International Affairs; High Seas Fishing Compliance Act; Permitting and Monitoring of U.S. High Seas Fishing Vessels, 19611-19629 [2015-08425]
Download as PDF
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
television market. In this respect,
communities may be considered part of
more than one television market.
(b) * * *
(1) A map or maps illustrating the
relevant community locations and
geographic features, station transmitter
sites, cable system headend or satellite
carrier local receive facility locations,
terrain features that would affect station
reception, mileage between the
community and the television station
transmitter site, transportation routes
and any other evidence contributing to
the scope of the market.
(2) Noise-limited service contour
maps (for digital stations) or Grade B
contour maps (for analog stations)
delineating the station’s technical
service area and showing the location of
the cable system headends or satellite
carrier local receive facilities and
communities in relation to the service
areas.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Cable system or satellite carrier
channel line-up cards or other exhibits
establishing historic carriage, such as
television guide listings.
(6) Published audience data for the
relevant station showing its average all
day audience (i.e., the reported
audience averaged over SundaySaturday, 7 a.m.–1 a.m., or an
equivalent time period) for both
multichannel video programming
distributor (MVPD) and non-MVPD
households or other specific audience
indicia, such as station advertising and
sales data or viewer contribution
records.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) A cable operator or satellite carrier
shall not delete from carriage the signal
of a commercial television station
during the pendency of any proceeding
pursuant to this section.
(e) A market determination under this
section shall not create additional
carriage obligations for a satellite carrier
if it is not technically and economically
feasible for such carrier to accomplish
such carriage by means of its satellites
in operation at the time of the
determination.
(f) No modification of a commercial
television broadcast station’s local
market pursuant to this section shall
have any effect on the eligibility of
households in the community affected
by such modification to receive distant
signals from a satellite carrier pursuant
to 47 U.S.C. 339.
■ 4. Section 76.66 is amended by adding
a new paragraph (d)(6) and revising
paragraph (e)(1) introductory text to
read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
§ 76.66
Satellite broadcast signal carriage.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(6) Carriage after a market
modification. Television broadcast
stations that become eligible for
mandatory carriage with respect to a
satellite carrier (pursuant to § 76.66) due
to a change in the market definition (by
operation of a market modification
pursuant to § 76.59) may, within 30
days of the effective date of the new
definition, elect retransmission consent
or mandatory carriage with respect to
such carrier. A satellite carrier shall
commence carriage within 90 days of
receiving the carriage election from the
television broadcast station. The
election must be made in accordance
with the requirements in paragraph
(d)(1) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Market definitions. (1) A local
market, in the case of both commercial
and noncommercial television broadcast
stations, is the designated market area in
which a station is located, unless such
market is amended pursuant to § 76.59,
and
*
*
*
*
*
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of
the Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2015–08435 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 300, 600, 660, and 665
[Docket No. 070516126–5292–03]
RIN 0648–AV12
International Affairs; High Seas
Fishing Compliance Act; Permitting
and Monitoring of U.S. High Seas
Fishing Vessels
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes regulatory
changes to improve the administration
of the High Seas Fishing Compliance
Act program and the monitoring of U.S.
fishing vessels operating on the high
seas. The proposed rule includes, for all
U.S. fishing vessels operating on the
high seas, adjustments to permitting and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19611
reporting procedures. It also includes
requirements for the installation and
operation of enhanced mobile
transceiver units for vessel monitoring,
carrying observers on vessels, reporting
of transshipments taking place on the
high seas, and protection of vulnerable
marine ecosystems. This proposed rule
has been prepared to minimize
duplication and to be consistent with
other established requirements.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by May 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on this
action, identified by NOAA–NMFS–
2015–0052, may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150052, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments. Mail: Mark
Wildman, Trade and Marine
Stewardship Division, Office for
International Affairs and Seafood
Inspection, NMFS, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Comments must be submitted by one
of the above methods to ensure that the
comments are received, documented,
and considered by NMFS. Comments
sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after
the end of the comment period may not
be considered. All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing
on www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(such as name or address) submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to Mark
Wildman, NMFS, Office for
International Affairs and Seafood
Inspection (see address above) and by
email to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Wildman, Trade and Marine
Stewardship Division, Office for
International Affairs and Seafood
Inspection, NMFS (phone 301–427–
8386 or email mark.wildman@
noaa.gov).
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
19612
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The purposes of the High Seas Fishing
Compliance Act (HSFCA; 16 U.S.C.
5501 et seq.) are (1) to implement the
Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations (FAO) Agreement to
Promote Compliance with International
Conservation and Management
Measures by Fishing Vessels on the
High Seas (Compliance Agreement) and
(2) to establish a system of permitting,
reporting and regulation for vessels of
the United States fishing on the high
seas. 16 U.S.C. 5501. ‘‘High seas’’ is
defined in the HSFCA and its
implementing regulations as waters
beyond the territorial sea or exclusive
economic zone (or the equivalent) of
any nation, to the extent that such
territorial sea or exclusive economic
zone (or the equivalent) is recognized by
the United States. 16 U.S.C. 5502 (3); 50
CFR 300.11.
The HSFCA authorizes a system of
permitting U.S. fishing vessels that
operate on the high seas to satisfy the
obligation of Parties to the Compliance
Agreement (Parties) to require that
fishing vessels flying their flags obtain
specific authorization to operate on the
high seas. The HSFCA requires the
Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to
establish conditions and restrictions on
each permit issued under HSFCA as
necessary and appropriate to carry out
the obligations of the United States
under the Compliance Agreement. 16
U.S.C. 5503 (d). At a minimum, such
conditions and restrictions must include
the marking of the permitted vessel in
accordance with the FAO Standard
Specifications for the Marking and
Identification of Fishing Vessels, and
reporting of fishing activities. Parties are
also responsible for ensuring that their
authorized vessels do not undermine
conservation and management
measures, including those adopted by
international fisheries management
organizations, or by treaties or other
international agreements. Accordingly,
the HSFCA prohibits the use of fishing
vessels on the high seas in
contravention of international
conservation and management measures
recognized by the United States. 16
U.S.C. 5505 (1). A list of the
international conservation and
management measures recognized by
the United States is published by NMFS
in the Federal Register from time to
time in consultation with the Secretary
of State, as required by section 5504(e)
of the HSFCA. The last such notice was
published on May 19, 2011 (76 FR
28954). NMFS reinforces this
prohibition by requiring a high seas
fishing permit for any vessel operating
on the high seas and, in that permit,
authorizing only those activities that
would not undermine international
conservation and management measures
recognized by the United States. The
HSFCA also gives NMFS discretion to
impose permit terms and requirements
pursuant to other applicable law, such
as the Endangered Species Act, the
Marine Mammal Protection Act, in
addition to international conservation
and management measures recognized
by the United States. See Turtle Island
Restoration Network v. National Marine
Fisheries Service, 340 F.3d 969 (9th Cir.
2003).
Finally, the HSFCA authorizes NMFS
to promulgate regulations ‘‘as may be
necessary to carry out the purposes of
the Agreement and [the Act],’’ including
its permitting authorities. In
promulgating such regulations, NMFS
shall ensure that ‘‘[t]o the extent
practicable, such regulations shall also
be consistent with regulations
implementing fishery management
plans under the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act,’’ 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., which
provides broad authority to establish
measures for the conservation and
management of fisheries, id.
1853(b)(14).
Regulations implementing the HSFCA
were first promulgated in 1996 (61 FR
11751, March 22, 1996). The initial
regulations included application and
issuance procedures for high seas
fishing permits. Subsequent regulations
promulgated in 1999 (64 FR 13, January
4, 1999) specified how high seas fishing
vessels must be marked for
identification purposes and required
reporting by vessel owners and
operators of catch and fishing effort
when fishing on the high seas.
An objective of this rulemaking is to
codify NMFS’ procedures for review of
its high seas fishing authorizations
under environmental laws, particularly
the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Another objective of this
proposed rule is to improve the
monitoring of U.S. fishing vessels
operating on the high seas. Improving
such monitoring would enhance the
U.S. government’s ability to ensure
compliance with international
conservation and management measures
with respect to U.S. fishing vessels
operating on the high seas. Furthermore,
this proposed rule adds a section
describing how NMFS will, through
high seas permit conditions, address
impacts to vulnerable marine
ecosystems from bottom fishing
consistent with international
conservation and management measures
recognized by the United States.
NMFS is proposing substantive
changes to the HSFCA regulations at 50
CFR part 300, subpart B, and also
redesignation of the regulations as
Subpart Q. Table 1 shows how the
sections currently in Subpart B would
be redesignated in Subpart Q. The
substance of the following sections
would not be changed: § 300.10
(redesignated to 300.330) and
§ 300.13(a) (redesignated to 300.333(a)).
Other sections are new or would be
modified per this rulemaking, as
explained below.
TABLE 1—REDESIGNATION OF SECTIONS IN 50 CFR PART 300, SUBPART B TO SUBPART Q
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed subpart Q sections
300.330
300.331
300.332
300.333
300.334
300.335
300.336
300.337
300.338
300.339
300.340
300.341
Current subpart B sections
Purpose .............................................................................................................................................
Definitions ..........................................................................................................................................
Issuing offices ....................................................................................................................................
Vessel permits ...................................................................................................................................
Fisheries authorized on the high seas ..............................................................................................
Bottom fishing ....................................................................................................................................
Vessel identification ...........................................................................................................................
Requirements for Enhanced Mobile Transceiver Units ....................................................................
Observers ..........................................................................................................................................
Transshipment on the high seas .......................................................................................................
Prohibitions ........................................................................................................................................
Reporting ...........................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
300.10.
300.11.
300.12.
300.13.
New section.
New section.
300.14.
New section.
New section.
New section.
300.15.
300.17.
13APP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Coordination With Other Laws
U.S. vessels fishing on the high seas
are subject to the requirements of
multiple U.S. regulations and laws,
depending on the geographic area of the
fishing activity, gear used, target fish
species, and other factors. Such vessels
can be subject to regulations that
implement fishery management plans
(FMPs) adopted pursuant to the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act; 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.) and laws and regulations
implementing international fisheries
agreements. Section 105 of the HSFCA
specifies that regulations should
minimize duplication of license
application and reporting requirements
contained in other regulations
applicable to U.S. vessels used for
fishing on the high seas and, to the
extent practicable, such regulations
must be consistent with regulations
implementing FMPs under the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. 16 U.S.C. 5504
(d). Recognizing that the HSFCA
requirements can overlap with other
requirements, this proposed rule has
been prepared to minimize duplication
and to be consistent with other
applicable requirements.
