Alkyl (C8-20, 31481-31485 [2015-13509]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
finality and regulatory repose, given that
CAA section 112(c)(6) itself does not
require the EPA to issue any final notice
or take any other final action that
functions to re-open previously
promulgated standards that are credited
to meeting the 90 percent requirement.
If, in fact, additional control of HAP,
including CAA section 112(c)(6) HAP, is
appropriate because of remaining risk or
newly available control technologies or
practices, the CAA addresses that
possibility by requiring review of CAA
section 112(d)(2) standards pursuant to
CAA sections 112(d)(6) and (f)(2). Thus,
the commenter has had and will have
additional opportunities to address
whether additional control of the
section 112(c)(6) HAP is warranted.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive Orders can be
found at https://www2.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was, therefore, not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA because it does not contain any
information collection activities.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities. This action does not alter any
of the standards discussed in this
document.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175. This action does not
materially alter the stringency of any
standards discussed in this document.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 because the EPA does not
believe the environmental health risks
or safety risks addressed by this action
present a disproportionate risk to
children. A health and risk assessment
was not performed for this action
because it does not alter any of the
regulations discussed in this action.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538 and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. The action imposes no
enforceable duty on any state, local or
tribal governments or the private sector.
The EPA believes the human health or
environmental risk addressed by this
action will not have potential
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority, low income or indigenous
populations because it does not affect
the level of protection provided to
human health or the environment. An
environmental justice evaluation was
not performed for this action because it
does not alter any of the regulations
discussed in this action.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states or on the
distribution of power and
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31481
Dated: May 22, 2015.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–13500 Filed 6–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0678; FRL–9927–19]
Alkyl (C8–20) Polyglucoside Esters;
Exemption From the Requirement of a
Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of Dglucopyranose, oligomeric, 6(dihydrogen citrates), C8–20 branched
and linear alkyl glycosides, sodium
salts; D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6(hydrogen sulfosuccinates), C8–20
branched and linear alkyl glycosides,
sodium salts; and D-glucopyranose,
oligomeric, lactates, C8–20 branched and
linear alkyl glycosides when used as an
inert ingredients (surfactants) in
pesticide formulations applied to
growing crops and raw agricultural
commodities after harvest. Lamberti
USA, Inc. submitted a petition to EPA
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting
establishment of an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of D-glucopyranose,
oligomeric, 6-(dihydrogen citrates), C8–20
branched and linear alkyl glycosides,
sodium salts: D-glucopyranose,
oligomeric, 6-(hydrogen
sulfosuccinates), C8–20 branched and
linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts;
and D-glucopyranose, oligomeric,
lactates, C8–20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides.
DATES: This regulation is effective June
3, 2015. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
August 3, 2015, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0678, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03JNR1.SGM
03JNR1
31482
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Lewis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Publishing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl. To access the OCSPP test
guidelines referenced in this document
electronically, please go to https://
www.epa.gov/ocspp and select ‘‘Test
Methods and Guidelines.’’
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:46 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2014–0678 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before August 3, 2015. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2014–0678, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of October 15,
2014 (79 FR 61844) (FRL–9917–24),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a,
announcing the filing of a pesticide
petition (PP IN–10675) by Lamberti
USA, Inc., 161 Washington St.,
Conshohocken, PA 19428. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.910 be
amended by establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of D-glucopyranose,
oligomeric, 6-(dihydrogen citrates), C8–20
branched and linear alkyl glycosides,
sodium salts (CAS Reg. No. 1079993–
97–7); D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6(hydrogen sulfosuccinates), C8–20
branched and linear alkyl glycosides,
sodium salts (CAS Reg. No. 1079993–
92–2); and D-glucopyranose, oligomeric,
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
lactates, C8–20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides (CAS Reg. No. 1079993–94–
4) (hereafter referred to in this
document as alkyl polyglucoside (C8–20)
esters or AGEs) when used as inert
ingredients (surfactants) in pesticide
formulations applied to growing crops
and raw agricultural commodities. That
document referenced a summary of the
petition prepared by Lamberti USA Inc.,
the petitioner, which is available in the
docket, https://www.regulations.gov. One
comment was received on the notice of
filing. EPA’s response to this comment
is discussed in Unit V.C.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients
that are not active ingredients as defined
in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are
not limited to, the following types of
ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own):
Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as
polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and
diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose;
wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol
dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not
intended to imply nontoxicity; the
ingredient may or may not be
chemically active. Generally, EPA has
exempted inert ingredients from the
requirement of a tolerance based on the
low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
E:\FR\FM\03JNR1.SGM
03JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
EPA establishes exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance only in those
cases where it can be clearly
demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide
chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no
appreciable risks to human health. In
order to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide inert
ingredients, the Agency considers the
toxicity of the inert in conjunction with
possible exposure to residues of the
inert ingredient through food, drinking
water, and through other exposures that
occur as a result of pesticide use in
residential settings. If EPA is able to
determine that a finite tolerance is not
necessary to ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
inert ingredient, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance may be
established.
