WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding United States-Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Measures on Certain Coated Paper From Indonesia, 21794-21795 [2015-09026]
Download as PDF
21794
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 75 / Monday, April 20, 2015 / Notices
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
could request the establishment of a
dispute settlement panel.
[Dispute No. WTO/DS491/Docket No. USTR–
2015–0005]
Major Issues Raised by Indonesia
On March 13, 2015, Indonesia
requested consultations concerning AD
and CVD measures pertaining to certain
coated paper suitable for high-quality
print graphics using sheet-fed presses.
The specific U.S. legal instruments
referenced in Indonesia’s consultations
request are: (1) Section 771(11)(B) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, codified
at 19 U.S.C. 1677(11)(B); (2) Certain
Coated Paper from Indonesia: Initiation
of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 74
FR 53707 (Oct. 20, 2009); (3) Certain
Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality
Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses
from Indonesia and the People’s
Republic of China: Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Investigations, 74 FR
53710 (Oct. 20, 2009); (4) Certain
Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality
Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses
from China and Indonesia, 74 FR 50243
(Sept. 30, 2009); (5) Certain Coated
Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print
Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from
China and Indonesia, 74 FR 61174 (Nov.
23, 2009); (6) Certain Coated Paper
Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics
Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia:
Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing
Duty Determination and Alignment of
Final Countervailing Duty
Determination with Final Antidumping
Duty Determination, 75 FR 10761 (Mar.
9, 2010); (7) Certain Coated Paper
Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics
Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia:
Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Postponement
of Final Determination, 75 FR 24885
(May 6, 2010); (8) Certain Coated Paper
Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics
Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia:
Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination, 75 FR 59209 (Sept. 27,
2010); (9) Certain Coated Paper Suitable
for High-Quality Print Graphics Using
Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, 75 FR 59223 (Sept. 27,
2010); (10) Certain Coated Paper
Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics
Using Sheet-Fed Presses from China and
Indonesia, 75 FR 70289 (Nov. 17, 2010);
(11) Certain Coated Paper Suitable for
High-Quality Print Graphics Using
Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia:
Countervailing Duty Order, 75 FR 70206
(Nov. 17, 2010); and (12) Certain Coated
Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print
Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from
Indonesia: Antidumping Duty Order, 75
FR 70205 (Nov. 17, 2010).
With respect to the CVD measures,
Indonesia challenges the U.S.
WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding
Regarding United States—AntiDumping and Countervailing Measures
on Certain Coated Paper From
Indonesia
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
The Office of the United
States Trade Representative (‘‘USTR’’) is
providing notice that on March 13,
2015, the Republic of Indonesia
requested consultations with the United
States under the Marrakesh Agreement
Establishing the World Trade
Organization (‘‘WTO Agreement’’)
concerning antidumping (‘‘AD’’) and
countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) measures
pertaining to certain coated paper
suitable for high-quality print graphics
using sheet-fed presses from Indonesia.
That request may be found at
www.wto.org contained in a document
designated as WT/DS491/1. USTR
invites written comments from the
public concerning the issues raised in
this dispute.
DATES: Although USTR will accept any
comments received during the course of
the dispute settlement proceedings,
comments should be submitted on or
before May 11, 2015, to be assured of
timely consideration by USTR.
ADDRESSES: Public comments should be
submitted electronically to
www.regulations.gov, docket number
USTR–2015–0005. If you are unable to
provide submissions by
www.regulations.gov, please contact
Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to
arrange for an alternative method of
transmission.
