Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Fisheries; Framework Adjustment 9, 28575-28578 [2015-12060]
Download as PDF
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
instructions for VMS installation and a
list of the current type-approved VMS
units and mobile communication
service providers.
(2) VMS Unit Activation. If the VMS
unit has not yet been activated as
described in this paragraph, or if the
VMS unit has been newly installed or
reinstalled, or if the mobile
communications service provider has
changed since the previous activation,
or if directed by the SAC, the vessel
owner or operator must, prior to leaving
port:
(i) Turn on the VMS unit to make it
operational;
(ii) Submit a written activation report
to the SAC, via mail, facsimile or email,
that includes the vessel’s name; the
vessel’s official number; the VMS unit
manufacturer and identification
number; and telephone, facsimile or
email contact information for the vessel
owner or operator; and
(iii) Receive verbal or written
confirmation from the SAC that the
proper VMS unit transmissions are
being received from the VMS unit.
(3) VMS Unit Operation. The vessel
owner and operator shall continuously
operate the VMS unit at all times,
except that the VMS unit may be shut
down while the vessel is in port or
otherwise not at sea, or if, after the end
of the fishing season, the vessel will no
longer be engaging in fishing activities
in the Convention Area for which either
a Pacific highly migratory species
permit or a high seas fishing permit is
required, provided that the owner or
operator:
(i) Prior to shutting down the VMS
unit, reports to the SAC or the NOAA
Office of Law Enforcement’s VMS
Helpdesk via facsimile, email, or webform the following information: The
intent to shut down the VMS unit; the
vessel’s name; the vessel’s official
number; an estimate for when the
vessel’s VMS may be turned back on;
and telephone, facsimile or email
contact information for the vessel owner
or operator. In addition, the vessel
owner or operator shall receive verbal or
written confirmation from the SAC
before shutting down the VMS unit after
the end of the fishing season; and
(ii) When turning the VMS unit back
on, report to the SAC or the NOAA
Office of Law Enforcement’s VMS
Helpdesk, via mail, facsimile or email,
the following information: That the
VMS unit has been turned on; the
vessel’s name; the vessel’s official
number; and telephone, facsimile or
email contact information for the vessel
owner or operator; and
(iii) Prior to leaving port, receive
verbal or written confirmation from the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:25 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
SAC that proper transmissions are being
received from the VMS unit.
(4) Failure of VMS unit. If the VMS
unit has become inoperable or
transmission of automatic position
reports from the VMS unit has been
interrupted, or if notified by NOAA or
the USCG that automatic position
reports are not being received from the
VMS unit or that an inspection of the
VMS unit has revealed a problem with
the performance of the VMS unit, the
vessel owner or operator shall comply
with the following requirements:
(i) If the vessel is at port: The vessel
owner or operator shall repair or replace
the VMS unit and ensure it is operable
before the vessel leaves port.
(ii) If the vessel is at sea: The vessel
owner, operator, or designee shall
contact the SAC by telephone, facsimile,
or email at the earliest opportunity
during the SAC’s business hours and
identify the caller and vessel. The vessel
operator shall follow the instructions
provided by the SAC which could
include, but are not limited to, ceasing
fishing, stowing fishing gear, returning
to port, and/or submitting periodic
position reports at specified intervals by
other means; and repair or replace the
VMS unit and ensure it is operable
before starting the next trip.
(5) Related VMS Requirements.
Installing, carrying and operating a VMS
unit in compliance with the
requirements in 50 CFR 300.219, 50 CFR
660.712, 50 CFR 660.14, or 50 CFR
665.19 relating to the installation,
carrying, and operation of VMS units
shall be deemed to satisfy the
requirements of paragraph (c) of this
section, provided that the VMS unit is
operated continuously and at all times
while the vessel is at sea, unless the
SAC authorizes a VMS unit to be shut
down as described in paragraph (c)(3),
the VMS unit and mobile
communications service providers are
type-approved by NOAA for fisheries in
IATTC Convention Area, the owner or
operator has authorized NOAA to
receive and relay transmissions from the
VMS unit, and the specific requirements
of paragraph (c)(4) of this section are
followed. If the VMS unit is owned by
NOAA, the requirement under
paragraph (c)(4) of this section to repair
or replace the VMS unit will be the
responsibility of NOAA, but the vessel
owner and operator shall be responsible
for ensuring that the VMS unit is
operable before leaving port or starting
the next trip.
