Safety Zones; Recurring Events in Captain of the Port Duluth Zone, 32321-32324 [2015-13932]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 109 / Monday, June 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules
087°53.104′ W., then northwest to
43°01.564′ N., 087°53.697′ W., then
northwest returning to the point of
origin (NAD 83).
(b) Effective period. This proposed
rule will be effective from July 23, 2015
until July 26, 2015. This proposed rule
would be enforced from 6 p.m. until 10
p.m. on each day from July 24, 2015
until July 26, 2015.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring in this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic except as permitted by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her
designated on-scene representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan to act on her behalf. The
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her
designated on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or her designated on-scene
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or her on-scene
representative.
Dated: May 19, 2015.
A.B. Cocanour,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2015–13928 Filed 6–5–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Table of Acronyms
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Coast Guard
33 CFR PART 165
[Docket No. USCG–2015–0215]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Recurring Events in
Captain of the Port Duluth Zone
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
amend its safety zones regulations for
annual events in the Captain of the Port
Duluth Zone. This proposed rule would
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Jun 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
update the locations for two safety
zones, add two safety zones, and modify
the format of the regulation to list the
annual events and corresponding safety
zones in table form. These proposed
amendments will protect spectators,
participants, and vessels from the
hazards associated with annual marine
events and improve the clarity and
readability of the regulations.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 8, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2015–0215 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail and Hand Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Hand Deliveries
will be accepted between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except on
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Chief Aaron Woof, Marine Safety
Unit Duluth, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone (218) 725–3821 or by email
Aaron.M.Woof@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32321
rulemaking (USCG–2015–0215),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment it will be considered received
by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility.
We recommend that you include your
name and a mailing address, email
address, or telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2015–0215 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH’’.
Click on the comment box in the row
listing this NPRM.
If you submit your comment by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit your
comment by mail and would like to
verify that they have reached the Docket
Management Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope and it will be returned to you.
We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment
period and may change the proposed
rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2015–0215 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH’’.
Click on ‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ on the
line associated with this rulemaking.
You may also visit the Document
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the U.S.
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590 between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except on Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment if submitted on
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
32322
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 109 / Monday, June 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules
behalf of an associated, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not currently plan to hold a
public meeting. You may submit a
request for one by using one of the three
methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
On May 31, 2013, the Coast Guard
published an NPRM in the Federal
Register (78 FR 32608) entitled
‘‘Recurring Events in the Captain of the
Port Duluth Zone.’’ The NPRM
proposed to establish 8 permanent
safety zones for annually recurring
events in the Captain of the Port Duluth
Zone under 33 CFR 165.943. The NPRM
was open for comment for 30 days.
On August 12, 2013 the Coast Guard
published the Final Rule in the Federal
Register (78 FR 48802) after receiving
no comments on the NPRM. Through
this proposed rule, the Coast Guard
seeks to update § 165.943.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for this proposed rule
is the Coast Guard’s authority to
establish safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 160.5; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
This proposed rule would update the
location for two safety zones for annual
events, add two new permanent safety
zones for recurring fireworks displays,
and modify the format of § 165.943 to
list annual events and corresponding
safety zones in table form. These
changes are necessary to protect
spectators, participants, and vessels
from the hazards associated with annual
marine events, and to improve the
overall clarity and readability of the
rule. These hazards related to the
annual events include obstructions to
the waterway that may result in marine
casualties; explosive danger and flaming
debris falling into the water from
fireworks; and large congregations of
vessels and waterborne spectators in the
vicinity of the annual events.
This proposed rule will also arrange
the safety zones listed in § 165.943 into
a table sorted in ascending order of
event date. This change in format is
intended to improve clarity and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Jun 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
readability and to reduce redundancy in
the regulation.
Finally, this proposed rule clarifies
that the enforcement dates and times for
each safety zone listed in Table 165.943
is subject to change. While the events
are anticipated to annually recur on
certain dates, factors, to include
inclement weather, may result in
postponement. In the event of a
postponement, the Coast Guard will
issue a Notice of Enforcement with
updated enforcement dates and times,
and corresponding Broadcast Notice to
Mariners for on scene notice.
