Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 22703-22705 [2015-09433]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 78 / Thursday, April 23, 2015 / Notices
of origin, APHIS has determined that
restrictions associated with shape or
country of origin are no longer relevant.
Therefore, in accordance with
§ 305.3(b)(2), we are providing notice
that we have determined that it is
necessary to amend treatment schedule
T102–a to specify the following weightbased dip times:
Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of
April 2015.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–09468 Filed 4–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
If the weight is
(grams):
Then the dip time (minutes) is:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Up to 375 ..............
376 to 500 ............
501 to 700 ............
701 to 900 ............
65
75
90
110
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
Valid if the fruit is not hydro-cooled within 30
minutes of removal from the hot-water immer- information under the provisions of the
sion tank. Alternatively, 10 minutes may be Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
added to the treatment duration to allow im- chapter 35).
mediate hydro-cooling.
Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
Title: Business Research &
In order to have minimum adverse
Development and Innovation Survey.
impact on the ongoing trade of this
OMB Control Number: 0607–0912.
commodity from mango exporting
Form Number(s): BRDI–1 and BRD–
countries, we are making these changes
1S.
effective immediately upon publication
Type of Request: Revision of a
of this notice.
currently approved collection.
Number of Respondents: 45,000.
The reasons for these revisions to the
Average Hours per Response: BRDI–
treatment manual are described in detail
1—14.85 hours; BRD–1(S)—.59 hours.
in the treatment evaluation document
Burden Hours: 126,500.
(TED) we have prepared to support this
Needs and Uses: Companies are the
action. The TED may be viewed on the
major performers of research and
Regulations.gov Web site or in our
development (R&D) in the United States
reading room (see ADDRESSES above for
(U.S.), accounting for over 70 percent of
instructions for accessing
total U.S. R&D outlays each year. A
Regulations.gov and information on the
location and hours of the reading room). consistent business R&D information
base is essential to government officials
You may also request paper copies of
formulating public policy, industry
the TED by calling or writing to the
personnel involved in corporate
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. Please refer to the planning, and members of the academic
community conducting research. In
subject of the TED when requesting
order to develop policies designed to
copies.
promote and enhance science and
After reviewing the comments we
technology, past trends and the present
receive, we will announce our decision
status of R&D must be known and
regarding the revised treatment
analyzed. Without comprehensive
schedule described in the TED in a
business R&D statistics, it would be
subsequent notice, in accordance with
impossible to evaluate the health of
paragraph (b)(3) of § 305.3. If we do not
science and technology in the United
receive any comments, or the comments States or to make comparisons between
we receive do not change our
the technological progress of our
determination that the proposed
country and that of other nations.
changes are effective, we will affirm
The National Science Foundation Act
these changes to the PPQ Treatment
of 1950 as amended authorizes and
Manual and make available a new
directs National Science Foundation
version of the PPQ Treatment Manual
(NSF) ‘‘. . . to provide a central
reflecting these changes. If we receive
clearinghouse for the collection,
comments that cause us to determine
interpretation, and analysis of data on
that additional changes need to be made scientific and engineering resources and
to treatment schedule T102–a, we will
to provide a source of information for
make available a new version of the PPQ policy formulation by other agencies of
Treatment Manual that reflects the
the Federal government.’’ One of the
changes.
methods used by the NSF to fulfill this
mandate is The Business R&D and
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22,
Innovation Survey (BRDIS)—the
2.80, and 371.3.
primary federal source of information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:53 Apr 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22703
on R&D in the business sector. The NSF
together with the Census Bureau, the
collecting and compiling agent, analyze
the data and publish the resulting
statistics.
The NSF has published annual R&D
statistics collected from the Survey of
Industrial Research and Development
(SIRD) (1953–2007) and BRDIS (2008–
2013) for 60 years. The results of the
survey are used to assess trends in R&D
expenditures by industry sector,
investigate productivity determinants,
formulate science and tax policy, and
compare individual company
performance with industry averages.
This survey is the Nation’s primary
source for international comparative
statistics on business R&D spending.
The BRDIS will continue to collect
the following types of information:
• R&D expense based on accounting
standards.
