Removal of Obsolete Regulations, 30352-30353 [2015-12914]

Download as PDF 30352 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 102 / Thursday, May 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations further flight, replace the cracked link with a new link, in accordance with ‘‘PART TWO: ROUTINE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE (EXCEPT FOR SERIES 91B7, 91B8 & 91C5)’’ or ‘‘PART THREE: ROUTINE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE (FOR SERIES 91B7, 91B8 & 91C5)’’ of the Accomplishment Instructions of Sicma Aero Seat Service Bulletin 90–25–012, Issue 6, dated January 25, 2012, including Annex 1, Issue 3, dated January 25, 2012. wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES (i) Retained Replacement, With No Changes This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD 2014–20–11, Amendment 39–17984 (79 FR 60322, October 7, 2014), with no changes. At the later of the times specified in paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD: Replace all seat backrest links, having P/ N 90–000200–104–1, P/N 90–000200–104–2, P/N 90–000202–104–1, and P/N 90–000202– 104–2, with new links, in accordance with ‘‘PART TWO: ROUTINE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE (EXCEPT FOR SERIES 91B7, 91B8 & 91C5)’’ or ‘‘PART THREE: ROUTINE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE (FOR SERIES 91B7, 91B8 & 91C5)’’ of the Accomplishment Instructions of Sicma Aero Seat Service Bulletin 90–25–012, Issue 6, dated January 25, 2012, including Annex 1, Issue 3, dated January 25, 2012. (1) Within 12,000 flight hours on the seat or 4 years, whichever occurs later after the seat manufacturing date or after the backrest link replacement. (2) Within 3,500 flight hours on the seat after October 22, 2014 (the effective date AD 2014–20–11, Amendment 39–17984 (79 FR 60322, October 7, 2014), but no later than 18 months after October 22, 2014. (j) Retained Credit for Previous Actions, With No Changes This paragraph restates the credit provided in paragraph (j) of AD 2014–20–11, Amendment 39–17984 (79 FR 60322, October 7, 2014), with no changes. This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) of this AD, if those actions were performed before October 22, 2014 (the effective date AD 2014–20–11, Amendment 39–17984 (79 FR 60322, October 7, 2014), using the service information specified in paragraph (j)(1), (j)(2), or (j)(3) of this AD. (1) Sicma Aero Seat Service Bulletin 90– 25–012, Issue 3, dated October 3, 2001, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD. (2) Sicma Aero Seat Service Bulletin 90– 25–012, Issue 4, dated December 19, 2001, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD. (3) Sicma Aero Seat Service Bulletin 90– 25–012, Issue 5, dated March 19, 2004, including Annex 1, Issue 2, dated March 19, 2004, which was incorporated by reference in AD 2011–07–05, Amendment 39–16642 (76 FR 18020, April 1, 2011). (k) Other FAA AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Boston Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:08 May 27, 2015 Jkt 235001 requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Ian Lucas, Aerospace Engineer, Boston ACO, ANE–150, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781–238–7757; fax: 781– 238–7170; email: ian.lucas@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Boston ACO, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). (l) Related Information (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2012–0038, dated March 12, 2012, for related information. You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–1282. (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (m)(4) and (m)(5) of this AD. (m) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on October 22, 2014 (79 FR 60322, October 7, 2014). (i) Sicma Aero Seat Service Bulletin 90– 25–012, Issue 6, dated January 25, 2012, including Annex 1, Issue 3, dated January 25, 2012. (ii) Reserved. (4) For service information identified in this AD, contact Zodiac Seats France, 7, Rue Lucien Coupet, 36100 ISSOUDUN, France; telephone +33 (0) 2 54 03 39 39; fax +33 (0) 2 54 03 39 00; email customerservices@ sicma.zodiac.com; Internet https:// www.sicma.zodiacaerospace.com/en/. (5) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. (6) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 4, 2015. Jeffrey E. Duven, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2015–11392 Filed 5–27–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 14 CFR Part 1216 RIN 2700–AE20 [Docket No. NASA–2015–0002] Removal of Obsolete Regulations National Aeronautics and Space Administration. ACTION: Direct final rule. AGENCY: This direct final rule makes non-substantive changes by removing regulations that are captured in NASA internal requirements. The revisions to this rule are part of NASA’s retrospective plan completed in August 2011 under Executive Order (E.O.) 13563. NASA’s full plan can be accessed on the Agency’s open Government Web site at https:// www.nasa.gov/open/. DATES: This direct final rule is effective on July 27, 2015. Comments due on or before June 29, 2015. If adverse comments are received, NASA will publish a timely withdrawal of the rule in the Federal Register. ADDRESSES: Comments must be identified with RIN 2700–AE20 and may be sent to NASA via the Federal ERulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Please note that NASA will post all comments on the Internet with changes, including any personal information provided. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nanette Jennings, 202–358–0819. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Direct Final Rule Adverse Comments NASA has determined this rulemaking meets the criteria for a direct final rule because it involves nonsubstantive changes to remove a section from 14 CFR part 1216 that is captured in internal NASA requirements. No opposition to the changes and no significant adverse comments are expected. However, if the Agency receives a significant adverse comment, it will withdraw this direct final rule by publishing a notice in the Federal Register. A significant adverse comment E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM 28MYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 102 / Thursday, May 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations is one that explains: (1) Why the direct final rule is inappropriate, including challenges to the rule’s underlying premise or approach; or (2) why the direct final rule will be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. In determining whether a comment necessitates withdrawal of this direct final rule, NASA will consider whether it warrants a substantive response in a notice and comment process. Background On January 18, 2011, President Obama signed E.O. 13563, Improving Regulations and Regulatory Review, directing agencies to develop a plan for a retrospective analysis of existing regulations. NASA developed its plan and published it on the Agency’s open Government Web site at https:// www.nasa.gov/open/. The Agency conducted an analysis of its existing regulations to comply with the Order and determined that subpart 1216.2, Floodplain and Wetlands Management, should be repealed. Subpart 1216.2 was promulgated January 4, 1979, [44 FR 1089] in response to Executive Order (E.O.) 11988, Floodplain Management, and E.O. 11990, Protection of Wetlands. Neither E.O. mandates that these requirements be codified in the CFR. For example, E.O. 11988 subsection 2(d) states in pertinent part ‘‘. . . each agency shall issue or amend existing regulations and procedures . . .;’’ and E.O. 11990 section 6 states in pertinent part ‘‘. . . agencies shall issue or amend their existing procedures . . .’’ Therefore, this subpart will be repealed because it is now captured in NASA Interim Directive (NID) 8500.100, Floodplain and Wetlands Management. NID 8500.100 is accessible at https:// nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/OPD_docs/NID_ 8500_100_.pdf. Statutory Authority The National Aeronautics and Space Act (the Space Act), 51 U.S.C. 20113 (a), authorizes the Administrator of NASA to make, promulgate, issue, rescind, and amend rules and regulations governing the manner of its operations and the exercise of the powers vested in it by law. necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits of reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. This rule has been designated as ‘‘not significant’’ under section 3(f) of E.O. 12866. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an agency to prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis to be published at the time the proposed rule is published. This requirement does not apply if the agency ‘‘certifies that the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities’’ (5 U.S.C. 603). This rule removes two subparts from Title 14 of the CFR that are already reflected in existing NASA internal requirements and, therefore, does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act This direct final rule does not contain any information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Review Under E.O. 13132 E.O. 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’ 64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999) requires regulations be reviewed for Federalism effects on the institutional interest of states and local governments, and if the effects are sufficiently substantial, preparation of the Federal assessment is required to assist senior policy makers. The amendments will not have any substantial direct effects on state and local governments within the meaning of the E.O. Therefore, no Federalism assessment is required. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 1216 Flood plains. wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES Regulatory Analysis Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563, Improvement Regulation and Regulation Review Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:08 May 27, 2015 Jkt 235001 PART 1216—ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY Accordingly, under the authority of the National Aeronautics and Space Act, as amended (51 U.S.C. 20113), NASA amends 14 CFR part 1216 by removing ■ PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 30353 and reserving subpart 1216.2, consisting of §§ 1216.200 through 1216.205. Cheryl E. Parker, NASA Federal Register Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 2015–12914 Filed 5–27–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7510–13–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 876 [Docket No. FDA–2015–N–1297] Medical Devices; GastroenterologyUrology Devices; Classification of the Vibrator for Climax Control of Premature Ejaculation AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Final order. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the vibrator for climax control of premature ejaculation into class II (special controls). The special controls that will apply to the device are identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for the classification of the vibrator for climax control of premature ejaculation. The Agency is classifying the device into class II (special controls) in order to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. DATES: This order is effective May 28, 2015. The classification was applicable on March 20, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tuan Nguyen, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G118, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–796–5174, tuan.nguyen@fda.hhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. Background In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)), devices that were not in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 (the date of enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976), generally referred to as postamendments devices, are classified automatically by statute into class III without any FDA rulemaking process. These devices remain in class III and require premarket approval, unless and until the device is classified or reclassified into class I or II, or FDA issues an order E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM 28MYR1

Agencies

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30352-30353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12914]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 1216

RIN 2700-AE20
[Docket No. NASA-2015-0002]


Removal of Obsolete Regulations

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This direct final rule makes non-substantive changes by 
removing regulations that are captured in NASA internal requirements. 
The revisions to this rule are part of NASA's retrospective plan 
completed in August 2011 under Executive Order (E.O.) 13563. NASA's 
full plan can be accessed on the Agency's open Government Web site at 
https://www.nasa.gov/open/.

