Interconnection of the Grande Prairie Wind Farm, Holt County, Nebraska (DOE/EIS-0485), 23538-23540 [2015-09938]
Download as PDF
23538
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 81 / Tuesday, April 28, 2015 / Notices
dockets. This can reduce the amount of
time you spend researching proceedings
by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document
summaries, and direct links to the
documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docsfiling/esubscription.asp.
Finally, public meetings or site visits
will be posted on the Commission’s
calendar located at www.ferc.gov/
EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along
with other related information.
Dated: April 17, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–09748 Filed 4–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket Nos. CP15–169–000]
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company, LLC; Notice of Application
Take notice that on April 13, 2015,
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line
Company LLC (Transco), 2800 Post Oak
Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77056, filed
in the above referenced docket an
application pursuant to section 7(c) of
the Natural Gas Act (NGA), to amend
the certificate of public convenience
and necessity granted by the
Commission by order issued on March
19, 2015 in the reference proceeding,
which order authorized Transco’s Rock
Spring Expansion Project (Project). The
amendment seeks authorization to
amend the Project’s certificate to
incorporate a minor route modification
of approximately 0.69 miles in
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, all as
more fully set forth in the application
which is on file with the Commission
and open to public inspection. The
filing is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference
Room or may be viewed on the
Commission’s Web site web at https://
www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link.
Enter the docket number excluding the
last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call
toll-free, (886) 208–3676 or TYY, (202)
502–8659.
Any questions concerning this
application may be directed to Bill
Hammons, P.O. Box 1396, Houston,
Texas 77251, by telephone at (713) 215–
2130.
Pursuant to section 157.9 of the
Commission’s rules (18 CFR 157.9),
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Apr 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
within 90 days of this Notice, the
Commission staff will either: complete
its environmental assessment (EA) and
place it into the Commission’s public
record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or
issue a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review. If a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review is
issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the
Commission staff’s issuance of the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS)
or EA for this proposal. The filing of the
EA in the Commission’s public record
for this proceeding or the issuance of a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental
Review will serve to notify federal and
state agencies of the timing for the
completion of all necessary reviews, and
the subsequent need to complete all
federal authorizations within 90 days of
the date of issuance of the Commission
staff’s FEIS or EA.
There are two ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project. First, any person wishing to
obtain legal status by becoming a party
to the proceedings for this project
should, on or before the comment date
stated below file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426,
a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)
and the Regulations under the NGA (18
CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list
maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies of
all documents filed by the applicant and
by all other parties. A party must submit
five copies of filings made in the
proceeding with the Commission and
must mail a copy to the applicant and
to every other party. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
However, a person does not have to
intervene in order to have comments
considered. The second way to
participate is by filing with the
Secretary of the Commission, as soon as
possible, an original and two copies of
comments in support of or in opposition
to this project. The Commission will
consider these comments in
determining the appropriate action to be
taken, but the filing of a comment alone
will not serve to make the filer a party
to the proceeding. The Commission’s
rules require that persons filing
comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to
the party or parties directly involved in
the protest.
Persons who wish to comment only
on the environmental review of this
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
project should submit an original and
two copies of their comments to the
Secretary of the Commission.
Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission’s
environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents,
and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission’s
environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be
required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties.
However, the non-party commentors
will not receive copies of all documents
filed by other parties or issued by the
Commission (except for the mailing of
environmental documents issued by the
Commission) and will not have the right
to seek court review of the
Commission’s final order.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests
and interventions in lieu of paper using
the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file
electronically should submit an original
and 5 copies of the protest or
intervention to the Federal Energy
regulatory Commission, 888 First Street
NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Comment Date: April 24, 2015.
Dated: April 14, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–09838 Filed 4–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
Interconnection of the Grande Prairie
Wind Farm, Holt County, Nebraska
(DOE/EIS–0485)
Western Area Power
Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Record of Decision.
AGENCY:
Western Area Power
Administration (Western) received a
request from Grande Prairie Wind, LLC
(Grande Prairie Wind), a subsidiary of
Geronimo Wind Energy, LLC d.b.a.
Geronimo Energy, LLC to interconnect
their proposed Grande Prairie Wind
Farm (Project) to Western’s power
transmission system. The proposed
interconnection point would be on
Western’s existing Fort Thompson to
Grand Island 345-kilovolt (kV)
transmission line, approximately seven
miles east of the town of O’Neill in Holt
County, Nebraska. The Project would be
built on private and State cropland and
pasture.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 81 / Tuesday, April 28, 2015 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
On January 16, 2015, the Notice of
Availability (NOA) of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the Interconnection of the Grande
Prairie Wind Farm, Holt County,
Nebraska (DOE/EIS–0485) was
published in the Federal Register (80
FR 2414). After considering the
environmental impacts, Western has
decided to execute an interconnection
agreement with Grande Prairie Wind to
interconnect the proposed Project to
Western’s transmission system and to
construct, own, and operate a new
switchyard adjacent to its Fort
Thompson to Grand Island 345-kV
transmission line to accommodate that
interconnection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, please contact Mr.
