Federal Acquisition Regulation; Consolidation and Bundling of Contract Requirements, 31561-31567 [2015-13421]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
22148), is extended. Send your
comments on this proposed rule to the
BLM on or before June 19, 2015. The
BLM need not consider, or include in
the administrative record for the final
rule, comments that the BLM receives
after the close of the comment period or
comments delivered to an address other
than those listed below (see ADDRESSES).
Mail: U.S. Department of
the Interior, Director (630), Bureau of
Land Management, Mail Stop 2134 LM,
1849 C St. NW., Washington, DC 20240,
Attention: 1004–AE41. Personal or
messenger delivery: Bureau of Land
Management, 20 M Street SE., Room
2134 LM, Attention: Regulatory Affairs,
Washington, DC 20003. Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions at this Web site.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dylan Fuge, Office of the Director, at
202–208–5235, Steven Wells, Division
of Fluid Minerals, at 202–912–7143, or
Jully McQuilliams, Division of Fluid
Minerals, at 202–912–7156, for
information regarding the substance of
this ANPR. For information on
procedural matters or the rulemaking
process generally, you may contact
Anna Atkinson, Regulatory Affairs, at
202–912–7438. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to
contact the above individuals.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Public Comment Procedures
If you wish to comment, you may
submit your comments by any one of
several methods: Mail: You may mail
comments to U.S. Department of the
Interior, Director (630), Bureau of Land
Management, Mail Stop 2134LM, 1849
C Street NW., Washington, DC 20240,
Attention: 1004–AE41. Personal or
messenger delivery: Bureau of Land
Management, 20 M Street SE., Room
2134 LM, Attention: Regulatory Affairs,
Washington, DC 20003. Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions at this Web site.
Please make your comments as
specific as possible by confining them to
issues directly related to the content of
the ANPR, and explain the basis for
your comments. The comments and
recommendations that will be most
useful and likely to influence agency
decisions are:
1. Those supported by quantitative
information or studies; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
2. Those that include citations to, and
analyses of, the applicable laws and
regulations.
The BLM is not obligated to consider
or include in the Administrative Record
for the rule comments received after the
close of the comment period (see DATES)
or comments delivered to an address
other than those listed above (see
ADDRESSES).
Comments, including names and
street addresses of respondents, will be
available for public review at the
address listed under ADDRESSES during
regular hours (7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m.),
Monday through Friday, except
holidays.
Before including your address,
telephone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information
in your comment, be advised that your
entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask in your comment to
withhold from public review your
personal identifying information, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Background
The ANPR was published on April 21,
2015 (80 FR 22148), with a 45-day
comment period closing on June 5,
2015. The ANPR poses questions and
seeks information related to potential
updates and changes to the BLM’s
existing regulations governing Federal
onshore oil and gas leases related to
royalty rates, annual rental payments,
minimum acceptable bids, bonding
requirements, and civil penalty
assessments. Following publication of
the ANPR, the BLM received requests
for extension of the comment period. In
response to those requests, the BLM has
decided to extend the comment period
on the rule for 14 days, until June 19,
2015.
Dated: May 26, 2015.
Janice M. Schneider,
Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals
Management.
[FR Doc. 2015–13474 Filed 6–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31561
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16,
19, and 52
[FAR Case 2014–015; Docket No. 2014–
0015; Sequence No. 1]
RIN 9000–AM92
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Consolidation and Bundling of
Contract Requirements
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement sections of the Small
Business Jobs Act of 2010 and
regulatory changes made by the Small
Business Administration, which provide
for a Governmentwide policy on the
consolidation and bundling of contract
requirements.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments to the Regulatory
Secretariat at one of the addresses
shown below on or before August 3,
2015 to be considered in the formation
of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
response to FAR Case 2014–015 by any
of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching for ‘‘FAR Case 2014–015’’.
Select the link ‘‘Comment Now’’ that
corresponds with ‘‘FAR Case 2014–
015.’’ Follow the instructions provided
at the ‘‘Comment Now’’ screen. Please
include your name, company name (if
any), and ‘‘FAR Case 2014–015’’ on your
attached document.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), ATTN: Ms. Flowers, 1800 F
Street NW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC
20405.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite FAR Case 2014–015, in all
correspondence related to this case. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
31562
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Ms.
Mahruba Uddowla, Procurement
Analyst, at 703–605–2868, for
clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202–501–4755. Please cite
FAR Case 2014–015.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing
to revise the FAR to implement
regulatory changes made by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) in its
final rule which was published in the
Federal Register at 78 FR 61113 on
October 2, 2013, concerning contract
consolidation and bundling. SBA’s final
rule implements the statutory
requirements set forth at sections 1312
and 1313 of the Small Business Jobs Act
of 2010 (Jobs Act) (Pub. L. 111–240).
This proposed rule will encompass the
acquisition of commercial items,
including commercially available offthe-shelf (COTS) items.
Section 1312 of the Jobs Act amends
the Small Business Act at 15 U.S.C.
644(q) to require Federal agencies to
include in each solicitation for any
multiple-award contract above the
substantial bundling threshold of the
Federal agency a provision soliciting
bids from any responsible source,
including responsible small business
teaming arrangements or joint ventures
of small business concerns. Section
1312 requires the FAR be amended to
establish a Governmentwide policy
regarding contract bundling, including
regarding the solicitation of teaming and
joint ventures, and to require agencies to
publish said policy on their agency Web
site. Section 1312 also requires the head
of the Federal agency to publish on the
Web site of the Federal agency a list and
rationale for any bundled contract for
which the Federal agency solicited bids
or that was awarded by the agency.
Section 1313 amends the Small
Business Act at 15 U.S.C. 657q to define
the term ‘‘consolidation of contract
requirements’’ to mean the use of a
solicitation to obtain offers for a single
contract or a multiple-award contract to
satisfy two or more requirements of the
Federal agency for goods or services that
have been provided to or performed for
the Federal agency under two or more
separate contracts, each of which was
lower in cost than the total cost of the
contract for which the offers are
solicited. The National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2013 (2013 NDAA), Public
Law 112–239, section 1671 further
amended the definition of consolidation
to include construction requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
Further, section 1313 prohibits the
agency from carrying out an acquisition
strategy that includes consolidation of
contract requirements of the Federal
agency with an estimated total value
exceeding $2 million, unless the Senior
Procurement Executive or Chief
Acquisition Officer for the Federal
agency, before carrying out the
acquisition strategy—
• Conducts market research;
• Identifies any alternative
contracting approach that would
involve a lesser degree of consolidation
of contract requirements;
• Makes a written determination that
the consolidation of contract
requirements is necessary and justified;
• Identifies any negative impact by
the acquisition strategy on contracting
with small business concerns; and
• Ensures that steps will be taken to
include small business concerns in the
acquisition strategy.
II. Discussion and Analysis
Amendments to the FAR are proposed
by this rule. The proposed changes are
summarized in the following
paragraphs.
A. FAR Subpart 2.1, Definitions. This
subpart is amended to revise the
definition of ‘‘bundling’’ for clarity,
incorporating the definition of ‘‘bundled
contract’’, and to add a new definition
for ‘‘consolidation, consolidation of
contract requirements, consolidated
contract or consolidated requirement’’.
In keeping with SBA’s final rule and
section 1671 of the NDAA for FY 2013,
Public Law 112–239, the latter
definition also encompasses the
consolidation of construction
requirements. This subpart is also
amended to add a definition for ‘‘small
business teaming arrangement’’.
B. FAR Subpart 5.2, Synopses of
Proposed Contract Actions. A
conforming cross-reference has been
added at FAR 5.205(g).
C. FAR Subpart 7.1, Acquisition
Plans.
• FAR 7.103—This section is
amended to clarify that agencies are to
ensure that unnecessary and unjustified
consolidation is avoided.
• FAR 7.104—This section is
amended to remove the substantial
bundling thresholds at FAR 7.104. The
substantial bundling thresholds are
relocated to the proposed new section
FAR 7.107–4, Substantial Bundling, for
clarity and consistency with the new
proposed structure of FAR 7.107. An
additional revision was made to clarify
that small business is to be a discipline
that is represented in the acquisition
planning team.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• FAR 7.105—This section is
amended by adding a reference to the
statutory authority for limiting the use
of acquisition strategies involving the
consolidation of contract requirements.
