Aggregation of Basis for Partnership Distributions Involving Equity Interests of a Partner, 33452-33456 [2015-14404]
Download as PDF
33452
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 113 / Friday, June 12, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–149518–
03), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC, or sent electronically,
via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–
149518–03).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Kevin I. Babitz, (202) 317–6852;
concerning submission of comments or
to request a public hearing,
Oluwafunmilayo Taylor at (202) 317–
6901.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Explanation of
Provisions
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563. Therefore, a regulatory
assessment is not required. These
proposed regulations do not impose a
collection of information on small
entities. Further, pursuant to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6), it is hereby certified that
these proposed regulations would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This certification is based on the fact
that these proposed regulations would
primarily affect sophisticated ownership
structures with interlocking ownership
of corporations, partnerships and
corporate stock. Additionally, these
proposed regulations contain a number
of de minimis provisions that render the
regulations inapplicable to most small
businesses. Accordingly, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code, these
regulations have been submitted to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business.
17:51 Jun 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to comments
that are submitted timely to the IRS as
prescribed in this preamble under the
ADDRESSES heading. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request
comments on all aspects of the proposed
rules. All comments will be available at
www.regulations.gov or upon request. A
public hearing will be scheduled if
requested in writing by any person that
timely submits written or electronic
comments. If a public hearing is
scheduled, notice of the date, time, and
place for the public hearing will be
published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
Temporary regulations in the Rules
and Regulations section of this issue of
the Federal Register amend the Income
Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 1) relating
to section 337(d). The temporary
regulations set forth rules for applying
section 337(d) to partnerships and S
corporations. The text of the temporary
regulations also serves as the text of
these proposed regulations. The
preamble to the temporary regulations
explains the temporary regulations and
these proposed regulations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing
The principal authors of these
regulations are Joseph R. Worst and
Kevin I. Babitz, Office of the Associate
Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and
Special Industries). However, other
personnel from the IRS and the Treasury
Department participated in their
development.
Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
Accordingly, under the authority of
26 U.S.C. 7805, the notice of proposed
rulemaking (PS–91–90; REG–208989–
90) that was published in the Federal
Register on December 15, 1992 (57 FR
59324), is withdrawn.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendment to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART I—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 is amended by adding an entry
in numerical order to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.337(d)–3 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 337(d). * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.337(d)–3 is added to
read as follows:
■
§ 1.337(d)–3 Gain recognition upon certain
partnership transactions involving a
partner’s stock.
[The text of proposed § 1.337(d)–3 is
the same as the text of § 1.337(d)–3T(a)
through (i) published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register].
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Par. 3. Section 1.732–1 is amended by
revising paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(5)(ii)
to read as follows:
■
§ 1.732–1 Basis of distributed property
other than money.
*
*
*
*
*
(c)(1) [The text of proposed § 1.732–
1(c)(1) is the same as the text of § 1.732–
1T(c)(1) published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register].
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(ii) [The text of proposed § 1.732–
1(c)(5)(ii) is the same as the text of
§ 1.732–1T(c)(5)(ii) published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register].
*
*
*
*
*
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2015–14403 Filed 6–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–138759–14]
RIN 1545–BM48
Aggregation of Basis for Partnership
Distributions Involving Equity Interests
of a Partner
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations that would allow
consolidated group members that are
partners in the same partnership to
aggregate their bases in stock distributed
by the partnership for the purpose of
limiting the application of rules that
might otherwise cause basis reduction
or gain recognition. The proposed
regulations would also require certain
corporations that engage in gain
elimination transactions to reduce the
basis of corporate assets or to recognize
gain. The proposed regulations affect
partnerships and their partners.
DATES: Comments and requests for a
public hearing must be received by
September 10, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–138759–14), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–138759–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 113 / Friday, June 12, 2015 / Proposed Rules
14), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC, or sent electronically,
via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–
138759–14).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Kevin I. Babitz, (202) 317–6852;
concerning submission of comments or
to request a public hearing,
Oluwafunmilayo Taylor at (202) 317–
6901.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Section 337(d) and the Repeal of the
General Utilities Doctrine
In General Utilities & Operating Co. v.
Helvering, 296 U.S. 200 (1935), the
Supreme Court held that corporations
generally could distribute appreciated
property to their shareholders without
the recognition of any corporate level
gain (the General Utilities doctrine).
Beginning in 1969 and ending with the
Tax Reform Act of 1986, Public Law 99–
514, 100 Stat. 2085, (the Act), Congress
enacted a series of statutory changes
that limited and ultimately repealed the
General Utilities doctrine. Under current
law, sections 311(b) and 336(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code) require a
corporation that distributes appreciated
property to its shareholders to recognize
gain determined as if the property were
sold to the shareholders for its fair
market value. Additionally, section 631
of the Act added section 337(d) to the
Code to permit the Secretary to
prescribe regulations that are necessary
or appropriate to carry out the purposes
of the General Utilities repeal,
‘‘including regulations to ensure that
[the repeal of the General Utilities
doctrine] may not be circumvented
through the use of any provision of law
or regulations.’’
2. Section 732(f)
Section 538 of the Ticket to Work and
Work Incentives Improvement Act of
1999, Public Law 106–170, 113 Stat.
1860, (the Ticket to Work Act), enacted
section 732(f) on December 17, 1999.
