Office Depot, Inc., Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order, 31576-31579 [2015-13422]
Download as PDF
31576
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Notices
effort, scallop size selectivity, and fish
bycatch. The study was funded in
response to feedback from the fishing
industry that the TDD must be towed at
relatively high speeds to perform
effectively.
CFF is requesting exemptions that
would allow four commercial fishing
vessels be exempt from the Atlantic sea
scallop days-at-sea (DAS) allocations at
50 CFR 648.53(b); crew size restriction
at § 648.51(c); Closed Area I Closed Area
at § 648.58(a), Closed Area II Closed
Area at § 648.58(b); and Nantucket
Lightship Closed Area at § 648.58(c). It
would also exempt the from possession
limits and minimum size requirements
specified in 50 CFR part 648, subparts
B and D through O, for sampling
purposes only. Any fishing activity
conducted outside the scope of the
exempted fishing activity would be
prohibited.
Four vessels would conduct scallop
dredging in June-September 2015, on a
total of four 7-day trips, for a total of 28
DAS. Each trip would complete
approximately 15 tows per day for an
overall total of 420 tows for the project.
All trips would take place in the open
areas of Southern New England and
Georges Bank as well as in Georges Bank
scallop closed areas. Trips would be
centralized around areas with high
yellowtail and winter flounder bycatch
and in areas that contain a wide range
of scallop sizes to examine changes in
size selectivity due to tow speed.
All tows would be conducted with
two tandem 15-foot (4.57-meter) TDD
dredges for a duration of 60 minutes
with a tow speed range of 4–5.5 knots.
One dredge would be rigged with a 7row apron and twine top hanging ratio
of 2:1, while the other dredge would be
rigged with a 5-row ring apron and 1.5:1
twine top hanging ratio. Both dredge
aprons would use 4-inch (10.16-cm)
rings. Each tow pair would be
conducted in a straight line varying
between higher and lower speeds with
dredge positions in an AB–BA
alternating pattern with a wire scope of
three to one plus ten fathoms.
For all tows the sea scallop catch
would be counted into baskets and
weighed. One basket from each dredge
would be randomly selected and the
scallops would be measured in 5-mm
increments to determine size selectivity.
Finfish catch would be sorted by species
and then counted, weighed and
measured in 1-mm increments.
Depending on the volume of scallops
and finfish captured, the catch would be
subsampled as necessary. No catch
would be retained for longer than
needed to conduct sampling and no
catch would be landed for sale.
PROJECT CATCH ESTIMATES
SNE
GB
Species
lbs
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scallops ...................................................................................
Yellowtail ..................................................................................
Winter Flounder .......................................................................
Windowpane Flounder .............................................................
Monkfish ...................................................................................
Other Fish ................................................................................
Barndoor Skate ........................................................................
NE Skate Complex ..................................................................
CFF has requested these exemptions
to allow them to conduct experimental
dredge towing without being charged
DAS, as well as deploy gear in access
areas that are currently closed to scallop
fishing. Participating vessels would
need crew size waivers to accommodate
science personnel and possession
waivers would enable them to conduct
finfish sampling activities.
If approved, the applicant may
request minor modifications and
extensions to the EFP throughout the
year. EFP modifications and extensions
may be granted without further notice if
they are deemed essential to facilitate
completion of the proposed research
and have minimal impacts that do not
change the scope or impact of the
initially approved EFP request. Any
fishing activity conducted outside the
scope of the exempted fishing activity
would be prohibited.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:57 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
mt
52,300
1,100
400
2,800
3,100
1,800
300
84,000
23.72
0.50
0.18
1.27
1.41
0.82
0.14
38.10
Dated: May 29, 2015.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–13468 Filed 6–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 15–C0004]
Office Depot, Inc., Provisional
Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement
and Order
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
It is the policy of the
Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the
Consumer Product Safety Act in the
Federal Register in accordance with the
terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). Published
below is a provisionally-accepted
Settlement Agreement with Office
Depot, Inc., containing a civil penalty of
$3,400,000, within twenty (20) days of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
lbs
mt
22,700
2,200
1,300
3,000
9,400
2,200
4,300
60,900
10.30
1.00
0.59
1.36
4.26
1.00
1.95
27.62
service of the Commission’s final Order
accepting the Settlement Agreement.1
DATES: Any interested person may ask
the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its
contents by filing a written request with
the Office of the Secretary by June 18,
2015.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to
comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the
Comment 15–C0004 Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Room 820, Bethesda, Maryland 20814–
4408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean R. Ward, Trial Attorney, Office of
the General Counsel, Division of
Compliance, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
1 Chairman Elliot F. Kaye and Commissioners
Robert S. Adler and Marietta S. Robinson voted to
provisionally accept the Settlement Agreement and
Order. Commissioners Joseph P. Mohorovic and
Ann Marie Buerkle voted to reject the Settlement
Agreement and Order. Commissioner Mohorovic
submitted a statement regarding the matter. The
statement will be available from the Office of the
Secretariat and the CPSC Web site, www.cpsc.gov.
