Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC; Hematite Decommissioning Project; Festus, Missouri, 21266-21268 [2015-08933]
Download as PDF
21266
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 74 / Friday, April 17, 2015 / Notices
Dated: April 13, 2015.
Rebecca J. Lent,
Executive Director.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Researchers must have a NARA
researcher card to view the materials;
you may obtain a card when you arrive
at the Library.
[FR Doc. 2015–08771 Filed 4–15–15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820–31–P
Dated: April 10, 2015.
David S. Ferriero,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2015–08850 Filed 4–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
Description of Materials
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
Nixon Presidential Historical Materials:
Opening of Materials
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Notice of opening of additional
Presidential materials.
AGENCY:
The National Archives and
Records Administration’s (NARA)
Richard Nixon Presidential Library and
Museum is opening additional Nixon
Presidential Historical Materials for
public access. These materials include
previously restricted materials and
select White House Central Files, Name
Files. In accordance with section 104 of
Title I of the Presidential Recordings
and Materials Preservation Act (PRMPA,
44 U.S.C. 2111 note) and § 1275.42(b) of
the regulations implementing the Act
(36 CFR part 1275), NARA has
identified, inventoried, and prepared for
public access these additional textual
materials with certain information
redacted as required by law, including
the PRMPA.
DATES: The materials described in this
notice will be available to the public on
Wednesday, May 20, 2015, beginning at
9:30 a.m. PDT (12:30 p.m. EDT).
In accordance with 36 CFR 1275.44,
any person who believes it necessary to
file a claim of legal right or privilege
concerning access to these materials
must notify the Archivist of the United
States in writing of the claimed right,
privilege, or defense by May 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The materials will be
available for viewing at the Richard
Nixon Presidential Library and
Museum; 18001 Yorba Linda Blvd.;
Yorba Linda, CA. Selections from these
materials will also be available online at
www.nixonlibrary.gov.
You must send any petition asserting
a legal or constitutional right or
privilege that would prevent or limit
public access to the materials to The
Archivist of the United States; National
Archives at College Park; 8601 Adelphi
Rd.; College Park, Maryland 20740–
6001.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Cumming, Richard Nixon
Presidential Library and Museum, by
telephone at 714–983–9131.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
The following materials will be made
available in accordance with this notice:
1. Previously restricted textual
materials. Volume: 2 cubic feet. A
number of textual materials previously
withheld from public access have been
reviewed for release or declassified
under the systematic declassification
review provisions and under the
mandatory review provisions of
Executive Order 13526, the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), or in
accordance with 36 CFR 1275.56 (Public
Access regulations). The materials are
from integral file segments for the
National Security Council (NSC Files
and NSC Institutional Files); along with
Henry A. Kissinger (HAK) Office Files;
Kissinger Telephone Conversation
Transcripts; the White House Special
Files; and White House Central Files.
2. White House Central Files, Name
Files: Volume: 4.5 cubic feet. The Name
Files were used for routine materials
filed alphabetically by the name of the
correspondent; copies of documents in
the Name Files were usually filed by
subject in the Subject Files.
Brosk
Brown, Robert H–K
Brown, William H–K
Bryant, We
Bush, G
Bush, George (Cong.)
Gov. Jimmy Carter
Hon. Fletcher, Arthur (Art)
Ford, Gerald
Ford, Gerald (Cong.)
Goldwater, Barry (Cong.)
Goldwater, Barry (Sen.)
Hoover, J. Edgar
Humphrey, Hubert
Kerne
Linkletter, Art
Luce, Clare Booth
Marriott, J. Willard (Bill)
McGovern, George S. (Sen)
McHugh, A–E
Meade, R.
Meany, George (Hon)
Murphy, Mr. Audie
Nesse
Orm
Patman, Wright (Cong.)
Payton, Q–T
Pelles
Peric
Proxmire, William (Sen.)
