Fisheries Off West Coast States; Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan; Revision to Prohibited Species Regulations, 31884-31885 [2015-13637]
Download as PDF
31884
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 107 / Thursday, June 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(ii) The recreational ACL for
wreckfish is 21,650 (9,820 kg), round
weight, for 2015; 21,185 lb (9,609 kg),
round weight, for 2016; 20,710 lb (9,394
kg), round weight, for 2017; 20,315 lb
(9,215 kg), round weight, for 2018;
19,840 lb (8,999 kg), round weight, for
2019; and 19,455 lb (8,825 kg), round
weight, for 2020 and subsequent fishing
years.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–13592 Filed 6–3–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 150112035–5035–01]
RIN 0648–BE80
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Highly Migratory Species Fishery
Management Plan; Revision to
Prohibited Species Regulations
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS is proposing
regulations under the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (MSA) to revise the
prohibited species regulations so that
each of the exceptions to the policy in
the Fishery Management Plan are
explicitly identified in the regulations.
The specific exceptions will allow HMS
fishermen to retain: (1) Salmon and
Pacific halibut, if all of the necessary
regulations for those respective fisheries
are followed; and (2) basking,
megamouth, and great white sharks, if
they are sold or donated to a scientific
or educational organization. This action
is necessary to more accurately reflect
the intent of the Fishery Management
Plan for U.S. West Coast Fisheries for
Highly Migratory Species (HMS FMP).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 19, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2015–0006, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150006, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:23 Jun 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Taylor Debevec, NMFS West Coast
Region Long Beach Office, 501 W.
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802. Include the identifier
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2015–0006’’ in the
comments.
Instructions: Comments must be
submitted by one of the above methods
to ensure they are received,
documented, and considered by NMFS.
Comments sent by any other method, to
any other address or individual, or
received after the end of the comment
period, may not be considered. All
comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be
posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
Copies of the draft Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR) and other supporting
documents are available via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov, docket NOAA–
NMFS–2015–0006 or contact the
Regional Administrator, William W.
Stelle, Jr., NMFS West Coast Region,
7600 Sand Point Way NE., Bldg. 1,
Seattle, WA 98115–0070, or
RegionalAdministrator.WCRHMS@
noaa.gov.
(3) basking, megamouth, and great white
sharks can be kept provided they are
sold or donated to recognized scientific
and educational organizations for
research or display purposes. The
implementing regulations, however,
only identify the first exception above;
the second and third are not included in
the regulations. The prohibited species
policy of the FMP was designed with
the second and third exceptions to:
Prevent salmon and Pacific halibut from
being retained as incidental catch in
HMS fisheries, and not preclude
fishermen from legally participating in
salmon and Pacific halibut fisheries
(permits, closures, gears, etc.); and
discourage targeting of the rare and low
productivity sharks, and not waste them
if caught.
The current regulations refer to
prohibited species in three sections of
the Code of Federal Regulations (in title
50 part 660 subpart K), which,
collectively, do not convey the full
prohibited species policy of the HMS
FMP. The definition of ‘‘prohibited
species’’ (§ 660.702) does not specify a
list of prohibited species and is vague
about the exceptions. The regulations on
prohibitions (§ 660.705(e)) describe the
action that should be taken if a
prohibited species is caught (i.e., return
the fish to sea), but does not incorporate
the exceptions. Finally, the regulations
on general catch restrictions
(§ 660.711(a)) identify the species that
are prohibited in HMS fisheries. The
lack of clarity and cohesion with the
HMS FMP has prompted NMFS to
modify the three sections of the
regulations that govern prohibited
species.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Proposed Regulations
The proposed rule would codify at
§ 660.705(e) the second and third
exceptions in the prohibited species
policy of the HMS FMP, as described
above. The definition of ‘‘Prohibited
species’’ at § 660.702 would be revised
to remove the general description of
what a prohibited species means, and
instead simply set forth the species
names; the prohibited species
themselves would not change. As a
result, the regulations at § 660.711(a),
which currently include the species
names, would be redundant and,
therefore, would be deleted. By
correcting the language at § 660.705(e)
to explicitly identify all the exceptions
and revising the definition of prohibited
species, the regulations would be
consistent with the HMS FMP.
