Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Services B.V. Airplanes, 25247-25249 [2015-10180]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 85 / Monday, May 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
25247
Cited documents
ADAMS Accession No.
NUREG–1302, ‘‘Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Boiling Water Reactors,’’ April 1991.
NUREG–1555, ‘‘Standard Review Plans for Environmental Reviews for Nuclear Power Plants: Environmental Standard Review
Plan (with Supplement 1 for Operating Reactor License Renewal),’’ June 2013.
NUREG/CR–4013, ‘‘LADTAP II, ‘‘Technical Reference and User Guide,’’ April 1986 ......................................................................
ML091050059
NUREG/CR–4653, ‘‘GASPAR II—Technical Reference and User Guide,’’ March 1987 ..................................................................
The NRC may post additional
materials to the Federal rulemaking Web
site at www.regulations.gov, under
Docket ID NRC–2014–0044. The Federal
rulemaking Web site allows you to
receive alerts when changes or additions
occur in a docket folder. To subscribe:
(1) Navigate to the docket folder (NRC–
2014–0044), (2) click the ‘‘Email Alert’’
link; and (3) enter your email address
and select how frequently you would
like to receive emails (daily, weekly, or
monthly).
IX. Rulemaking Process
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The NRC will consider comments
received or other information submitted
in response to this ANPR in the
development of the proposed draft
regulatory basis or any other documents
developed as a part of any potential
revisions to the 10 CFR part 50,
appendix I, regulations. The NRC,
however, does not intend to provide
responses to comments or other
information submitted in response to
this ANPR. If the NRC develops a
regulatory basis sufficient to support a
proposed rule, then there will be an
opportunity for public comment when
the proposed rule is published and the
NRC will respond to such comments if
and when it publishes a final rule. If the
NRC develops draft supporting guidance
or proposes revisions to existing
guidance documents associated with the
10 CFR part 50, appendix I regulations,
then the public, the regulated
community, and other stakeholders will
have an opportunity to provide
comment on the draft guidance. If NRC
decides not to pursue a 10 CFR part 50,
appendix I rulemaking, as described in
this ANPR, the NRC will publish a
document in the Federal Register that
will generally address public comments
and withdraw this ANPR.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 17th day
of April, 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mark A. Satorius,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015–10408 Filed 5–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0933; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–098–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker
Services B.V. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Fokker Services B.V. Model F.27 Mark
200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 700
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by a design review, which
revealed that no controlled bonding
provisions are present on a number of
critical locations inside the fuel tank or
connected to the fuel tank wall; and no
anti-spray cover is installed on the fuel
shut-off valve (FSOV) in both wings.
This proposed AD would require
installing additional bonding provisions
in the fuel tank, installing an anti-spray
cover on the FSOV, and revising the
airplane maintenance program by
incorporating fuel airworthiness
limitation items and critical design
configuration control limitations. We
are proposing this AD to prevent an
ignition source in the fuel tank vapor
space, which could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the
airplane.
SUMMARY:
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by June 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
DATES:
17 NUREG/CR–1276,
NUREG/CR–4013, and
NUREG/CR–4653 are available through the
Radiation Safety Information Computational Center
at https://rsicc.ornl.gov/Default.aspx.
18 See footnote 17.
19 See footnote 17.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 May 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ML12335A667
Not In
ADAMS 18
Not In
ADAMS 19
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
0933; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1137;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2015–0933; Directorate Identifier
2014–NM–098–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
25248
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 85 / Monday, May 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2014–0099, dated April 30,
2014 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for all Fokker
Services B.V. Model F.27 Mark 200, 300,
400, 500, 600, and 700 airplanes. The
MCAI states:
Prompted by an accident * * *, the FAA
published Special Federal Aviation
Regulation (SFAR) 88, and the Joint Aviation
Authorities (JAA) published Interim Policy
INT/POL/25/12.
The review conducted by Fokker Services
on the Fokker 27 design in response to these
regulations revealed that no controlled
bonding provisions are present on a number
of critical locations, inside the fuel tank or
connected to the fuel tank wall, and no antispray cover is installed on the Fueling ShutOff Valve (FSOV) in both wings.
This condition, if not corrected, could
create an ignition source in the fuel tank
vapour space, possibly resulting in a fuel
tank explosion and consequent loss of the
aeroplane.