• FAR 7.107—This section is
amended by revising the title of the
section and adding the statutory
authority for the consolidation of
contract requirements. This section also
proposes to clarify that if a requirement
is considered both consolidated and
bundled, the agency must follow the
guidance regarding bundling. In
addition, this section is amended by
restructuring FAR 7.107 to add
proposed subsections FAR 7.707–1,
General, FAR 7.107–2, Consolidation of
contract requirements, FAR 7.107–3
Bundling, FAR 7.107–4 Substantial
Bundling, FAR 7.107–5 Notifications,
and 7.107–6 Solicitation provision. The
proposed revisions are as follows:
Æ FAR 7.107–1—General. This
proposed new section provides
information relevant to both
consolidation and bundling, such as
evaluation of benefits, substantial
benefits, and applicability.
Æ FAR 7.107–2—Consolidation of
contract requirements. This proposed
new section is added to clarify that an
agency may not conduct an acquisition
exceeding $2 million that is a
consolidation of contract requirements
unless the agency’s Senior Procurement
Executive or Chief Acquisition Officer:
(1) Justifies the consolidation by
showing that the benefits of the
consolidated acquisition substantially
exceed the benefits of each possible
alternative approach that would involve
a lesser degree of consolidation and (2)
identify any negative impact by the
acquisition strategy on contracting with
small business concerns.
Æ FAR 7.107–3—Bundling. This
proposed new section clarifies language
regarding the requirements a contracting
officer must adhere to prior to
conducting an acquisition strategy that
involves the bundling of contract
requirements.
Æ FAR 7.107–4—Substantial
Bundling. This proposed new section
includes the substantial bundling
thresholds relocated from FAR 7.104(d)
and existing documentation
requirements.
Æ FAR 7.107–5—Notifications. This
proposed new section is added to
require Federal agencies to: (1) Notify
current small business contractors of an
agency’s intent to bundle a contract
requirement that was not previously
bundled at least 30 days prior to the
issuance of the solicitation; (2) provide
public notification of an agency’s intent
to bundle by publishing on the agency’s
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Web site a list and rationale for any
bundled requirement for which the
agency solicited offers or issued an
award; (3) require the agency to notify
SBA of a follow-on bundled or
consolidated contract requirement; and
(4) publish the Governmentwide policy
regarding contract bundling, including
regarding the solicitation of teaming and
joint ventures, on their agency Web site.
Æ FAR 7.107–6—Solicitation
Provision. This proposed new section is
added to prescribe a new provision
52.207–XX ‘‘Solicitation of Offers from
Small Business Concerns and Small
Business Teaming Arrangements or
Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award
Contracts)’’, in solicitations for
multiple-award contracts that are
estimated to be above the agency’s
substantial bundling threshold.
D. FAR Subpart 8.4, Federal Supply
Schedules. Proposed revisions to FAR
8.404(c)(2) are necessary to apply
consolidation requirements to orders.
E. FAR Part 10, Market Research.
Proposed revisions to FAR 10.001 are
necessary to add references to the
statutory authority for the consolidation
of contract requirements.
F. FAR Subpart 12.3, Solicitation
Provisions and Contract Clauses for the
Acquisition of Commercial Items.
Proposed revisions to FAR 12.301(d)(4)
are necessary to add a reference to the
new provision for multiple-award
contracts over the substantial bundling
thresholds at FAR 52.207–XX,
Solicitation of Offers from Small
Business Concerns and Small Business
Teaming Arrangements or Joint
Ventures (Multiple-Award Contracts).
G. FAR Subpart 15.3, Source
Selection.
• FAR 15.304, Evaluation factors and
significant subfactors. This section is
amended by adding references to the
consolidation of contract requirements.
H. FAR Subpart 16.5, IndefiniteDelivery Contracts.
• FAR 16.505, Ordering. This section
is amended to apply consolidation
requirements to orders.
• FAR 16.506, Solicitation provisions
and contract clauses. This section is
amended by adding a cross-reference to
the prescription in FAR Subpart 7.1 for
a new provision ‘‘Solicitation of Offers
from Small Business Concerns and
Small Business Teaming Arrangements
or Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award
Contracts)’’.
I. Subpart 19.2, Policies.
• FAR 19.201 General policy and
19.202–1 Encouraging small business
participation in acquisitions. These
sections are amended by adding
references to the consolidation of
contract requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
J. FAR Subpart 52.2, Text of
Provisions and Clauses.
• FAR 52.207–XX, Solicitation of
Offers from Small Business Concerns
and Small Business Teaming
Arrangements or Joint Ventures
(Multiple-Award Contracts). This
section is amended to include this
provision in solicitations for multipleaward contracts when the estimated
contract value is expected to exceed the
agency’s substantial bundling threshold.
The agency shall consider offers from
any responsible source, including
responsible small business concerns and
teaming arrangements or joint ventures
of small business concerns.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The change may have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is
summarized as follows:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to
amend the FAR to provide uniform guidance
consistent with SBA’s final rule which was
published in the Federal Register at 78 FR
61113 on October 2, 2013, which implements
sections 1312 and 1313 of the Small Business
Jobs Act of 2010, Public Law 111–240.
The objective of this proposed rule is to
alleviate the adverse effects of contract
bundling and consolidation on small
business concerns competing for Federal
contracts. This rule provides a balance
between the benefits of bundling and
consolidation and the obstacles they create
for small businesses. The authorizing
legislation for this action is sections 1312 and
1313 of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010,
Public Law 111–240, and section 1671 of the
NDAA for FY 2013 Public Law 112–239.
Section 1671 in conjunction with section
1313 now provides for a Governmentwide
requirement and threshold for consolidated
contracts.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31563
This rule may have a positive economic
impact on any small business entity that
wishes to participate in the Federal
procurement arena. Analysis of the System
for Award Management (SAM) database
indicates there are over 351,203 small
business registrants that can potentially
benefit from the implementation of this rule.
This rule does not impose any new
reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance
requirements. The rule does not duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with any other Federal
rules.
The Regulatory Secretariat has
submitted a copy of the IRFA to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration. A copy of the
IRFA may be obtained from the
Regulatory Secretariat. DoD, GSA, and
NASA invite comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also
consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in
subparts affected by the rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested
parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610
(FAR Case 2014–015), in
correspondence.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 2, 5, 7,
8, 10, 12, 15, 16, 19, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: May 28, 2015.
William Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
propose amending 48 CFR parts 2, 5, 7,
8, 10, 12, 15, 16, 19, and 52 as set forth
below:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16, 19, and
52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
PART 2—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS
AND TERMS
2. Amend section 2.101 in paragraph
(b) by—
■ a. Removing the definition ‘‘Bundled
contract’’;
■ b. Revising the definition ‘‘Bundling’’;
■ c. Adding, in alphabetical order, the
definitions ‘‘Consolidation,
■
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
31564
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
consolidation of contract requirements,
consolidated contract, or consolidated
requirement’’; and ‘‘Small Business
Teaming Arrangement’’.
The revised and added text reads as
follows:
2.101
Definitions.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
Bundling or bundled contract—
(1) Means the consolidating or
combining of two or more requirements
for supplies or services, previously
provided or performed under separate
smaller contracts, into a solicitation for
a single contract, a multiple-award
contract, a task order or delivery order
that is likely to be unsuitable for award
to a small business concern (but may be
suitable for award to a small business
with a Small Business Teaming
Arrangement) due to—
(i) The diversity, size, or specialized
nature of the elements of the
performance specified;
(ii) The aggregate dollar value of the
anticipated award;
(iii) The geographical dispersion of
the contract performance sites; or
(iv) Any combination of the factors
described in paragraphs (1)(i), (ii), and
(iii) of this definition.
(2) ‘‘Separate smaller contract’’ as
used in this definition, means a contract
that has been performed by one or more
small business concerns or that was
suitable for award to one or more small
business concerns.
(3) This definition does not apply to
a contract that will be awarded and
performed entirely outside of the United
States.
(4) (See 7.107–4 for a description of
substantial bundling.)
*
*
*
*
*
Consolidation, consolidation of
contract requirements, consolidated
contract, or consolidated requirement—
(1) Means a solicitation for a single
contract, a multiple-award contract, a
task order, or a delivery order to
satisfy—
(i) Two or more requirements of the
Federal agency for supplies or services
that have been provided to or performed
for the Federal agency under two or
more separate contracts, each of which
was lower in cost than the total cost of
the contract for which offers are
solicited; or
(ii) Requirements of the Federal
agency for construction projects to be
performed at two or more discrete sites.
(2) Separate contract as used in this
definition, means a contract that has
been performed by any business,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
including small and other than small
business concerns.
*
*
*
*
*
Small Business Teaming
Arrangement—
(1) Means an arrangement where—
(i) Two or more small business
concerns have formed a joint venture; or
(ii) A potential small business prime
contractor (‘‘offeror’’) agrees with one or
more other small business concerns to
have them act as its subcontractors
under a specified Government contract.
