Schedule for Rating Disabilities; The Organs of Special Sense and Schedule of Ratings-Eye, 32513-32522 [2015-13788]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–9700.
(This is not a toll-free telephone
number.)
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 4
Schedule for Rating Disabilities; The
Organs of Special Sense and Schedule
of Ratings—Eye
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend the
portion of the VA Schedule for Rating
Disabilities (VASRD or rating schedule)
that addresses the organs of special
sense and schedule of ratings—eye. The
purpose of these changes is to
incorporate medical advances that have
occurred since the last review, update
current medical terminology, and
provide clear evaluation criteria. The
proposed rule reflects advances in
medical knowledge, recommendations
from the National Academy of Sciences
(NAS), and comments from subject
matter experts and the public garnered
as part of a public forum. The public
forum, focusing on revisions to the
organs of special sense and schedule of
ratings for eye disabilities, was held on
January 19–20, 2012.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 10, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to Director, Office of Regulation
Policy and Management (02REG),
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue NW., Room 1068,
Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to
(202) 273–9026. Comments should
indicate that they are submitted in
response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AP14–Schedule
for Rating Disabilities; The Organs of
Special Sense and Schedule of
Ratings—Eye.’’ Copies of comments
received will be available for public
inspection in the Office of Regulation
Policy and Management, Room 1068,
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday (except
holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902 for
an appointment. (This is not a toll-free
number.) In addition, during the
comment period, comments may be
viewed online through the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) at
www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nick
Olmos-Lau, M.D., Medical Officer, Part
4 VASRD Staff (211C), Compensation
Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW.,
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Jun 08, 2015
As part of
VA’s ongoing revision of the VA
Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD
or rating schedule), VA proposes
changes to 38 CFR 4.77–4.79, which
pertain to the organs of special sense
and disabilities and disease of the eye.
The proposed changes will: (1) Update
the medical terminology of certain eye
conditions; (2) add medical conditions
frequently encountered but not
currently found in the rating schedule;
and (3) refine evaluation criteria based
on medical advances that have occurred
since the last revision and current
understanding of functional changes
associated with or resulting from
disease or injury (pathophysiology).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
RIN 2900–AP14
Jkt 235001
I. § 4.77 Visual Fields
Current § 4.77(a) requires examiners
to record the results of visual field
testing on a standard Goldmann chart
and include the Goldmann chart with
the examination report. In order to
improve the efficiency and timeliness of
claims processing, VA proposes to
eliminate the requirement that
examiners provide VA with the
Goldmann chart and instead only
require the visual field measurements
necessary for rating purposes.
An examination of visual fields
requires an examiner to indicate the
Veteran’s maximum visual field at 16
prescribed points of measurement.
Under the current regulation, if the
results of an examination do not include
the Goldmann chart used for visual field
testing, it must be returned to the
examiner for inclusion of the completed
chart prior to evaluating the disability.
This results in unnecessary delays in
claims where all relevant information to
evaluate visual field impairment is
present, but is not in the prescribed
format. In addition to reducing delays in
processing time, eliminating the chart
requirement expands the ability to
evaluate disabilities on the basis of
private treatment records, provided they
contain sufficient evidence to evaluate
the disability. Under the proposed
change, an examination of a visual field
impairment is sufficient for rating
purposes if it provides, at a minimum,
visual field measurements of at least 16
meridians 221⁄2 degrees apart for each
eye and it indicates the Goldmann
equivalent used during testing. As this
information need not be provided in a
chart format, VA proposes to amend in
current paragraph (a) the phrase ‘‘The
examiner must chart at least 16
meridians . . .’’ to read ‘‘The examiner
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32513
must document the results for at least 16
meridians . . .’’.
Similarly, VA proposes to amend the
language in current paragraph (a) which
directs an examiner to ‘‘include the
tracing of either the tangent screen or of
the 30-degree threshold visual field
. . .’’ when additional testing is
required. As above, VA proposes that
the examiner need only ‘‘document the
results’’ of the additional testing rather
than provide the actual tracing itself.
No other changes to § 4.77 are
proposed.
II. § 4.78 Muscle Function
Section 4.78(a) currently requires
muscle function to be examined and
measured using Goldmann perimeters.
However, due to the increasing
difficulty encountered by evaluation
facilities in acquiring and repairing
Goldmann perimeters, the Tangent
Screen has been developed as an
alternative method for documenting
alteration of eye muscle function. David
F. Chang, Chapter 2. Ophthalmologic
Examination, Vaughan & Asbury’s
General Ophthalmology, https://access
medicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?
bookid=387&Sectionid=40229319 (last
visited Apr. 29, 2014). The Tangent
Screen is an inexpensive device,
commonly found in many eye clinics,
and is used to test for diplopia due to
eye muscle dysfunction. Like the
Goldmann perimeter, the results of the
Tangent Screen method are documented
on a Goldmann chart recording sheet,
which plots areas of diplopia across the
major visual fields. Furthermore, the
results of both tests are relatively
similar. See Agnes M.F. Wong, MD, and
James A. Sharpe, MD, A Comparison of
Tangent Screen, Goldmann, and
Humphrey Perimetry in the Detection
and Localization of Occipital Lesions,
Ophthalmology 1107:527–544 (2000). In
order to accommodate more modern and
readily available methods, VA proposes
to amend § 4.78(a) to allow for
measurement of muscle function using
either Goldmann perimeters or Tangent
Screen method.
Current § 4.78(a) requires examiners
to plot the results of muscle function
testing on a standard Goldmann chart
and include the chart with the
examination report. VA proposes to
remove these requirements for the same
reasons indicated in the section above
discussing proposed changes to § 4.77.
Under the proposed change, an
examination of muscle function is
sufficient for rating purposes if it
identifies the quadrant(s) and range(s) of
degrees in which diplopia exists.
No other changes to § 4.78 are
proposed.
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
32514
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
III. § 4.79 Schedule of Ratings—Eye
Current § 4.79 contains a General
Rating Formula for Diagnostic Codes
6000 through 6009. This formula
evaluates disease of the eye on the basis
of incapacitating episodes or visual
impairment (impairment of visual
acuity, visual field, and/or muscle
function), whichever provides the
highest evaluation. Currently,
‘‘incapacitating episodes’’ is defined as
a period of acute symptoms severe
enough to require prescribed bed rest
and treatment by a physician or other
healthcare provider. This definition
provides limited applicability of the
rating formula as bed rest is no longer
a uniformly valid method of treatment,
nor is it a pertinent domain in the field
of disability criteria. R.I. Cho & E.
Savitsky, Ocular Trauma, Combat
Casualty Care: Lessons Learned from
OEF and OIF, 299 (M. Lenhart ed. 2012).
Limiting the definition to bed rest
categorically excludes periods of
incapacitation due to eye disease
requiring intensive treatment and
medical management other than bed
rest, as well as the potential for
development of medical complications.
Therefore, VA proposes to update the
definition of an incapacitating episode
to mean an episode that requires clinic
visits for treatment for an active eye
disease.
Through its definition, VA intends to
require that these visits be documented
in the medical record by a physician or
other health care provider and that such
visits must relate to the monitoring of
progress, administration of treatment(s),
and the development of complications
related to the underlying active eye
disability. Incorporating documented
treatment allows for consideration of
intensive interventional care, the use of
complex drugs, and the placement of
devices when evaluating the severity of
a given eye disability. By providing
evaluations based on the duration of
treatment for an active eye disease, the
proposed criteria more accurately reflect
occupational disruption and
impairment due to eye diseases that do
not necessarily involve measurable
visual impairment. This updated
definition of incapacitating episodes
aligns with modern medical practice
and the treatment of eye diseases,
providing an alternative basis for
evaluation of eye disabilities in the
absence of visual impairment. VA also
proposes to add a non-exhaustive list of
examples of treatment to the definition
of incapacitating episodes. This list
would clarify the evaluation criteria to
claims processors and ease application
of the rating schedule by indicating
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
possible treatment options for the
various eye diseases.
VA proposes a 60 percent evaluation
for documented incapacitating episodes
requiring 10 or more medical visits for
monitoring or treatment of an active eye
disease or complications per year. A 40
percent evaluation is proposed for
documented incapacitating episodes
requiring at least 7 but no more than 9
medical visits for monitoring or
treatment of an active eye disease or
complications per year. A 20 percent
evaluation is proposed for documented
incapacitating episodes requiring at
least 4 but no more than 6 medical visits
for monitoring or treatment of an active
eye disease or complications per year.
VA proposes a 10 percent evaluation for
documented incapacitating episodes
requiring 3 medical visits for monitoring
or treatment of an active eye disease or
complications per year.
VA would add a note to § 4.79 that
would refer raters, when evaluating
visual impairment due to the particular
condition, to 38 CFR 4.75–4.78 and to
§ 4.79, diagnostic codes 6061–6090.
A. Diseases of the Eye—Organizational
Headings
The current schedule of ratings for the
eye contains one general category for
Diseases of the Eye with a limited listing
of diagnoses and/or disabilities. This
category does not organize the listed
disabilities in a manner that represents
the current scientific understanding of
the specific anatomy of the eye, etiology
of the disease, or the disabling effect of
the disease itself. When presented with
a diagnosis that is not listed in the
rating schedule, claims processors must
rate by analogy to a listed diagnosis.
Section 4.27 directs claims processors
to analogize these disabilities on the
basis of disease similarity and residual
disability to allow for easy identification
of the source of each rating. However, it
is specifically noted that ‘‘the diagnostic
terminology will be that of the medical
examiner, with no attempt to translate
the terms into schedule nomenclature.’’
Id. In other words, the determination of
disease type and residual disability is to
be made by a medical professional; the
claims processor should not partake in
any type of medical determination when
deciding how to rate analogously.
In order to ease the use of analogous
codes when evaluating eye diseases, VA
proposes to organize the Diseases of the
Eye into nine categories. These
diagnostic categories organize the listed
disabilities into medically logical sets
on the basis of diagnostic criteria,
anatomical location, and disease
etiology. By grouping disabilities
according to medical criteria, the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
categories would ease the use of
analogous coding by claims processors.
Additionally, the categories would
allow VA to track the use of analogous
codes with more specificity, providing
data on the need for inclusion of new
disabilities in future revisions to the
VASRD.
All disabilities contained in § 4.79
would be evaluated under the General
Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye
unless otherwise directed. The
organizational categories and specific
diagnostic codes within each category
are as follows:
B. Diseases of the Uveal Tract
The uveal tract consists of three eye
structures: the iris, the ciliary body, and
the choroid. This category of conditions
includes infections, inflammations
including Tuberculosis of the eye (DC
6010) and other diseases involving these
three structures of the eye. This category
would include the following diagnostic
codes (DCs): DC 6000, choroidopathy,
including uveitis, iritis, cyclitis, and
choroiditis; and DC 6002, scleritis. VA
proposes to continue evaluating both
conditions under the General Rating
Formula for Diseases of the Eye, as
amended above.
C. Diseases of the Retina, Macula, and
Vitreous
The retina is the inner layer of the
eye, containing blood vessels and nerve
structures that connect the eye with the
optic nerve and brain. The retina
participates in light, motion, and color
perception and image formation. The
macula is the visual center of the eye
and contains receptors that perceive
light and color. Vitreous is the thick,
transparent substance that fills the eye,
providing it with volume and shape.
This category includes the following
diagnostic codes:
1. Diagnostic Code 6006
Current DC 6006 addresses
retinopathy or maculopathy. VA
proposes to clarify this code as ‘‘not
otherwise specified,’’ as new DCs are
proposed to capture other specified
types of retinopathy. If the retinopathy
diagnosed is not one of the other
specified diagnoses, it will be evaluated
as DC 6006. This condition would
continue to be evaluated under the
General Rating Formula for Diseases of
the Eye.
