Office Depot, Inc., Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order, 31576-31579 [2015-13422]

Download as PDF 31576 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Notices effort, scallop size selectivity, and fish bycatch. The study was funded in response to feedback from the fishing industry that the TDD must be towed at relatively high speeds to perform effectively. CFF is requesting exemptions that would allow four commercial fishing vessels be exempt from the Atlantic sea scallop days-at-sea (DAS) allocations at 50 CFR 648.53(b); crew size restriction at § 648.51(c); Closed Area I Closed Area at § 648.58(a), Closed Area II Closed Area at § 648.58(b); and Nantucket Lightship Closed Area at § 648.58(c). It would also exempt the from possession limits and minimum size requirements specified in 50 CFR part 648, subparts B and D through O, for sampling purposes only. Any fishing activity conducted outside the scope of the exempted fishing activity would be prohibited. Four vessels would conduct scallop dredging in June-September 2015, on a total of four 7-day trips, for a total of 28 DAS. Each trip would complete approximately 15 tows per day for an overall total of 420 tows for the project. All trips would take place in the open areas of Southern New England and Georges Bank as well as in Georges Bank scallop closed areas. Trips would be centralized around areas with high yellowtail and winter flounder bycatch and in areas that contain a wide range of scallop sizes to examine changes in size selectivity due to tow speed. All tows would be conducted with two tandem 15-foot (4.57-meter) TDD dredges for a duration of 60 minutes with a tow speed range of 4–5.5 knots. One dredge would be rigged with a 7row apron and twine top hanging ratio of 2:1, while the other dredge would be rigged with a 5-row ring apron and 1.5:1 twine top hanging ratio. Both dredge aprons would use 4-inch (10.16-cm) rings. Each tow pair would be conducted in a straight line varying between higher and lower speeds with dredge positions in an AB–BA alternating pattern with a wire scope of three to one plus ten fathoms. For all tows the sea scallop catch would be counted into baskets and weighed. One basket from each dredge would be randomly selected and the scallops would be measured in 5-mm increments to determine size selectivity. Finfish catch would be sorted by species and then counted, weighed and measured in 1-mm increments. Depending on the volume of scallops and finfish captured, the catch would be subsampled as necessary. No catch would be retained for longer than needed to conduct sampling and no catch would be landed for sale. PROJECT CATCH ESTIMATES SNE GB Species lbs tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Scallops ................................................................................... Yellowtail .................................................................................. Winter Flounder ....................................................................... Windowpane Flounder ............................................................. Monkfish ................................................................................... Other Fish ................................................................................ Barndoor Skate ........................................................................ NE Skate Complex .................................................................. CFF has requested these exemptions to allow them to conduct experimental dredge towing without being charged DAS, as well as deploy gear in access areas that are currently closed to scallop fishing. Participating vessels would need crew size waivers to accommodate science personnel and possession waivers would enable them to conduct finfish sampling activities. If approved, the applicant may request minor modifications and extensions to the EFP throughout the year. EFP modifications and extensions may be granted without further notice if they are deemed essential to facilitate completion of the proposed research and have minimal impacts that do not change the scope or impact of the initially approved EFP request. Any fishing activity conducted outside the scope of the exempted fishing activity would be prohibited. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:57 Jun 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 mt 52,300 1,100 400 2,800 3,100 1,800 300 84,000 23.72 0.50 0.18 1.27 1.41 0.82 0.14 38.10 Dated: May 29, 2015. Emily H. Menashes, Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2015–13468 Filed 6–2–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION [CPSC Docket No. 15–C0004] Office Depot, Inc., Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order Consumer Product Safety Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: It is the policy of the Commission to publish settlements which it provisionally accepts under the Consumer Product Safety Act in the Federal Register in accordance with the terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). Published below is a provisionally-accepted Settlement Agreement with Office Depot, Inc., containing a civil penalty of $3,400,000, within twenty (20) days of SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 lbs mt 22,700 2,200 1,300 3,000 9,400 2,200 4,300 60,900 10.30 1.00 0.59 1.36 4.26 1.00 1.95 27.62 service of the Commission’s final Order accepting the Settlement Agreement.1 DATES: Any interested person may ask the Commission not to accept this agreement or otherwise comment on its contents by filing a written request with the Office of the Secretary by June 18, 2015. ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this Settlement Agreement should send written comments to the Comment 15–C0004 Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Room 820, Bethesda, Maryland 20814– 4408. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean R. Ward, Trial Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Division of Compliance, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, 1 Chairman Elliot F. Kaye and Commissioners Robert S. Adler and Marietta S. Robinson voted to provisionally accept the Settlement Agreement and Order. Commissioners Joseph P. Mohorovic and Ann Marie Buerkle voted to reject the Settlement Agreement and Order. Commissioner Mohorovic submitted a statement regarding the matter. The statement will be available from the Office of the Secretariat and the CPSC Web site, www.cpsc.gov. E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM 03JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Notices Bethesda, Maryland 20814–4408; telephone (301) 504–7602. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Agreement and Order appears below. Dated: May 28, 2015. Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION In the Matter of: Office Depot, Inc. CPSC Docket No.: 15–C0004 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1. In accordance with the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2051– 2089 (‘‘CPSA’’) and 16 CFR 1118.20, Office Depot, Inc. (‘‘Office Depot’’ or ‘‘Firm’’), and the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (‘‘Commission’’), through its staff, hereby enter into this Settlement Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’). The Agreement, and the incorporated attached Order, resolve staff’s charges set forth below. THE PARTIES 2. The Commission is an independent federal regulatory agency, established pursuant to, and responsible for the enforcement of, the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2051–2089. By executing the Agreement, staff is acting on behalf of the Commission, pursuant to 16 CFR 1118.20(b). The Commission issues the Order under the provisions of the CPSA. 3. Office Depot is a corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, with its principal place of business in Boca Raton, Florida. STAFF CHARGES tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Quantum Chair 4. Between May 2006 and August 2009, Office Depot sold in the United States approximately 150,000 Quantum Realspace PROTM 9000 Series Mid-Back Multifunction Mesh Chairs and Quantum Realspace PROTM 9000 Series Mid-Back Multifunction Mesh Chairs with Headrest (‘‘Quantum Chair’’). 5. The Quantum Chair is a ‘‘consumer product’’ ‘‘distributed in commerce,’’ as those terms are defined or used in sections 3(a)(5), (8) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(5), (8). Office Depot was a ‘‘retailer’’ of the Quantum Chair, as such term is defined in section 3(a)(13) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(13). 6. The Quantum Chair is defective and creates an unreasonable risk of serious injury because the bolts attaching the seatback on the Quantum VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:57 Jun 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 Chair can loosen and detach, posing a fall and injury hazard to consumers. 7. Office Depot first received notice of a Quantum Chair failure in 2007 when a consumer reported to Office Depot that the seatback loosened or detached on the Quantum Chair, causing the consumer to sustain injuries. 8. In 2008, Office Depot became aware that, in an effort to eliminate seatback detachment, the manufacturer of the Quantum Chair made two design changes to the Quantum Chair and a change to the accompanying instructions. 9. In 2008 and 2009, Office Depot received 13 additional reports of injury, some requiring medical attention, and 33 total reports of the seatback detaching. 10. Despite having information regarding the defect in and risk of injury relating to the Quantum Chair, Office Depot did not notify the Commission immediately of such defect or risk, as required by section 15(b)(3) and (4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b)(3) and (4). Office Depot never notified the Commission about the Quantum Chair as required by the CPSA. Gibson Chair 11. Between 2003 and 2012, Office Depot imported into the United States and sold approximately 1.4 million Gibson Leather Task Chairs (‘‘Gibson Chair’’). 12. The Gibson Chair is a ‘‘consumer product’’ ‘‘distributed in commerce,’’ as those terms are defined or used in sections 3(a)(5), (8) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(5), (8). Office Depot was a ‘‘manufacturer’’ of the Gibson Chair, as such term is defined in section 3(a)(11) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(11). Office Depot also was a ‘‘retailer’’ of the Gibson Chair, as such term is defined in section 3(a)(13) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(13). 13. The Gibson Chair is defective and creates an unreasonable risk of serious injury because the mounting weld can break and separate the seat from the base of the Gibson Chair, posing a fall hazard to consumers. 14. Office Depot first received notice of a Gibson Chair failure in 2005, when one consumer reported to Office Depot that the seat broke and separated from the base of the Gibson Chair, causing the consumer to sustain injuries. 15. Office Depot continued to receive reports of injuries and incidents involving breakage of the Gibson Chair mounting plate weld and the resulting separation of the seat from the base of the Gibson Chair, with some injuries requiring medical attention. Office Depot settled the claims of several PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 31577 consumers who reported injuries resulting from the Gibson Chair’s failure. 16. In all, Office Depot received 25 reports of injuries and 153 incident reports from consumers of the seat breaking and separating from the base of the Gibson Chair. 17. Despite having information regarding the defect in and risk of injury relating to the Gibson Chair, Office Depot did not notify the Commission immediately of such defect or risk, as required by section 15(b)(3) and (4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b)(3) and (4). Office Depot failed to notify the Commission about the Gibson Chair until December 14, 2012, after receiving staff’s letter requesting a Full Report. Office Depot recalled the Gibson Chair on May 22, 2014. Failure to Report 18. In failing to inform the Commission immediately about the Quantum Chair and the Gibson Chair (together, ‘‘Subject Products’’), Office Depot knowingly violated section 19(a)(4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(4), as the term ‘‘knowingly’’ is defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069(d). 19. Pursuant to section 20 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, Office Depot is subject to civil penalties for its knowing failure to report, as required under section 15(b) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b). RESPONSE OF OFFICE DEPOT 20. This Agreement does not constitute an admission by Office Depot that the law has been violated. Office Depot neither admits nor denies the staff’s charges set forth above, including but not limited to the contention that the Subject Products ‘‘contain[] a defect which could create a substantial product hazard . . . or create[] an unreasonable risk of serious injury or death,’’ 15 U.S.C. 2064(b); that Office Depot did not notify the Commission in a timely manner, in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 2064(b); and that there was any allegedly ‘‘knowing’’ violation of the CPSA as that term is defined in 15 U.S.C. 2069(d). 21. The Quantum recall notice states that Office Depot received 14 reports of injuries in connection with about 150,000 Quantum chairs sold. There were fewer reports of consumers seeking medical treatment in connection with any reported injuries. The Gibson recall notice states that Office Depot received 25 reports of injuries in connection with about 1.4 million Gibson chairs sold. There were fewer reports of consumers seeking medical treatment in connection E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM 03JNN1 31578 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Notices tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES with any reported injuries. Office Depot investigated the reports, including by contacting the manufacturers of the Subject Products and the consumers making the reports. 22. The Subject Products passed multiple safety tests administered by independent third party testing organizations. 