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(c)(2)(A), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for alkyl
polyglucoside (C8–20) esters including
exposure resulting from the exemption
established by this action. EPA’s
assessment of exposures and risks
associated with alkyl polyglucoside
(C8–20) esters follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available
toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as
well as the relationship of the results of
the studies to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information
concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable
subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children. Specific
information on the studies received and
the nature of the adverse effects caused
by alkyl polyglucoside (C8–20) esters as
well as the no-observed-adverse-effectlevel (NOAEL) and the lowest-observedadverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the
toxicity studies are discussed in this
unit. Limited toxicity data are available
on D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6(dihydrogen citrates), C8–20 branched
and linear alkyl glycosides, sodium
salts); D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6(hydrogen sulfosuccinates), C8–20
branched and linear alkyl glycosides,
sodium salts; and D-glucopyranose,
oligomeric, lactates, C8–20 branched and
linear alkyl glycosides. The
alkylpolyglucoside (C8–C20) esters are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
reaction products of glucose and fatty
acids in which the alcohol moiety is
attached to the polyglucoside by a bglucosides linkage. The toxicity profile
of these substances is based upon data
from other, related alkyl polyglucoside
esters sharing similar physical and
chemical characteristics as well as
expected toxicity as well as AGE
metabolites lactic acid, citric acid and
disodium sulfosuccinate.
AGEs have low acute toxicity via the
oral route (oral LD50 > 5,000 milligram/
kilogram (mg/kg)). There is no available
data regarding acute exposure via the
dermal, eye or inhalation routes.
In a combined repeated dose toxicity
study with the reproduction/
developmental toxicity screening test in
rats (OCSPP Guideline 870.3650 study),
there were no observed adverse effects
for parental systemic or reproductive/
developmental toxicity at 1,000 mg/kg/
day.
A 2-year chronic oral study in rats
treated with citric acid was available for
review. Rats were administered 5
percent or 3 percent citric acid (approx.
2,000 or 1,200 mg/kg/day) in the diet.
There were no adverse effects observed
at 2,000 mg/kg/day. Chronic studies
were also available for the rabbit and
dog. There were no adverse effects
observed in either study at doses up to
1,500 and 1,400 mg/kg/day,
respectively.
Neurotoxicity studies with AGEs were
not available for review. However,
neurotoxicity was not observed in the
combined repeated dose toxicity study
with the reproduction/developmental
toxicity screening test at concentrations
as high as 1,000 mg/kg/day (limit dose).
Mutagenicity studies on several
surrogate chemicals did not indicate
positive response for mutagenic effects.
The Agency further evaluated the
carcinogenic potential of alkyl
polyglucoside (C8–20) esters by
conducting a knowledge base qualitative
structure activity relationship (SAR)
database search, DEREK Nexus Version
2.0, to determine if there were structural
alerts. No structural alerts were
identified including carcinogenicity.
Alkylpolyglycosides are rapidly
hydrolyzed in intestine and liver. The
cleavage products, sugars and longchain alcohols, enter the pathways of
lipid and carbohydrate metabolism.
Specific information on the studies
received and the nature of the adverse
effects caused by, can be found at
https://www.regulations.gov in the
document ‘‘PC Codes 911028, 911029,
911030: Alkyl (C8–20) polyglucoside
Esters (AGEs); Human Health Risk
Assessment and Ecological Effects
Assessment to Support Proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31483
Exemption from the Requirement of a
Tolerance When Used as Inert
Ingredients in Pesticide Formulations.’’
at (6) in docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2014–0678.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/
Levels of Concern
Alkylglycosides are rapidly
hydrolyzed in intestine and liver. The
cleavage products, sugars, and longchain alcohols enter the pathways of
lipid and carbohydrate metabolism.
