Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Cancer (Malignant Neoplastic Diseases), 28821-28832 [2015-11923]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Transactions between U.S. Financial
Services Providers and Foreign
Persons—2014, contained herein,
whether or not they are contacted by
BEA to ensure complete coverage of
financial services transactions between
U.S. financial services providers and
foreign persons. Also, a person, or its
agent, that is contacted by BEA about
reporting in this survey, either by
sending a report form or by written
inquiry, must respond in writing
pursuant to this section. This may be
accomplished by:
(1) Completing and returning the BE–
180 survey by the due date; or,
(2) If exempt, by completing pages
one through five of the BE–180 survey
and returning them to BEA.
(b) Who must report. (1) A BE–180
report is required of each U.S. person
that is a financial services provider or
intermediary, or whose consolidated
U.S. enterprise includes a separately
organized subsidiary, or part, that is a
financial services provider or
intermediary, and that had transactions
(either sales or purchases) directly with
foreign persons in all financial services
combined in excess of $3,000,000
during its fiscal year covered by the
survey on an accrual basis. The
$3,000,000 threshold should be applied
to financial services transactions with
foreign persons by all parts of the
consolidated U.S. enterprise combined
that are financial services providers or
intermediaries. Because the $3,000,000
threshold applies separately to sales and
purchases, the mandatory reporting
requirement may apply only to sales,
only to purchases, or to both.
(i) The determination of whether a
U.S. financial services provider or
intermediary is subject to this
mandatory reporting requirement may
be based on the judgment of
knowledgeable persons in a company
who can identify reportable transactions
on a recall basis, with a reasonable
degree of certainty, without conducting
a detailed manual records search.
(ii) Reporters that file pursuant to this
mandatory reporting requirement must
provide data on total sales and/or
purchases of each of the covered types
of financial services transactions and
must disaggregate the totals by country
and by relationship to the foreign
transactor (foreign affiliate, foreign
parent group, or unaffiliated).
(2) Voluntary reporting. If, during the
fiscal year covered, sales or purchases of
financial services by a firm that is a
financial services provider or
intermediary, or by a firm’s subsidiaries,
or parts, combined that are financial
services providers or intermediaries, are
$3,000,000 or less, the U.S. person is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
requested to provide an estimate of the
total for each type of service. Provision
of this information is voluntary. The
estimates may be judgmental, that is,
based on recall, without conducting a
detailed records search. Because the
$3,000,000 threshold applies separately
to sales and purchases, this voluntary
reporting option may apply only to
sales, only to purchases, or to both.
(3) Exemption claims. Any U.S.
person that receives the BE–180 survey
form from BEA, but is not subject to the
mandatory reporting requirements and
chooses not to report voluntarily, must
file an exemption claim by completing
pages one through five of the BE–180
survey and returning it to BEA. This
requirement is necessary to ensure
compliance with reporting requirements
and efficient administration of the Act
by eliminating unnecessary follow-up
contact.
(c) BE–180 definition of financial
services provider. The definition of
financial services provider used for this
survey is identical to the definition of
the term as used in the North American
Industry Classification System, United
States, 2012, Sector 52—Finance and
Insurance, and holding companies that
own or influence, and are principally
engaged in making management
decisions for these firms (part of Sector
55—Management of Companies and
Enterprises). For example, companies
and/or subsidiaries and other separable
parts of companies in the following
industries are defined as financial
services providers: Depository credit
intermediation and related activities
(including commercial banking, savings
institutions, credit unions, and other
depository credit intermediation); nondepository credit intermediation
(including credit card issuing, sales
financing, and other non-depository
credit intermediation); activities related
to credit intermediation (including
mortgage and nonmortgage loan brokers,
financial transactions processing,
reserve, and clearinghouse activities,
and other activities related to credit
intermediation); securities and
commodity contracts intermediation
and brokerage (including investment
banking and securities dealing,
securities brokerage, commodity
contracts and dealing, and commodity
contracts brokerage); securities and
commodity exchanges; other financial
investment activities (including
miscellaneous intermediation, portfolio
management, investment advice, and all
other financial investment activities);
insurance carriers; insurance agencies,
brokerages, and other insurance related
activities; insurance and employee
benefit funds (including pension funds,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28821
health and welfare funds, and other
insurance funds); other investment
pools and finds (including open-end
investment funds, trusts, estates, and
agency accounts, real estate investment
trusts, and other financial vehicles); and
holding companies that own, or
influence the management decisions of,
firms principally engaged in the
aforementioned activities.
(d) Covered types of services. The BE–
180 survey covers the following types of
financial services transactions (sales or
purchases) between U.S. financial
services companies and foreign persons:
brokerage services related to equity
transactions; other brokerage services;
underwriting and private placement
services; financial management service
(including fees for mutual funds,
pension funds, exchange-traded funds,
private equity funds, corporate
portfolio, individual portfolio, hedge
funds, trusts, and other); credit related
services, except credit card services;
credit card services; financial advisory
and custody services; securities lending
services; electronic funds transfer
services; and other financial services.
(e) Due date. A fully completed and
certified BE–180 report, or qualifying
exemption claim with pages one
through five completed, is due to be
filed with BEA not later than October 1,
2015.
[FR Doc. 2015–11996 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–06–M
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Part 404
[Docket No. SSA–2011–0098]
RIN 0960–AH43
Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating
Cancer (Malignant Neoplastic
Diseases)
Social Security Administration.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
We are revising the criteria in
parts A and B of the Listing of
Impairments (listings) that we use to
evaluate claims involving cancer
(malignant neoplastic diseases) under
titles II and XVI of the Social Security
Act (Act). These revisions reflect our
adjudicative experience, advances in
medical knowledge, recommendations
from medical experts we consulted, and
public comments we received in
response to a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM).
DATES: This rule is effective July 20,
2015.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
28822
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cheryl A. Williams, Office of Medical
Policy, Social Security Administration,
6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21235–6401, (410) 965–1020.
For information on eligibility or filing
for benefits, call our national toll-free
number, 1–800–772–1213, or TTY 1–
800–325–0778, or visit our Internet site,
Social Security Online, at https://
www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We are revising and making final the
regulations for evaluating cancer
(malignant neoplastic diseases) that we
proposed in an NPRM published in the
Federal Register on December 17, 2013,
at 78 FR 76508. Even though this rule
will not go into effect until 60 days after
publication of this document, for clarity
we refer to it in this preamble as the
‘‘final’’ rule. We refer to the rule in
effect prior to that time as the ‘‘prior’’
rule.
In the preamble to the NPRM, we
discussed our proposed changes and our
reasons for making them. Since we are
mostly adopting those revisions as we
proposed them, we are not repeating
that information here. Interested readers
may refer to the preamble in the NPRM,
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
We are making some changes in this
final rule based on the public comments
we received on the NPRM. We explain
these changes in the ‘‘Summary of
Public Comments’’ below.
Why are we revising the cancer
listings?
We developed this final rule as part
of our ongoing review of the cancer
body system. When we last revised the
listings for this body system in a final
rule published on October 6, 2009, we
indicated that we would monitor and
update the listings as needed.1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
How long will this final rule stay in
effect?
We are extending the effective date of
the cancer body system in parts A and
B of the listings until 5 years after the
effective date of this final rule. The rule
will remain in effect only until that date
unless we extend the expiration date.
We will continue to monitor the rule
and may revise it, as needed, before the
end of the 5-year period.
Summary of Public Comments
In the NPRM, we gave the public a 60day comment period that ended on
February 18, 2014. We received 15
comments. The commenters included
1 See
74 FR 51229.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
national cancer advocacy groups, State
agencies, a national group representing
disability examiners in State agencies
that make disability determinations for
us, medical professionals, and
individual members of the public.
We carefully considered all of the
significant comments relevant to this
rulemaking. We have condensed and
summarized the comments below. We
believe we have presented the
commenters’ concerns and suggestions
accurately and completely and
responded to all significant issues that
were within the scope of this rule. We
provide our reasons for adopting or not
adopting the recommendations in our
responses below.
General Comments
Comment: Many commenters
supported our proposal to change the
name of this body system from
‘‘Malignant Neoplastic Diseases’’ to
‘‘Cancer’’ to make the name more
recognizable to the lay public. However,
some commenters believed this change
was not necessary or appropriate. These
commenters believed the lay public is
sufficiently aware of the meaning of the
term ‘‘malignant neoplastic diseases’’
and that we should continue using it as
the body system’s name. One
commenter thought ‘‘malignant
neoplastic diseases’’ is a more
encompassing name for the body system
than ‘‘cancer.’’ The commenter
contended the term ‘‘cancer’’ has
traditionally meant only carcinoma, and
does not include sarcoma, leukemia, or
malignancies in other cell types.
Response: We disagree with the
commenters’ view that the lay public is
sufficiently aware of the term
‘‘malignant neoplastic diseases,’’ and
have adopted our proposal to change the
name of this body system to ‘‘Cancer.’’
We believe the lay public understands
that the term ‘‘cancer’’ means not only
carcinoma but also the wide array of
malignancies. The National Cancer
Institute (NCI), National Cancer Society
(NCS), and other recognized experts use
the term ‘‘cancer’’ when referring to
carcinoma, sarcoma, leukemia,
lymphoma, and malignancies of the
central nervous system in their
publications.2
Comment: A commenter, who
supported the proposed name change,
recommended that we use the term
‘‘anticancer therapy’’ instead of
‘‘antineoplastic therapy’’ in this final
rule.
2 For example, see ‘‘NCI Home’’ at https://
www.cancer.gov, and ‘‘American Cancer Society
Home’’ at https://www.cancer.org/index.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Response: We agree with the
commenter and have modified the
listings accordingly.
Comment: One commenter suggested
we have only one listing for evaluating
small-cell carcinomas rather than adopt
our proposal to provide a criterion for
small-cell carcinoma under several,
specific listings.3
Response: We did not adopt the
comment. Some small-cell carcinomas
might be included under the single
listing the commenter proposed, but
may have favorable prognoses and not
be of listing-level severity. These smallcell carcinomas have a favorable
prognosis because physicians can detect
them in their early stages when it is still
possible to remove the cancer. The final
listings cover small-cell carcinomas that
occur in certain organs and tissues
where physicians are unlikely to detect
them in their early stages, and treatment
is mainly palliative.
Comment: One commenter suggested
that we include the stage of the cancer
in the final listings for evaluating
central nervous system and cervical
cancers, and lymphomas.
Response: We did not adopt the
comment for two reasons. First, the
cancers mentioned by the commenter
may have different staging systems that
are inconsistent with each other.
Second, staging systems could change,
potentially resulting in an inability to
find people with listing-level
impairments disabled at the listing step
of the sequential evaluation process.
Comment: A commenter proposed we
provide more guidance in part B for
evaluating conditions in children,
resulting from cancer or its treatment,
that do not meet the listings. The
commenter said such conditions might
include organ dysfunction resulting
from small-cell carcinomas, or
secondary lymphedema resulting from
breast cancer treatment. The commenter
believed the additional guidance would
make the final listings more
comprehensive.
Response: We did not adopt the
comment because we believe final
sections 113.00F and 113.00G already
3 We retained prior listing 13.14B for evaluating
small-cell carcinoma in the lungs and added a
criterion for small-cell carcinoma under the
following specific listings: 13.02D for soft tissue
cancers of the head and neck; 13.10D for cancer of
the breast; 13.15C for cancer of the pleura and
mediastinum; 13.16C for cancer of the esophagus or
stomach; 13.17C for cancer of the small intestine;
13.18D for cancer of the large intestine; 13.22E for
cancer of the urinary bladder; 13.23F for cancers of
the female genital tract; and 13.24C for cancer of the
prostate gland. We include a listing for small-cell
carcinoma of the small intestine, even though it is
a very rare cancer, to maintain internal consistency
among the regulations, and because of the cancer’s
unfavorable prognosis.
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
provide the type of guidance the
commenter recommended. In these
sections, we explain that if a child has
a medically determinable impairment
that does not meet the listings, we will
determine whether the impairment
medically equals the listings. This
determination would include
impairments caused by the cancer or
treatment side effects. If the impairment
does not medically equal a listing,
section 113.00F further explains that we
will also determine whether the
impairment functionally equals the
listings. Again, this determination
would include impairments caused by
the cancer or treatment side effects.
Comment: One commenter
recommended we provide more
guidance for evaluating treatment
failure in bone marrow and stem cell
transplantation, and proposed specific
language for making this change.
Response: We believe the change, and
the specific language the commenter
proposed, is not necessary because
listings for bone marrow and stem cell
transplantation have a criterion for
evaluating any residual impairments
following treatment. These residual
impairments would include the
evaluation of those associated with
treatment failure.
Section 13.00E—When do we need
longitudinal evidence?
Comment: One commenter asked us
to specify which sources can provide
the evidence required in final section
13.00E3c to document that the treating
source has started multimodal therapy
under final listings 13.02E, 13.11D, and
13.14C. The commenter indicated that
we should accept this evidence only
from an acceptable medical source such
as a medical or osteopathic doctor.
Response: We did not adopt the
comment because it may limit our
ability to obtain evidence to determine
if multimodal therapy has started and,
thus, establish listing-level severity.
While an acceptable medical source
may provide this evidence, our existing
policy allows us to accept evidence
from other medical sources to establish
the impairment’s severity.4 For
example, this evidence may come from
sources we do not consider acceptable
medical sources, such as oncology nurse
practitioners who administer
chemotherapy and radiation therapists
who deliver radiation treatments.
Sections 13.00I and 113.00I—What do
we mean by the following terms?
Comment: One commenter expressed
concern over proposed sections 13.00I6
4 See
20 CFR 404.1513(d) and 416.913(d).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
and 113.00I5, in which we clarified that
we consider a cancer to be
‘‘progressive’’ if it is still growing after
the person has completed at least half of
his or her planned initial anticancer
therapy. The commenter believed this
criterion might delay adjudication if the
adjudicator must contact the treating
source to ask how much of planned
treatment the person has completed.
Response: We did not adopt this
comment. We disagree with the
commenter because we do not expect
adjudicators to obtain more information
than we required under the prior
regulations. The proposed and final
sections express our intent to decide as
quickly as possible that a person is
disabled.
Comment: The same commenter
thought that the definition of the term
‘‘progressive’’ could result in a finding
that the claimant has a condition
medically equivalent to cancer listings
that do not require the malignancy to be
progressive.
Response: We do not share the
commenter’s concern because, as we
explain in sections 13.00C and 113.00C,
we will only apply the criteria in a
specific listing to a cancer originating
from that specific site.
Comment: One commenter
recommended that we revise the
definition of ‘‘persistent’’ cancer in final
section 13.00I5. The commenter also
provided language for the suggested
revision.
Response: We did not adopt the
comment for two reasons. First, the
language the commenter proposed could
be misinterpreted to require that all of
a person’s anticancer therapy must fail
to achieve a complete remission,
including any second- or third-line
therapies after initial anticancer
therapy.5 This interpretation would be
contrary to our intent in listings that
require only the planned initial
anticancer therapy to fail. Second, the
language the commenter proposed
would not explain the meaning of the
phrase ‘‘failed to achieve a complete
remission.’’ By defining this phrase, the
final section clarifies that the cancer is
‘‘persistent’’ if any of it remains after
treatment is completed, even if the
cancer responded to the initial therapy
and became smaller.
Comment: One commenter
recommended that the definition of the
term ‘‘unresectable’’ in final section
13.00I8 address the presence of
micrometastases. The commenter
5 We may consider follow-up surgery to be a part
of initial anticancer treatment if the intent of the
follow-up surgery is to obtain clear margins and the
complete eradication of any residual cancer left
behind.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28823
contended that ‘‘unresectable’’ should
not include situations in which the
surgeon removed the tumor and then
used adjuvant therapy to eliminate any
micrometastases.
Response: We did not adopt the
comment. We believe the commenter’s
proposed change is unnecessary. Final
section 13.00I8 defines ‘‘adjuvant
therapy’’ as anticancer therapy given
after surgery ‘‘to eliminate any
remaining cancer cells or lessen the
chance of recurrence.’’ These
‘‘remaining cancer cells’’ include
micrometastases.
Sections 13.00K and 113.00K—How do
we evaluate specific cancers?
Comment: A commenter
recommended that we add examples of
common indolent lymphomas in final
section 13.00K1a. The commenter also
recommended that we add examples of
common solid tumors in final section
113.00K3.
Response: We did not adopt the
comment. These recommendations
appear to be administrative concerns
better handled through training and
operating instructions for our
adjudicators.
Comment: A commenter
recommended that we create a listing
for primary peritoneal carcinoma. The
commenter argued that having a listing
would be better than the guidance in
section 13.00K7, in which we explained
that we can evaluate this cancer in
women under final 13.23E for ovarian
cancer, and evaluate it in men under
13.15A for malignant mesothelioma.
Response: We did not adopt the
commenter’s recommendation that we
create a listing for primary peritoneal
carcinoma. Primary peritoneal
carcinoma is very rare, and we do not
usually provide listings for rare cancers.
Instead, we believe the better practice is
to clarify in the introductory text which
listings to use to evaluate certain rare
cancers, as we did in final section
13.00K7 for primary peritoneal
carcinoma.
Comment: A few commenters
expressed concern about the
clarification in proposed section
13.00K8 that excludes ‘‘biochemical
recurrence’’ for evaluating recurrent
cancer of the prostate gland in listing
13.24A. In this section, we defined
‘‘biochemical recurrence’’ as an increase
in the serum prostate-specific antigen
(PSA) level following the completion of
anticancer therapy. Section 13.24A
requires corroborating evidence to
document recurrence, such as
radiological studies or findings on
physical exam. Commenters believed
this requirement might delay a finding
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
28824
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
of disability and unfairly penalize
people with prostate cancer. They noted
that doctors frequently use PSA values
to determine recurrence and may
initiate anticancer treatment for
recurrent cancer upon this evidence
alone.
