Federal Employees Health Benefits Program; Rate Setting for Community-Rated Plans, 32859-32861 [2015-14219]

Agencies

• Office of Personnel Management

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 111 (Wednesday, June 10, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32859-32861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14219]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

48 CFR Parts 1602, 1615, and 1652

RIN 3206-AN00


Federal Employees Health Benefits Program; Rate Setting for 
Community-Rated Plans

AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a 
final rule that makes changes to the Federal Employees Health Benefits 
Acquisition Regulation (FEHBAR). These changes: define which subscriber 
groups may be included for consideration as similarly sized subscriber 
groups (SSSGs); require the SSSG to be traditional community rated; 
establish that traditional community rated (TCR) Federal Employees 
Health Benefits (FEHB) plans must select only one rather than two 
SSSGs; and make conforming changes to FEHB contract language to account 
for the new medical loss ratio (MLR) standard for most community rated 
FEHB plans.

DATES: Effective Date: July 10, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wenqiong Fu, Policy Analyst, at 
wenqiong.fu@opm.gov or (202) 606-0004.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management is 
issuing a final rule to update the Federal Employees Health Benefits 
Acquisition Regulation to accommodate the new FEHB specific medical 
loss ratio (MLR) requirement for most community rated plans as well as 
to update the similarly sized subscriber group (SSSG) requirement for 
traditional community rated plans.

Comments on FEHB Premium Impacts

    OPM received a comment regarding the impact the regulation will 
have on future premiums in the FEHB Program. Based on the analysis, OPM 
does not believe that there will be a significant impact in aggregate 
on the entire FEHBP, and as such, it is unlikely that there will be any 
major substantive impacts on future premium increases in the FEHBP as a 
whole.

Comment on Traditional Community Rating Plans on FEHB Groups

    A commenter raised a concern that, by utilizing TCR plans, OPM may 
potentially cost the government more money. The commenter's 
justification was that insurers will adjust rates to the highest 
expected rate if they have to provide the same rates to all groups. 
Traditional Community Rating is guided by state law and all groups pay 
the average cost of coverage for the community. As such, it is not 
believed plans will adjust rates to the highest expected rate.

Comments on Recommended Language

    A commenter suggested that (1) OPM should exclude customers of 
carrier subsidiaries from SSSG consideration and (2) OPM should also 
exclude from SSSG analysis ``[an] entity that maintains a contractual 
arrangement with the carrier to provide healthcare benefits.''
    OPM declines to make this change. We require these entities to be 
considered for SSSG comparison because we do not want businesses to 
form distinct entities under a corporate umbrella for the sole purposes 
of getting a lower rate for non-FEHBP groups. Our goal is to identify 
one non-FEHBP subscriber group (employer groups covered by an issuer) 
that is closest in size to the FEHBP group and, if the group received a 
discounted rate, the carrier must provide the discount to the FEHBP. We 
feel that, if carriers have the ability to shift groups under a 
corporate umbrella, the most appropriate SSSG will not be available for 
comparison to the FEHBP group and the FEHB program will be at greater 
risk. OPM also is not amending 48 CFR 1602.170-13(b)(1)(iv). Our 
intention is not to include SSSGs of entities with whom a Carrier 
contracts to provide health insurance coverage for its own employees. 
Additionally, we do not intend to set up a reinsurance arrangement. Our 
intent is to include entities where a Carrier has contracted provision 
of benefits to its customers to a third-party entity.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    OPM certifies that this regulation will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because the 
regulation only affects health insurance carriers in the FEHB Program.

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Review

    This rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget 
in accordance with Executive Order 12866. OPM has examined the impact 
of this final rule as required by Executive Order 12866 and Executive 
Order 13563, which direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of 
available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to 
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including 
potential economic, environmental, public, health, and safety effects, 
distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact analysis must be 
prepared for major rules with economically significant effects of $100 
million or more in any one year. This rule is not considered a major 
rule because there will be no increased costs to Federal agencies, 
Federal Employees, or Federal retirees in their health insurance 
premiums.

