License Amendment for United Nuclear Corporation, Church Rock Facility, McKinley County, New Mexico, 22744-22746 [2015-09516]

Download as PDF 22744 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 78 / Thursday, April 23, 2015 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [OMB 1205–0490] Comment Request for Information Collection: Self-Employment Assistance for Unemployment Insurance Claimants, Extension With Revisions Employment and Training Administration (ETA), Labor. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department of Labor (Department), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. Currently, ETA is soliciting comments concerning the collection of data about Self-Employment Assistance (SEA) activities, expiring October 31, 2015. DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the addresses section below on or before June 22, 2015. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to Lidia Fiore, Office of Unemployment Insurance, Room S–4524, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. Telephone number: 202–693–3029 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals with hearing or speech impairments may access the telephone number above via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 1–877– 889–5627 (TTY/TDD). Email: Fiore.Lidia@dol.gov. A copy of the proposed information collection request (ICR), please contact the person above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: I. Background The Noncitizen Benefit Clarification and Other Technical Amendments Act of 1998 (Public Law 105–306) permanently authorized the SEA program, which is a reemployment program that helps Unemployment Insurance (UI) claimants start their own VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:53 Apr 22, 2015 Jkt 235001 businesses, and Public Law 112–96, the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Act) expanded the SEA program to provide states the opportunity to allow UI claimants receiving Extended Benefits to participate in the SEA program. Currently, a handful of states use this reemployment program, for which a minor amount of information (claimants entering the program, and weeks and amounts of dollars paid) is collected under OMB Control Number 1205–0010. In accordance with statutory requirements and to assist states in establishing, improving, and administering SEA programs (section 2183(a)), the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) uses the ETA 9161 to collect information specific to the SEA program. Section 2183(b)(1) of the 2012 Act directs the Secretary of Labor to establish reporting requirements for States that have established SEA programs, which shall include reporting on—(A) the total number of individuals who received unemployment compensation and—(i) were referred to a SEA program; (ii) participated in such program; and (iii) received an allowance under such program; (B) the total amount of allowances provided to individuals participating in a SEA program; (C) the total income (as determined by survey or other appropriate method) for businesses that have been established by individuals participating in a SEA program, as well as the total number of individuals employed through such businesses; and (D) any additional information, as determined appropriate by the Secretary. ETA currently uses Form ETA–9161 as an electronic reporting mechanism to collect this required information. In addition to Public Law 112–96, collection of data is used for oversight of the program as authorized under Section 303(a)(6) of the Social Security Act. Previously such information was collected for participants eligible for Emergency Unemployment Compensation, however that program has expired and authorization for that portion of this data collection is no longer necessary. II. Review Focus The Department is particularly interested in comments which: • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 • evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; • enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submissions of responses. III. Current Actions Type of Review: Extension with revision Title: Self-Employment Assistance for UI Claimants, ETA 9161. OMB Number: 1205–0490. Affected Public: State Workforce Agencies, SEA participants. Estimated Total Annual Respondents: 1,607. Estimated Total Annual Responses: 1,607 respondents × 4 quarterly reports = 6,428 responses. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 6,456 hours. Total Estimated Annual Other Cost Burden: There are no other costs associated with this collection of information. We will summarize and/or include in the request for OMB approval of the ICR, the comments received in response to this comment request; they will also become a matter of public record. Portia Wu, Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training, Labor. [FR Doc. 2015–09479 Filed 4–22–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FW–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 40–8907; NRC–2013–0036] License Amendment for United Nuclear Corporation, Church Rock Facility, McKinley County, New Mexico Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; issuance. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering amending Source Materials License SUA–1475 issued to the United Nuclear Corporation (UNC), a subsidiary of SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM 23APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 78 / Thursday, April 23, 2015 / Notices General Electric (GE), to revise current ground water protection standards in License Condition 30.B of SUA–1475. The NRC has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for this proposed action in accordance with its regulations. Based on the EA, the NRC has concluded that a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is appropriate with respect to the proposed action. The NRC will issue the amended license following the publication of this document. The Final EA and FONSI are available as of April 23, 2015. DATES: Please refer to Docket ID: NRC–2013–0036 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID: NRC–2013–0036. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document (if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced. The EA and FONSI can be found under ADAMS accession no. ML14339A839. • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ashley Waldron, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–7317; email: Ashley.Waldron@ nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:53 Apr 22, 2015 Jkt 235001 I. Introduction On April 17, 2012, UNC, a subsidiary of GE, submitted to the NRC an application to amend Source Materials License SUA–1475 for the former Uranium Church Rock Mill Site (the Mill Site) (ADAMS Accession No. ML12150A146). This proposed amendment would revise current ground water protection standards in License Condition 30.B of SUA–1475 for the following constituents: Arsenic, Cadmium, Gross Alpha, Lead, Lead-210, Nickel, Radium-226 and -228, Selenium, Thorium-230, and Uranium. These proposed standards (values) are derived from a re-calculated background concentration for each constituent. The Mill Site is located approximately 17 miles northeast of Gallup in McKinley County, New Mexico. The UNC supplemented its request on November 16, 2012, by submitting a three-dimensional ground water flow model for the Mill Site and adjacent down-gradient areas (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML12334A292; ML12305A320; ML12305A309; ML12305A324). On January 10, 2013, the NRC accepted the amendment request for formal review (ADAMS Accession No. ML13007A069). The NRC issued a Request for Additional Information (RAI) on June 4, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13121A553), and the UNC responded on January 10, 2014 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML14056A541; ML14059A208). Subsequently, the NRC staff determined that all technical deficiencies had been addressed in the RAIs and requested the UNC to update the ground water flow model report (ADAMS Accession No. ML14063A497). The UNC submitted the revised ground water flow model report by letter dated June 3, 2014 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML14161A255; ML14161A311). In accordance with part 40, appendix A, criterion 5, paragraph 5B(5) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the NRC may establish ground water protection standards at the point of compliance (POC) either (1) by reference to the background concentrations in the ground water, (2) by assigning the appropriate value found in the table given in paragraph 5C, or (3) by using alternative concentration limits established by the NRC. The POC is defined in appendix A as the site-specific location in the uppermost aquifer where the ground water protection standard must be met. In addition, criterion 5, paragraph 5B(1) states the objective of the POC location is to provide the earliest practicable warning that the impoundment is PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22745 releasing hazardous constituents, with the goal that hazardous constituents from a licensed site not exceed the specified concentration limits in the uppermost aquifer beyond the POC during the compliance period. At the Mill Site, POC wells are located in three subsurface hydrostratigraphic units: the Southwest Alluvium, and Zone 1 and Zone 3 of the Upper Gallup Sandstone. The UNC’s proposed license amendment would affect ground water protection standards in each of these units. Additionally, paragraph 5B(6) of criterion 5 to 10 CFR part 40, appendix A states that, ‘‘[c]onceptually, background concentrations pose no incremental hazards . . .’’ The NRC staff has prepared an EA in support of its review of the proposed license amendment. The staff assessed the potential environmental impacts associated with amending the ground water protection standards and documented the results of the assessment in the EA. The NRC staff performed this assessment in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR part 51, ‘‘Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions.’’ Uranium mill tailings at the Mill Site are located onsite, within the tailings impoundment area comprising three contiguous cells differentiated as the North, Central and South Cells (see Figure 1, ADAMS Accession No. ML12150A146). The Central Cell also has two borrow pits. Borrow Pit No. 1 was used to dispose of tailings and Borrow Pit No. 2 was used to retain tailings liquids (ADAMS Accession No. ML063630443). Seepage from the three tailings disposal cells and the borrow pits, as well as infiltration of mine effluent water during dewatering operations of the nearby Northeast Church Rock and Quivira mines, have contributed to the saturated conditions found in the Southwest Alluvium and in Zones 1 and 3 of the Upper Gallup Sandstone (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML050070220; ML050070233; ML050070242; ML050070245). II. Environmental Assessment Summary Description of the Proposed Action The UNC is requesting a license amendment for the Mill Site to revise License Condition 30.B of Source Materials License SUA–1475. The UNC requests revisions to the current ground water protection standards in the license condition for the following constituents: Arsenic, Cadmium, Gross Alpha, Lead and Lead-210, Nickel, E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM 23APN1 22746 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 78 / Thursday, April 23, 2015 / Notices Radium-226 and -228, Selenium, Thorium-230, and Uranium for the Southwest Alluvium, Zone 1, and Zone 3. No changes are proposed for the other constituents in License Condition 30.B (i.e., Beryllium, Total Trihalomethanes, and Vanadium). Need for the Proposed Action The proposed action is needed to provide ground water protection standards for the Mill Site that are consistent with 10 CFR part 40, appendix A, paragraph 5B(1) and background ground water quality that is protective of public health and safety. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The NRC staff determined that, due to the nature of the proposed action, environmental impacts would be limited to subsurface ground water resources, and that such impacts would be small and not significant. Staff expects no impacts to public health and safety, ecological resources, or historical and cultural resources. Therefore, the NRC staff does not expect significant impacts to result from the proposed modification to the ground water protection standards in SUA–1475 and considers that impacts from the proposed action would be protective of public health and safety and the environment. In conducting its assessment, the NRC staff considered the following: • Information in the license application and supporting documentation; • Information in modeling reports and NRC staff review reports; • Information in land use and environmental monitoring reports; • Information from NRC staff site visits and inspections; • 10 CFR part 40, appendix A, ‘‘Criteria Relating to the Operation of Uranium Mills and the Disposition of Tailings or Wastes Produced by the Extraction or Concentration of Source Material From Ores Processed Primarily for Their Source Material Content;’’ • NUREG–1620, Rev. 1, ‘‘Standard Review Plan for the Review of a Reclamation Plan for Mill Tailings Sites Under Title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978’’ (ADAMS Accession No. ML031550522); and • NUREG–1748, ‘‘Environmental Review Guidance for Licensing Actions Associated with NMSS Programs, Final Report’’ (ADAMS Accession No. ML032540811). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:53 Apr 22, 2015 Jkt 235001 Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘noaction alternative’’). Denial of the proposed license amendment would result in no change in the currently approved ground water protection standards. The proposed action is needed to revise the ground water protection standards to more accurately reflect current background conditions. Both the No-Action alternative and the Proposed Action for the Mill Site are consistent with appendix A, criterion 5, paragraph 5B(1) and background ground water quality that is protective of public health and safety. Agencies and Persons Consulted The NRC staff determined that the proposed action would be limited to impacts to subsurface ground water resources and therefore is not expected to affect listed endangered and threatened species or their critical habitat. As well, the proposed action is not expected to impact potential or identified cultural or historical resources. Therefore, no further consultation was completed under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act or under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. During preparation of the EA, the NRC staff consulted with the following federal, tribal, and state agencies: the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regions 6 and 9, the U.S. Department of Energy, the Navajo Nation EPA, and the New Mexico Environment Department. The purpose of this consultation was to request comments on the proposed action; however, none of the agencies identified concerns with the proposed action. III. Finding of No Significant Impact Based on its review of the UNC’s license amendment request to revise License Condition 30.B of SUA–1475, the NRC staff expects there to be no significant environmental impacts in connection with the proposed action as the proposed ground water protection standard values, conceptually, pose no incremental hazards to public health and safety. Therefore, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is appropriate and preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is not warranted. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of April 2015. PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Craig G. Erlanger, Deputy Director, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards and Environmental Review, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. [FR Doc. 2015–09516 Filed 4–22–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 52–012 and 52–013; NRC– 2008–0091] Nuclear Innovation North America LLC; South Texas Project, Units 3 and 4 Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Combined license application; availability. AGENCY: On September 20, 2007, South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company (STPNOC) submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) an application for combined licenses (COLs) for two additional units (Units 3 and 4) at the South Texas Project (STP) Electric Generating Station site in Matagorda County near Bay City, Texas. The NRC published a notice of receipt and availability for this COL application in the Federal Register on December 5, 2007. In a letter dated January 19, 2011, STPNOC notified the NRC that, effective January 24, 2011, Nuclear Innovation North America LLC (NINA) became the lead applicant for STP, Units 3 and 4. This notice is being published to notify the public of the availability of the COL application for STP, Units 3 and 4. DATES: The COL application is available on April 23, 2015. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2008–0091 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2008–0091. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM 23APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 78 (Thursday, April 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22744-22746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09516]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 40-8907; NRC-2013-0036]