In addition to the HSFCA, the
following FMPs and laws, and their
associated regulations, have provisions
that may apply to U.S. vessels’ fishing
activities on the high seas:
• Fishery Ecosystem Plan for Pacific
Pelagic Fisheries of the Western Pacific
Region and its amendments, 50 CFR
part 665, subpart F,
• FMP for U.S. West Coast Fisheries
for Highly Migratory Species and its
amendments, 50 CFR part 660, subpart
K,
• 2006 Consolidated Atlantic Highly
Migratory Species FMP and its
amendments, 50 CFR part 635,
• Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of
1975, 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.,
• Antarctic Marine Living Resources
Convention Act of 1984, 16 U.S.C. 2431
et seq.,
• Northwest Atlantic Fisheries
Convention Act of 1995, 16 U.S.C. 5601
et seq.,
• South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988, 16
U.S.C. 973 et seq.,
• Tuna Conventions Act of 1950, 16
U.S.C. 951 et seq.,
• Western and Central Pacific
Fisheries Convention Implementation
Act, 16 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.,
• Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq., and
• Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
Any person subject to the jurisdiction
of the United States must abide by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
take prohibitions of, and all applicable
regulations implemented under, the
ESA and the Marine Mammal Protection
Act (MMPA) on U.S. territory, in U.S.
waters, and on the high seas, which
includes, for the purposes of the MMPA
and ESA, waters within foreign nations’
Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ) up to
the seaward boundaries of the territorial
seas of such nations. For all authorized
high seas fisheries, NMFS issues
permits only after a determination, in
accordance with section 7 of the ESA
and in consultation within NMFS or
with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
as appropriate, that the authorization of
the fishery on the high seas is not likely
to jeopardize the continued existence of
endangered and threatened species. 16
U.S.C. 1536. Such consultations can
result in permit conditions to minimize
impacts on threatened and endangered
species.
Since 2009, fisheries on the high seas
have been included in the List of
Fisheries published each year pursuant
to the MMPA. 16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(1). The
List of Fisheries classifies U.S.
commercial fisheries into one of three
categories based on an estimated level of
mortality and serious injury of marine
mammal stocks incidental to
commercial fishing operations. See 50
CFR 229.2. Category I and II fisheries are
those in which incidental injury or
death of marine mammals is frequent or
occasional, respectively. Category II
fisheries may also include fisheries for
which reliable information about the
frequency of incidental injury or
mortality is lacking. Eligible commercial
fisheries not specifically identified in
the list of fisheries are deemed to be
Category II fisheries until the next list of
fisheries is published. Category III
fisheries are determined to have a
remote likelihood of, or no known,
incidental mortality or serious injury of
marine mammals.
The majority of high seas fisheries are
classified as Category II because of the
lack of information on the frequency of
incidental mortality and serious injury
of marine mammals in the fisheries.
Other high seas fisheries are classified
as Category I, II or III because they are
considered extensions of fisheries taking
place within U.S. waters and therefore
are classified in the same category as
those fisheries. Owners of vessels with
gear that fall within a Category I or II
fishery are required under the MMPA
regulations, as described in 50 CFR
229.4 to 229.7, to (1) register with NMFS
and obtain a marine mammal
authorization certificate to lawfully take
a marine mammal incidental to
commercial fishing and (2) carry an
observer if requested by NMFS. MMPA
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19613
regulations do not require owners of
vessels or gear engaged in a Category III
fishery to register with NMFS, obtain a
marine mammal authorization
certificate, or, except in limited
circumstances, carry an observer
pursuant to MMPA regulations.
The owner or operator of a vessel
participating in a commercial fishery
listed on the List of Fisheries, regardless
of classification, is required to report
any injury or death of a marine mammal
incidental to commercial fishing
operations to NMFS within 48 hours of
returning from a fishing trip. 50 CFR
229.6.
Proposed Requirements for High Seas
Fishing Vessels
The following sections provide
further detail regarding proposed
requirements for the permit application
process, enhanced mobile transceiver
units for vessel monitoring, observer
coverage, transshipment on the high
seas, and protection of vulnerable
marine ecosystems on the high seas. A
reference to the HSFCA would also be
added to 50 CFR parts 600 and 660,
specifically § 600.705 and § 660.2,
which list laws related to the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, to alert fishers
who may be interested in fishing on the
high seas to the requirements in 50 CFR
part 300. Also, a proposed revision of
§ 600.745(a) would encourage any
person who intends to conduct
scientific research on the high seas to
obtain a Letter of Acknowledgement
from NMFS, as is currently done for
such activities in U.S. waters.
Adjustments would also be made to
other parts of CFR Title 50 because of
the redesignation of Subpart B to
Subpart Q.
Definitions
Consistent with 16 U.S.C. 5502(4),
NMFS proposes to revise the definition
of ‘‘high seas fishing vessel’’ in 50 CFR
300.331 by adding the word ‘‘and’’ as
underlined below to clarify that this
term means any vessel of the United
States used or intended for use: (1) On
the high seas, (2) for the purpose of the
commercial exploitation of living
marine resources, and (3) as a
harvesting vessel, mother ship, or any
other support vessel directly engaged in
a fishing operation. To clarify the
meaning of support vessels directly
engaged in a fishing operation,
examples are included in the definition
(vessels that transship fish on the high
seas, provide supplies or fuel on the
high seas to other fishing vessels, or
conduct other activities in support of, or
in preparation for, fishing).
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
19614
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
This rule proposes to revise the
regulatory definition of ‘‘international
conservation and management
measures’’ by adding the following
sentence from the HSFCA definition:
‘‘Such measures may be adopted by
global, regional, or sub-regional fisheries
organizations, subject to the rights and
obligations of their members, or by
treaties or other international
agreements.’’ The change clarifies that
commitments made by the United States
at international fisheries management
fora can be included in the term
‘‘international conservation and
management measures’’ to the extent
necessary and appropriate to carry out
U.S. obligations under the Compliance
Agreement or for purposes of the
HSFCA.
Definitions of bottom fishing,
enhanced mobile transceiver unit,
transship, and vessel monitoring system
would be added to the HSFCA
regulations and are discussed in the
relevant sections below.
Issuing Offices
Section 300.12, redesignated as
§ 300.332, would be revised to specify
that the Director of the NMFS Office for
International Affairs and Seafood
Inspection, as well as Regional
Administrators, may issue high seas
fishing permits for any authorized high
seas fishery.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Vessel Permits
The permitting requirement under the
HSFCA for vessels operating on the high
seas, currently set forth at § 300.13
(redesignated as § 300.333), has been in
effect since 1996. In general, any U.S.
vessel is eligible for a high seas fishing
permit unless that vessel had a permit
from a foreign nation that was
suspended and the suspension has not
expired or, during the 3 years prior to
the application date, the permit was
withdrawn due to the vessel
undermining the effectiveness of an
international conservation and
management measure.
High seas fishing permits are issued at
any time of the year and are valid for 5
years from the date of issuance, as
provided in the HSFCA. 16 U.S.C.
5503(f). For a permit to remain valid
until its expiration date, the vessel’s
U.S. Coast Guard documentation or state
registration must be kept current. A
permit becomes immediately void when
the name of the owner or vessel changes
or, in the event the vessel is no longer
eligible for U.S. documentation, such
documentation lapses or is revoked or
denied, or the vessel is removed from
such documentation. § 300.333(d)(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
In developing this proposed rule,
NMFS evaluated an option to rely on
fishery-specific permits for U.S. vessels
operating on the high seas, other than
the HSFCA permit program, to authorize
high seas fishing activities. However, by
continuing to require a separate high
seas fishing permit, in addition to any
permit required for the authorized high
seas fishery in which the HSFCA permit
applicant intends to fish, NMFS is able
to maintain a separate and more precise
record of vessels permitted to fish on
the high seas and submit information
from this record to the FAO as required
in the Compliance Agreement. FAO
compiles records of vessels authorized
to fish on the high seas from the Parties
to the Compliance Agreement. The
separate high seas fishing permit,
required under the existing regulations
to be carried on board the vessel, is also
useful in demonstrating to any domestic
inspectors, any foreign inspectors
operating under the authority of a high
seas boarding and inspection scheme
adopted by an RFMO to which the
United States is party, or any foreign
port inspectors, that a vessel is
authorized to fish on the high seas.
The proposed rule (§ 300.333(b))
provides that any high seas fishing
vessel engaging in fishing, as defined
under § 300.2, on the high seas must
have on board a valid permit issued
under this subpart. Under this new
paragraph and the revised definition of
high seas fishing vessel, harvesting
vessels, as well as vessels that are
involved in processing or transshipment
of fish on the high seas in fisheries
where such activity is allowed, or
providing supplies or fuel on the high
seas to a fishing vessel, must obtain a
high seas fishing permit prior to
undertaking those activities.
Under proposed § 300.333(c)(3),
applicants would also need to submit a
color, bow-to-stern, side-view
photograph of the vessel in its current
form and appearance legibly showing
vessel name and identification markings
with each application. Vessel
photographs would be made available
for use by NMFS, other agencies,
RFMOs, and other entities as an aid in
identifying vessels authorized to fish on
the high seas.
In proposed § 300.333(d), the existing
timeframe for issuance of permits would
be amended in light of changes in the
technology now used to issue permits,
which allow faster turnaround in permit
processing. Specifically, NMFS will
issue HSFCA permits within 15 days of
receipt of a complete application and
associated fees, rather than 30 days as
provided in the existing HSFCA
regulations. See § 300.13(e).
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Proposed § 300.333(g) would clarify
the need for high seas permit renewal
applicants to comply with all applicable
reporting requirements before a new
permit would be issued.
The rule would also add, at
§ 300.333(h), a reference to MMPA
requirements noting that high seas
permits do not authorize vessels or
persons subject to the jurisdiction of the
United States to take marine mammals.
Section 300.333(i) of the proposed
rule would allow NMFS to modify,
suspend, or revoke high seas permits if
permitted activities impact living
marine resources in ways that were not
foreseen or anticipated at the time of
permit issuance or are in contravention
of an international conservation and
management measure or are in violation
of any provision of domestic law. Such
flexibility is needed because high seas
fishing permits are valid by law for 5
years. In the event that NMFS
determines that a permit must be
modified, suspended or revoked, NMFS
would provide written notification to
the permit holder at its address of
record. A permit modification,
suspension or revocation under this
section is not an enforcement-related
permit modification, suspension or
revocation subject to the process and
procedures in subpart D of 15 CFR part
904.
Fisheries Authorized on the High Seas
NMFS issues high seas fishing
permits only for fisheries where high
seas fishing activities have been
analyzed in accordance with the ESA,
NEPA and other applicable law. Such
analyses have been completed for the
following fisheries:
• 50 CFR part 300, subpart C—
Eastern Pacific Tuna Fisheries
• 50 CFR part 300, subpart D—South
Pacific Tuna Fisheries
• 50 CFR part 300, subpart G—
Antarctic Marine Living Resources
• 50 CFR part 635—Atlantic Highly
Migratory Species Fisheries
• 50 CFR part 660, subpart K—U.S.
West Coast Fisheries for Highly
Migratory Species
• 50 CFR part 665, subpart F—
Western Pacific Pelagic Fisheries
• South Pacific Albacore Troll
Fishing
• Northwest Atlantic Fisheries
Under existing regulations at 50 CFR
300.212, vessels that fish on the high
seas in the area of application of the
Convention on the Conservation and
Management of Highly Migratory Fish
Stocks in the Western and Central
Pacific Ocean must have a valid
Western and Central Pacific Fisheries
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Commission (WCPFC) Area
Endorsement. Vessels must obtain or
hold a valid high seas fishing permit to
be eligible to receive the WCPFC Area
Endorsement.
At the time of publication of this
proposed rule, approximately 600 U.S.
fishing vessels are permitted under the
HSFCA to operate on the high seas.
These vessels are authorized to operate
in one or more of the above-authorized
fisheries as specified on their high seas
fishing permits.
NMFS proposes a new section
300.334 that lists the fisheries
authorized on the high seas, provides
for issuance of and changes to high seas
fishing permits for fisheries on the list,
and provides for changes to the list.