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Notices
Bethesda, Maryland 20814–4408;
telephone (301) 504–7602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of
the Agreement and Order appears
below.
Dated: May 28, 2015.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
In the Matter of:
Office Depot, Inc.
CPSC Docket No.: 15–C0004
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
1. In accordance with the Consumer
Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. 2051–
2089 (‘‘CPSA’’) and 16 CFR 1118.20,
Office Depot, Inc. (‘‘Office Depot’’ or
‘‘Firm’’), and the United States
Consumer Product Safety Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), through its staff,
hereby enter into this Settlement
Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’). The
Agreement, and the incorporated
attached Order, resolve staff’s charges
set forth below.
THE PARTIES
2. The Commission is an independent
federal regulatory agency, established
pursuant to, and responsible for the
enforcement of, the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2051–2089. By executing the
Agreement, staff is acting on behalf of
the Commission, pursuant to 16 CFR
1118.20(b). The Commission issues the
Order under the provisions of the CPSA.
3. Office Depot is a corporation,
organized and existing under the laws of
the state of Delaware, with its principal
place of business in Boca Raton, Florida.
STAFF CHARGES
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Quantum Chair
4. Between May 2006 and August
2009, Office Depot sold in the United
States approximately 150,000 Quantum
Realspace PROTM 9000 Series Mid-Back
Multifunction Mesh Chairs and
Quantum Realspace PROTM 9000 Series
Mid-Back Multifunction Mesh Chairs
with Headrest (‘‘Quantum Chair’’).
5. The Quantum Chair is a ‘‘consumer
product’’ ‘‘distributed in commerce,’’ as
those terms are defined or used in
sections 3(a)(5), (8) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2052(a)(5), (8). Office Depot was
a ‘‘retailer’’ of the Quantum Chair, as
such term is defined in section 3(a)(13)
of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(13).
6. The Quantum Chair is defective
and creates an unreasonable risk of
serious injury because the bolts
attaching the seatback on the Quantum
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:57 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
Chair can loosen and detach, posing a
fall and injury hazard to consumers.
7. Office Depot first received notice of
a Quantum Chair failure in 2007 when
a consumer reported to Office Depot
that the seatback loosened or detached
on the Quantum Chair, causing the
consumer to sustain injuries.
8. In 2008, Office Depot became aware
that, in an effort to eliminate seatback
detachment, the manufacturer of the
Quantum Chair made two design
changes to the Quantum Chair and a
change to the accompanying
instructions.
9. In 2008 and 2009, Office Depot
received 13 additional reports of injury,
some requiring medical attention, and
33 total reports of the seatback
detaching.
10. Despite having information
regarding the defect in and risk of injury
relating to the Quantum Chair, Office
Depot did not notify the Commission
immediately of such defect or risk, as
required by section 15(b)(3) and (4) of
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b)(3) and (4).
Office Depot never notified the
Commission about the Quantum Chair
as required by the CPSA.
Gibson Chair
11. Between 2003 and 2012, Office
Depot imported into the United States
and sold approximately 1.4 million
Gibson Leather Task Chairs (‘‘Gibson
Chair’’).
12. The Gibson Chair is a ‘‘consumer
product’’ ‘‘distributed in commerce,’’ as
those terms are defined or used in
sections 3(a)(5), (8) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2052(a)(5), (8). Office Depot was
a ‘‘manufacturer’’ of the Gibson Chair,
as such term is defined in section
3(a)(11) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2052(a)(11). Office Depot also was a
‘‘retailer’’ of the Gibson Chair, as such
term is defined in section 3(a)(13) of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(13).
13. The Gibson Chair is defective and
creates an unreasonable risk of serious
injury because the mounting weld can
break and separate the seat from the
base of the Gibson Chair, posing a fall
hazard to consumers.
14. Office Depot first received notice
of a Gibson Chair failure in 2005, when
one consumer reported to Office Depot
that the seat broke and separated from
the base of the Gibson Chair, causing the
consumer to sustain injuries.
15. Office Depot continued to receive
reports of injuries and incidents
involving breakage of the Gibson Chair
mounting plate weld and the resulting
separation of the seat from the base of
the Gibson Chair, with some injuries
requiring medical attention. Office
Depot settled the claims of several
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31577
consumers who reported injuries
resulting from the Gibson Chair’s
failure.
16. In all, Office Depot received 25
reports of injuries and 153 incident
reports from consumers of the seat
breaking and separating from the base of
the Gibson Chair.
17. Despite having information
regarding the defect in and risk of injury
relating to the Gibson Chair, Office
Depot did not notify the Commission
immediately of such defect or risk, as
required by section 15(b)(3) and (4) of
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b)(3) and (4).
Office Depot failed to notify the
Commission about the Gibson Chair
until December 14, 2012, after receiving
staff’s letter requesting a Full Report.
Office Depot recalled the Gibson Chair
on May 22, 2014.