Based on the low acute toxicity of AGEs,
the body’s ability to rapidly metabolize
these substances, the expected
metabolites being fatty acids and
carbohydrates (which are normal
constituents of the body), and the lack
of observed adverse effects for repeat
dose studies at the limit dose (1,000 mg/
kg/day), no endpoint of concern was
identified.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and
feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to alkyl polyglucoside (C8–20)
esters, EPA considered exposure under
the proposed exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. EPA
assessed dietary exposures from alkyl
polyglucoside (C8–20) esters in food as
follows:
Dietary exposure to AGEs can occur
from eating food treated with alkyl
polyglucoside (C8–20) esters. However, a
quantitative assessment was not
conducted since an endpoint of concern
for risk assessment was not identified.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking
water. Dietary exposure from drinking
water to alkyl polyglucoside (C8–20)
esters can occur by drinking water that
has been contaminated by run-off from
a pesticide treated area. Since an
endpoint for risk assessment was not
identified, a quantitative dietary
exposure assessment from drinking
water for alkyl polyglucoside (C8–20)
esters was not conducted.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The
term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in
this document to refer to nonoccupational, non-dietary exposure
(e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers),
carpets, swimming pools, and hard
surface disinfection on walls, floors,
tables).
Alkyl polyglucoside (C8–20) esters
have reported uses in personal care
products, such as antiperspirants,
shampoos, conditioners, and
moisturizers. Residential exposure to
alkyl polyglucoside (C8–20) esters via the
oral, dermal, and inhalation route of
exposure is also possible as a result of
their use as inert ingredients in
registered pesticide products that
E:\FR\FM\03JNR1.SGM
03JNR1
31484
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
include residential uses. However, since
there is toxicological endpoint
identified, it is not necessary to conduct
assessments of residential (nonoccupational) exposures and risks.
4. Cumulative effects from substances
with a common mechanism of toxicity.
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA has not found Alkyl
polyglucoside (C8–20) esters to share a
common mechanism of toxicity with
any other substances, and Alkyl
polyglucoside (C8–20) esters do not
appear to produce a toxic metabolite
produced by other substances. For the
purposes of this tolerance action,
therefore, EPA has assumed that Alkyl
polyglucoside (C8–20) esters do not have
a common mechanism of toxicity with
other substances. For information
regarding EPA’s efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate
the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see EPA’s Web site at
https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/
cumulative.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and
Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA
provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety
for infants and children in the case of
threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the
completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines
based on reliable data that a different
margin of safety will be safe for infant
and children. This additional margin of
safety is commonly referred to as the
FQPA Safety Factor (SF). In applying
this provision, EPA either retains the
default value of 10X, or uses a different
additional safety factor when reliable
data available to EPA support the choice
of a different factor. The database is
considered adequate for FQPA
assessment. Fetal susceptibility was not
observed in the combined repeated dose
toxicity study with the reproduction/
developmental toxicity screening test in
the rat. There were no toxic effects
observed in either study at the highest
doses tested, 1,000 mg/kg/day. Signs of
neurotoxicity were not observed in any
of the submitted studies. No treatment
related effects in a functional
observational battery—(FOB) and on
motor activity parameters were observed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
at doses up to 1,000 mg/kg/day; EPA has
concluded that a developmental
neurotoxicity study is not required.
