Pediatric Studies of Meropenem Conducted in Accordance With the Public Health Service Act; Availability of Summary Report and Requested Labeling Changes, 30467-30468 [2015-12848]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 102 / Thursday, May 28, 2015 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
entitled ‘‘Radiation Biodosimetry
Devices; Draft Guidance for Industry
and Food and Drug Administration
Staff; Availability’’, published in the
Federal Register of December 30, 2014.
In that document, FDA announced the
availability of a draft guidance for
industry and FDA staff and requested
comments. The Agency is taking this
action in response to a request for an
extension to allow interested persons
additional time to submit comments.
DATES: FDA is reopening and extending
the comment period on the draft
guidance. Submit either electronic or
written comments by June 29, 2015.
ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the
guidance document is available for
download from the Internet. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
information on electronic access to the
guidance. Submit written requests for a
single hard copy of the draft guidance
document entitled ‘‘Radiation
Biodosimetry Devices’’ to the Office of
the Center Director, Guidance and
Policy Development, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5431, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002. Send one selfaddressed adhesive label to assist that
office in processing your request.
Submit electronic comments on the
draft guidance to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Identify
comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Dickey, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5262, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–5028.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of December
30, 2014 (79 FR 78448), FDA published
a notice with a 90-day comment period
to request comments on the draft
guidance for industry and FDA staff
entitled ‘‘Radiation Biodosimetry
Devices’’.
The Agency received a request for an
extension of the comment period for the
draft guidance (Docket No. FDA–2014–
D–2065–0005). The request conveyed
concern that the current 90-day
comment period does not allow
sufficient time to respond. FDA has
considered the request and is reopening
and extending the comment period for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:06 May 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
the draft guidance for 30 days. The
Agency believes that a 30-day extension
allows adequate time for interested
persons to submit comments without
significantly delaying further FDA
action on this guidance document.
II. Electronic Access
Persons interested in obtaining a copy
of the draft guidance may do so by
downloading an electronic copy from
the Internet. A search capability for all
Center for Devices and Radiological
Health guidance documents is available
at https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
DeviceRegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/default.htm.
Guidance documents are also available
at https://www.regulations.gov. Persons
unable to download an electronic copy
of ‘‘Radiation Biodosimetry Devices’’
may send an email request to CDRHGuidance@fda.hhs.gov to receive an
electronic copy of the document. Please
use the document number 1400045 to
identify the guidance you are
requesting.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: May 21, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–12854 Filed 5–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0918]
Pediatric Studies of Meropenem
Conducted in Accordance With the
Public Health Service Act; Availability
of Summary Report and Requested
Labeling Changes
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is publishing a
summary report of the pediatric studies
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30467
of meropenem conducted in accordance
with the Public Health Service Act (the
PHS Act) and is making available
requested labeling changes for
meropenem. The Agency is making this
information available consistent with
the PHS Act.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori
Gorski, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 22, Rm. 6415, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–2200, FAX:
301–796–9855, email: lori.gorski@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Meropenem Summary Review
In the Federal Register of August 13,
2003 (68 FR 48402), meropenem was
identified as a drug that needed further
study in pediatrics. The approved
labeling lacked adequate information on
dosing, pharmacokinetic, tolerability,
and safety data in newborns and young
infants with complicated intraabdominal infections.
A written request for pediatric studies
of meropenem was issued on September
10, 2004, to AstraZeneca
Pharmaceuticals, the holder of the new
drug application (NDA) for meropenem.
FDA did not receive a response to the
written request. Accordingly, the
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
issued a request for proposals to
conduct the pediatric studies described
in the written request on August 15,
2005, and awarded funds to Duke
University and Stanford University on
September 28, 2007, to complete the
studies described in the written request.
On completion of the studies, the
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National
Institute of Child Health and Human
Development (NICHD) submitted a final
clinical study report for meropenem to
FDA for review under investigational
new drug application (IND) 101043:
(NICHD–2005–18) ‘‘A Multiple Dose PK
Study of Meropenem In Young Infants
(less than 91 days of age) With
Suspected or Complicated Intraabdominal Infections.’’