• Worldwide R&D of domestic
companies.
• Business segment detail.
• R&D related capital expenditures.
• Detailed data about the R&D
workforce.
• R&D strategy and data on the
potential impact of R&D on the market.
• R&D directed to application areas of
particular national interest.
• Data measuring innovation, and
intellectual property protection
activities.
The following changes were made to
the 2014 BRDIS from the 2013 BRDIS.
• Section 1: Moved foreign ownership
question up above ownership question.
Changed the EIN of owner to the
ownership question instead of the
foreign ownership question.
• Section 2: Added some questions to
gather data on monetary gifts to
academia.
• Section 6: Added a question on
revenue from sale of patents. Added two
questions in regards to how much the
company paid others to purchase
patents or license patents. Removed the
question on how many agreements
company entered into. Information from
the BRDIS will continue to support the
following initiatives:
Science of Science and Innovation
Policy (SciSIP), the NSF’s program to
foster the development of the
knowledge, theories, data, tools, and
human capital needed to underwrite
fundamental research that creates new
explanatory models and analytic tools
designed to inform the Nation’s public
and private sectors about the processes
through which investments in science
and engineering are transformed into
social and economic outcomes.
America Competes Act of 2007, which
calls for the doubling of funding for
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
22704
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 78 / Thursday, April 23, 2015 / Notices
basic research in physical sciences,
improvement of math instruction, and
expansion of low-income students’
access to Advance Placement (AP)
coursework through AP/International
Baccalaureate Program to, as The White
House fact sheet on the America
Competes Act says, ‘‘encourage
scientists to explore promising and
critical areas such as nanotechnology,
supercomputing, and alternative energy
sources.’’
Rising Above the Gathering Storm, the
National Research Council (NRC) report
that recommends increasing America’s
talent pool by improving K–12 math and
science education; sustaining and
strengthening the Nation’s commitment
to long-term basic research; developing
and recruiting top students, scientists
and engineers from U.S. and abroad;
and ensuring that the U.S. is the premier
place in the world for innovation.
Policy officials from many Federal
agencies rely on these statistics for
essential information. For example, total
U.S. R&D expenditures statistics have
been used by the Bureau of Economic
Analysis (BEA) to update the System of
National Accounts and, in fact, the BEA
recently has incorporated R&D as a
direct component of the System.
Accurate R&D data are needed to
continue the development and
subsequent updates to this detailed
satellite account. Also, a data linking
project has been designed to augment
the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) data
collected by BEA. The initial attempt to
link the SIRD data with BEA’s FDI
benchmark files was successful, and
plans now call for the annual linkage of
the R&D data to the FDI and U.S. Direct
Investment Abroad (USDIA) data.
Further, the Census Bureau links data
collected by the Survey with other
statistical files. At the Census Bureau,
historical company-level R&D data are
linked to a file that contains information
on the outputs and inputs of companies’
manufacturing plants. Researchers are
able to analyze the relationships
between R&D funding and other
economic variables by using micro-level
data.
Individuals and organizations access
the survey statistics via the Internet in
annual National Center for Science and
Engineering Statistics (NCSES)
InfoBriefs that announce the availability
of statistics from each cycle of the
Survey and provide detailed statistical
table reports that contain all of the
statistics the NSF produces from the
Survey. Information about the kinds of
projects that rely on statistics from the
Survey is available from internal records
at the NSF’s NCSES. In addition, survey
statistics are regularly cited in trade
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:09 Apr 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
publications and many researchers use
the survey statistics from these
secondary sources without directly
contacting the NSF or the Census
Bureau. Some of the users of the survey
statistics and the types of information
they request are described below.
Government Users
Government policy officials who are
involved in assessing the role of the
Federal government in promoting
economic growth use R&D statistics in
their decision-making processes since
R&D results affect technological and
economic progress. Members of
Congress make extensive use of R&D
statistics in preparing tax legislation,
contacting the NSF or the Census
Bureau directly through their own staffs,
one of the House or Senate science
committees, or the Congressional
Research Service.
