Russian Sanctions: Revisions and Clarifications for Licensing Policy for the Crimea Region of Ukraine, 29530-29533 [2015-12267]
Download as PDF
29530
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
256; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993
Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12854, 58 FR 36587, 3
CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12918, 59 FR
28205, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 899; E.O.
12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p.
950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995
Comp., p. 356; E.O. 12981, 60 FR 62981, 3
CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 419; E.O. 13020, 61 FR
54079, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 219; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998
Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR
49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; E.O.
13338, 69 FR 26751, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp., p
168; E.O. 13637 of March 8, 2013, 78 FR
16129 (March 13, 2013); Notice of August 7,
2014, 79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014); Notice
of September 17, 2014, 79 FR 56475
(September 19, 2014); Notice of November 7,
2014, 79 FR 67035 (November 12, 2014);
Notice of January 21, 2015, 80 FR 3461
(January 22, 2015); Notice of May 6, 2015, 80
FR 26815 (May 8, 2015).
PART 736—[AMENDED]
2. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 736 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note; E.O.
12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p.
950; E.O. 13020, 61 FR 54079, 3 CFR, 1996
Comp., p. 219; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3
CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR
44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O.
13338, 69 FR 26751, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp., p.
168; Notice of August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959
(August 11, 2014); Notice of November 7,
2014, 79 FR 67035 (November 12, 2014);
Notice of May 6, 2015, 80 FR 26815 (May 8,
2015).
PART 746—[AMENDED]
3. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 746 is revised to read as follows:
■
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 287c; Sec 1503,
Pub. L. 108–11, 117 Stat. 559; 22 U.S.C. 6004;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O.
12854, 58 FR 36587, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p.
614; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205, 3 CFR, 1994
Comp., p. 899; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13338, 69 FR
26751, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp., p 168;
Presidential Determination 2003–23 of May
7, 2003, 68 FR 26459, May 16, 2003;
Presidential Determination 2007–7 of
December 7, 2006, 72 FR 1899 (January 16,
2007); Notice of August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959
(August 11, 2014); Notice of May 6, 2015, 80
FR 26815 (May 8, 2015).
Dated: May 18, 2015.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–12453 Filed 5–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 738, 740, and 746
[Docket No. 150302205–5205–01]
RIN 0694–AG54
Russian Sanctions: Revisions and
Clarifications for Licensing Policy for
the Crimea Region of Ukraine
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS) issues this final rule to
amend the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR) to facilitate Internetbased communications with persons in
the Crimea region of Ukraine. This final
rule allows exports or reexports without
a license to the Crimea region of
Ukraine of software that is necessary to
enable the exchange of personal
communications over the Internet,
provided that such software is
designated EAR99, or is classified as
mass market software under Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN)
5D992.c of the EAR, and provided
further that such software is widely
available to the public at no cost to the
user. This final rule is being published
simultaneously with the Department of
the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) issuance of General
License No. 9, which authorizes the
export or reexport from the United
States or by U.S. persons to the Crimea
region of Ukraine of certain services and
software incident to the exchange of
personal communications over the
Internet. This action is consistent with
the U.S. Government’s policy to
promote personal communications
between the people in Crimea and the
outside world.
Lastly, this final rule makes
clarifications to the EAR with respect to
the addition of the Crimea region of
Ukraine provisions in a final rule
published on January, 29, 2015, to the
EAR. These clarifications are in
response to requests that BIS received
for guidance on applying these
provisions.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
This rule is effective May 22,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eileen Albanese, Director, Office of
National Security and Technology
Transfer Controls, Bureau of Industry
and Security, Department of Commerce,
Phone: (202) 482–0092, Fax: (202) 482–
482–3355, Email: rpd2@bis.doc.gov. For
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
emails, include ‘‘Russia’’ in the subject
line.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 29, 2015, the Bureau of Industry
and Security (BIS) published the final
rule Russian Sanctions: Licensing Policy
for the Crimea Region of Ukraine (80 FR
4776) (hereinafter the ‘‘January 29
rule’’). The January 29 rule imposed
additional sanctions that implemented
U.S. policy toward Russia.
Specifically, the January 29 rule
imposed a license requirement for the
export and reexport to the Crimea region
of Ukraine, and the transfer within the
Crimea region of Ukraine, of all items
subject to the EAR, other than food and
medicine designated as EAR99. The
January 29 rule also added other
provisions specific to the Crimea region
of Ukraine. This action was consistent
with the goals and objectives of
Executive Order 13685.
