Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 22943-22946 [2015-09549]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 79 / Friday, April 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(n) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits may be issued in
accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199
of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to
a location where the airplane can be
modified (if the operator elects to do so),
provided the MLG remains extended
throughout the flight.
(o) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2014–0058, dated
March 11, 2014, for related information. This
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2015–0831.
(2) For Airbus service information
identified in this AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33
5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(3) For Messier-Bugatti-Dowty service
information identified in this AD, contact
Messier Services Americas, Customer
Support Center, 45360 Severn Way, Sterling,
VA 20166 8910; phone: 703–450–8233; fax:
703–404–1621; Internet: https://
techpubs.services/messier-dowty.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 9,
2015.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–09288 Filed 4–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0926; Directorate
Identifier 2014–NM–121–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 97–07–14,
for certain Airbus Model A320–111,
–211, and –231 airplanes. AD 97–07–14
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Apr 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
currently requires modification of an
area on the front spar of the wing center
section by installing shims and new
fasteners to reinforce pressure floor
fittings. Since we issued AD 97–07–14,
we have determined the need for
repetitive inspections on airplanes on
which the modification of the rib flange
on the front spar of the wing center
section has been done. This proposed
AD would continue to require
modifying the rib flange on the front
spar of the wing center section by
installing shims and new fasteners to
reinforce pressure floor fittings; and
would require repetitive high frequency
eddy current inspections for cracking of
the radius of the rib flanges and vertical
stiffener at frame 36, a rototest
inspection for cracking of the fastener
holes of the rib flanges, repair if needed,
and adding additional airplanes to the
applicability. We are proposing this AD
to prevent fatigue cracking on the rib
flange area of the front spar of the wing
center section, which can reduce the
structural integrity of fuselage frame 36
and the wing center section.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by June 8, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22943
0926; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1405;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2015–0926; Directorate Identifier
2014–NM–121–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On March 27, 1997, we issued AD 97–
07–14, Amendment 39–9988 (62 FR
16473, April 7, 1997). AD 97–07–14
requires modification of an area on the
front spar of the wing center section by
installing shims and new fasteners to
reinforce pressure floor fittings on
certain Airbus Model A320–111, –211
and –231 airplanes.
Since we issued AD 97–07–14,
Amendment 39–9988 (62 FR 16473,
April 7, 1997), we have determined the
need for repetitive inspections on
airplanes on which Airbus Modification
20976 (modification of the rib flange on
the front spar of the wing center section)
was done in production, or was done
using Airbus Service Bulletin A320–57–
1013, dated April 12, 1989; or Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–57–1013,
Revision 1, dated September 29, 1992.
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
E:\FR\FM\24APP1.SGM
24APP1
22944
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 79 / Friday, April 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2014–0053, dated March 7,
2014 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition on certain Airbus
Model A320–211 and –231 airplanes.
The MCAI states:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
During full scale fatigue tests on the Airbus
A320 test specimen, cracks were found in the
rib flange on the front spar side
perpendicular to vertical posts at frame (FR)
36. It was determined that similar cracks
could develop on certain in-service
aeroplanes.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could affect the wing structural
integrity.
To reduce the risk of crack initiation, two
modifications for aeroplanes in production
and one modification for in-service
aeroplanes were developed by Airbus: Prior
to [manufacturer serial number] MSN 0085,
the adaptation modification (Mod) 20976 was
applied in production, consisting in
installing shims under the fasteners linking
the rib flange, the lower corner, the front spar
and its vertical stiffener; from MSN 0085
onwards, the serial Mod 20908 was applied
in production, consisting in installing
reinforced lower surface rib flanges at front
spar level.
Airbus issued Service Bulletin (SB) A320–
57–1013 for affected in-service aeroplanes,
and [Directorate General for Civil Aviation]
DGAC France issued AD 95–098–066 [which
corresponds to FAA AD 97–07–14,
Amendment 39–9988, (62 FR 16473, April 7,
1997)] to require installation of shims under
the fasteners linking the rib flange, the lower
corner, the front spar and its vertical
stiffener.
Following a recent analysis, Airbus
identified the need for repetitive [HFEC and
rototest] inspections for aeroplanes on which
Airbus SB A320–57–1013 or production Mod
20976 has been embodied.