Failure to Report
18. In failing to inform the
Commission immediately about the
Quantum Chair and the Gibson Chair
(together, ‘‘Subject Products’’), Office
Depot knowingly violated section
19(a)(4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2068(a)(4), as the term ‘‘knowingly’’ is
defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2069(d).
19. Pursuant to section 20 of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, Office Depot is
subject to civil penalties for its knowing
failure to report, as required under
section 15(b) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2064(b).
RESPONSE OF OFFICE DEPOT
20. This Agreement does not
constitute an admission by Office Depot
that the law has been violated. Office
Depot neither admits nor denies the
staff’s charges set forth above, including
but not limited to the contention that
the Subject Products ‘‘contain[] a defect
which could create a substantial
product hazard . . . or create[] an
unreasonable risk of serious injury or
death,’’ 15 U.S.C. 2064(b); that Office
Depot did not notify the Commission in
a timely manner, in accordance with 15
U.S.C. 2064(b); and that there was any
allegedly ‘‘knowing’’ violation of the
CPSA as that term is defined in 15
U.S.C. 2069(d).
21. The Quantum recall notice states
that Office Depot received 14 reports of
injuries in connection with about
150,000 Quantum chairs sold. There
were fewer reports of consumers seeking
medical treatment in connection with
any reported injuries. The Gibson recall
notice states that Office Depot received
25 reports of injuries in connection with
about 1.4 million Gibson chairs sold.
There were fewer reports of consumers
seeking medical treatment in connection
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
31578
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
with any reported injuries. Office Depot
investigated the reports, including by
contacting the manufacturers of the
Subject Products and the consumers
making the reports.
22. The Subject Products passed
multiple safety tests administered by
independent third party testing
organizations.
23. Following discussions with Office
Depot, the manufacturer of the Quantum
Chair reported the Quantum Chair to the
CPSC in April 2009. Therefore, Office
Depot did not make its own report.
24. At all relevant times, Office Depot
has had a product safety compliance
program, including dedicated product
safety personnel and appropriate
product safety testing.
25. As a retailer, Office Depot sells
thousands of products and relies on
product testing, conducted pursuant to
voluntary industry standards, in order
to protect its consumers. Office Depot
reviews and reacts to consumer
complaints and parts requests
associated with office chairs.
26. Office Depot enters into this
Agreement to settle this matter without
the delay and expense of litigation.
Office Depot enters into this Agreement
and agrees to pay the amount referenced
below in compromise of staff’s charges.
AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES
27. Under the CPSA, the Commission
has jurisdiction over the matter
involving the Subject Products
described herein and over Office Depot.
28. The parties enter into the
Agreement for settlement purposes only.
The Agreement does not constitute an
admission by Office Depot or a
determination by the Commission that
Office Depot violated the CPSA’s
reporting requirements.
29. In settlement of staff’s charges,
and to avoid the cost, distraction, delay,
uncertainty, and inconvenience of
protracted litigation or other
proceedings, Office Depot shall pay a
civil penalty in the amount of three
million, four hundred thousand dollars
($3,400,000) (‘‘Settlement Payment’’)
within thirty (30) calendar days after
receiving service of the Commission’s
final Order accepting the Agreement.
The payment shall be made by
electronic wire transfer to the
Commission via: https://www.pay.gov.
30. After staff receives this Agreement
executed on behalf of Office Depot, staff
shall promptly submit the Agreement to
the Commission for provisional
acceptance. Promptly following
provisional acceptance of the
Agreement by the Commission, the
Agreement shall be placed on the public
record and published in the Federal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:57 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
Register, in accordance with the
procedures set forth in 16 CFR
1118.20(e). If the Commission does not
receive any written request not to accept
the Agreement within fifteen (15)
calendar days, the Agreement shall be
deemed finally accepted on the 16th
calendar day after the date the
Agreement is published in the Federal
Register, in accordance with 16 CFR
1118.20(f).
31. This Agreement is conditioned
upon, and subject to, the Commission’s
final acceptance, as set forth above, and
it is subject to the provisions of 16 CFR
1118.20(h). Upon the later of: (i)
Commission’s final acceptance of this
Agreement and service of the accepted
Agreement upon Office Depot, and (ii)
the date of issuance of the final Order,
this Agreement shall be in full force and
effect and shall be binding upon the
parties.
32. Effective upon the later of: (i) the
Commission’s final acceptance of the
Agreement and service of the accepted
Agreement upon Office Depot, and (ii)
and the date of issuance of the final
Order, for good and valuable
consideration, Office Depot hereby
expressly and irrevocably waives and
agrees not to assert any past, present, or
future rights to the following, in
connection with the matter described in
this Agreement: (i) an administrative or
judicial hearing; (ii) judicial review or
other challenge or contest of the
Commission’s actions; (iii) a
determination by the Commission of
whether Office Depot failed to comply
with the CPSA and the underlying
regulations; (iv) a statement of findings
of fact and conclusions of law; and (v)
any claims under the Equal Access to
Justice Act.
