Airworthiness Directives; Agusta S.p.A. Helicopters, 32072-32074 [2015-13354]
Download as PDF
32072
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 108 / Friday, June 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Carl Gray, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE–117A, FAA, Atlanta
ACO, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park,
GA 30337; phone: 404–474–5554; fax: 404–
474–5605; email: carl.w.gray@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company, Airworthiness Office, Dept. 6A0M,
Zone 0252, Column P–58, 86 S. Cobb Drive,
Marietta, GA 30063; telephone 770–494–
5444; fax 770–494–5445; email ams.portal@
lmco.com; Internet https://
www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/
TechPubs.html. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 14,
2015.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–13339 Filed 6–4–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–1935; Directorate
Identifier 2014–SW–008–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Agusta
S.p.A. Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for Agusta
S.p.A. (Agusta) Model AB139 and
AW139 helicopters. This proposed AD
would require visually inspecting
certain subfloor frames for a crack. This
proposed AD is prompted by reports of
cracks on in-service helicopters. The
proposed actions are intended to detect
or prevent a crack in the subfloor frame,
which could result in failure of the pilot
and co-pilot pedal support frame and
subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 4, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Jun 04, 2015
Jkt 235001
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
Docket Operations Office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD, the economic evaluation,
any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations Office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact
AgustaWestland, Product Support
Engineering, Via del Gregge, 100, 21015
Lonate Pozzolo (VA) Italy, ATTN:
Maurizio D’Angelo; telephone 39–0331–
664757; fax 39–0331–664680; or at
https://www.agustawestland.com/
technical-bulletins. You may review the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas
76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Grant, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Safety Management Group, FAA, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas
76137; telephone (817) 222–5110; email
robert.grant@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that might result
from adopting the proposals in this
document. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We will file in the docket all
comments that we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
Before acting on this proposal, we will
consider all comments we receive on or
before the closing date for comments.
We will consider comments filed after
the comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. We may change this
proposal in light of the comments we
receive.
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2014–
0048, dated March 4, 2014, to correct an
unsafe condition for Agusta Model
AB139 and AW139 helicopters with a
serial number (S/N) 31005 through
31517 (except S/N 31007, 31415, 31431,
31491, 31500, 31508, and 31516) and S/
N 41001 through 41356 (except S/N
41355). EASA advises that cracks have
been reported in the subfloor frame at
station (STA) 2105 on in-service
helicopters. This condition, if not
detected and corrected, could lead to
failure of the pedals supporting the
frame, which in turn could lead to the
pedals being inoperative and
subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter, EASA advises.
The EASA AD requires repetitive
inspections of the subfloor frame at STA
2105 for a crack. The EASA AD also
requires installation of frame
reinforcements before further flight if
there is a crack or within 1,200 flight
hours if there is no crack. The EASA AD
provides that installation of the frame
reinforcements constitutes terminating
action for the repetitive inspections
required by the AD.
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by the aviation authority of Italy and are
approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with Italy, EASA, its
technical representative, has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in its
AD. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all known relevant
information and determined that an
unsafe condition is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed AgustaWestland
Bolletino Tecnico No. 139–311,
Revision B, dated June 4, 2014 (BT), for
certain serial-numbered Agusta Model
E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM
05JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 108 / Friday, June 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules
AB139 and AW139 helicopters. The BT
calls for visual inspections of the
subfloor frames within 30 flight hours or
two months, whichever occurs first, and
thereafter at intervals of 300 flight hours
or 6 months, whichever comes first,
until frame reinforcements are installed
to prevent future failures. The BT also
specifies installing the frame
reinforcements immediately if a crack is
found and within 1,200 flight hours if
a crack is not found. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section of this NPRM.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require:
• Within 30 hours time-in-service
(TIS) and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 300 hours TIS, using a light,
inspecting all visible surfaces of the
subfloor frames at station (STA) 2105 for
a crack.
