Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Exports and Temporary Imports Made to or on Behalf of a Department or Agency of the U.S. Government; Procedures for Obtaining State Department Authorization To Export Items Subject to the Export Administration Regulations; Revision to the Destination Control Statement; and Other Changes, 29565-29569 [2015-12295]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
PART 11—ANNUAL CHARGES UNDER
PART I OF THE FEDERAL POWER ACT
1. The authority citation for Part 11
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 792–828c; 42 U.S.C.
7101–7352.
2. Revise § 11.1(c)(5) to read as
follows:
■
§ 11.1
Costs of administration.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) For unconstructed projects, the
assessments start two years after the
effective date of the license or
exemption. For constructed projects, the
assessments start on the effective date of
the license or exemption, except for any
new capacity authorized therein. The
assessments for new authorized capacity
start two years after the effective date of
the license, exemption, or amendment,
authorizing such new capacity. In the
event that assessment commences
during a fiscal year, the charges will be
prorated based on the date of
commencement.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–12432 Filed 5–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Parts 120, 123, 124, 125, and
126
RIN 1400–AC88
[Public Notice 9139]
Amendment to the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations: Exports and
Temporary Imports Made to or on
Behalf of a Department or Agency of
the U.S. Government; Procedures for
Obtaining State Department
Authorization To Export Items Subject
to the Export Administration
Regulations; Revision to the
Destination Control Statement; and
Other Changes
Department of State.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
As part of the President’s
Export Control Reform (ECR) effort, the
Department of State is proposing to
amend the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) to: clarify
regulations pertaining to the export of
items subject to the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR);
revise the licensing exemption for
exports made to or on behalf of an
agency of the U.S. government; revise
the destination control statement in
ITAR § 123.9 to harmonize the language
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
with the EAR; and make several minor
edits for clarity. The proposed revisions
contained in this rule are part of the
Department of State’s retrospective plan
under E.O. 13563.
DATES: The Department of State will
accept comments on this proposed rule
until July 6, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments by one of the
following methods:
• Email: DDTCPublicComments@
state.gov with the subject line, ‘‘ITAR
Amendment—To or on behalf of’’;
• Internet: At www.regulations.gov,
search for this proposed rule by using
this proposed rule’s RIN (1400–AC88).
Comments received after that date
will be considered if feasible, but
consideration cannot be assured. Those
submitting comments should not
include any personally identifying
information they do not desire to be
made public or information for which a
claim of confidentiality is asserted
because those comments and/or
transmittal emails will be made
available for public inspection and
copying after the close of the comment
period via the Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls Web site at
www.pmddtc.state.gov. Parties who
wish to comment anonymously may do
so by submitting their comments via
www.regulations.gov, leaving the fields
that would identify the commenter
blank and including no identifying
information in the comment itself.
Comments submitted via
www.regulations.gov are immediately
available for public inspection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
C. Edward Peartree, Director, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Policy,
Department of State, telephone (202)
663–2792; email
DDTCPublicComments@state.gov.
ATTN: ITAR Amendment—To or on
behalf of. The Department of State’s full
retrospective plan can be accessed at
https://www.state.gov/documents/
organization/181028.pdf.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department proposes to make the
following revisions in this rule:
Items subject to the EAR: This
proposed rule adds clarifying language
to various provisions of the ITAR
pertaining to the export of items subject
to the EAR pursuant to a Department of
State authorization, when such exports
are made in conjunction with items
subject to the ITAR. These revisions
include guidance on the use of licensing
exemptions for export of such items, as
well as clarification that items subject to
the EAR are not considered defense
articles, even when exported under a
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29565
license or other approval (to include
exemptions, see § 120.20) issued by the
Department of State.
Items exported to or on behalf of an
agency of the U.S. government: This
proposed rule revises the licensing
exemption language in ITAR § 126.4 to
clarify when exports may be made to or
on behalf of an agency of the U.S.
government without a license.
Additionally, the scope of this
exemption is expanded in that it will
allow for permanent exports, rather than
only temporary exports. The
Department seeks comments from the
public on whether the proposed
revision adequately eliminates
ambiguity as to when the exemption
may be applied, and whether it creates
any unintended compliance burden.
Revision to the Destination Control
Statement: This proposed rule revises
the destination control statement in
ITAR § 123.9 to harmonize its language
with the EAR. This change is being
made to facilitate the President’s Export
Control Reform initiative, which has
transferred thousands of formerly ITARcontrolled defense article parts and
components, along with other items, to
the Commerce Control List in the EAR
under the jurisdiction of the Department
of Commerce.
This change in jurisdiction for many
parts and components, along with other
items, for military systems has increased
the incidence of exporters shipping
articles subject to both the ITAR and the
EAR in the same shipment. Both
regulations have a mandatory
destination control statement that must
be on the export control documents for
shipments that include items subject to
both sets of regulations. This has caused
confusion to exporters as to which
statement to include on mixed
shipments, or whether to include both.
Harmonizing these statements will ease
the regulatory burden on exporters.
Procedures for Obtaining State
Department Authorization to Export
Items Subject to the EAR: This proposed
rule revises the ITAR in a number of
places to clarify how parties may obtain
authorization from the Department to
export or retransfer items subject to the
EAR. Section 120.5 is revised to clarify
that items subject to the EAR may be
authorized pursuant to an exemption
with certain conditions. A new
paragraph (d) is added to ITAR § 123.9
to clarify the requirements for
retransferring items subject to the EAR
pursuant to a letter of General
Correspondence. Section 124.16 is
revised to clarify that the special
retransfer authorization of this section
may be used for items subject to the
EAR with certain conditions.