23. Following discussions with Office Depot, the manufacturer of the Quantum Chair reported the Quantum Chair to the CPSC in April 2009. Therefore, Office Depot did not make its own report. 24. At all relevant times, Office Depot has had a product safety compliance program, including dedicated product safety personnel and appropriate product safety testing. 25. As a retailer, Office Depot sells thousands of products and relies on product testing, conducted pursuant to voluntary industry standards, in order to protect its consumers. Office Depot reviews and reacts to consumer complaints and parts requests associated with office chairs. 26. Office Depot enters into this Agreement to settle this matter without the delay and expense of litigation. Office Depot enters into this Agreement and agrees to pay the amount referenced below in compromise of staff’s charges. AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES 27. Under the CPSA, the Commission has jurisdiction over the matter involving the Subject Products described herein and over Office Depot. 28. The parties enter into the Agreement for settlement purposes only. The Agreement does not constitute an admission by Office Depot or a determination by the Commission that Office Depot violated the CPSA’s reporting requirements. 29. In settlement of staff’s charges, and to avoid the cost, distraction, delay, uncertainty, and inconvenience of protracted litigation or other proceedings, Office Depot shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of three million, four hundred thousand dollars ($3,400,000) (‘‘Settlement Payment’’) within thirty (30) calendar days after receiving service of the Commission’s final Order accepting the Agreement. The payment shall be made by electronic wire transfer to the Commission via: https://www.pay.gov. 30. After staff receives this Agreement executed on behalf of Office Depot, staff shall promptly submit the Agreement to the Commission for provisional acceptance. Promptly following provisional acceptance of the Agreement by the Commission, the Agreement shall be placed on the public record and published in the Federal VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:57 Jun 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 Register, in accordance with the procedures set forth in 16 CFR 1118.20(e). If the Commission does not receive any written request not to accept the Agreement within fifteen (15) calendar days, the Agreement shall be deemed finally accepted on the 16th calendar day after the date the Agreement is published in the Federal Register, in accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20(f). 31. This Agreement is conditioned upon, and subject to, the Commission’s final acceptance, as set forth above, and it is subject to the provisions of 16 CFR 1118.20(h). Upon the later of: (i) Commission’s final acceptance of this Agreement and service of the accepted Agreement upon Office Depot, and (ii) the date of issuance of the final Order, this Agreement shall be in full force and effect and shall be binding upon the parties. 32. Effective upon the later of: (i) the Commission’s final acceptance of the Agreement and service of the accepted Agreement upon Office Depot, and (ii) and the date of issuance of the final Order, for good and valuable consideration, Office Depot hereby expressly and irrevocably waives and agrees not to assert any past, present, or future rights to the following, in connection with the matter described in this Agreement: (i) an administrative or judicial hearing; (ii) judicial review or other challenge or contest of the Commission’s actions; (iii) a determination by the Commission of whether Office Depot failed to comply with the CPSA and the underlying regulations; (iv) a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (v) any claims under the Equal Access to Justice Act. 33. Office Depot has and shall maintain a compliance program designed to ensure compliance with the CPSA with respect to any consumer product imported, manufactured, distributed, or sold by Office Depot. Office Depot’s compliance program shall contain the following elements: (i) written standards and policies, including those designed to convey effectively to personnel responsible for CPSA compliance information (whether in the form of complaints, parts requests, incident reports, or otherwise) that may relate to or impact CPSA compliance; (ii) a mechanism for confidential employee reporting of compliance-related questions or concerns to either a compliance officer or to another senior manager with authority to act as necessary; (iii) effective communication of company compliance-related policies and procedures regarding the CPSA to the PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 appropriate employees through training programs or otherwise; (iv) Office Depot senior management responsibility for, and general board oversight of, CPSA compliance; and (v) retention of all CPSA compliance-related records for at least five (5) years, and reasonable availability of such records, insofar as they are not protected by attorneyclient, work product, or other privilege, to staff upon reasonable request. 34. Office Depot has, and shall maintain and enforce, a system of internal controls and procedures designed to ensure that, with respect to all consumer products imported, manufactured, distributed, or sold by Office Depot: (i) information required to be disclosed by Office Depot to the Commission is recorded, processed, and reported in accordance with applicable law; (ii) all reporting made to the Commission is timely, truthful, complete, accurate, and in accordance with applicable law; and (iii) prompt disclosure is made to Office Depot’s management of any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of such internal controls that are reasonably likely to affect adversely, in any material respect, Office Depot’s ability to record, process, and report to the Commission in accordance with applicable law. 35. Upon reasonable request of staff, Office Depot shall provide written documentation of its internal controls and procedures, including, but not limited to, the effective dates of the procedures and improvements thereto. Office Depot shall cooperate fully and truthfully with staff and shall make available all non-privileged information and materials, and personnel deemed necessary by staff to evaluate Office Depot’s compliance with the terms of the Agreement. 36. The parties acknowledge and agree that the Commission may publicize the terms of the Agreement and the Order. 37. Office Depot represents that the Agreement: (i) is entered into freely and voluntarily, without any degree of duress or compulsion whatsoever; (ii) has been duly authorized; and (iii) constitutes the valid and binding obligation of Office Depot, enforceable against Office Depot in accordance with its terms. Office Depot will not directly or indirectly receive any reimbursement, indemnification, insurance-related payment, or other payment in connection with the civil penalty to be paid by Office Depot pursuant to the Agreement and Order. The individuals signing the Agreement on behalf of Office Depot represent and E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM 03JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Notices tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES warrant that they are duly authorized by Office Depot to execute the Agreement. 