Endangered and Threatened Species; Draft Recovery Plan for the Cook Inlet Beluga Whale, 27925-27926 [2015-11700]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 94 / Friday, May 15, 2015 / Notices
modifications in the activities are
appropriate.
(c) In the event that Hilcorp discovers
an injured or dead marine mammal, and
the lead PSO determines that the injury
or death is not associated with or related
to the activities authorized in Condition
3 of this Authorization (e.g., previously
wounded animal, carcass with moderate
to advanced decomposition, or
scavenger damage), Hilcorp shall report
the incident to the Chief, Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, at 301–
427–8401, and/or by email to
Jolie.Harrison@noaa.gov and
Shane.Guan@noaa.gov and the NMFS
Alaska Stranding Hotline (1–877–925–
7773) and/or by email to the Alaska
Regional Stranding Coordinators
(Aleria.Jensen@noaa.gov and
Barbara.Mahoney@noaa.gov), within 24
hours of the discovery. Hilcorp shall
provide photographs or video footage (if
available) or other documentation of the
stranded animal sighting to NMFS and
the Marine Mammal Stranding Network.
Hilcorp can continue its operations
under such a case.
(11) Activities related to the
monitoring described in this
Authorization do not require a separate
scientific research permit issued under
section 104 of the Marine Mammal
Protection Act.
(12) The Plan of Cooperation
outlining the steps that will be taken to
cooperate and communicate with the
native communities to ensure the
availability of marine mammals for
subsistence uses, must be implemented.
(13) This Authorization may be
modified, suspended, or withdrawn if
the holder fails to abide by the
conditions prescribed herein or if the
authorized taking is having more than a
negligible impact on the species or stock
of affected marine mammals, or if there
is an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of such species or stocks for
subsistence uses.
(14) A copy of this Authorization and
the Incidental Take Statement must be
in the possession of each survey vessel
operator taking marine mammals under
the authority of this Incidental
Harassment Authorization.
(15) Hilcorp is required to comply
with the Terms and Conditions of the
Incidental Take Statement
corresponding to NMFS’ Biological
Opinion.
Request for Public Comments
NMFS requests comment on our
analysis, the draft authorization, and
any other aspect of the Notice of
Proposed IHA for Hilcorp’s proposed
shallow geohazard survey in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 May 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
Beaufort Sea. Please include with your
comments any supporting data or
literature citations to help inform our
final decision on Hilcorp’s request for
an MMPA authorization.
Dated: May 11, 2015.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–11701 Filed 5–14–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XU02
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Draft Recovery Plan for the Cook Inlet
Beluga Whale
National Marine Fisheries
Service, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces the
availability of the Cook Inlet Beluga
Whale (Delphinapterus leucas) Draft
Recovery Plan for public review. NMFS
is soliciting review and comment from
the public and all interested parties on
the draft Plan, and will consider all
substantive comments received during
the review period before submitting the
Plan for final approval.
DATES: Comments on the draft Plan
must be received by close of business on
July 14, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2015–0053 by either of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal.
1. Go to www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150053,
2. Click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon
and complete the required fields,
3. Enter or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Jon Kurland, Assistant Regional
Administrator for Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service,
Alaska Regional Office, Protected
Resources Division, P.O. Box 21668, 709
W. 9th St., Rm. 420, Juneau, Alaska
99802–1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27925
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information submitted voluntarily by
the sender will be publicly accessible.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required
fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mandy Migura (907–271–1332), email
Mandy.Migura@noaa.gov or Therese
Conant (301–427–8456), email
Therese.Conant@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery plans describe actions
beneficial to the conservation and
recovery of species listed under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA),
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Section 4(f)(1) of the ESA requires that
recovery plans incorporate: (1)
Objective, measurable criteria which,
when met, would result in a
determination that the species is no
longer threatened or endangered; (2)
site-specific management actions
necessary to achieve the Plan’s goals;
and (3) estimates of the time required
and costs to implement recovery
actions. The ESA requires the
development of recovery plans for each
listed species unless such a plan would
not promote its recovery.
NMFS began conducting
comprehensive and systematic aerial
surveys of the Cook Inlet beluga whale
population in 1993. These surveys
documented a decline in abundance
from 653 whales in 1994 to 347 whales
in 1998, a decline of nearly 50 percent.
