Privacy Act; Implementation, 31336-31338 [2015-13166]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
31336
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 105 / Tuesday, June 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
seeks comments on the relative value of
limiting the use of SAFMRs to those
agencies exhibiting a pattern of HCV
tenant concentration in high-poverty
areas versus using SAFMRs for all PHAs
servicing an area where HCV tenants are
concentrated in high-poverty areas.
5. Voluntary participation: Should a
PHA be allowed to use SAFMRs even if
the PHA or the underlying metropolitan
area would not qualify for the use of
SAFMRs? Qualification thresholds as
discussed above will invariably result in
‘‘near misses’’ of areas or PHAs falling
just below qualification thresholds, but
where PHAs may see value in the
SAFMR approach for addressing
voucher concentration, or providing
better access to opportunity. HUD seeks
comment on whether the choice to use
SAFMRs should be entirely up to
individual PHAs, or if participation
should be limited in some way.
6. PBV Use of SAFMRs: Should
SAFMRs be applied to PBVs at least for
future PBV projects? HUD seeks
comment on whether the SAFMRs
should be applied to PBV assistance as
well as tenant-based rental assistance.
Under the PBV program, one of the
limitations on the amount of subsidy
that may be paid is that the rent to
owner may not exceed 110 percent of
the applicable FMR (or an exception
payment standard approved by the
Secretary) for the unit bedroom size
minus any utility allowance. As a result,
the use of SAFMRs for future PBV
projects could potentially increase the
number of PBV units that are located in
areas of opportunity, because the
SAFMRs would recognize the higher
rents that are prevalent in more
desirable neighborhoods, rather than
applying the same 110 percent FMR
limitation to all PBV projects
throughout the entire metro area,
regardless of the project’s location.
Because the 110 percent FMR rent
limitation applies not only to the initial
rent to owner but also to the redetermined rent to owner during the
term of the HAP contract, a change to
SAFMRs could impact the rents for
existing PBV projects and could have an
adverse impact on some PBV projects.
Should the applicability of SAFMRs to
PBV be limited to future PBV projects
(or limited in some other manner) so
that the change would not potentially
impact the rents of existing PBV
projects?
7. Success Rate Payment Standards:
In addition to using Small Area FMRs as
a tool to alleviate concentrations of
voucher tenants in high poverty areas,
should Small Area FMRs also be used
in areas that qualify for success rate
payment standards? HUD seeks
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Jun 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
comment on whether the Success Rate
Payment Standard regulations (24 CFR
982.503(e)) should continue to use 50th
percentile FMRs or if these areas would
also benefit from operating under Small
Area FMRs. Raising the level of rents
across an entire FMR area to the 50th
percentile may be necessary in areas
where current success rates are low;
consequently, the Department could
continue to produce 50th percentile
rents for this purpose. Such an area may
not have enough of a rent differential
and/or may not be in a metropolitan
area and may benefit from the higher
payment standard, up to 110 percent of
the 50th percentile rent.
8. Relevant PHA Experience: What
information do PHAs currently using
SAFMRs (Dallas area and SAFMR
Demonstration PHAs), or other PHAs
that have used SAFMRs for helping set
Housing Choice Voucher payment
standards (such as PHAs in the Moving
to Work Demonstration) have regarding
their use of Small Area FMRs? HUD is
seeking information about the impacts
of implementing Small Area FMRs,
including (but not limited to)
administrative burden, tenant outcomes
and landlord participation.
Environmental Impact
A Finding of No Significant Impact
with respect to the environment as
required by the National Environmental
Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321–4374) is
unnecessary, since the Housing Choice
Voucher Program is categorically
excluded from the Department’s
National Environmental Policy Act
procedures under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(d).
Regulatory Review—Executive Orders
12866 and 13563
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), a determination
must be made whether a regulatory
action is significant and therefore,
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in
accordance with the requirements of the
order. Executive Order 13563
(Improving Regulations and Regulatory
Review) directs executive agencies to
analyze regulations that are ‘‘outmoded,
ineffective, insufficient, or excessively
burdensome, and to modify, streamline,
expand, or repeal them in accordance
with what has been learned. Executive
Order 13563 also directs that, where
relevant, feasible, and consistent with
regulatory objectives, and to the extent
permitted by law, agencies are to
identify and consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and
maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public. This advance
notice of proposed rulemaking was
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
reviewed by OMB and determined to
likely result in a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ as defined in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, and potentially
an ‘‘economically significant action,’’ as
provided in section 3(f)(1) of that Order.