Background for Executive Order 13685
This Order took additional steps to
address the national emergency
declared in Executive Order 13660 of
March 6, 2014 (as expanded by
Executive Order 13661 of March 16,
2014 and Executive Order 13662 of
March 20, 2014), finding that the actions
and policies of the Government of the
Russian Federation with respect to
Ukraine—including the deployment of
Russian Federation military forces in
the Crimea region of Ukraine—
undermine democratic processes and
institutions in Ukraine; threaten its
peace, security, stability, sovereignty,
and territorial integrity; and contribute
to the misappropriation of its assets, and
thereby constitute an unusual and
extraordinary threat to the national
security and foreign policy of the United
States.
In part, Executive Order 13685
prohibits certain transactions with
respect to the Crimea region of Ukraine,
including the export, reexport, sale or
supply, directly or indirectly, from the
United States, or by a U.S. person, of
any goods, services or technology to the
Crimea region of Ukraine. Under
Section 10 of Executive Order 13685, all
agencies of the United States
Government are directed to take all
appropriate measures within their
authority to carry out the provisions of
the Order.
Permitted Exports and Reexports of
Certain Software to the Crimea Region
of Ukraine
This final rule published today makes
additional changes to the EAR for the
Crimea region of Ukraine. Specifically,
in § 746.6, this final rule revises
paragraph (a) (license requirements) to
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
add an additional sentence that allows
exports or reexports without a license to
the Crimea region of Ukraine and
transfers (in-country) within the
Crimean region of Ukraine of certain
software (described further below) that
is necessary to enable the exchange of
personal communications over the
Internet.
This change to the license
requirements, in addition to relieving a
regulatory burden on exporters,
reexporters, and transferors of such
software, may also facilitate Internetbased communication between people
located in the Crimea region of Ukraine
and other people around the world.
Facilitating such Internet-based
communication with the people located
in the Crimea region of Ukraine is in the
United States’ national security and
foreign policy interests because it helps
the people of the Crimea region of
Ukraine communicate with the outside
world. Persons in the Crimea region of
Ukraine may use such Internet-based
communication to describe their
situation directly and counter any false
messages being propagated by those
currently exercising control over the
Crimea region of Ukraine.
By creating an opportunity for the
people of the Crimea region of Ukraine
to draw attention to these issues, this
final rule may reduce the ability of
Russia, and those acting on Russia’s
behalf in the Crimea region of Ukraine,
to control the narrative of local events.
In addition, creating an opportunity for
people in the Crimea region of Ukraine
to draw attention to these issues may
also encourage other countries to join
with the United States and other likeminded countries currently imposing
sanctions on Russia as a result of their
activities in the Crimea region of
Ukraine and other parts of eastern
Ukraine, which is also in the national
security and foreign policy interests of
the United States.
This final rule is being published
simultaneously with the Department of
the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) issuance of General
License No. 9—Exportation of Certain
Services and Software Incident to
Internet-Based Communications
Authorized. This general license
authorizes the export or reexport,
directly or indirectly, from the United
States or by U.S. persons to the Crimea
region of Ukraine of certain services
incident to the exchange of personal
communications over the Internet, such
as instant messaging, chat and email,
social networking, sharing of photos and
movies, web browsing, and blogging,
provided that such services are publicly
available at no cost to the user, subject
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
to certain exclusions. General License 9
further authorizes, in relevant part, the
export or reexport, directly or indirectly,
from the United States or by U.S.
persons, wherever located, to persons in
the Crimea region of Ukraine of software
necessary to enable the services
described above, provided that such
software is designated as EAR99 or is
classified as mass market software
under ECCN 5D992.c of the EAR, and
provided further that such software is
widely available to the public at no cost
to the user, subject to certain exclusions.
See https://www.treasury.gov/resourcecenter/sanctions/Programs/Documents/
ukraine_gl9.pdf BIS is publishing this
rule to make § 746.6(a) of the EAR
consistent with OFAC’s new general
license. This rule revises § 746.6(a) to
allow license-free treatment of software
that is necessary to enable the exchange
of personal communications over the
Internet only if such software is
designated EAR99 or is classified as
mass market software under ECCN
5D992.c of the EAR, and provided
further that such software is widely
available to the public at no cost to the
user.
Other Clarifications To the EAR for the
Crimea Region of Ukraine
In addition to the changes described
above, this final rule also makes
clarifications to the EAR with respect to
the addition of the Crimea region of
Ukraine provisions to the EAR. These
clarifications are in response to requests
that BIS received for guidance on
applying these provisions. These
clarifications do not change policy as it
relates to the Crimea region of Ukraine
provisions added to the EAR in the
January 29 rule, but rather provide
guidance on how BIS interprets them.
These questions primarily arise because
Crimea is not a country, so the public
had questions in regards to how to
apply certain EAR provisions that are
generally tied to countries when they
involve the Crimea region of Ukraine.
