Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Midwest Wind Energy Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan, 33537-33540 [2015-14408]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 113 / Friday, June 12, 2015 / Notices
The Service proposes to approve the
HCP and to issue an ITP with a term of
21 years to the applicant for incidental
take of the covered species caused by
covered activities associated with the
construction and operation of the
Project, if permit issuance criteria are
met.
National Environmental Policy Act
Compliance
The development of the draft HCP
and the proposed issuance of an ITP
under this plan is a Federal action that
triggers the need for compliance with
NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). We have
prepared a draft EIS to analyze the
environmental impacts of three
alternatives related to the issuance of
the ITP and implementation of the
conservation program under the
proposed HCP. The three alternatives
include the proposed action, a no-action
alternative, and a larger wind energy
generation project alternative.
The proposed action alternative is
construction and operation of the
Project, implementation of the HCP, and
issuance of the ITP.
Under the no-action alternative, the
proposed Project would not be
constructed, the proposed HCP would
not be implemented, and no ITP would
be issued.
The larger wind energy generation
project alternative would include the
construction and operation of a larger
generation facility of up to 42 MW. This
alternative would consist of up to 12
WTGs, each with a generating capacity
of up to 3.3 MW, implementation of a
HCP, and issuance of the ITP.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Public Comments
You may submit your comments and
materials by one of the methods listed
in the ADDRESSES section. We
specifically request information, views,
and opinions from the public on our
proposed Federal action, including
identification of any other aspects of the
human environment not already
identified in the draft EIS pursuant to
NEPA regulations in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at 40 CFR 1506.6.
Further, we specifically solicit
information regarding the adequacy of
the Na Pua Makani Wind Energy Project
pursuant to the requirements for ITPs at
50 CFR parts 13 and 17.
Public Availability of Comments
All comments and materials we
receive become part of the public record
associated with this action. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personally
identifiable information in your
comments, you should be aware that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Jun 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
your entire comment—including your
personally identifiable information—
may be made publicly available at any
time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personally
identifiable information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so. All submissions
from organizations or businesses, and
from individuals identifying themselves
as representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public disclosure in
their entirety. Comments and materials
we receive, as well as supporting
documentation we use in preparing the
EIS, will be available for public
inspection by appointment, during
normal business hours, at our Pacific
Islands Field Office (see ADDRESSES).
Next Steps
We will evaluate the permit
application, associated documents, and
public comments in reaching a final
decision on whether the application
meets the requirements of section 10(a)
of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The
HCP and EIS may change in response to
public comments. We will prepare
responses to public comments and
publish a notice of availability of the
final HCP and final EIS. We will also
evaluate whether the proposed permit
action would comply with section 7 of
the ESA by conducting an intra-Service
section 7 consultation. We will use the
results of this consultation, in
combination with the above findings, in
our final analysis to determine whether
or not to issue an ITP. If the
requirements are met, we will issue the
ITP to the applicant. We will issue a
record of decision and issue or deny the
ITP no sooner than 30 days after
publication of the notice of availability
of the final EIS.
Authority
We provide this notice in accordance
with the requirements of section 10(c) of
the ESA and its implementing
regulations (50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32)
and NEPA and its implementing
regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
Richard Hannan,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Region, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2015–14194 Filed 6–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33537
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R3–ES–2015–0033; FF03E00000–
FXES11120300000–156]
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for the Proposed Midwest Wind Energy
Multi-Species Habitat Conservation
Plan
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement; notice
of scoping meeting and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), advise the
public that we intend to prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS) to
evaluate the impacts of several
alternatives relating to the proposed
issuance of Endangered Species Act
(ESA) Incidental Take Permits (Permit(s)
or ITP(s)) under the Midwest Wind
Energy Multi-Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). We also
provide this notice to announce a public
scoping period.
The MSHCP is being prepared by the
Service and their planning partners for
wind energy development within an
eight-state Plan Area. The activities
covered under the MSHCP (‘‘Covered
Activities’’) include the construction,
operation, maintenance, and
decommissioning of wind energy
facilities within portions of the Plan
Area where ESA incidental take
coverage may be considered, as well as
activities associated with the
management of mitigation lands. The
planning partners have requested
incidental take coverage for eight
species in the MSHCP (‘‘Covered
Species’’), including six species that are
federally listed, one species that is not
federally listed but may become listed
during the term of the MSHCP, and the
bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus),
which is protected under the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act;
50 CFR 22.11). As allowed under the
Eagle Act, we anticipate extending Eagle
Act take authorization for bald eagle
through the section 10(a)(1)(B) permit(s)
associated with the MSHCP, provided
permittees are in full compliance with
the terms and conditions of the ITP and
Eagle Act.