D. Discussion of Rule
The amendments to this proposed
rule are necessary to ensure the safety
of vessels and people during annual
events taking place on or near federally
maintained waterways in the Captain of
the Port Duluth Zone. Although this
proposed rule will be in effect yearround, the specific safety zones listed in
Table 165.943 will only be enforced
during a specified period of time when
the event is on-going.
When a Notice of Enforcement for a
particular safety zone is published,
entry into, transiting through, or
anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Duluth, or his or her
designated representative. The Captain
of the Port Duluth or his or her
designated representative can be
contacted via VHF Channel 16. All
persons and vessels granted permission
to enter the safety zone must comply
with all instructions given by the
Captain of the Port Duluth or his or her
designated representative.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). We conclude that this rule is not
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
a significant regulatory action because
we anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant
or loan recipients, and will not raise any
novel legal or policy issues. The safety
zones created by this rule will be small
and enforced for short periods of time.
Under certain conditions, moreover,
vessels may still transit through the
safety zone when permitted by the
Captain of the Port Duluth.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
areas designated as safety zones during
the dates and times the safety zones are
enforced.
These safety zones will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: These safety
zones created by this rule will be small
and enforced for short periods of time.
Under certain conditions, moreover,
vessels may still transit through the
safety zone when permitted by the
Captain of the Port Duluth. Before the
enforcement of these safety zones, the
Coast Guard will issue local Broadcast
Notice to Mariners so that vessel owners
and operators may plan accordingly.
If you believe that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and to what degree this rule
would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in this rulemaking.
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 109 / Monday, June 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Chief Aaron
Woof, Marine Safety Unit Duluth, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone (218) 725–3821
or by email Aaron.M.Woof@uscg.mil.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
7. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
9. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
12. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. An environmental
analysis checklist supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. This
proposed rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone and is
therefore categorically excluded under
32323
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR parts 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
2. Revise § 165.943 to read as follows:
§ 165.943 Safety Zones; Recurring Events
in Captain of the Port Duluth Zone.
(a) Regulations. The following
regulations apply to the safety zones
listed in Table 165.943 of this section:
(1) The Coast Guard will provide
advance notice of the enforcement date
and time of the safety zone being
enforced in Table 165.943, by issuing a
Notice of Enforcement, as well as, a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(2) During the enforcement period, the
general regulations found in § 165.23
shall apply.
(b) Contacting the Captain of the Port.
While a safety zone listed in this section
is enforced, the Captain of the Port
Duluth or his or her on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Duluth, or his or her onscene representative.
(c) Exemption. Public vessels, defined
as any vessel owned or operated by the
United States or by State or local
governments, operating in an official
capacity are exempted from the
requirements of this section.
TABLE 165.943
[Datum NAD 1983]
Event
(1) Bridgefest Regatta Fireworks Display.
(2) Ashland 4th of July Fireworks Display.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Jun 05, 2015
Location
Event date
All waters of the Keweenaw Waterway in Hancock, MI within the arc of a circle with a radius
of no more than 1,120 feet from the launch site at position 47°07′22″ N., 088°35′39″ W.
All waters of Chequamegon Bay in Ashland, WI within the arc of a circle with a radius of no
more than 1,120 feet from the launch site at position 46°35′50″ N., 090°52′59″ W.
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
Mid June.
On or around
July 4th.
32324
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 109 / Monday, June 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 165.943—Continued
[Datum NAD 1983]
Event
(3) City of Bayfield 4th of July
Fireworks Display.
(4) Cornucopia 4th of July Fireworks Display.
(5) Duluth 4th Fest Fireworks
Display.
(6) LaPointe 4th of July Fireworks Display.
(7) Two Harbors 4th of July
Fireworks Display.
(8) Point to LaPointe Swim .......
(9) Lake Superior Dragon Boat
Festival Fireworks Display.
(10) Superior Man Triathlon ......
Location
All waters of the Lake Superior North Channel in Bayfield, WI within the arc of a circle with a
radius of no more than 1,120 feet from the launch site at position 46°48′39″ N.,
090°48′35″ W.
All waters of Siskiwit Bay in Cornucopia, WI within the arc of a circle with a radius of no
more than 1,120 feet from the launch site at position 46°51′35″ N., 091°06′13″ W.