This rapid decline was associated with
a substantial, unregulated subsistence
hunt. Subsequent cooperative efforts
between NMFS and Alaska Native
subsistence users dramatically reduced
subsistence hunts beginning in 1999. If
subsistence harvest was the only factor
limiting population growth, this
reduction in hunting should have
allowed the Cook Inlet beluga whale
population to begin recovering at a rate
of 2 to 6 percent per year; however,
survey data indicated that the
population was not recovering upon
removal of hunting pressure. This lack
of population growth led NMFS to
reevaluate the status of Cook Inlet
beluga whales. In October 2008, NMFS
listed the Cook Inlet beluga whale
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
27926
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 94 / Friday, May 15, 2015 / Notices
distinct population segment (DPS) as
endangered under the ESA (73 FR
62919, October 22, 2008). The most
recent (2014) abundance survey
indicates a population of 340 Cook Inlet
beluga whales that has declined 0.4
percent per year over the past ten years.
The Cook Inlet belugas are the most
reproductively and demographically
isolated of all the Alaskan belugas, and
are unique in Alaska because their
habitat, a semi-enclosed tidal estuary in
southcentral Alaska, is in close
proximity to most of Alaska’s human
population. The distribution of Cook
Inlet belugas has changed significantly
since the 1970s; in recent years the
summer range has contracted to the
upper reaches of Cook Inlet near
Anchorage. This range contraction was
coincident with the decline in
population size.
Ten potential threat types are
identified and assessed in this draft
recovery plan, based on current
knowledge of threat factors.
Assessments were made based on the
information and data gaps presented in
the plan’s background section. Climate
change, while considered a potential
threat to Cook Inlet beluga recovery, is
not addressed as a separate threat, but
rather is discussed with respect to how
it may affect each of the listed threats.
The ten identified threats were ranked
in order of their relative concern (high,
medium, low) to the Cook Inlet beluga
population.
Due to an incomplete understanding
of the threats facing Cook Inlet beluga
whales, NMFS is unable to identify with
certainty the actions that will most
immediately encourage recovery. Until
we know which threats are limiting
recovery, the strategy of this recovery
plan is to focus on threats identified as
medium or high concern. This should
focus efforts and resources on actions
that are more likely to benefit Cook Inlet
beluga whale recovery.
Under section 4(f)(1) of the ESA,
recovery plans must contain objective,
measurable criteria which, when met,
would result in a determination that the
species be delisted. This recovery plan
contains both demographic and threatsbased criteria for down- and delisting.
The threat-based recovery criteria are
designed to evaluate the five ESA
section 4(a)(1) factors described in the
ESA listing determination of the Cook
Inlet belugas. The draft recovery plan
proposes that Cook Inlet beluga whales
may be reclassified from endangered to
threatened (i.e., downlisted) when all of
the following have been met: (1) The
abundance estimate for the Cook Inlet
beluga whale DPS is greater than or
equal to 520 individuals and there is 95
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 May 14, 2015
Jkt 235001
percent or greater probability that the
25-year population abundance trend
(representative of one full generation) is
positive; and (2) the 15 downlisting
threats-based criteria are satisfied. The
draft recovery plan proposes that the
population will be considered for
delisting when all of the following are
met: (1) The abundance estimate for the
Cook Inlet beluga whale DPS is greater
than or equal to 780 individuals and
there is 95 percent or greater probability
that the 25-year population abundance
trend (representative of one full
generation) is positive; and (2) the 15
downlisting and 6 delisting threatsbased criteria are satisfied.
When determining recovery actions,
we aimed to improve understanding of
whether a particular threat is limiting
recovery and to eliminate or mitigate
that threat, or to improve our
understanding of, and ability to manage,
that threat. The actions in this recovery
plan include research, management,
monitoring, and outreach efforts, since a
comprehensive approach to Cook Inlet
beluga whale recovery is likely to have
greater success than focusing on any one
type of action. There are also actions
targeted at incorporating new
information and conducting regular
reassessments, making this recovery
plan an adaptive management plan.
The total time and cost to recovery are
very difficult to predict with the current
information, and the total cost to
recovery will be largely dependent upon
the number of recovery actions
requiring implementation. Since that
cannot be determined prior to
implementation of portions of this plan,
the total cost presented assumes
implementation of all recovery actions.
As recovery progresses and we better
understand the relationship between
discrete threats and population
dynamics, it may become apparent that
there are some threats that need not be
addressed to achieve recovery.
