirements that involve activities that
are done infrequently or are direct and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
simple may be identified in the SWPPP
as written in the permit to be executed
effectively.
9. SWPPP Availability. To provide
greater access to the SWPPP for the
public, the EPA, and the Fish and
Wildlife Service and National Marine
Fisheries Services (the Services), the
2015 MSGP requires that permittees
either provide a URL for their SWPPP
on the NOI form, or provide selected
information from the SWPPP on the NOI
form. The selected information from the
SWPPP that would have to be included
in the NOI form includes: Onsite
industrial activities exposed to
stormwater, including potential spill
and leak areas (see Parts 5.2.3.1, 5.2.3.3
and 5.2.3.5); pollutants or pollutant
constituents associated with each
industrial activity exposed to
stormwater that could be discharged in
stormwater and any authorized nonstormwater discharges listed in Part
1.1.3 (see Part 5.2.3.2); control measures
employed to comply with the nonnumeric technology-based effluent
limits required in Part 2.1.2 and Part 8,
and any other measures taken to comply
with the requirements in Part 2.2 Water
Quality-Based Effluent Limitations (see
Part 5.2.4); a schedule for good
housekeeping and maintenance (see Part
5.2.5.1); and a schedule for all
inspections required in Part 3 (see Part
5.2.5.2).
10. Benchmark Monitoring. For the
2015 MSGP, the EPA has included
additional non-hardness dependent
metals benchmarks for facilities that
discharge into saline waters. The
addition of these benchmarks provide
an appropriate indicator of the
performance of the measures taken to
meet the effluent limitations contained
in the permit where stormwater is
discharged into saline waters.
Benchmark values in the 2008 MSGP for
these metals were based on acute or
chronic aquatic life freshwater criteria.
These additional saline benchmark
values are based on available acute
ambient water quality criteria for
arsenic, cadmium, copper, cyanide,
lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver
and zinc.
11. Industry Sector-specific
Requirements. The following changes
were made to Part 8 of the MSGP, which
describes requirements specific to
particular industry sectors:
Sector A, Timber Products—
Discharges resulting from
uncontaminated spray down or
intentional wetting of logs at wet deck
storage areas is an allowed nonstormwater discharge provided the
effluent limitation in Part 8.A.7 is met.
To accommodate situations where
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
facilities use water from a waterbody
that they intend to return to the
waterbody following spraying/wetting,
the permit contains an allowance or
credit for pollutants originally in the
waterbody prior to use and discharge.
Sector G, Metal Mining—As with the
2008 MSGP, this permit provides
coverage to operators for earthdisturbing activities conducted prior to
active mining activities. Before 2008
those activities were required to be
covered separately under the
Construction General Permit (CGP) or an
individual construction stormwater
permit. To facilitate such coverage,
additional requirements have been
added that are consistent with limits
from the Construction & Development
(C&D) Effluent Limitation Guideline
(ELG) (for earth-disturbing activities
associated with the construction of
staging roads and the construction of
access roads conducted prior to active
mining), and for mine site preparation
earth disturbances, revised limits based
on EPA’s best professional judgement
(BPJ)).
Sector H, Coal Mining—Additional
requirements have been added that are
consistent with changes made to Sector
G.
Sector J, Mineral Mining and
Dressing—Additional requirements
have been added that are consistent
with changes made to Sector G.
Sector S, Air Transportation—The
EPA has added requirements based on
the final effluent limitation guidelines
for airplane and airport deicing
operations. Also, the EPA has included
clarifications regarding airport
operators’ responsibilities and the
permit requirements that airport
authorities may conduct on behalf of
airport tenants.
IV. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
Under Executive Order (EO) 12866
(58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993)) this
action is a ‘‘significant regulatory
action.’’ Accordingly, the EPA
submitted this action to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review under Executive Orders 12866
and 13563 and any changes made in
response to OMB recommendations
have been documented in the docket for
this action.
V. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In compliance with Executive Order
13175, the EPA has consulted with
tribal officials to gain an understanding
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Notices
of and, where necessary, to address
tribal implications of the MSGP. In the
course of this consultation, the EPA
undertook the following activities:
• December 11, 2012—EPA presented
an overview of the 2008 MSGP and
potential changes for the renewal of the
MSGP to the National Tribal Caucus.