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
29566
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Other changes in this rule: The
Department proposes to make a number
of minor edits to the ITAR that will
address erroneous or outdated reporting
requirements. This rule would remove
the requirement to provide seven paper
copies for various export license
requests in §§ 124.7, 124.12, 124.14,
125.2, 125.7 and 126.9, which has not
been necessary for many years due to
the use of electronic license
submissions, change the identification
of the agency responsible for permanent
import authorizations in § 123.4 from
the Department of the Treasury to
Department of Justice, and impose the
Code of Federal Regulations paragraph
structure on § 124.8. Additionally, the
Department proposes removing the pilot
filing requirement found in § 123.13,
given that it does not take into account
the practices of modern airport
operations and is no longer necessary.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the
opinion that controlling the import and
export of defense articles and services is
a foreign affairs function of the United
States government and that rules
implementing this function are exempt
from §§ 553 (rulemaking) and 554
(adjudications) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA). Although the
Department is of the opinion that this
rule is exempt from the rulemaking
provisions of the APA, the Department
is publishing this rule with a 45-day
provision for public comment and
without prejudice to its determination
that controlling the import and export of
defense services is a foreign affairs
function.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since the Department of State is of the
opinion that this proposed rule is
exempt from the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
553, there is no requirement for an
analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rulemaking does not
involve a mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
The Department does not believe this
rulemaking is a major rule as defined in
5 U.S.C. 804.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This proposed rulemaking will not
have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this proposed
rulemaking does not have sufficient
federalism implications to require
consultations or warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and
activities do not apply to this proposed
rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributed impacts, and equity).
These executive orders stress the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. These rules have been
designated ‘‘significant regulatory
actions,’’ although not economically
significant, under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this proposed rule
has been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed
this proposed rulemaking in light of
Executive Order 12988 to eliminate
ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish
clear legal standards, and reduce
burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has
determined that this proposed
rulemaking will not have tribal
implications, will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments, and will not
preempt tribal law. Accordingly, the
provisions of Executive Order 13175 do
not apply to this proposed rulemaking.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act,
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35. This rule removes
provisions that previously required the
applicant to provide seven additional
copies for various export license
requests. The Department believes that
there will be little or no practical
burden reduction since the use of
electronic methods of filing has made
the requirement for ‘‘seven copies’’
obsolete.
The following information collections
are affected by this rulemaking:
1. Application/License for Permanent
Export of Unclassified Defense Articles
and Related Unclassified Technical
Data, OMB Control No. 1405–0003;
2. Application/License for Temporary
Import of Unclassified Defense Articles,
OMB Control No. 1405–0013;
3. Application/License for the
Permanent/Temporary Export or
Temporary Import of Classified Defense
Articles and Classified Technical Data,
OMB Control No. 1405–0022;
4. Application/License for Temporary
Export of Unclassified Defense Articles,
OMB Control No. 1405–0023;
5. Application for Amendment to
License for Export or Import of
Classified or Unclassified Defense
Articles and Related Technical Data
OMB Control No. 1405–0092;
6. Request for Approval of
Manufacturing License Agreements,
Technical Assistance Agreements, and
Other Agreements, OMB Control No.
1405–0093;
7. Request to Change End User, End
Use and/or Destination of Hardware,
OMB Control No. 1405–00173; and
8. Request for Advisory Opinion,
OMB Control No. 1405–0174.
The Department is requesting public
comment on its estimate that there will
be little or no change in the burdens
associated with these information
collections as a result of this
rulemaking.
Date: Comments will be accepted
until July 21, 2015.
Addresses: Interested parties may
submit comments within 60 days of the
date of publication by one of the
following methods:
• Email: DDTCPublicComments@
state.gov, with the subject line ‘‘AC88
PRA Burden Reduction’’;
• Internet: At www.regulations.gov;
please search for this proposed rule by
using this proposed rule’s RIN (1400–
AC88) and indicate that you are
commenting on the paperwork burden
change in any (or all) of the eight
information collections identified
above.
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects
PART 123—LICENSES FOR THE
EXPORT AND TEMPORARY IMPORT
OF DEFENSE ARTICLES
22 CFR Parts 120 and 125
Arms and munitions, Classified
information, Exports.
3. The authority citation for part 123
continues to read as follows:
■
22 CFR Part 123
Arms and munitions, Exports,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90–
629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2797); 22 U.S.C. 2753; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22
U.S.C. 2776; Pub. L. 105–261, 112 Stat. 1920;
Sec. 1205(a), Pub. L. 107–228; Section 1261,
Pub. L. 112–239; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129.
22 CFR Part 124
Arms and munitions, Exports,
Technical assistance.
22 CFR Part 126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
above, Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter
M, parts 120, 123, 124, 125, and 126 are
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 120—PURPOSE AND
DEFINITIONS
1. The authority citation for part 120
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90–
629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2797); 22 U.S.C. 2794; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Pub.
L. 105–261, 112 Stat. 1920; Pub. L. 111–266;
Section 1261, Pub. L. 112–239; E.O. 13637,
78 FR 16129.
2. Section 120.5 is amended by
revising the section heading and
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 120.5 Relation to regulations of other
agencies; export of items subject to the
EAR.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) A license or other approval (see
§ 120.20) from the Department of State
granted in accordance with this
subchapter may also authorize the
export of items subject to the EAR (see
§ 120.42). Items subject to the EAR may
be exported pursuant to an exemption
(see parts 124, 125, and 126 of this
subchapter), provided the items subject
to the EAR are for use in or with defense
articles authorized under a license or
other approval. Separate approval from
the Department of Commerce is not
required for these items when approved
for export under a Department of State
license or other approval. Those items
subject to the EAR exported pursuant to
a Department of State license or other
approval would remain under the
jurisdiction of the Department of
Commerce for any subsequent
transactions. The inclusion of items
subject to the EAR on a Department of
State license or other approval does not
change the licensing jurisdiction of the
items. (See § 123.1(b) of this subchapter
for guidance on identifying items
subject to the EAR in a license
application to the Department of State.)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
4. Section 123.4 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(4) to read as
follows:
■
§ 123.4 Temporary import license
exemptions.