DATES: The public scoping period begins
with the publication of this notice in the
Federal Register and will continue
through August 11, 2015. The Service
will consider all comments on the scope
of the EIS analysis that are received or
postmarked by this date. Comments
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
33538
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 113 / Friday, June 12, 2015 / Notices
received or postmarked after this date
will be considered to the extent
practicable. The Service will also
conduct eight scoping meetings during
the scoping period:
• July 13, 2015—Elliott Recreation
Center, 1000 E. 14th Street,
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 5 to 7 p.m.
• July 14, 2015—Warner Park
Community Center, 1625 Northpost
Drive, Madison, Wisconsin, 5 to 7 p.m.
• July 15, 2015—Iowa State
University Memorial Union, Campanile
Room, 2229 Lincoln Way, Ames, Iowa,
5 to 7 p.m.
• July 16, 2015—Battle High School,
Commons, 7575 East Street Charles
Road, Columbia, Missouri, 5 to 7 p.m.
• July 20, 2015—Letts Community
Center, 1220 West Kalamazoo Street,
Lansing, Michigan, 5 to 7 p.m.
• July 21, 2015—Columbus
Downtown High School, Commons, 364
South 4th Street, Columbus, Ohio, 5 to
7 p.m.
• July 22, 2015—World Sports Park,
Ballroom, 1313 South Post Road,
Indianapolis, Indiana, 5 to 7 p.m.
• July 23, 2015—Illinois Wesleyan
University Memorial Center, Young
Main Lounge, 104 E. University Avenue,
Bloomington, Illinois, 5 to 7 p.m.
The scoping meetings will provide the
public an opportunity to ask questions,
discuss issues with Service and State
staff regarding the EIS, and provide
written comments.
In addition, the Service will host an
online webinar on July 28, 2015 at 1:00
p.m. central time. Information on how
to participate in the webinar is provided
on the Internet at: https://
www.midwestwindenergyhcpeis.org.
To request further
information or submit written
comments, please use one of the
following methods:
• U.S. Mail: Regional Director, Attn:
Rick Amidon, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Ecological Services, 5600
American Blvd. West, Suite 990,
Bloomington, MN 55437–1458.
• Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, at https://
www.regulations.gov. In the search box
enter Docket Number FWS–R3–ES–
2015–0033.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick
Amidon, Ecological Services, at the
address shown above or at (612) 713–
5164 (telephone). If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf,
please call the Federal Information
Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We
publish this notice under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and its
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Jun 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
implementing regulations in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 40 CFR 1506.6,
and pursuant to Section 10(c) of the
ESA and Section 668a of the Eagle Act.
We intend to prepare a draft EIS to
evaluate the impacts of several
alternatives related to the potential
issuance of ITPs under the MSHCP from
Covered Activities. The permits would
authorize the incidental take of species
included in the MSHCP that could
occur as a result of existing and future
wind energy development and
operations. The planning partners
intend to request a 45-year permit term.
The primary purpose of the scoping
process is for the public and other
agencies to assist in developing the EIS
by identifying important issues and
alternatives related to the MSHCP and
the Service’s proposed action (issuance
of ITPs under the MSHCP).
Background
Section 9 of the ESA prohibits ‘‘take’’
of fish and wildlife species listed as
endangered under section 4 (16 U.S.C.
1538, 1533, respectively). The ESA
implementing regulations extend, under
certain circumstances, the prohibition of
take to threatened species (50 CFR
17.31). Under section 3 of the ESA, the
term ‘‘take’’ means to harass, harm,
pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap,
capture, or collect, or attempt to engage
in any such conduct (16 U.S.C.
1532(19)). The term ‘‘harm’’ is defined
by regulation as an act which actually
kills or injures wildlife. Such act may
include significant habitat modification
or degradation where it actually kills or
injures wildlife by significantly
impairing essential behavioral patterns,
including breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (50 CFR 17.3). The term
‘‘harass’’ is defined in the regulations as
an intentional or negligent act or
omission which creates the likelihood of
injury to wildlife by annoying it to such
an extent as to significantly disrupt
normal behavioral patterns which
include, but are not limited to, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR 17.3).
Under section 10(a) of the ESA, the
Service may issue permits to authorize
incidental take of listed fish and
wildlife species. ‘‘Incidental take’’ is
defined by the ESA as take that is
incidental to, and not the purpose of,
carrying out an otherwise lawful
activity. Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA
contains provisions for issuing ITPs to
non-Federal entities for the take of
endangered and threatened species,
provided the following criteria are met:
• The taking will be incidental;
• The applicant will, to the maximum
extent practicable, minimize and
mitigate the impact of such taking;
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• The applicant will develop a HCP
and ensure that adequate funding for the
plan will be provided;
• The taking will not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of the survival
and recovery of the species in the wild;
and
• The applicant will carry out any
other measures that the Secretary may
require as being necessary or
appropriate for the purposes of the HCP.