The NSF staff also work closely with
the Office of Science and Technology
Policy (OSTP), providing R&D statistics
and indications of emerging trends to
assist the OSTP staff in their analyses of
the status of science and technology in
the United States. In addition, the NSF
has frequent contact with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), the
Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the
Congressional Research Service (CRS),
and the Congressional Joint Economic
Committee which use R&D statistics in
their studies.
Statistics produced from the Survey
also have been requested by officials
from other Federal government and
quasi-governmental agencies including
the Departments of Agriculture,
Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy,
Health and Human Services, Labor,
State, Treasury; the Bureau of Economic
Analysis; Bureau of Labor Statistics
(BLS); Congressional Joint Committee
on Taxation; Consumer Products Safety
Commission; Environmental Protection
Agency; Federal Reserve Banks of
Chicago, Dallas, New York, and San
Francisco; Government Accountability
Office; Government Publishing Office;
International Trade Administration;
International Trade Commission;
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration; National Institute of
Standards and Technology; National
Institutes of Health; National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration;
Oakridge National Laboratory; Office of
Naval Research; President’s Council of
Economic Advisors; Office of Trade
Policy Analysis; U.S. Federal Trade
Commission; U.S. Patent Office; and
U.S. Small Business Administration.
As states and local governments seek
to attract high-tech industries to their
areas, the NSF and the Census Bureau
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
are frequently asked to provide R&D
funding and employment figures.
Among the state governments and state
organizations requesting industry R&D
statistics have been Alabama, Arkansas,
California Energy Commission, Center
for Innovative Technology (VA),
Georgia, Indiana, Maine Development
Foundation, Maine Science and
Technology Foundation, Maryland,
Massachusetts Department of Revenue,
Michigan Department of Labor and
Economic Growth, Michigan Economic
Development Corporation, Minnesota,
Mississippi, New Jersey Research and
Development Council, New York State
Department of Taxation and Finance,
New York State Economic Development
Authority, North Carolina, North Dakota
Department of Commerce, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South
Carolina, Southern Growth Policies
Board (representing Alabama, Arkansas,
Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri,
Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma,
South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia,
and West Virginia), and Utah.
Information and statistics from the
Survey also are supplied to the NSF
internal organizations. For example,
survey statistics are used in the
‘‘Research and Development: National
Trends and International Linkages’’ and
‘‘Industry, Technology, and the Global
Marketplace’’ chapters of the
Congressionally mandated Science and
Engineering Indicators series, a biennial
report in which the National Science
Board continues its effort to describe
quantitatively the condition of U.S.
science and research. Survey results are
also included in the NSF’s annual
National Patterns of R&D Resources
tabulations.
International Users
The international community uses
R&D spending information as part of its
comparisons of the economic
performance among nations. U.S. R&D
statistics are compiled in a format that
can be compared with those of other
countries. These statistics are
transmitted to the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) that relies on the
Survey as its primary source for
business R&D statistics for the United
States. Also, R&D statistics are used by
multi-national committees and
subcommittees studying and
maintaining the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
and North American Product
Classification System (NAPCS).
Other international and foreign
entities that have requested statistics on
U.S. business R&D expenditures include
the Brazilian National Council for
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 78 / Thursday, April 23, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scientific and Technological
Development, Canadian Ministry of
Treasury and Economics, Delegation of
the European Communities, Department
of State and Regional Development
(Australia), Department of Technology
Policy (Austria), European
Commission’s Joint Research Center,
French Embassy, French Federal
Institute of Research, Embassy of
Finland, Embassy of Germany,
Hungarian Academy of Sciences,,
Industry Canada, Instituto Nacional de
Estadistica (Madrid), National
Technology Agency of Finland, Natural
Sciences and Engineering Research
Council of Canada, Puerto Rico
Planning Board, Office of the
Representative of the Republic of
Taiwan, Statistics Canada, and Statistics
Quebec.
Business Users
Although the primary purpose of the
survey is to provide accurate R&D
statistics for well-informed public
policy decisions, business users also
benefit from the survey figures, and one
of the goals of the redesign is to increase
the utility of the information for
companies. There is a special obligation
to keep the survey relevant to industry
users particularly because business
personnel spend time answering the
annual questionnaire. Firms and trade
associations in all industries, whether
large or small in terms of R&D
performance, are interested in making
intra-industry comparisons, as well as
comparing other industries’
performance with their own.