2. Diagnostic Code 6008
VA proposes to continue evaluating
this condition, detachment of the retina,
under the General Rating Formula for
Diseases of the Eye. VA proposes no
other changes to this diagnostic code.
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
3. Diagnostic Code 6011
Current DC 6011 instructs claims
processors to evaluate retinal scars,
atrophy, or irregularities as 10 percent
disabling if such scars, etc., are centrally
located and result in an irregular,
duplicated, enlarged, or diminished
image. Alternatively, claims processors
may evaluate based on visual
impairment. VA proposes to further
expand this alternate rating criteria by
directing claims processors to evaluate
this condition under the General Rating
Formula for Diseases of the Eye if this
would result in a higher evaluation. In
other words, the only change to the
diagnostic code is to allow this
condition to be evaluated on the basis
of ‘‘incapacitating episodes,’’ in
addition to visual impairment or the
nature of the scar, atrophy, or
irregularity itself.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
4. New Diagnostic Code 6040
VA proposes to add a new DC 6040,
titled ‘‘Diabetic retinopathy,’’ in order to
account for retinal impairment
specifically caused by diabetes in the
Veteran population. Visual impairment
is a common complication of diabetes
mellitus. Diabetes is the most significant
cause of visual impairment and
blindness in the United States in
working age adults. James Orcutt et al.,
Eye Disease in Veterans with Diabetes,
27 Diabetes Care B50 (2004).
Epidemiologic studies of diabetic
retinopathy show that 15 years after the
onset of diabetes, retinopathy appears in
97 percent of patients with type 1
diabetes, 80 percent of type 2 diabetes
treated with insulin, and 55 percent of
type 2 diabetes treated without insulin.
Id. The most severe form of retinopathy
(proliferative) was evident 15 years after
the initial diagnosis of diabetes in 30
percent of cases with type 1 diabetes, in
15 percent of those with type 2 diabetes
treated with insulin, and in 5 percent of
those not treated with insulin. Id. Of
429,918 patients treated at the VA
hospital with diabetes in 1998, 9.5
percent developed proliferative
retinopathy related to diabetes. In
addition, the study noted that diabetic
veterans with lower-extremity
amputations have an increased risk for
developing diabetic retinopathy. Id. at
52.
Currently, this condition is evaluated
under DC 6006 (retinopathy or
maculopathy) without any method of
identifying those cases caused by
diabetes. Given the significance of
diabetes in the Veteran population and
the likelihood of developing this related
eye disease, VA proposes to add a
separate diagnostic code to properly
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
track and evaluate the Veteran
population with diabetic retinopathy.
VA proposes to continue evaluating this
condition under the General Rating
Formula for Diseases of the Eye.
5. New Diagnostic Code 6042
VA proposes to add a new DC 6042,
titled ‘‘Retinal dystrophy (including
retinitis pigmentosa),’’ in order to
account for impairment due to this
condition in the Veteran population.
Retinal dystrophy is an important and
growing group of disorders that cause
blindness. Included within the larger
group of retinal dystrophy is retinitis
pigmentosa, perhaps the best known
and most commonly recognized
condition. While retinitis pigmentosa is
hereditary, the onset of symptoms may
be delayed until early adult years,
meaning impairment may not manifest
until well after an individual has begun
his or her military service. In certain
situations, disability compensation can
be provided to Veterans with this
condition when the symptoms first
manifest themselves during active duty
military service. To reinforce the
potential for service-connection for
these disabilities, VA proposes to add a
specific diagnostic code for these
conditions.
In retinitis pigmentosa there is a
gradual loss of the eye photoreceptors
(rods and cones) with a deposition of
pigment caused by involutional changes
of the cells of the retinal pigment
epithelium layer. Retinitis pigmentosa,
A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia,
PubMed Health, U.S. National Library of
Medicine, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pubmedhealth/PMH0002024/ (last
visited Apr. 29, 2014). This leads to the
gradual onset of night blindness,
tripping over objects in the visual
periphery due to constricion of the
peripheral visual field, tunnel vision,
and eventually total blindness. Id. There
is currently no known effective
treatment for this condition. Id. Given
the functional effects of this disability,
VA proposes to evaluate this condition
under the General Rating Formula for
Diseases of the Eye, which would allow
for rating based on either visual
impairment or on incapacitating
episodes.
D. Glaucoma
Glaucoma is a group of diseases that
can damage the eye’s optic nerve and
can result in loss of vision. Glaucoma,
MayoClinic, https://www.mayoclinic.org/
diseases-conditions/glaucoma/basics/
symptoms/con-20024042 (last visited
Apr. 29, 2014). The most common types
of glaucoma are open-angle glaucoma
and angle-closure glaucoma. Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32515
Angle closure glaucoma is due to a
blockage of the fluid (aqueous humor)
drainage canals, causing a rapid and
dangerous increase in eye pressure. This
is an acute emergency that can lead to
permanent visual loss. These conditions
can be primary or secondary to an
injury, medication, inflammation,
tumor, or other medical condition. Id.
This category includes the following
diagnostic codes:
1. Diagnostic Code 6012
Current DC 6012, angle-closure
glaucoma, lists evaluation criteria based
on either visual impairment or on
incapacitating episodes, whichever
results in a higher evaluation. In
addition, a minimum 10 percent
evaluation is provided for the
requirement of continuous medication.
For clarity and uniformity with the
remainder of § 4.79, VA proposes to
include the general instruction to
evaluate this disability under the
General Rating Formula for Diseases of
the Eye with a minimum evaluation of
10 percent when continuous medication
is required.
2. Diagnostic Code 6013
Current DC 6013, open-angle
glaucoma, states to evaluate on the basis
of visual impairment due to this
condition. VA proposes to direct
evaluation under the General Rating
Formula for Diseases of the Eye, which
includes evaluation on the basis of
visual impairment or incapacitating
episodes, whichever provides a higher
evaluation. This proposal expands the
evaluation criteria to provide an
alternative measure of disability outside
the realm of visual impairment for this
disability, allowing VA to more
accurately and adequately capture the
disabling effects.
Current DC 6013 also provides a
minimum 10 percent evaluation if
continuous medication is required for
treatment. VA proposes no change to
this minimum evaluation.
E. Ocular Neoplasms and Trauma
This category includes current
diagnostic codes for neoplasms of the
eye (both malingnant and benign) as
well as eye traumas. This category
includes the following diagnostic codes:
1. Diagnostic Code 6007
VA proposes to continue evaluating
DC 6007, intraocular hemorrhage, under
the General Rating Formula for Diseases
of the Eye. VA proposes no other
changes to this diagnostic code.
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
32516
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
2. Diagnostic Code 6009
Current DC 6009, unhealed eye injury,
includes orbital trauma, as well as
penetrating and non-penetrating eye
injury. VA proposes to continue
evaluating this condition under the
General Rating Formula for Diseases of
the Eye. VA also proposes to add a note
stating that this code includes orbital
trauma, as well as penetrating and nonpenetrating eye injury. This note would
facilitate the identification and
recording of significant eye injuries in
one DC.
3. Diagnostic Code 6014
Current DC 6014 evaluates malignant
neoplasm of the eyeball only. VA
proposes to replace the word ‘‘eyeball’’
with ‘‘eye’’ to conform with modern
medical terminology. The preferred
nomenclature in medicine for the organ
of vision is the eye. While eyeball and
eye are used interchangeably, it is
customary to use the word eye when
referring to diseases or anatomy.
American Academy of Ophthalmology,
Introducing Ophthalmology: A Primer
for Office Staff, 8 (3d ed. 2013).
Additionally, VA proposes to clarify
that this diagnostic code includes
malignant neoplasms of the orbit and
adnexa. The most prevalent intraocular
malignant neoplasms include uveal
melanoma, intraocular lymphoma, and
intraocular metastasis. These
malignancies affect not only the eyeball,
but often involve the orbit and adnexa.
To ensure these malignancies are
adequately evaluated under the VASRD,
VA proposes to clarify that DC 6014 is
not limited to neoplasms of the eyeball
only. Malignant neoplasms of the skin
are still excluded as these are evaluated
under current DC 7818 within a
different body system. VA proposes no
changes to the evaluation criteria for DC
6014.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
4. Diagnostic Code 6015
Current DC 6015 evaluates benign
neoplasm of the eyeball and adnexa
only. VA proposes to replace the word
‘‘eyeball’’ with ‘‘eye’’ to conform with
modern medical terminology. Id.
Additionally, VA proposes to expand
the applicability of this diagnostic code
to include benign neoplasms of the
orbit, this includes lid tumors in adults,
cavernous hemangioma, dermoid,
epidermal cysts and other conditions.
By expanding the applicability, the
VASRD would provide a specific
diagnostic code for the evaluation of
benign growths of the orbit and adnexa.
Benign neoplasms of the skin are still
excluded as these are evaluated under
current DC 7819 within a different body
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
system. VA proposes no changes to the
evaluation criteria for DC 6015.
F. Conditions of the Lacrimal System
The lacrimal system consists of the
lacrimal glands and the nasolacrimal
duct. This system is responsible for the
secretion and drainage of tears and,
when properly functioning, serves to
moisten, lubricate, and protect the
surface of the eye. Cat N. Burkat MD,
and Mark J. Lucarelli MD, Anatomy of
the Lacrimal System, The Lacrimal
System: Diagnosis, Management, and
Surgery, https://link.springer.com/book/
10.1007%2F978-0-387-35267-1. This
category includes DC 6025, which
pertains to disorders of the lacrimal
apparatus (epiphora, dacrocystitis, etc.).
VA proposes no changes to this
diagnostic code.
G. Corneal Diseases
The cornea is the eye’s outermost
layer. It is a clear, dome-shaped surface,
overlying the pupil, that covers the front
of the eye. Facts About the Cornea and
Corneal Disease, National Eye Institute,
https://www.nei.nih.gov/health/
cornealdisease/ (last visited Apr. 29,
2014). The cornea functions as a lens
which focuses light on the retina. Id. An
injury to the cornea generally produces
redness, itching, tearing, and,
depending on the severity of the injury,
pain and blurring of vision. Id. This
category includes the following
diagnostic codes:
1. Diagnostic Code 6001
VA proposes to continue evaluating
DC 6001, keratopathy, under the
General Rating Formula for Diseases of
the Eye. VA proposes no other changes
to this diagnostic code.
2. Diagnostic Codes 6017 and 6018
Current DC 6017 states to evaluate
trachomatous conjunctivitis on the basis
of visual impairment when this
condition is active, with a minimum
evaluation of 30 percent. Current DC
6018 states to evaluate chronic
conjunctivitis (nontrachomatous) on the
basis of visual impairment when this
condition is active, with a minimum
evaluation of 10 percent.
VA proposes to direct evaluation of
active trachomatous and
nontrachomatous conjunctivitis under
the General Rating Formula for Diseases
of the Eye, which includes evaluation
on the basis of visual impairment or
incapacitating episodes, whichever
provides a higher evaluation. This
proposal expands the evaluation criteria
to provide an alternative measure of
disability outside the realm of visual
impairment for these disabilities,
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
allowing VA to more accurately and
adequately capture the disabling effects.
VA proposes to retain the respective
minimum evaluations for cases of active
conjunctivitis.
Once conjunctivitis (trachomatous or
nontrachomatous) is found to be
inactive, current DCs 6017 and 6018
state to evaluate based on residuals,
including visual impairment or
disfigurement under DC 7800. VA
proposes no change to these evaluation
criteria.
3. Diagnostic Code 6035
Current DC 6035 states to evaluate
keratoconus on the basis of visual
impairment due to this condition. VA
proposes to direct evaluation under the
General Rating Formula for Diseases of
the Eye, which includes evaluation on
the basis of visual impairment or
incapacitating episodes, whichever
provides a higher evaluation. This
proposal expands the evaluation criteria
to provide an alternative measure of
disability outside the realm of visual
impairment for this disability, allowing
VA to more accurately and adequately
capture the disabling effects.