Wayne, John (Duke)
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2012–0054; Docket No. 70–0036]
Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC;
Hematite Decommissioning Project;
Festus, Missouri
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of a license amendment to
special nuclear material (SNM) license
number SNM–33 issued to
Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC
for the former Hematite fuel cycle
facility in Festus, Missouri, authorizing
alternative disposal of buried debris and
contaminated soil, concrete and asphalt,
filter media, ion exchange resin and
piping at the US Ecology Idaho, Inc.
(USEI) disposal facility located near
Grand View, Idaho. In addition, the
NRC is considering the issuance of an
exemption to USEI so that it may accept
the waste for disposal. This exemption
would allow USEI to accept the NRC
regulated material under its Idaho
Department of Environmental Quality
issued license. The NRC staff is issuing
an Environmental Assessment (EA) and
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) associated with the proposed
action.
DATES: The EA and FONSI referenced in
this document are available on April 17,
2015.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2012–0054 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may access publicly-available
information related to this action by the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2012–0054. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM
17APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 74 / Friday, April 17, 2015 / Notices
(ADAMS): You may access publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
a document is referenced.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
J. Hayes, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
5928; email: John.Hayes@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Introduction
The NRC is considering the issuance
of an amendment to license SNM–33,
issued to Westinghouse Electric
Company, LLC (WEC), for the operation
of the Hematite facility, located in
Festus, Missouri for the disposal of
radioactive waste at the USEI facility
located near Grand View, Idaho. As part
of this action, the NRC is also
considering the approval of an
exemption that will allow USEI to
accept the waste. As required by section
51.21 of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), the NRC has
prepared an environmental assessment
(EA). Based upon this EA, the NRC has
determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the
proposed license amendment and is
issuing a finding of no significant
impact (FONSI).
By letter dated July 11, 2014 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML14193A008), WEC
requested NRC authorization under 10
CFR 20.2002 for alternate disposal of an
additional 87,100 m3 (cubic meters) of
radioactive waste from the WEC’s
Hematite facility, consisting of buried
debris and contaminated soil, concrete
and asphalt, filter media, ion exchange
resin and piping containing NRClicensed source, byproduct, and special
nuclear material. The amendment
requests authorization for WEC to
transfer this waste from the Hematite
facility to the USEI facility located near
Grand View, Idaho, which is a Resource
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
Subtitle C disposal facility. On August
12, 2014 USEI also submitted a request
for an exemption from 10 CFR 30.3 and
10 CFR 70.3 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14272A425) to enable it to receive
the WEC radioactive waste from the
Hematite site. The USEI facility is
regulated by the Idaho Department of
Environmental Quality (IDEQ) and is
not an NRC-licensed facility.
An NRC administrative review,
documented in a letter to WEC dated
August 29, 2014 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML14188B647), found the
application acceptable to begin a
technical review. On September 25,
2014, Westinghouse submitted a
revision (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14293A614) to their July 11, 2014,
request. On October 29, 2014, the NRC
transmitted to WEC a Request for
Additional Information (ADAMS
Accession Nos. ML14294A141 and
ML14294A146). On December 19, 2014,
WEC provided a response to NRC’s
request (ADAMS Accession No.
ML15009A166). Additional information
was provided by WEC in submittals
dated February 18, 2015, and March 25,
2015 (ADAMS Accession Nos.
ML15063A033 and ML15084A071).
On December 3, 2014, the NRC
published in the Federal Register (79
FR 71795), a Notice of Opportunity for
Hearing on the July 11, 2014, WEC
license amendment request. No request
for a hearing was received within the
request period. The NRC relied upon the
information provided in the July 11,
2014, license amendment request, the
September 25, 2014, December 19, 2014,
February 18, 2015, and March 25, 2015,
submittals, supporting documentation
and other sources as noted in the EA
references section, in preparing the EA.
The EA is electronically available to the
public through ADAMS (ADAMS
Accession No. ML15029A064). This
notice provides an EA summary and the
FONSI.
ll. Environmental Assessment Summary
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would authorize
WEC to transfer an additional 87,100 m3
of radioactive waste consisting of buried
debris and contaminated soil, concrete
and asphalt, filter media, ion exchange
resin and piping containing NRClicensed source, byproduct, and special
nuclear material from the Hematite
facility to the USEI disposal facility
located near Grand View, Idaho. The
proposed action is in accordance with
the licensee’s application dated July 11,
2014, as supplemented by letters dated
September 25, 2014, December 19, 2014,
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21267
February 18, 2015, and March 25, 2015.
