Partial Withdrawal of Technical Amendments Related to: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Fuel and Quality Assurance Plan Provisions, 26463-26464 [2015-10487]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 89 / Friday, May 8, 2015 / Rules and Regulations Name of non-regulatory SIP revision Applicable geographic area State submittal date EPA approval date * * Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 NO2 NAAQS. * Statewide .......... * 7/15/14 * 5/8/15 [Insert Federal Register citation]. Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. Statewide .......... 7/15/14 5/8/15 [Insert Federal Register citation]. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2015–11033 Filed 5–7–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 80 [EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0135; FRL–9927–17– OAR] RIN 2060–AS36 Partial Withdrawal of Technical Amendments Related to: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Fuel and Quality Assurance Plan Provisions Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Partial withdrawal of direct final rule. AGENCY: Because EPA received adverse comment on certain elements of the Tier 3 Amendments direct final rule published on February 19, 2015, we are withdrawing those elements of the direct final rule. EPA intends to consider the comments received and proceed with a new final rule for the withdrawn elements. The remaining elements will go into effect pursuant to the direct final rule. DATES: Effective May 5, 2015, EPA withdraws the amendments to 40 CFR 80.1453, 80.1616, and 80.1621 published at 80 FR 9078 on February 19, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia MacAllister, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Assessment and Standards Division, 2000 Traverwood Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105; telephone number: 734–214–4131; email address: MacAllister.Julia@ epa.gov. asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: We stated in the Tier 3 Technical Amendments direct final rule published on February SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 May 07, 2015 Jkt 235001 19, 2015 (80 FR 9078) that if we received adverse comment by April 6, 2015, as to any part of the direct final rule, those parts would be withdrawn by publishing a timely notice in the Federal Register. Because EPA received adverse comment, we are withdrawing the amendments that were the subject of these adverse comments and they will not take effect. Three specific provisions are being withdrawn, as described below. First, 40 CFR 80.1453: In the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Quality Assurance Program (QAP) Rule (79 FR 42078, July 18, 2014), EPA added additional product transfer document (PTD) requirements for renewable fuels that informed parties that took ownership of the renewable fuel that they would need to (a) use the fuel as it was intended, i.e., for transportation use; and, (b) incur a renewable volume obligation (RVO) if the fuel was exported. Shortly after publication of the QAP final rule, we received questions on whether these PTD requirements would apply downstream to the end users, including residential heating oil owners and people filling up their fuel tanks at fuel retail stations. EPA provides downstream end user exemptions to the PTD requirements in other fuels programs, and the direct final rule included similar exemptions for RFS PTD requirements. The words ‘‘or custody’’ were inadvertently added to the RFS PTD requirements and we received several comments pointing out that applying the PTD requirements to the transfer of custody of renewable fuels would be costly to industry and not beneficial to the RFS program. In this action we are withdrawing all of the changes to 40 CFR 80.1453. Second, 40 CFR 80.1616: The direct final rule included some clarifying language for when credits expire and are reported. We received a comment advocating for small refiners and small volume refineries to be allowed to use PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 26463 Additional explanation * * This rulemaking action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II) (prevention of significant deterioration), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). This rulemaking action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II) (prevention of significant deterioration), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). credits past January 1, 2020—to effectively receive a small refiner- and small volume refinery-specific period of lead time before these parties must comply with the Tier 3 sulfur standards. Although it is not clear whether this comment is germane to the provisions of the direct final rule, in light of the short time frame for withdrawal of the direct final rule, we have decided to treat this as an adverse comment on the amended rulemaking provisions and we therefore are withdrawing the proposed changes to 40 CFR 80.1616. Third, 40 CFR 80.1621: Following publication of the Tier 3 Final Rule (79 FR 23414, April 28, 2014) we were contacted by some refiners to clarify if/ when small volume refineries could be disqualified, because there was language inadvertently deleted from the regulatory text as part of the Tier 3 final rule. In re-inserting this text in the direct final rule, we clarified that small volume refinery disqualification was akin to small refiner disqualification. We received adverse comment raising the issue that the new wording is confusing because it does not explicitly state exactly when and under which circumstances that disqualification could occur, and also that the term ‘‘small refinery’’ was used instead of the correct term ‘‘small volume refinery’’. In this action we are withdrawing all changes to 40 CFR 80.1621. EPA published a parallel proposed rule on the same day as the direct final rule. The proposed rule invited comment on the substance of the direct final rule. EPA intends to consider the comments received and proceed with a new final rule. As stated in the parallel proposal, EPA does not plan to institute a second comment period for the proposed action with respect to the provisions that are withdrawn by this notice. The amendments for which we did not receive adverse comment are not being withdrawn and will become E:\FR\FM\08MYR1.SGM 08MYR1 26464 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 89 / Friday, May 8, 2015 / Rules and Regulations effective on May 5, 2015, as provided in the February 19, 2015 direct final rule. Accordingly, the amendments to 40 CFR 80.1453, 80.1616 and 80.1621 on February 19, 2015 (80 FR 9078), are withdrawn as of May 5, 2015. