Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Proposed Pacific Gas & Electric Company Eagle Conservation Plan, 24955-24958 [2015-10067]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Notices
significant mold present; contact
Agriculture for more information.
Utah
Little Mountain Communication
40.53807749–109.69935286
Maeser UT 84078
Landholding Agency: GSA
Property Number: 54201520002
Status: Excess
GSA Number: 7–A–UT–0536–AA
Directions: Disposal Agency: GSA, Land
Holding Agency: Agriculture
Comments: off-site removal; 190 sq. ft.;
12+mos. vacant; radio tower, commercial;
contact Forest Service to gain access;
contact Agriculture for more information.
Vermont
Old Operators Quarters/USACE N
100 Reservoir Road
Springfield VT 05156
Landholding Agency: COE
Property Number: 31201520001
Status: Underutilized
Comments: off-site removal only; 50+yrs. old;
700 sq. ft.; storage; asbestos; no future
agency need; contact COE for more
information.
Washington
Building 03932
Joint Base Lewis McChord
JBLM WA 98433
Landholding Agency: Army
Property Number: 21201520001
Status: Underutilized
Comments: off-site removal only; no future
agency need; 120 sq. ft.; storage; 49+ yrs.;
significant repairs for restoration;
contamination; contact Army for
accessibility and removal requirements.
Land
Colorado
Grand Valley Project
39.25326873–108.84370271
Unincorporated CO 81524
Landholding Agency: GSA
Property Number: 54201520001
Status: Excess
GSA Number: 7–I–CO–0699–AA
Directions: Disposal Agency: GSA, Land
Holding Agency: Interior
Comments: 30.12 acres; agricultural; silage
pits; contact Interior for more information.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Unsuitable Properties
Building
Massachusetts
Building 181
181 East Road
Otis ANGB MA 02542
Landholding Agency: Air Force
Property Number: 18201520001
Status: Excess
Comments: public access denied & no
alternative method to gain access without
compromising National Security.
Reasons: Secured Area
3 Buildings
Otis ANGB, MA
Otis ANGB MA 02542
Landholding Agency: Air Force
Property Number: 18201510045
Status: Excess
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
Directions: Building 120; 122; 153
Comments: public access denied & no
alternative method to gain access w/out
compromising National Security.; property
located within an Airport Runway Clear
Zone.
Reasons: Secured Area; Within airport
runway clear zone
Alaska
Duplex Housing Units 100 & 102
Lots 3 & 4, Block 2, Bettles Airport
Subdivision
Bettles AK 99755
Landholding Agency: Interior
Property Number: 61201520003
Status: Unutilized
Comments: Property located within an
airport runway.
Reasons: Within airport runway clear zone
Michigan
Mio 7 Winowiecki Consumers Cab
Huron Nat’l Forest Old M–72
(Smith Bridge)
Grayling MI 49738
Landholding Agency: Agriculture
Property Number: 15201520003
Status: Unutilized
Comments: documented deficiencies:
documentation provided represents a clear
threat to personal safety; significant rot in
floor/roof structure; relocation will most
likely result in the roof collapsing.
Reasons: Extensive deterioration
Mio 7 Winowiecki Consumers Lea
Huron National Forest Old M–72
(Smith Bridge)
Grayling MI 49738
Landholding Agency: Agriculture
Property Number: 15201520004
Status: Unutilized
Comments: documented deficiencies:
documentation provided represents a clear
threat to personal safety; interior space of
the structure cannot be made to comply w/
habitability requirements.
Reasons: Extensive deterioration
Washington
Navy Reserve Center-Building 7
5101 N. Assemble Street
Spokane WA 99205
Landholding Agency: Navy
Property Number: 77201520002
Status: Excess
Comments: Public access denied & no
alternative method to gain access without
compromising National Security.
Reasons: Secured Area
Land
Georgia
Proposed Photovoltaic (PV) Sit
Marine Corps Logistics Base
Albany GA 31704
Landholding Agency: Navy
Property Number: 77201520001
Status: Underutilized
Comments: Public access denied & no
alternative method to gain access without
compromising National Security.
