Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 34103-34106 [2015-14231]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 114 / Monday, June 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules
conclusively determined from that review.
For any engine replaced as specified in the
Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 Aircraft
Maintenance Manual (AMM), Task 71–00–
00–400–040–A01, ‘‘Installation of the Power
Plant with Engine Positioner TWW 75E,’’
dated May 2013: Within 6 months or 1,500
flight cycles, whichever occurs first after the
effective date of this AD, re-torque the 4 aft
mount pylon bolts using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus’ EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA).
Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD:
Additional guidance for the re-torque can be
found in Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321
AMM Temporary Revision 71–030, dated
March 14, 2014, or Airbus A318/A319/A320/
A321 AMM Task 71–00–00–400–040–A01,
‘‘Installation of the Power Plant with Engine
Positioner TWW 75E,’’ dated May 2014.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Parts Installation Limitation
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a CFM56–5 engine, on any
airplane, unless the engine is installed in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
71–1063, including Appendix 01, dated
August 13, 2014.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone: 425–227–1405; fax: 425–227–
1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
the EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If
approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014–0258, dated
November 28, 2014, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jun 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2015–1429.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 3,
2015.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–14228 Filed 6–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–1428; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–026–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
34103
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P. O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207;
phone: 206–544–5000, extension 1; fax:
206–766–5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221. It is also available
on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
1428.
Examining the AD Docket
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 777–200
and –300 series airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by reports
of fatigue cracking of a certain chord of
the pivot bulkhead. This proposed AD
would require repetitive inspections for
cracking of the left side and right side
forward outer chords of the pivot
bulkhead, and related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary. This
proposed AD provides a modification of
the pivot bulkhead, which would
terminate the repetitive inspections. We
are proposing this AD to detect and
correct fatigue cracking of the outer
flanges of the left and right side forward
outer chords of the pivot bulkhead,
which could result in a severed forward
outer chord and consequent loss of
horizontal stabilizer control.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
1428; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Narinder Luthra, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6513;
fax: 425–917–6590; email:
narinder.luthra@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2015–1428; Directorate Identifier 2015–
NM–026–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
34104
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 114 / Monday, June 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received reports of fatigue
cracking of the forward outer chord of
the STA 2370 pivot bulkhead. Cracks in
the forward outer chords of the STA
2370 pivot bulkhead that are not found
and repaired can become large and
result in a severed forward outer chord.
The cracks were caused by a stress
concentration, which is generated at the
transition radius of the forward outer
flange of the chord prior to the chord
splice at the upper longeron. Since the
horizontal stabilizer is attached to the
STA 2370 bulkhead at two pivot
locations, fatigue cracking of the outer
flanges of the left and right side forward
outer chords of the STA 2370 pivot
bulkhead, if not corrected, could result
in a severed forward outer chord and
consequent loss of horizontal stabilizer
control.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed the following Boeing
service information.
• Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777–
53A0075, dated January 14, 2015,
describes procedures for repetitive
detailed and high frequency eddy
current (HFEC) inspections for cracking
of the outer flanges of the left and right
side forward outer chords of the STA
2370 pivot bulkhead, repetitive postrepair inspections for certain airplanes,
and related investigative and corrective
actions.
• Boeing Service Bulletin 777–53–
0076, dated January 14, 2015, describes
procedures for a modification of the
STA 2370 pivot bulkhead by replacing
the left and right side forward outer
chords and upper splice angles, and
related investigative and corrective
actions.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section of
this NPRM.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of these same
type designs.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously, except as discussed under
‘‘Differences Between this Proposed AD
and the Service Information.’’ Refer to
this service information for details on
the procedures and compliance times.
The phrase ‘‘related investigative
actions’’ is used in this proposed AD.
‘‘Related investigative actions’’ are
follow-on actions that (1) are related to
the primary actions, and (2) further
investigate the nature of any condition
found. Related investigative actions in
an AD could include, for example,
inspections.
The phrase ‘‘corrective actions’’ is
used in this proposed AD. ‘‘Corrective
actions’’ are actions that correct or
address any condition found. Corrective
actions in an AD could include, for
example, repairs.
Explanation of ‘‘RC’’ Steps in Service
Information
The FAA worked in conjunction with
industry, under the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation
Rulemaking Committee (ARC), to
enhance the AD system. One
enhancement was a new process for
annotating which steps in the service
information are required for compliance
with an AD. Differentiating these steps
from other tasks in the service
information is expected to improve an
owner’s/operator’s understanding of
crucial AD requirements and help
provide consistent judgment in AD
compliance. The steps identified as RC
(required for compliance) in any service
information identified previously have a
direct effect on detecting, preventing,
resolving, or eliminating an identified
unsafe condition.
