Portability of a Deceased Spousal Unused Exclusion Amount, 34279-34292 [2015-14663]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
15. Revise § 522.1077 to read as
follows:
■
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 522.1077
Gonadorelin.
(a) Specifications. Each milliliter (mL)
of solution contains:
(1) 43 micrograms (mg) of gonadorelin
as gonadorelin acetate;
(2) 100 mg of gonadorelin as
gonadorelin acetate;
(3) 50 mg of gonadorelin as
gonadorelin diacetate tetrahydrate; or
(4) 50 mg of gonadorelin as
gonadorelin hydrochloride.
(b) Sponsors. See sponsor numbers in
§ 510.600(c) of this chapter.
(1) No. 000061 for use of the 43-mg/
mL product described in paragraph
(a)(1) as in paragraphs (d)(1)(i),
(d)(1)(iv), and (d)(2) of this section.
(2) No. 068504 for use of the 100-mg/
mL product described in paragraph
(a)(2) as in paragraphs (d)(1)(ii),
(d)(1)(v), and (d)(2) of this section.
(3) Nos. 000859 and 050604 for use of
the 50-mg/mL product described in
paragraph (a)(3) as in paragraphs
(d)(1)(ii) and (d)(2) of this section.
(4) No. 054771 for use of the 50-mg/
mL product described in paragraph
(a)(4) as in paragraphs (d)(1)(iii),
(d)(1)(vi), and (d)(2) of this section.
(c) Special considerations. Concurrent
luteolytic drug use is approved as
follows:
(1) Cloprostenol injection for use as in
paragraph (d)(1)(iv) of this section as
provided by No. 000061 in § 510.600(c)
of this chapter.
(2) Cloprostenol injection for use as in
paragraph (d)(1)(v) of this section as
provided by No. 000061 or No. 068504
in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
(3) Dinoprost injection for use as in
paragraph (d)(1)(vi) of this section as
provided by No. 054771 in § 510.600(c)
of this chapter.
(d) Conditions of use in cattle—(1)
Indications for use and amounts—(i)
For the treatment of ovarian follicular
cysts in dairy cattle: Administer 86 mg
gonadorelin by intramuscular or
intravenous injection.
(ii) For the treatment of ovarian
follicular cysts in dairy cattle:
Administer 100 mg gonadorelin by
intramuscular or intravenous injection.
(iii) For the treatment of ovarian
follicular cysts in cattle: Administer 100
mg gonadorelin by intramuscular
injection.
(iv) For use with cloprostenol
injection to synchronize estrous cycles
to allow for fixed-time artificial
insemination (FTAI) in lactating dairy
cows: Administer to each cow 86 mg
gonadorelin by intramuscular injection,
followed 6 to 8 days later by 500 mg
cloprostenol by intramuscular injection,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
followed 30 to 72 hours later by 86 mg
gonadorelin by intramuscular injection.
(v) For use with cloprostenol injection
to synchronize estrous cycles to allow
for fixed-time artificial insemination
(FTAI) in lactating dairy cows and beef
cows: Administer to each cow 100 mg
gonadorelin by intramuscular injection,
followed 6 to 8 days later by 500 mg
cloprostenol by intramuscular injection,
followed 30 to 72 hours later by 100 mg
gonadorelin by intramuscular injection.
(vi) For use with dinoprost injection
to synchronize estrous cycles to allow
fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI)
in lactating dairy cows: Administer to
each cow 100 to 200 mg gonadorelin by
intramuscular injection, followed 6 to 8
days later by 25 mg dinoprost by
intramuscular injection, followed 30 to
72 hours later by 100 to 200 mg
gonadorelin by intramuscular injection.
(2) Limitations. Federal law restricts
this drug to use by or on the order of
a licensed veterinarian.
§ 522.1145
[Amended]
34279
coagulase-negative staphylococci and S.
dysgalactiae.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 528—NEW ANIMAL DRUGS IN
GENETICALLY ENGINEERED
ANIMALS
21. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 528 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.
§ 528.1070
[Amended]
22. In § 528.1070, in paragraph (b),
remove ‘‘042976’’ and in its place add
‘‘086047’’.
■
Dated: June 11, 2015.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2015–14734 Filed 6–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
16. In § 520.1145, in paragraph
(e)(2)(i), remove ‘‘000859’’ and in its
place add ‘‘050604’’.
■ 17. In § 522.2470, revise paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
■
§ 522.2470
injection.
Tiletamine and zolazepam for
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Sponsors. See Nos. 026637 and
054771 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 18. In § 522.2483, revise paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
§ 522.2483
Triamcinolone.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Sponsors. See Nos. 000010 and
054628 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 526—INTRAMAMMARY DOSAGE
FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS
19. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 526 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.
20. In § 526.313, revise paragraph
(d)(1)(ii) to read as follows:
■
§ 526.313
Ceftiofur.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Indications for use. For use in
lactating dairy cattle:
(A) For the treatment of clinical
mastitis associated with coagulasenegative staphylococci, Streptococcus
dysgalactiae, and Escherichia coli; and
(B) For the treatment of diagnosed
subclinical mastitis associated with
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26 CFR Parts 20, 25, and 602
[TD 9725]
RIN 1545–BK74
Portability of a Deceased Spousal
Unused Exclusion Amount
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations and removal of
temporary regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains final
regulations that provide guidance under
sections 2010 and 2505 of the Internal
Revenue Code on the estate and gift tax
applicable exclusion amount, in general,
as well as on the applicable
requirements for electing portability of a
deceased spousal unused exclusion
(DSUE) amount to the surviving spouse
and on the applicable rules for the
surviving spouse’s use of this DSUE
amount. The statutory provisions
underlying the portability rules were
enacted as part of the Tax Relief,
Unemployment Insurance
Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of
2010, and these provisions were made
permanent by the American Taxpayer
Relief Act of 2012. The portability rules
affect the estates of married decedents
dying on or after January 1, 2011, and
the surviving spouses of those
decedents.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective Date. These regulations are
effective on June 12, 2015.
Applicability Dates: For specific dates
of applicability of the final regulations,
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
34280
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
see §§ 20.2001–2(b), 20.2010–1(e),
20.2010–2(e), 20.2010–3(f), 25.2505–
1(e), and 25.2505–2(g).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karlene Lesho (202) 317–6859 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collections of information
contained in these regulations have
been reviewed and approved by the
Office of Management and Budget under
control number 1545–0015. The
collections of information are in
§§ 20.2010–2(a), 20.2010–2(a)(1),
20.2010–2(a)(3)(i), 20.2010–
2(a)(7)(ii)(B), and 20.2010–2(b).
Responses to each collection of
information are voluntary to obtain the
benefit of being able to elect portability
or to take advantage of the special
reporting requirements applicable to
certain assets, and, for certain estates, to
opt out of a deemed portability election.
The likely respondents are executors of
estates of decedents survived by a
spouse.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid control
number.
Books and records relating to a
collection of information must be
retained as long as their contents may
become material in the administration
of any internal revenue law. Generally,
tax returns and tax return information
are confidential, as required by 26
U.S.C. 6103.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Background
This document amends the Estate Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 20) under
sections 2001 and 2010 of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code) and the Gift Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 25) under
section 2505 of the Code. On December
17, 2010, in section 303 of the Tax
Relief, Unemployment Insurance
Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of
2010, Public Law 111–312 (124 Stat.
3296, 3302) (TRUIRJCA), Congress
amended section 2010(c) of the Code to
allow portability of the applicable
exclusion amount between spouses and
made conforming amendments to
sections 2505(a), 2631(c), and 6018(a)(1)
of the Code. The changes made by
TRUIRJCA to sections 2010(c), 2505(a),
2631(c), and 6018(a)(1) of the Code were
scheduled to expire after December 31,
2012, pursuant to section 304 of
TRUIRJCA. However, on January 2,
2013, Congress enacted the American
Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, Public Law
112–240 (126 Stat. 2313) (ATRA), which
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
made portability permanent. In section
101(c)(2) of ATRA, Congress made a
technical correction to section
2010(c)(4)(B) of the Code, retroactive to
the original date of enactment of section
303 of TRUIRJCA, by amending clause
(i) to replace ‘‘basic exclusion amount’’
with ‘‘applicable exclusion amount.’’
On June 18, 2012, temporary
regulations relating to this topic (TD
9593, 77 FR 36150) (‘‘2012 temporary
regulations’’) and a notice of proposed
rulemaking cross-referencing the
temporary regulations (REG–141832–11,
77 FR 36229) (‘‘NPRM’’) were published
in the Federal Register. No requests to
speak at the scheduled public hearing
were received, and the hearing was
canceled. Comments responding to the
NPRM were received and are available
for public inspection and copying at
https://www.regulations.gov or upon
request. After consideration of all the
comments, the proposed rules in the
NPRM are adopted as amended by this
Treasury decision. The public
comments and revisions are discussed
in this preamble.
Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions
1. Availability of Extension of Time To
Elect Portability
Section 2010(c) of the Code allows the
estate of a decedent who is survived by
a spouse to make a portability election,
which generally allows the surviving
spouse to apply the decedent’s deceased
spousal unused exclusion (DSUE)
amount to the surviving spouse’s own
transfers during life and at death. Under
section 2010(c)(5)(A), a portability
election is effective only if made on an
estate tax return filed by the executor of
the decedent’s estate within the time
prescribed by law for filing such return.
Section 20.2010–2T(a)(1) of the 2012
temporary regulations requires every
estate electing portability of a
decedent’s DSUE amount to file an
estate tax return within nine months of
the decedent’s date of death, unless an
extension of time for filing has been
granted.
A commenter requested that the final
regulations address the availability of an
extension of time under §§ 301.9100–2
and 301.9100–3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to elect
portability under section 2010(c)(5)(A)
of the Code. Section 301.9100–2(b)
provides an automatic six-month
extension of time for making certain
statutory and regulatory elections if the
return is timely filed. Because the
portability election is deemed to be
made by the timely filing of a complete
and properly prepared estate tax return,
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
this relief provision will not be helpful
with regard to the portability election
unless the return that was timely filed
was not complete or properly prepared
and that insufficiency is corrected
within six months from the unextended
due date of the return.
Section 301.9100–3 allows the grant
of an extension of time for making
regulatory elections that do not meet the
requirements for an automatic extension
of time under § 301.9100–2. An
extension under § 301.9100–3 to elect
portability is not available to estates that
are required to file an estate tax return
based on the applicable amount in
section 6018(a) because, in such a case,
the due date for the portability election
is prescribed by statute and § 301.9100–
3 applies only to an election whose due
date is prescribed by regulation. See
sections 2010(c)(5)(A), 6075(a), and
6018(a); § 301.9100–1(b). However, an
extension of time under § 301.9100–3 to
elect portability may be available to
estates that are under the value
threshold described in section 6018 for
being required to file an estate tax
return. In such a case, the due date for
the portability election is prescribed by
regulation, not by statute. See Rev. Proc.
2014–18, 2014–7 IRB 513, section 2.03.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that clarifying the availability of
an extension of time under § 301.9100–
3 to elect portability will assist
taxpayers in understanding and meeting
their tax responsibilities. Accordingly,
the final regulations provide that an
extension of time to elect portability
will not be granted under § 301.9100–3
to any estate that is required to file an
estate tax return because the value of the
gross estate equals or exceeds the
threshold amount described in section
6018, but may be granted under the
rules set forth in § 301.9100–3 to estates
with a gross estate value below that
threshold amount and thus not
otherwise required to file an estate tax
return.
As transitional relief in the wake of
TRUIRJCA and ATRA, the Treasury
Department and the IRS have published
guidance regarding the availability of an
automatic extension of time for
executors of certain estates under the
filing threshold of section 6018(a) to file
an estate tax return to elect portability
of an unused exclusion amount. See
Notice 2012–21, 2012–10 IRB 450; Rev.
Proc. 2014–18. The Treasury
Department and the IRS continue to
receive, and are continuing to consider,
requests for permanent extensions of
this type of relief. However, such relief
is not included in the final regulations.
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2. Effect of Portability Election Where
DSUE Amount Is Uncertain
Section 20.2010–2T(a)(2) of the 2012
temporary regulations provides that
upon the timely filing of a complete and
properly prepared estate tax return, an
executor of the estate of a decedent
survived by a spouse will have elected
portability of the decedent’s DSUE
amount, unless the executor validly opts
out of making the portability election.
The inclusion of a computation of the
DSUE amount is an essential
requirement of a complete and properly
prepared estate tax return intended to
make the portability election. See
section 2010(c)(5)(A) and § 20.2010–
2T(b)(1). Section 20.2010–3T(c)
provides that the portability election
applies (and generally is available to the
surviving spouse) upon the decedent’s
death, but, to the extent the DSUE
amount subsequently is reduced or
cannot be substantiated, the DSUE
amount will not be available to the
surviving spouse.
A commenter requested that the final
regulations address whether an estate
can make a ‘‘protective’’ election if a
DSUE amount is not reflected on an
otherwise complete and properly
prepared estate tax return at the time of
its timely filing, but subsequent
adjustments to amounts on the estate tax
return would result in unused exclusion
of that decedent. The following example
illustrates such a scenario. An executor
files a complete and properly prepared
estate tax return that shows a DSUE
amount equal to zero at the time of the
return’s timely filing and does not
follow the instructions set forth in the
instructions for opting out of portability.
At the same time, the executor also files
a protective claim for refund attributable
to a claim against the estate.
Subsequently, the estate becomes
entitled to a deduction under section
2053 for a payment made in satisfaction
of the claim against the estate which
reduces the estate tax and results in
unused exemption.
In this example, the Treasury
Department and the IRS believe that the
executor has elected portability in
accordance with § 20.2010–2T(a)(2) and
that the recomputed DSUE amount will
be available to the decedent’s surviving
spouse. The final regulations clarify this
intended result by providing in
§ 20.2010–2(b) that the computation
requirement in section 2010(c)(5)(A)
will be satisfied if the estate tax return
is prepared in accordance with the
requirements of § 20.2010–2(a)(7).
Accordingly, there is no need for a
protective election.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
3. Persons Permitted To Make the
Election
Several commenters requested that
the final regulations allow a surviving
spouse who is not an executor as
defined in section 2203 of the Code to
file an estate tax return and make the
portability election in several different
circumstances. A few of the
circumstances described include those
in which the spouse is given the right
to file the estate tax return in a
prenuptial or marital agreement, or the
spouse has petitioned the appropriate
local court for the spouse’s appointment
as an executor solely for the limited
purpose of filing the estate tax return
and the executor does not make the
portability election. The Treasury
Department and the IRS recognize the
possibility that an executor may
exercise the executor’s discretion to not
make the portability election, thus
causing the estate to forfeit the
opportunity to elect portability, but note
that section 2010(c)(5) of the Code
permits only the executor of the
decedent’s estate to file the estate tax
return and make the portability election.
The 2012 temporary regulations address
the circumstances in which an
appointed executor or a non-appointed
executor may file the estate tax return
and decide whether or not to elect
portability. The Treasury Department
and the IRS believe that any
consideration of what, if any, state law
action might bring the surviving spouse
within the definition of executor under
section 2203 is outside of the scope of
this regulation. Accordingly, the final
regulations adopt the applicable rules in
the 2012 temporary regulations without
change.
4. Requirement of a ‘‘Complete and
Properly Prepared’’ Estate Tax Return
Section 20.2010–2T(a)(2) provides
that the estate of a decedent survived by
a spouse makes the portability election
by timely filing a complete and properly
prepared estate tax return for the
decedent’s estate. Section 20.2010–
2T(a)(7)(i) provides that an estate tax
return prepared in accordance with all
applicable requirements is considered a
‘‘complete and properly prepared’’
estate tax return. Section 20.2010–
2T(a)(7)(ii)(A), however, provides a
special rule applicable to estates that are
not otherwise required to file an estate
tax return under section 6018. For these
estates, the executor does not need to
report the value of certain property that
qualifies for the marital or charitable
deduction. The 2012 temporary
regulations also included exceptions to
the application of the special rule by
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34281
providing specific circumstances under
which the special rule will not apply.
A commenter suggested that the final
regulations elaborate on the
circumstances under which a timely
filed estate tax return may be considered
so deficient as to render the estate tax
return incomplete for purposes of
electing portability. The Treasury
Department and the IRS acknowledge
that, as with all tax returns, some errors
or omissions made with respect to an
estate tax return will be considered
minor and correctible. However, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
consider the issue of whether an estate
tax return is complete and properly
prepared to be determined most
appropriately on a case-by-case basis by
applying standards as prescribed in
current law. Therefore, this suggestion
has not been adopted.
A commenter recommended that the
final regulations modify the special rule
in § 20.2010–2T(a)(7)(ii)(A) to narrow
the exceptions to the application of the
special rule, thus allowing more estates
to avoid the expense of a potentiallycomplicated appraisal to value assets
includible in the gross estate.
Specifically, the commenter
recommended that the special rule in
§ 20.2010–2T(a)(7)(ii)(A) should apply
to certain property, the value of which
qualifies for the marital deduction or
charitable deduction (marital deduction
property or charitable deduction
property), when: (i) The marital
deduction property or charitable
deduction property is a stated number
of shares of stock and a stated number
of shares of the same stock are
includible in the gross estate but are not
marital deduction property or charitable
deduction property; (ii) the property
represents the balance of the value of
shares remaining after a non-marital or
non-charitable bequest of shares based
on a specific value; and (iii) the
property represents the marital or
charitable portion of a fractional
division of property, whether by
bequest, spousal election, or disclaimer.
In the first two instances, the value of
the marital deduction property or
charitable deduction property may be
relevant to assessing the accuracy of the
valuation of the nondeductible interest
and whether any valuation premium or
discount is warranted. In the last
instance, because any beneficiary’s
share of the estate usually can be
satisfied in a manner other than with
that beneficiary’s proportional share of
each individual asset, it will be
necessary to know the total value in
order to verify the non-deductible
portion of the estate. Therefore, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
34282
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
continue to believe that § 20.2010–
2T(a)(7)(ii)(A) appropriately excludes
the described circumstances from
application of the special rule. While
the final regulations do not adopt the
commenter’s suggestion to narrow the
exceptions to the application of the
special rule, the final regulations
provide flexibility to refine the rules in
subregulatory guidance at any time in
the future when the IRS may determine
that additional guidance would be
appropriate with regard to the
application of the special rule to
particular types of transfers.
The same commenter suggested that
the exception in § 20.2010–
2T(a)(7)(ii)(A)(2) is made unnecessarily
broad by its reference to ‘‘another
provision of the Code.’’ The commenter
was concerned that, because the fair
market value of a bequeathed asset
determines the basis of that asset in the
hands of the legatee, the value of all
estate assets would have an impact on
section 1014, and, thus, all assets would
have to be valued. In referring to value
needed to determine an estate’s
eligibility under other Code sections
such as sections 2032 and 2032A, the
Treasury Department and the IRS did
not intend to include a basis
determination under section 1014.
Accordingly, the language of § 20.2010–
2T(a)(7)(ii)(A)(2) has been clarified.
Finally, a commenter repeated a
suggestion (first made in response to a
request for comments in Notice 2011–
82, 2011–42 IRB 516) that the IRS
prepare a shorter version of the estate
tax return to be used by estates that are
not otherwise required to file an estate
tax return but do so only to elect
portability. The Treasury Department
and the IRS have reconsidered this
suggestion, taking into account several
factors including: The information
needed by the IRS to compute and
verify the DSUE amount; how such an
abbreviated return would differ from a
return qualifying for the special rule
regarding valuations under § 20.2010–
2(a)(7)(ii); the past experience of the IRS
regarding the accuracy of abbreviated
returns; the administrative issues in
creating and maintaining alternate
return forms; and the reasons provided
by commenters. The Treasury
Department and the IRS have concluded
that, on balance, a timely filed,
complete, and properly prepared estate
tax return affords the most efficient and
administrable method of obtaining the
information necessary to compute and
verify the DSUE amount, and the
alleged benefits to taxpayers from an
abbreviated form is far outweighed by
the anticipated administrative
difficulties in administering the estate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
tax. In addition, the ‘‘Technical
Explanation of the Revenue Provisions
Contained in the ‘Tax Relief,
Unemployment Insurance
Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of
2010’ Scheduled for Consideration by
the United States Senate,’’ J. Comm. on
Tax’n, 111th Cong., JCX–55–10
(December 10, 2010), suggests that
estates electing portability that are not
otherwise required to file an estate tax
return under section 6018(a) are
intended to be subject to the same filing
requirements applicable to estates
required to file an estate tax return
under section 6018(a). For these
reasons, this suggestion is not adopted.
5. Special Rules for Qualified Domestic
Trusts
The preamble to the 2012 regulations
discussed comments and proposals the
Treasury Department and the IRS had
received on the proper application of
the portability rules to qualified
domestic trusts (QDOTs) created for
spouses who are not U.S. citizens. The
preamble noted that each of the
proposals raised issues of fairness,
complexity, and administrability.
