Medical Devices; Gastroenterology-Urology Devices; Classification of the Vibrator for Climax Control of Premature Ejaculation, 30353-30355 [2015-12852]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 102 / Thursday, May 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
is one that explains: (1) Why the direct
final rule is inappropriate, including
challenges to the rule’s underlying
premise or approach; or (2) why the
direct final rule will be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. In
determining whether a comment
necessitates withdrawal of this direct
final rule, NASA will consider whether
it warrants a substantive response in a
notice and comment process.
Background
On January 18, 2011, President
Obama signed E.O. 13563, Improving
Regulations and Regulatory Review,
directing agencies to develop a plan for
a retrospective analysis of existing
regulations. NASA developed its plan
and published it on the Agency’s open
Government Web site at https://
www.nasa.gov/open/. The Agency
conducted an analysis of its existing
regulations to comply with the Order
and determined that subpart 1216.2,
Floodplain and Wetlands Management,
should be repealed.
Subpart 1216.2 was promulgated
January 4, 1979, [44 FR 1089] in
response to Executive Order (E.O.)
11988, Floodplain Management, and
E.O. 11990, Protection of Wetlands.
Neither E.O. mandates that these
requirements be codified in the CFR.
For example, E.O. 11988 subsection 2(d)
states in pertinent part ‘‘. . . each
agency shall issue or amend existing
regulations and procedures . . .;’’ and
E.O. 11990 section 6 states in pertinent
part ‘‘. . . agencies shall issue or amend
their existing procedures . . .’’
Therefore, this subpart will be repealed
because it is now captured in NASA
Interim Directive (NID) 8500.100,
Floodplain and Wetlands Management.
NID 8500.100 is accessible at https://
nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/OPD_docs/NID_
8500_100_.pdf.
Statutory Authority
The National Aeronautics and Space
Act (the Space Act), 51 U.S.C. 20113 (a),
authorizes the Administrator of NASA
to make, promulgate, issue, rescind, and
amend rules and regulations governing
the manner of its operations and the
exercise of the powers vested in it by
law.
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits of reducing costs,
harmonizing rules, and promoting
flexibility. This rule has been
designated as ‘‘not significant’’ under
section 3(f) of E.O. 12866.
Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an agency to
prepare an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis to be published at the time the
proposed rule is published. This
requirement does not apply if the
agency ‘‘certifies that the rule will not,
if promulgated, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities’’ (5 U.S.C. 603).
This rule removes two subparts from
Title 14 of the CFR that are already
reflected in existing NASA internal
requirements and, therefore, does not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Review Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act
This direct final rule does not contain
any information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Review Under E.O. 13132
E.O. 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’ 64 FR
43255 (August 4, 1999) requires
regulations be reviewed for Federalism
effects on the institutional interest of
states and local governments, and if the
effects are sufficiently substantial,
preparation of the Federal assessment is
required to assist senior policy makers.
The amendments will not have any
substantial direct effects on state and
local governments within the meaning
of the E.O. Therefore, no Federalism
assessment is required.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 1216
Flood plains.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Analysis
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563, Improvement Regulation
and Regulation Review
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 May 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
PART 1216—ENVIRONMENTAL
POLICY
Accordingly, under the authority of
the National Aeronautics and Space Act,
as amended (51 U.S.C. 20113), NASA
amends 14 CFR part 1216 by removing
■
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30353
and reserving subpart 1216.2, consisting
of §§ 1216.200 through 1216.205.
Cheryl E. Parker,
NASA Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–12914 Filed 5–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 876
[Docket No. FDA–2015–N–1297]
Medical Devices; GastroenterologyUrology Devices; Classification of the
Vibrator for Climax Control of
Premature Ejaculation
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is classifying the
vibrator for climax control of premature
ejaculation into class II (special
controls). The special controls that will
apply to the device are identified in this
order and will be part of the codified
language for the classification of the
vibrator for climax control of premature
ejaculation. The Agency is classifying
the device into class II (special controls)
in order to provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness of
the device.