To address this potential unsafe condition,
Fokker Services developed a set of bonding
modifications and anti-spray covers,
introduced with Service Bulletin (SB)
SBF27–28–071 Revision 1 (R1), that require
opening of the fuel tank access panels. More
information on this subject can be found in
Fokker Services All Operators Message
AOF27.043#03.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD requires installation of additional
bonding provisions, and of anti-spray covers
on the FSOV, that require opening of the fuel
tank access panels.
Required actions also include revising
the airplane maintenance program by
incorporating fuel airworthiness
limitation items and critical design
configuration control limitations. You
may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
0933.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
This proposed AD would require
revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new
actions (e.g., inspections) and Critical
Design Configuration Control
Limitations (CDCCLs). Compliance with
these actions and CDCCLs is required by
14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes that
have been previously modified, altered,
or repaired in the areas addressed by
this AD, the operator may not be able to
accomplish the actions described in the
revisions. In this situation, to comply
with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator
must request approval for an alternative
method of compliance according to
paragraph (j) of this AD. The request
should include a description of changes
to the required inspections that will
ensure the continued operational safety
of the airplane.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 15 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
Installation of bonding provisions, anti-spray
cover, and maintenance program revision.
70 work-hours × $85 per hour = $5,950 ........
$0
$5,950
$89,250
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 May 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 85 / Monday, May 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Fokker Services B.V.: Docket No. FAA–
2015–0933; Directorate Identifier 2014–
NM–098–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by June 18,
2015.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Fokker Services B.V.
Model F.27 Mark 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and
700 airplanes, certificated in any category, all
serial numbers.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 28, Fuel.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a design review,
which revealed that no controlled bonding
provisions are present on a number of critical
locations inside the fuel tank or connected to
the fuel tank wall; and no anti-spray cover is
installed on the fuel shut-off valve (FSOV) in
both wings. We are issuing this AD to
prevent an ignition source in the fuel tank
vapor space, which could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Installation of Bonding Provisions and
Anti-Spray Cover
At the next scheduled opening of the fuel
tanks after the effective date of this AD, but
no later than 84 months after the effective
date of this AD: Install additional bonding
provisions at the applicable locations, and
install an anti-spray cover on the FSOV in
both wings, using a method approved by the
Manager, International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Revision of Maintenance or Inspection
Program
Within 30 days after installing the bonding
provisions and anti-spray cover specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD: Revise the airplane
maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, by incorporating fuel
airworthiness limitation items and Critical
Design Configuration Control Limitations
(CDCCLs), using a method approved by the
Manager, International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA.
(i) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or
CDCCLs
After accomplishing the revision required
by paragraph (h) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, or
CDCCLs may be used unless the actions,
intervals, or CDCCLs are approved as an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 May 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (j) of this AD.
ACTION:
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch; ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–1137; fax 425–227–1137.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
the EASA; or Fokker Services B.V.’s EASA
Design Organization Approval (DOA). If
approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.
25249
SUMMARY:
(k) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014–0099, dated
April 30, 2014, for related information. This
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2015–0933.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 17,
2015.
Victor Wicklund,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–10180 Filed 5–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0937; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–024–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2011–24–
05, for certain Airbus Model A330–201,
–202, –203, –223, –243, –301, –302,
–303, –321, –322, –323, –341, –342, and
–343 airplanes; and Model A340–200
and –300 series airplanes. AD 2011–24–
05 currently requires repetitive
inspections for cracking of the hole(s) of
the horizontal flange of the keel beam,
and repair if necessary. Since we issued
AD 2011–24–05, a determination was
made that the rototest inspection and
applicable corrective actions of a certain
fastener hole were inadvertently omitted
from the requirements in that AD. This
proposed AD would change the
inspection compliance times, and, for
certain airplanes, would add a one-time
ultrasonic inspection for cracking at a
certain fastener hole. This proposed AD
would also provide optional terminating
action for the repetitive inspections. We
are proposing this AD to detect and
correct cracking of the fastener holes,
which could result in rupture of the keel
beam, and consequent reduced
structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by June 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS—
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 85 (Monday, May 4, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25247-25249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10180]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-0933; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-098-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Services B.V. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Fokker Services B.V. Model F.27 Mark 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 700
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a design review, which
revealed that no controlled bonding provisions are present on a number
of critical locations inside the fuel tank or connected to the fuel
tank wall; and no anti-spray cover is installed on the fuel shut-off
valve (FSOV) in both wings. This proposed AD would require installing
additional bonding provisions in the fuel tank, installing an anti-
spray cover on the FSOV, and revising the airplane maintenance program
by incorporating fuel airworthiness limitation items and critical
design configuration control limitations. We are proposing this AD to
prevent an ignition source in the fuel tank vapor space, which could
result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0933; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1137;
fax 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-0933;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-098-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the
[[Page 25248]]
closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014-0099, dated April 30, 2014 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Fokker Services
B.V. Model F.27 Mark 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 700 airplanes. The
MCAI states:
Prompted by an accident * * *, the FAA published Special Federal
Aviation Regulation (SFAR) 88, and the Joint Aviation Authorities
(JAA) published Interim Policy INT/POL/25/12.