33. Office Depot has and shall
maintain a compliance program
designed to ensure compliance with the
CPSA with respect to any consumer
product imported, manufactured,
distributed, or sold by Office Depot.
Office Depot’s compliance program
shall contain the following elements: (i)
written standards and policies,
including those designed to convey
effectively to personnel responsible for
CPSA compliance information (whether
in the form of complaints, parts
requests, incident reports, or otherwise)
that may relate to or impact CPSA
compliance; (ii) a mechanism for
confidential employee reporting of
compliance-related questions or
concerns to either a compliance officer
or to another senior manager with
authority to act as necessary; (iii)
effective communication of company
compliance-related policies and
procedures regarding the CPSA to the
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
appropriate employees through training
programs or otherwise; (iv) Office Depot
senior management responsibility for,
and general board oversight of, CPSA
compliance; and (v) retention of all
CPSA compliance-related records for at
least five (5) years, and reasonable
availability of such records, insofar as
they are not protected by attorneyclient, work product, or other privilege,
to staff upon reasonable request.
34. Office Depot has, and shall
maintain and enforce, a system of
internal controls and procedures
designed to ensure that, with respect to
all consumer products imported,
manufactured, distributed, or sold by
Office Depot: (i) information required to
be disclosed by Office Depot to the
Commission is recorded, processed, and
reported in accordance with applicable
law; (ii) all reporting made to the
Commission is timely, truthful,
complete, accurate, and in accordance
with applicable law; and (iii) prompt
disclosure is made to Office Depot’s
management of any significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses in
the design or operation of such internal
controls that are reasonably likely to
affect adversely, in any material respect,
Office Depot’s ability to record, process,
and report to the Commission in
accordance with applicable law.
35. Upon reasonable request of staff,
Office Depot shall provide written
documentation of its internal controls
and procedures, including, but not
limited to, the effective dates of the
procedures and improvements thereto.
Office Depot shall cooperate fully and
truthfully with staff and shall make
available all non-privileged information
and materials, and personnel deemed
necessary by staff to evaluate Office
Depot’s compliance with the terms of
the Agreement.
36. The parties acknowledge and
agree that the Commission may
publicize the terms of the Agreement
and the Order.
37. Office Depot represents that the
Agreement: (i) is entered into freely and
voluntarily, without any degree of
duress or compulsion whatsoever; (ii)
has been duly authorized; and (iii)
constitutes the valid and binding
obligation of Office Depot, enforceable
against Office Depot in accordance with
its terms. Office Depot will not directly
or indirectly receive any
reimbursement, indemnification,
insurance-related payment, or other
payment in connection with the civil
penalty to be paid by Office Depot
pursuant to the Agreement and Order.
The individuals signing the Agreement
on behalf of Office Depot represent and
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
warrant that they are duly authorized by
Office Depot to execute the Agreement.
38. The signatories represent that they
are authorized to execute this
Agreement.
39. The Agreement is governed by the
laws of the United States.
40. The Agreement and the Order
shall apply to, and be binding upon,
Office Depot and each of its successors,
transferees, and assigns, and a violation
of the Agreement or Order may subject
Office Depot, and each of its successors,
transferees and assigns, to appropriate
legal action.
41. The Agreement and the Order
constitute the complete agreement
between the parties on the subject
matter contained therein.
42. The Agreement may be used in
interpreting the Order. Understandings,
agreements, representations, or
interpretations apart from those
contained in the Agreement and the
Order may not be used to vary or
contradict their terms. For purposes of
construction, the Agreement shall be
deemed to have been drafted by both of
the parties and shall not, therefore, be
construed against any party for that
reason in any subsequent dispute.
43. The Agreement may not be
waived, amended, modified, or
otherwise altered, except as in
accordance with the provisions of 16
CFR 1118.20(h). The Agreement may be
executed in counterparts.
44. If any provision of the Agreement
or the Order is held to be illegal,
invalid, or unenforceable under present
or future laws effective during the terms
of the Agreement and the Order, such
provision shall be fully severable. The
balance of the Agreement and the Order
shall remain in full force and effect,
unless the Commission and Office
Depot agree in writing that severing the
provision materially affects the purpose
of the Agreement and the Order.
Dated: May 11, 2015
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
By: lllllllllllllllllll
Heather Stern
Vice President, Associate General Counsel
Office Depot, Inc.
6600 North Military Trail
Boca Raton, FL 33496
Dated: May 11, 2015
By: lllllllllllllllllll
Daniel F. Katz
Luba Shur
Counsel to Office Depot, Inc.
Williams & Connolly LLP
725 Twelfth Street NW.
Washington, DC 20005
U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Stephanie Tsacoumis
General Counsel
Mary T. Boyle
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:57 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
Deputy General Counsel
Mary B. Murphy
Assistant General Counsel
Dated: May 11, 2015
By: lllllllllllllllllll
Sean R. Ward
Trial Attorney
Division of Compliance
Office of the General Counsel
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
In the Matter of:
Office Depot, Inc.