DATES: This order is effective May 28,
2015. The classification was applicable
on March 20, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tuan Nguyen, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G118, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–5174,
tuan.nguyen@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)), devices that were not in
commercial distribution before May 28,
1976 (the date of enactment of the
Medical Device Amendments of 1976),
generally referred to as postamendments
devices, are classified automatically by
statute into class III without any FDA
rulemaking process. These devices
remain in class III and require
premarket approval, unless and until
the device is classified or reclassified
into class I or II, or FDA issues an order
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
30354
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 102 / Thursday, May 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
finding the device to be substantially
equivalent, in accordance with section
513(i) of the FD&C Act, to a predicate
device that does not require premarket
approval. The Agency determines
whether new devices are substantially
equivalent to predicate devices by
means of premarket notification
procedures in section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part
807 (21 CFR part 807) of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, as
amended by section 607 of the Food and
Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144),
provides two procedures by which a
person may request FDA to classify a
device under the criteria set forth in
section 513(a)(1). Under the first
procedure, the person submits a
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that
has not previously been classified and,
within 30 days of receiving an order
classifying the device into class III
under section 513(f)(1), the person
requests a classification under section
513(f)(2). Under the second procedure,
rather than first submitting a premarket
notification under section 510(k) and
then a request for classification under
the first procedure, the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence and requests a classification
under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
If the person submits a request to
classify the device under this second
procedure, FDA may decline to
undertake the classification request if
FDA identifies a legally marketed device
that could provide a reasonable basis for
review of substantial equivalence with
the device or if FDA determines that the
device submitted is not of ‘‘lowmoderate risk’’ or that general controls
would be inadequate to control the risks
and special controls to mitigate the risks
cannot be developed.
In response to a request to classify a
device under either procedure provided
by section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act,
FDA will classify the device by written
order within 120 days. This
classification will be the initial
classification of the device. On
November 21, 2013, Ergon Medical,
Ltd., submitted a request for
classification of the ProlongTM under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. The
manufacturer recommended that the
device be classified into class II (Ref. 1).
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed the
request in order to classify the device
under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1). FDA classifies
devices into class II if general controls
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 May 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
by themselves are insufficient to
provide reasonable assurance of safety
and effectiveness, but there is sufficient
information to establish special controls
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the request,
FDA determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
believes these special controls, in
addition to general controls, will
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on March 20, 2015, FDA
issued an order to the requestor
classifying the device into class II. FDA
is codifying the classification of the
device by adding 21 CFR 876.5025.
Following the effective date of this
final classification order, any firm
submitting a premarket notification
(510(k)) for a vibrator for climax control
of premature ejaculation will need to
comply with the special controls named
in this final order. The device is
assigned the generic name vibrator for
climax control of premature ejaculation,
and it is identified as a device used for
males who suffer from premature
ejaculation. It is designed to increase the
time between arousal and ejaculation
using the stimulating vibratory effects of
the device on the penis.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device, as well as the
measures required to mitigate these
risks in table 1.
to health and provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and
effectiveness:
• The labeling must include specific
instructions regarding the proper
placement and use of the device.
• The portions of the device that
contact the patient must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
• Appropriate analysis/testing must
demonstrate electromagnetic
compatibility safety, electrical safety,
and thermal safety of the device.
• Mechanical safety testing must
demonstrate that the device will
withstand forces encountered during
use.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act
provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act, if FDA determines that
premarket notification is not necessary
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification
is necessary to provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device. Therefore, this device
type is not exempt from premarket
notification requirements. Persons who
intend to market this type of device
must submit to FDA a premarket
notification, prior to marketing the
device, which contains information
about the vibrator for climax control of
premature ejaculation they intend to
market.