The review conducted by Fokker Services on the Fokker 27 design
in response to these regulations revealed that no controlled bonding
provisions are present on a number of critical locations, inside the
fuel tank or connected to the fuel tank wall, and no anti-spray
cover is installed on the Fueling Shut-Off Valve (FSOV) in both
wings.
This condition, if not corrected, could create an ignition
source in the fuel tank vapour space, possibly resulting in a fuel
tank explosion and consequent loss of the aeroplane.
To address this potential unsafe condition, Fokker Services
developed a set of bonding modifications and anti-spray covers,
introduced with Service Bulletin (SB) SBF27-28-071 Revision 1 (R1),
that require opening of the fuel tank access panels. More
information on this subject can be found in Fokker Services All
Operators Message AOF27.043#03.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires
installation of additional bonding provisions, and of anti-spray
covers on the FSOV, that require opening of the fuel tank access
panels.
Required actions also include revising the airplane maintenance
program by incorporating fuel airworthiness limitation items and
critical design configuration control limitations. You may examine the
MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-0933.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections) and
Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs). Compliance
with these actions and CDCCLs is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by this AD, the operator may not be able to
accomplish the actions described in the revisions. In this situation,
to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request approval for
an alternative method of compliance according to paragraph (j) of this
AD. The request should include a description of changes to the required
inspections that will ensure the continued operational safety of the
airplane.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 15 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation of bonding provisions, 70 work-hours x $85 per $0 $5,950 $89,250
anti-spray cover, and maintenance hour = $5,950.
program revision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[[Page 25249]]
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Fokker Services B.V.: Docket No. FAA-2015-0933; Directorate
Identifier 2014-NM-098-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by June 18, 2015.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Fokker Services B.V. Model F.27 Mark 200,
300, 400, 500, 600, and 700 airplanes, certificated in any category,
all serial numbers.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a design review, which revealed that no
controlled bonding provisions are present on a number of critical
locations inside the fuel tank or connected to the fuel tank wall;
and no anti-spray cover is installed on the fuel shut-off valve
(FSOV) in both wings. We are issuing this AD to prevent an ignition
source in the fuel tank vapor space, which could result in a fuel
tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Installation of Bonding Provisions and Anti-Spray Cover
At the next scheduled opening of the fuel tanks after the
effective date of this AD, but no later than 84 months after the
effective date of this AD: Install additional bonding provisions at
the applicable locations, and install an anti-spray cover on the
FSOV in both wings, using a method approved by the Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA.
(h) Revision of Maintenance or Inspection Program
Within 30 days after installing the bonding provisions and anti-
spray cover specified in paragraph (g) of this AD: Revise the
airplane maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, by
incorporating fuel airworthiness limitation items and Critical
Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs), using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA.
(i) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or CDCCLs
After accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (h) of
this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, or
CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, intervals, or CDCCLs are
approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch; ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1137; fax 425-227-1137. Information
may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA;
or Fokker Services B.V.'s EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).
If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
(k) Related Information
Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI)
EASA Airworthiness Directive 2014-0099, dated April 30, 2014, for
related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2015-0933.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 17, 2015.
Victor Wicklund,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-10180 Filed 5-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P