A Small Business Teaming Arrangement
between the offeror and its small
business subcontractor(s) exists through
a written agreement between the parties
that—
(A) Is specifically referred to as a
Small Business Teaming Arrangement
or Small Business Teaming Agreement;
and
(B) Sets forth the different
responsibilities, roles, and percentages
(or other allocations) of work as it
relates to the acquisition; and
(2) May include two business
concerns in a mentor-protege
relationship so long as both the mentor
and the protege are small or the protege
is small and the concerns have received
an exception to affiliation pursuant to
13 CFR 121.103(h)(3)(ii) or (iii).
(3) See 13 CFR 121.103(b)(9) regarding
the exception to affiliation for offers
received from Small Business Teaming
Arrangements.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 5—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT
ACTIONS
3. Amend section 5.205 by adding
paragraph (g) to read as follows:
■
5.205
Special situations.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Notification to public of rationale
for bundled requirement. See 7.107–
5(b)(2) with regard to notification to
FedBizOpps.gov before issuance of the
solicitation of any bundled requirement.
PART 7—ACQUISITION PLANNING
4. Amend section 7.103 by revising
paragraph (u)(2) to read as follows:
■
7.103
Agency-head responsibilities.
*
*
*
*
*
(u) * * *
(2) Avoid unnecessary and unjustified
consolidation or bundling of contract
requirements that precludes small
business participation as prime
contractors (see 7.107) (15 U.S.C. 631(j)
and 15 U.S.C. 657(q)).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Amend section 7.104 by removing
from paragraph (a) ‘‘contracting,’’ and
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
adding ‘‘contracting, small business,’’ in
its place; and revising paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
7.104
General procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The planner shall coordinate the
acquisition plan or strategy with the
cognizant small business specialist
when the strategy contemplates an
acquisition meeting the dollar amounts
for substantial bundling unless the
contract or task order or delivery order
is entirely reserved or set-aside for small
business under part 19. The small
business specialist shall notify the
agency Office of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization or
the Office of Small Business Programs if
the strategy involves consolidation or
bundling that is unnecessary,
unjustified, or not identified as
consolidated or bundled by the agency
(see 7.107 for further guidance regarding
consolidation and bundling).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Amend section 7.105 by revising
paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
7.105 Contents of written acquisition
plans.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Plan of action. (1) Sources. (i)
Indicate the prospective sources of
supplies or services that can meet the
need.
(ii) Consider required sources of
supplies or services (see part 8) and
sources identifiable through databases
including the Governmentwide database
of contracts and other procurement
instruments intended for use by
multiple agencies available at https://
www.contractdirectory.gov/
contractdirectory/.
(iii) Include consideration of small
business, veteran-owned small business,
service-disabled veteran-owned small
business, HUBZone small business,
small disadvantaged business, and
women-owned small business concerns
(see part 19).
(iv) Consider the impact of any
consolidation or bundling that might
affect participation of small businesses
in the acquisition (see 7.107) (15 U.S.C.
644(e) and 15 U.S.C. 657(q)). When the
proposed acquisition strategy involves
the consolidation or bundling of
contract requirements, identify the
incumbent contractors and contracts
affected by the consolidation or
bundling.
(v) Address the extent and results of
the market research and indicate their
impact on the various elements of the
plan (see part 10).
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
7. Revise section 7.107 to read as
follows:
■
7.107 Additional requirements for
acquisitions involving consolidation,
bundling, or substantial bundling.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
7.107–1
General.
(a) Consolidation and bundling of
contract requirements may provide
substantial benefits to the Government.
However, because of the potential
impact on small business participation,
the agency shall conduct market
research and any required analysis to
determine whether consolidation is
necessary and justified in accordance
with 15 U.S.C. 657(q) or if bundling is
necessary and justified pursuant to 15
U.S.C. 644(e)(2).
(b) A consolidated or bundled
requirement is necessary and justified if
the benefits of the acquisition strategy
substantially exceed the benefits of each
of the possible alternative contracting
approaches identified.
(c) Such benefits may include—
(1) Cost savings;
(2) Price reduction;
(3) Quality improvements that will
save time or improve or enhance
performance or efficiency;
(4) Reduction in acquisition cycle
times, or
(5) Better terms and conditions.
(d) Benefits are substantial if
individually, in combination, or in the
aggregate the anticipated financial
benefits are equivalent to—
(1) Ten percent of the estimated
contract or order value (including
options) if the value is $94 million or
less; or
(2) Five percent of the estimated
contract or order value (including
options) or $9.4 million, whichever is
greater, if the value exceeds $94 million.
(e) Reduction of administrative or
personnel costs alone is not sufficient
justification for consolidation or
bundling unless the cost savings are
expected to be at least 10 percent of the
estimated contract or order value
(including options) of the consolidated
or bundled requirements. For
consolidated requirements, the Senior
Procurement Executive or Chief
Acquisition Officer must make a
determination of the cost savings (15
U.S.C. 657(q)(c)(2)).
(f) If the requirement is considered
both consolidated and bundled, the
agency shall follow the guidance
regarding bundling in 7.107–3 and
7.107–4).
(g) The requirements of this section
do not apply—
(1) Except 7.107–4, if a cost
comparison analysis will be performed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
in accordance with OMB Circular A–76;
and
(2) To orders against single-agency
task-order contracts or delivery-order
contracts, if the requirement was
considered in determining that the
consolidation or bundling of the
underlying contract was necessary and
justified.
7.107–2 Consolidation of contract
requirements.
(a) Before conducting an acquisition
that is a consolidation of contract
requirements with an estimated total
dollar value exceeding $2 million, the
Senior Procurement Executive or Chief
Acquisition Officer shall make a written
determination that the consolidation of
contract requirements is necessary and
justified, after ensuring that—
(1) Market research has been
conducted;
(2) Any alternative contracting
approaches that would involve a lesser
degree of consolidation of contract
requirements have been identified;
(3) The determination is coordinated
with the agency’s Office of Small
Disadvantaged Business Utilization or
the Office of Small Business Programs;
(4) Any negative impact by the
acquisition strategy on contracting with
small business concerns has been
identified; and
(5) Steps are taken to include small
business concerns in the acquisition
strategy.
(b) The Senior Procurement Executive
or Chief Acquisition Officer may
determine that the consolidation of
contract requirements is necessary and
justified if, as compared to the benefits
that would be derived from the
alternative contracting approaches
identified under paragraph (a)(2) of this
subsection, consolidation would derive
substantial benefits (see 7.107–1(d)).
(c) If a determination is made, the
contracting officer shall include it in the
acquisition strategy documentation and
provide it to SBA upon request.
7.107–3
Bundling.
(a) Before conducting an acquisition
strategy that involves the bundling of
contract requirements, the agency shall
make a written determination that the
bundling is necessary and justified. A
bundled requirement is considered
necessary and justified if the agency
would obtain measurably substantial
benefits as compared to meeting its
agency’s requirements through separate
smaller contracts or orders.
(b) The agency shall quantify the
specific benefits identified through the
use of market research and other
techniques to explain how their impact
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31565
would be measurably substantial (see
10.001(a)(2)(iv) and (a)(3)(vi)).
(c) Without power of delegation, the
service acquisition executive for the
military departments, the component
acquisition executive for the Defense
Logistics Agency, the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition, Technology
and Logistics for the defense agencies,
or the Deputy Secretary or equivalent
for the civilian agencies may determine
that bundling is necessary and justified
when—
(1) The expected benefits do not meet
the thresholds for a substantial benefit
but are critical to the agency’s mission
success; and
(2) The acquisition strategy provides
for maximum practicable participation
by small business concerns.
(d) In assessing whether cost savings
and/or price reduction would be
achieved through bundling, the agency
and SBA shall—
(1) Compare the price that has been
charged by small businesses for the
work that they have performed; or
(2) Where previous prices are not
available, compare the price, based on
market research, that could have been or
could be charged by small businesses
for the work not previously performed
by other than a small business.
(e) If a determination is made, the
contracting officer shall include it in the
acquisition strategy documentation and
provide it to SBA upon request.
7.107–4
Substantial bundling.
(a)(1) Substantial bundling is any
bundling that results in a contract or
order with an estimated value of—
(i) $8 million or more for the
Department of Defense;
(ii) $6 million or more for the
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, the General Services
Administration, and the Department of
Energy; or
(iii) $2.5 million or more for all other
agencies.
(2) These thresholds apply to the
cumulative estimated dollar value
(including options) of—
(i) Multiple-award contracts;
(ii) Task orders or delivery orders
issued against a GSA Schedule contract;
or
(iii) Task orders or delivery orders
issued against a task-order or deliveryorder contract awarded by another
agency.
