Safety Zone; POLAR PIONEER, Outer Continental Shelf Drill Unit, Chukchi Sea, Alaska, 24863-24866 [2015-10259]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 6, 2014 and
effective September 15, 2014, is
amended as follows:
■
Class D airspace.
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Paragraph 5000
*
*
*
*
ANM UT D Ogden-Hinckley Airport, UT
[Modified]
Ogden-Hinckley Airport, UT
(Lat. 41°11′44″ N., long. 112°00′47″ W.)
Hill AFB, UT
(Lat. 41°07′26″ N., long. 111°58′23″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface up to, but not including, 7,800 feet
within a 4.3-mile radius of the OgdenHinckley Airport, and that airspace
beginning at a point where the OgdenHinckley 216° radial intersects the Hill AFB
4.6-mile radius to the point where the OgdenHinckley 231° radial intersects the 4.3-mile
radius, thence clockwise along the 4.3-mile
radius to where the Ogden-Hinckley 84°
radial intersects the 4.3-mile radius to the
point where the Ogden-Hinckley 99° radial
intersects the Hill AFB 4.6-mile radius,
excluding the portion southeast of a line
beginning where the 216° radial intersects
the Hill AFB 4.6-mile radius, thence
northeast to lat. 41°10′21″ N., long. 112°00′55
W.; to lat. 41°10′56″ N., long. 111°59′19″ W.;
to a point where the Ogden-Hinckley 99°
radial intersects the Hill AFB 4.6-nm radius.
This airspace is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time
will thereafter be published in the Airport/
Facility Directory.
Paragraph 6004 Class E airspace areas
designated as an extension to Class D or
Class E surface area.
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
16:34 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
ANM UT E4 Ogden-Hinckley Airport, UT
[New]
Ogden-Hinckley Airport, UT
(Lat. 41°11′44″ N., long. 112°00′47″ W.)
Hill AFB, UT
(Lat. 41°07′26″ N., long. 111°58′23″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface 4 miles north and parallel to the 225°
radial of the Ogden-Hinckley Airport,
extending from the 4.3-mile radius to 16
miles southwest of the airport, thence
southeast to lat.41°2′40″ N., long.112°20′4″
W., thence northeast to the point where the
Ogden-Hinckley 99° radial intersects the Hill
AFB 4.6-nm radius.
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ANM UT E5 Ogden-Hinckley Airport, UT
[Modified]
Ogden-Hinckley Airport, UT
(Lat. 41°11′44″ N., long. 112°00′47″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 5.3-mile
radius of Ogden-Hinckley Airport, and that
airspace 3 miles either side of the 294° radial
from the airport extending from the 5.3-mile
radius to 11 miles northwest of the airport,
and that airspace 4 miles either side of the
Ogden-Hinckley 226° radial from the 5.3-mile
radius to 13 miles southwest of the airport.
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on April 21,
2015.
Christopher Ramirez,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2015–10044 Filed 4–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4901–13P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 147
[Docket No. USCG–2015–0247]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; POLAR PIONEER, Outer
Continental Shelf Drill Unit, Chukchi
Sea, Alaska
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes a
safety zone that extends 500 meters
from the outer edge of the DRILL UNIT
POLAR PIONEER, as well as 500 meters
from those points, suitably marked by a
buoy, where the DRILL UNIT POLAR
PIONEER’s mooring spread meets the
ocean’s surface. This safety zone would
be in effect both when the DRILL UNIT
POLAR PIONEER is anchored and when
deploying and recovering moorings.
Placing a safety zone around the drilling
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24863
unit will significantly reduce the threat
of allisions, which could result in oil
spills and releases of natural gas, and
thereby protects the safety of life,
property, and the environment. Lawful
demonstrations may be conducted
outside of the safety zone.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 1, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2015–0247 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email LCDR Jason Boyle,
Seventeenth Coast Guard District (dpi);
telephone 907–463–2821, Jason.t.boyle@
uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Cheryl F. Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2015–0247),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
E:\FR\FM\01MYP1.SGM
01MYP1
24864
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2015–0247 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the
line associated with this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2015–0247 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this rulemaking. You
may also visit the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
4. Public Meeting
The Coast Guard does not plan to
hold a public meeting. But you may
submit a request for one by using one
of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you
believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Coast Guard proposes the
establishment of a temporary safety
zone around the DRILL UNIT POLAR
PIONEER while anchored or deploying
and recovering moorings on location in
order to drill exploratory wells in
several prospects located in the Chukchi
Sea during the 2015 drilling season. The
purpose of the temporary safety zone is
to protect the drilling unit from vessels
operating outside the normal shipping
channels and fairways.