Response: We agree that in some
cases, an isolated PSA reading may
support a diagnosis of recurrent prostate
cancer, especially if this diagnosis is
from an acceptable medical source and
is consistent with the prevailing state of
medical knowledge and clinical
practice. However, we did not adopt the
comments because we believe it is
reasonable to require corroborating
evidence to confirm the diagnosis. A
rising PSA level alone does not
necessarily mean prostate cancer has
returned. Additional factors, such as the
cancer’s TNM 6 characteristics, PSA
kinetics, timing of the biochemical
recurrence, treatment modality, and
Gleason score, should be considered.7 8
The American Joint Committee on
Cancer notes that the natural
progression from biochemical
recurrence to clinical disease recurrence
is highly variable and may depend on
these additional factors.9 In light of this
variability and the other factors that
should be considered, we continue to
believe that we should exclude
‘‘biochemical recurrence’’ in listing
13.24A.
Comment: One commenter
recommended that we delete the
parenthetical reference to ‘‘benign
melanocytic tumor’’ in final sections
13.00K9 and 113.00K6. The commenter
claimed that citing a benign disease in
the cancer listings may be confusing for
adjudicators.
Response: We did not adopt the
comment because we believe the
reference to benign melanocytic tumor
can direct adjudicators to the
appropriate body systems for evaluating
this condition, Skin Disorders (8.00 and
108.00). This reference is similar to how
final sections 13.00K6c and 113.00K4c
direct adjudicators to the appropriate
body systems for evaluating benign
brain tumors.
6 The acronym ‘‘TNM’’ relates to the Tumor size,
lymph Node involvement, and presence of
Metastases.
7 PSA kinetics involves assessing the PSA level
over time, such as measuring of its rate of change
(velocity) and how long it takes it to double.
8 The National Cancer Institute defines ‘‘Gleason
score’’ as a system of grading prostate cancer tissue
based on how it looks under the microscope
(available at: https://www.cancer.gov/dictionary
?CdrID=45696).
9 See Carolyn C. Compton et al. eds., Cancer
Staging Atlas: A Companion to the Seventh Editions
of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and Handbook,
New York: Springer, 2012, page 535–545.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
Listing 13.02—Soft Tissue Cancers of
the Head and Neck (Except Salivary
Glands—13.08—and Thyroid Gland—
13.09)
Comment: A commenter
recommended revisions to 13.02E to
condense the final listing significantly.
Response: We did not adopt the
comment because the proposed change
might be misinterpreted to include any
metastases in the head or neck from
cancers originating elsewhere under
listing 13.02E. Our intent in this listing
is to evaluate cancers that receive
multimodal therapy and originate in the
head and neck only.
Listing 113.05—Lymphoma (Excluding
All Types of Lymphoblastic
Lymphomas—113.06)
Comment: A commenter
recommended that we include
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings as
evidence for determining listing-level
lymphoma under final listings 113.05A1
and 113.05B1.
Response: We did not adopt the
comment. It is not a standard clinical
practice in lymphoma to conduct
cerebrospinal fluid examination for
analysis; therefore, we do not believe it
is appropriate to require this evidence to
establish severity. However, we will
inform adjudicators, through training
and operating instructions, that they can
accept CSF findings if this evidence is
available.
Listing 13.10—Breast (Except
Sarcoma—13.04)
Comment: One commenter asked how
long adjudicators should defer
adjudication of cases for evaluating
breast cancer with secondary
lymphedema resulting from anticancer
therapy and treated by surgery to
salvage or restore the functioning of an
upper extremity under proposed listing
13.10E.
Response: We disagree with the
commenter’s premise that adjudicators
need to defer adjudication of these
cases. Adjudicators can adjudicate a
case at the listing step if the surgery is
performed. The need for this surgery to
salvage or restore functioning of an
upper extremity demonstrates listinglevel severity of the secondary
lymphedema without the need to make
a determination about the effectiveness
of the surgery.
Comment: A commenter
recommended we add a listing that
prescribes a period of disability of at
least 18 months for people receiving
multimodal therapy for breast cancer.
The commenter noted that multimodal
therapy could last 6 or more months and
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
produce very serious adverse effects.
The commenter also noted that it is
common for us to find these people
disabled after the listing step in the
sequential evaluation process by taking
into consideration the adverse effects of
treatment and that the length of
treatment nearly satisfies the 12-month
duration requirement. The commenter
believed it would be better for us to
make the determination of disability at
the listing step.
Similarly, a commenter recommended
we add a listing that prescribes a period
of disability of at least 18 months for
people receiving multimodal therapy
that includes surgery for low anal
cancers and rectal cancers. The
commenter noted that neoadjuvant
chemotherapy or radiation followed by
surgery to eliminate these anal or rectal
cancers frequently takes at least 12
months to complete. The treatment may
result in prolonged debilitation
although the impairment may not meet
or medically equal the listings.
Response: We believe the
commenter’s proposed listing for breast
cancer would cover many cases of early
cancer. Most people with early breast
cancer complete multimodal therapy
within 6 months and recover from any
adverse effects relatively soon. In these
cases, the impairment would not
preclude the ability to work for the
required 12 months.
However, we agree with the
commenter that in some cases
multimodal therapy may take
substantially longer than 6 months to
complete. For example, very serious
adverse effects may interrupt and
prolong therapy, resulting in an active
impairment lasting almost 12 months. It
is a long-standing principle that we may
make a finding of disability at the listing
step if there is the expectation that an
impairment that has been active for
almost 12 months will preclude a
person from engaging in any gainful
activity for the required 12 months. We
base this finding on the nature of the
impairment; prescribed treatment;
therapeutic history, including adverse
effects of treatment; and other relevant
considerations. Therefore, we partially
adopted the comment by providing
language in final section 13.00G3 to
clarify that we can apply this principle
to multimodal anticancer therapy for
breast cancer and other cancers. We also
added the clarifying language in final
section 113.00G3 for children.
We did not make changes to listing
13.18 for evaluating anal and rectal
cancers. This listing and the
commenter’s recommendation for a new
listing covering multimodal therapy
with surgery for anal and rectal cancers
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
are outside the scope of this rulemaking.
However, we believe the changes made
in final section 13.00G3 partially
address this commenter’s concerns.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Listing 13.13—Nervous System
Comment: One commenter
recommended that we clarify in the
introductory text whether adjudicators
should use listing 13.13 to evaluate
pituitary gland cancer in adults.
Response: We adopted the
commenter’s recommendation by
providing language in final section
13.00K6a and final section 113.00K4a in
the introductory text clarifying that we
evaluate cancerous pituitary gland
tumors, for example, pituitary
carcinoma,10 under final listing 13.13A1
and final listing 113.13A, respectively.
Comment: The same commenter
expressed concern about the statement,
in proposed sections 13.00K6b and
113.00K4b, that we consider brain
tumors malignant only if they are
classified as grade II or higher under the
World Health Organization (WHO),
‘‘Classification of Tumours of the
Central Nervous System, 2007.’’ The
commenter asked how an adjudicator
should evaluate central nervous system
tumors graded under different
classification systems.
Response: We believe we have
addressed the commenter’s concerns in
existing operating instructions that help
adjudicators determine the WHO grade
of specific brain cancers if a different
grading system is used or if the medical
evidence does not identify a particular
grading system.11 These instructions
also help adjudicators determine which
grade to use when there are
inconsistencies in the medical record,
such as some medical evidence
describing the tumor as grade II while
other medical evidence describes it as
grade III or grade IV.
Listing 13.23—Cancers of the Female
Genital Tract—Carcinoma or Sarcoma
Comment: A commenter
recommended that we add criteria in
final listing 13.23B3 to take into account
a cancer’s histologic diagnosis and the
age of the claimant at onset.
Response: We did not adopt this
comment. We do not believe it is
necessary to include such
considerations in the listing because the
prognosis is already poor for cervical
cancer that meets the specific criteria of
the listing. Considering the histological
10 Pituitary gland carcinoma is highly malignant.
Treatment is mainly palliative. People who have
pituitary gland carcinoma have a mean survival
time of only about 2 years.
11 Program Operations Manual System, available
at: https://policy.ssa.gov/poms.nsf/lnx/0424585001.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
diagnosis would only confirm this
prognosis, and the prognosis would
remain poor regardless of a person’s age.
Comment: A national advocacy group
for women with ovarian cancer
recommended that we reinstate a listing
we deleted in 2009. The listing covered
ovarian cancer with ruptured ovarian
capsule, tumor on the serosal surface of
the ovary, ascites with malignant cells,
or positive peritoneal washings. The
commenter believed we find most
women with this extent of disease
disabled at later steps of the sequential
evaluation process after the listing step
or on appeal. The commenter also
believed the adverse effects of cancer
treatment might be disabling in
themselves, especially for women
whose jobs require significant exertion
or do not allow time off for recovery
from treatment.
Response: We agree we could find a
woman with the findings in the prior
listing disabled after the listing step of
the sequential evaluation process. We
realize that adverse effects of ovarian
cancer treatment may preclude a woman
from working. However, we did not
adopt the commenter’s recommendation
because many women with ovarian
cancer that meets the specific criteria in
the deleted listing would not have an
impairment that precludes any gainful
activity, which is the standard of
severity in the listings.12
Other Changes
We made a number of editorial
changes and technical corrections in the
final rule to increase the clarity and
consistency of the listings. For example,
we redesignated proposed listing
13.05A3 for evaluating mantle cell
lymphoma in adults as final listing
13.05D to make it a stand-alone listing
consistent with stand-alone final listing
113.05D for evaluating mantle cell
lymphoma in children. We also changed
the parenthetical examples in prior
sections 13.00H1 and 113.00H1 from ‘‘at
least 18 months from the date of
diagnosis’’ and ‘‘at least 12 months from
the date of diagnosis,’’ respectively, to
‘‘until at least 12 months from the date
of transplantation’’ to make these adult
and child sections consistent.
Additionally, we redesignated
proposed listings 13.29A3 and 113.29A3
for evaluating mucosal melanoma as
stand-alone listings 13.29C and 113.29C.
We made this change because we
determined, through our ongoing review
of the scientific and medical literature,
that mucosal melanoma carries a very
poor prognosis and is of listing-level
severity regardless of whether it is an
12 See
PO 00000
sections 404.1525 and 416.925.
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28825
initial disease or a recurrent disease. We
also added examples of distant sites
frequently affected by metastases from
cutaneous and ocular melanomas in
13.29B3 and 113.29B3.
What is our authority to make
regulations and set procedures for
determining whether a person is
disabled under the statutory definition?
Under the Act, we have full power
and authority to make rules and
regulations and to establish necessary
and appropriate procedures to carry out
such provisions.13
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, as
Supplemented by Executive Order
13563
We have consulted with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
determined that this final rule meets the
criteria for a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, and was reviewed by OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that this final rule has no
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because it affects only individuals.
Therefore, a regulatory flexibility
analysis was not required under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not create any
new or affect any existing collections
and, therefore, does not require OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 96.001, Social Security—
Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social
Security—Retirement Insurance; 96.004,
Social Security—Survivors Insurance; and
96.006, Supplemental Security Income).
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 404
Administrative practice and
procedure, Blind, Disability benefits,
Old-age, Survivors, and Disability
Insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Social Security.
Dated: May 11, 2015.
Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, we are amending 20 CFR part
404 subpart P as set forth below:
13 Sections
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
205(a), 702(a)(5), and 1631(d)(1).
20MYR1
28826
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart P—Determining Disability and
Blindness
1. The authority citation for subpart P
of part 404 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 202, 205(a)–(b) and (d)–
(h), 216(i), 221(a), (i), and (j), 222(c), 223,
225, and 702(a)(5) of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 402, 405(a)–(b), and (d)–(h), 416(i),
421(a), (i), and (j), 422(c), 423, 425, and
902(a)(5)); sec. 211(b), Pub. L. 104–193, 110
Stat. 2105, 2189; sec. 202, Pub. L. 108–203,
118 Stat. 509 (42 U.S.C. 902 note).
2. Amend appendix 1 to subpart P of
part 404 as follows:
■ a. Revise item 14 of the introductory
text before part A.
■ b. Amend part A by revising the body
system name for section 13.00 in the
table of contents.
■ c. Revise section 13.00 of part A.
■ d. Amend listing 13.02 of part A by
revising the heading, revising listing
13.02B, removing listing 13.02C,
redesignating listing 13.02D as new
13.02C, adding new listing 13.02D and
revising listing 13.02E.
■ e. Amend listing 13.03 of part A by
revising listing 13.03B.
■ f. Amend listing 13.04 of part A by
revising listing 13.04B.
■ g. Amend listing 13.05 of part A by
revising listings 13.05A1, 13.05A2 and
13.05B, and adding listing 13.05D.
■ h. Amend listing 13.06 of part A by
revising the first sentence of listing
13.06B1 and revising listing 13.06B2b.
■ i. Amend listing 13.07 of part A by
revising listing 13.07A.
■ j. Amend listing 13.10 of part A by
revising listings 13.10A and 13.10C,
adding the word ‘‘OR’’ after listing
13.10C, adding listing 13.10D, adding
the word ‘‘OR’’ after listing 13.10D, and
adding listing 13.10E.
■ k. Amend listing 13.11 of part A by
revising listings 13.11B and 13.11D.
■ l. Amend listing 13.12 of part A by
revising listing 13.12C.
■ m. Revise listing 13.13 of part A.
■ n. Amend listing 13.14C of part A by
revising the first sentence.
■ o. Amend listing 13.15 of part A by
revising listing 13.15B2 and adding the
word ‘‘OR’’ after listing 13.15B2, and
adding listing 13.15C.
■ p. Amend listing 13.16 of part A by
adding the word ‘‘OR’’ after listing
13.16B, and adding listing 13.16C.
■ q. Amend listing 13.17 of part A by
adding the word ‘‘OR’’ after listing
13.17B, and adding listing 13.17C.
■ r. Amend listing 13.18 of part A by
adding the word ‘‘OR’’ after listing
13.18C, and adding listing 13.18D.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
s. Revise listing 13.19 of part A.
t. Amend listing 13.20 of part A by
revising listing 13.20B.
■ u. Amend listing 13.22 of part A by
adding the word ‘‘OR’’ after listing
13.22D, and adding listing 13.22E.
■ v. Amend listing 13.23 of part A by
revising the heading, revising listings
13.23A3, 13.23B, 13.23C3, 13.23D2 and
13.23E, adding the word ‘‘OR’’ after
listing 13.23E, and adding listing
13.23F.
■ w. Amend listing 13.24 of part A by
revising listing 13.24A, adding the word
‘‘OR’’ after listing 13.24B, and adding
listing 13.24C.
■ x. Revise listing 13.25 of part A.
■ y. Amend listing 13.28 of part A by
revising the heading.
■ z. Add listing 13.29 after listing 13.28
of part A.
■ aa. Amend part B by revising the body
system name for section 113.00 in the
table of contents.
■ bb. Revise section 113.00 of part B.
■ cc. Revise listing 113.03 of part B.
■ dd. Amend listing 113.05 of part B by
revising the heading and listings
113.05A and 113.05B, adding the word
‘‘OR’’ after listing 113.05C, and adding
listing 113.05D.
■ ee. Amend listing 113.06 of part B by
revising listings 113.06A and 113.06B1.
■ ff. Amend listing 113.12 of part B by
revising listing 113.12B.
■ gg. Revise listing 113.13 of part B.
■ hh. Add listing 113.29 after listing
113.21 of part B.
The revised and added text is set forth
as follows:
■
■
PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE,
SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY
INSURANCE (1950–)
APPENDIX 1 TO SUBPART P OF PART
404—LISTING OF IMPAIRMENTS
*
*
*
*
*
14. Cancer (Malignant Neoplastic Diseases)
(13.00 and 113.00): July 20, 2020.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Part A
*
*
13.00 Cancer (Malignant Neoplastic
Diseases)
*
*
*
*
*
13.00 CANCER (MALIGNANT
NEOPLASTIC DISEASES)
A. What impairments do these listings
cover? We use these listings to evaluate all
cancers (malignant neoplastic diseases),
except certain cancers associated with
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
infection. If you have HIV infection, we use
the criteria in 14.08E to evaluate carcinoma
of the cervix, Kaposi sarcoma, lymphoma,
and squamous cell carcinoma of the anal
canal and anal margin.
B. What do we consider when we evaluate
cancer under these listings? We will consider
factors including:
1. Origin of the cancer.
2. Extent of involvement.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3. Duration, frequency, and response to
anticancer therapy.
4. Effects of any post-therapeutic residuals.
C. How do we apply these listings? We
apply the criteria in a specific listing to a
cancer originating from that specific site.
D. What evidence do we need?
1. We need medical evidence that specifies
the type, extent, and site of the primary,
recurrent, or metastatic lesion. When the
primary site cannot be identified, we will use
evidence documenting the site(s) of
metastasis to evaluate the impairment under
13.27.
2. For operative procedures, including a
biopsy or a needle aspiration, we generally
need a copy of both the:
a. Operative note, and
b. Pathology report.
3. When we cannot get these documents,
we will accept the summary of
hospitalization(s) or other medical reports.
This evidence should include details of the
findings at surgery and, whenever
appropriate, the pathological findings.
4. In some situations, we may also need
evidence about recurrence, persistence, or
progression of the cancer, the response to
therapy, and any significant residuals. (See
13.00G.)
E. When do we need longitudinal evidence?
1. Cancer with distant metastases. We
generally do not need longitudinal evidence
for cancer that has metastasized beyond the
regional lymph nodes because this cancer
usually meets the requirements of a listing.
Exceptions are for cancer with distant
metastases that we expect to respond to
anticancer therapy. For these exceptions, we
usually need a longitudinal record of 3
months after therapy starts to determine
whether the therapy achieved its intended
effect, and whether this effect is likely to
persist.
2. Other cancers. When there are no distant
metastases, many of the listings require that
we consider your response to initial
anticancer therapy; that is, the initial
planned treatment regimen. This therapy
may consist of a single modality or a
combination of modalities; that is,
multimodal therapy. (See 13.00I4.)