(a) * * *
(4) Has been rejected for permanent
import by the Department of Justice and
is being returned to the country from
which it was shipped; or
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Section 123.9 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b)(1) and (2), and
adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 123.9 Country of ultimate destination
and approval of reexports or retransfers.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) The exporter must incorporate the
following information as an integral part
of the bill of lading, air waybill, or other
shipping document, and the purchase
documentation or invoice whenever
defense articles are to be exported,
retransferred, or reexported pursuant to
a license or other approval under this
subchapter:
(i) The country of ultimate
destination;
(ii) The end-user;
(iii) The license or other approval
number or exemption citation; and
(iv) The following statement: ‘‘These
items are controlled and authorized by
the U.S. government for export only to
the country of ultimate destination for
use by the end-user herein identified.
They may not be resold, transferred, or
otherwise be disposed of, to any other
country or to any person other than the
authorized end-user or consignee(s),
either in their original form or after
being incorporated into other items,
without first obtaining approval from
the U.S. government or as otherwise
authorized by U.S. law and
regulations.’’
(2) When exporting items subject to
the EAR (see §§ 120.42 and 123.1(b) of
this subchapter) pursuant to a
Department of State license or other
approval, the U.S. exporter must also
provide the end-user and consignees
with the appropriate EAR classification
information for each item exported
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29567
pursuant to a U.S. Munitions List ‘‘(x)’’
paragraph. This includes the Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN)
or EAR99 designation.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The Directorate of Defense Trade
Controls may authorize reexport or
retransfer of an item subject to the EAR
provided that:
(1) The item was initially exported,
reexported or transferred pursuant to a
Department of State license or other
approval;
(2) The item is for end-use in or with
a defense article; and,
(3) All requirements of paragraph (c)
of this section are satisfied for the item
subject to the EAR, as well as for the
associated defense article.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Revise § 123.13 to read as follows:
§ 123.13 Domestic aircraft shipments via a
foreign country.
A license is not required for the
shipment by air of a defense article from
one location in the United States to
another location in the United States via
a foreign country.
PART 124—AGREEMENTS, OFF
SHORE PROCUREMENT, AND OTHER
DEFENSE SERVICES
7. The authority citation for part 124
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Sec. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90–
629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2797); 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 2776; Pub.
L. 105–261; Section 1261, Pub. L. 112–239;
E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129.
8. Section 124.7 is amended by
designating the introductory text as
paragraph (a), adding and reserving
paragraph (b), and revising paragraph
(a)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 124.7 Information required in all
manufacturing license agreements and
technical assistance agreements.
(a) * * *
(1) The agreement must describe the
defense article to be manufactured and
all defense articles to be exported,
including any test and support
equipment or advanced materials. They
should be described by military
nomenclature, contract number,
National Stock Number, nameplate data,
or other specific information. Only
defense articles listed in the agreement
will be eligible for export under the
exemption in § 123.16(b)(1) of this
subchapter. * * *
(b) [Reserved]
■ 9. Section 124.8 is amended by
designating the introductory text as
paragraph (a) and adding and reserving
paragraph (b), as follows:
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
29568
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
§ 124.8 Clauses required both in
manufacturing license agreements and
technical assistance agreements.
territories of the countries listed in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section or the
United States.
(b) Permanent retransfer of hardware
is not authorized pursuant to paragraph
(a) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. Section 124.12 is amended by
revising the introductory text of
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
PART 125—LICENSES FOR THE
EXPORT OF TECHNICAL DATA AND
CLASSIFIED DEFENSE ARTICLES
§ 124.12 Required information in letters of
transmittal.
(a) An application for the approval of
a manufacturing license or technical
assistance agreement with a foreign
person must be accompanied by an
explanatory letter. The explanatory
letter shall contain:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. Section 124.14 is amended by
revising the introductory text of
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 124.14 Exports to warehouses or
distribution points outside the United
States.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Transmittal letters. Requests for
approval of warehousing and
distribution agreements with foreign
persons must be made by letter. The
letter shall contain:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. Section 124.16 is revised to read
as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) The provisions of § 124.8(a)(5)
notwithstanding, the Department may
approve access to unclassified defense
articles and items subject to the EAR
(see § 120.42 of this subchapter)
exported in furtherance of or produced
as a result of a TAA/MLA, retransfer of
technical data and defense services, and
retransfer of technology subject to the
EAR and authorized under a TAA/MLA,
to individuals who are dual national or
third-country national employees of the
foreign signatory or its approved sublicensees, provided that:
(1) The transfer is to dual nationals or
third-country nationals who are bona
fide regular employees, directly
employed by the foreign signatory or
approved sub-licensees;
(2) The individuals are exclusively of
countries that are members of NATO,
the European Union, Australia, Japan,
New Zealand, and Switzerland;
(3) Their employer is a signatory to
the agreement or has executed a NonDisclosure Agreement; and
(4) The retransfer takes place
completely within the physical
17:08 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
Authority: Secs. 2 and 38, Pub. L. 90–629,
90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778); 22 U.S.C.
2651a; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129.
14. Section 125.2 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 125.2
data.
Exports of unclassified technical
(a) License. A license (DSP–5) is
required for the export of unclassified
technical data unless the export is
exempt from the licensing requirements
of this subchapter. In the case of a plant
visit, details of the proposed discussions
must be transmitted to the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls for an appraisal
of the technical data.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 15. Section 125.7 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 125.7 Procedures for the export of
classified technical data and other
classified defense articles.