Section 732(f) provides that if: (1) A
corporate partner receives a distribution
from a partnership of stock in another
corporation (distributed corporation),
(2) the corporate partner has control of
the distributed corporation (ownership
of stock meeting the requirements of
section 1504(a)(2)) immediately after the
distribution or at any time thereafter
(the ‘‘control requirement’’), and (3) the
partnership’s basis in the stock
immediately before the distribution
exceeded the corporate partner’s basis
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Jun 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
in the stock immediately after the
distribution, then the basis of the
distributed corporation’s property must
be reduced by this excess. The amount
of this reduction is limited to the
amount by which the sum of the
aggregate adjusted basis of property and
the amount of money of the distributed
corporation exceeds the corporate
partner’s adjusted basis in the stock of
the distributed corporation. The
corporate partner must recognize gain to
the extent that the basis of the
distributed corporation’s property
cannot be reduced.
Congress enacted section 732(f) due to
concerns that a corporate partner could
otherwise negate the effects of a basis
step-down to distributed property
required under section 732(b) by
applying the step-down against the basis
of distributed stock of a corporation
(distributed corporation). The Senate
Finance Committee stated that:
The Committee is concerned that the
downward adjustment to the basis of
property distributed by a partnership may be
nullified if the distributed property is
corporate stock. The distributed corporation
can be liquidated by the corporate partner, so
that the stock basis adjustment has no effect.
Similarly, if the corporations file a
consolidated return, their taxable income
may be computed without reference to the
downward adjustment to the basis of the
stock. These results can occur either if the
partnership has contributed property to the
distributed corporation, or if the property
was held by the corporation before the
distribution. Therefore, the provision
requires a basis reduction to the property of
the distributed corporation.
S. Rep. No. 106–201, 106th Cong., 1st
Sess. 50 (1999).
For example, assume a corporate
partner has a partnership interest with
zero basis and receives a partnership
distribution of high-basis stock in a
corporation. The corporate partner’s
basis in the distributed corporation’s
stock is reduced to zero under section
732(a) or section 732(b). If the
partnership has elected under section
754, then the basis of other partnership
property is increased by an equal
amount under section 734(b). The
effects of the section 732 basis decrease
and the section 734(b) basis increase
generally offset each other. However, if
the corporate partner owned stock in the
distributed corporation that satisfied the
control requirement, the corporate
partner could liquidate the distributed
corporation under section 332, and
section 334(b) would generally provide
for a carryover basis in the distributed
corporation’s property received by the
corporate partner in the liquidation.
Taken together, these rules could permit
the partnership to increase the basis of
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33453
its retained property without an
equivalent basis reduction following the
liquidation of the distributed
corporation. Section 732(f) generally
precludes this result by requiring that
either the distributed corporation must
reduce the basis of its property or the
corporate partner must recognize gain
(to the extent the distributed
corporation is unable to reduce the basis
of its property). Thus, section 732(f)
generally ensures that any basis increase
under section 734(b) is ultimately offset.
Section 732(f) applies if the corporate
partner either has control of the
distributed corporation following the
distribution or if the corporate partner
subsequently acquires control of the
distributed corporation at any time
thereafter. Section 732(f) does not apply
if the corporate partner does not have
control of the distributed corporation
immediately following the distribution
and the corporate partner establishes to
the satisfaction of the Secretary that the
distribution was not part of a plan or
arrangement to acquire control of the
distributed corporation.
In its discussion of the control
requirement of section 732(f)(1)(B), the
Conference Report to the Ticket to Work
Act explains that ‘‘[t]his provision also
calls for regulations, including
regulations to avoid double counting
and to prevent the abuse of the purposes
of this provision.’’ H.R. Conf. Rep. No.
106–478, 106th Cong., 1st Sess. 174
(1999). This grant of regulatory
authority is codified at section 732(f)(8),
which provides that ‘‘[t]he Secretary
shall prescribe such regulations as may
be necessary to carry out the purposes
of this subsection, including regulations
to avoid double counting and to prevent
the abuse of such purposes.’’
Simultaneous with this notice of
proposed rulemaking, the Treasury
Department and the IRS are issuing final
and temporary regulations under section
337(d) (§ 1.337(d)–3T) that prevent a
corporate partner from using a
partnership to avoid corporate-level
gain required to be recognized under
section 311(b) or section 336(a)
following the repeal of the General
Utilities doctrine. Those final and
temporary regulations address
partnership acquisitions, ownership,
and distributions of stock and other
equity interests in a corporate partner.
Sections 732(f) and 337(d) share a
common purpose of preserving
corporate-level gains. Given this shared
purpose, these proposed regulations are
issued under the combined authority of
sections 337(d) and 732(f).
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
33454
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 113 / Friday, June 12, 2015 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Explanation of Provisions
As described in this preamble,
Congress provided the Treasury
Department and the IRS with a broad
grant of statutory authority to carry out
the purposes of sections 337(d) and
732(f). The Treasury Department and
the IRS believe that as currently
applied, section 732(f) may be too broad
in some circumstances and too narrow
in others. Specifically, section 732(f)
may require basis reduction or gain
recognition even though that basis
reduction or gain recognition does not
further the purposes of section 732(f). In
other circumstances, corporate partners
may inappropriately avoid the purposes
of section 732(f) by engaging in
transactions that allow corporate
partners to receive property held by a
distributed corporation without
reducing the basis of that property to
account for basis reductions under
section 732(b) made when the
partnership distributed stock of the
distributed corporation to the corporate
partner. These proposed regulations add
rules to conform the application of
section 732(f) with Congress’s identified
purposes for enacting sections 337(d)
and 732(f) in these situations.
