Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 29617-29619 [2015-12519]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Notices
Issue 4: Whether Meihua’s energy
allocation methodology is distortive
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–12520 Filed 5–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[Application No. 99–8A005]
Export Trade Certificate of Review
Notice of Issuance of an
Amended Export Trade Certificate of
Review for the California Almond
Export Association, LLC, Application
no. 99–8A005.
ACTION:
The Secretary of Commerce,
through the Office of Trade and
Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’), issued an
amended Export Trade Certificate of
Review to the California Almond Export
Association, LLC (‘‘CAEA’’) on May 6,
2015. The previous amendment was
issued on May 1, 2014.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of Trade
and Economic Analysis, International
Trade Administration, (202) 482–5131
(this is not a toll-free number) or email
at etca@trade.gov.
Title III of
the Export Trading Company Act of
1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the
Secretary of Commerce to issue Export
Trade Certificates of Review. An Export
Trade Certificate of Review protects the
holder and the members identified in
the Certificate from State and Federal
government antitrust actions and from
private treble damage antitrust actions
for the export conduct specified in the
Certificate and carried out in
compliance with its terms and
conditions. The regulations
implementing Title III are found at 15
CFR part 325 (2015). OTEA is issuing
this notice pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b),
which requires the Secretary to publish
a summary of the certificate in the
Federal Register. Under Section 305(a)
of the Act and 15 CFR 325.11(a), any
person aggrieved by the Secretary’s
determination may, within 30 days of
the date of this notice, bring an action
in any appropriate district court of the
United States to set aside the
determination on the ground that the
determination is erroneous.
Description of the Amendment to the
Certificate: Remove the following
company as a Member of CAEA’s
Certificate: Minturn Nut Company, Inc.,
Le Grand, CA.
CAEA’s Export Trade Certificate of
Review complete amended Membership
is listed below:
Almonds California Pride, Inc.,
Caruthers, CA
Baldwin-Minkler Farms, Orland, CA
Blue Diamond Growers, Sacramento, CA
Campos Brothers, Caruthers, CA
Chico Nut Company, Chico, CA
Del Rio Nut Company, Inc., Livingston,
CA
Fair Trade Corner, Inc., Chico, CA
Fisher Nut Company, Modesto, CA
Hilltop Ranch, Inc., Ballico, CA
Hughson Nut, Inc., Hughson, CA
Mariani Nut Company, Winters, CA
Nutco, LLC d.b.a. Spycher Brothers,
Turlock, CA
Paramount Farms, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
P–R Farms, Inc., Clovis, CA
Roche Brothers International Family
Nut Co., Escalon, CA
South Valley Almond Company, LLC,
Wasco, CA
Sunny Gem, LLC, Wasco, CA
Western Nut Company, Chico, CA
Dated: May 18, 2015.
Joseph Flynn,
Director, Office of Trade and Economic
Analysis, International Trade Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–12405 Filed 5–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
International Trade Administration
[A–489–822]
Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of
Turkey: Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Postponement of Final Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Department) preliminarily determines
that welded line pipe from the Republic
of Turkey (Turkey) is being, or is likely
to be, sold in the United States at less
than fair value (LTFV), as provided in
section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act). The period of
investigation (POI) is October 1, 2013,
through September 30, 2014. The
estimated weighted-average dumping
margins of sales at LTFV are shown in
the ‘‘Preliminary Determination’’
section of this notice. Interested parties
are invited to comment on this
preliminary determination.
DATES: Effective Date: May 22, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alice Maldonado or David Crespo, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29617
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4682 or (202) 482–
3693, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department initiated this
investigation on November 5, 2014.1 For
a complete description of the events that
followed the initiation of this
investigation, see the memorandum that
is dated concurrently with this
determination and hereby adopted by
this notice.2 The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be found at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of the investigation covers
welded line pipe, which is carbon and
alloy steel pipe of a kind used for oil
and gas pipelines, not more than 24
inches in nominal outside diameter. For
a complete description of the scope of
the investigation, see Appendix I.
Scope Comments
Certain interested parties commented
on the scope of the investigation as it
appeared in the Initiation Notice. For
discussion of those comments, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
investigation in accordance with section
731 of the Act. There are two mandatory
respondents participating in this
investigation, Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve
¸
¨
Ticaret A.S./Yucel Boru Ithalat-Ihracat
1 See Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of
Korea and the Republic of Turkey: Initiation of
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 79 FR 68213
(November 14, 2014) (Initiation Notice).