The QDOT rules in the 2012
temporary regulations provide that the
executor of a decedent’s estate claiming
a marital deduction for property passing
to a QDOT shall compute the decedent’s
DSUE amount on the decedent’s estate
tax return for the purpose of electing
portability in the same way the DSUE
amount is computed for any other
decedent. However, because the estate
tax payments made from the QDOT after
the decedent’s death are part of the
decedent’s estate tax liability, the
decedent’s DSUE amount must be
redetermined upon the final distribution
or other taxable event on which estate
tax under section 2056A is imposed
(generally, this occurs upon the
termination of all QDOTs created by or
funded with assets passing from the
decedent or upon the death of the
surviving spouse). See § 20.2010–
2T(c)(4). The QDOT rules in the 2012
temporary regulations further provide
that the earliest date such a decedent’s
DSUE amount may be included in
determining the applicable exclusion
amount available to the surviving
spouse or the surviving spouse’s estate
is the date of the event that triggers the
final estate tax liability of the decedent
under section 2056A. See § 20.2010–
3T(c)(2). The preamble to the 2012
temporary regulations requested further
comments on the QDOT issue.
A commenter challenged this delay in
the surviving spouse’s ability to use the
decedent’s DSUE amount if the
surviving spouse becomes a United
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
States citizen after the decedent’s estate
tax return is filed and after property
passes to a QDOT for the benefit of that
surviving spouse.
Under section 2056A(b)(12), the estate
tax imposed under section 2056A(b)(1)
will cease to apply to property held in
a QDOT if the surviving spouse becomes
a United States citizen (a fact to be
certified to the IRS under § 20.2056A–
10(a)(2)) and either of the following
requirements are met: (A) the spouse
was a resident of the United States at all
times after the death of the decedent
and before the spouse becomes a citizen
of the United States, or (B) no tax was
imposed by section 2056A(b)(1)(A) with
respect to any distribution before the
spouse becomes a citizen. If the spouse
becomes a U.S. citizen, but does not
satisfy either of these two requirements,
section 2056A(b)(12)(C) provides that
the section 2056A(b)(1) estate tax will
cease to apply to the QDOT if the
spouse elects (i) to treat any distribution
on which tax was imposed by section
2056A(b)(1)(A) as a taxable gift made by
the spouse during the year in which the
spouse becomes a U.S. citizen or in any
subsequent year, and thereby including
each such distribution in the spouse’s
own adjusted taxable gifts for both
estate and gift tax purposes, and (ii) to
treat any reduction in the tax imposed
by section 2056A(b)(1)(A) by reason of
the credit allowable under section 2010
with respect to the decedent as a credit
allowable to such surviving spouse
under section 2505 for purposes of
determining the amount of the credit
allowable under section 2505 with
respect to taxable gifts made by the
surviving spouse during the year in
which the spouse becomes a U.S. citizen
or any subsequent year.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
conclude that, if the surviving spouse of
the decedent becomes a citizen of the
United States and the requirements
under section 2056A(b)(12) and the
corresponding regulations are satisfied
so that the tax imposed by section
2056A(b)(1) no longer applies, then the
decedent’s DSUE amount is no longer
subject to adjustment and will become
available for transfers by the surviving
spouse as of the date the surviving
spouse becomes a citizen of the United
States. Accordingly, the final
regulations make clarifying changes in
§§ 20.2010–2(c)(4), 20.2010–3(c)(3), and
25.2505–2(d)(3).
A commenter also requested
clarification of the rules in §§ 20.2010–
3T(b), 25.2505–2T(b) and 25.2505–2T(c)
as they apply to a QDOT. Section
25.2505–2T(b) provides that, in the case
of a surviving spouse making a gift, the
surviving spouse will be considered to
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
apply any available DSUE amount to the
taxable gift before the surviving spouse’s
own basic exclusion amount. Sections
20.2010–3T(b) and 25.2505–2T(c)
address how to compute the DSUE
amount included in the applicable
exclusion amount of a surviving spouse
who previously has applied a DSUE
amount of one or more deceased
spouses. These rules are applicable to
all surviving spouses but can be applied
only after the surviving spouse
determines the spouse’s available DSUE
amount, if any. Sections 20.2010–
3T(c)(2) and 25.2505–2T(d)(2) provide
rules governing the date DSUE can be
taken into consideration by the
surviving spouse or the surviving
spouse’s estate when property passes
from a decedent for the benefit of a
surviving spouse in one or more QDOTs
and the decedent elects portability. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that the impact of these rules in
the context of QDOTs is sufficiently
clear. Thus, the final regulations adopt
these rules without change, except that
the rule in § 25.2505–2T(d)(2) is now
provided in § 25.2505–2(d)(3).
6. Issues Related to Examination of
Returns To Determine DSUE Amount
Section 2010(c)(5)(B) grants the IRS
the authority to examine returns of each
deceased spouse of the surviving spouse
to determine the DSUE amount allowed
to be included in the applicable
exclusion amount of the surviving
spouse, even if the period of limitations
under section 6501 has expired for
assessing gift or estate tax with respect
to the returns of the deceased spouse.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
received several comments and
recommendations related to this
examination authority.
First, a commenter requested that the
final regulations provide that, during an
examination to determine the allowable
DSUE amount, the examination
authority of the IRS be limited to issues
of the reporting and valuation of assets,
and not extend to other legal issues that
may impact the availability of the DSUE
amount to the surviving spouse. The
Treasury Department and the IRS note
that section 2010(c)(5)(B) grants broad
statutory authority to the IRS to examine
the correctness of any return, without
regard to the period of limitations on
assessment, ‘‘to make determinations
with respect to [the allowable DSUE]
amount for purposes of carrying out
[section 2010(c) of the Code].’’ Thus, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
conclude that limiting such authority is
inconsistent with the statute.
Accordingly, this suggestion is not
adopted.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Second, a commenter requested
confirmation that, in the examination of
a return for the purpose of determining
the allowable DSUE amount that takes
place after the expiration of the period
of limitations on assessment of tax, the
valuation of assets may be adjusted
upward or downward with a possible
result that the allowable DSUE amount
may decrease or increase. The accurate
valuation of assets reported on an estate
or gift tax return, regardless of whether
the valuation is higher or lower than the
reported value, is fundamental to the
examination of such a return and
fundamental to the accurate
determination of the DSUE amount
available to the surviving spouse. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
accordingly conclude no clarifying
change is necessary on this issue.
Third, a commenter suggested the
final regulations consider whether, in
the examination of a return for the
purpose of determining the allowable
DSUE amount that takes place after the
expiration of the period of limitations
on assessment of tax, an adjustment to
the value of an asset reported on the
return affects the basis of that asset
under section 1014. Section 1014
generally provides that the basis of
property acquired from a decedent is the
fair market value of such property on
the decedent’s date of death. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that a change to the date-ofdeath value of an asset included in the
estate of a decedent survived by a
spouse, made pursuant to an
examination of a return of that decedent
after the expiration of the period of
limitations on the assessment of tax on
that return, does not necessarily result
in a change to the basis of that asset
under section 1014. Rather, the basis of
property acquired from a decedent is
determined in accordance with the
existing principles of section 1014. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
conclude that the scope of the
examination authority granted in
section 2010(c)(5)(B) is sufficiently clear
and, therefore, make no change in the
final regulations.
Fourth, a commenter suggested that
the final regulations clarify the
deductibility of administrative expenses
associated with the examination to
determine the allowable DSUE amount.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
conclude that any expenses associated
with an examination to determine the
DSUE amount to be included in the
applicable exclusion amount of the
surviving spouse should be treated as
any other expense associated with the
preparation of the surviving spouse’s
return. Thus, in the case of an
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34283
examination arising with respect to a
gift tax return of the surviving spouse,
such expenses are not deductible and,
in the case of an examination arising
with respect to an estate tax return of
the surviving spouse, such expenses
may be deductible if such expenses
meet all of the applicable requirements
for deductibility under section 2053.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that the standards for deducting
expenses for estate and gift tax purposes
are sufficiently clear so that no change
to the 2012 temporary regulations is
necessary.
Finally, a commenter suggested
clarifying who may participate in the
examination to determine the DSUE
amount to be included in the applicable
exclusion amount of the surviving
spouse. In general, pursuant to the
current rules, each taxpayer has the
authority to participate in the resolution
of the issues raised in the audit of his
or her return. However, the Treasury
Department and the IRS believe
addressing this issue is outside the
scope of this final regulation and,
therefore, make no change in the final
regulation.
7. Availability of DSUE Amount by
Surviving Spouse Who Becomes a
Citizen of the United States
A commenter requested further
guidance on the rules in §§ 20.2010–
3T(e) and 25.2505–2T(f), which prohibit
a noncitizen, nonresident surviving
spouse, or the estate of such a surviving
spouse, from taking into account the
DSUE amount of any deceased spouse
except to the extent allowed under any
treaty obligation of the United States.
First, the commenter suggested the final
regulations clarify the specificity a
treaty must employ in referencing
portability or the DSUE amount for the
exception to apply. The Treasury
Department and the IRS consider this
question regarding the interpretation of
treaty language to be outside the scope
of these final regulations and, thus,
decline to make this change.
Next, the commenter requested that
the final regulations allow a surviving
spouse who becomes a U.S. citizen after
the death of the deceased spouse to take
into account the DSUE amount of such
deceased spouse. Because a surviving
spouse who becomes a U.S. citizen is
subject to the estate and gift tax rules of
chapter 11 and 12 that apply to U.S.
citizens and residents, the Treasury
Department and the IRS believe it is
appropriate that such a surviving spouse
be permitted to take into account the
DSUE amount available from any
deceased spouse as of the date such
surviving spouse becomes a U.S. citizen,
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
34284
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
provided the deceased spouse’s
executor has made the portability
election. Accordingly, the final
regulations include such a rule in
§§ 20.2010–3 and 25.2505–2.
8. Effect of Portability Election on
Application of Rev. Proc. 2001–38
Multiple commenters have requested
guidance on the application of Rev.
Proc. 2001–38, 2001–24 IRB 1335, when
an estate makes a portability election
under section 2010(c)(5)(A) as well as
an election under section 2056(b)(7) to
treat qualified terminable interest
property (QTIP) as passing to the
surviving spouse for purposes of the
marital deduction.
Rev. Proc. 2001–38 provides a
procedure by which the IRS will
disregard and treat as a nullity for
Federal estate, gift, and generationskipping transfer tax purposes a QTIP
election made under section 2056(b)(7)
in cases where the election was not
necessary to reduce the estate tax
liability to zero. The commenter notes
that, with the introduction of portability
of a deceased spouse’s unused exclusion
amount, an executor may purposefully
elect both portability and QTIP
treatment and the rationale for the rule
voiding the election in Rev. Proc. 2001–
38 (that the election was of no benefit
to the taxpayer) is no longer applicable.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
intend to provide guidance, by
publication in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin, to clarify whether a QTIP
election made under section 2056(b)(7)
may be disregarded and treated as null
and void when an executor has elected
portability of the DSUE amount under
section 2010(c)(5)(A).
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
9. Incorrect Basic Exclusion Amount in
Examples
A commenter noted that §§ 20.2010–
3T and 25.2505–2T include an incorrect
basic exclusion amount for the
applicable year in the examples. The
final regulations correct this mistake.
10. Order of Credits
The NPRM requested comments on,
and reserved § 20.2010–2(c)(3) to
provide guidance on, the impact of the
credits in sections 2012 through 2015 on
computing the DSUE amount. One
comment was received, and advocated
for a rule in computing the DSUE
amount that the tentative tax is equal to
the net estate tax after the application of
all available credits. The commenter
stated that a deceased spouse’s
applicable credit amount should not be
applied to the extent one or more of the
estate tax credits are available to reduce
the decedent’s estate tax.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
The amount of the allowable credit in
sections 2012 through 2015 can be
determined only after subtracting from
the tax imposed by section 2001 the
applicable credit amount determined
under section 2010. Accordingly, to the
extent the applicable credit amount is
applied to reduce the tax imposed by
section 2001 to zero, the credits in
sections 2012 through 2015 are not
available. The rule in section 2010(c)(4)
for computing the DSUE amount does
not take into account any unused credits
arising under sections 2012 through
2015. Based on these considerations, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
conclude that no adjustment to the
computation of the DSUE amount to
account for any unused credits is
warranted. Accordingly, § 20.2010–
2(c)(3) of the final regulations clarifies
that eligibility for credits against the tax
imposed by section 2001 does not factor
into the computation of the DSUE
amount.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that these final
regulations are not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility
assessment is not required. It also has
been determined that section 553(b) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these
final regulations. It is hereby certified
that the collection of information
contained in this regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This certification is based on the fact
that these regulations primarily affect
estates of a decedent which generally
are not small entities under the Act.
Thus, we do not expect a substantial
number of small entities to be affected.
Therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) is
not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f)
of the Code, the 2012 temporary
regulations, as well as the crossreferencing notice of proposed
rulemaking preceding these final
regulations, were submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on their impact on small entities, and no
comments were received.
Statement of Availability for
Documents Published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin
For copies of recently issued revenue
procedures, revenue rulings, notices,
and other guidance published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin or Cumulative
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bulletin, please visit the IRS Web site at
https://www.irs.gov.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these final
regulations is Karlene Lesho, Office of
the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries).
Other personnel from the IRS and the
Treasury Department participated in
their development.
List of Subjects
26 CFR Part 20
Estate taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
26 CFR Part 25
Gift taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
26 CFR Part 602
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 20, 25, and
602 are amended as follows:
PART 20—ESTATE TAX; ESTATE OF
DECEDENTS DYING AFTER AUGUST
16, 1954
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 20 is amended by removing the
entries for §§ 20.2010–0T, 20.2010–1T,
20.2010–2T, and 20.2010–3T and
adding entries in numerical order to
read in part as follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.
Section 20.2010–0 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 2010(c)(6).
Section 20.2010–1 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 2010(c)(6).
Section 20.2010–2 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 2010(c)(6).
Section 20.2010–3 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 2010(c)(6).
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 2. Section 20.2001–2 is added to
read as follows:
■
§ 20.2001–2 Valuation of adjusted taxable
gifts for purposes of determining the
deceased spousal unused exclusion
amount of last deceased spouse.
(a) General rule. Notwithstanding
§ 20.2001–1(b), §§ 20.2010–2(d) and
20.2010–3(d) provide additional rules
regarding the authority of the Internal
Revenue Service to examine any gift or
other tax return(s), even if the time
within which a tax may be assessed
under section 6501 has expired, for the
purpose of determining the deceased
spousal unused exclusion amount
available under section 2010(c) of the
Internal Revenue Code.
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Effective/applicability date.
Paragraph (a) of this section applies to
the estates of decedents dying on or
after June 12, 2015. See 26 CFR
20.2001–2T(a), as contained in 26 CFR
part 20, revised as of April 1, 2015, for
the rules applicable to estates of
decedents dying on or after January 1,
2011, and before June 12, 2015.
§ 20.2001–2T
[Removed]
Par. 3. Section 20.2001–2T is
removed.
■ Par. 4. Section 20.2010–0 is added to
read as follows:
■
§ 20.2010–0
Table of contents.
This section lists the table of contents
for §§ 20.2010–1 through 20.2010–3.
§ 20.2010–1 Unified credit against estate
tax; in general.
(a) General rule.
(b) Special rule in case of certain gifts
made before 1977.
(c) Credit limitation.
(d) Explanation of terms.
(1) Applicable credit amount.
(2) Applicable exclusion amount.
(3) Basic exclusion amount.
(4) Deceased spousal unused
exclusion (DSUE) amount.
(5) Last deceased spouse.
(e) Effective/applicability date.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 20.2010–2 Portability provisions
applicable to estate of a decedent survived
by a spouse.
(a) Election required for portability.
(1) Timely filing required.
(2) Portability election upon filing of
estate tax return.
(3) Portability election not made;
requirements for election not to apply.
(4) Election irrevocable.
(5) Estates eligible to make the
election.
(6) Persons permitted to make the
election.
(7) Requirements of return.
(b) Requirement for DSUE
computation on estate tax return.
(c) Computation of the DSUE amount.
(1) General rule.
(2) Special rule to consider gift taxes
paid by decedent.
(3) Impact of applicable credits.
(4) Special rule in case of property
passing to qualified domestic trust.
(5) Examples.
(d) Authority to examine returns of
decedent.
(e) Effective/applicability date.
§ 20.2010–3 Portability provisions
applicable to the surviving spouse’s estate.
(a) Surviving spouse’s estate limited
to DSUE amount of last deceased
spouse.
(1) In general.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(2) No DSUE amount available from
last deceased spouse.
(3) Identity of last deceased spouse
unchanged by subsequent marriage or
divorce.
(b) Special rule in case of multiple
deceased spouses and previouslyapplied DSUE amount.
(1) In general.
(2) Example.
(c) Date DSUE amount taken into
consideration by surviving spouse’s
estate.
(1) General rule.
(2) Exception when surviving spouse
not a U.S. citizen on date of deceased
spouse’s death.
(3) Special rule when property passes
to surviving spouse in a qualified
domestic trust.
(d) Authority to examine returns of
deceased spouses.
(e) Availability of DSUE amount for
estates of nonresidents who are not
citizens.
(f) Effective/applicability date.
§ 20.2010–0T
[Removed]
Par. 5. Section 20.2010–0T is
removed.
■ Par. 6. Section 20.2010–1 is added to
read as follows:
■
§ 20.2010–1 Unified credit against estate
tax; in general.
(a) General rule. Section 2010(a)
allows the estate of every decedent a
credit against the estate tax imposed by
section 2001. The allowable credit is the
applicable credit amount. See paragraph
(d)(1) of this section for an explanation
of the term applicable credit amount.
(b) Special rule in case of certain gifts
made before 1977. The applicable credit
amount allowable under paragraph (a)
of this section must be reduced by an
amount equal to 20 percent of the
aggregate amount allowed as a specific
exemption under section 2521 (as in
effect before its repeal by the Tax
Reform Act of 1976) for gifts made by
the decedent after September 8, 1976,
and before January 1, 1977.
(c) Credit limitation. The applicable
credit amount allowed under paragraph
(a) of this section cannot exceed the
amount of the estate tax imposed by
section 2001.
(d) Explanation of terms. The
explanation of terms in this section
applies to this section and to
§§ 20.2010–2 and 20.2010–3.
(1) Applicable credit amount. The
term applicable credit amount refers to
the allowable credit against estate tax
imposed by section 2001 and gift tax
imposed by section 2501. The
applicable credit amount equals the
amount of the tentative tax that would
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34285
be determined under section 2001(c) if
the amount on which such tentative tax
is to be computed were equal to the
applicable exclusion amount. The
applicable credit amount is determined
by applying the unified rate schedule in
section 2001(c) to the applicable
exclusion amount.
(2) Applicable exclusion amount. The
applicable exclusion amount equals the
sum of the basic exclusion amount and,
in the case of a surviving spouse, the
deceased spousal unused exclusion
(DSUE) amount.
(3) Basic exclusion amount. The basic
exclusion amount is the sum of—
(i) For any decedent dying in calendar
year 2011, $5,000,000; and
(ii) For any decedent dying after
calendar year 2011, $5,000,000
multiplied by the cost-of-living
adjustment determined under section
1(f)(3) for that calendar year by
substituting ‘‘calendar year 2010’’ for
‘‘calendar year 1992’’ in section
1(f)(3)(B) and by rounding to the nearest
multiple of $10,000.
(4) Deceased spousal unused
exclusion (DSUE) amount. The term
DSUE amount refers, generally, to the
unused portion of a decedent’s
applicable exclusion amount to the
extent this amount does not exceed the
basic exclusion amount in effect in the
year of the decedent’s death. For the
rules on computing the DSUE amount,
see §§ 20.2010–2(c) and 20.2010–3(b).
(5) Last deceased spouse. The term
last deceased spouse means the most
recently deceased individual who, at
that individual’s death after December
31, 2010, was married to the surviving
spouse. See §§ 20.2010–3(a) and
25.2505–2(a) for additional rules
pertaining to the identity of the last
deceased spouse for purposes of
determining the applicable exclusion
amount of the surviving spouse.
(e) Effective/applicability date. This
section applies to the estates of
decedents dying on or after June 12,
2015. See 26 CFR 20.2010–1T, as
contained in 26 CFR part 20, revised as
of April 1, 2015, for the rules applicable
to estates of decedents dying on or after
January 1, 2011, and before June 12,
2015.
§ 20.2010–1T
[Removed]
Par. 7. Section 20.2010–1T is
removed.
■ Par. 8. Section 20.2010–2 is added to
read as follows:
■
§ 20.2010–2 Portability provisions
applicable to estate of a decedent survived
by a spouse.
(a) Election required for portability.