CPSC Docket No.: 15–C0004
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Settlement
Agreement entered into between Office
Depot, Inc. (‘‘Office Depot’’), and the U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), and the Commission having
jurisdiction over the subject matter and over
Office Depot, and it appearing that the
Settlement Agreement and the Order are in
the public interest, it is:
ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement
be, and is, hereby, accepted; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Office Depot
shall comply with the terms of the Settlement
Agreement and shall pay a civil penalty in
the amount of three million, four hundred
thousand dollars ($3,400,000) within thirty
(30) days after service of the Commission’s
final Order accepting the Settlement
Agreement. The payment shall be made by
electronic wire transfer to the Commission
via: https://www.pay.gov. Upon the failure of
Office Depot to make the foregoing payment
when due, interest on the unpaid amount
shall accrue and be paid by Office Depot at
the federal legal rate of interest set forth at
28 U.S.C. 1961(a) and (b). If Office Depot fails
to make such payment or to comply in full
with any other provision of the Settlement
Agreement, such conduct will be considered
a violation of the Settlement Agreement and
Order.
Provisionally accepted and provisional
Order issued on the 28th day of May, 2015.
By order of the Commission.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretariat, U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
31579
revocable license to US Patent number
7,702,473, issued April 20, 2010,
entitled, ‘‘Submersible portable in-situ
automated water quality biomonitoring
apparatus and method’’ and US Patent
number 6,988,394, issued January 24,
2006, entitled, ‘‘Apparatus and method
of portable automated biomonitoring of
water quality’’ and US Patent number
6,393,899, issued May 28, 2002,
entitled, ‘‘Apparatus and method for
automated biomonitoring of water
quality’’ and US Patent number
6,058,763 issued May 9, 2000, entitled,
‘‘Apparatus and method for automated
biomonitoring of water quality’’ and
Canada Patent number 2,515,062 issued
April 17, 2012, entitled ‘‘Apparatus and
method of portable automated
biomonitoring of water quality’’ to
Solution Resources, LLC, with its
principal place of business at 7906
Juniper Drive, Frederick, MD 21702.
ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army
Medical Research and Materiel
Command, ATTN: Command Judge
Advocate, MCMR–JA, 504 Scott Street,
Fort Detrick, MD 21702–5012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
licensing issues, Mr. Barry Datlof, Office
of Research & Technology Assessment,
(301) 619–0033. For patent issues, Ms.
Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301)
619–7808, both at telefax (301) 619–
5034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Anyone
wishing to object to the grant of this
license can file written objections along
with supporting evidence, if any, within
15 days from the date of this
publication. Written objections are to be
filed with the Command Judge Advocate
(see ADDRESSES).
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–13419 Filed 6–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
[FR Doc. 2015–13422 Filed 6–2–15; 8:45 am]
Department of the Army
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
Intent To Grant an Exclusive License
for a U.S. Government-Owned
Invention
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
AGENCY:
Intent To Grant an Exclusive License
of U.S. Government-Owned Patents
ACTION:
Department of the Army, DoD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with 35 U.S.C.
209 (e) and 37 CFR 404.7 (a)(1)(i),
announcement is made of the intent to
grant an exclusive, royalty-bearing,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice.
In accordance with 35 U.S.C.
209(e), and 37 CFR 404.7 (a)(1)(i),
announcement is made of the intent to
grant an exclusive, revocable license, to
U.S. Provisional Patent No. 61/884,630,
filed September 30, 2013, entitled
‘‘Intelligent Focused Assessment with
Sonography for Trauma,’’ and foreign
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31576-31579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13422]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 15-C0004]
Office Depot, Inc., Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement
Agreement and Order
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: It is the policy of the Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the Consumer Product Safety Act in
the Federal Register in accordance with the terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e).
Published below is a provisionally-accepted Settlement Agreement with
Office Depot, Inc., containing a civil penalty of $3,400,000, within
twenty (20) days of service of the Commission's final Order accepting
the Settlement Agreement.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Chairman Elliot F. Kaye and Commissioners Robert S. Adler
and Marietta S. Robinson voted to provisionally accept the
Settlement Agreement and Order. Commissioners Joseph P. Mohorovic
and Ann Marie Buerkle voted to reject the Settlement Agreement and
Order. Commissioner Mohorovic submitted a statement regarding the
matter. The statement will be available from the Office of the
Secretariat and the CPSC Web site, www.cpsc.gov.
DATES: Any interested person may ask the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its contents by filing a written
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
request with the Office of the Secretary by June 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the Comment 15-C0004 Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Room 820, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean R. Ward, Trial Attorney, Office
of the General Counsel, Division of Compliance, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
[[Page 31577]]
Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4408; telephone (301) 504-7602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Agreement and Order appears
below.
Dated: May 28, 2015.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
In the Matter of:
Office Depot, Inc.
