Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; 2011 Lead Base Year Emissions Inventory, 32474-32477 [2015-13945]
Download as PDF
32474
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: May 20, 2015.
William C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
Subpart V—Maryland
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entries
for COMAR 26.11.09.01, 26.11.09.04,
26.11.09.06, 26.11.09.07, and
26.11.09.09, and adding entries for
COMAR 26.11.09.10 and 26.11.09.12 in
numerical order to read as follows:
■
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1070
*
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS, TECHNICAL MEMORANDA, AND STATUTES IN THE MARYLAND SIP
Code of Maryland Administrative Regulations
(COMAR)
citation
Title/Subject
*
26.11.09.01 .......
*
*
Definitions .......................................
04/28/14
*
*
6/9/15 [Insert Federal Register
citation].
*
*
Definition of ‘‘biomass’’ is added.
*
26.11.09.04 .......
*
*
Prohibition of Certain New Fuel
Burning Equipment.
04/28/14
*
*
6/9/15 [Insert Federal Register
citation].
*
Revised (C)(1).
*
26.11.09.06 .......
*
*
Control of Particulate Matter ..........
04/28/14
*
*
Revised (D)(1) and (D)(2).
26.11.09.07 .......
Control of Sulfur Oxides from Fuel
Burning Equipment.
04/28/14
*
*
6/9/15 [Insert Federal Register
citation].
6/9/15 [Insert Federal Register
citation].
*
26.11.09.09 .......
*
*
Tables and Diagrams .....................
4/28/14
*
*
Amended incorrect reference.
26.11.09.10 .......
Requirements to Burn Used Oil
and Waste Combustible Fluid as
Fuel.
Standards for Biomass Fuel-Burning Equipment Equal to or Greater Than 350,000 Btu/hr.
*
*
6/9/15 [Insert Federal Register
citation].
6/9/15 [Insert Federal Register
citation].
6/9/15 [Insert Federal Register
citation].
New regulation.
26.11.09.12 .......
*
*
*
State
effective
date
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52, 62, and 81
[EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0311]; FRL–9928–
68–Region 3]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; 2011 Lead Base Year
Emissions Inventory
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
SUMMARY:
15:56 Jun 08, 2015
04/28/14
*
[FR Doc. 2015–13425 Filed 6–8–15; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
04/28/14
Jkt 235001
*
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Revised (B)(5).
New regulation.
*
action to approve a revision to the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
(Pennsylvania) State Implementation
Plan (SIP). EPA is proposing to approve
the 2011 base year emissions inventory
SIP revision submittal for the 2008 lead
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS). The base year emissions
inventory SIP revision was submitted by
the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP) on
February 9, 2015 to meet the
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
for the Lyons 2008 lead NAAQS
nonattainment area (hereafter referred to
as the ‘‘Lyons Area’’ or ‘‘Area’’). EPA is
approving this revision to the
Pennsylvania SIP in accordance with
the requirements of the CAA.
DATES: This rule is effective on August
10, 2015 without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse written comment
PO 00000
Additional explanation/
citation at 40 CFR 52.1100
EPA approval date
*
*
by July 9, 2015. If EPA receives such
comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2015–0311 by one of the
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0311,
Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director,
Office of Air Program Planning,
Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
E:\FR\FM\09JNR1.SGM
09JNR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2015–
0311. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI, or otherwise
protected, through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the SIP submittal are available
at the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air
Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400
Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
17105.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Schmitt, (215) 814–5787, or by
email at schmitt.ellen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66964),
EPA revised the lead NAAQS, lowering
the level from 1.5 micrograms per cubic
meter (mg/m3) to 0.15 mg/m3 calculated
over a three-month rolling average. EPA
established the NAAQS based on
significant evidence and numerous
health studies demonstrating that
serious health effects are associated
with exposures to lead emissions.