Taylor Debevec, NMFS, 562–980–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The HMS FMP was implemented in a
final rule published on April 7, 2004 (69
FR 18444). NMFS was recently
informed of a discrepancy between the
implementing regulations and the intent
of the HMS FMP regarding the policy on
prohibited species. The HMS FMP
identifies several fish as ‘‘prohibited
species’’ (salmon, Pacific halibut,
basking shark, megamouth shark, and
great white shark) that cannot be
retained in HMS fisheries, with the
following exceptions: (1) Any can be
kept for examination by an authorized
observer or to return tagged fish as
specified by the tagging agency; (2)
salmon and Pacific halibut can be kept
provided all applicable state and
Federal regulations are followed (e.g.,
gear, permits, season, fishing area); and
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Classification
The NMFS West Coast Regional
Administrator has preliminarily
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 107 / Thursday, June 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the MSA and other
applicable laws.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be categorically excluded
from the requirement to prepare an
Environmental Assessment under the
National Environmental Policy Act
because the rule falls within the scope
of alternatives addressed in the
environmental impact statement (EIS)
prepared for the HMS FMP in 2003. The
EIS determined that the prohibited
species policy would ensure that neither
the sharks nor the strict management of
Pacific halibut and salmon are
compromised by HMS fisheries.
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Chief
Counsel for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce certified to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The rationale for the certification is as
follows:
This proposed rule, in accordance
with the HMS FMP and the
recommendation of the Pacific Fishery
Management Council, will revise the
prohibited species regulations so that
the exceptions to the policy as outlined
in the FMP are explicitly identified in
the regulations. The specific exceptions
will allow HMS fishermen to retain: (1)
Salmon and Pacific halibut if all of the
necessary regulations for those
respective fisheries are followed, and (2)
basking, megamouth, and great white
sharks if they are sold or donated to a
scientific or educational organization.
The main entities to which this action
would apply are fishermen that fish for
albacore using surface hook-and-line
gear, as they often have the opportunity
to fish for salmon with the same gear
and on the same trip. Typically,
albacore are available off of the coast of
Oregon and Washington around May or
June, while the salmon season is also
open. Though albacore is caught beyond
10 miles off the coast, fishermen
sometimes stop to catch salmon when
returning to port and generally inside of
5 miles from the coast.
On June 12, 2014, the Small Business
Administration (SBA) issued an interim
final rule revising the small business
size standards for several industries
effective July 14, 2014 (79 FR 33467).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:23 Jun 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
The rule increased the size standard for
Finfish Fishing from $19.0 million to
$20.5 million, Shellfish Fishing from
$5.0 million to $5.5 million, and Other
Marine Fishing from $7.0 million to
$7.5 million. NMFS conducted its
analysis for this action in light of the
new size standards. On average, there
are 28 commercial vessels, and 4
charter/recreational vessels per year that
would be impacted by this rule. NMFS
considers all entities subject to this
action to be small entities as defined by
the revised size standards.
The clarification of these regulations
will enable all fleets to operate their
businesses as intended by the HMS
FMP. This rule is expected to have a
positive effect on income because HMS
fishermen will be allowed to retain and
sell salmon and halibut (provided the
vessel is fishing under a salmon or
halibut permit). This positive impact is
expected to be modest, however,
because not many fishermen actively
participate across these fisheries,
especially on the same trip. If this
proposed rule were not finalized,
fishermen would be more restricted
than the HMS FMP intended; they
would not be allowed to be in
possession of, or land, species listed as
prohibited while also possessing or
landing HMS.
Because each affected vessel is a small
business, this proposed action is
considered to equally affect all of these
small entities in the same manner.
Based on the disproportionality and
profitability analysis above, the
proposed action, if adopted, will not
have adverse or disproportional
economic impact on these small
business entities.
Because this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, an
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is
not required, and one was not prepared
for this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and
procedure, Fish, Fisheries, Fishing,
Marine resources, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Treaties.
Dated: May 29, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES
1. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C.
773 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
2. In § 660.702, revise the definition
for ‘‘Prohibited species’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 660.702
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Prohibited species means any highly
migratory species for which quotas or
catch limits under the FMP have been
achieved and the fishery closed; salmon;
great white shark; basking shark;
megamouth shark; and Pacific halibut.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 660.705, revise paragraph (e) to
read as follows:
§ 660.705
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) When fishing for HMS, fail to
return a prohibited species to the sea
immediately with a minimum of injury,
except under the following
circumstances:
(1) Any prohibited species may be
retained for examination by an
authorized observer or to return tagged
fish as specified by the tagging agency.
(2) Salmon may be retained if
harvested in accordance with subpart H
of this part, and other applicable law.