Signs of potential immunotoxicity were
not observed in any of the submitted
studies. Based on its assessment of
available data for AGEs as discussed in
Unit IV.A., EPA has concluded that
there are no toxicological endpoints of
concern for the U.S. population,
including infants and children, and has
conducted a qualitative assessment. As
part of its qualitative assessment, the
Agency did not use safety factors for
assessing risk, and no additional safety
factor is needed for assessing risk to
infants and children.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of
Safety
Taking into consideration all available
information on D-qlucopyranose,
oligomeric, 6-(dihydrogen citrates), C8–20
branched and linear alkyl glycosides,
sodium salts; D-glucopyranose,
oligomeric, 6-(hydrogen
sulfosuccinates), C8–20 branched and
linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts;
and D-glucopyranose, oligomeric,
lactates, C8–20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides, EPA has determined that
there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm to any population subgroup will
result from aggregate exposure to Dglucopyranose, oligomeric, 6(dihydrogen citrated), C8–20 branched
and linear alkyl glycosides, sodium
salts; D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6(hydrogen sulfosuccinates),
C8–20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides, sodium salts; and Dglucopyranose, oligomeric, lactates,
C8–20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides under reasonable foreseeable
circumstances. Therefore, the
establishment of an exemption from
tolerance under 40 CFR 180.910 for
residues of D-glucopyranose,
oligomeric, 6-(dihydrogen citrates), C8–20
branched and linear alkyl glycosides,
sodium salts; D-glucopyranose,
oligomeric, 6-(hydrogen
sulfosuccinated), C8–20 branched and
linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts;
and D-glucopyranose, oligomeric,
lactates, C8–20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides when used as inert
ingredients in pesticide formulations
applied to growing crops and raw
agricultural commodities after harvest,
is safe under FFDCA section 408.
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes since the
Agency is establishing an exemption
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
from the requirement of a tolerance
without any numerical limitation.
B. Response to Comments
One comment was received in
response to the notice of filing. The
comment received was from a private
citizen who opposed any pesticide
product that leaves a residue above 0.00.
The Agency understands the
commenter’s concerns and recognizes
that some individuals believe that no
residue of pesticides should be allowed.
However, under the existing legal
framework provided by FFDCA section
408, EPA is authorized to establish
pesticide tolerances or exemptions
where persons seeking such tolerances
or exemptions have demonstrated that
the pesticide meets the safety standard
imposed by the statute.
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance is established
under 40 CFR 180.910 for Dglucopyranose, oligomeric, 6(dihydrogen citrates), C8–20 branched
and linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts
(CAS Reg. No. 1079993–97–7); Dglucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-(hydrogen
sulfosuccinates), C8–20 branched and
linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts
(CAS Reg. No. 1079993–92–2); and Dglucopyranose, oligomeric, lactates,
C8–20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides (CAS Reg. No. 1079993–94–
4) esters when used as inert ingredients
(surfactants) in pesticide formulations
applied to growing crops and raw
agricultural commodities after harvest.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes exemptions
from the requirement of a tolerance
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
E:\FR\FM\03JNR1.SGM
03JNR1
31485
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the exemptions in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132,
entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999) and Executive Order
13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In
addition, this action does not impose
any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: May 18, 2015.
Daniel J. Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Amend § 180.910 by adding
alphabetically the following inert
ingredients to the table to read as
follows:
■
§ 180.910 Inert ingredients used pre- and
post-harvest; exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance.
*
*
*
*
*
Inert ingredients
Limits
*
*
*
*
D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-(dihydrogen citrates), C8–20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides, sodium salts (CAS Reg. No. 1079993–97–7).
D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-(hydrogen sulfosuccinates), C8–20 branched and linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts (CAS Reg. No. 1079993–92–2).
D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, lactates, C8–20 branched and linear alkyl glycosides
(CAS Reg. No. 1079993–94–4).
*
*
.............................................
Surfactant.
.............................................
Surfactant.
.............................................
Surfactant.
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
§ 413.89 Bad debts, charity, and courtesy
allowances.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(iii) For cost reporting periods
beginning during fiscal year 2000, by 45
percent; and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 2. On page 876, in § 413.337, reinstate
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
42 CFR Part 413
Principles of Reasonable Cost
Reimbursement; Payment for EndStage Renal Disease Services;
Optional Prospectively Determined
Payment Rates for Skilled Nursing
Facilities
Jkt 235001
[FR Doc. 2015–13434 Filed 6–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
*
*
*
*
(e) Pursuant to section 101 of the
Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP
Balanced Budget Refinement Act of
1999 (BBRA) as revised by section 314
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
*
of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP
Benefits Improvement and Protection
Act of 2000 (BIPA), using the best
available data, the Secretary will issue
a new regulation with a newly refined
case-mix classification system to better
account for medically complex patients.
Upon issuance of the new regulation,
the temporary increases in payment for
certain high cost patients will no longer
be applicable.
