Safety Zone, Fall River Grand Prix, Mt. Hope Bay and Taunton River, Fall River, MA, 30637-30640 [2015-12736]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 103 / Friday, May 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
30637
[Docket No. USCG–2015–0286]
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, contact Mr. Edward G. LeBlanc,
Waterways Management Division at
Coast Guard Sector Southeastern New
England, telephone 401–435–2351,
email Edward.G.LeBlanc@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Cheryl Collins, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Drafting Information
RIN 1625–AA00
Table of Acronyms
The author of this document is Denise
Brown, Enforcement Programs and
Services, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives.
Safety Zone, Fall River Grand Prix, Mt.
Hope Bay and Taunton River, Fall
River, MA
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
(1) Be legible and appear in a
minimum 12 point size of type (.17
inches);
(2) Be on 81⁄2″ x 11″ paper;
(3) Contain a legible, written
signature; and
(4) Be no more than five pages long.
ATF will not accept faxed comments
that exceed five pages.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: To
submit comments to ATF via the
Federal eRulemaking portal, visit
https://www.regulations.gov, and follow
the instructions for submitting
comments.
Disclosure
Copies of the petition, this notice, and
the comments received will be available
for public inspection by appointment
during normal business hours at: ATF
Reading Room, Room 1E–063, 99 New
York Avenue NE., Washington, DC
20226; telephone: (202) 648–7080.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 555
Administrative practice and
procedure, Authority delegations,
Customs duties and inspection,
Explosives, Hazardous materials,
Imports, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Safety,
Security measures, Seizures and
forfeitures, Transportation, and
Warehouses.
Accordingly, for the reasons
discussed in the preamble, 27 CFR part
555 is proposed to be amended as
follows:
PART 555—COMMERCE IN
EXPLOSIVES
1. The authority citation for 27 CFR
part 555 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 847.
2. In § 555.220, revise paragraph (3) in
the notes following the table, to read as
follows:
■
Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 555.220 Table of separation distances of
ammonium nitrate and blasting agents from
explosives or blasting agents.
*
*
*
*
(3) These distances apply to all
ammonium nitrate with respect to their
separation from stores of high
explosives and blasting agents.
Ammonium nitrate explosive mixtures
that are high explosives pursuant to
§ 555.202(a) or are defined as a blasting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:18 May 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
Dated: May 21, 2015.
Loretta E. Lynch,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. 2015–12990 Filed 5–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone in the
navigable waters of Mt. Hope Bay and
the Taunton River in the vicinity of Fall
River, MA, during the Fall River Grand
Prix marine event from August 14–16,
2015. This safety zone is intended to
safeguard mariners from the hazards
associated with high-speed, highperformance motorboats competing in
the event. Vessels will be prohibited
from entering into, transiting through,
mooring, or anchoring within this safety
zone during periods of enforcement
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port (COTP), Southeastern New England
or the COTP’s designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 29, 2015. Requests for
public meetings must be received by the
Coast Guard on or before June 19, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2015–0286 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
SUMMARY:
Authority and Issuance
*
agent pursuant to § 555.11 are subject to
the table of distances for storage of
explosive materials in § 555.218 and to
the table of separation distances of
ammonium nitrate and blasting agents
from explosives or blasting agents in
§ 555.220.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2015–0286),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
E:\FR\FM\29MYP1.SGM
29MYP1
30638
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 103 / Friday, May 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2015–0286] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2015–0286) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one, using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard has not promulgated
a rule for past iterations of this event.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:18 May 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is 33 U.S.C., 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33
CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard
to establish regulatory safety zones.
This rule is necessary to provide for
the safety of life and navigation, for both
participants and spectators involved
with the Fall River Grand Prix in Mt.
Hope Bay and the Taunton River in the
vicinity of Fall River, MA.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The initial Fall River Grand Prix is a
three-day event where high-speed, highperformance motorboats participate in
controlled races within a well-defined
water area. The safety zone proposed in
this NPRM will encompass the racing
area and will include a buffer between
the racing motorboats and spectator
craft to provide a margin of safety. As
these races are part of a national series
of events, governed by a national racing
and safety organization (the U.S.