Regulations governing permits for
endangered and threatened species are
at 50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32.
Eagles are protected under the Eagle
Act, which prohibits take and
disturbance of individuals and nests.
‘‘Take’’ under the Eagle Act includes
any actions that pursue, shoot, shoot at,
poison, wound, kill, capture, trap,
collect, destroy, molest, and disturb
eagles. ‘‘Disturb’’ is further defined in
50 CFR 22.3 as to agitate or bother a
bald or golden eagle to a degree that
causes, or is likely to cause, based on
the best scientific information available,
(1) injury to an eagle, (2) a decrease in
its productivity, by substantially
interfering with normal breeding,
feeding, or sheltering behavior, or (3)
nest abandonment, by substantially
interfering with normal breeding,
feeding, or sheltering behavior. 50 CFR
22.11 allows Eagle Act take
authorization to be extended to
permittees authorized to take eagles by
an ITP issued pursuant to section
10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA. Take coverage for
bald eagles provided through an ITP
applies for the duration of the permit, or
until the amount or level of take
authorized has been met, provided the
permittee complies with all terms and
conditions provided in the ITP.
Proposed Plan
The MSHCP is being prepared by the
Service and their planning partners for
wind energy development within an
eight-state Plan Area. The planning
partners include the conservation
agencies for seven of the eight states
within the Plan Area, the American
Wind Energy Association, a consortium
of wind energy companies, and The
Conservation Fund. The following
summarizes information provided in the
draft MSHCP.
The MSHCP Plan Area encompasses
all lands within the political boundary
of Region 3 of the Service, which
includes eight states: Illinois, Indiana,
Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,
Ohio, and Wisconsin. The geographic
area where incidental take authorization
would be allowed under the MSHCP
(‘‘Covered Lands’’) are a subset of the
Plan Area and specifically exclude
lands that are within: (a) 20 miles of
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 113 / Friday, June 12, 2015 / Notices
sensitive bat hibernacula identified by
the Service and state wildlife agencies;
(b) 3 miles of the shores of the Great
Lakes; (c) 1 mile of the edges of rivers
supporting bird and bat migration
corridors and/or concentrations of
wintering waterfowl; (d) floodplain
areas along the Mississippi and Illinois
Rivers; (e) high bat concentration areas
in Indiana and Missouri; and (f) bird
migratory areas in Illinois and around
large lakes in Minnesota. In 2012, the
Service prepared a notice of intent to
prepare the MSHCP (77 FR 52754).
Public comment during that scoping
process informed the geographic scope
of Covered Lands included in the
MSHCP.
The MSHCP does not preclude the
development of wind energy projects
outside of Covered Lands; however,
those projects would not be eligible for
participation in the MSHCP. Mitigation
measures under the MSHCP (e.g.,
habitat protection and restoration) may
occur throughout the Plan Area, as
appropriate for the conservation of
Covered Species.
Covered Activities under the MSHCP
include actions necessary to construct,
operate, maintain and repair,
decommission and reclaim, and
repower commercial multi-turbine wind
energy projects with Covered Lands.
Covered Activities also include
management of compensatory
mitigation lands and monitoring. The
MSHCP anticipates 33,000 megawatts
(MW) of new wind energy may be
installed within the Covered Lands over
the term of the permit(s). New wind
energy development would vary by
state. The actual implemented build-out
of new wind development projects may
be less than the maximum anticipated
build-out, depending on the number
and generation capacity of wind energy
projects that are issued take
authorizations under the MSHCP. The
Plan Area also currently supports
approximately 13,681 MW of installed
wind energy. Existing commercial
multi-turbine wind facilities would be
able to ‘‘opt in’’ to the MSHCP if they
meet all of the requirements of the
MSHCP for existing facilities and
implement the required avoidance,
minimization, and mitigation measures.
Repowering of existing commercial
wind energy facilities would also be
included. There would be no limit on
the number of qualifying existing wind
energy facilities that may opt-in to the
MSHCP.
The MSHCP would cover eight
species that are subject to injury or
mortality at wind turbine facilities,
including six federally listed species
and two unlisted species. The six
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Jun 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
federally listed species covered under
the MSHCP include: Indiana bat (Myotis
sodalis), northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionalis), Kirtland’s warbler
(Dendroica kirtlandii), piping plover
(Charadrius melodius) (Great Lakes
population and northern Great Plains
population which are two distinct
population segments), and interior least
tern (Sternula antillarum athalassos).
The unlisted species included in the
MSHCP are little brown bat (Myotis
lucifugus) and bald eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus). Species may be added
or deleted as the MSHCP is developed
based on further analysis, new
information, agency consultation, and
public comment.