To allow a decedent’s surviving spouse
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
34286
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
to take into account that decedent’s
deceased spousal unused exclusion
(DSUE) amount, the executor of the
decedent’s estate must elect portability
of the DSUE amount on a timely filed
Form 706, ‘‘United States Estate (and
Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax
Return’’ (estate tax return). This election
is referred to in this section and in
§ 20.2010–3 as the portability election.
(1) Timely filing required. An estate
that elects portability will be
considered, for purposes of subtitle B
and subtitle F of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code), to be required to file a
return under section 6018(a).
Accordingly, the due date of an estate
tax return required to elect portability is
nine months after the decedent’s date of
death or the last day of the period
covered by an extension (if an extension
of time for filing has been obtained). See
§§ 20.6075–1 and 20.6081–1 for
additional rules relating to the time for
filing estate tax returns. An extension of
time to elect portability under this
paragraph (a) will not be granted under
§ 301.9100–3 of this chapter to an estate
that is required to file an estate tax
return under section 6018(a), as
determined without regard to this
paragraph (a). Such an extension,
however, may be available under the
procedures applicable under
§§ 301.9100–1 and 301.9100–3 of this
chapter to an estate that is not required
to file a return under section 6018(a), as
determined without regard to this
paragraph (a).
(2) Portability election upon filing of
estate tax return. Upon the timely filing
of a complete and properly prepared
estate tax return, an executor of an
estate of a decedent survived by a
spouse will have elected portability of
the decedent’s DSUE amount unless the
executor chooses not to elect portability
and satisfies the requirement in
paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section. See
paragraph (a)(7) of this section for the
return requirements related to the
portability election.
(3) Portability election not made;
requirements for election not to apply.
The executor of the estate of a decedent
survived by a spouse will not make or
be considered to make the portability
election if either of the following
applies:
(i) The executor states affirmatively
on a timely filed estate tax return, or in
an attachment to that estate tax return,
that the estate is not electing portability
under section 2010(c)(5). The manner in
which the executor may make this
affirmative statement on the estate tax
return is as set forth in the instructions
issued with respect to such form
(‘‘Instructions for Form 706’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(ii) The executor does not timely file
an estate tax return in accordance with
paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
(4) Election irrevocable. An executor
of the estate of a decedent survived by
a spouse who timely files an estate tax
return may make or may supersede a
portability election previously made,
provided that the estate tax return
reporting the election or the superseding
election is filed on or before the due
date of the return, including extensions
actually granted. However, see
paragraph (a)(6) of this section when
contrary elections are made by more
than one person permitted to make the
election. The portability election, once
made, becomes irrevocable once the due
date of the estate tax return, including
extensions actually granted, has passed.
(5) Estates eligible to make the
election. An executor may elect
portability on behalf of the estate of a
decedent survived by a spouse if the
decedent dies on or after January 1,
2011. However, an executor of the estate
of a nonresident decedent who was not
a citizen of the United States at the time
of death may not elect portability on
behalf of that decedent, and the timely
filing of such a decedent’s estate tax
return will not constitute the making of
a portability election.
(6) Persons permitted to make the
election—(i) Appointed executor. An
executor or administrator of the estate of
a decedent survived by a spouse that is
appointed, qualified, and acting within
the United States, within the meaning of
section 2203 (an appointed executor),
may timely file the estate tax return on
behalf of the estate of the decedent and,
in so doing, elect portability of the
decedent’s DSUE amount. An appointed
executor also may elect not to have
portability apply pursuant to paragraph
(a)(3) of this section.
(ii) Non-appointed executor. If there
is no appointed executor, any person in
actual or constructive possession of any
property of the decedent (a nonappointed executor) may timely file the
estate tax return on behalf of the estate
of the decedent and, in so doing, elect
portability of the decedent’s DSUE
amount, or, by complying with
paragraph (a)(3) of this section, may
elect not to have portability apply. A
portability election made by a nonappointed executor when there is no
appointed executor for that decedent’s
estate can be superseded by a
subsequent contrary election made by
an appointed executor of that same
decedent’s estate on an estate tax return
filed on or before the due date of the
return, including extensions actually
granted. An election to allow portability
made by a non-appointed executor
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
cannot be superseded by a contrary
election to have portability not apply
made by another non-appointed
executor of that same decedent’s estate
(unless such other non-appointed
executor is the successor of the nonappointed executor who made the
election). See § 20.6018–2 for additional
rules relating to persons permitted to
file the estate tax return.
(7) Requirements of return—(i)
General rule. An estate tax return will
be considered complete and properly
prepared for purposes of this section if
it is prepared in accordance with the
instructions issued for the estate tax
return (Instructions for Form 706) and if
the requirements of §§ 20.6018–2,
20.6018–3, and 20.6018–4 are satisfied.
However, see paragraph (a)(7)(ii) of this
section for reduced requirements
applicable to certain property of certain
estates.
(ii) Reporting of value not required for
certain property—(A) In general. A
special rule applies with respect to
certain property of estates in which the
executor is not required to file an estate
tax return under section 6018(a), as
determined without regard to paragraph
(a)(1) of this section. With respect to
such an estate, for bequests, devises, or
transfers of property included in the
gross estate, the value of which is
deductible under section 2056 or 2056A
(marital deduction property) or under
section 2055(a) (charitable deduction
property), an executor is not required to
report a value for such property on the
estate tax return (except to the extent
provided in this paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(A))
and will be required to report only the
description, ownership, and/or
beneficiary of such property, along with
all other information necessary to
establish the right of the estate to the
deduction in accordance with
§§ 20.2056(a)–1(b)(i) through (iii) and
20.2055–1(c), as applicable. However,
this rule does not apply in certain
circumstances as provided in this
paragraph (a) and as may be further
described in guidance issued from time
to time by publication in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin (see
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter). In
particular, this rule does not apply to
marital deduction property or charitable
deduction property if—
(1) The value of such property relates
to, affects, or is needed to determine, the
value passing from the decedent to a
recipient other than the recipient of the
marital or charitable deduction
property;
(2) The value of such property is
needed to determine the estate’s
eligibility for the provisions of sections
2032, 2032A, or another estate or
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
generation-skipping transfer tax
provision of the Code for which the
value of such property or the value of
the gross estate or adjusted gross estate
must be known (not including section
1014 of the Code);
(3) Less than the entire value of an
interest in property includible in the
decedent’s gross estate is marital
deduction property or charitable
deduction property; or
(4) A partial disclaimer or partial
qualified terminable interest property
(QTIP) election is made with respect to
a bequest, devise, or transfer of property
includible in the gross estate, part of
which is marital deduction property or
charitable deduction property.
(B) Return requirements when
reporting of value not required for
certain property. Paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(A)
of this section applies only if the
executor exercises due diligence to
estimate the fair market value of the
gross estate, including the property
described in paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(A) of
this section. Using the executor’s best
estimate of the value of properties to
which paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(A) of this
section applies, the executor must
report on the estate tax return, under
penalties of perjury, the amount
corresponding to the particular range
within which falls the executor’s best
estimate of the total gross estate, in
accordance with the Instructions for
Form 706.
(C) Examples. The following
examples illustrate the application of
paragraph (a)(7)(ii) of this section. In
each example, assume that Husband (H)
dies in 2015, survived by his wife (W),
that both H and W are U.S. citizens, that
H’s gross estate does not exceed the
excess of the applicable exclusion
amount for the year of his death over the
total amount of H’s adjusted taxable
gifts and any specific exemption under
section 2521, and that H’s executor (E)
timely files Form 706 solely to make the
portability election.
Example 1. (i) Facts. The assets includible
in H’s gross estate consist of a parcel of real
property and bank accounts held jointly with
W with rights of survivorship, a life
insurance policy payable to W, and a
survivor annuity payable to W for her life. H
made no taxable gifts during his lifetime.
(ii) Application. E files an estate tax return
on which these assets are identified on the
proper schedule, but E provides no
information on the return with regard to the
date of death value of these assets in
accordance with paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(A) of
this section. To establish the estate’s
entitlement to the marital deduction in
accordance with § 20.2056(a)–1(b) (except
with regard to establishing the value of the
property) and the instructions for the estate
tax return, E includes with the estate tax
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
return evidence to verify the title of each
jointly held asset, to confirm that W is the
sole beneficiary of both the life insurance
policy and the survivor annuity, and to verify
that the annuity is exclusively for W’s life.
Finally, E reports on the estate return E’s best
estimate, determined by exercising due
diligence, of the fair market value of the gross
estate in accordance with paragraph
(a)(7)(ii)(B) of this section. The estate tax
return is considered complete and properly
prepared and E has elected portability.
Example 2. (i) Facts. H’s will, duly
admitted to probate and not subject to any
proceeding to challenge its validity, provides
that H’s entire estate is to be distributed
outright to W. The non-probate assets
includible in H’s gross estate consist of a life
insurance policy payable to H’s children
from a prior marriage, and H’s individual
retirement account (IRA) payable to W. H
made no taxable gifts during his lifetime.
(ii) Application. E files an estate tax return
on which all of the assets includible in the
gross estate are identified on the proper
schedule. In the case of the probate assets
and the IRA, no information is provided with
regard to date of death value in accordance
with paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(A) of this section.
However, E attaches a copy of H’s will and
describes each such asset and its ownership
to establish the estate’s entitlement to the
marital deduction in accordance with the
instructions for the estate tax return and
§ 20.2056(a)–1(b) (except with regard to
establishing the value of the property). In the
case of the life insurance policy payable to
H’s children, all of the regular return
requirements, including reporting and
establishing the fair market value of such
asset, apply. Finally, E reports on the estate
return E’s best estimate, determined by
exercising due diligence, of the fair market
value of the gross estate in accordance with
paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(B) of this section. The
estate tax return is considered complete and
properly prepared and E has elected
portability.
Example 3. (i) Facts. H’s will, duly
admitted to probate and not subject to any
proceeding to challenge its validity, provides
that 50 percent of the property passing under
the terms of H’s will is to be paid to a marital
trust for W and 50 percent is to be paid to
a trust for W and their descendants.
(ii) Application. The amount passing to the
non-marital trust cannot be verified without
knowledge of the full value of the property
passing under the will. Therefore, the value
of the property of the marital trust relates to
or affects the value passing to the trust for W
and the descendants of H and W.
Accordingly, the general return requirements
apply to all of the property includible in the
gross estate and the provisions of paragraph
(a)(7)(ii) of this section do not apply.
(b) Requirement for DSUE
computation on estate tax return.
Section 2010(c)(5)(A) requires an
executor of a decedent’s estate to
include a computation of the DSUE
amount on the estate tax return to elect
portability and thereby allow the
decedent’s surviving spouse to take into
account that decedent’s DSUE amount.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34287
This requirement is satisfied by the
timely filing of a complete and properly
prepared estate tax return, as long as the
executor has not elected out of
portability as described in paragraph
(a)(3)(i) of this section. See paragraph
(a)(7) of this section for the
requirements for a return to be
considered complete and properly
prepared.
(c) Computation of the DSUE
amount—(1) General rule. Subject to
paragraphs (c)(2) through (4) of this
section, the DSUE amount of a decedent
with a surviving spouse is the lesser of
the following amounts—
(i) The basic exclusion amount in
effect in the year of the death of the
decedent; or
(ii) The excess of—
(A) The decedent’s applicable
exclusion amount; over
(B) The sum of the amount of the
taxable estate and the amount of the
adjusted taxable gifts of the decedent,
which together is the amount on which
the tentative tax on the decedent’s estate
is determined under section 2001(b)(1).
(2) Special rule to consider gift taxes
paid by decedent. Solely for purposes of
computing the decedent’s DSUE
amount, the amount of the adjusted
taxable gifts of the decedent referred to
in paragraph (c)(1)(ii)(B) of this section
is reduced by the amount, if any, on
which gift taxes were paid for the
calendar year of the gift(s).
(3) Impact of applicable credits. An
estate’s eligibility under sections 2012
through 2015 for credits against the tax
imposed by section 2001 does not
impact the computation of the DSUE
amount.
(4) Special rule in case of property
passing to qualified domestic trust—(i)
In general. When property passes for the
benefit of a surviving spouse in a
qualified domestic trust (QDOT) as
defined in section 2056A(a), the DSUE
amount of the decedent is computed on
the decedent’s estate tax return for the
purpose of electing portability in the
same manner as this amount is
computed under paragraph (c)(1) of this
section, but this DSUE amount is subject
to subsequent adjustments. The DSUE
amount of the decedent must be
redetermined upon the occurrence of
the final distribution or other event
(generally, the termination of all QDOTs
created by or funded with assets passing
from the decedent or the death of the
surviving spouse) on which estate tax is
imposed under section 2056A. See
§ 20.2056A–6 for the rules on
determining the estate tax under section
2056A. See § 20.2010–3(c)(3) regarding
the timing of the availability of the
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
34288
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
decedent’s DSUE amount to the
surviving spouse.
(ii) Surviving spouse becomes a U.S.
citizen. If the surviving spouse becomes
a U.S. citizen and if the requirements of
section 2056A(b)(12) and the
corresponding regulations are satisfied,
the estate tax imposed under section
2056A(b)(1) ceases to apply.
Accordingly, no estate tax will be
imposed under section 2056A either on
subsequent QDOT distributions or on
the property remaining in the QDOT on
the surviving spouse’s death and the
decedent’s DSUE amount is no longer
subject to adjustment.
(5) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the application of this
paragraph (c):
Example 1. Computation of DSUE amount.
(i) Facts. In 2002, having made no prior
taxable gift, Husband (H) makes a taxable gift
valued at $1,000,000 and reports the gift on
a timely filed gift tax return. Because the
amount of the gift is equal to the applicable
exclusion amount for that year ($1,000,000),
$345,800 is allowed as a credit against the
tax, reducing the gift tax liability to zero. H
dies in 2015, survived by Wife (W). H and
W are U.S. citizens and neither has any prior
marriage. H’s taxable estate is $1,000,000.
The executor of H’s estate timely files H’s
estate tax return and elects portability,
thereby allowing W to benefit from H’s DSUE
amount.
(ii) Application. The executor of H’s estate
computes H’s DSUE amount to be $3,430,000
(the lesser of the $5,430,000 basic exclusion
amount in 2015, or the excess of H’s
$5,430,000 applicable exclusion amount over
the sum of the $1,000,000 taxable estate and
the $1,000,000 amount of adjusted taxable
gifts).
Example 2. Computation of DSUE amount
when gift tax paid. (i) Facts. The facts are the
same as in Example 1 of this paragraph (c)(5)
except that the value of H’s taxable gift in
2002 is $2,000,000. After application of the
applicable credit amount, H owes gift tax on
$1,000,000, the amount of the gift in excess
of the applicable exclusion amount for that
year. H pays the gift tax owed on the 2002
transfer.
(ii) Application. On H’s death, the executor
of H’s estate computes the DSUE amount to
be $3,430,000 (the lesser of the $5,430,000
basic exclusion amount in 2015, or the excess
of H’s $5,430,000 applicable exclusion
amount over the sum of the $1,000,000
taxable estate and $1,000,000 of adjusted
taxable gifts sheltered from tax by H’s
applicable credit amount). H’s adjusted
taxable gifts of $2,000,000 were reduced for
purposes of this computation by $1,000,000,
the amount of taxable gifts on which gift
taxes were paid.
Example 3. Computation of DSUE amount
when QDOT created. (i) Facts. Husband (H),
a U.S. citizen, makes his first taxable gift in
2002, valued at $1,000,000, and reports the
gift on a timely filed gift tax return. No gift
tax is due because the applicable exclusion
amount for that year ($1,000,000) equals the
fair market value of the gift. H dies in 2015
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
with a gross estate of $2,000,000. H’s
surviving spouse (W) is a resident, but not a
citizen, of the United States and, under H’s
will, a pecuniary bequest of $1,500,000
passes to a QDOT for the benefit of W. H’s
executor timely files an estate tax return and
makes the QDOT election for the property
passing to the QDOT, and H’s estate is
allowed a marital deduction of $1,500,000
under section 2056(d) for the value of that
property. H’s taxable estate is $500,000. On
H’s estate tax return, H’s executor computes
H’s preliminary DSUE amount to be
$3,930,000 (the lesser of the $5,430,000 basic
exclusion amount in 2015, or the excess of
H’s $5,430,000 applicable exclusion amount
over the sum of the $500,000 taxable estate
and the $1,000,000 adjusted taxable gifts). No
taxable events within the meaning of section
2056A occur during W’s lifetime with respect
to the QDOT, and W makes no taxable gifts.
At all times since H’s death, W has been a
U.S. resident. In 2017, W dies and the value
of the assets of the QDOT is $1,800,000.
(ii) Application. H’s DSUE amount is
redetermined to be $2,130,000 (the lesser of
the $5,430,000 basic exclusion amount in
2015, or the excess of H’s $5,430,000
applicable exclusion amount over $3,300,000
(the sum of the $500,000 taxable estate
augmented by the $1,800,000 of QDOT assets
and the $1,000,000 adjusted taxable gifts)).
Example 4. Computation of DSUE amount
when surviving spouse with QDOT becomes
a U.S. citizen. (i) Facts. The facts are the
same as in Example 3 of this paragraph (c)(5)
except that W becomes a U.S. citizen in 2016
and dies in 2018. The U.S. Trustee of the
QDOT notifies the IRS that W has become a
U.S. citizen by timely filing a final estate tax
return (Form 706–QDT). Pursuant to section
2056A(b)(12), the estate tax under section
2056A no longer applies to the QDOT
property.
(ii) Application. Because H’s DSUE amount
no longer is subject to adjustment once W
becomes a citizen of the United States, H’s
DSUE amount is $3,930,000, as it was
preliminarily determined as of H’s death.
Upon W’s death in 2018, the value of the
QDOT property is includible in W’s gross
estate.
(d) Authority to examine returns of
decedent. The IRS may examine returns
of a decedent in determining the
decedent’s DSUE amount, regardless of
whether the period of limitations on
assessment has expired for that return.
See § 20.2010–3(d) for additional rules
relating to the IRS’s authority to
examine returns. See also section 7602
for the IRS’s authority, when
ascertaining the correctness of any
return, to examine any returns that may
be relevant or material to such inquiry.
(e) Effective/applicability date. This
section applies to the estates of
decedents dying on or after June 12,
2015. See 26 CFR 20.2010–2T, as
contained in 26 CFR part 20, revised as
of April 1, 2015, for the rule applicable
to estates of decedents dying on or after
January 1, 2011, and before June 12,
2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 20.2010–2T
[Removed]
Par. 9. Section 20.2010–2T is
removed.
■ Par. 10. Section 20.2010–3 is added to
read as follows:
■
§ 20.2010–3 Portability provisions
applicable to the surviving spouse’s estate.
(a) Surviving spouse’s estate limited to
DSUE amount of last deceased spouse—
(1) In general. The deceased spousal
unused exclusion (DSUE) amount of a
decedent, computed under § 20.2010–
2(c), is included in determining the
surviving spouse’s applicable exclusion
amount under section 2010(c)(2),
provided—
(i) Such decedent is the last deceased
spouse of such surviving spouse within
the meaning of § 20.2010–1(d)(5) on the
date of the death of the surviving
spouse; and
(ii) The executor of the decedent’s
estate elected portability (see § 20.2010–
2(a) and (b) for applicable
requirements).
(2) No DSUE amount available from
last deceased spouse. If the last
deceased spouse of such surviving
spouse had no DSUE amount, or if the
executor of such a decedent’s estate did
not make a portability election, the
surviving spouse’s estate has no DSUE
amount (except as provided in
paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section) to be
included in determining the applicable
exclusion amount, even if the surviving
spouse previously had a DSUE amount
available from another decedent who,
prior to the death of the last deceased
spouse, was the last deceased spouse of
such surviving spouse. See paragraph
(b) of this section for a special rule in
the case of multiple deceased spouses
and a previously applied DSUE amount.
(3) Identity of last deceased spouse
unchanged by subsequent marriage or
divorce. A decedent is the last deceased
spouse (as defined in § 20.2010–1(d)(5))
of a surviving spouse even if, on the
date of the death of the surviving
spouse, the surviving spouse is married
to another (then-living) individual. If a
surviving spouse marries again and that
marriage ends in divorce or an
annulment, the subsequent death of the
divorced spouse does not end the status
of the prior deceased spouse as the last
deceased spouse of the surviving
spouse. The divorced spouse, not being
married to the surviving spouse at
death, is not the last deceased spouse as
that term is defined in § 20.2010–
1(d)(5).
(b) Special rule in case of multiple
deceased spouses and previouslyapplied DSUE amount—(1) In general.