§ 124.16 Special retransfer authorizations
for unclassified defense articles and
defense services to member states of NATO
and the European Union, Australia, Japan,
New Zealand, and Switzerland.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13. The authority citation for part 126
continues to read as follows:
■
*
*
*
*
*
(b) An application for the export of
classified technical data or other
classified defense articles must be
accompanied by a completed Form
DSP–83 (see § 123.10 of this
subchapter). All classified materials
accompanying an application must be
transmitted to the Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls in accordance with the
procedures contained in the Department
of Defense National Industrial Security
Program Operating Manual (unless such
requirements are inconsistent with
guidance provided by the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls, in which case
the latter guidance must be followed).
PART 126—GENERAL POLICIES AND
PROVISIONS
16. The authority citation for part 126
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, 40, 42, and 71, Pub.
L. 90–629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2780, 2791, and 2797); 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22
U.S.C. 287c; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205; 3 CFR,
1994 Comp., p. 899; Sec. 1225, Pub. L. 108–
375; Sec. 7089, Pub. L. 111–117; Pub. L. 111–
266; Section 7045, Pub. L. 112–74; Section
7046, Pub. L. 112–74; E.O. 13637, 78 FR
16129.
17. Section 126.4 is revised to read as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 126.4 Exports and temporary imports
made to or on behalf of a department or
agency of the U.S. government.
(a) A license is not required for the
export or temporary import of a defense
article or the performance of a defense
service, when made:
(1) To a department or agency of the
U.S. government for official use.
Defense articles exported or temporarily
imported under this provision may only
be provided to a regular employee or
contractor support personnel of the U.S.
government;
Note 1 to paragraph (a): Contractor
support personnel means those U.S. persons
who provide administrative, managerial,
scientific or technical support under contract
with a U.S. government department or
agency within a U.S. government owned or
operated facility or under the direct
supervision of a regular U.S. government
employee (e.g., Federally Funded Research
and Development Center or Systems
Engineering and Technical Assistance
contractors). For purposes of this section,
private security contractors are not
considered contractor support personnel, and
‘‘direct supervision’’ refers to the control over
the manner and means in which contractor
support personnel conduct their day-to-day
work activities as well as control over the
contractor’s access to defense articles
authorized under this paragraph.
Note 2 to paragraph (a): Any retransfer,
reexport, disposal, or change in end-user of
a defense article exported pursuant to this
section must be performed in accordance
with § 123.9 of this subchapter.
(2)(i) By, or on behalf of, a department
or agency of the U.S. government for
carrying out any foreign assistance,
cooperative project, or sales program
authorized by law and subject to control
by the President by other means,
provided:
(A) Items subject to the EAR and
controlled for missile technology (MT)
reasons (see § 742.5 of the EAR (15 CFR
742.5) are not authorized for export
under this subsection; and
(B) The United States government
performs or directs all aspects of the
transaction (export, carriage, and
delivery abroad) or the export is covered
by a U.S. government Bill of Lading.
(ii) This section does not authorize a
U.S. government agency to act as a
transmittal agent on behalf of a private
individual or firm, either as a
convenience or in satisfaction of
security requirements.
Note to paragraph (a)(2): Approval of a
foreign assistance, cooperative project, or
sales program authorizing a U.S. government
department and agency to permanently
export a defense article described on the
Missile Technology Control Regime Annex
should be reviewed by the Missile
Technology Export Committee, unless
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
authorized by statutory authority providing
export authority notwithstanding the Arms
Export Control Act.
COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER
SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
(b) This section does not authorize
any department or agency of the U.S.
government to make any export that is
otherwise prohibited by virtue of other
administrative provisions or by any
statute.
(c) An Electronic Export Information
(EEI) filing, required under § 123.22 of
this subchapter, and a written statement
by the exporter certifying that these
requirements have been met must be
presented at the time of export to the
appropriate Port Directors of U.S.
Customs and Border Protection or
Department of Defense transmittal
authority. For any export made pursuant
to paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the
shipment documents (bill of lading,
airway bill, or other transportation
documents) must include the following
statement:
‘‘For official use by [insert U.S.
government department or agency].
Property will not enter the trade of the
country to which it is shipped. No
export license required per CFR Title
22, section 126.4. U.S. government point
of contact: [insert name and telephone
number]’’.
■ 18. Section 126.9 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
28 CFR Part 810
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 126.9 Advisory opinions and related
authorizations.
(a) Advisory opinion. A person may
request information from the Directorate
of Defense Trade Controls on whether it
would likely grant a license or other
approval for a particular defense article
or defense service to a particular
country. Such information from the
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls is
issued on a case-by-case basis and
applies only to the particular matters
presented to the Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls. These opinions are not
binding on the Department of State and
may not be used in future matters before
the Department. A request for an
advisory opinion must be made in
writing and must outline in detail the
equipment, its usage, the security
classification (if any) of the articles or
related technical data, and the country
or countries involved.
*
*
*
*
*
Rose E. Gottemoeller,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015–12295 Filed 5–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
RIN 3225–AA00
Community Supervision:
Administrative Sanctions and GPS
Monitoring as a Supervision Tool
Court Services and Offender
Supervision Agency for the District of
Columbia.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the Court
Services and Offender Supervision
Agency for the District of Columbia
(CSOSA) is proposing to amend its
current rule regarding the conditions of
release requirements for offenders under
CSOSA supervision. In addition,
CSOSA will expand the language of the
regulation to detail and provide notice
of when CSOSA Community
Supervision Officers will use electronic
monitoring as a tool to assist in
supervision.