The proposed permit term under the
MSHCP is 45 years. During the first 15
years, proposed and existing
commercial multi-wind energy projects
may apply for and receive take
authorizations under the MSHCP. The
duration of take authorizations issued to
new projects would be 30 years from the
time project operations commence or up
to the 45 year term of the MSHCP. The
duration of take authorizations issued to
existing commercial multi-turbine wind
energy projects would extend from the
time of issuance until the project is
decommissioned and reclaimed up to a
period of 30 years.
The MSHCP would be implemented
as both a ‘‘template’’ HCP for wind
energy project proponents and a
‘‘programmatic’’ HCP implemented
through a ‘‘master permittee.’’ Under the
template HCP, the Service would
directly issue individual permits to
applicants that agree to implement the
MSHCP. Under the programmatic HCP,
the Service would issue a permit to a
master permittee, who would be
responsible for issuing certificates of
inclusion to wind energy companies
that agree to implement the MSHCP at
their facility. Issuance of certificates of
inclusion by the master permittee would
be completed in coordination with, and
with concurrence from, the Service. The
master permittee is anticipated to be
comprised of a Board with
representation from the wind energy
industry and wind energy developmentrelated conservation interests.
Environmental Impact Statement
NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) requires
that Federal agencies conduct an
environmental analysis of their
proposed actions to determine if the
actions may significantly affect the
human environment. Based on 40 CFR
1508.27 and 40 CFR 1508.2, we have
determined that the proposed MSHCP
may have significant effects on the
human environment. Therefore, before
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33539
deciding whether to issue Federal
permits under the MSHCP, we will
prepare an EIS to analyze the
environmental impacts associated with
those actions.
The EIS will consider the impacts of
the proposed action—the issuance of
section 10(a)(1)(B) permits under the
ESA on the human environment. The
EIS will also include analysis of a
reasonable range of alternatives to the
proposed action. Alternatives
considered in the EIS may include, but
are not limited to, variations in the
permit term or permit structure; the No
Surprises timeframe allowed under the
ITPs; the level of take allowed; the level,
location, or type of conservation,
monitoring, or mitigation provided in
the MSHCP; the scope of Covered
Activities; the list of Covered Species; or
a combination of these factors.
Additionally, a No Action Alternative
will be included. Under the No Action
Alternative, the Service would not issue
ITPs, and wind energy developers
would be obligated to prepare an
independent Section 10(a)(1)(B)
application and/or eagle permit
application; avoid incidental take of
federally-listed species and bald eagle;
or be subject to enforcement action by
the Service.
The EIS will identify and describe
direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts
on biological resources, land use, air
quality, water quality, water resources,
socioeconomics, climate, and other
environmental resources that could
occur with the implementation of the
proposed action and alternatives. The
Service will also identify measures,
consistent with NEPA and other
relevant considerations of national
policy, to avoid or minimize any
significant effects of the proposed action
on the quality of the human
environment. Following completion of
the environmental review, the Service
will publish a notice of availability and
a request for comment on a draft EIS,
which will include a draft of the
proposed MSHCP.
Request for Information
We request data, comments, new
information, or suggestions from the
public, other concerned governmental
agencies, the scientific community,
Tribes, industry, or any other interested
party on this notice. We will consider
these comments in developing the draft
EIS. We seek specific comments on:
1. Biological information and relevant
data concerning Covered Species;
2. Additional information concerning
the range, distribution, population size,
and population trends of Covered
Species;
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
33540
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 113 / Friday, June 12, 2015 / Notices
3. Direct, indirect, and cumulative
impacts that implementation of the
proposed Covered Activities could have
on endangered, threatened, and other
Covered Species, and their communities
or habitats;
4. Other possible alternatives to the
proposed action that the Service should
consider;
5. Other current or planned activities
in the subject area and their possible
impacts on Covered Species;
6. The presence of archaeological
sites, buildings and structures, historic
events, sacred and traditional areas, and
other historic preservation concerns,
which are required to be considered in
project planning by the National
Historic Preservation Act; and
7. Identification of any other
environmental issues that should be
considered with regard to the proposed
MSHCP and permit action.
Public Availability of Comments
You may submit your comments and
materials by one of the methods listed
above in the ADDRESSES section. Before
including your address, phone number,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—might be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Comments and materials we receive,
as well as supporting documentation we
use in preparing the EIS, will be
available for public inspection by
appointment, during normal business
hours, at the Services Midwest Regional
Office in Bloomington, Minnesota. (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section). You may obtain copies of this
notice on the Internet at: https://
www.midwestwindenergyhcpeis.org, or
from the Midwest Regional Office (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
section).
Scoping Meetings
See DATES for the date/s and time/s of
our public scoping meetings. The
primary purpose of these meetings and
public comment period is to provide the
public with a general understanding of
the background of the proposed action
and to solicit suggestions and
information on the scope of issues and
alternatives we should consider when
drafting the EIS. Written comments will
be accepted at the meetings. Comments
can also be submitted by methods listed
in the ADDRESSES section. Once the draft
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Jun 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
EIS and proposed MSHCP are complete
and made available for review, there
will be additional opportunity for
public comment on the content of those
documents.