In the Federal Register of February
27, 2012 (77 FR 11556), FDA announced
the opening on February 17, 2012, of
docket FDA–2011–N–0918 for
submission of data from pediatric
studies of meropenem. The data
submitted to the docket by NIH were
submitted in accordance with section
409I of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 284m)
and were the same data submitted to
IND 101043, with the exception that
personal privacy information had been
redacted from the data submitted to the
docket.
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
30468
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 102 / Thursday, May 28, 2015 / Notices
The meropenem docket remained
opened for public comment from
February 27, 2012, until March 28,
2012. There were no comments
submitted to the docket during that
time. The key findings of this final
clinical study report are:
The submitted study was an openlabel, non-comparative, multicenter,
prospective, multiple pharmacokinetic
(PK) and safety study in infants less
than 91 days of age. The study enrolled
200 infants with a median postnatal age
of 21 days (range 1 to 92 days) and a
median gestation age (GA) of 27.8 weeks
(range 22.5 to 40 weeks). Infants with
complicated intra-abdominal infections
who were receiving meropenem based
on local standard of care were eligible
for enrollment. Complicated intraabdominal infections were defined per
the protocol as physical, radiologic, or
bacteriologic findings of complicated
intra-abdominal infection to include
peritonitis, necrotizing enterocolitis
(NEC) grade II or higher by Bell’s
criteria, Hirschsprung’s disease with
perforation, spontaneous perforation,
meconium ileus with perforation, bowel
obstruction with perforation, as
evidenced by free peritoneal air on
abdominal radiograph, intestinal
pneumatosis, or portal venous gas on
abdominal radiographic examination, or
possible NEC.
The study was not statistically
powered to establish efficacy because
the Division of Anti-Infective Products
agreed that extrapolation of efficacy to
pediatric populations from adult
populations was acceptable. However,
clinical efficacy endpoints were also
evaluated. The efficacy assessment
included a comparison of the clinical
status at study baseline and at day 28 or
after a minimum of 7 days of treatment,
using a combination of an assessment
using the Score for Neonatal Acute
Physiology II tool and other protocol
specified outcome criteria. The clinical
endpoint was defined as the patient
being alive, with negative bacterial
cultures from a sterile body fluid, and
a presumptive clinical cure. Clinical
failure was defined as death, change in
antibiotic therapy while on study drug,
or lack of presumptive clinical cure. The
addition of treatment directed against
Gram-positive pathogens from a nonabdominal source was not considered to
represent treatment failure. Using these
criteria, 195/200 patients or 97.5 percent
were considered to have achieved the
clinical endpoint. Of the 195 patients
included in the efficacy population, 192
(98.5 percent) were evaluated for
efficacy. The overall efficacy success
rate for the study was 84.4 percent (95
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 May 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
percent confidence interval, 78.5 to 89.2
percent).
Analysis of safety was a primary
objective of the study. The following
assessments were included in the study:
Monitoring for adverse events, serious
adverse events, and death;
documentation of seizures; acute
abdominal complications; development
of resistant bacterial infection or
candidiasis; treatment failure; physical
examination; clinical laboratory values;
cultures from sterile sites, and
concomitant medications. There were
11 deaths in the study; all occurred in
patients less than 32 weeks GA. The
most common cause of death was multiorgan failure. None of the deaths were
related to meropenem administration.
The following adverse events occurred
with a frequency in the study that
differed from that seen in previous
pediatric and adult studies: Convulsion
(seizures), 5 percent,
hyperbilirubinemia, 4.5 percent and
vomiting, 2.5 percent. Study oversight
included a safety committee and an
independent data safety monitoring
board.
The Division of Anti-Infective
Products agreed that meropenem was
well-tolerated in the pediatric
population enrolled in the study. Of the
10 patients with seizures, 8 patients
were adjudicated to have developed
seizures possibly due to the study
medication. Because cerebrospinal fluid
was only evaluated in a limited number
of patients with seizures, it is not
possible to determine if the seizure
threshold may have changed due to
possible underlying meningitis and the
administration of meropenem.