3. Types of treatment.
a. Whenever the initial planned therapy is
a single modality, enough time must pass to
allow a determination about whether the
therapy will achieve its intended effect. If the
treatment fails, the failure often happens
within 6 months after treatment starts, and
there will often be a change in the treatment
regimen.
b. Whenever the initial planned therapy is
multimodal, we usually cannot make a
determination about the effectiveness of the
therapy until we can determine the effects of
all the planned modalities. In some cases, we
may need to defer adjudication until we can
assess the effectiveness of therapy. However,
we do not need to defer adjudication to
determine whether the therapy will achieve
its intended effect if we can make a fully
favorable determination or decision based on
the length and effects of therapy, or the
residuals of the cancer or therapy (see
13.00G).
c. We need evidence under 13.02E, 13.11D,
and 13.14C to establish that your treating
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
source initiated multimodal anticancer
therapy. We do not need to make a
determination about the length or
effectiveness of your therapy. Multimodal
therapy has been initiated, and satisfies the
requirements in 13.02E, 13.11D, and 13.14C,
when your treating source starts the first
modality. We may defer adjudication if your
treating source plans multimodal therapy and
has not yet initiated it.
F. How do we evaluate impairments that
do not meet one of the cancer listings?
1. These listings are only examples of
cancer that we consider severe enough to
prevent you from doing any gainful activity.
If your severe impairment(s) does not meet
the criteria of any of these listings, we must
also consider whether you have an
impairment(s) that meets the criteria of a
listing in another body system.
2. If you have a severe medically
determinable impairment(s) that does not
meet a listing, we will determine whether
your impairment(s) medically equals a
listing. (See §§ 404.1526 and 416.926 of this
chapter.) If your impairment(s) does not meet
or medically equal a listing, you may or may
not have the residual functional capacity to
engage in substantial gainful activity. In that
situation, we proceed to the fourth, and, if
necessary, the fifth steps of the sequential
evaluation process in §§ 404.1520 and
416.920 of this chapter. We use the rules in
§§ 404.1594 and 416.994 of this chapter, as
appropriate, when we decide whether you
continue to be disabled.
G. How do we consider the effects of
anticancer therapy?
1. How we consider the effects of
anticancer therapy under the listings. In
many cases, cancers meet listing criteria only
if the therapy is not effective and the cancer
persists, progresses, or recurs. However, as
explained in the following paragraphs, we
will not delay adjudication if we can make
a fully favorable determination or decision
based on the evidence in the case record.
2. Effects can vary widely.
a. We consider each case on an individual
basis because the therapy and its toxicity
may vary widely. We will request a specific
description of the therapy, including these
items:
i. Drugs given.
ii. Dosage.
iii. Frequency of drug administration.
iv. Plans for continued drug
administration.
v. Extent of surgery.
vi. Schedule and fields of radiation
therapy.
b. We will also request a description of the
complications or adverse effects of therapy,
such as the following:
i. Continuing gastrointestinal symptoms.
ii. Persistent weakness.
iii. Neurological complications.
iv. Cardiovascular complications.
v. Reactive mental disorders.
3. Effects of therapy may change. The
severity of the adverse effects of anticancer
therapy may change during treatment;
therefore, enough time must pass to allow us
to evaluate the therapy’s effect. The residual
effects of treatment are temporary in most
instances; however, on occasion, the effects
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
may be disabling for a consecutive period of
at least 12 months. In some situations, very
serious adverse effects may interrupt and
prolong multimodal anticancer therapy for a
continuous period of almost 12 months. In
these situations, we may determine there is
an expectation that your impairment will
preclude you from engaging in any gainful
activity for at least 12 months.
4. When the initial anticancer therapy is
effective. We evaluate any post-therapeutic
residual impairment(s) not included in these
listings under the criteria for the affected
body system. We must consider any
complications of therapy. When the residual
impairment(s) does not meet or medically
equal a listing, we must consider its effect on
your ability to do substantial gainful activity.
H. How long do we consider your
impairment to be disabling?
1. In some listings, we specify that we will
consider your impairment to be disabling
until a particular point in time (for example,
until at least 12 months from the date of
transplantation). We may consider your
impairment to be disabling beyond this point
when the medical and other evidence
justifies it.
2. When a listing does not contain such a
specification, we will consider an
impairment(s) that meets or medically equals
a listing in this body system to be disabling
until at least 3 years after onset of complete
remission. When the impairment(s) has been
in complete remission for at least 3 years,
that is, the original tumor or a recurrence (or
relapse) and any metastases have not been
evident for at least 3 years, the impairment(s)
will no longer meet or medically equal the
criteria of a listing in this body system.
3. Following the appropriate period, we
will consider any residuals, including
residuals of the cancer or therapy (see
13.00G), in determining whether you are
disabled. If you have a recurrence or relapse
of your cancer, your impairment may meet or
medically equal one of the listings in this
body system again.
I. What do we mean by the following
terms?
1. Anticancer therapy means surgery,
radiation, chemotherapy, hormones,
immunotherapy, or bone marrow or stem cell
transplantation. When we refer to surgery as
an anticancer treatment, we mean surgical
excision for treatment, not for diagnostic
purposes.
2. Inoperable means surgery is thought to
be of no therapeutic value or the surgery
cannot be performed; for example, when you
cannot tolerate anesthesia or surgery because
of another impairment(s), or you have a
cancer that is too large or that has invaded
crucial structures. This term does not include
situations in which your cancer could have
been surgically removed but another method
of treatment was chosen; for example, an
attempt at organ preservation. Your
physician may determine whether the cancer
is inoperable before or after you receive
neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy is
anticancer therapy, such as chemotherapy or
radiation, given before surgery in order to
reduce the size of the cancer.
3. Metastases means the spread of cancer
cells by blood, lymph, or other body fluid.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28827
This term does not include the spread of
cancer cells by direct extension of the cancer
to other tissues or organs.
4. Multimodal therapy means anticancer
therapy that is a combination of at least two
types of treatment given in close proximity
as a unified whole and usually planned
before any treatment has begun. There are
three types of treatment modalities: surgery,
radiation, and systemic drug therapy
(chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and
immunotherapy or biological modifier
therapy). Examples of multimodal therapy
include:
a. Surgery followed by chemotherapy or
radiation.
b. Chemotherapy followed by surgery.
c. Chemotherapy and concurrent radiation.
5. Persistent means the planned initial
anticancer therapy failed to achieve a
complete remission of your cancer; that is,
your cancer is evident, even if smaller, after
the therapy has ended.
6. Progressive means the cancer becomes
more extensive after treatment; that is, there
is evidence that your cancer is growing after
you have completed at least half of your
planned initial anticancer therapy.
7. Recurrent or relapse means the cancer
that was in complete remission or entirely
removed by surgery has returned.
8. Unresectable means surgery or surgeries
did not completely remove the cancer. This
term includes situations in which your
cancer is incompletely resected or the
surgical margins are positive. It does not
include situations in which there is a finding
of a positive margin(s) if additional surgery
obtains a margin(s) that is clear. It also does
not include situations in which the cancer is
completely resected but you are receiving
adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant therapy is
anticancer therapy, such as chemotherapy or
radiation, given after surgery in order to
eliminate any remaining cancer cells or
lessen the chance of recurrence.
J. Can we establish the existence of a
disabling impairment prior to the date of the
evidence that shows the cancer satisfies the
criteria of a listing? Yes. We will consider
factors such as:
1. The type of cancer and its location.
2. The extent of involvement when the
cancer was first demonstrated.
3. Your symptoms.
K. How do we evaluate specific cancers?
1. Lymphoma.
a. Many indolent (non-aggressive)
lymphomas are controlled by well-tolerated
treatment modalities, although the
lymphomas may produce intermittent
symptoms and signs. We may defer
adjudicating these cases for an appropriate
period after therapy is initiated to determine
whether the therapy will achieve its intended
effect, which is usually to stabilize the
disease process. (See 13.00E3.) Once your
disease stabilizes, we will assess severity
based on the extent of involvement of other
organ systems and residuals from therapy.
b. A change in therapy for indolent
lymphomas is usually an indicator that the
therapy is not achieving its intended effect.
However, your impairment will not meet the
requirements of 13.05A2 if your therapy is
changed solely because you or your
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
28828
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
physician chooses to change it and not
because of a failure to achieve stability.
c. We consider Hodgkin lymphoma that
recurs more than 12 months after completing
initial anticancer therapy to be a new disease
rather than a recurrence.
2. Leukemia.
a. Acute leukemia. The initial diagnosis of
acute leukemia, including the accelerated or
blast phase of chronic myelogenous
(granulocytic) leukemia, is based on
definitive bone marrow examination.
Additional diagnostic information is based
on chromosomal analysis, cytochemical and
surface marker studies on the abnormal cells,
or other methods consistent with the
prevailing state of medical knowledge and
clinical practice. Recurrent disease must be
documented by peripheral blood, bone
marrow, or cerebrospinal fluid examination,
or by testicular biopsy. The initial and
follow-up pathology reports should be
included.
b. Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML).
We need a diagnosis of CML based on
documented granulocytosis, including
immature forms such as differentiated or
undifferentiated myelocytes and myeloblasts,
and a chromosomal analysis that
demonstrates the Philadelphia chromosome.
In the absence of a chromosomal analysis, or
if the Philadelphia chromosome is not
present, the diagnosis may be made by other
methods consistent with the prevailing state
of medical knowledge and clinical practice.
The requirement for CML in the accelerated
or blast phase is met in 13.06B if laboratory
findings show the proportion of blast
(immature) cells in the peripheral blood or
bone marrow is 10 percent or greater.
c. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
i. We require the diagnosis of chronic
lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) to be
documented by evidence of a chronic
lymphocytosis of at least 10,000 cells/mm3
for 3 months or longer, or other acceptable
diagnostic techniques consistent with the
prevailing state of medical knowledge and
clinical practice.
ii. We evaluate the complications and
residual impairment(s) from CLL under the
appropriate listings, such as 13.05A2 or the
hematological listings (7.00).
d. Elevated white cell count. In cases of
chronic leukemia (either myelogenous or
lymphocytic), an elevated white cell count,
in itself, is not a factor in determining the
severity of the impairment.
3. Macroglobulinemia or heavy chain
disease. We require the diagnosis of these
diseases to be confirmed by protein
electrophoresis or immunoelectrophoresis.
We evaluate the resulting impairment(s)
under the appropriate listings, such as
13.05A2 or the hematological listings (7.00).
4. Primary breast cancer.
a. We evaluate bilateral primary breast
cancer (synchronous or metachronous) under
13.10A, which covers local primary disease,
and not as a primary disease that has
metastasized.
b. We evaluate secondary lymphedema that
results from anticancer therapy for breast
cancer under 13.10E if the lymphedema is
treated by surgery to salvage or restore the
functioning of an upper extremity. Secondary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
lymphedema is edema that results from
obstruction or destruction of normal
lymphatic channels. We may not restrict our
determination of the onset of disability to the
date of the surgery; we may establish an
earlier onset date of disability if the evidence
in your case record supports such a finding.
5. Carcinoma-in-situ. Carcinoma-in-situ, or
preinvasive carcinoma, usually responds to
treatment. When we use the term
‘‘carcinoma’’ in these listings, it does not
include carcinoma-in-situ.
6. Primary central nervous system (CNS)
cancers. We use the criteria in 13.13 to
evaluate cancers that originate within the
CNS (that is, brain and spinal cord cancers).
a. The CNS cancers listed in 13.13A1 are
highly malignant and respond poorly to
treatment, and therefore we do not require
additional criteria to evaluate them. We do
not list pituitary gland cancer (for example,
pituitary gland carcinoma) in 13.13A1,
although this CNS cancer is highly malignant
and responds poorly to treatment. We
evaluate pituitary gland cancer under
13.13A1 and do not require additional
criteria to evaluate it.
b. We consider a CNS tumor to be
malignant if it is classified as Grade II, Grade
III, or Grade IV under the World Health
Organization (WHO) classification of tumors
of the CNS (WHO Classification of Tumours
of the Central Nervous System, 2007).
c. We evaluate benign (for example, WHO
Grade I) CNS tumors under 11.05. We
evaluate metastasized CNS cancers from nonCNS sites under the primary cancers (see
13.00C). We evaluate any complications of
CNS cancers, such as resultant neurological
or psychological impairments, under the
criteria for the affected body system.
7. Primary peritoneal carcinoma. We use
the criteria in 13.23E to evaluate primary
peritoneal carcinoma in women because this
cancer is often indistinguishable from
ovarian cancer and is generally treated the
same way as ovarian cancer. We use the
criteria in 13.15A to evaluate primary
peritoneal carcinoma in men because many
of these cases are similar to malignant
mesothelioma.
8. Prostate cancer. We exclude
‘‘biochemical recurrence’’ in 13.24A, which
is defined as an increase in the serum
prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level
following the completion of the hormonal
intervention therapy. We need corroborating
evidence to document recurrence, such as
radiological studies or findings on physical
examination.
9. Melanoma. We evaluate malignant
melanoma that affects the skin (cutaneous
melanoma), eye (ocular melanoma), or
mucosal membranes (mucosal melanoma)
under 13.29. We evaluate melanoma that is
not malignant that affects the skin (benign
melanocytic tumor) under the listings in 8.00
or other affected body systems.
L. How do we evaluate cancer treated by
bone marrow or stem cell transplantation,
including transplantation using stem cells
from umbilical cord blood? Bone marrow or
stem cell transplantation is performed for a
variety of cancers. We require the
transplantation to occur before we evaluate it
under these listings. We do not need to
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
restrict our determination of the onset of
disability to the date of the transplantation
(13.05, 13.06, or 13.07) or the date of first
treatment under the treatment plan that
includes transplantation (13.28). We may be
able to establish an earlier onset date of
disability due to your transplantation if the
evidence in your case record supports such
a finding.
1. Acute leukemia (including T-cell
lymphoblastic lymphoma) or accelerated or
blast phase of CML. If you undergo bone
marrow or stem cell transplantation for any
of these disorders, we will consider you to
be disabled until at least 24 months from the
date of diagnosis or relapse, or at least 12
months from the date of transplantation,
whichever is later.
2. Lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or
chronic phase of CML. If you undergo bone
marrow or stem cell transplantation for any
of these disorders, we will consider you to
be disabled until at least 12 months from the
date of transplantation.
3. Other cancers. We will evaluate any
other cancer treated with bone marrow or
stem cell transplantation under 13.28,
regardless of whether there is another listing
that addresses that impairment. The length of
time we will consider you to be disabled
depends on whether you undergo allogeneic
or autologous transplantation.
a. Allogeneic bone marrow or stem cell
transplantation. If you undergo allogeneic
transplantation (transplantation from an
unrelated donor or a related donor other than
an identical twin), we will consider you to
be disabled until at least 12 months from the
date of transplantation.
b. Autologous bone marrow or stem cell
transplantation. If you undergo autologous
transplantation (transplantation of your own
cells or cells from your identical twin
(syngeneic transplantation)), we will
consider you to be disabled until at least 12
months from the date of the first treatment
under the treatment plan that includes
transplantation. The first treatment usually
refers to the initial therapy given to prepare
you for transplantation.
4. Evaluating disability after the
appropriate time period has elapsed. We
consider any residual impairment(s), such as
complications arising from:
a. Graft-versus-host (GVH) disease.
b. Immunosuppressant therapy, such as
frequent infections.
c. Significant deterioration of other organ
systems.
*
*
*
*
*
13.02 Soft tissue cancers of the head and
neck (except salivary glands—13.08—and
thyroid gland—13.09).
*
*
*
*
*
B. Persistent or recurrent disease following
initial anticancer therapy, except persistence
or recurrence in the true vocal cord.
*
*
*
*
*
D. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
OR
E. Soft tissue cancers originating in the
head and neck treated with multimodal
anticancer therapy (see 13.00E3c). Consider
under a disability until at least 18 months
from the date of diagnosis. Thereafter,
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
treated the secondary lymphedema.
Thereafter, evaluate any residual
impairment(s) under the criteria for the
affected body system.
13.11 Skeletal system—sarcoma.
evaluate any residual impairment(s) under
the criteria for the affected body system.
13.03 Skin (except malignant
melanoma—13.29).
*
*
*
*
*
B. Carcinoma invading deep extradermal
structures (for example, skeletal muscle,
cartilage, or bone).
13.04 Soft tissue sarcoma.
*
*
D. All other cancers originating in bone
with multimodal anticancer therapy (see
13.00E3c). Consider under a disability for 12
months from the date of diagnosis.
Thereafter, evaluate any residual
impairment(s) under the criteria for the
affected body system.
13.12 Maxilla, orbit, or temporal fossa.
*
*
*
*
*
B. Persistent or recurrent following initial
anticancer therapy.
13.05 Lymphoma (including mycosis
fungoides, but excluding T-cell
lymphoblastic lymphoma—13.06). (See
13.00K1 and 13.00K2c.)
A. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, as described
in 1 or 2:
1. Aggressive lymphoma (including diffuse
large B-cell lymphoma) persistent or
recurrent following initial anticancer
therapy.
2. Indolent lymphoma (including mycosis
fungoides and follicular small cleaved cell)
requiring initiation of more than one (single
mode or multimodal) anticancer treatment
regimen within a period of 12 consecutive
months. Consider under a disability from at
least the date of initiation of the treatment
regimen that failed within 12 months.
OR
B. Hodgkin lymphoma with failure to
achieve clinically complete remission, or
recurrent lymphoma within 12 months of
completing initial anticancer therapy.
*
*
*
*
*
OR
D. Mantle cell lymphoma.
13.06 Leukemia. (See 13.00K2.)
*
*
*
*
*
B. * * *
1. Accelerated or blast phase (see
13.00K2b). * * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
13.10 Breast (except sarcoma—13.04).
(See 13.00K4.)
A. Locally advanced cancer (inflammatory
carcinoma, cancer of any size with direct
extension to the chest wall or skin, or cancer
of any size with metastases to the ipsilateral
internal mammary nodes).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
C. Recurrent carcinoma, except local
recurrence that remits with anticancer
therapy.
OR
D. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
OR
E. With secondary lymphedema that is
caused by anticancer therapy and treated by
surgery to salvage or restore the functioning
of an upper extremity. (See 13.00K4b.)
Consider under a disability until at least 12
months from the date of the surgery that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
C. Cancer with extension to the orbit,
meninges, sinuses, or base of the skull.
13.13 Nervous system. (See 13.00K6.)
A. Primary central nervous system (CNS;
that is, brain and spinal cord) cancers, as
described in 1, 2, or 3:
1. Glioblastoma multiforme,
ependymoblastoma, and diffuse intrinsic
brain stem gliomas (see 13.00K6a).