(d) Costs. The vessel owner and
operator shall be responsible for all
costs associated with the purchase,
installation and maintenance of the
VMS unit and for all charges levied by
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28575
the mobile communications service
provider as necessary to ensure the
transmission of automatic position
reports to NOAA as required in
paragraph (c) of this section. However,
if NOAA is paying for the VMSassociated costs because the VMS unit
is carried and operated under a
requirement of 50 CFR 300.219, 50 CFR
660.712, or 50 CFR 665.19, the vessel
owner and operator shall not be
responsible to pay the costs.
(e) Tampering. The vessel owner and
operator must ensure that the VMS unit
is not tampered with, disabled,
destroyed, damaged or maintained
improperly, and that its operation is not
impeded or interfered with.
(f) Inspection. The vessel owner and
operator must make the VMS unit,
including its antenna, connectors and
antenna cable, available for inspection
by authorized officers.
(g) Access to data. The vessel owner
and operator must make the vessel’s
position data obtained from the VMS
unit or other means immediately and
always available for inspection by
NOAA personnel, USCG personnel, and
authorized officers.
[FR Doc. 2015–11991 Filed 5–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 150401329–5437–01]
RIN 0648–BF00
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and
Butterfish Fisheries; Framework
Adjustment 9
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule, request for
comments.
AGENCY:
Framework Adjustment 9
proposes management measures to
further enhance catch monitoring and
address discarding catch before it has
been sampled by observers (known as
slippage), in the Atlantic mackerel
fishery. Framework 9 would implement
slippage consequence measures, and a
requirement that slippage events be
reported via the vessel monitoring
system. For allowable slippage events,
due to safety, mechanical failure, or
excess catch of spiny dogfish, vessels
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
28576
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
must move 15 nm from the location of
the slippage event. For non-allowable
slippage events, due to reasons other
than those listed previously, vessels
must terminate their fishing trip.
Slippage events have the potential to
substantially affect analysis or
extrapolations of incidental catch,
including river herring and shad, these
proposed measures are designed to
address this issue.
DATES: Public comments must be
received by June 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting
documents used by the Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council, including
the Environmental Assessment (EA) and
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR)/Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA),
are available from: Dr. Christopher M.
Moore, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council, 800 North
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901,
telephone (302) 674–2331. The EA/RIR/
IRFA is also accessible via the Internet
at https://
www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov.
You may submit comments, identified
by NOAA–NMFS–2015–0049, by any
one of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150049, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
NMFS, Northeast Regional Office, 55
Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930. Mark the outside of the envelope
‘‘Comments on Framework 9.’’
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carly Bari, Fishery Policy Analyst, (978)
281–9224, fax (978) 281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NMFS implemented measures to
improve catch monitoring of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:25 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
mackerel, squid, and butterfish fisheries
through Amendment 14 to the Atlantic
Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) (79 FR 10029,
February 24, 2014). The focus of
Amendment 14 was to improve
evaluation of the incidental catch of
river herring (alewife and blueback
herring) and shad (American shad and
hickory shad), and to address incidental
catch of river herring and shad. NMFS
disapproved three measures that were
initially included in Amendment 14
including: A dealer reporting
requirement; a cap that, if achieved,
would require vessels discarding catch
before it had been sampled by observers
(known as slippage) to return to port;
and a recommendation of 100-percent
observer coverage on midwater trawl
vessels and 100-, 50-, and 25-percent
observer coverage on bottom trawl
mackerel vessels, with the industry
contributing $325 per day toward
observer costs.
Currently, slippage events are
prohibited for vessels issued a limited
access mackerel permit or a longfin
squid/butterfish moratorium permit and
carrying a NMFS-approved observer
except in circumstances which allow
slippage events including: Safety;
mechanical failure; and excess catch of
spiny dogfish. Additionally, following a
slippage event, vessels are currently
required to submit a Released Catch
Affidavit within 48 hours of the end of
the fishing trip. In response to the
disapproval of the slippage measures in
Amendment 14, the Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council developed
Framework Adjustment 9 to the Atlantic
Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish FMP to
further enhance catch monitoring and to
address slippage in the Atlantic
mackerel fishery. Framework 9 would
add slippage consequence measures and
slippage reporting requirements to build
upon the current measures and to
address monitoring the catch of river
herring and shad.