For the reason described above, this
[EASA] AD retains the requirements of DGAC
France AD 95–098–066, which is superseded,
and requires repetitive [HFEC and rototest]
inspections of the center wing lower ribs at
FR 36 and, depending on findings,
accomplishment of a repair.
After EASA issued PAD 14–013, it was
discovered that additional work [removal of
shims and fasteners on the rib flange on the
front spar side and doing an HFEC inspection
for cracking of the radius of the rib flanges
and a rototest inspection for cracking of the
fastener holes during each inspection] to be
included in Revision 01 of Airbus SB A320–
57–1175, is required to accomplish the
inspections. This Final [EASA] AD has been
amended accordingly.
Airplanes having MSNs 001, 009, and
015 were not included in the
applicability of AD 97–07–14,
Amendment 39–9988 (62 FR 16473,
April 7, 1997). EASA AD 2014–0053,
dated March 7, 2014, expanded the
applicability to all airplanes having up
to MSN 0084. We included paragraph
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Apr 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
(h) of this proposed AD to require the
modification for the airplanes having
MSNs 001, 009, and 015.You may
examine the MCAI in the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
0926.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR part 51
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin
A320–57–1175, Revision 01, including
Appendix 01 and Appendix 02, dated
May 28, 2014. The service information
describes procedures for repetitive high
frequency eddy current inspections for
cracking of the radius of the rib flanges
and vertical stiffener at frame 36, a
rototest inspection for cracking of the
fastener holes of the rib flanges, and
repair. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI. This service information is
reasonably available; see ADDRESSES for
ways to access this service information.
Explanation of ‘‘RC’’ Procedures and
Tests in Service Information
The FAA worked in conjunction with
industry, under the Airworthiness
Directives Implementation Aviation
Rulemaking Committee (AD ARC), to
enhance the AD system. One
enhancement was a new process for
annotating which procedures and tests
in the service information are required
for compliance with an AD.
Differentiating these procedures and
tests from other tasks in the service
information is expected to improve an
owner’s/operator’s understanding of
crucial AD requirements and help
provide consistent judgment in AD
compliance. The actions specified in the
service information identified
previously include procedures and tests
that are identified as RC (required for
compliance) because these procedures
have a direct effect on detecting,
preventing, resolving, or eliminating an
identified unsafe condition.
As specified in a NOTE under the
Accomplishment Instructions of the
specified service information,
procedures and tests identified as RC
must be done to comply with the
proposed AD. However, procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC are
recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may
be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the
operator’s maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of
an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC), provided the procedures and
tests identified as RC can be done and
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the airplane can be put back in a
serviceable condition. Any substitutions
or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC will require approval of
an AMOC.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between the AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
Although Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–57–1175, Revision 01, including
Appendix 01 and Appendix 02, dated
May 28, 2014, specifies to contact the
manufacturer for instructions on how to
repair certain conditions, this proposed
AD would require repairing those
conditions using a method approved by
the Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or EASA or its
delegated agent, or Airbus’ EASA
Design Organization Approval (DOA).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 11 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The actions required by AD 97–07–14,
Amendment 39–9988 (62 FR 16473,
April 7, 1997), and retained in this
proposed AD take about 13 work-hours
per product, at an average labor rate of
$85 per work-hour. Required parts cost
about $576 per product. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the actions
that are required by AD 97–07–14 is
$1,681 per product.
We also estimate that it would take
about 45 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $1,600 per
product. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of this proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $59,675, or $5,425
per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
E:\FR\FM\24APP1.SGM
24APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 79 / Friday, April 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2015–0926;
Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–121–AD.
Regulatory Findings
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by the
determination that repetitive inspections are
needed on airplanes on which the
modification of the rib flange on the front
spar of the wing center section has been
done. We are issuing this AD to prevent
fatigue cracking on the rib flange area of the
front spar of the wing center section, which
can reduce the structural integrity of fuselage
frame 36 and the wing center section.