However, we expect that recovery may
take at least two generations (50 years).
If every identified recovery action is
implemented, and if recovery
implementation lasts for 50 years (two
generations), then the estimated cost of
implementing this entire recovery
program would be approximately $78.3
million. Any projections of total costs
over the full recovery period are likely
to be imprecise, and the cost estimates
do not imply that funding will
necessarily be available for all Cook
Inlet beluga whale recovery tasks.
NMFS requests and will consider all
substantive comments and information
presented during the public comment
period as we finalize this Plan. NMFS
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
concludes that the Draft Recovery Plan
meets the requirements of the ESA.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: May 11, 2015.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–11700 Filed 5–14–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Availability of Seats for National
Marine Sanctuary Advisory Councils
Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice and request for
applications.
AGENCY:
ONMS is seeking applications
for vacant seats for 7 of its 13 national
marine sanctuary advisory councils and
for the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands
Coral Reef Ecosystem Reserve Advisory
Council (advisory councils). Vacant
seats, including positions (i.e., primary
member and alternate), for each of the
advisory councils are listed in this
notice under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. Applicants are chosen
based upon their particular expertise
and experience in relation to the seat for
which they are applying; community
and professional affiliations; views
regarding the protection and
management of marine or Great Lake
resources; and possibly the length of
residence in the area affected by the
sanctuary. Applicants who are chosen
as members or alternates should expect
to serve two- or three year terms,
pursuant to the charter of the specific
national marine sanctuary advisory
council or the Northwestern Hawaiian
Islands Coral Reef Ecosystem Reserve
Advisory Council.
DATES: Applications are due by June 30,
2015.
ADDRESSES: Application kits are specific
to each advisory council. As such,
application kits must be obtained from
and returned to the council-specific
addresses noted below.
• Channel Islands National Marine
Sanctuary Advisory Council: Michael
Murray, Channel Islands National
Marine Sanctuary, University of
California Santa Barbara, Ocean Science
Education Building 514, MC 6155, Santa
Barbara, CA, 93106–6155; (805) 893–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 94 (Friday, May 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27925-27926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11700]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XU02
Endangered and Threatened Species; Draft Recovery Plan for the
Cook Inlet Beluga Whale
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces the
availability of the Cook Inlet Beluga Whale (Delphinapterus leucas)
Draft Recovery Plan for public review. NMFS is soliciting review and
comment from the public and all interested parties on the draft Plan,
and will consider all substantive comments received during the review
period before submitting the Plan for final approval.
DATES: Comments on the draft Plan must be received by close of business
on July 14, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2015-0053 by either of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal.
1. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-0053,
2. Click the ``Comment Now!'' icon and complete the required
fields,
3. Enter or attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Jon Kurland, Assistant
Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service, Alaska Regional Office, Protected Resources
Division, P.O. Box 21668, 709 W. 9th St., Rm. 420, Juneau, Alaska
99802-1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive or protected information submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mandy Migura (907-271-1332), email
Mandy.Migura@noaa.gov or Therese Conant (301-427-8456), email
Therese.Conant@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery plans describe actions beneficial to the conservation and
recovery of species listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Section 4(f)(1) of the ESA
requires that recovery plans incorporate: (1) Objective, measurable
criteria which, when met, would result in a determination that the
species is no longer threatened or endangered; (2) site-specific
management actions necessary to achieve the Plan's goals; and (3)
estimates of the time required and costs to implement recovery actions.
The ESA requires the development of recovery plans for each listed
species unless such a plan would not promote its recovery.
NMFS began conducting comprehensive and systematic aerial surveys
of the Cook Inlet beluga whale population in 1993. These surveys
documented a decline in abundance from 653 whales in 1994 to 347 whales
in 1998, a decline of nearly 50 percent. This rapid decline was
associated with a substantial, unregulated subsistence hunt. Subsequent
cooperative efforts between NMFS and Alaska Native subsistence users
dramatically reduced subsistence hunts beginning in 1999. If
subsistence harvest was the only factor limiting population growth,
this reduction in hunting should have allowed the Cook Inlet beluga
whale population to begin recovering at a rate of 2 to 6 percent per
year; however, survey data indicated that the population was not
recovering upon removal of hunting pressure. This lack of population
growth led NMFS to reevaluate the status of Cook Inlet beluga whales.
