Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Units 2 and 3; South Carolina Electric & Gas Company; Tier 1 Editorial and Consistency Changes, 20031-20032 [2015-08563]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices
‘‘Design Comparison to Regulatory
Positions of Regulatory Guide 1.46,
Revision 0, dated May 1973, titled
‘Protection Against Pipe Whip Inside
Containment,’ ’’ in particular regard to
the high-density polyethylene (HDPE)
piping installed in ASME Class 3 line
segments of the essential service water
system. Also, new Reference 25 is added
to FSAR-Standard Plant Section 3.6.3 to
cite the NRC-approved version of the
HDPE requirements covered by Relief
Request I3R–10 dated October 31, 2008.
Date of issuance: March 31, 2015.
Effective date: As of its date of
issuance and shall be implemented
within 60 days from the date of
issuance.
Amendment No.: 211. A publiclyavailable version is in ADAMS under
Accession No. ML15064A028;
documents related to this amendment
are listed in the Safety Evaluation
enclosed with the amendment.
Renewed Facility Operating License
No. NPF–30: The amendment revised
the Operating License.
Date of initial notice in Federal
Register: March 18, 2014 (79 FR
15150). The supplements dated
September 2 and December 11, 2014,
and February 3, 2015, provided
additional information that clarified the
application, did not expand the scope of
the application as originally noticed,
and did not change the staff’s original
proposed no significant hazards
consideration determination as
published in the Federal Register.
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendment is contained in a
Safety Evaluation dated March 31, 2015.
No significant hazards consideration
comments received: No.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day
of April 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
A. Louise Lund,
Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2015–08579 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52–027 and 52–028; NRC–
2008–0441]
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station,
Units 2 and 3; South Carolina Electric
& Gas Company; Tier 1 Editorial and
Consistency Changes
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Apr 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
Exemption and combined
license amendment; issuance.
ACTION:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is granting an
exemption to allow a departure from the
certification information of Tier 1 of the
generic design control document (DCD)
and issuing License Amendment No. 23
to Combined Licenses (COL), NPF–93
and NPF–94. The COLs were issued to
South Carolina Electric & Gas Company
(SCE&G), and South Carolina Public
Service Authority (the licensee), for
construction and operation of the Virgil
C. Summer Nuclear Station (VCSNS),
Units 2 and 3 located in Fairfield
County, South Carolina.
The granting of the exemption allows
the changes to Tier 1 information
requested in the amendment. Because
the acceptability of the exemption was
determined in part by the acceptability
of the amendment, the exemption and
amendment are being issued
concurrently.
SUMMARY:
Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2008–0441 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2008–0441. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
a document is referenced. The request
for the amendment and exemption was
submitted by the letter dated May 20,
2014 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14140A637). The licensee
supplemented this request by letter
dated June 3, 2014 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML14155A257).
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20031
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ruth Reyes, Office of New Reactors,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–3249; email: Ruth.Reyes@
nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is granting an exemption
from the provisions of Paragraph B of
Section III, ‘‘Scope and Contents,’’ of
appendix D, ‘‘Design Certification Rule
for the AP1000,’’ to part 52 of Title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR) and issuing License Amendment
No. 23 to COLs, NPF–93 and NPF–94,
to the licensee. The exemption is
required by Paragraph A.4 of Section
VIII, ‘‘Processes for Changes and
Departures,’’ appendix D to 10 CFR part
52 to allow the licensee to depart from
Tier 1 information. With the requested
amendment, the licensee sought
changes to COL Appendix C and
corresponding plant-specific Tier 1
information to correct editorial errors
and/or consistency errors (e.g.,
inconsistencies between Updated Final
Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) (Tier 2)
and Tier 1 information, and
inconsistencies between information
from different locations within Tier 1).
Part of the justification for granting
the exemption was provided by the
review of the amendment. Because the
exemption is necessary in order to issue
the requested license amendment, the
NRC granted the exemption and issued
the amendment concurrently, rather
than in sequence. This included issuing
a combined safety evaluation containing
the NRC staff’s review of both the
exemption request and the license
amendment. The exemption met all
applicable regulatory criteria set forth in
10 CFR 50.12, 10 CFR 52.7, and
52.63(b)(1). The license amendment was
found to be acceptable as well. The
combined safety evaluation is available
in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML14345B029.
