Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Draft Recovery Plan for the Coterminous United States Population of Bull Trout and Draft Recovery Unit Implementation Plans, 31916-31918 [2015-13624]
Download as PDF
31916
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 107 / Thursday, June 4, 2015 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–4221–
DR; Docket ID FEMA–2015–0002]
West Virginia; Major Disaster and
Related Determinations
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This is a notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of West Virginia
(FEMA–4221–DR), dated May 21, 2015,
and related determinations.
DATES: Effective Date: May 21, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2833.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that, in a letter dated May
21, 2015, the President issued a major
disaster declaration under the authority
of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act, 42
U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ‘‘Stafford Act’’),
as follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
I have determined that the damage in
certain areas of the State of West Virginia
resulting from severe storms, flooding,
landslides, and mudslides during the period
of April 13–15, 2015, is of sufficient severity
and magnitude to warrant a major disaster
declaration under the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance
Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ‘‘Stafford
Act’’). Therefore, I declare that such a major
disaster exists in the State of West Virginia.
In order to provide Federal assistance, you
are hereby authorized to allocate from funds
available for these purposes such amounts as
you find necessary for Federal disaster
assistance and administrative expenses.
You are authorized to provide Public
Assistance in the designated areas and
Hazard Mitigation throughout the State.
Consistent with the requirement that Federal
assistance be supplemental, any Federal
funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Hazard Mitigation will be limited to 75
percent of the total eligible costs. Federal
funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Public Assistance also will be limited to 75
percent of the total eligible costs, with the
exception of projects that meet the eligibility
criteria for a higher Federal cost-sharing
percentage under the Public Assistance
Alternative Procedures Pilot Program for
Debris Removal implemented pursuant to
section 428 of the Stafford Act.
Further, you are authorized to make
changes to this declaration for the approved
assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:33 Jun 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
The Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that
pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order
12148, as amended, Kari Suzann Cowie,
of FEMA is appointed to act as the
Federal Coordinating Officer for this
major disaster.
The following areas of the State of
West Virginia have been designated as
adversely affected by this major disaster:
Cabell, Calhoun, Greenbrier, Jackson,
Pleasants, Roane, Summers, and Wirt
Counties for Public Assistance.
All areas within the State of West Virginia
are eligible for assistance under the Hazard
Mitigation Grant Program.
The following Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used
for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora
Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034,
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA);
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant;
97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to
Individuals and Households in Presidentially
Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—
Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals
and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals
and Households—Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants—Public Assistance
(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2015–13666 Filed 6–3–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–23–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R1–ES–2015–N076;
FXES11130100000–156–FF01E00000]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Revised Draft Recovery
Plan for the Coterminous United States
Population of Bull Trout and Draft
Recovery Unit Implementation Plans
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability
for review and public comment.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of six draft recovery unit
implementation plans (RUIPs) that are
part of the recovery plan we are
developing for the coterminous United
States population of bull trout
(Salvelinus confluentus). On September
4, 2014, we announced the availability
of the Revised Draft Recovery Plan for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Coterminous United States
Population of Bull Trout, along with a
90-day comment period. While the
revised draft recovery plan proposed the
specific goals, objectives, and criteria
that should be met to remove the
species from the Federal List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife,
the principal conservation actions
needed to advance the recovery of bull
trout had not yet been developed. We
have been working through an
interagency collaboration of interested
and knowledgeable Federal, Tribal,
State, private, and other parties to
develop individual draft RUIPs that
propose site-specific conservation
actions for each of six recovery units
(Coastal, Klamath, Mid-Columbia,
Columbia Headwaters, Upper Snake,
and St. Mary). Based on comments
received on the revised draft recovery
plan, we are also proposing a
modification to the recovery criteria for
the Columbia Headwaters Recovery
Unit. We consider this a substantive
change to the current revised draft
recovery plan. We request review and
comment on the draft RUIPs and
recovery criteria modifications from
Federal, State and local agencies, Native
American Tribes, and the public.
DATES: In order to be considered,
comments on the draft RUIPs and
modified recovery criteria must be
received on or before July 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the
draft recovery unit implementation
plans, as well as the revised draft
recovery plan of September 2014 and a
summary of newly proposed recovery
criteria, are available at https://
www.fws.gov/endangered/species/
recovery-plans.html and https://
www.fws.gov/pacific/ecoservices/
endangered/recovery/plans.html. These
documents are also available by request
from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office, 1387 S.