If (as explained below) the comment
contains confidential information, then
the comment should be submitted by
fax only to Sandy McKinzy at (202)
395–3640.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Micah Myers, Associate General
Counsel, or Juli Schwartz, Assistant
General Counsel, Office of the United
States Trade Representative, 600 17th
Street NW., Washington, DC 20508,
(202) 395–3150.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USTR is
providing notice that consultations have
been requested pursuant to the WTO
Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes
(‘‘DSU’’). If such consultations should
fail to resolve the matter, Indonesia
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Apr 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Department of Commerce’s (‘‘DOC’’)
determination that Indonesia provided
standing timber for less than adequate
remuneration, describing it in the
consultation request as a ‘‘per se
determination of price distortion’’
without a (corresponding)
determination of ‘‘the adequacy of
remuneration ‘in relation to prevailing
market conditions.’ ’’ Indonesia also
states that DOC failed to ‘‘examine
whether there was a plan or scheme in
place sufficient to constitute a ‘subsidy
programme.’ ’’ Indonesia further claims
DOC ‘‘did not identify whether the
entity providing the purported subsidy
was the national, regional, or local
government and . . . thus . . . whether
the subsidy was ‘specific to an
enterprise . . . within the jurisdiction of
the granting authority’ ’’ (third ellipsis
in original). In addition, Indonesia
challenges DOC’s facts available
analysis in which it concluded that the
Government of Indonesia forgave debt.
With respect to both the AD and CVD
measures, Indonesia alleges that the
U.S. International Trade Commission’s
(‘‘ITC’’) threat of injury determination
‘‘relied on ‘allegation, conjecture [and]
remote possibility,’ ’’ was not based ‘‘on
a change in circumstances that was
‘clearly foreseen and imminent,’ ’’ and
showed no ‘‘causal relationship between
the [subject] imports and the . . . threat
of injury to the domestic industry.’’
With respect to 19 U.S.C. 1677(11)(B),
Indonesia contends that ‘‘the law does
not consider or exercise ‘special care’ ’’
as a result of the ‘‘requirement that a tie
vote in a threat of injury determination
must be treated as an affirmative . . .
[ITC] determination.’’
Indonesia alleges inconsistencies with
Article VI of the General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade 1994, Articles 1, 3.5,
3.7 and 3.8 of the Agreement on
Implementation of Article VI of the
General Agreement on Tariffs And
Trade 1994 and Articles 2.1, 12.7, 10,
14(d), 15.5, 15.7 and 15.8 of the
Agreement on Subsidies and
Countervailing Measures.
Public Comment: Requirements for
Submissions
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments concerning
the issues raised in this dispute. Persons
may submit public comments
electronically to www.regulations.gov
docket number USTR–2015–0005. If you
are unable to provide submissions by
www.regulations.gov, please contact
Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to
arrange for an alternative method of
transmission.
To submit comments via
www.regulations.gov, enter docket
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 75 / Monday, April 20, 2015 / Notices
number USTR–2015–0005 on the home
page and click ‘‘Search.’’ The site will
provide a search-results page listing all
documents associated with this docket.
Find a reference to this notice by
selecting ‘‘Notice’’ under ‘‘Document
Type’’ on the left side of the searchresults page, and click on the link
entitled ‘‘Comment Now!’’ (For further
information on using the
www.regulations.gov Web site, please
consult the resources provided on the
Web site by clicking on ‘‘How to Use
This Site’’ on the left side of the home
page.)
The www.regulations.gov Web site
allows users to provide comments by
filling in a ‘‘Type Comments’’ field, or
by attaching a document using an
‘‘Upload File’’ field. It is expected that
most comments will be provided in an
attached document. If a document is
attached, it is sufficient to type ‘‘See
attached’’ in the ‘‘Type Comments’’
field.
A person requesting that information
contained in a comment that he/she
submitted, be treated as confidential
business information must certify that
such information is business
confidential and would not customarily
be released to the public by the
submitter. Confidential business
information must be clearly designated
as such and the submission must be
marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’
at the top and bottom of the cover page
and each succeeding page. Any
comment containing business
confidential information must be
submitted by fax to Sandy McKinzy at
(202) 395–3640. A non-confidential
summary of the confidential
information must be submitted to
www.regulations.gov. The nonconfidential summary will be placed in
the docket and will be open to public
inspection.
