Evaluation of a Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework, 27191-27193 [2015-11454]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 91 / Tuesday, May 12, 2015 / Notices
ADAMS
Accession No.
Document
South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4, Submittal of Supplement to Combined License Application ‘‘Safeguards Information,’’ Part
8, Revision 3, July 15, 2010.
South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4, Combined License Application, Revision 4, October 5, 2010 ................................................
South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4, Submittal of Supplement to Combined License Application ‘‘Safeguards Information,’’ Part
8, Revision 4, February 3, 2011.
South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4, Update to Change in Lead Applicant, January 19, 2011 .......................................................
South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4, Combined License Application, Revision 5, January 26, 2011 ..............................................
South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4, Submittal of Supplement to Combined License Application ‘‘Safeguards Information,’’ Part
8, Revision 5, August 30, 2011.
South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4, Combined License Application, Revision 6, August 30, 2011 ...............................................
South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4, Combined License Application, Revision 7, February 1, 2012 ..............................................
South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4, Combined License Application, Revision 8, September 17, 2012 .........................................
South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4, Combined License Application, Revision 9, April 17, 2013 ...................................................
South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4, Combined License Application, Revision 10, October 29, 2013 ............................................
South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4, Combined License Application, Revision 11, October 21, 2014 ............................................
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day
of May 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Samuel Lee,
Chief, Licensing Branch 2, Division of New
Reactor Licensing, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2015–11549 Filed 5–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2013–0254]
Evaluation of a Proposed Risk
Management Regulatory Framework
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft white paper; request for
comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is seeking public
comment on a draft document entitled,
‘‘NRC Staff White Paper on Options for
Responding to the June 14, 2012
Chairman’s Tasking Memorandum on
‘Evaluating Options Proposed for a More
Holistic Risk-Informed, PerformanceBased Regulatory Approach’ ’’
(hereinafter referred to as NRC Staff
White Paper). The draft NRC Staff White
Paper discusses three items that the
NRC staff expects to present to the
Commission for its consideration:
Options for enhancing the risk
management approach used to ensure
nuclear power reactor safety; reevaluations of two ‘‘improvement
activities’’ from Fukushima Near-Term
Task Force Recommendation 1 that the
Commission deferred; and consideration
of an over-arching, agencywide policy
statement on using the risk management
approach to ensure safety and security.
DATES: Submit comments by June 11,
2015. Comments received after this date
will be considered if it is practical to do
so, but the NRC staff is able to assure
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 May 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
Although the NRC staff will consider all
timely comments, the NRC does not
intend to prepare detailed comment
responses.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comment
by any of the following methods (unless
this document describes a different
method for submitting comments on a
specific subject):
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2013–0254. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
Office of Administration, Mail Stop:
OWFN–12–H08, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard F. Dudley, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
1116; email: Richard.Dudley@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2013–
0254 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
27191
Sfmt 4703
ML102010268
ML102861292
ML110400425
ML110250369
ML110340451
ML11243A171
ML11252A505
ML12048A714
ML12291A415
ML13115A094
ML13310A599
ML14307A876
• Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2013–0254.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
it is mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2013–
0254 in the subject line of your
comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
27192
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 91 / Tuesday, May 12, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment submissions into
ADAMS.
II. Background
In early 2011, the NRC formed a Risk
Management Task Force (RMTF) to
evaluate how the agency should be
regulating 10 to 15 years in the future.
More specifically, the RMTF was
chartered ‘‘to develop a strategic vision
and options for adopting a more
comprehensive and holistic riskinformed, performance-based regulatory
approach for reactors, materials, waste,
fuel cycle, and transportation that
would continue to ensure the safe and
secure use of nuclear material.’’ The
task force report, NUREG–2150, ‘‘A
Proposed Risk Management Regulatory
Framework’’ (ADAMS Accession No.
ML12109A277), was published in April
2012. The report provides findings and
recommendations in two categories. The
first category addresses strategic,
agencywide issues, recommending that
‘‘[t]he NRC should formally adopt the
proposed Risk Management Regulatory
Framework through a Commission
Policy Statement.’’ The second category
addresses what changes could be made
in specific regulatory program areas
(power reactors, nuclear materials, etc.)
in the next several years to support
implementation of the risk management
regulatory framework.