II. Environmental Impact
TABLE 1—VIBRATOR FOR CLIMAX
CONTROL OF PREMATURE EJACULAThe Agency has determined under 21
TION RISKS AND MITIGATION MEAS- CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
URES
Identified risk
Pain or Discomfort
due to Misuse of
Device.
Burns .........................
Electrical Shock ........
Adverse Skin Reactions.
Patient Injury due to
Device Breakage or
Failure.
Interference With
Other Devices/Electrical Equipment.
Mitigation measures
Labeling.
Electrical and Thermal Safety Testing.
Labeling.
Electrical Safety Testing.
Labeling.
Biocompatibility Testing.
Mechanical Safety
Testing.
Labeling.
Electromagnetic
Compatibility Testing.
Labeling.
FDA believes that the following
special controls, in combination with
the general controls, address these risks
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations. These
collections of information are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information in
part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120, and the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 801,
regarding labeling have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0485.
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 102 / Thursday, May 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
IV. Reference
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
The following reference has been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, and is available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Office of the Secretary
1. DEN130047: De Novo Request per 513(f)(2)
from Ergon Medical Ltd., dated
November 21, 2013.
ACTION:
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 876
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 876 is
amended as follows:
PART 876—GASTROENTEROLOGY—
UROLOGY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 876 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 876.5025 to subpart F to read
as follows:
■
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 876.5025 Vibrator for climax control of
premature ejaculation.
(a) Identification. A vibrator for
climax control of premature ejaculation
is used for males who suffer from
premature ejaculation. It is designed to
increase the time between arousal and
ejaculation using the stimulating
vibratory effects of the device on the
penis.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) The labeling must include specific
instructions regarding the proper
placement and use of the device.
(2) The portions of the device that
contact the patient must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(3) Appropriate analysis/testing must
demonstrate electromagnetic
compatibility safety, electrical safety,
and thermal safety of the device.
(4) Mechanical safety testing must
demonstrate that the device will
withstand forces encountered during
use.
Dated: May 21, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–12852 Filed 5–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 May 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
32 CFR Part 243
[Docket ID: DOD–2013–OS–0130]
RIN 0790–AJ08
Ratemaking Procedures for Civil
Reserve Air Fleet Contracts
USTRANSCOM, DoD.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
Section 366 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2012 directs the Secretary of
Defense to determine a fair and
reasonable rate of payment for airlift
services provided to the Department of
Defense by air carriers who are
participants in the Civil Reserve Air
Fleet Program. The Department of
Defense (the Department or DoD) is
promulgating regulations to establish
ratemaking procedures for civil reserve
air fleet contracts as required by Section
366(a) in order to determine a fair and
reasonable rate of payment.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
June 29, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Richard Gates, Chief, Acquisition Law,
USTRANSCOM/TCJA, (618) 220–3982
or Mr. Jeff Beyer, Chief, Business
Support and Policy Division,
USTRANSCOM/TCAQ, (618) 220–7021.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
The Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF) is
a wartime readiness program, based on
the Defense Production Act of 1950, as
amended, (50 U.S.C. App. 2601 et seq.),
and Executive Order 13603 (National
Defense Resource Preparedness), March
16, 2012, to ensure quantifiable,
accessible, and reliable commercial
airlift capability to augment DoD airlift
and to assure a mobilization base of
aircraft available to the Department of
Defense for use in the event of any level
of national emergency or defenseorientated situations. As a readiness
program, CRAF quantifies the number of
passenger and cargo commercial assets
required to support various levels of
wartime requirements and thus allows
DoD to account for their use when
developing and executing contingency
operations and war plans. In addition,
the CRAF program identifies how DoD
gains access to these commercial assets
for operations by defining the
authorities and procedures for CRAF
activation. Finally, the program helps
ensure that the DoD has reliable lines of
communication and a common
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30355
understanding of procedures with the
carriers.