New Footnote To Clarify Application of
Country Groups for Crimea Region of
Ukraine
In Supplement No. 1 to part 740—
Country Groups, this final rule adds a
footnote 3 to the entry for Ukraine. The
new footnote clarifies that for purposes
of the Country Group provisions under
the EAR, the Crimea region of Ukraine
uses the same Country Group
designations as the country of Ukraine.
This is because the Crimea region of
Ukraine is not a country. The Country
Groups are also closely tied to the use
of license exceptions, so the new
footnote also clarifies that the only
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29531
license exceptions that may be used for
the Crimea region of Ukraine are those
specified in § 746.6(c). Similar to
footnote 8 that was added to the
Commerce Country Chart in
Supplement No. 1 to part 738 in the
January 29 rule, footnote 3 makes the
public aware of the additional
requirements under § 746.6 that apply to
the ‘Crimea region of Ukraine,’
including limitations on the use of
license exceptions. The new footnote
also includes the same definition of
‘Crimea region of Ukraine’ that appears
in footnote 8 to the Commerce Country
Chart and this rule’s revision to § 746.6.
New Note To Clarify Application of
Deemed Exports and Deemed Reexports
for Crimea Region of Ukraine
In § 746.6 (Crimea region of Ukraine),
this final rule adds a paragraph (a)(2) to
clarify that for purposes of applying the
EAR deemed export and deemed
reexport requirements for foreign
nationals located in or from the Crimea
region of Ukraine, the nationality of the
foreign national (as determined by
accepted methods, such as looking to
the passport or other nationality
documents recognized by the United
States Government) is what is used for
purposes of determining whether a
license is required under the EAR. For
example, if a foreign national is in the
United States and has a Ukrainian
passport, the person releasing the
technology or software source code
would use Ukraine for purposes of
determining the EAR license
requirements and would not need to
determine whether the person was from
the Crimea region of Ukraine. For
releases of technology in the Crimea
region to foreign nationals of any
country other than Ukraine, the
nationality of the foreign national is
used for determining deemed reexport
license requirements. For example, a
release of technology or software source
code to a Russian national located in the
Crimea region of Ukraine would use
Russia for purposes of determining the
EAR license requirements. BIS makes
this clarification because of requests
received from the public for guidance
on how to apply the Crimea region of
Ukraine license requirements in the
deemed export and deemed reexport
contexts. Note that nothing in this rule
affects licensing requirements for the
provision of goods and services under
the OFAC regulations, 31 CFR parts
500–599.
Export Administration Act
Although the Export Administration
Act expired on August 20, 2001, the
President, through Executive Order
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
29532
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by
Executive Order 13637 of March 8,
2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and
as extended by the Notice of August 7,
2014, 79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014),
has continued the Export
Administration Regulations in effect
under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to
carry out the provisions of the Export
Administration Act, as appropriate and
to the extent permitted by law, pursuant
to Executive Order 13222 as amended
by Executive Order 13637.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has been determined to be not
significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to nor be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection
of information, subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Control Number. This regulation
involves collections previously
approved by OMB under control
number 0694–0088, Simplified Network
Application Processing System, which
includes, among other things, license
applications and carries a burden
estimate of 43.8 minutes for a manual or
electronic submission. Total burden
hours associated with the PRA and
OMB control number 0694–0088 are not
expected to increase as a result of this
rule. You may send comments regarding
the collection of information associated
with this rule, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to Jasmeet K.
Seehra, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), by email to Jasmeet_K._
Seehra@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to (202)
395–7285.
3. This rule does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that
term is defined in Executive Order
13132.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
4. The provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) requiring notice of proposed
rulemaking, the opportunity for public
comment and a delay in effective date
are inapplicable to the changes
described above under the heading
Permitted exports and reexports of
certain software to the Crimea region of
Ukraine because this regulation
involves a military or foreign affairs
function of the United States. (See 5
U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). BIS implements this
rule to advance U.S. policy toward
Russia and therefore promote U.S.
national security or foreign policy
objectives by immediately facilitating
Internet-based communications with
persons in the Crimea region of Ukraine.
Delay in publication and the rule’s
effective date to allow for notice and
comment would frustrate those
objectives. This change to the license
requirements, in addition to relieving a
regulatory burden of exporters,
reexporters and transferors of such
software, may also facilitate Internetbased communication between people
located in the Crimea region of Ukraine
and other people around the world.