Identical exemption documents
(except for referenced unit numbers and
license numbers) were issued to the
licensee for VCSNS Units 2 and 3 (COLs
NPF–93 and NPF–94). These documents
can be found in ADAMS under
Accession Nos. ML14352A155 and
ML14352A164, respectively. The
exemption is reproduced (with the
exception of abbreviated titles and
additional citations) in Section II of this
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
20032
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices
document. The amendment documents
for COLs NPF–93 and NPF–94 are
available in ADAMS under Accession
Nos. ML14351A419 and ML14351A424,
respectively. A summary of the
amendment documents is provided in
Section III of this document.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Exemption
Reproduced below is the exemption
document issued to VCSNS, Units 2 and
3. It makes reference to the combined
safety evaluation that provides the
reasoning for the findings made by the
NRC (and listed under Item 1) in order
to grant the exemption:
1. In a letter dated May 20, 2014, and
supplemented by the letters dated June
3, November 6, and November 14, 2014,
South Carolina Electric & Gas Company
(licensee) requested from the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (Commission)
an exemption to allow departures from
Tier 1 information in the certified
Design Control Document (DCD)
incorporated by reference in 10 CFR
part 52, appendix D, ‘‘Design
Certification Rule for the AP1000
Design,’’ as part of license amendment
request (LAR) 13–42, ‘‘Tier 1 Editorial
and Consistency Changes.’’
For the reasons set forth in Section 3.1
of the NRC staff’s Safety Evaluation,
which can be found in ADAMS under
Accession No. ML14345B029, the
Commission finds that:
A. The exemption is authorized by
law;
B. the exemption presents no undue
risk to public health and safety;
C. the exemption is consistent with
the common defense and security;
D. special circumstances are present
in that the application of the rule in this
circumstance is not necessary to serve
the underlying purpose of the rule;
E. the special circumstances outweigh
any decrease in safety that may result
from the reduction in standardization
caused by the exemption; and
F. the exemption will not result in a
significant decrease in the level of safety
otherwise provided by the design.
2. Accordingly, the licensee is granted
an exemption from the certified DCD
Tier 1 Figures 2.2.4–1, 3.3–1 through 10,
3.3–11A, 3.3–11B, and 3.3–12 through
14; Tables 2.2.2–3, 2.2.3–4, 2.2.3–6,
2.2.4–1, 2.2.4–4, 2.2.5–5, 2.3.2–2, 2.3.6–
1, 2.3.6–4, 2.3.10–1, 2.3.10–4, 2.3.14–2,
2.6.3–3, 2.6.3–4, 3.3–1, 3.3–6, 2.1.3–4,
2.5.1–2 and 3.7–2; and Sections 2.6.3
and 3.3, as described in the licensee’s
request dated May 20, 2014, and
supplemented on June 3, November 6,
and November 14, 2014. This exemption
is related to, and necessary for the
granting of License Amendment No. 23,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Apr 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
which is being issued concurrently with
this exemption.
3. As explained in Section 5.0 of the
NRC staff’s Safety Evaluation (ADAMS
Accession Number ML14345B029), this
exemption meets the eligibility criteria
for categorical exclusion set forth in 10
CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to
10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental
impact statement or environmental
assessment needs to be prepared in
connection with the issuance of the
exemption.
4. This exemption is effective as of the
date of its issuance.
III. License Amendment Request
The request for the amendment and
exemption was submitted by the letter
dated May 20, 2014. The licensee
supplemented this request by letter
dated June 3, 2014. The proposed
amendment is described in Section I,
above.
The Commission has determined for
these amendments that the application
complies with the standards and
requirements of the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the
Commission’s rules and regulations.
The Commission has made appropriate
findings as required by the Act and the
Commission’s rules and regulations in
10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in
the license amendment.
A notice of consideration of issuance
of amendment to facility operating
license or combined license, as
applicable, proposed no significant
hazards consideration determination,
and opportunity for a hearing in
connection with these actions, was
published in the Federal Register on
September 2, 2014 (79 FR 52059). The
June 3, 2014 supplement had no effect
on the no significant hazards
consideration determination, and no
comments were received during the 60day comment period.
The Commission has determined that
these amendments satisfy the criteria for
categorical exclusion in accordance
with 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore,
pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no
environmental impact statement or
environmental assessment need be
prepared for these amendments.