The docket file is available for public
inspection in the Regulations Division,
Office of the General Counsel, 451 7th
Street SW., Room 10276, Washington,
DC 20410–0500. Due to security
measures at the HUD Headquarters
building, please schedule an
appointment to review the docket file by
calling the Regulations Division at 202–
708–3055 (this is not a toll-free
number). Individuals with speech or
hearing impairments may access this
number via TTY by calling the Federal
Relay Service at 800–877–8339.
Dated: May 27, 2015.
Katherine M. O’Regan,
Assistant Secretary for Policy Development
and Research.
[FR Doc. 2015–13430 Filed 6–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Secretary
31 CFR Part 1
RIN 1505–AC50
Privacy Act; Implementation
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974,
as amended, the Department of the
Treasury (Treasury) amends this part to
partially exempt a new Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)
system of records entitled ‘‘Treasury/CC
.800—Office of Inspector General
Investigations System’’ from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than July 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Because paper mail in the
Washington, DC area and at the OCC is
subject to delay, commenters are
encouraged to submit comments by
email, if possible. Please use the title
‘‘Proposed Rule for New Privacy Act
System of Records’’ to facilitate the
organization and distribution of the
comments. You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email: regs.comments@
occ.treas.gov.
• Mail: Legislative and Regulatory
Activities Division, Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 105 / Tuesday, June 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Street SW., Suite 3E–218, Mail Stop
9W–11, Washington, DC 20219.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th
Street SW., Suite 3E–218, Mail Stop
9W–11, Washington, DC 20219.
• Fax: (571) 465–4326.
Instructions: You must include
‘‘OCC’’ as the agency name and the
docket number in your comment. In
general, OCC will enter all comments
received into the docket without
change, including any business or
personal information that you provide
such as name and address information,
email addresses, or phone numbers.
Comments received, including
attachments and other supporting
materials, are part of the public record
and subject to public disclosure. Do not
enclose any information in your
comment or supporting materials that
you consider confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure.
You may review comments and other
related materials that pertain to this
notice by appearing personally to
inspect and photocopy comments at the
OCC, 400 7th Street SW., Washington,
DC. For security reasons, the OCC
requires that visitors make an
appointment to inspect comments. You
may do so by calling (202) 649–6700.
Upon arrival, visitors will be required to
present valid government-issued photo
identification and to submit to security
screening in order to inspect and
photocopy comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Merritt, Special Counsel, Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400
7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the head of an agency
may promulgate rules to exempt a
system of records from certain
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a if the system
is investigatory material compiled for
law enforcement purposes. Treasury is
hereby giving notice of a proposed rule
to exempt ‘‘Treasury/CC .800–Office of
Inspector General Investigations
System’’ from certain provisions of the
Privacy Act of 1974, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). The proposed
exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2) is from provisions (c)(3),
(d)(1)–(4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G)–(I), and (f)
because the system contains
investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes. The following
are the reasons why this system of
records maintained by the OCC is
exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2)
of the Privacy Act of 1974:
(1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3). This provision
of the Privacy Act provides for the
release of the disclosure accounting
required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(1) and (2)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Jun 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
to the individual named in the record at
his/her request. The reasons for
exempting this system of records from
the foregoing provision are:
(i) The release of disclosure
accounting would put the subject of an
investigation on notice that an
investigation exists and that such
person is the subject of that
investigation.
(ii) Such release would provide the
subject of an investigation with an
accurate accounting of the date, nature,
and purpose of each disclosure and the
name and address of the person or
agency to which disclosure was made.
The release of such information to the
subject of an investigation would
provide the subject with significant
information concerning the nature of the
investigation and could result in the
alteration or destruction of documentary
evidence, the improper influencing of
witnesses, and other activities that
could impede or compromise the
investigation.
(iii) Release to the individual of the
disclosure accounting would alert the
individual as to which agencies were
investigating the subject and the scope
of the investigation and could aid the
individual in impeding or
compromising investigations by those
agencies.