The United States Transportation
Command (USTRANSCOM) negotiates
and structures award of aircraft service
contracts with certificated civilian air
carriers willing to participate in the
CRAF program in order to ensure that a
mobilization base of aircraft is capable
of responding to any level of defenseorientated situations.
The ability to set rates maintains the
CRAF program’s great flexibility to have
any air carrier in the program able to
provide aircraft within 24 hours of
activation to fly personnel and cargo to
any location in the world at a set rate
per passenger or ton mile, regardless of
where the air carrier normally operates.
It also provides the Secretary of Defense
the ability to respond rapidly to assist
in emergencies and approved
humanitarian operations, both in the
United States and overseas where delay
could result in more than monetary
losses. The Government-set rate allows
contracts to any location, sometimes
awarded within less than an hour, and
provides substantial commercial
capability on short notice.
During the initial CRAF program
years (between 1955 and 1962),
ratemaking to price DoD airlift service
relied upon price competition to meet
its commercial airlift needs. This
procurement method resulted in
predatory pricing issues and failed to
provide service meeting safety and
performance requirements.
Congressional Subcommittee hearings
held at the time determined price
competition to be non-compensatory
and destructive to the industry. As a
result, the ratemaking process was
implemented under the regulatory
authority of the Civil Aeronautics Board
(CAB). Ratemaking continued under the
CAB until deregulation in 1980. At that
time, civil air carriers and DoD’s
contracting agency for long-term
international airlift, the Military Airlift
Command (MAC), agreed by a
memorandum of understanding (MOU)
that CAB methodologies by which rates
for DoD airlift were established
produced fair and reasonable rates and
furthered the objectives of the CRAF
program; and therefore, the parties
agreed to continue to use CAB
methodologies for establishing MAC
uniform negotiated rates under an MOU
renewed every five years. MAC became
Air Mobility Command (AMC) on June
1, 1992. Ratemaking continued under
AMC until January 1, 2007, when DoD’s
contracting authority for long-term
international airlift was transferred from
AMC to USTRANSCOM. On December
31, 2011, the National Defense
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30353-30355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12852]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 876
[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-1297]
Medical Devices; Gastroenterology-Urology Devices; Classification
of the Vibrator for Climax Control of Premature Ejaculation
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the
vibrator for climax control of premature ejaculation into class II
(special controls). The special controls that will apply to the device
are identified in this order and will be part of the codified language
for the classification of the vibrator for climax control of premature
ejaculation. The Agency is classifying the device into class II
(special controls) in order to provide a reasonable assurance of safety
and effectiveness of the device.
DATES: This order is effective May 28, 2015. The classification was
applicable on March 20, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tuan Nguyen, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G118, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-5174,
tuan.nguyen@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)), devices that were
not in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 (the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976), generally referred
to as postamendments devices, are classified automatically by statute
into class III without any FDA rulemaking process. These devices remain
in class III and require premarket approval, unless and until the
device is classified or reclassified into class I or II, or FDA issues
an order
[[Page 30354]]
finding the device to be substantially equivalent, in accordance with
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act, to a predicate device that does not
require premarket approval. The Agency determines whether new devices
are substantially equivalent to predicate devices by means of premarket
notification procedures in section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807) of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, as amended by section 607 of the
Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-
144), provides two procedures by which a person may request FDA to
classify a device under the criteria set forth in section 513(a)(1).
Under the first procedure, the person submits a premarket notification
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that has not
previously been classified and, within 30 days of receiving an order
classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1), the
person requests a classification under section 513(f)(2). Under the
second procedure, rather than first submitting a premarket notification
under section 510(k) and then a request for classification under the
first procedure, the person determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a determination of substantial
equivalence and requests a classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act. If the person submits a request to classify the device
under this second procedure, FDA may decline to undertake the
classification request if FDA identifies a legally marketed device that
could provide a reasonable basis for review of substantial equivalence
with the device or if FDA determines that the device submitted is not
of ``low-moderate risk'' or that general controls would be inadequate
to control the risks and special controls to mitigate the risks cannot
be developed.