Facilitating such Internet-based
communication with the people located
in the Crimea region of Ukraine is in
U.S. national security and foreign policy
interests because it helps create a
potentially uncontrolled access point to
the outside world for the people of the
Crimea region of Ukraine. They may use
such Internet-based communication to
highlight their plight and to counter any
false messages being propagated by
those currently exercising control over
the Crimea region of Ukraine. By
creating an opportunity for the people of
the Crimea region of Ukraine to draw
attention to these issues, this final rule
may increase pressure on Russia and
those acting on Russia’s behalf in the
Crimea region of Ukraine to stop such
activities, or at least to allow a counter
version of local events. In addition,
creating an opportunity for people in
the Crimea region of Ukraine to draw
attention to these issues may also
encourage other countries to join with
the United States and other like-minded
countries currently imposing sanctions
on Russia as a result of their activities
in the Crimea region of Ukraine and
other parts of eastern Ukraine, which is
also in the national security and foreign
policy interests of the United States.
Further, no other law requires that a
notice of proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment be
given for this rule. Because a notice of
proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment are not
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
required to be given for this rule by 5
U.S.C. 553, or by any other law, the
analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly,
no regulatory flexibility analysis is
required and none has been prepared.
5. The Department finds for the
changes described under the heading
Other Clarifications to the EAR for the
Crimea region of Ukraine that there is
good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)
to waive the provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act requiring
prior notice and the opportunity for
public comment because they are
unnecessary. These changes included in
this final rule are limited to
clarifications to what was included in
the final rule published on January 29,
2015. These revisions are nonsubstantive, or are limited to only
clarifying the regulations to ensure
consistency with the intent of the
January 29 rule; therefore, providing an
additional opportunity for public
comment on these corrections is
unnecessary.
In addition, BIS finds good cause to
waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) because it will
allow the clarifications to go into effect
immediately, which will reduce the
potential for confusion among the
public and make sure all members of the
public are aware of how BIS interprets
these Crimea region of Ukraine
provisions as they relate to other EAR
provisions.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 738
Exports.
15 CFR Part 740
Administrative practice and
procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
15 CFR Part 746
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, parts 738, 740, and 746
of the Export Administration
Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–774) are
amended as follows:
PART 738—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 738 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C.
7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u);
42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42 U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C.
1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. app. 5; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 99 / Friday, May 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 7, 2014, 79
FR 46959 (August 11, 2014).
2. Supplement No. 1 to part 738 is
amended by revising footnote 8 to read
as follows:
■
Supplement No. 1 to Part 738—
Commerce Country Chart
*
*
*
*
*
8 See § 746.6 for additional license
requirements for export and reexports to
the Crimea region of Ukraine and
transfers (in-country) within the Crimea
region of Ukraine for all items subject to
the EAR, other than food and medicine
designated as EAR99 and certain EAR99
or ECCN 5D992.c software for Internetbased communications. The Crimea
region of Ukraine includes the land
territory in that region as well as any
maritime area over which sovereignty,
sovereign rights, or jurisdiction is
claimed based on purported annexation
of that land territory.
PART 740—[AMENDED]
3. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 740 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.;
E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 7, 2014, 79
FR 46959 (August 11, 2014).
4. Supplement No. 1 to part 740 is
amended by:
■ a. Adding footnote designation ‘‘3’’ to
‘‘Ukraine’’ in Country Group A; and
■ b. Adding footnote 3 to Country
Group A to read as follows:
■
Supplement No. 1 to Part 740—Country
Groups
*
*
*
*
*
purposes of this supplement, as
well as any other EAR provision that
references the Country Groups, the
designations for Ukraine also apply to
the Crimea region of Ukraine. See
§ 746.6(c) for an exhaustive listing of
license exceptions that are available for
the Crimea region of Ukraine. No other
EAR license exceptions are available for
the Crimea region of Ukraine. The
Crimea region of Ukraine includes the
land territory in that region as well as
any maritime area over which
sovereignty, sovereign rights, or
jurisdiction is claimed based on
purported annexation of that land
territory.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
3 For
PART 746—[AMENDED]
5. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 746 is revised to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 May 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 287c; Sec 1503,
Pub. L. 108–11, 117 Stat. 559; 22 U.S.C. 6004;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O.
12854, 58 FR 36587, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p.
614; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205, 3 CFR, 1994
Comp., p. 899; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13338, 69 FR
26751, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp., p 168;
Presidential Determination 2003–23 of May
7, 2003, 68 FR 26459, May 16, 2003;
Presidential Determination 2007–7 of
December 7, 2006, 72 FR 1899 (January 16,
2007); Notice of August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959
(August 11, 2014); Notice of May 6, 2015, 80
FR 26815 (May 8, 2015).
6. Section 746.6 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 746.6
Crimea region of Ukraine.