1. Aggregation of Section 732(b) Basis
Adjustments
Section 732(f) generally applies on a
partner-by-partner basis. However, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that in certain circumstances, it
is appropriate to aggregate the bases of
consolidated group members in a
partnership for purposes of applying
section 732(f). For example, basis
aggregation may be appropriate when
two or more corporate partners in the
same consolidated group (memberpartners) receive a deemed distribution
of stock in a distributed corporation
either because (a) the partnership elects
to be treated as an association taxable as
a corporation under § 301.7701–3 or (b)
one corporate partner acquires all of the
interests in the partnership causing the
partnership to liquidate. In these
instances, section 732(b) may cause one
member-partner to increase the basis of
distributed stock while another
member-partner reduces the basis of
distributed stock by an equivalent
amount. Under current law, section
732(f) may require the member-partner
whose basis is reduced to recognize gain
or to reduce the basis of the distributed
corporation’s property, with no
offsetting loss or increase to the basis of
the distributed corporation’s property
with respect to the member-partner
whose basis is increased. The Treasury
Department and the IRS do not believe
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Jun 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
that prohibiting member-partners from
consolidating their bases in a
partnership for purposes of applying
section 732(f) in these situations
furthers Congress’s intent to sustain the
effect of the basis reduction to
distributed property.
These proposed regulations provide
for the aggregation of basis within the
same consolidated group (as defined in
§ 1.1502–1(h)), for purposes of section
732(f), when two conditions are met.
First, two or more of the corporate
partners receive a distribution of stock
in a distributed corporation. Second, the
distributed corporation is or becomes a
member of the distributee partners’
consolidated group following the
distribution.
Under this rule, section 732(f) only
applies to the extent that the
partnership’s adjusted basis in the
distributed stock immediately before the
distribution exceeds the aggregate basis
of the distributed stock in the hands of
all members of the distributee corporate
partner’s consolidated group
immediately after the distribution. The
requirement that the distributed
corporation be a member of the
consolidated group is intended to avoid
unintended consequences that could
result if that corporation was a
controlled foreign corporation.
However, the Treasury Department and
the IRS request comments on whether
this proposed rule should apply more
broadly.
2. Gain Elimination Transactions
As described in the Background
section of this Preamble, Congress
enacted section 732(f) to address
concerns that a corporate partner could
otherwise negate the effects of a basis
step-down to distributed property
required under section 732(b) by
applying the step-down against stock of
a distributed corporation. Congress
indicated that it intended for the control
requirement to apply expansively by
requiring corporate partners to apply
section 732(f) whenever the corporate
partner acquires control (as defined in
section 732(f)(5)) of the distributed
corporation as part of a plan or
arrangement. The formalistic definition
of control, however, fails to anticipate
other scenarios in which a corporate
partner’s acquisition of the property of
a distributed corporation has the same
effect. To address these scenarios,
Congress granted the Secretary authority
to promulgate regulations necessary to
carry out the purposes of section 732(f).
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are concerned that some corporate
partners might eliminate gain in the
stock of a distributed corporation while
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
avoiding the effects of a basis step-down
in transactions in which the corporate
partner’s ownership of the distributed
corporation does not satisfy the control
requirement. For example, a distributed
corporation not controlled by a
corporate partner might subsequently
merge into the corporate partner in a
reorganization under section 368(a) in
which gain is not recognized as part of
a plan or arrangement. In this situation,
the gain inherent in the stock of the
distributed corporation is eliminated,
but the basis of the distributed
corporation’s property is not reduced. If
section 732(f) does not apply to this
transaction, then the basis step-down is
negated, contravening the purposes of
section 732(f) and General Utilities
repeal.
Accordingly, these proposed
regulations provide that, in the event of
a gain elimination transaction, section
732(f) shall apply as though the
corporate partner acquired control (as
defined in section 732(f)(5)) of the
distributed corporation immediately
before the gain elimination transaction.
The proposed regulations define
several terms for purposes of applying
this rule. The term ‘‘Corporate Partner’’
means a person that is classified as a
corporation for federal income tax
purposes and that holds or acquires an
interest in a partnership. The term
‘‘Stock’’ includes other equity interests,
including options, warrants and similar
interests. The term ‘‘Distributed Stock’’
means Stock distributed by a
partnership to a Corporate Partner, or
Stock the basis of which is determined
by reference to the basis of such Stock.
Distributed Stock also includes Stock
owned directly or indirectly by a
Distributed Corporation if the basis of
such Stock has been reduced pursuant
to section 732(f)(7). The term
‘‘Distributed Corporation’’ means the
issuer of Distributed Stock (or, in the
case of an option, the issuer of the Stock
into which the option is exercisable).
The term ‘‘Gain Elimination
Transaction’’ means a transaction in
which Distributed Stock is disposed of
and less than all of the gain is
recognized, unless (1) the transferor of
the Distributed Stock receives in
exchange Stock or a partnership interest
that is exchanged basis property (as
defined in section 7701(a)(44)) with
respect to the Distributed Stock, or (2)
a transferee corporation holds the
Distributed Stock as transferred basis
property (as defined in section
7701(a)(43)) with respect to a transferor
corporation’s gain. Examples of Gain
Elimination Transactions include
(without limitation) a reorganization
under section 368(a) in which the
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 113 / Friday, June 12, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Corporate Partner and the Distributed
Corporation combine, and a distribution
of the Distributed Stock by the
Corporate Partner to which section
355(c)(1) or 361(c)(1) applies.