Through these provisions, NMFS seeks
to reinforce U.S. vessels’ compliance
with all domestic requirements when
they are operating on the high seas.
Under proposed § 300.334(a),
applicants for high seas fishing permits
must identify in their application which
of the authorized fisheries from the list
they plan to fish in. In addition, prior
to applying for a high seas permit,
applicants would need to obtain any
permits or other types of authorizations
required to participate in an authorized
fishery. As a condition of the HSFCA
permit (once issued), the holder must
abide by all applicable requirements
associated with the underlying
authorized fishery, as well as the terms
and conditions of the high seas fishing
permit, the HSFCA regulations, and any
other applicable laws and regulations.
As noted earlier, high seas fishing
permits are valid for five years from date
of issuance (§ 300.333(d)), and this
proposed rule would not alter the
duration of validity. If, after receiving a
permit, the owner or operator of the
vessel seeks to change the authorized
fisheries in which he or she operates on
the high seas, he or she would need to
request in writing such a change from
NMFS and obtain any permits
associated with the authorized fisheries.
After confirming that the applicant has
been issued any other necessary
permits, and meets all other applicable
criteria, NMFS would issue a new high
seas fishing permit per the process in
§ 300.333(d) with the change in the
authorized fisheries. The revised permit
would be valid for the remainder of the
original 5-year period.
Section 300.334(d) would provide
that NMFS may add other fisheries to
the list of authorized fisheries after
completing any needed analyses under
the ESA, NEPA, and other applicable
law or policy. NMFS would add
fisheries to the list through rulemaking.
While NMFS may decide on its own to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
propose to add a fishery to the list, this
proposed rule would include
procedures at § 300.334(e) for a person
to request that NMFS consider adding a
fishery. The request would need to be in
writing with a description of the species
(target and incidental) expected to be
harvested, the anticipated amounts of
harvest and incidental catch, the
approximate times when and places
where fishing would take place,
approximate number and types of
vessels participating, or expected to
participate, in the fishing activity, and
the type, size, and amount of gear to be
used. The request would also need to
describe the specific area(s) that may be
affected by the fishing activities and any
anticipated impacts on the environment,
including impacts on fish stocks, marine
mammals, and species listed as
threatened or endangered under the
ESA or their critical habitat. If requested
by NMFS, the applicant would be
required to submit additional
supporting information for NMFS to
make determinations under the ESA,
NEPA, or other applicable law or policy.
Given the transboundary nature of many
high seas fisheries and the potential
impact of newly authorized high seas
fisheries on domestic fishery
management programs, NMFS would
work with relevant NMFS regional
office(s) and consult with Regional
Fishery Management Council(s) to
evaluate requests to authorize new high
seas fisheries and, as part of that
process, would publish a proposed rule
in the Federal Register to gather public
comment on such requests. Information
received during the comment period
may be considered by NMFS, working
in conjunction with the relevant NMFS
regional office(s) and in consultation
with Regional Fishery Management
Council(s), in its analysis to determine
whether to authorize the fishery. Based
on the analysis and other relevant
considerations, NMFS would publish its
determination in the Federal Register
whether to add the fishery to the list of
authorized high seas fisheries.
Section 300.334 (d), describes several
factors that would be taken into account
when considering the deletion of a
fishery from the list of authorized
fisheries including whether
continuation of the fishery would
contravene international conservation
and management measures recognized
by the United States or U.S. laws or
regulations. For example, NMFS would
remove a fishery from the list if vessels
of the United States are no longer
authorized to catch fish in the area of
competence of the relevant RFMO.
Proposals to remove a fishery from the
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19615
list of authorized fisheries (i.e., deauthorize the fishery), as well as any
necessary changes to other regulations
in this chapter and 50 CFR part 600,
would be published in the Federal
Register as a proposed rule with an
opportunity for public comment. NMFS
would then publish its final
determination on deleting the fishery
from the list of fisheries in the Federal
Register. In addition, NMFS would
provide notice of a deletion of an
authorized fishery to those permit
holders that have the authorized fishery
specified on their high seas fishing
permit and to the public via the NMFS
Web site. Permit holders would no
longer be able to fish in high seas
fisheries that are no longer authorized,
but may request authorization to fish in
other, still authorized, high seas
fisheries. If requested, and as
appropriate, NMFS would void the
original permit and issue the permit
holder a revised permit, valid for the
remainder of the original 5 year period,
for operations in another authorized
fishery.
Protecting Vulnerable Marine
Ecosystems From Significant Adverse
Impacts of Bottom Fishing
Many RFMOs recognize the need to
protect vulnerable marine ecosystems
(VMEs) located on the high seas from
certain bottom fishing practices and are
taking steps for their protection.
Through this proposed rule, the United
States would be similarly taking steps to
protect VMEs. The characteristics of
VMEs are described in the FAO
International Guidelines for the
Management of Deep-sea Fisheries in
the High Seas. These FAO Guidelines
give examples of species groups,
communities and habitat forming
species that may contribute to the
formation of VMEs, such as certain
coldwater corals and hydroids, some
types of sponge dominated
communities, and seep and vent
communities comprised of invertebrate
and microbial species found nowhere
else. Examples of topographic,
hydrophysical or geological features that
potentially support these and other
species include seamounts, guyots,
banks, knolls, hills and hydrothermal
vents.
The United Nations General Assembly
(UNGA), through annual sustainable
fisheries resolutions, calls upon States,
both individually and cooperatively
through RFMOs, to ensure that bottom
fishing activities do not have significant
adverse impacts on VMEs. The United
States has strongly promoted the
adoption of measures to protect VMEs
by relevant RFMOs.
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
19616
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
The UNGA resolutions call on RFMOs
with competence over bottom fishing
activities or flag States in areas where
RFMOs have not taken action or areas
where there are no relevant RFMOs to:
(1) Assess, on the basis of the best
available scientific information, whether
individual bottom fishing activities
would have significant adverse impacts
on VMEs, and to ensure that if
significant adverse impact is likely to
occur, such activities are managed to
prevent such impacts or not authorized
to proceed;
(2) Identify areas where VMEs occur
or are likely to occur and assess bottom
fishing impacts on such ecosystems;
(3) Close such areas to bottom fishing
unless conservation and management
measures have been established that
prevent significant adverse impacts to
VMEs; and
(4) Cease bottom fishing activities in
areas where, in the course of fishing
activities, VMEs are encountered and
report these encounters to a relevant
authority.
In its International Guidelines for the
Management of Deep-sea Fisheries in
the High Seas, the FAO identifies
impacts as significantly adverse if they
compromise ecosystem integrity, such
as ecosystem structure or function, by
impairing the ability of affected
populations to replace themselves,
degrading the long-term natural
productivity of habitats, or causing, on
a more than temporary basis, significant
loss of species richness, habitat or
community types.
Several RFMOs have competence over
bottom fishing activities. Four of these
RFMOs existed prior to the most recent
publication in the Federal Register of
international conservation and
management measures recognized by
the United States: Commission for the
Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living
Resources (CCAMLR), Northeast
Atlantic Fisheries Commission
(NEAFC), Northwest Atlantic Fisheries
Organization (NAFO), and Southeast
Atlantic Fisheries Organization
(SEAFO). Each of these four bodies
adopted conservation and management
measures in accordance with UNGA
resolutions 61/105 and 64/72 related to
protection of VMEs. The United States
is a member of CCAMLR and NAFO,
and thus, is obligated to abide by their
conservation and management
measures. The United States recognizes
the conservation and management
measures adopted by NEAFC and
SEAFO under the HSFCA, and thus
prohibits U.S. fishing vessels from
acting in contravention of them (76 FR
28954, May 19, 2011).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
The UNGA resolutions call upon
States to develop new RFMOs in areas
where no organization or arrangement
with the competence to manage bottom
fisheries exists and to develop and agree
to implement interim measures until
binding conservation measures can be
implemented. The United States
participated in negotiations in the North
and South Pacific for the establishment
of two new RFMOs with such
competency. In the North Pacific, a
treaty, the Convention on the
Conservation and Management of High
Seas Fisheries Resources in the North
Pacific Ocean, has been negotiated but
has not yet entered into force. The
United States has signed the treaty and
is undertaking the domestic process to
ratify the treaty. The participants have
developed two sets of interim measures
for the protection of VMEs, one for the
eastern and the other for the western
portion of the area where the treaty
would apply.
In the South Pacific, the Convention
on the Conservation and Management of
High Seas Fishery Resources in the
South Pacific Ocean entered into force
on August 24, 2012, creating the South
Pacific Regional Fisheries Management
Organisation (SPRFMO). While the
United States is not currently a party to
the Convention, the United States
participates in the SPRFMO as a
Cooperating non-Contracting Party, has
signed the treaty, and is undertaking the
domestic process to ratify it. SPRFMO
adopted a conservation and
management measure in January 2014 in
accordance with UNGA resolutions 61/
105 and 64/72.
Under § 300.335 of this proposed rule,
bottom fishing would only be permitted
on the high seas in accordance with
international conservation and
management measures recognized by
the United States. Currently, CCAMLR,
NAFO, NEAFC and SEAFO have such
measures, as discussed above. A person
seeking to engage in bottom fishing not
subject to international conservation
and management measures recognized
by the United States must request
authorization of a new high seas fishery
as described in § 300.334(e) and then, if
the fishery is authorized, obtain a high
seas permit authorizing participation in
the fishery. See ‘‘Fisheries Authorized
on the High Seas’’ section above. NMFS
may specify conditions in the permit to
mitigate adverse impacts on VMEs,
which may include the types of
conditions that have been adopted in
relevant RFMO measures recognized by
the United States. Procedures for
permits under § 300.333 and changes to
existing permits under § 300.334 would
be used for bottom fishing permitting.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Consistent with the FAO’s International
Guidelines for the Management of Deepsea Fisheries in the High Seas, NMFS is
proposing to define bottom fishing as
fishing using gear that is likely to
contact the seafloor during the normal
course of fishing operations.
Vessel Identification
To clarify the type of vessel length
used in determining the required sizing
of vessel markings, the word ‘‘overall’’
would be added after ‘‘length,’’ in
§ 300.336(b)(2)(v) in the proposed rule
(§ 300.14(b)(2)(v) in the existing
regulations). This revision to the
regulatory text is consistent with the
FAO Standard Specifications for the
Marking and Identification of Fishing
Vessels. No other changes to this section
are proposed.
Requirements for Enhanced Mobile
Transceiver Units (EMTUs)
NMFS published a final rule for VMS
type-approval on December 24, 2014.
See 79 FR 77399. Those regulations are
codified at 50 CFR part 600, subpart Q
(national VMS regulations). As defined
in the VMS type-approval regulations,
vessel monitoring system, or VMS,
refers to a satellite based surveillance
system designed to monitor the location
and movement of vessels using onboard
transceiver units that send global
positioning system location reports to a
monitoring entity. An enhanced mobile
transceiver unit (EMTU) is a transceiver
or communications device, including
antennae, dedicated message terminal
and display, and an input device such
as a keyboard which is installed on a
fishing vessel, and is capable of
supporting two-way communication,
messaging, and electronic forms
transmission, and is an example of the
device that provides the vessel location
reports as part of a VMS.
