Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; XELJANZ, 33527-33528 [2015-14433]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 113 / Friday, June 12, 2015 / Notices
pre- or post-conception exposure of a
male to an API. Such male-mediated
developmental toxicity may result from
an effect of the API on the male germ
cell before conception or occur as a
result of direct exposure of the
conceptus to the pharmaceutical
following seminal transfer and vaginal
uptake in a pregnant partner.
This draft guidance provides
recommendations for addressing the
potential for male-mediated adverse
effects on pregnancy outcome for
sponsors developing an investigational
drug. Topics covered include: (1)
Factors that investigators should
consider when testing a new API in
males, (2) nonclinical studies relevant to
the assessment of male-mediated
developmental risks, and (3) measures
to prevent pregnancy or seminal transfer
to a pregnant sexual partner when risk
is either unknown or anticipated.
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent the current thinking of FDA
on the assessment of male-mediated
developmental risk for pharmaceuticals.
It does not establish any rights for any
person and is not binding on FDA or the
public. You can use an alternative
approach if it satisfies the requirements
of the applicable statutes and
regulations.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. The Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995
This guidance refers to previously
approved collections of information that
are subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The collections
of information in 21 CFR part 312 have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0014.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at either
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Jun 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
default.htm or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: June 8, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–14363 Filed 6–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–E–1656]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; XELJANZ
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
XELJANZ and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO),
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
petitions (two copies are required) and
written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit petitions electronically to https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
FDA–2013–S–0610.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 10001 New Hampshire
Ave., Hillandale Campus, Rm. 3180,
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–796–
7900.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–417)
and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent
Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670)
generally provide that a patent may be
extended for a period of up to 5 years
so long as the patented item (human
drug product, animal drug product,
medical device, food additive, or color
additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was
marketed. Under these acts, a product’s
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33527
regulatory review period forms the basis
for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes
effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts
with the initial submission of an
application to market the human drug
product and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the
Director of USPTO may award (for
example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the
human drug product XELJANZ
(tofacitinib citrate). XELJANZ is
indicated for the treatment of adult
patients with moderately to severely
active rheumatoid arthritis who have
had an inadequate response or
intolerance to methotrexate. Subsequent
to this approval, the USPTO received a
patent term restoration application for
XELJANZ (U.S. Patent No. RE41,783)
from Pfizer Inc., and the USPTO
requested FDA’s assistance in
determining this patent’s eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
March 26, 2014, FDA advised the
USPTO that this human drug product
had undergone a regulatory review
period and that the approval of
XELJANZ represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Thereafter, the USPTO
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
XELJANZ is 3,947 days. Of this time,
3,564 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 383 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: January
18, 2002. FDA has verified the
applicant’s claim that the date the
investigational new drug application
became effective was on January 18,
2002.
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
33528
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 113 / Friday, June 12, 2015 / Notices
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the FD&C Act: October 21,
2011. FDA has verified the applicant’s
claim that the new drug application
(NDA) for XELJANZ (NDA 203214) was
submitted on October 21, 2011.
3. The date the application was
approved: November 6, 2012. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
203214 was approved on November 6,
2012.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the USPTO applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 5 years of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) either
electronic or written comments and ask
for a redetermination by August 11,
2015. Furthermore, any interested
person may petition FDA for a
determination regarding whether the
applicant for extension acted with due
diligence during the regulatory review
period by December 9, 2015. To meet its
burden, the petition must contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA
investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1,
98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.)
Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) electronic or written
comments and written or electronic
petitions. It is only necessary to send
one set of comments. Identify comments
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. If you submit a written
petition, two copies are required. A
petition submitted electronically must
be submitted to https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FDA–
2013–S–0610. Comments and petitions
that have not been made publicly
available on https://www.regulations.gov
may be viewed in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: June 9, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–14433 Filed 6–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Jun 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–D–0928]
Recommendations for Preparation and
Submission of Animal Food Additive
Petitions; Guidance for Industry;
Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance for industry
(GFI) #221 entitled ‘‘Recommendations
for Preparation and Submission of
Animal Food Additive Petitions.’’ This
guidance describes the types of
information that FDA’s Center for
Veterinary Medicine recommends for
inclusion in food additive petitions
submitted for food additives intended
for use in food for animals. It is
intended to help the petitioner submit
this information in a consistent and
appropriate manner.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the guidance to the
Policy and Regulations Staff (HFV–6),
Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food
and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish
Pl., Rockville, MD 20855. Send one selfaddressed adhesive label to assist that
office in processing your requests. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for electronic access to the guidance
document.
Submit electronic comments on the
guidance to https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Center for Veterinary Medicine,
Division of Animal Feeds (HFV–220),
Food and Drug Administration, 7519
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240–
402–7077; AskCVM@fda.hhs.gov, in the
subject line please include ATTN:
Division of Animal Feeds.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
interested persons until November 12,
2013, to comment on the draft guidance.
In the Federal Register of December 10,
2013 (78 FR 74154), FDA published a
notice reopening the comment period
for the draft guidance giving interested
persons until January 9, 2014, to
comment on the draft guidance.
FDA received four comments on the
draft guidance and considered those
comments as we finalized the guidance.
The guidance announced in this notice
finalizes the draft guidance dated
September 2013.
II. Significance of Guidance
This level 1 guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The guidance represents the current
thinking of FDA on recommendations
for preparation and submission of
animal food additive petitions. It does
not establish any rights for any person
and is not binding on FDA or the public.
You can use an alternative approach if
it satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This guidance refers to previously
approved collections of information
found in FDA regulations. These
collections of information are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information in
21 CFR 571.1 and 571.6 have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0546.
IV. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
I. Background
V. Electronic Access
In the Federal Register of September
11, 2013 (78 FR 55727), FDA published
the notice of availability for a draft
guidance entitled ‘‘Recommendations
for Preparation and Submission of
Animal Food Additive Petitions’’ giving
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the guidance at either https://
www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/
GuidanceComplianceEnforcement/
GuidanceforIndustry/default.htm or
https://www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33527-33528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14433]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-E-1656]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; XELJANZ
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for XELJANZ and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written petitions (two copies are required) and written comments
to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA-2013-S-0610.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of
Management, Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave.,
Hillandale Campus, Rm. 3180, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-7900.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the human drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of USPTO may award
(for example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's
determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a human
drug product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the human drug product XELJANZ
(tofacitinib citrate). XELJANZ is indicated for the treatment of adult
patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who
have had an inadequate response or intolerance to methotrexate.
Subsequent to this approval, the USPTO received a patent term
restoration application for XELJANZ (U.S. Patent No. RE41,783) from
Pfizer Inc., and the USPTO requested FDA's assistance in determining
this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter
dated March 26, 2014, FDA advised the USPTO that this human drug
product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval
of XELJANZ represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Thereafter, the USPTO requested that FDA determine the
product's regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
XELJANZ is 3,947 days. Of this time, 3,564 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 383 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became
effective: January 18, 2002. FDA has verified the applicant's claim
that the date the investigational new drug application became effective
was on January 18, 2002.
[[Page 33528]]
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the FD&C Act: October
21, 2011. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the new drug
application (NDA) for XELJANZ (NDA 203214) was submitted on October 21,
2011.
3. The date the application was approved: November 6, 2012. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NDA 203214 was approved on November
6, 2012.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the USPTO
applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual
period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 5 years of patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by August 11, 2015. Furthermore, any interested person
may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant
for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review
period by December 9, 2015. To meet its burden, the petition must
contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept.
857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should
be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments and written or
electronic petitions. It is only necessary to send one set of comments.
Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. If you submit a written petition, two copies
are required. A petition submitted electronically must be submitted to
https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FDA-2013-S-0610. Comments and
petitions that have not been made publicly available on https://www.regulations.gov may be viewed in the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: June 9, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-14433 Filed 6-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P