On June 14, 2012, the NRC Chairman
issued a tasking memorandum,
‘‘Evaluating Options Proposed for a
More Holistic Risk-Informed,
Performance-Based Regulatory
Approach’’ (ADAMS Accession No.
ML121660102), directing the NRC staff
to ‘‘. . . review NUREG–2150 and
provide a paper to the Commission that
would identify options and make
recommendations, including the
potential development of a Commission
policy statement.’’
In response to this direction, the NRC
staff prepared a draft NRC Staff White
Paper (ADAMS Accession No.
ML15107A402) that discusses three
items it expects to present to the
Commission for its consideration. The
following discussion briefly describes
these three items.
Item 1: Three options for enhancing
the risk management approach used to
ensure nuclear power reactor safety.
The NRC staff formed a working
group to review NUREG–2150 and make
recommendations to the Commission
regarding possible implementation of an
agencywide Risk Management
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 May 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
Regulatory Framework (RMRF). The
staff’s evaluation determined that the
existing Policy Statements on ‘‘Safety
Goals for the Operation of Nuclear
Power Plants’’ (51 FR 30028; August 21,
1986), and ‘‘Use of Probabilistic Risk
Assessment Methods in Nuclear
Regulatory Activities’’ (60 FR 42622;
August 16, 1995), in concert with
increasing experience with riskinformed regulation and integrated riskinformed decision making processes,
have already established a de-facto
RMRF for the nuclear power reactor
safety program area. Furthermore, the
existing risk-informed regulatory
guidance, risk tools, and risk
information provide a sufficient
foundation to allow the NRC staff to
proceed with recommending specific
risk management implementation
options for nuclear power reactor safety.
Therefore, to obtain Commission
direction on whether the current riskinformed regulatory approach for
nuclear power reactor safety should be
enhanced, the NRC staff intends to
provide the Commission with an RMRF
paper that includes three specific
options for increasing the use of risk
information. These options are
discussed in Section I of the NRC Staff
White Paper. The NRC staff is seeking
public comments on these options for
enhancing the risk management
approach for nuclear power reactor
safety.
Item 2: Re-evaluations of two
‘‘improvement activities’’ from
Fukushima Near-Term Task Force
Recommendation 1 that the Commission
deferred.
On March 11, 2011, the Great Tohoku
Earthquake off the coast of Japan caused
a series of events that led to core
damage at three of the six nuclear power
reactors at the Fukushima Dai-ichi site.
The NRC established a senior-level
agency task force, referred to as the Near
Term Task Force (NTTF), to conduct a
review of the NRC’s processes and
regulations to determine whether the
agency should make additional
improvements to its regulatory system
and to make recommendations to the
Commission for its policy direction. The
NTTF issued its report on July 12, 2011
(ADAMS Accession No. ML111861807),
as an enclosure to Commission Paper,
SECY–11–0093, ‘‘Near-Term Report and
Recommendations for Agency Actions
Following the Events in Japan’’
(ADAMS Accession No. ML11186A959).
The NTTF developed 12 overarching
recommendations for nuclear power
reactors. Recommendation 1 was to
establish a ‘‘logical, systematic, and
coherent regulatory framework for
adequate protection that appropriately
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
balances defense-in-depth and risk
considerations.’’ The June 14, 2012,
tasking memorandum on the RMTF
report also directed the NRC staff to
consider, when developing options for
the disposition of NTTF
Recommendation 1, the regulatory
framework recommendations for
nuclear power reactors in the RMTF
report. The NRC staff provided its
evaluation of NTTF Recommendation 1
and the RMTF report recommendations
related to nuclear power reactors on
December 6, 2013, in SECY–13–0132,
‘‘U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Staff Recommendation for the
Disposition of Recommendation 1 of the
Near-Term Task Force Report’’ (ADAMS
Package Accession No. ML13277A413).
In its staff requirements memorandum
(SRM) for SECY–13–0132 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML14139A104), the
Commission closed NTTF
Recommendation 1. The Commission
directed the NRC staff to reevaluate the
objectives of the staff’s proposed
Improvement Activity 1 (establish new
design-basis extension category) and
Improvement Activity 2 (establish
Commission expectations for defensein-depth) ‘‘in the context of the
Commission direction on a long-term
Risk Management Regulatory
Framework (RMRF). . . .’’ The NRC
staff believes that these two
improvement activities are key elements
involved in evaluating an RMRF for
nuclear power reactors as described in
NUREG–2150. Therefore, the NRC staff
has reevaluated these improvement
activities and provides
recommendations for how Improvement
Activities 1 and 2 could be addressed
under each of the three RMRF nuclear
power reactor implementation options
discussed in Item 1. These proposed
activities are discussed in Section II of
the draft NRC Staff White Paper. The
NRC staff is seeking public comments
on these proposed regulatory framework
improvement activities for nuclear
power reactor safety.