(b) In addition to addressing the
requirements for bundling (see 7.107–3),
when the proposed acquisition strategy
involves substantial bundling, the
agency shall document in its strategy—
(1) The specific benefits anticipated to
be derived from substantial bundling;
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
31566
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(2) An assessment of the specific
impediments to participation by small
business concerns as contractors that
result from substantial bundling;
(3) Actions designed to maximize
small business participation as
contractors, including provisions that
encourage small business teaming;
(4) Actions designed to maximize
small business participation as
subcontractors (including suppliers) at
any tier under the contract, or order,
that may be awarded to meet the
requirements;
(5) The determination that the
anticipated benefits of the proposed
bundled contract or order justify its use;
and
(6) Alternative strategies that would
reduce or minimize the scope of the
bundling, and the rationale for not
choosing those alternatives.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
7.107–5
Notifications.
(a) Notifications to current small
business contractors of agency’s intent
to bundle.
(1) The contracting officer shall notify
each small business performing a
contract that it intends to bundle the
requirement with one or more other
requirements at least 30 days prior to
the issuance of the solicitation for the
bundled requirement.
(2) The notification shall provide the
name, phone number and address of the
applicable SBA procurement center
representative (PCR), or if a PCR is not
assigned to the procuring activity, the
SBA Office of Government Contracting
Area Office serving the area in which
the buying activity is located (see
subpart 19.4 regarding the duties and
responsibilities of the SBA PCR).
(3) This notification shall be
documented in the contract file.
(b) Notification to public of rationale
for bundled requirement.
(1) The agency shall publish on its
Web site a list and rationale for any
bundled requirement for which the
agency solicited offers or issued an
award. The notification shall be made
within 30 days of the agency’s data
certification regarding the validity and
verification of data entered in the
Federal Procurement Data System to the
Office of Federal Procurement Policy
(see 4.604).
(2) In addition, the agency is
encouraged to provide to
FedBizOpps.gov, before issuance of the
solicitation, notification of the rationale
for any bundled requirement (see 5.201).
(c) Notification to SBA of follow-on
bundled or consolidated requirements.
For each follow-on bundled or
consolidated contract (even if additional
requirements have been added or some
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
have been deleted), the contracting
officer shall obtain from the requiring
activity and notify the SBA PCR as soon
as possible but no later than 30 days
prior to issuance of the solicitation of—
(1) The amount of savings and
benefits achieved under the prior
consolidation or bundling of contract
requirements;
(2) Whether such savings and benefits
will continue to be realized if the
contract remains consolidated or
bundled; and
(3) Whether such savings and benefits
would be greater if the procurement
requirements were divided into separate
solicitations suitable for award to small
business concerns.
(d) Public notification of bundling
policy. In accordance with 15 U.S.C.
644(q)(2)(A)(ii), agencies shall publish
the Governmentwide policy regarding
contract bundling, including regarding
the solicitation of teaming and joint
ventures, on their agency Web site.
7.107–6
Solicitation provision.
The contracting officer shall insert the
provision at 52.207–XX, Solicitation of
Offers from Small Business Concerns
and Small Business Teaming
Arrangements or Joint Ventures
(Multiple-Award Contracts), in
solicitations for multiple-award
contracts above the substantial bundling
threshold of the agency.
PART 8—REQUIRED SOURCES OF
SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
8. Amend section 8.404 by revising
paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
■
8.404
Use of Federal Supply Schedules.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Shall comply with all FAR
requirements for a consolidated or
bundled contract when the task order or
delivery order meets the definition at
2.101(b) of ‘‘consolidation’’ or
‘‘bundling’’; and
*
*
*
*
*
PART 10—MARKET RESEARCH
9. Amend section 10.001 by—
a. Removing from the introductory
text of paragraph (a) ‘‘Agencies must—
’’ and adding ‘‘Agencies shall—’’ in its
place;
■ b. Revising paragraphs (a)(2)(iv) and
(a)(2)(vi)(B);
■ c. Removing from the end of
paragraph (a)(3)(v) ‘‘efficiency; and’’ and
adding ‘‘efficiency;’’ in its place;
■ d. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(3)(vi)
and (a)(3)(vii) as paragraphs (a)(3)(vii)
and (a)(3)(viii), respectively;
■ e. Adding a new paragraph (a)(3)(vi);
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
f. Revising the newly designated
paragraph (a)(3)(vii); and
■ g. Revising paragraph (c) to read as
follows.
■
10.001
Policy.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) Before soliciting offers for
acquisitions that could lead to a
consolidated or bundled contract (15
U.S.C. 644(e)(2)(A) and 15 U.S.C. 657q);
*
*
*
*
*
(B) Disaster relief to include debris
removal, distribution of supplies,
reconstruction, and other disaster or
emergency relief activities (see 26.205);
and
(3) * * *
(vi) Determine whether consolidation
is necessary and justified (see 7.107–2)
(15 U.S.C. 657q);
(vii) Determine whether bundling is
necessary and justified (see 7.107–3)
(15 U.S.C. 644(e)(2)(A)); and
*
*
*
*
*
(c) If an agency contemplates
awarding a consolidated or bundled
contract, the agency—
(1) When performing market research,
should consult with the agency small
business specialist and the local Small
Business Administration procurement
center representative (PCR). If a PCR is
not assigned, see 19.402(a); and
(2) Shall notify any affected
incumbent small business concerns of
the Government’s intention to bundle
the requirement and how small business
concerns may contact the appropriate
Small Business Administration
procurement center representative (see
7.107–5(a).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 12—ACQUISITION OF
COMMERCIAL ITEMS
10. Amend section 12.301 by
redesignating paragraphs (d)(3) through
(d)(6) as paragraphs (d)(4) through
(d)(7), respectively; and adding a new
paragraph (d)(3) to read as follows:
■
12.301 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses for the acquisition of
commercial items.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) Insert the provision at 52.207–XX,
Solicitation of Offers from Small
Business Concerns and Small Business
Teaming Arrangements or Joint
Ventures (Multiple-Award Contracts), as
prescribed at 7.107–6.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 106 / Wednesday, June 3, 2015 / Proposed Rules
PART 15—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
PART 19—SMALL BUSINESS
PROGRAMS
■
11. Amend section 15.304 by revising
paragraphs (c)(3)(ii) and (c)(4) to read as
follows:
■
15.304 Evaluation factors and significant
subfactors.
19.201
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) For solicitations involving the
consolidation of contract requirements
or bundling that offer a significant
opportunity for subcontracting, the
contracting officer shall include a factor
to evaluate past performance indicating
the extent to which the offeror attained
applicable goals for small business
participation under contracts that
required subcontracting plans (15 U.S.C.
637(d)(4)(G)(ii)).
*
*
*
*
*
(4) For solicitations involving the
consolidation of contract requirements
or bundling that offer a significant
opportunity for subcontracting, the
contracting officer shall include
proposed small business subcontracting
participation in the subcontracting plan
as an evaluation factor (15 U.S.C.
637(d)(4)(G)(i)).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 16—TYPES OF CONTRACTS
12. Amend section 16.505 by revising
paragraph (a)(8)(iii) to read as follows:
■
16.505
Ordering.
(a) * * *
(8) * * *
(iii) Shall comply with all FAR
requirements for a consolidated or
bundled contract when the task order or
delivery order meets the definition at
2.101(b) of ‘‘consolidation’’ or
‘‘bundling’’.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. Amend section 16.506 by adding
paragraph (i) to read as follows:
16.506 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(i) See 7.107–6 for use of 52.207–XX,
Solicitation of Offers from Small
Business Concerns and Small Business
Teaming Arrangement or Joint Ventures
(Multiple-Award Contracts) in
solicitations for multiple-award
contracts above the substantial bundling
threshold of the agency.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Jun 02, 2015
Jkt 235001
14. Amend section 19.201 by revising
paragraphs (c)(5)(i), (c)(11)(ii), and
(c)(11)(iii) to read as follows:
General policy.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) * * *
(i) Identify proposed solicitations that
involve significant bundling and work
with the agency acquisition officials and
SBA to revise the procurement strategies
for such proposed solicitations to
increase the probability of participation
by small businesses as prime contractors
through Small Business Teaming
Arrangements;
*
*
*
*
*
(11) * * *
(ii) Adequacy of consolidated or
bundled contract documentation and
justifications; and
(iii) Actions taken to mitigate the
effects of necessary and justified
consolidation of contract requirements
or contract bundling on small
businesses.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 15. Amend section 19.202–1 by
revising paragraphs (e)(1)(iii), (e)(2),
(e)(2)(v), (e)(3), and (e)(4) to read as
follows:
19.202–1 Encouraging small business
participation in acquisitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(e)(1) * * *
(iii) The proposed acquisition is for a
consolidated or bundled requirement.