The request for the temporary safety
zone was made by Shell Exploration &
Production Company due to safety
concerns for both the personnel aboard
the DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER and
the environment. Shell Exploration &
Production Company indicated that it is
highly likely that any allision or
inability to identify, monitor or mitigate
any risks or threats, including icerelated hazards that might be
encountered, may result in a
catastrophic event. Incursions into the
safety zone by unapproved vessels
could degrade the ability to monitor and
mitigate such risks. In evaluating this
request, the Coast Guard explored
relevant safety factors and considered
several criteria, including but not
limited to: (1) The level of shipping
activity around the operation; (2) safety
concerns for personnel aboard the
vessel; (3) concerns for the environment
given the sensitivity of the
environmental and the importance of
fishing and hunting to the indigenous
population; (4) the lack of any
established shipping fairways, and
fueling and supply storage/operations
which increase the likelihood that an
allision would result in a catastrophic
event; (5) the recent and potential future
maritime traffic in the vicinity of the
proposed areas; (6) the types of vessels
navigating in the vicinity of the
proposed area; (7) the structural
configuration of the vessel, and (8) the
need to allow for lawful demonstrations
without endangering the safe operation
of the vessel.
Results from a thorough and
comprehensive examination of the
criteria, IMO guidelines, and existing
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
regulations warrant the establishment of
the proposed temporary safety zone. A
safety zone would significantly reduce
the threat of allisions that could result
in oil spills, and other releases.
Furthermore, a safety zone would
increase the safety of life, property, and
the environment in the Chukchi Sea by
prohibiting entry into the zone unless
specifically authorized by the
Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard
District, or a designated representative.
Due to the remote location and the need
to protect the environment, the Coast
Guard may use criminal sanctions to
enforce the safety zone as appropriate.
Shell Exploration & Production
Company has proposed and received
permits for drill sites within the Burger
prospects, Chukchi Sea, Alaska.
Based on the anticipated drilling
operations, we believe a safety zone is
needed be around the DRILL UNIT
POLAR PIONEER while anchored or
deploying and recovering moorings on
location in order to drill exploratory
wells in various locations in the
Chukchi Sea Outer Continental Shelf,
Alaska during the 2015 timeframe.
The actual order of drilling activities
will be controlled by an interplay
between actual ice conditions
immediately prior to a rig move, ice
forecasts, any regulatory restrictions
with respect to the dates of allowed
operating windows, whether the
planned drilling activity involves only
drilling the shallow non-objective
section or penetrating potential
hydrocarbon zones, the availability of
permitted sites having approved
shallow hazards clearance, the
anticipated duration of each
contemplated drilling activity, the
results of preceding wells and Marine
Mammal Monitoring and Mitigation
plan requirements.
All planned exploration drilling in
the identified lease will be conducted
with the DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER.
While conducting exploration drilling
operations, the DRILL UNIT POLAR
PIONEER will be anchored using an
anchoring system consisting of an 8point anchored mooring spread attached
to the onboard turret and could have a
maximum anchor radius of 3,600 ft
(1,100 m). The center point of the DRILL
UNIT POLAR PIONEER will be
positioned within the prospect location
in the Chukchi Sea.
The DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER
will move into the Chukchi Sea on or
about July 1, 2015 and onto a prospect
location when ice allows. Drilling will
conclude on or before October 31, 2015.
The drillship and support vessels will
depart the Chukchi Sea at the
conclusion of the 2015 drilling season.
E:\FR\FM\01MYP1.SGM
01MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed temporary safety zone
would encompass the area that extends
500 meters from the outer edge of the
DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER, as well
as 500 meters from those points,
suitably marked by a buoy, where the
DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER’s
mooring spread meets the ocean’s
surface. As a result, the size and shape
of the safety zone would vary,
depending on how far from the vessel
the mooring spread is deployed, which
is expected to be no more than 1,000
meters. This safety zone would be in
effect when the DRILL UNIT POLAR
PIONEER is on location in order to drill
exploratory wells at various prospects
located in the Chukchi Sea Outer
Continental Shelf, Alaska, from 12:01
a.m. on July 1, 2015 through 11:59 p.m.
on October 31, 2015.
