Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes, 26490-26492 [2015-10947]
Download as PDF
26490
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 89 / Friday, May 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2015–1277.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 29,
2015.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–10948 Filed 5–7–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0929; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–218–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model BD–100–1A10
(Challenger 300) airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by multiple
reports of chafing found on an electrical
wiring harness in the aft equipment bay,
caused by contact between the wiring
harness and a neighboring hydraulic
line. This proposed AD would require
an inspection, repair if necessary, and
modification of the wiring harness
installation to ensure that the wiring
harness routing is correct and a
minimum clearance between the wire
and the hydraulic line is maintained.
We are proposing this AD to detect and
correct chafing on an electrical wiring
harness, which could cause an electrical
short circuit or lead to a malfunction of
the flight control system, the engine
indication system, or the hydraulic
power control system, and adversely
affect the continued safe operation and
landing of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by June 22, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 May 07, 2015
Jkt 235001
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Bombardier,
ˆ
Inc., 400 Cote Vertu Road West, Dorval,
´
Quebec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone:
514–855–5000; fax: 514–855–7401;
email thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com;
Internet https://www.bombardier.com.
You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
0929; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone: 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Assata Dessaline, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Service Branch, ANE–172,
FAA, New York Aircraft Certification
Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone: 516–
228–7301; fax: 516–794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2015–0929; Directorate Identifier
2014–NM–218–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2014–32,
dated September 8, 2014 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model BD–
100–1A10 (Challenger 300) airplanes.
The MCAI states:
There have been multiple in-service
reports of chafing found on an electrical
wiring harness in the aft equipment bay. An
investigation determined that the chafing was
attributed to contact between the wiring
harness and a neighboring hydraulic line.
This chafing could cause an electrical short
circuit or lead to a malfunction of the flight
control system, the engine indication system,
or the hydraulic power control system; which
could adversely affect the continued safe
operation and landing of the aeroplane.
This [Canadian] AD mandates the
inspection [general visual inspection],
rectification as required [repair of damage
(including wear and chafing)], and
modification of the wiring harness
installation to ensure the correct wiring
routing and a minimum clearance between
the wire and the hydraulic line is
maintained.
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
0929.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Bombardier, Inc. has issued Service
Bulletin 100–24–24, dated June 6, 2014.
The service information describes
procedures for an inspection, repair if
necessary, and modification to reroute
wiring harness installation to prevent
contact with the hydraulic line. This
service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section of
this NPRM.
E:\FR\FM\08MYP1.SGM
08MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 89 / Friday, May 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 107 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 4 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $64 per product.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $43,228, or $404 per
product.
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions
specified in this proposed AD. We have
no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these actions.
According to the manufacturer, all of
the costs of this proposed AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby
reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty
coverage for affected individuals. As a
result, we have included all costs in our
cost estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 May 07, 2015
Jkt 235001
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2015–
0929; Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–
218–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by June 22,
2015.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model
BD–100–1A10 (Challenger 300) airplanes,
certificated in any category, having serial
numbers 20003 through 20382 inclusive,
20384, and 20386.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 24, Electrical Power.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26491
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by multiple reports
of chafing found on an electrical wiring
harness in the aft equipment bay, caused by
contact between the wiring harness and a
neighboring hydraulic line. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct chafing on an
electrical wiring harness which could cause
an electrical short circuit or lead to a
malfunction of the flight control system, the
engine indication system, or the hydraulic
power control system; which could adversely
affect the continued safe operation and
landing of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Inspection, Repair, and Preventive
Modification
Within 36 months after the effective date
of this AD, do the actions required by
paragraph (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD.
(1) Do a one-time general visual inspection
to detect damage (including wear and
chafing) of the wiring harness, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier, Inc. Service Bulletin 100–24–24,
dated June 6, 2014. Repair any damage before
further flight, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier,
Inc. Service Bulletin 100–24–24, dated June
6, 2014; except, where Bombardier, Inc.
Service Bulletin 100–24–24, dated June 6,
2014, specifies to contact Bombardier for
repair instructions, repair using a method
approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA;
or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA);
or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO).
(2) Modify the wiring harness routing in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier, Inc. Service
Bulletin 100–24–24, dated June 6, 2014.
(h) Definition of General Visual Inspection
For the purposes of this AD, a general
visual inspection is a visual examination of
an interior or exterior area, installation, or
assembly to detect obvious damage, failure,
or irregularity. This level of inspection is
made from within touching distance unless
otherwise specified. A mirror may be
necessary to ensure visual access to all
surfaces in the inspection area. This level of
inspection is made under normally available
lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar
lighting, flashlight, or droplight and may
require removal or opening of access panels
or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may
be required to gain proximity to the area
being checked.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO,
ANE–170, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
E:\FR\FM\08MYP1.SGM
08MYP1
26492
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 89 / Friday, May 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety,
FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone:
516–228–7300; fax: 516–794–5531. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a
principal inspector, the manager of the local
flight standards district office/certificate
holding district office. The AMOC approval
letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, New York ACO, ANE–170,
FAA; or TCCA; or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA
DAO. If approved by the DAO, the approval
must include the DAO-authorized signature.
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2014–32, dated
September 8, 2014, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2015–0929.