*
In Title 42 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Parts 1 to 399, revised as of
*
*
§ 413.337 Methodology for calculating the
prospective payment rates.
CFR Correction
16:13 Jun 02, 2015
*
October 1, 2014, make the following two
corrections:
■ 1. On page 817, in § 413.89, reinstate
paragraph (h)(1)(iii) to read as follows:
[FR Doc. 2015–13509 Filed 6–2–15; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
Uses
E:\FR\FM\03JNR1.SGM
03JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31481-31485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13509]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0678; FRL-9927-19]
Alkyl (C8-20) Polyglucoside Esters; Exemption From the
Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-
(dihydrogen citrates), C8-20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides, sodium salts; D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-(hydrogen
sulfosuccinates), C8-20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides, sodium salts; and D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, lactates,
C8-20 branched and linear alkyl glycosides when used as an
inert ingredients (surfactants) in pesticide formulations applied to
growing crops and raw agricultural commodities after harvest. Lamberti
USA, Inc. submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting establishment of an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of D-glucopyranose,
oligomeric, 6-(dihydrogen citrates), C8-20 branched and
linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts: D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-
(hydrogen sulfosuccinates), C8-20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides, sodium salts; and D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, lactates,
C8-20 branched and linear alkyl glycosides.
DATES: This regulation is effective June 3, 2015. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before August 3, 2015, and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0678, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket)
[[Page 31482]]
in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West
William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the
telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket
available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lewis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305-7090; email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Publishing Office's e-CFR site at
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl. To access the OCSPP test guidelines referenced in this
document electronically, please go to https://www.epa.gov/ocspp and
select ``Test Methods and Guidelines.''
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0678 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
August 3, 2015. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0678, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of October 15, 2014 (79 FR 61844) (FRL-
9917-24), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21
U.S.C. 346a, announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP IN-
10675) by Lamberti USA, Inc., 161 Washington St., Conshohocken, PA
19428. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.910 be amended by
establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-(dihydrogen citrates),
C8-20 branched and linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts
(CAS Reg. No. 1079993-97-7); D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-(hydrogen
sulfosuccinates), C8-20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides, sodium salts (CAS Reg. No. 1079993-92-2); and D-
glucopyranose, oligomeric, lactates, C8-20 branched and
linear alkyl glycosides (CAS Reg. No. 1079993-94-4) (hereafter referred
to in this document as alkyl polyglucoside (C8-20) esters or
AGEs) when used as inert ingredients (surfactants) in pesticide
formulations applied to growing crops and raw agricultural commodities.
That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by Lamberti
USA Inc., the petitioner, which is available in the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. One comment was received on the notice of filing.
EPA's response to this comment is discussed in Unit V.C.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active.
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to
infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue. . . .''
[[Page 31483]]
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human
health. In order to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to
pesticide inert ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the
inert in conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert
ingredient through food, drinking water, and through other exposures
that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA
is able to determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from
aggregate exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(A), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for alkyl polyglucoside
(C8-20) esters including exposure resulting from the
exemption established by this action. EPA's assessment of exposures and
risks associated with alkyl polyglucoside (C8-20) esters
follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature
of the adverse effects caused by alkyl polyglucoside (C8-20)
esters as well as the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the
lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies
are discussed in this unit. Limited toxicity data are available on D-
glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-(dihydrogen citrates), C8-20
branched and linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts); D-glucopyranose,
oligomeric, 6-(hydrogen sulfosuccinates), C8-20 branched and
linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts; and D-glucopyranose, oligomeric,
lactates, C8-20 branched and linear alkyl glycosides. The
alkylpolyglucoside (C8-C20) esters are reaction
products of glucose and fatty acids in which the alcohol moiety is
attached to the polyglucoside by a [beta]-glucosides linkage. The
toxicity profile of these substances is based upon data from other,
related alkyl polyglucoside esters sharing similar physical and
chemical characteristics as well as expected toxicity as well as AGE
metabolites lactic acid, citric acid and disodium sulfosuccinate.
AGEs have low acute toxicity via the oral route (oral
LD50 > 5,000 milligram/kilogram (mg/kg)). There is no
available data regarding acute exposure via the dermal, eye or
inhalation routes.