Under § 300.337 of this proposed rule,
NMFS would require all vessels
permitted to operate on the high seas, or
subject to those permitting
requirements, to have an installed and
activated NMFS-type-approved EMTU
on board. NMFS will not issue or renew
a high seas fishing permit unless the
vessel has an installed and activated
NMFS-type-approved EMTU that
reports automatically to NMFS
(§ 300.333(d)(2) and (g)).
NOAA’s Office of Law Enforcement
(OLE) currently type-approves EMTUs
and mobile communication services
(MCS) associated with the EMTUs based
on requirements outlined in the national
VMS regulations. OLE periodically
publishes a list of type-approved
EMTUs and MCS in the Federal
Register. Vessel owners also would
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
need to comply with any other
applicable VMS requirements set forth
under applicable fishery-and regionspecific regulations and the national
VMS regulations. The owner or operator
of the vessel would need to work with
a divisional office of the NOAA Office
of Law Enforcement, preferably the
office in, or nearest, the NMFS Region
that is issuing the high seas fishing
permit, to ensure that their EMTU
properly reports positions to NMFS.
This proposed rule would require the
continuous operation of the EMTU, with
hourly transmission of position reports
whenever a U.S. vessel with a high seas
permit is on the high seas. In addition,
the vessel must comply with any other
position reporting requirements
applicable to the specific fisheries in
which it is authorized to participate.
The proposed requirement will
strengthen NMFS’ ability to ensure that
U.S. high seas vessels do not undermine
international conservation and
management measures recognized by
the United States.
A vessel would be exempt from these
requirements and could power down
the EMTU when the vessel remains at
a dock or permanent mooring for more
than 72 consecutive hours (referred to as
the in-port exemption in the proposed
rule) or when it participates in a
domestic fishery within the U.S. EEZ,
for 30 or more consecutive days, and
there are no other applicable
requirements for any EMTU or VMS
unit operation for those activities or
fishery (referred to as the long-term
exemption in the proposed rule). Prior
to powering down, the high seas permit
holder would be required to notify the
OLE divisional office, via email or other
means as directed by the OLE divisional
office, the following information: The
vessel’s name; the vessel’s official
number; the intent to power down the
EMTU; the applicable exemption that
allows for power-down; and full name,
telephone, and email contact
information for the vessel owner or
operator. If the in-port exemption is
being invoked, the high seas permit
holder must also include in the above
notification the name of the port where
the vessel will be docked or at
permanent mooring and the amount of
time the vessel is expected to remain
there. If the long-term exemption is
being invoked, the high seas permit
holder must include information in the
above notification that describes the
activities or fishery the vessel will be
engaged in and estimated duration.
When powering up the EMTU after an
in-port exemption, the vessel owner or
operator would need to report to the
OLE divisional office the following
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
information: That the EMTU has been
powered up; the vessel’s name; the
vessel’s official number; port name;
fishery where the vessel intends to
operate; and full name, telephone, and
email contact information for the vessel
owner or operator. The vessel owner or
operator needs to make this report to the
OLE divisional office, during office
hours, at least 2 hours before leaving
port or mooring. When powering up
after a long-term exemption, the vessel
owner or operator would need to notify
the OLE divisional office with the
previously described information,
during office hours.
When powering up after either
exemption, the vessel owner or operator
would need to receive email
confirmation from the OLE divisional
office that EMTU transmissions are
being properly received. This
confirmation would need to be received
before leaving port, after an in-port
exemption, or before entering the high
seas or a fishery that requires EMTU
operation, after a long-term exemption.
Many HSFCA-permitted vessels are
already required to operate EMTUs
when at sea because they participate in
fisheries with domestic EMTU
requirements. Satisfying those
requirements would satisfy the
proposed HSFCA requirement, if the
EMTU is operating at all times,
providing hourly position reports while
on the high seas, and the EMTU
activation and power-down/power-up
procedures are the same or are more
restrictive than these proposed HSFCA
requirements. VMS requirements that
currently apply on the high seas include
the following regulations:
• § 660.712(d) for longliners in the
U.S. West Coast fisheries for highly
migratory species (HMS) (these units are
owned and installed by NMFS),
• § 665.19 for Western Pacific pelagic
fisheries (these units are owned and
installed by NMFS),
• § 300.219 for Western and Central
Pacific fisheries for HMS,
• § 300.45 for South Pacific tuna
fisheries,
• § 635.69 for Atlantic HMS fisheries,
and
• § 300.116 for harvest of Antarctic
marine living resources.
High seas fishing vessels that would
need to purchase, install, activate, and
operate EMTUs as a result of this
proposed rule include vessels other than
longliners participating in the U.S. West
Coast fisheries for HMS, longline vessels
less than 40 feet in length overall in the
Western Pacific pelagic fisheries, vessels
in the Atlantic HMS fisheries that do
not use pelagic longline gear, and
certain vessels in the Atlantic HMS
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19617
fisheries that use shark bottom longline
and gillnet gear.
In the case of failure of the EMTU
while at sea, the vessel operator, owner,
or designee would be required to notify
the OLE divisional office and follow
instructions provided, which could
include actions described under
proposed § 300.337(e)(2). The EMTU
would then need to be repaired or
replaced and operating within 30 days
or before starting the next trip,
whichever is sooner.
For communicating with enforcement
authorities about the functioning of the
EMTU and other purposes, operators of
vessels would be required to carry on
board and continuously monitor a twoway communication device capable of
real-time communication with the OLE
divisional office. The device must be
capable of transmitting position reports,
or the vessel must have a separate
device for transmitting position reports,
in the event the EMTU fails.
The vessel owner or operator would
be responsible for all costs associated
with the purchase, installation and
maintenance of the EMTU, and for all
charges levied by the vendors as
necessary to ensure the transmission of
automatic position reports to NMFS.
However, if the EMTU is being carried
and operated in compliance with the
requirements in 50 CFR part 300, 50
CFR part 660, or 50 CFR part 665
relating to the installation, carrying, and
operation of VMS units, the vessel
owner and operator would not be
responsible for costs that are the
responsibility of NMFS under those
regulations.
Vessel owners or operators who
purchase an EMTU for the purpose of
complying with Federal VMS
regulations such as those in this rule, if
finalized, may be eligible for a one-time
reimbursement per vessel. See 73 FR
24955, May 6, 2008, for details.
Requirement for Observers
Observers provide NMFS with
information on fishing effort and catch
of target species and non-target species,
including protected species (such as
marine mammals, sea turtles, and
seabirds) pursuant to various legal
authorities, including the MagnusonStevens Act, ESA, MMPA, the
implementing legislation of
international or regional treaties to
which the United States is party, or
regulations promulgated under those
statutes. An observer under this
proposed rule is defined as any person
serving in the capacity of an observer
employed by NMFS, either directly or
under contract with a third party, or
certified as an observer by NMFS
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
19618
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(§ 600.10). Under § 300.338 of this
proposed rule, NMFS would require a
vessel permitted pursuant to the
HSFCA, if directed by NMFS, to carry
an observer during a fishing trip with
operations on the high seas. This
requirement would not be invoked by
NMFS if the vessel will already be
carrying an observer pursuant to other
legal authorities. While the vessel may
be required to cover the costs of an
observer under other applicable laws,
NMFS would fund the cost of the
observer’s salary and benefits when
placed on board pursuant to this rule. If
and when a mechanism is established
whereby the fishing vessel could pay
these costs without any conflict of
interest, the vessel could be responsible
for all or a portion of these costs.
Currently, there are different fisheryspecific observer requirements. In some
fisheries authorized on the high seas, an
observer must be on board every fishing
trip, such as on the Class 6 purse seine
vessels (vessels with well volume
carrying capacity in excess of 425 cubic
meters) operating in the Pacific tuna
fisheries. In others, such as the pelagic
longline vessels in the Atlantic HMS
fisheries, only a portion of vessel trips
are selected for observer coverage.
Certain fisheries on the high seas
currently do not require carrying an atsea observer, such as the South Pacific
albacore troll fisheries, some Class 5
(vessels with well volume carrying
capacity between 319 and 425 cubic
meters) and all Class 1 to 4 purse seine
vessels fishing in the U.S. West Coast
Fisheries for Pacific HMS, some
longliners in the Western Pacific pelagic
fishery, and vessels less than 40 feet in
length overall in the American Samoa
longline fishery. However, these and
any other commercial HMS vessels are
subject to WCPFC observer deployment
under WCPFC regulations for fishing
trips during which the vessel at any
time enters or is within the WCPF
Convention Area.
This proposed rule would allow
NMFS to place an observer on board a
high seas fishing vessel where observer
coverage is not otherwise required by
other regulations or relevant RFMO
conservation and management
measures. Such additional coverage
would enhance NMFS’ ability to collect
fishery dependent data needed for
fishery management. A vessel would be
selected for observer deployment using
a sampling scheme to be developed by
NMFS, based on the need to obtain
information on high seas activities.
The owner or operator of a vessel that
is selected for observer deployment
under this rule would be required to
notify NMFS before commencing any
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
fishing trip that takes place on the high
seas. In the letter to the vessel owner or
operator informing him/her of the
selection for observer deployment,
NMFS would specify notification
procedures and information
requirements such as expected gear
deployment, trip duration, and fishing
area. Requirements pertaining to
observer deployment, including the
requirement to provide the observer
access to, for example, vessel
communications and navigation
equipment and cooperate with observers
are included in the proposed rule.
Observer safety requirements set forth at
§ 600.746 would also apply, as well as
the associated prohibitions in
§ 600.725(q) through (u). These sections
require vessels carrying observers to
have a valid U.S. Coast Guard
Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety decal
and take other steps to ensure safe
conditions aboard the vessel.
Transshipment on the High Seas
At-sea transshipment, defined in this
proposed rule at § 300.331 as offloading
or receiving or otherwise transferring
fish or fish products from one fishing
vessel to another, allows harvesting
vessels to continue operations for longer
periods when they are in waters far from
ports. At-sea transshipment can also be
used to obscure the origin of illegallycaught fish so that the product can be
placed into commerce in contravention
of regulations designed to eliminate
illegal, unreported and unregulated
(IUU) fishing practices. Unreported and
unregulated transshipments at sea can
contribute to inaccurate reporting of
catches and can support IUU fishing
activities. Improved oversight of
transshipment taking place on the high
seas would promote compliance with
international conservation and
management measures and help deter
IUU fishing.
The proposed definition of transship
or transshipment would exclude ‘‘net
sharing,’’ that is, the transfer of fish that
have not yet been loaded on board any
fishing vessel from the purse seine net
of one fishing vessel to another fishing
vessel. Fish would be considered to be
on board a fishing vessel once they are
on a deck or in a hold, or once they are
first lifted out of the water by the vessel.
In those instances where
transshipment on the high seas is not
prohibited under other legal authorities,
this proposed rule requires that U.S.
high seas fishing vessels involved in
transshipment on the high seas have on
board a high seas fishing permit
(§ 300.333(b)). The permitting
requirement applies to both the vessel
offloading the fish or fish product and
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the vessel receiving the fish or fish
product. In addition to any other
applicable requirements, under
§ 300.339(b), the owner or operator of a
U.S. vessel receiving or offloading fish
or fish product on the high seas must
notify NMFS at least 36 hours prior to
each transshipment event, and submit a
report on the transshipment event
within 15 days after the vessel first
enters into port, using the form obtained
from the Regional Administrator or
Office Director who issued the high seas
fishing permit.