38. The signatories represent that they are authorized to execute this Agreement. 39. The Agreement is governed by the laws of the United States. 40. The Agreement and the Order shall apply to, and be binding upon, Office Depot and each of its successors, transferees, and assigns, and a violation of the Agreement or Order may subject Office Depot, and each of its successors, transferees and assigns, to appropriate legal action. 41. The Agreement and the Order constitute the complete agreement between the parties on the subject matter contained therein. 42. The Agreement may be used in interpreting the Order. Understandings, agreements, representations, or interpretations apart from those contained in the Agreement and the Order may not be used to vary or contradict their terms. For purposes of construction, the Agreement shall be deemed to have been drafted by both of the parties and shall not, therefore, be construed against any party for that reason in any subsequent dispute. 43. The Agreement may not be waived, amended, modified, or otherwise altered, except as in accordance with the provisions of 16 CFR 1118.20(h). The Agreement may be executed in counterparts. 44. If any provision of the Agreement or the Order is held to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future laws effective during the terms of the Agreement and the Order, such provision shall be fully severable. The balance of the Agreement and the Order shall remain in full force and effect, unless the Commission and Office Depot agree in writing that severing the provision materially affects the purpose of the Agreement and the Order. Dated: May 11, 2015 OFFICE DEPOT, INC. By: lllllllllllllllllll Heather Stern Vice President, Associate General Counsel Office Depot, Inc. 6600 North Military Trail Boca Raton, FL 33496 Dated: May 11, 2015 By: lllllllllllllllllll Daniel F. Katz Luba Shur Counsel to Office Depot, Inc. Williams & Connolly LLP 725 Twelfth Street NW. Washington, DC 20005 U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION Stephanie Tsacoumis General Counsel Mary T. Boyle VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:57 Jun 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 Deputy General Counsel Mary B. Murphy Assistant General Counsel Dated: May 11, 2015 By: lllllllllllllllllll Sean R. Ward Trial Attorney Division of Compliance Office of the General Counsel UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION In the Matter of: Office Depot, Inc. CPSC Docket No.: 15–C0004 ORDER Upon consideration of the Settlement Agreement entered into between Office Depot, Inc. (‘‘Office Depot’’), and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (‘‘Commission’’), and the Commission having jurisdiction over the subject matter and over Office Depot, and it appearing that the Settlement Agreement and the Order are in the public interest, it is: ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement be, and is, hereby, accepted; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that Office Depot shall comply with the terms of the Settlement Agreement and shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of three million, four hundred thousand dollars ($3,400,000) within thirty (30) days after service of the Commission’s final Order accepting the Settlement Agreement. The payment shall be made by electronic wire transfer to the Commission via: https://www.pay.gov. Upon the failure of Office Depot to make the foregoing payment when due, interest on the unpaid amount shall accrue and be paid by Office Depot at the federal legal rate of interest set forth at 28 U.S.C. 1961(a) and (b). If Office Depot fails to make such payment or to comply in full with any other provision of the Settlement Agreement, such conduct will be considered a violation of the Settlement Agreement and Order. Provisionally accepted and provisional Order issued on the 28th day of May, 2015. By order of the Commission. Todd A. Stevenson, Secretariat, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. 31579 revocable license to US Patent number 7,702,473, issued April 20, 2010, entitled, ‘‘Submersible portable in-situ automated water quality biomonitoring apparatus and method’’ and US Patent number 6,988,394, issued January 24, 2006, entitled, ‘‘Apparatus and method of portable automated biomonitoring of water quality’’ and US Patent number 6,393,899, issued May 28, 2002, entitled, ‘‘Apparatus and method for automated biomonitoring of water quality’’ and US Patent number 6,058,763 issued May 9, 2000, entitled, ‘‘Apparatus and method for automated biomonitoring of water quality’’ and Canada Patent number 2,515,062 issued April 17, 2012, entitled ‘‘Apparatus and method of portable automated biomonitoring of water quality’’ to Solution Resources, LLC, with its principal place of business at 7906 Juniper Drive, Frederick, MD 21702. ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR–JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, MD 21702–5012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For licensing issues, Mr. Barry Datlof, Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619–0033. For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619–7808, both at telefax (301) 619– 5034. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license can file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, within 15 days from the date of this publication. Written objections are to be filed with the Command Judge Advocate (see ADDRESSES). Brenda S. Bowen, Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 2015–13419 Filed 6–2–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3710–08–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE [FR Doc. 2015–13422 Filed 6–2–15; 8:45 am] Department of the Army BILLING CODE 6355–01–P Intent To Grant an Exclusive License for a U.S. Government-Owned Invention DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army AGENCY: Intent To Grant an Exclusive License of U.S. Government-Owned Patents ACTION: Department of the Army, DoD. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209 (e) and 37 CFR 404.7 (a)(1)(i), announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, royalty-bearing, SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Department of the Army, DoD. Notice. In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e), and 37 CFR 404.7 (a)(1)(i), announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, revocable license, to U.S. Provisional Patent No. 61/884,630, filed September 30, 2013, entitled ‘‘Intelligent Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma,’’ and foreign SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM 03JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31576-31579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13422]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