2. Any Grade III or Grade IV CNS cancer
(see 13.00K6b), including astrocytomas,
sarcomas, and medulloblastoma and other
primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs).
3. Any primary CNS cancer, as described
in a or b:
a. Metastatic.
b. Progressive or recurrent following initial
anticancer therapy.
OR
B. Primary peripheral nerve or spinal root
cancers, as described in 1 or 2:
1. Metastatic.
2. Progressive or recurrent following initial
anticancer therapy.
13.14 Lungs.
*
*
*
*
C. Carcinoma of the superior sulcus
(including Pancoast tumors) with multimodal
anticancer therapy (see 13.00E3c). * * *
b. Progressive disease following initial
anticancer therapy.
13.07 Multiple myeloma (confirmed by
appropriate serum or urine protein
electrophoresis and bone marrow findings).
A. Failure to respond or progressive
disease following initial anticancer therapy.
*
*
*
*
2. Chronic phase, as described in a or b:
*
*
B. Recurrent cancer (except local
recurrence) after initial anticancer therapy.
*
*
13.15
*
*
*
*
*
Pleura or mediastinum.
*
*
*
B. * * *
2. Persistent or recurrent following initial
anticancer therapy.
OR
C. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
13.16 Esophagus or stomach.
*
*
*
*
*
B. * * *
OR
C. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
13.17 Small intestine—carcinoma,
sarcoma, or carcinoid.
*
*
*
*
*
B. * * *
OR
C. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
13.18 Large intestine (from ileocecal
valve to and including anal canal).
*
*
*
*
*
C. * * *
OR
D. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
13.19 Liver or gallbladder—cancer of the
liver, gallbladder, or bile ducts.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13.20
*
*
28829
Pancreas.
*
*
*
B. Islet cell carcinoma that is
physiologically active and is either
inoperable or unresectable.
*
*
13.22
*
*
*
*
*
Urinary bladder—carcinoma.
*
*
*
D. * * *
OR
E. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
13.23 Cancers of the female genital
tract—carcinoma or sarcoma (including
primary peritoneal carcinoma).
A. * * *
3. Persistent or recurrent following initial
anticancer therapy.
B. Uterine cervix, as described in 1, 2, or
3:
1. Extending to the pelvic wall, lower
portion of the vagina, or adjacent or distant
organs.
2. Persistent or recurrent following initial
anticancer therapy.
3. With metastases to distant (for example,
para-aortic or supraclavicular) lymph nodes.
C. * * *
3. Persistent or recurrent following initial
anticancer therapy.
D. * * *
2. Persistent or recurrent following initial
anticancer therapy.
E. Ovaries, as described in 1 or 2:
1. All cancers except germ-cell cancers,
with at least one of the following:
a. Extension beyond the pelvis; for
example, implants on, or direct extension to,
peritoneal, omental, or bowel surfaces.
b. Metastases to or beyond the regional
lymph nodes.
c. Recurrent following initial anticancer
therapy.
2. Germ-cell cancers—progressive or
recurrent following initial anticancer
therapy.
OR
F. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
13.24 Prostate gland—carcinoma.
A. Progressive or recurrent (not including
biochemical recurrence) despite initial
hormonal intervention. (See 13.00K8.)
OR
B. * * *
OR
C. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
13.25 Testicles—cancer with metastatic
disease progressive or recurrent following
initial chemotherapy.
*
*
*
*
*
13.28 Cancer treated by bone marrow or
stem cell transplantation. (See 13.00L.)
*
*
*
*
*
13.29 Malignant melanoma (including
skin, ocular, or mucosal melanomas), as
described in either A, B, or C:
A. Recurrent (except an additional primary
melanoma at a different site, which is not
considered to be recurrent disease) following
either 1 or 2:
1. Wide excision (skin melanoma).
2. Enucleation of the eye (ocular
melanoma).
OR
B. With metastases as described in 1, 2, or
3:
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
28830
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
1. Metastases to one or more clinically
apparent nodes; that is, nodes that are
detected by imaging studies (excluding
lymphoscintigraphy) or by clinical
evaluation (palpable).
2. If the nodes are not clinically apparent,
with metastases to four or more nodes.
3. Metastases to adjacent skin (satellite
lesions) or distant sites (for example, liver,
lung, or brain).
OR
C. Mucosal melanoma.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Part B
*
*
113.00 Cancer (Malignant Neoplastic
Diseases)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
113.00 CANCER (MALIGNANT
NEOPLASTIC DISEASES)
A. What impairments do these listings
cover? We use these listings to evaluate all
cancers (malignant neoplastic diseases),
except certain cancers associated with
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
infection. If you have HIV infection, we use
the criteria in 114.08E to evaluate carcinoma
of the cervix, Kaposi sarcoma, lymphoma,
and squamous cell carcinoma of the anal
canal and anal margin.
B. What do we consider when we evaluate
cancer under these listings? We will consider
factors including:
1. Origin of the cancer.
2. Extent of involvement.
3. Duration, frequency, and response to
anticancer therapy.
4. Effects of any post-therapeutic residuals.
C. How do we apply these listings? We
apply the criteria in a specific listing to a
cancer originating from that specific site.
D. What evidence do we need?
1. We need medical evidence that specifies
the type, extent, and site of the primary,
recurrent, or metastatic lesion. When the
primary site cannot be identified, we will use
evidence documenting the site(s) of
metastasis to evaluate the impairment under
13.27 in part A.
2. For operative procedures, including a
biopsy or a needle aspiration, we generally
need a copy of both the:
a. Operative note, and
b. Pathology report.
3. When we cannot get these documents,
we will accept the summary of
hospitalization(s) or other medical reports.
This evidence should include details of the
findings at surgery and, whenever
appropriate, the pathological findings.
4. In some situations, we may also need
evidence about recurrence, persistence, or
progression of the cancer, the response to
therapy, and any significant residuals. (See
113.00G.)
E. When do we need longitudinal evidence?
1. Cancer with distant metastases. Most
cancer of childhood consists of a local lesion
with metastases to regional lymph nodes and,
less often, distant metastases. We generally
do not need longitudinal evidence for cancer
that has metastasized beyond the regional
lymph nodes because this cancer usually
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
meets the requirements of a listing.
Exceptions are for cancer with distant
metastases that we expect to respond to
anticancer therapy. For these exceptions, we
usually need a longitudinal record of 3
months after therapy starts to determine
whether the therapy achieved its intended
effect, and whether this effect is likely to
persist.
2. Other cancers. When there are no distant
metastases, many of the listings require that
we consider your response to initial
anticancer therapy; that is, the initial
planned treatment regimen. This therapy
may consist of a single modality or a
combination of modalities; that is,
multimodal therapy (see 113.00I3).
3. Types of treatment.
a. Whenever the initial planned therapy is
a single modality, enough time must pass to
allow a determination about whether the
therapy will achieve its intended effect. If the
treatment fails, the failure often happens
within 6 months after treatment starts, and
there will often be a change in the treatment
regimen.
b. Whenever the initial planned therapy is
multimodal, we usually cannot make a
determination about the effectiveness of the
therapy until we can determine the effects of
all the planned modalities. In some cases, we
may need to defer adjudication until we can
assess the effectiveness of therapy. However,
we do not need to defer adjudication to
determine whether the therapy will achieve
its intended effect if we can make a fully
favorable determination or decision based on
the length and effects of therapy, or the
residuals of the cancer or therapy (see
113.00G).
F. How do we evaluate impairments that
do not meet one of the cancer listings?
1. These listings are only examples of
cancers that we consider severe enough to
result in marked and severe functional
limitations. If your severe impairment(s) does
not meet the criteria of any of these listings,
we must also consider whether you have an
impairment(s) that meets the criteria of a
listing in another body system.
2. If you have a severe medically
determinable impairment(s) that does not
meet a listing, we will determine whether
your impairment(s) medically equals a
listing. (See §§ 404.1526 and 416.926 of this
chapter.) If your impairment(s) does not meet
or medically equal a listing, we will also
consider whether you have an impairment(s)
that functionally equals the listings. (See
§ 416.926a of this chapter.) We use the rules
in § 416.994a of this chapter when we decide
whether you continue to be disabled.
G. How do we consider the effects of
anticancer therapy?
1. How we consider the effects of
anticancer therapy under the listings. In
many cases, cancers meet listing criteria only
if the therapy is not effective and the cancer
persists, progresses, or recurs. However, as
explained in the following paragraphs, we
will not delay adjudication if we can make
a fully favorable determination or decision
based on the evidence in the case record.
2. Effects can vary widely.
a. We consider each case on an individual
basis because the therapy and its toxicity
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
may vary widely. We will request a specific
description of the therapy, including these
items:
i. Drugs given.
ii. Dosage.
iii. Frequency of drug administration.
iv. Plans for continued drug
administration.
v. Extent of surgery.
vi. Schedule and fields of radiation
therapy.
b. We will also request a description of the
complications or adverse effects of therapy,
such as the following:
i. Continuing gastrointestinal symptoms.
ii. Persistent weakness.
iii. Neurological complications.
iv. Cardiovascular complications.
v. Reactive mental disorders.
3. Effects of therapy may change. The
severity of the adverse effects of anticancer
therapy may change during treatment;
therefore, enough time must pass to allow us
to evaluate the therapy’s effect. The residual
effects of treatment are temporary in most
instances; however, on occasion, the effects
may be disabling for a consecutive period of
at least 12 months. In some situations, very
serious adverse effects may interrupt and
prolong multimodal anticancer therapy for a
continuous period of almost 12 months. In
these situations, we may determine there is
an expectation that your impairment will
preclude you from engaging in any ageappropriate activities for at least 12 months.
4. When the initial anticancer therapy is
effective. We evaluate any post-therapeutic
residual impairment(s) not included in these
listings under the criteria for the affected
body system. We must consider any
complications of therapy. When the residual
impairment(s) does not meet a listing, we
must consider whether it medically equals a
listing, or, as appropriate, functionally equals
the listings.
H. How long do we consider your
impairment to be disabling?
1. In some listings, we specify that we will
consider your impairment to be disabling
until a particular point in time (for example,
until at least 12 months from the date of
transplantation). We may consider your
impairment to be disabling beyond this point
when the medical and other evidence
justifies it.
2. When a listing does not contain such a
specification, we will consider an
impairment(s) that meets or medically equals
a listing in this body system to be disabling
until at least 3 years after onset of complete
remission. When the impairment(s) has been
in complete remission for at least 3 years,
that is, the original tumor or a recurrence (or
relapse) and any metastases have not been
evident for at least 3 years, the impairment(s)
will no longer meet or medically equal the
criteria of a listing in this body system.
3. Following the appropriate period, we
will consider any residuals, including
residuals of the cancer or therapy (see
113.00G), in determining whether you are
disabled. If you have a recurrence or relapse
of your cancer, your impairment may meet or
medically equal one of the listings in this
body system again.
I. What do we mean by the following
terms?
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
1. Anticancer therapy means surgery,
radiation, chemotherapy, hormones,
immunotherapy, or bone marrow or stem cell
transplantation. When we refer to surgery as
an anticancer treatment, we mean surgical
excision for treatment, not for diagnostic
purposes.
2. Metastases means the spread of cancer
cells by blood, lymph, or other body fluid.
This term does not include the spread of
cancer cells by direct extension of the cancer
to other tissues or organs.
3. Multimodal therapy means anticancer
therapy that is a combination of at least two
types of treatment given in close proximity
as a unified whole and usually planned
before any treatment has begun. There are
three types of treatment modalities: Surgery,
radiation, and systemic drug therapy
(chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and
immunotherapy or biological modifier
therapy). Examples of multimodal therapy
include:
a. Surgery followed by chemotherapy or
radiation.
b. Chemotherapy followed by surgery.
c. Chemotherapy and concurrent radiation.
4. Persistent means the planned initial
anticancer therapy failed to achieve a
complete remission of your cancer; that is,
your cancer is evident, even if smaller, after
the therapy has ended.
5. Progressive means the cancer becomes
more extensive after treatment; that is, there
is evidence that your cancer is growing after
you have completed at least half of your
planned initial anticancer therapy.
6. Recurrent or relapse means the cancer
that was in complete remission or entirely
removed by surgery has returned.
J. Can we establish the existence of a
disabling impairment prior to the date of the
evidence that shows the cancer satisfies the
criteria of a listing? Yes. We will consider
factors such as:
1. The type of cancer and its location.
2. The extent of involvement when the
cancer was first demonstrated.
3. Your symptoms.
K. How do we evaluate specific cancers?
1. Lymphoma.
a. We provide criteria for evaluating
lymphomas that are disseminated or have not
responded to anticancer therapy in 113.05.
b. Lymphoblastic lymphoma is treated
with leukemia-based protocols, so we
evaluate this type of cancer under 113.06.
2. Leukemia.
a. Acute leukemia. The initial diagnosis of
acute leukemia, including the accelerated or
blast phase of chronic myelogenous
(granulocytic) leukemia, is based on
definitive bone marrow examination.
Additional diagnostic information is based
on chromosomal analysis, cytochemical and
surface marker studies on the abnormal cells,
or other methods consistent with the
prevailing state of medical knowledge and
clinical practice. Recurrent disease must be
documented by peripheral blood, bone
marrow, or cerebrospinal fluid examination,
or by testicular biopsy. The initial and
follow-up pathology reports should be
included.
b. Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML).
We need a diagnosis of CML based on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
documented granulocytosis, including
immature forms such as differentiated or
undifferentiated myelocytes and myeloblasts,
and a chromosomal analysis that
demonstrates the Philadelphia chromosome.
In the absence of a chromosomal analysis, or
if the Philadelphia chromosome is not
present, the diagnosis may be made by other
methods consistent with the prevailing state
of medical knowledge and clinical practice.
The requirement for CML in the accelerated
or blast phase is met in 113.06B if laboratory
findings show the proportion of blast
(immature) cells in the peripheral blood or
bone marrow is 10 percent or greater.
c. Juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia
(JCML). JCML is a rare, Philadelphiachromosome-negative childhood leukemia
that is aggressive and clinically similar to
acute myelogenous leukemia. We evaluate
JCML under 113.06A.
d. Elevated white cell count. In cases of
chronic leukemia (either myelogenous or
lymphocytic), an elevated white cell count,
in itself, is not a factor in determining the
severity of the impairment.
3. Malignant solid tumors. The tumors we
consider under 113.03 include the
histiocytosis syndromes except for solitary
eosinophilic granuloma. We do not evaluate
thyroid cancer (see 113.09), retinoblastomas
(see 113.12), primary central nervous system
(CNS) cancers (see 113.13), neuroblastomas
(see 113.21), or malignant melanoma (see
113.29) under this listing.
4. Primary central nervous system (CNS)
cancers. We use the criteria in 113.13 to
evaluate cancers that originate within the
CNS (that is, brain and spinal cord cancers).
a. The CNS cancers listed in 113.13A are
highly malignant and respond poorly to
treatment, and therefore we do not require
additional criteria to evaluate them. We do
not list pituitary gland cancer (for example,
pituitary gland carcinoma) in 113.13A,
although this CNS cancer is highly malignant
and responds poorly to treatment. We
evaluate pituitary gland cancer under
113.13A and do not require additional
criteria to evaluate it.
b. We consider a CNS tumor to be
malignant if it is classified as Grade II, Grade
III, or Grade IV under the World Health
Organization (WHO) classification of tumors
of the CNS (WHO Classification of Tumours
of the Central Nervous System, 2007).
c. We evaluate benign (for example, WHO
Grade I) CNS tumors under 111.05. We
evaluate metastasized CNS cancers from nonCNS sites under the primary cancers (see
113.00C). We evaluate any complications of
CNS cancers, such as resultant neurological
or psychological impairments, under the
criteria for the affected body system.
5. Retinoblastoma. The treatment for
bilateral retinoblastoma usually results in a
visual impairment. We will evaluate any
resulting visual impairment under 102.02.
6. Melanoma. We evaluate malignant
melanoma that affects the skin (cutaneous
melanoma), eye (ocular melanoma), or
mucosal membranes (mucosal melanoma)
under 113.29. We evaluate melanoma that is
not malignant that affects the skin (benign
melanocytic tumor) under the listings in
108.00 or other affected body systems.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28831
L. How do we evaluate cancer treated by
bone marrow or stem cell transplantation,
including transplantation using stem cells
from umbilical cord blood? Bone marrow or
stem cell transplantation is performed for a
variety of cancers. We require the
transplantation to occur before we evaluate it
under these listings. We do not need to
restrict our determination of the onset of
disability to the date of transplantation
(113.05 or 113.06). We may be able to
establish an earlier onset date of disability
due to your transplantation if the evidence in
your case record supports such a finding.
1. Acute leukemia (including all types of
lymphoblastic lymphomas and JCML) or
accelerated or blast phase of CML. If you
undergo bone marrow or stem cell
transplantation for any of these disorders, we
will consider you to be disabled until at least
24 months from the date of diagnosis or
relapse, or at least 12 months from the date
of transplantation, whichever is later.
2. Lymphoma or chronic phase of CML. If
you undergo bone marrow or stem cell
transplantation for any of these disorders, we
will consider you to be disabled until at least
12 months from the date of transplantation.
3. Evaluating disability after the
appropriate time period has elapsed. We
consider any residual impairment(s), such as
complications arising from:
a. Graft-versus-host (GVH) disease.
b. Immunosuppressant therapy, such as
frequent infections.
c. Significant deterioration of other organ
systems.
113.01 Category of Impairments, Cancer
(Malignant Neoplastic Diseases)
113.03 Malignant solid tumors. Consider
under a disability:
A. For 24 months from the date of initial
diagnosis. Thereafter, evaluate any residual
impairment(s) under the criteria for the
affected body system.
OR
B. For 24 months from the date of
recurrence of active disease. Thereafter,
evaluate any residual impairment(s) under
the criteria for the affected body system.
113.05 Lymphoma (excluding all types of
lymphoblastic lymphomas—113.06). (See
113.00K1.)
A. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (including
Burkitt’s and anaplastic large cell), with
either 1 or 2:
1. Bone marrow, brain, spinal cord, liver,
or lung involvement at initial diagnosis.