4. Diagnostic Code 6036
Current DC 6036 states to evaluate
status post corneal transplant on the
basis of visual impairment due to this
condition, with a minimum evaluation
of 10 percent in the presence of pain,
photophobia, and glare sensitivity. VA
proposes to direct evaluation under the
General Rating Formula for Diseases of
the Eye, which includes evaluation on
the basis of visual impairment or
incapacitating episodes, whichever
provides a higher evaluation. This
proposal expands the evaluation criteria
to provide an alternative measure of
disability outside the realm of visual
impairment for this disability, allowing
VA to more accurately and adequately
capture the disabling effects. VA intends
to retain the minimum evaluation of 10
percent in the presence of pain,
photophobia, and glare sensitivity.
H. External Eye Diseases, Including the
Eyelash, Eyelid, and Eyebrow
The external eye disease category
consists of a group of conditions
involving the ocular-related structures,
which have direct contact with the
environment, and includes the eyelids,
eyelashes, and eyebrows. While the
cornea has direct contact with the
environment as well, VA has provided
a separate category for diseases of the
cornea. The external eye diseases
category includes nine conditions of the
eyelashes, eyelids, and eyebrows listed
in the current VASRD. This category
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
includes the following diagnostic codes
in which no change is proposed to the
current evaluation criteria: DC 6020,
Ectropion; DC 6021, Entropion; DC
6022, Lagophthalmos; DC 6023, Loss of
eyebrows, complete, unilateral or
bilateral; DC 6024, Loss of eyelashes,
complete, unilateral or bilateral; DC
6032, Loss of eyelids, partial or
complete; and DC 6037, Pinguecula. It
also includes the following diagnostic
codes with specific proposed changes.
Current DC 6034 states to evaluate
pterygium on the basis of visual
impairment, disfigurement (DC 7800),
conjunctivitis (DC 6018), etc.,
depending on the particular findings.
Similarly, current DC 6091 states to
evaluate symblepharon on the basis of
visual impairment, lagophthalmos (DC
6022), disfigurement (DC 7800), etc.,
depending on the particular findings.
In both cases, VA proposes to replace
the direction to evaluate on the basis of
visual impairment with the General
Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye,
which includes evaluation on the basis
of visual impairment or incapacitating
episodes, whichever provides a higher
evaluation. This proposal expands the
evaluation criteria to provide an
alternative measure of disability outside
the realm of visual impairment for these
disabilities, allowing VA to more
accurately and adequately capture the
disabling effects. VA also proposes to
include the phrase ‘‘and combine in
accordance with § 4.25’’ to the rating
instructions of DCs 6034 and 6091. The
current language allows for multiple
evaluations to be assigned and
combined depending on the particular
findings, but it is not entirely clear to
the reader. Therefore, this addition
would ensure consistency and clarity
for field application.
VA proposes no other changes to
these diagnostic codes.
I. Disease of the Lens
The lens is a crystalline, transparent
structure covered by a capsule and
suspended by a ligament that weakens
with age. Henry Gray, Anatomy of the
Human Body, 1019–20 (20th ed. 1918).
The lens capsule is lined in the anterior
portion by an epithelium that generates
new lens fibers at the equators. Id. In
addition to malformation and
malposition, the main lens pathology is
cataract formation. A cataract is a lens
opacity which produces visual
impairment by obscuration and altered
light refraction. Facts About Cataract,
National Eye Institute, https://
www.nei.nih.gov/health/cataract/
cataract_facts.asp (last visited Apr. 29,
2014). This category includes evaluation
criteria for DC 6029, Aphakia or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
dislocation of crystalline lens for which
VA proposes no changes. It also
includes the following diagnostic codes
with specific proposed changes.
Current DC 6027 states to evaluate
preoperative cataracts on the basis of
visual impairment. VA proposes to
direct evaluation of preoperative
cataracts under the General Rating
Formula for Diseases of the Eye, which
includes evaluation on the basis of
visual impairment or incapacitating
episodes, whichever provides a higher
evaluation. This proposal expands the
evaluation criteria to provide an
alternative measure of disability outside
the realm of visual impairment for this
disability, allowing VA to more
accurately and adequately capture the
disabling effects.
Current DC 6027 also provides two
evaluation options for postoperative
cataracts depending on the presence or
absence of a replacement lens. If a
replacement lens is present, current DC
6027 states to evaluate on the basis of
visual impairment. VA proposes to
direct the evaluation of postoperative
cataracts with a replacement lens under
the General Rating Formula for Diseases
of the Eye for the same reasons
discussed above. If there is no
replacement lens present, current DC
6027 states to evaluate based on aphakia
(DC 6029). VA proposes only to insert
the applicable DC. No substantive
change is proposed.
J. Neuro-Ophthalmic Conditions
This category includes a listing of the
most common and pertinent neuroophthalmic conditions, to include
diseases of the anterior visual pathways,
optic nerve disorders, cranial nerve
palsies resulting in visual impairment,
disorders of eye movements, and
pupillary disorders. The field of neuroophthalmology bridges the gap between
neurology and ophthalmology by
providing particular attention to visual
impairment due to diseases of the
neural structures involved in vision.
Since a substantial portion of the brain
is involved with vision, many brain
disorders produce visual impairment.
This category includes the following
diagnostic codes in which no change is
proposed to the current evaluation
criteria: DC 6016, Nystagmus, central;
DC 6019, Ptosis, unilateral or bilateral;
and DC 6030, Paralysis of
accommodation (due to neuropathy of
the Oculomotor Nerve (cranial nerve
III)). It also includes the following
diagnostic code with specific proposes
changes.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32517
1. Diagnostic Code 6026
Current DC 6026 states to evaluate
optic neuropathy on the basis of visual
impairment due to this condition. VA
proposes to direct evaluation under the
General Rating Formula for Diseases of
the Eye, which includes evaluation on
the basis of visual impairment or
incapacitating episodes, whichever
provides a higher evaluation. This
proposal expands the evaluation criteria
to provide an alternative measure of
disability outside the realm of visual
impairment for this disability, allowing
VA to more accurately and adequately
capture the disabling effects.
2. New Diagnostic Code 6046
VA proposes to add a new DC 6046,
titled ‘‘Post-chiasmal disorders.’’ This
category includes a variety of central
visual disorders with brain
involvement. This category incorporates
ophthalmic residuals from traumatic
brain injury (TBI) or other causes of
cerebral injury, such as infectious,
vascular conditions, or degenerative
conditions. Post-chiasmal disorders may
be associated with cognitive changes
caused by the structural or functional
alteration of the brain tissue, which are
often associated with TBI. See James
Garrity MD, Overview of Optic Nerve
Disorders, The Merck Manual Home
Health Handbook, https://
www.merckmanuals.com/home/eye_
disorders/optic_nerve_disorders/
overview_of_optic_nerve_disorders.html
(last visited Apr. 29, 2014) (each optic
nerve splits at a structure in the brain
called the optic chiasm). The alteration
can lead to brain dysfunction which can
manifest as a variety of visual
impairments. Given the increased
awareness and understanding of the
chronic residuals of TBI in the medical
community, particularly amongst the
Veteran population, VA proposes this
new diagnostic code to provide
adequate and proper evaluations for
Veterans with post-chiasmal disorders.
Due to the varying presentation of postchiasmal disorders, VA proposes to
evaluate these conditions under the
General Rating Formula for Diseases of
the Eye to maximize the options
available for an accurate evaluation.
IV. Technical Amendments
VA also would update Appendix A,
B, and C of part 4 to reflect the above
noted proposed amendments.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
32518
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ which requires
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), as ‘‘any regulatory action
that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this proposed rule have
been examined, and it has been
determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. VA’s impact analysis can be
found as a supporting document at
https://www.regulations.gov, usually
within 48 hours after the rulemaking
document is published. Additionally, a
copy of this rulemaking and its impact
analysis are available on VA’s Web site
at https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by
following the link for ‘‘VA Regulations
Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal
Year to Date.’’
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This
proposed rule would not affect any
small entities. Only certain VA
beneficiaries could be directly affected.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
this proposed rule is exempt from the
initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of sections 603
and 604.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on State, local, and
tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance program numbers and titles
for this rule are 64.009, Veterans
Medical Care Benefits; 64.104, Pension
for Non-Service-Connected Disability
for Veterans; 64.109, Veterans
Compensation for Service-Connected
Disability; and 64.110, Veterans
Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation for Service-Connected
Death.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Robert A. McDonald, Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on May 10, 2015, for
publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 4
Disability benefits, Pensions,
Veterans.
Approved: June 2, 2015.
William F. Russo,
Acting Director, Office of Regulation Policy
& Management.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 4, subpart B as set forth below:
PART 4—SCHEDULE FOR RATING
DISABILITIES
Subpart B—Disability Ratings
1. The authority citation for part 4
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155, unless
otherwise noted.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Amend § 4.77 by revising paragraph
(a) to read as follows:
■
§ 4.77
Visual fields.
(a) Examination of visual fields.
Examiners must use either Goldmann
kinetic perimetry or automated
perimetry using Humphrey Model 750,
Octopus Model 101, or later versions of
these perimetric devices with simulated
kinetic Goldmann testing capability. For
phakic (normal) individuals, as well as
for pseudophakic or aphakic individuals
who are well adapted to intraocular lens
implant or contact lens correction,
visual field examinations must be
conducted using a standard target size
and luminance, which is Goldmann’s
equivalent III/4e. For aphakic
individuals not well adapted to contact
lens correction or pseudophakic
individuals not well adapted to
intraocular lens implant, visual field
examinations must be conducted using
Goldmann’s equivalent IV/4e. The
examiner must document the results for
at least 16 meridians 221⁄2 degrees apart
for each eye and indicate the Goldmann
equivalent used. See Table III for the
normal extent (in degrees) of the visual
fields at the 8 principal meridians (45
degrees apart). When the examiner
indicates that additional testing is
necessary to evaluate visual fields, the
additional testing must be conducted
using either a tangent screen or a 30degree threshold visual field with the
Goldmann III stimulus size. The
examination report must document the
results of either the tangent screen or of
the 30-degree threshold visual field with
the Goldmann III stimulus size.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 4.78 by revising paragraph
(a) to read as follows:
§ 4.78
Muscle function.
(a) Examination of muscle function.
The examiner must use a Goldmann
perimeter chart or the Tangent Screen
method that identifies the four major
quadrants (upward, downward, left and
right lateral) and the central field (20
degrees or less) (see Figure 2). The
examiner must document the results of
muscle function testing by identifying
the quadrant(s) and range(s) of degrees
in which diplopia exists.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 4.79 Schedule of ratings—
eye by revising the tables Diseases of the
Eye and Ratings for Impairment of
Muscle Function to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
32519
DISEASES OF THE EYE
Rating
Unless otherwise directed, evaluate diseases of the eye under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye.
General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye:
Evaluate on the basis of either visual impairment due to the particular condition or on incapacitating episodes, whichever results
in a higher evaluation.
With documented incapacitating episodes requiring 10 or more medical visits for monitoring or treatment of an active eye disease
or complications per year ...................................................................................................................................................................
With documented incapacitating episodes requiring at least 7 but no more than 9 medical visits for monitoring or treatment of an
active eye disease or complications per year ....................................................................................................................................
With documented incapacitating episodes requiring at least 4 but no more than 6 medical visits for monitoring or treatment of an
active eye disease or complications per year ....................................................................................................................................