USTR may determine that information
or advice contained in a comment
submitted, other than business
confidential information, is confidential
in accordance with Section 135(g)(2) of
the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that
information or advice may qualify as
such, the submitter:
(1) Must clearly so designate the
information or advice;
(2) Must clearly mark the material as
‘‘SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE’’ at the
top and bottom of the cover page and
each succeeding page; and
(3) Must provide a non-confidential
summary of the information or advice.
Any comment containing confidential
information must be submitted by fax. A
non-confidential summary of the
confidential information must be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Apr 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
submitted to www.regulations.gov. The
non-confidential summary will be
placed in the docket and will be open
to public inspection.
Pursuant to section 127(e) of the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19
U.S.C. 3537(e)), USTR will maintain a
docket on this dispute settlement
proceeding, docket number USTR–
2015–0005, accessible to the public at
www.regulations.gov. The public file
will include non-confidential comments
received by USTR from the public
regarding the dispute. If a dispute
settlement panel is convened, or in the
event of an appeal from such a panel,
the following documents will be made
available to the public at www.ustr.gov:
The United States’ submissions, any
non-confidential submissions received
from other participants in the dispute,
and any non-confidential summaries of
submissions received from other
participants in the dispute. In the event
that a dispute settlement panel is
convened, or in the event of an appeal
from such a panel, the report of the
panel, and, if applicable, the report of
the Appellate Body, will also be
available on the Web site of the World
Trade Organization, at www.wto.org.
Comments open to public inspection
may be viewed at www.regulations.gov.
Juan Millan,
Assistant United States Trade Representative
for Monitoring and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2015–09026 Filed 4–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3290–F5–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA–2015–0007–N–6]
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces that the renewal
Information Collection Requests (ICRs)
abstracted below are being forwarded to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and comment. The
ICRs describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden. The Federal Register notice
with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the following collections
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21795
of information was published on
February 9, 2015.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before May 20, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Robert Brogan, Office of Planning and
Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Ave. SE., Mail Stop 25,
Washington, DC 20590 (Telephone:
(202) 493–6292), or Ms. Kimberly
Toone, Office of Information
Technology, RAD–20, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave.
SE., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC
20590 (Telephone: (202) 493–6132).
(These telephone numbers are not tollfree.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law 104–13, sec. 2, 109
Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as revised at
44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR part
1320, require Federal agencies to issue
two notices seeking public comment on
information collection activities before
OMB may approve paperwork packages.
44 U.S.C. 3506, 3507; 5 CFR 1320.5,
1320.8(d)(1), and 1320.12. On February
9, 2015, FRA published a 60-day notice
in the Federal Register soliciting
comment on ICR that the agency is
seeking OMB approval. See 80 FR 7072.
FRA received no comments in response
to this notice.
Before OMB decides whether to
approve these proposed collections of
information, it must provide 30 days for
public comment. 44 U.S.C. 3507(b); 5
CFR 1320.12(d). Federal law requires
OMB to approve or disapprove
paperwork packages between 30 and 60
days after the 30 day notice is
published. 44 U.S.C. 3507 (b)–(c); 5 CFR
1320.12(d); see also 60 FR 44978, 44983,
Aug. 29, 1995. OMB believes that the 30
day notice informs the regulated
community to file relevant comments
and affords the agency adequate time to
digest public comments before it
renders a decision. 60 FR 44983, Aug.
29, 1995. Therefore, respondents should
submit their respective comments to
OMB within 30 days of publication to
best ensure having their full effect. 5
CFR 1320.12(c); see also 60 FR 44983,
Aug. 29, 1995.
The summary below describes the
nature of the information collection
requests (ICRs) and the expected
burden. The revised request is being
submitted for clearance by OMB as
required by the PRA.
Title: Inspection and Maintenance of
Steam Locomotives (Formerly Steam
Locomotive Inspection).
OMB Control Number: 2130–0505.