Consider under a disability for 24 months
from the date of diagnosis. Thereafter,
evaluate under 113.05A2, or any residual
impairments(s) under the criteria for the
affected body system.
2. Persistent or recurrent following initial
anticancer therapy.
OR
B. Hodgkin lymphoma, with either 1 or 2:
1. Bone marrow, brain, spinal cord, liver,
or lung involvement at initial diagnosis.
Consider under a disability for 24 months
from the date of diagnosis. Thereafter,
evaluate under 113.05B2, or any residual
impairment(s) under the criteria for the
affected body system.
2. Persistent or recurrent following initial
anticancer therapy.
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
28832
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
OR
*
*
*
*
*
OR
D. Mantle cell lymphoma.
113.06 Leukemia. (See 113.00K2.)
A. Acute leukemia (including all types of
lymphoblastic lymphomas and juvenile
chronic myelogenous leukemia (JCML)).
Consider under a disability until at least 24
months from the date of diagnosis or relapse,
or at least 12 months from the date of bone
marrow or stem cell transplantation,
whichever is later. Thereafter, evaluate any
residual impairment(s) under the criteria for
the affected body system.
OR
B. * * *
1. Accelerated or blast phase (see
113.00K2b). Consider under a disability until
at least 24 months from the date of diagnosis
or relapse, or at least 12 months from the date
of bone marrow or stem cell transplantation,
whichever is later. Thereafter, evaluate any
residual impairment(s) under the criteria for
the affected body system.
*
*
113.12
*
*
*
*
*
Retinoblastoma.
*
*
*
*
*
*
113.13 Nervous system. (See 113.00K4.)
Primary central nervous system (CNS; that is,
brain and spinal cord) cancers, as described
in A, B, or C:
A. Glioblastoma multiforme,
ependymoblastoma, and diffuse intrinsic
brain stem gliomas (see 113.00K4a).
B. Any Grade III or Grade IV CNS cancer
(see 113.00K4b), including astrocytomas,
sarcomas, and medulloblastoma and other
primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs).
C. Any primary CNS cancer, as described
in 1 or 2:
1. Metastatic.
2. Progressive or recurrent following initial
anticancer therapy.
*
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
113.29 Malignant melanoma (including
skin, ocular, or mucosal melanomas), as
described in either A, B, or C:
A. Recurrent (except an additional primary
melanoma at a different site, which is not
considered to be recurrent disease) following
either 1 or 2:
1. Wide excision (skin melanoma).
2. Enucleation of the eye (ocular
melanoma).
OR
B. With metastases as described in 1, 2, or
3:
1. Metastases to one or more clinically
apparent nodes; that is, nodes that are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 May 19, 2015
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–11923 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under
the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
*
B. Persistent or recurrent following initial
anticancer therapy.
*
detected by imaging studies (excluding
lymphoscintigraphy) or by clinical
evaluation (palpable).
2. If the nodes are not clinically apparent,
with metastases to four or more nodes.
3. Metastases to adjacent skin (satellite
lesions) or distant sites (for example, liver,
lung, or brain).
OR
C. Mucosal melanoma.
Jkt 235001
ACTION:
The Department of the Navy
(DoN) is amending its certifications and
exemptions under the International
Regulations for Preventing Collisions at
Sea, 1972, as amended (72 COLREGS),
to reflect that the Deputy Assistant
Judge Advocate General (DAJAG)
(Admiralty and Maritime Law) has
determined that USS PRINCETON (CG
59) is a vessel of the Navy which, due
to its special construction and purpose,
cannot fully comply with certain
provisions of the 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a
naval ship. The intended effect of this
rule is to warn mariners in waters where
72 COLREGS apply.
DATES: This rule is effective May 20,
2015 and is applicable beginning May
11, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commander Theron R. Korsak,
(Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of
the Judge Advocate General, Department
of the Navy, 1322 Patterson Ave. SE.,
Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC
20374–5066, telephone 202–685–5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C.
1605, the DoN amends 32 CFR part 706.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This amendment provides notice that
the DAJAG (Admiralty and Maritime
Law), under authority delegated by the
Secretary of the Navy, has certified that
USS PRINCETON (CG 59) is a vessel of
the Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot fully
comply with the following specific
provisions of 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a
naval ship: Annex I, paragraph 3(a),
pertaining to the horizontal distance
between the forward and after masthead
lights. The DAJAG (Admiralty and
Maritime Law) has also certified that the
lights involved are located in closest
possible compliance with the applicable
72 COLREGS requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in
accordance with 32 CFR parts 296 and
701, that publication of this amendment
for public comment prior to adoption is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest since it is
based on technical findings that the
placement of lights on this vessel in a
manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel’s
ability to perform its military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Vessels.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the DoN amends part 706 of
title 32 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 706—CERTIFICATIONS AND
EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE
INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR
PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA,
1972
1. The authority citation for part 706
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
2. Section 706.2 is amended in Table
Five by revising the entry for USS
PRINCETON (CG 59) to read as follows:
■
§ 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of
the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and
33 U.S.C. 1605.
*
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
*
*
20MYR1
*
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28821-28832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11923]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Part 404
[Docket No. SSA-2011-0098]
RIN 0960-AH43
Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Cancer (Malignant
Neoplastic Diseases)
AGENCY: Social Security Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are revising the criteria in parts A and B of the Listing
of Impairments (listings) that we use to evaluate claims involving
cancer (malignant neoplastic diseases) under titles II and XVI of the
Social Security Act (Act). These revisions reflect our adjudicative
experience, advances in medical knowledge, recommendations from medical
experts we consulted, and public comments we received in response to a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM).
DATES: This rule is effective July 20, 2015.
[[Page 28822]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl A. Williams, Office of Medical
Policy, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21235-6401, (410) 965-1020. For information on
eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number,
1-800-772-1213, or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or visit our Internet site,
Social Security Online, at https://www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We are revising and making final the regulations for evaluating
cancer (malignant neoplastic diseases) that we proposed in an NPRM
published in the Federal Register on December 17, 2013, at 78 FR 76508.
Even though this rule will not go into effect until 60 days after
publication of this document, for clarity we refer to it in this
preamble as the ``final'' rule. We refer to the rule in effect prior to
that time as the ``prior'' rule.
In the preamble to the NPRM, we discussed our proposed changes and
our reasons for making them. Since we are mostly adopting those
revisions as we proposed them, we are not repeating that information
here. Interested readers may refer to the preamble in the NPRM,
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
We are making some changes in this final rule based on the public
comments we received on the NPRM. We explain these changes in the
``Summary of Public Comments'' below.
Why are we revising the cancer listings?
We developed this final rule as part of our ongoing review of the
cancer body system. When we last revised the listings for this body
system in a final rule published on October 6, 2009, we indicated that
we would monitor and update the listings as needed.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 74 FR 51229.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How long will this final rule stay in effect?
We are extending the effective date of the cancer body system in
parts A and B of the listings until 5 years after the effective date of
this final rule. The rule will remain in effect only until that date
unless we extend the expiration date. We will continue to monitor the
rule and may revise it, as needed, before the end of the 5-year period.
Summary of Public Comments
In the NPRM, we gave the public a 60-day comment period that ended
on February 18, 2014. We received 15 comments. The commenters included
national cancer advocacy groups, State agencies, a national group
representing disability examiners in State agencies that make
disability determinations for us, medical professionals, and individual
members of the public.
We carefully considered all of the significant comments relevant to
this rulemaking. We have condensed and summarized the comments below.
We believe we have presented the commenters' concerns and suggestions
accurately and completely and responded to all significant issues that
were within the scope of this rule. We provide our reasons for adopting
or not adopting the recommendations in our responses below.
General Comments
Comment: Many commenters supported our proposal to change the name
of this body system from ``Malignant Neoplastic Diseases'' to
``Cancer'' to make the name more recognizable to the lay public.
However, some commenters believed this change was not necessary or
appropriate. These commenters believed the lay public is sufficiently
aware of the meaning of the term ``malignant neoplastic diseases'' and
that we should continue using it as the body system's name. One
commenter thought ``malignant neoplastic diseases'' is a more
encompassing name for the body system than ``cancer.'' The commenter
contended the term ``cancer'' has traditionally meant only carcinoma,
and does not include sarcoma, leukemia, or malignancies in other cell
types.
Response: We disagree with the commenters' view that the lay public
is sufficiently aware of the term ``malignant neoplastic diseases,''
and have adopted our proposal to change the name of this body system to
``Cancer.'' We believe the lay public understands that the term
``cancer'' means not only carcinoma but also the wide array of
malignancies. The National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Cancer
Society (NCS), and other recognized experts use the term ``cancer''
when referring to carcinoma, sarcoma, leukemia, lymphoma, and
malignancies of the central nervous system in their publications.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For example, see ``NCI Home'' at https://www.cancer.gov, and
``American Cancer Society Home'' at https://www.cancer.org/index.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment: A commenter, who supported the proposed name change,
recommended that we use the term ``anticancer therapy'' instead of
``antineoplastic therapy'' in this final rule.
Response: We agree with the commenter and have modified the
listings accordingly.
Comment: One commenter suggested we have only one listing for
evaluating small-cell carcinomas rather than adopt our proposal to
provide a criterion for small-cell carcinoma under several, specific
listings.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ We retained prior listing 13.14B for evaluating small-cell
carcinoma in the lungs and added a criterion for small-cell
carcinoma under the following specific listings: 13.02D for soft
tissue cancers of the head and neck; 13.10D for cancer of the
breast; 13.15C for cancer of the pleura and mediastinum; 13.16C for
cancer of the esophagus or stomach; 13.17C for cancer of the small
intestine; 13.18D for cancer of the large intestine; 13.22E for
cancer of the urinary bladder; 13.23F for cancers of the female
genital tract; and 13.24C for cancer of the prostate gland. We
include a listing for small-cell carcinoma of the small intestine,
even though it is a very rare cancer, to maintain internal
consistency among the regulations, and because of the cancer's
unfavorable prognosis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Response: We did not adopt the comment. Some small-cell carcinomas
might be included under the single listing the commenter proposed, but
may have favorable prognoses and not be of listing-level severity.
These small-cell carcinomas have a favorable prognosis because
physicians can detect them in their early stages when it is still
possible to remove the cancer. The final listings cover small-cell
carcinomas that occur in certain organs and tissues where physicians
are unlikely to detect them in their early stages, and treatment is
mainly palliative.
Comment: One commenter suggested that we include the stage of the
cancer in the final listings for evaluating central nervous system and
cervical cancers, and lymphomas.
Response: We did not adopt the comment for two reasons. First, the
cancers mentioned by the commenter may have different staging systems
that are inconsistent with each other. Second, staging systems could
change, potentially resulting in an inability to find people with
listing-level impairments disabled at the listing step of the
sequential evaluation process.
Comment: A commenter proposed we provide more guidance in part B
for evaluating conditions in children, resulting from cancer or its
treatment, that do not meet the listings. The commenter said such
conditions might include organ dysfunction resulting from small-cell
carcinomas, or secondary lymphedema resulting from breast cancer
treatment. The commenter believed the additional guidance would make
the final listings more comprehensive.
Response: We did not adopt the comment because we believe final
sections 113.00F and 113.00G already
[[Page 28823]]
provide the type of guidance the commenter recommended. In these
sections, we explain that if a child has a medically determinable
impairment that does not meet the listings, we will determine whether
the impairment medically equals the listings. This determination would
include impairments caused by the cancer or treatment side effects. If
the impairment does not medically equal a listing, section 113.00F
further explains that we will also determine whether the impairment
functionally equals the listings. Again, this determination would
include impairments caused by the cancer or treatment side effects.
Comment: One commenter recommended we provide more guidance for
evaluating treatment failure in bone marrow and stem cell
transplantation, and proposed specific language for making this change.
Response: We believe the change, and the specific language the
commenter proposed, is not necessary because listings for bone marrow
and stem cell transplantation have a criterion for evaluating any
residual impairments following treatment. These residual impairments
would include the evaluation of those associated with treatment
failure.
Section 13.00E--When do we need longitudinal evidence?
Comment: One commenter asked us to specify which sources can
provide the evidence required in final section 13.00E3c to document
that the treating source has started multimodal therapy under final
listings 13.02E, 13.11D, and 13.14C. The commenter indicated that we
should accept this evidence only from an acceptable medical source such
as a medical or osteopathic doctor.
Response: We did not adopt the comment because it may limit our
ability to obtain evidence to determine if multimodal therapy has
started and, thus, establish listing-level severity. While an
acceptable medical source may provide this evidence, our existing
policy allows us to accept evidence from other medical sources to
establish the impairment's severity.\4\ For example, this evidence may
come from sources we do not consider acceptable medical sources, such
as oncology nurse practitioners who administer chemotherapy and
radiation therapists who deliver radiation treatments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 20 CFR 404.1513(d) and 416.913(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sections 13.00I and 113.00I--What do we mean by the following terms?
Comment: One commenter expressed concern over proposed sections
13.00I6 and 113.00I5, in which we clarified that we consider a cancer
to be ``progressive'' if it is still growing after the person has
completed at least half of his or her planned initial anticancer
therapy. The commenter believed this criterion might delay adjudication
if the adjudicator must contact the treating source to ask how much of
planned treatment the person has completed.
Response: We did not adopt this comment. We disagree with the
commenter because we do not expect adjudicators to obtain more
information than we required under the prior regulations. The proposed
and final sections express our intent to decide as quickly as possible
that a person is disabled.
Comment: The same commenter thought that the definition of the term
``progressive'' could result in a finding that the claimant has a
condition medically equivalent to cancer listings that do not require
the malignancy to be progressive.
Response: We do not share the commenter's concern because, as we
explain in sections 13.00C and 113.00C, we will only apply the criteria
in a specific listing to a cancer originating from that specific site.
Comment: One commenter recommended that we revise the definition of
``persistent'' cancer in final section 13.00I5. The commenter also
provided language for the suggested revision.
Response: We did not adopt the comment for two reasons. First, the
language the commenter proposed could be misinterpreted to require that
all of a person's anticancer therapy must fail to achieve a complete
remission, including any second- or third-line therapies after initial
anticancer therapy.\5\ This interpretation would be contrary to our
intent in listings that require only the planned initial anticancer
therapy to fail. Second, the language the commenter proposed would not
explain the meaning of the phrase ``failed to achieve a complete
remission.'' By defining this phrase, the final section clarifies that
the cancer is ``persistent'' if any of it remains after treatment is
completed, even if the cancer responded to the initial therapy and
became smaller.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ We may consider follow-up surgery to be a part of initial
anticancer treatment if the intent of the follow-up surgery is to
obtain clear margins and the complete eradication of any residual
cancer left behind.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment: One commenter recommended that the definition of the term
``unresectable'' in final section 13.00I8 address the presence of
micrometastases. The commenter contended that ``unresectable'' should
not include situations in which the surgeon removed the tumor and then
used adjuvant therapy to eliminate any micrometastases.
Response: We did not adopt the comment. We believe the commenter's
proposed change is unnecessary. Final section 13.00I8 defines
``adjuvant therapy'' as anticancer therapy given after surgery ``to
eliminate any remaining cancer cells or lessen the chance of
recurrence.'' These ``remaining cancer cells'' include micrometastases.
Sections 13.00K and 113.00K--How do we evaluate specific cancers?
Comment: A commenter recommended that we add examples of common
indolent lymphomas in final section 13.00K1a. The commenter also
recommended that we add examples of common solid tumors in final
section 113.00K3.
Response: We did not adopt the comment. These recommendations
appear to be administrative concerns better handled through training
and operating instructions for our adjudicators.
Comment: A commenter recommended that we create a listing for
primary peritoneal carcinoma. The commenter argued that having a
listing would be better than the guidance in section 13.00K7, in which
we explained that we can evaluate this cancer in women under final
13.23E for ovarian cancer, and evaluate it in men under 13.15A for
malignant mesothelioma.
Response: We did not adopt the commenter's recommendation that we
create a listing for primary peritoneal carcinoma. Primary peritoneal
carcinoma is very rare, and we do not usually provide listings for rare
cancers. Instead, we believe the better practice is to clarify in the
introductory text which listings to use to evaluate certain rare
cancers, as we did in final section 13.00K7 for primary peritoneal
carcinoma.
Comment: A few commenters expressed concern about the clarification
in proposed section 13.00K8 that excludes ``biochemical recurrence''
for evaluating recurrent cancer of the prostate gland in listing
13.24A. In this section, we defined ``biochemical recurrence'' as an
increase in the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level following
the completion of anticancer therapy. Section 13.24A requires
corroborating evidence to document recurrence, such as radiological
studies or findings on physical exam. Commenters believed this
requirement might delay a finding
[[Page 28824]]
of disability and unfairly penalize people with prostate cancer. They
noted that doctors frequently use PSA values to determine recurrence
and may initiate anticancer treatment for recurrent cancer upon this
evidence alone.
Response: We agree that in some cases, an isolated PSA reading may
support a diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer, especially if this
diagnosis is from an acceptable medical source and is consistent with
the prevailing state of medical knowledge and clinical practice.
However, we did not adopt the comments because we believe it is
reasonable to require corroborating evidence to confirm the diagnosis.
A rising PSA level alone does not necessarily mean prostate cancer has
returned. Additional factors, such as the cancer's TNM \6\
characteristics, PSA kinetics, timing of the biochemical recurrence,
treatment modality, and Gleason score, should be
considered.7 8 The American Joint Committee on Cancer notes
that the natural progression from biochemical recurrence to clinical
disease recurrence is highly variable and may depend on these
additional factors.\9\ In light of this variability and the other
factors that should be considered, we continue to believe that we
should exclude ``biochemical recurrence'' in listing 13.24A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The acronym ``TNM'' relates to the Tumor size, lymph Node
involvement, and presence of Metastases.
\7\ PSA kinetics involves assessing the PSA level over time,
such as measuring of its rate of change (velocity) and how long it
takes it to double.
\8\ The National Cancer Institute defines ``Gleason score'' as a
system of grading prostate cancer tissue based on how it looks under
the microscope (available at: https://www.cancer.gov/dictionary?CdrID=45696).