2 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, entitled ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Determination in the Antidumping
Duty Investigation of Welded Line Pipe from the
Republic of Turkey’’ (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice.
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
29618
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Notices
ve Pazarlama A.S. (collectively,
Cayirova) and Toscelik Profil ve Sac
¸
¸
Endustrisi A.S./Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S.
(collectively, Toscelik). Export price for
¸
these companies is calculated in
accordance with section 772 of the Act.
Normal value (NV) is calculated in
accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
preliminary conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Because mandatory respondents
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve
Ticaret A.S. (Borusan Mannesmann) and
Borusan Istikbal Ticaret (Borusan
Istikbal) failed to respond to the
Department’s questionnaire, we
preliminarily determine to apply
adverse facts available (AFA) to these
respondents, in accordance with
sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.308. For further discussion, see
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
Consistent with sections
733(d)(1)(A)(ii) and 735(c)(5) of the Act,
the Department also calculated an
estimated all-others rate. Section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the
estimated all-others rate shall be an
amount equal to the weighted average of
the estimated weighted-average
dumping margins established for
exporters and producers individually
investigated, excluding any zero and de
minimis margins, and any margins
determined entirely under section 776
of the Act.
In this investigation, we calculated
weighted-average dumping margins for
both participating mandatory
respondents that are above de minimis
and which are not based on total facts
available. However, because there are
only two relevant weighted-average
dumping margins for this preliminary
determination, using a weighted average
of these two rates risks disclosure of
business proprietary data. Therefore, we
calculated both a weighted average of
the dumping margins calculated for the
two cooperating mandatory respondents
using publicly ranged quantities for
their sales of subject merchandise and a
simple average of these two dumping
margins, and selected, as the all-others
rate, the average that provides a more
accurate proxy for the weighted-average
margin of both companies calculated
using business proprietary information.3
Preliminary Determination
The Department preliminarily
determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist:
Weighted-average
dumping margin
(percent)
Exporter/manufacturer
Borusan Istikbal Ticaret .................................................................................................................................................................
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. ....................................................................................................................
¨
Cayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S./Yucel Boru Ithalat-Ihracat ve Pazarlama A.S. .................................................................
¸
Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S./Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. ....................................................................................................
¸
All Others .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Disclosure
In accordance with section 733(d)(2)
of the Act, we are directing U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
suspend liquidation of all entries of
welded line pipe from Turkey as
described in Appendix I of this notice,
which are entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication of this notice in
the Federal Register.
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.205(d), we will instruct CBP to
require a cash deposit equal to the
weighted-average amount by which the
NV exceeds U.S. price, as indicated in
the chart above, adjusted for export
subsidies found in the preliminary
determination of the companion
countervailing duty investigation.4
Specifically, consistent with our
longstanding practice, where the
product under investigation is also
subject to a concurrent countervailing
duty investigation, we instruct CBP to
require a cash deposit equal to the
amount by which the NV exceeds the
U.S. price, as indicated below, less the
amount of the countervailing duty
determined to constitute an export
subsidy.5 Therefore, for cash deposit
purposes, we are subtracting from the
applicable cash deposit rate that portion
of the countervailing duty rate
attributable to the export subsidies
found in the preliminary affirmative
countervailing duty determination.
Accordingly, the export subsidy offsets
are as follows: 0.82 percent for Toscelik,
¸
and 0.77 percent for Cayirova and all
¸
others, and 0.42 percent for Borusan
Istikbal and Borusan Mannesmann.6
After this adjustment, the resulting cash
deposit rates will be 9.43 percent for
Borusan Istikbal and Borusan
Mannesmann, 8.94 percent for Cayirova,
¸
2.29 percent for Toscelik, and 2.52
¸
percent for all others. The suspension of
liquidation instructions will remain in
effect until further notice.
3 See Memorandum to the File from David
Crespo, Senior Analyst, entitled, ‘‘Welded Line Pipe
from the Republic of Turkey: Calculation of the
Preliminary Margin for All Other Companies,’’
dated concurrently with this memorandum (All
Others Calculation Memorandum).