Persons needing reasonable
accommodations in order to attend and
participate in the public meetings
should contact the Midwest Region
using one of the methods listed above in
ADDRESSES as soon as possible. In order
to allow sufficient time to process
requests, please make contact no later
than one week before the public
meeting. Information regarding this
proposed action is available in
alternative formats upon request.
Authority
We provide this notice under section
10 of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
section 668a of the Eagle Act (16 U.S.C.
668a–668d), and per NEPA regulations
(40 CFR 1501.7, 40 CFR 1506.5 and
1508.22).
Dated: May 29, 2015.
Lynn Lewis,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological
Services, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2015–14408 Filed 6–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R3–ES–2013–N194;
FXHC11300300000–156–FF03E00000]
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Damage Assessment and Restoration
Plan and Environmental Assessment
for Enbridge Line 6B Oil Discharges
Near Marshall, MI
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for public comments.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of the
Interior (DOI), acting through the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS); the
Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the
Potawatomi Tribe; and the Match-E-BeNash-She-Wish Band of the
Pottawatomi Indians have written a
Draft Damage Assessment and
Restoration Plan and Environmental
Assessment (Draft Plan), which
describes proposed alternatives for
restoring injured natural resources and
compensating for losses resulting from
the discharges of oil from Enbridge’s
Line 6B oil pipeline near Marshall,
Michigan, in July 2010. The Draft Plan
was prepared in accordance with the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) and the
National Environmental Policy Act
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(NEPA). The purpose of this notice is to
inform the public of the availability of
the Draft Plan and to seek written
comments.
Written comments must be
postmarked no later than July 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Obtaining Documents: You
may obtain copies of the documents by
any of the following methods:
• Online: https://www.fws.gov/
midwest/es/ec/nrda/MichiganEnbridge/
index.html.
• Email: Lisa L. Williams, at lisa_
williams@fws.gov. Do not use any
special characters or forms of
encryption in your email.
• In-person: U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 2651 Coolidge Road, Suite 101,
East Lansing, MI 48848.
• U.S. mail: Lisa L. Williams,
Contaminants Specialist, at the Coolidge
Road address above.
Submitting Comments: You may
submit comments to Lisa L. Williams at
the Coolidge Road address above or via
email at kzoorivernrda@fws.gov with
‘‘Enbridge NRDA Comment’’ in the
subject line
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Technical Information: Lisa Williams,
(517) 351–8324.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOI,
acting through FWS; the Nottawaseppi
Huron Band of the Potawatomi Tribe;
and the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish
Band of the Pottawatomi Indians have
written a Draft Damage Assessment and
Restoration Plan and Environmental
Assessment (Draft Plan), which
describes proposed alternatives for
restoring injured natural resources and
compensating for losses resulting from
the discharges of oil from Enbridge’s
Line 6B oil pipeline near Marshall,
Michigan, which occurred July 25–26,
2010. The Draft Plan was prepared in
accordance with the Oil Pollution Act of
1990 (OPA) and the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). DOI
and the two tribes prepared this Draft
Plan in cooperation with our coTrustees: The Department of Commerce
(DOC), acting through the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), and the State
of Michigan, acting through the
Michigan Department of Environmental
Quality (MDEQ), the Michigan
Department of Natural Resources
(MDNR), and the Michigan Department
of Attorney General (MDAG). The
purpose of this notice is to inform the
public of the availability of the Draft
Plan and to seek written comments.
This notice is provided pursuant to
Natural Resource Damage Assessment
and Restoration (NRDAR) regulations
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\12JNN1.SGM
12JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33537-33540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14408]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R3-ES-2015-0033; FF03E00000-FXES11120300000-156]
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Midwest
Wind Energy Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement;
notice of scoping meeting and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), advise the
public that we intend to prepare an environmental impact statement
(EIS) to evaluate the impacts of several alternatives relating to the
proposed issuance of Endangered Species Act (ESA) Incidental Take
Permits (Permit(s) or ITP(s)) under the Midwest Wind Energy Multi-
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). We also provide this notice
to announce a public scoping period.
The MSHCP is being prepared by the Service and their planning
partners for wind energy development within an eight-state Plan Area.
The activities covered under the MSHCP (``Covered Activities'') include
the construction, operation, maintenance, and decommissioning of wind
energy facilities within portions of the Plan Area where ESA incidental
take coverage may be considered, as well as activities associated with
the management of mitigation lands. The planning partners have
requested incidental take coverage for eight species in the MSHCP
(``Covered Species''), including six species that are federally listed,
one species that is not federally listed but may become listed during
the term of the MSHCP, and the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus),
which is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
(Eagle Act; 50 CFR 22.11). As allowed under the Eagle Act, we
anticipate extending Eagle Act take authorization for bald eagle
through the section 10(a)(1)(B) permit(s) associated with the MSHCP,
provided permittees are in full compliance with the terms and
conditions of the ITP and Eagle Act.