(2) 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(1)–(4), (e)(4)(G),
(e)(4)(H), and (f). These provisions of the
Privacy Act relate to an individual’s
right to be notified of:
(i) The existence of records pertaining
to such individual;
(ii) Requirements for identifying an
individual who requested access to
records;
(iii) The agency procedures relating to
access to and amendment of records;
(iv) The content of the information
contained in such records; and
(v) The civil remedies available to the
individual in the event of an adverse
determination by an agency concerning
access to or amendment of information
contained in record systems.
The reasons for exempting this system
of records from the foregoing provisions
are that notifying an individual (at the
individual’s request) of the existence of
an investigative file pertaining to such
individual or granting access to, or the
right to amend, such an investigative
file pertaining to such individual could
allow individuals to learn whether they
have been identified as suspects or
subjects of an investigation. Such
knowledge would impair and interfere
with the OCC’s, the OIG’s, and other
agencies’ investigative, enforcement, or
criminal proceedings because
individuals could:
(i) Take steps to avoid detection;
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31337
(ii) Inform associates than an
investigation is in process;
(iii) Learn the nature of the
investigation;
(iv) Begin, continue, or resume illegal
conduct upon learning that they are not
identified in the system of records;
(iv) Destroy evidence needed to prove
the violation;
(v) Constitute an unwarranted
invasion of the personal privacy of
others;
(vi) Disclose the identity of
confidential sources and reveal
confidential information supplied by
such sources; or
(vii) Disclose investigative techniques
and procedures.
(3) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1). This provision
of the Privacy Act requires each agency
to maintain in its records only such
information about an individual as is
relevant and necessary to accomplish a
purpose of the agency required to be
accomplished by statute or executive
order. The reasons for exempting this
system of records from the foregoing
requirements is that: At the time that the
OCC collects information it often lacks
sufficient time to determine whether the
information is relevant and necessary to
accomplish the purposes of an
investigation. Therefore, what appears
relevant and necessary when first
received may subsequently be
determined to be irrelevant or
unnecessary. It is only after the
information is evaluated that the
relevance and necessity of such
information can be established with
certainty.
(4) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I). This
provision of the Privacy Act requires the
publication of the categories of sources
of records in each system of records.
The reasons for claiming an exemption
from this provision are as follows:
(i) Revealing categories of sources of
information could disclose investigative
techniques and procedures.
(ii) Revealing categories of sources of
information could cause sources who
supply information to investigators to
refrain from giving such information
because of fear of reprisal, or fear of
breach of promises of anonymity and
confidentiality.
(iii) Revealing categories of sources
could cause informers to refuse to give
full information to investigators for fear
of having their identities as sources
disclosed.
Treasury will publish the notice of the
proposed new system of records
separately in the Federal Register.
Pursuant to Executive Order 12866, it
has been determined that this proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory
action, and therefore, does not require a
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
31338
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 105 / Tuesday, June 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
regulatory impact analysis. Because no
notice of proposed rulemaking is
required, the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612, do not apply.
The regulation will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, it is
determined that this proposed rule does
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132.
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612, it is hereby certified that these
regulations will not significantly affect a
substantial number of small entities.
The proposed rule imposes no duties or
obligations on small entities.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0824; FRL–9928–34–
Region 5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Michigan; Part 3 Rules
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving revisions to
the Part 3 rules into the Michigan State
Implementation Plan (SIP). On
December 13, 2013, the Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality
(MDEQ) submitted to EPA for approval
revisions to Part 3, Emission Limitations
and Prohibitions—Particulate Matter
(PM), for open burning and electro-static
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 1
precipitators (ESPs). The revisions for
open burning eliminate specific
Privacy.
provisions to allow household waste
Part 1, subpart C of title 31 of the
burning, and add a provision to allow
Code of Federal Regulations is proposed for burning of fruit and vegetable storage
to be amended as follows:
bins for pest or disease control with
specific location limitations. The SIP
PART 1—[AMENDED]
request also removes rule 330 dealing
with operation parameters for
■ 1. The authority citation for part 1
electrostatic precipitators because of
continues to read as follows:
redundancy, and rule 349 dealing with
compliance dates for coke ovens
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 31 U.S.C. 321.
because it is now obsolete. EPA is
Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552 as
approving this SIP revision because it
amended. Subpart C also issued under 5
will not interfere with attainment or
U.S.C. 552a.
maintenance of the fine particulate
■ 2. Section 1.36 paragraph (g)(1)(iii) is
matter (PM2.5) National Ambient Air
amended by adding the following text to
Quality Standard (NAAQS).
the table in numerical order.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 2, 2015.