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Confidential business information, Diesel fuel, Fuel additives, Gasoline, Imports, Incorporation by reference, Labeling, Motor vehicle pollution, Penalties, Petroleum, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: April 30, 2015. Gina McCarthy, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2015–10487 Filed 5–6–15; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 42 CFR Part 86 Grants for Education Programs in Occupational Safety and Health CFR Correction In Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 399, revised as of October 1, 2014, on page 668, in § 86.33, in paragraph (b), remove the term ‘‘068’’. ■ [FR Doc. 2015–11141 Filed 5–7–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1505–01–D DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 42 CFR Part 121 RIN 0906–AB05 Organ Procurement and Transplantation: Implementation of the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Final rule. asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES AGENCY: This final rule amends the regulations implementing the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984, as amended, (NOTA) pursuant to statutory requirements of the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act (HOPE Act), enacted in 2013. In accordance with the mandates of the HOPE Act, this regulation removes the current regulatory provision that SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 May 07, 2015 Jkt 235001 requires the Organ Procurement Transplantation Network (OPTN) to adopt and use standards for preventing the acquisition of organs from individuals known to be infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In its place, this regulation includes new requirements that organs from individuals infected with HIV may be transplanted only into individuals who are infected with HIV before receiving such organs and who are participating in clinical research approved by an institutional review board, as provided by regulation. The only exception to this requirement of participation in such clinical research is if the Secretary publishes a determination in the future that participation in such clinical research, as a requirement for transplants of organs from individuals infected with HIV, is no longer warranted. In addition, this regulatory change establishes that OPTN standards must ensure that any HIV-infected transplant recipients are participating in clinical research in accordance with the research criteria to be published by the Secretary. Alternately, if and when the Secretary determines that participation in such clinical research should no longer be a requirement for transplants with organs from donors infected with HIV to individuals infected with HIV, the regulation mandates that the OPTN adopt and use standards of quality, as directed by the Secretary, consistent with the law and in a way that ensures the changes will not reduce the safety of organ transplantation. DATES: This final rule is effective June 8, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert W. Walsh, Director, Division of Transplantation, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 8W37, Rockville, MD 20857; or by telephone (301) 443–7577. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Health Resources and Services Administration’s (HRSA), Healthcare Systems Bureau (HSB), Division of Transplantation (DoT) is responsible for overseeing the operation of the nation’s Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), which has responsibilities including the equitable allocation of donor organs for transplantation. The allocation of organs is guided by organ allocation policies developed by the OPTN in accordance with the regulations governing the PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 operation of the OPTN (sometimes referred to as the ‘‘OPTN final rule’’ and herein referred to as ‘‘OPTN regulations’’) (42 CFR part 121). The OPTN is also charged with developing policies on many subjects, including standards of quality pertaining to organs procured for use in transplantation. In addition to the efficient and effective allocation of donor organs through the OPTN, the Secretary also supports efforts to increase the supply of donor organs made available through transplantation. II. Summary of the HOPE Act Prior to the enactment of the HOPE Act, Public Law 113–51 (November 21, 2013), NOTA required the OPTN to adopt and use standards of quality for preventing the acquisition of organs from individuals known to be infected with HIV. This requirement was further incorporated into regulation at 42 CFR 121.6(b). Thus, OPTN members were prohibited from transplanting organs from individuals known to be infected with HIV into patients (including patients infected with HIV). The HOPE Act made an important change with respect to the transplantation of organs from individuals infected with HIV. Pursuant to the HOPE Act, organs from individuals infected with HIV may be transplanted so long as two sets of requirements are satisfied. First, organs from individuals infected with HIV may be transplanted only into individuals who were infected with HIV prior to receiving such an organ. Second, transplants from individuals infected with HIV are subject to one of two oversight frameworks. Specifically, under the initial framework envisioned by the HOPE Act, all recipients of organs from individuals infected with HIV must be participating in clinical research approved by an institutional review board under research criteria to be published by the Secretary as described in the HOPE Act and the standards of quality implemented by the OPTN pursuant to the HOPE Act. Based on this change, all transplant centers conducting such clinical research will be required to comply with research criteria published by the Secretary under subsection (a) of section 377E of the Public Health Service Act, as amended. Alternately, if the Secretary determines that participation in such clinical research is no longer warranted as a requirement for transplants of organs from individuals infected with HIV, the Secretary will publish such a determination. The Secretary must then, consistent with the HOPE Act, direct the OPTN to revise its standards, consistent E:\FR\FM\08MYR1.SGM 08MYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 89 (Friday, May 8, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26463-26464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 80