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
97–07–14, Amendment 39–9988 (62 FR
16473, April 7, 1997), and adding the
following new AD:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Apr 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by June 8,
2015.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 97–07–14,
Amendment 39–9988 (62 FR 16473, April 7,
1997).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A320–
211 and –231 airplanes, certificated in any
category, all manufacturer serial numbers
(MSN) up to MSN 0084 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57, Wings.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Retained Modification
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (a) of AD 97–07–14, Amendment
39–9988 (62 FR 16473, April 7, 1997). For
airplanes with manufacturer serial number
(MSN) 005 through 008 inclusive, MSN 010
through 014 inclusive, and MSN 016 through
042 inclusive: Prior to the accumulation of
16,000 total landings, or within 3 months
after May 12, 1997 (the effective date of AD
97–07–14), whichever occurs later, modify
the rib flange on the front spar of the wing
center section by installing shims and new
fasteners to reinforce pressure floor fittings,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
57–1013, Revision 1, dated September 29,
1992.
(h) Modification for Airplanes With MSNs
001, 009, and 015
Prior to the accumulation of 16,000 total
landings since first flight, or within 30 days
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, modify the rib flange on the
front spar of the wing center section by
installing shims and new fasteners to
reinforce pressure floor fittings, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
57–1013, Revision 1, dated September 29,
1992.
(i) New Requirement of This AD: Repetitive
Inspections
Within the applicable compliance times
specified in paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this
AD, do a high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22945
inspection for cracking of the radius of the
rib flanges and vertical stiffener at frame 36
and do a rototest inspection for cracking of
the fastener holes of the rib flanges and
vertical stiffener, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–57–1175, Revision 01,
including Appendix 01, dated May 28, 2014.
During each inspection, remove the shims
and fasteners on the rib flange on the front
spar side and do an HFEC inspection for
cracking of the radius of the rib flanges and
a rototest inspection for cracking of the
fastener holes. If no cracking is found,
oversize the holes of the rib flange and the
holes of the shims, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–57–1175, Revision 01,
including Appendix 01, dated May 28, 2014.
Repeat the inspections thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 32,500 flight cycles or 65,000
flight hours, whichever occurs first.
(1) For airplanes having Airbus
Modification 20976 embodied: At the later of
the times specified in paragraphs (i)(1)(i) or
(i)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before exceeding 47,800 flight cycles or
95,600 flight hours, whichever occurs first,
since the airplane’s first flight.
(ii) Within 850 flight cycles or 1,700 flight
hours, whichever occurs first, after the
effective date of this AD.
(2) For airplanes on which the
modification of the front spar of the wing
center section was accomplished using
Airbus Service Bulletin A320–57–1013,
Revision 1, dated September 29, 1992: At the
later of the times specified in paragraphs
(i)(2)(i) or (i)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before exceeding 10,700 flight cycles or
21,500 flight hours, whichever occurs first,
after the modification of the rib flange on the
front spar of the wing center section was
done using Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
57–1013, Revision 1, dated September 29,
1992.
(ii) Within 850 flight cycles or 1,700 flight
hours, whichever occurs first, after the
effective date of this AD.
(j) Repair
If, during any inspection required by
paragraph (i) of this AD, any cracking is
found, before further flight, repair using a
method approved by the Manager,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus’s
EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph restates the requirements of
Note 2 of paragraph (g) of AD 97–07–14,
Amendment 39–9988 (62 FR 16473, April 7,
1997): This paragraph provides credit for the
modification of the rib flange required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before May 12, 1997 (the effective
date of AD 97–07–14) using Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–57–1013, dated April 12,
1989.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
E:\FR\FM\24APP1.SGM
24APP1
22946
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 79 / Friday, April 24, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–1405; fax 425–227–1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the
effective date of this AD, for any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by
the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If approved
by the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except
as required by paragraph (j) of this AD, if the
service information contains procedures or
tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures and tests that
are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not
identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the
operator’s maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an
AMOC, provided the procedures and tests
identified as RC can be done and the airplane
can be put back in a serviceable condition.