[CPSC Docket No. 15-C0004]


Office Depot, Inc., Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement 
Agreement and Order

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It is the policy of the Commission to publish settlements 
which it provisionally accepts under the Consumer Product Safety Act in 
the Federal Register in accordance with the terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). 
Published below is a provisionally-accepted Settlement Agreement with 
Office Depot, Inc., containing a civil penalty of $3,400,000, within 
twenty (20) days of service of the Commission's final Order accepting 
the Settlement Agreement.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Chairman Elliot F. Kaye and Commissioners Robert S. Adler 
and Marietta S. Robinson voted to provisionally accept the 
Settlement Agreement and Order. Commissioners Joseph P. Mohorovic 
and Ann Marie Buerkle voted to reject the Settlement Agreement and 
Order. Commissioner Mohorovic submitted a statement regarding the 
matter. The statement will be available from the Office of the 
Secretariat and the CPSC Web site, www.cpsc.gov.

DATES: Any interested person may ask the Commission not to accept this 
agreement or otherwise comment on its contents by filing a written 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
request with the Office of the Secretary by June 18, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this Settlement Agreement 
should send written comments to the Comment 15-C0004 Office of the 
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, 
Room 820, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4408.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean R. Ward, Trial Attorney, Office 
of the General Counsel, Division of Compliance, Consumer Product Safety 
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,

[[Page 31577]]

Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4408; telephone (301) 504-7602.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Agreement and Order appears 
below.

    Dated: May 28, 2015.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

In the Matter of:

Office Depot, Inc.

CPSC Docket No.: 15-C0004

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

    1. In accordance with the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 
2051-2089 (``CPSA'') and 16 CFR 1118.20, Office Depot, Inc. (``Office 
Depot'' or ``Firm''), and the United States Consumer Product Safety 
Commission (``Commission''), through its staff, hereby enter into this 
Settlement Agreement (``Agreement''). The Agreement, and the 
incorporated attached Order, resolve staff's charges set forth below.

THE PARTIES

    2. The Commission is an independent federal regulatory agency, 
established pursuant to, and responsible for the enforcement of, the 
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2051-2089. By executing the Agreement, staff is acting 
on behalf of the Commission, pursuant to 16 CFR 1118.20(b). The 
Commission issues the Order under the provisions of the CPSA.
    3. Office Depot is a corporation, organized and existing under the 
laws of the state of Delaware, with its principal place of business in 
Boca Raton, Florida.