In order to implement the proposed
action, the NRC would need to amend
WEC’s license, SNM–33, to expressly
allow for the disposal of the radioactive
waste and would need to grant
exemptions to USEI from NRC
regulations 10 CFR 30.3 and 10 CFR
70.3.1
Need for the Proposed Action
The WEC Hematite Decommissioning
Project (HDP) is a decommissioning 2
and environmental restoration project
that will generate low-activity, low-level
radioactive waste (LLRW) in the form of
buried debris and contaminated soil,
concrete and asphalt, filter media, ion
exchange resin and piping containing
low concentrations of source, byproduct
and special nuclear material. There is
also the potential that this LLRW will
contain hazardous constituents, such as
metals and volatile organics, that exceed
the levels identified in 40 CFR part 261.
If the LLRW contains such hazardous
constituents, and if the levels of such
constituents exceed the 40 CFR part 261
limits, then the LLRW is considered
hazardous waste under RCRA and will
require treatment at a RCRA facility,
such as USEI, prior to disposal. The
need for the proposed action is the safe
and permanent disposal of HDP’s
LLRW.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
In accordance with 10 CFR 20.2002,
WEC proposes to dispose of this LLRW
at the USEI hazardous waste disposal
facility near Grand View, Idaho. The
facility occupies Section 19 (2.59 square
kilometers or 640 acres) of Township 4
South and Range 2 East in Owyhee
County, Idaho. This disposal is in
addition to the approximately 23,000 m3
(30,000 yd3) of LLRW which was
approved for alternate disposal by
Hematite License Amendment 58, the
23,000 m3 (30,000 yd3) of LLRW that
1 NRC regulation 10 CFR 30.3 requires a NRC
issued license for the manufacture, production,
transfer, receipt, acquisition, ownership, possession
or use of byproduct material. Similarly, 10 CFR 70.3
requires a NRC issued license for the ownership,
acquisition, delivery, receipt, possession, use or
transfer of special nuclear material. Approvals of
the exemption requests are part of the proposed
action as USEI is not a NRC licensed facility and
Idaho is not an Agreement State under Section 274
of the Atomic Energy Act. If the proposed action is
approved, the NRC would issue exemptions
pursuant to its exemption grant authority at 10 CFR
30.11(a) and 10 CFR 70.17(a), respectively.
2 In NRC regulations, the term ‘‘decommission’’
means to remove a facility or site safely from
service and reduce residual radioactivity to a level
that permits: Release of the property for
unrestricted use and termination of the license; or
release of the property under restricted conditions
and termination of the license. See 10 CFR 70.4.
E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM
17APN1
21268
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 74 / Friday, April 17, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
was approved for Hematite License
Amendment 60, and the 22,000 m3
(29,000 yd3) of LLRW that was approved
for Hematite License Amendment 63. As
such, the cumulative impacts on the
USEI facility and surrounding
environment resulting from the receipt
of the waste material described in the
aforementioned license amendments
were considered.
In 2002, WEC and the Missouri
Department of Natural Resources
(MDNR) entered into a Letter
Agreement, which, among other things,
provided for MDNR oversight of certain
studies and response actions in
accordance with the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan under the
requirements of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.
(Westinghouse MDNR Review Draft
Remedial Design Work Plan, 2002).
On July 3, 2008, Missouri and WEC
entered into a Consent Decree, and the
Letter Agreement was terminated. The
Consent Decree provides for MDNR
oversight of those portions of the
investigation and selection of the
remedy for Operable Units at the site
that are not preempted by the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended. The
Selected Remedy for Operable Unit 1 at
the HDP is Alternative 4: Removal,
Treatment of Volatile Organic
Compound Waste, and Off-site Disposal
of Low-Level Radioactive Waste and
Non-Hazardous Treatment Residues.