Following promulgation of a new or
revised NAAQS, EPA is required by the
CAA to designate areas throughout the
United States as attaining or not
attaining the NAAQS; this designation
process is described in section 107(d)(1)
of the CAA. On November 22, 2010 (75
FR 71033), EPA promulgated initial air
quality designations for the 2008 lead
NAAQS, which became effective on
December 31, 2010, based on air quality
monitoring data for calendar years
2007–2009, where there was sufficient
data to support a nonattainment
designation. Designations for all
remaining areas were completed on
November 22, 2011, based on air quality
monitoring data for calendar years
2008–2010. Effective December 31,
2010, the Lyons Area was designated as
nonattainment for the 2008 lead
NAAQS. This designation triggered a
requirement for Pennsylvania to submit
a SIP revision with a plan for how the
Lyons Area would attain the 2008 lead
NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable,
but no later than December 31, 2015.
Designation of an area as
nonattainment starts the process for a
state to develop and submit to EPA a
SIP revision under title I, part D of the
CAA. This SIP revision must include,
among other elements, a demonstration
of how the NAAQS will be attained in
the nonattainment area as expeditiously
as practicable, but no later than the date
required by the CAA, together with a
base year emissions inventory,
reasonably available control measures
(RACM), a reasonable further progress
(RFP) plan, and contingency measures
for failure to meet RFP and attainment
deadlines. Under CAA section 172(b), a
state has up to three years after an area’s
designation as nonattainment to submit
its SIP revision to EPA.
On December 29, 2014 (79 FR 77911),
EPA took final action to determine that
the Lyons Area (comprised of Kutztown
Borough, Lyon Borough, Maxatawny
Township, and Richmond Township)
has ambient air quality monitoring data
that shows the Area meets the 2008 lead
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32475
NAAQS. This clean data determination
was based upon quality assured, quality
controlled and certified ambient air
monitoring data that shows the Area has
monitored attainment of the 2008 lead
NAAQS based on the calendar years
2009–2011 data. Pursuant to EPA’s
Clean Data Policy, once EPA finalizes a
clean data determination, the
requirements for the Area to submit an
attainment demonstration, RACM, a
RFP plan, and contingency measures for
failure to meet RFP and attainment
deadlines are suspended for so long as
the Area continues to attain the 2008
lead NAAQS.
Since 1995, EPA has applied its
interpretation under the Clean Data
Policy in many rulemakings,
suspending certain attainment-related
planning requirements for individual
areas, based on a determination of
attainment. However, EPA notes that a
final determination of attainment does
not suspend requirements not related to
attaining the NAAQS, such as the
emissions inventory requirement found
in CAA section 172(c)(3), which
requires submission and approval of an
inventory of actual emissions of lead
from all sources in the nonattainment
area (i.e., base year emissions
inventory).
On February 9, 2015, Pennsylvania
submitted a formal revision to its SIP
that consists of the lead base year
emissions inventory for the Lyons Area
for the 2008 lead NAAQS.
II. Emissions Inventory Requirements
States are required under section
172(c)(3) of the CAA to develop
comprehensive, accurate and current
emissions inventories of all sources of
the relevant pollutant or pollutants in
the nonattainment area. These
inventories provide a detailed
accounting of all emissions and
emission sources by precursor or
pollutant. In the November 12, 2008
lead NAAQS rulemaking, EPA finalized
the guidance related to the emissions
inventories requirements. The current
regulations are located at 40 CFR
51.117(e), and include, but are not
limited to, the following requirements:
• States must develop and
periodically update a comprehensive,
accurate, current inventory of actual
emissions from all sources affecting
ambient lead concentrations;
• The SIP inventory must be
approved by EPA as a SIP element and
is subject to public hearing
requirements; and
• The point source inventory upon
which the summary of the baseline for
lead emissions inventory is based must
E:\FR\FM\09JNR1.SGM
09JNR1
32476
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
contain all sources that emit 0.5 or more
tons of lead per year.
For the base-year inventory of actual
lead emissions, EPA recommends using
either 2010 or 2011 as the base year for
the contingency measure calculations,
but does provide flexibility for using
other inventory years if states can show
another year is more appropriate.1 For
lead SIPs, the CAA requires that all
sources of lead emissions in the
nonattainment area must be submitted
with the base-year inventory. In today’s
action, EPA is approving the base year
emissions inventory SIP revision
submitted by Pennsylvania on February
9, 2015, (hereinafter also referred to as
‘‘Pennsylvania’s submission’’) as
required by section 172(c)(3).