A special rule applies to compute the
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
DSUE amount included in the
applicable exclusion amount of a
surviving spouse who previously has
applied the DSUE amount of one or
more deceased spouses to taxable gifts
in accordance with § 25.2505–2(b) and
(c). If a surviving spouse has applied the
DSUE amount of one or more
(successive) last deceased spouses to the
surviving spouse’s transfers during life,
and if any of those last deceased
spouses is different from the surviving
spouse’s last deceased spouse as defined
in § 20.2010–1(d)(5) at the time of the
surviving spouse’s death, then the DSUE
amount to be included in determining
the applicable exclusion amount of the
surviving spouse at the time of the
surviving spouse’s death is the sum of—
(i) The DSUE amount of the surviving
spouse’s last deceased spouse as
described in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section; and
(ii) The DSUE amount of each other
deceased spouse of the surviving
spouse, to the extent that such amount
was applied to one or more taxable gifts
of the surviving spouse.
(2) Example. The following example,
in which all described individuals are
U.S. citizens, illustrates the application
of this paragraph (b):
Example. (i) Facts. Husband 1 (H1) dies
in 2011, survived by Wife (W). Neither has
made any taxable gifts during H1’s lifetime.
H1’s executor elects portability of H1’s DSUE
amount. The DSUE amount of H1 as
computed on the estate tax return filed on
behalf of H1’s estate is $5,000,000. In 2012,
W makes taxable gifts to her children valued
at $2,000,000. W reports the gifts on a timely
filed gift tax return. W is considered to have
applied $2,000,000 of H1’s DSUE amount to
the amount of taxable gifts, in accordance
with § 25.2505–2(c), and, therefore, W owes
no gift tax. W has an applicable exclusion
amount remaining in the amount of
$8,120,000 ($3,000,000 of H1’s remaining
DSUE amount plus W’s own $5,120,000 basic
exclusion amount). W marries Husband 2
(H2) in 2013. H2 dies in 2014. H2’s executor
elects portability of H2’s DSUE amount,
which is properly computed on H2’s estate
tax return to be $2,000,000. W dies in 2015.
(ii) Application. The DSUE amount to be
included in determining the applicable
exclusion amount available to W’s estate is
$4,000,000, determined by adding the
$2,000,000 DSUE amount of H2 and the
$2,000,000 DSUE amount of H1 that was
applied by W to W’s 2012 taxable gifts. The
$4,000,000 DSUE amount added to W’s
$5,430,000 basic exclusion amount (for
2015), causes W’s applicable exclusion
amount to be $9,430,000.
(c) Date DSUE amount taken into
consideration by surviving spouse’s
estate—(1) General rule. A portability
election made by an executor of a
decedent’s estate (see § 20.2010–2(a)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
and (b) for applicable requirements)
generally applies as of the date of the
decedent’s death. Thus, such decedent’s
DSUE amount is included in the
applicable exclusion amount of the
decedent’s surviving spouse under
section 2010(c)(2) and will be applicable
to transfers made by the surviving
spouse after the decedent’s death
(subject to the limitations in paragraph
(a) of this section). However, such
decedent’s DSUE amount will not be
included in the applicable exclusion
amount of the surviving spouse, even if
the surviving spouse had made a
transfer in reliance on the availability or
computation of the decedent’s DSUE
amount:
(i) If the executor of the decedent’s
estate supersedes the portability
election by filing a subsequent estate tax
return in accordance with § 20.2010–
2(a)(4);
(ii) To the extent that the DSUE
amount subsequently is reduced by a
valuation adjustment or the correction
of an error in calculation; or
(iii) To the extent that the surviving
spouse cannot substantiate the DSUE
amount claimed on the surviving
spouse’s return.
(2) Exception when surviving spouse
not a U.S. citizen on date of deceased
spouse’s death. If a surviving spouse
becomes a citizen of the United States
after the death of the surviving spouse’s
last deceased spouse, the DSUE amount
of the surviving spouse’s last deceased
spouse becomes available to the
surviving spouse on the date the
surviving spouse becomes a citizen of
the United States (subject to the
limitations in paragraph (a) of this
section). However, when the special
rule regarding qualified domestic trusts
in paragraph (c)(3) of this section
applies, the earliest date on which a
decedent’s DSUE amount may be
included in the applicable exclusion
amount of such decedent’s surviving
spouse who becomes a U.S. citizen is as
provided in paragraph (c)(3) of this
section.
(3) Special rule when property passes
to surviving spouse in a qualified
domestic trust—(i) In general. When
property passes from a decedent for the
benefit of the decedent’s surviving
spouse in one or more qualified
domestic trusts (QDOT) as defined in
section 2056A(a) and the decedent’s
executor elects portability, the DSUE
amount available to be included in the
applicable exclusion amount of the
surviving spouse under section
2010(c)(2) is the DSUE amount of the
decedent as redetermined in accordance
with § 20.2010–2(c)(4) (subject to the
limitations in paragraph (a) of this
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34289
section). The earliest date on which
such decedent’s DSUE amount may be
included in the applicable exclusion
amount of the surviving spouse under
section 2010(c)(2) is the date of the
occurrence of the final QDOT
distribution or final other event
(generally, the termination of all QDOTs
created by or funded with assets passing
from the decedent or the death of the
surviving spouse) on which tax under
section 2056A is imposed. However, the
decedent’s DSUE amount as
redetermined in accordance with
§ 20.2010–2(c)(4) may be applied to
certain taxable gifts of the surviving
spouse. See § 25.2505–2(d)(3)(i).
(ii) Surviving spouse becomes a U.S.
citizen. If a surviving spouse for whom
property has passed from a decedent in
one or more QDOTs becomes a citizen
of the United States and the
requirements in section 2056A(b)(12)
and the corresponding regulations are
satisfied, then the date on which such
decedent’s DSUE amount may be
included in the applicable exclusion
amount of the surviving spouse under
section 2010(c)(2) (subject the
limitations in paragraph (a) of this
section) is the date on which the
surviving spouse becomes a citizen of
the United States. See § 20.2010–2(c)(4)
for the rules for computing the
decedent’s DSUE amount in the case of
a qualified domestic trust.
(d) Authority to examine returns of
deceased spouses. For the purpose of
determining the DSUE amount to be
included in the applicable exclusion
amount of a surviving spouse, the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may
examine returns of each of the surviving
spouse’s deceased spouses whose DSUE
amount is claimed to be included in the
surviving spouse’s applicable exclusion
amount, regardless of whether the
period of limitations on assessment has
expired for any such return. The IRS’s
authority to examine returns of a
deceased spouse applies with respect to
each transfer by the surviving spouse to
which a DSUE amount is or has been
applied. Upon examination, the IRS
may adjust or eliminate the DSUE
amount reported on such a return of a
deceased spouse; however, the IRS may
assess additional tax on that return only
if that tax is assessed within the period
of limitations on assessment under
section 6501 applicable to the tax
shown on that return. See also section
7602 for the IRS’s authority, when
ascertaining the correctness of any
return, to examine any returns that may
be relevant or material to such inquiry.
For purposes of these examinations to
determine the DSUE amount, the
surviving spouse is considered to have
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
34290
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
a material interest that is affected by the
return information of the deceased
spouse within the meaning of section
6103(e)(3).
(e) Availability of DSUE amount for
estates of nonresidents who are not
citizens. The estate of a nonresident
surviving spouse who is not a citizen of
the United States at the time of such
surviving spouse’s death shall not take
into account the DSUE amount of any
deceased spouse of such surviving
spouse within the meaning of
§ 20.2010–1(d)(5) except to the extent
allowed under any applicable treaty
obligation of the United States. See
section 2102(b)(3).
(f) Effective/applicability date. This
section applies to the estates of
decedents dying on or after June 12,
2015. See 26 CFR 20.2010–3T, as
contained in 26 CFR part 20, revised as
of April 1, 2015, for the rules applicable
to estates of decedents dying on or after
January 1, 2011, and before June 12,
2015.
§ 20.2010–3T
[Removed]
Par. 11. Section 20.2010–3T is
removed.
(b) Manner in which DSUE amount is
applied.
(c) Special rule in case of multiple
deceased spouses and previouslyapplied DSUE amount.
(1) In general.
(2) Example.
(d) Date DSUE amount taken into
consideration by donor who is a
surviving spouse.
(1) General rule.
(2) Exception when surviving spouse
not a U.S. citizen on date of deceased
spouse’s death.
(3) Special rule when property passes
to surviving spouse in a qualified
domestic trust.
(e) Authority to examine returns of
deceased spouses.
(f) Availability of DSUE amount for
nonresidents who are not citizens.
(g) Effective/applicability date.
§ 25.2505–0T
[Removed]
Par. 14. Section 25.2505–0T is
removed.
■ Par. 15. Section 25.2505–1 is added to
read as follows:
■
■
§ 25.2505–1
in general.
PART 25—GIFT TAX; GIFTS MADE
AFTER DECEMBER 31, 1954
Par. 12. The authority citation for part
25 is amended by removing the entry for
§ 25.2505–2T and adding an entry in
numerical order to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.
Section 25.2505–2 also issued under
26 U.S.C. 2010(c)(6).
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 13. Section 25.2505–0 is added to
read as follows:
§ 25.2505–0
Table of contents.
This section lists the table of contents
for §§ 25.2505–1 and 25.2505–2.
§ 25.2505–1
in general.
Unified credit against gift tax;
(a) General rule.
(b) Applicable rate of tax.
(c) Special rule in case of certain gifts
made before 1977.
(d) Credit limitation.
(e) Effective/applicability date.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 25.2505–2 Gifts made by a surviving
spouse having a DSUE amount available.
(a) Donor who is surviving spouse is
limited to DSUE amount of last
deceased spouse.
(1) In general.
(2) No DSUE amount available from
last deceased spouse.
(3) Identity of last deceased spouse
unchanged by subsequent marriage or
divorce.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Unified credit against gift tax;
(a) General rule. Section 2505(a)
allows a citizen or resident of the
United States a credit against the tax
imposed by section 2501 for each
calendar year. The allowable credit is
the applicable credit amount in effect
under section 2010(c) that would apply
if the donor died as of the end of the
calendar year, reduced by the sum of the
amounts allowable as a credit against
the gift tax due for all preceding
calendar periods. See §§ 25.2505–2,
20.2010–1, and 20.2010–2 for additional
rules and definitions related to
determining the applicable credit
amount in effect under section 2010(c).
(b) Applicable rate of tax. In
determining the amounts allowable as a
credit against the gift tax due for all
preceding calendar periods, the unified
rate schedule under section 2001(c) in
effect for such calendar year applies
instead of the rates of tax actually in
effect for preceding calendar periods.
See sections 2505(a) and 2502(a)(2).
(c) Special rule in case of certain gifts
made before 1977. The applicable credit
amount allowable under paragraph (a)
of this section must be reduced by an
amount equal to 20 percent of the
aggregate amount allowed as a specific
exemption under section 2521 (as in
effect before its repeal by the Tax
Reform Act of 1976) for gifts made by
the decedent after September 8, 1976,
and before January 1, 1977.
(d) Credit limitation. The applicable
credit amount allowed under paragraph
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(a) of this section for any calendar year
shall not exceed the amount of the tax
imposed by section 2501 for such
calendar year.
(e) Effective/applicability date. This
section applies to gifts made on or after
June 12, 2015. See 26 CFR 25.2505–1T,
as contained in 26 CFR part 25, revised
as of April 1, 2015, for the rules
applicable to gifts made on or after
January 1, 2011, and before June 12,
2015.
§ 25.2505–1T
[Removed]
Par. 16. Section 25.2505–1T is
removed.
■ Par. 17. Section 25.2505–2 is added to
read as follows:
■
§ 25.2505–2 Gifts made by a surviving
spouse having a DSUE amount available.
(a) Donor who is surviving spouse is
limited to DSUE amount of last
deceased spouse—(1) In general. In
computing a surviving spouse’s gift tax
liability with regard to a transfer subject
to the tax imposed by section 2501
(taxable gift), a deceased spousal unused
exclusion (DSUE) amount of a decedent,
computed under § 20.2010–2(c), is
included in determining the surviving
spouse’s applicable exclusion amount
under section 2010(c)(2), provided:
(i) Such decedent is the last deceased
spouse of such surviving spouse within
the meaning of § 20.2010–1(d)(5) at the
time of the surviving spouse’s taxable
gift; and
(ii) The executor of the decedent’s
estate elected portability (see § 20.2010–
2(a) and (b) for applicable
requirements).
(2) No DSUE amount available from
last deceased spouse. If on the date of
the surviving spouse’s taxable gift the
last deceased spouse of such surviving
spouse had no DSUE amount or if the
executor of the estate of such last
deceased spouse did not elect
portability, the surviving spouse has no
DSUE amount (except as and to the
extent provided in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of
this section) to be included in
determining his or her applicable
exclusion amount, even if the surviving
spouse previously had a DSUE amount
available from another decedent who,
prior to the death of the last deceased
spouse, was the last deceased spouse of
such surviving spouse. See paragraph
(c) of this section for a special rule in
the case of multiple deceased spouses.
(3) Identity of last deceased spouse
unchanged by subsequent marriage or
divorce. A decedent is the last deceased
spouse (as defined in § 20.2010–1(d)(5))
of a surviving spouse even if, on the
date of the surviving spouse’s taxable
gift, the surviving spouse is married to
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
another (then-living) individual. If a
surviving spouse marries again and that
marriage ends in divorce or an
annulment, the subsequent death of the
divorced spouse does not end the status
of the prior deceased spouse as the last
deceased spouse of the surviving
spouse. The divorced spouse, not being
married to the surviving spouse at
death, is not the last deceased spouse as
that term is defined in § 20.2010–
1(d)(5).
(b) Manner in which DSUE amount is
applied. If a donor who is a surviving
spouse makes a taxable gift and a DSUE
amount is included in determining the
surviving spouse’s applicable exclusion
amount under section 2010(c)(2), such
surviving spouse will be considered to
apply such DSUE amount to the taxable
gift before the surviving spouse’s own
basic exclusion amount.
(c) Special rule in case of multiple
deceased spouses and previouslyapplied DSUE amount—(1) In general.
A special rule applies to compute the
DSUE amount included in the
applicable exclusion amount of a
surviving spouse who previously has
applied the DSUE amount of one or
more deceased spouses. If a surviving
spouse applied the DSUE amount of one
or more (successive) last deceased
spouses to the surviving spouse’s
previous lifetime transfers, and if any of
those last deceased spouses is different
from the surviving spouse’s last
deceased spouse as defined in
§ 20.2010–1(d)(5) at the time of the
current taxable gift by the surviving
spouse, then the DSUE amount to be
included in determining the applicable
exclusion amount of the surviving
spouse that will be applicable at the
time of the current taxable gift is the
sum of—
(i) The DSUE amount of the surviving
spouse’s last deceased spouse as
described in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section; and
(ii) The DSUE amount of each other
deceased spouse of the surviving spouse
to the extent that such amount was
applied to one or more previous taxable
gifts of the surviving spouse.
(2) Example. The following example,
in which all described individuals are
U.S. citizens, illustrates the application
of this paragraph (c):
Example. (i) Facts. Husband 1 (H1) dies in
2011, survived by Wife (W). Neither has
made any taxable gifts during H1’s lifetime.
H1’s executor elects portability of H1’s
deceased spousal unused exclusion (DSUE)
amount. The DSUE amount of H1 as
computed on the estate tax return filed on
behalf of H1’s estate is $5,000,000. In 2012,
W makes taxable gifts to her children valued
at $2,000,000. W reports the gifts on a timely
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
filed gift tax return. W is considered to have
applied $2,000,000 of H1’s DSUE amount to
the 2012 taxable gifts, in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section, and, therefore,
W owes no gift tax. W is considered to have
an applicable exclusion amount remaining in
the amount of $8,120,000 ($3,000,000 of H1’s
remaining DSUE amount plus W’s own
$5,120,000 basic exclusion amount). In 2013,
W marries Husband 2 (H2). H2 dies on June
30, 2015. H2’s executor elects portability of
H2’s DSUE amount, which is properly
computed on H2’s estate tax return to be
$2,000,000.
(ii) Application. The DSUE amount to be
included in determining the applicable
exclusion amount available to W for gifts
during the second half of 2015 is $4,000,000,
determined by adding the $2,000,000 DSUE
amount of H2 and the $2,000,000 DSUE
amount of H1 that was applied by W to W’s
2012 taxable gifts. Thus, W’s applicable
exclusion amount during the balance of 2015
is $9,430,000 ($4,000,000 DSUE plus
$5,430,000 basic exclusion amount for 2015).
(d) Date DSUE amount taken into
consideration by donor who is a
surviving spouse—(1) General rule. A
portability election made by an executor
of a decedent’s estate (see § 20.2010–2(a)
and (b) for applicable requirements)
generally applies as of the date of such
decedent’s death. Thus, the decedent’s
DSUE amount is included in the
applicable exclusion amount of the
decedent’s surviving spouse under
section 2010(c)(2) and will be applicable
to transfers made by the surviving
spouse after the decedent’s death
(subject to the limitations in paragraph
(a) of this section). However, such
decedent’s DSUE amount will not be
included in the applicable exclusion
amount of the surviving spouse, even if
the surviving spouse had made a taxable
gift in reliance on the availability or
computation of the decedent’s DSUE
amount:
(i) If the executor of the decedent’s
estate supersedes the portability
election by filing a subsequent estate tax
return in accordance with § 20.2010–
2(a)(4);
(ii) To the extent that the DSUE
amount subsequently is reduced by a
valuation adjustment or the correction
of an error in calculation; or
(iii) To the extent that the DSUE
amount claimed on the decedent’s
return cannot be determined.
(2) Exception when surviving spouse
not a U.S. citizen on date of deceased
spouse’s death. If a surviving spouse
becomes a citizen of the United States
after the death of the surviving spouse’s
last deceased spouse, the DSUE amount
of the surviving spouse’s last deceased
spouse becomes available to the
surviving spouse on the date the
surviving spouse becomes a citizen of
the United States (subject to the
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34291
limitations in paragraph (a) of this
section). However, when the special
rule regarding qualified domestic trusts
in paragraph (d)(3) of this section
applies, the earliest date on which a
decedent’s DSUE amount may be
included in the applicable exclusion
amount of such decedent’s surviving
spouse who becomes a U.S. citizen is as
provided in paragraph (d)(3) of this
section.
(3) Special rule when property passes
to surviving spouse in a qualified
domestic trust—(i) In general. When
property passes from a decedent for the
benefit of the decedent’s surviving
spouse in one or more qualified
domestic trusts (QDOT) as defined in
section 2056A(a) and the decedent’s
executor elects portability, the DSUE
amount available to be included in the
applicable exclusion amount of the
surviving spouse under section
2010(c)(2) is the DSUE amount of the
decedent as redetermined in accordance
with § 20.2010–2(c)(4) (subject to the
limitations in paragraph (a) of this
section). The earliest date on which
such decedent’s DSUE amount may be
included in the applicable exclusion
amount of the surviving spouse under
section 2010(c)(2) is the date of the
occurrence of the final QDOT
distribution or final other event
(generally, the termination of all QDOTs
created by or funded with assets passing
from the decedent or the death of the
surviving spouse) on which tax under
section 2056A is imposed. However, the
decedent’s DSUE amount as
redetermined in accordance with
§ 20.2010–2(c)(4) may be applied to the
surviving spouse’s taxable gifts made in
the year of the surviving spouse’s death
or, if the terminating event occurs prior
to the surviving spouse’s death, then in
the year of that terminating event and/
or in any subsequent year during the
surviving spouse’s life.
(ii) Surviving spouse becomes a U.S.
citizen. If a surviving spouse for whom
property has passed from a decedent in
one or more QDOTs becomes a citizen
of the United States and the
requirements in section 2056A(b)(12)
and the corresponding regulations are
satisfied, then the date on which such
decedent’s DSUE amount may be
included in the applicable exclusion
amount of the surviving spouse under
section 2010(c)(2) (subject to the
limitations in paragraph (a) of this
section) is the date on which the
surviving spouse becomes a citizen of
the United States. See § 20.2010–2(c)(4)
for the rules for computing the
decedent’s DSUE amount in the case of
a qualified domestic trust.
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
34292
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
(iii) Example. The following example
illustrates the application of this
paragraph (d)(3):
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Example. (i) Facts. Husband (H), a U.S.
citizen, dies in 2011 having made no taxable
gifts during his lifetime. H’s gross estate is
$3,000,000. H’s wife (W) is not a citizen of
the United States and, under H’s will, a
pecuniary bequest of $2,000,000 passes to a
QDOT for the benefit of W. H’s executor
timely files an estate tax return and makes
the QDOT election for the property passing
to the QDOT, and H’s estate is allowed a
marital deduction of $2,000,000 under
section 2056(d) for the value of that property.
H’s taxable estate is $1,000,000. On H’s estate
tax return, H’s executor computes H’s
preliminary DSUE amount to be $4,000,000.