Each year the NSF and Census Bureau
receive many requests for R&D
information from business users. Some
of the industries where users who have
requested information are aerospace,
telecommunications, healthcare,
pharmaceuticals, chemicals, software,
and motor vehicles.
In addition to industry researchers
who utilize the R&D statistics directly
from the NSF Web site and publications,
there are many who use the Survey’s
tabulations in their own trade reports.
Other trade publications that regularly
print statistics directly from the Survey
include multiple Fortune 500
companies and various trade
associations.
Unions also consider business R&D
statistics relevant to their members’
well-being. R&D statistics also are used
by research organizations devoted to the
study of industry, R&D, science and
technology and related topics.
Other Users
Research undertaken at universities
on innovation and economic growth has
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:53 Apr 22, 2015
Jkt 235001
relied heavily on the detailed R&D time
series from the Survey. Research
projects that have used R&D statistics
obtained from the Survey have been
conducted at many colleges and
universities.
In addition, inquiries are regularly
received from the news media. And
finally, Internet sites continue to link
with the Survey’s results.
In summary, each item in the Survey
has been the subject of research by
someone interested in business R&D
performance. Although the consumers
of the R&D statistics from the Survey are
diverse, there is one common element
underlying all the uses of the survey
statistics—an attempt to gain a better
understanding of some aspect of the
nation’s scientific and technological
resources. The detailed statistics
provided by the Survey are the most
complete set of elements for assessing
the impact of R&D on business
development and the nation’s economy.
The total burden estimate for the 2014
BRDIS has increased due to an increase
in amount of companies that are
receiving the longer Form BRDI–1 from
3,000 to 7,000. The increase in the
number of companies receiving form
BRDI–1 is the result of lowering the
R&D threshold for receiving the longer
form from $7 million to $1 million. At
the same time the burden on companies
receiving the shorter form has been
reduced. Prior to 2012 the shorter form
(then called Form BRDI–1A) was 32
pages (168 response fields). The current
shorter form (Form BRD–1S) is 8 pages
(61 response fields).
The increase in burden also reflects a
slight increase in the total number of
companies in the sample from the prior
OMB submission.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C.,
Sections 182, 224 and 225; NSF Act of
1950.
This information collection request
may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov.
Follow the instructions to view
Department of Commerce collections
currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
Dated: April 17, 2015.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–09433 Filed 4–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22705
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–22–2015]
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 134—
Chattanooga, Tennessee; Notification
of Proposed Production Activity,
Cormetech, Inc. (Selective Catalyst
Reduction Catalysts), Cleveland, TN
Cormetech, Inc. (Cormetech), an
operator of FTZ 134, submitted a
notification of proposed production
activity to the FTZ Board for its facility
in Cleveland, Tennessee. The
notification conforming to the
requirements of the regulations of the
FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was
received on April 1, 2015.
A separate request for subzone
designation at the Cormetech facility is
planned and will be processed under
Section 400.31 of the FTZ Board’s
regulations. The facility is used for the
production of selective catalyst
reduction catalysts and related elements
(logs), which are used for emissions
reduction in power generation,
industrial, marine and petrochemical
applications. Pursuant to 15 CFR
400.14(b), FTZ activity would be limited
to the specific foreign-status materials
and components and specific finished
products described in the submitted
notification (as described below) and
subsequently authorized by the FTZ
Board.
Production under FTZ procedures
could exempt Cormetech from customs
duty payments on the foreign status
materials and components used in
export production. On its domestic
sales, Cormetech would be able to
choose the duty rate during customs
entry procedures that applies to
selective catalyst reduction catalysts
and related elements (free) for the
foreign status inputs noted below.
Customs duties also could possibly be
deferred or reduced on foreign status
production equipment.