The owner or operator of U.S. vessels
receiving or offloading fish on the high
seas would need to include the
following information in the prior
notification: The vessels participating in
the transshipment (names, official
numbers, and vessel types); the location
(latitude and longitude to the nearest
tenth of a degree) of transshipment, date
and time that transshipment is expected
to occur, and species, processed state,
and quantities (in metric tons) expected
to be transshipped. Each transshipment
would require a separate notice and
report. As some of the information
might be known by only the receiving
vessel operator and some of the
information might be known only by the
offloading vessel operator, the operators
of both vessels may need to exchange
information regarding transshipment
activities. In authorized fisheries where
equivalent or more restrictive domestic
transshipment notification and
reporting regulations apply, fulfillment
of such regulations would satisfy the
requirements under this proposed rule.
The following are examples of
existing at-sea transshipment
restrictions and reporting requirements
that already apply to high seas fishing
vessels (all citations are to 50 CFR):
• § 300.24(d) of the Eastern Pacific
Tuna Fisheries regulations prohibits the
transshipment of purse seine caught
tuna in the Inter-American Tropical
Tuna Commission (IATTC) Convention
Area.
• § 300.112(k) requires U.S. flagged
vessels that receive or attempt to receive
Dissostichus species from a harvesting
vessel at sea, regardless of whether such
transshipment occurs in waters under
the jurisdiction of CCAMLR, to obtain
from NMFS a harvesting permit
authorizing transshipment. CCAMLR
conservation measures also require
advance notification for transshipment
of Antarctic marine living resources and
other materials (e.g., bait, fuel) in the
CAMLR Convention area. All
transshipments of Dissostichus species
must be reflected in the Dissostichus
Catch Document regardless of where the
transshipment occurs.
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
• § 635.29(a) prohibits at-sea and in
port transshipment of any tuna or tunalike species, or other highly migratory
species, regardless of where the fish
were harvested. However, an owner or
operator of a vessel for which an
Atlantic Tunas Purse Seine category
permit has been issued under § 635.4
may transfer large, medium, and giant
bluefin tuna at sea from the net of the
catching vessel to another vessel for
which an Atlantic Tunas Purse Seine
category permit has been issued,
provided the amount transferred does
not cause the receiving vessel to exceed
its currently authorized vessel
allocation, including incidental catch
limits.
• For U.S. West Coast fisheries for
HMS, the operators of any commercial
fishing vessel and any recreational
charter vessel fishing for HMS in the
management area must fill out
information on the date, transshipper,
and amount transshipped on report
forms provided by the Western Regional
Administrator or a state agency
(§ 660.708(a)). Thus, the albacore
trollers, pole and line vessels, and other
vessels that fish for HMS on the high
seas are subject to this reporting
requirement.
• For Western Pacific pelagic
fisheries, regulations set forth at
§ 665.14(c) require operators of vessels
receiving transshipments to keep
records and submit information on
transshipments that occur in the EEZ.
Specifically, any person subject to the
requirements set forth in § 665.801(e)—
which pertains to longline and other
pelagic fishing within the EEZ or
landing or transshipping pelagic species
within the EEZ—must maintain on
board the vessel an accurate and
complete NMFS transshipment logbook
containing report forms provided by the
Pacific Islands Regional Administrator.
All information specified on the forms
must be recorded on the forms within
24 hours after the day of transshipment.
Each form must be signed and dated by
the receiving vessel operator. The
original logbook for each day of
transshipment activity must be
submitted to the Pacific Islands
Regional Administrator within 72 hours
of each landing of western Pacific
pelagic species.
• For the WCPF Convention Area,
NMFS regulations prohibit
transshipments at sea involving purse
seine vessels in the WCPF Convention
Area as well as transshipments to and
from purse seine vessels of fish caught
in the WCPF Convention Area and
transshipped outside the WCPF
Convention Area. 50 CFR 300.216(b).
However, net sharing between purse
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
seine vessels is allowed in the WCPF
Convention Area in limited
circumstances. 50 CFR 300.216(c). For
transshipments that are not prohibited,
owners and operators of each vessel
involved in a transshipment in the
WCPF Convention Area or a
transshipment of fish caught in the
Convention Area and transshipped
anywhere are required to complete a
specific report form and to submit that
form to NMFS. 50 CFR 300.218(b).
Vessels are required to notify the
WCPFC when such transshipment
occurs on the high seas or when an
emergency transshipment that would
otherwise be prohibited occurs. Notices
for high seas transshipments need to be
submitted to the WCPFC at least 36
hours before the transshipment and
notices for emergency transshipments
must be submitted within 12 hours after
completion of the emergency
transshipment.
Prohibitions
The proposed rule would redesignate
the existing prohibitions in §§ 300.15 to
300.340, and would add prohibitions to
clarify that a high seas vessel: Must have
on board a valid permit; may not fish on
the high seas unless any and all permits
related to the authorized fisheries noted
on the high seas permit are valid; must
follow new requirements related to the
use of an EMTU; must follow new
requirements with respect to observers,
must follow new reporting requirements
with respect to transshipments; and
must follow reporting requirements of
the authorized fishery(ies) noted on the
high seas permit.
Penalties
NMFS proposes to remove the
penalties section in the existing
regulations, as these penalties are
adequately addressed in the HSFCA
itself and do not need to be repeated in
these regulations.
Catch and Effort Reporting
Requirements
The proposed rule would modify the
catch and effort reporting requirements
to clarify the information that must be
maintained on board a vessel and
reported to NMFS.
Under the proposed rule, the
references to the regulations in the
existing version of § 300.17 would be
removed. The references to the
regulations of each authorized fishery
would be provided in § 300.334 instead.
The vessel owner and operator would be
responsible for obtaining from their
Regional Administrator the appropriate
forms for their authorized fishing
activities and submitting the reports
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19619
within the deadlines of the authorized
fisheries or within 15 days following the
end of a fishing trip, whichever is
sooner. The reference in current
regulations to MSA confidentiality
provisions in § 300.17(c) would be
deleted.
Scientific Research Activities
Existing regulations set forth at
§§ 600.512(a) and 600.745(a) encourage
persons planning scientific research
activities in the U.S. EEZ using foreign
vessels or U.S.-flagged vessels to submit
their research plan to the appropriate
Regional Administrator or Science
Center Director and obtain a letter of
acknowledgement. Under the proposed
rule, the phrase ‘‘or on the high seas’’
would be added in § 600.745(a) so that
any person who would use a U.S. vessel
for research activities on the high seas
would also be encouraged to submit
their research plan and obtain a letter of
acknowledgement. The scientific
research plan should be submitted 60
days, or as soon as practicable, prior to
the start of the research activities. This
is not intended to inhibit or prevent any
scientific research activity conducted on
the high seas, and is in addition to any
requirements that may apply to such
research under RFMO conservation and
management measures or other
applicable law.
Publication of International
Conservation and Management
Measures
HSFCA section 105(e) (16 U.S.C.
5504(e))requires the Secretary, in
consultation with the Secretary of State,
to periodically publish in the Federal
Register a notice listing ‘‘international
conservation and management measures
recognized by the United States.’’ The
latest listing was published on May 19,
2011 (76 FR 28954).
Request for Comments
NMFS is requesting comments on any
of the requirements or analyses
described in the proposed rule.
Furthermore, NMFS requests comments
on the following topics:
1. The time it takes to procure an
EMTU and have it installed. Currently,
NMFS is considering requiring that
vessel owners have an EMTU installed
and operational within 90 days of
publication of the final rule;
2. The number of hours and costs
associated with having the EMTU
installed by a qualified marine
electrician;
3. Current levels of transshipment on
the high seas involving U.S. vessels and
the areas where the transshipments
occur; and
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
19620
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
4. The fisheries in state waters,
territorial seas, or within the EEZ in
which high seas fishing vessels
participate and details on how vessels
transit from the high seas to those
fisheries.
Classification
This proposed rule is published under
the authority of the High Seas Fishing
Compliance Act (16 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.).
The NMFS Assistant Administrator has
determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with this and other
applicable laws, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Flexibility Act
An Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
IRFA describes the economic impact
this proposed rule, if adopted, would
have on small entities. A description of
the action, why it is being considered,
and the legal basis for this action are
contained above in the first few
paragraphs of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section. The analysis
follows. A copy of the analysis is
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities
The proposed rule would apply to
owners and operators of U.S. fishing
vessels operating on the high seas,
including harvesting vessels,
refrigerated cargo vessels, and other
vessels used to support fishing. There
are approximately 600 U.S. vessels
permitted under the HSFCA to fish on
the high seas. The majority of these
permitted vessels are longliners, purse
seiners, trollers, or pole and line vessels
that fish for highly migratory species.
There are also small numbers of
gillnetting, squid jigging, hand or other
lining, multipurpose, and trawl vessels.
In this RFA analysis, an individual
vessel is the proxy for each business
entity. Although a single business entity
may own multiple vessels, NMFS does
not have a reliable means at this time to
track ownership of multiple vessels to a
single business entity. Based on limited
financial information about the affected
fishing vessels, NMFS believes that all
the affected fish harvesting businesses,
except for the Pacific tuna purse seine
vessels, are small entities as defined by
the RFA; that is, they are independently
owned and operated and not dominant
in their fields of operation, and have
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
annual receipts of no more than $20.5
million.
Projecting Reporting, Record-Keeping,
and Other Compliance Requirements
For each element of the proposed
rule, the analysis of impacts to small
entities is described below.
Permit Application Process. NMFS
currently authorizes fisheries on the
high seas only after appropriate reviews
are completed pursuant to the ESA,
MMPA, NEPA, and other applicable
law. Applicants select from a list of
such authorized fisheries when
applying for a high seas fishing permit.
The proposed rule would codify this
procedure. Vessel owners and operators
apply for a high seas fishing permit
every 5 years, paying an application fee
currently set at $129 and completing the
application form, which is estimated to
take 30 minutes. The rule would not
change these burdens.
The proposed rule would be explicit
about the requirement that vessels
harvesting or participating in operations
on the high seas in support of
harvesting, such as transshipment and
provision of supplies or fuel, have on
board a valid high seas fishing permit.
NMFS expects this aspect of the
proposed rule to result in few additional
applications for high seas permits, if
any, because transshipment of fish on
the high seas is prohibited in some
fisheries and where it is not prohibited,
records show few instances of
transshipment. NMFS is not aware of
any U.S. vessels that provide supplies or
fuel to harvesting vessels on the high
seas.
The rule would require a photograph
of the high seas fishing vessel to be
submitted with the permit application.
The time necessary to photograph the
vessel, print or scan the photograph,
and attach it to the application is
estimated to take 30 minutes per
application.
The proposed rule would allow a
person, which could include an
organization or a group of persons, to
request NMFS add a fishery authorized
on the high seas. A request would need
to include the following information:
(a) The species (target and incidental)
expected to be harvested and the
anticipated amounts of harvest and
bycatch.
(b) The approximate times and places
fishing will take place, approximate
number of vessels participating, and the
type, size, and amount of gear to be
used.
(c) A description of the specific area
that may be affected by the fishing
activities.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(d) A description of any anticipated
impacts on the environment, including
impacts on fish stocks, marine
mammals, species listed as threatened
or endangered under the ESA or their
critical habitat.