Any substitutions or changes to procedures
or tests identified as RC require approval of
an AMOC.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014–0053, dated
March 7, 2014, for related information. This
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2015–0926.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Apr 23, 2015
Jkt 235001
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 6,
2015.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–09549 Filed 4–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0046; Airspace
Docket No. 14–ASO–23]
Proposed Establishment of Class E
Airspace; Headland, AL
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
establish Class E Airspace at Headland,
AL, to accommodate new Area
Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning
System (GPS) Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures (SIAPs) serving
Headland Municipal Airport. Controlled
airspace is necessary for the safety and
management of instrument flight rules
(IFR) operations at the airport.
DATES: 0901 UTC. Comments must be
received on or before June 8, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule
to: U. S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey, SE., Washington, DC
20590–0001; Telephone: 1–800–647–
5527; Fax: 202–493–2251. You must
identify the Docket Number FAA–2015–
0046; Airspace Docket No. 14–ASO–23,
at the beginning of your comments. You
may also submit and review received
comments through the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The Docket Office (telephone 1–800–
647–5527), is on the ground floor of the
building at the above address.
FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed
online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/
publications/. The Order is also
available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the
availability of this proposed
incorporation by reference material at
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to
https://www.archives.gov/federal_
register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_
locations.html.
FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on
September 15. For further information,
you can contact the Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, 20591;
telephone: 202–267–8783.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Fornito, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, P.O. Box 20636,
Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)
305–6364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to
comment on this rule by submitting
such written data, views, or arguments,
as they may desire. Comments that
provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are
particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the
proposal. Comments are specifically
invited on the overall regulatory,
aeronautical, economic, environmental,
and energy-related aspects of the
proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA–
2015–0046; Airspace Docket No. 14–
ASO–23) and be submitted in triplicate
to the Docket Management System (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number). You may also submit
comments through the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Persons wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those
comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. FAA–2015–0046; Airspace
Docket No. 14–ASO–23.’’ The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned
to the commenter.
All communications received before
the specified closing date for comments
will be considered before taking action
on the proposed rule. The proposal
contained in this notice may be changed
in light of the comments received. A
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerned with this rulemaking will be
filed in the docket.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded from and
E:\FR\FM\24APP1.SGM
24APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22943-22946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09549]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-0926; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-121-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 97-07-14,
for certain Airbus Model A320-111, -211, and -231 airplanes. AD 97-07-
14 currently requires modification of an area on the front spar of the
wing center section by installing shims and new fasteners to reinforce
pressure floor fittings. Since we issued AD 97-07-14, we have
determined the need for repetitive inspections on airplanes on which
the modification of the rib flange on the front spar of the wing center
section has been done. This proposed AD would continue to require
modifying the rib flange on the front spar of the wing center section
by installing shims and new fasteners to reinforce pressure floor
fittings; and would require repetitive high frequency eddy current
inspections for cracking of the radius of the rib flanges and vertical
stiffener at frame 36, a rototest inspection for cracking of the
fastener holes of the rib flanges, repair if needed, and adding
additional airplanes to the applicability. We are proposing this AD to
prevent fatigue cracking on the rib flange area of the front spar of
the wing center section, which can reduce the structural integrity of
fuselage frame 36 and the wing center section.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 8, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0926; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1405;
fax 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-0926;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-121-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On March 27, 1997, we issued AD 97-07-14, Amendment 39-9988 (62 FR
16473, April 7, 1997). AD 97-07-14 requires modification of an area on
the front spar of the wing center section by installing shims and new
fasteners to reinforce pressure floor fittings on certain Airbus Model
A320-111, -211 and -231 airplanes.
Since we issued AD 97-07-14, Amendment 39-9988 (62 FR 16473, April
7, 1997), we have determined the need for repetitive inspections on
airplanes on which Airbus Modification 20976 (modification of the rib
flange on the front spar of the wing center section) was done in
production, or was done using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1013,
dated April 12, 1989; or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1013, Revision
1, dated September 29, 1992.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent
[[Page 22944]]
for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014-0053, dated March 7, 2014 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition on certain Airbus Model
A320-211 and -231 airplanes. The MCAI states:
During full scale fatigue tests on the Airbus A320 test
specimen, cracks were found in the rib flange on the front spar side
perpendicular to vertical posts at frame (FR) 36. It was determined
that similar cracks could develop on certain in-service aeroplanes.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could affect the
wing structural integrity.