§ 1.36 Systems exempt in whole or in part
from provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a and this
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
part.
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2013–0824, by one of the
(g) * * *
following methods:
(1) * * *
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
(iii) * * *
comments.
2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov.
Number
Name of system
3. Fax: (312) 692–2450.
4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief,
Control Strategies Section, Air Programs
*
*
*
*
*
CC .800 Office of Inspector General Inves- Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
tigations System.
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley,
Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
*
*
*
*
*
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
Dated: May 12, 2015.
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Helen Goff Foster,
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Privacy,
accepted during the Regional Office
Transparency, and Records.
normal hours of operation, and special
[FR Doc. 2015–13166 Filed 6–1–15; 8:45 am]
arrangements should be made for
BILLING CODE 4830–33–P
deliveries of boxed information. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Jun 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Final Rules section of
this Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carolyn Persoon, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312)353–8290,
persoon.carolyn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the state’s
SIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this rule, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment. For additional information,
see the direct final rule which is located
in the Rules section of this Federal
Register.
Dated: May 18, 2015.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2015–13119 Filed 6–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R10–RCRA–2015–0307; FRL–9928–
38–Region 10]
Idaho: Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31336-31338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13166]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Secretary
31 CFR Part 1
RIN 1505-AC50
Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Department of the
Treasury.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of the Privacy Act of
1974, as amended, the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) amends this
part to partially exempt a new Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency (OCC) system of records entitled ``Treasury/CC .800--Office of
Inspector General Investigations System'' from certain provisions of
the Privacy Act.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than July 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Because paper mail in the Washington, DC area and at the OCC
is subject to delay, commenters are encouraged to submit comments by
email, if possible. Please use the title ``Proposed Rule for New
Privacy Act System of Records'' to facilitate the organization and
distribution of the comments. You may submit comments by any of the
following methods:
Email: regs.comments@occ.treas.gov.
Mail: Legislative and Regulatory Activities Division,
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th
[[Page 31337]]
Street SW., Suite 3E-218, Mail Stop 9W-11, Washington, DC 20219.
Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th Street SW., Suite 3E-218,
Mail Stop 9W-11, Washington, DC 20219.
Fax: (571) 465-4326.
Instructions: You must include ``OCC'' as the agency name and the
docket number in your comment. In general, OCC will enter all comments
received into the docket without change, including any business or
personal information that you provide such as name and address
information, email addresses, or phone numbers. Comments received,
including attachments and other supporting materials, are part of the
public record and subject to public disclosure. Do not enclose any
information in your comment or supporting materials that you consider
confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure.
You may review comments and other related materials that pertain to
this notice by appearing personally to inspect and photocopy comments
at the OCC, 400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC. For security reasons,
the OCC requires that visitors make an appointment to inspect comments.
You may do so by calling (202) 649-6700. Upon arrival, visitors will be
required to present valid government-issued photo identification and to
submit to security screening in order to inspect and photocopy
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Merritt, Special Counsel,
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the head of an
agency may promulgate rules to exempt a system of records from certain
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a if the system is investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes. Treasury is hereby giving notice
of a proposed rule to exempt ``Treasury/CC .800-Office of Inspector
General Investigations System'' from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act of 1974, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). The proposed exemption
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) is from provisions (c)(3), (d)(1)-(4),
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G)-(I), and (f) because the system contains
investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes. The
following are the reasons why this system of records maintained by the
OCC is exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) of the Privacy Act of
1974:
(1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3). This provision of the Privacy Act provides
for the release of the disclosure accounting required by 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(1) and (2) to the individual named in the record at his/her
request. The reasons for exempting this system of records from the
foregoing provision are:
(i) The release of disclosure accounting would put the subject of
an investigation on notice that an investigation exists and that such
person is the subject of that investigation.