(3) Great white sharks, basking sharks,
and megamouth sharks may be retained
if incidentally caught and subsequently
sold or donated to a recognized
scientific or educational organization for
research or display purposes.
(4) Pacific halibut may be retained if
harvested in accordance with part 300,
subpart E of this title, and other
applicable law.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 660.711
[Amended]
4. In § 660.711, remove paragraph (a)
and redesignate paragraphs (b) through
(d) as (a) through (c).
■
[FR Doc. 2015–13637 Filed 6–3–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
31885
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31884-31885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13637]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 150112035-5035-01]
RIN 0648-BE80
Fisheries Off West Coast States; Highly Migratory Species Fishery
Management Plan; Revision to Prohibited Species Regulations
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS is proposing regulations under the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) to revise the prohibited
species regulations so that each of the exceptions to the policy in the
Fishery Management Plan are explicitly identified in the regulations.
The specific exceptions will allow HMS fishermen to retain: (1) Salmon
and Pacific halibut, if all of the necessary regulations for those
respective fisheries are followed; and (2) basking, megamouth, and
great white sharks, if they are sold or donated to a scientific or
educational organization. This action is necessary to more accurately
reflect the intent of the Fishery Management Plan for U.S. West Coast
Fisheries for Highly Migratory Species (HMS FMP).
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 19, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2015-0006, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-0006, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Taylor Debevec, NMFS West
Coast Region Long Beach Office, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long
Beach, CA 90802. Include the identifier ``NOAA-NMFS-2015-0006'' in the
comments.
Instructions: Comments must be submitted by one of the above
methods to ensure they are received, documented, and considered by
NMFS. Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are a part of the public record and
will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name,
address, etc.) submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly
accessible. Do not submit confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
Copies of the draft Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) and other
supporting documents are available via the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov, docket NOAA-NMFS-2015-0006 or contact the
Regional Administrator, William W. Stelle, Jr., NMFS West Coast Region,
7600 Sand Point Way NE., Bldg. 1, Seattle, WA 98115-0070, or
RegionalAdministrator.WCRHMS@noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Taylor Debevec, NMFS, 562-980-4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The HMS FMP was implemented in a final rule published on April 7,
2004 (69 FR 18444). NMFS was recently informed of a discrepancy between
the implementing regulations and the intent of the HMS FMP regarding
the policy on prohibited species. The HMS FMP identifies several fish
as ``prohibited species'' (salmon, Pacific halibut, basking shark,
megamouth shark, and great white shark) that cannot be retained in HMS
fisheries, with the following exceptions: (1) Any can be kept for
examination by an authorized observer or to return tagged fish as
specified by the tagging agency; (2) salmon and Pacific halibut can be
kept provided all applicable state and Federal regulations are followed
(e.g., gear, permits, season, fishing area); and (3) basking,
megamouth, and great white sharks can be kept provided they are sold or
donated to recognized scientific and educational organizations for
research or display purposes. The implementing regulations, however,
only identify the first exception above; the second and third are not
included in the regulations. The prohibited species policy of the FMP
was designed with the second and third exceptions to: Prevent salmon
and Pacific halibut from being retained as incidental catch in HMS
fisheries, and not preclude fishermen from legally participating in
salmon and Pacific halibut fisheries (permits, closures, gears, etc.);
and discourage targeting of the rare and low productivity sharks, and
not waste them if caught.
The current regulations refer to prohibited species in three
sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (in title 50 part 660
subpart K), which, collectively, do not convey the full prohibited
species policy of the HMS FMP. The definition of ``prohibited species''
(Sec. 660.702) does not specify a list of prohibited species and is
vague about the exceptions. The regulations on prohibitions (Sec.
660.705(e)) describe the action that should be taken if a prohibited
species is caught (i.e., return the fish to sea), but does not
incorporate the exceptions. Finally, the regulations on general catch
restrictions (Sec. 660.711(a)) identify the species that are
prohibited in HMS fisheries. The lack of clarity and cohesion with the
HMS FMP has prompted NMFS to modify the three sections of the
regulations that govern prohibited species.
Proposed Regulations
The proposed rule would codify at Sec. 660.705(e) the second and
third exceptions in the prohibited species policy of the HMS FMP, as
described above. The definition of ``Prohibited species'' at Sec.
660.702 would be revised to remove the general description of what a
prohibited species means, and instead simply set forth the species
names; the prohibited species themselves would not change. As a result,
the regulations at Sec. 660.711(a), which currently include the
species names, would be redundant and, therefore, would be deleted. By
correcting the language at Sec. 660.705(e) to explicitly identify all
the exceptions and revising the definition of prohibited species, the
regulations would be consistent with the HMS FMP.