Rod O’Sullivan, Western Area Power
Administration, P.O. Box 281213,
Lakewood, CO 80228–8213, telephone
(720) 962–7260, fax (720) 962–7263, or
email: osullivan@wapa.gov. For general
information on DOE’s National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
review process, please contact Carol M.
Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA
Policy and Compliance, GC–54, U.S.
Department of Energy, Washington, DC
20585, telephone (202) 586–4600 or
(800) 472–2756, or email: askNEPA@
hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Western is
a Federal agency under the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) that
markets and transmits wholesale
electrical power through an integrated
17,000-circuit mile, high-voltage
transmission system across 15 central
and western states. Western’s Open
Access Transmission Service Tariff
(Tariff) provides open access to its
electric transmission system.
Considering the requester’s objectives,
Western provides transmission services
if there is sufficient available capacity
and the reliability of the transmission
system is maintained.
Proposed Federal Action
Western’s Proposed Federal Action is
to execute an interconnection agreement
with Grande Prairie Wind to
interconnect the proposed Project to
Western’s transmission system and to
construct, own, and operate a new
switchyard adjacent to its Fort
Thompson to Grand Island 345-kV
transmission line to accommodate that
interconnection.
Grande Prairie Wind’s Proposed Project
Grande Prairie Wind proposes to
construct and operate a 400-megawatt
(MW) wind energy generation facility in
Holt County in northern Nebraska. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Apr 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
proposed Project would interconnect to
Western’s 345-kV Fort Thompson to
Grand Island transmission line at a new
switchyard constructed, owned and
operated by Western. The Project area
would occupy approximately 54,250
acres in portions of Willowdale,
Antelope, Grattan, Iowa, Scott, and Steel
Creek Townships. Grande Prairie Wind
proposes to build up to 266 wind
turbines, up to 85 miles of access roads,
an underground electrical power
collection system, collector substations,
a step-up substation, a 14-mile overhead
transmission line, meteorological
towers, maintenance buildings, and
other associated ancillary facilities.
Grande Prairie Wind proposes to begin
construction as early as spring 2015.
The life of the Project is anticipated to
be a minimum of 20 years.
Description of Alternatives
Under its Proposed Action
Alternative, Western would execute an
interconnection agreement with Grande
Prairie Wind to interconnect their
proposed Project to Western’s
transmission system and to construct,
own, and operate a new switchyard
adjacent to its Fort Thompson to Grand
Island 345-kV transmission line to
accommodate that interconnection.
Grande Prairie Wind would construct
and operate the 400–MW Project
northeast of O’Neill in Holt County,
Nebraska.
Under the No Action Alternative,
Western would not enter into an
interconnection agreement and would
not construct a switchyard for the
proposed Project interconnection.
Although Grande Prairie Wind could
still construct and operate their Project,
the wind farm would need to rely on
different means of power transmission.
For purposes of the NEPA analysis, the
No Action Alternative assumed the
proposed Project would not be built.
Western has identified the No Action
alternative as its environmentally
preferred alternative as there would
likely be no new impacts. Grande
Prairie Wind’s objectives relating to
renewable energy development would
not be met.
Public Involvement
The public and interested parties
were notified of the proposed Project
and public comment opportunity
through a Notice of Intent published in
the Federal Register on April 16, 2012
(77 FR 22569). The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) published a
NOA of the Draft EIS in the Federal
Register on June 20, 2014 (79 FR 35346).
The public comment period closed on
August, 4, 2014. On January 16, 2015,
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23539
the EPA published a NOA of the Final
EIS for the Project in the Federal
Register (80 FR 2414).1
Each official notification published in
the Federal Register was accompanied
concurrently by direct mailings of
notices to State and Federal agencies,
Tribal governments, landholders and
interested parties, and widely
distributed local notices and
advertisements.
Mitigation
The design features, best management
practices (BMPs), and avoidance and
minimization measures are considered
an integral part of the proposed Project
to be implemented by Grande Prairie
Wind as requirements of their
agreements with their construction
contractors. These design features,
BMPs, and avoidance and minimization
measures described in detail in the
Final EIS reflect all practicable means to
avoid or minimize environmental harm
from Grande Prairie Wind’s Project and
Western’s proposed action.