License Amendment for United Nuclear Corporation, Church Rock 
Facility, McKinley County, New Mexico

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; 
issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering 
amending Source Materials License SUA-1475 issued to the United Nuclear 
Corporation (UNC), a subsidiary of

[[Page 22745]]

General Electric (GE), to revise current ground water protection 
standards in License Condition 30.B of SUA-1475. The NRC has prepared 
an environmental assessment (EA) for this proposed action in accordance 
with its regulations. Based on the EA, the NRC has concluded that a 
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is appropriate with respect to 
the proposed action. The NRC will issue the amended license following 
the publication of this document.

DATES: The Final EA and FONSI are available as of April 23, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID: NRC-2013-0036 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You 
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID: NRC-2013-0036. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact 
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this document.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The 
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document 
(if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time 
that a document is referenced. The EA and FONSI can be found under 
ADAMS accession no. ML14339A839.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ashley Waldron, Office of Nuclear 
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-7317; email: 
Ashley.Waldron@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Introduction

    On April 17, 2012, UNC, a subsidiary of GE, submitted to the NRC an 
application to amend Source Materials License SUA-1475 for the former 
Uranium Church Rock Mill Site (the Mill Site) (ADAMS Accession No. 
ML12150A146). This proposed amendment would revise current ground water 
protection standards in License Condition 30.B of SUA-1475 for the 
following constituents: Arsenic, Cadmium, Gross Alpha, Lead, Lead-210, 
Nickel, Radium-226 and -228, Selenium, Thorium-230, and Uranium. These 
proposed standards (values) are derived from a re-calculated background 
concentration for each constituent. The Mill Site is located 
approximately 17 miles northeast of Gallup in McKinley County, New 
Mexico.
    The UNC supplemented its request on November 16, 2012, by 
submitting a three-dimensional ground water flow model for the Mill 
Site and adjacent down-gradient areas (ADAMS Accession Nos. 
ML12334A292; ML12305A320; ML12305A309; ML12305A324). On January 10, 
2013, the NRC accepted the amendment request for formal review (ADAMS 
Accession No. ML13007A069). The NRC issued a Request for Additional 
Information (RAI) on June 4, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13121A553), 
and the UNC responded on January 10, 2014 (ADAMS Accession Nos. 
ML14056A541; ML14059A208). Subsequently, the NRC staff determined that 
all technical deficiencies had been addressed in the RAIs and requested 
the UNC to update the ground water flow model report (ADAMS Accession 
No. ML14063A497). The UNC submitted the revised ground water flow model 
report by letter dated June 3, 2014 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML14161A255; 
ML14161A311).
    In accordance with part 40, appendix A, criterion 5, paragraph 
5B(5) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the NRC 
may establish ground water protection standards at the point of 
compliance (POC) either (1) by reference to the background 
concentrations in the ground water, (2) by assigning the appropriate 
value found in the table given in paragraph 5C, or (3) by using 
alternative concentration limits established by the NRC. The POC is 
defined in appendix A as the site-specific location in the uppermost 
aquifer where the ground water protection standard must be met. In 
addition, criterion 5, paragraph 5B(1) states the objective of the POC 
location is to provide the earliest practicable warning that the 
impoundment is releasing hazardous constituents, with the goal that 
hazardous constituents from a licensed site not exceed the specified 
concentration limits in the uppermost aquifer beyond the POC during the 
compliance period. At the Mill Site, POC wells are located in three 
subsurface hydrostratigraphic units: the Southwest Alluvium, and Zone 1 
and Zone 3 of the Upper Gallup Sandstone. The UNC's proposed license 
amendment would affect ground water protection standards in each of 
these units. Additionally, paragraph 5B(6) of criterion 5 to 10 CFR 
part 40, appendix A states that, ``[c]onceptually, background 
concentrations pose no incremental hazards . . .''
    The NRC staff has prepared an EA in support of its review of the 
proposed license amendment. The staff assessed the potential 
environmental impacts associated with amending the ground water 
protection standards and documented the results of the assessment in 
the EA. The NRC staff performed this assessment in accordance with the 
requirements of 10 CFR part 51, ``Environmental Protection Regulations 
for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions.''
    Uranium mill tailings at the Mill Site are located onsite, within 
the tailings impoundment area comprising three contiguous cells 
differentiated as the North, Central and South Cells (see Figure 1, 
ADAMS Accession No. ML12150A146). The Central Cell also has two borrow 
pits. Borrow Pit No. 1 was used to dispose of tailings and Borrow Pit 
No. 2 was used to retain tailings liquids (ADAMS Accession No. 
ML063630443).
    Seepage from the three tailings disposal cells and the borrow pits, 
as well as infiltration of mine effluent water during dewatering 
operations of the nearby Northeast Church Rock and Quivira mines, have 
contributed to the saturated conditions found in the Southwest Alluvium 
and in Zones 1 and 3 of the Upper Gallup Sandstone (ADAMS Accession 
Nos. ML050070220; ML050070233; ML050070242; ML050070245).