STAFF CHARGES

Quantum Chair

    4. Between May 2006 and August 2009, Office Depot sold in the 
United States approximately 150,000 Quantum Realspace PROTM 
9000 Series Mid-Back Multifunction Mesh Chairs and Quantum Realspace 
PROTM 9000 Series Mid-Back Multifunction Mesh Chairs with 
Headrest (``Quantum Chair'').
    5. The Quantum Chair is a ``consumer product'' ``distributed in 
commerce,'' as those terms are defined or used in sections 3(a)(5), (8) 
of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(5), (8). Office Depot was a ``retailer'' 
of the Quantum Chair, as such term is defined in section 3(a)(13) of 
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(13).
    6. The Quantum Chair is defective and creates an unreasonable risk 
of serious injury because the bolts attaching the seatback on the 
Quantum Chair can loosen and detach, posing a fall and injury hazard to 
consumers.
    7. Office Depot first received notice of a Quantum Chair failure in 
2007 when a consumer reported to Office Depot that the seatback 
loosened or detached on the Quantum Chair, causing the consumer to 
sustain injuries.
    8. In 2008, Office Depot became aware that, in an effort to 
eliminate seatback detachment, the manufacturer of the Quantum Chair 
made two design changes to the Quantum Chair and a change to the 
accompanying instructions.
    9. In 2008 and 2009, Office Depot received 13 additional reports of 
injury, some requiring medical attention, and 33 total reports of the 
seatback detaching.
    10. Despite having information regarding the defect in and risk of 
injury relating to the Quantum Chair, Office Depot did not notify the 
Commission immediately of such defect or risk, as required by section 
15(b)(3) and (4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b)(3) and (4). Office 
Depot never notified the Commission about the Quantum Chair as required 
by the CPSA.

Gibson Chair

    11. Between 2003 and 2012, Office Depot imported into the United 
States and sold approximately 1.4 million Gibson Leather Task Chairs 
(``Gibson Chair'').
    12. The Gibson Chair is a ``consumer product'' ``distributed in 
commerce,'' as those terms are defined or used in sections 3(a)(5), (8) 
of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(5), (8). Office Depot was a 
``manufacturer'' of the Gibson Chair, as such term is defined in 
section 3(a)(11) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(11). Office Depot also 
was a ``retailer'' of the Gibson Chair, as such term is defined in 
section 3(a)(13) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(13).
    13. The Gibson Chair is defective and creates an unreasonable risk 
of serious injury because the mounting weld can break and separate the 
seat from the base of the Gibson Chair, posing a fall hazard to 
consumers.
    14. Office Depot first received notice of a Gibson Chair failure in 
2005, when one consumer reported to Office Depot that the seat broke 
and separated from the base of the Gibson Chair, causing the consumer 
to sustain injuries.
    15. Office Depot continued to receive reports of injuries and 
incidents involving breakage of the Gibson Chair mounting plate weld 
and the resulting separation of the seat from the base of the Gibson 
Chair, with some injuries requiring medical attention. Office Depot 
settled the claims of several consumers who reported injuries resulting 
from the Gibson Chair's failure.
    16. In all, Office Depot received 25 reports of injuries and 153 
incident reports from consumers of the seat breaking and separating 
from the base of the Gibson Chair.
    17. Despite having information regarding the defect in and risk of 
injury relating to the Gibson Chair, Office Depot did not notify the 
Commission immediately of such defect or risk, as required by section 
15(b)(3) and (4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b)(3) and (4). Office 
Depot failed to notify the Commission about the Gibson Chair until 
December 14, 2012, after receiving staff's letter requesting a Full 
Report. Office Depot recalled the Gibson Chair on May 22, 2014.

Failure to Report

    18. In failing to inform the Commission immediately about the 
Quantum Chair and the Gibson Chair (together, ``Subject Products''), 
Office Depot knowingly violated section 19(a)(4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 
2068(a)(4), as the term ``knowingly'' is defined in section 20(d) of 
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069(d).
    19. Pursuant to section 20 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, Office 
Depot is subject to civil penalties for its knowing failure to report, 
as required under section 15(b) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b).

RESPONSE OF OFFICE DEPOT

    20. This Agreement does not constitute an admission by Office Depot 
that the law has been violated. Office Depot neither admits nor denies 
the staff's charges set forth above, including but not limited to the 
contention that the Subject Products ``contain[] a defect which could 
create a substantial product hazard . . . or create[] an unreasonable 
risk of serious injury or death,'' 15 U.S.C. 2064(b); that Office Depot 
did not notify the Commission in a timely manner, in accordance with 15 
U.S.C. 2064(b); and that there was any allegedly ``knowing'' violation 
of the CPSA as that term is defined in 15 U.S.C. 2069(d).
    21. The Quantum recall notice states that Office Depot received 14 
reports of injuries in connection with about 150,000 Quantum chairs 
sold. There were fewer reports of consumers seeking medical treatment 
in connection with any reported injuries. The Gibson recall notice 
states that Office Depot received 25 reports of injuries in connection 
with about 1.4 million Gibson chairs sold. There were fewer reports of 
consumers seeking medical treatment in connection