(See 7.107–5(a) for mandatory 30-day
notice requirement to incumbent small
business concerns.) The contracting
officer shall provide all information
relative to the justification for the
consolidation of contract requirements
or contract bundling, including the
acquisition plan or strategy, and if the
acquisition involves substantial
bundling, the information identified in
7.107–4. The contracting officer shall
also provide the same information to the
agency Office of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization.
(2) Provide a statement explaining
why the—
*
*
*
*
*
(v) The consolidation of contract
requirements or bundling is necessary
and justified.
(3) Process the 30-day notification
concurrently with other processing
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
31567
steps required prior to the issuance of
the solicitation.
(4) If the contracting officer rejects the
SBA procurement center
representative’s recommendation made
in accordance with 19.402(c)(2),
document the basis for the rejection and
notify the SBA procurement center
representative in accordance with
19.505.
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
16. Add section 52.207–XX to read as
follows:
■
52.207–XX Solicitation of Offers from
Small Business Concerns and Small
Business Teaming Arrangements or Joint
Ventures (Multiple-Award Contracts).
As prescribed in 7.107–6, insert the
following provision:
Solicitation of Offers From Small Business
Concerns and Small Business Teaming
Arrangements or Joint Ventures (MultipleAward Contracts) (Date)
(a) Definition. Small Business Teaming
Arrangement, as used in this provision—
(1) Means an arrangement where—
(i) Two or more small business concerns
have formed a joint venture; or
(ii) A potential small business prime
contractor (‘‘offeror’’) agrees with one or
more other small business concerns to have
them act as its subcontractors under a
specified Government contract. A Small
Business Teaming Arrangement between the
offeror and its small business
subcontractor(s) exists through a written
agreement between the parties that—
(A) Is specifically referred to as a ‘‘Small
Business Teaming Arrangement’’ or ‘‘Small
Business Teaming Agreement’’; and
(B) Sets forth the different responsibilities,
roles, and percentages (or other allocations)
of work as it relates to the acquisition; and
(2) May include two business concerns in
a mentor-protege relationship so long as both
the mentor and the protege are small or the
protege is small and the concerns have
received an exception to affiliation pursuant
to 13 CFR 121.103(h)(3)(ii) or (iii).
(3) See 13 CFR 121.103(b)(9) regarding the
exception to affiliation for offers received
from Small Business Teaming Arrangements.
(b) The Government is soliciting and will
consider offers from any responsible source,
including responsible small business
concerns and offers from Small Business
Teaming Arrangements or joint ventures of
small business concerns.
(End of provision)
[FR Doc. 2015–13421 Filed 6–2–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31561-31567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13421]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16, 19, and 52
[FAR Case 2014-015; Docket No. 2014-0015; Sequence No. 1]
RIN 9000-AM92
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Consolidation and Bundling of
Contract Requirements
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement sections of the Small
Business Jobs Act of 2010 and regulatory changes made by the Small
Business Administration, which provide for a Governmentwide policy on
the consolidation and bundling of contract requirements.
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the
Regulatory Secretariat at one of the addresses shown below on or before
August 3, 2015 to be considered in the formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in response to FAR Case 2014-015 by any of
the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching for ``FAR Case
2014-015''. Select the link ``Comment Now'' that corresponds with ``FAR
Case 2014-015.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Comment
Now'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and
``FAR Case 2014-015'' on your attached document.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), ATTN: Ms. Flowers, 1800 F Street NW., 2nd Floor,
Washington, DC 20405.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite FAR Case 2014-
015, in all correspondence related to this case. All comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business confidential information provided.
[[Page 31562]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Mahruba Uddowla, Procurement
Analyst, at 703-605-2868, for clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAR Case 2014-015.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to revise the FAR to implement
regulatory changes made by the Small Business Administration (SBA) in
its final rule which was published in the Federal Register at 78 FR
61113 on October 2, 2013, concerning contract consolidation and
bundling. SBA's final rule implements the statutory requirements set
forth at sections 1312 and 1313 of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010
(Jobs Act) (Pub. L. 111-240). This proposed rule will encompass the
acquisition of commercial items, including commercially available off-
the-shelf (COTS) items.
Section 1312 of the Jobs Act amends the Small Business Act at 15
U.S.C. 644(q) to require Federal agencies to include in each
solicitation for any multiple-award contract above the substantial
bundling threshold of the Federal agency a provision soliciting bids
from any responsible source, including responsible small business
teaming arrangements or joint ventures of small business concerns.
Section 1312 requires the FAR be amended to establish a Governmentwide
policy regarding contract bundling, including regarding the
solicitation of teaming and joint ventures, and to require agencies to
publish said policy on their agency Web site. Section 1312 also
requires the head of the Federal agency to publish on the Web site of
the Federal agency a list and rationale for any bundled contract for
which the Federal agency solicited bids or that was awarded by the
agency.
Section 1313 amends the Small Business Act at 15 U.S.C. 657q to
define the term ``consolidation of contract requirements'' to mean the
use of a solicitation to obtain offers for a single contract or a
multiple-award contract to satisfy two or more requirements of the
Federal agency for goods or services that have been provided to or
performed for the Federal agency under two or more separate contracts,
each of which was lower in cost than the total cost of the contract for
which the offers are solicited. The National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 (2013 NDAA), Public Law 112-239,
section 1671 further amended the definition of consolidation to include
construction requirements.
Further, section 1313 prohibits the agency from carrying out an
acquisition strategy that includes consolidation of contract
requirements of the Federal agency with an estimated total value
exceeding $2 million, unless the Senior Procurement Executive or Chief
Acquisition Officer for the Federal agency, before carrying out the
acquisition strategy--
Conducts market research;
Identifies any alternative contracting approach that would
involve a lesser degree of consolidation of contract requirements;
Makes a written determination that the consolidation of
contract requirements is necessary and justified;
Identifies any negative impact by the acquisition strategy
on contracting with small business concerns; and
Ensures that steps will be taken to include small business
concerns in the acquisition strategy.
II. Discussion and Analysis
Amendments to the FAR are proposed by this rule. The proposed
changes are summarized in the following paragraphs.
A. FAR Subpart 2.1, Definitions. This subpart is amended to revise
the definition of ``bundling'' for clarity, incorporating the
definition of ``bundled contract'', and to add a new definition for
``consolidation, consolidation of contract requirements, consolidated
contract or consolidated requirement''. In keeping with SBA's final
rule and section 1671 of the NDAA for FY 2013, Public Law 112-239, the
latter definition also encompasses the consolidation of construction
requirements. This subpart is also amended to add a definition for
``small business teaming arrangement''.
B. FAR Subpart 5.2, Synopses of Proposed Contract Actions. A
conforming cross-reference has been added at FAR 5.205(g).
C. FAR Subpart 7.1, Acquisition Plans.
FAR 7.103--This section is amended to clarify that
agencies are to ensure that unnecessary and unjustified consolidation
is avoided.
FAR 7.104--This section is amended to remove the
substantial bundling thresholds at FAR 7.104. The substantial bundling
thresholds are relocated to the proposed new section FAR 7.107-4,
Substantial Bundling, for clarity and consistency with the new proposed
structure of FAR 7.107. An additional revision was made to clarify that
small business is to be a discipline that is represented in the
acquisition planning team.
FAR 7.105--This section is amended by adding a reference
to the statutory authority for limiting the use of acquisition
strategies involving the consolidation of contract requirements.
FAR 7.107--This section is amended by revising the title
of the section and adding the statutory authority for the consolidation
of contract requirements. This section also proposes to clarify that if
a requirement is considered both consolidated and bundled, the agency
must follow the guidance regarding bundling. In addition, this section
is amended by restructuring FAR 7.107 to add proposed subsections FAR
7.707-1, General, FAR 7.107-2, Consolidation of contract requirements,
FAR 7.107-3 Bundling, FAR 7.107-4 Substantial Bundling, FAR 7.107-5
Notifications, and 7.107-6 Solicitation provision. The proposed
revisions are as follows:
[cir] FAR 7.107-1--General. This proposed new section provides
information relevant to both consolidation and bundling, such as
evaluation of benefits, substantial benefits, and applicability.
[cir] FAR 7.107-2--Consolidation of contract requirements. This
proposed new section is added to clarify that an agency may not conduct
an acquisition exceeding $2 million that is a consolidation of contract
requirements unless the agency's Senior Procurement Executive or Chief
Acquisition Officer: (1) Justifies the consolidation by showing that
the benefits of the consolidated acquisition substantially exceed the
benefits of each possible alternative approach that would involve a
lesser degree of consolidation and (2) identify any negative impact by
the acquisition strategy on contracting with small business concerns.
