Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho: Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter, 21181-21183 [2015-08893]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 74 / Friday, April 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
NOX), equipment list, equipment
arrangement, and a summary of kiln
characteristics that were relied upon as
the design basis for the SNCR system.
(ii) By October 3, 2017, the owner/
operator shall submit to EPA a summary
of any process improvement or
debugging activities that were
performed on the SNCR system.
Elements of this summary report shall
include: a description of each process
adjustment performed on the SNCR
system, a discussion of whether the
adjustment affected NOX emission rate
(including CEMS data that may have
been recorded while the adjustment was
in progress), a description of the range
(if applicable) over which the
adjustment was examined, and a
discussion of how the adjustment will
be reflected or accounted for in kiln
operating practices. In addition, to the
extent that the owner/operator evaluates
the impact of varying reagent injection
rate on NOX emissions, the owner/
operator shall include the following
information: the range of reagent
injection rates evaluated (expressed as a
molar ratio of reagent to average NOX
concentration), reagent injection rate,
average NOX concentration, lime
production rate, kiln flue gas
temperature, and the presence of any
detached plumes from the kiln exhaust.
(iii) The owner/operator shall submit
a report that lists the daily rolling 30kiln operating day emission rates for
NOX and SO2, calculated in accordance
with paragraphs (i)(6)(iii) and (iv) of this
section.
(iv) The owner/operator shall submit
a report that lists the monthly rolling
12-month emission rates for NOX and
SO2, calculated in accordance with
paragraphs (i)(6)(v) and (vi) of this
section.
(v) The owner/operator shall submit
excess emissions reports for NOX and
SO2 limits. Excess emissions means
emissions that exceed any of the
emissions limits specified in paragraph
(i)(3) of this section. The reports shall
include the magnitude, date(s), and
duration of each period of excess
emissions; specific identification of
each period of excess emissions that
occurs during startups, shutdowns, and
malfunctions of the kiln; the nature and
cause of any malfunction (if known);
and the corrective action taken or
preventative measures adopted.
(vi) The owner/operator shall submit
a summary of CEMS operation, to
include dates and duration of each
period during which the CEMS was
inoperative (except for zero and span
adjustments and calibration checks),
reason(s) why the CEMS was
inoperative and steps taken to prevent
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
recurrence, and any CEMS repairs or
adjustments.
(vii) The owner/operator shall submit
results of all CEMS performance tests
required by 40 CFR part 60, Appendix
F, Procedure 1 (Relative Accuracy Test
Audits, Relative Accuracy Audits, and
Cylinder Gas Audits).
(viiii) When no excess emissions have
occurred or the CEMS has not been
inoperative, repaired, or adjusted during
the reporting period, the owner/operator
shall state such information in the
semiannual report.
(9) Notifications. All notifications
required under this section shall be
submitted by the owner/operator to the
Director, Enforcement Division (Mail
Code ENF–2–1), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 9, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105–3901.
(i) The owner/operator shall submit
notification of commencement of
construction of any equipment which is
being constructed to comply with the
NOX emission limits in paragraph (i)(3)
of this section.
(ii) The owner/operator shall submit
semiannual progress reports on
construction of any such equipment.
(iii) The owner/operator shall submit
notification of initial startup of any such
equipment.
(10) Equipment operations. (i) At all
times, including periods of startup,
shutdown, and malfunction, the owner/
operator shall, to the extent practicable,
maintain and operate the kilns,
including associated air pollution
control equipment, in a manner
consistent with good air pollution
control practices for minimizing
emissions. Pollution control equipment
shall be designed and capable of
operating properly to minimize
emissions during all expected operating
conditions. Determination of whether
acceptable operating and maintenance
procedures are being used will be based
on information available to the Regional
Administrator, which may include, but
is not limited to, monitoring results,
review of operating and maintenance
procedures, and inspection of the kilns.
(ii) After completion of installation of
ammonia injection on a kiln, the owner/
operator shall inject sufficient ammonia
to achieve compliance with the NOX
emission limits from paragraph (i)(3) of
this section for that kiln while
preventing excessive ammonia
emissions.
(11) Enforcement. Notwithstanding
any other provision in this
implementation plan, any credible
evidence or information relevant as to
whether the kiln would have been in
compliance with applicable
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21181
requirements if the appropriate
performance or compliance test had
been performed can be used to establish
whether or not the owner/operator has
violated or is in violation of any
standard or applicable emission limit in
the plan.