Reasons: Secured Area
[FR Doc. 2015–10017 Filed 4–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24955
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–MB–2015–N062; FF08M00000–
FXMB12310800000–145]
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
and Proposed Pacific Gas & Electric
Company Eagle Conservation Plan
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement; notice
of scoping meeting and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), intend to
prepare a draft environmental impact
statement (EIS) for the Pacific Gas and
Electric Company’s (PG&E) (Applicant)
proposed Eagle Conservation Plan (ECP)
and request for a 30-year programmatic
eagle take permit for take of bald eagles
and golden eagles under the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act).
The ECP, which serves as the
foundation of the permit application, is
a comprehensive plan that addresses
take of the eagles associated with
PG&E’s existing infrastructure and
operations and maintenance (O&M)
activities throughout the Plan Area,
which encompasses about two-thirds of
the State of California. We provide this
notice to (1) describe the proposed
action; (2) advise other Federal and state
agencies, potentially affected tribal
interests, and the public of our intent to
prepare an EIS; (3) announce the
initiation of a 60-day public scoping
period; and (4) obtain suggestions and
information on the scope of issues and
possible alternatives to be included in
the EIS. We also announce plans for a
public scoping meeting and the opening
of a public comment period. We request
data, comments, new information, or
suggestions from the public,
governmental agencies, the scientific
community, tribes, industry, or any
other interested party.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by June 30,
2015. A public scoping meeting will be
held on May 21, 2015, at Red Lion Hotel
Woodlake Conference Center, 500
Leisure Lane, Sacramento, CA 95815.
ADDRESSES: To request further
information or submit written
comments, please use one of the
following methods, and note that your
information request or comment is in
reference to the PG&E Eagle
Conservation Plan EIS:
• Email: [fw8_eagle_nepa@fws.gov].
Include ‘‘PG&E Eagle Conservation Plan
EIS’’ in the subject line of the message.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
24956
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Notices
• U.S. Mail: Heather Beeler,
Migratory Bird Program, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Pacific Southwest
Regional Office, 2800 Cottage Way, W–
2605, Sacramento, CA 95825.
• Fax: Heather Beeler, Migratory Bird
Program, (916) 414–6486; Attn: PG&E
Eagle Conservation Plan EIS Scoping.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather Beeler, Migratory Bird Program,
at the address shown above or at (916)
414–6651 (telephone). If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf,
please call the Federal Information
Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service),
intend to prepare a draft environmental
impact statement (EIS) for the Pacific
Gas and Electric Company’s (PG&E)
(Applicant) proposed Eagle
Conservation Plan (ECP) and request for
a 30-year programmatic eagle take
permit under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (Eagle Act). The ECP
serves as the foundation of the permit
application. The ECP summarizes the
applicant’s current voluntary approach
to address eagle and bird impacts
associated with PG&E’s existing
infrastructure and operations and
maintenance (O&M) activities
throughout their ECP Plan Area (Plan
Area).
The ECP is a comprehensive plan that
addresses the take of bald eagles
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and golden
eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) associated
with PG&E’s existing infrastructure and
O&M activities throughout the Plan
Area, which encompasses about twothirds of the State of California. The ECP
also provides measures to avoid,
minimize, and mitigate for eagle
mortality. The draft EIS will evaluate
the impacts of several alternatives
related to the proposed issuance of a
programmatic eagle take permit to PG&E
for bald and golden eagles that results
from system-wide standard O&M at
their infrastructure and facilities.
We provide this notice to (1) describe
the proposed action; (2) advise other
Federal and state agencies, potentially
affected tribal interests, and the public
of our intent to prepare an EIS; (3)
announce the initiation of a 60-day
public scoping period; and (4) obtain
suggestions and information on the
scope of issues and possible alternatives
to be included in the EIS.
We also announce plans for a public
scoping meeting and the opening of a
public comment period. We request
data, comments, new information, or
suggestions from the public,
governmental agencies, the scientific
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
community, tribes, industry, or any
other interested party.
We publish this notice in accordance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C.
4321–4347, et seq.; NEPA), and its
implementing regulations in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) at 40 CFR
1500–1508 as well as Section 668a of
the Eagle Act (16 U.S.C. 668a–668d).