With documented incapacitating episodes requiring 3 medical visits for monitoring or treatment of an active eye disease or complications per year ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Note (1): For the purposes of evaluation under 38 CFR 4.79, an incapacitating episode is one which requires clinic visits for an
active eye disease, as documented in the medical record by a physician or other health care provider, and relates to the monitoring of progress, administration of treatment(s), and to the development of complications related to the underlying active eye
disability. Examples of treatment may include but are not limited to: Systemic immunosuppressants or biologic agents;
intravitreal or periocular injections; laser treatments; or other surgical interventions.
Note (2): For the purposes of evaluating visual impairment due to the particular condition, refer to 38 CFR 4.75–4.78 and to
§ 4.79, diagnostic codes 6061–6090.
60
40
20
10
Diseases of the Uveal Tract
6000 Choroidopathy, including uveitis, iritis, cyclitis, and choroiditis.
6002 Scleritis.
6010 Tuberculosis of the eye:
Active ......................................................................................................................................................................................................
Inactive: Evaluate under § 4.88c or § 4.89 of this part, whichever is appropriate.
100
Diseases of the Retina, Macula, and Vitreous
6006 Retinopathy or maculopathy not otherwise specified.
6008 Detachment of retina.
6011 Retinal scars, atrophy, or irregularities:
Localized scars, atrophy, or irregularities of the retina, unilateral or bilateral, that are centrally located and that result in an irregular, duplicated, enlarged, or diminished image .................................................................................................................................
Alternatively, evaluate based on the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye, if this would result in a higher evaluation.
6040 Diabetic retinopathy.
6042 Retinal dystrophy (including retinitis pigmentosa).
10
Glaucoma
6012 Angle-closure glaucoma.
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye. Minimum evaluation if continuous medication is required .....
6013 Open-angle glaucoma.
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye. Minimum evaluation if continuous medication is required .....
10
10
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Ocular Neoplasms and Trauma
6007 Introacular hemorrhage.
6009 Unhealed eye injury.
Note: This code includes orbital trauma, as well as penetrating and non-penetrating eye injury.
6014 Malignant neoplasms of the eye, orbit, and adnexa (excluding skin):
Malignant neoplasms of the eye, orbit, and adnexa (excluding skin) that require therapy that is comparable to those used for systemic malignancies, i.e., systemic chemotherapy, X-ray therapy more extensive than to the area of the eye, or surgery more
extensive than enucleation .................................................................................................................................................................
Note: Continue the 100-percent rating beyond the cessation of any surgical, X-ray, antineoplastic chemotherapy or other therapeutic procedure. Six months after discontinuance of such treatment, the appropriate disability rating will be determined by
mandatory VA examination. Any change in evaluation based upon that or any subsequent examination will be subject to the
provisions of § 3.105(e) of this chapter. If there has been no local recurrence or metastasis, evaluate based on residuals.
Malignant neoplasm of the eye, orbit, and adnexa (excluding skin) that does not require therapy comparable to that for systemic
malignancies:
Separately evaluate visual impairment and nonvisual impairment, e.g., disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800), and combine
the evaluations.
6015 Benign neoplasms of the eye, orbit, and adnexa (excluding skin):
Separately evaluate visual impairment and nonvisual impairment, e.g., disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800), and combine the
evaluations.
100
Conditions of the Lacrimal System
6025 Disorders of the lacrimal apparatus (epiphora, dacrocystitis, etc.):
Bilateral ...................................................................................................................................................................................................
Unilateral .................................................................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
20
10
32520
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
DISEASES OF THE EYE—Continued
Rating
Corneal Diseases
6001 Keratopathy.
6017 Trachomatous conjunctivitis:
Active: Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye, minimum rating ...........................................................
Inactive: Evaluate based on residuals, such as visual impairment and disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800).
6018 Chronic conjunctivitis (nontrachomatous):
Active: Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye, minimum rating ...........................................................
Inactive: Evaluate based on residuals, such as visual impairment and disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800).
6035 Keratoconus.
6036 Status post corneal transplant:
Rate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye.
Minimum, if there is pain, photophobia, and glare sensitivity .........................................................................................................
30
10
10
External Eye Diseases, Including the Eyelash, Eyelid, and Eyebrow
6020 Ectropion:
Bilateral ...................................................................................................................................................................................................
Unilateral .................................................................................................................................................................................................
6021 Entropion:
Bilateral ...................................................................................................................................................................................................
Unilateral .................................................................................................................................................................................................
6022 Lagophthalmos:
Bilateral ...................................................................................................................................................................................................
Unilateral .................................................................................................................................................................................................
6023 Loss of eyebrows, complete, unilateral or bilateral ...........................................................................................................................
6024 Loss of eyelashes, complete, unilateral or bilateral ..........................................................................................................................
6032 Loss of eyelids, partial or complete:
Separately evaluate both visual impairment due to eyelid loss and nonvisual impairment, e.g., disfigurement (diagnostic code
7800), and combine the evaluations.
6034 Pterygium:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye, disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800), conjunctivitis (diagnostic code 6018), etc., depending on the particular findings, and combine in accordance with § 4.25.
6037 Pinguecula:
Evaluate based on disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800).
6091 Symblepharon:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye, lagophthalmos (diagnostic code 6022), disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800), etc., depending on the particular findings, and combine in accordance with § 4.25.
20
10
20
10
20
10
10
10
Disease of the Lens
6027 Cataract:
Preoperative: Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye.
Postoperative: If a replacement lens is present (pseudophakia), evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the
Eye. If there is no replacement lens, evaluate based on aphakia (diagnostic code 6029).
6029 Aphakia or dislocation of crystalline lens:
Evaluate based on visual impairment, and elevate the resulting level of visual impairment one step.
Minimum (unilateral or bilateral) .............................................................................................................................................................
30
Neuro-Ophthalmic Conditions
6016 Nystagmus, central ............................................................................................................................................................................
6019 Ptosis, unilateral or bilateral:
Evaluate based on visual impairment or, in the absence of visual impairment, on disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800).
6026 Optic neuropathy: Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye.
6030 Paralysis of accommodation (due to neuropathy of the Oculomotor Nerve (cranial nerve III)) .......................................................
6046 Post-chiasmal disorders: Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye.
10
20
RATINGS FOR IMPAIRMENT OF MUSCLE FUNCTION
Equivalent
visual acuity
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Degree of diplopia
6090 Diplopia (double vision):
(a) Central 20 degrees ...........................................................................................................................................................
(b) 21 degrees to 30 degrees ................................................................................................................................................
(1) Down
(2) Lateral ........................................................................................................................................................................
(3) Up ..............................................................................................................................................................................
(c) 31 degrees to 40 degrees .................................................................................................................................................
(1) Down ..........................................................................................................................................................................
(2) Lateral ........................................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
5/200
(1.5/60)
15/200
(4.5/60)
20/100
(6/30)
20/70 (6/21)
32521
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
RATINGS FOR IMPAIRMENT OF MUSCLE FUNCTION—Continued
Equivalent
visual acuity
Degree of diplopia
(3) Up
Note: In accordance with 38 CFR 4.31, diplopia that is occasional or that is correctable with spectacles is evaluated at
0 percent .............................................................................................................................................................................
20/200 (6/60)
20/70 (6/21)
20/40 (6/12)
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155).
5. In Appendix A to Part 4, add
§§ 4.77, 4.78, and 4.79 to read as
follows:
■
APPENDIX A TO PART 4—TABLE OF AMENDMENTS AND EFFECTIVE DATES SINCE 1946
Sec.
Diagnostic
code No.
*
4.77 ...................
4.78 ...................
4.79 ...................
*
........................
........................
........................
6000
6001
6002
6006
6007
6008
6009
6011
6012
6013
6014
6015
6017
6018
6019
6026
6027
6034
6035
6036
6040
6042
6046
6091
*
*
*
*
*
*
Revised [insert effective date of final rule].
Revised [insert effective date of final rule].
Introduction criterion [insert effective date of final rule]; Revised General Rating Formula for Diseases of the
Eye [insert effective date of final rule]; General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye NOTE revised
[insert effective date of final rule]; Organizational categories added [insert effective date of final rule].
Criterion [insert effective date of final rule].
Criterion [insert effective date of final rule].
Criterion [insert effective date of final rule].
Title [insert effective date of final rule]; criterion [insert effective date of final rule].
Criterion [insert effective date of final rule].
Criterion [insert effective date of final rule].
Criterion [insert effective date of final rule].
Evaluation [insert effective date of final rule].
Evaluation [insert effective date of final rule].
Evaluation [insert effective date of final rule].
Title [insert effective date of final rule].
Title [insert effective date of final rule].
Evaluation [insert effective date of final rule].
Evaluation [insert effective date of final rule].
Evaluation [insert effective date of final rule].
Evaluation [insert effective date of final rule].
Evaluation [insert effective date of final rule].
Evaluation [insert effective date of final rule].
Evaluation [insert effective date of final rule].
Evaluation [insert effective date of final rule].
Added [insert effective date of final rule].
Added [insert effective date of final rule].
Added [insert effective date of final rule].
Evaluation [insert effective date of final rule].
*
*
6. In Appendix B to Part 4, The Eye,
Diseases of the Eye, revise diagnostic
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Jun 08, 2015
Jkt 235001
*
*
codes 6000, 6003–6005, 6006–6009,
6011–15, 6017–6018, 6026–6027, 6034–
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
6036, and add diagnostic codes 6040,
6042, and 6046 to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
32522
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
APPENDIX A TO PART 4—NUMERICAL
INDEX OF DISABILITIES
Diagnostic
code No.
*
*
*
*
THE EYE
Diseases of the Eye
*
*
*
*
*
*
6025 ............ Disorders of the lacrimal apparatus (epiphora,
dacrocystitis, etc.)
6026 ............ Optic neuropathy.
6027 ............ Cataract.
*
*
*
*
*
6034 ............ Pterygium.
6035 ............ Keratoconus.
6036 ............ Status post corneal transplant.
*
*
*
*
*
6040 ............ Diabetic retinopathy.
6042 ............ Retinal dystrophy (including
retinitis pigmentosa).
6046 ............ Post-chiasmal disorders.
*
*
*
*
7. In Appendix C to Part 4, revise the
disability entries for diagnostic codes
6006, 6014, and 6015, and add disability
entries for Retinopathy, diabetic; Retinal
dystrophy (including retinitis
pigmentosa); and Post-chiasmal
disorders to read as follows:
■
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
APPENDIX C TO PART 4—
ALPHABETICAL INDEX OF DISABILITIES
Diagnostic
code No.
*
*
New growths:
Benign
VerDate Sep<11>2014
EPA Regional Office listed in the
section of this document or
is also available electronically within
the Docket for this rulemaking action. If
*
*
*
*
*
no adverse comments are received in
Eye, orbit, and
response to this action, no further
adnexa ................
6015
activity is contemplated. If EPA receives
adverse comments, the direct final rule
*
*
*
*
*
will be withdrawn and all public
Eye, orbit, and
adnexa ................
6014 comments received will be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on this
*
*
*
*
*
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
Post-chiasmal disorders .......
6046 second comment period. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action
*
*
*
*
*
should do so at this time.
Retinal dystrophy (including
retinitis pigmentosa) ..........
6042 DATES: Comments must be received in
Retinopathy, diabetic ............
6040 writing by July 9, 2015.
Retinopathy or maculopathy
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
not otherwise specified .....
6006 identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2015–0311 by one of the
*
*
*
*
*
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
[FR Doc. 2015–13788 Filed 6–8–15; 8:45 am]
on-line instructions for submitting
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
comments.
B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0311,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director,
AGENCY
Office of Air Program Planning,
Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental
40 CFR Part 52
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
[EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0311; FRL–9928–67– Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Region 3]
19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslyApproval and Promulgation of Air
listed EPA Region III address. Such
Quality Implementation Plans;
deliveries are only accepted during the
Pennsylvania; 2011 Lead Base Year
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
Emissions Inventory
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Agency (EPA).