III. EPA Analysis of the Lyons 2011
Lead Base Year Emissions Inventory
EPA guidance for emissions inventory
development provides that actual
emissions should be used for purposes
of the base year inventory.2 On February
9, 2015, Pennsylvania submitted to EPA
the 2011 base year emissions inventory
for the lead point sources located within
the Lyons Area. The Lyons Area has the
following point sources of lead
emissions: East Penn Manufacturing
Company’s Richmond Township
Facility; East Penn Manufacturing
Company’s Kutztown Facility; and
McConway & Torley Kutztown Foundry.
PADEP requires larger emitting facilities
to report production figures and
emission calculations annually.
Throughput data are multiplied by
emission factors based on source
classification codes (SCC) to develop
emission estimates.
PADEP submitted EPA’s 2011
National Emissions Inventory (NEI) v2
data for nonpoint source lead emissions.
The nonpoint source values for the
Lyons Area were calculated using Berks
County data apportioned by population,
of which 4.1 percent (%) is included in
the Lyons Area. EPA reviewed the
results, procedures, and methodologies
for Pennsylvania’s submission and
found them to be reasonable for
calculating the lead base year inventory
for CAA section 172(c)(3) and in
accordance with 40 CFR 51.117(e). A
more detailed description of the SIP
submittal and EPA’s evaluation is
included in a Technical Support
Document (TSD) prepared in support of
this rulemaking action. A copy of the
TSD is available, upon request, from the
1 See EPA document titled ‘‘Addendum to the
2008 Lead NAAQS Implementation Questions and
Answers’’ dated August 10, 2012, which is included
in EPA’s SIP Toolkit located at https://www.epa.gov/
air/lead/kitmodel.html.
2 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
EPA Regional Office listed in the
section of this document or
is also available electronically within
the Docket for this rulemaking action.
ADDRESSES
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving Pennsylvania’s
submission consisting of the base year
emissions inventory for the Lyons Area
for the 2008 lead NAAQS. EPA is
publishing this rule without prior
proposal because EPA views this as a
noncontroversial amendment and
anticipates no adverse comment.
However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of today’s Federal Register, EPA
is publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
SIP revision if adverse comments are
filed. This rule will be effective on
August 10, 2015 without further notice
unless EPA receives adverse comment
by July 9, 2015. If EPA receives adverse
comment, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. EPA will address all
public comments in a subsequent final
rule based on the proposed rule. EPA
will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by August 10, 2015. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
E:\FR\FM\09JNR1.SGM
09JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking action. This action
to approve Pennsylvania’s base year
emissions inventory for the Lyons Area
may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements.
(See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
and Lead.
Dated: May 20, 2015.
William C. Early,
Acting, Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN—Pennsylvania
2. Section 52.2036 is amended by
adding paragraph (v) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.2036
Base year emissions inventory.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(v) EPA approves as a revision to the
Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan
the 2011 base year lead emission
inventory for the Lyons, Pennsylvania
nonattainment area for the 2008 lead
NAAQS. This SIP revision was
submitted by the Acting Secretary of the
Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection, on February
9, 2015. This submittal consists of the
2011 base year inventories for all
relevant sources in the Lyons,
Pennsylvania nonattainment area for the
pollutant lead (Pb).
[FR Doc. 2015–13945 Filed 6–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
45 CFR Part 170
Acceptance and Approval of NonGovernmental Developed Test
Procedures, Test Tools, and Test Data
for Use Under the ONC Health IT
Certification Program
Office of the National
Coordinator for Health Information
Technology (ONC), Department of
Health and Human Services.
ACTION: Reissuance.
AGENCY:
This document further
informs the public of ONC’s policy that
permits any person or entity to submit
test procedures, test tools, and test data
for approval and use under the ONC
Health IT Certification Program.