Each resource section in the Final EIS
provides specific mitigation measures to
address potential impacts of the
proposed Project on that resource and
can be reviewed in detail in chapter 4
of the Final EIS. Western’s decision to
execute an interconnection agreement
considers Grande Prairie Wind’s
commitments to implement these design
features, BMPs, and avoidance and
minimization measures, along with the
attendant reduction in environmental
impacts that would result from their
implementation. A Mitigation Action
Plan is not required for Western’s
proposed action.
Endangered Species Act
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
United States Code [U.S.C.] 1531 et seq.)
requires Federal agencies to consult
with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) on their Federal actions and
how they may affect federally listed
threatened or endangered species.
Western requested concurrence with
their Biological Assessment, Formal
Conferencing on the Project’s effects on
Northern Long Eared Bat, and Formal
Consultation on the Project’s effects on
the American Burying Beetle by letter
on October 1, 2014. Subsequently, the
USFWS issued its Biological Opinion on
March 24, 2015, and a separate
Conferencing Opinion on March 30,
2015.
1 The Final EIS can be found on Western’s Web
site at: https://www.wapa.gov/ugp/Environment/
documents/FEIS_GrandePrairie_2014-12-29.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
23540
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 81 / Tuesday, April 28, 2015 / Notices
National Historic Preservation Act
Final cultural resource reports and
effects determination were sent to the
Nebraska State Historical Preservation
Officer (SHPO) and were subsequently
approved. A Memorandum of
Agreement addressing effects to
properties on or eligible for listing on
the National Register of Historic Places
for the preservation of eligible
properties was signed by Grand Prairie
Wind, the SHPO, and Western on March
25, 2015, in compliance with the
National Historic Preservation Act.
Comments on the Final EIS
One comment was received by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA). In their February 17, 2015, letter,
EPA recommended additional
alternatives be considered in Western’s
future NEPA documents.
Decision
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Western’s decision is to execute an
interconnection agreement with Grande
Prairie Wind to interconnect their
proposed Project to Western’s
transmission system and to construct,
own, and operate a new switchyard
adjacent to its Fort Thompson to Grand
Island 345-kV transmission line to
accommodate that interconnection.2
Western’s decision to grant this
interconnection request satisfies the
agency’s statutory mission and Grande
Prairie Wind’s objectives while
minimizing harm to the environment.
Full implementation of this decision is
contingent upon Grande Prairie Wind’s
obtaining all other applicable permits
and approvals as well as executing an
interconnection agreement in
accordance with Western’s Tariff. This
decision is based on the information
contained in the Interconnection of the
Grande Prairie Wind Farm Final EIS.
This ROD was prepared pursuant to the
requirements of the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
Implementing the Procedural Provisions
of the NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508)
and DOE’s NEPA Implementing
Procedures (10 CFR part 1021).
Dated: April 20, 2015.
Mark A. Gabriel,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–09938 Filed 4–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
2 On November 16, 2011, DOE’s Acting General
Counsel restated the delegations to Western’s
Administrator of all the authorities of the General
Counsel respecting Environmental Impact
Statements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Apr 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2013–0811; FRL 9926–56–
OEI]
Information Collection Request
Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request;
Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard
Disclosure Requirements (Renewal)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
EPA has submitted the
following information collection request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA): ‘‘Residential
Lead-Based Paint Hazard Disclosure
Requirements (Renewal),’’ identified by
EPA ICR No. 1710.07 and OMB Control
No. 2070–0151. The ICR, which is
available in the docket along with other
related materials, provides a detailed
explanation of the collection activities
and the burden estimate that is briefly
summarized in this document. EPA did
not receive any comments in response
to the previously provided public
review opportunity issued in the
Federal Register on July 24, 2014 (79 FR
71603). With this submission, EPA is
providing an additional 30 days for
public review.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2013–0811, to
both EPA and OMB as follows:
• To EPA online using https://www.
regulations.gov (our preferred method)
or by mail to: EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460.
• To OMB via email to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov. Address
comments to OMB Desk Officer for EPA.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the docket
without change, including any personal
information provided, unless the
comment includes profanity, threats,
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colby Lintner, Environmental
Assistance Division, Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Mail code:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7408–M, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: 202–554–1404; fax number:
202–564–8251; email address: TSCAHotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Docket: Supporting documents,
including the ICR that explains in detail
the information collection activities and
the related burden and cost estimates
that are summarized in this document,
are available in the docket for this ICR.