(a) License requirements—(1) General
prohibition. As authorized by Section 6
of the Export Administration Act of
1979, a license is required to export or
reexport any item subject to the EAR to
the Crimea region of Ukraine and the
transfer within the Crimea region of
Ukraine except food and medicine
designated as EAR99 or software that is
necessary to enable the exchange of
personal communications over the
Internet (such as instant messaging, chat
and email, social networking, sharing of
photos and movies, Web browsing, and
blogging), provided that such software is
designated EAR99 or is classified as
mass market software under Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN)
5D992.c of the EAR, and provided
further that such software is widely
available to the public at no cost to the
user. The ‘Crimea region of Ukraine’
includes the land territory in that region
as well as any maritime area over which
sovereignty, sovereign rights, or
jurisdiction is claimed based on
purported annexation of that land
territory.
(2) For purposes of applying the EAR
deemed export and deemed reexport
requirements for foreign nationals
located in or from the Crimea region of
Ukraine, the nationality of the foreign
national (as determined by accepted
methods, such as looking to the passport
or other nationality document(s)
recognized by the United States
Government) is what is used for
purposes of determining whether a
license is required for a deemed export
or deemed reexport. For any other
export, reexport or transfer (in-country),
see the license requirements specified in
paragraph (a).
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29533
Dated: May 14, 2015.
Eric L. Hirschhorn,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry
and Security.
[FR Doc. 2015–12267 Filed 5–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2015–0464]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Lake Washington Ship Canal, Seattle,
WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of deviation from
drawbridge regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule that governs the Washington
State Department of Transportation
Montlake Bridge across the Lake
Washington Ship Canal, mile 5.2, at
Seattle, WA. The deviation is necessary
to accommodate the University of
Washington, and University of
Washington Bothell commencement
ceremony traffic. This deviation allows
the bridge to remain in the closed-tonavigation position to accommodate the
timely movement of vehicular traffic.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
9:30 a.m. on June 13, 2015 to 6:15 p.m.
on June 14, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
deviation, [USCG–2015–0464] is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Type the docket number in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation. You may
also visit the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email Mr. Steven
Fischer, Bridge Administrator,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District;
telephone 206–220–7282, email d13-pfd13bridges@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Cheryl Collins, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29530-29533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12267]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 738, 740, and 746
[Docket No. 150302205-5205-01]
RIN 0694-AG54
Russian Sanctions: Revisions and Clarifications for Licensing
Policy for the Crimea Region of Ukraine
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issues this final
rule to amend the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to facilitate
Internet-based communications with persons in the Crimea region of
Ukraine. This final rule allows exports or reexports without a license
to the Crimea region of Ukraine of software that is necessary to enable
the exchange of personal communications over the Internet, provided
that such software is designated EAR99, or is classified as mass market
software under Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 5D992.c of
the EAR, and provided further that such software is widely available to
the public at no cost to the user. This final rule is being published
simultaneously with the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign
Assets Control (OFAC) issuance of General License No. 9, which
authorizes the export or reexport from the United States or by U.S.
persons to the Crimea region of Ukraine of certain services and
software incident to the exchange of personal communications over the
Internet. This action is consistent with the U.S. Government's policy
to promote personal communications between the people in Crimea and the
outside world.
Lastly, this final rule makes clarifications to the EAR with
respect to the addition of the Crimea region of Ukraine provisions in a
final rule published on January, 29, 2015, to the EAR. These
clarifications are in response to requests that BIS received for
guidance on applying these provisions.
DATES: This rule is effective May 22, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eileen Albanese, Director, Office of
National Security and Technology Transfer Controls, Bureau of Industry
and Security, Department of Commerce, Phone: (202) 482-0092, Fax: (202)
482-482-3355, Email: rpd2@bis.doc.gov. For emails, include ``Russia''
in the subject line.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 29, 2015, the Bureau of Industry
and Security (BIS) published the final rule Russian Sanctions:
Licensing Policy for the Crimea Region of Ukraine (80 FR 4776)
(hereinafter the ``January 29 rule''). The January 29 rule imposed
additional sanctions that implemented U.S. policy toward Russia.
Specifically, the January 29 rule imposed a license requirement for
the export and reexport to the Crimea region of Ukraine, and the
transfer within the Crimea region of Ukraine, of all items subject to
the EAR, other than food and medicine designated as EAR99. The January
29 rule also added other provisions specific to the Crimea region of
Ukraine. This action was consistent with the goals and objectives of
Executive Order 13685.
Background for Executive Order 13685
This Order took additional steps to address the national emergency
declared in Executive Order 13660 of March 6, 2014 (as expanded by
Executive Order 13661 of March 16, 2014 and Executive Order 13662 of
March 20, 2014), finding that the actions and policies of the
Government of the Russian Federation with respect to Ukraine--including
the deployment of Russian Federation military forces in the Crimea
region of Ukraine--undermine democratic processes and institutions in
Ukraine; threaten its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, and
territorial integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its
assets, and thereby constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to
the national security and foreign policy of the United States.