[FR Doc. 2015–08883 Filed 4–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2013–0581; FRL–9926–52–
Region 10]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Idaho:
Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate
Matter
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
On June 28, 2010, the State of
Idaho submitted a State Implementation
Plan (SIP) revision to the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) to address
certain interstate transport requirements
of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The EPA
finds that the Idaho SIP meets the CAA
interstate transport requirements that
the SIP contain adequate provisions
prohibiting air emissions that will
contribute significantly to
nonattainment or interfere with
maintenance of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS in any other state.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
May 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R10–OAR–
2013–0581. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information
may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or
other information the disclosure of
which is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in
hard copy form. Publicly available
docket materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
EPA Region 10, Office of Air, Waste,
and Toxics, AWT–150, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. The
EPA requests that you contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17APR1.SGM
17APR1
21182
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 74 / Friday, April 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Hall at (206) 553–6357,
hall.kristin@epa.gov, or by using the
above EPA, Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is
intended to refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
In a notice of proposed rulemaking
published on February 23, 2015 (80 FR
9423), the EPA proposed to find that the
Idaho SIP adequately addressed the
interstate transport requirements of
CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the
2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Please see
our February 23, 2015, proposed
rulemaking for further explanation and
the basis for our finding. The public
comment period for the proposed rule
ended on March 25, 2015. No comments
were received on the proposal.
II. Final Action
The EPA finds that the Idaho SIP
meets the interstate transport
requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS. This action is being
taken under section 110 of the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves State law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
this action does not involve technical
standards; and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to
apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where the EPA or an
Indian Tribe has demonstrated that a
Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by June 16, 2015. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: April 6, 2015.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N—Idaho
2. In § 52.670, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding an entry at the
end of the table for ‘‘Interstate Transport
Requirements for the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.670
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
E:\FR\FM\17APR1.SGM
17APR1
*
*
21183
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 74 / Friday, April 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED IDAHO NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Name of SIP provision
Applicable geographic
or
non-attainment area
State
submittal date
*
*
Interstate Transport Requirements for the
2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
*
State-wide .................
*
[FR Doc. 2015–08893 Filed 4–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2014–0188; FRL–9926–31–
Region 5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Michigan; SO2 Rules
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a request by
the Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality (MDEQ)
submitted on February 14, 2014, and
supplemented on October 27, 2014, to
revise the Michigan state
implementation plan (SIP) to
incorporate sulfur dioxide (SO2) limits
found in Michigan’s Air Pollution
Control Rules at Chapter 336, Part 4,
‘‘Emissions Limitations and
Prohibitions—Sulfur Bearing
Compounds.’’ EPA will take no action
on the provisions pertaining to the
Federal Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR)
SO2 trading program because CAIR is no
longer in effect.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective June 16, 2015, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by May 18,
2015. If adverse comments are received,
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2014–0188, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2450.
4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief,
Control Strategies Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Apr 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
6/28/2010
EPA Approval date
Comments
*
*
4/17/2015 ..........................
[Insert Federal Register
citation].
*
This action addresses the
following CAA elements:
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley,
Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2014–
0188. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g. CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Charles
Hatten, Environmental Engineer, (312)
886–6031 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Hatten, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6031,
hatten.charles@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What did Michigan submit?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Orders Reviews
I. What is the background for this
action?
On February 14, 2014, and October
27, 2014, MDEQ submitted a request to
incorporate revisions to the Part 4 rule
in Michigan’s SO2 SIP. Specifically, the
revisions to the Part 4 rule includes the
removal of obsolete rule language,
added definitions, and the consolidation
of certain provisions for sources located
in Wayne County.
MDEQ published a Notice of Public
Information in several newspapers and
provided a 30-day public comment
period on September 30, 2012, October
E:\FR\FM\17APR1.SGM
17APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21181-21183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08893]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2013-0581; FRL-9926-52-Region 10]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho:
Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On June 28, 2010, the State of Idaho submitted a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) to address certain interstate transport requirements of
the Clean Air Act (CAA). The EPA finds that the Idaho SIP meets the CAA
interstate transport requirements that the SIP contain adequate
provisions prohibiting air emissions that will contribute significantly
to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS in any other state.
DATES: This final rule is effective on May 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket Identification No. EPA-R10-OAR-2013-0581. All documents in the
docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information may not be publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material,
such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region 10, Office of Air,
Waste, and Toxics, AWT-150, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington
98101. The EPA requests that you contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The
Regional Office's official hours of business are
[[Page 21182]]
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Hall at (206) 553-6357,
hall.kristin@epa.gov, or by using the above EPA, Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us'' or ``our'' is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
In a notice of proposed rulemaking published on February 23, 2015
(80 FR 9423), the EPA proposed to find that the Idaho SIP adequately
addressed the interstate transport requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Please
see our February 23, 2015, proposed rulemaking for further explanation
and the basis for our finding. The public comment period for the
proposed rule ended on March 25, 2015. No comments were received on the
proposal.
II. Final Action
The EPA finds that the Idaho SIP meets the interstate transport
requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS. This action is being taken under section 110 of
the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and
does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation
land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian Tribe has
demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 16, 2015. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: April 6, 2015.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N--Idaho
0
2. In Sec. 52.670, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an
entry at the end of the table for ``Interstate Transport Requirements
for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.670 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 21183]]
EPA-Approved Idaho Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable geographic
Name of SIP provision or non-attainment State EPA Approval date Comments
area submittal date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Interstate Transport Requirements State-wide........... 6/28/2010 4/17/2015............................. This action addresses the following
for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. [Insert Federal Register citation].... CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2015-08893 Filed 4-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P