To reduce the risk of crack initiation, two modifications for
aeroplanes in production and one modification for in-service
aeroplanes were developed by Airbus: Prior to [manufacturer serial
number] MSN 0085, the adaptation modification (Mod) 20976 was
applied in production, consisting in installing shims under the
fasteners linking the rib flange, the lower corner, the front spar
and its vertical stiffener; from MSN 0085 onwards, the serial Mod
20908 was applied in production, consisting in installing reinforced
lower surface rib flanges at front spar level.
Airbus issued Service Bulletin (SB) A320-57-1013 for affected
in-service aeroplanes, and [Directorate General for Civil Aviation]
DGAC France issued AD 95-098-066 [which corresponds to FAA AD 97-07-
14, Amendment 39-9988, (62 FR 16473, April 7, 1997)] to require
installation of shims under the fasteners linking the rib flange,
the lower corner, the front spar and its vertical stiffener.
Following a recent analysis, Airbus identified the need for
repetitive [HFEC and rototest] inspections for aeroplanes on which
Airbus SB A320-57-1013 or production Mod 20976 has been embodied.
For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of DGAC France AD 95-098-066, which is superseded, and
requires repetitive [HFEC and rototest] inspections of the center
wing lower ribs at FR 36 and, depending on findings, accomplishment
of a repair.
After EASA issued PAD 14-013, it was discovered that additional
work [removal of shims and fasteners on the rib flange on the front
spar side and doing an HFEC inspection for cracking of the radius of
the rib flanges and a rototest inspection for cracking of the
fastener holes during each inspection] to be included in Revision 01
of Airbus SB A320-57-1175, is required to accomplish the
inspections. This Final [EASA] AD has been amended accordingly.
Airplanes having MSNs 001, 009, and 015 were not included in the
applicability of AD 97-07-14, Amendment 39-9988 (62 FR 16473, April 7,
1997). EASA AD 2014-0053, dated March 7, 2014, expanded the
applicability to all airplanes having up to MSN 0084. We included
paragraph (h) of this proposed AD to require the modification for the
airplanes having MSNs 001, 009, and 015.You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-0926.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR part 51
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A320-57-1175, Revision 01,
including Appendix 01 and Appendix 02, dated May 28, 2014. The service
information describes procedures for repetitive high frequency eddy
current inspections for cracking of the radius of the rib flanges and
vertical stiffener at frame 36, a rototest inspection for cracking of
the fastener holes of the rib flanges, and repair. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI. This service information is
reasonably available; see ADDRESSES for ways to access this service
information.
Explanation of ``RC'' Procedures and Tests in Service Information
The FAA worked in conjunction with industry, under the
Airworthiness Directives Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee
(AD ARC), to enhance the AD system. One enhancement was a new process
for annotating which procedures and tests in the service information
are required for compliance with an AD. Differentiating these
procedures and tests from other tasks in the service information is
expected to improve an owner's/operator's understanding of crucial AD
requirements and help provide consistent judgment in AD compliance. The
actions specified in the service information identified previously
include procedures and tests that are identified as RC (required for
compliance) because these procedures have a direct effect on detecting,
preventing, resolving, or eliminating an identified unsafe condition.
As specified in a NOTE under the Accomplishment Instructions of the
specified service information, procedures and tests identified as RC
must be done to comply with the proposed AD. However, procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures
and tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an alternative method
of compliance (AMOC), provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in a serviceable
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC will require approval of an AMOC.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between the AD and the MCAI or Service Information
Although Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1175, Revision 01,
including Appendix 01 and Appendix 02, dated May 28, 2014, specifies to
contact the manufacturer for instructions on how to repair certain
conditions, this proposed AD would require repairing those conditions
using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA or its delegated agent, or
Airbus' EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 11 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
The actions required by AD 97-07-14, Amendment 39-9988 (62 FR
16473, April 7, 1997), and retained in this proposed AD take about 13
work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work-hour.
Required parts cost about $576 per product. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the actions that are required by AD 97-07-14 is
$1,681 per product.