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0135; FRL-9927-17-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS36


Partial Withdrawal of Technical Amendments Related to: Tier 3 
Motor Vehicle Fuel and Quality Assurance Plan Provisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Partial withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Because EPA received adverse comment on certain elements of 
the Tier 3 Amendments direct final rule published on February 19, 2015, 
we are withdrawing those elements of the direct final rule. EPA intends 
to consider the comments received and proceed with a new final rule for 
the withdrawn elements. The remaining elements will go into effect 
pursuant to the direct final rule.

DATES: Effective May 5, 2015, EPA withdraws the amendments to 40 CFR 
80.1453, 80.1616, and 80.1621 published at 80 FR 9078 on February 19, 
2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia MacAllister, Office of 
Transportation and Air Quality, Assessment and Standards Division, 2000 
Traverwood Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105; telephone number: 734-214-
4131; email address: MacAllister.Julia@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We stated in the Tier 3 Technical Amendments 
direct final rule published on February 19, 2015 (80 FR 9078) that if 
we received adverse comment by April 6, 2015, as to any part of the 
direct final rule, those parts would be withdrawn by publishing a 
timely notice in the Federal Register. Because EPA received adverse 
comment, we are withdrawing the amendments that were the subject of 
these adverse comments and they will not take effect. Three specific 
provisions are being withdrawn, as described below.
    First, 40 CFR 80.1453: In the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Quality 
Assurance Program (QAP) Rule (79 FR 42078, July 18, 2014), EPA added 
additional product transfer document (PTD) requirements for renewable 
fuels that informed parties that took ownership of the renewable fuel 
that they would need to (a) use the fuel as it was intended, i.e., for 
transportation use; and, (b) incur a renewable volume obligation (RVO) 
if the fuel was exported. Shortly after publication of the QAP final 
rule, we received questions on whether these PTD requirements would 
apply downstream to the end users, including residential heating oil 
owners and people filling up their fuel tanks at fuel retail stations. 
EPA provides downstream end user exemptions to the PTD requirements in 
other fuels programs, and the direct final rule included similar 
exemptions for RFS PTD requirements. The words ``or custody'' were 
inadvertently added to the RFS PTD requirements and we received several 
comments pointing out that applying the PTD requirements to the 
transfer of custody of renewable fuels would be costly to industry and 
not beneficial to the RFS program. In this action we are withdrawing 
all of the changes to 40 CFR 80.1453.
    Second, 40 CFR 80.1616: The direct final rule included some 
clarifying language for when credits expire and are reported. We 
received a comment advocating for small refiners and small volume 
refineries to be allowed to use credits past January 1, 2020--to 
effectively receive a small refiner- and small volume refinery-specific 
period of lead time before these parties must comply with the Tier 3 
sulfur standards. Although it is not clear whether this comment is 
germane to the provisions of the direct final rule, in light of the 
short time frame for withdrawal of the direct final rule, we have 
decided to treat this as an adverse comment on the amended rulemaking 
provisions and we therefore are withdrawing the proposed changes to 40 
CFR 80.1616.
    Third, 40 CFR 80.1621: Following publication of the Tier 3 Final 
Rule (79 FR 23414, April 28, 2014) we were contacted by some refiners 
to clarify if/when small volume refineries could be disqualified, 
because there was language inadvertently deleted from the regulatory 
text as part of the Tier 3 final rule. In re-inserting this text in the 
direct final rule, we clarified that small volume refinery 
disqualification was akin to small refiner disqualification. We 
received adverse comment raising the issue that the new wording is 
confusing because it does not explicitly state exactly when and under 
which circumstances that disqualification could occur, and also that 
the term ``small refinery'' was used instead of the correct term 
``small volume refinery''. In this action we are withdrawing all 
changes to 40 CFR 80.1621.
    EPA published a parallel proposed rule on the same day as the 
direct final rule. The proposed rule invited comment on the substance 
of the direct final rule. EPA intends to consider the comments received 
and proceed with a new final rule. As stated in the parallel proposal, 
EPA does not plan to institute a second comment period for the proposed 
action with respect to the provisions that are withdrawn by this 
notice.
    The amendments for which we did not receive adverse comment are not 
being withdrawn and will become

[[Page 26464]]

effective on May 5, 2015, as provided in the February 19, 2015 direct 
final rule.
    Accordingly, the amendments to 40 CFR 80.1453, 80.1616 and 80.1621 
on February 19, 2015 (80 FR 9078), are withdrawn as of May 5, 2015.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Air pollution control, Confidential business information, Diesel fuel, 
Fuel additives, Gasoline, Imports, Incorporation by reference, 
Labeling, Motor vehicle pollution, Penalties, Petroleum, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: April 30, 2015.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-10487 Filed 5-6-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.