Vinnell Way, Room 368, Boise, ID
83709; telephone (208) 378–5345.
If you want to comment, you may
submit written comments by one of the
following methods:
(1) You may submit written comments
and materials to Bull Trout Recovery,
Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office, at the
above Boise address;
(2) You may hand-deliver written
comments to our Idaho Fish and
Wildlife Office, at the above Boise
address, or fax them to (208) 378–5262;
or
(3) You may send comments by email
to fw1bulltroutrecoveryplan@fws.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Carrier, State Supervisor, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Idaho Fish
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 107 / Thursday, June 4, 2015 / Notices
and Wildlife Office, at the above Boise
address; telephone (208) 378–5243. If
you use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD), call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
In November 1999, all populations of
bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus)
within the coterminous United States
were listed as a threatened species
pursuant to the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.; Act) (64 FR 58910; November 1,
1999). This final listing added bull trout
in the Coastal-Puget Sound populations
(Olympic Peninsula and Puget Sound
regions) and Saint Mary-Belly River
populations (east of the Continental
divide in Montana) to the previous
listing of three distinct population
segments of bull trout in the Columbia
River, Klamath River, and Jarbidge River
basins (63 FR 31647, June 10, 1998; 64
FR 17110, April 8, 1999).
Recovery of endangered and
threatened animals and plants is a
primary goal of our endangered species
program. To help guide the recovery
effort, we prepare recovery plans for
most listed species. Recovery plans
describe actions considered necessary
for conservation of the species, establish
criteria for downlisting or delisting, and
estimate time and cost for implementing
recovery measures.
For the coterminous population of
bull trout, three separate draft bull trout
recovery plans were completed in 2002
and 2004. The 2002 draft recovery plan
(USFWS 2002) addressed bull trout
populations within the Columbia, St.
Mary–Belly, and Klamath River basins
and included individual chapters for 24
separate recovery units. In 2004, draft
recovery plans were developed for the
Coastal–Puget Sound drainages in
western Washington, including two
recovery unit chapters (USFWS 2004a),
and for the Jarbidge River in Nevada
(USFWS 2004b). Although none of these
draft recovery plans were finalized, they
served to identify recovery actions
across the range of the species, and
provided the framework for
implementing numerous recovery
actions by our partner agencies, local
working groups, and others since that
time.
Revised Draft Recovery Plan
On September 4, 2014, the Service
announced the availability of a Revised
Draft Recovery Plan for the Coterminous
United States Population of Bull Trout
(79 FR 52741).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:33 Jun 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
The primary recovery strategy for bull
trout in the coterminous United States
proposed in the revised draft recovery
plan is to: (1) Conserve bull trout so that
they are geographically widespread
across representative habitats and
demographically stable in six recovery
units; (2) effectively manage and
ameliorate the primary threats in each of
six recovery units at the core area scale
such that bull trout are not likely to
become endangered in the foreseeable
future; (3) build upon the numerous and
ongoing conservation actions
implemented on behalf of bull trout
since their listing in 1999, and improve
our understanding of how various threat
factors potentially affect the species; (4)
use that information to work
cooperatively with our partners to
design, fund, prioritize, and implement
effective conservation actions in those
areas that offer the greatest long-term
benefit to sustain bull trout and where
recovery can be achieved; and (5) apply
adaptive management principles to
implementing the bull trout recovery
program to account for new information.
The revised draft recovery plan also
proposed recovery criteria that represent
our best assessment of the conditions
that would most likely result in a
determination that listing under the Act
is no longer required. For bull trout,
these conditions would be met when
conservation actions have been
implemented to ameliorate the primary
threats in suitable habitats in each of the
six recovery units. Additionally,
proposed recovery criteria were drafted
with the acknowledgement that despite
our best conservation efforts, it is
possible that some existing bull trout
core areas may become extirpated due to
various factors, including the effects of
small populations, isolation, and
possible future climate change effects.