This safety zone will be in effect both
when the DRILL UNIT POLAR
PIONEER is anchored and when
deploying and recovering moorings. As
a result, the size and shape of the safety
zone will vary, depending on how far
from the vessel the mooring spread is
deployed, which is expected to be no
more than 1,000 meters. No vessel
would be allowed to enter or remain in
this proposed safety zone except the
following: An attending vessel or a
vessel authorized by the Commander,
Seventeenth Coast Guard District or a
designated representative. They may be
contacted on VHF–FM Channel 13 or 16
or by telephone at 907–463–2000. For
any group intending to conduct lawful
demonstrations in the vicinity of the rig,
these demonstrations must be
conducted outside the safety zone.
Evaluation. This rule is not a significant
regulatory action due to the location of
the DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER on
the Outer Continental Shelf and its
distance from both land and safety
fairways. Vessels traversing waters near
the proposed safety zone will be able to
safely travel around the zone without
incurring additional costs.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
2. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Coast
Guard has considered whether this
proposed rule would have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the Burger Prospects of the
Chukchi Sea.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact or a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This rule will
enforce a safety zone around a drilling
unit facility that is in areas of the
Chukchi Sea not frequented by vessel
traffic and is not in close proximity to
a safety fairway. Further, vessel traffic
can pass safely around the safety zone
without incurring additional costs.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or Section 1 of Executive Order 13563.
The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule will not rise to the level of
necessitating a full Regulatory
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact LCDR Jason
Boyle, Coast Guard Seventeenth District,
Office of Prevention; telephone 907–
D. Regulatory Analyses
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The Coast Guard developed this
proposed rule after considering
numerous statutes and executive orders
related to rulemaking. Below we
summarize our analyses based on 14 of
these statutes or executive orders.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24865
463–2821, Jason.t.boyle@uscg.mil. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this proposed rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000.00 (adjusted for inflation)
or more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children
The Coast Guard has analyzed this
proposed rule under Executive Order
E:\FR\FM\01MYP1.SGM
01MYP1
24866
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules
13045, Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
12. Energy Effects
The Coast Guard analyzed this
proposed rule under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandants Instruction.
§ 147.T17–0247 Safety Zone; DRILL UNIT
POLAR PIONEER, Outer Continental Shelf
Drillship, Chukchi Sea, Alaska.
(a) Description. The DRILL UNIT
POLAR PIONEER will be engaged in
exploratory drilling operations at
various locations in the Chukchi Sea
from July 1, 2015 through October 31,
2015. The DRILL UNIT POLAR
PIONEER will be anchored while
conducting exploratory drilling
operations with the center point of the
vessel located in various locations in the
Chukchi Sea. The area that extends 500
meters from the outer edge of the DRILL
UNIT POLAR PIONEER, as well as 500
meters from those points, suitably
marked by a buoy, where the DRILL
UNIT POLAR PIONEER’s mooring
spread meets the ocean’s surface is a
safety zone. Lawful demonstrations may
be conducted outside of the safety zone.
(b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or
remain in this safety zone except the
following:
(1) An attending vessel; or
(2) A vessel authorized by the
Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard
District, or a designated representative.
Dated: April 8, 2015.
Daniel B. Abel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Seventeenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015–10259 Filed 4–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2015–0246]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone—Oil Exploration Staging
Area in Dutch Harbor, AK
navigable waters within a 25-yard
radius of moored or anchored offshore
exploration or support vessels, and the
navigable waters within a 100-yard
radius of underway offshore exploration
or support vessels. The purpose of the
safety zones is to protect persons and
vessels during an unusually high
volume of vessel traffic in the Port of
Dutch Harbor, and the adjacent
territorial sea due to additional vessel
traffic associated with exploratory
drilling operations in the Chukchi and
Beaufort seas during the summer of
2015. Lawful demonstrations are
permitted outside of the temporary
safety zones so long as they do not
endanger the safety of vessels either
moored or anchored within the port,
transiting through the port, or transiting
through the adjacent waters of the
territorial sea.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 1, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2015–0246 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility, Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001. Deliveries accepted between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays. The
telephone number is 202–366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LT Heikki Laukkanen, Sector
Anchorage Prevention, Coast Guard;
telephone 907–428–4186, email
Heikki.J.Laukkanen@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Continental shelf, Marine safety,
Navigation (water).