Federalism

    We have examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order 
13132, Federalism, and have determined that this rule will not have any 
negative impact on the rights, roles, and responsibilities of State, 
local, or tribal governments.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1602, 1615, and 1652

    Government employees, Government procurement, Health insurance 
reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Katherine Archuleta,
Director.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, OPM amends chapter 16 of 
title 48 CFR (FEHBAR) as follows:

PART 1602--DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

0
1. The authority citation for part 1602 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8913; 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 48 CFR 1.301.


0
2. Revise Sec.  1602.170-13 to read as follows:


Sec.  1602.170-13  Similarly sized subscriber groups.

    (a) A Similarly sized subscriber group (SSSG) is a non-FEHB 
employer group that:
    (1) As of the date specified by OPM in the rate instructions, has a 
subscriber enrollment closest to the FEHBP subscriber enrollment;
    (2) Uses traditional community rating; and,
    (3) Meets the criteria specified in the rate instructions issued by 
OPM.
    (b) Any group with which an entity enters into an agreement to 
provide

[[Page 32860]]

health care services is a potential SSSG (including groups that are 
traditional community rated and covered by separate lines of business, 
government entities, groups that have multi-year contracts, and groups 
having point-of-service products) except as specified in paragraph (c) 
of this section.
    (1) An entity's subscriber groups may be included as an SSSG if the 
entity is any of the following:
    (i) The carrier;
    (ii) A division or subsidiary of the carrier;
    (iii) A separate line of business or qualified separate line of 
business of the carrier; or
    (iv) An entity that maintains a contractual arrangement with the 
carrier to provide healthcare benefits.
    (2) A subscriber group covered by an entity meeting any of the 
criteria under paragraph (b)(1) of this section may be included for 
comparison as a SSSG if the entity meets any of the following criteria:
    (i) It reports financial statements on a consolidated basis with 
the carrier; or
    (ii) Shares, delegates, or otherwise contracts with the carrier, 
any portion of its workforce that involves the management, design, 
pricing, or marketing of the healthcare product.
    (c) The following groups must be excluded from SSSG consideration:
    (1) Groups the carrier rates by the method of retrospective 
experience rating;
    (2) Groups consisting of the carrier's own employees;
    (3) Medicaid groups, Medicare-only groups, and groups that receive 
only excepted benefits as defined at 26 U.S.C. 9832(c);
    (4) A purchasing alliance whose rate-setting is mandated by the 
State or local government;
    (5) Administrative Service Organizations (ASOs);
    (6) Any other group excluded from consideration as specified in the 
rate instructions issued by OPM.
    (d) OPM shall determine the FEHBP rate by selecting the lowest rate 
derived by using rating methods consistent with those used to derive 
the SSSG rate.
    (e) In the event that a State-mandated TCR carrier has no SSSG, 
then it will be subject to the FEHB specific MLR requirement.

0
3. In Sec.  1602.170-14, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:


Sec.  1602.170-14  FEHB-specific medical loss ratio threshold 
calculation.

    (a) Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) means the ratio of plan incurred 
claims, including the carrier's expenditures for activities that 
improve health care quality, to total premium revenue determined by 
OPM, as defined by the Department of Health and Human Services in 45 
CFR part 158.
* * * * *

PART 1615--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

0
4. The authority citation for part 1615 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 8913; 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 48 CFR 1.301; 5 
U.S.C. 8902.


0
5. In Sec.  1615.402, revise paragraphs (c)(2), (c)(3)(i)(A) and (B), 
and (c)(4) to read as follows:


Sec.  1615.402  Pricing policy.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (2) For contracts with fewer than 1,500 enrollee contracts for 
which the FEHB Program premiums for the contract term will be at or 
above the threshold at FAR 15.403-4(a)(1), OPM will require the carrier 
to submit its rate proposal, utilization data, and a certificate of 
accurate cost or pricing data required in 1615.406-2. In addition, OPM 
will require the carrier to complete the proposed rates form containing 
cost and pricing data, and the Community-Rate Questionnaire, but will 
not require the carrier to send these documents to OPM. The carrier 
will keep the documents on file for periodic auditor and actuarial 
review in accordance with 1652.204-70. OPM will perform a basic 
reasonableness test on the data submitted. Rates that do not pass this 
test will be subject to further OPM review.
    (3) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) For contracts with 1,500 or more enrollee contracts for which 
the FEHB Program premiums for the contract term will be at or above the 
threshold at FAR 15.403-4(a)(1), OPM will require the carrier to 
provide the data and methodology used to determine the FEHB Program 
rates. OPM will also require the data and methodology used to determine 
the rates for the carrier's SSSG. The carrier will provide cost or 
pricing data required by OPM in its rate instructions for the 
applicable contract period. OPM will evaluate the data to ensure that 
the rate is reasonable and consistent with the requirements in this 
chapter. If necessary, OPM may require the carrier to provide 
additional documentation.
    (B) Contracts will be subject to a downward price adjustment if OPM 
determines that the Federal group was charged more than it would have 
been charged using a methodology consistent with that used for the 
SSSG. Such adjustments will be based on the rate determined by using 
the methodology (including discounts) the carrier used for the SSSG.
* * * * *
    (4) Contracts will be subject to a downward price adjustment if OPM 
determines that the Federal group was charged more than it would have 
been charged using a methodology consistent with that used for the 
similarly-sized subscriber group (SSSG). Such adjustments will be based 
on the rate determined by using the methodology (including discounts) 
the carrier used for the SSSG.
* * * * *

0
6. In Sec.  1615.406-2, revise the first certificate following 
paragraph (b) to read as follows:


Sec.  1615.406-2  Certificates of accurate cost or pricing data for 
community rated carriers.

* * * * *

(Beginning of first certificate)


Certificate of Accurate Cost or Pricing Data for Community-Rated 
Carriers (SSSG methodology)

    This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: 
(1) The cost or pricing data submitted (or, if not submitted, 
maintained and identified by the carrier as supporting documentation) 
to the Contracting officer or the Contracting officer's representative 
or designee, in support of the __* FEHB Program rates were developed in 
accordance with the requirements of 48 CFR Chapter 16 and the FEHB 
Program contract and are accurate, complete, and current as of the date 
this certificate is executed; and (2) the methodology used to determine 
the FEHB Program rates is consistent with the methodology used to 
determine the rates for the carrier's Similarly Sized Subscriber Group.
    * Insert the year for which the rates apply.

Firm:------------------------------------------------------------------

Name:------------------------------------------------------------------

Signature:-------------------------------------------------------------

Date of Execution:-----------------------------------------------------

(End of first certificate)

* * * * *

PART 1652--CONTRACT CLAUSES

0
7. The authority citation for part 1652 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8913; 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 48 CFR 1.301.


0
8. In Sec.  1652.215-70, revise paragraphs (a) and (c) to read as 
follows:

[[Page 32861]]

Sec.  1652.215-70  Rate Reduction for Defective Pricing or Defective 
Cost or Pricing Data.

* * * * *
    (a) If any rate established in connection with this contract was 
increased because:
    (1) The Carrier submitted, or kept in its files in support of the 
FEHBP rate, cost or pricing data that were not complete, accurate, or 
current as certified in one of the Certificates of Accurate Cost or 
Pricing Data (FEHBAR 1615.406-2);
    (2) The Carrier submitted, or kept in its files in support of the 
FEHBP rate, cost or pricing data that were not accurate as represented 
in the rate reconciliation documents or MLR Calculation;
    (3) The Carrier developed FEHBP rates for traditional community 
rated plans with a rating methodology and structure inconsistent with 
that used to develop rates for a similarly sized subscriber group (see 
FEHBAR 1602.170-13) as certified in the Certificate of Accurate Cost or 
Pricing Data for Community Rated Carriers;
    (4) The Carrier, who is not mandated by the State to use 
traditional community rating, developed FEHBP rates with a rating 
methodology and structure inconsistent with its State-filed rating 
methodology (or if not required to file with the State, their standard 
written and established rating methodology) or inconsistent with the 
FEHB specific medical loss ratio (MLR) requirements (see FEHBAR 
1602.170-13); or
    (5) The Carrier submitted or, kept in its files in support of the 
FEHBP rate, data or information of any description that were not 
complete, accurate, and current--then, the rate shall be reduced in the 
amount by which the price was increased because of the defective data 
or information.
* * * * *
    (c) When the Contracting Officer determines that the rates shall be 
reduced and the Government is thereby entitled to a refund or that the 
Government is entitled to a MLR penalty, the Carrier shall be liable to 
and shall pay the FEHB Fund at the time the overpayment is repaid or at 
the time the MLR penalty is paid--
    (1) Simple interest on the amount of the overpayment from the date 
the overpayment was paid from the FEHB Fund to the Carrier until the 
date the overcharge is liquidated. In calculating the amount of 
interest due, the quarterly rate determinations by the Secretary of the 
Treasury under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 6621(a)(2) applicable to the 
periods the overcharge was retained by the Carrier shall be used;
    (2) A penalty equal to the amount of overpayment, if the Carrier 
knowingly submitted cost or pricing data which was incomplete, 
inaccurate, or noncurrent; and,
    (3) Simple interest on the MLR penalty from the date on which the 
penalty should have been paid to the FEHB Fund to the date on which the 
penalty was or will be actually paid to the FEHB fund. The interest 
rate shall be calculated as specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this 
section.