II. Recommendation
This study supports the use of
meropenem in neonates and infants less
than 91 days of age for complicated
intra-abdominal infections. However,
infants with complicated intraabdominal infections are anticipated to
have different physiological
characteristics than patients with
meningitis that may impact the PK of
meropenem; as such, it may not be
appropriate to apply the PK findings
from this population to a patient
population with meningitis. The
Division recommended that the
evaluation of meropenem in infants less
than 91 days of age be limited to the
treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections at this time.
FDA’s requested labeling changes,
including dosing recommendations for
the use of meropenem in neonates and
infants less than 91 days of age for
complicated intra-abdominal infections,
are available on the FDA Web site at
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/
DevelopmentApprovalProcess/
DevelopmentResources/ucm379088.htm
and in the docket (Ref. 1).
Dated: May 21, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–12848 Filed 5–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2015–N–0012]
Molecular Characterization of Multiple
Myeloma Black/African Ancestry
Disparity
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of grant funds for the
support of the efforts of the Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER).
FDA is announcing its intent to accept
and consider a single-source application
for the award of a grant to the Multiple
Myeloma Service of Memorial Sloan
Kettering Cancer Institute. The goal of
the cooperative agreement between
CDER and the Multiple Myeloma
Service of Memorial Sloan Kettering
Cancer Institute is to support the
development of appropriate
methodologies to conduct clinical trial
design evaluation and determine
extrapolation of findings from the
general population to the U.S. Black
population.
SUMMARY:
Important dates are as follows:
1. The application due date is July 20,
2015.
2. The anticipated start date is August
2015.
3. The opening date is May 18, 2015.
4. The expiration date is July 21,
2015.
DATES:
Submit electronic
applications to: https://www.Grants.gov.
For more information, see section III of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dickran Kazandjian, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, Rm. 2320,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 240–
402–5272; or Vieda Hubbard, Division
of Acquisition Support and Grants
(HFA–500), Food and Drug
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30467-30468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12848]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0918]
Pediatric Studies of Meropenem Conducted in Accordance With the
Public Health Service Act; Availability of Summary Report and Requested
Labeling Changes
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing a summary
report of the pediatric studies of meropenem conducted in accordance
with the Public Health Service Act (the PHS Act) and is making
available requested labeling changes for meropenem. The Agency is
making this information available consistent with the PHS Act.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori Gorski, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, Rm. 6415, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-2200, FAX: 301-796-9855, email: lori.gorski@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Meropenem Summary Review
In the Federal Register of August 13, 2003 (68 FR 48402), meropenem
was identified as a drug that needed further study in pediatrics. The
approved labeling lacked adequate information on dosing,
pharmacokinetic, tolerability, and safety data in newborns and young
infants with complicated intra-abdominal infections.
A written request for pediatric studies of meropenem was issued on
September 10, 2004, to AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, the holder of the
new drug application (NDA) for meropenem. FDA did not receive a
response to the written request. Accordingly, the National Institutes
of Health (NIH) issued a request for proposals to conduct the pediatric
studies described in the written request on August 15, 2005, and
awarded funds to Duke University and Stanford University on September
28, 2007, to complete the studies described in the written request.
On completion of the studies, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) submitted a
final clinical study report for meropenem to FDA for review under
investigational new drug application (IND) 101043: (NICHD-2005-18) ``A
Multiple Dose PK Study of Meropenem In Young Infants (less than 91 days
of age) With Suspected or Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections.''
In the Federal Register of February 27, 2012 (77 FR 11556), FDA
announced the opening on February 17, 2012, of docket FDA-2011-N-0918
for submission of data from pediatric studies of meropenem. The data
submitted to the docket by NIH were submitted in accordance with
section 409I of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 284m) and were the same data
submitted to IND 101043, with the exception that personal privacy
information had been redacted from the data submitted to the docket.