• December 12, 2012—EPA presented
an overview of the current MSGP and
potential changes for the renewal of the
MSGP to the National Tribal Water
Council.
• December 12, 2012—EPA mailed
notification letters to tribal leaders
initiating consultation and coordination
on the renewal of the MSGP. The
initiation letter was posted on the tribal
portal Web site at https://www.epa.gov/
tribal/consultation.
• January 15, 2013—EPA held an
informational teleconference open to all
tribal representatives, and reserved the
last part of the teleconference for official
consultation comments. EPA also
invited tribes to submit written
comments on the permit renewal. The
presentation was posted on the tribal
portal Web site at https://www.epa.gov/
tribal/consultation.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Tinka G. Hyde,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 5.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
William K. Honker,
Director, Water Quality Protection Division,
EPA Region 6.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Karen Flournoy,
Director, Water, Wetlands, and Pesticides
Division, EPA Region 7.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Darcy O’Connor,
Acting Assistant Regional Administrator, EPA
Region 8.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Nancy Woo,
Acting Director, Water Division, EPA Region
9.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Daniel D. Opalski,
Director, Office of Water and Watersheds,
EPA Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2015–14792 Filed 6–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
VI. Analysis of Economic Impacts
[FRL–9929–20–Region–6]
The EPA expects the economic impact
on entities covered under this permit,
including small businesses, to be
minimal. A copy of the EPA’s economic
analysis, titled, ‘‘Cost Impact Analysis
for the Multi-Sector General Permit
(MSGP)’’ is available in the docket for
this permit. The economic impact
analysis indicates that while there will
be some incremental increase in the
costs of complying with the new permit,
these costs will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Clean Air Act Operating Permit
Program; Petition for Objection to
State Operating Permit for Valero
Refining—Meraux, LLC in Louisiana
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251
et seq.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Deborah Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region
1.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
´
Jose C. Font,
Director, Caribbean Environmental Protection
Division, EPA Region 2.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Jon M. Capacasa,
Director, Water Protection Division, EPA
Region 3.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:39 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final action.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to Clean Air Act
(CAA) Section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR
70.8(d), the EPA Administrator signed
an Order, dated May 29, 2015, denying
the petition asking EPA to object to an
operating permit issued by the
Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality for the Meraux petroleum
refinery (Title V operating permit
number 2500–00001–V5). The EPA’s
May 29, 2015 Order responds to the
petition submitted by the Concerned
Citizens Around Murphy, represented
by the Tulane Environmental Law
Clinic, on April 3, 2012. Sections 307(b)
and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that
a petitioner may ask for judicial review
of those portions of the Orders that deny
issues raised in the petition by the
United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit. Any petition for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34407
review shall be filed within 60 days
from the date this notice appears in the
Federal Register, pursuant to section
307(b) of the Act.
ADDRESSES: You may review copies of
the final Order, the petition, and other
supporting information at EPA Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–
2733.
EPA requests that if at all possible,
you contact the individual listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to view copies of the final
Orders, petitions, and other supporting
information. You may view the hard
copies Monday through Friday, from
9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays. If you wish to
examine these documents, you should
make an appointment at least 24 hours
before the visiting day. Additionally, the
final May 29, 2015 Order is available
electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/
region07/air/title5/petitiondb/petitions/
meraux_response2012.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kyndall Cox at (214) 665–8567, email
address: cox.kyndall@epa.gov or the
above EPA, Region 6 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA
affords EPA a 45-day period to review,
and object, as appropriate, to a title V
operating permit proposed by a state
permitting authority. Section 505(b)(2)
of the CAA authorizes any person to
petition the EPA Administrator, within
60 days after the expiration of this
review period, to object to a title V
operating permit if EPA has not done so.
Petitions must be based only on
objections to the permit that were raised
with reasonable specificity during the
public comment period provided by the
state, unless the petitioner demonstrates
that it was impracticable to raise these
issues during the comment period or
unless the grounds for the issue arose
after this period.
EPA received the petition from the
Concerned Citizens Around Murphy
(CCAM) on April 3, 2012 (2012
Petition), which is the second petition
that EPA received from CCAM
concerning this facility’s title V permit.