IV. Conclusion
Using the reasons set forth in the
combined safety evaluation, the staff
granted the exemption and issued the
amendment that the licensee requested
on May 20, 2014, and supplemented by
letter dated June 3, 2014. The exemption
and amendment were issued on March
10, 2015, as part of a combined package
to the licensee (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14345B023).
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day
of April 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Chandu P. Patel,
Acting Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division
of New Reactor Licensing, Office of New
Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2015–08563 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74681; File No. SR–CBOE–
2015–023]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Order Granting
Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1, to List and Trade
Options on the MSCI EAFE Index and
on the MSCI Emerging Markets Index
April 8, 2015.
I. Introduction
On February 26, 2015, the Chicago
Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
list and trade options on the MSCI EAFE
Index and the MSCI Emerging Markets
(‘‘EM’’) Index. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on March 10,
2015.3 On March 24, 2015, the Exchange
filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change.4 The Commission received
no comments on the proposed rule
change. This order grants approval of
the proposed rule change, as modified
by Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated
basis.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
The Exchange proposes to list and
trade P.M. cash-settled, European-style
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74430
(March 4, 2015), 80 FR 12675 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 Amendment No. 1 corrects the customer
portfolio margin description in the Exhibit 3 to
conform it to Exchange Rule 12.4. As the stated in
the Notice, the MSCI EAFE and MSCI EM Index
options would be subject to the same rules that
currently govern other CBOE index options,
including margin requirements. Amendment No. 1
is not subject to notice and comment because it is
technical in nature and does not materially alter the
substance of the proposed rule change or raise any
novel regulatory issues.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20031-20032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08563]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52-027 and 52-028; NRC-2008-0441]
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Units 2 and 3; South Carolina
Electric & Gas Company; Tier 1 Editorial and Consistency Changes
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Exemption and combined license amendment; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is granting an
exemption to allow a departure from the certification information of
Tier 1 of the generic design control document (DCD) and issuing License
Amendment No. 23 to Combined Licenses (COL), NPF-93 and NPF-94. The
COLs were issued to South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G), and
South Carolina Public Service Authority (the licensee), for
construction and operation of the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station
(VCSNS), Units 2 and 3 located in Fairfield County, South Carolina.
The granting of the exemption allows the changes to Tier 1
information requested in the amendment. Because the acceptability of
the exemption was determined in part by the acceptability of the
amendment, the exemption and amendment are being issued concurrently.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2008-0441 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2008-0441. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available
in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced. The
request for the amendment and exemption was submitted by the letter
dated May 20, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14140A637). The licensee
supplemented this request by letter dated June 3, 2014 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML14155A257).
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth Reyes, Office of New Reactors,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001;
telephone: 301-415-3249; email: Ruth.Reyes@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is granting an exemption from the provisions of Paragraph B
of Section III, ``Scope and Contents,'' of appendix D, ``Design
Certification Rule for the AP1000,'' to part 52 of Title 10 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) and issuing License Amendment No. 23 to
COLs, NPF-93 and NPF-94, to the licensee. The exemption is required by
Paragraph A.4 of Section VIII, ``Processes for Changes and
Departures,'' appendix D to 10 CFR part 52 to allow the licensee to
depart from Tier 1 information. With the requested amendment, the
licensee sought changes to COL Appendix C and corresponding plant-
specific Tier 1 information to correct editorial errors and/or
consistency errors (e.g., inconsistencies between Updated Final Safety
Analysis Report (UFSAR) (Tier 2) and Tier 1 information, and
inconsistencies between information from different locations within
Tier 1).
Part of the justification for granting the exemption was provided
by the review of the amendment. Because the exemption is necessary in
order to issue the requested license amendment, the NRC granted the
exemption and issued the amendment concurrently, rather than in
sequence. This included issuing a combined safety evaluation containing
the NRC staff's review of both the exemption request and the license
amendment. The exemption met all applicable regulatory criteria set
forth in 10 CFR 50.12, 10 CFR 52.7, and 52.63(b)(1). The license
amendment was found to be acceptable as well. The combined safety
evaluation is available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML14345B029.