[[Page 30468]]
The meropenem docket remained opened for public comment from
February 27, 2012, until March 28, 2012. There were no comments
submitted to the docket during that time. The key findings of this
final clinical study report are:
The submitted study was an open-label, non-comparative,
multicenter, prospective, multiple pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety
study in infants less than 91 days of age. The study enrolled 200
infants with a median postnatal age of 21 days (range 1 to 92 days) and
a median gestation age (GA) of 27.8 weeks (range 22.5 to 40 weeks).
Infants with complicated intra-abdominal infections who were receiving
meropenem based on local standard of care were eligible for enrollment.
Complicated intra-abdominal infections were defined per the protocol as
physical, radiologic, or bacteriologic findings of complicated intra-
abdominal infection to include peritonitis, necrotizing enterocolitis
(NEC) grade II or higher by Bell's criteria, Hirschsprung's disease
with perforation, spontaneous perforation, meconium ileus with
perforation, bowel obstruction with perforation, as evidenced by free
peritoneal air on abdominal radiograph, intestinal pneumatosis, or
portal venous gas on abdominal radiographic examination, or possible
NEC.
The study was not statistically powered to establish efficacy
because the Division of Anti-Infective Products agreed that
extrapolation of efficacy to pediatric populations from adult
populations was acceptable. However, clinical efficacy endpoints were
also evaluated. The efficacy assessment included a comparison of the
clinical status at study baseline and at day 28 or after a minimum of 7
days of treatment, using a combination of an assessment using the Score
for Neonatal Acute Physiology II tool and other protocol specified
outcome criteria. The clinical endpoint was defined as the patient
being alive, with negative bacterial cultures from a sterile body
fluid, and a presumptive clinical cure. Clinical failure was defined as
death, change in antibiotic therapy while on study drug, or lack of
presumptive clinical cure. The addition of treatment directed against
Gram-positive pathogens from a non-abdominal source was not considered
to represent treatment failure. Using these criteria, 195/200 patients
or 97.5 percent were considered to have achieved the clinical endpoint.
Of the 195 patients included in the efficacy population, 192 (98.5
percent) were evaluated for efficacy. The overall efficacy success rate
for the study was 84.4 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 78.5 to
89.2 percent).
Analysis of safety was a primary objective of the study. The
following assessments were included in the study: Monitoring for
adverse events, serious adverse events, and death; documentation of
seizures; acute abdominal complications; development of resistant
bacterial infection or candidiasis; treatment failure; physical
examination; clinical laboratory values; cultures from sterile sites,
and concomitant medications. There were 11 deaths in the study; all
occurred in patients less than 32 weeks GA. The most common cause of
death was multi-organ failure. None of the deaths were related to
meropenem administration. The following adverse events occurred with a
frequency in the study that differed from that seen in previous
pediatric and adult studies: Convulsion (seizures), 5 percent,
hyperbilirubinemia, 4.5 percent and vomiting, 2.5 percent. Study
oversight included a safety committee and an independent data safety
monitoring board.
The Division of Anti-Infective Products agreed that meropenem was
well-tolerated in the pediatric population enrolled in the study. Of
the 10 patients with seizures, 8 patients were adjudicated to have
developed seizures possibly due to the study medication. Because
cerebrospinal fluid was only evaluated in a limited number of patients
with seizures, it is not possible to determine if the seizure threshold
may have changed due to possible underlying meningitis and the
administration of meropenem.
II. Recommendation
This study supports the use of meropenem in neonates and infants
less than 91 days of age for complicated intra-abdominal infections.
However, infants with complicated intra-abdominal infections are
anticipated to have different physiological characteristics than
patients with meningitis that may impact the PK of meropenem; as such,
it may not be appropriate to apply the PK findings from this population
to a patient population with meningitis. The Division recommended that
the evaluation of meropenem in infants less than 91 days of age be
limited to the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections at
this time.
FDA's requested labeling changes, including dosing recommendations
for the use of meropenem in neonates and infants less than 91 days of
age for complicated intra-abdominal infections, are available on the
FDA Web site at https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/ucm379088.htm and in the docket (Ref. 1).
Dated: May 21, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-12848 Filed 5-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P