In a combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/
developmental toxicity screening test in rats (OCSPP Guideline 870.3650
study), there were no observed adverse effects for parental systemic or
reproductive/developmental toxicity at 1,000 mg/kg/day.
A 2-year chronic oral study in rats treated with citric acid was
available for review. Rats were administered 5 percent or 3 percent
citric acid (approx. 2,000 or 1,200 mg/kg/day) in the diet. There were
no adverse effects observed at 2,000 mg/kg/day. Chronic studies were
also available for the rabbit and dog. There were no adverse effects
observed in either study at doses up to 1,500 and 1,400 mg/kg/day,
respectively.
Neurotoxicity studies with AGEs were not available for review.
However, neurotoxicity was not observed in the combined repeated dose
toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening
test at concentrations as high as 1,000 mg/kg/day (limit dose).
Mutagenicity studies on several surrogate chemicals did not
indicate positive response for mutagenic effects. The Agency further
evaluated the carcinogenic potential of alkyl polyglucoside
(C8-20) esters by conducting a knowledge base qualitative
structure activity relationship (SAR) database search, DEREK Nexus
Version 2.0, to determine if there were structural alerts. No
structural alerts were identified including carcinogenicity.
Alkylpolyglycosides are rapidly hydrolyzed in intestine and liver.
The cleavage products, sugars and long-chain alcohols, enter the
pathways of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism.
Specific information on the studies received and the nature of the
adverse effects caused by, can be found at https://www.regulations.gov
in the document ``PC Codes 911028, 911029, 911030: Alkyl
(C8-20) polyglucoside Esters (AGEs); Human Health Risk
Assessment and Ecological Effects Assessment to Support Proposed
Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance When Used as Inert
Ingredients in Pesticide Formulations.'' at (6) in docket ID number
EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0678.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern
Alkylglycosides are rapidly hydrolyzed in intestine and liver. The
cleavage products, sugars, and long-chain alcohols enter the pathways
of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Based on the low acute toxicity
of AGEs, the body's ability to rapidly metabolize these substances, the
expected metabolites being fatty acids and carbohydrates (which are
normal constituents of the body), and the lack of observed adverse
effects for repeat dose studies at the limit dose (1,000 mg/kg/day), no
endpoint of concern was identified.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to alkyl polyglucoside (C8-20) esters, EPA
considered exposure under the proposed exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance. EPA assessed dietary exposures from alkyl polyglucoside
(C8-20) esters in food as follows:
Dietary exposure to AGEs can occur from eating food treated with
alkyl polyglucoside (C8-20) esters. However, a quantitative
assessment was not conducted since an endpoint of concern for risk
assessment was not identified.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. Dietary exposure from
drinking water to alkyl polyglucoside (C8-20) esters can
occur by drinking water that has been contaminated by run-off from a
pesticide treated area. Since an endpoint for risk assessment was not
identified, a quantitative dietary exposure assessment from drinking
water for alkyl polyglucoside (C8-20) esters was not
conducted.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers), carpets, swimming
pools, and hard surface disinfection on walls, floors, tables).
Alkyl polyglucoside (C8-20) esters have reported uses in
personal care products, such as antiperspirants, shampoos,
conditioners, and moisturizers. Residential exposure to alkyl
polyglucoside (C8-20) esters via the oral, dermal, and
inhalation route of exposure is also possible as a result of their use
as inert ingredients in registered pesticide products that
[[Page 31484]]
include residential uses. However, since there is toxicological
endpoint identified, it is not necessary to conduct assessments of
residential (non-occupational) exposures and risks.
4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA has not found Alkyl polyglucoside (C8-20) esters to
share a common mechanism of toxicity with any other substances, and
Alkyl polyglucoside (C8-20) esters do not appear to produce
a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of
this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed that Alkyl
polyglucoside (C8-20) esters do not have a common mechanism
of toxicity with other substances. For information regarding EPA's
efforts to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of
toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see
EPA's Web site at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and children in
the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure
unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different margin of
safety will be safe for infant and children. This additional margin of
safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA Safety Factor (SF). In
applying this provision, EPA either retains the default value of 10X,
or uses a different additional safety factor when reliable data
available to EPA support the choice of a different factor. The database
is considered adequate for FQPA assessment. Fetal susceptibility was
not observed in the combined repeated dose toxicity study with the
reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test in the rat. There
were no toxic effects observed in either study at the highest doses
tested, 1,000 mg/kg/day. Signs of neurotoxicity were not observed in
any of the submitted studies. No treatment related effects in a
functional observational battery--(FOB) and on motor activity
parameters were observed at doses up to 1,000 mg/kg/day; EPA has
concluded that a developmental neurotoxicity study is not required.