Item 3: Consideration of an overarching, agencywide policy statement
on using the risk management approach
to ensure safety and security.
Early in its review of NUREG–2150,
the NRC staff determined that it would
provide an example of a conceptual
RMRF policy statement for Commission
consideration. The RMRF working
group drafted a conceptual example of
a policy statement and made it publicly
available in ADAMS under Accession
No. ML13273A517. The NRC staff then
published a notice in the Federal
Register on November 25, 2013 (78 FR
70354), requesting public comments on
the document (ADAMS Accession No.
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 91 / Tuesday, May 12, 2015 / Notices
ML13273A493). The NRC staff held
public meetings on June 5, 2013
(ADAMS Accession No. ML13197A216),
and January 30, 2014 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML14064A550). Public
comments were accepted and are
available at the Federal rulemaking Web
site (www.regulations.gov) under Docket
ID NRC–2013–0254. The public
comments that were received on the
draft conceptual agencywide policy
statement varied greatly. The NRC staff’s
overall assessment was that the
comments indicated a need to revise the
staff’s approach. The NRC staff is now
seeking public comments on a revised
policy statement approach as described
in Section III of the draft NRC Staff
White Paper.
III. Opportunity for Public Comment
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The NRC staff notes that the draft
NRC Staff White Paper represents work
in progress; the information may be
modified before the NRC staff provides
its recommendation to the Commission
for a decision, as a result of internal
NRC review and/or consideration of
public comments received. The NRC
staff will review and consider all timely
comments received on the draft NRC
Staff White Paper, but the staff does not
intend to provide detailed comment
responses for all comments received.
Should the Commission proceed with
these initiatives, the public will be
afforded opportunity to provide formal
comment to the NRC through the
rulemaking or policy statement
development process.
Persons interested in monitoring this
activity can do so by searching for
Docket ID NRC–2013–0254 on the
Federal Rulemaking Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov. The
Federal Rulemaking Web site allows
you to receive alerts when changes or
additions occur in a docket folder. To
subscribe: (1) Navigate to the docket
folder (NRC–2013–0254); (2) click the
‘‘Email Alert’’ link; and (3) enter your
email address and select how frequently
you would like to receive emails (daily,
weekly, or monthly).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day
of May, 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Lawrence E. Kokajko,
Director, Division of Policy and Rulemaking,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2015–11454 Filed 5–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 May 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
27193
[NRC–2015–0117]
Applications and Amendments to
Facility Operating Licenses and
Combined Licenses Involving No
Significant Hazards Considerations
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
1927, email: Lynn.Ronewicz@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Biweekly notice.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to Section 189a. (2)
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (the Act), the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) is
publishing this regular biweekly notice.
The Act requires the Commission to
publish notice of any amendments
issued, or proposed to be issued and
grants the Commission the authority to
issue and make immediately effective
any amendment to an operating license
or combined license, as applicable,
upon a determination by the
Commission that such amendment
involves no significant hazards
consideration, notwithstanding the
pendency before the Commission of a
request for a hearing from any person.
This biweekly notice includes all
notices of amendments issued, or
proposed to be issued, from April 16,
2015, to April 29, 2015. The last
biweekly notice was published on April
28, 2015.
DATES: Comments must be filed by June
11, 2015. A request for a hearing must
be filed by July 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods (unless
this document describes a different
method for submitting comments on a
specific subject):
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2015–0117. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
Office of Administration, Mail Stop:
OWFN–12–H08, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynn M. Ronewicz, Office of Nuclear
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2015–
0117 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2015–0117.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
it is mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2015–
0117, facility name, unit number(s),
application date, and subject in your
comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC posts all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as entering
the comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27191-27193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11454]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2013-0254]
Evaluation of a Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Draft white paper; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is seeking public
comment on a draft document entitled, ``NRC Staff White Paper on
Options for Responding to the June 14, 2012 Chairman's Tasking
Memorandum on `Evaluating Options Proposed for a More Holistic Risk-
Informed, Performance-Based Regulatory Approach' '' (hereinafter
referred to as NRC Staff White Paper). The draft NRC Staff White Paper
discusses three items that the NRC staff expects to present to the
Commission for its consideration: Options for enhancing the risk
management approach used to ensure nuclear power reactor safety; re-
evaluations of two ``improvement activities'' from Fukushima Near-Term
Task Force Recommendation 1 that the Commission deferred; and
consideration of an over-arching, agencywide policy statement on using
the risk management approach to ensure safety and security.