DATES: Reissued June 9, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alicia Morton, Director, ONC Health IT
Certification Program, Office of the
National Coordinator for Health
Information Technology, 202–549–7851.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 7, 2011, the Department of
Health and Human Services issued a
final rule establishing a permanent
certification program for the purposes of
testing and certifying health information
technology (‘‘Establishment of the
Permanent Certification Program for
Health Information Technology,’’ 76 FR
1262) (‘‘Permanent Certification
Program final rule’’). The permanent
certification program was renamed the
‘‘ONC HIT Certification Program’’ in a
final rule published on September 4,
2012 (77 FR 54163) (‘‘2014 Edition EHR
Certification Criteria final rule’’). In the
proposed rule entitled ‘‘2015 Edition
Health Information Technology (Health
IT) Certification Criteria, 2015 Edition
Base Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Definition, and ONC Health IT
Certification Program Modifications’’
(80 FR 16804, 16806), we propose to
further rename the program as the ‘‘ONC
Health IT Certification Program.’’
In the preamble of the Permanent
Certification Program final rule, we
stated that a person or entity may
submit a test procedure or test tool (to
note, which includes any associated test
data) to the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology (the
National Coordinator) to be considered
for approval and use by NVLAP
accredited testing laboratories. ‘‘The
submission should identify the
developer of the test tool and/or test
procedure; specify the certification
criterion or criteria that is/are addressed
by the test tool and/or test procedure;
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
32477
and explain how the test tool and/or test
procedure would evaluate a Complete
EHR’s, EHR Module’s, or if the
applicable, and other type of HIT’s
compliance with the applicable
certification criterion or criteria. The
submission should also provide
information describing the process used
to develop the test tool and/or test
procedure, including any opportunity
for the public to comment on the test
tool and/or test procedure and the
degree to which public comments were
considered.’’ (76 FR 1280) We also
stated that ‘‘[i]n determining whether to
approve a test tool and/or test procedure
for purposes of the permanent
certification program, the National
Coordinator will consider whether it is
clearly traceable to a certification
criterion or criteria adopted by the
Secretary; whether it is sufficiently
comprehensive (i.e., assesses all
required capabilities) for NVLAPaccredited testing laboratories to use in
testing a Complete EHR’s, EHR
Module’s, or other type of HIT’s
compliance with the certification
criterion or criteria adopted by the
Secretary; whether an appropriate
public comment process was used
during the development of the test tool
and/or test procedure; and any other
relevant factors.’’ (76 FR 1280)
During the time in which the ONC
Health IT Certification Program has
operated, health IT developers have
suggested that testing efficiencies could
be achieved if the ONC Health IT
Certification Program were to leverage
operational testing and certification,
such as the ePrescribing (eRX) network
testing (and certification). As indicated
by the previously recited ONC policy,
the National Coordinator is open to
approving test procedures, test tools,
and test data that meet the outlined
approval requirements above for an
applicable adopted certification
criterion or criteria. By way of this
document, we strongly encourage
persons or entities to submit such test
procedures, test tools, and test data to
ONC if they believe such procedures,
tools, and data could be used to meet
ONC’s certification criteria and testing
approval requirements. We also note
that there is no programmatic
prohibition on the approval of multiple
test procedures, test tools, and test data
for a certification criterion or criteria.
Dated: May 21, 2015.
Alicia Morton,
Director, ONC Health IT Certification
Program, Office of the National Coordinator
for Health Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2015–13510 Filed 6–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–45–P
E:\FR\FM\09JNR1.SGM
09JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32474-32477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13945]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52, 62, and 81
[EPA-R03-OAR-2015-0311]; FRL-9928-68-Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; 2011 Lead Base Year Emissions Inventory
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve a revision to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
(Pennsylvania) State Implementation Plan (SIP). EPA is proposing to
approve the 2011 base year emissions inventory SIP revision submittal
for the 2008 lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The
base year emissions inventory SIP revision was submitted by the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) on February
9, 2015 to meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the
Lyons 2008 lead NAAQS nonattainment area (hereafter referred to as the
``Lyons Area'' or ``Area''). EPA is approving this revision to the
Pennsylvania SIP in accordance with the requirements of the CAA.