The docket can be viewed online at
https://www.regulations.gov or in person
at the EPA Docket Center, West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The telephone number for the
Docket Center is (202) 566–1744. For
additional information about EPA’s
public docket, visit https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
ICR status: This ICR is currently
scheduled to expire on April 30, 2015.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency
may continue to conduct or sponsor the
collection of information while this
submission is pending at OMB.
Under PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., an
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information, unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OMB control numbers are
displayed either by publication in the
Federal Register or by other appropriate
means, such as on the related collection
instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers for
certain EPA regulations is consolidated
in 40 CFR part 9.
Abstract: Section 1018 of the
Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard
Reduction Act (42 U.S.C. 4852d)
requires that sellers and lessors of most
residential housing built before 1978
disclose known information on the
presence of lead based paint and lead
based paint hazards, and provide an
EPA approved pamphlet to purchasers
and renters before selling or leasing the
housing. Sellers of pre-1978 housing are
also required to provide prospective
purchasers with ten days to conduct an
inspection or risk assessment for lead
based paint hazards before obligating
purchasers under contracts to purchase
the property. The rule does not apply to
rental housing that has been found to be
free of lead-based paint, zero-bedroom
dwellings, housing for the elderly,
housing for the handicapped, or short
term leases.
Responses to the collection of
information are mandatory (see 40 CFR
part 745, subpart F, and 24 CFR part 35,
subpart H). Respondents may claim all
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23538-23540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09938]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
Interconnection of the Grande Prairie Wind Farm, Holt County,
Nebraska (DOE/EIS-0485)
AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Record of Decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Western Area Power Administration (Western) received a request
from Grande Prairie Wind, LLC (Grande Prairie Wind), a subsidiary of
Geronimo Wind Energy, LLC d.b.a. Geronimo Energy, LLC to interconnect
their proposed Grande Prairie Wind Farm (Project) to Western's power
transmission system. The proposed interconnection point would be on
Western's existing Fort Thompson to Grand Island 345-kilovolt (kV)
transmission line, approximately seven miles east of the town of
O'Neill in Holt County, Nebraska. The Project would be built on private
and State cropland and pasture.
[[Page 23539]]
On January 16, 2015, the Notice of Availability (NOA) of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Interconnection of the
Grande Prairie Wind Farm, Holt County, Nebraska (DOE/EIS-0485) was
published in the Federal Register (80 FR 2414). After considering the
environmental impacts, Western has decided to execute an
interconnection agreement with Grande Prairie Wind to interconnect the
proposed Project to Western's transmission system and to construct,
own, and operate a new switchyard adjacent to its Fort Thompson to
Grand Island 345-kV transmission line to accommodate that
interconnection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, please
contact Mr. Rod O'Sullivan, Western Area Power Administration, P.O. Box
281213, Lakewood, CO 80228-8213, telephone (720) 962-7260, fax (720)
962-7263, or email: osullivan@wapa.gov. For general information on
DOE's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review process, please
contact Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and
Compliance, GC-54, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585,
telephone (202) 586-4600 or (800) 472-2756, or email:
askNEPA@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Western is a Federal agency under the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) that markets and transmits wholesale
electrical power through an integrated 17,000-circuit mile, high-
voltage transmission system across 15 central and western states.
Western's Open Access Transmission Service Tariff (Tariff) provides
open access to its electric transmission system. Considering the
requester's objectives, Western provides transmission services if there
is sufficient available capacity and the reliability of the
transmission system is maintained.
Proposed Federal Action
Western's Proposed Federal Action is to execute an interconnection
agreement with Grande Prairie Wind to interconnect the proposed Project
to Western's transmission system and to construct, own, and operate a
new switchyard adjacent to its Fort Thompson to Grand Island 345-kV
transmission line to accommodate that interconnection.
Grande Prairie Wind's Proposed Project
Grande Prairie Wind proposes to construct and operate a 400-
megawatt (MW) wind energy generation facility in Holt County in
northern Nebraska. The proposed Project would interconnect to Western's
345-kV Fort Thompson to Grand Island transmission line at a new
switchyard constructed, owned and operated by Western. The Project area
would occupy approximately 54,250 acres in portions of Willowdale,
Antelope, Grattan, Iowa, Scott, and Steel Creek Townships. Grande
Prairie Wind proposes to build up to 266 wind turbines, up to 85 miles
of access roads, an underground electrical power collection system,
collector substations, a step-up substation, a 14-mile overhead
transmission line, meteorological towers, maintenance buildings, and
other associated ancillary facilities. Grande Prairie Wind proposes to
begin construction as early as spring 2015. The life of the Project is
anticipated to be a minimum of 20 years.