• If there is a crack, before further
flight, and if there are no cracks, within
1200 hours TIS, installing frame STA
2105 retromod part number (P/N)
3G5306P47211. This terminates the
repetitive inspection requirements of
this AD.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the EASA AD
The EASA AD requires conducting
the initial inspection within 30 flight
hours or 2 months, whichever occurs
first, and thereafter, at intervals not to
exceed 300 flight hours or 6 months,
whichever occurs first. The proposed
AD would require conducting the initial
inspection within 30 TIS, and thereafter,
at intervals not to exceed 300 hours TIS.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 102 U.S.-registered
helicopters and that labor costs average
$85 a work hour. Based on these
estimates, we expect the following costs:
• The visual inspection would
require 2 work-hours for a labor cost of
$170 per helicopter. No parts would be
needed, so the cost would total $170 per
helicopter, $17,340 for the U.S. fleet.
• If there are no cracks, installing the
frame reinforcements would require 240
work-hours for a labor cost of $20,400
and parts would cost $2,274. The total
cost would be $22,674 per helicopter.
• If there is a crack, installing the
frame reinforcements would require 240
work-hours for a labor cost of $20,400
and parts would cost $3,401. The total
cost would be $23,801 per helicopter.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Jun 04, 2015
Jkt 235001
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32073
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Agusta S.p.A.: Docket No. FAA–2015–1935;
Directorate Identifier 2014–SW–008–AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Agusta S.p.A. Model
AB139 and AW139 helicopters, serial
number (S/N) 31005 through 31517 (except
S/N 31007, 31415, 31431, 31491, 31500,
31508, and 31516) and S/N 41001 through
41356 (except S/N 41355), certificated in any
category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a
crack in a subfloor frame. This condition
could result in failure of the pilot and copilot pedal support frame and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
(c) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by August 4,
2015.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
(1) Within 30 hours time-in-service (TIS)
and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 300
hours TIS, using a light, inspect all visible
surfaces of the left hand subfloor frame, right
hand subfloor frame, and middle subfloor
frame at station (STA) 2105 for a crack as
shown in Figures 10 through 13 of
AgustaWestland Bollettino Tecnico No. 139–
311, Revision B, dated June 4, 2014 (BT 139–
311).
(2) If there is a crack, before further flight,
install frame STA 2105 retromod part
number (P/N) 3G5306P47211 by following
the Compliance Instructions, Part II,
paragraphs 7 through 7.10. of BT 139–311.
(3) If there are no cracks, within 1200
hours TIS, install frame STA 2105 retromod
P/N 3G5306P47211 by following the
Compliance Instructions, Part II, paragraphs
7 through 7.10. of BT 139–311.
(4) Installing frame STA 2105 retromod P/
N 3G5306P47211 terminates the repetitive
inspection requirements in paragraph (e)(1)
of this AD.
(f) Special Flight Permit
Special Flight Permits are prohibited.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Robert Grant,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management
E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM
05JNP1
32074
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 108 / Friday, June 5, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Group, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222–
5110; email robert.grant@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(h) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
No. 2014–0048, March 4, 2014. You may
view the EASA AD on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov in the AD Docket.
(i) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 5300, Fuselage Structure (General).
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 26,
2015.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–13354 Filed 6–4–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2015–1345; Airspace
Docket No. 14–AWP–13]
Proposed Establishment of Multiple Air
Traffic Service (ATS) Routes; Western
United States
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
establish 13 high altitude Area
Navigation (RNAV) routes (Q-routes),
and one low altitude RNAV route (Troute) in the western United States. The
routes would promote operational
efficiencies for users and provide
connectivity to current and proposed
RNAV en route and terminal
procedures.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before July 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001; telephone:
(202) 366–9826. You must identify FAA
Docket No. FAA–2015–1345 and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Jun 04, 2015
Jkt 235001
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of the airspace necessary
to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority as
it would modify the route structure in
the western U.S. to preserve the safe and
efficient flow of air traffic within the
NAS.