CPSC Docket No.: 15-C0004
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
1. In accordance with the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C.
2051-2089 (``CPSA'') and 16 CFR 1118.20, Office Depot, Inc. (``Office
Depot'' or ``Firm''), and the United States Consumer Product Safety
Commission (``Commission''), through its staff, hereby enter into this
Settlement Agreement (``Agreement''). The Agreement, and the
incorporated attached Order, resolve staff's charges set forth below.
THE PARTIES
2. The Commission is an independent federal regulatory agency,
established pursuant to, and responsible for the enforcement of, the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2051-2089. By executing the Agreement, staff is acting
on behalf of the Commission, pursuant to 16 CFR 1118.20(b). The
Commission issues the Order under the provisions of the CPSA.
3. Office Depot is a corporation, organized and existing under the
laws of the state of Delaware, with its principal place of business in
Boca Raton, Florida.
STAFF CHARGES
Quantum Chair
4. Between May 2006 and August 2009, Office Depot sold in the
United States approximately 150,000 Quantum Realspace PROTM
9000 Series Mid-Back Multifunction Mesh Chairs and Quantum Realspace
PROTM 9000 Series Mid-Back Multifunction Mesh Chairs with
Headrest (``Quantum Chair'').
5. The Quantum Chair is a ``consumer product'' ``distributed in
commerce,'' as those terms are defined or used in sections 3(a)(5), (8)
of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(5), (8). Office Depot was a ``retailer''
of the Quantum Chair, as such term is defined in section 3(a)(13) of
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(13).
6. The Quantum Chair is defective and creates an unreasonable risk
of serious injury because the bolts attaching the seatback on the
Quantum Chair can loosen and detach, posing a fall and injury hazard to
consumers.
7. Office Depot first received notice of a Quantum Chair failure in
2007 when a consumer reported to Office Depot that the seatback
loosened or detached on the Quantum Chair, causing the consumer to
sustain injuries.
8. In 2008, Office Depot became aware that, in an effort to
eliminate seatback detachment, the manufacturer of the Quantum Chair
made two design changes to the Quantum Chair and a change to the
accompanying instructions.
9. In 2008 and 2009, Office Depot received 13 additional reports of
injury, some requiring medical attention, and 33 total reports of the
seatback detaching.
10. Despite having information regarding the defect in and risk of
injury relating to the Quantum Chair, Office Depot did not notify the
Commission immediately of such defect or risk, as required by section
15(b)(3) and (4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b)(3) and (4). Office
Depot never notified the Commission about the Quantum Chair as required
by the CPSA.
Gibson Chair
11. Between 2003 and 2012, Office Depot imported into the United
States and sold approximately 1.4 million Gibson Leather Task Chairs
(``Gibson Chair'').
12. The Gibson Chair is a ``consumer product'' ``distributed in
commerce,'' as those terms are defined or used in sections 3(a)(5), (8)
of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(5), (8). Office Depot was a
``manufacturer'' of the Gibson Chair, as such term is defined in
section 3(a)(11) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(11). Office Depot also
was a ``retailer'' of the Gibson Chair, as such term is defined in
section 3(a)(13) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(13).
13. The Gibson Chair is defective and creates an unreasonable risk
of serious injury because the mounting weld can break and separate the
seat from the base of the Gibson Chair, posing a fall hazard to
consumers.
14. Office Depot first received notice of a Gibson Chair failure in
2005, when one consumer reported to Office Depot that the seat broke
and separated from the base of the Gibson Chair, causing the consumer
to sustain injuries.
15. Office Depot continued to receive reports of injuries and
incidents involving breakage of the Gibson Chair mounting plate weld
and the resulting separation of the seat from the base of the Gibson
Chair, with some injuries requiring medical attention. Office Depot
settled the claims of several consumers who reported injuries resulting
from the Gibson Chair's failure.
16. In all, Office Depot received 25 reports of injuries and 153
incident reports from consumers of the seat breaking and separating
from the base of the Gibson Chair.
17. Despite having information regarding the defect in and risk of
injury relating to the Gibson Chair, Office Depot did not notify the
Commission immediately of such defect or risk, as required by section
15(b)(3) and (4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b)(3) and (4). Office
Depot failed to notify the Commission about the Gibson Chair until
December 14, 2012, after receiving staff's letter requesting a Full
Report. Office Depot recalled the Gibson Chair on May 22, 2014.
Failure to Report
18. In failing to inform the Commission immediately about the
Quantum Chair and the Gibson Chair (together, ``Subject Products''),
Office Depot knowingly violated section 19(a)(4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2068(a)(4), as the term ``knowingly'' is defined in section 20(d) of
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069(d).
19. Pursuant to section 20 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, Office
Depot is subject to civil penalties for its knowing failure to report,
as required under section 15(b) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b).
RESPONSE OF OFFICE DEPOT
20. This Agreement does not constitute an admission by Office Depot
that the law has been violated. Office Depot neither admits nor denies
the staff's charges set forth above, including but not limited to the
contention that the Subject Products ``contain[] a defect which could
create a substantial product hazard . . . or create[] an unreasonable
risk of serious injury or death,'' 15 U.S.C. 2064(b); that Office Depot
did not notify the Commission in a timely manner, in accordance with 15
U.S.C. 2064(b); and that there was any allegedly ``knowing'' violation
of the CPSA as that term is defined in 15 U.S.C. 2069(d).