Offshore Powerboat Association), and
operated by experienced high-speed
motorboat crews and support teams,
they are expected to generate local and
regional media coverage, and attract
spectators on a number of recreational
and excursion vessels.
The Coast Guard is establishing this
safety zone, in conjunction with the Fall
River Grand Prix, to ensure the
protection of the maritime public and
event participants from the hazards
associated with high-speed, highperformance motorboat racing. The
Coast Guard anticipates little concern
with the proposed safety zone by
mariners, as there is little major
commercial vessel activity in Mt. Hope
Bay and the Taunton River in the
vicinity of Fall River, MA, and most
recreational vessels are not restricted to
the deep draft channel and can easily
transit via alternate routes. Also, the
safety zone will be enforced only during
periods of actual racing, which will be
limited to only a few hours on each of
the three days of the event.
Regardless, in the unlikely situation
where a commercial or recreational
vessel may still need to transit Mt. Hope
Bay and the Taunton River in the
vicinity of Fall River, MA, for any
number of reasons including
destination, familiarity with the
waterway, tide restrictions, etc., these
vessels may be able to continue transits
through Mt. Hope Bay and the Taunton
River, even during enforcement of the
safety zone, as there will be sufficient
room for most recreational vessels, and
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
some commercial vessels, to pass to the
west of the safety zone. Also, the Coast
Guard routinely works with the local
marine pilot organization and shipping
agents to coordinate vessel transits
during marine events, and will continue
to do so for the entire event to avoid
major interruptions to shipping
schedules.
The Coast Guard proposes to add a
temporary safety zone under 33 CFR
T165.0286. The safety zone will
encompass the navigation channel from
approximately Mt. Hope Bay buoy R10
southwest of Brayton Point channel, and
will extend approximately two miles to
the northeast up to and including Mt.
Hope Bay buoy C17 north of the I–195/
Braga Bridge. The safety zone will be
enforced only during times of actual
vessel racing.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive
orders.
1. Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the adverse economic
impact of this proposed rule to be
minimal. Although this regulation may
have some adverse impact on the
public, the potential impact will be
minimized for the following reasons:
The safety zone will be in effect for only
a few hours each day for three
consecutive days, and vessels will only
be restricted from the zone in Mt. Hope
Bay and the Taunton River in the
vicinity of Fall River, MA during those
limited periods when the races are
actually ongoing; during periods when
there is no actual racing (e.g., racing
vessels are transiting from the pier to
the racing site; downtime between races,
etc.) vessels may be allowed to transit
through the safety zone; there is an
alternate route available for recreational
vessels to the west of the safety zone
that does not add substantial transit
time and is already routinely used by
mariners; many vessels, especially
recreational vessels, may transit in all
portions of the affected waterway except
for those areas covered by the proposed
E:\FR\FM\29MYP1.SGM
29MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 103 / Friday, May 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
safety zone; and vessels may enter or
pass through the affected waterway with
the permission of the COTP or the
COTP’s representative.
Notification of the Fall River Grand
Prix and the associated safety zone will
be made to mariners through the Rhode
Island Port Safety Forum, local Notice to
Mariners, event sponsors, and local
media well in advance of the event.
Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit in Mt. Hope
Bay and the Taunton River in the
vicinity of Fall River, MA, during the
Fall River Grand Prix marine event.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:18 May 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
30639
5. Federalism
11. Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
6. Protest Activities
12. Energy Effects
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action appears to be one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment.
A preliminary environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. This
proposed rule involves the
establishment of a temporary safety
zone in conjunction with the Fall River
Grand Prix event, a high-speed, highperformance motorboat racing event. It
appears that this action will qualify for
Coast Guard Categorical Exclusion
(34)(g), as described in figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
E:\FR\FM\29MYP1.SGM
29MYP1
30640
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 103 / Friday, May 29, 2015 / Proposed Rules
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add a new § 165.T0286 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T0286 Safety Zone for the Fall River
Grand Prix, Mt. Hope Bay and Taunton
River, Fall River, MA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: Mt. Hope Bay and the
Taunton River navigation channel from
approximately Mt. Hope Bay buoy R10
southwest of Brayton Point channel, and
extending approximately two miles to
the northeast up to and including Mt.
