Authority of the Assistant Attorneys General To Compromise or Close Civil Claims, 30617-30619 [2015-12991]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 103 / Friday, May 29, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review.’’
Only one comment was received as a
result of this outreach. The commenter
generally believes that the rule creates
additional legal requirements without
providing measures to prevent crime.
The Department believes that the rule in
fact has the opposite effect, decreasing
legal requirements by removing defense
articles from the USMIL while
enhancing national security by focusing
resources on imports that need to be
protected.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act relating to an initial and
final regulatory flexibility analysis are
not applicable to this final rule because
the Department was not required to
publish a general notice of proposed
rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553 or any
other law. See 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
F. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 251 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. 5 U.S.C. 804. This
rule is not likely to result in an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more; a major increase in costs or
prices; or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of United States-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises
in domestic and export markets.
during normal business hours at the
ATF Reading Room, Room 1E–062, 99
New York Avenue NE., Washington, DC
20226; telephone: (202) 648–8740.
Drafting Information
The author of this document is George
M. Fodor, Office of Regulatory Affairs,
Enforcement Programs and Services,
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 447
Administrative practice and
procedure, Arms and munitions,
Chemicals, Customs duties and
inspection, Imports, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Scientific equipment,
Seizures and forfeitures.
PART 447—IMPORTATION OF ARMS,
AMMUNITION AND DEFENSE
ARTICLES
Accordingly, for the reasons
discussed in the preamble, the interim
final rule amending part 447 of title 27
of the Code of Federal Regulations,
which was published at 79 FR 17024 on
March 27, 2014, is adopted as a final
rule, without change.
Dated: May 21, 2015.
Loretta E. Lynch,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. 2015–12992 Filed 5–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of the Attorney General
H. Paperwork Reduction Act
The provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR part
1320, do not apply to this rule because
there are no reporting or recordkeeping
requirements.
Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995. See 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.
SUMMARY:
Disclosure
Copies of the interim final rule and
the comment received are available for
public inspection through the Federal eGovernment portal, https://
www.regulations.gov, or by appointment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:17 May 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
28 CFR Part 0
[Docket No. OAG 147; AG Order No. 3532–
2015]
Authority of the Assistant Attorneys
General To Compromise or Close Civil
Claims
Department of Justice.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This final rule amends the
Department’s regulations to increase the
authority currently delegated to the
Assistant Attorneys General to
compromise or close civil claims and to
make certain technical corrections.
DATES: Effective May 29, 2015
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
August E. Flentje, Acting Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, Civil
Division, Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20530; (202) 514–3309.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
current delegations of authority to
compromise or close civil claims are
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30617
contained in 28 CFR part 0, subpart Y,
§§ 0.160–0.169. See 60 FR 15675 (Mar.
27, 1995). This final rule increases the
monetary thresholds for the exercise of
this authority by the Assistant Attorneys
General and increases the redelegation
authority to the United States Attorneys
with respect to accepting offers of
compromise for affirmative claims.
This final rule amends 28 CFR
0.160(a)(1) to increase the authority of
the Assistant Attorneys General to
compromise a civil claim asserted by
the United States where the proposed
settlement is within $10 million or 15
percent of the original claim (up from
the current threshold of $2 million or 15
percent of the original claim). As
provided in § 0.164, this change to
§ 0.160(a)(1) also means that the
Assistant Attorneys General will have
authority to close affirmative civil
matters within the same new limits.
The final rule adds a new paragraph
§ 0.160(a)(2) to allow the Assistant
Attorneys General to accept
compromises in affirmative civil cases
independent of the $10 million cap in
the limited circumstance where a
qualified financial expert has reviewed
the defendant’s finances and has
determined that the defendant likely
does not have the ability to pay more
than the proposed compromise offer.
This would obviate the need to obtain
higher level approval when claims are
being compromised simply based on the
defendant’s financial condition rather
than an analysis of the legal or factual
merits of the claim. To clarify that new
§ 0.160(a)(2) applies to all cases within
the authority of the Assistant Attorney
General for the Environment and
Natural Resources Division, including
cases brought under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.,
the final rule also amends § 0.160(c)(2)
by removing language similar to new
§ 0.160(a)(2).
In addition, the final rule also
increases the authority for the Assistant
Attorneys General to accept offers in
compromise of claims asserted against
the United States of up to $4 million (up
from the current threshold of $2
million). See new § 0.160(a)(3)
(currently § 0.160(a)(2)).
The final rule also amends § 0.168(d)
to allow a delegation of authority to the
United States Attorneys to compromise
claims asserted by the United States for
up to $10 million (up from a claim of
$5 million where the settlement
difference does not exceed $1 million).