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21794-21795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09026]
[[Page 21794]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
[Dispute No. WTO/DS491/Docket No. USTR-2015-0005]
WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding United States--Anti-
Dumping and Countervailing Measures on Certain Coated Paper From
Indonesia
AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the United States Trade Representative
(``USTR'') is providing notice that on March 13, 2015, the Republic of
Indonesia requested consultations with the United States under the
Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (``WTO
Agreement'') concerning antidumping (``AD'') and countervailing duty
(``CVD'') measures pertaining to certain coated paper suitable for
high-quality print graphics using sheet-fed presses from Indonesia.
That request may be found at www.wto.org contained in a document
designated as WT/DS491/1. USTR invites written comments from the public
concerning the issues raised in this dispute.
DATES: Although USTR will accept any comments received during the
course of the dispute settlement proceedings, comments should be
submitted on or before May 11, 2015, to be assured of timely
consideration by USTR.
ADDRESSES: Public comments should be submitted electronically to
www.regulations.gov, docket number USTR-2015-0005. If you are unable to
provide submissions by www.regulations.gov, please contact Sandy
McKinzy at (202) 395-9483 to arrange for an alternative method of
transmission.
If (as explained below) the comment contains confidential
information, then the comment should be submitted by fax only to Sandy
McKinzy at (202) 395-3640.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Micah Myers, Associate General
Counsel, or Juli Schwartz, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the
United States Trade Representative, 600 17th Street NW., Washington, DC
20508, (202) 395-3150.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USTR is providing notice that consultations
have been requested pursuant to the WTO Understanding on Rules and
Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (``DSU''). If such
consultations should fail to resolve the matter, Indonesia could
request the establishment of a dispute settlement panel.
Major Issues Raised by Indonesia
On March 13, 2015, Indonesia requested consultations concerning AD
and CVD measures pertaining to certain coated paper suitable for high-
quality print graphics using sheet-fed presses. The specific U.S. legal
instruments referenced in Indonesia's consultations request are: (1)
Section 771(11)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, codified at
19 U.S.C. 1677(11)(B); (2) Certain Coated Paper from Indonesia:
Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 74 FR 53707 (Oct. 20,
2009); (3) Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print
Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia and the People's
Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigations, 74 FR
53710 (Oct. 20, 2009); (4) Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-
Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from China and
Indonesia, 74 FR 50243 (Sept. 30, 2009); (5) Certain Coated Paper
Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from
China and Indonesia, 74 FR 61174 (Nov. 23, 2009); (6) Certain Coated
Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses
from Indonesia: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination and Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty Determination
with Final Antidumping Duty Determination, 75 FR 10761 (Mar. 9, 2010);
(7) Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics Using
Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia: Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 75 FR
24885 (May 6, 2010); (8) Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality
Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia: Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 75 FR 59209 (Sept. 27,
2010); (9) Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print
Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia: Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 75 FR 59223 (Sept. 27, 2010); (10)
Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics Using
Sheet-Fed Presses from China and Indonesia, 75 FR 70289 (Nov. 17,
2010); (11) Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print
Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia: Countervailing Duty
Order, 75 FR 70206 (Nov. 17, 2010); and (12) Certain Coated Paper
Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from
Indonesia: Antidumping Duty Order, 75 FR 70205 (Nov. 17, 2010).
With respect to the CVD measures, Indonesia challenges the U.S.
Department of Commerce's (``DOC'') determination that Indonesia
provided standing timber for less than adequate remuneration,
describing it in the consultation request as a ``per se determination
of price distortion'' without a (corresponding) determination of ``the
adequacy of remuneration `in relation to prevailing market conditions.'
'' Indonesia also states that DOC failed to ``examine whether there was
a plan or scheme in place sufficient to constitute a `subsidy
programme.' '' Indonesia further claims DOC ``did not identify whether
the entity providing the purported subsidy was the national, regional,
or local government and . . . thus . . . whether the subsidy was
`specific to an enterprise . . . within the jurisdiction of the
granting authority' '' (third ellipsis in original). In addition,
Indonesia challenges DOC's facts available analysis in which it
concluded that the Government of Indonesia forgave debt.