All waters of the Duluth Harbor Basin, Northern Section in Duluth, MN within the arc of a circle with a radius of no more than 1,120 feet from the launch site at position 46°46′14″ N.,
092°06′16″ W.
All waters of Lake Superior in LaPointe, WI within the arc of a circle with a radius of no
more than 1,120 feet from the launch site at position 46°46′40″ N., 090°47′22″ W.
All waters of Agate Bay in Two Harbors, MN within the arc of a circle with a radius of no
more than 1,120 feet from the launch site at position 46°46′40″ N., 090°47′22″ W.
All waters of the Lake Superior North Channel between Bayfield and LaPointe, WI within an
imaginary line created by the following coordinates: 46°48′50″ N., 090°48′44″ W., moving
southeast to 46°46′44″ N., 090°47′33″ W., then moving northeast to 46°46′52″ N.,
090°47′17″ W., then moving northwest to 46°49′03″ N., 090°48′25″ W., and finally returning to the starting position.
All waters of Superior Bay in Superior, WI within the arc of a circle with a radius of no more
than 1,120 feet from the launch site at position 46°43′23″ N., 092°03′45″ W.
All waters of the Duluth Harbor Basin, Northern Section in Duluth, MN within an imaginary
line created by the following coordinates: 46°46′36″ N., 092°06′06″ W., moving southeast
to 46°46′32″ N., 092°06′01″ W., then moving northeast to 46°46′45″ N., 092°05′45″ W.,
then moving northwest to 46°46′49″ N., 092°05′49″ W., and finally returning to the starting
position.
Dated: May 4, 2015
A.H. Moore, JR.,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Duluth.
[FR Doc. 2015–13932 Filed 6–5–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0852; FRL–9928–85–
Region 4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; South Carolina;
Infrastructure Requirements for the
2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality
Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
16:31 Jun 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
enforcement of each NAAQS
promulgated by EPA, which is
commonly referred to as an
‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP. SC DHEC certified
that the South Carolina SIP contains
provisions that ensure the 2008 Lead
NAAQS is implemented, enforced, and
maintained in South Carolina. With the
exception of provisions pertaining to
prevention of significant deterioration
(PSD) permitting for which EPA is
proposing no action through this notice,
EPA is proposing to approve that South
Carolina’s infrastructure SIP
submission, provided to EPA on
September 20, 2011, satisfies the
required infrastructure elements for the
2008 Lead NAAQS.
Written comments must be
received on or before July 8, 2015.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2012–0852, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: R4–ARMS@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2012–
0852,’’ Air Regulatory Management
Section (formerly Regulatory
Development Section), Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
ADDRESSES:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
the September 20, 2011, State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission,
provided by the South Carolina
Department of Health and
Environmental Control (SC DHEC) for
inclusion into the South Carolina SIP.
This proposal pertains to the Clean Air
Act (CAA or the Act) infrastructure
requirements for the 2008 Lead national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).
The CAA requires that each state adopt
and submit a SIP for the
implementation, maintenance, and
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Event date
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
On or around
July 4th.
On or around
July 4th.
On or around
July 4th.
On or around
July 4th.
On or around
July 4th.
Early August.
Late August.
Late August.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae
Benjamin, Chief, Air Regulatory
Management Section (formerly
Regulatory Development Section), Air
Planning and Implementation Branch,
Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2012–
0852. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through
www.regulations.gov or email,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 109 (Monday, June 8, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32321-32324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13932]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR PART 165
[Docket No. USCG-2015-0215]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones; Recurring Events in Captain of the Port Duluth Zone
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend its safety zones regulations
for annual events in the Captain of the Port Duluth Zone. This proposed
rule would update the locations for two safety zones, add two safety
zones, and modify the format of the regulation to list the annual
events and corresponding safety zones in table form. These proposed
amendments will protect spectators, participants, and vessels from the
hazards associated with annual marine events and improve the clarity
and readability of the regulations.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before July 8, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2015-0215 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail and Hand Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Hand Deliveries will
be accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except on
Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Chief Aaron Woof, Marine Safety Unit Duluth, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone (218) 725-3821 or by email Aaron.M.Woof@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket,
call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
(202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2015-0215), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online at https://www.regulations.gov or by fax, mail, or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment it will
be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility.