DATES: Submit comments by June 11, 2015. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC staff
is able to assure consideration only for comments received on or before
this date. Although the NRC staff will consider all timely comments,
the NRC does not intend to prepare detailed comment responses.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comment by any of the following methods
(unless this document describes a different method for submitting
comments on a specific subject):
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2013-0254. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration,
Mail Stop: OWFN-12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard F. Dudley, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1116; email: Richard.Dudley@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2013-0254 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain
publicly-available information related to this action by any of the
following methods:
Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2013-0254.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available
in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2013-0254 in the subject line of your
comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into
ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission.
[[Page 27192]]
Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information before making the comment
submissions available to the public or entering the comment submissions
into ADAMS.
II. Background
In early 2011, the NRC formed a Risk Management Task Force (RMTF)
to evaluate how the agency should be regulating 10 to 15 years in the
future. More specifically, the RMTF was chartered ``to develop a
strategic vision and options for adopting a more comprehensive and
holistic risk-informed, performance-based regulatory approach for
reactors, materials, waste, fuel cycle, and transportation that would
continue to ensure the safe and secure use of nuclear material.'' The
task force report, NUREG-2150, ``A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory
Framework'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML12109A277), was published in April
2012. The report provides findings and recommendations in two
categories. The first category addresses strategic, agencywide issues,
recommending that ``[t]he NRC should formally adopt the proposed Risk
Management Regulatory Framework through a Commission Policy
Statement.'' The second category addresses what changes could be made
in specific regulatory program areas (power reactors, nuclear
materials, etc.) in the next several years to support implementation of
the risk management regulatory framework.
On June 14, 2012, the NRC Chairman issued a tasking memorandum,
``Evaluating Options Proposed for a More Holistic Risk-Informed,
Performance-Based Regulatory Approach'' (ADAMS Accession No.
ML121660102), directing the NRC staff to ``. . . review NUREG-2150 and
provide a paper to the Commission that would identify options and make
recommendations, including the potential development of a Commission
policy statement.''
In response to this direction, the NRC staff prepared a draft NRC
Staff White Paper (ADAMS Accession No. ML15107A402) that discusses
three items it expects to present to the Commission for its
consideration. The following discussion briefly describes these three
items.
Item 1: Three options for enhancing the risk management approach
used to ensure nuclear power reactor safety.
The NRC staff formed a working group to review NUREG-2150 and make
recommendations to the Commission regarding possible implementation of
an agencywide Risk Management Regulatory Framework (RMRF). The staff's
evaluation determined that the existing Policy Statements on ``Safety
Goals for the Operation of Nuclear Power Plants'' (51 FR 30028; August
21, 1986), and ``Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methods in
Nuclear Regulatory Activities'' (60 FR 42622; August 16, 1995), in
concert with increasing experience with risk-informed regulation and
integrated risk-informed decision making processes, have already
established a de-facto RMRF for the nuclear power reactor safety
program area. Furthermore, the existing risk-informed regulatory
guidance, risk tools, and risk information provide a sufficient
foundation to allow the NRC staff to proceed with recommending specific
risk management implementation options for nuclear power reactor
safety. Therefore, to obtain Commission direction on whether the
current risk-informed regulatory approach for nuclear power reactor
safety should be enhanced, the NRC staff intends to provide the
Commission with an RMRF paper that includes three specific options for
increasing the use of risk information. These options are discussed in
Section I of the NRC Staff White Paper. The NRC staff is seeking public
comments on these options for enhancing the risk management approach
for nuclear power reactor safety.
Item 2: Re-evaluations of two ``improvement activities'' from
Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 1 that the Commission
deferred.