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2015–
ACTION: Proposed rule.
0311. EPA’s policy is that all comments
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection received will be included in the public
Agency (EPA) proposes to approve the
docket without change, and may be
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
made available online at
revision submitted by the
www.regulations.gov, including any
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
personal information provided, unless
regarding the 2011 lead base year
the comment includes information
emissions inventory. The base year
claimed to be Confidential Business
emissions inventory SIP revision was
Information (CBI) or other information
submitted to meet the requirements of
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the Lyons
Do not submit information that you
2008 lead National Ambient Air Quality consider to be CBI or otherwise
Standards (NAAQS) nonattainment area protected through www.regulations.gov
(hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Lyons
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
Area’’ or ‘‘Area’’). In the Rules and
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
Regulations section of this Federal
which means EPA will not know your
Register, EPA is approving the
identity or contact information unless
Commonwealth’s SIP submittal as a
you provide it in the body of your
direct final rule without prior proposal
comment. If you send an email
because the Agency views this as a
comment directly to EPA without going
noncontroversial submittal and
through www.regulations.gov, your
anticipates no adverse comments. A
email address will be automatically
more detailed description of the SIP
captured and included as part of the
submittal and EPA’s evaluation is
comment that is placed in the public
included in a Technical Support
docket and made available on the
Diagnostic
code No.
*
*
*
*
*
6000 ............ Choroidopathy, including uveitis, iritis, cyclitis, and choroiditis.
6001 ............ Keratopathy.
6002 ............ Scleritis.
6006 ............ Retinopathy or maculopathy
not otherwise specified.
6007 ............ Intraocular hemorrhage.
6008 ............ Detachment of retina.
6009 ............ Unhealed eye injury.
6010 ............ Tuberculosis of eye.
6011 ............ Retinal scars, atrophy, or
irregularities.
6012 ............ Angle-closure glaucoma.
6013 ............ Open-angle glaucoma.
6014 ............ Malignant neoplasms of the
eye, orbit, and adnexa (excluding skin).
6015 ............ Benign neoplasms of the eye,
orbit, and adnexa (excluding
skin).
*
APPENDIX C TO PART 4—ALPHABET- Document (TSD) prepared in support of
ICAL INDEX OF DISABILITIES—Con- this rulemaking action. A copy of the
TSD is available, upon request, from the
tinued
*
17:11 Jun 08, 2015
*
Jkt 235001
*
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ADDRESSES
E:\FR\FM\09JNP1.SGM
09JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32513-32522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13788]
[[Page 32513]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 4
RIN 2900-AP14
Schedule for Rating Disabilities; The Organs of Special Sense and
Schedule of Ratings--Eye
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend the
portion of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD or rating
schedule) that addresses the organs of special sense and schedule of
ratings--eye. The purpose of these changes is to incorporate medical
advances that have occurred since the last review, update current
medical terminology, and provide clear evaluation criteria. The
proposed rule reflects advances in medical knowledge, recommendations
from the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), and comments from subject
matter experts and the public garnered as part of a public forum. The
public forum, focusing on revisions to the organs of special sense and
schedule of ratings for eye disabilities, was held on January 19-20,
2012.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 10, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to Director, Office of
Regulation Policy and Management (02REG), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by
fax to (202) 273-9026. Comments should indicate that they are submitted
in response to ``RIN 2900-AP14-Schedule for Rating Disabilities; The
Organs of Special Sense and Schedule of Ratings--Eye.'' Copies of
comments received will be available for public inspection in the Office
of Regulation Policy and Management, Room 1068, between the hours of
8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (except holidays).
Please call (202) 461-4902 for an appointment. (This is not a toll-free
number.) In addition, during the comment period, comments may be viewed
online through the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at
www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nick Olmos-Lau, M.D., Medical Officer,
Part 4 VASRD Staff (211C), Compensation Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-9700. (This is not a toll-free
telephone number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As part of VA's ongoing revision of the VA
Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD or rating schedule), VA
proposes changes to 38 CFR 4.77-4.79, which pertain to the organs of
special sense and disabilities and disease of the eye. The proposed
changes will: (1) Update the medical terminology of certain eye
conditions; (2) add medical conditions frequently encountered but not
currently found in the rating schedule; and (3) refine evaluation
criteria based on medical advances that have occurred since the last
revision and current understanding of functional changes associated
with or resulting from disease or injury (pathophysiology).
I. Sec. 4.77 Visual Fields
Current Sec. 4.77(a) requires examiners to record the results of
visual field testing on a standard Goldmann chart and include the
Goldmann chart with the examination report. In order to improve the
efficiency and timeliness of claims processing, VA proposes to
eliminate the requirement that examiners provide VA with the Goldmann
chart and instead only require the visual field measurements necessary
for rating purposes.
An examination of visual fields requires an examiner to indicate
the Veteran's maximum visual field at 16 prescribed points of
measurement. Under the current regulation, if the results of an
examination do not include the Goldmann chart used for visual field
testing, it must be returned to the examiner for inclusion of the
completed chart prior to evaluating the disability. This results in
unnecessary delays in claims where all relevant information to evaluate
visual field impairment is present, but is not in the prescribed
format. In addition to reducing delays in processing time, eliminating
the chart requirement expands the ability to evaluate disabilities on
the basis of private treatment records, provided they contain
sufficient evidence to evaluate the disability. Under the proposed
change, an examination of a visual field impairment is sufficient for
rating purposes if it provides, at a minimum, visual field measurements
of at least 16 meridians 22\1/2\ degrees apart for each eye and it
indicates the Goldmann equivalent used during testing. As this
information need not be provided in a chart format, VA proposes to
amend in current paragraph (a) the phrase ``The examiner must chart at
least 16 meridians . . .'' to read ``The examiner must document the
results for at least 16 meridians . . .''.
Similarly, VA proposes to amend the language in current paragraph
(a) which directs an examiner to ``include the tracing of either the
tangent screen or of the 30-degree threshold visual field . . .'' when
additional testing is required. As above, VA proposes that the examiner
need only ``document the results'' of the additional testing rather
than provide the actual tracing itself.
No other changes to Sec. 4.77 are proposed.
II. Sec. 4.78 Muscle Function
Section 4.78(a) currently requires muscle function to be examined
and measured using Goldmann perimeters. However, due to the increasing
difficulty encountered by evaluation facilities in acquiring and
repairing Goldmann perimeters, the Tangent Screen has been developed as
an alternative method for documenting alteration of eye muscle
function. David F. Chang, Chapter 2. Ophthalmologic Examination,
Vaughan & Asbury's General Ophthalmology, https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=387&Sectionid=40229319
(last visited Apr. 29, 2014). The Tangent Screen is an inexpensive
device, commonly found in many eye clinics, and is used to test for
diplopia due to eye muscle dysfunction. Like the Goldmann perimeter,
the results of the Tangent Screen method are documented on a Goldmann
chart recording sheet, which plots areas of diplopia across the major
visual fields. Furthermore, the results of both tests are relatively
similar. See Agnes M.F. Wong, MD, and James A. Sharpe, MD, A Comparison
of Tangent Screen, Goldmann, and Humphrey Perimetry in the Detection
and Localization of Occipital Lesions, Ophthalmology 1107:527-544
(2000). In order to accommodate more modern and readily available
methods, VA proposes to amend Sec. 4.78(a) to allow for measurement of
muscle function using either Goldmann perimeters or Tangent Screen
method.
Current Sec. 4.78(a) requires examiners to plot the results of
muscle function testing on a standard Goldmann chart and include the
chart with the examination report. VA proposes to remove these
requirements for the same reasons indicated in the section above
discussing proposed changes to Sec. 4.77. Under the proposed change,
an examination of muscle function is sufficient for rating purposes if
it identifies the quadrant(s) and range(s) of degrees in which diplopia
exists.
No other changes to Sec. 4.78 are proposed.
[[Page 32514]]
III. Sec. 4.79 Schedule of Ratings--Eye
Current Sec. 4.79 contains a General Rating Formula for Diagnostic
Codes 6000 through 6009. This formula evaluates disease of the eye on
the basis of incapacitating episodes or visual impairment (impairment
of visual acuity, visual field, and/or muscle function), whichever
provides the highest evaluation. Currently, ``incapacitating episodes''
is defined as a period of acute symptoms severe enough to require
prescribed bed rest and treatment by a physician or other healthcare
provider. This definition provides limited applicability of the rating
formula as bed rest is no longer a uniformly valid method of treatment,
nor is it a pertinent domain in the field of disability criteria. R.I.
Cho & E. Savitsky, Ocular Trauma, Combat Casualty Care: Lessons Learned
from OEF and OIF, 299 (M. Lenhart ed. 2012). Limiting the definition to
bed rest categorically excludes periods of incapacitation due to eye
disease requiring intensive treatment and medical management other than
bed rest, as well as the potential for development of medical
complications. Therefore, VA proposes to update the definition of an
incapacitating episode to mean an episode that requires clinic visits
for treatment for an active eye disease.
Through its definition, VA intends to require that these visits be
documented in the medical record by a physician or other health care
provider and that such visits must relate to the monitoring of
progress, administration of treatment(s), and the development of
complications related to the underlying active eye disability.
Incorporating documented treatment allows for consideration of
intensive interventional care, the use of complex drugs, and the
placement of devices when evaluating the severity of a given eye
disability. By providing evaluations based on the duration of treatment
for an active eye disease, the proposed criteria more accurately
reflect occupational disruption and impairment due to eye diseases that
do not necessarily involve measurable visual impairment. This updated
definition of incapacitating episodes aligns with modern medical
practice and the treatment of eye diseases, providing an alternative
basis for evaluation of eye disabilities in the absence of visual
impairment. VA also proposes to add a non-exhaustive list of examples
of treatment to the definition of incapacitating episodes. This list
would clarify the evaluation criteria to claims processors and ease
application of the rating schedule by indicating possible treatment
options for the various eye diseases.
VA proposes a 60 percent evaluation for documented incapacitating
episodes requiring 10 or more medical visits for monitoring or
treatment of an active eye disease or complications per year. A 40
percent evaluation is proposed for documented incapacitating episodes
requiring at least 7 but no more than 9 medical visits for monitoring
or treatment of an active eye disease or complications per year. A 20
percent evaluation is proposed for documented incapacitating episodes
requiring at least 4 but no more than 6 medical visits for monitoring
or treatment of an active eye disease or complications per year. VA
proposes a 10 percent evaluation for documented incapacitating episodes
requiring 3 medical visits for monitoring or treatment of an active eye
disease or complications per year.
VA would add a note to Sec. 4.79 that would refer raters, when
evaluating visual impairment due to the particular condition, to 38 CFR
4.75-4.78 and to Sec. 4.79, diagnostic codes 6061-6090.
A. Diseases of the Eye--Organizational Headings
The current schedule of ratings for the eye contains one general
category for Diseases of the Eye with a limited listing of diagnoses
and/or disabilities. This category does not organize the listed
disabilities in a manner that represents the current scientific
understanding of the specific anatomy of the eye, etiology of the
disease, or the disabling effect of the disease itself. When presented
with a diagnosis that is not listed in the rating schedule, claims
processors must rate by analogy to a listed diagnosis.
Section 4.27 directs claims processors to analogize these
disabilities on the basis of disease similarity and residual disability
to allow for easy identification of the source of each rating. However,
it is specifically noted that ``the diagnostic terminology will be that
of the medical examiner, with no attempt to translate the terms into
schedule nomenclature.'' Id. In other words, the determination of
disease type and residual disability is to be made by a medical
professional; the claims processor should not partake in any type of
medical determination when deciding how to rate analogously.