\9\ See Carolyn C. Compton et al. eds., Cancer Staging Atlas: A
Companion to the Seventh Editions of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual
and Handbook, New York: Springer, 2012, page 535-545.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment: One commenter recommended that we delete the parenthetical
reference to ``benign melanocytic tumor'' in final sections 13.00K9 and
113.00K6. The commenter claimed that citing a benign disease in the
cancer listings may be confusing for adjudicators.
Response: We did not adopt the comment because we believe the
reference to benign melanocytic tumor can direct adjudicators to the
appropriate body systems for evaluating this condition, Skin Disorders
(8.00 and 108.00). This reference is similar to how final sections
13.00K6c and 113.00K4c direct adjudicators to the appropriate body
systems for evaluating benign brain tumors.
Listing 13.02--Soft Tissue Cancers of the Head and Neck (Except
Salivary Glands--13.08--and Thyroid Gland--13.09)
Comment: A commenter recommended revisions to 13.02E to condense
the final listing significantly.
Response: We did not adopt the comment because the proposed change
might be misinterpreted to include any metastases in the head or neck
from cancers originating elsewhere under listing 13.02E. Our intent in
this listing is to evaluate cancers that receive multimodal therapy and
originate in the head and neck only.
Listing 113.05--Lymphoma (Excluding All Types of Lymphoblastic
Lymphomas--113.06)
Comment: A commenter recommended that we include cerebrospinal
fluid (CSF) findings as evidence for determining listing-level lymphoma
under final listings 113.05A1 and 113.05B1.
Response: We did not adopt the comment. It is not a standard
clinical practice in lymphoma to conduct cerebrospinal fluid
examination for analysis; therefore, we do not believe it is
appropriate to require this evidence to establish severity. However, we
will inform adjudicators, through training and operating instructions,
that they can accept CSF findings if this evidence is available.
Listing 13.10--Breast (Except Sarcoma--13.04)
Comment: One commenter asked how long adjudicators should defer
adjudication of cases for evaluating breast cancer with secondary
lymphedema resulting from anticancer therapy and treated by surgery to
salvage or restore the functioning of an upper extremity under proposed
listing 13.10E.
Response: We disagree with the commenter's premise that
adjudicators need to defer adjudication of these cases. Adjudicators
can adjudicate a case at the listing step if the surgery is performed.
The need for this surgery to salvage or restore functioning of an upper
extremity demonstrates listing-level severity of the secondary
lymphedema without the need to make a determination about the
effectiveness of the surgery.
Comment: A commenter recommended we add a listing that prescribes a
period of disability of at least 18 months for people receiving
multimodal therapy for breast cancer. The commenter noted that
multimodal therapy could last 6 or more months and produce very serious
adverse effects. The commenter also noted that it is common for us to
find these people disabled after the listing step in the sequential
evaluation process by taking into consideration the adverse effects of
treatment and that the length of treatment nearly satisfies the 12-
month duration requirement. The commenter believed it would be better
for us to make the determination of disability at the listing step.
Similarly, a commenter recommended we add a listing that prescribes
a period of disability of at least 18 months for people receiving
multimodal therapy that includes surgery for low anal cancers and
rectal cancers. The commenter noted that neoadjuvant chemotherapy or
radiation followed by surgery to eliminate these anal or rectal cancers
frequently takes at least 12 months to complete. The treatment may
result in prolonged debilitation although the impairment may not meet
or medically equal the listings.
Response: We believe the commenter's proposed listing for breast
cancer would cover many cases of early cancer. Most people with early
breast cancer complete multimodal therapy within 6 months and recover
from any adverse effects relatively soon. In these cases, the
impairment would not preclude the ability to work for the required 12
months.
However, we agree with the commenter that in some cases multimodal
therapy may take substantially longer than 6 months to complete. For
example, very serious adverse effects may interrupt and prolong
therapy, resulting in an active impairment lasting almost 12 months. It
is a long-standing principle that we may make a finding of disability
at the listing step if there is the expectation that an impairment that
has been active for almost 12 months will preclude a person from
engaging in any gainful activity for the required 12 months. We base
this finding on the nature of the impairment; prescribed treatment;
therapeutic history, including adverse effects of treatment; and other
relevant considerations. Therefore, we partially adopted the comment by
providing language in final section 13.00G3 to clarify that we can
apply this principle to multimodal anticancer therapy for breast cancer
and other cancers. We also added the clarifying language in final
section 113.00G3 for children.
We did not make changes to listing 13.18 for evaluating anal and
rectal cancers. This listing and the commenter's recommendation for a
new listing covering multimodal therapy with surgery for anal and
rectal cancers
[[Page 28825]]
are outside the scope of this rulemaking. However, we believe the
changes made in final section 13.00G3 partially address this
commenter's concerns.
Listing 13.13--Nervous System
Comment: One commenter recommended that we clarify in the
introductory text whether adjudicators should use listing 13.13 to
evaluate pituitary gland cancer in adults.
Response: We adopted the commenter's recommendation by providing
language in final section 13.00K6a and final section 113.00K4a in the
introductory text clarifying that we evaluate cancerous pituitary gland
tumors, for example, pituitary carcinoma,\10\ under final listing
13.13A1 and final listing 113.13A, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Pituitary gland carcinoma is highly malignant. Treatment is
mainly palliative. People who have pituitary gland carcinoma have a
mean survival time of only about 2 years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment: The same commenter expressed concern about the statement,
in proposed sections 13.00K6b and 113.00K4b, that we consider brain
tumors malignant only if they are classified as grade II or higher
under the World Health Organization (WHO), ``Classification of Tumours
of the Central Nervous System, 2007.'' The commenter asked how an
adjudicator should evaluate central nervous system tumors graded under
different classification systems.
Response: We believe we have addressed the commenter's concerns in
existing operating instructions that help adjudicators determine the
WHO grade of specific brain cancers if a different grading system is
used or if the medical evidence does not identify a particular grading
system.\11\ These instructions also help adjudicators determine which
grade to use when there are inconsistencies in the medical record, such
as some medical evidence describing the tumor as grade II while other
medical evidence describes it as grade III or grade IV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Program Operations Manual System, available at: https://policy.ssa.gov/poms.nsf/lnx/0424585001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Listing 13.23--Cancers of the Female Genital Tract--Carcinoma or
Sarcoma
Comment: A commenter recommended that we add criteria in final
listing 13.23B3 to take into account a cancer's histologic diagnosis
and the age of the claimant at onset.
Response: We did not adopt this comment. We do not believe it is
necessary to include such considerations in the listing because the
prognosis is already poor for cervical cancer that meets the specific
criteria of the listing. Considering the histological diagnosis would
only confirm this prognosis, and the prognosis would remain poor
regardless of a person's age.
Comment: A national advocacy group for women with ovarian cancer
recommended that we reinstate a listing we deleted in 2009. The listing
covered ovarian cancer with ruptured ovarian capsule, tumor on the
serosal surface of the ovary, ascites with malignant cells, or positive
peritoneal washings. The commenter believed we find most women with
this extent of disease disabled at later steps of the sequential
evaluation process after the listing step or on appeal. The commenter
also believed the adverse effects of cancer treatment might be
disabling in themselves, especially for women whose jobs require
significant exertion or do not allow time off for recovery from
treatment.
Response: We agree we could find a woman with the findings in the
prior listing disabled after the listing step of the sequential
evaluation process. We realize that adverse effects of ovarian cancer
treatment may preclude a woman from working. However, we did not adopt
the commenter's recommendation because many women with ovarian cancer
that meets the specific criteria in the deleted listing would not have
an impairment that precludes any gainful activity, which is the
standard of severity in the listings.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See sections 404.1525 and 416.925.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Changes
We made a number of editorial changes and technical corrections in
the final rule to increase the clarity and consistency of the listings.
For example, we redesignated proposed listing 13.05A3 for evaluating
mantle cell lymphoma in adults as final listing 13.05D to make it a
stand-alone listing consistent with stand-alone final listing 113.05D
for evaluating mantle cell lymphoma in children. We also changed the
parenthetical examples in prior sections 13.00H1 and 113.00H1 from ``at
least 18 months from the date of diagnosis'' and ``at least 12 months
from the date of diagnosis,'' respectively, to ``until at least 12
months from the date of transplantation'' to make these adult and child
sections consistent.
Additionally, we redesignated proposed listings 13.29A3 and
113.29A3 for evaluating mucosal melanoma as stand-alone listings 13.29C
and 113.29C. We made this change because we determined, through our
ongoing review of the scientific and medical literature, that mucosal
melanoma carries a very poor prognosis and is of listing-level severity
regardless of whether it is an initial disease or a recurrent disease.
We also added examples of distant sites frequently affected by
metastases from cutaneous and ocular melanomas in 13.29B3 and 113.29B3.
What is our authority to make regulations and set procedures for
determining whether a person is disabled under the statutory
definition?
Under the Act, we have full power and authority to make rules and
regulations and to establish necessary and appropriate procedures to
carry out such provisions.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Sections 205(a), 702(a)(5), and 1631(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, as Supplemented by Executive Order 13563
We have consulted with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
and determined that this final rule meets the criteria for a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, and was reviewed by OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that this final rule has no significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities because it affects only
individuals. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis was not
required under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not create any new or affect any existing
collections and, therefore, does not require OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 96.001, Social
Security--Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social Security--Retirement
Insurance; 96.004, Social Security--Survivors Insurance; and 96.006,
Supplemental Security Income).
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 404
Administrative practice and procedure, Blind, Disability benefits,
Old-age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Social Security.
Dated: May 11, 2015.
Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, we are amending 20 CFR
part 404 subpart P as set forth below:
[[Page 28826]]
PART 404--FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY INSURANCE
(1950-)
Subpart P--Determining Disability and Blindness
0
1. The authority citation for subpart P of part 404 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: Secs. 202, 205(a)-(b) and (d)-(h), 216(i), 221(a),
(i), and (j), 222(c), 223, 225, and 702(a)(5) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 402, 405(a)-(b), and (d)-(h), 416(i), 421(a), (i),
and (j), 422(c), 423, 425, and 902(a)(5)); sec. 211(b), Pub. L. 104-
193, 110 Stat. 2105, 2189; sec. 202, Pub. L. 108-203, 118 Stat. 509
(42 U.S.C. 902 note).
0
2. Amend appendix 1 to subpart P of part 404 as follows:
0
a. Revise item 14 of the introductory text before part A.
0
b. Amend part A by revising the body system name for section 13.00 in
the table of contents.
0
c. Revise section 13.00 of part A.
0
d. Amend listing 13.02 of part A by revising the heading, revising
listing 13.02B, removing listing 13.02C, redesignating listing 13.02D
as new 13.02C, adding new listing 13.02D and revising listing 13.02E.
0
e. Amend listing 13.03 of part A by revising listing 13.03B.
0
f. Amend listing 13.04 of part A by revising listing 13.04B.
0
g. Amend listing 13.05 of part A by revising listings 13.05A1, 13.05A2
and 13.05B, and adding listing 13.05D.
0
h. Amend listing 13.06 of part A by revising the first sentence of
listing 13.06B1 and revising listing 13.06B2b.
0
i. Amend listing 13.07 of part A by revising listing 13.07A.
0
j. Amend listing 13.10 of part A by revising listings 13.10A and
13.10C, adding the word ``OR'' after listing 13.10C, adding listing
13.10D, adding the word ``OR'' after listing 13.10D, and adding listing
13.10E.
0
k. Amend listing 13.11 of part A by revising listings 13.11B and
13.11D.
0
l. Amend listing 13.12 of part A by revising listing 13.12C.
0
m. Revise listing 13.13 of part A.
0
n. Amend listing 13.14C of part A by revising the first sentence.
0
o. Amend listing 13.15 of part A by revising listing 13.15B2 and adding
the word ``OR'' after listing 13.15B2, and adding listing 13.15C.
0
p. Amend listing 13.16 of part A by adding the word ``OR'' after
listing 13.16B, and adding listing 13.16C.
0
q. Amend listing 13.17 of part A by adding the word ``OR'' after
listing 13.17B, and adding listing 13.17C.
0
r. Amend listing 13.18 of part A by adding the word ``OR'' after
listing 13.18C, and adding listing 13.18D.
0
s. Revise listing 13.19 of part A.
0
t. Amend listing 13.20 of part A by revising listing 13.20B.
0
u. Amend listing 13.22 of part A by adding the word ``OR'' after
listing 13.22D, and adding listing 13.22E.
0
v. Amend listing 13.23 of part A by revising the heading, revising
listings 13.23A3, 13.23B, 13.23C3, 13.23D2 and 13.23E, adding the word
``OR'' after listing 13.23E, and adding listing 13.23F.
0
w. Amend listing 13.24 of part A by revising listing 13.24A, adding the
word ``OR'' after listing 13.24B, and adding listing 13.24C.
0
x. Revise listing 13.25 of part A.
0
y. Amend listing 13.28 of part A by revising the heading.
0
z. Add listing 13.29 after listing 13.28 of part A.
0
aa. Amend part B by revising the body system name for section 113.00 in
the table of contents.
0
bb. Revise section 113.00 of part B.
0
cc. Revise listing 113.03 of part B.
0
dd. Amend listing 113.05 of part B by revising the heading and listings
113.05A and 113.05B, adding the word ``OR'' after listing 113.05C, and
adding listing 113.05D.
0
ee. Amend listing 113.06 of part B by revising listings 113.06A and
113.06B1.
0
ff. Amend listing 113.12 of part B by revising listing 113.12B.
0
gg. Revise listing 113.13 of part B.
0
hh. Add listing 113.29 after listing 113.21 of part B.
The revised and added text is set forth as follows:
APPENDIX 1 TO SUBPART P OF PART 404--LISTING OF IMPAIRMENTS
* * * * *
14. Cancer (Malignant Neoplastic Diseases) (13.00 and 113.00):
July 20, 2020.
* * * * *
Part A
* * * * *
13.00 Cancer (Malignant Neoplastic Diseases)
* * * * *
13.00 CANCER (MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASES)
A. What impairments do these listings cover? We use these
listings to evaluate all cancers (malignant neoplastic diseases),
except certain cancers associated with human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV) infection. If you have HIV infection, we use the criteria in
14.08E to evaluate carcinoma of the cervix, Kaposi sarcoma,
lymphoma, and squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal and anal
margin.
B. What do we consider when we evaluate cancer under these
listings? We will consider factors including:
1. Origin of the cancer.
2. Extent of involvement.
3. Duration, frequency, and response to anticancer therapy.
4. Effects of any post-therapeutic residuals.
C. How do we apply these listings? We apply the criteria in a
specific listing to a cancer originating from that specific site.
D. What evidence do we need?
1. We need medical evidence that specifies the type, extent, and
site of the primary, recurrent, or metastatic lesion. When the
primary site cannot be identified, we will use evidence documenting
the site(s) of metastasis to evaluate the impairment under 13.27.
2. For operative procedures, including a biopsy or a needle
aspiration, we generally need a copy of both the:
a. Operative note, and
b. Pathology report.
3. When we cannot get these documents, we will accept the
summary of hospitalization(s) or other medical reports. This
evidence should include details of the findings at surgery and,
whenever appropriate, the pathological findings.
4. In some situations, we may also need evidence about
recurrence, persistence, or progression of the cancer, the response
to therapy, and any significant residuals. (See 13.00G.)
E. When do we need longitudinal evidence?
1. Cancer with distant metastases. We generally do not need
longitudinal evidence for cancer that has metastasized beyond the
regional lymph nodes because this cancer usually meets the
requirements of a listing. Exceptions are for cancer with distant
metastases that we expect to respond to anticancer therapy. For
these exceptions, we usually need a longitudinal record of 3 months
after therapy starts to determine whether the therapy achieved its
intended effect, and whether this effect is likely to persist.
2. Other cancers. When there are no distant metastases, many of
the listings require that we consider your response to initial
anticancer therapy; that is, the initial planned treatment regimen.
This therapy may consist of a single modality or a combination of
modalities; that is, multimodal therapy. (See 13.00I4.)
3. Types of treatment.
a. Whenever the initial planned therapy is a single modality,
enough time must pass to allow a determination about whether the
therapy will achieve its intended effect. If the treatment fails,
the failure often happens within 6 months after treatment starts,
and there will often be a change in the treatment regimen.
b. Whenever the initial planned therapy is multimodal, we
usually cannot make a determination about the effectiveness of the
therapy until we can determine the effects of all the planned
modalities. In some cases, we may need to defer adjudication until
we can assess the effectiveness of therapy. However, we do not need
to defer adjudication to determine whether the therapy will achieve
its intended effect if we can make a fully favorable determination
or decision based on the length and effects of therapy, or the
residuals of the cancer or therapy (see 13.00G).
c. We need evidence under 13.02E, 13.11D, and 13.14C to
establish that your treating
[[Page 28827]]
source initiated multimodal anticancer therapy. We do not need to
make a determination about the length or effectiveness of your
therapy. Multimodal therapy has been initiated, and satisfies the
requirements in 13.02E, 13.11D, and 13.14C, when your treating
source starts the first modality. We may defer adjudication if your
treating source plans multimodal therapy and has not yet initiated
it.
F. How do we evaluate impairments that do not meet one of the
cancer listings?
1. These listings are only examples of cancer that we consider
severe enough to prevent you from doing any gainful activity. If
your severe impairment(s) does not meet the criteria of any of these
listings, we must also consider whether you have an impairment(s)
that meets the criteria of a listing in another body system.
2. If you have a severe medically determinable impairment(s)
that does not meet a listing, we will determine whether your
impairment(s) medically equals a listing. (See Sec. Sec. 404.1526
and 416.926 of this chapter.) If your impairment(s) does not meet or
medically equal a listing, you may or may not have the residual
functional capacity to engage in substantial gainful activity. In
that situation, we proceed to the fourth, and, if necessary, the
fifth steps of the sequential evaluation process in Sec. Sec.
404.1520 and 416.920 of this chapter. We use the rules in Sec. Sec.
404.1594 and 416.994 of this chapter, as appropriate, when we decide
whether you continue to be disabled.
G. How do we consider the effects of anticancer therapy?
1. How we consider the effects of anticancer therapy under the
listings. In many cases, cancers meet listing criteria only if the
therapy is not effective and the cancer persists, progresses, or
recurs. However, as explained in the following paragraphs, we will
not delay adjudication if we can make a fully favorable
determination or decision based on the evidence in the case record.