21. The Quantum recall notice states that Office Depot received 14
reports of injuries in connection with about 150,000 Quantum chairs
sold. There were fewer reports of consumers seeking medical treatment
in connection with any reported injuries. The Gibson recall notice
states that Office Depot received 25 reports of injuries in connection
with about 1.4 million Gibson chairs sold. There were fewer reports of
consumers seeking medical treatment in connection
[[Page 31578]]
with any reported injuries. Office Depot investigated the reports,
including by contacting the manufacturers of the Subject Products and
the consumers making the reports.
22. The Subject Products passed multiple safety tests administered
by independent third party testing organizations.
23. Following discussions with Office Depot, the manufacturer of
the Quantum Chair reported the Quantum Chair to the CPSC in April 2009.
Therefore, Office Depot did not make its own report.
24. At all relevant times, Office Depot has had a product safety
compliance program, including dedicated product safety personnel and
appropriate product safety testing.
25. As a retailer, Office Depot sells thousands of products and
relies on product testing, conducted pursuant to voluntary industry
standards, in order to protect its consumers. Office Depot reviews and
reacts to consumer complaints and parts requests associated with office
chairs.
26. Office Depot enters into this Agreement to settle this matter
without the delay and expense of litigation. Office Depot enters into
this Agreement and agrees to pay the amount referenced below in
compromise of staff's charges.
AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES
27. Under the CPSA, the Commission has jurisdiction over the matter
involving the Subject Products described herein and over Office Depot.
28. The parties enter into the Agreement for settlement purposes
only. The Agreement does not constitute an admission by Office Depot or
a determination by the Commission that Office Depot violated the CPSA's
reporting requirements.
29. In settlement of staff's charges, and to avoid the cost,
distraction, delay, uncertainty, and inconvenience of protracted
litigation or other proceedings, Office Depot shall pay a civil penalty
in the amount of three million, four hundred thousand dollars
($3,400,000) (``Settlement Payment'') within thirty (30) calendar days
after receiving service of the Commission's final Order accepting the
Agreement. The payment shall be made by electronic wire transfer to the
Commission via: https://www.pay.gov.
30. After staff receives this Agreement executed on behalf of
Office Depot, staff shall promptly submit the Agreement to the
Commission for provisional acceptance. Promptly following provisional
acceptance of the Agreement by the Commission, the Agreement shall be
placed on the public record and published in the Federal Register, in
accordance with the procedures set forth in 16 CFR 1118.20(e). If the
Commission does not receive any written request not to accept the
Agreement within fifteen (15) calendar days, the Agreement shall be
deemed finally accepted on the 16th calendar day after the date the
Agreement is published in the Federal Register, in accordance with 16
CFR 1118.20(f).
31. This Agreement is conditioned upon, and subject to, the
Commission's final acceptance, as set forth above, and it is subject to
the provisions of 16 CFR 1118.20(h). Upon the later of: (i)
Commission's final acceptance of this Agreement and service of the
accepted Agreement upon Office Depot, and (ii) the date of issuance of
the final Order, this Agreement shall be in full force and effect and
shall be binding upon the parties.
32. Effective upon the later of: (i) the Commission's final
acceptance of the Agreement and service of the accepted Agreement upon
Office Depot, and (ii) and the date of issuance of the final Order, for
good and valuable consideration, Office Depot hereby expressly and
irrevocably waives and agrees not to assert any past, present, or
future rights to the following, in connection with the matter described
in this Agreement: (i) an administrative or judicial hearing; (ii)
judicial review or other challenge or contest of the Commission's
actions; (iii) a determination by the Commission of whether Office
Depot failed to comply with the CPSA and the underlying regulations;
(iv) a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (v)
any claims under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
33. Office Depot has and shall maintain a compliance program
designed to ensure compliance with the CPSA with respect to any
consumer product imported, manufactured, distributed, or sold by Office
Depot. Office Depot's compliance program shall contain the following
elements: (i) written standards and policies, including those designed
to convey effectively to personnel responsible for CPSA compliance
information (whether in the form of complaints, parts requests,
incident reports, or otherwise) that may relate to or impact CPSA
compliance; (ii) a mechanism for confidential employee reporting of
compliance-related questions or concerns to either a compliance officer
or to another senior manager with authority to act as necessary; (iii)
effective communication of company compliance-related policies and
procedures regarding the CPSA to the appropriate employees through
training programs or otherwise; (iv) Office Depot senior management
responsibility for, and general board oversight of, CPSA compliance;
and (v) retention of all CPSA compliance-related records for at least
five (5) years, and reasonable availability of such records, insofar as
they are not protected by attorney-client, work product, or other
privilege, to staff upon reasonable request.