Hope Bay buoy C17 north of the Braga
Bridge. The safety zone is encompassed
by the following coordinates:
Latitude
SW ............
NW ............
SE .............
NE .............
Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Corner
41°41.40′
41°41.48′
41°42.33′
41°42.42′
Longitude
N.
N.
N.
N.
71°11.15′
71°11.15′
71°09.40′
71°09.47′
W.
W.
W.
W.
(b) Enforcement Period. Vessels will
be prohibited from entering this safety
zone, when enforced, during the Fall
River Grand Prix marine event between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. from Friday, August
14, 2015 to Sunday, August 16, 2015.
(c) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated Representative. A
‘‘designated representative’’ is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has
been designated by the Captain of the
Port, Sector Southeastern New England
(COTP), to act on his or her behalf. The
designated representative may be on an
official patrol vessel or may be on shore
and will communicate with vessels via
VHF–FM radio or loudhailer. In
addition, members of the Coast Guard
Auxiliary may be present to inform
vessel operators of this regulation.
(2) Official Patrol Vessels. Official
patrol vessels may consist of any Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or
local law enforcement vessels assigned
or approved by the COTP.
(3) Patrol Commander. The Coast
Guard may patrol each safety zone
under the direction of a designated
Coast Guard Patrol Commander. The
Patrol Commander may be contacted on
Channel 16 VHF–FM (156.8 MHz) by
the call sign ‘‘PATCOM.’’
(4) Spectators. All persons and vessels
not registered with the event sponsor as
participants or official patrol vessels.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:18 May 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
(d) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23
as well as the following regulations
apply to the safety zone established in
conjunction with the Fall River Grand
Prix, Taunton River, vicinity of Fall
River, MA. These regulations may be
enforced for the duration of the event.
(2) No later than 8 a.m. each day of
the event, the Coast Guard will
announce via Safety Marine Information
Broadcasts and local media the times
and duration of each race scheduled for
that day, and the precise area(s) of the
safety zone that will be enforced.
(3) Vessels may not transit through or
within the safety zone during periods of
enforcement without Patrol Commander
approval. Vessels permitted to transit
must operate at a no-wake speed, in a
manner which will not endanger
participants or other crafts in the event.
(4) Spectators or other vessels shall
not anchor, block, loiter, or impede the
movement of event participants or
official patrol vessels in the safety zone
unless authorized by an official patrol
vessel.
(5) The Patrol Commander may
control the movement of all vessels in
the safety zone. When hailed or signaled
by an official patrol vessel, a vessel shall
come to an immediate stop and comply
with the lawful directions issued.
Failure to comply with a lawful
direction may result in expulsion from
the area, citation for failure to comply,
or both.
(6) The Patrol Commander may delay
or terminate the Fall River Grand Prix
at any time to ensure safety. Such action
may be justified as a result of weather,
traffic density, spectator operation or
participant behavior.
[FR Doc. 2015–12736 Filed 5–28–15; 8:45 am]
for a tolerance for residues of banda de
Lupinus albus doce (BLAD) in or on all
food commodities. In its place, EPA
proposes to establish a tolerance
limiting residues of BLAD to 0.005 parts
per million (ppm) in or on almonds,
grapes, strawberries and tomatoes. The
Agency is undertaking this action under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0230, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert McNally, Director, Biopesticides
and Pollution Prevention Division
(7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305–7090; email address:
BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
I. General Information
Dated: May 8, 2015.
J.T. Kondratowicz,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Southeastern New England.