DATES: Comments must be submitted
July 21, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning this proposed rule to the
Office of General Counsel, CSOSA, 13th
Floor, 633 Indiana Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie Carrigg, Assistant General
Counsel, at (202) 220–5352 or by email
at stephanie.carrigg@csosa.gov.
Questions about this publication are
welcome, but inquiries concerning
individual cases cannot be answered
over the telephone.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Court
Services and Offender Supervision
Agency for the District of Columbia
(CSOSA) is proposing to amend its
regulations concerning the conditions of
release requirements for offenders under
CSOSA supervision. Specifically, these
regulations pertain to the conditions of
release that are imposed on an offender
when under CSOSA supervision;
specifically, the requirement to
maintain a certain frequency of face-toface contact with one’s community
supervision officer, and the conditions
of release that are articulated in the
accountability contract that the offender
signs with CSOSA. These regulations
also detail the consequences that an
offender may face for violating the
conditions of his or her supervision.
With this amendment, CSOSA will
revise the language to reflect that the
regulations apply to probationers as
well as parolees, and to offenders who
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29569
are under supervised release. In
addition, CSOSA will expand the
language of the regulation to detail and
provide notice of when CSOSA
Community Supervision Officers will
use electronic monitoring as a tool to
assist in supervision. Currently, the
regulations only reference electronic
monitoring as an administrative
sanction for an offender who has
violated the general or specific
conditions of release or who has
engaged in criminal activity. The
amended language will specify the
circumstances under which electronic
monitoring is used as a supervision tool,
including but not limited to: instances
when CSOSA’s Community Supervision
Services (CSS) Division issues directives
to place offenders who fit a certain
criminal behavioral pattern on
electronic monitoring; and instances
when CSS makes an individualized
determination to place an offender on
electronic monitoring based on an
offender’s noncompliance with the
conditions of his supervised release or
for other extenuating circumstances.
Matters of Regulatory Procedure
Administrative Procedure Act
CSOSA is publishing the proposed
rule for notice and comment as required
by 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
Executive Order 12866
CSOSA has determined that the
proposed rule is not a significant rule
within the meaning of Executive Order
12866.
Executive Order 13132
The proposed rule will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Under Executive
Order 13132, this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications
requiring a Federalism Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact upon a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The proposed rule will not cause
State, local, or tribal governments, or the
private sector, to spend $100,000,000 or
more in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. No action under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
is necessary.
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29565-29569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12295]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Parts 120, 123, 124, 125, and 126
RIN 1400-AC88
[Public Notice 9139]
Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations:
Exports and Temporary Imports Made to or on Behalf of a Department or
Agency of the U.S. Government; Procedures for Obtaining State
Department Authorization To Export Items Subject to the Export
Administration Regulations; Revision to the Destination Control
Statement; and Other Changes
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of the President's Export Control Reform (ECR) effort,
the Department of State is proposing to amend the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to: clarify regulations pertaining to the
export of items subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR);
revise the licensing exemption for exports made to or on behalf of an
agency of the U.S. government; revise the destination control statement
in ITAR Sec. 123.9 to harmonize the language with the EAR; and make
several minor edits for clarity. The proposed revisions contained in
this rule are part of the Department of State's retrospective plan
under E.O. 13563.
DATES: The Department of State will accept comments on this proposed
rule until July 6, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments by one of the
following methods:
Email: DDTCPublicComments@state.gov with the subject line,
``ITAR Amendment--To or on behalf of'';
Internet: At www.regulations.gov, search for this proposed
rule by using this proposed rule's RIN (1400-AC88).
Comments received after that date will be considered if feasible,
but consideration cannot be assured. Those submitting comments should
not include any personally identifying information they do not desire
to be made public or information for which a claim of confidentiality
is asserted because those comments and/or transmittal emails will be
made available for public inspection and copying after the close of the
comment period via the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls Web site
at www.pmddtc.state.gov. Parties who wish to comment anonymously may do
so by submitting their comments via www.regulations.gov, leaving the
fields that would identify the commenter blank and including no
identifying information in the comment itself. Comments submitted via
www.regulations.gov are immediately available for public inspection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. C. Edward Peartree, Director,
Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy, Department of State, telephone
(202) 663-2792; email DDTCPublicComments@state.gov. ATTN: ITAR
Amendment--To or on behalf of. The Department of State's full
retrospective plan can be accessed at https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/181028.pdf.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department proposes to make the
following revisions in this rule:
Items subject to the EAR: This proposed rule adds clarifying
language to various provisions of the ITAR pertaining to the export of
items subject to the EAR pursuant to a Department of State
authorization, when such exports are made in conjunction with items
subject to the ITAR. These revisions include guidance on the use of
licensing exemptions for export of such items, as well as clarification
that items subject to the EAR are not considered defense articles, even
when exported under a license or other approval (to include exemptions,
see Sec. 120.20) issued by the Department of State.
Items exported to or on behalf of an agency of the U.S. government:
This proposed rule revises the licensing exemption language in ITAR
Sec. 126.4 to clarify when exports may be made to or on behalf of an
agency of the U.S. government without a license. Additionally, the
scope of this exemption is expanded in that it will allow for permanent
exports, rather than only temporary exports. The Department seeks
comments from the public on whether the proposed revision adequately
eliminates ambiguity as to when the exemption may be applied, and
whether it creates any unintended compliance burden.
Revision to the Destination Control Statement: This proposed rule
revises the destination control statement in ITAR Sec. 123.9 to
harmonize its language with the EAR. This change is being made to
facilitate the President's Export Control Reform initiative, which has
transferred thousands of formerly ITAR-controlled defense article parts
and components, along with other items, to the Commerce Control List in
the EAR under the jurisdiction of the Department of Commerce.