[[Page 31578]]

with any reported injuries. Office Depot investigated the reports, 
including by contacting the manufacturers of the Subject Products and 
the consumers making the reports.
    22. The Subject Products passed multiple safety tests administered 
by independent third party testing organizations.
    23. Following discussions with Office Depot, the manufacturer of 
the Quantum Chair reported the Quantum Chair to the CPSC in April 2009. 
Therefore, Office Depot did not make its own report.
    24. At all relevant times, Office Depot has had a product safety 
compliance program, including dedicated product safety personnel and 
appropriate product safety testing.
    25. As a retailer, Office Depot sells thousands of products and 
relies on product testing, conducted pursuant to voluntary industry 
standards, in order to protect its consumers. Office Depot reviews and 
reacts to consumer complaints and parts requests associated with office 
chairs.
    26. Office Depot enters into this Agreement to settle this matter 
without the delay and expense of litigation. Office Depot enters into 
this Agreement and agrees to pay the amount referenced below in 
compromise of staff's charges.

AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES

    27. Under the CPSA, the Commission has jurisdiction over the matter 
involving the Subject Products described herein and over Office Depot.
    28. The parties enter into the Agreement for settlement purposes 
only. The Agreement does not constitute an admission by Office Depot or 
a determination by the Commission that Office Depot violated the CPSA's 
reporting requirements.
    29. In settlement of staff's charges, and to avoid the cost, 
distraction, delay, uncertainty, and inconvenience of protracted 
litigation or other proceedings, Office Depot shall pay a civil penalty 
in the amount of three million, four hundred thousand dollars 
($3,400,000) (``Settlement Payment'') within thirty (30) calendar days 
after receiving service of the Commission's final Order accepting the 
Agreement. The payment shall be made by electronic wire transfer to the 
Commission via: https://www.pay.gov.
    30. After staff receives this Agreement executed on behalf of 
Office Depot, staff shall promptly submit the Agreement to the 
Commission for provisional acceptance. Promptly following provisional 
acceptance of the Agreement by the Commission, the Agreement shall be 
placed on the public record and published in the Federal Register, in 
accordance with the procedures set forth in 16 CFR 1118.20(e). If the 
Commission does not receive any written request not to accept the 
Agreement within fifteen (15) calendar days, the Agreement shall be 
deemed finally accepted on the 16th calendar day after the date the 
Agreement is published in the Federal Register, in accordance with 16 
CFR 1118.20(f).
    31. This Agreement is conditioned upon, and subject to, the 
Commission's final acceptance, as set forth above, and it is subject to 
the provisions of 16 CFR 1118.20(h). Upon the later of: (i) 
Commission's final acceptance of this Agreement and service of the 
accepted Agreement upon Office Depot, and (ii) the date of issuance of 
the final Order, this Agreement shall be in full force and effect and 
shall be binding upon the parties.
    32. Effective upon the later of: (i) the Commission's final 
acceptance of the Agreement and service of the accepted Agreement upon 
Office Depot, and (ii) and the date of issuance of the final Order, for 
good and valuable consideration, Office Depot hereby expressly and 
irrevocably waives and agrees not to assert any past, present, or 
future rights to the following, in connection with the matter described 
in this Agreement: (i) an administrative or judicial hearing; (ii) 
judicial review or other challenge or contest of the Commission's 
actions; (iii) a determination by the Commission of whether Office 
Depot failed to comply with the CPSA and the underlying regulations; 
(iv) a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (v) 
any claims under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
    33. Office Depot has and shall maintain a compliance program 
designed to ensure compliance with the CPSA with respect to any 
consumer product imported, manufactured, distributed, or sold by Office 
Depot. Office Depot's compliance program shall contain the following 
elements: (i) written standards and policies, including those designed 
to convey effectively to personnel responsible for CPSA compliance 
information (whether in the form of complaints, parts requests, 
incident reports, or otherwise) that may relate to or impact CPSA 
compliance; (ii) a mechanism for confidential employee reporting of 
compliance-related questions or concerns to either a compliance officer 
or to another senior manager with authority to act as necessary; (iii) 
effective communication of company compliance-related policies and 
procedures regarding the CPSA to the appropriate employees through 
training programs or otherwise; (iv) Office Depot senior management 
responsibility for, and general board oversight of, CPSA compliance; 
and (v) retention of all CPSA compliance-related records for at least 
five (5) years, and reasonable availability of such records, insofar as 
they are not protected by attorney-client, work product, or other 
privilege, to staff upon reasonable request.
    34. Office Depot has, and shall maintain and enforce, a system of 
internal controls and procedures designed to ensure that, with respect 
to all consumer products imported, manufactured, distributed, or sold 
by Office Depot: (i) information required to be disclosed by Office 
Depot to the Commission is recorded, processed, and reported in 
accordance with applicable law; (ii) all reporting made to the 
Commission is timely, truthful, complete, accurate, and in accordance 
with applicable law; and (iii) prompt disclosure is made to Office 
Depot's management of any significant deficiencies or material 
weaknesses in the design or operation of such internal controls that 
are reasonably likely to affect adversely, in any material respect, 
Office Depot's ability to record, process, and report to the Commission 
in accordance with applicable law.
    35. Upon reasonable request of staff, Office Depot shall provide 
written documentation of its internal controls and procedures, 
including, but not limited to, the effective dates of the procedures 
and improvements thereto. Office Depot shall cooperate fully and 
truthfully with staff and shall make available all non-privileged 
information and materials, and personnel deemed necessary by staff to 
evaluate Office Depot's compliance with the terms of the Agreement.
    36. The parties acknowledge and agree that the Commission may 
publicize the terms of the Agreement and the Order.
    37. Office Depot represents that the Agreement: (i) is entered into 
freely and voluntarily, without any degree of duress or compulsion 
whatsoever; (ii) has been duly authorized; and (iii) constitutes the 
valid and binding obligation of Office Depot, enforceable against 
Office Depot in accordance with its terms. Office Depot will not 
directly or indirectly receive any reimbursement, indemnification, 
insurance-related payment, or other payment in connection with the 
civil penalty to be paid by Office Depot pursuant to the Agreement and 
Order. The individuals signing the Agreement on behalf of Office Depot 
represent and