The components and materials
sourced from abroad include: Anatase
titanium dioxide; glass fiber; clay;
carboxyl methyl cellulose;
polypropylene (RP chop); polyethylene
oxide (PEO); ammonium metavanadate
(AMT); hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
(methocel); manganese acetate; vanadyl
oxalate; ammonium heptamolybdate
(AHM); pressing/lubricating agents;
ammonium polyvanadate; and,
honeycomb ceramic porcelain (duty rate
ranges from free to 6.5%).
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions shall be
addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive
Secretary at the address below. The
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 78 (Thursday, April 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22703-22705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09433]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 35).
Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
Title: Business Research & Development and Innovation Survey.
OMB Control Number: 0607-0912.
Form Number(s): BRDI-1 and BRD-1S.
Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Number of Respondents: 45,000.
Average Hours per Response: BRDI-1--14.85 hours; BRD-1(S)--.59
hours.
Burden Hours: 126,500.
Needs and Uses: Companies are the major performers of research and
development (R&D) in the United States (U.S.), accounting for over 70
percent of total U.S. R&D outlays each year. A consistent business R&D
information base is essential to government officials formulating
public policy, industry personnel involved in corporate planning, and
members of the academic community conducting research. In order to
develop policies designed to promote and enhance science and
technology, past trends and the present status of R&D must be known and
analyzed. Without comprehensive business R&D statistics, it would be
impossible to evaluate the health of science and technology in the
United States or to make comparisons between the technological progress
of our country and that of other nations.
The National Science Foundation Act of 1950 as amended authorizes
and directs National Science Foundation (NSF) ``. . . to provide a
central clearinghouse for the collection, interpretation, and analysis
of data on scientific and engineering resources and to provide a source
of information for policy formulation by other agencies of the Federal
government.'' One of the methods used by the NSF to fulfill this
mandate is The Business R&D and Innovation Survey (BRDIS)--the primary
federal source of information on R&D in the business sector. The NSF
together with the Census Bureau, the collecting and compiling agent,
analyze the data and publish the resulting statistics.
The NSF has published annual R&D statistics collected from the
Survey of Industrial Research and Development (SIRD) (1953-2007) and
BRDIS (2008-2013) for 60 years. The results of the survey are used to
assess trends in R&D expenditures by industry sector, investigate
productivity determinants, formulate science and tax policy, and
compare individual company performance with industry averages. This
survey is the Nation's primary source for international comparative
statistics on business R&D spending.
The BRDIS will continue to collect the following types of
information:
R&D expense based on accounting standards.
Worldwide R&D of domestic companies.
Business segment detail.
R&D related capital expenditures.
Detailed data about the R&D workforce.
R&D strategy and data on the potential impact of R&D on
the market.
R&D directed to application areas of particular national
interest.
Data measuring innovation, and intellectual property
protection activities.
The following changes were made to the 2014 BRDIS from the 2013
BRDIS.
Section 1: Moved foreign ownership question up above
ownership question. Changed the EIN of owner to the ownership question
instead of the foreign ownership question.
Section 2: Added some questions to gather data on monetary
gifts to academia.
Section 6: Added a question on revenue from sale of
patents. Added two questions in regards to how much the company paid
others to purchase patents or license patents. Removed the question on
how many agreements company entered into. Information from the BRDIS
will continue to support the following initiatives:
Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP), the NSF's
program to foster the development of the knowledge, theories, data,
tools, and human capital needed to underwrite fundamental research that
creates new explanatory models and analytic tools designed to inform
the Nation's public and private sectors about the processes through
which investments in science and engineering are transformed into
social and economic outcomes.
America Competes Act of 2007, which calls for the doubling of
funding for
[[Page 22704]]
basic research in physical sciences, improvement of math instruction,
and expansion of low-income students' access to Advance Placement (AP)
coursework through AP/International Baccalaureate Program to, as The
White House fact sheet on the America Competes Act says, ``encourage
scientists to explore promising and critical areas such as
nanotechnology, supercomputing, and alternative energy sources.''
Rising Above the Gathering Storm, the National Research Council
(NRC) report that recommends increasing America's talent pool by
improving K-12 math and science education; sustaining and strengthening
the Nation's commitment to long-term basic research; developing and
recruiting top students, scientists and engineers from U.S. and abroad;
and ensuring that the U.S. is the premier place in the world for
innovation.