DATES: The public scoping period begins with the publication of this
notice in the Federal Register and will continue through August 11,
2015. The Service will consider all comments on the scope of the EIS
analysis that are received or postmarked by this date. Comments
[[Page 33538]]
received or postmarked after this date will be considered to the extent
practicable. The Service will also conduct eight scoping meetings
during the scoping period:
July 13, 2015--Elliott Recreation Center, 1000 E. 14th
Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 5 to 7 p.m.
July 14, 2015--Warner Park Community Center, 1625
Northpost Drive, Madison, Wisconsin, 5 to 7 p.m.
July 15, 2015--Iowa State University Memorial Union,
Campanile Room, 2229 Lincoln Way, Ames, Iowa, 5 to 7 p.m.
July 16, 2015--Battle High School, Commons, 7575 East
Street Charles Road, Columbia, Missouri, 5 to 7 p.m.
July 20, 2015--Letts Community Center, 1220 West Kalamazoo
Street, Lansing, Michigan, 5 to 7 p.m.
July 21, 2015--Columbus Downtown High School, Commons, 364
South 4th Street, Columbus, Ohio, 5 to 7 p.m.
July 22, 2015--World Sports Park, Ballroom, 1313 South
Post Road, Indianapolis, Indiana, 5 to 7 p.m.
July 23, 2015--Illinois Wesleyan University Memorial
Center, Young Main Lounge, 104 E. University Avenue, Bloomington,
Illinois, 5 to 7 p.m.
The scoping meetings will provide the public an opportunity to ask
questions, discuss issues with Service and State staff regarding the
EIS, and provide written comments.
In addition, the Service will host an online webinar on July 28,
2015 at 1:00 p.m. central time. Information on how to participate in
the webinar is provided on the Internet at: https://www.midwestwindenergyhcpeis.org.
ADDRESSES: To request further information or submit written comments,
please use one of the following methods:
U.S. Mail: Regional Director, Attn: Rick Amidon, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services, 5600 American Blvd. West,
Suite 990, Bloomington, MN 55437-1458.
Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, at
https://www.regulations.gov. In the search box enter Docket Number FWS-
R3-ES-2015-0033.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Amidon, Ecological Services, at
the address shown above or at (612) 713-5164 (telephone). If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf, please call the Federal
Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We publish this notice under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
and its implementing regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations at
40 CFR 1506.6, and pursuant to Section 10(c) of the ESA and Section
668a of the Eagle Act. We intend to prepare a draft EIS to evaluate the
impacts of several alternatives related to the potential issuance of
ITPs under the MSHCP from Covered Activities. The permits would
authorize the incidental take of species included in the MSHCP that
could occur as a result of existing and future wind energy development
and operations. The planning partners intend to request a 45-year
permit term.
The primary purpose of the scoping process is for the public and
other agencies to assist in developing the EIS by identifying important
issues and alternatives related to the MSHCP and the Service's proposed
action (issuance of ITPs under the MSHCP).
Background
Section 9 of the ESA prohibits ``take'' of fish and wildlife
species listed as endangered under section 4 (16 U.S.C. 1538, 1533,
respectively). The ESA implementing regulations extend, under certain
circumstances, the prohibition of take to threatened species (50 CFR
17.31). Under section 3 of the ESA, the term ``take'' means to harass,
harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or
attempt to engage in any such conduct (16 U.S.C. 1532(19)). The term
``harm'' is defined by regulation as an act which actually kills or
injures wildlife. Such act may include significant habitat modification
or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by
significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including
breeding, feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR 17.3). The term ``harass'' is
defined in the regulations as an intentional or negligent act or
omission which creates the likelihood of injury to wildlife by annoying
it to such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavioral
patterns which include, but are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (50 CFR 17.3).
Under section 10(a) of the ESA, the Service may issue permits to
authorize incidental take of listed fish and wildlife species.
``Incidental take'' is defined by the ESA as take that is incidental
to, and not the purpose of, carrying out an otherwise lawful activity.
Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA contains provisions for issuing ITPs to
non-Federal entities for the take of endangered and threatened species,
provided the following criteria are met:
The taking will be incidental;
The applicant will, to the maximum extent practicable,
minimize and mitigate the impact of such taking;
The applicant will develop a HCP and ensure that adequate
funding for the plan will be provided;
The taking will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of
the survival and recovery of the species in the wild; and
The applicant will carry out any other measures that the
Secretary may require as being necessary or appropriate for the
purposes of the HCP.
Regulations governing permits for endangered and threatened species
are at 50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32.