Citations to subsections of § 0.160 in
§§ 0.162 and 0.168 also have been
revised in light of the changes to
§ 0.160.
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
30618
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 103 / Friday, May 29, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Finally, this final rule would update
the agency reference in § 0.169(b)
defining the term ‘‘gross amount of the
original claim’’ for purposes of any civil
claim brought under section 592 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Regulatory Certifications
Administrative Procedure Act
This rule relates to a matter of agency
management or personnel and is a rule
of agency organization, procedure, and
practice. As such, this rule is exempt
from the usual requirements of prior
notice and comment and a 30-day delay
in effective date. See 5 U.S.C. 553.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Attorney General, in accordance
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 605(b), has reviewed this rule,
and by approving it, certifies that it will
not have an impact on a substantial
number of small entities because it
pertains to personnel and administrative
matters affecting the Department.
Further, a Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis is not required for this final
rule because the Department was not
required to publish a general notice of
proposed rulemaking for this matter.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
This rule has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review,’’ section l(b), Principles of
Regulation, and with Executive Order
13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review.’’ This final rule is
‘‘limited to agency organization,
management, or personnel matters’’ and
thus is not a ‘‘rule’’ as described by
Executive Order 12866, section 3(d)(3)
and, therefore, is not a ‘‘regulation’’ or
‘‘rule’’ as defined by that Executive
Order.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil
Justice Reform.’’
Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
‘‘Federalism,’’ the Department has
determined that this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:17 May 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted for inflation) in any one year,
and it will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions are necessary under the
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 251 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 804. This
rule will not result in an annual effect
on the economy of $100 million or
more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of United States-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises
in domestic and export markets.
Congressional Review Act
This action pertains to agency
management, personnel, and
organization and does not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties. Accordingly, it is not a
‘‘rule’’ for purposes of the reporting
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 0
Authority delegations (Government
agencies), Government employees,
Organization and functions
(Government agencies), Privacy,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Whistleblowing.
Accordingly, by virtue of the
authority vested in me as Attorney
General, including 5 U.S.C. 301 and 28
U.S.C. 509, 510, and for the reasons set
forth in the preamble, part 0 of title 28
of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 0—ORGANIZATION OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
1. The authority citation for part 0
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 28 U.S.C. 509,
510, 515–19.
2. In § 0.160, revise paragraphs (a), (c)
introductory text, and (c)(2) to read as
follows:
■
§ 0.160 Offers that may be accepted by
Assistant Attorneys General.
(a) Subject to the limitations set forth
in paragraph (d) of this section,
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Assistant Attorneys General are
authorized, with respect to matters
assigned to their respective divisions,
to:
(1) Accept offers in compromise of
claims asserted by the United States in
all cases in which the difference
between the gross amount of the original
claim and the proposed settlement does
not exceed $10,000,000 or 15 percent of
the original claim, whichever is greater;
(2) Accept offers in compromise of
claims asserted by the United States in
all cases in which a qualified financial
expert has determined that the offer in
compromise is likely the maximum that
the offeror has the ability to pay;
(3) Accept offers in compromise of, or
settle administratively, claims against
the United States in all cases in which
the principal amount of the proposed
settlement does not exceed $4,000,000;
and
(4) Accept offers in compromise in all
nonmonetary cases.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Subject to the limitations set forth
in paragraph (d) of this section, the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, is further authorized to
approve settlements under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq., regardless of
the amount of the proposed settlement,
with:
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Parties whose responsibility can be
equitably allocated and are paying at
least the allocated amount.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 0.162
[Amended]
3. Amend § 0.162 by removing the
reference to ‘‘§ 0.160(c)(2)’’ and adding
in its place ‘‘§ 0.160(d)(2)’’.
■ 4. Amend § 0.168:
■ a. In paragraph (a) by removing the
reference to ‘‘§§ 0.160(a) and (b)’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘§§ 0.160(a), (b), and
(c)’’; and
■ b. By revising paragraphs (d)
introductory text and (d)(1).
The revisions read as follows:
■
§ 0.168 Redelegation by Assistant
Attorneys General.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Subject to the limitations set forth
in § 0.160(d) and paragraph (a) of this
section, redelegations by the Assistant
Attorneys General to United States
Attorneys may include the authority to:
(1) Accept offers in compromise of
claims asserted by the United States in
all cases in which the gross amount of
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 103 / Friday, May 29, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
■
Dated: May 21, 2015.
Loretta E. Lynch,
Attorney General.
