Safety Zone; Detroit Belle Isle Grand Prix, Detroit River; Detroit, MI, 29946-29948 [2015-12554]
Download as PDF
29946
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 26, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
■
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule simply
promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges. This rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:03 May 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Effective 7 a.m. on May 26, 2015 to
7 p.m. on February 28, 2016, suspend
§ 117.269 and add § 117.T269 to read as
follows:
■
§ 117.T269
Biscayne Bay.
The Venetian Causeway Bridge (East)
shall remain closed to navigation.
Dated: May 7, 2015.
Melissa Bert,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Seventh Coast Guard District, Acting.
[FR Doc. 2015–12552 Filed 5–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2015–0389]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Detroit Belle Isle Grand
Prix, Detroit River; Detroit, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
encompassing a portion of the Detroit
River in Detroit, Michigan. This safety
zone is necessary to protect Belle Isle
Grand Prix participants, spectators and
vessels from the hazards associated with
a high speed automobile race in close
proximity to a navigable waterway.
This safety zone will establish
restrictions upon, and control
movement of, vessels in a portion of the
Detroit River. During the enforcement
period, no person or vessel may enter
the regulated area without permission of
the Captain of the Port.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This temporary final rule is
effective and will be enforced from 8
a.m. on May 29, 2015 until 8 p.m. on
May 31, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2015–0389. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box, and
click ‘‘Search.’’ You may visit the
Docket Management Facility,
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or email PO1 Todd Manow,
Prevention Department, Sector Detroit,
Coast Guard; telephone 313–568–9580,
email Todd.M.Manow@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Ms. Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826 or 1–800–647–5527.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NAD 83 North American Datum of 1983
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because waiting
for a notice and comment period to run
would be impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest. The
final details of this event were not
known to the Coast Guard with
sufficient time for the Coast Guard to
solicit public comments before the start
of the event. Thus, delaying this
temporary rule to wait for a notice and
comment period to run would be
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest because it would inhibit the
Coast Guard’s ability to protect
waterways users from the hazards
associated with a high speed automobile
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 26, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
race in close proximity to a navigable
waterway.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register (FR). For the same reasons
discussed in the preceding paragraph,
waiting for a 30-day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis and authorities for this
rule are found in 33 U.S.C. 1231, 46
U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1,
6.04–6, and 160.5; Public Law 107–295,
116 Stat. 2064; and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1, which collectively authorize the
Coast Guard to establish and define
regulatory safety zones.
On the morning of May 29, 2015, a
series of high speed automobile races
will begin and continue for three days
until the evening of May 31, 2015.
Participants in the Detroit Belle Isle
Grand Prix will race on portions of the
roadway in the Belle Isle Park that are
very near to the waterfront, making
these areas vulnerable in the event of a
collision.
The Captain of the Port Detroit has
determined that the likely combination
of recreation vessels, commercial
vessels, and large numbers of spectators
in close proximity to the automobile
races pose extra and unusual hazards to
public safety and property. Thus, the
Captain of the Port Detroit has
determined that establishing a Safety
Zone around the location of the
racecourse will help minimize risks to
safety of life and property during this
event.
C. Discussion of Rule
In light of the aforementioned
hazards, the Captain of the Port Detroit
has determined that a temporary safety
zone is necessary to prevent vessels
from entering, transiting, or anchoring
in the vicinity of the event. The safety
zone will encompass a 50 yard wide
zone around the western side of Belle
Isle in U.S. Waters, of the Detroit River.
The area will start on the west side of
the Belle Isle Bridge at position 42°20.4′
N.; 082°59.8′ W. to 50 yards offshore;
and will end 50 yards offshore south of
the Dossin Museum parking lot, and
extending to Belle Isle straight north to
position 42°20.1′ N.; 082°59.0′ W. (all
coordinates are NAD 83).
This safety zone is necessary in order
to ensure the protection of Participants
of the Detroit Belle Isle Grand Prix and
waterways users transiting the area.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:03 May 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
This safety zone will be enforced from
8 a.m. until 8 p.m. each day on May 29,
30, and 31, 2015.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Detroit or his designated on-scene
representative.