Framework 9 would require Tier 1, 2,
and 3 mackerel vessels on observed
trips to move 15 nm following an
excepted slippage event, which includes
safety, mechanical failure, or excess
catch of spiny dogfish. These vessels
would also be required to terminate a
fishing trip and immediately return to
port following a non-excepted slippage
event, which would be due to any
reason other than those listed above. In
addition to submitting a Released Catch
Affidavit, vessels carrying an observer
would also be required to report all
slippage events through the vessel
monitoring system daily catch report for
mackerel and longfin squid.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Corrections
This proposed rule also contains an
additional regulation change that was
mistakenly omitted in the 2015–2017
Atlantic mackerel, squid, and butterfish
specifications final rule (80 FR 14870,
March 20, 2015). This regulation change
would prohibit all vessels with a valid
mackerel permit from fishing for,
possessing, transferring, receiving, or
selling more than 20,000 lb (9.07 mt) of
mackerel per trip or per day after 95
percent of the river herring and shad
catch cap has been harvested. This
change in the regulations was identified,
described, and made available for public
comment in the proposed rule for the
2015–2017 Atlantic mackerel, squid,
and butterfish specifications (79 FR
68202, November 14, 2014).
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that this proposed rule is consistent
with the Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and
Butterfish FMP, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An IRFA was prepared, as required by
section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA). The IRFA describes the
economic impact this proposed rule, if
adopted, would have on small entities.
A summary of the analysis follows.
Description of the Reasons Why Action
by the Agency Is Being Considered
This action proposes management
measures for the slippage consequences
to better monitor catch of river herring
and shad in the Atlantic mackerel
fishery. The preamble to this proposed
rule includes a complete description of
the reasons why the Council and NMFS
are considering this action and these are
not repeated here.
Statement of the Objectives of, and
Legal Basis for, This Proposed Rule
The purpose of this proposed action
is to minimize slippage, which will
improve observer data, and should in
turn improve decision-making that uses
observer data. Failure to implement the
measures described in this proposed
rule could result in biased observer
data. The preamble to this proposed rule
includes a complete description of the
objectives of and legal basis for this
action and these are not repeated here.
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities to Which This
Proposed Rule Would Apply
The proposed alternative applies to
mackerel limited access permits. Based
on permit data for 2013, 150 separate
vessels hold mackerel limited access
permits, 114 entities own those vessels,
and, based on current Small Business
Administration (SBA) definitions, 107
of these are small entities. Of the 107
small entities, 4 had no revenue in 2013
and those entities with no revenue are
considered small entities for the
purpose of this analysis. All of the
entities that had revenue fell into the
finfish or shellfish categories, and the
SBA definitions for those categories for
2014 are $20.5 million for finfish fishing
and $5.5 million for shellfish fishing. Of
the entities with revenues, their average
revenues in 2013 were $1,201,419. 70
had primary revenues from finfish
fishing and 33 had their primary
revenues from shellfish fishing.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Description of the Projected Reporting,
Record-Keeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements of This Proposed Rule
The proposed action contains
collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA). This requirement has been
submitted to OMB for approval under
Control Number 0648–0679.
Under the proposed action, all limited
access mackerel vessels carrying an
observer would be required to report all
slippage events on the VMS mackerel
and longfin squid daily catch report.
This information collection is intended
to improve monitoring the catch of river
herring and shad in the Atlantic
mackerel fishery. The burden estimates
for these new requirements apply to all
limited access mackerel vessels. In a
given fishing year, NMFS estimates that
these additionally reporting
requirements will not cause any
additional time or cost burden from that
which was previously approved under
OMB Control Number 0648–0679.
Public comment is sought regarding:
Whether this proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:25 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
on these or any other aspects of the
collection of information to the Regional
Administrator (see ADDRESSES), and
email to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202) 395–5806.
Notwithstanding any other provisions
of the law, no person is required to, nor
shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection
of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that
collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be
viewed at: https://www.cio.noaa.gov/
services_programs/prasubs.html.
Federal Rules Which May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With This Proposed
Rule
This action contains no other
compliance costs. It does not duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal law.