2. Effects can vary widely.
a. We consider each case on an individual basis because the
therapy and its toxicity may vary widely. We will request a specific
description of the therapy, including these items:
i. Drugs given.
ii. Dosage.
iii. Frequency of drug administration.
iv. Plans for continued drug administration.
v. Extent of surgery.
vi. Schedule and fields of radiation therapy.
b. We will also request a description of the complications or
adverse effects of therapy, such as the following:
i. Continuing gastrointestinal symptoms.
ii. Persistent weakness.
iii. Neurological complications.
iv. Cardiovascular complications.
v. Reactive mental disorders.
3. Effects of therapy may change. The severity of the adverse
effects of anticancer therapy may change during treatment;
therefore, enough time must pass to allow us to evaluate the
therapy's effect. The residual effects of treatment are temporary in
most instances; however, on occasion, the effects may be disabling
for a consecutive period of at least 12 months. In some situations,
very serious adverse effects may interrupt and prolong multimodal
anticancer therapy for a continuous period of almost 12 months. In
these situations, we may determine there is an expectation that your
impairment will preclude you from engaging in any gainful activity
for at least 12 months.
4. When the initial anticancer therapy is effective. We evaluate
any post-therapeutic residual impairment(s) not included in these
listings under the criteria for the affected body system. We must
consider any complications of therapy. When the residual
impairment(s) does not meet or medically equal a listing, we must
consider its effect on your ability to do substantial gainful
activity.
H. How long do we consider your impairment to be disabling?
1. In some listings, we specify that we will consider your
impairment to be disabling until a particular point in time (for
example, until at least 12 months from the date of transplantation).
We may consider your impairment to be disabling beyond this point
when the medical and other evidence justifies it.
2. When a listing does not contain such a specification, we will
consider an impairment(s) that meets or medically equals a listing
in this body system to be disabling until at least 3 years after
onset of complete remission. When the impairment(s) has been in
complete remission for at least 3 years, that is, the original tumor
or a recurrence (or relapse) and any metastases have not been
evident for at least 3 years, the impairment(s) will no longer meet
or medically equal the criteria of a listing in this body system.
3. Following the appropriate period, we will consider any
residuals, including residuals of the cancer or therapy (see
13.00G), in determining whether you are disabled. If you have a
recurrence or relapse of your cancer, your impairment may meet or
medically equal one of the listings in this body system again.
I. What do we mean by the following terms?
1. Anticancer therapy means surgery, radiation, chemotherapy,
hormones, immunotherapy, or bone marrow or stem cell
transplantation. When we refer to surgery as an anticancer
treatment, we mean surgical excision for treatment, not for
diagnostic purposes.
2. Inoperable means surgery is thought to be of no therapeutic
value or the surgery cannot be performed; for example, when you
cannot tolerate anesthesia or surgery because of another
impairment(s), or you have a cancer that is too large or that has
invaded crucial structures. This term does not include situations in
which your cancer could have been surgically removed but another
method of treatment was chosen; for example, an attempt at organ
preservation. Your physician may determine whether the cancer is
inoperable before or after you receive neoadjuvant therapy.
Neoadjuvant therapy is anticancer therapy, such as chemotherapy or
radiation, given before surgery in order to reduce the size of the
cancer.
3. Metastases means the spread of cancer cells by blood, lymph,
or other body fluid. This term does not include the spread of cancer
cells by direct extension of the cancer to other tissues or organs.
4. Multimodal therapy means anticancer therapy that is a
combination of at least two types of treatment given in close
proximity as a unified whole and usually planned before any
treatment has begun. There are three types of treatment modalities:
surgery, radiation, and systemic drug therapy (chemotherapy, hormone
therapy, and immunotherapy or biological modifier therapy). Examples
of multimodal therapy include:
a. Surgery followed by chemotherapy or radiation.
b. Chemotherapy followed by surgery.
c. Chemotherapy and concurrent radiation.
5. Persistent means the planned initial anticancer therapy
failed to achieve a complete remission of your cancer; that is, your
cancer is evident, even if smaller, after the therapy has ended.
6. Progressive means the cancer becomes more extensive after
treatment; that is, there is evidence that your cancer is growing
after you have completed at least half of your planned initial
anticancer therapy.
7. Recurrent or relapse means the cancer that was in complete
remission or entirely removed by surgery has returned.
8. Unresectable means surgery or surgeries did not completely
remove the cancer. This term includes situations in which your
cancer is incompletely resected or the surgical margins are
positive. It does not include situations in which there is a finding
of a positive margin(s) if additional surgery obtains a margin(s)
that is clear. It also does not include situations in which the
cancer is completely resected but you are receiving adjuvant
therapy. Adjuvant therapy is anticancer therapy, such as
chemotherapy or radiation, given after surgery in order to eliminate
any remaining cancer cells or lessen the chance of recurrence.
J. Can we establish the existence of a disabling impairment
prior to the date of the evidence that shows the cancer satisfies
the criteria of a listing? Yes. We will consider factors such as:
1. The type of cancer and its location.
2. The extent of involvement when the cancer was first
demonstrated.
3. Your symptoms.
K. How do we evaluate specific cancers?
1. Lymphoma.
a. Many indolent (non-aggressive) lymphomas are controlled by
well-tolerated treatment modalities, although the lymphomas may
produce intermittent symptoms and signs. We may defer adjudicating
these cases for an appropriate period after therapy is initiated to
determine whether the therapy will achieve its intended effect,
which is usually to stabilize the disease process. (See 13.00E3.)
Once your disease stabilizes, we will assess severity based on the
extent of involvement of other organ systems and residuals from
therapy.
b. A change in therapy for indolent lymphomas is usually an
indicator that the therapy is not achieving its intended effect.
However, your impairment will not meet the requirements of 13.05A2
if your therapy is changed solely because you or your
[[Page 28828]]
physician chooses to change it and not because of a failure to
achieve stability.
c. We consider Hodgkin lymphoma that recurs more than 12 months
after completing initial anticancer therapy to be a new disease
rather than a recurrence.
2. Leukemia.
a. Acute leukemia. The initial diagnosis of acute leukemia,
including the accelerated or blast phase of chronic myelogenous
(granulocytic) leukemia, is based on definitive bone marrow
examination. Additional diagnostic information is based on
chromosomal analysis, cytochemical and surface marker studies on the
abnormal cells, or other methods consistent with the prevailing
state of medical knowledge and clinical practice. Recurrent disease
must be documented by peripheral blood, bone marrow, or
cerebrospinal fluid examination, or by testicular biopsy. The
initial and follow-up pathology reports should be included.
b. Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). We need a diagnosis of
CML based on documented granulocytosis, including immature forms
such as differentiated or undifferentiated myelocytes and
myeloblasts, and a chromosomal analysis that demonstrates the
Philadelphia chromosome. In the absence of a chromosomal analysis,
or if the Philadelphia chromosome is not present, the diagnosis may
be made by other methods consistent with the prevailing state of
medical knowledge and clinical practice. The requirement for CML in
the accelerated or blast phase is met in 13.06B if laboratory
findings show the proportion of blast (immature) cells in the
peripheral blood or bone marrow is 10 percent or greater.
c. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
i. We require the diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia
(CLL) to be documented by evidence of a chronic lymphocytosis of at
least 10,000 cells/mm\3\ for 3 months or longer, or other acceptable
diagnostic techniques consistent with the prevailing state of
medical knowledge and clinical practice.
ii. We evaluate the complications and residual impairment(s)
from CLL under the appropriate listings, such as 13.05A2 or the
hematological listings (7.00).
d. Elevated white cell count. In cases of chronic leukemia
(either myelogenous or lymphocytic), an elevated white cell count,
in itself, is not a factor in determining the severity of the
impairment.
3. Macroglobulinemia or heavy chain disease. We require the
diagnosis of these diseases to be confirmed by protein
electrophoresis or immunoelectrophoresis. We evaluate the resulting
impairment(s) under the appropriate listings, such as 13.05A2 or the
hematological listings (7.00).
4. Primary breast cancer.
a. We evaluate bilateral primary breast cancer (synchronous or
metachronous) under 13.10A, which covers local primary disease, and
not as a primary disease that has metastasized.
b. We evaluate secondary lymphedema that results from anticancer
therapy for breast cancer under 13.10E if the lymphedema is treated
by surgery to salvage or restore the functioning of an upper
extremity. Secondary lymphedema is edema that results from
obstruction or destruction of normal lymphatic channels. We may not
restrict our determination of the onset of disability to the date of
the surgery; we may establish an earlier onset date of disability if
the evidence in your case record supports such a finding.
5. Carcinoma-in-situ. Carcinoma-in-situ, or preinvasive
carcinoma, usually responds to treatment. When we use the term
``carcinoma'' in these listings, it does not include carcinoma-in-
situ.
6. Primary central nervous system (CNS) cancers. We use the
criteria in 13.13 to evaluate cancers that originate within the CNS
(that is, brain and spinal cord cancers).
a. The CNS cancers listed in 13.13A1 are highly malignant and
respond poorly to treatment, and therefore we do not require
additional criteria to evaluate them. We do not list pituitary gland
cancer (for example, pituitary gland carcinoma) in 13.13A1, although
this CNS cancer is highly malignant and responds poorly to
treatment. We evaluate pituitary gland cancer under 13.13A1 and do
not require additional criteria to evaluate it.
b. We consider a CNS tumor to be malignant if it is classified
as Grade II, Grade III, or Grade IV under the World Health
Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the CNS (WHO
Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System, 2007).
c. We evaluate benign (for example, WHO Grade I) CNS tumors
under 11.05. We evaluate metastasized CNS cancers from non-CNS sites
under the primary cancers (see 13.00C). We evaluate any
complications of CNS cancers, such as resultant neurological or
psychological impairments, under the criteria for the affected body
system.
7. Primary peritoneal carcinoma. We use the criteria in 13.23E
to evaluate primary peritoneal carcinoma in women because this
cancer is often indistinguishable from ovarian cancer and is
generally treated the same way as ovarian cancer. We use the
criteria in 13.15A to evaluate primary peritoneal carcinoma in men
because many of these cases are similar to malignant mesothelioma.
8. Prostate cancer. We exclude ``biochemical recurrence'' in
13.24A, which is defined as an increase in the serum prostate-
specific antigen (PSA) level following the completion of the
hormonal intervention therapy. We need corroborating evidence to
document recurrence, such as radiological studies or findings on
physical examination.
9. Melanoma. We evaluate malignant melanoma that affects the
skin (cutaneous melanoma), eye (ocular melanoma), or mucosal
membranes (mucosal melanoma) under 13.29. We evaluate melanoma that
is not malignant that affects the skin (benign melanocytic tumor)
under the listings in 8.00 or other affected body systems.
L. How do we evaluate cancer treated by bone marrow or stem cell
transplantation, including transplantation using stem cells from
umbilical cord blood? Bone marrow or stem cell transplantation is
performed for a variety of cancers. We require the transplantation
to occur before we evaluate it under these listings. We do not need
to restrict our determination of the onset of disability to the date
of the transplantation (13.05, 13.06, or 13.07) or the date of first
treatment under the treatment plan that includes transplantation
(13.28). We may be able to establish an earlier onset date of
disability due to your transplantation if the evidence in your case
record supports such a finding.
1. Acute leukemia (including T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma) or
accelerated or blast phase of CML. If you undergo bone marrow or
stem cell transplantation for any of these disorders, we will
consider you to be disabled until at least 24 months from the date
of diagnosis or relapse, or at least 12 months from the date of
transplantation, whichever is later.
2. Lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or chronic phase of CML. If you
undergo bone marrow or stem cell transplantation for any of these
disorders, we will consider you to be disabled until at least 12
months from the date of transplantation.
3. Other cancers. We will evaluate any other cancer treated with
bone marrow or stem cell transplantation under 13.28, regardless of
whether there is another listing that addresses that impairment. The
length of time we will consider you to be disabled depends on
whether you undergo allogeneic or autologous transplantation.
a. Allogeneic bone marrow or stem cell transplantation. If you
undergo allogeneic transplantation (transplantation from an
unrelated donor or a related donor other than an identical twin), we
will consider you to be disabled until at least 12 months from the
date of transplantation.
b. Autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation. If you
undergo autologous transplantation (transplantation of your own
cells or cells from your identical twin (syngeneic
transplantation)), we will consider you to be disabled until at
least 12 months from the date of the first treatment under the
treatment plan that includes transplantation. The first treatment
usually refers to the initial therapy given to prepare you for
transplantation.
4. Evaluating disability after the appropriate time period has
elapsed. We consider any residual impairment(s), such as
complications arising from:
a. Graft-versus-host (GVH) disease.
b. Immunosuppressant therapy, such as frequent infections.
c. Significant deterioration of other organ systems.
* * * * *
13.02 Soft tissue cancers of the head and neck (except salivary
glands--13.08--and thyroid gland--13.09).
* * * * *
B. Persistent or recurrent disease following initial anticancer
therapy, except persistence or recurrence in the true vocal cord.
* * * * *
D. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
OR
E. Soft tissue cancers originating in the head and neck treated
with multimodal anticancer therapy (see 13.00E3c). Consider under a
disability until at least 18 months from the date of diagnosis.
Thereafter,
[[Page 28829]]
evaluate any residual impairment(s) under the criteria for the
affected body system.
13.03 Skin (except malignant melanoma--13.29).
* * * * *
B. Carcinoma invading deep extradermal structures (for example,
skeletal muscle, cartilage, or bone).
13.04 Soft tissue sarcoma.
* * * * *
B. Persistent or recurrent following initial anticancer therapy.
13.05 Lymphoma (including mycosis fungoides, but excluding T-
cell lymphoblastic lymphoma--13.06). (See 13.00K1 and 13.00K2c.)
A. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, as described in 1 or 2:
1. Aggressive lymphoma (including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma)
persistent or recurrent following initial anticancer therapy.
2. Indolent lymphoma (including mycosis fungoides and follicular
small cleaved cell) requiring initiation of more than one (single
mode or multimodal) anticancer treatment regimen within a period of
12 consecutive months. Consider under a disability from at least the
date of initiation of the treatment regimen that failed within 12
months.
OR
B. Hodgkin lymphoma with failure to achieve clinically complete
remission, or recurrent lymphoma within 12 months of completing
initial anticancer therapy.
* * * * *
OR
D. Mantle cell lymphoma.
13.06 Leukemia. (See 13.00K2.)
* * * * *
B. * * *
1. Accelerated or blast phase (see 13.00K2b). * * *
* * * * *
2. Chronic phase, as described in a or b:
* * * * *
b. Progressive disease following initial anticancer therapy.
13.07 Multiple myeloma (confirmed by appropriate serum or urine
protein electrophoresis and bone marrow findings).
A. Failure to respond or progressive disease following initial
anticancer therapy.
* * * * *
13.10 Breast (except sarcoma--13.04). (See 13.00K4.)
A. Locally advanced cancer (inflammatory carcinoma, cancer of
any size with direct extension to the chest wall or skin, or cancer
of any size with metastases to the ipsilateral internal mammary
nodes).
* * * * *
C. Recurrent carcinoma, except local recurrence that remits with
anticancer therapy.
OR
D. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
OR
E. With secondary lymphedema that is caused by anticancer
therapy and treated by surgery to salvage or restore the functioning
of an upper extremity. (See 13.00K4b.) Consider under a disability
until at least 12 months from the date of the surgery that treated
the secondary lymphedema. Thereafter, evaluate any residual
impairment(s) under the criteria for the affected body system.
13.11 Skeletal system--sarcoma.
* * * * *
B. Recurrent cancer (except local recurrence) after initial
anticancer therapy.
* * * * *
D. All other cancers originating in bone with multimodal
anticancer therapy (see 13.00E3c). Consider under a disability for
12 months from the date of diagnosis. Thereafter, evaluate any
residual impairment(s) under the criteria for the affected body
system.
13.12 Maxilla, orbit, or temporal fossa.
* * * * *
C. Cancer with extension to the orbit, meninges, sinuses, or
base of the skull.
13.13 Nervous system. (See 13.00K6.)
A. Primary central nervous system (CNS; that is, brain and
spinal cord) cancers, as described in 1, 2, or 3:
1. Glioblastoma multiforme, ependymoblastoma, and diffuse
intrinsic brain stem gliomas (see 13.00K6a).
2. Any Grade III or Grade IV CNS cancer (see 13.00K6b),
including astrocytomas, sarcomas, and medulloblastoma and other
primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs).
3. Any primary CNS cancer, as described in a or b:
a. Metastatic.
b. Progressive or recurrent following initial anticancer
therapy.
OR
B. Primary peripheral nerve or spinal root cancers, as described
in 1 or 2:
1. Metastatic.
2. Progressive or recurrent following initial anticancer
therapy.
13.14 Lungs.
* * * * *
C. Carcinoma of the superior sulcus (including Pancoast tumors)
with multimodal anticancer therapy (see 13.00E3c). * * *
* * * * *
13.15 Pleura or mediastinum.
* * * * *
B. * * *
2. Persistent or recurrent following initial anticancer therapy.
OR
C. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
13.16 Esophagus or stomach.
* * * * *
B. * * *
OR
C. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
13.17 Small intestine--carcinoma, sarcoma, or carcinoid.
* * * * *
B. * * *
OR
C. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
13.18 Large intestine (from ileocecal valve to and including
anal canal).
* * * * *
C. * * *
OR
D. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
13.19 Liver or gallbladder--cancer of the liver, gallbladder, or
bile ducts.
13.20 Pancreas.
* * * * *
B. Islet cell carcinoma that is physiologically active and is
either inoperable or unresectable.
* * * * *
13.22 Urinary bladder--carcinoma.
* * * * *
D. * * *
OR
E. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
13.23 Cancers of the female genital tract--carcinoma or sarcoma
(including primary peritoneal carcinoma).
A. * * *
3. Persistent or recurrent following initial anticancer therapy.
B. Uterine cervix, as described in 1, 2, or 3:
1. Extending to the pelvic wall, lower portion of the vagina, or
adjacent or distant organs.
2. Persistent or recurrent following initial anticancer therapy.
3. With metastases to distant (for example, para-aortic or
supraclavicular) lymph nodes.