Background
RIN 2120–AA66
DATES:
Airspace Docket No. 14–AWP–13 at the
beginning of your comments. You may
also submit comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason Stahl, Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group, Office of Airspace
Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The development of new RNAV
Standard Instrument Departure (SID)
and Standard Terminal Arrival (STAR)
routes requires incorporation of these
proposed Q and T routes into the NAS
Route Structure in order to maximize
the benefits of increased safety in high
volume en route sectors.
The Los Angeles Air Route Traffic
Control Center (ARTCC) currently does
not have routes that join the
Performance Based Navigation (PBN)
arrival and departure procedures. The
existing conventional jet route structure
does not serve the new SID/STAR
designs. Routes made up of ground
based navigational aids are not capable
of delivering aircraft onto the RNAV
based arrival and departure procedures
in an efficient manner. Developing these
predictable and repeatable flight paths
(Q and T routes) through a complex area
confined by restricted areas will
improve throughput and safety for Los
Angeles ARTCC.
This first phase of a two phase project
will align a network of Q-Routes with
the new SID’s and STAR’s. The Q-Route
structure is projected to optimize
descent/climb profiles to/from several
airports in southern California and
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
create segregated arrival/departure paths
to reduce airspace complexity.
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, views,
or arguments as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related
aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA–
2015–1345 and Airspace Docket No. 14–
AWP–13) and be submitted in triplicate
to the Docket Management Facility (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number). You may also submit
comments through the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those
comments a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA–2015–1345 and
Airspace Docket No. 14–AWP–13.’’ The
postcard will be date/time stamped and
returned to the commenter.
All communications received on or
before the specified comment closing
date will be considered before taking
action on the proposed rule. The
proposal contained in this action may
be changed in light of comments
received. All comments submitted will
be available for examination in the
public docket both before and after the
comment closing date. A report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerned
with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. An informal
docket may also be examined during
normal business hours at the office of
the Western Service Center, Operations
Support Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 1601 Lind Ave SW.,
Renton, WA 98057.
E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM
05JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32072-32074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13354]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-1935; Directorate Identifier 2014-SW-008-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Agusta S.p.A. Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) Model AB139 and AW139 helicopters. This proposed
AD would require visually inspecting certain subfloor frames for a
crack. This proposed AD is prompted by reports of cracks on in-service
helicopters. The proposed actions are intended to detect or prevent a
crack in the subfloor frame, which could result in failure of the pilot
and co-pilot pedal support frame and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 4, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, the economic evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
AgustaWestland, Product Support Engineering, Via del Gregge, 100, 21015
Lonate Pozzolo (VA) Italy, ATTN: Maurizio D'Angelo; telephone 39-0331-
664757; fax 39-0331-664680; or at https://www.agustawestland.com/technical-bulletins. You may review the referenced service information
at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Grant, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth,
Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222-5110; email robert.grant@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to
the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might
result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has
closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay.
We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive.
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2014-0048, dated March 4, 2014,
to correct an unsafe condition for Agusta Model AB139 and AW139
helicopters with a serial number (S/N) 31005 through 31517 (except S/N
31007, 31415, 31431, 31491, 31500, 31508, and 31516) and S/N 41001
through 41356 (except S/N 41355). EASA advises that cracks have been
reported in the subfloor frame at station (STA) 2105 on in-service
helicopters. This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead
to failure of the pedals supporting the frame, which in turn could lead
to the pedals being inoperative and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter, EASA advises.
The EASA AD requires repetitive inspections of the subfloor frame
at STA 2105 for a crack. The EASA AD also requires installation of
frame reinforcements before further flight if there is a crack or
within 1,200 flight hours if there is no crack. The EASA AD provides
that installation of the frame reinforcements constitutes terminating
action for the repetitive inspections required by the AD.