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 147 as follows:
AGENCY:
Table of Acronyms
ACTION:
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147
Jkt 235001
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 85; 43 U.S.C. 1333;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 147.T17–0247 to read as
follows:
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
16:34 Apr 30, 2015
1. The authority citation for part 147
continues to read as follows:
■
■
11. Indian Tribal Governments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
PART 147—SAFETY ZONES
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Coast Guard proposes
temporary safety zones in the Port of
Dutch Harbor, Broad Bay, and adjacent
navigable waters in the Dutch Harbor
area on June 15, 2015. The temporary
safety zones would encompass the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
E:\FR\FM\01MYP1.SGM
01MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24863-24866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10259]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 147
[Docket No. USCG-2015-0247]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; POLAR PIONEER, Outer Continental Shelf Drill Unit,
Chukchi Sea, Alaska
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes a safety zone that extends 500 meters
from the outer edge of the DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER, as well as 500
meters from those points, suitably marked by a buoy, where the DRILL
UNIT POLAR PIONEER's mooring spread meets the ocean's surface. This
safety zone would be in effect both when the DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER
is anchored and when deploying and recovering moorings. Placing a
safety zone around the drilling unit will significantly reduce the
threat of allisions, which could result in oil spills and releases of
natural gas, and thereby protects the safety of life, property, and the
environment. Lawful demonstrations may be conducted outside of the
safety zone.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 1, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2015-0247 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email LCDR Jason Boyle, Seventeenth Coast Guard District
(dpi); telephone 907-463-2821, Jason.t.boyle@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl
F. Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2015-0247), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://
[[Page 24864]]
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use
only one of these means. If you submit a comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver,
or mail your comment, it will be considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket Management Facility.
We recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an email
address, or a telephone number in the body of your document so that we
can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2015-0247 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2015-0247 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
The Coast Guard does not plan to hold a public meeting. But you may
submit a request for one by using one of the four methods specified
under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would
be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Coast Guard proposes the establishment of a temporary safety
zone around the DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER while anchored or deploying
and recovering moorings on location in order to drill exploratory wells
in several prospects located in the Chukchi Sea during the 2015
drilling season. The purpose of the temporary safety zone is to protect
the drilling unit from vessels operating outside the normal shipping
channels and fairways.
The request for the temporary safety zone was made by Shell
Exploration & Production Company due to safety concerns for both the
personnel aboard the DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER and the environment.
Shell Exploration & Production Company indicated that it is highly
likely that any allision or inability to identify, monitor or mitigate
any risks or threats, including ice-related hazards that might be
encountered, may result in a catastrophic event. Incursions into the
safety zone by unapproved vessels could degrade the ability to monitor
and mitigate such risks. In evaluating this request, the Coast Guard
explored relevant safety factors and considered several criteria,
including but not limited to: (1) The level of shipping activity around
the operation; (2) safety concerns for personnel aboard the vessel; (3)
concerns for the environment given the sensitivity of the environmental
and the importance of fishing and hunting to the indigenous population;
(4) the lack of any established shipping fairways, and fueling and
supply storage/operations which increase the likelihood that an
allision would result in a catastrophic event; (5) the recent and
potential future maritime traffic in the vicinity of the proposed
areas; (6) the types of vessels navigating in the vicinity of the
proposed area; (7) the structural configuration of the vessel, and (8)
the need to allow for lawful demonstrations without endangering the
safe operation of the vessel.
Results from a thorough and comprehensive examination of the
criteria, IMO guidelines, and existing regulations warrant the
establishment of the proposed temporary safety zone. A safety zone
would significantly reduce the threat of allisions that could result in
oil spills, and other releases. Furthermore, a safety zone would
increase the safety of life, property, and the environment in the
Chukchi Sea by prohibiting entry into the zone unless specifically
authorized by the Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard District, or a
designated representative. Due to the remote location and the need to
protect the environment, the Coast Guard may use criminal sanctions to
enforce the safety zone as appropriate.
Shell Exploration & Production Company has proposed and received
permits for drill sites within the Burger prospects, Chukchi Sea,
Alaska.
Based on the anticipated drilling operations, we believe a safety
zone is needed be around the DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER while anchored or
deploying and recovering moorings on location in order to drill
exploratory wells in various locations in the Chukchi Sea Outer
Continental Shelf, Alaska during the 2015 timeframe.
The actual order of drilling activities will be controlled by an
interplay between actual ice conditions immediately prior to a rig
move, ice forecasts, any regulatory restrictions with respect to the
dates of allowed operating windows, whether the planned drilling
activity involves only drilling the shallow non-objective section or
penetrating potential hydrocarbon zones, the availability of permitted
sites having approved shallow hazards clearance, the anticipated
duration of each contemplated drilling activity, the results of
preceding wells and Marine Mammal Monitoring and Mitigation plan
requirements.