This change in jurisdiction for many parts and components, along
with other items, for military systems has increased the incidence of
exporters shipping articles subject to both the ITAR and the EAR in the
same shipment. Both regulations have a mandatory destination control
statement that must be on the export control documents for shipments
that include items subject to both sets of regulations. This has caused
confusion to exporters as to which statement to include on mixed
shipments, or whether to include both. Harmonizing these statements
will ease the regulatory burden on exporters.
Procedures for Obtaining State Department Authorization to Export
Items Subject to the EAR: This proposed rule revises the ITAR in a
number of places to clarify how parties may obtain authorization from
the Department to export or retransfer items subject to the EAR.
Section 120.5 is revised to clarify that items subject to the EAR may
be authorized pursuant to an exemption with certain conditions. A new
paragraph (d) is added to ITAR Sec. 123.9 to clarify the requirements
for retransferring items subject to the EAR pursuant to a letter of
General Correspondence. Section 124.16 is revised to clarify that the
special retransfer authorization of this section may be used for items
subject to the EAR with certain conditions.
[[Page 29566]]
Other changes in this rule: The Department proposes to make a
number of minor edits to the ITAR that will address erroneous or
outdated reporting requirements. This rule would remove the requirement
to provide seven paper copies for various export license requests in
Sec. Sec. 124.7, 124.12, 124.14, 125.2, 125.7 and 126.9, which has not
been necessary for many years due to the use of electronic license
submissions, change the identification of the agency responsible for
permanent import authorizations in Sec. 123.4 from the Department of
the Treasury to Department of Justice, and impose the Code of Federal
Regulations paragraph structure on Sec. 124.8. Additionally, the
Department proposes removing the pilot filing requirement found in
Sec. 123.13, given that it does not take into account the practices of
modern airport operations and is no longer necessary.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the opinion that controlling the
import and export of defense articles and services is a foreign affairs
function of the United States government and that rules implementing
this function are exempt from Sec. Sec. 553 (rulemaking) and 554
(adjudications) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Although the
Department is of the opinion that this rule is exempt from the
rulemaking provisions of the APA, the Department is publishing this
rule with a 45-day provision for public comment and without prejudice
to its determination that controlling the import and export of defense
services is a foreign affairs function.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since the Department of State is of the opinion that this proposed
rule is exempt from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, there is no
requirement for an analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rulemaking does not involve a mandate that will
result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
The Department does not believe this rulemaking is a major rule as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 804.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This proposed rulemaking will not have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with
Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this proposed rulemaking
does not have sufficient federalism implications to require
consultations or warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact
statement. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this proposed rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess costs
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributed impacts, and equity). These executive orders
stress the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
These rules have been designated ``significant regulatory actions,''
although not economically significant, under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, this proposed rule has been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed this proposed rulemaking in
light of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has determined that this proposed
rulemaking will not have tribal implications, will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and
will not preempt tribal law. Accordingly, the provisions of Executive
Order 13175 do not apply to this proposed rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35. This rule removes provisions that previously required the applicant
to provide seven additional copies for various export license requests.
The Department believes that there will be little or no practical
burden reduction since the use of electronic methods of filing has made
the requirement for ``seven copies'' obsolete.
The following information collections are affected by this
rulemaking:
1. Application/License for Permanent Export of Unclassified Defense
Articles and Related Unclassified Technical Data, OMB Control No. 1405-
0003;
2. Application/License for Temporary Import of Unclassified Defense
Articles, OMB Control No. 1405-0013;
3. Application/License for the Permanent/Temporary Export or
Temporary Import of Classified Defense Articles and Classified
Technical Data, OMB Control No. 1405-0022;
4. Application/License for Temporary Export of Unclassified Defense
Articles, OMB Control No. 1405-0023;
5. Application for Amendment to License for Export or Import of
Classified or Unclassified Defense Articles and Related Technical Data
OMB Control No. 1405-0092;
6. Request for Approval of Manufacturing License Agreements,
Technical Assistance Agreements, and Other Agreements, OMB Control No.
1405-0093;
7. Request to Change End User, End Use and/or Destination of
Hardware, OMB Control No. 1405-00173; and
8. Request for Advisory Opinion, OMB Control No. 1405-0174.
The Department is requesting public comment on its estimate that
there will be little or no change in the burdens associated with these
information collections as a result of this rulemaking.
Date: Comments will be accepted until July 21, 2015.
Addresses: Interested parties may submit comments within 60 days of
the date of publication by one of the following methods:
Email: DDTCPublicComments@state.gov, with the subject line
``AC88 PRA Burden Reduction'';
Internet: At www.regulations.gov; please search for this
proposed rule by using this proposed rule's RIN (1400-AC88) and
indicate that you are commenting on the paperwork burden change in any
(or all) of the eight information collections identified above.
[[Page 29567]]
List of Subjects
22 CFR Parts 120 and 125
Arms and munitions, Classified information, Exports.
22 CFR Part 123
Arms and munitions, Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
22 CFR Part 124
Arms and munitions, Exports, Technical assistance.
22 CFR Part 126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, Title 22, Chapter I,
Subchapter M, parts 120, 123, 124, 125, and 126 are proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 120--PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 120 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat. 744
(22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2797); 22 U.S.C. 2794; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Pub.
L. 105-261, 112 Stat. 1920; Pub. L. 111-266; Section 1261, Pub. L.
112-239; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129.
0
2. Section 120.5 is amended by revising the section heading and
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 120.5 Relation to regulations of other agencies; export of items
subject to the EAR.
* * * * *
(b) A license or other approval (see Sec. 120.20) from the
Department of State granted in accordance with this subchapter may also
authorize the export of items subject to the EAR (see Sec. 120.42).