Policy officials from many Federal agencies rely on these
statistics for essential information. For example, total U.S. R&D
expenditures statistics have been used by the Bureau of Economic
Analysis (BEA) to update the System of National Accounts and, in fact,
the BEA recently has incorporated R&D as a direct component of the
System. Accurate R&D data are needed to continue the development and
subsequent updates to this detailed satellite account. Also, a data
linking project has been designed to augment the Foreign Direct
Investment (FDI) data collected by BEA. The initial attempt to link the
SIRD data with BEA's FDI benchmark files was successful, and plans now
call for the annual linkage of the R&D data to the FDI and U.S. Direct
Investment Abroad (USDIA) data. Further, the Census Bureau links data
collected by the Survey with other statistical files. At the Census
Bureau, historical company-level R&D data are linked to a file that
contains information on the outputs and inputs of companies'
manufacturing plants. Researchers are able to analyze the relationships
between R&D funding and other economic variables by using micro-level
data.
Individuals and organizations access the survey statistics via the
Internet in annual National Center for Science and Engineering
Statistics (NCSES) InfoBriefs that announce the availability of
statistics from each cycle of the Survey and provide detailed
statistical table reports that contain all of the statistics the NSF
produces from the Survey. Information about the kinds of projects that
rely on statistics from the Survey is available from internal records
at the NSF's NCSES. In addition, survey statistics are regularly cited
in trade publications and many researchers use the survey statistics
from these secondary sources without directly contacting the NSF or the
Census Bureau. Some of the users of the survey statistics and the types
of information they request are described below.
Government Users
Government policy officials who are involved in assessing the role
of the Federal government in promoting economic growth use R&D
statistics in their decision-making processes since R&D results affect
technological and economic progress. Members of Congress make extensive
use of R&D statistics in preparing tax legislation, contacting the NSF
or the Census Bureau directly through their own staffs, one of the
House or Senate science committees, or the Congressional Research
Service.
The NSF staff also work closely with the Office of Science and
Technology Policy (OSTP), providing R&D statistics and indications of
emerging trends to assist the OSTP staff in their analyses of the
status of science and technology in the United States. In addition, the
NSF has frequent contact with the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Congressional
Research Service (CRS), and the Congressional Joint Economic Committee
which use R&D statistics in their studies.
Statistics produced from the Survey also have been requested by
officials from other Federal government and quasi-governmental agencies
including the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education,
Energy, Health and Human Services, Labor, State, Treasury; the Bureau
of Economic Analysis; Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS); Congressional
Joint Committee on Taxation; Consumer Products Safety Commission;
Environmental Protection Agency; Federal Reserve Banks of Chicago,
Dallas, New York, and San Francisco; Government Accountability Office;
Government Publishing Office; International Trade Administration;
International Trade Commission; National Aeronautics and Space
Administration; National Institute of Standards and Technology;
National Institutes of Health; National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration; Oakridge National Laboratory; Office of Naval Research;
President's Council of Economic Advisors; Office of Trade Policy
Analysis; U.S. Federal Trade Commission; U.S. Patent Office; and U.S.
Small Business Administration.
As states and local governments seek to attract high-tech
industries to their areas, the NSF and the Census Bureau are frequently
asked to provide R&D funding and employment figures. Among the state
governments and state organizations requesting industry R&D statistics
have been Alabama, Arkansas, California Energy Commission, Center for
Innovative Technology (VA), Georgia, Indiana, Maine Development
Foundation, Maine Science and Technology Foundation, Maryland,
Massachusetts Department of Revenue, Michigan Department of Labor and
Economic Growth, Michigan Economic Development Corporation, Minnesota,
Mississippi, New Jersey Research and Development Council, New York
State Department of Taxation and Finance, New York State Economic
Development Authority, North Carolina, North Dakota Department of
Commerce, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Southern Growth
Policies Board (representing Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia), and Utah.