EPA previously received a petition from
CCAM regarding the 2009 Meraux Title
V Modification Permit (2009 Permit) on
December 10, 2009 (2009 Petition), and
responded to that petition in a prior
order (2011 Order) that granted in part
and denied in part the request for an
objection. Within 90 days after that
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34403-34407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14792]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OW-2012-0803; FRL-9920-21-OW]
Final National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
General Permit for Stormwater Discharges From Industrial Activities
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final permit issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA's Regions 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 are issuing
their final 2015 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) general permit for stormwater discharges from industrial
activity, also referred to as the Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP).
This permit replaces the existing permit covering stormwater discharges
from industrial facilities in the EPA's Regions 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, and
10 that expired September 29, 2013, and provides coverage for
industrial facilities in areas where the EPA is the NPDES permitting
authority in the EPA's Regions 7 and 8. The MSGP consists of 44
separate regional EPA general permits that may vary from each other
based on state or tribal certifications and water quality-based
requirements. As with earlier permits, this permit authorizes the
discharge of stormwater associated with industrial activities in
accordance with the terms and conditions described therein. Industrial
dischargers have the option to instead seek coverage under an
individual permit. An individual permit may be necessary if the
discharger cannot meet the terms and conditions or eligibility
requirements in this permit. The EPA is issuing this permit for five
years.
DATES: The permit became effective on June 4, 2015. This effective date
is necessary to provide dischargers with the immediate opportunity to
comply with Clean Water Act requirements in light of the expiration of
the 2008 MSGP on September 29, 2013. In accordance with 40 CFR part 23,
this permit shall be considered issued for the purpose of judicial
review on June 22, 2015. Under section 509(b) of the Clean Water Act,
judicial review of this general permit can be requested by filing a
petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals within 120
days after the permit is considered issued. Under section 509(b)(2) of
the Clean Water Act, the requirements in this permit may not be
challenged later in civil or criminal proceedings to enforce these
requirements. In addition, this permit may not be challenged in other
agency proceedings. Deadlines for submittal of
[[Page 34404]]
notices of intent are provided in Part 1.2 of the 2015 MSGP. The 2015
MSGP also provides additional dates for compliance with the terms of
these permits.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on the final
NPDES MSGP, contact the appropriate EPA Regional Office listed in
Section I.C., or Bryan Rittenhouse, EPA Headquarters, Office of Water,
Office of Wastewater Management at tel.: 202-564-0577 or email:
rittenhouse.bryan@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This supplementary information is organized
as follows:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. How can I get copies of these documents and other related
information?
C. Who are the EPA regional contacts for this final permit?
II. Background of Permit
III. Scope and Applicability of the Multi-Sector General Permit
A. Geographic Coverage
B. Categories of Facilities Covered
C. Summary of Significant Changes From the 2008 Multi-Sector
General Permit
IV. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
V. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
VI. Analysis of Economic Impacts
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This MSGP regulates stormwater discharges from industrial
facilities in the 30 sectors shown below:
Sector A--Timber Products.
Sector B--Paper and Allied Products Manufacturing.
Sector C--Chemical and Allied Products Manufacturing.
Sector D--Asphalt Paving and Roofing Materials Manufactures and
Lubricant Manufacturers.
Sector E--Glass, Clay, Cement, Concrete, and Gypsum Product
Manufacturing.
Sector F--Primary Metals.
Sector G--Metal Mining (Ore Mining and Dressing).
Sector H--Coal Mines and Coal Mining-Related Facilities.
Sector I--Oil and Gas Extraction.
Sector J--Mineral Mining and Dressing.
Sector K--Hazardous Waste Treatment Storage or Disposal.
Sector L--Landfills and Land Application Sites.
Sector M--Automobile Salvage Yards.
Sector N--Scrap Recycling Facilities.
Sector O--Steam Electric Generating Facilities.
Sector P--Land Transportation.
Sector Q--Water Transportation.
Sector R--Ship and Boat Building or Repairing Yards.
Sector S--Air Transportation Facilities.
Sector T--Treatment Works.
Sector U--Food and Kindred Products.
Sector V--Textile Mills, Apparel, and other Fabric Products
Manufacturing.
Sector W--Furniture and Fixtures.
Sector X--Printing and Publishing.