No taxable events within the meaning of
section 2056A occur during W’s lifetime with
respect to the QDOT, and W resides in the
United States at all times after H’s death. W
makes a taxable gift of $1,000,000 to X in
2012 and a taxable gift of $1,000,000 to Y in
January 2015, in each case from W’s own
assets rather than from the QDOT. W dies in
September 2015, not having married again,
when the value of the assets of the QDOT is
$2,200,000.
(ii) Application. H’s DSUE amount is
redetermined to be $1,800,000 (the lesser of
the $5,000,000 basic exclusion amount for
2011, or the excess of H’s $5,000,000
applicable exclusion amount over $3,200,000
(the sum of the $1,000,000 taxable estate
augmented by the $2,200,000 of QDOT
assets)). On W’s gift tax return filed for 2012,
W cannot apply any DSUE amount to the gift
made to X. However, because W’s gift to Y
was made in the year that W died, W’s
executor will apply $1,000,000 of H’s
redetermined DSUE amount to the gift on
W’s gift tax return filed for 2015. The
remaining $800,000 of H’s redetermined
DSUE amount is included in W’s applicable
exclusion amount to be used in computing
W’s estate tax liability.
(e) Authority to examine returns of
deceased spouses. For the purpose of
determining the DSUE amount to be
included in the applicable exclusion
amount of a surviving spouse, the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may
examine returns of each of the surviving
spouse’s deceased spouses whose DSUE
amount is claimed to be included in the
surviving spouse’s applicable exclusion
amount, regardless of whether the
period of limitations on assessment has
expired for any such return. The IRS’s
authority to examine returns of a
deceased spouse applies with respect to
each transfer by the surviving spouse to
which a DSUE amount is or has been
applied. Upon examination, the IRS
may adjust or eliminate the DSUE
amount reported on such a return of a
deceased spouse; however, the IRS may
assess additional tax on that return only
if that tax is assessed within the period
of limitations on assessment under
section 6501 applicable to the tax
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jun 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
shown on that return. See also section
7602 for the IRS’s authority, when
ascertaining the correctness of any
return, to examine any returns that may
be relevant or material to such inquiry.
(f) Availability of DSUE amount for
nonresidents who are not citizens. A
nonresident surviving spouse who was
not a citizen of the United States at the
time of making a transfer subject to tax
under chapter 12 of the Internal
Revenue Code shall not take into
account the DSUE amount of any
deceased spouse except to the extent
allowed under any applicable treaty
obligation of the United States. See
section 2102(b)(3).
(g) Effective/applicability date. This
section applies to gifts made on or after
June 12, 2015. See 26 CFR 25.2505–2T,
as contained in 26 CFR part 25, revised
as of April 1, 2015, for the rules
applicable to gifts made on or after
January 1, 2011, and before June 12,
2015.
§ 25.2505–2T
[Removed]
Par. 18. Section 25.2505–2T is
removed.
■
Par. 19. The authority citation for part
602 continues to read as follows:
■
Par. 20. In § 602.101, paragraph (b) is
amended by:
■ 1. Removing the entry for 20.2010–2T.
■ 2. Adding in numerical order an entry
for 20.2010–2.
The addition reads as follows:
■
OMB Control numbers.
*
*
(b) * * *
*
*
Current
OMB
control No.
CFR Part or section where
identified and described
*
*
*
20.2010–2 .............................
*
*
*
*
*
1545–0015
*
*
John M. Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: June 8, 2015.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2015–14663 Filed 6–12–15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
26 CFR Part 54
[TD–9724]
RIN 1545–BM53
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
29 CFR Part 2590
RIN 1210–AB69
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
45 CFR Part 147
[CMS–9938–F]
RIN 0938–AS54
Summary of Benefits and Coverage
and Uniform Glossary
Internal Revenue Service,
Department of the Treasury; Employee
Benefits Security Administration,
Department of Labor; Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services.
ACTION: Final rules.
This document contains final
regulations regarding the summary of
benefits and coverage (SBC) and the
uniform glossary for group health plans
and health insurance coverage in the
group and individual markets under the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act. It finalizes changes to the
regulations that implement the
disclosure requirements under section
2715 of the Public Health Service Act to
help plans and individuals better
understand their health coverage, as
well as to gain a better understanding of
other coverage options for comparison.
DATES: Effective Date: These final
regulations are effective on August 17,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Schumacher or Amber Rivers,
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Department of Labor, at
(202) 693–8335; Karen Levin, Internal
Revenue Service, Department of the
Treasury, at (202) 317–5500; Heather
Raeburn, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, at (301)
492–4224.
Customer Service Information:
Individuals interested in obtaining
SUMMARY:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.
*
Internal Revenue Service
AGENCY:
PART 602—OMB CONTROL NUMBERS
UNDER THE PAPERWORK
REDUCTION ACT
§ 602.101
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34279-34292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14663]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Parts 20, 25, and 602
[TD 9725]
RIN 1545-BK74
Portability of a Deceased Spousal Unused Exclusion Amount
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations that provide guidance
under sections 2010 and 2505 of the Internal Revenue Code on the estate
and gift tax applicable exclusion amount, in general, as well as on the
applicable requirements for electing portability of a deceased spousal
unused exclusion (DSUE) amount to the surviving spouse and on the
applicable rules for the surviving spouse's use of this DSUE amount.
The statutory provisions underlying the portability rules were enacted
as part of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and
Job Creation Act of 2010, and these provisions were made permanent by
the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. The portability rules affect
the estates of married decedents dying on or after January 1, 2011, and
the surviving spouses of those decedents.
DATES:
Effective Date. These regulations are effective on June 12, 2015.
Applicability Dates: For specific dates of applicability of the
final regulations,
[[Page 34280]]
see Sec. Sec. 20.2001-2(b), 20.2010-1(e), 20.2010-2(e), 20.2010-3(f),
25.2505-1(e), and 25.2505-2(g).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karlene Lesho (202) 317-6859 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collections of information contained in these regulations have
been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget under
control number 1545-0015. The collections of information are in
Sec. Sec. 20.2010-2(a), 20.2010-2(a)(1), 20.2010-2(a)(3)(i), 20.2010-
2(a)(7)(ii)(B), and 20.2010-2(b). Responses to each collection of
information are voluntary to obtain the benefit of being able to elect
portability or to take advantage of the special reporting requirements
applicable to certain assets, and, for certain estates, to opt out of a
deemed portability election. The likely respondents are executors of
estates of decedents survived by a spouse.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid
control number.
Books and records relating to a collection of information must be
retained as long as their contents may become material in the
administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and
tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.
Background
This document amends the Estate Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 20)
under sections 2001 and 2010 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and
the Gift Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 25) under section 2505 of the
Code. On December 17, 2010, in section 303 of the Tax Relief,
Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010,
Public Law 111-312 (124 Stat. 3296, 3302) (TRUIRJCA), Congress amended
section 2010(c) of the Code to allow portability of the applicable
exclusion amount between spouses and made conforming amendments to
sections 2505(a), 2631(c), and 6018(a)(1) of the Code. The changes made
by TRUIRJCA to sections 2010(c), 2505(a), 2631(c), and 6018(a)(1) of
the Code were scheduled to expire after December 31, 2012, pursuant to
section 304 of TRUIRJCA. However, on January 2, 2013, Congress enacted
the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, Public Law 112-240 (126 Stat.
2313) (ATRA), which made portability permanent. In section 101(c)(2) of
ATRA, Congress made a technical correction to section 2010(c)(4)(B) of
the Code, retroactive to the original date of enactment of section 303
of TRUIRJCA, by amending clause (i) to replace ``basic exclusion
amount'' with ``applicable exclusion amount.''
On June 18, 2012, temporary regulations relating to this topic (TD
9593, 77 FR 36150) (``2012 temporary regulations'') and a notice of
proposed rulemaking cross-referencing the temporary regulations (REG-
141832-11, 77 FR 36229) (``NPRM'') were published in the Federal
Register. No requests to speak at the scheduled public hearing were
received, and the hearing was canceled. Comments responding to the NPRM
were received and are available for public inspection and copying at
https://www.regulations.gov or upon request. After consideration of all
the comments, the proposed rules in the NPRM are adopted as amended by
this Treasury decision. The public comments and revisions are discussed
in this preamble.
Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions
1. Availability of Extension of Time To Elect Portability
Section 2010(c) of the Code allows the estate of a decedent who is
survived by a spouse to make a portability election, which generally
allows the surviving spouse to apply the decedent's deceased spousal
unused exclusion (DSUE) amount to the surviving spouse's own transfers
during life and at death. Under section 2010(c)(5)(A), a portability
election is effective only if made on an estate tax return filed by the
executor of the decedent's estate within the time prescribed by law for
filing such return. Section 20.2010-2T(a)(1) of the 2012 temporary
regulations requires every estate electing portability of a decedent's
DSUE amount to file an estate tax return within nine months of the
decedent's date of death, unless an extension of time for filing has
been granted.
A commenter requested that the final regulations address the
availability of an extension of time under Sec. Sec. 301.9100-2 and
301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to elect
portability under section 2010(c)(5)(A) of the Code. Section 301.9100-
2(b) provides an automatic six-month extension of time for making
certain statutory and regulatory elections if the return is timely
filed. Because the portability election is deemed to be made by the
timely filing of a complete and properly prepared estate tax return,
this relief provision will not be helpful with regard to the
portability election unless the return that was timely filed was not
complete or properly prepared and that insufficiency is corrected
within six months from the unextended due date of the return.
Section 301.9100-3 allows the grant of an extension of time for
making regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements for an
automatic extension of time under Sec. 301.9100-2. An extension under
Sec. 301.9100-3 to elect portability is not available to estates that
are required to file an estate tax return based on the applicable
amount in section 6018(a) because, in such a case, the due date for the
portability election is prescribed by statute and Sec. 301.9100-3
applies only to an election whose due date is prescribed by regulation.
See sections 2010(c)(5)(A), 6075(a), and 6018(a); Sec. 301.9100-1(b).
However, an extension of time under Sec. 301.9100-3 to elect
portability may be available to estates that are under the value
threshold described in section 6018 for being required to file an
estate tax return. In such a case, the due date for the portability
election is prescribed by regulation, not by statute. See Rev. Proc.
2014-18, 2014-7 IRB 513, section 2.03.
The Treasury Department and the IRS believe that clarifying the
availability of an extension of time under Sec. 301.9100-3 to elect
portability will assist taxpayers in understanding and meeting their
tax responsibilities. Accordingly, the final regulations provide that
an extension of time to elect portability will not be granted under
Sec. 301.9100-3 to any estate that is required to file an estate tax
return because the value of the gross estate equals or exceeds the
threshold amount described in section 6018, but may be granted under
the rules set forth in Sec. 301.9100-3 to estates with a gross estate
value below that threshold amount and thus not otherwise required to
file an estate tax return.
As transitional relief in the wake of TRUIRJCA and ATRA, the
Treasury Department and the IRS have published guidance regarding the
availability of an automatic extension of time for executors of certain
estates under the filing threshold of section 6018(a) to file an estate
tax return to elect portability of an unused exclusion amount. See
Notice 2012-21, 2012-10 IRB 450; Rev. Proc. 2014-18. The Treasury
Department and the IRS continue to receive, and are continuing to
consider, requests for permanent extensions of this type of relief.
However, such relief is not included in the final regulations.
[[Page 34281]]
2. Effect of Portability Election Where DSUE Amount Is Uncertain
Section 20.2010-2T(a)(2) of the 2012 temporary regulations provides
that upon the timely filing of a complete and properly prepared estate
tax return, an executor of the estate of a decedent survived by a
spouse will have elected portability of the decedent's DSUE amount,
unless the executor validly opts out of making the portability
election. The inclusion of a computation of the DSUE amount is an
essential requirement of a complete and properly prepared estate tax
return intended to make the portability election. See section
2010(c)(5)(A) and Sec. 20.2010-2T(b)(1). Section 20.2010-3T(c)
provides that the portability election applies (and generally is
available to the surviving spouse) upon the decedent's death, but, to
the extent the DSUE amount subsequently is reduced or cannot be
substantiated, the DSUE amount will not be available to the surviving
spouse.
A commenter requested that the final regulations address whether an
estate can make a ``protective'' election if a DSUE amount is not
reflected on an otherwise complete and properly prepared estate tax
return at the time of its timely filing, but subsequent adjustments to
amounts on the estate tax return would result in unused exclusion of
that decedent. The following example illustrates such a scenario. An
executor files a complete and properly prepared estate tax return that
shows a DSUE amount equal to zero at the time of the return's timely
filing and does not follow the instructions set forth in the
instructions for opting out of portability. At the same time, the
executor also files a protective claim for refund attributable to a
claim against the estate. Subsequently, the estate becomes entitled to
a deduction under section 2053 for a payment made in satisfaction of
the claim against the estate which reduces the estate tax and results
in unused exemption.
In this example, the Treasury Department and the IRS believe that
the executor has elected portability in accordance with Sec. 20.2010-
2T(a)(2) and that the recomputed DSUE amount will be available to the
decedent's surviving spouse. The final regulations clarify this
intended result by providing in Sec. 20.2010-2(b) that the computation
requirement in section 2010(c)(5)(A) will be satisfied if the estate
tax return is prepared in accordance with the requirements of Sec.
20.2010-2(a)(7). Accordingly, there is no need for a protective
election.
3. Persons Permitted To Make the Election
Several commenters requested that the final regulations allow a
surviving spouse who is not an executor as defined in section 2203 of
the Code to file an estate tax return and make the portability election
in several different circumstances. A few of the circumstances
described include those in which the spouse is given the right to file
the estate tax return in a prenuptial or marital agreement, or the
spouse has petitioned the appropriate local court for the spouse's
appointment as an executor solely for the limited purpose of filing the
estate tax return and the executor does not make the portability
election. The Treasury Department and the IRS recognize the possibility
that an executor may exercise the executor's discretion to not make the
portability election, thus causing the estate to forfeit the
opportunity to elect portability, but note that section 2010(c)(5) of
the Code permits only the executor of the decedent's estate to file the
estate tax return and make the portability election. The 2012 temporary
regulations address the circumstances in which an appointed executor or
a non-appointed executor may file the estate tax return and decide
whether or not to elect portability. The Treasury Department and the
IRS believe that any consideration of what, if any, state law action
might bring the surviving spouse within the definition of executor
under section 2203 is outside of the scope of this regulation.
Accordingly, the final regulations adopt the applicable rules in the
2012 temporary regulations without change.
4. Requirement of a ``Complete and Properly Prepared'' Estate Tax
Return
Section 20.2010-2T(a)(2) provides that the estate of a decedent
survived by a spouse makes the portability election by timely filing a
complete and properly prepared estate tax return for the decedent's
estate. Section 20.2010-2T(a)(7)(i) provides that an estate tax return
prepared in accordance with all applicable requirements is considered a
``complete and properly prepared'' estate tax return. Section 20.2010-
2T(a)(7)(ii)(A), however, provides a special rule applicable to estates
that are not otherwise required to file an estate tax return under
section 6018. For these estates, the executor does not need to report
the value of certain property that qualifies for the marital or
charitable deduction. The 2012 temporary regulations also included
exceptions to the application of the special rule by providing specific
circumstances under which the special rule will not apply.
A commenter suggested that the final regulations elaborate on the
circumstances under which a timely filed estate tax return may be
considered so deficient as to render the estate tax return incomplete
for purposes of electing portability. The Treasury Department and the
IRS acknowledge that, as with all tax returns, some errors or omissions
made with respect to an estate tax return will be considered minor and
correctible. However, the Treasury Department and the IRS consider the
issue of whether an estate tax return is complete and properly prepared
to be determined most appropriately on a case-by-case basis by applying
standards as prescribed in current law. Therefore, this suggestion has
not been adopted.
A commenter recommended that the final regulations modify the
special rule in Sec. 20.2010-2T(a)(7)(ii)(A) to narrow the exceptions
to the application of the special rule, thus allowing more estates to
avoid the expense of a potentially-complicated appraisal to value
assets includible in the gross estate. Specifically, the commenter
recommended that the special rule in Sec. 20.2010-2T(a)(7)(ii)(A)
should apply to certain property, the value of which qualifies for the
marital deduction or charitable deduction (marital deduction property
or charitable deduction property), when: (i) The marital deduction
property or charitable deduction property is a stated number of shares
of stock and a stated number of shares of the same stock are includible
in the gross estate but are not marital deduction property or
charitable deduction property; (ii) the property represents the balance
of the value of shares remaining after a non-marital or non-charitable
bequest of shares based on a specific value; and (iii) the property
represents the marital or charitable portion of a fractional division
of property, whether by bequest, spousal election, or disclaimer. In
the first two instances, the value of the marital deduction property or
charitable deduction property may be relevant to assessing the accuracy
of the valuation of the nondeductible interest and whether any
valuation premium or discount is warranted. In the last instance,
because any beneficiary's share of the estate usually can be satisfied
in a manner other than with that beneficiary's proportional share of
each individual asset, it will be necessary to know the total value in
order to verify the non-deductible portion of the estate. Therefore,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
[[Page 34282]]
continue to believe that Sec. 20.2010-2T(a)(7)(ii)(A) appropriately
excludes the described circumstances from application of the special
rule. While the final regulations do not adopt the commenter's
suggestion to narrow the exceptions to the application of the special
rule, the final regulations provide flexibility to refine the rules in
subregulatory guidance at any time in the future when the IRS may
determine that additional guidance would be appropriate with regard to
the application of the special rule to particular types of transfers.
The same commenter suggested that the exception in Sec. 20.2010-
2T(a)(7)(ii)(A)(2) is made unnecessarily broad by its reference to
``another provision of the Code.'' The commenter was concerned that,
because the fair market value of a bequeathed asset determines the
basis of that asset in the hands of the legatee, the value of all
estate assets would have an impact on section 1014, and, thus, all
assets would have to be valued. In referring to value needed to
determine an estate's eligibility under other Code sections such as
sections 2032 and 2032A, the Treasury Department and the IRS did not
intend to include a basis determination under section 1014.
Accordingly, the language of Sec. 20.2010-2T(a)(7)(ii)(A)(2) has been
clarified.
Finally, a commenter repeated a suggestion (first made in response
to a request for comments in Notice 2011-82, 2011-42 IRB 516) that the
IRS prepare a shorter version of the estate tax return to be used by
estates that are not otherwise required to file an estate tax return
but do so only to elect portability. The Treasury Department and the
IRS have reconsidered this suggestion, taking into account several
factors including: The information needed by the IRS to compute and
verify the DSUE amount; how such an abbreviated return would differ
from a return qualifying for the special rule regarding valuations
under Sec. 20.2010-2(a)(7)(ii); the past experience of the IRS
regarding the accuracy of abbreviated returns; the administrative
issues in creating and maintaining alternate return forms; and the
reasons provided by commenters. The Treasury Department and the IRS
have concluded that, on balance, a timely filed, complete, and properly
prepared estate tax return affords the most efficient and administrable
method of obtaining the information necessary to compute and verify the
DSUE amount, and the alleged benefits to taxpayers from an abbreviated
form is far outweighed by the anticipated administrative difficulties
in administering the estate tax. In addition, the ``Technical
Explanation of the Revenue Provisions Contained in the `Tax Relief,
Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010'
Scheduled for Consideration by the United States Senate,'' J. Comm. on
Tax'n, 111th Cong., JCX-55-10 (December 10, 2010), suggests that
estates electing portability that are not otherwise required to file an
estate tax return under section 6018(a) are intended to be subject to
the same filing requirements applicable to estates required to file an
estate tax return under section 6018(a). For these reasons, this
suggestion is not adopted.
5. Special Rules for Qualified Domestic Trusts
The preamble to the 2012 regulations discussed comments and
proposals the Treasury Department and the IRS had received on the
proper application of the portability rules to qualified domestic
trusts (QDOTs) created for spouses who are not U.S. citizens. The
preamble noted that each of the proposals raised issues of fairness,
complexity, and administrability.
The QDOT rules in the 2012 temporary regulations provide that the
executor of a decedent's estate claiming a marital deduction for
property passing to a QDOT shall compute the decedent's DSUE amount on
the decedent's estate tax return for the purpose of electing
portability in the same way the DSUE amount is computed for any other
decedent. However, because the estate tax payments made from the QDOT
after the decedent's death are part of the decedent's estate tax
liability, the decedent's DSUE amount must be redetermined upon the
final distribution or other taxable event on which estate tax under
section 2056A is imposed (generally, this occurs upon the termination
of all QDOTs created by or funded with assets passing from the decedent
or upon the death of the surviving spouse). See Sec. 20.2010-2T(c)(4).
The QDOT rules in the 2012 temporary regulations further provide that
the earliest date such a decedent's DSUE amount may be included in
determining the applicable exclusion amount available to the surviving
spouse or the surviving spouse's estate is the date of the event that
triggers the final estate tax liability of the decedent under section
2056A. See Sec. 20.2010-3T(c)(2). The preamble to the 2012 temporary
regulations requested further comments on the QDOT issue.