In October 2008, NMFS listed the Cook Inlet beluga whale
[[Page 27926]]
distinct population segment (DPS) as endangered under the ESA (73 FR
62919, October 22, 2008). The most recent (2014) abundance survey
indicates a population of 340 Cook Inlet beluga whales that has
declined 0.4 percent per year over the past ten years.
The Cook Inlet belugas are the most reproductively and
demographically isolated of all the Alaskan belugas, and are unique in
Alaska because their habitat, a semi-enclosed tidal estuary in
southcentral Alaska, is in close proximity to most of Alaska's human
population. The distribution of Cook Inlet belugas has changed
significantly since the 1970s; in recent years the summer range has
contracted to the upper reaches of Cook Inlet near Anchorage. This
range contraction was coincident with the decline in population size.
Ten potential threat types are identified and assessed in this
draft recovery plan, based on current knowledge of threat factors.
Assessments were made based on the information and data gaps presented
in the plan's background section. Climate change, while considered a
potential threat to Cook Inlet beluga recovery, is not addressed as a
separate threat, but rather is discussed with respect to how it may
affect each of the listed threats. The ten identified threats were
ranked in order of their relative concern (high, medium, low) to the
Cook Inlet beluga population.
Due to an incomplete understanding of the threats facing Cook Inlet
beluga whales, NMFS is unable to identify with certainty the actions
that will most immediately encourage recovery. Until we know which
threats are limiting recovery, the strategy of this recovery plan is to
focus on threats identified as medium or high concern. This should
focus efforts and resources on actions that are more likely to benefit
Cook Inlet beluga whale recovery.
Under section 4(f)(1) of the ESA, recovery plans must contain
objective, measurable criteria which, when met, would result in a
determination that the species be delisted. This recovery plan contains
both demographic and threats-based criteria for down- and delisting.
The threat-based recovery criteria are designed to evaluate the five
ESA section 4(a)(1) factors described in the ESA listing determination
of the Cook Inlet belugas. The draft recovery plan proposes that Cook
Inlet beluga whales may be reclassified from endangered to threatened
(i.e., downlisted) when all of the following have been met: (1) The
abundance estimate for the Cook Inlet beluga whale DPS is greater than
or equal to 520 individuals and there is 95 percent or greater
probability that the 25-year population abundance trend (representative
of one full generation) is positive; and (2) the 15 downlisting
threats-based criteria are satisfied. The draft recovery plan proposes
that the population will be considered for delisting when all of the
following are met: (1) The abundance estimate for the Cook Inlet beluga
whale DPS is greater than or equal to 780 individuals and there is 95
percent or greater probability that the 25-year population abundance
trend (representative of one full generation) is positive; and (2) the
15 downlisting and 6 delisting threats-based criteria are satisfied.
When determining recovery actions, we aimed to improve
understanding of whether a particular threat is limiting recovery and
to eliminate or mitigate that threat, or to improve our understanding
of, and ability to manage, that threat. The actions in this recovery
plan include research, management, monitoring, and outreach efforts,
since a comprehensive approach to Cook Inlet beluga whale recovery is
likely to have greater success than focusing on any one type of action.
There are also actions targeted at incorporating new information and
conducting regular reassessments, making this recovery plan an adaptive
management plan.
The total time and cost to recovery are very difficult to predict
with the current information, and the total cost to recovery will be
largely dependent upon the number of recovery actions requiring
implementation. Since that cannot be determined prior to implementation
of portions of this plan, the total cost presented assumes
implementation of all recovery actions. As recovery progresses and we
better understand the relationship between discrete threats and
population dynamics, it may become apparent that there are some threats
that need not be addressed to achieve recovery. However, we expect that
recovery may take at least two generations (50 years).
If every identified recovery action is implemented, and if recovery
implementation lasts for 50 years (two generations), then the estimated
cost of implementing this entire recovery program would be
approximately $78.3 million. Any projections of total costs over the
full recovery period are likely to be imprecise, and the cost estimates
do not imply that funding will necessarily be available for all Cook
Inlet beluga whale recovery tasks.
NMFS requests and will consider all substantive comments and
information presented during the public comment period as we finalize
this Plan. NMFS concludes that the Draft Recovery Plan meets the
requirements of the ESA.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: May 11, 2015.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Conservation Division, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-11700 Filed 5-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P