3. Tiered Partnerships
The IRS and the Treasury Department
are concerned that taxpayers could use
tiered partnerships to circumvent these
regulations and section 732(f) generally.
Congress specified in the Conference
Report to the Ticket to Work Act that
taxpayers should not be permitted to
avoid the purposes of section 732(f)
through the use of tiered partnerships.
H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 106–478, 106th
Cong., 1st Sess. 174 (1999). Therefore,
these regulations require taxpayers to
apply these regulations to tiered
partnerships in a manner consistent
with the purpose of section 732(f).
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Effective/Applicability Date
The rules governing aggregation of
basis apply to distributions occurring on
or after the date these regulations are
published as final regulations in the
Federal Register. The rules governing
gain elimination transactions apply to
transactions occurring on or after the
date these regulations are published as
final regulations in the Federal Register.
The rules governing tiered partnerships
apply to distributions and transactions
occurring on or after the date these
regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register. No
inference is expressed or implied with
respect to distributions or transactions
occurring before the date these
regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563. Therefore, a regulatory
assessment is not required. These
proposed regulations do not impose a
collection of information on small
entities. Further, pursuant to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6), it is hereby certified that
these proposed regulations would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This certification is based on the fact
that these proposed regulations would
primarily affect sophisticated ownership
structures with interlocking ownership
of corporations, partnerships and
corporate stock. Accordingly, a
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of
the Code, these regulations have been
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Jun 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
comments that are submitted timely to
the IRS as prescribed in this preamble
under the ADDRESSES heading. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on all aspects of the
proposed rules. All comments will be
available at www.regulations.gov or
upon request. A public hearing will be
scheduled if requested in writing by any
person that timely submits written or
electronic comments. If a public hearing
is scheduled, notice of the date, time,
and place for the public hearing will be
published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these
regulations are Kevin I. Babitz and
Joseph R. Worst, Office of the Associate
Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and
Special Industries). However, other
personnel from the Treasury
Department and the IRS participated in
their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendment to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART I—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.732–3 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 337(d), 732(f), and 1502. * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.732–3 is revised to
read as follows:
■
§ 1.732–3 Corresponding adjustment to
basis of assets of a distributed corporation
controlled by a corporate partner.
(a) Determination of control. The
determination of whether a corporate
partner that is a member of a
consolidated group has control of a
distributed corporation for purposes of
section 732(f) shall be made by applying
the special aggregate stock ownership
rules of § 1.1502–34.
(b) Aggregation of basis within
consolidated group. With respect to
distributed stock of a corporation, if the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33455
following two conditions are met, then
section 732(f) shall apply only to the
extent that the partnership’s adjusted
basis in the distributed stock
immediately before the distribution
exceeds the aggregate basis of the
distributed stock of the corporation in
the hands of corporate partners that are
members of the same consolidated
group (as defined in § 1.1502–1(h))
immediately after the distribution:
(1) Two or more of the corporate
partners receive a distribution of stock
in another corporation; and
(2) The corporation, the stock of
which was distributed by the
partnership, is or becomes a member of
the distributee partners’ consolidated
group following the distribution.
(c) Application of section 732(f) to
Gain Elimination Transactions—(1)
General rule. In the event of a Gain
Elimination Transaction, section 732(f)
shall apply as though the Corporate
Partner acquired control (as defined in
section 732(f)(5)) of the Distributed
Corporation immediately before the
Gain Elimination Transaction.
(2) Definitions. The following
definitions apply for purposes of this
paragraph (c):
(i) Corporate Partner. The term
Corporate Partner means a person that is
classified a corporation for federal
income tax purposes and that holds or
acquires an interest in a partnership.
(ii) Stock. The term Stock includes
other equity interests, including
options, warrants and similar interests.
(iii) Distributed Stock. The term
Distributed Stock means Stock
distributed by a partnership to a
Corporate Partner, or Stock the basis of
which is determined by reference to the
basis of such Stock. Distributed Stock
also includes Stock owned directly or
indirectly by a Distributed Corporation
if the basis of such Stock has been
reduced pursuant to section 732(f).
(iv) Distributed Corporation. The term
Distributed Corporation means the
issuer of Distributed Stock (or, in the
case of an option, the issuer of the Stock
into which the option is exercisable).
(v) Gain Elimination Transaction. The
term Gain Elimination Transaction
means a transaction in which
Distributed Stock is disposed of and less
than all of the gain is recognized
unless—
(A) The transferor of the Distributed
Stock receives in exchange Stock or a
partnership interest that is exchanged
basis property (as defined in section
7701(a)(44)) with respect to the
Distributed Stock, or
(B) A transferee corporation holds the
Distributed Stock as transferred basis
property (as defined in section
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
33456
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 113 / Friday, June 12, 2015 / Proposed Rules
7701(a)(43)) with respect to the
transferor corporation’s gain. A Gain
Elimination Transaction includes
(without limitation) a reorganization
under section 368(a) in which the
Corporate Partner and the Distributed
Corporation combine, and a distribution
of the Distributed Stock by the
Corporate Partner to which section
355(c)(1) or 361(c)(1) applies.
(d) Tiered partnerships. The rules of
this section shall apply to tiered
partnerships in a manner that is
consistent with the purposes of section
732(f).