Introduction
The Service is considering an
application from PG&E, under the Eagle
Act, for a 30-year programmatic take
permit for bald and golden eagles. PG&E
has prepared an ECP, which addresses
incidental take of bald and golden
eagles from electrocution and collision
with above-ground electric transmission
and distribution lines (collectively
power lines), as well as disturbance of
nesting eagles during various operations
and maintenance (O&M) activities
within the Plan Area. The Plan Area
encompasses PG&E’s Service Area
including all electric and hydroelectric
facilities located within the state of
California. The ECP analyzes their
system’s risk to eagles. It also identifies
measures to avoid, minimize and
mitigate eagle mortality associated with
those activities. The Plan Area is within
the following California Counties:
Alameda
Alpine
Amador
Butte
Calaveras
Colusa
Contra Costa
Del Norte
El Dorado
Fresno
Glenn
Humboldt
Inyo
Kern
Kings
Lake
Lassen
Los Angeles
Madera
Marin
Mariposa
Mendocino
Merced
Modoc
Mono
Monterey
Napa
Nevada
Placer
Plumas
Sacramento
San Benito
San Bernardino
San Francisco
San Joaquin
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
San Luis Obispo
San Mateo
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
Santa Cruz
Shasta
Sierra
Siskiyou
Solano
Sonoma
Stanislaus
Sutter
Tehama
Trinity
Tulare
Tuolumne
Ventura
Yolo
Yuba
Background
Eagles are protected under the Eagle
Act, which prohibits take and
disturbance of individuals and nests.
Take under the Eagle Act includes any
actions that pursue, shoot, shoot at,
poison, wound, kill, capture, trap,
collect, destroy, molest, and disturb
eagles. Disturb is further defined in 50
CFR 22.3 as ‘‘to agitate or bother a bald
or golden eagle to a degree that causes,
or is likely to cause, based on the best
scientific information available (1)
injury to an eagle, (2) a decrease in its
productivity, by substantially interfering
with normal breeding, feeding, or
sheltering behavior, or (3) nest
abandonment, by substantially
interfering with normal breeding,
feeding, or sheltering behavior.’’
Prior to 2009, permits for purposeful
take of birds or body parts were limited
to scientific (50 CFR 22.21), religious
(50 CFR 22.22), or falconry (50 CFR
22.24) pursuits; for eagles causing
serious injury to livestock or other
wildlife (50 CFR 22.23); and for golden
eagle nests that interfere with resource
development or recovery operations (50
CFR 22.21–25). In 2009, we issued the
Final Rule for Eagle Permits; Take
Necessary to Protect Interests in
Particular Localities (2009 Final Rule)
on new permit regulations that allow
take ‘‘for the protection of . . . other
interests in any particular locality’’ and
where the take is ‘‘associated with and
not the purpose of an otherwise lawful
activity . . .’’ (September 11, 2009; 74
FR 46836–46879). The 2009 Final Rule
authorizes programmatic take (take that
is recurring and not in a specific,
identifiable timeframe and/or location)
of eagles only if avoidance measures
have been implemented to the
maximum extent achievable. PG&E’s
activities are programmatic and existed
prior to the 2009 Final Rule.
Considerations for issuing take permits
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
include the health of the local and
regional eagle populations, availability
of suitable nesting and foraging habitat
for any displaced eagles, and whether
the take and associated mitigation
provide a net benefit to eagles (74 FR
46836–46879). The programmatic take
permit under the 2009 Final Rule was
valid up to 5 years. In 2012, we
proposed to extend the maximum term
for programmatic take permits from 5 to
30 years (April 13, 2012; 77 FR 22267–
22278), and in 2013, we issued a Final
Rule to extend the maximum term for
programmatic eagle permits to 30 years,
subject to a recurring 5-year review
process throughout the life of the permit
(December 9, 2013; 78 FR 73704–
78725).
PG&E’s power lines have resulted in
eagle mortality due to electrocution and
collision. Furthermore, infrastructure
associated with electric and
hydroelectric energy generation requires
long-term O&M, pipeline, and utility
line modernization and replacement to
produce and deliver reliable and safe
energy to PG&E customers. Some O&M
activities occur in eagle nesting habitat
where there is a potential to disturb
nesting eagles.
Scope of EIS
PG&E’s ECP serves as the foundation
of the permit application. As such, all
alternatives considered in the EIS
should conform to the permit issuance
criteria for programmatic eagle take
permits under the Eagle Act as required
in 50 CFR 22.26(f)(1–6).
The draft EIS will identify and
analyze direct, indirect, and cumulative
impacts of the proposed action and
alternatives to several resource areas,
including biological resources, public
utilities, air quality, noise, water
resources, cultural resources,
socioeconomics, and climate change.