Identical exemption documents (except for referenced unit numbers
and license numbers) were issued to the licensee for VCSNS Units 2 and
3 (COLs NPF-93 and NPF-94). These documents can be found in ADAMS under
Accession Nos. ML14352A155 and ML14352A164, respectively. The exemption
is reproduced (with the exception of abbreviated titles and additional
citations) in Section II of this
[[Page 20032]]
document. The amendment documents for COLs NPF-93 and NPF-94 are
available in ADAMS under Accession Nos. ML14351A419 and ML14351A424,
respectively. A summary of the amendment documents is provided in
Section III of this document.
II. Exemption
Reproduced below is the exemption document issued to VCSNS, Units 2
and 3. It makes reference to the combined safety evaluation that
provides the reasoning for the findings made by the NRC (and listed
under Item 1) in order to grant the exemption:
1. In a letter dated May 20, 2014, and supplemented by the letters
dated June 3, November 6, and November 14, 2014, South Carolina
Electric & Gas Company (licensee) requested from the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (Commission) an exemption to allow departures from Tier 1
information in the certified Design Control Document (DCD) incorporated
by reference in 10 CFR part 52, appendix D, ``Design Certification Rule
for the AP1000 Design,'' as part of license amendment request (LAR) 13-
42, ``Tier 1 Editorial and Consistency Changes.''
For the reasons set forth in Section 3.1 of the NRC staff's Safety
Evaluation, which can be found in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML14345B029, the Commission finds that:
A. The exemption is authorized by law;
B. the exemption presents no undue risk to public health and
safety;
C. the exemption is consistent with the common defense and
security;
D. special circumstances are present in that the application of the
rule in this circumstance is not necessary to serve the underlying
purpose of the rule;
E. the special circumstances outweigh any decrease in safety that
may result from the reduction in standardization caused by the
exemption; and
F. the exemption will not result in a significant decrease in the
level of safety otherwise provided by the design.
2. Accordingly, the licensee is granted an exemption from the
certified DCD Tier 1 Figures 2.2.4-1, 3.3-1 through 10, 3.3-11A, 3.3-
11B, and 3.3-12 through 14; Tables 2.2.2-3, 2.2.3-4, 2.2.3-6, 2.2.4-1,
2.2.4-4, 2.2.5-5, 2.3.2-2, 2.3.6-1, 2.3.6-4, 2.3.10-1, 2.3.10-4,
2.3.14-2, 2.6.3-3, 2.6.3-4, 3.3-1, 3.3-6, 2.1.3-4, 2.5.1-2 and 3.7-2;
and Sections 2.6.3 and 3.3, as described in the licensee's request
dated May 20, 2014, and supplemented on June 3, November 6, and
November 14, 2014. This exemption is related to, and necessary for the
granting of License Amendment No. 23, which is being issued
concurrently with this exemption.
3. As explained in Section 5.0 of the NRC staff's Safety Evaluation
(ADAMS Accession Number ML14345B029), this exemption meets the
eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR
51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental
impact statement or environmental assessment needs to be prepared in
connection with the issuance of the exemption.
4. This exemption is effective as of the date of its issuance.
III. License Amendment Request
The request for the amendment and exemption was submitted by the
letter dated May 20, 2014. The licensee supplemented this request by
letter dated June 3, 2014. The proposed amendment is described in
Section I, above.
The Commission has determined for these amendments that the
application complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules
and regulations. The Commission has made appropriate findings as
required by the Act and the Commission's rules and regulations in 10
CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in the license amendment.
A notice of consideration of issuance of amendment to facility
operating license or combined license, as applicable, proposed no
significant hazards consideration determination, and opportunity for a
hearing in connection with these actions, was published in the Federal
Register on September 2, 2014 (79 FR 52059). The June 3, 2014
supplement had no effect on the no significant hazards consideration
determination, and no comments were received during the 60-day comment
period.
The Commission has determined that these amendments satisfy the
criteria for categorical exclusion in accordance with 10 CFR
51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental
impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared for these
amendments.
IV. Conclusion
Using the reasons set forth in the combined safety evaluation, the
staff granted the exemption and issued the amendment that the licensee
requested on May 20, 2014, and supplemented by letter dated June 3,
2014. The exemption and amendment were issued on March 10, 2015, as
part of a combined package to the licensee (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14345B023).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of April 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Chandu P. Patel,
Acting Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division of New Reactor Licensing,
Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2015-08563 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P