II. Environmental Assessment Summary

Description of the Proposed Action

    The UNC is requesting a license amendment for the Mill Site to 
revise License Condition 30.B of Source Materials License SUA-1475. The 
UNC requests revisions to the current ground water protection standards 
in the license condition for the following constituents: Arsenic, 
Cadmium, Gross Alpha, Lead and Lead-210, Nickel,

[[Page 22746]]

Radium-226 and -228, Selenium, Thorium-230, and Uranium for the 
Southwest Alluvium, Zone 1, and Zone 3. No changes are proposed for the 
other constituents in License Condition 30.B (i.e., Beryllium, Total 
Trihalomethanes, and Vanadium).

Need for the Proposed Action

    The proposed action is needed to provide ground water protection 
standards for the Mill Site that are consistent with 10 CFR part 40, 
appendix A, paragraph 5B(1) and background ground water quality that is 
protective of public health and safety.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

    The NRC staff determined that, due to the nature of the proposed 
action, environmental impacts would be limited to subsurface ground 
water resources, and that such impacts would be small and not 
significant. Staff expects no impacts to public health and safety, 
ecological resources, or historical and cultural resources. Therefore, 
the NRC staff does not expect significant impacts to result from the 
proposed modification to the ground water protection standards in SUA-
1475 and considers that impacts from the proposed action would be 
protective of public health and safety and the environment.
    In conducting its assessment, the NRC staff considered the 
following:
     Information in the license application and supporting 
documentation;
     Information in modeling reports and NRC staff review 
reports;
     Information in land use and environmental monitoring 
reports;
     Information from NRC staff site visits and inspections;
     10 CFR part 40, appendix A, ``Criteria Relating to the 
Operation of Uranium Mills and the Disposition of Tailings or Wastes 
Produced by the Extraction or Concentration of Source Material From 
Ores Processed Primarily for Their Source Material Content;''
     NUREG-1620, Rev. 1, ``Standard Review Plan for the Review 
of a Reclamation Plan for Mill Tailings Sites Under Title II of the 
Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978'' (ADAMS Accession 
No. ML031550522); and
     NUREG-1748, ``Environmental Review Guidance for Licensing 
Actions Associated with NMSS Programs, Final Report'' (ADAMS Accession 
No. ML032540811).

Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action

    As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered 
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action alternative''). 
Denial of the proposed license amendment would result in no change in 
the currently approved ground water protection standards. The proposed 
action is needed to revise the ground water protection standards to 
more accurately reflect current background conditions. Both the No-
Action alternative and the Proposed Action for the Mill Site are 
consistent with appendix A, criterion 5, paragraph 5B(1) and background 
ground water quality that is protective of public health and safety.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

    The NRC staff determined that the proposed action would be limited 
to impacts to subsurface ground water resources and therefore is not 
expected to affect listed endangered and threatened species or their 
critical habitat. As well, the proposed action is not expected to 
impact potential or identified cultural or historical resources. 
Therefore, no further consultation was completed under Section 7 of the 
Endangered Species Act or under Section 106 of the National Historic 
Preservation Act.
    During preparation of the EA, the NRC staff consulted with the 
following federal, tribal, and state agencies: the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) Regions 6 and 9, the U.S. Department of Energy, 
the Navajo Nation EPA, and the New Mexico Environment Department. The 
purpose of this consultation was to request comments on the proposed 
action; however, none of the agencies identified concerns with the 
proposed action.

III. Finding of No Significant Impact

    Based on its review of the UNC's license amendment request to 
revise License Condition 30.B of SUA-1475, the NRC staff expects there 
to be no significant environmental impacts in connection with the 
proposed action as the proposed ground water protection standard 
values, conceptually, pose no incremental hazards to public health and 
safety. Therefore, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is 
appropriate and preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement is not 
warranted.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of April 2015.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Craig G. Erlanger,
Deputy Director, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards and 
Environmental Review, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2015-09516 Filed 4-22-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.