We will also consider evaluation of
additional resource areas if issues of
concern specific to the proposed action
are identified during the public scoping
process. The purpose of the public
scoping process for the EIS is to
determine relevant issues that will
influence the scope of the
environmental analysis, including
potential alternatives, and the extent to
which those issues and impacts will be
analyzed in the EIS. We will evaluate a
minimum of three alternatives.
Applicant’s Proposal
PG&E has requested a programmatic
eagle take permit for incidental take of
bald and golden eagles associated with
O&M activities in the Plan Area, as
described in the ECP, for a term of 30
years. Specific activities covered under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
the ECP would include otherwise lawful
activities that have the potential to kill
eagles or disturb them to the extent that
nests are abandoned or eagle
productivity is decreased, as well as
avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce these impacts. The ECP
describes:
(1) Eagle collision with or
electrocution by PG&E’s existing
distribution and transmission lines and
conductors within the Plan Area;
(2) Operation and maintenance of
PG&E’s electrical system, including
inspection and patrols (aerial and
ground), routine maintenance and
repair, vegetation management
(including tree pruning and removal
with the right of way), and replacement
or upgrades of existing power lines and
infrastructure. This activity would
apply to all power lines in the Plan Area
(141,200 miles of distribution lines and
18,600 miles of transmission lines) and
related infrastructure;
(3) Operation and maintenance of
PG&E’s hydroelectric system, including
the associated electric system,
recreation facility maintenance, log
boom/buoy/safety marker maintenance,
intake tunnel clearing, and repair of
weirs and gages. This activity would
apply to all facilities in the Plan Area,
including 68 existing powerhouses, a
pumped storage facility, and nearly 100
reservoirs;
(4) Continued implementation of
migratory bird and eagle take-reduction
measures, including, but not limited to:
(a) Adoption of avian-safe
construction design standards;
(b) Proactive and reactive bird-safe
power pole retrofits;
(c) Bird nest protection best
management practices during vegetation
management activities and other routine
or project work;
(d) Bird flight diverter effectiveness
studies;
(e) Targeted management at
hydroelectric facilities; and
(f) Pre-construction nesting bird
surveys when required for project work.
(5) Monitoring to validate the
estimated amount of disturbance take
and the number of fatalities associated
with PG&E’s existing infrastructure and
to evaluate the effectiveness of the
conservation measures at reducing eagle
take. Monitoring efforts would generally
include:
(a) Monitoring of eagle nests located
throughout PG&E’s hydroelectric
system, as well as those discovered
during inspections, patrols, and
vegetation management activities; and
(b) Monitoring eagle fatalities during
inspections, patrols, and vegetation
management actions.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24957
Public Comments
We request data, comments, new
information, or suggestions from the
public, other governmental agencies, the
scientific community, Tribes, industry,
or any other interested party on this
notice. We will consider these
comments in developing the draft EIS.
Public Availability of Comments
You may submit your comments and
materials by one of the methods listed
above in ADDRESSES. Before including
your address, phone number, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—might
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Scoping Meetings
See DATES for the date(s) and time(s)
of our public meeting(s). The primary
purpose of these meetings and public
comment period is to provide the public
with a general understanding of the
background of the proposed action and
to solicit suggestions and information
on the scope of issues and alternatives
we should consider when drafting the
EIS. Oral and written comments will be
accepted at the meetings. An interpreter
and/or court reporter will be present
when deemed necessary. Comments can
also be submitted by methods listed in
the ADDRESSES section. Once the draft
EIS and proposed ECP are complete and
made available for review, there will be
additional opportunity for public
comment on the content of these
documents.
Persons needing reasonable
accommodations in order to attend and
participate in the public meetings
should contact the Pacific Southwest
Region’s Migratory Bird Office using
one of the methods listed above in
ADDRESSES as soon as possible. In order
to allow sufficient time to process
requests, please make contact no later
than one week before the public
meeting. Information regarding this
proposed action is available in
alternative formats upon request.
Authority
We provide this notice under section
668a of the Eagle Act (16 U.S.C. 668–
668c) and NEPA regulations (40 CFR
1501.7, 40 CFR 1506.6, and 40 CFR
1508.22).
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
24958
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Notices
Dated: April 23, 2015.