C. * * *
3. Persistent or recurrent following initial anticancer therapy.
D. * * *
2. Persistent or recurrent following initial anticancer therapy.
E. Ovaries, as described in 1 or 2:
1. All cancers except germ-cell cancers, with at least one of
the following:
a. Extension beyond the pelvis; for example, implants on, or
direct extension to, peritoneal, omental, or bowel surfaces.
b. Metastases to or beyond the regional lymph nodes.
c. Recurrent following initial anticancer therapy.
2. Germ-cell cancers--progressive or recurrent following initial
anticancer therapy.
OR
F. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
13.24 Prostate gland--carcinoma.
A. Progressive or recurrent (not including biochemical
recurrence) despite initial hormonal intervention. (See 13.00K8.)
OR
B. * * *
OR
C. Small-cell (oat cell) carcinoma.
13.25 Testicles--cancer with metastatic disease progressive or
recurrent following initial chemotherapy.
* * * * *
13.28 Cancer treated by bone marrow or stem cell
transplantation. (See 13.00L.)
* * * * *
13.29 Malignant melanoma (including skin, ocular, or mucosal
melanomas), as described in either A, B, or C:
A. Recurrent (except an additional primary melanoma at a
different site, which is not considered to be recurrent disease)
following either 1 or 2:
1. Wide excision (skin melanoma).
2. Enucleation of the eye (ocular melanoma).
OR
B. With metastases as described in 1, 2, or 3:
[[Page 28830]]
1. Metastases to one or more clinically apparent nodes; that is,
nodes that are detected by imaging studies (excluding
lymphoscintigraphy) or by clinical evaluation (palpable).
2. If the nodes are not clinically apparent, with metastases to
four or more nodes.
3. Metastases to adjacent skin (satellite lesions) or distant
sites (for example, liver, lung, or brain).
OR
C. Mucosal melanoma.
* * * * *
Part B
* * * * *
113.00 Cancer (Malignant Neoplastic Diseases)
* * * * *
113.00 CANCER (MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASES)
A. What impairments do these listings cover? We use these
listings to evaluate all cancers (malignant neoplastic diseases),
except certain cancers associated with human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV) infection. If you have HIV infection, we use the criteria in
114.08E to evaluate carcinoma of the cervix, Kaposi sarcoma,
lymphoma, and squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal and anal
margin.
B. What do we consider when we evaluate cancer under these
listings? We will consider factors including:
1. Origin of the cancer.
2. Extent of involvement.
3. Duration, frequency, and response to anticancer therapy.
4. Effects of any post-therapeutic residuals.
C. How do we apply these listings? We apply the criteria in a
specific listing to a cancer originating from that specific site.
D. What evidence do we need?
1. We need medical evidence that specifies the type, extent, and
site of the primary, recurrent, or metastatic lesion. When the
primary site cannot be identified, we will use evidence documenting
the site(s) of metastasis to evaluate the impairment under 13.27 in
part A.
2. For operative procedures, including a biopsy or a needle
aspiration, we generally need a copy of both the:
a. Operative note, and
b. Pathology report.
3. When we cannot get these documents, we will accept the
summary of hospitalization(s) or other medical reports. This
evidence should include details of the findings at surgery and,
whenever appropriate, the pathological findings.
4. In some situations, we may also need evidence about
recurrence, persistence, or progression of the cancer, the response
to therapy, and any significant residuals. (See 113.00G.)
E. When do we need longitudinal evidence?
1. Cancer with distant metastases. Most cancer of childhood
consists of a local lesion with metastases to regional lymph nodes
and, less often, distant metastases. We generally do not need
longitudinal evidence for cancer that has metastasized beyond the
regional lymph nodes because this cancer usually meets the
requirements of a listing. Exceptions are for cancer with distant
metastases that we expect to respond to anticancer therapy. For
these exceptions, we usually need a longitudinal record of 3 months
after therapy starts to determine whether the therapy achieved its
intended effect, and whether this effect is likely to persist.
2. Other cancers. When there are no distant metastases, many of
the listings require that we consider your response to initial
anticancer therapy; that is, the initial planned treatment regimen.
This therapy may consist of a single modality or a combination of
modalities; that is, multimodal therapy (see 113.00I3).
3. Types of treatment.
a. Whenever the initial planned therapy is a single modality,
enough time must pass to allow a determination about whether the
therapy will achieve its intended effect. If the treatment fails,
the failure often happens within 6 months after treatment starts,
and there will often be a change in the treatment regimen.
b. Whenever the initial planned therapy is multimodal, we
usually cannot make a determination about the effectiveness of the
therapy until we can determine the effects of all the planned
modalities. In some cases, we may need to defer adjudication until
we can assess the effectiveness of therapy. However, we do not need
to defer adjudication to determine whether the therapy will achieve
its intended effect if we can make a fully favorable determination
or decision based on the length and effects of therapy, or the
residuals of the cancer or therapy (see 113.00G).
F. How do we evaluate impairments that do not meet one of the
cancer listings?
1. These listings are only examples of cancers that we consider
severe enough to result in marked and severe functional limitations.
If your severe impairment(s) does not meet the criteria of any of
these listings, we must also consider whether you have an
impairment(s) that meets the criteria of a listing in another body
system.
2. If you have a severe medically determinable impairment(s)
that does not meet a listing, we will determine whether your
impairment(s) medically equals a listing. (See Sec. Sec. 404.1526
and 416.926 of this chapter.) If your impairment(s) does not meet or
medically equal a listing, we will also consider whether you have an
impairment(s) that functionally equals the listings. (See Sec.
416.926a of this chapter.) We use the rules in Sec. 416.994a of
this chapter when we decide whether you continue to be disabled.
G. How do we consider the effects of anticancer therapy?
1. How we consider the effects of anticancer therapy under the
listings. In many cases, cancers meet listing criteria only if the
therapy is not effective and the cancer persists, progresses, or
recurs. However, as explained in the following paragraphs, we will
not delay adjudication if we can make a fully favorable
determination or decision based on the evidence in the case record.
2. Effects can vary widely.
a. We consider each case on an individual basis because the
therapy and its toxicity may vary widely. We will request a specific
description of the therapy, including these items:
i. Drugs given.
ii. Dosage.
iii. Frequency of drug administration.
iv. Plans for continued drug administration.
v. Extent of surgery.
vi. Schedule and fields of radiation therapy.
b. We will also request a description of the complications or
adverse effects of therapy, such as the following:
i. Continuing gastrointestinal symptoms.
ii. Persistent weakness.
iii. Neurological complications.
iv. Cardiovascular complications.
v. Reactive mental disorders.
3. Effects of therapy may change. The severity of the adverse
effects of anticancer therapy may change during treatment;
therefore, enough time must pass to allow us to evaluate the
therapy's effect. The residual effects of treatment are temporary in
most instances; however, on occasion, the effects may be disabling
for a consecutive period of at least 12 months. In some situations,
very serious adverse effects may interrupt and prolong multimodal
anticancer therapy for a continuous period of almost 12 months. In
these situations, we may determine there is an expectation that your
impairment will preclude you from engaging in any age-appropriate
activities for at least 12 months.
4. When the initial anticancer therapy is effective. We evaluate
any post-therapeutic residual impairment(s) not included in these
listings under the criteria for the affected body system. We must
consider any complications of therapy. When the residual
impairment(s) does not meet a listing, we must consider whether it
medically equals a listing, or, as appropriate, functionally equals
the listings.
H. How long do we consider your impairment to be disabling?
1. In some listings, we specify that we will consider your
impairment to be disabling until a particular point in time (for
example, until at least 12 months from the date of transplantation).
We may consider your impairment to be disabling beyond this point
when the medical and other evidence justifies it.
2. When a listing does not contain such a specification, we will
consider an impairment(s) that meets or medically equals a listing
in this body system to be disabling until at least 3 years after
onset of complete remission. When the impairment(s) has been in
complete remission for at least 3 years, that is, the original tumor
or a recurrence (or relapse) and any metastases have not been
evident for at least 3 years, the impairment(s) will no longer meet
or medically equal the criteria of a listing in this body system.
3. Following the appropriate period, we will consider any
residuals, including residuals of the cancer or therapy (see
113.00G), in determining whether you are disabled. If you have a
recurrence or relapse of your cancer, your impairment may meet or
medically equal one of the listings in this body system again.
I. What do we mean by the following terms?
[[Page 28831]]
1. Anticancer therapy means surgery, radiation, chemotherapy,
hormones, immunotherapy, or bone marrow or stem cell
transplantation. When we refer to surgery as an anticancer
treatment, we mean surgical excision for treatment, not for
diagnostic purposes.
2. Metastases means the spread of cancer cells by blood, lymph,
or other body fluid. This term does not include the spread of cancer
cells by direct extension of the cancer to other tissues or organs.
3. Multimodal therapy means anticancer therapy that is a
combination of at least two types of treatment given in close
proximity as a unified whole and usually planned before any
treatment has begun. There are three types of treatment modalities:
Surgery, radiation, and systemic drug therapy (chemotherapy, hormone
therapy, and immunotherapy or biological modifier therapy). Examples
of multimodal therapy include:
a. Surgery followed by chemotherapy or radiation.
b. Chemotherapy followed by surgery.
c. Chemotherapy and concurrent radiation.
4. Persistent means the planned initial anticancer therapy
failed to achieve a complete remission of your cancer; that is, your
cancer is evident, even if smaller, after the therapy has ended.
5. Progressive means the cancer becomes more extensive after
treatment; that is, there is evidence that your cancer is growing
after you have completed at least half of your planned initial
anticancer therapy.
6. Recurrent or relapse means the cancer that was in complete
remission or entirely removed by surgery has returned.
J. Can we establish the existence of a disabling impairment
prior to the date of the evidence that shows the cancer satisfies
the criteria of a listing? Yes. We will consider factors such as:
1. The type of cancer and its location.
2. The extent of involvement when the cancer was first
demonstrated.
3. Your symptoms.
K. How do we evaluate specific cancers?
1. Lymphoma.
a. We provide criteria for evaluating lymphomas that are
disseminated or have not responded to anticancer therapy in 113.05.
b. Lymphoblastic lymphoma is treated with leukemia-based
protocols, so we evaluate this type of cancer under 113.06.
2. Leukemia.
a. Acute leukemia. The initial diagnosis of acute leukemia,
including the accelerated or blast phase of chronic myelogenous
(granulocytic) leukemia, is based on definitive bone marrow
examination. Additional diagnostic information is based on
chromosomal analysis, cytochemical and surface marker studies on the
abnormal cells, or other methods consistent with the prevailing
state of medical knowledge and clinical practice. Recurrent disease
must be documented by peripheral blood, bone marrow, or
cerebrospinal fluid examination, or by testicular biopsy. The
initial and follow-up pathology reports should be included.
b. Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). We need a diagnosis of
CML based on documented granulocytosis, including immature forms
such as differentiated or undifferentiated myelocytes and
myeloblasts, and a chromosomal analysis that demonstrates the
Philadelphia chromosome. In the absence of a chromosomal analysis,
or if the Philadelphia chromosome is not present, the diagnosis may
be made by other methods consistent with the prevailing state of
medical knowledge and clinical practice. The requirement for CML in
the accelerated or blast phase is met in 113.06B if laboratory
findings show the proportion of blast (immature) cells in the
peripheral blood or bone marrow is 10 percent or greater.
c. Juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia (JCML). JCML is a rare,
Philadelphia-chromosome-negative childhood leukemia that is
aggressive and clinically similar to acute myelogenous leukemia. We
evaluate JCML under 113.06A.
d. Elevated white cell count. In cases of chronic leukemia
(either myelogenous or lymphocytic), an elevated white cell count,
in itself, is not a factor in determining the severity of the
impairment.
3. Malignant solid tumors. The tumors we consider under 113.03
include the histiocytosis syndromes except for solitary eosinophilic
granuloma. We do not evaluate thyroid cancer (see 113.09),
retinoblastomas (see 113.12), primary central nervous system (CNS)
cancers (see 113.13), neuroblastomas (see 113.21), or malignant
melanoma (see 113.29) under this listing.
4. Primary central nervous system (CNS) cancers. We use the
criteria in 113.13 to evaluate cancers that originate within the CNS
(that is, brain and spinal cord cancers).
a. The CNS cancers listed in 113.13A are highly malignant and
respond poorly to treatment, and therefore we do not require
additional criteria to evaluate them. We do not list pituitary gland
cancer (for example, pituitary gland carcinoma) in 113.13A, although
this CNS cancer is highly malignant and responds poorly to
treatment. We evaluate pituitary gland cancer under 113.13A and do
not require additional criteria to evaluate it.
b. We consider a CNS tumor to be malignant if it is classified
as Grade II, Grade III, or Grade IV under the World Health
Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the CNS (WHO
Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System, 2007).
c. We evaluate benign (for example, WHO Grade I) CNS tumors
under 111.05. We evaluate metastasized CNS cancers from non-CNS
sites under the primary cancers (see 113.00C). We evaluate any
complications of CNS cancers, such as resultant neurological or
psychological impairments, under the criteria for the affected body
system.
5. Retinoblastoma. The treatment for bilateral retinoblastoma
usually results in a visual impairment. We will evaluate any
resulting visual impairment under 102.02.
6. Melanoma. We evaluate malignant melanoma that affects the
skin (cutaneous melanoma), eye (ocular melanoma), or mucosal
membranes (mucosal melanoma) under 113.29. We evaluate melanoma that
is not malignant that affects the skin (benign melanocytic tumor)
under the listings in 108.00 or other affected body systems.
L. How do we evaluate cancer treated by bone marrow or stem cell
transplantation, including transplantation using stem cells from
umbilical cord blood? Bone marrow or stem cell transplantation is
performed for a variety of cancers. We require the transplantation
to occur before we evaluate it under these listings. We do not need
to restrict our determination of the onset of disability to the date
of transplantation (113.05 or 113.06). We may be able to establish
an earlier onset date of disability due to your transplantation if
the evidence in your case record supports such a finding.
1. Acute leukemia (including all types of lymphoblastic
lymphomas and JCML) or accelerated or blast phase of CML. If you
undergo bone marrow or stem cell transplantation for any of these
disorders, we will consider you to be disabled until at least 24
months from the date of diagnosis or relapse, or at least 12 months
from the date of transplantation, whichever is later.
2. Lymphoma or chronic phase of CML. If you undergo bone marrow
or stem cell transplantation for any of these disorders, we will
consider you to be disabled until at least 12 months from the date
of transplantation.
3. Evaluating disability after the appropriate time period has
elapsed. We consider any residual impairment(s), such as
complications arising from:
a. Graft-versus-host (GVH) disease.
b. Immunosuppressant therapy, such as frequent infections.
c. Significant deterioration of other organ systems.
113.01 Category of Impairments, Cancer (Malignant Neoplastic
Diseases)
113.03 Malignant solid tumors. Consider under a disability:
A. For 24 months from the date of initial diagnosis. Thereafter,
evaluate any residual impairment(s) under the criteria for the
affected body system.
OR
B. For 24 months from the date of recurrence of active disease.
Thereafter, evaluate any residual impairment(s) under the criteria
for the affected body system.
113.05 Lymphoma (excluding all types of lymphoblastic
lymphomas--113.06). (See 113.00K1.)
A. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (including Burkitt's and anaplastic
large cell), with either 1 or 2:
1. Bone marrow, brain, spinal cord, liver, or lung involvement
at initial diagnosis. Consider under a disability for 24 months from
the date of diagnosis. Thereafter, evaluate under 113.05A2, or any
residual impairments(s) under the criteria for the affected body
system.
2. Persistent or recurrent following initial anticancer therapy.
OR
B. Hodgkin lymphoma, with either 1 or 2:
1. Bone marrow, brain, spinal cord, liver, or lung involvement
at initial diagnosis. Consider under a disability for 24 months from
the date of diagnosis. Thereafter, evaluate under 113.05B2, or any
residual impairment(s) under the criteria for the affected body
system.
2. Persistent or recurrent following initial anticancer therapy.
[[Page 28832]]
OR
* * * * *
OR
D. Mantle cell lymphoma.
113.06 Leukemia. (See 113.00K2.)
A. Acute leukemia (including all types of lymphoblastic
lymphomas and juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia (JCML)).
Consider under a disability until at least 24 months from the date
of diagnosis or relapse, or at least 12 months from the date of bone
marrow or stem cell transplantation, whichever is later. Thereafter,
evaluate any residual impairment(s) under the criteria for the
affected body system.
OR
B. * * *
1. Accelerated or blast phase (see 113.00K2b). Consider under a
disability until at least 24 months from the date of diagnosis or
relapse, or at least 12 months from the date of bone marrow or stem
cell transplantation, whichever is later. Thereafter, evaluate any
residual impairment(s) under the criteria for the affected body
system.
* * * * *
113.12 Retinoblastoma.
* * * * *
B. Persistent or recurrent following initial anticancer therapy.
* * * * *
113.13 Nervous system. (See 113.00K4.) Primary central nervous
system (CNS; that is, brain and spinal cord) cancers, as described
in A, B, or C:
A. Glioblastoma multiforme, ependymoblastoma, and diffuse
intrinsic brain stem gliomas (see 113.00K4a).
B. Any Grade III or Grade IV CNS cancer (see 113.00K4b),
including astrocytomas, sarcomas, and medulloblastoma and other
primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs).
C. Any primary CNS cancer, as described in 1 or 2:
1. Metastatic.
2. Progressive or recurrent following initial anticancer
therapy.
* * * * *
113.29 Malignant melanoma (including skin, ocular, or mucosal
melanomas), as described in either A, B, or C:
A. Recurrent (except an additional primary melanoma at a
different site, which is not considered to be recurrent disease)
following either 1 or 2:
1. Wide excision (skin melanoma).
2. Enucleation of the eye (ocular melanoma).
OR
B. With metastases as described in 1, 2, or 3:
1. Metastases to one or more clinically apparent nodes; that is,
nodes that are detected by imaging studies (excluding
lymphoscintigraphy) or by clinical evaluation (palpable).
2. If the nodes are not clinically apparent, with metastases to
four or more nodes.
3. Metastases to adjacent skin (satellite lesions) or distant
sites (for example, liver, lung, or brain).
OR
C. Mucosal melanoma.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-11923 Filed 5-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P