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed
action, the staff considered denial of the
proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’
alternative). The no-action alternative
involves discontinuing ongoing
decommissioning activities at the HDP
and leaving contaminated soil and other
radioactive waste at the HDP site. This
action would require an exemption from
the requirement in 10 CFR 70.38(d) that
decommissioning of facilities
specifically licensed for possession and
use of special nuclear material be
completed and approved by the NRC
after licensed activities cease. The noaction alternative would result in
leaving approximately 87,100 m3 of
total waste volume onsite.
As was previously noted, the
radioactive waste, regulated by the NRC,
is co-mingled with chemically
contaminated waste regulated under
CERCLA. The no-action alternative
would not be in accordance with the
July 2009 CERCLA Record of Decision
(https://www.dnr.mo.gov/env/hwp/docs/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
01:21 Apr 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
20090721HRSFINALROD.pdf) for the
removal and subsequent treatment of
the chemically contaminated waste.
The no-action alternative would not
allow WEC to meet the requirements of
10 CFR 20.1402 for unrestricted release.
Selection of this alternative would
require WEC to continue environmental
monitoring/surveillance and to maintain
administrative and engineered controls
to ensure facility safety and security.
The environmental impacts of the noaction alternative would include
continued contamination of soil and
water, which could further escalate over
time if groundwater contamination
spreads and material such as
Technicium-99 continue to leach into
the soil. The continued monitoring
required at the site would result in
environmental impacts due to the
emissions from vehicular traffic
associated with workers traversing to
and from the site and entities providing
services and supplies to the Hematite
facility. Additional vehicular traffic
could also impact public and
occupational health with the potential
for vehicle accidents.
Another alternative to the proposed
action is to dispose of the LLRW in a
facility licensed by an NRC Agreement
State for the storage and/or disposal of
LLRW. For this EA, the NRC evaluated
the EnergySolutions, LLC
(EnergySolutions) Clive, Utah, facility as
the alternative disposal site for the
radioactive and chemically hazardous
waste.
The EnergySolutions LLRW disposal
facility at Clive, Utah, is located 128
kilometers (80 miles) west of Salt Lake
City, Utah, and 70 kilometers (45 miles)
east of Wendover, Nevada. The site is
arid with an annual precipitation of
approximately 20 centimeters (8
inches). The facility is licensed by the
State of Utah, to dispose of Class A
radioactive waste only (Utah License
2300249) and 11e.(2) byproduct material
(UT2300478) and holds a Part B
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) solid waste permit
(Environmental Protection Agency ID
No. UTD982598898).
The selection of this alternative
would allow WEC to meet the
requirements of 10 CFR 20.1402 for
unrestricted release. In addition, this
site is environmentally similar to USEI.
However, this alternative was not
selected by WEC.
Alternative Use of Resources
The proposed action does not impact
any resource implications discussed in
previous environmental reviews.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Agencies and Persons Consulted
In accordance with its stated policy,
the NRC staff consulted with the
Missouri Department of Conservation,
Idaho Department of Fish and Game,
and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
during the development of this EA. On
January 14, 2015, the NRC staff
consulted with MDNR and IDEQ
regarding the environmental impact of
the proposed action and solicited
comments on a draft EA and FONSI. No
comments were received.
lIl. Finding of No Significant Impact
WEC has requested NRC authorization
under 10 CFR 20.2002 for the alternate
disposal of an additional 87,100 m3 of
radioactive waste consisting of buried
debris and contaminated soil, concrete
and asphalt, filter media, ion exchange
resin and piping containing NRClicensed source, byproduct, and special
nuclear material. In addition, both WEC
and USEI have requested that the NRC
exempt USEI from the requirements of
10 CFR 30.3 and 10 CFR 70.3.
Consistent with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC
conducted the EA for the proposed
action described Section II of this
document and publicly available in
ADAMS (ADAMS Accession No.
ML15029A064). The EA is incorporated
by reference in this finding. On the basis
of the EA, the NRC concludes that the
proposed action will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment. Accordingly, the
NRC has determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the
proposed action.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 8th day
of April 2015.