Alexandra Pitts,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest
Region, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2015–10067 Filed 4–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2014–N198;
FXRS12650400000S3–123–FF04R02000]
Cat Island National Wildlife Refuge,
Louisiana; Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of a ‘‘Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment (Draft CCP/EA) for Cat
Island National Wildlife Refuge in West
Feliciana Parish, Louisiana, for public
review and comment. In this Draft CCP/
EA, we describe the alternative we
propose to use to manage this refuge for
the 15 years following approval of the
final CCP.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
June 1, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of
the Draft CCP/EA by contacting Kent
Ozment, Wildlife Refuge Specialist, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Lower
Mississippi River Refuge Complex, 21
Pintail Ln. 89, Natchez, MS 39165.
Alternatively, you may download the
document from our Internet site at
https://southeast.fws.gov/planning under
‘‘Draft CCP Documents.’’ Comments on
the Draft CCP/EA may be submitted to
the above postal address or by email to
Kent Ozment at Kent_Ozment@fws.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kent
Ozment, Natural Resource Planner,
(601) 442–6696 or Kent_Ozment@
fws.gov.
SUMMARY:
With this
notice, we continue the CCP process for
Cat Island National Wildlife Refuge
(NWR) started through a notice in the
Federal Register on October 22, 2013
(78 FR 62648). For more about the
refuge and our CCP process, please see
that notice.
Cat Island National Wildlife Refuge
was established in October 2000, as the
526th refuge in the National Wildlife
Refuge System. It is located in West
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
Feliciana Parish, Louisiana, near the
town of St. Francisville, 25 miles north
of Baton Rouge. The refuge currently
encompasses 10,473 acres of bottomland
hardwood forest, baldcypress-tupelo
swamp, and shrub-scrub swamps. The
Congressionally approved acquisition
boundary encloses 36,500 acres.
Cat Island NWR is part of the Lower
Mississippi River Ecosystem and is
located on the southeastern edge of the
Mississippi Alluvial Valley (MAV) Bird
Conservation Region, which is
incorporated into the Gulf Coastal Plans
and Ozarks Landscape Conservation
Cooperative. The refuge provides highquality habitat for many species of
waterfowl, wading birds, Neotropical
migratory songbirds, and resident game
and fish, as well as threatened and
endangered species and species of
concern. The refuge contains a number
of relict old-growth baldcypress trees,
including the world’s largest known
individual of this species.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement
Act), requires us to develop a CCP for
each national wildlife refuge. CCPs are
developed to provide refuge managers
with a 15-year plan for achieving refuge
purposes and contributing toward the
mission of the National Wildlife Refuge
System consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal
mandates, and our policies. In addition
to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Improvement Act.
Priority resource issues addressed in
the Draft CCP/EA include: Fish and
Wildlife Population Management,
Habitat Management, Resource
Protection, Visitor Services, and Refuge
Administration.
CCP Alternatives, Including Our
Proposed Alternative (B)
We developed three alternatives for
managing the refuge (Alternatives A, B,
and C), with Alternative B as our
proposed alternative. A full description
of each alternative is in the Draft CCP/
EA. We summarize each alternative
below.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Alternative A: Current Management (No
Action)
Under alternative A, Cat Island NWR
would be managed as it has been in
recent years. No new actions would be
taken to manage Cat Island NWR, or
improve or otherwise change the
refuge’s habitats, wildlife, or public use.
Programs that have been ongoing in the
past would continue. Certain
monitoring activities would continue,
including periodic migratory bird
surveys. Maintenance of roads and
public-use facilities would continue as
presently conducted. Habitats would
continue to be mostly passively
managed, with actions taken only to
provide for public safety or to avoid or
mitigate damage to refuge resources.
Current partnerships with the West
Feliciana Parish Tourist Commission,
Louisiana Hiking Club, Louisiana
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries,
and others would continue as before.
The refuge hunting, fishing, and nonconsumptive uses would continue as
presently constituted. Legal
requirements for protection of natural
and cultural resources would continue
to be met.
Acquisition of lands within the
approved acquisition boundary would
continue as before, contingent upon the
availability of funding and appropriate
lands offered by willing sellers. Law
enforcement would continue to be a
shared responsibility between the
Service, the State of Louisiana, and the
West Feliciana Parish Sheriff’s Office.
The refuge would continue to be
unstaffed, and funding for its operation
would be restricted to funds generated
by the sale of recreational use permits
and occasional special project funding.