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
Italy and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with Italy, EASA, its technical representative,
has notified us of the unsafe condition described in its AD. We are
proposing this AD because we evaluated all known relevant information
and determined that an unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop
on other products of the same type design.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed AgustaWestland Bolletino Tecnico No. 139-311, Revision
B, dated June 4, 2014 (BT), for certain serial-numbered Agusta Model
[[Page 32073]]
AB139 and AW139 helicopters. The BT calls for visual inspections of the
subfloor frames within 30 flight hours or two months, whichever occurs
first, and thereafter at intervals of 300 flight hours or 6 months,
whichever comes first, until frame reinforcements are installed to
prevent future failures. The BT also specifies installing the frame
reinforcements immediately if a crack is found and within 1,200 flight
hours if a crack is not found. This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section of this NPRM.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require:
Within 30 hours time-in-service (TIS) and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 300 hours TIS, using a light, inspecting all
visible surfaces of the subfloor frames at station (STA) 2105 for a
crack.
If there is a crack, before further flight, and if there
are no cracks, within 1200 hours TIS, installing frame STA 2105
retromod part number (P/N) 3G5306P47211. This terminates the repetitive
inspection requirements of this AD.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD
The EASA AD requires conducting the initial inspection within 30
flight hours or 2 months, whichever occurs first, and thereafter, at
intervals not to exceed 300 flight hours or 6 months, whichever occurs
first. The proposed AD would require conducting the initial inspection
within 30 TIS, and thereafter, at intervals not to exceed 300 hours
TIS.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 102 U.S.-registered
helicopters and that labor costs average $85 a work hour. Based on
these estimates, we expect the following costs:
The visual inspection would require 2 work-hours for a
labor cost of $170 per helicopter. No parts would be needed, so the
cost would total $170 per helicopter, $17,340 for the U.S. fleet.
If there are no cracks, installing the frame
reinforcements would require 240 work-hours for a labor cost of $20,400
and parts would cost $2,274. The total cost would be $22,674 per
helicopter.
If there is a crack, installing the frame reinforcements
would require 240 work-hours for a labor cost of $20,400 and parts
would cost $3,401. The total cost would be $23,801 per helicopter.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Agusta S.p.A.: Docket No. FAA-2015-1935; Directorate Identifier
2014-SW-008-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Agusta S.p.A. Model AB139 and AW139
helicopters, serial number (S/N) 31005 through 31517 (except S/N
31007, 31415, 31431, 31491, 31500, 31508, and 31516) and S/N 41001
through 41356 (except S/N 41355), certificated in any category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a crack in a subfloor
frame. This condition could result in failure of the pilot and co-
pilot pedal support frame and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
(c) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by August 4, 2015.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.
(e) Required Actions
(1) Within 30 hours time-in-service (TIS) and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 300 hours TIS, using a light, inspect all
visible surfaces of the left hand subfloor frame, right hand
subfloor frame, and middle subfloor frame at station (STA) 2105 for
a crack as shown in Figures 10 through 13 of AgustaWestland
Bollettino Tecnico No. 139-311, Revision B, dated June 4, 2014 (BT
139-311).
(2) If there is a crack, before further flight, install frame
STA 2105 retromod part number (P/N) 3G5306P47211 by following the
Compliance Instructions, Part II, paragraphs 7 through 7.10. of BT
139-311.
(3) If there are no cracks, within 1200 hours TIS, install frame
STA 2105 retromod P/N 3G5306P47211 by following the Compliance
Instructions, Part II, paragraphs 7 through 7.10. of BT 139-311.
(4) Installing frame STA 2105 retromod P/N 3G5306P47211
terminates the repetitive inspection requirements in paragraph
(e)(1) of this AD.
(f) Special Flight Permit
Special Flight Permits are prohibited.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Robert Grant, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management
[[Page 32074]]
Group, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone
(817) 222-5110; email robert.grant@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(h) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) No. 2014-0048, March 4, 2014. You may view the
EASA AD on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov in the AD
Docket.
(i) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 5300, Fuselage
Structure (General).
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 26, 2015.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-13354 Filed 6-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P