For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Andrew Persinko,
Deputy Director, Division of
Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery, and
Waste Programs, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2015–08933 Filed 4–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Advisory Committee on the Medical
Uses of Isotopes: Meeting Notice
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission will convene a
teleconference meeting of the Advisory
Committee on the Medical Uses of
Isotopes (ACMUI) on August 12, 2015,
to discuss the ACMUI Germanium/
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM
17APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21266-21268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08933]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2012-0054; Docket No. 70-0036]
Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC; Hematite Decommissioning
Project; Festus, Missouri
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of a license amendment to special nuclear material (SNM)
license number SNM-33 issued to Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC for
the former Hematite fuel cycle facility in Festus, Missouri,
authorizing alternative disposal of buried debris and contaminated
soil, concrete and asphalt, filter media, ion exchange resin and piping
at the US Ecology Idaho, Inc. (USEI) disposal facility located near
Grand View, Idaho. In addition, the NRC is considering the issuance of
an exemption to USEI so that it may accept the waste for disposal. This
exemption would allow USEI to accept the NRC regulated material under
its Idaho Department of Environmental Quality issued license. The NRC
staff is issuing an Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) associated with the proposed action.
DATES: The EA and FONSI referenced in this document are available on
April 17, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2012-0054 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may access publicly-available information related to this action by the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2012-0054. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
[[Page 21267]]
(ADAMS): You may access publicly available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time
that a document is referenced.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John J. Hayes, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-5928; email:
John.Hayes@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is considering the issuance of an amendment to license SNM-
33, issued to Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC (WEC), for the
operation of the Hematite facility, located in Festus, Missouri for the
disposal of radioactive waste at the USEI facility located near Grand
View, Idaho. As part of this action, the NRC is also considering the
approval of an exemption that will allow USEI to accept the waste. As
required by section 51.21 of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), the NRC has prepared an environmental assessment
(EA). Based upon this EA, the NRC has determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the proposed license amendment and
is issuing a finding of no significant impact (FONSI).
By letter dated July 11, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14193A008),
WEC requested NRC authorization under 10 CFR 20.2002 for alternate
disposal of an additional 87,100 m\3\ (cubic meters) of radioactive
waste from the WEC's Hematite facility, consisting of buried debris and
contaminated soil, concrete and asphalt, filter media, ion exchange
resin and piping containing NRC-licensed source, byproduct, and special
nuclear material. The amendment requests authorization for WEC to
transfer this waste from the Hematite facility to the USEI facility
located near Grand View, Idaho, which is a Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle C disposal facility. On August 12, 2014
USEI also submitted a request for an exemption from 10 CFR 30.3 and 10
CFR 70.3 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14272A425) to enable it to receive the
WEC radioactive waste from the Hematite site. The USEI facility is
regulated by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) and
is not an NRC-licensed facility.
An NRC administrative review, documented in a letter to WEC dated
August 29, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14188B647), found the
application acceptable to begin a technical review. On September 25,
2014, Westinghouse submitted a revision (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14293A614) to their July 11, 2014, request. On October 29, 2014, the
NRC transmitted to WEC a Request for Additional Information (ADAMS
Accession Nos. ML14294A141 and ML14294A146). On December 19, 2014, WEC
provided a response to NRC's request (ADAMS Accession No. ML15009A166).
Additional information was provided by WEC in submittals dated February
18, 2015, and March 25, 2015 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML15063A033 and
ML15084A071).
On December 3, 2014, the NRC published in the Federal Register (79
FR 71795), a Notice of Opportunity for Hearing on the July 11, 2014,
WEC license amendment request. No request for a hearing was received
within the request period. The NRC relied upon the information provided
in the July 11, 2014, license amendment request, the September 25,
2014, December 19, 2014, February 18, 2015, and March 25, 2015,
submittals, supporting documentation and other sources as noted in the
EA references section, in preparing the EA. The EA is electronically
available to the public through ADAMS (ADAMS Accession No.
