Safety Zones; San Juan Island Independence Day Celebration, Friday Harbor, WA, 28207-28209 [2015-11939]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 95 / Monday, May 18, 2015 / Proposed Rules
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves a temporary safety zone
around a fireworks display in Lake
Union. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
All waters within a 300 yard radius
around the point 47°38′24.85″ N,
122°20′3.81″ W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in subpart C of
this part, no vessel operator may enter,
transit, moor, or anchor within this
safety zone, except for vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
Designated Representatives. Designated
Representatives are Coast Guard
Personnel authorized by the Captain of
the Port to grant persons or vessels
permission to enter or remain in the
safety zone created by this section. See
subpart C of this part, for additional
information and requirements.
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators
who desire to enter the safety zone must
obtain permission from the Captain of
the Port or Designated representative by
contacting either the on-scene patrol
craft on VHF Ch 13 or Ch 16 or the
Coast guard Sector Puget Sound Joint
Harbor Operations Center (JHOC) via
telephone at (206) 217–6002.
(d) Enforcement period. This rule is
effective from 5:00 p.m. on July 4, 2015,
until 1:00 a.m. on July 5, 2015.
Dated: April 30, 2015.
M.W. Raymond,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2015–11938 Filed 5–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
[Docket Number USCG–2015–0254]
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
SUMMARY:
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–288 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–288 Safety Zone; Seattle Seafair
4th of July; Lake Union, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is
designated as a temporary safety zone:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 May 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; San Juan Island
Independence Day Celebration, Friday
Harbor, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
Friday Harbor for the San Juan Island
Independence Day Celebration
fireworks display. The safety zone is
necessary to help ensure the safety of
the maritime public during the display
and will do so by prohibiting all persons
and vessels from entering the safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port or his designated
representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 17, 2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28207
You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer Kenneth Hoppe,
Waterways Management Division,
Sector Puget Sound, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone (206) 217–6051, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
28208
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 95 / Monday, May 18, 2015 / Proposed Rules
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2015–0254] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2015–0254) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one, using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 May 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
Coast Guard Captains of the Port are
granted authority to establish safety and
security zones in 33 CFR 1.05–1(f) for
safety and environmental purposes as
described in 33 CFR part 165.
The San Juan Island Independence
Day Celebration fireworks display will
be held on July 4, 2015. Fireworks
displays create hazardous conditions for
the maritime public because of the large
number of vessels that congregate near
the displays as well as the noise, falling
debris, and explosions that occur during
the event. A safety zone is necessary in
order to prevent vessels from
congregating in the proximity of the
firework discharge site to ensure
maritime public safety.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
In order to mitigate the hazards
associated with the fireworks display,
the Coast Guard is proposing to
establish a temporary safety zone in
Friday Harbor, WA in a 200 yard radius
around the point 48°32.471′ N,
123°0.714′ W. This safety zone would be
in effect from 5:00 p.m. on July 4 until
1:00 a.m. on July 5, 2015.
All persons and vessels would be
prohibited from entering the safety zone
during the dates and times they are
effective unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his Designated
Representative.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. This rule is not a significant
regulatory action because it creates a
safety zone that is minimal in size and
short in duration.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit through the
established safety zone during the times
of enforcement. This rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because the temporary safety zone is
minimal in size and short in duration,
maritime traffic will be able to transit
around it and may be permitted to
transit through with the permission
from the Captain of the Port or a
Designated Representative.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 95 / Monday, May 18, 2015 / Proposed Rules
28209
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
6. Protest Activities
12. Energy Effects
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
(a) Location. The following area is
designated as a temporary safety zone:
(1) All waters within a 200 yard
radius around the point 48°32.471′ N,
123°0.714′ W.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR part
165, subpart C, no vessel operator may
enter, transit, moor, or anchor within
this safety zone, except for vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
Designated Representatives. Designated
Representatives are Coast Guard
Personnel authorized by the Captain
of the Port to grant persons or vessels
permission to enter or remain in the
safety zone created by this section. See
33 CFR part 165, subpart C, for
additional information and
requirements.