With respect to both the AD and CVD measures, Indonesia alleges
that the U.S. International Trade Commission's (``ITC'') threat of
injury determination ``relied on `allegation, conjecture [and] remote
possibility,' '' was not based ``on a change in circumstances that was
`clearly foreseen and imminent,' '' and showed no ``causal relationship
between the [subject] imports and the . . . threat of injury to the
domestic industry.''
With respect to 19 U.S.C. 1677(11)(B), Indonesia contends that
``the law does not consider or exercise `special care' '' as a result
of the ``requirement that a tie vote in a threat of injury
determination must be treated as an affirmative . . . [ITC]
determination.''
Indonesia alleges inconsistencies with Article VI of the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, Articles 1, 3.5, 3.7 and 3.8 of
the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement
on Tariffs And Trade 1994 and Articles 2.1, 12.7, 10, 14(d), 15.5, 15.7
and 15.8 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.
Public Comment: Requirements for Submissions
Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning the issues raised in this dispute. Persons may submit public
comments electronically to www.regulations.gov docket number USTR-2015-
0005. If you are unable to provide submissions by www.regulations.gov,
please contact Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-9483 to arrange for an
alternative method of transmission.
To submit comments via www.regulations.gov, enter docket
[[Page 21795]]
number USTR-2015-0005 on the home page and click ``Search.'' The site
will provide a search-results page listing all documents associated
with this docket. Find a reference to this notice by selecting
``Notice'' under ``Document Type'' on the left side of the search-
results page, and click on the link entitled ``Comment Now!'' (For
further information on using the www.regulations.gov Web site, please
consult the resources provided on the Web site by clicking on ``How to
Use This Site'' on the left side of the home page.)
The www.regulations.gov Web site allows users to provide comments
by filling in a ``Type Comments'' field, or by attaching a document
using an ``Upload File'' field. It is expected that most comments will
be provided in an attached document. If a document is attached, it is
sufficient to type ``See attached'' in the ``Type Comments'' field.
A person requesting that information contained in a comment that
he/she submitted, be treated as confidential business information must
certify that such information is business confidential and would not
customarily be released to the public by the submitter. Confidential
business information must be clearly designated as such and the
submission must be marked ``BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL'' at the top and
bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page. Any comment
containing business confidential information must be submitted by fax
to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-3640. A non-confidential summary of the
confidential information must be submitted to www.regulations.gov. The
non-confidential summary will be placed in the docket and will be open
to public inspection.
USTR may determine that information or advice contained in a
comment submitted, other than business confidential information, is
confidential in accordance with Section 135(g)(2) of the Trade Act of
1974 (19 U.S.C. 2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that information
or advice may qualify as such, the submitter:
(1) Must clearly so designate the information or advice;
(2) Must clearly mark the material as ``SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE''
at the top and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page; and
(3) Must provide a non-confidential summary of the information or
advice.
Any comment containing confidential information must be submitted
by fax. A non-confidential summary of the confidential information must
be submitted to www.regulations.gov. The non-confidential summary will
be placed in the docket and will be open to public inspection.
Pursuant to section 127(e) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19
U.S.C. 3537(e)), USTR will maintain a docket on this dispute settlement
proceeding, docket number USTR-2015-0005, accessible to the public at
www.regulations.gov. The public file will include non-confidential
comments received by USTR from the public regarding the dispute. If a
dispute settlement panel is convened, or in the event of an appeal from
such a panel, the following documents will be made available to the
public at www.ustr.gov: The United States' submissions, any non-
confidential submissions received from other participants in the
dispute, and any non-confidential summaries of submissions received
from other participants in the dispute. In the event that a dispute
settlement panel is convened, or in the event of an appeal from such a
panel, the report of the panel, and, if applicable, the report of the
Appellate Body, will also be available on the Web site of the World
Trade Organization, at www.wto.org. Comments open to public inspection
may be viewed at www.regulations.gov.
Juan Millan,
Assistant United States Trade Representative for Monitoring and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2015-09026 Filed 4-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3290-F5-P