In order to ease the use of analogous codes when evaluating eye
diseases, VA proposes to organize the Diseases of the Eye into nine
categories. These diagnostic categories organize the listed
disabilities into medically logical sets on the basis of diagnostic
criteria, anatomical location, and disease etiology. By grouping
disabilities according to medical criteria, the categories would ease
the use of analogous coding by claims processors. Additionally, the
categories would allow VA to track the use of analogous codes with more
specificity, providing data on the need for inclusion of new
disabilities in future revisions to the VASRD.
All disabilities contained in Sec. 4.79 would be evaluated under
the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye unless otherwise
directed. The organizational categories and specific diagnostic codes
within each category are as follows:
B. Diseases of the Uveal Tract
The uveal tract consists of three eye structures: the iris, the
ciliary body, and the choroid. This category of conditions includes
infections, inflammations including Tuberculosis of the eye (DC 6010)
and other diseases involving these three structures of the eye. This
category would include the following diagnostic codes (DCs): DC 6000,
choroidopathy, including uveitis, iritis, cyclitis, and choroiditis;
and DC 6002, scleritis. VA proposes to continue evaluating both
conditions under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye, as
amended above.
C. Diseases of the Retina, Macula, and Vitreous
The retina is the inner layer of the eye, containing blood vessels
and nerve structures that connect the eye with the optic nerve and
brain. The retina participates in light, motion, and color perception
and image formation. The macula is the visual center of the eye and
contains receptors that perceive light and color. Vitreous is the
thick, transparent substance that fills the eye, providing it with
volume and shape. This category includes the following diagnostic
codes:
1. Diagnostic Code 6006
Current DC 6006 addresses retinopathy or maculopathy. VA proposes
to clarify this code as ``not otherwise specified,'' as new DCs are
proposed to capture other specified types of retinopathy. If the
retinopathy diagnosed is not one of the other specified diagnoses, it
will be evaluated as DC 6006. This condition would continue to be
evaluated under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye.
2. Diagnostic Code 6008
VA proposes to continue evaluating this condition, detachment of
the retina, under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye.
VA proposes no other changes to this diagnostic code.
[[Page 32515]]
3. Diagnostic Code 6011
Current DC 6011 instructs claims processors to evaluate retinal
scars, atrophy, or irregularities as 10 percent disabling if such
scars, etc., are centrally located and result in an irregular,
duplicated, enlarged, or diminished image. Alternatively, claims
processors may evaluate based on visual impairment. VA proposes to
further expand this alternate rating criteria by directing claims
processors to evaluate this condition under the General Rating Formula
for Diseases of the Eye if this would result in a higher evaluation. In
other words, the only change to the diagnostic code is to allow this
condition to be evaluated on the basis of ``incapacitating episodes,''
in addition to visual impairment or the nature of the scar, atrophy, or
irregularity itself.
4. New Diagnostic Code 6040
VA proposes to add a new DC 6040, titled ``Diabetic retinopathy,''
in order to account for retinal impairment specifically caused by
diabetes in the Veteran population. Visual impairment is a common
complication of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes is the most significant
cause of visual impairment and blindness in the United States in
working age adults. James Orcutt et al., Eye Disease in Veterans with
Diabetes, 27 Diabetes Care B50 (2004). Epidemiologic studies of
diabetic retinopathy show that 15 years after the onset of diabetes,
retinopathy appears in 97 percent of patients with type 1 diabetes, 80
percent of type 2 diabetes treated with insulin, and 55 percent of type
2 diabetes treated without insulin. Id. The most severe form of
retinopathy (proliferative) was evident 15 years after the initial
diagnosis of diabetes in 30 percent of cases with type 1 diabetes, in
15 percent of those with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin, and in 5
percent of those not treated with insulin. Id. Of 429,918 patients
treated at the VA hospital with diabetes in 1998, 9.5 percent developed
proliferative retinopathy related to diabetes. In addition, the study
noted that diabetic veterans with lower-extremity amputations have an
increased risk for developing diabetic retinopathy. Id. at 52.
Currently, this condition is evaluated under DC 6006 (retinopathy
or maculopathy) without any method of identifying those cases caused by
diabetes. Given the significance of diabetes in the Veteran population
and the likelihood of developing this related eye disease, VA proposes
to add a separate diagnostic code to properly track and evaluate the
Veteran population with diabetic retinopathy. VA proposes to continue
evaluating this condition under the General Rating Formula for Diseases
of the Eye.
5. New Diagnostic Code 6042
VA proposes to add a new DC 6042, titled ``Retinal dystrophy
(including retinitis pigmentosa),'' in order to account for impairment
due to this condition in the Veteran population. Retinal dystrophy is
an important and growing group of disorders that cause blindness.
Included within the larger group of retinal dystrophy is retinitis
pigmentosa, perhaps the best known and most commonly recognized
condition. While retinitis pigmentosa is hereditary, the onset of
symptoms may be delayed until early adult years, meaning impairment may
not manifest until well after an individual has begun his or her
military service. In certain situations, disability compensation can be
provided to Veterans with this condition when the symptoms first
manifest themselves during active duty military service. To reinforce
the potential for service-connection for these disabilities, VA
proposes to add a specific diagnostic code for these conditions.
In retinitis pigmentosa there is a gradual loss of the eye
photoreceptors (rods and cones) with a deposition of pigment caused by
involutional changes of the cells of the retinal pigment epithelium
layer. Retinitis pigmentosa, A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia, PubMed
Health, U.S. National Library of Medicine, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002024/ (last visited Apr. 29, 2014). This leads to
the gradual onset of night blindness, tripping over objects in the
visual periphery due to constricion of the peripheral visual field,
tunnel vision, and eventually total blindness. Id. There is currently
no known effective treatment for this condition. Id. Given the
functional effects of this disability, VA proposes to evaluate this
condition under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye,
which would allow for rating based on either visual impairment or on
incapacitating episodes.
D. Glaucoma
Glaucoma is a group of diseases that can damage the eye's optic
nerve and can result in loss of vision. Glaucoma, MayoClinic, https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/glaucoma/basics/symptoms/con-20024042 (last visited Apr. 29, 2014). The most common types of
glaucoma are open-angle glaucoma and angle-closure glaucoma. Id.
Angle closure glaucoma is due to a blockage of the fluid (aqueous
humor) drainage canals, causing a rapid and dangerous increase in eye
pressure. This is an acute emergency that can lead to permanent visual
loss. These conditions can be primary or secondary to an injury,
medication, inflammation, tumor, or other medical condition. Id. This
category includes the following diagnostic codes:
1. Diagnostic Code 6012
Current DC 6012, angle-closure glaucoma, lists evaluation criteria
based on either visual impairment or on incapacitating episodes,
whichever results in a higher evaluation. In addition, a minimum 10
percent evaluation is provided for the requirement of continuous
medication. For clarity and uniformity with the remainder of Sec.
4.79, VA proposes to include the general instruction to evaluate this
disability under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye
with a minimum evaluation of 10 percent when continuous medication is
required.
2. Diagnostic Code 6013
Current DC 6013, open-angle glaucoma, states to evaluate on the
basis of visual impairment due to this condition. VA proposes to direct
evaluation under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye,
which includes evaluation on the basis of visual impairment or
incapacitating episodes, whichever provides a higher evaluation. This
proposal expands the evaluation criteria to provide an alternative
measure of disability outside the realm of visual impairment for this
disability, allowing VA to more accurately and adequately capture the
disabling effects.
Current DC 6013 also provides a minimum 10 percent evaluation if
continuous medication is required for treatment. VA proposes no change
to this minimum evaluation.
E. Ocular Neoplasms and Trauma
This category includes current diagnostic codes for neoplasms of
the eye (both malingnant and benign) as well as eye traumas. This
category includes the following diagnostic codes:
1. Diagnostic Code 6007
VA proposes to continue evaluating DC 6007, intraocular hemorrhage,
under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye. VA proposes
no other changes to this diagnostic code.
[[Page 32516]]
2. Diagnostic Code 6009
Current DC 6009, unhealed eye injury, includes orbital trauma, as
well as penetrating and non-penetrating eye injury. VA proposes to
continue evaluating this condition under the General Rating Formula for
Diseases of the Eye. VA also proposes to add a note stating that this
code includes orbital trauma, as well as penetrating and non-
penetrating eye injury. This note would facilitate the identification
and recording of significant eye injuries in one DC.
3. Diagnostic Code 6014
Current DC 6014 evaluates malignant neoplasm of the eyeball only.
VA proposes to replace the word ``eyeball'' with ``eye'' to conform
with modern medical terminology. The preferred nomenclature in medicine
for the organ of vision is the eye. While eyeball and eye are used
interchangeably, it is customary to use the word eye when referring to
diseases or anatomy. American Academy of Ophthalmology, Introducing
Ophthalmology: A Primer for Office Staff, 8 (3d ed. 2013).
Additionally, VA proposes to clarify that this diagnostic code includes
malignant neoplasms of the orbit and adnexa. The most prevalent
intraocular malignant neoplasms include uveal melanoma, intraocular
lymphoma, and intraocular metastasis. These malignancies affect not
only the eyeball, but often involve the orbit and adnexa. To ensure
these malignancies are adequately evaluated under the VASRD, VA
proposes to clarify that DC 6014 is not limited to neoplasms of the
eyeball only. Malignant neoplasms of the skin are still excluded as
these are evaluated under current DC 7818 within a different body
system. VA proposes no changes to the evaluation criteria for DC 6014.
4. Diagnostic Code 6015
Current DC 6015 evaluates benign neoplasm of the eyeball and adnexa
only. VA proposes to replace the word ``eyeball'' with ``eye'' to
conform with modern medical terminology. Id. Additionally, VA proposes
to expand the applicability of this diagnostic code to include benign
neoplasms of the orbit, this includes lid tumors in adults, cavernous
hemangioma, dermoid, epidermal cysts and other conditions. By expanding
the applicability, the VASRD would provide a specific diagnostic code
for the evaluation of benign growths of the orbit and adnexa. Benign
neoplasms of the skin are still excluded as these are evaluated under
current DC 7819 within a different body system. VA proposes no changes
to the evaluation criteria for DC 6015.
F. Conditions of the Lacrimal System
The lacrimal system consists of the lacrimal glands and the
nasolacrimal duct. This system is responsible for the secretion and
drainage of tears and, when properly functioning, serves to moisten,
lubricate, and protect the surface of the eye. Cat N. Burkat MD, and
Mark J. Lucarelli MD, Anatomy of the Lacrimal System, The Lacrimal
System: Diagnosis, Management, and Surgery, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-0-387-35267-1. This category includes DC 6025, which
pertains to disorders of the lacrimal apparatus (epiphora,
dacrocystitis, etc.). VA proposes no changes to this diagnostic code.
G. Corneal Diseases
The cornea is the eye's outermost layer. It is a clear, dome-shaped
surface, overlying the pupil, that covers the front of the eye. Facts
About the Cornea and Corneal Disease, National Eye Institute, https://www.nei.nih.gov/health/cornealdisease/ (last visited Apr. 29, 2014).
The cornea functions as a lens which focuses light on the retina. Id.
An injury to the cornea generally produces redness, itching, tearing,
and, depending on the severity of the injury, pain and blurring of
vision. Id. This category includes the following diagnostic codes:
1. Diagnostic Code 6001
VA proposes to continue evaluating DC 6001, keratopathy, under the
General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye. VA proposes no other
changes to this diagnostic code.
2. Diagnostic Codes 6017 and 6018
Current DC 6017 states to evaluate trachomatous conjunctivitis on
the basis of visual impairment when this condition is active, with a
minimum evaluation of 30 percent. Current DC 6018 states to evaluate
chronic conjunctivitis (nontrachomatous) on the basis of visual
impairment when this condition is active, with a minimum evaluation of
10 percent.