4 See Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of
Turkey: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing
Duty Determination and Alignment of Final
Determination With Final Antidumping
Determination, 80 FR 14943 (March 20, 2015), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
5 See, e.g., Notice of Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value: Carbazole Violet Pigment
23 From India, 69 FR 67306, 67307 (November 17,
2004); and Notice of Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value and Negative Critical
Circumstances Determination: Bottom Mount
Combination Refrigerator-Freezers From the
Republic of Korea, 77 FR 17413 (March 26, 2012).
6 See Memorandum to the File from Alice
Maldonado, Senior Analyst, entitled, ‘‘Placing
Information on the Record: Export Subsidies
Calculated in the Preliminary Determination of the
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Welded Line
Pipe from the Republic of Turkey,’’dated May 14,
2015.
Suspension of Liquidation
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
9.85
9.85
9.71
3.11
3.29
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
We will disclose the calculations
performed to interested parties in this
proceeding within five days of the date
of publication of this notice in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the
Act, we intend to verify information
relied upon in making our final
determination.
Public Comment
Interested parties are invited to
comment on this preliminary
determination. Case briefs or other
written comments may be submitted to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance no later than seven
days after the date on which the final
verification report is issued in this
proceeding, and rebuttal briefs, limited
to issues raised in case briefs, may be
submitted no later than five days after
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the deadline date for case briefs.7
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and
(d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument;
and (3) a table of authorities.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S.
Department of Commerce. All
documents must be filed electronically
using ACCESS. An electronically-filed
request must be received successfully in
its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time, within 30 days
after the date of publication of this
notice.8 Requests should contain the
party’s name, address, and telephone
number, the number of participants, and
a list of the issues to be discussed. If a
request for a hearing is made, the
Department intends to hold the hearing
at the U.S. Department of Commerce,
14th Street and Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time
and date to be determined. Parties
should confirm by telephone the date,
time, and location of the hearing two
days before the scheduled date.
Postponement of Final Determination
and Extension of Provisional Measures
Section 735(a)(2) of the Act provides
that a final determination may be
postponed until not later than 135 days
after the date of the publication of the
preliminary determination if, in the
event of an affirmative preliminary
determination, a request for such
postponement is made by exporters who
account for a significant proportion of
exports of the subject merchandise, or in
the event of a negative preliminary
determination, a request for such
postponement is made by the petitioner.
19 CFR 351.210(e)(2) requires that
requests by respondents for
postponement of a final antidumping
determination be accompanied by a
request for extension of provisional
measures from a four-month period to a
period not more than six months in
duration.
Cayirova and Toscelik requested that,
¸
¸
in the event of an affirmative
preliminary determination in this
investigation, the Department postpone
its final determination by 60 days (i.e.,
to 135 days after publication of the
preliminary determination), and agreed
to extend the application of the
7 See
8 See
19 CFR 351.309.
19 CFR 351.310(c).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
29619
provisional measures prescribed under
section 733(d) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(e)(2), from a four-month period
to a period not to exceed six months.9
In addition, certain petitioners 10 also
requested that, in the event of a negative
preliminary determination, the
Department postpone its final
determination to 135 days after the date
of publication of the preliminary
determination.11
In accordance with section
735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(2)(ii), because (1) our
preliminary determination is
affirmative; (2) the requesting exporters
account for a significant proportion of
exports of the subject merchandise; and
(3) no compelling reasons for denial
exist, we are postponing the final
determination and extending the
provisional measures from a four-month
period to a period not greater than six
months. Accordingly, we will make our
final determination no later than 135
days after the date of publication of this
preliminary determination, pursuant to
section 735(a)(2) of the Act.12
a kind used for oil or gas pipelines (welded
line pipe), not more than 24 inches in
nominal outside diameter, regardless of wall
thickness, length, surface finish, end finish,
or stenciling. Welded line pipe is normally
produced to the American Petroleum
Institute (API) specification 5L, but can be
produced to comparable foreign
specifications, to proprietary grades, or can
be non-graded material. All pipe meeting the
physical description set forth above,
including multiple-stenciled pipe with an
API or comparable foreign specification line
pipe stencil is covered by the scope of this
investigation.