Items subject to the EAR may be exported pursuant to an exemption (see
parts 124, 125, and 126 of this subchapter), provided the items subject
to the EAR are for use in or with defense articles authorized under a
license or other approval. Separate approval from the Department of
Commerce is not required for these items when approved for export under
a Department of State license or other approval. Those items subject to
the EAR exported pursuant to a Department of State license or other
approval would remain under the jurisdiction of the Department of
Commerce for any subsequent transactions. The inclusion of items
subject to the EAR on a Department of State license or other approval
does not change the licensing jurisdiction of the items. (See Sec.
123.1(b) of this subchapter for guidance on identifying items subject
to the EAR in a license application to the Department of State.)
PART 123--LICENSES FOR THE EXPORT AND TEMPORARY IMPORT OF DEFENSE
ARTICLES
0
3. The authority citation for part 123 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat. 744 (22
U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2797); 22 U.S.C. 2753; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C.
2776; Pub. L. 105-261, 112 Stat. 1920; Sec. 1205(a), Pub. L. 107-
228; Section 1261, Pub. L. 112-239; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129.
0
4. Section 123.4 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(4) to read as
follows:
Sec. 123.4 Temporary import license exemptions.
(a) * * *
(4) Has been rejected for permanent import by the Department of
Justice and is being returned to the country from which it was shipped;
or
* * * * *
0
5. Section 123.9 is amended by revising paragraphs (b)(1) and (2), and
adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 123.9 Country of ultimate destination and approval of reexports
or retransfers.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) The exporter must incorporate the following information as an
integral part of the bill of lading, air waybill, or other shipping
document, and the purchase documentation or invoice whenever defense
articles are to be exported, retransferred, or reexported pursuant to a
license or other approval under this subchapter:
(i) The country of ultimate destination;
(ii) The end-user;
(iii) The license or other approval number or exemption citation;
and
(iv) The following statement: ``These items are controlled and
authorized by the U.S. government for export only to the country of
ultimate destination for use by the end-user herein identified. They
may not be resold, transferred, or otherwise be disposed of, to any
other country or to any person other than the authorized end-user or
consignee(s), either in their original form or after being incorporated
into other items, without first obtaining approval from the U.S.
government or as otherwise authorized by U.S. law and regulations.''
(2) When exporting items subject to the EAR (see Sec. Sec. 120.42
and 123.1(b) of this subchapter) pursuant to a Department of State
license or other approval, the U.S. exporter must also provide the end-
user and consignees with the appropriate EAR classification information
for each item exported pursuant to a U.S. Munitions List ``(x)''
paragraph. This includes the Export Control Classification Number
(ECCN) or EAR99 designation.
* * * * *
(d) The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls may authorize
reexport or retransfer of an item subject to the EAR provided that:
(1) The item was initially exported, reexported or transferred
pursuant to a Department of State license or other approval;
(2) The item is for end-use in or with a defense article; and,
(3) All requirements of paragraph (c) of this section are satisfied
for the item subject to the EAR, as well as for the associated defense
article.
* * * * *
0
6. Revise Sec. 123.13 to read as follows:
Sec. 123.13 Domestic aircraft shipments via a foreign country.
A license is not required for the shipment by air of a defense
article from one location in the United States to another location in
the United States via a foreign country.
PART 124--AGREEMENTS, OFF SHORE PROCUREMENT, AND OTHER DEFENSE
SERVICES
0
7. The authority citation for part 124 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat. 744 (22
U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2797); 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 2776; Pub. L.
105-261; Section 1261, Pub. L. 112-239; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129.
0
8. Section 124.7 is amended by designating the introductory text as
paragraph (a), adding and reserving paragraph (b), and revising
paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 124.7 Information required in all manufacturing license
agreements and technical assistance agreements.
(a) * * *
(1) The agreement must describe the defense article to be
manufactured and all defense articles to be exported, including any
test and support equipment or advanced materials. They should be
described by military nomenclature, contract number, National Stock
Number, nameplate data, or other specific information. Only defense
articles listed in the agreement will be eligible for export under the
exemption in Sec. 123.16(b)(1) of this subchapter. * * *
(b) [Reserved]
0
9. Section 124.8 is amended by designating the introductory text as
paragraph (a) and adding and reserving paragraph (b), as follows:
[[Page 29568]]
Sec. 124.8 Clauses required both in manufacturing license agreements
and technical assistance agreements.
* * * * *
(b) [Reserved]
* * * * *
0
10. Section 124.12 is amended by revising the introductory text of
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 124.12 Required information in letters of transmittal.
(a) An application for the approval of a manufacturing license or
technical assistance agreement with a foreign person must be
accompanied by an explanatory letter. The explanatory letter shall
contain:
* * * * *
0
11. Section 124.14 is amended by revising the introductory text of
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 124.14 Exports to warehouses or distribution points outside the
United States.
* * * * *
(e) Transmittal letters. Requests for approval of warehousing and
distribution agreements with foreign persons must be made by letter.
The letter shall contain:
* * * * *
0
12. Section 124.16 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 124.16 Special retransfer authorizations for unclassified
defense articles and defense services to member states of NATO and the
European Union, Australia, Japan, New Zealand, and Switzerland.
(a) The provisions of Sec. 124.8(a)(5) notwithstanding, the
Department may approve access to unclassified defense articles and
items subject to the EAR (see Sec. 120.42 of this subchapter) exported
in furtherance of or produced as a result of a TAA/MLA, retransfer of
technical data and defense services, and retransfer of technology
subject to the EAR and authorized under a TAA/MLA, to individuals who
are dual national or third-country national employees of the foreign
signatory or its approved sub-licensees, provided that:
(1) The transfer is to dual nationals or third-country nationals
who are bona fide regular employees, directly employed by the foreign
signatory or approved sub-licensees;
(2) The individuals are exclusively of countries that are members
of NATO, the European Union, Australia, Japan, New Zealand, and
Switzerland;
(3) Their employer is a signatory to the agreement or has executed
a Non-Disclosure Agreement; and
(4) The retransfer takes place completely within the physical
territories of the countries listed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section
or the United States.