(e) Effective/applicability date. The
rules governing aggregation of basis in
paragraph (b) of these regulations apply
to distributions occurring on or after the
date these regulations are published as
final regulations in the Federal Register.
The rules governing gain elimination
transactions in paragraph (c) of this
section apply to transactions occurring
on or after the date these regulations are
published as final regulations in the
Federal Register. The rules governing
tiered partnerships in paragraph (d) of
this section apply to distributions and
transactions occurring on or after the
date these regulations are published as
final regulations in the Federal Register.
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2015–14404 Filed 6–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 917
[SATS No. KY–258–FOR; Docket ID: OSM–
2015–0001; S1D1SSS08011000SX066A0006
7F144S180110; S2D2SSS08011000SX066A
00033F14XS501520]
Kentucky Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
AGENCY:
The Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE),
is announcing receipt of a proposed
amendment to the Kentucky regulatory
program (the Kentucky program) under
the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the
Act). Kentucky submitted this proposed
amendment with the intent to clarify
certain permit application requirements.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Jun 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
Specifically, Kentucky proposes to
amend the language of two provisions
that outline the permit application
requirements for an operator seeking to
mine land with severed surface and
mineral estates.
This document gives the times and
locations that the Kentucky program
and this proposed amendment to that
program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during
which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the
procedures that we will follow for the
public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m., Eastern Standard Time (EST), July
13, 2015. If requested, we will hold a
public hearing on the amendment on
July 7, 2015. We will accept requests to
speak at a hearing until 4:00 p.m., EST
on June 29, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by SATS No. KY–258–FOR
and Docket ID OSM–2015–0001, by
either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. The proposed rule
has been assigned Docket ID OSM–
2015–0001. If you would like to submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking
portal, go to www.regulations.gov and
follow the instructions.
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. Robert
Evans, Field Office Director, Lexington
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 2675
Regency Road, Lexington, Kentucky
40503.
• Email: bevans@osmre.gov.
• Fax: (859) 260–8410.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Comment Procedures’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
review copies of the Kentucky program,
this amendment, a listing of any
scheduled public hearings, and all
written comments received in response
to this document, you must go to the
address listed below during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive
one free copy of the amendment by
contacting OSMRE’s Lexington Field
Office or the full text of the program
amendment is available for you to read
at www.regulations.gov.
Mr. Robert Evans, Field Office
Director, Lexington Field Office, Office
of Surface Mining Reclamation and
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Enforcement, 2675 Regency Road,
Lexington, Kentucky 40503, Telephone:
(859) 260–3900. Email:
bevans@osmre.gov.
In addition, you may review a copy of
the amendment during regular business
hours at the following location:
Mr. Steve Hohmann, Commissioner,
Kentucky Department for Natural
Resources, 2 Hudson Hollow, Frankfort,
Kentucky 40601, Telephone: (502) 564–
6940. Email: Steve.Hohmann@ky.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Robert Evans, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement,
Telephone: (859) 260–3900. Email:
bevans@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Kentucky Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Kentucky
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘. . . a
State law which provides for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations in accordance
with the requirements of this Act . . .;
and rules and regulations consistent
with regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Kentucky
program on May 18, 1982. You can find
background information on the
Kentucky program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and conditions of approval,
in the May 18, 1982, Federal Register
(47 FR 21434). You can also find later
actions concerning the Kentucky
program and program amendments at 30
CFR 917.11, 917.12, 917.13, 917.15,
917.16, and 917.17.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated January 29, 2015
(Administrative Record No. KY–2001),
the Kentucky Department for Natural
Resources (KYDNR) submitted an
amendment to its program under
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.).
SMCRA sets forth the minimum
application requirements for approval of
a permit at section 510. When the
mineral estate has been severed from the
private surface estate, section 510(b)(6)
of SMCRA provides that an operator
E:\FR\FM\12JNP1.SGM
12JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33452-33456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14404]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-138759-14]
RIN 1545-BM48
Aggregation of Basis for Partnership Distributions Involving
Equity Interests of a Partner
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations that would allow
consolidated group members that are partners in the same partnership to
aggregate their bases in stock distributed by the partnership for the
purpose of limiting the application of rules that might otherwise cause
basis reduction or gain recognition. The proposed regulations would
also require certain corporations that engage in gain elimination
transactions to reduce the basis of corporate assets or to recognize
gain. The proposed regulations affect partnerships and their partners.
DATES: Comments and requests for a public hearing must be received by
September 10, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-138759-14), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
138759-
[[Page 33453]]
14), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC, or sent electronically, via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-138759-14).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Kevin I. Babitz, (202) 317-6852; concerning submission of comments or
to request a public hearing, Oluwafunmilayo Taylor at (202) 317-6901.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
1. Section 337(d) and the Repeal of the General Utilities Doctrine
In General Utilities & Operating Co. v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 200
(1935), the Supreme Court held that corporations generally could
distribute appreciated property to their shareholders without the
recognition of any corporate level gain (the General Utilities
doctrine). Beginning in 1969 and ending with the Tax Reform Act of
1986, Public Law 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085, (the Act), Congress enacted a
series of statutory changes that limited and ultimately repealed the
General Utilities doctrine. Under current law, sections 311(b) and
336(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) require a corporation that
distributes appreciated property to its shareholders to recognize gain
determined as if the property were sold to the shareholders for its
fair market value. Additionally, section 631 of the Act added section
337(d) to the Code to permit the Secretary to prescribe regulations
that are necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of the
General Utilities repeal, ``including regulations to ensure that [the
repeal of the General Utilities doctrine] may not be circumvented
through the use of any provision of law or regulations.''