VA proposes to direct evaluation of active trachomatous and
nontrachomatous conjunctivitis under the General Rating Formula for
Diseases of the Eye, which includes evaluation on the basis of visual
impairment or incapacitating episodes, whichever provides a higher
evaluation. This proposal expands the evaluation criteria to provide an
alternative measure of disability outside the realm of visual
impairment for these disabilities, allowing VA to more accurately and
adequately capture the disabling effects. VA proposes to retain the
respective minimum evaluations for cases of active conjunctivitis.
Once conjunctivitis (trachomatous or nontrachomatous) is found to
be inactive, current DCs 6017 and 6018 state to evaluate based on
residuals, including visual impairment or disfigurement under DC 7800.
VA proposes no change to these evaluation criteria.
3. Diagnostic Code 6035
Current DC 6035 states to evaluate keratoconus on the basis of
visual impairment due to this condition. VA proposes to direct
evaluation under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye,
which includes evaluation on the basis of visual impairment or
incapacitating episodes, whichever provides a higher evaluation. This
proposal expands the evaluation criteria to provide an alternative
measure of disability outside the realm of visual impairment for this
disability, allowing VA to more accurately and adequately capture the
disabling effects.
4. Diagnostic Code 6036
Current DC 6036 states to evaluate status post corneal transplant
on the basis of visual impairment due to this condition, with a minimum
evaluation of 10 percent in the presence of pain, photophobia, and
glare sensitivity. VA proposes to direct evaluation under the General
Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye, which includes evaluation on
the basis of visual impairment or incapacitating episodes, whichever
provides a higher evaluation. This proposal expands the evaluation
criteria to provide an alternative measure of disability outside the
realm of visual impairment for this disability, allowing VA to more
accurately and adequately capture the disabling effects. VA intends to
retain the minimum evaluation of 10 percent in the presence of pain,
photophobia, and glare sensitivity.
H. External Eye Diseases, Including the Eyelash, Eyelid, and Eyebrow
The external eye disease category consists of a group of conditions
involving the ocular-related structures, which have direct contact with
the environment, and includes the eyelids, eyelashes, and eyebrows.
While the cornea has direct contact with the environment as well, VA
has provided a separate category for diseases of the cornea. The
external eye diseases category includes nine conditions of the
eyelashes, eyelids, and eyebrows listed in the current VASRD. This
category
[[Page 32517]]
includes the following diagnostic codes in which no change is proposed
to the current evaluation criteria: DC 6020, Ectropion; DC 6021,
Entropion; DC 6022, Lagophthalmos; DC 6023, Loss of eyebrows, complete,
unilateral or bilateral; DC 6024, Loss of eyelashes, complete,
unilateral or bilateral; DC 6032, Loss of eyelids, partial or complete;
and DC 6037, Pinguecula. It also includes the following diagnostic
codes with specific proposed changes.
Current DC 6034 states to evaluate pterygium on the basis of visual
impairment, disfigurement (DC 7800), conjunctivitis (DC 6018), etc.,
depending on the particular findings. Similarly, current DC 6091 states
to evaluate symblepharon on the basis of visual impairment,
lagophthalmos (DC 6022), disfigurement (DC 7800), etc., depending on
the particular findings.
In both cases, VA proposes to replace the direction to evaluate on
the basis of visual impairment with the General Rating Formula for
Diseases of the Eye, which includes evaluation on the basis of visual
impairment or incapacitating episodes, whichever provides a higher
evaluation. This proposal expands the evaluation criteria to provide an
alternative measure of disability outside the realm of visual
impairment for these disabilities, allowing VA to more accurately and
adequately capture the disabling effects. VA also proposes to include
the phrase ``and combine in accordance with Sec. 4.25'' to the rating
instructions of DCs 6034 and 6091. The current language allows for
multiple evaluations to be assigned and combined depending on the
particular findings, but it is not entirely clear to the reader.
Therefore, this addition would ensure consistency and clarity for field
application.
VA proposes no other changes to these diagnostic codes.
I. Disease of the Lens
The lens is a crystalline, transparent structure covered by a
capsule and suspended by a ligament that weakens with age. Henry Gray,
Anatomy of the Human Body, 1019-20 (20th ed. 1918). The lens capsule is
lined in the anterior portion by an epithelium that generates new lens
fibers at the equators. Id. In addition to malformation and
malposition, the main lens pathology is cataract formation. A cataract
is a lens opacity which produces visual impairment by obscuration and
altered light refraction. Facts About Cataract, National Eye Institute,
https://www.nei.nih.gov/health/cataract/cataract_facts.asp (last
visited Apr. 29, 2014). This category includes evaluation criteria for
DC 6029, Aphakia or dislocation of crystalline lens for which VA
proposes no changes. It also includes the following diagnostic codes
with specific proposed changes.
Current DC 6027 states to evaluate preoperative cataracts on the
basis of visual impairment. VA proposes to direct evaluation of
preoperative cataracts under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of
the Eye, which includes evaluation on the basis of visual impairment or
incapacitating episodes, whichever provides a higher evaluation. This
proposal expands the evaluation criteria to provide an alternative
measure of disability outside the realm of visual impairment for this
disability, allowing VA to more accurately and adequately capture the
disabling effects.
Current DC 6027 also provides two evaluation options for
postoperative cataracts depending on the presence or absence of a
replacement lens. If a replacement lens is present, current DC 6027
states to evaluate on the basis of visual impairment. VA proposes to
direct the evaluation of postoperative cataracts with a replacement
lens under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye for the
same reasons discussed above. If there is no replacement lens present,
current DC 6027 states to evaluate based on aphakia (DC 6029). VA
proposes only to insert the applicable DC. No substantive change is
proposed.
J. Neuro-Ophthalmic Conditions
This category includes a listing of the most common and pertinent
neuro-ophthalmic conditions, to include diseases of the anterior visual
pathways, optic nerve disorders, cranial nerve palsies resulting in
visual impairment, disorders of eye movements, and pupillary disorders.
The field of neuro-ophthalmology bridges the gap between neurology and
ophthalmology by providing particular attention to visual impairment
due to diseases of the neural structures involved in vision. Since a
substantial portion of the brain is involved with vision, many brain
disorders produce visual impairment. This category includes the
following diagnostic codes in which no change is proposed to the
current evaluation criteria: DC 6016, Nystagmus, central; DC 6019,
Ptosis, unilateral or bilateral; and DC 6030, Paralysis of
accommodation (due to neuropathy of the Oculomotor Nerve (cranial nerve
III)). It also includes the following diagnostic code with specific
proposes changes.
1. Diagnostic Code 6026
Current DC 6026 states to evaluate optic neuropathy on the basis of
visual impairment due to this condition. VA proposes to direct
evaluation under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye,
which includes evaluation on the basis of visual impairment or
incapacitating episodes, whichever provides a higher evaluation. This
proposal expands the evaluation criteria to provide an alternative
measure of disability outside the realm of visual impairment for this
disability, allowing VA to more accurately and adequately capture the
disabling effects.
2. New Diagnostic Code 6046
VA proposes to add a new DC 6046, titled ``Post-chiasmal
disorders.'' This category includes a variety of central visual
disorders with brain involvement. This category incorporates ophthalmic
residuals from traumatic brain injury (TBI) or other causes of cerebral
injury, such as infectious, vascular conditions, or degenerative
conditions. Post-chiasmal disorders may be associated with cognitive
changes caused by the structural or functional alteration of the brain
tissue, which are often associated with TBI. See James Garrity MD,
Overview of Optic Nerve Disorders, The Merck Manual Home Health
Handbook, https://www.merckmanuals.com/home/eye_disorders/optic_nerve_disorders/overview_of_optic_nerve_disorders.html (last
visited Apr. 29, 2014) (each optic nerve splits at a structure in the
brain called the optic chiasm). The alteration can lead to brain
dysfunction which can manifest as a variety of visual impairments.
Given the increased awareness and understanding of the chronic
residuals of TBI in the medical community, particularly amongst the
Veteran population, VA proposes this new diagnostic code to provide
adequate and proper evaluations for Veterans with post-chiasmal
disorders. Due to the varying presentation of post-chiasmal disorders,
VA proposes to evaluate these conditions under the General Rating
Formula for Diseases of the Eye to maximize the options available for
an accurate evaluation.
IV. Technical Amendments
VA also would update Appendix A, B, and C of part 4 to reflect the
above noted proposed amendments.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
[[Page 32518]]
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review) emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules,
and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning
and Review) defines a ``significant regulatory action,'' which requires
review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as ``any
regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2)
Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal
or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this proposed rule have been examined, and it has been
determined not to be a significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 12866. VA's impact analysis can be found as a supporting document
at https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 hours after the
rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy of this
rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's Web site at
https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ``VA Regulations
Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to Date.''
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. This proposed rule would not affect any small entities.
Only certain VA beneficiaries could be directly affected. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this proposed rule is exempt from the
initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of
sections 603 and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no provisions constituting a collection
of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501-3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and
titles for this rule are 64.009, Veterans Medical Care Benefits;
64.104, Pension for Non-Service-Connected Disability for Veterans;
64.109, Veterans Compensation for Service-Connected Disability; and
64.110, Veterans Dependency and Indemnity Compensation for Service-
Connected Death.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Robert A.
McDonald, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved this document on May
10, 2015, for publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 4
Disability benefits, Pensions, Veterans.
Approved: June 2, 2015.
William F. Russo,
Acting Director, Office of Regulation Policy & Management.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 4, subpart B as set forth below:
PART 4--SCHEDULE FOR RATING DISABILITIES
Subpart B--Disability Ratings
0
1. The authority citation for part 4 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155, unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Amend Sec. 4.77 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 4.77 Visual fields.
(a) Examination of visual fields. Examiners must use either
Goldmann kinetic perimetry or automated perimetry using Humphrey Model
750, Octopus Model 101, or later versions of these perimetric devices
with simulated kinetic Goldmann testing capability. For phakic (normal)
individuals, as well as for pseudophakic or aphakic individuals who are
well adapted to intraocular lens implant or contact lens correction,
visual field examinations must be conducted using a standard target
size and luminance, which is Goldmann's equivalent III/4e. For aphakic
individuals not well adapted to contact lens correction or pseudophakic
individuals not well adapted to intraocular lens implant, visual field
examinations must be conducted using Goldmann's equivalent IV/4e. The
examiner must document the results for at least 16 meridians 22\1/2\
degrees apart for each eye and indicate the Goldmann equivalent used.
See Table III for the normal extent (in degrees) of the visual fields
at the 8 principal meridians (45 degrees apart). When the examiner
indicates that additional testing is necessary to evaluate visual
fields, the additional testing must be conducted using either a tangent
screen or a 30-degree threshold visual field with the Goldmann III
stimulus size. The examination report must document the results of
either the tangent screen or of the 30-degree threshold visual field
with the Goldmann III stimulus size.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 4.78 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 4.78 Muscle function.
(a) Examination of muscle function. The examiner must use a
Goldmann perimeter chart or the Tangent Screen method that identifies
the four major quadrants (upward, downward, left and right lateral) and
the central field (20 degrees or less) (see Figure 2). The examiner
must document the results of muscle function testing by identifying the
quadrant(s) and range(s) of degrees in which diplopia exists.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 4.79 Schedule of ratings--eye by revising the tables
Diseases of the Eye and Ratings for Impairment of Muscle Function to
read as follows:
[[Page 32519]]
Diseases of the Eye
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rating
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless otherwise directed, evaluate diseases of the eye under
the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye.
General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye:
Evaluate on the basis of either visual impairment due to
the particular condition or on incapacitating episodes,
whichever results in a higher evaluation.