A commenter challenged this delay in the surviving spouse's ability
to use the decedent's DSUE amount if the surviving spouse becomes a
United States citizen after the decedent's estate tax return is filed
and after property passes to a QDOT for the benefit of that surviving
spouse.
Under section 2056A(b)(12), the estate tax imposed under section
2056A(b)(1) will cease to apply to property held in a QDOT if the
surviving spouse becomes a United States citizen (a fact to be
certified to the IRS under Sec. 20.2056A-10(a)(2)) and either of the
following requirements are met: (A) the spouse was a resident of the
United States at all times after the death of the decedent and before
the spouse becomes a citizen of the United States, or (B) no tax was
imposed by section 2056A(b)(1)(A) with respect to any distribution
before the spouse becomes a citizen. If the spouse becomes a U.S.
citizen, but does not satisfy either of these two requirements, section
2056A(b)(12)(C) provides that the section 2056A(b)(1) estate tax will
cease to apply to the QDOT if the spouse elects (i) to treat any
distribution on which tax was imposed by section 2056A(b)(1)(A) as a
taxable gift made by the spouse during the year in which the spouse
becomes a U.S. citizen or in any subsequent year, and thereby including
each such distribution in the spouse's own adjusted taxable gifts for
both estate and gift tax purposes, and (ii) to treat any reduction in
the tax imposed by section 2056A(b)(1)(A) by reason of the credit
allowable under section 2010 with respect to the decedent as a credit
allowable to such surviving spouse under section 2505 for purposes of
determining the amount of the credit allowable under section 2505 with
respect to taxable gifts made by the surviving spouse during the year
in which the spouse becomes a U.S. citizen or any subsequent year.
The Treasury Department and the IRS conclude that, if the surviving
spouse of the decedent becomes a citizen of the United States and the
requirements under section 2056A(b)(12) and the corresponding
regulations are satisfied so that the tax imposed by section
2056A(b)(1) no longer applies, then the decedent's DSUE amount is no
longer subject to adjustment and will become available for transfers by
the surviving spouse as of the date the surviving spouse becomes a
citizen of the United States. Accordingly, the final regulations make
clarifying changes in Sec. Sec. 20.2010-2(c)(4), 20.2010-3(c)(3), and
25.2505-2(d)(3).
A commenter also requested clarification of the rules in Sec. Sec.
20.2010-3T(b), 25.2505-2T(b) and 25.2505-2T(c) as they apply to a QDOT.
Section 25.2505-2T(b) provides that, in the case of a surviving spouse
making a gift, the surviving spouse will be considered to
[[Page 34283]]
apply any available DSUE amount to the taxable gift before the
surviving spouse's own basic exclusion amount. Sections 20.2010-3T(b)
and 25.2505-2T(c) address how to compute the DSUE amount included in
the applicable exclusion amount of a surviving spouse who previously
has applied a DSUE amount of one or more deceased spouses. These rules
are applicable to all surviving spouses but can be applied only after
the surviving spouse determines the spouse's available DSUE amount, if
any. Sections 20.2010-3T(c)(2) and 25.2505-2T(d)(2) provide rules
governing the date DSUE can be taken into consideration by the
surviving spouse or the surviving spouse's estate when property passes
from a decedent for the benefit of a surviving spouse in one or more
QDOTs and the decedent elects portability. The Treasury Department and
the IRS believe that the impact of these rules in the context of QDOTs
is sufficiently clear. Thus, the final regulations adopt these rules
without change, except that the rule in Sec. 25.2505-2T(d)(2) is now
provided in Sec. 25.2505-2(d)(3).
6. Issues Related to Examination of Returns To Determine DSUE Amount
Section 2010(c)(5)(B) grants the IRS the authority to examine
returns of each deceased spouse of the surviving spouse to determine
the DSUE amount allowed to be included in the applicable exclusion
amount of the surviving spouse, even if the period of limitations under
section 6501 has expired for assessing gift or estate tax with respect
to the returns of the deceased spouse. The Treasury Department and the
IRS received several comments and recommendations related to this
examination authority.
First, a commenter requested that the final regulations provide
that, during an examination to determine the allowable DSUE amount, the
examination authority of the IRS be limited to issues of the reporting
and valuation of assets, and not extend to other legal issues that may
impact the availability of the DSUE amount to the surviving spouse. The
Treasury Department and the IRS note that section 2010(c)(5)(B) grants
broad statutory authority to the IRS to examine the correctness of any
return, without regard to the period of limitations on assessment, ``to
make determinations with respect to [the allowable DSUE] amount for
purposes of carrying out [section 2010(c) of the Code].'' Thus, the
Treasury Department and the IRS conclude that limiting such authority
is inconsistent with the statute. Accordingly, this suggestion is not
adopted.
Second, a commenter requested confirmation that, in the examination
of a return for the purpose of determining the allowable DSUE amount
that takes place after the expiration of the period of limitations on
assessment of tax, the valuation of assets may be adjusted upward or
downward with a possible result that the allowable DSUE amount may
decrease or increase. The accurate valuation of assets reported on an
estate or gift tax return, regardless of whether the valuation is
higher or lower than the reported value, is fundamental to the
examination of such a return and fundamental to the accurate
determination of the DSUE amount available to the surviving spouse. The
Treasury Department and the IRS accordingly conclude no clarifying
change is necessary on this issue.
Third, a commenter suggested the final regulations consider
whether, in the examination of a return for the purpose of determining
the allowable DSUE amount that takes place after the expiration of the
period of limitations on assessment of tax, an adjustment to the value
of an asset reported on the return affects the basis of that asset
under section 1014. Section 1014 generally provides that the basis of
property acquired from a decedent is the fair market value of such
property on the decedent's date of death. The Treasury Department and
the IRS believe that a change to the date-of-death value of an asset
included in the estate of a decedent survived by a spouse, made
pursuant to an examination of a return of that decedent after the
expiration of the period of limitations on the assessment of tax on
that return, does not necessarily result in a change to the basis of
that asset under section 1014. Rather, the basis of property acquired
from a decedent is determined in accordance with the existing
principles of section 1014. The Treasury Department and the IRS
conclude that the scope of the examination authority granted in section
2010(c)(5)(B) is sufficiently clear and, therefore, make no change in
the final regulations.
Fourth, a commenter suggested that the final regulations clarify
the deductibility of administrative expenses associated with the
examination to determine the allowable DSUE amount. The Treasury
Department and the IRS conclude that any expenses associated with an
examination to determine the DSUE amount to be included in the
applicable exclusion amount of the surviving spouse should be treated
as any other expense associated with the preparation of the surviving
spouse's return. Thus, in the case of an examination arising with
respect to a gift tax return of the surviving spouse, such expenses are
not deductible and, in the case of an examination arising with respect
to an estate tax return of the surviving spouse, such expenses may be
deductible if such expenses meet all of the applicable requirements for
deductibility under section 2053. The Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that the standards for deducting expenses for estate and gift
tax purposes are sufficiently clear so that no change to the 2012
temporary regulations is necessary.
Finally, a commenter suggested clarifying who may participate in
the examination to determine the DSUE amount to be included in the
applicable exclusion amount of the surviving spouse. In general,
pursuant to the current rules, each taxpayer has the authority to
participate in the resolution of the issues raised in the audit of his
or her return. However, the Treasury Department and the IRS believe
addressing this issue is outside the scope of this final regulation
and, therefore, make no change in the final regulation.
7. Availability of DSUE Amount by Surviving Spouse Who Becomes a
Citizen of the United States
A commenter requested further guidance on the rules in Sec. Sec.
20.2010-3T(e) and 25.2505-2T(f), which prohibit a noncitizen,
nonresident surviving spouse, or the estate of such a surviving spouse,
from taking into account the DSUE amount of any deceased spouse except
to the extent allowed under any treaty obligation of the United States.
First, the commenter suggested the final regulations clarify the
specificity a treaty must employ in referencing portability or the DSUE
amount for the exception to apply. The Treasury Department and the IRS
consider this question regarding the interpretation of treaty language
to be outside the scope of these final regulations and, thus, decline
to make this change.
Next, the commenter requested that the final regulations allow a
surviving spouse who becomes a U.S. citizen after the death of the
deceased spouse to take into account the DSUE amount of such deceased
spouse. Because a surviving spouse who becomes a U.S. citizen is
subject to the estate and gift tax rules of chapter 11 and 12 that
apply to U.S. citizens and residents, the Treasury Department and the
IRS believe it is appropriate that such a surviving spouse be permitted
to take into account the DSUE amount available from any deceased spouse
as of the date such surviving spouse becomes a U.S. citizen,
[[Page 34284]]
provided the deceased spouse's executor has made the portability
election. Accordingly, the final regulations include such a rule in
Sec. Sec. 20.2010-3 and 25.2505-2.
8. Effect of Portability Election on Application of Rev. Proc. 2001-38
Multiple commenters have requested guidance on the application of
Rev. Proc. 2001-38, 2001-24 IRB 1335, when an estate makes a
portability election under section 2010(c)(5)(A) as well as an election
under section 2056(b)(7) to treat qualified terminable interest
property (QTIP) as passing to the surviving spouse for purposes of the
marital deduction.
Rev. Proc. 2001-38 provides a procedure by which the IRS will
disregard and treat as a nullity for Federal estate, gift, and
generation-skipping transfer tax purposes a QTIP election made under
section 2056(b)(7) in cases where the election was not necessary to
reduce the estate tax liability to zero. The commenter notes that, with
the introduction of portability of a deceased spouse's unused exclusion
amount, an executor may purposefully elect both portability and QTIP
treatment and the rationale for the rule voiding the election in Rev.
Proc. 2001-38 (that the election was of no benefit to the taxpayer) is
no longer applicable. The Treasury Department and the IRS intend to
provide guidance, by publication in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, to
clarify whether a QTIP election made under section 2056(b)(7) may be
disregarded and treated as null and void when an executor has elected
portability of the DSUE amount under section 2010(c)(5)(A).
9. Incorrect Basic Exclusion Amount in Examples
A commenter noted that Sec. Sec. 20.2010-3T and 25.2505-2T include
an incorrect basic exclusion amount for the applicable year in the
examples. The final regulations correct this mistake.
10. Order of Credits
The NPRM requested comments on, and reserved Sec. 20.2010-2(c)(3)
to provide guidance on, the impact of the credits in sections 2012
through 2015 on computing the DSUE amount. One comment was received,
and advocated for a rule in computing the DSUE amount that the
tentative tax is equal to the net estate tax after the application of
all available credits. The commenter stated that a deceased spouse's
applicable credit amount should not be applied to the extent one or
more of the estate tax credits are available to reduce the decedent's
estate tax.
The amount of the allowable credit in sections 2012 through 2015
can be determined only after subtracting from the tax imposed by
section 2001 the applicable credit amount determined under section
2010. Accordingly, to the extent the applicable credit amount is
applied to reduce the tax imposed by section 2001 to zero, the credits
in sections 2012 through 2015 are not available. The rule in section
2010(c)(4) for computing the DSUE amount does not take into account any
unused credits arising under sections 2012 through 2015. Based on these
considerations, the Treasury Department and the IRS conclude that no
adjustment to the computation of the DSUE amount to account for any
unused credits is warranted. Accordingly, Sec. 20.2010-2(c)(3) of the
final regulations clarifies that eligibility for credits against the
tax imposed by section 2001 does not factor into the computation of the
DSUE amount.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that these final regulations are not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory
flexibility assessment is not required. It also has been determined
that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 5) does not apply to these final regulations. It is hereby
certified that the collection of information contained in this
regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This certification is based on the fact that
these regulations primarily affect estates of a decedent which
generally are not small entities under the Act. Thus, we do not expect
a substantial number of small entities to be affected. Therefore, a
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 6) is not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Code, the 2012 temporary regulations, as well as the cross-referencing
notice of proposed rulemaking preceding these final regulations, were
submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on their impact on small entities, and no
comments were received.
Statement of Availability for Documents Published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin
For copies of recently issued revenue procedures, revenue rulings,
notices, and other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
or Cumulative Bulletin, please visit the IRS Web site at https://www.irs.gov.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these final regulations is Karlene Lesho,
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special
Industries). Other personnel from the IRS and the Treasury Department
participated in their development.
List of Subjects
26 CFR Part 20
Estate taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
26 CFR Part 25
Gift taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
26 CFR Part 602
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 20, 25, and 602 are amended as follows:
PART 20--ESTATE TAX; ESTATE OF DECEDENTS DYING AFTER AUGUST 16,
1954
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 20 is amended by removing
the entries for Sec. Sec. 20.2010-0T, 20.2010-1T, 20.2010-2T, and
20.2010-3T and adding entries in numerical order to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.
Section 20.2010-0 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 2010(c)(6).
Section 20.2010-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 2010(c)(6).
Section 20.2010-2 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 2010(c)(6).
Section 20.2010-3 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 2010(c)(6).
* * * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 20.2001-2 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 20.2001-2 Valuation of adjusted taxable gifts for purposes of
determining the deceased spousal unused exclusion amount of last
deceased spouse.
(a) General rule. Notwithstanding Sec. 20.2001-1(b), Sec. Sec.
20.2010-2(d) and 20.2010-3(d) provide additional rules regarding the
authority of the Internal Revenue Service to examine any gift or other
tax return(s), even if the time within which a tax may be assessed
under section 6501 has expired, for the purpose of determining the
deceased spousal unused exclusion amount available under section
2010(c) of the Internal Revenue Code.
[[Page 34285]]
(b) Effective/applicability date. Paragraph (a) of this section
applies to the estates of decedents dying on or after June 12, 2015.
See 26 CFR 20.2001-2T(a), as contained in 26 CFR part 20, revised as of
April 1, 2015, for the rules applicable to estates of decedents dying
on or after January 1, 2011, and before June 12, 2015.
Sec. 20.2001-2T [Removed]
0
Par. 3. Section 20.2001-2T is removed.
0
Par. 4. Section 20.2010-0 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 20.2010-0 Table of contents.
This section lists the table of contents for Sec. Sec. 20.2010-1
through 20.2010-3.
Sec. 20.2010-1 Unified credit against estate tax; in general.
(a) General rule.
(b) Special rule in case of certain gifts made before 1977.
(c) Credit limitation.
(d) Explanation of terms.
(1) Applicable credit amount.
(2) Applicable exclusion amount.
(3) Basic exclusion amount.
(4) Deceased spousal unused exclusion (DSUE) amount.
(5) Last deceased spouse.
(e) Effective/applicability date.
Sec. 20.2010-2 Portability provisions applicable to estate of a
decedent survived by a spouse.
(a) Election required for portability.
(1) Timely filing required.
(2) Portability election upon filing of estate tax return.
(3) Portability election not made; requirements for election not to
apply.
(4) Election irrevocable.
(5) Estates eligible to make the election.
(6) Persons permitted to make the election.
(7) Requirements of return.
(b) Requirement for DSUE computation on estate tax return.
(c) Computation of the DSUE amount.
(1) General rule.
(2) Special rule to consider gift taxes paid by decedent.
(3) Impact of applicable credits.
(4) Special rule in case of property passing to qualified domestic
trust.
(5) Examples.
(d) Authority to examine returns of decedent.
(e) Effective/applicability date.
Sec. 20.2010-3 Portability provisions applicable to the surviving
spouse's estate.
(a) Surviving spouse's estate limited to DSUE amount of last
deceased spouse.
(1) In general.
(2) No DSUE amount available from last deceased spouse.
(3) Identity of last deceased spouse unchanged by subsequent
marriage or divorce.
(b) Special rule in case of multiple deceased spouses and
previously-applied DSUE amount.
(1) In general.
(2) Example.
(c) Date DSUE amount taken into consideration by surviving spouse's
estate.
(1) General rule.
(2) Exception when surviving spouse not a U.S. citizen on date of
deceased spouse's death.
(3) Special rule when property passes to surviving spouse in a
qualified domestic trust.
(d) Authority to examine returns of deceased spouses.
(e) Availability of DSUE amount for estates of nonresidents who are
not citizens.
(f) Effective/applicability date.
Sec. 20.2010-0T [Removed]
0
Par. 5. Section 20.2010-0T is removed.
0
Par. 6. Section 20.2010-1 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 20.2010-1 Unified credit against estate tax; in general.
(a) General rule. Section 2010(a) allows the estate of every
decedent a credit against the estate tax imposed by section 2001. The
allowable credit is the applicable credit amount. See paragraph (d)(1)
of this section for an explanation of the term applicable credit
amount.
(b) Special rule in case of certain gifts made before 1977. The
applicable credit amount allowable under paragraph (a) of this section
must be reduced by an amount equal to 20 percent of the aggregate
amount allowed as a specific exemption under section 2521 (as in effect
before its repeal by the Tax Reform Act of 1976) for gifts made by the
decedent after September 8, 1976, and before January 1, 1977.
(c) Credit limitation. The applicable credit amount allowed under
paragraph (a) of this section cannot exceed the amount of the estate
tax imposed by section 2001.
(d) Explanation of terms. The explanation of terms in this section
applies to this section and to Sec. Sec. 20.2010-2 and 20.2010-3.
(1) Applicable credit amount. The term applicable credit amount
refers to the allowable credit against estate tax imposed by section
2001 and gift tax imposed by section 2501. The applicable credit amount
equals the amount of the tentative tax that would be determined under
section 2001(c) if the amount on which such tentative tax is to be
computed were equal to the applicable exclusion amount. The applicable
credit amount is determined by applying the unified rate schedule in
section 2001(c) to the applicable exclusion amount.
(2) Applicable exclusion amount. The applicable exclusion amount
equals the sum of the basic exclusion amount and, in the case of a
surviving spouse, the deceased spousal unused exclusion (DSUE) amount.
(3) Basic exclusion amount. The basic exclusion amount is the sum
of--
(i) For any decedent dying in calendar year 2011, $5,000,000; and
(ii) For any decedent dying after calendar year 2011, $5,000,000
multiplied by the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section
1(f)(3) for that calendar year by substituting ``calendar year 2010''
for ``calendar year 1992'' in section 1(f)(3)(B) and by rounding to the
nearest multiple of $10,000.
(4) Deceased spousal unused exclusion (DSUE) amount. The term DSUE
amount refers, generally, to the unused portion of a decedent's
applicable exclusion amount to the extent this amount does not exceed
the basic exclusion amount in effect in the year of the decedent's
death. For the rules on computing the DSUE amount, see Sec. Sec.
20.2010-2(c) and 20.2010-3(b).
(5) Last deceased spouse. The term last deceased spouse means the
most recently deceased individual who, at that individual's death after
December 31, 2010, was married to the surviving spouse. See Sec. Sec.
20.2010-3(a) and 25.2505-2(a) for additional rules pertaining to the
identity of the last deceased spouse for purposes of determining the
applicable exclusion amount of the surviving spouse.
(e) Effective/applicability date. This section applies to the
estates of decedents dying on or after June 12, 2015. See 26 CFR
20.2010-1T, as contained in 26 CFR part 20, revised as of April 1,
2015, for the rules applicable to estates of decedents dying on or
after January 1, 2011, and before June 12, 2015.
Sec. 20.2010-1T [Removed]
0
Par. 7. Section 20.2010-1T is removed.
0
Par. 8. Section 20.2010-2 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 20.2010-2 Portability provisions applicable to estate of a
decedent survived by a spouse.
(a) Election required for portability. To allow a decedent's
surviving spouse
[[Page 34286]]
to take into account that decedent's deceased spousal unused exclusion
(DSUE) amount, the executor of the decedent's estate must elect
portability of the DSUE amount on a timely filed Form 706, ``United
States Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return'' (estate
tax return). This election is referred to in this section and in Sec.
20.2010-3 as the portability election.
(1) Timely filing required. An estate that elects portability will
be considered, for purposes of subtitle B and subtitle F of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code), to be required to file a return under
section 6018(a). Accordingly, the due date of an estate tax return
required to elect portability is nine months after the decedent's date
of death or the last day of the period covered by an extension (if an
extension of time for filing has been obtained). See Sec. Sec.
20.6075-1 and 20.6081-1 for additional rules relating to the time for
filing estate tax returns. An extension of time to elect portability
under this paragraph (a) will not be granted under Sec. 301.9100-3 of
this chapter to an estate that is required to file an estate tax return
under section 6018(a), as determined without regard to this paragraph
(a). Such an extension, however, may be available under the procedures
applicable under Sec. Sec. 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of this chapter
to an estate that is not required to file a return under section
6018(a), as determined without regard to this paragraph (a).
(2) Portability election upon filing of estate tax return. Upon the
timely filing of a complete and properly prepared estate tax return, an
executor of an estate of a decedent survived by a spouse will have
elected portability of the decedent's DSUE amount unless the executor
chooses not to elect portability and satisfies the requirement in
paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section. See paragraph (a)(7) of this
section for the return requirements related to the portability
election.