We also estimate that it would take about 45 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $1,600
per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $59,675, or $5,425 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII:
[[Page 22945]]
Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
97-07-14, Amendment 39-9988 (62 FR 16473, April 7, 1997), and adding
the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2015-0926; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-
121-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by June 8, 2015.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 97-07-14, Amendment 39-9988 (62 FR 16473,
April 7, 1997).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A320-211 and -231 airplanes,
certificated in any category, all manufacturer serial numbers (MSN)
up to MSN 0084 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by the determination that repetitive
inspections are needed on airplanes on which the modification of the
rib flange on the front spar of the wing center section has been
done. We are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracking on the rib
flange area of the front spar of the wing center section, which can
reduce the structural integrity of fuselage frame 36 and the wing
center section.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Modification
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (a) of AD
97-07-14, Amendment 39-9988 (62 FR 16473, April 7, 1997). For
airplanes with manufacturer serial number (MSN) 005 through 008
inclusive, MSN 010 through 014 inclusive, and MSN 016 through 042
inclusive: Prior to the accumulation of 16,000 total landings, or
within 3 months after May 12, 1997 (the effective date of AD 97-07-
14), whichever occurs later, modify the rib flange on the front spar
of the wing center section by installing shims and new fasteners to
reinforce pressure floor fittings, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1013,
Revision 1, dated September 29, 1992.
(h) Modification for Airplanes With MSNs 001, 009, and 015
Prior to the accumulation of 16,000 total landings since first
flight, or within 30 days after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, modify the rib flange on the front spar of
the wing center section by installing shims and new fasteners to
reinforce pressure floor fittings, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1013,
Revision 1, dated September 29, 1992.
(i) New Requirement of This AD: Repetitive Inspections
Within the applicable compliance times specified in paragraphs
(i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD, do a high frequency eddy current
(HFEC) inspection for cracking of the radius of the rib flanges and
vertical stiffener at frame 36 and do a rototest inspection for
cracking of the fastener holes of the rib flanges and vertical
stiffener, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1175, Revision 01, including
Appendix 01, dated May 28, 2014. During each inspection, remove the
shims and fasteners on the rib flange on the front spar side and do
an HFEC inspection for cracking of the radius of the rib flanges and
a rototest inspection for cracking of the fastener holes. If no
cracking is found, oversize the holes of the rib flange and the
holes of the shims, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1175, Revision 01,
including Appendix 01, dated May 28, 2014. Repeat the inspections
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 32,500 flight cycles or 65,000
flight hours, whichever occurs first.
(1) For airplanes having Airbus Modification 20976 embodied: At
the later of the times specified in paragraphs (i)(1)(i) or
(i)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Before exceeding 47,800 flight cycles or 95,600 flight
hours, whichever occurs first, since the airplane's first flight.
(ii) Within 850 flight cycles or 1,700 flight hours, whichever
occurs first, after the effective date of this AD.
(2) For airplanes on which the modification of the front spar of
the wing center section was accomplished using Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-57-1013, Revision 1, dated September 29, 1992: At the
later of the times specified in paragraphs (i)(2)(i) or (i)(2)(ii)
of this AD.
(i) Before exceeding 10,700 flight cycles or 21,500 flight
hours, whichever occurs first, after the modification of the rib
flange on the front spar of the wing center section was done using
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1013, Revision 1, dated September
29, 1992.
(ii) Within 850 flight cycles or 1,700 flight hours, whichever
occurs first, after the effective date of this AD.
(j) Repair
If, during any inspection required by paragraph (i) of this AD,
any cracking is found, before further flight, repair using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph restates the requirements of Note 2 of paragraph
(g) of AD 97-07-14, Amendment 39-9988 (62 FR 16473, April 7, 1997):
This paragraph provides credit for the modification of the rib
flange required by paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before May 12, 1997 (the effective date of AD 97-07-14)
using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1013, dated April 12, 1989.
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International
[[Page 22946]]
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone 425-227-1405; fax 425-227-1149. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraph (j) of this AD, if the service information contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures and tests
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the
airplane can be put back in a serviceable condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC
require approval of an AMOC.
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2014-0053, dated March 7, 2014,
for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2015-0926.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 6, 2015.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-09549 Filed 4-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P