Alternative B: Active Resource
Management (Proposed Alternative)
Under this alternative, the refuge’s
natural resources would be managed to
enhance habitats for priority species,
including waterfowl and other
migratory birds, threatened and
endangered species, species of concern,
and resident fish and wildlife.
Additionally, consistent wildlife
surveys would be conducted, using
established protocols to establish
baseline habitat conditions, estimate
wildlife population indices, determine
responses to management actions, and
contribute to larger scale biological
assessments. Invasive exotic and
nuisance species would be actively
managed to minimize their impacts on
refuge resources. The refuge forests
would be actively managed to enhance
wildlife habitat. Aquatic habitats on the
refuge would be inventoried and
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24955-24958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10067]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-MB-2015-N062; FF08M00000-FXMB12310800000-145]
Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Proposed Pacific Gas &
Electric Company Eagle Conservation Plan
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement;
notice of scoping meeting and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), intend to
prepare a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Pacific
Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) (Applicant) proposed Eagle
Conservation Plan (ECP) and request for a 30-year programmatic eagle
take permit for take of bald eagles and golden eagles under the Bald
and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act). The ECP, which serves as
the foundation of the permit application, is a comprehensive plan that
addresses take of the eagles associated with PG&E's existing
infrastructure and operations and maintenance (O&M) activities
throughout the Plan Area, which encompasses about two-thirds of the
State of California. We provide this notice to (1) describe the
proposed action; (2) advise other Federal and state agencies,
potentially affected tribal interests, and the public of our intent to
prepare an EIS; (3) announce the initiation of a 60-day public scoping
period; and (4) obtain suggestions and information on the scope of
issues and possible alternatives to be included in the EIS. We also
announce plans for a public scoping meeting and the opening of a public
comment period. We request data, comments, new information, or
suggestions from the public, governmental agencies, the scientific
community, tribes, industry, or any other interested party.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
June 30, 2015. A public scoping meeting will be held on May 21, 2015,
at Red Lion Hotel Woodlake Conference Center, 500 Leisure Lane,
Sacramento, CA 95815.
ADDRESSES: To request further information or submit written comments,
please use one of the following methods, and note that your information
request or comment is in reference to the PG&E Eagle Conservation Plan
EIS:
Email: [fw8_eagle_nepa@fws.gov]. Include ``PG&E Eagle
Conservation Plan EIS'' in the subject line of the message.
[[Page 24956]]
U.S. Mail: Heather Beeler, Migratory Bird Program, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Southwest Regional Office, 2800
Cottage Way, W-2605, Sacramento, CA 95825.
Fax: Heather Beeler, Migratory Bird Program, (916) 414-
6486; Attn: PG&E Eagle Conservation Plan EIS Scoping.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Beeler, Migratory Bird
Program, at the address shown above or at (916) 414-6651 (telephone).
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf, please call the
Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service), intend to prepare a draft environmental impact statement
(EIS) for the Pacific Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) (Applicant)
proposed Eagle Conservation Plan (ECP) and request for a 30-year
programmatic eagle take permit under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (Eagle Act). The ECP serves as the foundation of the
permit application. The ECP summarizes the applicant's current
voluntary approach to address eagle and bird impacts associated with
PG&E's existing infrastructure and operations and maintenance (O&M)
activities throughout their ECP Plan Area (Plan Area).
The ECP is a comprehensive plan that addresses the take of bald
eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos)
associated with PG&E's existing infrastructure and O&M activities
throughout the Plan Area, which encompasses about two-thirds of the
State of California. The ECP also provides measures to avoid, minimize,
and mitigate for eagle mortality. The draft EIS will evaluate the
impacts of several alternatives related to the proposed issuance of a
programmatic eagle take permit to PG&E for bald and golden eagles that
results from system-wide standard O&M at their infrastructure and
facilities.
We provide this notice to (1) describe the proposed action; (2)
advise other Federal and state agencies, potentially affected tribal
interests, and the public of our intent to prepare an EIS; (3) announce
the initiation of a 60-day public scoping period; and (4) obtain
suggestions and information on the scope of issues and possible
alternatives to be included in the EIS.
We also announce plans for a public scoping meeting and the opening
of a public comment period. We request data, comments, new information,
or suggestions from the public, governmental agencies, the scientific
community, tribes, industry, or any other interested party.
We publish this notice in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, et
seq.; NEPA), and its implementing regulations in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at 40 CFR 1500-1508 as well as Section 668a of the
Eagle Act (16 U.S.C. 668a-668d).