Signs of potential immunotoxicity were not observed in any of the
submitted studies. Based on its assessment of available data for AGEs
as discussed in Unit IV.A., EPA has concluded that there are no
toxicological endpoints of concern for the U.S. population, including
infants and children, and has conducted a qualitative assessment. As
part of its qualitative assessment, the Agency did not use safety
factors for assessing risk, and no additional safety factor is needed
for assessing risk to infants and children.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety
Taking into consideration all available information on D-
qlucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-(dihydrogen citrates), C8-20
branched and linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts; D-glucopyranose,
oligomeric, 6-(hydrogen sulfosuccinates), C8-20 branched and
linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts; and D-glucopyranose, oligomeric,
lactates, C8-20 branched and linear alkyl glycosides, EPA
has determined that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm to any
population subgroup will result from aggregate exposure to D-
glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-(dihydrogen citrated), C8-20
branched and linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts; D-glucopyranose,
oligomeric, 6-(hydrogen sulfosuccinates),
C8-20 branched and linear alkyl glycosides, sodium
salts; and D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, lactates, C8-20
branched and linear alkyl glycosides under reasonable foreseeable
circumstances. Therefore, the establishment of an exemption from
tolerance under 40 CFR 180.910 for residues of D-glucopyranose,
oligomeric, 6-(dihydrogen citrates), C8-20 branched and
linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts; D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-
(hydrogen sulfosuccinated), C8-20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides, sodium salts; and D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, lactates,
C8-20 branched and linear alkyl glycosides when used as
inert ingredients in pesticide formulations applied to growing crops
and raw agricultural commodities after harvest, is safe under FFDCA
section 408.
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance without any numerical limitation.
B. Response to Comments
One comment was received in response to the notice of filing. The
comment received was from a private citizen who opposed any pesticide
product that leaves a residue above 0.00. The Agency understands the
commenter's concerns and recognizes that some individuals believe that
no residue of pesticides should be allowed. However, under the existing
legal framework provided by FFDCA section 408, EPA is authorized to
establish pesticide tolerances or exemptions where persons seeking such
tolerances or exemptions have demonstrated that the pesticide meets the
safety standard imposed by the statute.
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is
established under 40 CFR 180.910 for D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-
(dihydrogen citrates), C8-20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides, sodium salts (CAS Reg. No. 1079993-97-7); D-glucopyranose,
oligomeric, 6-(hydrogen sulfosuccinates), C8-20 branched and
linear alkyl glycosides, sodium salts (CAS Reg. No. 1079993-92-2); and
D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, lactates, C8-20 branched and
linear alkyl glycosides (CAS Reg. No. 1079993-94-4) esters when used as
inert ingredients (surfactants) in pesticide formulations applied to
growing crops and raw agricultural commodities after harvest.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition
submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review
under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
[[Page 31485]]
any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled
``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the exemptions in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: May 18, 2015.
Daniel J. Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Amend Sec. 180.910 by adding alphabetically the following inert
ingredients to the table to read as follows:
Sec. 180.910 Inert ingredients used pre- and post-harvest; exemptions
from the requirement of a tolerance.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inert ingredients Limits Uses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6- .................. Surfactant.
(dihydrogen citrates), C8 20
branched and linear alkyl
glycosides, sodium salts (CAS
Reg. No. 1079993-97-7).
D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6- .................. Surfactant.
(hydrogen sulfosuccinates),
C8 20 branched and linear alkyl
glycosides, sodium salts (CAS
Reg. No. 1079993-92-2).
D-glucopyranose, oligomeric, .................. Surfactant.
lactates, C8 20 branched and
linear alkyl glycosides (CAS
Reg. No. 1079993-94-4).
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2015-13509 Filed 6-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P