2. Section 732(f)
Section 538 of the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement
Act of 1999, Public Law 106-170, 113 Stat. 1860, (the Ticket to Work
Act), enacted section 732(f) on December 17, 1999. Section 732(f)
provides that if: (1) A corporate partner receives a distribution from
a partnership of stock in another corporation (distributed
corporation), (2) the corporate partner has control of the distributed
corporation (ownership of stock meeting the requirements of section
1504(a)(2)) immediately after the distribution or at any time
thereafter (the ``control requirement''), and (3) the partnership's
basis in the stock immediately before the distribution exceeded the
corporate partner's basis in the stock immediately after the
distribution, then the basis of the distributed corporation's property
must be reduced by this excess. The amount of this reduction is limited
to the amount by which the sum of the aggregate adjusted basis of
property and the amount of money of the distributed corporation exceeds
the corporate partner's adjusted basis in the stock of the distributed
corporation. The corporate partner must recognize gain to the extent
that the basis of the distributed corporation's property cannot be
reduced.
Congress enacted section 732(f) due to concerns that a corporate
partner could otherwise negate the effects of a basis step-down to
distributed property required under section 732(b) by applying the
step-down against the basis of distributed stock of a corporation
(distributed corporation). The Senate Finance Committee stated that:
The Committee is concerned that the downward adjustment to the
basis of property distributed by a partnership may be nullified if
the distributed property is corporate stock. The distributed
corporation can be liquidated by the corporate partner, so that the
stock basis adjustment has no effect. Similarly, if the corporations
file a consolidated return, their taxable income may be computed
without reference to the downward adjustment to the basis of the
stock. These results can occur either if the partnership has
contributed property to the distributed corporation, or if the
property was held by the corporation before the distribution.
Therefore, the provision requires a basis reduction to the property
of the distributed corporation.
S. Rep. No. 106-201, 106th Cong., 1st Sess. 50 (1999).
For example, assume a corporate partner has a partnership interest
with zero basis and receives a partnership distribution of high-basis
stock in a corporation. The corporate partner's basis in the
distributed corporation's stock is reduced to zero under section 732(a)
or section 732(b). If the partnership has elected under section 754,
then the basis of other partnership property is increased by an equal
amount under section 734(b). The effects of the section 732 basis
decrease and the section 734(b) basis increase generally offset each
other. However, if the corporate partner owned stock in the distributed
corporation that satisfied the control requirement, the corporate
partner could liquidate the distributed corporation under section 332,
and section 334(b) would generally provide for a carryover basis in the
distributed corporation's property received by the corporate partner in
the liquidation. Taken together, these rules could permit the
partnership to increase the basis of its retained property without an
equivalent basis reduction following the liquidation of the distributed
corporation. Section 732(f) generally precludes this result by
requiring that either the distributed corporation must reduce the basis
of its property or the corporate partner must recognize gain (to the
extent the distributed corporation is unable to reduce the basis of its
property). Thus, section 732(f) generally ensures that any basis
increase under section 734(b) is ultimately offset.
Section 732(f) applies if the corporate partner either has control
of the distributed corporation following the distribution or if the
corporate partner subsequently acquires control of the distributed
corporation at any time thereafter. Section 732(f) does not apply if
the corporate partner does not have control of the distributed
corporation immediately following the distribution and the corporate
partner establishes to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the
distribution was not part of a plan or arrangement to acquire control
of the distributed corporation.
In its discussion of the control requirement of section
732(f)(1)(B), the Conference Report to the Ticket to Work Act explains
that ``[t]his provision also calls for regulations, including
regulations to avoid double counting and to prevent the abuse of the
purposes of this provision.'' H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 106-478, 106th Cong.,
1st Sess. 174 (1999). This grant of regulatory authority is codified at
section 732(f)(8), which provides that ``[t]he Secretary shall
prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the
purposes of this subsection, including regulations to avoid double
counting and to prevent the abuse of such purposes.''
Simultaneous with this notice of proposed rulemaking, the Treasury
Department and the IRS are issuing final and temporary regulations
under section 337(d) (Sec. 1.337(d)-3T) that prevent a corporate
partner from using a partnership to avoid corporate-level gain required
to be recognized under section 311(b) or section 336(a) following the
repeal of the General Utilities doctrine. Those final and temporary
regulations address partnership acquisitions, ownership, and
distributions of stock and other equity interests in a corporate
partner. Sections 732(f) and 337(d) share a common purpose of
preserving corporate-level gains. Given this shared purpose, these
proposed regulations are issued under the combined authority of
sections 337(d) and 732(f).
[[Page 33454]]
Explanation of Provisions
As described in this preamble, Congress provided the Treasury
Department and the IRS with a broad grant of statutory authority to
carry out the purposes of sections 337(d) and 732(f). The Treasury
Department and the IRS believe that as currently applied, section
732(f) may be too broad in some circumstances and too narrow in others.
Specifically, section 732(f) may require basis reduction or gain
recognition even though that basis reduction or gain recognition does
not further the purposes of section 732(f). In other circumstances,
corporate partners may inappropriately avoid the purposes of section
732(f) by engaging in transactions that allow corporate partners to
receive property held by a distributed corporation without reducing the
basis of that property to account for basis reductions under section
732(b) made when the partnership distributed stock of the distributed
corporation to the corporate partner. These proposed regulations add
rules to conform the application of section 732(f) with Congress's
identified purposes for enacting sections 337(d) and 732(f) in these
situations.