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Lewis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
the original claim does not exceed
$10,000,000; and
*
*
*
*
*
§ 0.169
[Amended]
5. Amend paragraph (b) of § 0.169 by
removing the words ‘‘Customs
Service’s’’ and adding in their place the
words ‘‘United States Customs and
Border Protection’s’’.
A. Does this action apply to me?
[FR Doc. 2015–12991 Filed 5–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–12–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0230; FRL–9927–11]
Metconazole; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of metconazole
in or on multiple commodities which
are identified and discussed later in this
document. Interregional Research
Project Number 4 (IR–4) requested these
tolerances under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). In
addition, this regulation removes
established tolerances for certain
commodities/groups superseded by this
action, and deletes expired tolerances.
DATES: This regulation is effective May
29, 2015. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
July 28, 2015, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
SUMMARY:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0230, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:01 May 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Publishing Office’s eCFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/
text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/
Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2014–0230 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before July 28, 2015. Addresses for mail
and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30619
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2014–0230, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center
(EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
In the Federal Register of May 23,
2014 (79 FR 29729) (FRL–9910–29),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 4E8244) by
Interregional Research Project Number 4
(IR–4), 500 College Road East, Suite 201
W, Princeton, NJ 08540. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.617 be
amended by establishing tolerances for
residues of the fungicide metconazole,
5-[(4-chlorophenyl)methyl]-2,-2dimethyl-1-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1ylmethyl)-cyclopentanol, in or on fruit,
stone, group 12–12 at 0.2 parts per
million (ppm); nut, tree, group 14–12 at
0.04 ppm; pea and bean, dried shelled,
except soybean, subgroup 6C at 0.15
ppm; rapeseed subgroup 20A at 0.08
ppm; and sunflower subgroup 20B at 0.9
ppm. The petition also requested that
current established tolerances for
residues of the fungicide metconazole in
or on canola seed at 0.04 ppm; fruit,
stone, group 12 at 0.20 ppm; pistachio
at 0.04 ppm; and nut, tree, group 14 at
0.04 ppm be removed once the proposed
tolerances were approved. That
document referenced a summary of the
petition prepared by Valent U.S.A
Corporation, the registrant, which is
available in the docket, https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments were
received on the notice of filing. EPA’s
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30617-30619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12991]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of the Attorney General
28 CFR Part 0
[Docket No. OAG 147; AG Order No. 3532-2015]
Authority of the Assistant Attorneys General To Compromise or
Close Civil Claims
AGENCY: Department of Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the Department's regulations to
increase the authority currently delegated to the Assistant Attorneys
General to compromise or close civil claims and to make certain
technical corrections.
DATES: Effective May 29, 2015
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: August E. Flentje, Acting Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20530; (202) 514-3309.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The current delegations of authority to
compromise or close civil claims are contained in 28 CFR part 0,
subpart Y, Sec. Sec. 0.160-0.169. See 60 FR 15675 (Mar. 27, 1995).
This final rule increases the monetary thresholds for the exercise of
this authority by the Assistant Attorneys General and increases the
redelegation authority to the United States Attorneys with respect to
accepting offers of compromise for affirmative claims.
This final rule amends 28 CFR 0.160(a)(1) to increase the authority
of the Assistant Attorneys General to compromise a civil claim asserted
by the United States where the proposed settlement is within $10
million or 15 percent of the original claim (up from the current
threshold of $2 million or 15 percent of the original claim). As
provided in Sec. 0.164, this change to Sec. 0.160(a)(1) also means
that the Assistant Attorneys General will have authority to close
affirmative civil matters within the same new limits.
The final rule adds a new paragraph Sec. 0.160(a)(2) to allow the
Assistant Attorneys General to accept compromises in affirmative civil
cases independent of the $10 million cap in the limited circumstance
where a qualified financial expert has reviewed the defendant's
finances and has determined that the defendant likely does not have the
ability to pay more than the proposed compromise offer. This would
obviate the need to obtain higher level approval when claims are being
compromised simply based on the defendant's financial condition rather
than an analysis of the legal or factual merits of the claim. To
clarify that new Sec. 0.160(a)(2) applies to all cases within the
authority of the Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and
Natural Resources Division, including cases brought under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act,
42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq., the final rule also amends Sec. 0.160(c)(2) by
removing language similar to new Sec. 0.160(a)(2).
In addition, the final rule also increases the authority for the
Assistant Attorneys General to accept offers in compromise of claims
asserted against the United States of up to $4 million (up from the
current threshold of $2 million). See new Sec. 0.160(a)(3) (currently
Sec. 0.160(a)(2)).