If threats are effectively managed at
the thresholds established in the revised
draft recovery plan, we expect that bull
trout populations will respond
accordingly and reflect the biodiversity
principles of resiliency, redundancy,
and representation. Specifically,
achieving the proposed recovery criteria
in each recovery unit would result in
geographically widespread and
demographically stable local bull trout
populations within the range of natural
variation, with their essential cold water
habitats connected to allow their diverse
life history forms to persist into the
foreseeable future; therefore, the species
would be brought to the point where the
protections of the Act are no longer
necessary.
During the 90 day comment period,
we received 70 comment letters from 4
federal agencies, 5 state agencies, 6
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31917
Native American tribes, 9 utilities/
commissions/counties, 20
environmental or conservation
organizations, 26 individuals, and 4
peer reviewers. Several commenters
provided new and updated scientific
information or suggested revisions or
changes in the revised draft recovery
plan. New scientific information will be
incorporated or updated in the final
recovery plan where appropriate.
In general, most of the comments
were centered around: (1) The six
recovery unit structure and boundary
delineations, with several suggested
boundary changes or further splitting of
recovery units (i.e., separating the core
areas in the lower Columbia/Willamette
watersheds from the rest of the Coastal
Recovery Unit, separating the Malheur
drainage from the rest of the Upper
Snake Recovery Unit, and/or moving the
Clearwater drainage from the MidColumbia to Upper Snake Recovery
Unit); (2) lack of support for the
proposed threshold for effective threat
management in recovery criteria for the
Coastal, Mid-Columbia, Upper Snake,
and Columbia Headwaters Recovery
Units (i.e., primary threats effectively
managed in 75 percent of core areas,
representing 75 percent of local
populations within each recovery unit),
which many believe does not conserve
all remaining bull trout populations; (3)
concern that the revised draft recovery
plan abandons demographic or
population targets proposed in earlier
draft recovery plans for bull trout; and
(4) requests for further explanation and
detail regarding the role of monitoring
and evaluation in bull trout recovery.
Any changes resulting from these
comments will be reflected when the
final recovery plan is published, and a
detailed response to comments will be
included as an appendix to the final
recovery plan. We are continuing to
review proposed modifications to the
recovery unit boundaries, but at present
the draft RUIPs continue to be based
upon the original recovery unit
boundaries as published in the revised
draft recovery plan. Based on comments
received, we propose modifying the
recovery criteria for the Columbia
Headwaters Recovery Unit to address
simple and complex core areas
separately. Given that this is a
substantive change to the revised draft
recovery plan, we request public
comment on the criteria as modified. A
link to the amended recovery criteria is
available at the Web addresses above.
Note also that the current status and
expected needs for bull trout monitoring
and evaluation at the recovery unit and
core area level are now discussed in
greater detail within the draft RUIPs.
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
31918
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 107 / Thursday, June 4, 2015 / Notices
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The final bull trout recovery plan will
describe the principal actions needed to
advance the recovery of bull trout in the
six recovery units within the
coterminous United States; and will
include individual RUIPs for each
recovery unit that will provide sitespecific detail at the core area scale. The
RUIPs for each recovery unit have been
developed through an interagency
collaboration of interested and
knowledgeable Federal, Tribal, State,
private, and other parties prior to
completion of the final recovery plan. In
many parts of the range of bull trout,
local interagency bull trout working
groups have previously identified and
are already implementing recovery
actions necessary for local bull trout
core area conservation. Much of this
existing information has been
incorporated into the RUIPs where
appropriate. RUIPs incorporated in the
final recovery plan will also include an
implementation schedule that outline
core area specific recovery actions and
estimated costs for bull trout recovery.
Request for Public Comments
Section 4(f) of the Act requires us to
provide public notice and an
opportunity for public review and
comment during recovery plan
development. In an appendix to the
approved final recovery plan, we will
summarize and respond to the issues
raised by the public and peer reviewers.
Substantive comments may or may not
result in changes to the recovery plan;
comments regarding recovery plan
implementation will be forwarded as
appropriate to Federal or other entities
so that they can be taken into account
during the course of implementing
recovery actions.
We request written comments on the
six draft RUIPs and the proposed
modified recovery criteria. We will
consider all comments we receive by the
date specified in DATES prior to final
approval of the plan. If you previously
submitted comments or information on
the revised draft recovery plan during
the initial comment period from
September 4, 2014, to December 3, 2014
(79 FR 52741), you need not resubmit
them. We have incorporated them into
our files for the original comment
period, and we will fully consider them
in development of the final recovery
plan.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:33 Jun 03, 2015
Jkt 235001
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
The authority for this action is section
4(f) of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Dated: May 12, 2015.