Sector Y--Rubber, Miscellaneous Plastic Products, and Miscellaneous
Manufacturing Industries.
Sector Z--Leather Tanning and Finishing.
Sector AA--Fabricated Metal Products.
Sector AB--Transportation Equipment, Industrial or Commercial
Machinery.
Sector AC--Electronic, Electrical, Photographic and Optical Goods.
Sector AD--Reserved for Facilities Not Covered Under Other Sectors and
Designated by the Director.
Coverage under the 2015 MSGP is available to operators of eligible
facilities located in areas where the EPA is the permitting authority
and has made this general permit available for use. A list of eligible
areas is included in Appendix C of the 2015 MSGP.
B. How can I get copies of these documents and other related
information?
1. Docket. The EPA has established an official public docket for
this action under Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OW-2012-0803. The official
public docket is the collection of materials that are available for
public viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC)
WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460. Although all documents in the docket are listed in an index,
some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Publicly available docket materials are available in hard
copy at the EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room, open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744 and the
telephone number for the Water Docket is (202) 566-2426.
2. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the United States government on-line source for
federal regulations at https://www.regulations.gov.
Electronic versions of the final permit and fact sheet are
available on the EPA's NPDES Web site at https://water.epa.gov/polwaste/npdes/stormwater/EPA-Multi-Sector-General-Permit-MSGP.cfm.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through the
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may
use EPA Dockets at https://www.regulations.gov to view public comments,
access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket,
and to access those documents in the public docket that are available
electronically. For additional information about the EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/dockets. Although not all docket materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available
docket materials at the EPA Docket Center.
C. Who are the EPA regional contacts for this final permit?
For EPA Region 1, contact David Gray at tel.: (617) 918-1577 or
email at gray.davidj@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 2, contact Sergio Bosques at tel.: (787) 977-5838 or
email at bosques.sergio@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 3, contact Kaitlyn Bendik at tel.: 215-814-2709 or
email at bendik.kaitlyn@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 5, contact Brian Bell at tel.: (312) 886-0981 or
email at bell.brianc@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 6, contact Nasim Jahan at tel.: (214) 665-7522 or
email at jahan.nasim@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 7, contact Mark Matthews at tel. 913-551-7635 or
email at matthews.mark@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 8, contact Gregory Davis at tel.: (303) 312-6314 or
email at davis.gregory@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 9, contact Eugene Bromley at tel.: (415) 972-3510 or
email at bromley.eugene@epa.gov.
For EPA Region 10, contact Margaret McCauley at tel.: (206) 553-
1772 or email at mccauley.margaret@epa.gov.
II. Background of Permit
Section 405 of the Water Quality Act of 1987 added section 402(p)
of the Clean Water Act (CWA), which directed the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) to develop a phased approach to regulate
stormwater discharges under the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) program. The EPA published a final
regulation on the first phase on this program on November 16, 1990,
establishing permit application requirements for ``stormwater
discharges associated with industrial activity.'' See 55 FR 48063. The
EPA defined the term ``stormwater discharge associated with industrial
activity'' in a comprehensive manner to cover a wide variety of
facilities. See 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14). The EPA is issuing
[[Page 34405]]
the MSGP under this statutory and regulatory authority. The 2015 MSGP
replaces the 2008 MSGP covering stormwater discharges from industrial
facilities in the EPA's Regions 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 10 that expired
September 29, 2013, and provides coverage for industrial facilities in
areas where the EPA is the NPDES permitting authority in the EPA's
Regions 7 and 8.
Dischargers choosing to be covered by the MSGP must certify in
their Notice of Intent (NOI) that they meet the requisite eligibility
requirements described in Part 1 of the permit. In addition,
dischargers must install and implement control measures to meet the
effluent limits required in Part 2 and any sector-specific effluent
limits in Part 8, and develop a stormwater pollution prevention plan
(SWPPP) consistent with Part 5 describing their control measures used
to achieve the effluent limits. The MSGP requires dischargers to
conduct routine facility inspections (Part 3.1) and quarterly visual
assessments of stormwater discharges (Part 3.2). Dischargers are also
required to review and revise, as necessary, their SWPPP in order to
meet the permit's effluent limits when certain triggering conditions
occur (Part 4). Dischargers subject to benchmark monitoring are
required to submit to the EPA quarterly benchmark monitoring results
(Part 6.2.1). The EPA notes that Part 6.2.1 emphasizes that the
benchmark thresholds used for monitoring are not effluent limits
themselves, but rather information that is primarily for the use of the
industrial facility to determine the overall effectiveness of its
control measures and to assist in understanding when corrective
action(s) may be necessary. Where applicable, dischargers must also
submit to the EPA stormwater effluent data relating to impaired waters
(Part 6.2.4) and compliance with numeric effluent limitations
guidelines (Part 6.2.2). In addition, dischargers are required to
submit an annual report containing permit compliance information
generated from the past calendar year (Part 7.5).