Description of Significant Alternatives
to the Proposed Action Which
Accomplish the Stated Objectives of
Applicable Statues and Which Minimize
Any Significant Economic Impact on
Small Entities
The proposed alternative should not
have more than minimal impact on the
affected small entities compared to
recent operation of the fishery (2011–
2013, and 2014 landings to date appear
similar to 2013). First, the primary
impact should only be that vessels will
not slip catches before observers have a
chance to observe/sample them, which
should have almost no economic impact
on vessels. Slippage for reasons besides
safety, mechanical issues, and spiny
dogfish are already prohibited, and this
proposed action would require vessels
to move 15 nm before fishing again if a
slippage for those excepted reasons
occurs (vessels could not fish within 15
nm of the slippage event for the
remainder of the trip). Total small entity
mackerel revenues over 2011–2013
averaged $2.0 million, for an average of
approximately $19,000 per affected
small entity (107), compared to their
average revenues of $1,201,419 in 2013
as described above. Given the small
relative value of mackerel for most
affected entities, the infrequency of
slippage, and given the consequence of
excepted slippages is only to move 15
nm, it seems likely that the economic
impacts should be minimal for affected
small entities. This is especially true
since only a small portion of trips are
observed, and the measures only apply
to observed trips.
If slippages have been masking higher
river herring and shad landings, it is
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28577
possible that prohibiting slippages
could lead to the mackerel fishery
closing earlier (because of the river
herring and shad cap) than it otherwise
would if more slippages were occurring.
However, given the very low mackerel
catches in recent years (less than 20
percent of the quota), it is more likely
that catch increases might be limited
rather than actually having decreased
catches, so small entities should not be
more than minimally impacted
compared to recent fishery operations.
In addition, if vessels are prohibited
from targeting mackerel due to the cap,
they will likely partially mitigate any
foregone revenue by fishing for other
species (e.g. squid, butterfish, herring,
etc.).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Recordkeeping and
reporting requirements.
Dated: May 13, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 648.11, paragraph (n)(3)(ii) is
revised and paragraph (n)(3)(iii) is
added to read as follows:
■
§ 648.11 At-sea sea sampler/observer
coverage.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) If fish are released prior to being
brought on board the vessel due to any
of the exceptions in paragraphs
(n)(3)(i)(A)–(C) of this section, the vessel
operator must move at least 15 nm from
the location of release before fishing
again, and must stay at least 15 nm from
the slippage event location for the
remainder of the fishing trip. The vessel
operator must also complete and sign a
Released Catch Affidavit detailing the
vessel name and permit number; the
VTR serial number; where, when, and
for what reason the catch was released;
the estimated weight of each species
brought on board (if only part of the tow
was released) or released on that tow. A
completed affidavit must be submitted
to NMFS within 48 hr of the end of the
trip. The vessel operator must also
report a slippage event on the VMS
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
28578
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
mackerel and longfin squid daily catch
report.
(iii) If fish are released prior to being
brought on board the vessel due to any
reason other than the exceptions in
paragraphs (n)(3)(i)(A)–(C) of this
section, the vessel operator must
immediately terminate the trip and
return to port. No fishing activity may
occur during the return to port. The
vessel operator must also complete and
sign a Released Catch Affidavit detailing
the vessel name and permit number; the
VTR serial number; where, when, and
for what reason the catch was released;
the estimated weight of each species
brought on board (if only part of the tow
was released) or released on that tow. A
completed affidavit must be submitted
to NMFS within 48 hr of the end of the
trip. The vessel operator must also
report the slippage event on the VMS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:25 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
mackerel and longfin squid daily catch
report.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 648.14, paragraph (g)(2)(ii)(G) is
added, paragraphs (g)(2)(vi) and (vii) are
revised and paragraphs (g)(2)(viii), (ix),
and (x) are added to read as follows:
§ 648.14
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(G) Fish for, possess, transfer, receive,
or sell; or attempt to fish for, possess,
transfer, receive, or sell; more than
20,000 lb (9.07 mt) of mackerel per trip;
or land, or attempt to land more than
20,000 lb (9.07 mt) of mackerel per day
after 95 percent of the river herring and
shad cap has been harvested, if the
vessel holds a valid mackerel permit.