All planned exploration drilling in the identified lease will be
conducted with the DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER. While conducting
exploration drilling operations, the DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER will be
anchored using an anchoring system consisting of an 8-point anchored
mooring spread attached to the onboard turret and could have a maximum
anchor radius of 3,600 ft (1,100 m). The center point of the DRILL UNIT
POLAR PIONEER will be positioned within the prospect location in the
Chukchi Sea.
The DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER will move into the Chukchi Sea on or
about July 1, 2015 and onto a prospect location when ice allows.
Drilling will conclude on or before October 31, 2015. The drillship and
support vessels will depart the Chukchi Sea at the conclusion of the
2015 drilling season.
[[Page 24865]]
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed temporary safety zone would encompass the area that
extends 500 meters from the outer edge of the DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER,
as well as 500 meters from those points, suitably marked by a buoy,
where the DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER's mooring spread meets the ocean's
surface. As a result, the size and shape of the safety zone would vary,
depending on how far from the vessel the mooring spread is deployed,
which is expected to be no more than 1,000 meters. This safety zone
would be in effect when the DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER is on location in
order to drill exploratory wells at various prospects located in the
Chukchi Sea Outer Continental Shelf, Alaska, from 12:01 a.m. on July 1,
2015 through 11:59 p.m. on October 31, 2015.
This safety zone will be in effect both when the DRILL UNIT POLAR
PIONEER is anchored and when deploying and recovering moorings. As a
result, the size and shape of the safety zone will vary, depending on
how far from the vessel the mooring spread is deployed, which is
expected to be no more than 1,000 meters. No vessel would be allowed to
enter or remain in this proposed safety zone except the following: An
attending vessel or a vessel authorized by the Commander, Seventeenth
Coast Guard District or a designated representative. They may be
contacted on VHF-FM Channel 13 or 16 or by telephone at 907-463-2000.
For any group intending to conduct lawful demonstrations in the
vicinity of the rig, these demonstrations must be conducted outside the
safety zone.
D. Regulatory Analyses
The Coast Guard developed this proposed rule after considering
numerous statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we
summarize our analyses based on 14 of these statutes or executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
Section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule will not rise to the
level of necessitating a full Regulatory Evaluation. This rule is not a
significant regulatory action due to the location of the DRILL UNIT
POLAR PIONEER on the Outer Continental Shelf and its distance from both
land and safety fairways. Vessels traversing waters near the proposed
safety zone will be able to safely travel around the zone without
incurring additional costs.
2. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601-612),
the Coast Guard has considered whether this proposed rule would have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in the Burger
Prospects of the Chukchi Sea.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact or a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
rule will enforce a safety zone around a drilling unit facility that is
in areas of the Chukchi Sea not frequented by vessel traffic and is not
in close proximity to a safety fairway. Further, vessel traffic can
pass safely around the safety zone without incurring additional costs.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact LCDR Jason Boyle, Coast Guard
Seventeenth District, Office of Prevention; telephone 907-463-2821,
Jason.t.boyle@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the For Further
Information Contact section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000.00 (adjusted
for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would
not result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
The Coast Guard has analyzed this proposed rule under Executive
Order
[[Page 24866]]
13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
The Coast Guard analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule. This rule is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandants Instruction.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 147
Continental shelf, Marine safety, Navigation (water).
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 147 as follows:
PART 147--SAFETY ZONES
0
1. The authority citation for part 147 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 14 U.S.C. 85; 43 U.S.C. 1333; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 147.T17-0247 to read as follows:
Sec. 147.T17-0247 Safety Zone; DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER, Outer
Continental Shelf Drillship, Chukchi Sea, Alaska.
(a) Description. The DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER will be engaged in
exploratory drilling operations at various locations in the Chukchi Sea
from July 1, 2015 through October 31, 2015. The DRILL UNIT POLAR
PIONEER will be anchored while conducting exploratory drilling
operations with the center point of the vessel located in various
locations in the Chukchi Sea. The area that extends 500 meters from the
outer edge of the DRILL UNIT POLAR PIONEER, as well as 500 meters from
those points, suitably marked by a buoy, where the DRILL UNIT POLAR
PIONEER's mooring spread meets the ocean's surface is a safety zone.
Lawful demonstrations may be conducted outside of the safety zone.
(b) Regulation. No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone
except the following:
(1) An attending vessel; or
(2) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard
District, or a designated representative.
Dated: April 8, 2015.
Daniel B. Abel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2015-10259 Filed 4-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P