Information and statistics from the Survey also are supplied to the
NSF internal organizations. For example, survey statistics are used in
the ``Research and Development: National Trends and International
Linkages'' and ``Industry, Technology, and the Global Marketplace''
chapters of the Congressionally mandated Science and Engineering
Indicators series, a biennial report in which the National Science
Board continues its effort to describe quantitatively the condition of
U.S. science and research. Survey results are also included in the
NSF's annual National Patterns of R&D Resources tabulations.
International Users
The international community uses R&D spending information as part
of its comparisons of the economic performance among nations. U.S. R&D
statistics are compiled in a format that can be compared with those of
other countries. These statistics are transmitted to the Organization
for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that relies on the
Survey as its primary source for business R&D statistics for the United
States. Also, R&D statistics are used by multi-national committees and
subcommittees studying and maintaining the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) and North American Product Classification
System (NAPCS).
Other international and foreign entities that have requested
statistics on U.S. business R&D expenditures include the Brazilian
National Council for
[[Page 22705]]
Scientific and Technological Development, Canadian Ministry of Treasury
and Economics, Delegation of the European Communities, Department of
State and Regional Development (Australia), Department of Technology
Policy (Austria), European Commission's Joint Research Center, French
Embassy, French Federal Institute of Research, Embassy of Finland,
Embassy of Germany, Hungarian Academy of Sciences,, Industry Canada,
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica (Madrid), National Technology Agency
of Finland, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of
Canada, Puerto Rico Planning Board, Office of the Representative of the
Republic of Taiwan, Statistics Canada, and Statistics Quebec.
Business Users
Although the primary purpose of the survey is to provide accurate
R&D statistics for well-informed public policy decisions, business
users also benefit from the survey figures, and one of the goals of the
redesign is to increase the utility of the information for companies.
There is a special obligation to keep the survey relevant to industry
users particularly because business personnel spend time answering the
annual questionnaire. Firms and trade associations in all industries,
whether large or small in terms of R&D performance, are interested in
making intra-industry comparisons, as well as comparing other
industries' performance with their own.
Each year the NSF and Census Bureau receive many requests for R&D
information from business users. Some of the industries where users who
have requested information are aerospace, telecommunications,
healthcare, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, software, and motor vehicles.
In addition to industry researchers who utilize the R&D statistics
directly from the NSF Web site and publications, there are many who use
the Survey's tabulations in their own trade reports.
Other trade publications that regularly print statistics directly
from the Survey include multiple Fortune 500 companies and various
trade associations.
Unions also consider business R&D statistics relevant to their
members' well-being. R&D statistics also are used by research
organizations devoted to the study of industry, R&D, science and
technology and related topics.
Other Users
Research undertaken at universities on innovation and economic
growth has relied heavily on the detailed R&D time series from the
Survey. Research projects that have used R&D statistics obtained from
the Survey have been conducted at many colleges and universities.
In addition, inquiries are regularly received from the news media.
And finally, Internet sites continue to link with the Survey's results.
In summary, each item in the Survey has been the subject of
research by someone interested in business R&D performance. Although
the consumers of the R&D statistics from the Survey are diverse, there
is one common element underlying all the uses of the survey
statistics--an attempt to gain a better understanding of some aspect of
the nation's scientific and technological resources. The detailed
statistics provided by the Survey are the most complete set of elements
for assessing the impact of R&D on business development and the
nation's economy.
The total burden estimate for the 2014 BRDIS has increased due to
an increase in amount of companies that are receiving the longer Form
BRDI-1 from 3,000 to 7,000. The increase in the number of companies
receiving form BRDI-1 is the result of lowering the R&D threshold for
receiving the longer form from $7 million to $1 million. At the same
time the burden on companies receiving the shorter form has been
reduced. Prior to 2012 the shorter form (then called Form BRDI-1A) was
32 pages (168 response fields). The current shorter form (Form BRD-1S)
is 8 pages (61 response fields).
The increase in burden also reflects a slight increase in the total
number of companies in the sample from the prior OMB submission.
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C., Sections 182, 224 and 225; NSF
Act of 1950.
This information collection request may be viewed at
www.reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce
collections currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice
to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395-5806.
Dated: April 17, 2015.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-09433 Filed 4-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P