III. Scope and Applicability of the Multi-Sector General Permit
A. Geographic Coverage
The 2015 MSGP provides coverage for sectors of industrial point
source discharges that occur in areas not covered by an approved state
or tribal NPDES program. The geographic coverage of the 2015 MSGP is
listed in Appendix C of the permit, and includes the states of Idaho,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and New Mexico as well as all Indian
Country lands (except in Region 4), and facilities operated by a
federal operator in selected states. Permit coverage is also provided
in Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, and the Pacific Island
territories. The EPA notes that, unlike the 2008 MSGP, facilities
located in certain areas in the EPA's Regions 7 and 8 may be covered by
this permit.
Because certifications required by Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act were not received in time, operators of industrial facilities in
the following areas are not yet eligible for coverage under the 2015
MSGP:
The State of Idaho (except Indian country);
The State of Washington (except Indian country) if
operated by a federal operator; and
Spokane Tribe of Indians lands.
The EPA will announce the availability of coverage under the 2015
MSGP for these areas in separate Federal Register notice(s) as soon as
possible after the certifications are completed. In the meantime,
existing dischargers in these areas that were authorized for coverage
under the 2008 MSGP will remain covered under the 2008 MSGP until the
2015 MSGP has been issued. Once the permit is available, existing
dischargers will be given 90 days to file an NOI for coverage under the
2015 MSGP.
B. Categories of Facilities Covered
This permit regulates stormwater discharges from industrial
facilities in 30 sectors, as shown above in section I.A.
C. Summary of Significant Changes from the 2008 Multi-Sector General
Permit
The 2015 MSGP replaces the 2008 MSGP, which was issued for a five-
year term on September 29, 2008 (see 73 FR 56572) and expired September
29, 2013. The 2015 MSGP is similar to the 2008 MSGP, and is structured
in nine parts: General requirements that apply to all facilities (e.g.,
eligibility of discharges, effluent limitations, stormwater pollution
prevention plan (SWPPP) requirements, monitoring and reporting
requirements) (Parts 1-7), industrial sector-specific conditions (Part
8), and specific requirements applicable to facilities within
individual states or Indian country (Part 9). Additionally, the
appendices provide forms for the submittal of a paper Notice of Intent,
Notice of Termination, Conditional No Exposure Exclusion, Discharge
Monitoring Report, and annual report, as well as step-by-step
procedures for determining eligibility with respect to protecting
historic properties and threatened and endangered species, and for
calculating site-specific, hardness-dependent benchmarks.
This 2015 MSGP includes several new or modified requirements from
the 2008 MSGP. These changes are summarized below and are discussed in
more detail in the 2015 MSGP fact sheet.
1. NEPA Review for Dischargers Subject to any New Source
Performance Standards (NSPS). For the issuance of the 2015 MSGP, the
EPA prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA)/finding of no significant
impact (FONSI) that analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the
permit. The EA considered the potential environmental impacts from the
discharge of new source pollutants in stormwater discharges associated
with industrial facilities where the EPA is the permitting authority
(see the permit's docket for a copy of the EPA's EA and FONSI).
2. Information Required for Notices of Intent. The 2015 MSGP
revises the information required in NOIs to provide the EPA with more
complete information to determine eligibility and to enable the EPA to
inform the operator of its specific monitoring requirements. Operators
now need to include in their NOI location information for each
stormwater outfall they discharge from, whether the facility discharges
to saltwater, the hardness of the receiving water (if subject to
benchmark monitoring for metals), whether the facility discharges to a
federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) site identified in Appendix P, as well as
general information from their SWPPP if the SWPPP is not posted online.