Vessel operators desiring to transit
through this safety zone must contact
the Coast Guard Patrol Commander to
obtain permission to do so. The Captain
of the Port or his designated on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 14 of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We conclude that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we
anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant
or loan recipients, and will not raise any
novel legal or policy issues.
The safety zone created by this rule
will be relatively small and enforced for
relatively short duration, and it is
designed to minimize the impact on
navigation. Under certain conditions,
vessels may still transit through the
safety zone when permitted by the
Captain of the Port. Moreover, this
safety zone is outside the navigable
channel. Overall, the Coast Guard
expects minimal impact to vessel
movement from the enforcement of this
safety zone.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29947
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of the Detroit River from 8
a.m. until 8 p.m. on May 29, 30, and 31,
2015.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This safety zone
is outside of the navigable shipping
channel and will not obstruct the
regular flow of commercial traffic.
Vessels may be allowed to pass through
the safety zone with the permission of
the Captain of the Port or his designated
on-scene representative. The Captain of
the Port can be reached via VHF
channel 16. The Coast Guard will give
notice to the public via a Broadcast to
Mariners that the regulation is in effect,
allowing vessel owners and operators to
plan accordingly.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule to that they can
better evaluate its effects on them. If this
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
29948
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 26, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
11. Indian Tribal Governments
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received withou1111t
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:03 May 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0389 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T09–0389 Safety Zone; Detroit Belle
Isle Grand Prix, Detroit River, Detroit, MI.
(a) Safety zone. A safety zone is
established to include all waters of the
Detroit River within a 50-yard wide
zone around the western side of Belle
Isle in U.S. Waters, of the Detroit River.
The area will start on the west side of
the Belle Isle Bridge at position 42°20.4′
N.; 082°59.8′ W. to 50 yards offshore;
and will end 50 yards offshore south of
the Dossin Museum parking lot, and
extending to Belle Isle straight north to
position 42°20.1′ N.; 082°59.0′ W. All
geographic coordinates are North
American Datum of 1983.
(b) Effective and enforcement period.
This regulation will be enforced from 8
a.m. until 8 p.m. each day on May 29,
30, and 31, 2015.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in section
165.23, entry into, transiting or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Detroit, MI, or his
designated representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Detroit, MI, or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
who has been designated by the Captain
of the Port to act on his behalf. The onscene representative will be aboard
either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard
auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port
representative may be contacted via
VHF channel 16 or at 313–568–9464.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Detroit,
MI or his on-scene representative to
request permission to do so. Vessel
operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port Detroit, MI or his onscene representative.
Dated: April 11, 2015.
S.B. Lemasters,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2015–12554 Filed 5–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 26, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29946-29948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12554]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2015-0389]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Detroit Belle Isle Grand Prix, Detroit River;
Detroit, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone
encompassing a portion of the Detroit River in Detroit, Michigan. This
safety zone is necessary to protect Belle Isle Grand Prix participants,
spectators and vessels from the hazards associated with a high speed
automobile race in close proximity to a navigable waterway.
This safety zone will establish restrictions upon, and control
movement of, vessels in a portion of the Detroit River. During the
enforcement period, no person or vessel may enter the regulated area
without permission of the Captain of the Port.
DATES: This temporary final rule is effective and will be enforced from
8 a.m. on May 29, 2015 until 8 p.m. on May 31, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2015-0389. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ``SEARCH'' box, and click ``Search.'' You may visit the
Docket Management Facility, Department of Transportation, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email PO1 Todd Manow, Prevention Department,
Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone 313-568-9580, email
Todd.M.Manow@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Ms. Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826 or 1-800-647-5527.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NAD 83 North American Datum of 1983
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because waiting for a notice and comment
period to run would be impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the
public interest. The final details of this event were not known to the
Coast Guard with sufficient time for the Coast Guard to solicit public
comments before the start of the event. Thus, delaying this temporary
rule to wait for a notice and comment period to run would be
impracticable and contrary to the public interest because it would
inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect waterways users from the
hazards associated with a high speed automobile
[[Page 29947]]
race in close proximity to a navigable waterway.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (FR). For the same reasons
discussed in the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30-day notice
period to run would be impracticable and contrary to the public
interest.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis and authorities for this rule are found in 33
U.S.C. 1231, 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat.