1. Aggregation of Section 732(b) Basis Adjustments
Section 732(f) generally applies on a partner-by-partner basis.
However, the Treasury Department and the IRS believe that in certain
circumstances, it is appropriate to aggregate the bases of consolidated
group members in a partnership for purposes of applying section 732(f).
For example, basis aggregation may be appropriate when two or more
corporate partners in the same consolidated group (member-partners)
receive a deemed distribution of stock in a distributed corporation
either because (a) the partnership elects to be treated as an
association taxable as a corporation under Sec. 301.7701-3 or (b) one
corporate partner acquires all of the interests in the partnership
causing the partnership to liquidate. In these instances, section
732(b) may cause one member-partner to increase the basis of
distributed stock while another member-partner reduces the basis of
distributed stock by an equivalent amount. Under current law, section
732(f) may require the member-partner whose basis is reduced to
recognize gain or to reduce the basis of the distributed corporation's
property, with no offsetting loss or increase to the basis of the
distributed corporation's property with respect to the member-partner
whose basis is increased. The Treasury Department and the IRS do not
believe that prohibiting member-partners from consolidating their bases
in a partnership for purposes of applying section 732(f) in these
situations furthers Congress's intent to sustain the effect of the
basis reduction to distributed property.
These proposed regulations provide for the aggregation of basis
within the same consolidated group (as defined in Sec. 1.1502-1(h)),
for purposes of section 732(f), when two conditions are met. First, two
or more of the corporate partners receive a distribution of stock in a
distributed corporation. Second, the distributed corporation is or
becomes a member of the distributee partners' consolidated group
following the distribution.
Under this rule, section 732(f) only applies to the extent that the
partnership's adjusted basis in the distributed stock immediately
before the distribution exceeds the aggregate basis of the distributed
stock in the hands of all members of the distributee corporate
partner's consolidated group immediately after the distribution. The
requirement that the distributed corporation be a member of the
consolidated group is intended to avoid unintended consequences that
could result if that corporation was a controlled foreign corporation.
However, the Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on
whether this proposed rule should apply more broadly.
2. Gain Elimination Transactions
As described in the Background section of this Preamble, Congress
enacted section 732(f) to address concerns that a corporate partner
could otherwise negate the effects of a basis step-down to distributed
property required under section 732(b) by applying the step-down
against stock of a distributed corporation. Congress indicated that it
intended for the control requirement to apply expansively by requiring
corporate partners to apply section 732(f) whenever the corporate
partner acquires control (as defined in section 732(f)(5)) of the
distributed corporation as part of a plan or arrangement. The
formalistic definition of control, however, fails to anticipate other
scenarios in which a corporate partner's acquisition of the property of
a distributed corporation has the same effect. To address these
scenarios, Congress granted the Secretary authority to promulgate
regulations necessary to carry out the purposes of section 732(f).
The Treasury Department and the IRS are concerned that some
corporate partners might eliminate gain in the stock of a distributed
corporation while avoiding the effects of a basis step-down in
transactions in which the corporate partner's ownership of the
distributed corporation does not satisfy the control requirement. For
example, a distributed corporation not controlled by a corporate
partner might subsequently merge into the corporate partner in a
reorganization under section 368(a) in which gain is not recognized as
part of a plan or arrangement. In this situation, the gain inherent in
the stock of the distributed corporation is eliminated, but the basis
of the distributed corporation's property is not reduced. If section
732(f) does not apply to this transaction, then the basis step-down is
negated, contravening the purposes of section 732(f) and General
Utilities repeal.
Accordingly, these proposed regulations provide that, in the event
of a gain elimination transaction, section 732(f) shall apply as though
the corporate partner acquired control (as defined in section
732(f)(5)) of the distributed corporation immediately before the gain
elimination transaction.
The proposed regulations define several terms for purposes of
applying this rule. The term ``Corporate Partner'' means a person that
is classified as a corporation for federal income tax purposes and that
holds or acquires an interest in a partnership. The term ``Stock''
includes other equity interests, including options, warrants and
similar interests. The term ``Distributed Stock'' means Stock
distributed by a partnership to a Corporate Partner, or Stock the basis
of which is determined by reference to the basis of such Stock.
Distributed Stock also includes Stock owned directly or indirectly by a
Distributed Corporation if the basis of such Stock has been reduced
pursuant to section 732(f)(7). The term ``Distributed Corporation''
means the issuer of Distributed Stock (or, in the case of an option,
the issuer of the Stock into which the option is exercisable). The term
``Gain Elimination Transaction'' means a transaction in which
Distributed Stock is disposed of and less than all of the gain is
recognized, unless (1) the transferor of the Distributed Stock receives
in exchange Stock or a partnership interest that is exchanged basis
property (as defined in section 7701(a)(44)) with respect to the
Distributed Stock, or (2) a transferee corporation holds the
Distributed Stock as transferred basis property (as defined in section
7701(a)(43)) with respect to a transferor corporation's gain. Examples
of Gain Elimination Transactions include (without limitation) a
reorganization under section 368(a) in which the
[[Page 33455]]
Corporate Partner and the Distributed Corporation combine, and a
distribution of the Distributed Stock by the Corporate Partner to which
section 355(c)(1) or 361(c)(1) applies.