34. Office Depot has, and shall maintain and enforce, a system of
internal controls and procedures designed to ensure that, with respect
to all consumer products imported, manufactured, distributed, or sold
by Office Depot: (i) information required to be disclosed by Office
Depot to the Commission is recorded, processed, and reported in
accordance with applicable law; (ii) all reporting made to the
Commission is timely, truthful, complete, accurate, and in accordance
with applicable law; and (iii) prompt disclosure is made to Office
Depot's management of any significant deficiencies or material
weaknesses in the design or operation of such internal controls that
are reasonably likely to affect adversely, in any material respect,
Office Depot's ability to record, process, and report to the Commission
in accordance with applicable law.
35. Upon reasonable request of staff, Office Depot shall provide
written documentation of its internal controls and procedures,
including, but not limited to, the effective dates of the procedures
and improvements thereto. Office Depot shall cooperate fully and
truthfully with staff and shall make available all non-privileged
information and materials, and personnel deemed necessary by staff to
evaluate Office Depot's compliance with the terms of the Agreement.
36. The parties acknowledge and agree that the Commission may
publicize the terms of the Agreement and the Order.
37. Office Depot represents that the Agreement: (i) is entered into
freely and voluntarily, without any degree of duress or compulsion
whatsoever; (ii) has been duly authorized; and (iii) constitutes the
valid and binding obligation of Office Depot, enforceable against
Office Depot in accordance with its terms. Office Depot will not
directly or indirectly receive any reimbursement, indemnification,
insurance-related payment, or other payment in connection with the
civil penalty to be paid by Office Depot pursuant to the Agreement and
Order. The individuals signing the Agreement on behalf of Office Depot
represent and
[[Page 31579]]
warrant that they are duly authorized by Office Depot to execute the
Agreement.
38. The signatories represent that they are authorized to execute
this Agreement.
39. The Agreement is governed by the laws of the United States.
40. The Agreement and the Order shall apply to, and be binding
upon, Office Depot and each of its successors, transferees, and
assigns, and a violation of the Agreement or Order may subject Office
Depot, and each of its successors, transferees and assigns, to
appropriate legal action.
41. The Agreement and the Order constitute the complete agreement
between the parties on the subject matter contained therein.
42. The Agreement may be used in interpreting the Order.
Understandings, agreements, representations, or interpretations apart
from those contained in the Agreement and the Order may not be used to
vary or contradict their terms. For purposes of construction, the
Agreement shall be deemed to have been drafted by both of the parties
and shall not, therefore, be construed against any party for that
reason in any subsequent dispute.
43. The Agreement may not be waived, amended, modified, or
otherwise altered, except as in accordance with the provisions of 16
CFR 1118.20(h). The Agreement may be executed in counterparts.
44. If any provision of the Agreement or the Order is held to be
illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future laws
effective during the terms of the Agreement and the Order, such
provision shall be fully severable. The balance of the Agreement and
the Order shall remain in full force and effect, unless the Commission
and Office Depot agree in writing that severing the provision
materially affects the purpose of the Agreement and the Order.
Dated: May 11, 2015
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Heather Stern
Vice President, Associate General Counsel
Office Depot, Inc.
6600 North Military Trail
Boca Raton, FL 33496
Dated: May 11, 2015
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel F. Katz
Luba Shur
Counsel to Office Depot, Inc.
Williams & Connolly LLP
725 Twelfth Street NW.
Washington, DC 20005
U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
Stephanie Tsacoumis
General Counsel
Mary T. Boyle
Deputy General Counsel
Mary B. Murphy
Assistant General Counsel
Dated: May 11, 2015
By:--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sean R. Ward
Trial Attorney
Division of Compliance
Office of the General Counsel
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
In the Matter of:
Office Depot, Inc.
CPSC Docket No.: 15-C0004
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Settlement Agreement entered into
between Office Depot, Inc. (``Office Depot''), and the U.S. Consumer
Product Safety Commission (``Commission''), and the Commission
having jurisdiction over the subject matter and over Office Depot,
and it appearing that the Settlement Agreement and the Order are in
the public interest, it is:
ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement be, and is, hereby,
accepted; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that Office Depot shall comply with the terms of
the Settlement Agreement and shall pay a civil penalty in the amount
of three million, four hundred thousand dollars ($3,400,000) within
thirty (30) days after service of the Commission's final Order
accepting the Settlement Agreement. The payment shall be made by
electronic wire transfer to the Commission via: https://www.pay.gov.
Upon the failure of Office Depot to make the foregoing payment when
due, interest on the unpaid amount shall accrue and be paid by
Office Depot at the federal legal rate of interest set forth at 28
U.S.C. 1961(a) and (b). If Office Depot fails to make such payment
or to comply in full with any other provision of the Settlement
Agreement, such conduct will be considered a violation of the
Settlement Agreement and Order.
Provisionally accepted and provisional Order issued on the 28th
day of May, 2015.
By order of the Commission.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretariat, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-13422 Filed 6-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P