Richard R. Hannan,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Region, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–13624 Filed 6–3–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[156A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G]
Indian Gaming
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
Notice of Extension of Tribal—
State Class III Gaming Compact.
ACTION:
This publishes notice of the
extension of the Class III gaming
compact between the Yankton Sioux
Tribe and the State of South Dakota.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective Date: June 4, 2015.
Ms.
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Policy and Economic
Development, Washington, DC 20240,
(202) 219–4066.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pursuant
to 25 CFR 293.5, an extension to an
existing tribal-state Class III gaming
compact does not require approval by
the Secretary if the extension does not
include any amendment to the terms of
the compact. The Yankton Sioux Tribe
and the State of South Dakota have
reached an agreement to extend the
expiration of their existing Tribal-State
Class III gaming compact until October
20, 2015. This publishes notice of the
new expiration date of the compact.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: May 28, 2015.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2015–13715 Filed 6–3–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[156A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G]
Indian Gaming
Authority
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State
Class III Gaming Compact.
AGENCY:
This notice publishes the
approval of the Amendment to the
compacts between the Confederated
Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation,
Confederated Tribes of the Colville
Reservation, Cowlitz Indian Tribe, Hoh
Indian Tribe, Jamestown S’Klallam
Tribe, Kalispel Indian Community of the
Kalispel Reservation, Lower Elwha
Tribal Community, Lummi Tribe of the
Lummi Reservation, Makah Indian Tribe
of the Makah Reservation, Nisqually
Indian Tribe, Port Gamble S’Klallam
Tribe, Quileute Tribe of the Quileute
Reservation, Quinault Indian Nation,
Samish Indian Nation, Sauk Suiattle
Indian Tribe, Shoalwater Bay Indian
Tribe of the Shoalwater Bay Indian
Reservation, Skokomish Indian Tribe,
Snoqualmie Indian Tribe, Spokane
Tribe of the Spokane Reservation,
Squaxin Island Tribe of the Squaxin
Island Reservation, Stillaguamish Tribe
of Indians of Washington, Suquamish
Indian Tribe of the Fort Madison
Reservation, Swinomish Indian Tribal
Community, Tulalip Tribes of
Washington, Upper Skagit Indian Tribe,
Yakama Nation, and the State of
Washington governing Class III gaming
(Compact).
DATES: Effective Date: June 4, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Policy and Economic
Development, Washington, DC 20240,
(202) 219–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 11 of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act (IGRA) Public Law 100–
497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of
engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR
293.4, all compacts are subject to review
and approval by the Secretary. The
Compact requires that ATM machines
shall not accept Electronic Benefits
Cards, increases the allocation of
Players Terminals, sets the regulatory
fee schedule, authorizes changes for
tribal contributions, and incorporates
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 107 (Thursday, June 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31916-31918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13624]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R1-ES-2015-N076; FXES11130100000-156-FF01E00000]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Draft
Recovery Plan for the Coterminous United States Population of Bull
Trout and Draft Recovery Unit Implementation Plans
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability for review and public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of six draft recovery unit implementation plans (RUIPs)
that are part of the recovery plan we are developing for the
coterminous United States population of bull trout (Salvelinus
confluentus). On September 4, 2014, we announced the availability of
the Revised Draft Recovery Plan for the Coterminous United States
Population of Bull Trout, along with a 90-day comment period. While the
revised draft recovery plan proposed the specific goals, objectives,
and criteria that should be met to remove the species from the Federal
List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife, the principal conservation
actions needed to advance the recovery of bull trout had not yet been
developed. We have been working through an interagency collaboration of
interested and knowledgeable Federal, Tribal, State, private, and other
parties to develop individual draft RUIPs that propose site-specific
conservation actions for each of six recovery units (Coastal, Klamath,
Mid-Columbia, Columbia Headwaters, Upper Snake, and St. Mary). Based on
comments received on the revised draft recovery plan, we are also
proposing a modification to the recovery criteria for the Columbia
Headwaters Recovery Unit. We consider this a substantive change to the
current revised draft recovery plan. We request review and comment on
the draft RUIPs and recovery criteria modifications from Federal, State
and local agencies, Native American Tribes, and the public.