Eagles are protected under the Eagle Act, which prohibits take and
disturbance of individuals and nests. ``Take'' under the Eagle Act
includes any actions that pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill,
capture, trap, collect, destroy, molest, and disturb eagles.
``Disturb'' is further defined in 50 CFR 22.3 as to agitate or bother a
bald or golden eagle to a degree that causes, or is likely to cause,
based on the best scientific information available, (1) injury to an
eagle, (2) a decrease in its productivity, by substantially interfering
with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering behavior, or (3) nest
abandonment, by substantially interfering with normal breeding,
feeding, or sheltering behavior. 50 CFR 22.11 allows Eagle Act take
authorization to be extended to permittees authorized to take eagles by
an ITP issued pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA. Take coverage
for bald eagles provided through an ITP applies for the duration of the
permit, or until the amount or level of take authorized has been met,
provided the permittee complies with all terms and conditions provided
in the ITP.
Proposed Plan
The MSHCP is being prepared by the Service and their planning
partners for wind energy development within an eight-state Plan Area.
The planning partners include the conservation agencies for seven of
the eight states within the Plan Area, the American Wind Energy
Association, a consortium of wind energy companies, and The
Conservation Fund. The following summarizes information provided in the
draft MSHCP.
The MSHCP Plan Area encompasses all lands within the political
boundary of Region 3 of the Service, which includes eight states:
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and
Wisconsin. The geographic area where incidental take authorization
would be allowed under the MSHCP (``Covered Lands'') are a subset of
the Plan Area and specifically exclude lands that are within: (a) 20
miles of
[[Page 33539]]
sensitive bat hibernacula identified by the Service and state wildlife
agencies; (b) 3 miles of the shores of the Great Lakes; (c) 1 mile of
the edges of rivers supporting bird and bat migration corridors and/or
concentrations of wintering waterfowl; (d) floodplain areas along the
Mississippi and Illinois Rivers; (e) high bat concentration areas in
Indiana and Missouri; and (f) bird migratory areas in Illinois and
around large lakes in Minnesota. In 2012, the Service prepared a notice
of intent to prepare the MSHCP (77 FR 52754). Public comment during
that scoping process informed the geographic scope of Covered Lands
included in the MSHCP.
The MSHCP does not preclude the development of wind energy projects
outside of Covered Lands; however, those projects would not be eligible
for participation in the MSHCP. Mitigation measures under the MSHCP
(e.g., habitat protection and restoration) may occur throughout the
Plan Area, as appropriate for the conservation of Covered Species.
Covered Activities under the MSHCP include actions necessary to
construct, operate, maintain and repair, decommission and reclaim, and
repower commercial multi-turbine wind energy projects with Covered
Lands. Covered Activities also include management of compensatory
mitigation lands and monitoring. The MSHCP anticipates 33,000 megawatts
(MW) of new wind energy may be installed within the Covered Lands over
the term of the permit(s). New wind energy development would vary by
state. The actual implemented build-out of new wind development
projects may be less than the maximum anticipated build-out, depending
on the number and generation capacity of wind energy projects that are
issued take authorizations under the MSHCP. The Plan Area also
currently supports approximately 13,681 MW of installed wind energy.
Existing commercial multi-turbine wind facilities would be able to
``opt in'' to the MSHCP if they meet all of the requirements of the
MSHCP for existing facilities and implement the required avoidance,
minimization, and mitigation measures. Repowering of existing
commercial wind energy facilities would also be included. There would
be no limit on the number of qualifying existing wind energy facilities
that may opt-in to the MSHCP.
The MSHCP would cover eight species that are subject to injury or
mortality at wind turbine facilities, including six federally listed
species and two unlisted species. The six federally listed species
covered under the MSHCP include: Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis), northern
long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), Kirtland's warbler (Dendroica
kirtlandii), piping plover (Charadrius melodius) (Great Lakes
population and northern Great Plains population which are two distinct
population segments), and interior least tern (Sternula antillarum
athalassos). The unlisted species included in the MSHCP are little
brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) and bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus).
Species may be added or deleted as the MSHCP is developed based on
further analysis, new information, agency consultation, and public
comment.
The proposed permit term under the MSHCP is 45 years. During the
first 15 years, proposed and existing commercial multi-wind energy
projects may apply for and receive take authorizations under the MSHCP.
The duration of take authorizations issued to new projects would be 30
years from the time project operations commence or up to the 45 year
term of the MSHCP. The duration of take authorizations issued to
existing commercial multi-turbine wind energy projects would extend
from the time of issuance until the project is decommissioned and
reclaimed up to a period of 30 years.