DATES: This direct final rule is effective on July 27, 2015. Comments 
due on or before June 29, 2015. If adverse comments are received, NASA 
will publish a timely withdrawal of the rule in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Comments must be identified with RIN 2700-AE20 and may be 
sent to NASA via the Federal E-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments. Please note that NASA will post all comments on the Internet 
with changes, including any personal information provided.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nanette Jennings, 202-358-0819.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Direct Final Rule Adverse Comments

    NASA has determined this rulemaking meets the criteria for a direct 
final rule because it involves non-substantive changes to remove a 
section from 14 CFR part 1216 that is captured in internal NASA 
requirements. No opposition to the changes and no significant adverse 
comments are expected. However, if the Agency receives a significant 
adverse comment, it will withdraw this direct final rule by publishing 
a notice in the Federal Register. A significant adverse comment

[[Page 30353]]

is one that explains: (1) Why the direct final rule is inappropriate, 
including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach; or 
(2) why the direct final rule will be ineffective or unacceptable 
without a change. In determining whether a comment necessitates 
withdrawal of this direct final rule, NASA will consider whether it 
warrants a substantive response in a notice and comment process.

Background

    On January 18, 2011, President Obama signed E.O. 13563, Improving 
Regulations and Regulatory Review, directing agencies to develop a plan 
for a retrospective analysis of existing regulations. NASA developed 
its plan and published it on the Agency's open Government Web site at 
https://www.nasa.gov/open/. The Agency conducted an analysis of its 
existing regulations to comply with the Order and determined that 
subpart 1216.2, Floodplain and Wetlands Management, should be repealed.
    Subpart 1216.2 was promulgated January 4, 1979, [44 FR 1089] in 
response to Executive Order (E.O.) 11988, Floodplain Management, and 
E.O. 11990, Protection of Wetlands. Neither E.O. mandates that these 
requirements be codified in the CFR. For example, E.O. 11988 subsection 
2(d) states in pertinent part ``. . . each agency shall issue or amend 
existing regulations and procedures . . .;'' and E.O. 11990 section 6 
states in pertinent part ``. . . agencies shall issue or amend their 
existing procedures . . .'' Therefore, this subpart will be repealed 
because it is now captured in NASA Interim Directive (NID) 8500.100, 
Floodplain and Wetlands Management. NID 8500.100 is accessible at 
https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/OPD_docs/NID_8500_100_.pdf.

Statutory Authority

    The National Aeronautics and Space Act (the Space Act), 51 U.S.C. 
20113 (a), authorizes the Administrator of NASA to make, promulgate, 
issue, rescind, and amend rules and regulations governing the manner of 
its operations and the exercise of the powers vested in it by law.

Regulatory Analysis

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive 
Order 13563, Improvement Regulation and Regulation Review

    Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits 
of reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. This 
rule has been designated as ``not significant'' under section 3(f) of 
E.O. 12866.

Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an 
agency to prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis to be 
published at the time the proposed rule is published. This requirement 
does not apply if the agency ``certifies that the rule will not, if 
promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number 
of small entities'' (5 U.S.C. 603). This rule removes two subparts from 
Title 14 of the CFR that are already reflected in existing NASA 
internal requirements and, therefore, does not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act

    This direct final rule does not contain any information collection 
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3501 et seq.).

Review Under E.O. 13132

    E.O. 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999) requires 
regulations be reviewed for Federalism effects on the institutional 
interest of states and local governments, and if the effects are 
sufficiently substantial, preparation of the Federal assessment is 
required to assist senior policy makers. The amendments will not have 
any substantial direct effects on state and local governments within 
the meaning of the E.O. Therefore, no Federalism assessment is 
required.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 1216

    Flood plains.

PART 1216--ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

0
Accordingly, under the authority of the National Aeronautics and Space 
Act, as amended (51 U.S.C. 20113), NASA amends 14 CFR part 1216 by 
removing and reserving subpart 1216.2, consisting of Sec. Sec.  
1216.200 through 1216.205.

Cheryl E. Parker,
NASA Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-12914 Filed 5-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7510-13-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.