DATES: In order to be considered, comments on the draft RUIPs and
modified recovery criteria must be received on or before July 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the draft recovery unit implementation
plans, as well as the revised draft recovery plan of September 2014 and
a summary of newly proposed recovery criteria, are available at https://www.fws.gov/endangered/species/recovery-plans.html and https://www.fws.gov/pacific/ecoservices/endangered/recovery/plans.html. These
documents are also available by request from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Room 368,
Boise, ID 83709; telephone (208) 378-5345.
If you want to comment, you may submit written comments by one of
the following methods:
(1) You may submit written comments and materials to Bull Trout
Recovery, Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office, at the above Boise address;
(2) You may hand-deliver written comments to our Idaho Fish and
Wildlife Office, at the above Boise address, or fax them to (208) 378-
5262; or
(3) You may send comments by email to
fw1bulltroutrecoveryplan@fws.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Carrier, State Supervisor,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Idaho Fish
[[Page 31917]]
and Wildlife Office, at the above Boise address; telephone (208) 378-
5243. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call
the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In November 1999, all populations of bull trout (Salvelinus
confluentus) within the coterminous United States were listed as a
threatened species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.; Act) (64 FR 58910; November 1, 1999).
This final listing added bull trout in the Coastal-Puget Sound
populations (Olympic Peninsula and Puget Sound regions) and Saint Mary-
Belly River populations (east of the Continental divide in Montana) to
the previous listing of three distinct population segments of bull
trout in the Columbia River, Klamath River, and Jarbidge River basins
(63 FR 31647, June 10, 1998; 64 FR 17110, April 8, 1999).
Recovery of endangered and threatened animals and plants is a
primary goal of our endangered species program. To help guide the
recovery effort, we prepare recovery plans for most listed species.
Recovery plans describe actions considered necessary for conservation
of the species, establish criteria for downlisting or delisting, and
estimate time and cost for implementing recovery measures.
For the coterminous population of bull trout, three separate draft
bull trout recovery plans were completed in 2002 and 2004. The 2002
draft recovery plan (USFWS 2002) addressed bull trout populations
within the Columbia, St. Mary-Belly, and Klamath River basins and
included individual chapters for 24 separate recovery units. In 2004,
draft recovery plans were developed for the Coastal-Puget Sound
drainages in western Washington, including two recovery unit chapters
(USFWS 2004a), and for the Jarbidge River in Nevada (USFWS 2004b).
Although none of these draft recovery plans were finalized, they served
to identify recovery actions across the range of the species, and
provided the framework for implementing numerous recovery actions by
our partner agencies, local working groups, and others since that time.
Revised Draft Recovery Plan
On September 4, 2014, the Service announced the availability of a
Revised Draft Recovery Plan for the Coterminous United States
Population of Bull Trout (79 FR 52741).
The primary recovery strategy for bull trout in the coterminous
United States proposed in the revised draft recovery plan is to: (1)
Conserve bull trout so that they are geographically widespread across
representative habitats and demographically stable in six recovery
units; (2) effectively manage and ameliorate the primary threats in
each of six recovery units at the core area scale such that bull trout
are not likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future; (3)
build upon the numerous and ongoing conservation actions implemented on
behalf of bull trout since their listing in 1999, and improve our
understanding of how various threat factors potentially affect the
species; (4) use that information to work cooperatively with our
partners to design, fund, prioritize, and implement effective
conservation actions in those areas that offer the greatest long-term
benefit to sustain bull trout and where recovery can be achieved; and
(5) apply adaptive management principles to implementing the bull trout
recovery program to account for new information.
The revised draft recovery plan also proposed recovery criteria
that represent our best assessment of the conditions that would most
likely result in a determination that listing under the Act is no
longer required. For bull trout, these conditions would be met when
conservation actions have been implemented to ameliorate the primary
threats in suitable habitats in each of the six recovery units.
Additionally, proposed recovery criteria were drafted with the
acknowledgement that despite our best conservation efforts, it is
possible that some existing bull trout core areas may become extirpated
due to various factors, including the effects of small populations,
isolation, and possible future climate change effects.