We recommend that you include your name and a mailing address,
email address, or telephone number in the body of your document so that
we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2015-0215 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH''. Click on the comment box in the row listing this NPRM.
If you submit your comment by mail or hand delivery, submit them in
an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit your comment by mail and
would like to verify that they have reached the Docket Management
Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope
and it will be returned to you. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the proposed
rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2015-0215 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH''. Click on ``Open Docket Folder'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Document Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the U.S. Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except on
Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment if submitted on
[[Page 32322]]
behalf of an associated, business, labor union, etc.). You may review a
Privacy Act notice regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008
issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not currently plan to hold a public meeting. You may submit a
request for one by using one of the three methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
On May 31, 2013, the Coast Guard published an NPRM in the Federal
Register (78 FR 32608) entitled ``Recurring Events in the Captain of
the Port Duluth Zone.'' The NPRM proposed to establish 8 permanent
safety zones for annually recurring events in the Captain of the Port
Duluth Zone under 33 CFR 165.943. The NPRM was open for comment for 30
days.
On August 12, 2013 the Coast Guard published the Final Rule in the
Federal Register (78 FR 48802) after receiving no comments on the NPRM.
Through this proposed rule, the Coast Guard seeks to update Sec.
165.943.
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for this proposed rule is the Coast Guard's
authority to establish safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR 1.05-1,
160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
This proposed rule would update the location for two safety zones
for annual events, add two new permanent safety zones for recurring
fireworks displays, and modify the format of Sec. 165.943 to list
annual events and corresponding safety zones in table form. These
changes are necessary to protect spectators, participants, and vessels
from the hazards associated with annual marine events, and to improve
the overall clarity and readability of the rule. These hazards related
to the annual events include obstructions to the waterway that may
result in marine casualties; explosive danger and flaming debris
falling into the water from fireworks; and large congregations of
vessels and waterborne spectators in the vicinity of the annual events.
This proposed rule will also arrange the safety zones listed in
Sec. 165.943 into a table sorted in ascending order of event date.
This change in format is intended to improve clarity and readability
and to reduce redundancy in the regulation.
Finally, this proposed rule clarifies that the enforcement dates
and times for each safety zone listed in Table 165.943 is subject to
change. While the events are anticipated to annually recur on certain
dates, factors, to include inclement weather, may result in
postponement. In the event of a postponement, the Coast Guard will
issue a Notice of Enforcement with updated enforcement dates and times,
and corresponding Broadcast Notice to Mariners for on scene notice.
D. Discussion of Rule
The amendments to this proposed rule are necessary to ensure the
safety of vessels and people during annual events taking place on or
near federally maintained waterways in the Captain of the Port Duluth
Zone. Although this proposed rule will be in effect year-round, the
specific safety zones listed in Table 165.943 will only be enforced
during a specified period of time when the event is on-going.
When a Notice of Enforcement for a particular safety zone is
published, entry into, transiting through, or anchoring within the
safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
Duluth, or his or her designated representative. The Captain of the
Port Duluth or his or her designated representative can be contacted
via VHF Channel 16. All persons and vessels granted permission to enter
the safety zone must comply with all instructions given by the Captain
of the Port Duluth or his or her designated representative.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We conclude that this rule is
not a significant regulatory action because we anticipate that it will
have minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with other
agencies, will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan
recipients, and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues. The
safety zones created by this rule will be small and enforced for short
periods of time. Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still
transit through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of the
Port Duluth.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in areas designated as safety zones during the dates
and times the safety zones are enforced.
These safety zones will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: These
safety zones created by this rule will be small and enforced for short
periods of time. Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still
transit through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of the
Port Duluth. Before the enforcement of these safety zones, the Coast
Guard will issue local Broadcast Notice to Mariners so that vessel
owners and operators may plan accordingly.
If you believe that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in this rulemaking.
[[Page 32323]]
If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact Chief Aaron Woof,
Marine Safety Unit Duluth, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (218) 725-3821
or by email Aaron.M.Woof@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
7. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
8. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
9. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
11. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
12. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. An environmental analysis checklist supporting this
determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. This proposed rule involves the establishment of a safety
zone and is therefore categorically excluded under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR parts 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 165.943 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.943 Safety Zones; Recurring Events in Captain of the Port
Duluth Zone.