Description of Alternatives
Under its Proposed Action Alternative, Western would execute an
interconnection agreement with Grande Prairie Wind to interconnect
their proposed Project to Western's transmission system and to
construct, own, and operate a new switchyard adjacent to its Fort
Thompson to Grand Island 345-kV transmission line to accommodate that
interconnection. Grande Prairie Wind would construct and operate the
400-MW Project northeast of O'Neill in Holt County, Nebraska.
Under the No Action Alternative, Western would not enter into an
interconnection agreement and would not construct a switchyard for the
proposed Project interconnection. Although Grande Prairie Wind could
still construct and operate their Project, the wind farm would need to
rely on different means of power transmission. For purposes of the NEPA
analysis, the No Action Alternative assumed the proposed Project would
not be built. Western has identified the No Action alternative as its
environmentally preferred alternative as there would likely be no new
impacts. Grande Prairie Wind's objectives relating to renewable energy
development would not be met.
Public Involvement
The public and interested parties were notified of the proposed
Project and public comment opportunity through a Notice of Intent
published in the Federal Register on April 16, 2012 (77 FR 22569). The
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a NOA of the Draft
EIS in the Federal Register on June 20, 2014 (79 FR 35346). The public
comment period closed on August, 4, 2014. On January 16, 2015, the EPA
published a NOA of the Final EIS for the Project in the Federal
Register (80 FR 2414).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Final EIS can be found on Western's Web site at: https://www.wapa.gov/ugp/Environment/documents/FEIS_GrandePrairie_2014-12-29.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each official notification published in the Federal Register was
accompanied concurrently by direct mailings of notices to State and
Federal agencies, Tribal governments, landholders and interested
parties, and widely distributed local notices and advertisements.
Mitigation
The design features, best management practices (BMPs), and
avoidance and minimization measures are considered an integral part of
the proposed Project to be implemented by Grande Prairie Wind as
requirements of their agreements with their construction contractors.
These design features, BMPs, and avoidance and minimization measures
described in detail in the Final EIS reflect all practicable means to
avoid or minimize environmental harm from Grande Prairie Wind's Project
and Western's proposed action.
Each resource section in the Final EIS provides specific mitigation
measures to address potential impacts of the proposed Project on that
resource and can be reviewed in detail in chapter 4 of the Final EIS.
Western's decision to execute an interconnection agreement considers
Grande Prairie Wind's commitments to implement these design features,
BMPs, and avoidance and minimization measures, along with the attendant
reduction in environmental impacts that would result from their
implementation. A Mitigation Action Plan is not required for Western's
proposed action.
Endangered Species Act
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(16 United States Code [U.S.C.] 1531 et seq.) requires Federal agencies
to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) on their
Federal actions and how they may affect federally listed threatened or
endangered species. Western requested concurrence with their Biological
Assessment, Formal Conferencing on the Project's effects on Northern
Long Eared Bat, and Formal Consultation on the Project's effects on the
American Burying Beetle by letter on October 1, 2014. Subsequently, the
USFWS issued its Biological Opinion on March 24, 2015, and a separate
Conferencing Opinion on March 30, 2015.
[[Page 23540]]
National Historic Preservation Act
Final cultural resource reports and effects determination were sent
to the Nebraska State Historical Preservation Officer (SHPO) and were
subsequently approved. A Memorandum of Agreement addressing effects to
properties on or eligible for listing on the National Register of
Historic Places for the preservation of eligible properties was signed
by Grand Prairie Wind, the SHPO, and Western on March 25, 2015, in
compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act.
Comments on the Final EIS
One comment was received by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA). In their February 17, 2015, letter, EPA recommended
additional alternatives be considered in Western's future NEPA
documents.
Decision
Western's decision is to execute an interconnection agreement with
Grande Prairie Wind to interconnect their proposed Project to Western's
transmission system and to construct, own, and operate a new switchyard
adjacent to its Fort Thompson to Grand Island 345-kV transmission line
to accommodate that interconnection.\2\ Western's decision to grant
this interconnection request satisfies the agency's statutory mission
and Grande Prairie Wind's objectives while minimizing harm to the
environment. Full implementation of this decision is contingent upon
Grande Prairie Wind's obtaining all other applicable permits and
approvals as well as executing an interconnection agreement in
accordance with Western's Tariff. This decision is based on the
information contained in the Interconnection of the Grande Prairie Wind
Farm Final EIS. This ROD was prepared pursuant to the requirements of
the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the
Procedural Provisions of the NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508) and DOE's
NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR part 1021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ On November 16, 2011, DOE's Acting General Counsel restated
the delegations to Western's Administrator of all the authorities of
the General Counsel respecting Environmental Impact Statements.
Dated: April 20, 2015.
Mark A. Gabriel,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-09938 Filed 4-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P