In part, Executive Order 13685 prohibits certain transactions with
respect to the Crimea region of Ukraine, including the export,
reexport, sale or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United
States, or by a U.S. person, of any goods, services or technology to
the Crimea region of Ukraine. Under Section 10 of Executive Order
13685, all agencies of the United States Government are directed to
take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the
provisions of the Order.
Permitted Exports and Reexports of Certain Software to the Crimea
Region of Ukraine
This final rule published today makes additional changes to the EAR
for the Crimea region of Ukraine. Specifically, in Sec. 746.6, this
final rule revises paragraph (a) (license requirements) to
[[Page 29531]]
add an additional sentence that allows exports or reexports without a
license to the Crimea region of Ukraine and transfers (in-country)
within the Crimean region of Ukraine of certain software (described
further below) that is necessary to enable the exchange of personal
communications over the Internet.
This change to the license requirements, in addition to relieving a
regulatory burden on exporters, reexporters, and transferors of such
software, may also facilitate Internet-based communication between
people located in the Crimea region of Ukraine and other people around
the world. Facilitating such Internet-based communication with the
people located in the Crimea region of Ukraine is in the United States'
national security and foreign policy interests because it helps the
people of the Crimea region of Ukraine communicate with the outside
world. Persons in the Crimea region of Ukraine may use such Internet-
based communication to describe their situation directly and counter
any false messages being propagated by those currently exercising
control over the Crimea region of Ukraine.
By creating an opportunity for the people of the Crimea region of
Ukraine to draw attention to these issues, this final rule may reduce
the ability of Russia, and those acting on Russia's behalf in the
Crimea region of Ukraine, to control the narrative of local events. In
addition, creating an opportunity for people in the Crimea region of
Ukraine to draw attention to these issues may also encourage other
countries to join with the United States and other like-minded
countries currently imposing sanctions on Russia as a result of their
activities in the Crimea region of Ukraine and other parts of eastern
Ukraine, which is also in the national security and foreign policy
interests of the United States.
This final rule is being published simultaneously with the
Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
issuance of General License No. 9--Exportation of Certain Services and
Software Incident to Internet-Based Communications Authorized. This
general license authorizes the export or reexport, directly or
indirectly, from the United States or by U.S. persons to the Crimea
region of Ukraine of certain services incident to the exchange of
personal communications over the Internet, such as instant messaging,
chat and email, social networking, sharing of photos and movies, web
browsing, and blogging, provided that such services are publicly
available at no cost to the user, subject to certain exclusions.
General License 9 further authorizes, in relevant part, the export or
reexport, directly or indirectly, from the United States or by U.S.
persons, wherever located, to persons in the Crimea region of Ukraine
of software necessary to enable the services described above, provided
that such software is designated as EAR99 or is classified as mass
market software under ECCN 5D992.c of the EAR, and provided further
that such software is widely available to the public at no cost to the
user, subject to certain exclusions. See https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/ukraine_gl9.pdf BIS is
publishing this rule to make Sec. 746.6(a) of the EAR consistent with
OFAC's new general license. This rule revises Sec. 746.6(a) to allow
license-free treatment of software that is necessary to enable the
exchange of personal communications over the Internet only if such
software is designated EAR99 or is classified as mass market software
under ECCN 5D992.c of the EAR, and provided further that such software
is widely available to the public at no cost to the user.
Other Clarifications To the EAR for the Crimea Region of Ukraine
In addition to the changes described above, this final rule also
makes clarifications to the EAR with respect to the addition of the
Crimea region of Ukraine provisions to the EAR. These clarifications
are in response to requests that BIS received for guidance on applying
these provisions. These clarifications do not change policy as it
relates to the Crimea region of Ukraine provisions added to the EAR in
the January 29 rule, but rather provide guidance on how BIS interprets
them. These questions primarily arise because Crimea is not a country,
so the public had questions in regards to how to apply certain EAR
provisions that are generally tied to countries when they involve the
Crimea region of Ukraine.
New Footnote To Clarify Application of Country Groups for Crimea Region
of Ukraine
In Supplement No. 1 to part 740--Country Groups, this final rule
adds a footnote 3 to the entry for Ukraine. The new footnote clarifies
that for purposes of the Country Group provisions under the EAR, the
Crimea region of Ukraine uses the same Country Group designations as
the country of Ukraine. This is because the Crimea region of Ukraine is
not a country. The Country Groups are also closely tied to the use of
license exceptions, so the new footnote also clarifies that the only
license exceptions that may be used for the Crimea region of Ukraine
are those specified in Sec. 746.6(c). Similar to footnote 8 that was
added to the Commerce Country Chart in Supplement No. 1 to part 738 in
the January 29 rule, footnote 3 makes the public aware of the
additional requirements under Sec. 746.6 that apply to the `Crimea
region of Ukraine,' including limitations on the use of license
exceptions. The new footnote also includes the same definition of
`Crimea region of Ukraine' that appears in footnote 8 to the Commerce
Country Chart and this rule's revision to Sec. 746.6.