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) Release fish from codend of the
net, transfer fish to another vessel that
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
is not carrying a NMFS-approved
observer, or otherwise discard fish at sea
before bringing the fish aboard and
making it available to the observer for
sampling, unless subject to one of the
exceptions defined at § 648.11(n)(3) if
issued a Limited Access Atlantic
mackerel permit, or a longfin squid/
butterfish moratorium permit.
(vii) Fail to move 15 nm, as specified
at § 648.11(n)(3)(ii).
(viii) Fail to immediately return to
port as specified at § 648.11(n)(3)(iii).
(ix) Fail to complete, sign, and submit
a Released Catch Affidavit if fish are
released pursuant to the requirements at
§ 648.11(n)(3).
(x) Fail to report a slippage event on
the VMS mackerel and longfin squid
daily catch report.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–12060 Filed 5–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\19MYP1.SGM
19MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 96 (Tuesday, May 19, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28575-28578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12060]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 150401329-5437-01]
RIN 0648-BF00
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Mackerel,
Squid, and Butterfish Fisheries; Framework Adjustment 9
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule, request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Framework Adjustment 9 proposes management measures to further
enhance catch monitoring and address discarding catch before it has
been sampled by observers (known as slippage), in the Atlantic mackerel
fishery. Framework 9 would implement slippage consequence measures, and
a requirement that slippage events be reported via the vessel
monitoring system. For allowable slippage events, due to safety,
mechanical failure, or excess catch of spiny dogfish, vessels
[[Page 28576]]
must move 15 nm from the location of the slippage event. For non-
allowable slippage events, due to reasons other than those listed
previously, vessels must terminate their fishing trip. Slippage events
have the potential to substantially affect analysis or extrapolations
of incidental catch, including river herring and shad, these proposed
measures are designed to address this issue.
DATES: Public comments must be received by June 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting documents used by the Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council, including the Environmental Assessment (EA)
and Regulatory Impact Review (RIR)/Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA), are available from: Dr. Christopher M. Moore,
Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 North
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901, telephone (302) 674-2331. The
EA/RIR/IRFA is also accessible via the Internet at https://www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov.
You may submit comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2015-0049, by any
one of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic
public comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-0049, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to NMFS, Northeast Regional
Office, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside
of the envelope ``Comments on Framework 9.''
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carly Bari, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281-9224, fax (978) 281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NMFS implemented measures to improve catch monitoring of the
mackerel, squid, and butterfish fisheries through Amendment 14 to the
Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Fishery Management Plan (FMP)
(79 FR 10029, February 24, 2014). The focus of Amendment 14 was to
improve evaluation of the incidental catch of river herring (alewife
and blueback herring) and shad (American shad and hickory shad), and to
address incidental catch of river herring and shad. NMFS disapproved
three measures that were initially included in Amendment 14 including:
A dealer reporting requirement; a cap that, if achieved, would require
vessels discarding catch before it had been sampled by observers (known
as slippage) to return to port; and a recommendation of 100-percent
observer coverage on midwater trawl vessels and 100-, 50-, and 25-
percent observer coverage on bottom trawl mackerel vessels, with the
industry contributing $325 per day toward observer costs.
Currently, slippage events are prohibited for vessels issued a
limited access mackerel permit or a longfin squid/butterfish moratorium
permit and carrying a NMFS-approved observer except in circumstances
which allow slippage events including: Safety; mechanical failure; and
excess catch of spiny dogfish. Additionally, following a slippage
event, vessels are currently required to submit a Released Catch
Affidavit within 48 hours of the end of the fishing trip. In response
to the disapproval of the slippage measures in Amendment 14, the Mid-
Atlantic Fishery Management Council developed Framework Adjustment 9 to
the Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish FMP to further enhance
catch monitoring and to address slippage in the Atlantic mackerel
fishery. Framework 9 would add slippage consequence measures and
slippage reporting requirements to build upon the current measures and
to address monitoring the catch of river herring and shad.
Framework 9 would require Tier 1, 2, and 3 mackerel vessels on
observed trips to move 15 nm following an excepted slippage event,
which includes safety, mechanical failure, or excess catch of spiny
dogfish. These vessels would also be required to terminate a fishing
trip and immediately return to port following a non-excepted slippage
event, which would be due to any reason other than those listed above.