DATES: This rule is effective on August 10, 2015 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by July 9, 2015. If
EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that
the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2015-0311 by one of the following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2015-0311, Cristina Fernandez, Associate
Director, Office of Air Program Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such
[[Page 32475]]
deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2015-0311. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI, or otherwise protected, through www.regulations.gov or email.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the SIP submittal
are available at the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market
Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Schmitt, (215) 814-5787, or by
email at schmitt.ellen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66964), EPA revised the lead NAAQS,
lowering the level from 1.5 micrograms per cubic meter ([mu]g/m\3\) to
0.15 [mu]g/m\3\ calculated over a three-month rolling average. EPA
established the NAAQS based on significant evidence and numerous health
studies demonstrating that serious health effects are associated with
exposures to lead emissions.
Following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, EPA is required
by the CAA to designate areas throughout the United States as attaining
or not attaining the NAAQS; this designation process is described in
section 107(d)(1) of the CAA. On November 22, 2010 (75 FR 71033), EPA
promulgated initial air quality designations for the 2008 lead NAAQS,
which became effective on December 31, 2010, based on air quality
monitoring data for calendar years 2007-2009, where there was
sufficient data to support a nonattainment designation. Designations
for all remaining areas were completed on November 22, 2011, based on
air quality monitoring data for calendar years 2008-2010. Effective
December 31, 2010, the Lyons Area was designated as nonattainment for
the 2008 lead NAAQS. This designation triggered a requirement for
Pennsylvania to submit a SIP revision with a plan for how the Lyons
Area would attain the 2008 lead NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable,
but no later than December 31, 2015.
Designation of an area as nonattainment starts the process for a
state to develop and submit to EPA a SIP revision under title I, part D
of the CAA. This SIP revision must include, among other elements, a
demonstration of how the NAAQS will be attained in the nonattainment
area as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than the date
required by the CAA, together with a base year emissions inventory,
reasonably available control measures (RACM), a reasonable further
progress (RFP) plan, and contingency measures for failure to meet RFP
and attainment deadlines. Under CAA section 172(b), a state has up to
three years after an area's designation as nonattainment to submit its
SIP revision to EPA.
On December 29, 2014 (79 FR 77911), EPA took final action to
determine that the Lyons Area (comprised of Kutztown Borough, Lyon
Borough, Maxatawny Township, and Richmond Township) has ambient air
quality monitoring data that shows the Area meets the 2008 lead NAAQS.
This clean data determination was based upon quality assured, quality
controlled and certified ambient air monitoring data that shows the
Area has monitored attainment of the 2008 lead NAAQS based on the
calendar years 2009-2011 data. Pursuant to EPA's Clean Data Policy,
once EPA finalizes a clean data determination, the requirements for the
Area to submit an attainment demonstration, RACM, a RFP plan, and
contingency measures for failure to meet RFP and attainment deadlines
are suspended for so long as the Area continues to attain the 2008 lead
NAAQS.
Since 1995, EPA has applied its interpretation under the Clean Data
Policy in many rulemakings, suspending certain attainment-related
planning requirements for individual areas, based on a determination of
attainment. However, EPA notes that a final determination of attainment
does not suspend requirements not related to attaining the NAAQS, such
as the emissions inventory requirement found in CAA section 172(c)(3),
which requires submission and approval of an inventory of actual
emissions of lead from all sources in the nonattainment area (i.e.,
base year emissions inventory).
On February 9, 2015, Pennsylvania submitted a formal revision to
its SIP that consists of the lead base year emissions inventory for the
Lyons Area for the 2008 lead NAAQS.