Introduction
The Service is considering an application from PG&E, under the
Eagle Act, for a 30-year programmatic take permit for bald and golden
eagles. PG&E has prepared an ECP, which addresses incidental take of
bald and golden eagles from electrocution and collision with above-
ground electric transmission and distribution lines (collectively power
lines), as well as disturbance of nesting eagles during various
operations and maintenance (O&M) activities within the Plan Area. The
Plan Area encompasses PG&E's Service Area including all electric and
hydroelectric facilities located within the state of California. The
ECP analyzes their system's risk to eagles. It also identifies measures
to avoid, minimize and mitigate eagle mortality associated with those
activities. The Plan Area is within the following California Counties:
Alameda
Alpine
Amador
Butte
Calaveras
Colusa
Contra Costa
Del Norte
El Dorado
Fresno
Glenn
Humboldt
Inyo
Kern
Kings
Lake
Lassen
Los Angeles
Madera
Marin
Mariposa
Mendocino
Merced
Modoc
Mono
Monterey
Napa
Nevada
Placer
Plumas
Sacramento
San Benito
San Bernardino
San Francisco
San Joaquin
San Luis Obispo
San Mateo
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
Santa Cruz
Shasta
Sierra
Siskiyou
Solano
Sonoma
Stanislaus
Sutter
Tehama
Trinity
Tulare
Tuolumne
Ventura
Yolo
Yuba
Background
Eagles are protected under the Eagle Act, which prohibits take and
disturbance of individuals and nests. Take under the Eagle Act includes
any actions that pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture,
trap, collect, destroy, molest, and disturb eagles. Disturb is further
defined in 50 CFR 22.3 as ``to agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle
to a degree that causes, or is likely to cause, based on the best
scientific information available (1) injury to an eagle, (2) a decrease
in its productivity, by substantially interfering with normal breeding,
feeding, or sheltering behavior, or (3) nest abandonment, by
substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering
behavior.''
Prior to 2009, permits for purposeful take of birds or body parts
were limited to scientific (50 CFR 22.21), religious (50 CFR 22.22), or
falconry (50 CFR 22.24) pursuits; for eagles causing serious injury to
livestock or other wildlife (50 CFR 22.23); and for golden eagle nests
that interfere with resource development or recovery operations (50 CFR
22.21-25). In 2009, we issued the Final Rule for Eagle Permits; Take
Necessary to Protect Interests in Particular Localities (2009 Final
Rule) on new permit regulations that allow take ``for the protection of
. . . other interests in any particular locality'' and where the take
is ``associated with and not the purpose of an otherwise lawful
activity . . .'' (September 11, 2009; 74 FR 46836-46879). The 2009
Final Rule authorizes programmatic take (take that is recurring and not
in a specific, identifiable timeframe and/or location) of eagles only
if avoidance measures have been implemented to the maximum extent
achievable. PG&E's activities are programmatic and existed prior to the
2009 Final Rule. Considerations for issuing take permits
[[Page 24957]]
include the health of the local and regional eagle populations,
availability of suitable nesting and foraging habitat for any displaced
eagles, and whether the take and associated mitigation provide a net
benefit to eagles (74 FR 46836-46879). The programmatic take permit
under the 2009 Final Rule was valid up to 5 years. In 2012, we proposed
to extend the maximum term for programmatic take permits from 5 to 30
years (April 13, 2012; 77 FR 22267-22278), and in 2013, we issued a
Final Rule to extend the maximum term for programmatic eagle permits to
30 years, subject to a recurring 5-year review process throughout the
life of the permit (December 9, 2013; 78 FR 73704-78725).
PG&E's power lines have resulted in eagle mortality due to
electrocution and collision. Furthermore, infrastructure associated
with electric and hydroelectric energy generation requires long-term
O&M, pipeline, and utility line modernization and replacement to
produce and deliver reliable and safe energy to PG&E customers. Some
O&M activities occur in eagle nesting habitat where there is a
potential to disturb nesting eagles.
Scope of EIS
PG&E's ECP serves as the foundation of the permit application. As
such, all alternatives considered in the EIS should conform to the
permit issuance criteria for programmatic eagle take permits under the
Eagle Act as required in 50 CFR 22.26(f)(1-6).