The EPA NPDES electronic Reporting Tool (NeT) will use latitude and
longitude information for each outfall to automatically determine the
receiving waters the facility discharges to and the receiving water's
or waters' impairment status.
3. Electronic Reporting Requirements. Electronic reporting is
required in the 2015 MSGP. Electronic reporting will create
efficiencies and burden reduction regarding information submittal to
the Agency. Recognizing there may be cases that make electronic
submittals of information not possible, the EPA has included a waiver
that an operator can receive from their EPA Regional Office. Waivers
must be approved by the EPA Regional Office on a case-by-case basis and
are not intended to cover information submittals for the entire permit
term.
[[Page 34406]]
4. Threatened and Endangered Species Requirements. The EPA has
finalized changes to the procedures operators must follow to establish
their eligibility with regard to protection of threatened and
endangered species and critical habitat (Appendix E) as a result of the
EPA's consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
These changes are necessary to ensure that the endangered and
threatened species eligibility criteria in Part 1.1.4.5 are adequately
protective of such species, and to ensure that operators are making
accurate determinations of which eligibility criterion they qualify
under.
5. Effluent Limit Clarifications. Several of the effluent limits in
Part 2 of the 2015 MSGP include a greater level of specificity in order
to make the requirements more clear and transparent. These
clarifications will help permittees better understand how to comply
with the effluent limits. The effluent limits in Part 2 for which the
EPA has made clarifications include requirements for minimizing
exposure, good housekeeping, maintenance, spill prevention and response
procedures, and employee training.
6. Inspections. The EPA has consolidated the comprehensive site
inspection and routine facility inspection procedures into one set of
procedures to eliminate redundancies.
7. Corrective Actions. Although the 2008 MSGP required corrective
actions, the EPA has provided greater detail about how these actions
are to be handled. In the 2015 MSGP, the EPA clarified which conditions
require a SWPPP review, modified the deadlines to further specify the
EPA's expectations for what actions must be taken by the deadlines, and
rewrote and clarified the reporting requirements following corrective
actions.
8. SWPPP Documentation. To reduce permittee burden, the EPA
identified the effluent limit requirements in Part 2.1.2 that are the
most straightforward, i.e., the ones that do not involve the site-
specific selection of a control measure or are specific activity
requirements (e.g., ``Plainly label containers . . . that could be
susceptible to spillage or leakage to encourage proper handling and
facilitate rapid response if spills or leaks occur''). Permittees can
comply with the documentation requirements regarding these particular
effluent limits by including the effluent limits verbatim in their
SWPPP without providing additional information, thereby reducing the
burden associated with SWPPP development (see Part 5.2.4). Requirements
that involve activities that are done infrequently or are direct and
simple may be identified in the SWPPP as written in the permit to be
executed effectively.
9. SWPPP Availability. To provide greater access to the SWPPP for
the public, the EPA, and the Fish and Wildlife Service and National
Marine Fisheries Services (the Services), the 2015 MSGP requires that
permittees either provide a URL for their SWPPP on the NOI form, or
provide selected information from the SWPPP on the NOI form. The
selected information from the SWPPP that would have to be included in
the NOI form includes: Onsite industrial activities exposed to
stormwater, including potential spill and leak areas (see Parts
5.2.3.1, 5.2.3.3 and 5.2.3.5); pollutants or pollutant constituents
associated with each industrial activity exposed to stormwater that
could be discharged in stormwater and any authorized non-stormwater
discharges listed in Part 1.1.3 (see Part 5.2.3.2); control measures
employed to comply with the non-numeric technology-based effluent
limits required in Part 2.1.2 and Part 8, and any other measures taken
to comply with the requirements in Part 2.2 Water Quality-Based
Effluent Limitations (see Part 5.2.4); a schedule for good housekeeping
and maintenance (see Part 5.2.5.1); and a schedule for all inspections
required in Part 3 (see Part 5.2.5.2).
10. Benchmark Monitoring. For the 2015 MSGP, the EPA has included
additional non-hardness dependent metals benchmarks for facilities that
discharge into saline waters. The addition of these benchmarks provide
an appropriate indicator of the performance of the measures taken to
meet the effluent limitations contained in the permit where stormwater
is discharged into saline waters. Benchmark values in the 2008 MSGP for
these metals were based on acute or chronic aquatic life freshwater
criteria. These additional saline benchmark values are based on
available acute ambient water quality criteria for arsenic, cadmium,
copper, cyanide, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver and zinc.