If threats are effectively managed at the thresholds established in
the revised draft recovery plan, we expect that bull trout populations
will respond accordingly and reflect the biodiversity principles of
resiliency, redundancy, and representation. Specifically, achieving the
proposed recovery criteria in each recovery unit would result in
geographically widespread and demographically stable local bull trout
populations within the range of natural variation, with their essential
cold water habitats connected to allow their diverse life history forms
to persist into the foreseeable future; therefore, the species would be
brought to the point where the protections of the Act are no longer
necessary.
During the 90 day comment period, we received 70 comment letters
from 4 federal agencies, 5 state agencies, 6 Native American tribes, 9
utilities/commissions/counties, 20 environmental or conservation
organizations, 26 individuals, and 4 peer reviewers. Several commenters
provided new and updated scientific information or suggested revisions
or changes in the revised draft recovery plan. New scientific
information will be incorporated or updated in the final recovery plan
where appropriate.
In general, most of the comments were centered around: (1) The six
recovery unit structure and boundary delineations, with several
suggested boundary changes or further splitting of recovery units
(i.e., separating the core areas in the lower Columbia/Willamette
watersheds from the rest of the Coastal Recovery Unit, separating the
Malheur drainage from the rest of the Upper Snake Recovery Unit, and/or
moving the Clearwater drainage from the Mid-Columbia to Upper Snake
Recovery Unit); (2) lack of support for the proposed threshold for
effective threat management in recovery criteria for the Coastal, Mid-
Columbia, Upper Snake, and Columbia Headwaters Recovery Units (i.e.,
primary threats effectively managed in 75 percent of core areas,
representing 75 percent of local populations within each recovery
unit), which many believe does not conserve all remaining bull trout
populations; (3) concern that the revised draft recovery plan abandons
demographic or population targets proposed in earlier draft recovery
plans for bull trout; and (4) requests for further explanation and
detail regarding the role of monitoring and evaluation in bull trout
recovery.
Any changes resulting from these comments will be reflected when
the final recovery plan is published, and a detailed response to
comments will be included as an appendix to the final recovery plan. We
are continuing to review proposed modifications to the recovery unit
boundaries, but at present the draft RUIPs continue to be based upon
the original recovery unit boundaries as published in the revised draft
recovery plan. Based on comments received, we propose modifying the
recovery criteria for the Columbia Headwaters Recovery Unit to address
simple and complex core areas separately. Given that this is a
substantive change to the revised draft recovery plan, we request
public comment on the criteria as modified. A link to the amended
recovery criteria is available at the Web addresses above. Note also
that the current status and expected needs for bull trout monitoring
and evaluation at the recovery unit and core area level are now
discussed in greater detail within the draft RUIPs.
[[Page 31918]]
The final bull trout recovery plan will describe the principal
actions needed to advance the recovery of bull trout in the six
recovery units within the coterminous United States; and will include
individual RUIPs for each recovery unit that will provide site-specific
detail at the core area scale. The RUIPs for each recovery unit have
been developed through an interagency collaboration of interested and
knowledgeable Federal, Tribal, State, private, and other parties prior
to completion of the final recovery plan. In many parts of the range of
bull trout, local interagency bull trout working groups have previously
identified and are already implementing recovery actions necessary for
local bull trout core area conservation. Much of this existing
information has been incorporated into the RUIPs where appropriate.
RUIPs incorporated in the final recovery plan will also include an
implementation schedule that outline core area specific recovery
actions and estimated costs for bull trout recovery.
Request for Public Comments
Section 4(f) of the Act requires us to provide public notice and an
opportunity for public review and comment during recovery plan
development. In an appendix to the approved final recovery plan, we
will summarize and respond to the issues raised by the public and peer
reviewers. Substantive comments may or may not result in changes to the
recovery plan; comments regarding recovery plan implementation will be
forwarded as appropriate to Federal or other entities so that they can
be taken into account during the course of implementing recovery
actions.
We request written comments on the six draft RUIPs and the proposed
modified recovery criteria. We will consider all comments we receive by
the date specified in DATES prior to final approval of the plan. If you
previously submitted comments or information on the revised draft
recovery plan during the initial comment period from September 4, 2014,
to December 3, 2014 (79 FR 52741), you need not resubmit them. We have
incorporated them into our files for the original comment period, and
we will fully consider them in development of the final recovery plan.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Authority
The authority for this action is section 4(f) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: May 12, 2015.
Richard R. Hannan,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-13624 Filed 6-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P