(ii) Such release would provide the subject of an investigation
with an accurate accounting of the date, nature, and purpose of each
disclosure and the name and address of the person or agency to which
disclosure was made. The release of such information to the subject of
an investigation would provide the subject with significant information
concerning the nature of the investigation and could result in the
alteration or destruction of documentary evidence, the improper
influencing of witnesses, and other activities that could impede or
compromise the investigation.
(iii) Release to the individual of the disclosure accounting would
alert the individual as to which agencies were investigating the
subject and the scope of the investigation and could aid the individual
in impeding or compromising investigations by those agencies.
(2) 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(1)-(4), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (f). These
provisions of the Privacy Act relate to an individual's right to be
notified of:
(i) The existence of records pertaining to such individual;
(ii) Requirements for identifying an individual who requested
access to records;
(iii) The agency procedures relating to access to and amendment of
records;
(iv) The content of the information contained in such records; and
(v) The civil remedies available to the individual in the event of
an adverse determination by an agency concerning access to or amendment
of information contained in record systems.
The reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing
provisions are that notifying an individual (at the individual's
request) of the existence of an investigative file pertaining to such
individual or granting access to, or the right to amend, such an
investigative file pertaining to such individual could allow
individuals to learn whether they have been identified as suspects or
subjects of an investigation. Such knowledge would impair and interfere
with the OCC's, the OIG's, and other agencies' investigative,
enforcement, or criminal proceedings because individuals could:
(i) Take steps to avoid detection;
(ii) Inform associates than an investigation is in process;
(iii) Learn the nature of the investigation;
(iv) Begin, continue, or resume illegal conduct upon learning that
they are not identified in the system of records;
(iv) Destroy evidence needed to prove the violation;
(v) Constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of
others;
(vi) Disclose the identity of confidential sources and reveal
confidential information supplied by such sources; or
(vii) Disclose investigative techniques and procedures.
(3) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1). This provision of the Privacy Act requires
each agency to maintain in its records only such information about an
individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish a purpose of the
agency required to be accomplished by statute or executive order. The
reasons for exempting this system of records from the foregoing
requirements is that: At the time that the OCC collects information it
often lacks sufficient time to determine whether the information is
relevant and necessary to accomplish the purposes of an investigation.
Therefore, what appears relevant and necessary when first received may
subsequently be determined to be irrelevant or unnecessary. It is only
after the information is evaluated that the relevance and necessity of
such information can be established with certainty.
(4) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I). This provision of the Privacy Act
requires the publication of the categories of sources of records in
each system of records. The reasons for claiming an exemption from this
provision are as follows:
(i) Revealing categories of sources of information could disclose
investigative techniques and procedures.
(ii) Revealing categories of sources of information could cause
sources who supply information to investigators to refrain from giving
such information because of fear of reprisal, or fear of breach of
promises of anonymity and confidentiality.
(iii) Revealing categories of sources could cause informers to
refuse to give full information to investigators for fear of having
their identities as sources disclosed.
Treasury will publish the notice of the proposed new system of
records separately in the Federal Register.
Pursuant to Executive Order 12866, it has been determined that this
proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action, and therefore,
does not require a
[[Page 31338]]
regulatory impact analysis. Because no notice of proposed rulemaking is
required, the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
601-612, do not apply.
The regulation will not have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this
proposed rule does not have federalism implications under Executive
Order 13132.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612, it is hereby certified that these regulations will not
significantly affect a substantial number of small entities. The
proposed rule imposes no duties or obligations on small entities.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 1
Privacy.
Part 1, subpart C of title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 31 U.S.C. 321. Subpart A also issued
under 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended. Subpart C also issued under 5 U.S.C.
552a.
0
2. Section 1.36 paragraph (g)(1)(iii) is amended by adding the
following text to the table in numerical order.
Sec. 1.36 Systems exempt in whole or in part from provisions of 5
U.S.C. 552a and this part.
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Name of system
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
CC .800.......................... Office of Inspector General
Investigations System.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Dated: May 12, 2015.
Helen Goff Foster,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Privacy, Transparency, and Records.
[FR Doc. 2015-13166 Filed 6-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-33-P