11. Industry Sector-specific Requirements. The following changes
were made to Part 8 of the MSGP, which describes requirements specific
to particular industry sectors:
Sector A, Timber Products--Discharges resulting from uncontaminated
spray down or intentional wetting of logs at wet deck storage areas is
an allowed non-stormwater discharge provided the effluent limitation in
Part 8.A.7 is met. To accommodate situations where facilities use water
from a waterbody that they intend to return to the waterbody following
spraying/wetting, the permit contains an allowance or credit for
pollutants originally in the waterbody prior to use and discharge.
Sector G, Metal Mining--As with the 2008 MSGP, this permit provides
coverage to operators for earth-disturbing activities conducted prior
to active mining activities. Before 2008 those activities were required
to be covered separately under the Construction General Permit (CGP) or
an individual construction stormwater permit. To facilitate such
coverage, additional requirements have been added that are consistent
with limits from the Construction & Development (C&D) Effluent
Limitation Guideline (ELG) (for earth-disturbing activities associated
with the construction of staging roads and the construction of access
roads conducted prior to active mining), and for mine site preparation
earth disturbances, revised limits based on EPA's best professional
judgement (BPJ)).
Sector H, Coal Mining--Additional requirements have been added that
are consistent with changes made to Sector G.
Sector J, Mineral Mining and Dressing--Additional requirements have
been added that are consistent with changes made to Sector G.
Sector S, Air Transportation--The EPA has added requirements based
on the final effluent limitation guidelines for airplane and airport
deicing operations. Also, the EPA has included clarifications regarding
airport operators' responsibilities and the permit requirements that
airport authorities may conduct on behalf of airport tenants.
IV. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
Under Executive Order (EO) 12866 (58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993))
this action is a ``significant regulatory action.'' Accordingly, the
EPA submitted this action to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 and any changes made
in response to OMB recommendations have been documented in the docket
for this action.
V. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
In compliance with Executive Order 13175, the EPA has consulted
with tribal officials to gain an understanding
[[Page 34407]]
of and, where necessary, to address tribal implications of the MSGP. In
the course of this consultation, the EPA undertook the following
activities:
December 11, 2012--EPA presented an overview of the 2008
MSGP and potential changes for the renewal of the MSGP to the National
Tribal Caucus.
December 12, 2012--EPA presented an overview of the
current MSGP and potential changes for the renewal of the MSGP to the
National Tribal Water Council.
December 12, 2012--EPA mailed notification letters to
tribal leaders initiating consultation and coordination on the renewal
of the MSGP. The initiation letter was posted on the tribal portal Web
site at https://www.epa.gov/tribal/consultation.
January 15, 2013--EPA held an informational teleconference
open to all tribal representatives, and reserved the last part of the
teleconference for official consultation comments. EPA also invited
tribes to submit written comments on the permit renewal. The
presentation was posted on the tribal portal Web site at https://www.epa.gov/tribal/consultation.
VI. Analysis of Economic Impacts
The EPA expects the economic impact on entities covered under this
permit, including small businesses, to be minimal. A copy of the EPA's
economic analysis, titled, ``Cost Impact Analysis for the Multi-Sector
General Permit (MSGP)'' is available in the docket for this permit. The
economic impact analysis indicates that while there will be some
incremental increase in the costs of complying with the new permit,
these costs will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Deborah Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Jos[eacute] C. Font,
Director, Caribbean Environmental Protection Division, EPA Region 2.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Jon M. Capacasa,
Director, Water Protection Division, EPA Region 3.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Tinka G. Hyde,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 5.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
William K. Honker,
Director, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region 6.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Karen Flournoy,
Director, Water, Wetlands, and Pesticides Division, EPA Region 7.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Darcy O'Connor,
Acting Assistant Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Nancy Woo,
Acting Director, Water Division, EPA Region 9.
Dated: June 4, 2015.
Daniel D. Opalski,
Director, Office of Water and Watersheds, EPA Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2015-14792 Filed 6-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P