2064; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to establish and define
regulatory safety zones.
On the morning of May 29, 2015, a series of high speed automobile
races will begin and continue for three days until the evening of May
31, 2015. Participants in the Detroit Belle Isle Grand Prix will race
on portions of the roadway in the Belle Isle Park that are very near to
the waterfront, making these areas vulnerable in the event of a
collision.
The Captain of the Port Detroit has determined that the likely
combination of recreation vessels, commercial vessels, and large
numbers of spectators in close proximity to the automobile races pose
extra and unusual hazards to public safety and property. Thus, the
Captain of the Port Detroit has determined that establishing a Safety
Zone around the location of the racecourse will help minimize risks to
safety of life and property during this event.
C. Discussion of Rule
In light of the aforementioned hazards, the Captain of the Port
Detroit has determined that a temporary safety zone is necessary to
prevent vessels from entering, transiting, or anchoring in the vicinity
of the event. The safety zone will encompass a 50 yard wide zone around
the western side of Belle Isle in U.S. Waters, of the Detroit River.
The area will start on the west side of the Belle Isle Bridge at
position 42[deg]20.4' N.; 082[deg]59.8' W. to 50 yards offshore; and
will end 50 yards offshore south of the Dossin Museum parking lot, and
extending to Belle Isle straight north to position 42[deg]20.1' N.;
082[deg]59.0' W. (all coordinates are NAD 83).
This safety zone is necessary in order to ensure the protection of
Participants of the Detroit Belle Isle Grand Prix and waterways users
transiting the area. This safety zone will be enforced from 8 a.m.
until 8 p.m. each day on May 29, 30, and 31, 2015.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Detroit or his
designated on-scene representative.
Vessel operators desiring to transit through this safety zone must
contact the Coast Guard Patrol Commander to obtain permission to do so.
The Captain of the Port or his designated on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 14 of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy,
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel
legal or policy issues.
The safety zone created by this rule will be relatively small and
enforced for relatively short duration, and it is designed to minimize
the impact on navigation. Under certain conditions, vessels may still
transit through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of the
Port. Moreover, this safety zone is outside the navigable channel.
Overall, the Coast Guard expects minimal impact to vessel movement from
the enforcement of this safety zone.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of the Detroit River from 8 a.m. until 8
p.m. on May 29, 30, and 31, 2015.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
safety zone is outside of the navigable shipping channel and will not
obstruct the regular flow of commercial traffic. Vessels may be allowed
to pass through the safety zone with the permission of the Captain of
the Port or his designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the
Port can be reached via VHF channel 16. The Coast Guard will give
notice to the public via a Broadcast to Mariners that the regulation is
in effect, allowing vessel owners and operators to plan accordingly.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule to that they can better evaluate
its effects on them. If this rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against entities
that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
[[Page 29948]]
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received withou1111t jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and, therefore it
is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6 and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0389 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0389 Safety Zone; Detroit Belle Isle Grand Prix, Detroit
River, Detroit, MI.
(a) Safety zone. A safety zone is established to include all waters
of the Detroit River within a 50-yard wide zone around the western side
of Belle Isle in U.S. Waters, of the Detroit River. The area will start
on the west side of the Belle Isle Bridge at position 42[deg]20.4' N.;
082[deg]59.8' W. to 50 yards offshore; and will end 50 yards offshore
south of the Dossin Museum parking lot, and extending to Belle Isle
straight north to position 42[deg]20.1' N.; 082[deg]59.0' W. All
geographic coordinates are North American Datum of 1983.
(b) Effective and enforcement period. This regulation will be
enforced from 8 a.m. until 8 p.m. each day on May 29, 30, and 31, 2015.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23, entry into, transiting or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Detroit, MI, or his designated representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Detroit, MI, or his designated
on-scene representative.
(3) The on-scene representative of the Captain of the Port is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative will be aboard either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard
auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port representative may be
contacted via VHF channel 16 or at 313-568-9464.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Detroit, MI or his on-scene
representative to request permission to do so. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain of the Port Detroit, MI or his
on-scene representative.
Dated: April 11, 2015.
S.B. Lemasters,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2015-12554 Filed 5-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P