Classification
The NMFS West Coast Regional Administrator has preliminarily
[[Page 31885]]
determined that this proposed rule is consistent with the MSA and other
applicable laws.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule has been determined to be categorically excluded
from the requirement to prepare an Environmental Assessment under the
National Environmental Policy Act because the rule falls within the
scope of alternatives addressed in the environmental impact statement
(EIS) prepared for the HMS FMP in 2003. The EIS determined that the
prohibited species policy would ensure that neither the sharks nor the
strict management of Pacific halibut and salmon are compromised by HMS
fisheries.
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
the Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The rationale for the certification is as follows:
This proposed rule, in accordance with the HMS FMP and the
recommendation of the Pacific Fishery Management Council, will revise
the prohibited species regulations so that the exceptions to the policy
as outlined in the FMP are explicitly identified in the regulations.
The specific exceptions will allow HMS fishermen to retain: (1) Salmon
and Pacific halibut if all of the necessary regulations for those
respective fisheries are followed, and (2) basking, megamouth, and
great white sharks if they are sold or donated to a scientific or
educational organization.
The main entities to which this action would apply are fishermen
that fish for albacore using surface hook-and-line gear, as they often
have the opportunity to fish for salmon with the same gear and on the
same trip. Typically, albacore are available off of the coast of Oregon
and Washington around May or June, while the salmon season is also
open. Though albacore is caught beyond 10 miles off the coast,
fishermen sometimes stop to catch salmon when returning to port and
generally inside of 5 miles from the coast.
On June 12, 2014, the Small Business Administration (SBA) issued an
interim final rule revising the small business size standards for
several industries effective July 14, 2014 (79 FR 33467). The rule
increased the size standard for Finfish Fishing from $19.0 million to
$20.5 million, Shellfish Fishing from $5.0 million to $5.5 million, and
Other Marine Fishing from $7.0 million to $7.5 million. NMFS conducted
its analysis for this action in light of the new size standards. On
average, there are 28 commercial vessels, and 4 charter/recreational
vessels per year that would be impacted by this rule. NMFS considers
all entities subject to this action to be small entities as defined by
the revised size standards.
The clarification of these regulations will enable all fleets to
operate their businesses as intended by the HMS FMP. This rule is
expected to have a positive effect on income because HMS fishermen will
be allowed to retain and sell salmon and halibut (provided the vessel
is fishing under a salmon or halibut permit). This positive impact is
expected to be modest, however, because not many fishermen actively
participate across these fisheries, especially on the same trip. If
this proposed rule were not finalized, fishermen would be more
restricted than the HMS FMP intended; they would not be allowed to be
in possession of, or land, species listed as prohibited while also
possessing or landing HMS.
Because each affected vessel is a small business, this proposed
action is considered to equally affect all of these small entities in
the same manner. Based on the disproportionality and profitability
analysis above, the proposed action, if adopted, will not have adverse
or disproportional economic impact on these small business entities.
Because this rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis is not required, and one was not prepared for this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and procedure, Fish, Fisheries, Fishing,
Marine resources, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Treaties.
Dated: May 29, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 16
U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 660.702, revise the definition for ``Prohibited species''
to read as follows:
Sec. 660.702 Definitions.
* * * * *
Prohibited species means any highly migratory species for which
quotas or catch limits under the FMP have been achieved and the fishery
closed; salmon; great white shark; basking shark; megamouth shark; and
Pacific halibut.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 660.705, revise paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 660.705 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(e) When fishing for HMS, fail to return a prohibited species to
the sea immediately with a minimum of injury, except under the
following circumstances:
(1) Any prohibited species may be retained for examination by an
authorized observer or to return tagged fish as specified by the
tagging agency.
(2) Salmon may be retained if harvested in accordance with subpart
H of this part, and other applicable law.
(3) Great white sharks, basking sharks, and megamouth sharks may be
retained if incidentally caught and subsequently sold or donated to a
recognized scientific or educational organization for research or
display purposes.
(4) Pacific halibut may be retained if harvested in accordance with
part 300, subpart E of this title, and other applicable law.
* * * * *
Sec. 660.711 [Amended]
0
4. In Sec. 660.711, remove paragraph (a) and redesignate paragraphs
(b) through (d) as (a) through (c).
[FR Doc. 2015-13637 Filed 6-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P