ML15029A064). This notice provides an EA summary and the FONSI.
ll. Environmental Assessment Summary
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would authorize WEC to transfer an additional
87,100 m\3\ of radioactive waste consisting of buried debris and
contaminated soil, concrete and asphalt, filter media, ion exchange
resin and piping containing NRC-licensed source, byproduct, and special
nuclear material from the Hematite facility to the USEI disposal
facility located near Grand View, Idaho. The proposed action is in
accordance with the licensee's application dated July 11, 2014, as
supplemented by letters dated September 25, 2014, December 19, 2014,
February 18, 2015, and March 25, 2015. In order to implement the
proposed action, the NRC would need to amend WEC's license, SNM-33, to
expressly allow for the disposal of the radioactive waste and would
need to grant exemptions to USEI from NRC regulations 10 CFR 30.3 and
10 CFR 70.3.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ NRC regulation 10 CFR 30.3 requires a NRC issued license for
the manufacture, production, transfer, receipt, acquisition,
ownership, possession or use of byproduct material. Similarly, 10
CFR 70.3 requires a NRC issued license for the ownership,
acquisition, delivery, receipt, possession, use or transfer of
special nuclear material. Approvals of the exemption requests are
part of the proposed action as USEI is not a NRC licensed facility
and Idaho is not an Agreement State under Section 274 of the Atomic
Energy Act. If the proposed action is approved, the NRC would issue
exemptions pursuant to its exemption grant authority at 10 CFR
30.11(a) and 10 CFR 70.17(a), respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Need for the Proposed Action
The WEC Hematite Decommissioning Project (HDP) is a decommissioning
\2\ and environmental restoration project that will generate low-
activity, low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) in the form of buried
debris and contaminated soil, concrete and asphalt, filter media, ion
exchange resin and piping containing low concentrations of source,
byproduct and special nuclear material. There is also the potential
that this LLRW will contain hazardous constituents, such as metals and
volatile organics, that exceed the levels identified in 40 CFR part
261. If the LLRW contains such hazardous constituents, and if the
levels of such constituents exceed the 40 CFR part 261 limits, then the
LLRW is considered hazardous waste under RCRA and will require
treatment at a RCRA facility, such as USEI, prior to disposal. The need
for the proposed action is the safe and permanent disposal of HDP's
LLRW.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ In NRC regulations, the term ``decommission'' means to
remove a facility or site safely from service and reduce residual
radioactivity to a level that permits: Release of the property for
unrestricted use and termination of the license; or release of the
property under restricted conditions and termination of the license.
See 10 CFR 70.4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
In accordance with 10 CFR 20.2002, WEC proposes to dispose of this
LLRW at the USEI hazardous waste disposal facility near Grand View,
Idaho. The facility occupies Section 19 (2.59 square kilometers or 640
acres) of Township 4 South and Range 2 East in Owyhee County, Idaho.
This disposal is in addition to the approximately 23,000 m\3\ (30,000
yd\3\) of LLRW which was approved for alternate disposal by Hematite
License Amendment 58, the 23,000 m\3\ (30,000 yd\3\) of LLRW that
[[Page 21268]]
was approved for Hematite License Amendment 60, and the 22,000 m\3\
(29,000 yd\3\) of LLRW that was approved for Hematite License Amendment
63. As such, the cumulative impacts on the USEI facility and
surrounding environment resulting from the receipt of the waste
material described in the aforementioned license amendments were
considered.
In 2002, WEC and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources
(MDNR) entered into a Letter Agreement, which, among other things,
provided for MDNR oversight of certain studies and response actions in
accordance with the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan under the requirements of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42
U.S.C. 9601 et seq. (Westinghouse MDNR Review Draft Remedial Design
Work Plan, 2002).
On July 3, 2008, Missouri and WEC entered into a Consent Decree,
and the Letter Agreement was terminated. The Consent Decree provides
for MDNR oversight of those portions of the investigation and selection
of the remedy for Operable Units at the site that are not preempted by
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. The Selected Remedy for
Operable Unit 1 at the HDP is Alternative 4: Removal, Treatment of
Volatile Organic Compound Waste, and Off-site Disposal of Low-Level
Radioactive Waste and Non-Hazardous Treatment Residues.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative).