The welded line pipe that is subject to this
investigation is currently classifiable in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS) under subheadings
7305.11.1030, 7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030,
7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.5000,
7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050, 7306.19.5110,
and 7306.19.5150. The subject merchandise
may also enter in HTSUS 7305.11.1060 and
7305.12.1060. While the HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of this investigation is dispositive.
International Trade Commission (ITC)
Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of
the Act, we have notified the ITC of our
affirmative preliminary determination of
sales at LTFV. If our final determination
is affirmative, the ITC will determine
before the later of 120 days after the date
of this preliminary determination or 45
days after our final determination
whether these imports are materially
injuring, or threaten material injury to,
the U.S. industry.
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.205(c).
Appendix II
Dated: May 14, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is circular welded carbon and
alloy steel (other than stainless steel) pipe of
9 See letter from Cayirova and Toscelik entitled,
¸
¸
‘‘Line pipe from Turkey; request to extend the final
determination,’’ dated March 20, 2015.
10 These companies include American Cast Iron
Pipe Company, Energex Tube, a division of JMC
Steel Group, Northwest Pipe Company, Stupp
Corporation, a division of Stupp Bros., Inc., TexTube Company, TMK IPSCO, and Welspun Tubular
LLC USA (collectively, certain petitioners).
11 See letter from certain of the petitioners
entitled, ‘‘Welded Line Pipe from Turkey:
Contingent Request for Postponement of Final
Determination,’’ dated April 23, 2015.
12 See also 19 CFR 351.210(e).
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Period of Investigation
4. Postponement of Final Determination and
Extension of Provisional Measures
5. Scope Comments
6. Affiliation and Single Entity
7. Discussion of Methodology
a. Determination of the Comparison
Method
b. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
8. Date of Sale
9. Product Comparisons
10. Export Price
11. Duty Drawback
12. Normal Value
a. Home Market Viability
b. Level of Trade
c. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis
1. Calculation of COP
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
3. Results of the COP Test
d. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison
Market Prices
13. Facts Available
a. Use of Facts Available
b. Application of Facts Available With an
Adverse Reference
c. Selection and Corroboration of Adverse
Facts Available (AFA) Rate
14. Currency Conversion
[FR Doc. 2015–12519 Filed 5–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29617-29619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12519]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-489-822]
Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of
Final Determination
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) preliminarily
determines that welded line pipe from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey)
is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than
fair value (LTFV), as provided in section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act). The period of investigation (POI) is
October 1, 2013, through September 30, 2014. The estimated weighted-
average dumping margins of sales at LTFV are shown in the ``Preliminary
Determination'' section of this notice. Interested parties are invited
to comment on this preliminary determination.
DATES: Effective Date: May 22, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Maldonado or David Crespo, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4682 or (202) 482-3693, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department initiated this investigation on November 5, 2014.\1\
For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation
of this investigation, see the memorandum that is dated concurrently
with this determination and hereby adopted by this notice.\2\ The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov,
and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum
and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea and the
Republic of Turkey: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigations, 79 FR 68213 (November 14, 2014) (Initiation Notice).
\2\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
entitled ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in
the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Welded Line Pipe from the
Republic of Turkey'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated
concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of the investigation covers welded line pipe, which is
carbon and alloy steel pipe of a kind used for oil and gas pipelines,
not more than 24 inches in nominal outside diameter. For a complete
description of the scope of the investigation, see Appendix I.
Scope Comments
Certain interested parties commented on the scope of the
investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice. For discussion
of those comments, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this investigation in accordance with
section 731 of the Act. There are two mandatory respondents
participating in this investigation, [Ccedil]ayirova Boru Sanayi ve
Ticaret A.S./Y[uuml]cel Boru Ithalat-Ihracat
[[Page 29618]]
ve Pazarlama A.S. (collectively, [Ccedil]ayirova) and Tos[ccedil]elik
Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S./Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. (collectively,
Tos[ccedil]elik). Export price for these companies is calculated in
accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value (NV) is calculated
in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of
the methodology underlying our preliminary conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Because mandatory respondents Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve
Ticaret A.S. (Borusan Mannesmann) and Borusan Istikbal Ticaret (Borusan
Istikbal) failed to respond to the Department's questionnaire, we
preliminarily determine to apply adverse facts available (AFA) to these
respondents, in accordance with sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.308. For further discussion, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
Consistent with sections 733(d)(1)(A)(ii) and 735(c)(5) of the Act,
the Department also calculated an estimated all-others rate. Section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the estimated all-others rate
shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated
weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and
producers individually investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis
margins, and any margins determined entirely under section 776 of the
Act.