New Note To Clarify Application of Deemed Exports and Deemed Reexports
for Crimea Region of Ukraine
In Sec. 746.6 (Crimea region of Ukraine), this final rule adds a
paragraph (a)(2) to clarify that for purposes of applying the EAR
deemed export and deemed reexport requirements for foreign nationals
located in or from the Crimea region of Ukraine, the nationality of the
foreign national (as determined by accepted methods, such as looking to
the passport or other nationality documents recognized by the United
States Government) is what is used for purposes of determining whether
a license is required under the EAR. For example, if a foreign national
is in the United States and has a Ukrainian passport, the person
releasing the technology or software source code would use Ukraine for
purposes of determining the EAR license requirements and would not need
to determine whether the person was from the Crimea region of Ukraine.
For releases of technology in the Crimea region to foreign nationals of
any country other than Ukraine, the nationality of the foreign national
is used for determining deemed reexport license requirements. For
example, a release of technology or software source code to a Russian
national located in the Crimea region of Ukraine would use Russia for
purposes of determining the EAR license requirements. BIS makes this
clarification because of requests received from the public for guidance
on how to apply the Crimea region of Ukraine license requirements in
the deemed export and deemed reexport contexts. Note that nothing in
this rule affects licensing requirements for the provision of goods and
services under the OFAC regulations, 31 CFR parts 500-599.
Export Administration Act
Although the Export Administration Act expired on August 20, 2001,
the President, through Executive Order
[[Page 29532]]
13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended
by Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013)
and as extended by the Notice of August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959 (August
11, 2014), has continued the Export Administration Regulations in
effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. BIS
continues to carry out the provisions of the Export Administration Act,
as appropriate and to the extent permitted by law, pursuant to
Executive Order 13222 as amended by Executive Order 13637.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to nor be subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with a collection of information, subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation involves
collections previously approved by OMB under control number 0694-0088,
Simplified Network Application Processing System, which includes, among
other things, license applications and carries a burden estimate of
43.8 minutes for a manual or electronic submission. Total burden hours
associated with the PRA and OMB control number 0694-0088 are not
expected to increase as a result of this rule. You may send comments
regarding the collection of information associated with this rule,
including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Jasmeet K. Seehra,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), by email to
Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to (202) 395-7285.
3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
4. The provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) requiring notice of proposed rulemaking, the opportunity for
public comment and a delay in effective date are inapplicable to the
changes described above under the heading Permitted exports and
reexports of certain software to the Crimea region of Ukraine because
this regulation involves a military or foreign affairs function of the
United States. (See 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). BIS implements this rule to
advance U.S. policy toward Russia and therefore promote U.S. national
security or foreign policy objectives by immediately facilitating
Internet-based communications with persons in the Crimea region of
Ukraine. Delay in publication and the rule's effective date to allow
for notice and comment would frustrate those objectives. This change to
the license requirements, in addition to relieving a regulatory burden
of exporters, reexporters and transferors of such software, may also
facilitate Internet-based communication between people located in the
Crimea region of Ukraine and other people around the world.
Facilitating such Internet-based communication with the people located
in the Crimea region of Ukraine is in U.S. national security and
foreign policy interests because it helps create a potentially
uncontrolled access point to the outside world for the people of the
Crimea region of Ukraine. They may use such Internet-based
communication to highlight their plight and to counter any false
messages being propagated by those currently exercising control over
the Crimea region of Ukraine. By creating an opportunity for the people
of the Crimea region of Ukraine to draw attention to these issues, this
final rule may increase pressure on Russia and those acting on Russia's
behalf in the Crimea region of Ukraine to stop such activities, or at
least to allow a counter version of local events. In addition, creating
an opportunity for people in the Crimea region of Ukraine to draw
attention to these issues may also encourage other countries to join
with the United States and other like-minded countries currently
imposing sanctions on Russia as a result of their activities in the
Crimea region of Ukraine and other parts of eastern Ukraine, which is
also in the national security and foreign policy interests of the
United States. Further, no other law requires that a notice of proposed
rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment be given for this
rule. Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C.
553, or by any other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly,
no regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none has been
prepared.
5. The Department finds for the changes described under the heading
Other Clarifications to the EAR for the Crimea region of Ukraine that
there is good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive the provisions
of the Administrative Procedure Act requiring prior notice and the
opportunity for public comment because they are unnecessary. These
changes included in this final rule are limited to clarifications to
what was included in the final rule published on January 29, 2015.