(e) If requested by NMFS, any
additional information necessary for
NMFS to conduct analyses under ESA,
MMPA and NEPA.
Making the request to add an
authorized fishery is expected to take
approximately 110 hours. This time
would be spent gathering and compiling
the required information. NMFS does
not expect such requests on a regular
basis. For the purposes of this IRFA,
NMFS estimates that one request might
be submitted every 5 years. The impact
from this aspect of the proposed rule is
not expected to be significant because
this is not a requirement, but an option
for the public, and such requests are
expected to be made infrequently.
Installation and Operation of EMTUs.
The proposed rule would require the
installation of EMTUs on all high seas
fishing vessels. The EMTU would need
to be operated at all times, except when
the vessel will be at a dock or
permanent mooring for more than 72
consecutive hours, or when the vessel
will not operate on the high seas or in
any fishery that requires EMTU
operation for more than 30 consecutive
days. Notices prior to EMTU powerdown and power-up would need to be
provided to NMFS.
Under the proposed rule,
approximately 200 of the currently
permitted high seas fishing vessels
would need to install an EMTU. The
remaining 400 or so vessels currently
holding high seas fishing permits are
already subject to EMTU requirements
and would not bear any additional
compliance costs as a result of this
proposed rule.
The majority of the approximately 200
affected vessels would likely be albacore
trollers operating in the Pacific Ocean.
These vessels have generally not been
subject to VMS requirements contained
in other regulations. The cost of
compliance with this requirement
includes the cost of purchase,
installation, maintenance, and operation
of the EMTU. The costs of purchase and
installation are treated as one-time costs
because this analysis shows costs just in
the near-term future. Table 2
summarizes the costs associated with
the EMTU requirement in the proposed
rule. A description of the estimates and
calculations used in Table 2 is provided
below the table.
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
19621
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED COSTS OF COMPLIANCE WITH EMTU REQUIREMENTS
Description
Cost
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
EMTU purchase .......................................................................................................................................
Installation cost (one-time) .......................................................................................................................
Daily position report costs (Hourly, 24/day; $0.06/report *24 reports/day) .............................................
Annual position report cost per vessel .....................................................................................................
($1.44/day * 365 days/year) .....................................................................................................................
Annual EMTU maintenance cost .............................................................................................................
Total cost per vessel (Year 1; unit + installation + position reports) .......................................................
Total cost per vessel after reimbursement of EMTU cost (for eligible vessels only) ..............................
Cost per vessel (Year 2 and beyond; position reports and EMTU maintenance) ..................................
Number of affected vessels .....................................................................................................................
Total cost (Year 1; total cost per vessel before reimbursement * number of affected vessels) .............
Total cost (Year 2 and beyond; total cost per vessel * number of affected vessels) .............................
Units would need to be installed by
a qualified marine electrician. Based on
experience in other fisheries with
EMTU requirements, NMFS suggests
that installation cost can range from $50
to $400, depending on the vessel,
proximity to the installer, and the
difficulty of the installation. For
estimation purposes, $400 was used to
calculate the costs of compliance with
this proposed rule. NMFS is interested
in receiving public comment on these
values to refine estimates of the
economic impacts on the affected
vessels.
The cost of transmitting data through
the EMTU depends on the type of
EMTU installed and the communication
service provider selected. For the
purposes of this rulemaking, NMFS is
assuming the cost of EMTU position
data transmissions is approximately
$0.06 per transmission. This equates to
$1.44 per day for the location reports, at
a rate of one transmission per hour.
Providing position reports throughout
the year could cost a high seas fishing
vessel $525 (365 days per year * 24
position reports per day * $0.06 = $525).
The EMTU may be powered down if
the vessel would be at the dock or
mooring for more than 72 consecutive
hours or if the vessel, for 30 or more
consecutive days, would not be
operating on the high seas or
participating in a fishery that requires
EMTU operation. A message notifying
NMFS of the power-down must be sent
to NMFS prior to powering down the
unit and again when the EMTU will be
powered back up. If an EMTU is
powered down for portions of the year,
the actual annual cost of transmitting
position data would be less. Thus the
annual costs of EMTU operation could
vary among individual vessels
depending on the number of days an
EMTU may be powered down.
The cost of compliance for vessel
owners is estimated to be $4,025 per
vessel in the first year (Table 2). This is
the cost of compliance prior to receiving
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
reimbursement for the cost of the
EMTU. Reimbursement funds of up to
$3,100 per VMS unit would reduce the
cost to $925 per vessel, on average, for
reimbursement-eligible vessels. The cost
of operating the EMTU in year two and
beyond would include the cost of
sending position reports and
maintenance and is estimated to be
$625.
Aside from the costs of purchase,
installation, and operation of EMTUs,
vessel owners or operators would need
to spend time purchasing a unit, having
it installed, and submitting an
installation and activation report form.
These steps are estimated to take an
average of 4 hours. The notices prior to
power-down and powering back up the
EMTU are estimated to take 10 minutes
each.
The compliance cost of obtaining,
carrying on board, and monitoring the
required communication devices is
expected to be zero, as NMFS believes
all affected small entities already carry
and monitor such devices.
Requirement to Carry an Observer.
Under the proposed rule, a high seas
fishing vessel would be required to
carry an observer for the duration of a
fishing trip, if so selected by NMFS.
When an observer is deployed pursuant
to the proposed rule, NMFS would pay
the cost of the observer’s salary and
benefits. If and when a mechanism is
established, through a future
rulemaking, whereby the fishing vessel
could pay these costs without any
conflict of interest, the vessel could be
responsible for all or a portion of these
costs. Most high seas fishing vessels are
already subject to requirements for
carrying an observer. For example, in
the shallow-set and deep-set longline
sectors of the Hawaii longline fleet, 100
percent and approximately 20 percent of
fishing trips, respectively, are covered
by observers. In authorized fisheries
where observers are placed on all
participating vessels pursuant to other
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Up to $3,100.
$50–400 ($400 used for estimation).
$1.44.
$525/vessel.
$50–100 ($100 used for estimation).
$4025.
$925.
$625/vessel.
200.
$805,000.
$125,000.
regulations, the compliance cost of the
proposed rule would be nil.
In high seas fisheries where only a
portion of the high seas fishing vessels
are selected for observer coverage, the
possibility of being selected to carry an
observer would increase under this
proposed rule. Vessels that are not
already subject to any other observer
requirements could be selected to carry
observers under the proposed rule. This
includes, but is not limited to, South
Pacific albacore trollers, purse seine
vessels of Class 5 or smaller
participating in the Eastern Pacific tuna
fisheries, and some longline vessels in
Western Pacific pelagic fisheries.
If a vessel is selected for observer
coverage under this rule, the vessel
owner or operator would be required to
provide NMFS a notice of their next
fishing trip. This notification is
estimated to take 5 minutes and cost $1
in communication costs.
For trips on which an observer is
deployed under this new requirement,
the affected entity would be at least
responsible for the costs associated with
providing the observer with food,
accommodations, and medical facilities.
These costs are expected to be $20 to
$50 per day. If the affected entity is also
responsible for the cost of the observer’s
salary and benefits because a
mechanism is established whereby the
fishing vessel pays these costs, the range
would be $250 to $500 per day.
Assuming a high seas fishing trip
averages 20 days in duration, the
estimated cost of compliance for
accommodating an observer on a vessel
would be between $400 and $1,000 if
the entity is responsible for only food,
accommodations, and medical facilities,
or between $5,000 and $10,000 if the
entity will also bear the cost of the
observer’s salary and benefits.
Transshipment Notices and Reports.
For owners and operators of vessels
involved in offloading or receiving a
transshipment of fish or fish product on
the high seas, the proposed rule would
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
19622
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
require vessel owners or operators to
provide to NMFS notice of
transshipments at least 36 hours prior to
any transshipment on the high seas and
to submit to NMFS reports of
transshipment following the
transshipment events.
Transshipment is also regulated under
other applicable law. For example, in
the Atlantic Ocean, transshipments are
generally prohibited, with some
exceptions. In the Pacific Ocean, purse
seine vessels are prohibited from
transshipping in some instances. NMFS
is aware that during 2006 to 2009, four
to eight vessels offloaded longlinecaught fish each year and four to eight
vessels received longline-caught fish
each year. It is likely that most of these
transshipments took place at sea by the
Hawaii-based longline fleet, but it is
unknown how many of these
transshipments took place on the high
seas. NMFS also has data on past
transshipments on the high seas
involving a few U.S. albacore troll
vessels.
Each transshipment notice is
estimated to take about 15 minutes and
no more than $1 in communication
costs to prepare and submit to NMFS.
Each transshipment report is
estimated to take about 60 minutes and
$1 in communication costs for
submitting each report to NMFS. Thus,
for each transshipment event on the
high seas, the time burden is estimated
to be 1 hour and 15 minutes and cost
$2 for each U.S. flagged vessel involved
in the transshipment.
Reporting Requirements. Existing
regulations require submission of high
seas fishing logbooks. This proposed
rule deletes that requirement under the
HSFCA, and instead, provides that
owners and operators of high seas
fishing vessels would use the reporting
forms developed for their authorized
fisheries to report high seas catch and
effort information. Given that the former
reporting requirements would not be
changed in a substantive way, the
associated compliance cost would be
unchanged.
The reporting requirements described
above would amend an existing
collection of information, (OMB Control
No. 0648–0304) and these amendments
are subject to approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Summary. The proposed rule would
increase the cost of operating on the
high seas for all affected entities.
Fulfillment of these requirements is not
expected to require any professional
skills that the vessel owners and
operators do not already possess.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
Significant Alternatives Considered
NMFS attempted to identify
alternatives that would accomplish the
objectives of the rulemaking and
minimize any significant economic
impact of the proposed rule on small
entities.
The alternative of taking no action
was rejected because it would fail to
achieve the objectives of the
rulemaking.
NMFS evaluated an option to rely on
existing permit programs, other than the
HSFCA permit program, to authorize
high seas fishing activities. However, by
continuing to require the separate
HSFCA permit, NMFS is able to
maintain a separate record of vessels
permitted to fish on the high seas,
facilitating NMFS’ ability to submit
information regarding U.S. high seas
vessels to the FAO as required in the
Compliance Agreement. FAO compiles
from the Parties to the Compliance
Agreement records of vessels authorized
to fish on the high seas. The separate
HSFCA permit, required under the
existing regulations to be carried on
board the vessel, is also useful in
demonstrating to any domestic
inspectors, foreign inspectors operating
under the authority of a high seas
boarding and inspection scheme
adopted by an RFMO to which the
United States is party, or foreign port
inspectors, that a vessel is permitted to
fish on the high seas.
With respect to the EMTU
requirement, one alternative would be
to require EMTU operation at all times,
which would provide NMFS the ability
to monitor a vessel’s location at any
time. However, NMFS is aware that
some vessels holding high seas fishing
permits may remain in the EEZ for
extended periods and are not currently
subject to EMTU operation requirements
while in the EEZ. Some of these vessels
may also dock their vessels and not
engage in fishing for portions of the
year. This alternative is not preferred
because the regulatory burden could be
minimized by providing some
exemptions to the EMTU operation
requirement, such as exemptions to
address the two circumstances
described above. The preferred
alternative would maintain the ability to
monitor high seas fishing vessels yet
minimize the regulatory burden.