(3) Portability election not made; requirements for election not to
apply. The executor of the estate of a decedent survived by a spouse
will not make or be considered to make the portability election if
either of the following applies:
(i) The executor states affirmatively on a timely filed estate tax
return, or in an attachment to that estate tax return, that the estate
is not electing portability under section 2010(c)(5). The manner in
which the executor may make this affirmative statement on the estate
tax return is as set forth in the instructions issued with respect to
such form (``Instructions for Form 706'').
(ii) The executor does not timely file an estate tax return in
accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
(4) Election irrevocable. An executor of the estate of a decedent
survived by a spouse who timely files an estate tax return may make or
may supersede a portability election previously made, provided that the
estate tax return reporting the election or the superseding election is
filed on or before the due date of the return, including extensions
actually granted. However, see paragraph (a)(6) of this section when
contrary elections are made by more than one person permitted to make
the election. The portability election, once made, becomes irrevocable
once the due date of the estate tax return, including extensions
actually granted, has passed.
(5) Estates eligible to make the election. An executor may elect
portability on behalf of the estate of a decedent survived by a spouse
if the decedent dies on or after January 1, 2011. However, an executor
of the estate of a nonresident decedent who was not a citizen of the
United States at the time of death may not elect portability on behalf
of that decedent, and the timely filing of such a decedent's estate tax
return will not constitute the making of a portability election.
(6) Persons permitted to make the election--(i) Appointed executor.
An executor or administrator of the estate of a decedent survived by a
spouse that is appointed, qualified, and acting within the United
States, within the meaning of section 2203 (an appointed executor), may
timely file the estate tax return on behalf of the estate of the
decedent and, in so doing, elect portability of the decedent's DSUE
amount. An appointed executor also may elect not to have portability
apply pursuant to paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
(ii) Non-appointed executor. If there is no appointed executor, any
person in actual or constructive possession of any property of the
decedent (a non-appointed executor) may timely file the estate tax
return on behalf of the estate of the decedent and, in so doing, elect
portability of the decedent's DSUE amount, or, by complying with
paragraph (a)(3) of this section, may elect not to have portability
apply. A portability election made by a non-appointed executor when
there is no appointed executor for that decedent's estate can be
superseded by a subsequent contrary election made by an appointed
executor of that same decedent's estate on an estate tax return filed
on or before the due date of the return, including extensions actually
granted. An election to allow portability made by a non-appointed
executor cannot be superseded by a contrary election to have
portability not apply made by another non-appointed executor of that
same decedent's estate (unless such other non-appointed executor is the
successor of the non-appointed executor who made the election). See
Sec. 20.6018-2 for additional rules relating to persons permitted to
file the estate tax return.
(7) Requirements of return--(i) General rule. An estate tax return
will be considered complete and properly prepared for purposes of this
section if it is prepared in accordance with the instructions issued
for the estate tax return (Instructions for Form 706) and if the
requirements of Sec. Sec. 20.6018-2, 20.6018-3, and 20.6018-4 are
satisfied. However, see paragraph (a)(7)(ii) of this section for
reduced requirements applicable to certain property of certain estates.
(ii) Reporting of value not required for certain property--(A) In
general. A special rule applies with respect to certain property of
estates in which the executor is not required to file an estate tax
return under section 6018(a), as determined without regard to paragraph
(a)(1) of this section. With respect to such an estate, for bequests,
devises, or transfers of property included in the gross estate, the
value of which is deductible under section 2056 or 2056A (marital
deduction property) or under section 2055(a) (charitable deduction
property), an executor is not required to report a value for such
property on the estate tax return (except to the extent provided in
this paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(A)) and will be required to report only the
description, ownership, and/or beneficiary of such property, along with
all other information necessary to establish the right of the estate to
the deduction in accordance with Sec. Sec. 20.2056(a)-1(b)(i) through
(iii) and 20.2055-1(c), as applicable. However, this rule does not
apply in certain circumstances as provided in this paragraph (a) and as
may be further described in guidance issued from time to time by
publication in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see Sec.
601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter). In particular, this rule does
not apply to marital deduction property or charitable deduction
property if--
(1) The value of such property relates to, affects, or is needed to
determine, the value passing from the decedent to a recipient other
than the recipient of the marital or charitable deduction property;
(2) The value of such property is needed to determine the estate's
eligibility for the provisions of sections 2032, 2032A, or another
estate or
[[Page 34287]]
generation-skipping transfer tax provision of the Code for which the
value of such property or the value of the gross estate or adjusted
gross estate must be known (not including section 1014 of the Code);
(3) Less than the entire value of an interest in property
includible in the decedent's gross estate is marital deduction property
or charitable deduction property; or
(4) A partial disclaimer or partial qualified terminable interest
property (QTIP) election is made with respect to a bequest, devise, or
transfer of property includible in the gross estate, part of which is
marital deduction property or charitable deduction property.
(B) Return requirements when reporting of value not required for
certain property. Paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(A) of this section applies only
if the executor exercises due diligence to estimate the fair market
value of the gross estate, including the property described in
paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(A) of this section. Using the executor's best
estimate of the value of properties to which paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(A) of
this section applies, the executor must report on the estate tax
return, under penalties of perjury, the amount corresponding to the
particular range within which falls the executor's best estimate of the
total gross estate, in accordance with the Instructions for Form 706.
(C) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of
paragraph (a)(7)(ii) of this section. In each example, assume that
Husband (H) dies in 2015, survived by his wife (W), that both H and W
are U.S. citizens, that H's gross estate does not exceed the excess of
the applicable exclusion amount for the year of his death over the
total amount of H's adjusted taxable gifts and any specific exemption
under section 2521, and that H's executor (E) timely files Form 706
solely to make the portability election.
Example 1. (i) Facts. The assets includible in H's gross estate
consist of a parcel of real property and bank accounts held jointly
with W with rights of survivorship, a life insurance policy payable
to W, and a survivor annuity payable to W for her life. H made no
taxable gifts during his lifetime.
(ii) Application. E files an estate tax return on which these
assets are identified on the proper schedule, but E provides no
information on the return with regard to the date of death value of
these assets in accordance with paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(A) of this
section. To establish the estate's entitlement to the marital
deduction in accordance with Sec. 20.2056(a)-1(b) (except with
regard to establishing the value of the property) and the
instructions for the estate tax return, E includes with the estate
tax return evidence to verify the title of each jointly held asset,
to confirm that W is the sole beneficiary of both the life insurance
policy and the survivor annuity, and to verify that the annuity is
exclusively for W's life. Finally, E reports on the estate return
E's best estimate, determined by exercising due diligence, of the
fair market value of the gross estate in accordance with paragraph
(a)(7)(ii)(B) of this section. The estate tax return is considered
complete and properly prepared and E has elected portability.
Example 2. (i) Facts. H's will, duly admitted to probate and
not subject to any proceeding to challenge its validity, provides
that H's entire estate is to be distributed outright to W. The non-
probate assets includible in H's gross estate consist of a life
insurance policy payable to H's children from a prior marriage, and
H's individual retirement account (IRA) payable to W. H made no
taxable gifts during his lifetime.
(ii) Application. E files an estate tax return on which all of
the assets includible in the gross estate are identified on the
proper schedule. In the case of the probate assets and the IRA, no
information is provided with regard to date of death value in
accordance with paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(A) of this section. However, E
attaches a copy of H's will and describes each such asset and its
ownership to establish the estate's entitlement to the marital
deduction in accordance with the instructions for the estate tax
return and Sec. 20.2056(a)-1(b) (except with regard to establishing
the value of the property). In the case of the life insurance policy
payable to H's children, all of the regular return requirements,
including reporting and establishing the fair market value of such
asset, apply. Finally, E reports on the estate return E's best
estimate, determined by exercising due diligence, of the fair market
value of the gross estate in accordance with paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(B)
of this section. The estate tax return is considered complete and
properly prepared and E has elected portability.
Example 3. (i) Facts. H's will, duly admitted to probate and
not subject to any proceeding to challenge its validity, provides
that 50 percent of the property passing under the terms of H's will
is to be paid to a marital trust for W and 50 percent is to be paid
to a trust for W and their descendants.
(ii) Application. The amount passing to the non-marital trust
cannot be verified without knowledge of the full value of the
property passing under the will. Therefore, the value of the
property of the marital trust relates to or affects the value
passing to the trust for W and the descendants of H and W.
Accordingly, the general return requirements apply to all of the
property includible in the gross estate and the provisions of
paragraph (a)(7)(ii) of this section do not apply.
(b) Requirement for DSUE computation on estate tax return. Section
2010(c)(5)(A) requires an executor of a decedent's estate to include a
computation of the DSUE amount on the estate tax return to elect
portability and thereby allow the decedent's surviving spouse to take
into account that decedent's DSUE amount. This requirement is satisfied
by the timely filing of a complete and properly prepared estate tax
return, as long as the executor has not elected out of portability as
described in paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section. See paragraph (a)(7)
of this section for the requirements for a return to be considered
complete and properly prepared.
(c) Computation of the DSUE amount--(1) General rule. Subject to
paragraphs (c)(2) through (4) of this section, the DSUE amount of a
decedent with a surviving spouse is the lesser of the following
amounts--
(i) The basic exclusion amount in effect in the year of the death
of the decedent; or
(ii) The excess of--
(A) The decedent's applicable exclusion amount; over
(B) The sum of the amount of the taxable estate and the amount of
the adjusted taxable gifts of the decedent, which together is the
amount on which the tentative tax on the decedent's estate is
determined under section 2001(b)(1).
(2) Special rule to consider gift taxes paid by decedent. Solely
for purposes of computing the decedent's DSUE amount, the amount of the
adjusted taxable gifts of the decedent referred to in paragraph
(c)(1)(ii)(B) of this section is reduced by the amount, if any, on
which gift taxes were paid for the calendar year of the gift(s).
(3) Impact of applicable credits. An estate's eligibility under
sections 2012 through 2015 for credits against the tax imposed by
section 2001 does not impact the computation of the DSUE amount.
(4) Special rule in case of property passing to qualified domestic
trust--(i) In general. When property passes for the benefit of a
surviving spouse in a qualified domestic trust (QDOT) as defined in
section 2056A(a), the DSUE amount of the decedent is computed on the
decedent's estate tax return for the purpose of electing portability in
the same manner as this amount is computed under paragraph (c)(1) of
this section, but this DSUE amount is subject to subsequent
adjustments. The DSUE amount of the decedent must be redetermined upon
the occurrence of the final distribution or other event (generally, the
termination of all QDOTs created by or funded with assets passing from
the decedent or the death of the surviving spouse) on which estate tax
is imposed under section 2056A. See Sec. 20.2056A-6 for the rules on
determining the estate tax under section 2056A. See Sec. 20.2010-
3(c)(3) regarding the timing of the availability of the
[[Page 34288]]
decedent's DSUE amount to the surviving spouse.
(ii) Surviving spouse becomes a U.S. citizen. If the surviving
spouse becomes a U.S. citizen and if the requirements of section
2056A(b)(12) and the corresponding regulations are satisfied, the
estate tax imposed under section 2056A(b)(1) ceases to apply.
Accordingly, no estate tax will be imposed under section 2056A either
on subsequent QDOT distributions or on the property remaining in the
QDOT on the surviving spouse's death and the decedent's DSUE amount is
no longer subject to adjustment.
(5) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of
this paragraph (c):
Example 1. Computation of DSUE amount. (i) Facts. In 2002,
having made no prior taxable gift, Husband (H) makes a taxable gift
valued at $1,000,000 and reports the gift on a timely filed gift tax
return. Because the amount of the gift is equal to the applicable
exclusion amount for that year ($1,000,000), $345,800 is allowed as
a credit against the tax, reducing the gift tax liability to zero. H
dies in 2015, survived by Wife (W). H and W are U.S. citizens and
neither has any prior marriage. H's taxable estate is $1,000,000.
The executor of H's estate timely files H's estate tax return and
elects portability, thereby allowing W to benefit from H's DSUE
amount.
(ii) Application. The executor of H's estate computes H's DSUE
amount to be $3,430,000 (the lesser of the $5,430,000 basic
exclusion amount in 2015, or the excess of H's $5,430,000 applicable
exclusion amount over the sum of the $1,000,000 taxable estate and
the $1,000,000 amount of adjusted taxable gifts).
Example 2. Computation of DSUE amount when gift tax paid. (i)
Facts. The facts are the same as in Example 1 of this paragraph
(c)(5) except that the value of H's taxable gift in 2002 is
$2,000,000. After application of the applicable credit amount, H
owes gift tax on $1,000,000, the amount of the gift in excess of the
applicable exclusion amount for that year. H pays the gift tax owed
on the 2002 transfer.
(ii) Application. On H's death, the executor of H's estate
computes the DSUE amount to be $3,430,000 (the lesser of the
$5,430,000 basic exclusion amount in 2015, or the excess of H's
$5,430,000 applicable exclusion amount over the sum of the
$1,000,000 taxable estate and $1,000,000 of adjusted taxable gifts
sheltered from tax by H's applicable credit amount). H's adjusted
taxable gifts of $2,000,000 were reduced for purposes of this
computation by $1,000,000, the amount of taxable gifts on which gift
taxes were paid.
Example 3. Computation of DSUE amount when QDOT created. (i)
Facts. Husband (H), a U.S. citizen, makes his first taxable gift in
2002, valued at $1,000,000, and reports the gift on a timely filed
gift tax return. No gift tax is due because the applicable exclusion
amount for that year ($1,000,000) equals the fair market value of
the gift. H dies in 2015 with a gross estate of $2,000,000. H's
surviving spouse (W) is a resident, but not a citizen, of the United
States and, under H's will, a pecuniary bequest of $1,500,000 passes
to a QDOT for the benefit of W. H's executor timely files an estate
tax return and makes the QDOT election for the property passing to
the QDOT, and H's estate is allowed a marital deduction of
$1,500,000 under section 2056(d) for the value of that property. H's
taxable estate is $500,000. On H's estate tax return, H's executor
computes H's preliminary DSUE amount to be $3,930,000 (the lesser of
the $5,430,000 basic exclusion amount in 2015, or the excess of H's
$5,430,000 applicable exclusion amount over the sum of the $500,000
taxable estate and the $1,000,000 adjusted taxable gifts). No
taxable events within the meaning of section 2056A occur during W's
lifetime with respect to the QDOT, and W makes no taxable gifts. At
all times since H's death, W has been a U.S. resident. In 2017, W
dies and the value of the assets of the QDOT is $1,800,000.
(ii) Application. H's DSUE amount is redetermined to be
$2,130,000 (the lesser of the $5,430,000 basic exclusion amount in
2015, or the excess of H's $5,430,000 applicable exclusion amount
over $3,300,000 (the sum of the $500,000 taxable estate augmented by
the $1,800,000 of QDOT assets and the $1,000,000 adjusted taxable
gifts)).
Example 4. Computation of DSUE amount when surviving spouse with
QDOT becomes a U.S. citizen. (i) Facts. The facts are the same as in
Example 3 of this paragraph (c)(5) except that W becomes a U.S.
citizen in 2016 and dies in 2018. The U.S. Trustee of the QDOT
notifies the IRS that W has become a U.S. citizen by timely filing a
final estate tax return (Form 706-QDT). Pursuant to section
2056A(b)(12), the estate tax under section 2056A no longer applies
to the QDOT property.
(ii) Application. Because H's DSUE amount no longer is subject
to adjustment once W becomes a citizen of the United States, H's
DSUE amount is $3,930,000, as it was preliminarily determined as of
H's death. Upon W's death in 2018, the value of the QDOT property is
includible in W's gross estate.
(d) Authority to examine returns of decedent. The IRS may examine
returns of a decedent in determining the decedent's DSUE amount,
regardless of whether the period of limitations on assessment has
expired for that return. See Sec. 20.2010-3(d) for additional rules
relating to the IRS's authority to examine returns. See also section
7602 for the IRS's authority, when ascertaining the correctness of any
return, to examine any returns that may be relevant or material to such
inquiry.
(e) Effective/applicability date. This section applies to the
estates of decedents dying on or after June 12, 2015. See 26 CFR
20.2010-2T, as contained in 26 CFR part 20, revised as of April 1,
2015, for the rule applicable to estates of decedents dying on or after
January 1, 2011, and before June 12, 2015.
Sec. 20.2010-2T [Removed]
0
Par. 9. Section 20.2010-2T is removed.
0
Par. 10. Section 20.2010-3 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 20.2010-3 Portability provisions applicable to the surviving
spouse's estate.
(a) Surviving spouse's estate limited to DSUE amount of last
deceased spouse--(1) In general. The deceased spousal unused exclusion
(DSUE) amount of a decedent, computed under Sec. 20.2010-2(c), is
included in determining the surviving spouse's applicable exclusion
amount under section 2010(c)(2), provided--
(i) Such decedent is the last deceased spouse of such surviving
spouse within the meaning of Sec. 20.2010-1(d)(5) on the date of the
death of the surviving spouse; and
(ii) The executor of the decedent's estate elected portability (see
Sec. 20.2010-2(a) and (b) for applicable requirements).
(2) No DSUE amount available from last deceased spouse. If the last
deceased spouse of such surviving spouse had no DSUE amount, or if the
executor of such a decedent's estate did not make a portability
election, the surviving spouse's estate has no DSUE amount (except as
provided in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section) to be included in
determining the applicable exclusion amount, even if the surviving
spouse previously had a DSUE amount available from another decedent
who, prior to the death of the last deceased spouse, was the last
deceased spouse of such surviving spouse. See paragraph (b) of this
section for a special rule in the case of multiple deceased spouses and
a previously applied DSUE amount.
(3) Identity of last deceased spouse unchanged by subsequent
marriage or divorce. A decedent is the last deceased spouse (as defined
in Sec. 20.2010-1(d)(5)) of a surviving spouse even if, on the date of
the death of the surviving spouse, the surviving spouse is married to
another (then-living) individual. If a surviving spouse marries again
and that marriage ends in divorce or an annulment, the subsequent death
of the divorced spouse does not end the status of the prior deceased
spouse as the last deceased spouse of the surviving spouse. The
divorced spouse, not being married to the surviving spouse at death, is
not the last deceased spouse as that term is defined in Sec. 20.2010-
1(d)(5).
(b) Special rule in case of multiple deceased spouses and
previously-applied DSUE amount--(1) In general. A special rule applies
to compute the
[[Page 34289]]
DSUE amount included in the applicable exclusion amount of a surviving
spouse who previously has applied the DSUE amount of one or more
deceased spouses to taxable gifts in accordance with Sec. 25.2505-2(b)
and (c). If a surviving spouse has applied the DSUE amount of one or
more (successive) last deceased spouses to the surviving spouse's
transfers during life, and if any of those last deceased spouses is
different from the surviving spouse's last deceased spouse as defined
in Sec. 20.2010-1(d)(5) at the time of the surviving spouse's death,
then the DSUE amount to be included in determining the applicable
exclusion amount of the surviving spouse at the time of the surviving
spouse's death is the sum of--
(i) The DSUE amount of the surviving spouse's last deceased spouse
as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; and
(ii) The DSUE amount of each other deceased spouse of the surviving
spouse, to the extent that such amount was applied to one or more
taxable gifts of the surviving spouse.
(2) Example. The following example, in which all described
individuals are U.S. citizens, illustrates the application of this
paragraph (b):
Example. (i) Facts. Husband 1 (H1) dies in 2011, survived by
Wife (W). Neither has made any taxable gifts during H1's lifetime.
H1's executor elects portability of H1's DSUE amount. The DSUE
amount of H1 as computed on the estate tax return filed on behalf of
H1's estate is $5,000,000. In 2012, W makes taxable gifts to her
children valued at $2,000,000. W reports the gifts on a timely filed
gift tax return. W is considered to have applied $2,000,000 of H1's
DSUE amount to the amount of taxable gifts, in accordance with Sec.
25.2505-2(c), and, therefore, W owes no gift tax. W has an
applicable exclusion amount remaining in the amount of $8,120,000
($3,000,000 of H1's remaining DSUE amount plus W's own $5,120,000
basic exclusion amount). W marries Husband 2 (H2) in 2013. H2 dies
in 2014. H2's executor elects portability of H2's DSUE amount, which
is properly computed on H2's estate tax return to be $2,000,000. W
dies in 2015.
(ii) Application. The DSUE amount to be included in determining
the applicable exclusion amount available to W's estate is
$4,000,000, determined by adding the $2,000,000 DSUE amount of H2
and the $2,000,000 DSUE amount of H1 that was applied by W to W's
2012 taxable gifts. The $4,000,000 DSUE amount added to W's
$5,430,000 basic exclusion amount (for 2015), causes W's applicable
exclusion amount to be $9,430,000.