The no-action alternative involves discontinuing ongoing
decommissioning activities at the HDP and leaving contaminated soil and
other radioactive waste at the HDP site. This action would require an
exemption from the requirement in 10 CFR 70.38(d) that decommissioning
of facilities specifically licensed for possession and use of special
nuclear material be completed and approved by the NRC after licensed
activities cease. The no-action alternative would result in leaving
approximately 87,100 m\3\ of total waste volume onsite.
As was previously noted, the radioactive waste, regulated by the
NRC, is co-mingled with chemically contaminated waste regulated under
CERCLA. The no-action alternative would not be in accordance with the
July 2009 CERCLA Record of Decision (https://www.dnr.mo.gov/env/hwp/docs/20090721HRSFINALROD.pdf) for the removal and subsequent treatment
of the chemically contaminated waste.
The no-action alternative would not allow WEC to meet the
requirements of 10 CFR 20.1402 for unrestricted release. Selection of
this alternative would require WEC to continue environmental
monitoring/surveillance and to maintain administrative and engineered
controls to ensure facility safety and security. The environmental
impacts of the no-action alternative would include continued
contamination of soil and water, which could further escalate over time
if groundwater contamination spreads and material such as Technicium-99
continue to leach into the soil. The continued monitoring required at
the site would result in environmental impacts due to the emissions
from vehicular traffic associated with workers traversing to and from
the site and entities providing services and supplies to the Hematite
facility. Additional vehicular traffic could also impact public and
occupational health with the potential for vehicle accidents.
Another alternative to the proposed action is to dispose of the
LLRW in a facility licensed by an NRC Agreement State for the storage
and/or disposal of LLRW. For this EA, the NRC evaluated the
EnergySolutions, LLC (EnergySolutions) Clive, Utah, facility as the
alternative disposal site for the radioactive and chemically hazardous
waste.
The EnergySolutions LLRW disposal facility at Clive, Utah, is
located 128 kilometers (80 miles) west of Salt Lake City, Utah, and 70
kilometers (45 miles) east of Wendover, Nevada. The site is arid with
an annual precipitation of approximately 20 centimeters (8 inches). The
facility is licensed by the State of Utah, to dispose of Class A
radioactive waste only (Utah License 2300249) and 11e.(2) byproduct
material (UT2300478) and holds a Part B Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) solid waste permit (Environmental Protection Agency
ID No. UTD982598898).
The selection of this alternative would allow WEC to meet the
requirements of 10 CFR 20.1402 for unrestricted release. In addition,
this site is environmentally similar to USEI. However, this alternative
was not selected by WEC.
Alternative Use of Resources
The proposed action does not impact any resource implications
discussed in previous environmental reviews.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
In accordance with its stated policy, the NRC staff consulted with
the Missouri Department of Conservation, Idaho Department of Fish and
Game, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service during the development of this
EA. On January 14, 2015, the NRC staff consulted with MDNR and IDEQ
regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action and solicited
comments on a draft EA and FONSI. No comments were received.
lIl. Finding of No Significant Impact
WEC has requested NRC authorization under 10 CFR 20.2002 for the
alternate disposal of an additional 87,100 m\3\ of radioactive waste
consisting of buried debris and contaminated soil, concrete and
asphalt, filter media, ion exchange resin and piping containing NRC-
licensed source, byproduct, and special nuclear material. In addition,
both WEC and USEI have requested that the NRC exempt USEI from the
requirements of 10 CFR 30.3 and 10 CFR 70.3. Consistent with 10 CFR
51.21, the NRC conducted the EA for the proposed action described
Section II of this document and publicly available in ADAMS (ADAMS
Accession No. ML15029A064). The EA is incorporated by reference in this
finding. On the basis of the EA, the NRC concludes that the proposed
action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human
environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the proposed action.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 8th day of April 2015.
For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Andrew Persinko,
Deputy Director, Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery, and
Waste Programs, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2015-08933 Filed 4-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P