0
9. In Sec.  1652.216-70, revise paragraphs (b)(2), (3), (7), and (8) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  1652.216-70  Accounting and price adjustment.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2). Effective January 1, 2013 all community rated plans must 
develop the FEHBP's rates using their State-filed rating methodology 
or, if not required to file with the State, their standard written and 
established rating methodology. A carrier who mandated by the State to 
use traditional community rating will be subject to paragraph 
(b)(2)(ii) of this clause. All other carriers will be subject to 
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this clause.
    (i) The subscription rates agreed to in this contract shall meet 
the FEHB-specific MLR threshold as defined in FEHBAR 1602.170-14. The 
ratio of a plan's incurred claims, including the carrier's expenditures 
for activities that improve health care quality, to total premium 
revenue shall not be lower than the FEHB-specific MLR threshold 
published annually by OPM in its rate instructions.
    (ii) The subscription rates agreed to in this contract shall be 
equivalent to the subscription rates given to the carrier's similarly 
sized subscriber group (SSSG) as defined in FEHBAR 1602.170-13. The 
subscription rates shall be determined according to the carrier's 
established policy, which must be applied consistently to the FEHBP and 
to the carrier's SSSG. If the SSSG receives a rate lower than that 
determined according to the carrier's established policy, it is 
considered a discount. The FEHBP must receive a discount equal to or 
greater than the carrier's SSSG discount.
    (3) If subject to paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this clause, then:
    (i) If, at the time of the rate reconciliation, the subscription 
rates are found to be lower than the equivalent rates for the SSSG, the 
carrier may include an adjustment to the Federal group's rates for the 
next contract period, except as noted in paragraph (b)(3)(iii) of this 
clause.
    (ii) If, at the time of the rate reconciliation, the subscription 
rates are found to be higher than the equivalent rates for the SSSG, 
the carrier shall reimburse the Fund, for example, by reducing the FEHB 
rates for the next contract term to reflect the difference between the 
estimated rates and the rates which are derived using the methodology 
of the SSSG, except as noted in paragraph (b)(3)(iii) of this clause.
    (iii) Carriers may provide additional guaranteed discounts to the 
FEHBP that are not given to the SSSG. Any such guaranteed discounts 
must be clearly identified as guaranteed discounts. After the beginning 
of the contract year for which the rates are set, these guaranteed 
FEHBP discounts may not be adjusted.
* * * * *
    (7) Carriers may provide additional guaranteed discounts to the 
FEHBP. Any such guaranteed discounts must be clearly identified as 
guaranteed discounts. After the beginning of the contract year for 
which the rates are set, these guaranteed FEHBP discounts may not be 
adjusted.
    (8) Carriers may not impose surcharges (loadings not defined based 
on an established rating method) on the FEHBP subscription rates or use 
surcharges in the rate reconciliation process. If the carrier is 
subject to the SSSG rules and imposes a surcharge on the SSSG, the 
carrier cannot impose the surcharge on FEHB.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-14219 Filed 6-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6325-63-P