3. Tiered Partnerships
The IRS and the Treasury Department are concerned that taxpayers
could use tiered partnerships to circumvent these regulations and
section 732(f) generally. Congress specified in the Conference Report
to the Ticket to Work Act that taxpayers should not be permitted to
avoid the purposes of section 732(f) through the use of tiered
partnerships. H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 106-478, 106th Cong., 1st Sess. 174
(1999). Therefore, these regulations require taxpayers to apply these
regulations to tiered partnerships in a manner consistent with the
purpose of section 732(f).
Effective/Applicability Date
The rules governing aggregation of basis apply to distributions
occurring on or after the date these regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register. The rules governing gain
elimination transactions apply to transactions occurring on or after
the date these regulations are published as final regulations in the
Federal Register. The rules governing tiered partnerships apply to
distributions and transactions occurring on or after the date these
regulations are published as final regulations in the Federal Register.
No inference is expressed or implied with respect to distributions or
transactions occurring before the date these regulations are published
as final regulations in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. These proposed regulations do
not impose a collection of information on small entities. Further,
pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it is
hereby certified that these proposed regulations would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This certification is based on the fact that these proposed regulations
would primarily affect sophisticated ownership structures with
interlocking ownership of corporations, partnerships and corporate
stock. Accordingly, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, these regulations have been
submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its impact on small business.
Comments and Requests for a Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any comments that are submitted timely
to the IRS as prescribed in this preamble under the ADDRESSES heading.
The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on all aspects of
the proposed rules. All comments will be available at
www.regulations.gov or upon request. A public hearing will be scheduled
if requested in writing by any person that timely submits written or
electronic comments. If a public hearing is scheduled, notice of the
date, time, and place for the public hearing will be published in the
Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these regulations are Kevin I. Babitz and
Joseph R. Worst, Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs
and Special Industries). However, other personnel from the Treasury
Department and the IRS participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendment to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART I--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.732-3 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 337(d), 732(f), and
1502. * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.732-3 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1.732-3 Corresponding adjustment to basis of assets of a
distributed corporation controlled by a corporate partner.
(a) Determination of control. The determination of whether a
corporate partner that is a member of a consolidated group has control
of a distributed corporation for purposes of section 732(f) shall be
made by applying the special aggregate stock ownership rules of Sec.
1.1502-34.
(b) Aggregation of basis within consolidated group. With respect to
distributed stock of a corporation, if the following two conditions are
met, then section 732(f) shall apply only to the extent that the
partnership's adjusted basis in the distributed stock immediately
before the distribution exceeds the aggregate basis of the distributed
stock of the corporation in the hands of corporate partners that are
members of the same consolidated group (as defined in Sec. 1.1502-
1(h)) immediately after the distribution:
(1) Two or more of the corporate partners receive a distribution of
stock in another corporation; and
(2) The corporation, the stock of which was distributed by the
partnership, is or becomes a member of the distributee partners'
consolidated group following the distribution.
(c) Application of section 732(f) to Gain Elimination
Transactions--(1) General rule. In the event of a Gain Elimination
Transaction, section 732(f) shall apply as though the Corporate Partner
acquired control (as defined in section 732(f)(5)) of the Distributed
Corporation immediately before the Gain Elimination Transaction.
(2) Definitions. The following definitions apply for purposes of
this paragraph (c):
(i) Corporate Partner. The term Corporate Partner means a person
that is classified a corporation for federal income tax purposes and
that holds or acquires an interest in a partnership.
(ii) Stock. The term Stock includes other equity interests,
including options, warrants and similar interests.
(iii) Distributed Stock. The term Distributed Stock means Stock
distributed by a partnership to a Corporate Partner, or Stock the basis
of which is determined by reference to the basis of such Stock.
Distributed Stock also includes Stock owned directly or indirectly by a
Distributed Corporation if the basis of such Stock has been reduced
pursuant to section 732(f).
(iv) Distributed Corporation. The term Distributed Corporation
means the issuer of Distributed Stock (or, in the case of an option,
the issuer of the Stock into which the option is exercisable).
(v) Gain Elimination Transaction. The term Gain Elimination
Transaction means a transaction in which Distributed Stock is disposed
of and less than all of the gain is recognized unless--
(A) The transferor of the Distributed Stock receives in exchange
Stock or a partnership interest that is exchanged basis property (as
defined in section 7701(a)(44)) with respect to the Distributed Stock,
or
(B) A transferee corporation holds the Distributed Stock as
transferred basis property (as defined in section
[[Page 33456]]
7701(a)(43)) with respect to the transferor corporation's gain. A Gain
Elimination Transaction includes (without limitation) a reorganization
under section 368(a) in which the Corporate Partner and the Distributed
Corporation combine, and a distribution of the Distributed Stock by the
Corporate Partner to which section 355(c)(1) or 361(c)(1) applies.
(d) Tiered partnerships. The rules of this section shall apply to
tiered partnerships in a manner that is consistent with the purposes of
section 732(f).
(e) Effective/applicability date. The rules governing aggregation
of basis in paragraph (b) of these regulations apply to distributions
occurring on or after the date these regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register. The rules governing gain
elimination transactions in paragraph (c) of this section apply to
transactions occurring on or after the date these regulations are
published as final regulations in the Federal Register. The rules
governing tiered partnerships in paragraph (d) of this section apply to
distributions and transactions occurring on or after the date these
regulations are published as final regulations in the Federal Register.
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2015-14404 Filed 6-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P