Another alternative would be to
require EMTU operation only on the
high seas. However, allowing units to be
powered down while a vessel is in the
EEZ of the U.S. or of another country
would weaken the effectiveness of using
EMTU position information to monitor
the locations of high seas fishing
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
vessels. For vessels that are highly
mobile and could operate at any time of
the year, such as many high seas fishing
vessels, EMTUs are more effective if
they remain in operation at all times.
Allowing power-downs whenever in the
EEZ, aside from the in-port and longterm exemptions provided in the
proposed rule, could also encourage
non-compliance and result in large gaps
in NMFS’ ability to monitor high seas
fishing vessels. Thus, this alternative is
not preferred.
With respect to the requirement for
prior notice of high seas transshipments,
one alternative would be to allow
affected entities to provide the notice of
high seas transshipment to NMFS at
least one business day in advance of the
transshipment, rather than 36 hours as
proposed. However, a shorter advance
notice would reduce opportunities for
NMFS or the U.S. Coast Guard to
observe transshipments in the event
they are able to meet the transshipping
vessels at sea. For this reason, this
alternative is not preferred.
With respect to the transshipment
reporting requirements, one alternative
would be to impose a different
timeframe for submission of the report.
The report could be submitted more
than 15 days after completion of the
transshipment. However, NMFS
believes 15 days is a reasonable
timeframe, and that extending it further
could lead to NMFS not receiving
transshipment reports in a timely
manner and would not support
collection of complete information
regarding authorized fisheries.
Duplicative, Overlapping, and
Conflicting Rules
The proposed rule has been prepared
to be consistent with a number of
regulations. These include the
following:
• 50 CFR part 300, subpart C—Eastern
Pacific Tuna Fisheries
• 50 CFR part 300, subpart D—South
Pacific Tuna Fisheries
• 50 CFR part 300, subpart G—Antarctic
Marine Living Resources
• 50 CFR part 300, subpart O—Western
and Central Pacific Fisheries for
Highly Migratory Species
• 50 CFR part 635—Atlantic Highly
Migratory Species Fisheries
• 50 CFR part 660, subpart K—Pacific
Highly Migratory Species Fisheries
• 50 CFR part 665, subpart F—Western
Pacific Pelagic Fisheries
Below are some NMFS regulations
that have the same or similar regulatory
goals and regulate the same classes of
industry as the proposed rule. Although
the regulations and the proposed rule
contain the same or similar elements,
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
the proposed rule has been drafted so
that an entity would need to follow the
more restrictive set of requirements with
respect to EMTUs, observers, and
transshipment where applicable.
VMS EMTU requirements:
• § 300.45 (South Pacific Tuna
Fisheries)
• § 300.116 (Antarctic Marine Living
Resources)
• § 300.219 (Western and Central
Pacific Fisheries for HMS)
• § 635.69 (Atlantic HMS)
• § 660.359 (Pacific Coast Groundfish
Fisheries)
• § 660.712(d) (U.S. West Coast
Fisheries for HMS)
• § 665.19 (Western Pacific Pelagic
Fisheries)
• § 679.28 (Fisheries of the EEZ off
Alaska)
Observer requirements:
• § 300.22 (Eastern Pacific Tuna
Fisheries)
• § 300.43 (South Pacific Tuna
Fisheries)
• § 300.113 (Antarctic Marine Living
Resources)
• § 300.215 (Western and Central
Pacific Fisheries for HMS)
• § 635.7 (Atlantic HMS)
• § 660.719 (U.S. West Coast Fisheries
for HMS)
• § 665.808 (Western Pacific Pelagic
Fisheries)
Transshipment notices and reporting
requirements:
• § 300.46 (South Pacific Tuna
Fisheries)
• § 300.112(k) (Antarctic Marine Living
Resources)
• § 300.218 (Western and Central
Pacific Fisheries for HMS)
• § 665.801 (Western Pacific Pelagic
Fisheries)
• Final rule (77 FR 71501, January 2,
2013) for the Western and Central
Pacific Fisheries for Highly Migratory
Species
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
National Environmental Policy Act
As stated in NOAA’s Administrative
Order (NAO) 216–6 5.05b, an action
should be evaluated to determine
whether it falls into a category of actions
that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant impact on the quality
of the human environment, and thus, is
exempt from further environmental
review under NEPA. That analysis
should determine if (1) a prior NEPA
analysis for the ‘‘same’’ action
demonstrated that the action will not
have significant impacts on the quality
of the human environment
(considerations in determining whether
the action is the ‘‘same’’ as a prior
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
19623
action may include, among other things,
the nature of the action, the geographic
area of the action, the species affected,
the season, the size of the area, etc.) or
(2) the action is likely to result in
significant impacts, as defined in 40
CFR 1508.27 and NAO 216–6 Section
6.01b. NMFS analyzed the proposed
rule using these criteria and has
preliminarily determined that this
proposed rule can be categorically
excluded under 6.03c.3(i) of NAO 216–
6. The provisions of the rule are
administrative in nature and facilitate
monitoring of all high seas fishing
vessels. The requirements for the
installation of VMS EMTUs on vessels,
the carrying of observers, and the prior
notice and reporting of transshipments
on the high seas would facilitate
monitoring of vessels and would not
have any impacts on the human
environment. Moreover, the proposed
rule also includes procedures that
incorporate reviews under ESA and
NEPA prior to any authorization of
activities on the high seas.
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
on these or any other aspects of the
collection of information to Mark
Wildman, Office for International
Affairs and Seafood Inspection at the
ADDRESSES above, and by email to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax
to (202) 395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains a
collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by OMB
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). This requirement has been
submitted to OMB for approval. The
current collection of information, under
OMB Control No. 0648–0304, includes a
permit application, vessel marking
requirements, and high seas fishing
effort and catch reporting. In addition to
this collection of information, the
proposed rule includes new
requirements listed below.
The public reporting burden for each
proposed requirement has been
estimated, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information per response. The
estimates are as follows:
• Inclusion of a vessel photograph in
the permit application: 30 minutes.
• Request for a fishery to be
authorized on the high seas: 110 hours.
• EMTU purchase and installation: 4
hour for purchase, installation, and
activation of the EMTU and submittal of
the installation and activation report.
• Position reports: Automatically sent
by the EMTU.
• Notices of EMTU power-down and
power-up: 10 minutes each.
• Prior notice for high seas
transshipments: 15 minutes.
• Transshipment reporting: 1 hour.
Public comment is sought regarding:
Whether this proposed collection of
List of Subjects
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50 CFR Part 300
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing
vessels, Foreign relations,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Statistics.
50 CFR Part 600
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing
vessels, Foreign relations,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Statistics.
50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and
procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaiian Natives,
Indians, Northern Mariana Islands,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
50 CFR Part 665
Accountability measures, Annual
catch limits, Fisheries, Fishing, Western
and central Pacific.
Dated: April 8, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR parts 300, 600, 660
and 665 are proposed to be amended as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
19624
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
PART 300—INTERNATIONAL
FISHERIES REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 300
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 951 et seq., 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 5501 et seq., 16 U.S.C.
2431 et seq., 31 U.S.C. 9701 et seq.
Subpart B—[Removed and Reserved]
2. Remove and reserve subpart B,
consisting of § 300.10 through 300.17.
■ 3. Add subpart Q to read as follows:
■
Subpart Q—High Seas Fisheries
Sec.
300.330 Purpose.
300.331 Definitions.
300.332 Issuing offices.
300.333 Vessel permits.
300.334 Fisheries authorized on the high
seas.
300.335 Bottom fishing.
300.336 Vessel identification.
300.337 Requirements for Enhanced Mobile
Transceiver Units (EMTUs).
300.338 Observers.
300.339 Transshipment on the high seas.
300.340 Prohibitions.
300.341 Reporting.
Subpart Q—High Seas Fisheries
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.
§ 300.330
Purpose.
This subpart implements the High
Seas Fishing Compliance Act of 1995
(Act), which requires the Secretary to
license U.S. vessels fishing on the high
seas and to ensure that such vessels do
not operate in contravention of
international conservation and
management measures recognized by
the United States.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 300.331
Definitions.
In addition to the terms defined in
section 300.2 and those in the Act and
the Agreement to Promote Compliance
with International Conservation and
Management Measures by Fishing
Vessels on the High Seas, adopted by
the Conference of the Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations on November 24, 1993
(Agreement), the terms used in this
subpart have the following meanings. If
a term is defined differently in section
300.2, the Act, or the Agreement, the
definition in this section shall apply.
Bottom fishing means fishing using
gear that is likely to contact the seafloor
during the normal course of fishing
operations.
Enhanced mobile transceiver unit
(EMTU) is defined in § 600.1500 of this
chapter.
High seas means the waters beyond
the territorial sea or exclusive economic
zone (or the equivalent) of any Nation,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
to the extent that such territorial sea or
exclusive economic zone (or the
equivalent) is recognized by the United
States.
High seas fishing permit means a
permit issued under this subpart.
High seas fishing vessel means any
vessel of the United States used or
intended for use on the high seas for the
purpose of the commercial exploitation
of living marine resources and as a
harvesting vessel, mothership, or any
other support vessel directly engaged in
a fishing operation. Support vessels
include vessels that process or transship
fish on the high seas; provide supplies,
personnel or fuel on the high seas to
other fishing vessels; or conduct other
activities in support of, or in
preparation for fishing.
International conservation and
management measures means measures
to conserve or manage one or more
species of living marine resources that
are adopted and applied in accordance
with the relevant rules of international
law, as reflected in the 1982 United
Nations Convention on the Law of the
Sea, and that are recognized by the
United States. Such measures may be
adopted by global, regional, or subregional fisheries organizations, subject
to the rights and obligations of their
members, or by treaties or other
international agreements.
Observer means any person serving in
the capacity of an observer employed by
NMFS, either directly or under contract
with a third party, or certified as an
observer by NMFS.
Office Director means the director of
the NMFS Office for International
Affairs and Seafood Inspection.
Regional Administrator means any
one of the Directors of a NMFS regional
office, defined under § 300.2.
Transship or transshipment means
offloading or receiving or otherwise
transferring fish or fish products from
one fishing vessel to another. Excluded
from this definition is net sharing,
which means the transfer of fish that
have not yet been loaded on board any
fishing vessel from the purse seine net
of one vessel to another fishing vessel.
Fish shall be considered to be on board
a fishing vessel once they are on a deck
or in a hold, or once they are first lifted
out of the water by the vessel.
Vessel monitoring system (VMS) is
defined in § 600.1500 of this title.
§ 300.332
Issuing offices.
Any Regional Administrator or the
Office Director may issue permits
required under this subpart. While
applicants for permits may submit an
application to any Regional
Administrator or the Office Director,
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
applicants are encouraged to submit
their applications (with envelopes
marked ‘‘Attn: HSFCA Permits’’) to the
Regional Administrator or the Office
Director with whom they normally
interact on fisheries matters.
§ 300.333
Vessel permits.
(a) Eligibility. (1) Any vessel owner or
operator of a high seas fishing vessel is
eligible to receive a permit for a fishery
authorized on the high seas under this
subpart, unless the vessel was
previously authorized to be used for
fishing on the high seas by a foreign
nation, and—
(i) The foreign nation suspended such
authorization, because the vessel
undermined the effectiveness of
international conservation and
management measures, and the
suspension has not expired; or
(ii) The foreign nation, within the 3
years preceding application for a permit
under this section, withdrew such
authorization, because the vessel
undermined the effectiveness of
international conservation and
management measures.