[cir] FAR 7.107-3--Bundling. This proposed new section clarifies
language regarding the requirements a contracting officer must adhere
to prior to conducting an acquisition strategy that involves the
bundling of contract requirements.
[cir] FAR 7.107-4--Substantial Bundling. This proposed new section
includes the substantial bundling thresholds relocated from FAR
7.104(d) and existing documentation requirements.
[cir] FAR 7.107-5--Notifications. This proposed new section is
added to require Federal agencies to: (1) Notify current small business
contractors of an agency's intent to bundle a contract requirement that
was not previously bundled at least 30 days prior to the issuance of
the solicitation; (2) provide public notification of an agency's intent
to bundle by publishing on the agency's
[[Page 31563]]
Web site a list and rationale for any bundled requirement for which the
agency solicited offers or issued an award; (3) require the agency to
notify SBA of a follow-on bundled or consolidated contract requirement;
and (4) publish the Governmentwide policy regarding contract bundling,
including regarding the solicitation of teaming and joint ventures, on
their agency Web site.
[cir] FAR 7.107-6--Solicitation Provision. This proposed new
section is added to prescribe a new provision 52.207-XX ``Solicitation
of Offers from Small Business Concerns and Small Business Teaming
Arrangements or Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award Contracts)'', in
solicitations for multiple-award contracts that are estimated to be
above the agency's substantial bundling threshold.
D. FAR Subpart 8.4, Federal Supply Schedules. Proposed revisions to
FAR 8.404(c)(2) are necessary to apply consolidation requirements to
orders.
E. FAR Part 10, Market Research. Proposed revisions to FAR 10.001
are necessary to add references to the statutory authority for the
consolidation of contract requirements.
F. FAR Subpart 12.3, Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses
for the Acquisition of Commercial Items. Proposed revisions to FAR
12.301(d)(4) are necessary to add a reference to the new provision for
multiple-award contracts over the substantial bundling thresholds at
FAR 52.207-XX, Solicitation of Offers from Small Business Concerns and
Small Business Teaming Arrangements or Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award
Contracts).
G. FAR Subpart 15.3, Source Selection.
FAR 15.304, Evaluation factors and significant subfactors.
This section is amended by adding references to the consolidation of
contract requirements.
H. FAR Subpart 16.5, Indefinite-Delivery Contracts.
FAR 16.505, Ordering. This section is amended to apply
consolidation requirements to orders.
FAR 16.506, Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.
This section is amended by adding a cross-reference to the prescription
in FAR Subpart 7.1 for a new provision ``Solicitation of Offers from
Small Business Concerns and Small Business Teaming Arrangements or
Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award Contracts)''.
I. Subpart 19.2, Policies.
FAR 19.201 General policy and 19.202-1 Encouraging small
business participation in acquisitions. These sections are amended by
adding references to the consolidation of contract requirements.
J. FAR Subpart 52.2, Text of Provisions and Clauses.
FAR 52.207-XX, Solicitation of Offers from Small Business
Concerns and Small Business Teaming Arrangements or Joint Ventures
(Multiple-Award Contracts). This section is amended to include this
provision in solicitations for multiple-award contracts when the
estimated contract value is expected to exceed the agency's substantial
bundling threshold. The agency shall consider offers from any
responsible source, including responsible small business concerns and
teaming arrangements or joint ventures of small business concerns.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The change may have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is summarized as follows:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the FAR to provide
uniform guidance consistent with SBA's final rule which was
published in the Federal Register at 78 FR 61113 on October 2, 2013,
which implements sections 1312 and 1313 of the Small Business Jobs
Act of 2010, Public Law 111-240.
The objective of this proposed rule is to alleviate the adverse
effects of contract bundling and consolidation on small business
concerns competing for Federal contracts. This rule provides a
balance between the benefits of bundling and consolidation and the
obstacles they create for small businesses. The authorizing
legislation for this action is sections 1312 and 1313 of the Small
Business Jobs Act of 2010, Public Law 111-240, and section 1671 of
the NDAA for FY 2013 Public Law 112-239. Section 1671 in conjunction
with section 1313 now provides for a Governmentwide requirement and
threshold for consolidated contracts.
This rule may have a positive economic impact on any small
business entity that wishes to participate in the Federal
procurement arena. Analysis of the System for Award Management (SAM)
database indicates there are over 351,203 small business registrants
that can potentially benefit from the implementation of this rule.
This rule does not impose any new reporting, recordkeeping or
other compliance requirements. The rule does not duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with any other Federal rules.
The Regulatory Secretariat has submitted a copy of the IRFA to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. A copy
of the IRFA may be obtained from the Regulatory Secretariat. DoD, GSA,
and NASA invite comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by the rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (FAR Case 2014-015),
in correspondence.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16, 19,
and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: May 28, 2015.
William Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA propose amending 48 CFR parts 2, 5,
7, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16, 19, and 52 as set forth below:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16,
19, and 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51
U.S.C. 20113.
PART 2--DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS
0
2. Amend section 2.101 in paragraph (b) by--
0
a. Removing the definition ``Bundled contract'';
0
b. Revising the definition ``Bundling'';
0
c. Adding, in alphabetical order, the definitions ``Consolidation,
[[Page 31564]]
consolidation of contract requirements, consolidated contract, or
consolidated requirement''; and ``Small Business Teaming Arrangement''.
The revised and added text reads as follows:
2.101 Definitions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
Bundling or bundled contract--
(1) Means the consolidating or combining of two or more
requirements for supplies or services, previously provided or performed
under separate smaller contracts, into a solicitation for a single
contract, a multiple-award contract, a task order or delivery order
that is likely to be unsuitable for award to a small business concern
(but may be suitable for award to a small business with a Small
Business Teaming Arrangement) due to--
(i) The diversity, size, or specialized nature of the elements of
the performance specified;
(ii) The aggregate dollar value of the anticipated award;
(iii) The geographical dispersion of the contract performance
sites; or
(iv) Any combination of the factors described in paragraphs (1)(i),
(ii), and (iii) of this definition.
(2) ``Separate smaller contract'' as used in this definition, means
a contract that has been performed by one or more small business
concerns or that was suitable for award to one or more small business
concerns.
(3) This definition does not apply to a contract that will be
awarded and performed entirely outside of the United States.
(4) (See 7.107-4 for a description of substantial bundling.)
* * * * *
Consolidation, consolidation of contract requirements, consolidated
contract, or consolidated requirement--
(1) Means a solicitation for a single contract, a multiple-award
contract, a task order, or a delivery order to satisfy--
(i) Two or more requirements of the Federal agency for supplies or
services that have been provided to or performed for the Federal agency
under two or more separate contracts, each of which was lower in cost
than the total cost of the contract for which offers are solicited; or
(ii) Requirements of the Federal agency for construction projects
to be performed at two or more discrete sites.
(2) Separate contract as used in this definition, means a contract
that has been performed by any business, including small and other than
small business concerns.
* * * * *
Small Business Teaming Arrangement--
(1) Means an arrangement where--
(i) Two or more small business concerns have formed a joint
venture; or
(ii) A potential small business prime contractor (``offeror'')
agrees with one or more other small business concerns to have them act
as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract. A Small
Business Teaming Arrangement between the offeror and its small business
subcontractor(s) exists through a written agreement between the parties
that--
(A) Is specifically referred to as a Small Business Teaming
Arrangement or Small Business Teaming Agreement; and
(B) Sets forth the different responsibilities, roles, and
percentages (or other allocations) of work as it relates to the
acquisition; and
(2) May include two business concerns in a mentor-protege
relationship so long as both the mentor and the protege are small or
the protege is small and the concerns have received an exception to
affiliation pursuant to 13 CFR 121.103(h)(3)(ii) or (iii).
(3) See 13 CFR 121.103(b)(9) regarding the exception to affiliation
for offers received from Small Business Teaming Arrangements.
* * * * *
PART 5--PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS
0
3. Amend section 5.205 by adding paragraph (g) to read as follows:
5.205 Special situations.
* * * * *
(g) Notification to public of rationale for bundled requirement.
See 7.107-5(b)(2) with regard to notification to FedBizOpps.gov before
issuance of the solicitation of any bundled requirement.
PART 7--ACQUISITION PLANNING
0
4. Amend section 7.103 by revising paragraph (u)(2) to read as follows:
7.103 Agency-head responsibilities.
* * * * *
(u) * * *
(2) Avoid unnecessary and unjustified consolidation or bundling of
contract requirements that precludes small business participation as
prime contractors (see 7.107) (15 U.S.C. 631(j) and 15 U.S.C. 657(q)).