The final rule also amends Sec. 0.168(d) to allow a delegation of
authority to the United States Attorneys to compromise claims asserted
by the United States for up to $10 million (up from a claim of $5
million where the settlement difference does not exceed $1 million).
Citations to subsections of Sec. 0.160 in Sec. Sec. 0.162 and 0.168
also have been revised in light of the changes to Sec. 0.160.
[[Page 30618]]
Finally, this final rule would update the agency reference in Sec.
0.169(b) defining the term ``gross amount of the original claim'' for
purposes of any civil claim brought under section 592 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended.
Regulatory Certifications
Administrative Procedure Act
This rule relates to a matter of agency management or personnel and
is a rule of agency organization, procedure, and practice. As such,
this rule is exempt from the usual requirements of prior notice and
comment and a 30-day delay in effective date. See 5 U.S.C. 553.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Attorney General, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), has reviewed this rule, and by approving it,
certifies that it will not have an impact on a substantial number of
small entities because it pertains to personnel and administrative
matters affecting the Department. Further, a Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis is not required for this final rule because the Department was
not required to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking for
this matter.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
This rule has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' section
l(b), Principles of Regulation, and with Executive Order 13563,
``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review.'' This final rule is
``limited to agency organization, management, or personnel matters''
and thus is not a ``rule'' as described by Executive Order 12866,
section 3(d)(3) and, therefore, is not a ``regulation'' or ``rule'' as
defined by that Executive Order.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, ``Civil Justice
Reform.''
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order
13132, ``Federalism,'' the Department has determined that this rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more (adjusted for inflation) in any one year, and it will
not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions are necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C.
804. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and
export markets.
Congressional Review Act
This action pertains to agency management, personnel, and
organization and does not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties. Accordingly, it is not a ``rule''
for purposes of the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 0
Authority delegations (Government agencies), Government employees,
Organization and functions (Government agencies), Privacy, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Whistleblowing.
Accordingly, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Attorney
General, including 5 U.S.C. 301 and 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, and for the
reasons set forth in the preamble, part 0 of title 28 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 0--ORGANIZATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
0
1. The authority citation for part 0 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 515-19.
0
2. In Sec. 0.160, revise paragraphs (a), (c) introductory text, and
(c)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 0.160 Offers that may be accepted by Assistant Attorneys
General.
(a) Subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (d) of this
section, Assistant Attorneys General are authorized, with respect to
matters assigned to their respective divisions, to:
(1) Accept offers in compromise of claims asserted by the United
States in all cases in which the difference between the gross amount of
the original claim and the proposed settlement does not exceed
$10,000,000 or 15 percent of the original claim, whichever is greater;
(2) Accept offers in compromise of claims asserted by the United
States in all cases in which a qualified financial expert has
determined that the offer in compromise is likely the maximum that the
offeror has the ability to pay;
(3) Accept offers in compromise of, or settle administratively,
claims against the United States in all cases in which the principal
amount of the proposed settlement does not exceed $4,000,000; and
(4) Accept offers in compromise in all nonmonetary cases.
* * * * *
(c) Subject to the limitations set forth in paragraph (d) of this
section, the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, is further authorized to approve settlements under
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq., regardless of the amount of the proposed
settlement, with:
* * * * *
(2) Parties whose responsibility can be equitably allocated and are
paying at least the allocated amount.
* * * * *
Sec. 0.162 [Amended]
0
3. Amend Sec. 0.162 by removing the reference to ``Sec. 0.160(c)(2)''
and adding in its place ``Sec. 0.160(d)(2)''.
0
4. Amend Sec. 0.168:
0
a. In paragraph (a) by removing the reference to ``Sec. Sec. 0.160(a)
and (b)'' and adding in its place ``Sec. Sec. 0.160(a), (b), and
(c)''; and
0
b. By revising paragraphs (d) introductory text and (d)(1).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 0.168 Redelegation by Assistant Attorneys General.
* * * * *
(d) Subject to the limitations set forth in Sec. 0.160(d) and
paragraph (a) of this section, redelegations by the Assistant Attorneys
General to United States Attorneys may include the authority to:
(1) Accept offers in compromise of claims asserted by the United
States in all cases in which the gross amount of
[[Page 30619]]
the original claim does not exceed $10,000,000; and
* * * * *
Sec. 0.169 [Amended]
0
5. Amend paragraph (b) of Sec. 0.169 by removing the words ``Customs
Service's'' and adding in their place the words ``United States Customs
and Border Protection's''.
Dated: May 21, 2015.
Loretta E. Lynch,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. 2015-12991 Filed 5-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-12-P