The MSHCP would be implemented as both a ``template'' HCP for wind
energy project proponents and a ``programmatic'' HCP implemented
through a ``master permittee.'' Under the template HCP, the Service
would directly issue individual permits to applicants that agree to
implement the MSHCP. Under the programmatic HCP, the Service would
issue a permit to a master permittee, who would be responsible for
issuing certificates of inclusion to wind energy companies that agree
to implement the MSHCP at their facility. Issuance of certificates of
inclusion by the master permittee would be completed in coordination
with, and with concurrence from, the Service. The master permittee is
anticipated to be comprised of a Board with representation from the
wind energy industry and wind energy development-related conservation
interests.
Environmental Impact Statement
NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) requires that Federal agencies
conduct an environmental analysis of their proposed actions to
determine if the actions may significantly affect the human
environment. Based on 40 CFR 1508.27 and 40 CFR 1508.2, we have
determined that the proposed MSHCP may have significant effects on the
human environment. Therefore, before deciding whether to issue Federal
permits under the MSHCP, we will prepare an EIS to analyze the
environmental impacts associated with those actions.
The EIS will consider the impacts of the proposed action--the
issuance of section 10(a)(1)(B) permits under the ESA on the human
environment. The EIS will also include analysis of a reasonable range
of alternatives to the proposed action. Alternatives considered in the
EIS may include, but are not limited to, variations in the permit term
or permit structure; the No Surprises timeframe allowed under the ITPs;
the level of take allowed; the level, location, or type of
conservation, monitoring, or mitigation provided in the MSHCP; the
scope of Covered Activities; the list of Covered Species; or a
combination of these factors. Additionally, a No Action Alternative
will be included. Under the No Action Alternative, the Service would
not issue ITPs, and wind energy developers would be obligated to
prepare an independent Section 10(a)(1)(B) application and/or eagle
permit application; avoid incidental take of federally-listed species
and bald eagle; or be subject to enforcement action by the Service.
The EIS will identify and describe direct, indirect, and cumulative
impacts on biological resources, land use, air quality, water quality,
water resources, socioeconomics, climate, and other environmental
resources that could occur with the implementation of the proposed
action and alternatives. The Service will also identify measures,
consistent with NEPA and other relevant considerations of national
policy, to avoid or minimize any significant effects of the proposed
action on the quality of the human environment. Following completion of
the environmental review, the Service will publish a notice of
availability and a request for comment on a draft EIS, which will
include a draft of the proposed MSHCP.
Request for Information
We request data, comments, new information, or suggestions from the
public, other concerned governmental agencies, the scientific
community, Tribes, industry, or any other interested party on this
notice. We will consider these comments in developing the draft EIS. We
seek specific comments on:
1. Biological information and relevant data concerning Covered
Species;
2. Additional information concerning the range, distribution,
population size, and population trends of Covered Species;
[[Page 33540]]
3. Direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts that implementation of
the proposed Covered Activities could have on endangered, threatened,
and other Covered Species, and their communities or habitats;
4. Other possible alternatives to the proposed action that the
Service should consider;
5. Other current or planned activities in the subject area and
their possible impacts on Covered Species;
6. The presence of archaeological sites, buildings and structures,
historic events, sacred and traditional areas, and other historic
preservation concerns, which are required to be considered in project
planning by the National Historic Preservation Act; and
7. Identification of any other environmental issues that should be
considered with regard to the proposed MSHCP and permit action.
Public Availability of Comments
You may submit your comments and materials by one of the methods
listed above in the ADDRESSES section. Before including your address,
phone number, or other personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including your
personal identifying information--might be made publicly available at
any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your
personal identifying information from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Comments and materials we receive, as well as supporting
documentation we use in preparing the EIS, will be available for public
inspection by appointment, during normal business hours, at the
Services Midwest Regional Office in Bloomington, Minnesota. (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section). You may obtain copies of this
notice on the Internet at: https://www.midwestwindenergyhcpeis.org, or
from the Midwest Regional Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section).
Scoping Meetings
See DATES for the date/s and time/s of our public scoping meetings.
The primary purpose of these meetings and public comment period is to
provide the public with a general understanding of the background of
the proposed action and to solicit suggestions and information on the
scope of issues and alternatives we should consider when drafting the
EIS. Written comments will be accepted at the meetings. Comments can
also be submitted by methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. Once the
draft EIS and proposed MSHCP are complete and made available for
review, there will be additional opportunity for public comment on the
content of those documents.
Persons needing reasonable accommodations in order to attend and
participate in the public meetings should contact the Midwest Region
using one of the methods listed above in ADDRESSES as soon as possible.
In order to allow sufficient time to process requests, please make
contact no later than one week before the public meeting. Information
regarding this proposed action is available in alternative formats upon
request.
Authority
We provide this notice under section 10 of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.), section 668a of the Eagle Act (16 U.S.C. 668a-668d), and per
NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1501.7, 40 CFR 1506.5 and 1508.22).
Dated: May 29, 2015.
Lynn Lewis,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2015-14408 Filed 6-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P