* * * * *
0
5. Amend section 7.104 by removing from paragraph (a) ``contracting,''
and adding ``contracting, small business,'' in its place; and revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
7.104 General procedures.
* * * * *
(d) The planner shall coordinate the acquisition plan or strategy
with the cognizant small business specialist when the strategy
contemplates an acquisition meeting the dollar amounts for substantial
bundling unless the contract or task order or delivery order is
entirely reserved or set-aside for small business under part 19. The
small business specialist shall notify the agency Office of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization or the Office of Small Business
Programs if the strategy involves consolidation or bundling that is
unnecessary, unjustified, or not identified as consolidated or bundled
by the agency (see 7.107 for further guidance regarding consolidation
and bundling).
* * * * *
0
6. Amend section 7.105 by revising paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
7.105 Contents of written acquisition plans.
* * * * *
(b) Plan of action. (1) Sources. (i) Indicate the prospective
sources of supplies or services that can meet the need.
(ii) Consider required sources of supplies or services (see part 8)
and sources identifiable through databases including the Governmentwide
database of contracts and other procurement instruments intended for
use by multiple agencies available at https://www.contractdirectory.gov/contractdirectory/.
(iii) Include consideration of small business, veteran-owned small
business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small
business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business
concerns (see part 19).
(iv) Consider the impact of any consolidation or bundling that
might affect participation of small businesses in the acquisition (see
7.107) (15 U.S.C. 644(e) and 15 U.S.C. 657(q)). When the proposed
acquisition strategy involves the consolidation or bundling of contract
requirements, identify the incumbent contractors and contracts affected
by the consolidation or bundling.
(v) Address the extent and results of the market research and
indicate their impact on the various elements of the plan (see part
10).
* * * * *
[[Page 31565]]
0
7. Revise section 7.107 to read as follows:
7.107 Additional requirements for acquisitions involving
consolidation, bundling, or substantial bundling.
7.107-1 General.
(a) Consolidation and bundling of contract requirements may provide
substantial benefits to the Government. However, because of the
potential impact on small business participation, the agency shall
conduct market research and any required analysis to determine whether
consolidation is necessary and justified in accordance with 15 U.S.C.
657(q) or if bundling is necessary and justified pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
644(e)(2).
(b) A consolidated or bundled requirement is necessary and
justified if the benefits of the acquisition strategy substantially
exceed the benefits of each of the possible alternative contracting
approaches identified.
(c) Such benefits may include--
(1) Cost savings;
(2) Price reduction;
(3) Quality improvements that will save time or improve or enhance
performance or efficiency;
(4) Reduction in acquisition cycle times, or
(5) Better terms and conditions.
(d) Benefits are substantial if individually, in combination, or in
the aggregate the anticipated financial benefits are equivalent to--
(1) Ten percent of the estimated contract or order value (including
options) if the value is $94 million or less; or
(2) Five percent of the estimated contract or order value
(including options) or $9.4 million, whichever is greater, if the value
exceeds $94 million.
(e) Reduction of administrative or personnel costs alone is not
sufficient justification for consolidation or bundling unless the cost
savings are expected to be at least 10 percent of the estimated
contract or order value (including options) of the consolidated or
bundled requirements. For consolidated requirements, the Senior
Procurement Executive or Chief Acquisition Officer must make a
determination of the cost savings (15 U.S.C. 657(q)(c)(2)).
(f) If the requirement is considered both consolidated and bundled,
the agency shall follow the guidance regarding bundling in 7.107-3 and
7.107-4).
(g) The requirements of this section do not apply--
(1) Except 7.107-4, if a cost comparison analysis will be performed
in accordance with OMB Circular A-76; and
(2) To orders against single-agency task-order contracts or
delivery-order contracts, if the requirement was considered in
determining that the consolidation or bundling of the underlying
contract was necessary and justified.
7.107-2 Consolidation of contract requirements.
(a) Before conducting an acquisition that is a consolidation of
contract requirements with an estimated total dollar value exceeding $2
million, the Senior Procurement Executive or Chief Acquisition Officer
shall make a written determination that the consolidation of contract
requirements is necessary and justified, after ensuring that--
(1) Market research has been conducted;
(2) Any alternative contracting approaches that would involve a
lesser degree of consolidation of contract requirements have been
identified;
(3) The determination is coordinated with the agency's Office of
Small Disadvantaged Business Utilization or the Office of Small
Business Programs;
(4) Any negative impact by the acquisition strategy on contracting
with small business concerns has been identified; and
(5) Steps are taken to include small business concerns in the
acquisition strategy.
(b) The Senior Procurement Executive or Chief Acquisition Officer
may determine that the consolidation of contract requirements is
necessary and justified if, as compared to the benefits that would be
derived from the alternative contracting approaches identified under
paragraph (a)(2) of this subsection, consolidation would derive
substantial benefits (see 7.107-1(d)).
(c) If a determination is made, the contracting officer shall
include it in the acquisition strategy documentation and provide it to
SBA upon request.
7.107-3 Bundling.
(a) Before conducting an acquisition strategy that involves the
bundling of contract requirements, the agency shall make a written
determination that the bundling is necessary and justified. A bundled
requirement is considered necessary and justified if the agency would
obtain measurably substantial benefits as compared to meeting its
agency's requirements through separate smaller contracts or orders.
(b) The agency shall quantify the specific benefits identified
through the use of market research and other techniques to explain how
their impact would be measurably substantial (see 10.001(a)(2)(iv) and
(a)(3)(vi)).
(c) Without power of delegation, the service acquisition executive
for the military departments, the component acquisition executive for
the Defense Logistics Agency, the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics for the defense agencies, or the
Deputy Secretary or equivalent for the civilian agencies may determine
that bundling is necessary and justified when--
(1) The expected benefits do not meet the thresholds for a
substantial benefit but are critical to the agency's mission success;
and
(2) The acquisition strategy provides for maximum practicable
participation by small business concerns.
(d) In assessing whether cost savings and/or price reduction would
be achieved through bundling, the agency and SBA shall--
(1) Compare the price that has been charged by small businesses for
the work that they have performed; or
(2) Where previous prices are not available, compare the price,
based on market research, that could have been or could be charged by
small businesses for the work not previously performed by other than a
small business.
(e) If a determination is made, the contracting officer shall
include it in the acquisition strategy documentation and provide it to
SBA upon request.
7.107-4 Substantial bundling.
(a)(1) Substantial bundling is any bundling that results in a
contract or order with an estimated value of--
(i) $8 million or more for the Department of Defense;
(ii) $6 million or more for the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, the General Services Administration, and the Department
of Energy; or
(iii) $2.5 million or more for all other agencies.
(2) These thresholds apply to the cumulative estimated dollar value
(including options) of--
(i) Multiple-award contracts;
(ii) Task orders or delivery orders issued against a GSA Schedule
contract; or
(iii) Task orders or delivery orders issued against a task-order or
delivery-order contract awarded by another agency.
(b) In addition to addressing the requirements for bundling (see
7.107-3), when the proposed acquisition strategy involves substantial
bundling, the agency shall document in its strategy--
(1) The specific benefits anticipated to be derived from
substantial bundling;
[[Page 31566]]
(2) An assessment of the specific impediments to participation by
small business concerns as contractors that result from substantial
bundling;
(3) Actions designed to maximize small business participation as
contractors, including provisions that encourage small business
teaming;
(4) Actions designed to maximize small business participation as
subcontractors (including suppliers) at any tier under the contract, or
order, that may be awarded to meet the requirements;
(5) The determination that the anticipated benefits of the proposed
bundled contract or order justify its use; and
(6) Alternative strategies that would reduce or minimize the scope
of the bundling, and the rationale for not choosing those alternatives.
7.107-5 Notifications.
(a) Notifications to current small business contractors of agency's
intent to bundle.
(1) The contracting officer shall notify each small business
performing a contract that it intends to bundle the requirement with
one or more other requirements at least 30 days prior to the issuance
of the solicitation for the bundled requirement.
(2) The notification shall provide the name, phone number and
address of the applicable SBA procurement center representative (PCR),
or if a PCR is not assigned to the procuring activity, the SBA Office
of Government Contracting Area Office serving the area in which the
buying activity is located (see subpart 19.4 regarding the duties and
responsibilities of the SBA PCR).
(3) This notification shall be documented in the contract file.
(b) Notification to public of rationale for bundled requirement.
(1) The agency shall publish on its Web site a list and rationale
for any bundled requirement for which the agency solicited offers or
issued an award. The notification shall be made within 30 days of the
agency's data certification regarding the validity and verification of
data entered in the Federal Procurement Data System to the Office of
Federal Procurement Policy (see 4.604).
(2) In addition, the agency is encouraged to provide to
FedBizOpps.gov, before issuance of the solicitation, notification of
the rationale for any bundled requirement (see 5.201).