For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the following
provisions apply: (1) The steps labeled
as RC, including substeps under an RC
step and any figures identified in an RC
step, must be done to comply with the
AD, and an AMOC is required for any
deviations to RC steps, including
substeps and identified figures; and (2)
steps not labeled as RC may be deviated
from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program
without obtaining approval of an
AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified
figures, can still be done as specified,
and the airplane can be put back in an
airworthy condition.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the Service Information
The service bulletin specifies to
contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain
conditions, but this proposed AD would
require repairing those conditions in
one of the following ways:
• In accordance with a method that
we approve; or
• Using data that meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and
that have been approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) whom
we have authorized to make those
findings.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 60 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Inspections of left and right
side pivot bulkhead forward
chord.
Post-Repair Inspections ..........
Up to 15 work-hours × $85
per hour = $1,275 per inspection cycle.
Up to 11 work-hours × $85
per hour = $935 per inspection cycle.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jun 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Parts cost
Cost per product
$0
Cost on U.S. operators
Up to $76,500 per inspection
cycle.
0
Fmt 4702
Up to $1,275 per inspection
cycle.
Up to $935 per inspection
cycle.
Up to $56,100 per inspection
cycle.
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
34105
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 114 / Monday, June 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary repairs and modifications
that would be required based on the
results of the proposed inspection. We
have no way of determining the number
of aircraft that might need these actions:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Small crack repair ..........................................................
Up to 45 work-hours × $85 per hour = $3,825 per
side.
Up to 137 work-hours × $85 per hour = $11,645 ........
Modification of the STA 2370 Pivot Bulkhead (forward
outer chord replacement).
Parts cost
(1)
$34,086
Cost per product
Up to $7,650.
Up to $45,731.
1 We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide parts cost estimates for the on-condition repair specified in this proposed
AD.
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this proposed AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby
reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty
coverage for affected individuals. As a
result, we have included all costs in our
cost estimate.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jun 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2015–1428; Directorate Identifier 2015–
NM–026–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 30,
2015.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 777–200 and –300 series airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777–53A0075,
dated January 14, 2015.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of
fatigue cracking of the forward outer chord of
the station (STA) 2370 pivot bulkhead. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct
fatigue cracking of the outer flanges of the left
and right side forward outer chords of the
STA 2370 pivot bulkhead, which could result
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in a severed forward outer chord and
consequent loss of horizontal stabilizer
control.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Inspections and Corrective Actions
At the times specified in table 1 of
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 777–53A0075, dated
January 14, 2015, except as provided in
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD: Do a detailed
inspection and high frequency eddy current
(HFEC) inspections for cracking of the left
and right side forward outer chords of the
STA 2370 pivot bulkhead, and do all
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777–53A0075, dated January
14, 2015, except as provided in paragraph
(j)(2) of this AD. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before
further flight. Repeat the inspections
thereafter at the applicable intervals specified
in table 1 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777–
53A0075, dated January 14, 2015, until the
modification specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD is done.
(h) Post-Repair Inspections
For airplanes on which a repair specified
in Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777–
53A0075 has been done: At the times
specified in table 2 of paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 777–53A0075, dated January 14,
2015, do a surface HFEC inspection, an openhole HFEC inspection, and a detailed
inspection for cracking of the left side and
right side forward outer chords of the STA
2370 pivot bulkhead, and do all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions,
in accordance with Part 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777–53A0075, dated January
14, 2015, except as required by paragraph
(j)(2) of this AD. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before
further flight. Repeat the inspections
thereafter at the applicable times specified in
table 2 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777–53A0075,
dated January 14, 2015, until the
modification specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD is done.
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
34106
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 114 / Monday, June 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(i) Terminating Action
Modifying the STA 2370 pivot bulkhead by
replacing the left and right side forward outer
chords and upper splice angles, and doing all
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, terminates the repetitive
inspections required by paragraphs (g) and
(h) of this AD for the modified location only.
The modification must be done in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 777–
53–0076, dated January 14, 2015, except as
required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(j) Exceptions to Service Bulletin
Specifications
(1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
777–53A0075, dated January 14, 2015,
specifies a compliance time ‘‘after the
Original Issue date of this Service Bulletin,’’
this AD requires compliance within the
specified compliance time after the effective
date of this AD.