II. Emissions Inventory Requirements
States are required under section 172(c)(3) of the CAA to develop
comprehensive, accurate and current emissions inventories of all
sources of the relevant pollutant or pollutants in the nonattainment
area. These inventories provide a detailed accounting of all emissions
and emission sources by precursor or pollutant. In the November 12,
2008 lead NAAQS rulemaking, EPA finalized the guidance related to the
emissions inventories requirements. The current regulations are located
at 40 CFR 51.117(e), and include, but are not limited to, the following
requirements:
States must develop and periodically update a
comprehensive, accurate, current inventory of actual emissions from all
sources affecting ambient lead concentrations;
The SIP inventory must be approved by EPA as a SIP element
and is subject to public hearing requirements; and
The point source inventory upon which the summary of the
baseline for lead emissions inventory is based must
[[Page 32476]]
contain all sources that emit 0.5 or more tons of lead per year.
For the base-year inventory of actual lead emissions, EPA
recommends using either 2010 or 2011 as the base year for the
contingency measure calculations, but does provide flexibility for
using other inventory years if states can show another year is more
appropriate.\1\ For lead SIPs, the CAA requires that all sources of
lead emissions in the nonattainment area must be submitted with the
base-year inventory. In today's action, EPA is approving the base year
emissions inventory SIP revision submitted by Pennsylvania on February
9, 2015, (hereinafter also referred to as ``Pennsylvania's
submission'') as required by section 172(c)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See EPA document titled ``Addendum to the 2008 Lead NAAQS
Implementation Questions and Answers'' dated August 10, 2012, which
is included in EPA's SIP Toolkit located at https://www.epa.gov/air/lead/kitmodel.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. EPA Analysis of the Lyons 2011 Lead Base Year Emissions Inventory
EPA guidance for emissions inventory development provides that
actual emissions should be used for purposes of the base year
inventory.\2\ On February 9, 2015, Pennsylvania submitted to EPA the
2011 base year emissions inventory for the lead point sources located
within the Lyons Area. The Lyons Area has the following point sources
of lead emissions: East Penn Manufacturing Company's Richmond Township
Facility; East Penn Manufacturing Company's Kutztown Facility; and
McConway & Torley Kutztown Foundry. PADEP requires larger emitting
facilities to report production figures and emission calculations
annually. Throughput data are multiplied by emission factors based on
source classification codes (SCC) to develop emission estimates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PADEP submitted EPA's 2011 National Emissions Inventory (NEI) v2
data for nonpoint source lead emissions. The nonpoint source values for
the Lyons Area were calculated using Berks County data apportioned by
population, of which 4.1 percent (%) is included in the Lyons Area. EPA
reviewed the results, procedures, and methodologies for Pennsylvania's
submission and found them to be reasonable for calculating the lead
base year inventory for CAA section 172(c)(3) and in accordance with 40
CFR 51.117(e). A more detailed description of the SIP submittal and
EPA's evaluation is included in a Technical Support Document (TSD)
prepared in support of this rulemaking action. A copy of the TSD is
available, upon request, from the EPA Regional Office listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document or is also available electronically
within the Docket for this rulemaking action.
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving Pennsylvania's submission consisting of the base
year emissions inventory for the Lyons Area for the 2008 lead NAAQS.
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because EPA views
this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse
comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal
Register, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the
proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are filed.
This rule will be effective on August 10, 2015 without further notice
unless EPA receives adverse comment by July 9, 2015. If EPA receives
adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. EPA
will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on
the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this
time.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by August 10, 2015. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it
[[Page 32477]]
extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to
file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed
rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of
today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for
judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw
this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking action. This action to approve Pennsylvania's base year
emissions inventory for the Lyons Area may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, and Lead.
Dated: May 20, 2015.
William C. Early,
Acting, Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN--Pennsylvania
0
2. Section 52.2036 is amended by adding paragraph (v) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.2036 Base year emissions inventory.
* * * * *
(v) EPA approves as a revision to the Pennsylvania State
Implementation Plan the 2011 base year lead emission inventory for the
Lyons, Pennsylvania nonattainment area for the 2008 lead NAAQS. This
SIP revision was submitted by the Acting Secretary of the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection, on February 9, 2015. This
submittal consists of the 2011 base year inventories for all relevant
sources in the Lyons, Pennsylvania nonattainment area for the pollutant
lead (Pb).
[FR Doc. 2015-13945 Filed 6-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P