(c) Notification to SBA of follow-on bundled or consolidated
requirements. For each follow-on bundled or consolidated contract (even
if additional requirements have been added or some have been deleted),
the contracting officer shall obtain from the requiring activity and
notify the SBA PCR as soon as possible but no later than 30 days prior
to issuance of the solicitation of--
(1) The amount of savings and benefits achieved under the prior
consolidation or bundling of contract requirements;
(2) Whether such savings and benefits will continue to be realized
if the contract remains consolidated or bundled; and
(3) Whether such savings and benefits would be greater if the
procurement requirements were divided into separate solicitations
suitable for award to small business concerns.
(d) Public notification of bundling policy. In accordance with 15
U.S.C. 644(q)(2)(A)(ii), agencies shall publish the Governmentwide
policy regarding contract bundling, including regarding the
solicitation of teaming and joint ventures, on their agency Web site.
7.107-6 Solicitation provision.
The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.207-XX,
Solicitation of Offers from Small Business Concerns and Small Business
Teaming Arrangements or Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award Contracts), in
solicitations for multiple-award contracts above the substantial
bundling threshold of the agency.
PART 8--REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
0
8. Amend section 8.404 by revising paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
8.404 Use of Federal Supply Schedules.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Shall comply with all FAR requirements for a consolidated or
bundled contract when the task order or delivery order meets the
definition at 2.101(b) of ``consolidation'' or ``bundling''; and
* * * * *
PART 10--MARKET RESEARCH
0
9. Amend section 10.001 by--
0
a. Removing from the introductory text of paragraph (a) ``Agencies
must--'' and adding ``Agencies shall--'' in its place;
0
b. Revising paragraphs (a)(2)(iv) and (a)(2)(vi)(B);
0
c. Removing from the end of paragraph (a)(3)(v) ``efficiency; and'' and
adding ``efficiency;'' in its place;
0
d. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(3)(vi) and (a)(3)(vii) as paragraphs
(a)(3)(vii) and (a)(3)(viii), respectively;
0
e. Adding a new paragraph (a)(3)(vi);
0
f. Revising the newly designated paragraph (a)(3)(vii); and
0
g. Revising paragraph (c) to read as follows.
10.001 Policy.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) Before soliciting offers for acquisitions that could lead to a
consolidated or bundled contract (15 U.S.C. 644(e)(2)(A) and 15 U.S.C.
657q);
* * * * *
(B) Disaster relief to include debris removal, distribution of
supplies, reconstruction, and other disaster or emergency relief
activities (see 26.205); and
(3) * * *
(vi) Determine whether consolidation is necessary and justified
(see 7.107-2) (15 U.S.C. 657q);
(vii) Determine whether bundling is necessary and justified (see
7.107-3) (15 U.S.C. 644(e)(2)(A)); and
* * * * *
(c) If an agency contemplates awarding a consolidated or bundled
contract, the agency--
(1) When performing market research, should consult with the agency
small business specialist and the local Small Business Administration
procurement center representative (PCR). If a PCR is not assigned, see
19.402(a); and
(2) Shall notify any affected incumbent small business concerns of
the Government's intention to bundle the requirement and how small
business concerns may contact the appropriate Small Business
Administration procurement center representative (see 7.107-5(a).
* * * * *
PART 12--ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS
0
10. Amend section 12.301 by redesignating paragraphs (d)(3) through
(d)(6) as paragraphs (d)(4) through (d)(7), respectively; and adding a
new paragraph (d)(3) to read as follows:
12.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the
acquisition of commercial items.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) Insert the provision at 52.207-XX, Solicitation of Offers from
Small Business Concerns and Small Business Teaming Arrangements or
Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award Contracts), as prescribed at 7.107-6.
* * * * *
[[Page 31567]]
PART 15--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
0
11. Amend section 15.304 by revising paragraphs (c)(3)(ii) and (c)(4)
to read as follows:
15.304 Evaluation factors and significant subfactors.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) For solicitations involving the consolidation of contract
requirements or bundling that offer a significant opportunity for
subcontracting, the contracting officer shall include a factor to
evaluate past performance indicating the extent to which the offeror
attained applicable goals for small business participation under
contracts that required subcontracting plans (15 U.S.C.
637(d)(4)(G)(ii)).
* * * * *
(4) For solicitations involving the consolidation of contract
requirements or bundling that offer a significant opportunity for
subcontracting, the contracting officer shall include proposed small
business subcontracting participation in the subcontracting plan as an
evaluation factor (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)(G)(i)).
* * * * *
PART 16--TYPES OF CONTRACTS
0
12. Amend section 16.505 by revising paragraph (a)(8)(iii) to read as
follows:
16.505 Ordering.
(a) * * *
(8) * * *
(iii) Shall comply with all FAR requirements for a consolidated or
bundled contract when the task order or delivery order meets the
definition at 2.101(b) of ``consolidation'' or ``bundling''.
* * * * *
0
13. Amend section 16.506 by adding paragraph (i) to read as follows:
16.506 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.
* * * * *
(i) See 7.107-6 for use of 52.207-XX, Solicitation of Offers from
Small Business Concerns and Small Business Teaming Arrangement or Joint
Ventures (Multiple-Award Contracts) in solicitations for multiple-award
contracts above the substantial bundling threshold of the agency.
PART 19--SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
0
14. Amend section 19.201 by revising paragraphs (c)(5)(i), (c)(11)(ii),
and (c)(11)(iii) to read as follows:
19.201 General policy.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) * * *
(i) Identify proposed solicitations that involve significant
bundling and work with the agency acquisition officials and SBA to
revise the procurement strategies for such proposed solicitations to
increase the probability of participation by small businesses as prime
contractors through Small Business Teaming Arrangements;
* * * * *
(11) * * *
(ii) Adequacy of consolidated or bundled contract documentation and
justifications; and
(iii) Actions taken to mitigate the effects of necessary and
justified consolidation of contract requirements or contract bundling
on small businesses.
* * * * *
0
15. Amend section 19.202-1 by revising paragraphs (e)(1)(iii), (e)(2),
(e)(2)(v), (e)(3), and (e)(4) to read as follows:
19.202-1 Encouraging small business participation in acquisitions.
* * * * *
(e)(1) * * *
(iii) The proposed acquisition is for a consolidated or bundled
requirement. (See 7.107-5(a) for mandatory 30-day notice requirement to
incumbent small business concerns.) The contracting officer shall
provide all information relative to the justification for the
consolidation of contract requirements or contract bundling, including
the acquisition plan or strategy, and if the acquisition involves
substantial bundling, the information identified in 7.107-4. The
contracting officer shall also provide the same information to the
agency Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization.
(2) Provide a statement explaining why the--
* * * * *
(v) The consolidation of contract requirements or bundling is
necessary and justified.
(3) Process the 30-day notification concurrently with other
processing steps required prior to the issuance of the solicitation.
(4) If the contracting officer rejects the SBA procurement center
representative's recommendation made in accordance with 19.402(c)(2),
document the basis for the rejection and notify the SBA procurement
center representative in accordance with 19.505.
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
16. Add section 52.207-XX to read as follows:
52.207-XX Solicitation of Offers from Small Business Concerns and
Small Business Teaming Arrangements or Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award
Contracts).
As prescribed in 7.107-6, insert the following provision:
Solicitation of Offers From Small Business Concerns and Small Business
Teaming Arrangements or Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award Contracts)
(Date)
(a) Definition. Small Business Teaming Arrangement, as used in
this provision--
(1) Means an arrangement where--
(i) Two or more small business concerns have formed a joint
venture; or
(ii) A potential small business prime contractor (``offeror'')
agrees with one or more other small business concerns to have them
act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract. A
Small Business Teaming Arrangement between the offeror and its small
business subcontractor(s) exists through a written agreement between
the parties that--
(A) Is specifically referred to as a ``Small Business Teaming
Arrangement'' or ``Small Business Teaming Agreement''; and
(B) Sets forth the different responsibilities, roles, and
percentages (or other allocations) of work as it relates to the
acquisition; and
(2) May include two business concerns in a mentor-protege
relationship so long as both the mentor and the protege are small or
the protege is small and the concerns have received an exception to
affiliation pursuant to 13 CFR 121.103(h)(3)(ii) or (iii).
(3) See 13 CFR 121.103(b)(9) regarding the exception to
affiliation for offers received from Small Business Teaming
Arrangements.
(b) The Government is soliciting and will consider offers from
any responsible source, including responsible small business
concerns and offers from Small Business Teaming Arrangements or
joint ventures of small business concerns.
(End of provision)
[FR Doc. 2015-13421 Filed 6-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P