These revisions are non-substantive, or are limited to only clarifying
the regulations to ensure consistency with the intent of the January 29
rule; therefore, providing an additional opportunity for public comment
on these corrections is unnecessary.
In addition, BIS finds good cause to waive the 30-day delay in
effectiveness under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) because it will allow the
clarifications to go into effect immediately, which will reduce the
potential for confusion among the public and make sure all members of
the public are aware of how BIS interprets these Crimea region of
Ukraine provisions as they relate to other EAR provisions.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 738
Exports.
15 CFR Part 740
Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
15 CFR Part 746
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, parts 738, 740, and 746 of the Export Administration
Regulations (15 CFR parts 730-774) are amended as follows:
PART 738--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 738 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C. 7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u); 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42
U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C. 1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. app. 5; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR,
1996 Comp., p.
[[Page 29533]]
228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of
August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014).
0
2. Supplement No. 1 to part 738 is amended by revising footnote 8 to
read as follows:
Supplement No. 1 to Part 738--Commerce Country Chart
* * * * *
\8\ See Sec. 746.6 for additional license requirements for export
and reexports to the Crimea region of Ukraine and transfers (in-
country) within the Crimea region of Ukraine for all items subject to
the EAR, other than food and medicine designated as EAR99 and certain
EAR99 or ECCN 5D992.c software for Internet-based communications. The
Crimea region of Ukraine includes the land territory in that region as
well as any maritime area over which sovereignty, sovereign rights, or
jurisdiction is claimed based on purported annexation of that land
territory.
PART 740--[AMENDED]
0
3. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 740 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice
of August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959 (August 11, 2014).
0
4. Supplement No. 1 to part 740 is amended by:
0
a. Adding footnote designation ``3'' to ``Ukraine'' in Country Group A;
and
0
b. Adding footnote 3 to Country Group A to read as follows:
Supplement No. 1 to Part 740--Country Groups
* * * * *
\3\ For purposes of this supplement, as well as any other EAR
provision that references the Country Groups, the designations for
Ukraine also apply to the Crimea region of Ukraine. See Sec. 746.6(c)
for an exhaustive listing of license exceptions that are available for
the Crimea region of Ukraine. No other EAR license exceptions are
available for the Crimea region of Ukraine. The Crimea region of
Ukraine includes the land territory in that region as well as any
maritime area over which sovereignty, sovereign rights, or jurisdiction
is claimed based on purported annexation of that land territory.
PART 746--[AMENDED]
0
5. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 746 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 287c; Sec 1503, Pub. L. 108-11, 117 Stat. 559; 22 U.S.C.
6004; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12854, 58 FR
36587, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 614; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205, 3 CFR,
1994 Comp., p. 899; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
783; E.O. 13338, 69 FR 26751, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp., p 168; Presidential
Determination 2003-23 of May 7, 2003, 68 FR 26459, May 16, 2003;
Presidential Determination 2007-7 of December 7, 2006, 72 FR 1899
(January 16, 2007); Notice of August 7, 2014, 79 FR 46959 (August
11, 2014); Notice of May 6, 2015, 80 FR 26815 (May 8, 2015).
0
6. Section 746.6 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 746.6 Crimea region of Ukraine.
(a) License requirements--(1) General prohibition. As authorized by
Section 6 of the Export Administration Act of 1979, a license is
required to export or reexport any item subject to the EAR to the
Crimea region of Ukraine and the transfer within the Crimea region of
Ukraine except food and medicine designated as EAR99 or software that
is necessary to enable the exchange of personal communications over the
Internet (such as instant messaging, chat and email, social networking,
sharing of photos and movies, Web browsing, and blogging), provided
that such software is designated EAR99 or is classified as mass market
software under Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 5D992.c of
the EAR, and provided further that such software is widely available to
the public at no cost to the user. The `Crimea region of Ukraine'
includes the land territory in that region as well as any maritime area
over which sovereignty, sovereign rights, or jurisdiction is claimed
based on purported annexation of that land territory.
(2) For purposes of applying the EAR deemed export and deemed
reexport requirements for foreign nationals located in or from the
Crimea region of Ukraine, the nationality of the foreign national (as
determined by accepted methods, such as looking to the passport or
other nationality document(s) recognized by the United States
Government) is what is used for purposes of determining whether a
license is required for a deemed export or deemed reexport. For any
other export, reexport or transfer (in-country), see the license
requirements specified in paragraph (a).
* * * * *
Dated: May 14, 2015.
Eric L. Hirschhorn,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security.
[FR Doc. 2015-12267 Filed 5-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P