In addition to submitting a Released Catch Affidavit, vessels carrying
an observer would also be required to report all slippage events
through the vessel monitoring system daily catch report for mackerel
and longfin squid.
Corrections
This proposed rule also contains an additional regulation change
that was mistakenly omitted in the 2015-2017 Atlantic mackerel, squid,
and butterfish specifications final rule (80 FR 14870, March 20, 2015).
This regulation change would prohibit all vessels with a valid mackerel
permit from fishing for, possessing, transferring, receiving, or
selling more than 20,000 lb (9.07 mt) of mackerel per trip or per day
after 95 percent of the river herring and shad catch cap has been
harvested. This change in the regulations was identified, described,
and made available for public comment in the proposed rule for the
2015-2017 Atlantic mackerel, squid, and butterfish specifications (79
FR 68202, November 14, 2014).
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish FMP, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law,
subject to further consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An IRFA was prepared, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA). The IRFA describes the economic impact this
proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A summary of
the analysis follows.
Description of the Reasons Why Action by the Agency Is Being Considered
This action proposes management measures for the slippage
consequences to better monitor catch of river herring and shad in the
Atlantic mackerel fishery. The preamble to this proposed rule includes
a complete description of the reasons why the Council and NMFS are
considering this action and these are not repeated here.
Statement of the Objectives of, and Legal Basis for, This Proposed Rule
The purpose of this proposed action is to minimize slippage, which
will improve observer data, and should in turn improve decision-making
that uses observer data. Failure to implement the measures described in
this proposed rule could result in biased observer data. The preamble
to this proposed rule includes a complete description of the objectives
of and legal basis for this action and these are not repeated here.
[[Page 28577]]
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which This
Proposed Rule Would Apply
The proposed alternative applies to mackerel limited access
permits. Based on permit data for 2013, 150 separate vessels hold
mackerel limited access permits, 114 entities own those vessels, and,
based on current Small Business Administration (SBA) definitions, 107
of these are small entities. Of the 107 small entities, 4 had no
revenue in 2013 and those entities with no revenue are considered small
entities for the purpose of this analysis. All of the entities that had
revenue fell into the finfish or shellfish categories, and the SBA
definitions for those categories for 2014 are $20.5 million for finfish
fishing and $5.5 million for shellfish fishing. Of the entities with
revenues, their average revenues in 2013 were $1,201,419. 70 had
primary revenues from finfish fishing and 33 had their primary revenues
from shellfish fishing.
Description of the Projected Reporting, Record-Keeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements of This Proposed Rule
The proposed action contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This requirement has
been submitted to OMB for approval under Control Number 0648-0679.
Under the proposed action, all limited access mackerel vessels
carrying an observer would be required to report all slippage events on
the VMS mackerel and longfin squid daily catch report. This information
collection is intended to improve monitoring the catch of river herring
and shad in the Atlantic mackerel fishery. The burden estimates for
these new requirements apply to all limited access mackerel vessels. In
a given fishing year, NMFS estimates that these additionally reporting
requirements will not cause any additional time or cost burden from
that which was previously approved under OMB Control Number 0648-0679.
Public comment is sought regarding: Whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Send comments on
these or any other aspects of the collection of information to the
Regional Administrator (see ADDRESSES), and email to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202) 395-5806.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of the law, no person is
required to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements
of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays a currently
valid OMB Control Number. All currently approved NOAA collections of
information may be viewed at: https://www.cio.noaa.gov/services_programs/prasubs.html.
Federal Rules Which May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With This
Proposed Rule
This action contains no other compliance costs. It does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other Federal law.
Description of Significant Alternatives to the Proposed Action Which
Accomplish the Stated Objectives of Applicable Statues and Which
Minimize Any Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities
The proposed alternative should not have more than minimal impact
on the affected small entities compared to recent operation of the
fishery (2011-2013, and 2014 landings to date appear similar to 2013).