On March 11, 2011, the Great Tohoku Earthquake off the coast of
Japan caused a series of events that led to core damage at three of the
six nuclear power reactors at the Fukushima Dai-ichi site. The NRC
established a senior-level agency task force, referred to as the Near
Term Task Force (NTTF), to conduct a review of the NRC's processes and
regulations to determine whether the agency should make additional
improvements to its regulatory system and to make recommendations to
the Commission for its policy direction. The NTTF issued its report on
July 12, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML111861807), as an enclosure to
Commission Paper, SECY-11-0093, ``Near-Term Report and Recommendations
for Agency Actions Following the Events in Japan'' (ADAMS Accession No.
ML11186A959). The NTTF developed 12 overarching recommendations for
nuclear power reactors. Recommendation 1 was to establish a ``logical,
systematic, and coherent regulatory framework for adequate protection
that appropriately balances defense-in-depth and risk considerations.''
The June 14, 2012, tasking memorandum on the RMTF report also directed
the NRC staff to consider, when developing options for the disposition
of NTTF Recommendation 1, the regulatory framework recommendations for
nuclear power reactors in the RMTF report. The NRC staff provided its
evaluation of NTTF Recommendation 1 and the RMTF report recommendations
related to nuclear power reactors on December 6, 2013, in SECY-13-0132,
``U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff Recommendation for the
Disposition of Recommendation 1 of the Near-Term Task Force Report''
(ADAMS Package Accession No. ML13277A413). In its staff requirements
memorandum (SRM) for SECY-13-0132 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14139A104),
the Commission closed NTTF Recommendation 1. The Commission directed
the NRC staff to reevaluate the objectives of the staff's proposed
Improvement Activity 1 (establish new design-basis extension category)
and Improvement Activity 2 (establish Commission expectations for
defense-in-depth) ``in the context of the Commission direction on a
long-term Risk Management Regulatory Framework (RMRF). . . .'' The NRC
staff believes that these two improvement activities are key elements
involved in evaluating an RMRF for nuclear power reactors as described
in NUREG-2150. Therefore, the NRC staff has reevaluated these
improvement activities and provides recommendations for how Improvement
Activities 1 and 2 could be addressed under each of the three RMRF
nuclear power reactor implementation options discussed in Item 1. These
proposed activities are discussed in Section II of the draft NRC Staff
White Paper. The NRC staff is seeking public comments on these proposed
regulatory framework improvement activities for nuclear power reactor
safety.
Item 3: Consideration of an over-arching, agencywide policy
statement on using the risk management approach to ensure safety and
security.
Early in its review of NUREG-2150, the NRC staff determined that it
would provide an example of a conceptual RMRF policy statement for
Commission consideration. The RMRF working group drafted a conceptual
example of a policy statement and made it publicly available in ADAMS
under Accession No. ML13273A517. The NRC staff then published a notice
in the Federal Register on November 25, 2013 (78 FR 70354), requesting
public comments on the document (ADAMS Accession No.
[[Page 27193]]
ML13273A493). The NRC staff held public meetings on June 5, 2013 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13197A216), and January 30, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14064A550). Public comments were accepted and are available at the
Federal rulemaking Web site (www.regulations.gov) under Docket ID NRC-
2013-0254. The public comments that were received on the draft
conceptual agencywide policy statement varied greatly. The NRC staff's
overall assessment was that the comments indicated a need to revise the
staff's approach. The NRC staff is now seeking public comments on a
revised policy statement approach as described in Section III of the
draft NRC Staff White Paper.
III. Opportunity for Public Comment
The NRC staff notes that the draft NRC Staff White Paper represents
work in progress; the information may be modified before the NRC staff
provides its recommendation to the Commission for a decision, as a
result of internal NRC review and/or consideration of public comments
received. The NRC staff will review and consider all timely comments
received on the draft NRC Staff White Paper, but the staff does not
intend to provide detailed comment responses for all comments received.
Should the Commission proceed with these initiatives, the public will
be afforded opportunity to provide formal comment to the NRC through
the rulemaking or policy statement development process.
Persons interested in monitoring this activity can do so by
searching for Docket ID NRC-2013-0254 on the Federal Rulemaking Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov. The Federal Rulemaking Web site
allows you to receive alerts when changes or additions occur in a
docket folder. To subscribe: (1) Navigate to the docket folder (NRC-
2013-0254); (2) click the ``Email Alert'' link; and (3) enter your
email address and select how frequently you would like to receive
emails (daily, weekly, or monthly).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of May, 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Lawrence E. Kokajko,
Director, Division of Policy and Rulemaking, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2015-11454 Filed 5-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P