A. Does this action apply to me?
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0230; FRL–9927–02]
RIN 2070–ZA16
Banda de Lupinus albus doce BLAD;
Proposed Pesticide Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA proposes to revoke the
current exemption from the requirement
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
E:\FR\FM\29MYP1.SGM
29MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30637-30640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12736]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2015-0286]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone, Fall River Grand Prix, Mt. Hope Bay and Taunton
River, Fall River, MA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
in the navigable waters of Mt. Hope Bay and the Taunton River in the
vicinity of Fall River, MA, during the Fall River Grand Prix marine
event from August 14-16, 2015. This safety zone is intended to
safeguard mariners from the hazards associated with high-speed, high-
performance motorboats competing in the event. Vessels will be
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, mooring, or
anchoring within this safety zone during periods of enforcement unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP), Southeastern New England
or the COTP's designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 29, 2015. Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before June 19, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2015-0286 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, contact Mr. Edward G. LeBlanc, Waterways Management Division at
Coast Guard Sector Southeastern New England, telephone 401-435-2351,
email Edward.G.LeBlanc@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2015-0286), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
[[Page 30638]]
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2015-0286] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2015-0286) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard has not promulgated a rule for past iterations of
this event.
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule is 33 U.S.C., 1231; 50 U.S.C.
191, 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5 Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast
Guard to establish regulatory safety zones.
This rule is necessary to provide for the safety of life and
navigation, for both participants and spectators involved with the Fall
River Grand Prix in Mt. Hope Bay and the Taunton River in the vicinity
of Fall River, MA.
D. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The initial Fall River Grand Prix is a three-day event where high-
speed, high-performance motorboats participate in controlled races
within a well-defined water area. The safety zone proposed in this NPRM
will encompass the racing area and will include a buffer between the
racing motorboats and spectator craft to provide a margin of safety. As
these races are part of a national series of events, governed by a
national racing and safety organization (the U.S. Offshore Powerboat
Association), and operated by experienced high-speed motorboat crews
and support teams, they are expected to generate local and regional
media coverage, and attract spectators on a number of recreational and
excursion vessels.
The Coast Guard is establishing this safety zone, in conjunction
with the Fall River Grand Prix, to ensure the protection of the
maritime public and event participants from the hazards associated with
high-speed, high-performance motorboat racing. The Coast Guard
anticipates little concern with the proposed safety zone by mariners,
as there is little major commercial vessel activity in Mt. Hope Bay and
the Taunton River in the vicinity of Fall River, MA, and most
recreational vessels are not restricted to the deep draft channel and
can easily transit via alternate routes. Also, the safety zone will be
enforced only during periods of actual racing, which will be limited to
only a few hours on each of the three days of the event.
Regardless, in the unlikely situation where a commercial or
recreational vessel may still need to transit Mt. Hope Bay and the
Taunton River in the vicinity of Fall River, MA, for any number of
reasons including destination, familiarity with the waterway, tide
restrictions, etc., these vessels may be able to continue transits
through Mt. Hope Bay and the Taunton River, even during enforcement of
the safety zone, as there will be sufficient room for most recreational
vessels, and some commercial vessels, to pass to the west of the safety
zone. Also, the Coast Guard routinely works with the local marine pilot
organization and shipping agents to coordinate vessel transits during
marine events, and will continue to do so for the entire event to avoid
major interruptions to shipping schedules.
The Coast Guard proposes to add a temporary safety zone under 33
CFR T165.0286. The safety zone will encompass the navigation channel
from approximately Mt. Hope Bay buoy R10 southwest of Brayton Point
channel, and will extend approximately two miles to the northeast up to
and including Mt. Hope Bay buoy C17 north of the I-195/Braga Bridge.
The safety zone will be enforced only during times of actual vessel
racing.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes or executive orders.
1. Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it
under that Order.
We expect the adverse economic impact of this proposed rule to be
minimal. Although this regulation may have some adverse impact on the
public, the potential impact will be minimized for the following
reasons: The safety zone will be in effect for only a few hours each
day for three consecutive days, and vessels will only be restricted
from the zone in Mt. Hope Bay and the Taunton River in the vicinity of
Fall River, MA during those limited periods when the races are actually
ongoing; during periods when there is no actual racing (e.g., racing
vessels are transiting from the pier to the racing site; downtime
between races, etc.) vessels may be allowed to transit through the
safety zone; there is an alternate route available for recreational
vessels to the west of the safety zone that does not add substantial
transit time and is already routinely used by mariners; many vessels,
especially recreational vessels, may transit in all portions of the
affected waterway except for those areas covered by the proposed
[[Page 30639]]
safety zone; and vessels may enter or pass through the affected
waterway with the permission of the COTP or the COTP's representative.