First, the primary impact should only be that vessels will not slip
catches before observers have a chance to observe/sample them, which
should have almost no economic impact on vessels. Slippage for reasons
besides safety, mechanical issues, and spiny dogfish are already
prohibited, and this proposed action would require vessels to move 15
nm before fishing again if a slippage for those excepted reasons occurs
(vessels could not fish within 15 nm of the slippage event for the
remainder of the trip). Total small entity mackerel revenues over 2011-
2013 averaged $2.0 million, for an average of approximately $19,000 per
affected small entity (107), compared to their average revenues of
$1,201,419 in 2013 as described above. Given the small relative value
of mackerel for most affected entities, the infrequency of slippage,
and given the consequence of excepted slippages is only to move 15 nm,
it seems likely that the economic impacts should be minimal for
affected small entities. This is especially true since only a small
portion of trips are observed, and the measures only apply to observed
trips.
If slippages have been masking higher river herring and shad
landings, it is possible that prohibiting slippages could lead to the
mackerel fishery closing earlier (because of the river herring and shad
cap) than it otherwise would if more slippages were occurring. However,
given the very low mackerel catches in recent years (less than 20
percent of the quota), it is more likely that catch increases might be
limited rather than actually having decreased catches, so small
entities should not be more than minimally impacted compared to recent
fishery operations. In addition, if vessels are prohibited from
targeting mackerel due to the cap, they will likely partially mitigate
any foregone revenue by fishing for other species (e.g. squid,
butterfish, herring, etc.).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
Dated: May 13, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 648.11, paragraph (n)(3)(ii) is revised and paragraph
(n)(3)(iii) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 648.11 At-sea sea sampler/observer coverage.
* * * * *
(n) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) If fish are released prior to being brought on board the
vessel due to any of the exceptions in paragraphs (n)(3)(i)(A)-(C) of
this section, the vessel operator must move at least 15 nm from the
location of release before fishing again, and must stay at least 15 nm
from the slippage event location for the remainder of the fishing trip.
The vessel operator must also complete and sign a Released Catch
Affidavit detailing the vessel name and permit number; the VTR serial
number; where, when, and for what reason the catch was released; the
estimated weight of each species brought on board (if only part of the
tow was released) or released on that tow. A completed affidavit must
be submitted to NMFS within 48 hr of the end of the trip. The vessel
operator must also report a slippage event on the VMS
[[Page 28578]]
mackerel and longfin squid daily catch report.
(iii) If fish are released prior to being brought on board the
vessel due to any reason other than the exceptions in paragraphs
(n)(3)(i)(A)-(C) of this section, the vessel operator must immediately
terminate the trip and return to port. No fishing activity may occur
during the return to port. The vessel operator must also complete and
sign a Released Catch Affidavit detailing the vessel name and permit
number; the VTR serial number; where, when, and for what reason the
catch was released; the estimated weight of each species brought on
board (if only part of the tow was released) or released on that tow. A
completed affidavit must be submitted to NMFS within 48 hr of the end
of the trip. The vessel operator must also report the slippage event on
the VMS mackerel and longfin squid daily catch report.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 648.14, paragraph (g)(2)(ii)(G) is added, paragraphs
(g)(2)(vi) and (vii) are revised and paragraphs (g)(2)(viii), (ix), and
(x) are added to read as follows:
Sec. 648.14 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(G) Fish for, possess, transfer, receive, or sell; or attempt to
fish for, possess, transfer, receive, or sell; more than 20,000 lb
(9.07 mt) of mackerel per trip; or land, or attempt to land more than
20,000 lb (9.07 mt) of mackerel per day after 95 percent of the river
herring and shad cap has been harvested, if the vessel holds a valid
mackerel permit.
* * * * *
(vi) Release fish from codend of the net, transfer fish to another
vessel that is not carrying a NMFS-approved observer, or otherwise
discard fish at sea before bringing the fish aboard and making it
available to the observer for sampling, unless subject to one of the
exceptions defined at Sec. 648.11(n)(3) if issued a Limited Access
Atlantic mackerel permit, or a longfin squid/butterfish moratorium
permit.
(vii) Fail to move 15 nm, as specified at Sec. 648.11(n)(3)(ii).
(viii) Fail to immediately return to port as specified at Sec.
648.11(n)(3)(iii).
(ix) Fail to complete, sign, and submit a Released Catch Affidavit
if fish are released pursuant to the requirements at Sec.
648.11(n)(3).
(x) Fail to report a slippage event on the VMS mackerel and longfin
squid daily catch report.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-12060 Filed 5-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P