In response to a request to classify a device under either
procedure provided by section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA will
classify the device by written order within 120 days. This
classification will be the initial classification of the device. On
November 21, 2013, Ergon Medical, Ltd., submitted a request for
classification of the ProlongTM under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act. The manufacturer recommended that the device be
classified into class II (Ref. 1).
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed
the request in order to classify the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section 513(a)(1). FDA classifies devices
into class II if general controls by themselves are insufficient to
provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness, but there is
sufficient information to establish special controls to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use. After review of the information submitted in the
request, FDA determined that the device can be classified into class II
with the establishment of special controls. FDA believes these special
controls, in addition to general controls, will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on March 20, 2015, FDA issued an order to the requestor
classifying the device into class II. FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 876.5025.
Following the effective date of this final classification order,
any firm submitting a premarket notification (510(k)) for a vibrator
for climax control of premature ejaculation will need to comply with
the special controls named in this final order. The device is assigned
the generic name vibrator for climax control of premature ejaculation,
and it is identified as a device used for males who suffer from
premature ejaculation. It is designed to increase the time between
arousal and ejaculation using the stimulating vibratory effects of the
device on the penis.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device, as well as the measures required
to mitigate these risks in table 1.
Table 1--Vibrator for Climax Control of Premature Ejaculation Risks and
Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risk Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pain or Discomfort due to Misuse of Device Labeling.
Burns..................................... Electrical and Thermal
Safety Testing.
Labeling.
Electrical Shock.......................... Electrical Safety Testing.
Labeling.
Adverse Skin Reactions.................... Biocompatibility Testing.
Patient Injury due to Device Breakage or Mechanical Safety Testing.
Failure. Labeling.
Interference With Other Devices/Electrical Electromagnetic
Equipment. Compatibility Testing.
Labeling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA believes that the following special controls, in combination
with the general controls, address these risks to health and provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness:
The labeling must include specific instructions regarding
the proper placement and use of the device.
The portions of the device that contact the patient must
be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
Appropriate analysis/testing must demonstrate
electromagnetic compatibility safety, electrical safety, and thermal
safety of the device.
Mechanical safety testing must demonstrate that the device
will withstand forces encountered during use.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification requirements under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act, if FDA determines that premarket notification
is not necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. For this type of device, FDA has
determined that premarket notification is necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, this device type is not exempt from premarket notification
requirements. Persons who intend to market this type of device must
submit to FDA a premarket notification, prior to marketing the device,
which contains information about the vibrator for climax control of
premature ejaculation they intend to market.
II. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations. These collections of information are subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in
part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket notification submissions have
been approved under OMB control number 0910-0120, and the collections
of information in 21 CFR part 801, regarding labeling have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0485.
[[Page 30355]]
IV. Reference
The following reference has been placed on display in the Division
of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, and may be seen by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
and is available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov.
1. DEN130047: De Novo Request per 513(f)(2) from Ergon Medical Ltd.,
dated November 21, 2013.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 876
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
876 is amended as follows:
PART 876--GASTROENTEROLOGY--UROLOGY DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 876 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 876.5025 to subpart F to read as follows:
Sec. 876.5025 Vibrator for climax control of premature ejaculation.
(a) Identification. A vibrator for climax control of premature
ejaculation is used for males who suffer from premature ejaculation. It
is designed to increase the time between arousal and ejaculation using
the stimulating vibratory effects of the device on the penis.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) The labeling must include specific instructions regarding the
proper placement and use of the device.
(2) The portions of the device that contact the patient must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(3) Appropriate analysis/testing must demonstrate electromagnetic
compatibility safety, electrical safety, and thermal safety of the
device.
(4) Mechanical safety testing must demonstrate that the device will
withstand forces encountered during use.
Dated: May 21, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-12852 Filed 5-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P