(a) Regulations. The following regulations apply to the safety
zones listed in Table 165.943 of this section:
(1) The Coast Guard will provide advance notice of the enforcement
date and time of the safety zone being enforced in Table 165.943, by
issuing a Notice of Enforcement, as well as, a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
(2) During the enforcement period, the general regulations found in
Sec. 165.23 shall apply.
(b) Contacting the Captain of the Port. While a safety zone listed
in this section is enforced, the Captain of the Port Duluth or his or
her on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel
operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must
comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of the Port
Duluth, or his or her on-scene representative.
(c) Exemption. Public vessels, defined as any vessel owned or
operated by the United States or by State or local governments,
operating in an official capacity are exempted from the requirements of
this section.
Table 165.943
[Datum NAD 1983]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Event Location Event date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Bridgefest Regatta Fireworks Display All waters of the Keweenaw Waterway in Mid June.
Hancock, MI within the arc of a circle
with a radius of no more than 1,120 feet
from the launch site at position
47[deg]07'22'' N., 088[deg]35'39'' W.
(2) Ashland 4th of July Fireworks All waters of Chequamegon Bay in Ashland, On or around July 4th.
Display. WI within the arc of a circle with a
radius of no more than 1,120 feet from
the launch site at position
46[deg]35'50'' N., 090[deg]52'59'' W.
[[Page 32324]]
(3) City of Bayfield 4th of July All waters of the Lake Superior North On or around July 4th.
Fireworks Display. Channel in Bayfield, WI within the arc of
a circle with a radius of no more than
1,120 feet from the launch site at
position 46[deg]48'39'' N.,
090[deg]48'35'' W.
(4) Cornucopia 4th of July Fireworks All waters of Siskiwit Bay in Cornucopia, On or around July 4th.
Display. WI within the arc of a circle with a
radius of no more than 1,120 feet from
the launch site at position
46[deg]51'35'' N., 091[deg]06'13'' W.
(5) Duluth 4th Fest Fireworks Display... All waters of the Duluth Harbor Basin, On or around July 4th.
Northern Section in Duluth, MN within the
arc of a circle with a radius of no more
than 1,120 feet from the launch site at
position 46[deg]46'14'' N.,
092[deg]06'16'' W.
(6) LaPointe 4th of July Fireworks All waters of Lake Superior in LaPointe, On or around July 4th.
Display. WI within the arc of a circle with a
radius of no more than 1,120 feet from
the launch site at position
46[deg]46'40'' N., 090[deg]47'22'' W.
(7) Two Harbors 4th of July Fireworks All waters of Agate Bay in Two Harbors, MN On or around July 4th.
Display. within the arc of a circle with a radius
of no more than 1,120 feet from the
launch site at position 46[deg]46'40''
N., 090[deg]47'22'' W.
(8) Point to LaPointe Swim.............. All waters of the Lake Superior North Early August.
Channel between Bayfield and LaPointe, WI
within an imaginary line created by the
following coordinates: 46[deg]48'50'' N.,
090[deg]48'44'' W., moving southeast to
46[deg]46'44'' N., 090[deg]47'33'' W.,
then moving northeast to 46[deg]46'52''
N., 090[deg]47'17'' W., then moving
northwest to 46[deg]49'03'' N.,
090[deg]48'25'' W., and finally returning
to the starting position.
(9) Lake Superior Dragon Boat Festival All waters of Superior Bay in Superior, WI Late August.
Fireworks Display. within the arc of a circle with a radius
of no more than 1,120 feet from the
launch site at position 46[deg]43'23''
N., 092[deg]03'45'' W.
(10) Superior Man Triathlon............. All waters of the Duluth Harbor Basin, Late August.
Northern Section in Duluth, MN within an
imaginary line created by the following
coordinates: 46[deg]46'36'' N.,
092[deg]06'06'' W., moving southeast to
46[deg]46'32'' N., 092[deg]06'01'' W.,
then moving northeast to 46[deg]46'45''
N., 092[deg]05'45'' W., then moving
northwest to 46[deg]46'49'' N.,
092[deg]05'49'' W., and finally returning
to the starting position.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: May 4, 2015
A.H. Moore, JR.,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Duluth.
[FR Doc. 2015-13932 Filed 6-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P