In this investigation, we calculated weighted-average dumping
margins for both participating mandatory respondents that are above de
minimis and which are not based on total facts available. However,
because there are only two relevant weighted-average dumping margins
for this preliminary determination, using a weighted average of these
two rates risks disclosure of business proprietary data. Therefore, we
calculated both a weighted average of the dumping margins calculated
for the two cooperating mandatory respondents using publicly ranged
quantities for their sales of subject merchandise and a simple average
of these two dumping margins, and selected, as the all-others rate, the
average that provides a more accurate proxy for the weighted-average
margin of both companies calculated using business proprietary
information.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum to the File from David Crespo, Senior
Analyst, entitled, ``Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Turkey:
Calculation of the Preliminary Margin for All Other Companies,''
dated concurrently with this memorandum (All Others Calculation
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination
The Department preliminarily determines that the following
weighted-average dumping margins exist:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Exporter/manufacturer dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Borusan Istikbal Ticaret............................. 9.85
Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S........ 9.85
[Ccedil]ayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S./ 9.71
Y[uuml]cel Boru Ithalat-Ihracat ve Pazarlama A.S....
Tos[ccedil]elik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S./Tosyali 3.11
Dis Ticaret A.S.....................................
All Others........................................... 3.29
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 733(d)(2) of the Act, we are directing
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of all
entries of welded line pipe from Turkey as described in Appendix I of
this notice, which are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register.
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.205(d), we will instruct CBP to
require a cash deposit equal to the weighted-average amount by which
the NV exceeds U.S. price, as indicated in the chart above, adjusted
for export subsidies found in the preliminary determination of the
companion countervailing duty investigation.\4\ Specifically,
consistent with our longstanding practice, where the product under
investigation is also subject to a concurrent countervailing duty
investigation, we instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the
amount by which the NV exceeds the U.S. price, as indicated below, less
the amount of the countervailing duty determined to constitute an
export subsidy.\5\ Therefore, for cash deposit purposes, we are
subtracting from the applicable cash deposit rate that portion of the
countervailing duty rate attributable to the export subsidies found in
the preliminary affirmative countervailing duty determination.
Accordingly, the export subsidy offsets are as follows: 0.82 percent
for Tos[ccedil]elik, and 0.77 percent for [Ccedil]ayirova and all
others, and 0.42 percent for Borusan Istikbal and Borusan
Mannesmann.\6\ After this adjustment, the resulting cash deposit rates
will be 9.43 percent for Borusan Istikbal and Borusan Mannesmann, 8.94
percent for [Ccedil]ayirova, 2.29 percent for Tos[ccedil]elik, and 2.52
percent for all others. The suspension of liquidation instructions will
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of Turkey:
Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and
Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping
Determination, 80 FR 14943 (March 20, 2015), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\5\ See, e.g., Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India, 69 FR
67306, 67307 (November 17, 2004); and Notice of Final Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Negative Critical Circumstances
Determination: Bottom Mount Combination Refrigerator-Freezers From
the Republic of Korea, 77 FR 17413 (March 26, 2012).
\6\ See Memorandum to the File from Alice Maldonado, Senior
Analyst, entitled, ``Placing Information on the Record: Export
Subsidies Calculated in the Preliminary Determination of the
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Welded Line Pipe from the
Republic of Turkey,''dated May 14, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations performed to interested parties
in this proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this
notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, we intend to verify
information relied upon in making our final determination.