The draft EIS will identify and analyze direct, indirect, and
cumulative impacts of the proposed action and alternatives to several
resource areas, including biological resources, public utilities, air
quality, noise, water resources, cultural resources, socioeconomics,
and climate change. We will also consider evaluation of additional
resource areas if issues of concern specific to the proposed action are
identified during the public scoping process. The purpose of the public
scoping process for the EIS is to determine relevant issues that will
influence the scope of the environmental analysis, including potential
alternatives, and the extent to which those issues and impacts will be
analyzed in the EIS. We will evaluate a minimum of three alternatives.
Applicant's Proposal
PG&E has requested a programmatic eagle take permit for incidental
take of bald and golden eagles associated with O&M activities in the
Plan Area, as described in the ECP, for a term of 30 years. Specific
activities covered under the ECP would include otherwise lawful
activities that have the potential to kill eagles or disturb them to
the extent that nests are abandoned or eagle productivity is decreased,
as well as avoidance and minimization measures to reduce these impacts.
The ECP describes:
(1) Eagle collision with or electrocution by PG&E's existing
distribution and transmission lines and conductors within the Plan
Area;
(2) Operation and maintenance of PG&E's electrical system,
including inspection and patrols (aerial and ground), routine
maintenance and repair, vegetation management (including tree pruning
and removal with the right of way), and replacement or upgrades of
existing power lines and infrastructure. This activity would apply to
all power lines in the Plan Area (141,200 miles of distribution lines
and 18,600 miles of transmission lines) and related infrastructure;
(3) Operation and maintenance of PG&E's hydroelectric system,
including the associated electric system, recreation facility
maintenance, log boom/buoy/safety marker maintenance, intake tunnel
clearing, and repair of weirs and gages. This activity would apply to
all facilities in the Plan Area, including 68 existing powerhouses, a
pumped storage facility, and nearly 100 reservoirs;
(4) Continued implementation of migratory bird and eagle take-
reduction measures, including, but not limited to:
(a) Adoption of avian-safe construction design standards;
(b) Proactive and reactive bird-safe power pole retrofits;
(c) Bird nest protection best management practices during
vegetation management activities and other routine or project work;
(d) Bird flight diverter effectiveness studies;
(e) Targeted management at hydroelectric facilities; and
(f) Pre-construction nesting bird surveys when required for project
work.
(5) Monitoring to validate the estimated amount of disturbance take
and the number of fatalities associated with PG&E's existing
infrastructure and to evaluate the effectiveness of the conservation
measures at reducing eagle take. Monitoring efforts would generally
include:
(a) Monitoring of eagle nests located throughout PG&E's
hydroelectric system, as well as those discovered during inspections,
patrols, and vegetation management activities; and
(b) Monitoring eagle fatalities during inspections, patrols, and
vegetation management actions.
Public Comments
We request data, comments, new information, or suggestions from the
public, other governmental agencies, the scientific community, Tribes,
industry, or any other interested party on this notice. We will
consider these comments in developing the draft EIS.
Public Availability of Comments
You may submit your comments and materials by one of the methods
listed above in ADDRESSES. Before including your address, phone number,
or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should
be aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--might be made publicly available at any time. While you
can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Scoping Meetings
See DATES for the date(s) and time(s) of our public meeting(s). The
primary purpose of these meetings and public comment period is to
provide the public with a general understanding of the background of
the proposed action and to solicit suggestions and information on the
scope of issues and alternatives we should consider when drafting the
EIS. Oral and written comments will be accepted at the meetings. An
interpreter and/or court reporter will be present when deemed
necessary. Comments can also be submitted by methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Once the draft EIS and proposed ECP are complete and
made available for review, there will be additional opportunity for
public comment on the content of these documents.
Persons needing reasonable accommodations in order to attend and
participate in the public meetings should contact the Pacific Southwest
Region's Migratory Bird Office using one of the methods listed above in
ADDRESSES as soon as possible. In order to allow sufficient time to
process requests, please make contact no later than one week before the
public meeting. Information regarding this proposed action is available
in alternative formats upon request.
Authority
We provide this notice under section 668a of the Eagle Act (16
U.S.C. 668-668c) and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1501.7, 40 CFR 1506.6,
and 40 CFR 1508.22).
[[Page 24958]]
Dated: April 23, 2015.
Alexandra Pitts,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 2015-10067 Filed 4-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P