(2) Although Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
777–53A0075, dated January 14, 2015; and
Boeing Service Bulletin 777–530076, dated
January 14, 2015; specify to contact Boeing
for appropriate action, and Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777–53A0075, dated January
14, 2015, specifies that action as ‘‘RC’’
(Required for Compliance), this AD requires
repair before further flight using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as required by paragraph (j)(2)
of this AD: For service information that
contains steps that are labeled as Required
for Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (k)(4)(i) and (k)(4)(ii) apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. An AMOC is required
for any deviations to RC steps, including
substeps and identified figures.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Jun 12, 2015
Jkt 235001
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
prevent an ignition source in the fuel
tank vapor space, which could result in
a fuel tank explosion and consequent
loss of the airplane.
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 30, 2015.
DATES:
[Docket No. FAA–2015–1982; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–108–AD]
You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Fokker
Services B.V., Technical Services Dept.,
P.O. Box 1357, 2130 EL Hoofddorp, the
Netherlands; telephone +31 (0)88–6280–
350; fax +31 (0)88–6280–111; email
technicalservices@fokker.com; Internet
https://www.myfokkerfleet.com. You may
view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
RIN 2120–AA64
Examining the AD Docket
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker
Services B.V. Airplanes
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
1982; or in person at the Docket
Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Narinder Luthra, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6513; fax: 425–
917–6590; email: narinder.luthra@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; phone: 206–544–
5000, extension 1; fax: 206–766–5680;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 2,
2015.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–14231 Filed 6–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Fokker Services B.V. Model F.28 Mark
1000, 2000, 3000, and 4000 airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by a
design review, which revealed that no
controlled bonding provisions are
present on a number of critical locations
outside the fuel tank. This proposed AD
would require installing additional and
improved fuel system bonding
provisions, and revising the airplane
maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, by incorporating fuel
airworthiness limitation items and
critical design configuration control
limitations. We are proposing this AD to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ADDRESSES:
Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1137;
fax 425–227–1149.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 114 (Monday, June 15, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34103-34106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14231]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-1428; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-026-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 777-200 and -300 series airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by reports of fatigue cracking of a
certain chord of the pivot bulkhead. This proposed AD would require
repetitive inspections for cracking of the left side and right side
forward outer chords of the pivot bulkhead, and related investigative
and corrective actions if necessary. This proposed AD provides a
modification of the pivot bulkhead, which would terminate the
repetitive inspections. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct
fatigue cracking of the outer flanges of the left and right side
forward outer chords of the pivot bulkhead, which could result in a
severed forward outer chord and consequent loss of horizontal
stabilizer control.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.
O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; phone: 206-544-5000,
extension 1; fax: 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It
is also available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-1428.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
1428; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Narinder Luthra, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6513; fax: 425-917-6590; email: narinder.luthra@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-1428;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-026-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
[[Page 34104]]
comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by
the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We received reports of fatigue cracking of the forward outer chord
of the STA 2370 pivot bulkhead. Cracks in the forward outer chords of
the STA 2370 pivot bulkhead that are not found and repaired can become
large and result in a severed forward outer chord. The cracks were
caused by a stress concentration, which is generated at the transition
radius of the forward outer flange of the chord prior to the chord
splice at the upper longeron. Since the horizontal stabilizer is
attached to the STA 2370 bulkhead at two pivot locations, fatigue
cracking of the outer flanges of the left and right side forward outer
chords of the STA 2370 pivot bulkhead, if not corrected, could result
in a severed forward outer chord and consequent loss of horizontal
stabilizer control.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed the following Boeing service information.
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0075, dated January
14, 2015, describes procedures for repetitive detailed and high
frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections for cracking of the outer
flanges of the left and right side forward outer chords of the STA 2370
pivot bulkhead, repetitive post-repair inspections for certain
airplanes, and related investigative and corrective actions.
Boeing Service Bulletin 777-53-0076, dated January 14,
2015, describes procedures for a modification of the STA 2370 pivot
bulkhead by replacing the left and right side forward outer chords and
upper splice angles, and related investigative and corrective actions.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section of this
NPRM.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of these same type
designs.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously, except as discussed
under ``Differences Between this Proposed AD and the Service
Information.'' Refer to this service information for details on the
procedures and compliance times.
The phrase ``related investigative actions'' is used in this
proposed AD. ``Related investigative actions'' are follow-on actions
that (1) are related to the primary actions, and (2) further
investigate the nature of any condition found. Related investigative
actions in an AD could include, for example, inspections.
The phrase ``corrective actions'' is used in this proposed AD.
``Corrective actions'' are actions that correct or address any
condition found. Corrective actions in an AD could include, for
example, repairs.