(b) Permanent retransfer of hardware is not authorized pursuant to
paragraph (a) of this section.
PART 125--LICENSES FOR THE EXPORT OF TECHNICAL DATA AND CLASSIFIED
DEFENSE ARTICLES
0
13. The authority citation for part 126 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2 and 38, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat. 744 (22
U.S.C. 2752, 2778); 22 U.S.C. 2651a; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129.
0
14. Section 125.2 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 125.2 Exports of unclassified technical data.
(a) License. A license (DSP-5) is required for the export of
unclassified technical data unless the export is exempt from the
licensing requirements of this subchapter. In the case of a plant
visit, details of the proposed discussions must be transmitted to the
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls for an appraisal of the technical
data.
* * * * *
0
15. Section 125.7 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 125.7 Procedures for the export of classified technical data and
other classified defense articles.
* * * * *
(b) An application for the export of classified technical data or
other classified defense articles must be accompanied by a completed
Form DSP-83 (see Sec. 123.10 of this subchapter). All classified
materials accompanying an application must be transmitted to the
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls in accordance with the procedures
contained in the Department of Defense National Industrial Security
Program Operating Manual (unless such requirements are inconsistent
with guidance provided by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, in
which case the latter guidance must be followed).
PART 126--GENERAL POLICIES AND PROVISIONS
0
16. The authority citation for part 126 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, 40, 42, and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat.
744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2780, 2791, and 2797); 22 U.S.C. 2651a;
22 U.S.C. 287c; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205; 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 899;
Sec. 1225, Pub. L. 108-375; Sec. 7089, Pub. L. 111-117; Pub. L. 111-
266; Section 7045, Pub. L. 112-74; Section 7046, Pub. L. 112-74;
E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129.
0
17. Section 126.4 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 126.4 Exports and temporary imports made to or on behalf of a
department or agency of the U.S. government.
(a) A license is not required for the export or temporary import of
a defense article or the performance of a defense service, when made:
(1) To a department or agency of the U.S. government for official
use. Defense articles exported or temporarily imported under this
provision may only be provided to a regular employee or contractor
support personnel of the U.S. government;
Note 1 to paragraph (a): Contractor support personnel means
those U.S. persons who provide administrative, managerial,
scientific or technical support under contract with a U.S.
government department or agency within a U.S. government owned or
operated facility or under the direct supervision of a regular U.S.
government employee (e.g., Federally Funded Research and Development
Center or Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance contractors).
For purposes of this section, private security contractors are not
considered contractor support personnel, and ``direct supervision''
refers to the control over the manner and means in which contractor
support personnel conduct their day-to-day work activities as well
as control over the contractor's access to defense articles
authorized under this paragraph.
Note 2 to paragraph (a): Any retransfer, reexport, disposal, or
change in end-user of a defense article exported pursuant to this
section must be performed in accordance with Sec. 123.9 of this
subchapter.
(2)(i) By, or on behalf of, a department or agency of the U.S.
government for carrying out any foreign assistance, cooperative
project, or sales program authorized by law and subject to control by
the President by other means, provided:
(A) Items subject to the EAR and controlled for missile technology
(MT) reasons (see Sec. 742.5 of the EAR (15 CFR 742.5) are not
authorized for export under this subsection; and
(B) The United States government performs or directs all aspects of
the transaction (export, carriage, and delivery abroad) or the export
is covered by a U.S. government Bill of Lading.
(ii) This section does not authorize a U.S. government agency to
act as a transmittal agent on behalf of a private individual or firm,
either as a convenience or in satisfaction of security requirements.
Note to paragraph (a)(2): Approval of a foreign assistance,
cooperative project, or sales program authorizing a U.S. government
department and agency to permanently export a defense article
described on the Missile Technology Control Regime Annex should be
reviewed by the Missile Technology Export Committee, unless
[[Page 29569]]
authorized by statutory authority providing export authority
notwithstanding the Arms Export Control Act.
(b) This section does not authorize any department or agency of the
U.S. government to make any export that is otherwise prohibited by
virtue of other administrative provisions or by any statute.
(c) An Electronic Export Information (EEI) filing, required under
Sec. 123.22 of this subchapter, and a written statement by the
exporter certifying that these requirements have been met must be
presented at the time of export to the appropriate Port Directors of
U.S. Customs and Border Protection or Department of Defense transmittal
authority. For any export made pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of this
section, the shipment documents (bill of lading, airway bill, or other
transportation documents) must include the following statement:
``For official use by [insert U.S. government department or
agency]. Property will not enter the trade of the country to which it
is shipped. No export license required per CFR Title 22, section 126.4.
U.S. government point of contact: [insert name and telephone number]''.
0
18. Section 126.9 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 126.9 Advisory opinions and related authorizations.
(a) Advisory opinion. A person may request information from the
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls on whether it would likely grant
a license or other approval for a particular defense article or defense
service to a particular country. Such information from the Directorate
of Defense Trade Controls is issued on a case-by-case basis and applies
only to the particular matters presented to the Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls. These opinions are not binding on the Department of
State and may not be used in future matters before the Department. A
request for an advisory opinion must be made in writing and must
outline in detail the equipment, its usage, the security classification
(if any) of the articles or related technical data, and the country or
countries involved.
* * * * *
Rose E. Gottemoeller,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and International Security, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-12295 Filed 5-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P