Public Comment
Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary
determination. Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted
to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance no later than
seven days after the date on which the final verification report is
issued in this proceeding, and rebuttal briefs, limited to issues
raised in case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after
[[Page 29619]]
the deadline date for case briefs.\7\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2)
and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement
of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.309.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce. All documents must be filed
electronically using ACCESS. An electronically-filed request must be
received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Standard Time, within 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice.\8\ Requests should contain the party's name, address, and
telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues
to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and
date to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date,
time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional
Measures
Section 735(a)(2) of the Act provides that a final determination
may be postponed until not later than 135 days after the date of the
publication of the preliminary determination if, in the event of an
affirmative preliminary determination, a request for such postponement
is made by exporters who account for a significant proportion of
exports of the subject merchandise, or in the event of a negative
preliminary determination, a request for such postponement is made by
the petitioner. 19 CFR 351.210(e)(2) requires that requests by
respondents for postponement of a final antidumping determination be
accompanied by a request for extension of provisional measures from a
four-month period to a period not more than six months in duration.
[Ccedil]ayirova and Tos[ccedil]elik requested that, in the event of
an affirmative preliminary determination in this investigation, the
Department postpone its final determination by 60 days (i.e., to 135
days after publication of the preliminary determination), and agreed to
extend the application of the provisional measures prescribed under
section 733(d) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(e)(2), from a four-month
period to a period not to exceed six months.\9\ In addition, certain
petitioners \10\ also requested that, in the event of a negative
preliminary determination, the Department postpone its final
determination to 135 days after the date of publication of the
preliminary determination.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See letter from [Ccedil]ayirova and Tos[ccedil]elik
entitled, ``Line pipe from Turkey; request to extend the final
determination,'' dated March 20, 2015.
\10\ These companies include American Cast Iron Pipe Company,
Energex Tube, a division of JMC Steel Group, Northwest Pipe Company,
Stupp Corporation, a division of Stupp Bros., Inc., Tex-Tube
Company, TMK IPSCO, and Welspun Tubular LLC USA (collectively,
certain petitioners).
\11\ See letter from certain of the petitioners entitled,
``Welded Line Pipe from Turkey: Contingent Request for Postponement
of Final Determination,'' dated April 23, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(2)(ii), because (1) our preliminary determination is
affirmative; (2) the requesting exporters account for a significant
proportion of exports of the subject merchandise; and (3) no compelling
reasons for denial exist, we are postponing the final determination and
extending the provisional measures from a four-month period to a period
not greater than six months. Accordingly, we will make our final
determination no later than 135 days after the date of publication of
this preliminary determination, pursuant to section 735(a)(2) of the
Act.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See also 19 CFR 351.210(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Trade Commission (ITC) Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, we have notified the
ITC of our affirmative preliminary determination of sales at LTFV. If
our final determination is affirmative, the ITC will determine before
the later of 120 days after the date of this preliminary determination
or 45 days after our final determination whether these imports are
materially injuring, or threaten material injury to, the U.S. industry.
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: May 14, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this investigation is circular welded
carbon and alloy steel (other than stainless steel) pipe of a kind
used for oil or gas pipelines (welded line pipe), not more than 24
inches in nominal outside diameter, regardless of wall thickness,
length, surface finish, end finish, or stenciling. Welded line pipe
is normally produced to the American Petroleum Institute (API)
specification 5L, but can be produced to comparable foreign
specifications, to proprietary grades, or can be non-graded
material. All pipe meeting the physical description set forth above,
including multiple-stenciled pipe with an API or comparable foreign
specification line pipe stencil is covered by the scope of this
investigation.
The welded line pipe that is subject to this investigation is
currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 7305.11.1030, 7305.11.5000,
7305.12.1030, 7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.5000,
7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050, 7306.19.5110, and 7306.19.5150. The
subject merchandise may also enter in HTSUS 7305.11.1060 and
7305.12.1060. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the
scope of this investigation is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Period of Investigation
4. Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional
Measures
5. Scope Comments
6. Affiliation and Single Entity
7. Discussion of Methodology
a. Determination of the Comparison Method
b. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
8. Date of Sale
9. Product Comparisons
10. Export Price
11. Duty Drawback
12. Normal Value
a. Home Market Viability
b. Level of Trade
c. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis
1. Calculation of COP
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
3. Results of the COP Test
d. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison Market Prices
13. Facts Available
a. Use of Facts Available
b. Application of Facts Available With an Adverse Reference
c. Selection and Corroboration of Adverse Facts Available (AFA)
Rate
14. Currency Conversion
[FR Doc. 2015-12519 Filed 5-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P