Explanation of ``RC'' Steps in Service Information
The FAA worked in conjunction with industry, under the
Airworthiness Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee
(ARC), to enhance the AD system. One enhancement was a new process for
annotating which steps in the service information are required for
compliance with an AD. Differentiating these steps from other tasks in
the service information is expected to improve an owner's/operator's
understanding of crucial AD requirements and help provide consistent
judgment in AD compliance. The steps identified as RC (required for
compliance) in any service information identified previously have a
direct effect on detecting, preventing, resolving, or eliminating an
identified unsafe condition.
For service information that contains steps that are labeled as
Required for Compliance (RC), the following provisions apply: (1) The
steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step and any
figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply with the AD,
and an AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps, including
substeps and identified figures; and (2) steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the operator's
maintenance or inspection program without obtaining approval of an
AMOC, provided the RC steps, including substeps and identified figures,
can still be done as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an
airworthy condition.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information
The service bulletin specifies to contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD
would require repairing those conditions in one of the following ways:
In accordance with a method that we approve; or
Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have
authorized to make those findings.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 60 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections of left and right Up to 15 work-hours $0 Up to $1,275 per Up to $76,500 per
side pivot bulkhead forward x $85 per hour = inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
chord. $1,275 per
inspection cycle.
Post-Repair Inspections.......... Up to 11 work-hours 0 Up to $935 per Up to $56,100 per
x $85 per hour = inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
$935 per inspection
cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 34105]]
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs and
modifications that would be required based on the results of the
proposed inspection. We have no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these actions:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small crack repair................... Up to 45 work[dash]hours x (\1\) Up to $7,650.
$85 per hour = $3,825 per
side.
Modification of the STA 2370 Pivot Up to 137 work[dash]hours x $34,086 Up to $45,731.
Bulkhead (forward outer chord $85 per hour = $11,645.
replacement).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide parts cost estimates for the on-
condition repair specified in this proposed AD.
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2015-1428; Directorate Identifier
2015-NM-026-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 30, 2015.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200 and -300
series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0075, dated January 14, 2015.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of fatigue cracking of the
forward outer chord of the station (STA) 2370 pivot bulkhead. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the outer
flanges of the left and right side forward outer chords of the STA
2370 pivot bulkhead, which could result in a severed forward outer
chord and consequent loss of horizontal stabilizer control.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspections and Corrective Actions
At the times specified in table 1 of paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0075, dated
January 14, 2015, except as provided in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD:
Do a detailed inspection and high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspections for cracking of the left and right side forward outer
chords of the STA 2370 pivot bulkhead, and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
53A0075, dated January 14, 2015, except as provided in paragraph
(j)(2) of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight. Repeat the inspections
thereafter at the applicable intervals specified in table 1 of
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
777-53A0075, dated January 14, 2015, until the modification
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD is done.
(h) Post-Repair Inspections
For airplanes on which a repair specified in Part 2 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
53A0075 has been done: At the times specified in table 2 of
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
777-53A0075, dated January 14, 2015, do a surface HFEC inspection,
an open-hole HFEC inspection, and a detailed inspection for cracking
of the left side and right side forward outer chords of the STA 2370
pivot bulkhead, and do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, in accordance with Part 3 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0075, dated
January 14, 2015, except as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD.
Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions
before further flight. Repeat the inspections thereafter at the
applicable times specified in table 2 of paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0075, dated
January 14, 2015, until the modification specified in paragraph (i)
of this AD is done.
[[Page 34106]]
(i) Terminating Action
Modifying the STA 2370 pivot bulkhead by replacing the left and
right side forward outer chords and upper splice angles, and doing
all applicable related investigative and corrective actions,
terminates the repetitive inspections required by paragraphs (g) and
(h) of this AD for the modified location only. The modification must
be done in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Service Bulletin 777-53-0076, dated January 14, 2015, except as
required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD.
(j) Exceptions to Service Bulletin Specifications
(1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0075, dated
January 14, 2015, specifies a compliance time ``after the Original
Issue date of this Service Bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance
within the specified compliance time after the effective date of
this AD.
(2) Although Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0075, dated
January 14, 2015; and Boeing Service Bulletin 777-530076, dated
January 14, 2015; specify to contact Boeing for appropriate action,
and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-53A0075, dated January 14,
2015, specifies that action as ``RC'' (Required for Compliance),
this AD requires repair before further flight using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph
(k) of this AD.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD: For
service information that contains steps that are labeled as Required
for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs (k)(4)(i) and
(k)(4)(ii) apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Narinder Luthra,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle ACO,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6513;
fax: 425-917-6590; email: narinder.luthra@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; phone: 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax: 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 2, 2015.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-14231 Filed 6-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P