(2) For service information identified in
ˆ
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Cote´
Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone: 514–855–5000; fax: 514–
855–7401; email thd.crj@
aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://
www.bombardier.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 13,
2015.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–10947 Filed 5–7–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–1275; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–070–AD]
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2004–14–
09, for certain Airbus Model A320–211,
–212, and –231 airplanes. AD 2004–14–
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 May 07, 2015
Jkt 235001
09 currently requires repetitive
inspections for fatigue cracking of the
lower surface panel on the wing center
box, and repair if necessary; and
modification of the lower surface panel
on the wing center box, which
constitutes terminating action for the
repetitive inspections. Since we issued
AD 2004–14–09, we have determined
that, based on the average flight
duration, the average weight of fuel at
landing is higher than that defined for
the analysis of the fatigue-related tasks;
and that shot peening might have been
improperly done on the chromic acid
anodizing (CAA) protection, which
would adversely affect fatigue crack
protection. This proposed AD would
reduce the compliance times for the
repetitive inspections, and would
require a repair for certain airplanes. We
are proposing this AD to detect and
correct fatigue cracking of the lower
surface panel on the wing center box,
which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by June 22, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
1275; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1405;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2015–1275; Directorate Identifier
2014–NM–070–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On June 29, 2004, we issued AD
2004–14–09, Amendment 39–13718 (69
FR 41398, July 9, 2004). AD 2004–14–
09 requires actions intended to address
an unsafe condition on the products
listed above. AD 2004–14–09
superseded AD 98–22–05, Amendment
39–10851 (63 FR 56542, October 22,
1998).
Since we issued AD 2004–14–09,
Amendment 39–13718 (69 FR 41398,
July 9, 2004), we have determined that,
based on the average flight duration, the
average weight of fuel at landing is
higher than that defined for the analysis
of the fatigue-related tasks; and that shot
peening might have been improperly
done on the CAA protection, which
would adversely affect fatigue crack
protection.
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2014–0065, dated March 14,
E:\FR\FM\08MYP1.SGM
08MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 89 (Friday, May 8, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26490-26492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10947]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-0929; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-218-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-100-1A10 (Challenger 300) airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by multiple reports of chafing found on
an electrical wiring harness in the aft equipment bay, caused by
contact between the wiring harness and a neighboring hydraulic line.
This proposed AD would require an inspection, repair if necessary, and
modification of the wiring harness installation to ensure that the
wiring harness routing is correct and a minimum clearance between the
wire and the hydraulic line is maintained. We are proposing this AD to
detect and correct chafing on an electrical wiring harness, which could
cause an electrical short circuit or lead to a malfunction of the
flight control system, the engine indication system, or the hydraulic
power control system, and adversely affect the continued safe operation
and landing of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 22, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone: 514-855-5000; fax: 514-855-7401; email
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0929; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assata Dessaline, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Service Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone: 516-228-7301; fax: 516-794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-0929;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-218-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2014-32, dated September 8, 2014 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-100-
1A10 (Challenger 300) airplanes. The MCAI states:
There have been multiple in-service reports of chafing found on
an electrical wiring harness in the aft equipment bay. An
investigation determined that the chafing was attributed to contact
between the wiring harness and a neighboring hydraulic line. This
chafing could cause an electrical short circuit or lead to a
malfunction of the flight control system, the engine indication
system, or the hydraulic power control system; which could adversely
affect the continued safe operation and landing of the aeroplane.
This [Canadian] AD mandates the inspection [general visual
inspection], rectification as required [repair of damage (including
wear and chafing)], and modification of the wiring harness
installation to ensure the correct wiring routing and a minimum
clearance between the wire and the hydraulic line is maintained.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0929.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Bombardier, Inc. has issued Service Bulletin 100-24-24, dated June
6, 2014. The service information describes procedures for an
inspection, repair if necessary, and modification to reroute wiring
harness installation to prevent contact with the hydraulic line. This
service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section of this NPRM.
[[Page 26491]]
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 107 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We also estimate that it would take about 4 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $64
per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $43,228, or $404 per product.
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might
need these actions.
According to the manufacturer, all of the costs of this proposed AD
may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2015-0929; Directorate Identifier
2014-NM-218-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by June 22, 2015.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-100-1A10
(Challenger 300) airplanes, certificated in any category, having
serial numbers 20003 through 20382 inclusive, 20384, and 20386.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24, Electrical
Power.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by multiple reports of chafing found on an
electrical wiring harness in the aft equipment bay, caused by
contact between the wiring harness and a neighboring hydraulic line.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct chafing on an
electrical wiring harness which could cause an electrical short
circuit or lead to a malfunction of the flight control system, the
engine indication system, or the hydraulic power control system;
which could adversely affect the continued safe operation and
landing of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspection, Repair, and Preventive Modification
Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions required by paragraph (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD.
(1) Do a one-time general visual inspection to detect damage
(including wear and chafing) of the wiring harness, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier, Inc. Service
Bulletin 100-24-24, dated June 6, 2014. Repair any damage before
further flight, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Bombardier, Inc. Service Bulletin 100-24-24, dated June 6, 2014;
except, where Bombardier, Inc. Service Bulletin 100-24-24, dated
June 6, 2014, specifies to contact Bombardier for repair
instructions, repair using a method approved by the Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA; or Transport
Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design
Approval Organization (DAO).
(2) Modify the wiring harness routing in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier, Inc. Service Bulletin
100-24-24, dated June 6, 2014.
(h) Definition of General Visual Inspection
For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection is a
visual examination of an interior or exterior area, installation, or
assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or irregularity. This
level of inspection is made from within touching distance unless
otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to ensure visual
access to all surfaces in the inspection area. This level of
inspection is made under normally available lighting conditions such
as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or droplight and may
require removal or opening of access panels or doors. Stands,
ladders, or platforms may be required to gain proximity to the area
being checked.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO, ANE-170, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local
[[Page 26492]]
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone: 516-228-7300; fax:
516-794-5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO,
ANE-170, FAA; or TCCA; or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA DAO. If approved
by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2014-32, dated September
8, 2014, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-0929.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone: 514-855-5000; fax: 514-
855-7401; email thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 13, 2015.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-10947 Filed 5-7-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P