(c) Date DSUE amount taken into consideration by surviving spouse's
estate--(1) General rule. A portability election made by an executor of
a decedent's estate (see Sec. 20.2010-2(a) and (b) for applicable
requirements) generally applies as of the date of the decedent's death.
Thus, such decedent's DSUE amount is included in the applicable
exclusion amount of the decedent's surviving spouse under section
2010(c)(2) and will be applicable to transfers made by the surviving
spouse after the decedent's death (subject to the limitations in
paragraph (a) of this section). However, such decedent's DSUE amount
will not be included in the applicable exclusion amount of the
surviving spouse, even if the surviving spouse had made a transfer in
reliance on the availability or computation of the decedent's DSUE
amount:
(i) If the executor of the decedent's estate supersedes the
portability election by filing a subsequent estate tax return in
accordance with Sec. 20.2010-2(a)(4);
(ii) To the extent that the DSUE amount subsequently is reduced by
a valuation adjustment or the correction of an error in calculation; or
(iii) To the extent that the surviving spouse cannot substantiate
the DSUE amount claimed on the surviving spouse's return.
(2) Exception when surviving spouse not a U.S. citizen on date of
deceased spouse's death. If a surviving spouse becomes a citizen of the
United States after the death of the surviving spouse's last deceased
spouse, the DSUE amount of the surviving spouse's last deceased spouse
becomes available to the surviving spouse on the date the surviving
spouse becomes a citizen of the United States (subject to the
limitations in paragraph (a) of this section). However, when the
special rule regarding qualified domestic trusts in paragraph (c)(3) of
this section applies, the earliest date on which a decedent's DSUE
amount may be included in the applicable exclusion amount of such
decedent's surviving spouse who becomes a U.S. citizen is as provided
in paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
(3) Special rule when property passes to surviving spouse in a
qualified domestic trust--(i) In general. When property passes from a
decedent for the benefit of the decedent's surviving spouse in one or
more qualified domestic trusts (QDOT) as defined in section 2056A(a)
and the decedent's executor elects portability, the DSUE amount
available to be included in the applicable exclusion amount of the
surviving spouse under section 2010(c)(2) is the DSUE amount of the
decedent as redetermined in accordance with Sec. 20.2010-2(c)(4)
(subject to the limitations in paragraph (a) of this section). The
earliest date on which such decedent's DSUE amount may be included in
the applicable exclusion amount of the surviving spouse under section
2010(c)(2) is the date of the occurrence of the final QDOT distribution
or final other event (generally, the termination of all QDOTs created
by or funded with assets passing from the decedent or the death of the
surviving spouse) on which tax under section 2056A is imposed. However,
the decedent's DSUE amount as redetermined in accordance with Sec.
20.2010-2(c)(4) may be applied to certain taxable gifts of the
surviving spouse. See Sec. 25.2505-2(d)(3)(i).
(ii) Surviving spouse becomes a U.S. citizen. If a surviving spouse
for whom property has passed from a decedent in one or more QDOTs
becomes a citizen of the United States and the requirements in section
2056A(b)(12) and the corresponding regulations are satisfied, then the
date on which such decedent's DSUE amount may be included in the
applicable exclusion amount of the surviving spouse under section
2010(c)(2) (subject the limitations in paragraph (a) of this section)
is the date on which the surviving spouse becomes a citizen of the
United States. See Sec. 20.2010-2(c)(4) for the rules for computing
the decedent's DSUE amount in the case of a qualified domestic trust.
(d) Authority to examine returns of deceased spouses. For the
purpose of determining the DSUE amount to be included in the applicable
exclusion amount of a surviving spouse, the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) may examine returns of each of the surviving spouse's deceased
spouses whose DSUE amount is claimed to be included in the surviving
spouse's applicable exclusion amount, regardless of whether the period
of limitations on assessment has expired for any such return. The IRS's
authority to examine returns of a deceased spouse applies with respect
to each transfer by the surviving spouse to which a DSUE amount is or
has been applied. Upon examination, the IRS may adjust or eliminate the
DSUE amount reported on such a return of a deceased spouse; however,
the IRS may assess additional tax on that return only if that tax is
assessed within the period of limitations on assessment under section
6501 applicable to the tax shown on that return. See also section 7602
for the IRS's authority, when ascertaining the correctness of any
return, to examine any returns that may be relevant or material to such
inquiry. For purposes of these examinations to determine the DSUE
amount, the surviving spouse is considered to have
[[Page 34290]]
a material interest that is affected by the return information of the
deceased spouse within the meaning of section 6103(e)(3).
(e) Availability of DSUE amount for estates of nonresidents who are
not citizens. The estate of a nonresident surviving spouse who is not a
citizen of the United States at the time of such surviving spouse's
death shall not take into account the DSUE amount of any deceased
spouse of such surviving spouse within the meaning of Sec. 20.2010-
1(d)(5) except to the extent allowed under any applicable treaty
obligation of the United States. See section 2102(b)(3).
(f) Effective/applicability date. This section applies to the
estates of decedents dying on or after June 12, 2015. See 26 CFR
20.2010-3T, as contained in 26 CFR part 20, revised as of April 1,
2015, for the rules applicable to estates of decedents dying on or
after January 1, 2011, and before June 12, 2015.
Sec. 20.2010-3T [Removed]
0
Par. 11. Section 20.2010-3T is removed.
PART 25--GIFT TAX; GIFTS MADE AFTER DECEMBER 31, 1954
0
Par. 12. The authority citation for part 25 is amended by removing the
entry for Sec. 25.2505-2T and adding an entry in numerical order to
read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.
Section 25.2505-2 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 2010(c)(6).
* * * * *
0
Par. 13. Section 25.2505-0 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 25.2505-0 Table of contents.
This section lists the table of contents for Sec. Sec. 25.2505-1
and 25.2505-2.
Sec. 25.2505-1 Unified credit against gift tax; in general.
(a) General rule.
(b) Applicable rate of tax.
(c) Special rule in case of certain gifts made before 1977.
(d) Credit limitation.
(e) Effective/applicability date.
Sec. 25.2505-2 Gifts made by a surviving spouse having a DSUE amount
available.
(a) Donor who is surviving spouse is limited to DSUE amount of last
deceased spouse.
(1) In general.
(2) No DSUE amount available from last deceased spouse.
(3) Identity of last deceased spouse unchanged by subsequent
marriage or divorce.
(b) Manner in which DSUE amount is applied.
(c) Special rule in case of multiple deceased spouses and
previously-applied DSUE amount.
(1) In general.
(2) Example.
(d) Date DSUE amount taken into consideration by donor who is a
surviving spouse.
(1) General rule.
(2) Exception when surviving spouse not a U.S. citizen on date of
deceased spouse's death.
(3) Special rule when property passes to surviving spouse in a
qualified domestic trust.
(e) Authority to examine returns of deceased spouses.
(f) Availability of DSUE amount for nonresidents who are not
citizens.
(g) Effective/applicability date.
Sec. 25.2505-0T [Removed]
0
Par. 14. Section 25.2505-0T is removed.
0
Par. 15. Section 25.2505-1 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 25.2505-1 Unified credit against gift tax; in general.
(a) General rule. Section 2505(a) allows a citizen or resident of
the United States a credit against the tax imposed by section 2501 for
each calendar year. The allowable credit is the applicable credit
amount in effect under section 2010(c) that would apply if the donor
died as of the end of the calendar year, reduced by the sum of the
amounts allowable as a credit against the gift tax due for all
preceding calendar periods. See Sec. Sec. 25.2505-2, 20.2010-1, and
20.2010-2 for additional rules and definitions related to determining
the applicable credit amount in effect under section 2010(c).
(b) Applicable rate of tax. In determining the amounts allowable as
a credit against the gift tax due for all preceding calendar periods,
the unified rate schedule under section 2001(c) in effect for such
calendar year applies instead of the rates of tax actually in effect
for preceding calendar periods. See sections 2505(a) and 2502(a)(2).
(c) Special rule in case of certain gifts made before 1977. The
applicable credit amount allowable under paragraph (a) of this section
must be reduced by an amount equal to 20 percent of the aggregate
amount allowed as a specific exemption under section 2521 (as in effect
before its repeal by the Tax Reform Act of 1976) for gifts made by the
decedent after September 8, 1976, and before January 1, 1977.
(d) Credit limitation. The applicable credit amount allowed under
paragraph (a) of this section for any calendar year shall not exceed
the amount of the tax imposed by section 2501 for such calendar year.
(e) Effective/applicability date. This section applies to gifts
made on or after June 12, 2015. See 26 CFR 25.2505-1T, as contained in
26 CFR part 25, revised as of April 1, 2015, for the rules applicable
to gifts made on or after January 1, 2011, and before June 12, 2015.
Sec. 25.2505-1T [Removed]
0
Par. 16. Section 25.2505-1T is removed.
0
Par. 17. Section 25.2505-2 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 25.2505-2 Gifts made by a surviving spouse having a DSUE amount
available.
(a) Donor who is surviving spouse is limited to DSUE amount of last
deceased spouse--(1) In general. In computing a surviving spouse's gift
tax liability with regard to a transfer subject to the tax imposed by
section 2501 (taxable gift), a deceased spousal unused exclusion (DSUE)
amount of a decedent, computed under Sec. 20.2010-2(c), is included in
determining the surviving spouse's applicable exclusion amount under
section 2010(c)(2), provided:
(i) Such decedent is the last deceased spouse of such surviving
spouse within the meaning of Sec. 20.2010-1(d)(5) at the time of the
surviving spouse's taxable gift; and
(ii) The executor of the decedent's estate elected portability (see
Sec. 20.2010-2(a) and (b) for applicable requirements).
(2) No DSUE amount available from last deceased spouse. If on the
date of the surviving spouse's taxable gift the last deceased spouse of
such surviving spouse had no DSUE amount or if the executor of the
estate of such last deceased spouse did not elect portability, the
surviving spouse has no DSUE amount (except as and to the extent
provided in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section) to be included in
determining his or her applicable exclusion amount, even if the
surviving spouse previously had a DSUE amount available from another
decedent who, prior to the death of the last deceased spouse, was the
last deceased spouse of such surviving spouse. See paragraph (c) of
this section for a special rule in the case of multiple deceased
spouses.
(3) Identity of last deceased spouse unchanged by subsequent
marriage or divorce. A decedent is the last deceased spouse (as defined
in Sec. 20.2010-1(d)(5)) of a surviving spouse even if, on the date of
the surviving spouse's taxable gift, the surviving spouse is married to
[[Page 34291]]
another (then-living) individual. If a surviving spouse marries again
and that marriage ends in divorce or an annulment, the subsequent death
of the divorced spouse does not end the status of the prior deceased
spouse as the last deceased spouse of the surviving spouse. The
divorced spouse, not being married to the surviving spouse at death, is
not the last deceased spouse as that term is defined in Sec. 20.2010-
1(d)(5).
(b) Manner in which DSUE amount is applied. If a donor who is a
surviving spouse makes a taxable gift and a DSUE amount is included in
determining the surviving spouse's applicable exclusion amount under
section 2010(c)(2), such surviving spouse will be considered to apply
such DSUE amount to the taxable gift before the surviving spouse's own
basic exclusion amount.
(c) Special rule in case of multiple deceased spouses and
previously-applied DSUE amount--(1) In general. A special rule applies
to compute the DSUE amount included in the applicable exclusion amount
of a surviving spouse who previously has applied the DSUE amount of one
or more deceased spouses. If a surviving spouse applied the DSUE amount
of one or more (successive) last deceased spouses to the surviving
spouse's previous lifetime transfers, and if any of those last deceased
spouses is different from the surviving spouse's last deceased spouse
as defined in Sec. 20.2010-1(d)(5) at the time of the current taxable
gift by the surviving spouse, then the DSUE amount to be included in
determining the applicable exclusion amount of the surviving spouse
that will be applicable at the time of the current taxable gift is the
sum of--
(i) The DSUE amount of the surviving spouse's last deceased spouse
as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; and
(ii) The DSUE amount of each other deceased spouse of the surviving
spouse to the extent that such amount was applied to one or more
previous taxable gifts of the surviving spouse.
(2) Example. The following example, in which all described
individuals are U.S. citizens, illustrates the application of this
paragraph (c):
Example. (i) Facts. Husband 1 (H1) dies in 2011, survived by
Wife (W). Neither has made any taxable gifts during H1's lifetime.
H1's executor elects portability of H1's deceased spousal unused
exclusion (DSUE) amount. The DSUE amount of H1 as computed on the
estate tax return filed on behalf of H1's estate is $5,000,000. In
2012, W makes taxable gifts to her children valued at $2,000,000. W
reports the gifts on a timely filed gift tax return. W is considered
to have applied $2,000,000 of H1's DSUE amount to the 2012 taxable
gifts, in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, and,
therefore, W owes no gift tax. W is considered to have an applicable
exclusion amount remaining in the amount of $8,120,000 ($3,000,000
of H1's remaining DSUE amount plus W's own $5,120,000 basic
exclusion amount). In 2013, W marries Husband 2 (H2). H2 dies on
June 30, 2015. H2's executor elects portability of H2's DSUE amount,
which is properly computed on H2's estate tax return to be
$2,000,000.
(ii) Application. The DSUE amount to be included in determining
the applicable exclusion amount available to W for gifts during the
second half of 2015 is $4,000,000, determined by adding the
$2,000,000 DSUE amount of H2 and the $2,000,000 DSUE amount of H1
that was applied by W to W's 2012 taxable gifts. Thus, W's
applicable exclusion amount during the balance of 2015 is $9,430,000
($4,000,000 DSUE plus $5,430,000 basic exclusion amount for 2015).
(d) Date DSUE amount taken into consideration by donor who is a
surviving spouse--(1) General rule. A portability election made by an
executor of a decedent's estate (see Sec. 20.2010-2(a) and (b) for
applicable requirements) generally applies as of the date of such
decedent's death. Thus, the decedent's DSUE amount is included in the
applicable exclusion amount of the decedent's surviving spouse under
section 2010(c)(2) and will be applicable to transfers made by the
surviving spouse after the decedent's death (subject to the limitations
in paragraph (a) of this section). However, such decedent's DSUE amount
will not be included in the applicable exclusion amount of the
surviving spouse, even if the surviving spouse had made a taxable gift
in reliance on the availability or computation of the decedent's DSUE
amount:
(i) If the executor of the decedent's estate supersedes the
portability election by filing a subsequent estate tax return in
accordance with Sec. 20.2010-2(a)(4);
(ii) To the extent that the DSUE amount subsequently is reduced by
a valuation adjustment or the correction of an error in calculation; or
(iii) To the extent that the DSUE amount claimed on the decedent's
return cannot be determined.
(2) Exception when surviving spouse not a U.S. citizen on date of
deceased spouse's death. If a surviving spouse becomes a citizen of the
United States after the death of the surviving spouse's last deceased
spouse, the DSUE amount of the surviving spouse's last deceased spouse
becomes available to the surviving spouse on the date the surviving
spouse becomes a citizen of the United States (subject to the
limitations in paragraph (a) of this section). However, when the
special rule regarding qualified domestic trusts in paragraph (d)(3) of
this section applies, the earliest date on which a decedent's DSUE
amount may be included in the applicable exclusion amount of such
decedent's surviving spouse who becomes a U.S. citizen is as provided
in paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
(3) Special rule when property passes to surviving spouse in a
qualified domestic trust--(i) In general. When property passes from a
decedent for the benefit of the decedent's surviving spouse in one or
more qualified domestic trusts (QDOT) as defined in section 2056A(a)
and the decedent's executor elects portability, the DSUE amount
available to be included in the applicable exclusion amount of the
surviving spouse under section 2010(c)(2) is the DSUE amount of the
decedent as redetermined in accordance with Sec. 20.2010-2(c)(4)
(subject to the limitations in paragraph (a) of this section). The
earliest date on which such decedent's DSUE amount may be included in
the applicable exclusion amount of the surviving spouse under section
2010(c)(2) is the date of the occurrence of the final QDOT distribution
or final other event (generally, the termination of all QDOTs created
by or funded with assets passing from the decedent or the death of the
surviving spouse) on which tax under section 2056A is imposed. However,
the decedent's DSUE amount as redetermined in accordance with Sec.
20.2010-2(c)(4) may be applied to the surviving spouse's taxable gifts
made in the year of the surviving spouse's death or, if the terminating
event occurs prior to the surviving spouse's death, then in the year of
that terminating event and/or in any subsequent year during the
surviving spouse's life.
(ii) Surviving spouse becomes a U.S. citizen. If a surviving spouse
for whom property has passed from a decedent in one or more QDOTs
becomes a citizen of the United States and the requirements in section
2056A(b)(12) and the corresponding regulations are satisfied, then the
date on which such decedent's DSUE amount may be included in the
applicable exclusion amount of the surviving spouse under section
2010(c)(2) (subject to the limitations in paragraph (a) of this
section) is the date on which the surviving spouse becomes a citizen of
the United States. See Sec. 20.2010-2(c)(4) for the rules for
computing the decedent's DSUE amount in the case of a qualified
domestic trust.
[[Page 34292]]
(iii) Example. The following example illustrates the application of
this paragraph (d)(3):
Example. (i) Facts. Husband (H), a U.S. citizen, dies in 2011
having made no taxable gifts during his lifetime. H's gross estate
is $3,000,000. H's wife (W) is not a citizen of the United States
and, under H's will, a pecuniary bequest of $2,000,000 passes to a
QDOT for the benefit of W. H's executor timely files an estate tax
return and makes the QDOT election for the property passing to the
QDOT, and H's estate is allowed a marital deduction of $2,000,000
under section 2056(d) for the value of that property. H's taxable
estate is $1,000,000. On H's estate tax return, H's executor
computes H's preliminary DSUE amount to be $4,000,000. No taxable
events within the meaning of section 2056A occur during W's lifetime
with respect to the QDOT, and W resides in the United States at all
times after H's death. W makes a taxable gift of $1,000,000 to X in
2012 and a taxable gift of $1,000,000 to Y in January 2015, in each
case from W's own assets rather than from the QDOT. W dies in
September 2015, not having married again, when the value of the
assets of the QDOT is $2,200,000.
(ii) Application. H's DSUE amount is redetermined to be
$1,800,000 (the lesser of the $5,000,000 basic exclusion amount for
2011, or the excess of H's $5,000,000 applicable exclusion amount
over $3,200,000 (the sum of the $1,000,000 taxable estate augmented
by the $2,200,000 of QDOT assets)). On W's gift tax return filed for
2012, W cannot apply any DSUE amount to the gift made to X. However,
because W's gift to Y was made in the year that W died, W's executor
will apply $1,000,000 of H's redetermined DSUE amount to the gift on
W's gift tax return filed for 2015. The remaining $800,000 of H's
redetermined DSUE amount is included in W's applicable exclusion
amount to be used in computing W's estate tax liability.
(e) Authority to examine returns of deceased spouses. For the
purpose of determining the DSUE amount to be included in the applicable
exclusion amount of a surviving spouse, the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) may examine returns of each of the surviving spouse's deceased
spouses whose DSUE amount is claimed to be included in the surviving
spouse's applicable exclusion amount, regardless of whether the period
of limitations on assessment has expired for any such return. The IRS's
authority to examine returns of a deceased spouse applies with respect
to each transfer by the surviving spouse to which a DSUE amount is or
has been applied. Upon examination, the IRS may adjust or eliminate the
DSUE amount reported on such a return of a deceased spouse; however,
the IRS may assess additional tax on that return only if that tax is
assessed within the period of limitations on assessment under section
6501 applicable to the tax shown on that return. See also section 7602
for the IRS's authority, when ascertaining the correctness of any
return, to examine any returns that may be relevant or material to such
inquiry.
(f) Availability of DSUE amount for nonresidents who are not
citizens. A nonresident surviving spouse who was not a citizen of the
United States at the time of making a transfer subject to tax under
chapter 12 of the Internal Revenue Code shall not take into account the
DSUE amount of any deceased spouse except to the extent allowed under
any applicable treaty obligation of the United States. See section
2102(b)(3).
(g) Effective/applicability date. This section applies to gifts
made on or after June 12, 2015. See 26 CFR 25.2505-2T, as contained in
26 CFR part 25, revised as of April 1, 2015, for the rules applicable
to gifts made on or after January 1, 2011, and before June 12, 2015.
Sec. 25.2505-2T [Removed]
0
Par. 18. Section 25.2505-2T is removed.
PART 602--OMB CONTROL NUMBERS UNDER THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
0
Par. 19. The authority citation for part 602 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805.
0
Par. 20. In Sec. 602.101, paragraph (b) is amended by:
0
1. Removing the entry for 20.2010-2T.
0
2. Adding in numerical order an entry for 20.2010-2.
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 602.101 OMB Control numbers.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current OMB
CFR Part or section where identified and described control No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
20.2010-2.............................................. 1545-0015
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
John M. Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: June 8, 2015.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2015-14663 Filed 6-12-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P