With documented incapacitating episodes requiring 10 or 60
more medical visits for monitoring or treatment of an
active eye disease or complications per year.............
With documented incapacitating episodes requiring at least 40
7 but no more than 9 medical visits for monitoring or
treatment of an active eye disease or complications per
year.....................................................
With documented incapacitating episodes requiring at least 20
4 but no more than 6 medical visits for monitoring or
treatment of an active eye disease or complications per
year.....................................................
With documented incapacitating episodes requiring 3 10
medical visits for monitoring or treatment of an active
eye disease or complications per year....................
Note (1): For the purposes of evaluation under 38 CFR
4.79, an incapacitating episode is one which requires
clinic visits for an active eye disease, as documented in
the medical record by a physician or other health care
provider, and relates to the monitoring of progress,
administration of treatment(s), and to the development of
complications related to the underlying active eye
disability. Examples of treatment may include but are not
limited to: Systemic immunosuppressants or biologic
agents; intravitreal or periocular injections; laser
treatments; or other surgical interventions.
Note (2): For the purposes of evaluating visual impairment
due to the particular condition, refer to 38 CFR 4.75-
4.78 and to Sec. 4.79, diagnostic codes 6061-6090.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diseases of the Uveal Tract
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6000 Choroidopathy, including uveitis, iritis, cyclitis, and
choroiditis.
6002 Scleritis.
6010 Tuberculosis of the eye:
Active.................................................... 100
Inactive: Evaluate under Sec. 4.88c or Sec. 4.89 of
this part, whichever is appropriate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diseases of the Retina, Macula, and Vitreous
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6006 Retinopathy or maculopathy not otherwise specified.
6008 Detachment of retina.
6011 Retinal scars, atrophy, or irregularities:
Localized scars, atrophy, or irregularities of the retina, 10
unilateral or bilateral, that are centrally located and
that result in an irregular, duplicated, enlarged, or
diminished image.........................................
Alternatively, evaluate based on the General Rating
Formula for Diseases of the Eye, if this would result in
a higher evaluation.
6040 Diabetic retinopathy.
6042 Retinal dystrophy (including retinitis pigmentosa).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Glaucoma
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6012 Angle-closure glaucoma.
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of 10
the Eye. Minimum evaluation if continuous medication is
required.................................................
6013 Open-angle glaucoma.
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of 10
the Eye. Minimum evaluation if continuous medication is
required.................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ocular Neoplasms and Trauma
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6007 Introacular hemorrhage.
6009 Unhealed eye injury.
Note: This code includes orbital trauma, as well as
penetrating and non-penetrating eye injury.
6014 Malignant neoplasms of the eye, orbit, and adnexa
(excluding skin):
Malignant neoplasms of the eye, orbit, and adnexa 100
(excluding skin) that require therapy that is comparable
to those used for systemic malignancies, i.e., systemic
chemotherapy, X-ray therapy more extensive than to the
area of the eye, or surgery more extensive than
enucleation..............................................
Note: Continue the 100-percent rating beyond the cessation
of any surgical, X-ray, antineoplastic chemotherapy or
other therapeutic procedure. Six months after
discontinuance of such treatment, the appropriate
disability rating will be determined by mandatory VA
examination. Any change in evaluation based upon that or
any subsequent examination will be subject to the
provisions of Sec. 3.105(e) of this chapter. If there
has been no local recurrence or metastasis, evaluate
based on residuals.
Malignant neoplasm of the eye, orbit, and adnexa
(excluding skin) that does not require therapy comparable
to that for systemic malignancies:
Separately evaluate visual impairment and nonvisual
impairment, e.g., disfigurement (diagnostic code
7800), and combine the evaluations.
6015 Benign neoplasms of the eye, orbit, and adnexa (excluding
skin):
Separately evaluate visual impairment and nonvisual
impairment, e.g., disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800),
and combine the evaluations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conditions of the Lacrimal System
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6025 Disorders of the lacrimal apparatus (epiphora,
dacrocystitis, etc.):
Bilateral................................................. 20
Unilateral................................................ 10
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 32520]]
Corneal Diseases
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6001 Keratopathy.
6017 Trachomatous conjunctivitis:
Active: Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for 30
Diseases of the Eye, minimum rating......................
Inactive: Evaluate based on residuals, such as visual
impairment and disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800).
6018 Chronic conjunctivitis (nontrachomatous):
Active: Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for 10
Diseases of the Eye, minimum rating......................
Inactive: Evaluate based on residuals, such as visual
impairment and disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800).
6035 Keratoconus.
6036 Status post corneal transplant:
Rate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the
Eye.
Minimum, if there is pain, photophobia, and glare 10
sensitivity..........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
External Eye Diseases, Including the Eyelash, Eyelid, and Eyebrow
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6020 Ectropion:
Bilateral................................................. 20
Unilateral................................................ 10
6021 Entropion:
Bilateral................................................. 20
Unilateral................................................ 10
6022 Lagophthalmos:
Bilateral................................................. 20
Unilateral................................................ 10
6023 Loss of eyebrows, complete, unilateral or bilateral...... 10
6024 Loss of eyelashes, complete, unilateral or bilateral..... 10
6032 Loss of eyelids, partial or complete:
Separately evaluate both visual impairment due to eyelid
loss and nonvisual impairment, e.g., disfigurement
(diagnostic code 7800), and combine the evaluations.
6034 Pterygium:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of
the Eye, disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800),
conjunctivitis (diagnostic code 6018), etc., depending on
the particular findings, and combine in accordance with
Sec. 4.25.
6037 Pinguecula:
Evaluate based on disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800).
6091 Symblepharon:
Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of
the Eye, lagophthalmos (diagnostic code 6022),
disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800), etc., depending on
the particular findings, and combine in accordance with
Sec. 4.25.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disease of the Lens
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6027 Cataract:
Preoperative: Evaluate under the General Rating Formula
for Diseases of the Eye.
Postoperative: If a replacement lens is present
(pseudophakia), evaluate under the General Rating Formula
for Diseases of the Eye. If there is no replacement lens,
evaluate based on aphakia (diagnostic code 6029).
6029 Aphakia or dislocation of crystalline lens:
Evaluate based on visual impairment, and elevate the
resulting level of visual impairment one step.
Minimum (unilateral or bilateral)......................... 30
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neuro-Ophthalmic Conditions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6016 Nystagmus, central....................................... 10
6019 Ptosis, unilateral or bilateral:
Evaluate based on visual impairment or, in the absence of
visual impairment, on disfigurement (diagnostic code
7800).
6026 Optic neuropathy: Evaluate under the General Rating
Formula for Diseases of the Eye.
6030 Paralysis of accommodation (due to neuropathy of the 20
Oculomotor Nerve (cranial nerve III))........................
6046 Post-chiasmal disorders: Evaluate under the General
Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratings for Impairment of Muscle Function
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equivalent visual
Degree of diplopia acuity
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6090 Diplopia (double vision):
(a) Central 20 degrees........................... 5/200
(b) 21 degrees to 30 degrees..................... (1.5/60)
(1) Down
(2) Lateral.................................. 15/200
(3) Up....................................... (4.5/60)
(c) 31 degrees to 40 degrees..................... 20/100
(1) Down..................................... (6/30)
(2) Lateral.................................. 20/70 (6/21)
[[Page 32521]]
(3) Up
Note: In accordance with 38 CFR 4.31, diplopia 20/200 (6/60)
that is occasional or that is correctable with 20/70 (6/21)
spectacles is evaluated at 0 percent............ 20/40 (6/12)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155).
0
5. In Appendix A to Part 4, add Sec. Sec. 4.77, 4.78, and 4.79 to read
as follows:
Appendix A to Part 4--Table of Amendments and Effective Dates Since 1946
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic
Sec. code No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
4.77....................... .............. Revised [insert effective
date of final rule].
4.78....................... .............. Revised [insert effective
date of final rule].
4.79....................... .............. Introduction criterion
[insert effective date of
final rule]; Revised
General Rating Formula for
Diseases of the Eye
[insert effective date of
final rule]; General
Rating Formula for
Diseases of the Eye NOTE
revised [insert effective
date of final rule];
Organizational categories
added [insert effective
date of final rule].
6000 Criterion [insert effective
date of final rule].
6001 Criterion [insert effective
date of final rule].
6002 Criterion [insert effective
date of final rule].
6006 Title [insert effective
date of final rule];
criterion [insert
effective date of final
rule].
6007 Criterion [insert effective
date of final rule].
6008 Criterion [insert effective
date of final rule].
6009 Criterion [insert effective
date of final rule].
6011 Evaluation [insert
effective date of final
rule].
6012 Evaluation [insert
effective date of final
rule].
6013 Evaluation [insert
effective date of final
rule].
6014 Title [insert effective
date of final rule].
6015 Title [insert effective
date of final rule].
6017 Evaluation [insert
effective date of final
rule].
6018 Evaluation [insert
effective date of final
rule].
6019 Evaluation [insert
effective date of final
rule].
6026 Evaluation [insert
effective date of final
rule].
6027 Evaluation [insert
effective date of final
rule].
6034 Evaluation [insert
effective date of final
rule].
6035 Evaluation [insert
effective date of final
rule].
6036 Evaluation [insert
effective date of final
rule].
6040 Added [insert effective
date of final rule].
6042 Added [insert effective
date of final rule].
6046 Added [insert effective
date of final rule].
6091 Evaluation [insert
effective date of final
rule].
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
6. In Appendix B to Part 4, The Eye, Diseases of the Eye, revise
diagnostic codes 6000, 6003-6005, 6006-6009, 6011-15, 6017-6018, 6026-
6027, 6034-6036, and add diagnostic codes 6040, 6042, and 6046 to read
as follows:
[[Page 32522]]
Appendix A to Part 4--Numerical Index of Disabilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic code No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
THE EYE
Diseases of the Eye
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
6000................................ Choroidopathy, including uveitis,
iritis, cyclitis, and
choroiditis.
6001................................ Keratopathy.
6002................................ Scleritis.
6006................................ Retinopathy or maculopathy not
otherwise specified.
6007................................ Intraocular hemorrhage.
6008................................ Detachment of retina.
6009................................ Unhealed eye injury.
6010................................ Tuberculosis of eye.
6011................................ Retinal scars, atrophy, or
irregularities.
6012................................ Angle-closure glaucoma.
6013................................ Open-angle glaucoma.
6014................................ Malignant neoplasms of the eye,
orbit, and adnexa (excluding
skin).
6015................................ Benign neoplasms of the eye,
orbit, and adnexa (excluding
skin).
* * * * *
6025................................ Disorders of the lacrimal
apparatus (epiphora,
dacrocystitis, etc.)
6026................................ Optic neuropathy.
6027................................ Cataract.
* * * * *
6034................................ Pterygium.
6035................................ Keratoconus.
6036................................ Status post corneal transplant.
* * * * *
6040................................ Diabetic retinopathy.
6042................................ Retinal dystrophy (including
retinitis pigmentosa).
6046................................ Post-chiasmal disorders.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
7. In Appendix C to Part 4, revise the disability entries for
diagnostic codes 6006, 6014, and 6015, and add disability entries for
Retinopathy, diabetic; Retinal dystrophy (including retinitis
pigmentosa); and Post-chiasmal disorders to read as follows:
Appendix C to Part 4--Alphabetical Index of Disabilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic
code No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
New growths:
Benign
* * * * *
Eye, orbit, and adnexa.......................... 6015
* * * * *
Eye, orbit, and adnexa.......................... 6014
* * * * *
Post-chiasmal disorders................................. 6046
* * * * *
Retinal dystrophy (including retinitis pigmentosa)...... 6042
Retinopathy, diabetic................................... 6040
Retinopathy or maculopathy not otherwise specified...... 6006
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2015-13788 Filed 6-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P