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators
who desire to enter the safety zone must
obtain permission from the Captain of
the Port or Designated representative by
contacting either the on-scene patrol
craft on VHF Ch 13 or Ch 16 or the
Coast guard Sector Puget Sound Joint
Harbor Operations Center (JHOC) via
telephone at (206) 217–6002.
(d) Enforcement Period. This rule is
effective from 5:00 p.m. on July 4, 2015,
until 1:00 a.m. on July 5, 2015.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:36 May 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves a temporary safety zone
around a fireworks display in Friday
Harbor. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
13. Technical Standards
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Add § 165.T13–286 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–286 Safety Zone; San Juan
Island Independence Day Celebration;
Friday Harbor, WA.
Dated: May 1, 2015.
M.W. Raymond,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2015–11939 Filed 5–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0351; FRL–9927–81–
Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Implementation Plans; State of
Wyoming; Interstate Transport of
Pollution for the 2006 24-Hour PM2.5
NAAQS
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 95 (Monday, May 18, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28207-28209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11939]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2015-0254]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones; San Juan Island Independence Day Celebration,
Friday Harbor, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in
Friday Harbor for the San Juan Island Independence Day Celebration
fireworks display. The safety zone is necessary to help ensure the
safety of the maritime public during the display and will do so by
prohibiting all persons and vessels from entering the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 17, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Kenneth Hoppe, Waterways Management
Division, Sector Puget Sound, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (206) 217-
6051, email SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
[[Page 28208]]
comment, it will be considered as having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an email
address, or a telephone number in the body of your document so that we
can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2015-0254] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2015-0254) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
Coast Guard Captains of the Port are granted authority to establish
safety and security zones in 33 CFR 1.05-1(f) for safety and
environmental purposes as described in 33 CFR part 165.
The San Juan Island Independence Day Celebration fireworks display
will be held on July 4, 2015. Fireworks displays create hazardous
conditions for the maritime public because of the large number of
vessels that congregate near the displays as well as the noise, falling
debris, and explosions that occur during the event. A safety zone is
necessary in order to prevent vessels from congregating in the
proximity of the firework discharge site to ensure maritime public
safety.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
In order to mitigate the hazards associated with the fireworks
display, the Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary safety
zone in Friday Harbor, WA in a 200 yard radius around the point
48[deg]32.471' N, 123[deg]0.714' W. This safety zone would be in effect
from 5:00 p.m. on July 4 until 1:00 a.m. on July 5, 2015.
All persons and vessels would be prohibited from entering the
safety zone during the dates and times they are effective unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or his Designated Representative.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This rule is not a
significant regulatory action because it creates a safety zone that is
minimal in size and short in duration.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This rule will affect the
following entities, some of which may be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit through the established
safety zone during the times of enforcement. This rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
because the temporary safety zone is minimal in size and short in
duration, maritime traffic will be able to transit around it and may be
permitted to transit through with the permission from the Captain of
the Port or a Designated Representative.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
[[Page 28209]]
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and determined that this
rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves a temporary safety zone around a fireworks display in Friday
Harbor. This rule is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A
preliminary environmental analysis checklist supporting this
determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are available
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-286 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-286 Safety Zone; San Juan Island Independence Day
Celebration; Friday Harbor, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is designated as a temporary
safety zone:
(1) All waters within a 200 yard radius around the point
48[deg]32.471' N, 123[deg]0.714' W.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR part 165, subpart C, no vessel operator may enter, transit, moor,
or anchor within this safety zone, except for vessels authorized by the
Captain of the Port or Designated Representatives. Designated
Representatives are Coast Guard
Personnel authorized by the Captain of the Port to grant persons or
vessels permission to enter or remain in the safety zone created by
this section. See 33 CFR part 165, subpart C, for additional
information and requirements.
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators who desire to enter the
safety zone must obtain permission from the Captain of the Port or
Designated representative by contacting either the on-scene patrol
craft on VHF Ch 13 or Ch 16 or the Coast guard Sector Puget Sound Joint
Harbor Operations Center (JHOC) via telephone at (206) 217-6002.
(d) Enforcement Period. This rule is effective from 5:00 p.m. on
July 4, 2015, until 1:00 a.m. on July 5, 2015.
Dated: May 1, 2015.
M.W. Raymond,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2015-11939 Filed 5-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P