Notification of the Fall River Grand Prix and the associated safety
zone will be made to mariners through the Rhode Island Port Safety
Forum, local Notice to Mariners, event sponsors, and local media well
in advance of the event.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: owners or operators of vessels intending
to transit in Mt. Hope Bay and the Taunton River in the vicinity of
Fall River, MA, during the Fall River Grand Prix marine event.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action appears to be
one of a category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment.
A preliminary environmental analysis checklist supporting this
determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. This proposed rule involves the establishment of a temporary
safety zone in conjunction with the Fall River Grand Prix event, a
high-speed, high-performance motorboat racing event. It appears that
this action will qualify for Coast Guard Categorical Exclusion (34)(g),
as described in figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction.
We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery
of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
[[Page 30640]]
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add a new Sec. 165.T0286 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T0286 Safety Zone for the Fall River Grand Prix, Mt. Hope
Bay and Taunton River, Fall River, MA.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: Mt. Hope Bay and
the Taunton River navigation channel from approximately Mt. Hope Bay
buoy R10 southwest of Brayton Point channel, and extending
approximately two miles to the northeast up to and including Mt. Hope
Bay buoy C17 north of the Braga Bridge. The safety zone is encompassed
by the following coordinates:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corner Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SW...................................... 41[deg]41.40' 71[deg]11.15'
N. W.
NW...................................... 41[deg]41.48' 71[deg]11.15'
N. W.
SE...................................... 41[deg]42.33' 71[deg]09.40'
N. W.
NE...................................... 41[deg]42.42' 71[deg]09.47'
N. W.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Enforcement Period. Vessels will be prohibited from entering
this safety zone, when enforced, during the Fall River Grand Prix
marine event between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. from Friday, August 14, 2015 to
Sunday, August 16, 2015.
(c) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated Representative. A ``designated representative'' is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard who has been designated by the Captain of the Port, Sector
Southeastern New England (COTP), to act on his or her behalf. The
designated representative may be on an official patrol vessel or may be
on shore and will communicate with vessels via VHF-FM radio or
loudhailer. In addition, members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be
present to inform vessel operators of this regulation.
(2) Official Patrol Vessels. Official patrol vessels may consist of
any Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law enforcement
vessels assigned or approved by the COTP.
(3) Patrol Commander. The Coast Guard may patrol each safety zone
under the direction of a designated Coast Guard Patrol Commander. The
Patrol Commander may be contacted on Channel 16 VHF-FM (156.8 MHz) by
the call sign ``PATCOM.''
(4) Spectators. All persons and vessels not registered with the
event sponsor as participants or official patrol vessels.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR
165.23 as well as the following regulations apply to the safety zone
established in conjunction with the Fall River Grand Prix, Taunton
River, vicinity of Fall River, MA. These regulations may be enforced
for the duration of the event.
(2) No later than 8 a.m. each day of the event, the Coast Guard
will announce via Safety Marine Information Broadcasts and local media
the times and duration of each race scheduled for that day, and the
precise area(s) of the safety zone that will be enforced.
(3) Vessels may not transit through or within the safety zone
during periods of enforcement without Patrol Commander approval.
Vessels permitted to transit must operate at a no-wake speed, in a
manner which will not endanger participants or other crafts in the
event.
(4) Spectators or other vessels shall not anchor, block, loiter, or
impede the movement of event participants or official patrol vessels in
the safety zone unless authorized by an official patrol vessel.
(5) The Patrol Commander may control the movement of all vessels in
the safety zone. When hailed or signaled by an official patrol vessel,
a vessel shall come to an immediate stop and comply with the lawful
directions issued. Failure to comply with a lawful direction may result
in expulsion from the area, citation for failure to comply, or both.
(6) The Patrol Commander may delay or terminate the Fall River
Grand Prix at any time to ensure safety. Such action may be justified
as a result of weather, traffic density, spectator operation or
participant behavior.
Dated: May 8, 2015.
J.T. Kondratowicz,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Southeastern New
England.
[FR Doc. 2015-12736 Filed 5-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P