[[Page 31579]]

warrant that they are duly authorized by Office Depot to execute the 
Agreement.
    38. The signatories represent that they are authorized to execute 
this Agreement.
    39. The Agreement is governed by the laws of the United States.
    40. The Agreement and the Order shall apply to, and be binding 
upon, Office Depot and each of its successors, transferees, and 
assigns, and a violation of the Agreement or Order may subject Office 
Depot, and each of its successors, transferees and assigns, to 
appropriate legal action.
    41. The Agreement and the Order constitute the complete agreement 
between the parties on the subject matter contained therein.
    42. The Agreement may be used in interpreting the Order. 
Understandings, agreements, representations, or interpretations apart 
from those contained in the Agreement and the Order may not be used to 
vary or contradict their terms. For purposes of construction, the 
Agreement shall be deemed to have been drafted by both of the parties 
and shall not, therefore, be construed against any party for that 
reason in any subsequent dispute.
    43. The Agreement may not be waived, amended, modified, or 
otherwise altered, except as in accordance with the provisions of 16 
CFR 1118.20(h). The Agreement may be executed in counterparts.
    44. If any provision of the Agreement or the Order is held to be 
illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future laws 
effective during the terms of the Agreement and the Order, such 
provision shall be fully severable. The balance of the Agreement and 
the Order shall remain in full force and effect, unless the Commission 
and Office Depot agree in writing that severing the provision 
materially affects the purpose of the Agreement and the Order.

    Dated: May 11, 2015
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.

By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Heather Stern
Vice President, Associate General Counsel
Office Depot, Inc.
6600 North Military Trail
Boca Raton, FL 33496

    Dated: May 11, 2015
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel F. Katz
Luba Shur
Counsel to Office Depot, Inc.
Williams & Connolly LLP
725 Twelfth Street NW.
Washington, DC 20005

U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
Stephanie Tsacoumis
General Counsel

Mary T. Boyle
Deputy General Counsel

Mary B. Murphy
Assistant General Counsel

    Dated: May 11, 2015
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sean R. Ward
Trial Attorney
Division of Compliance
Office of the General Counsel

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

In the Matter of:

Office Depot, Inc.

CPSC Docket No.: 15-C0004

ORDER

    Upon consideration of the Settlement Agreement entered into 
between Office Depot, Inc. (``Office Depot''), and the U.S. Consumer 
Product Safety Commission (``Commission''), and the Commission 
having jurisdiction over the subject matter and over Office Depot, 
and it appearing that the Settlement Agreement and the Order are in 
the public interest, it is:
    ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement be, and is, hereby, 
accepted; and it is
    FURTHER ORDERED that Office Depot shall comply with the terms of 
the Settlement Agreement and shall pay a civil penalty in the amount 
of three million, four hundred thousand dollars ($3,400,000) within 
thirty (30) days after service of the Commission's final Order 
accepting the Settlement Agreement. The payment shall be made by 
electronic wire transfer to the Commission via: https://www.pay.gov. 
Upon the failure of Office Depot to make the foregoing payment when 
due, interest on the unpaid amount shall accrue and be paid by 
Office Depot at the federal legal rate of interest set forth at 28 
U.S.C. 1961(a) and (b). If Office Depot fails to make such payment 
or to comply in full with any other provision of the Settlement 
Agreement, such conduct will be considered a violation of the 
Settlement Agreement and Order.

    Provisionally accepted and provisional Order issued on the 28th 
day of May, 2015.

    By order of the Commission.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretariat, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-13422 Filed 6-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.