(2) The restrictions in paragraphs
(a)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section do not
apply if ownership of the vessel has
changed since the vessel undermined
the effectiveness of international
conservation and management
measures, and the new owner has
provided sufficient evidence to the
Regional Administrator or Office
Director demonstrating that the owner
and operator at the time the vessel
undermined the effectiveness of such
measures have no further legal,
beneficial, or financial interest in, or
control of, the vessel.
(3) The restrictions in paragraphs
(a)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section do not
apply if it is determined by the Regional
Administrator or Office Director that
issuing a permit would not subvert the
purposes of the Agreement.
(b) Applicability. Any high seas
fishing vessel used for fishing, as
defined under § 300.2, on the high seas
must have on board a valid permit
issued under this subpart.
(c) Application. Permit application
forms are available from the NMFS Web
site or from any Regional Administrator
or the Office Director. Failure to submit
a complete and accurate application,
along with all other required
documentation and the specified fee
will preclude issuance of a permit. To
apply for a permit under this subpart,
the owner or operator of a high seas
fishing vessel must submit the following
to a Regional Administrator or Office
Director:
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(1) A complete, accurate application
form signed by the vessel owner or
operator.
(2) Information required under this
section and § 300.334(a).
(3) A color photograph showing an
entire bow-to-stern side-view of the
vessel in its current form and
appearance. The photograph must
clearly and legibly display the vessel
name and identification markings. If the
vessel’s form or appearance materially
changes (such as the vessel is painted
another color, the vessel’s identification
markings change, or the vessel
undergoes a structural modification) the
vessel owner and operator must submit
a new photograph of the vessel within
15 days of the change.
(4) For vessels with state registration
instead of U.S. Coast Guard
documentation, the applicant must
supply additional vessel information
that NMFS may request.
(5) The fee specified in the
application form. Payment by a
commercial instrument later determined
to be insufficiently funded will
invalidate any permit. NMFS charges
this fee to recover the administrative
expenses of permit issuance, and the
amount of the fee is determined in
accordance with the procedures of the
NOAA Finance Handbook.
(d) Permit issuance and validity. (1)
Except as provided for in subpart D of
15 CFR part 904, and subject to
paragraphs (a), (c), and (d)(2) and (3),
the Regional Administrator or Office
Director will issue a permit, which will
include applicable conditions or
restrictions, within 15 days of receipt of
a completed application and payment of
the appropriate fee.
(2) The Regional Administrator or
Office Director will not issue a permit
unless an EMTU has been installed and
activated on the vessel in accordance
with § 300.337(c)(2).
(3) The Regional Administrator or
Office Director will not issue a permit
unless the applicant holds a valid
permit for the subject vessel for U.S.
domestic fisheries related to the
authorized high seas fishery.
(4) Except as otherwise provided,
permits issued under this subpart are
valid for 5 years from the date of
issuance. For a permit to remain valid
to its expiration date, the vessel’s U.S.
Coast Guard documentation or state
registration must be kept current. A
permit issued under this subpart is void
when the vessel owner or the name of
the vessel changes, or in the event the
vessel is no longer eligible for U.S.
documentation, such documentation is
revoked or denied, or the vessel is
removed from such documentation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
(5) A permit issued under this subpart
is not transferable or assignable to
another vessel or owner; it is valid only
for the vessel and owner to which it is
issued.
(e) Display. A valid permit, or a copy
thereof, issued under this subpart must
be on board any high seas fishing vessel
while operating on the high seas and
available for inspection by an
authorized officer.
(f) Change in application information.
Any changes in vessel documentation
status or other permit application
information must be reported in writing
to the Regional Administrator or Office
Director who issued the permit within
15 days of such changes.
(g) Renewal. Application for renewal
of a permit prior to its expiration is the
responsibility of the permit holder and
may be completed per § 300.333(c). The
Regional Administrator or Office
Director will not consider a permit
renewal application to be complete until
the permit holder satisfies all required
fishing activity report requirements
under the permit and § 300.342. The
Regional Administrator or Office
Director will not issue a renewed permit
unless an EMTU has been activated on
the vessel in accordance with
§ 300.337(c)(2) and the applicant holds
a valid permit for the subject vessel for
U.S. domestic fisheries related to the
authorized high seas fishery.
(h) Marine mammals and ESA-listed
species. Permits issued under this
section do not authorize vessels or
persons subject to the jurisdiction of the
United States to take marine mammals
or ESA-listed species. No marine
mammals or ESA-listed species may be
taken in the course of fishing operations
unless the taking is allowed under the
Marine Mammal Protection Act or the
Endangered Species Act (ESA),
pursuant to regulations, an
authorization, or permit granted by
NMFS or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
(i) Permit status changes. NMFS may
modify, suspend, or revoke a permit
issued under this subpart if permitted
activities may impact living marine
resources in ways that were not foreseen
or anticipated at the time of permit
issuance; are in contravention of an
international conservation and
management measure; or violate any
applicable law. NMFS will notify an
affected permit holder of any change in
permit status by contacting the permit
holder at the address of record provided
on the permit application or as updated
pursuant to paragraph (f) of this
subsection.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 300.334
seas.
19625
Fisheries authorized on the high
(a) When applying for a permit under
§ 300.333, the owner or operator of a
high seas fishing vessel must identify in
the application the authorized fisheries
in which he or she intends to fish. More
than one authorized fishery may be
selected. The following fisheries are
authorized on the high seas:
(1) 50 CFR part 300, Subpart C—Eastern
Pacific Tuna Fisheries
(2) 50 CFR part 300, Subpart D—South
Pacific Tuna Fisheries
(3) 50 CFR part 300, Subpart G—
Antarctic Marine Living Resources
(4) 50 CFR part 635—Atlantic Highly
Migratory Species Fisheries
(5) 50 CFR part 660, Subpart K—U.S.
West Coast Fisheries for Highly
Migratory Species
(6) 50 CFR part 665, Subpart F—
Western Pacific Pelagic Fisheries
(7) South Pacific Albacore Troll Fishery
(8) Northwest Atlantic Fishery
(b) For each of the authorized
fisheries specified on the high seas
fishing permit, the owner or operator of
the high seas fishing vessel must:
(1) Abide by the regulations, set forth
in other parts of this chapter and
Chapter VI, governing those authorized
fisheries while operating on the high
seas;
(2) Obtain and renew any appropriate
permits or authorizations; and
(3) Notify the Regional Administrator
or Office Director who issued the permit
immediately in the event that a species
listed as threatened or endangered
under the ESA is taken incidental to the
fishing activities without authorization
under a relevant incidental take
statement.
(c) Change in authorized fisheries. If
a high seas fishing permit holder elects
to change the authorized fisheries
specified on the permit, he or she shall
notify the Regional Administrator or
Office Director who issued the permit of
the change(s) and shall obtain the
underlying permits for the authorized
fisheries prior to engaging in the fishery
on the high seas. Per the process under
§ 300.333(d), the Regional Administrator
or Office Director will then issue a
revised high seas fishing permit which
will expire 5 years from the original
effective date.
(d) Revision of authorized fisheries
list. Through rulemaking, NMFS will
add a fishery to, or delete a fishery from,
the list in paragraph (a) of this section.
NMFS may add or delete fisheries from
the list after completing any analyses
required under the Endangered Species
Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act,
National Environmental Policy Act, and
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
19626
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
other applicable laws. In taking such
action, NMFS, in consultation with the
relevant Regional Fishery Management
Council(s) where appropriate, will
consider, among other things, whether:
(1) The proposed fishing activities
would detrimentally affect the wellbeing of the stock of any regulated
species of fish, marine mammal, or
species listed as threatened or
endangered under the Endangered
Species Act;
(2) The proposed fishing activities
would be inconsistent with relevant
fishery management plans and their
implementing regulations or other
applicable law;
(3) Insufficient mechanisms exist to
effectively monitor the activities of
vessels engaged in the proposed fishing
activities; or
(4) The proposed fishing activities
would contravene international
conservation and management measures
recognized by the United States.
(e) Request for revision of authorized
fisheries list. A person may submit a
written request to the Office Director to
add a fishery to or delete a fishery from
the list. A request to delete a fishery
from the list of authorized fisheries
must include the name of the fishery;
information that addresses
considerations under paragraph (d) of
this section; and, if requested by NMFS,
any additional information necessary for
NMFS to conduct analyses required
under applicable laws. A request to add
a fishery to the list of authorized
fisheries must include the following
information:
(1) The species (target and incidental)
expected to be harvested and the
anticipated amounts of such harvest and
bycatch;
(2) The approximate times and places
when fishing is expected to take place,
the number and type of vessels expected
to participate, and the type, size, and
amount of gear expected to be used;
(3) A description of the specific area
that may be affected by the fishing
activities;
(4) A description of any anticipated
impacts on the environment, including
impacts on fisheries, marine mammals,
and species listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA or their
critical habitat;
(5) Other information that addresses
considerations under paragraph (d); and
(6) If requested by NMFS, any
additional information necessary for
NMFS to conduct analyses required
under applicable laws.
(7) Once all required information is
received to proceed with consideration
of a request, NMFS will publish in the
Federal Register a proposed rule, noting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
receipt of the request to add an
authorized fishery, and inviting
information and comments. Relevant
information received during the
comment period may be considered by
NMFS and, where appropriate, the
relevant Regional Fishery Management
Council(s) to analyze potential
environmental impacts of the fisheries
and develop any conditions or
restrictions. Based on its analysis,
considerations under paragraph (d) of
this section, and other relevant
considerations, NMFS would publish its
decision on the request in the Federal
Register.
(f) Deletion of a fishery from the
authorized fisheries list. NMFS will
delete (i.e., deauthorize) a fishery under
paragraph (d) or (e) of this section
through publication of a final rule.
NMFS will also provide notice to
affected permit holders by email at the
address provided to NMFS in the high
seas permit application and by
Registered Mail. When a fishery is
deleted from the list, any activities on
the high seas related to that fishery are
prohibited as of the effective date of the
final rule. In addition, the high seas
permit will be voided unless the permit
holder notifies NMFS that he or she
elects to change to another authorized
high seas fishery or continue in any
other authorized fisheries noted on the
permit. Once the applicant so notifies
NMFS and, if necessary, secures any
underlying permits necessary for
participation in another authorized high
seas fishery, the Regional Administrator
or Office Director will then issue a
revised high seas fishing permit per the
process under § 300.333(d). The revised
permit will expire 5 years from the
original effective date.
§ 300.335
Bottom fishing.
(a) Bottom fishing may be permitted
on the high seas when authorized by
international conservation and
management measures recognized by
the United States. For bottom fishing
activity not subject to international
conservation measures recognized by
the United States, a person who seeks to
engage in such fishing must request
authorization of a new high seas fishery
as described in § 300.334(e), then if the
fishery is authorized, must obtain all
applicable permits including a high seas
fishing permit issued under § 300.333.
NMFS may specify conditions in the
permit to mitigate adverse impacts on
VMEs, which may include the types of
conditions that have been adopted in
relevant RFMO measures recognized by
the United States.
(b) Permit. To be permitted under this
section, the owner or operator of a high
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
seas fishing vessel must follow the
procedures under § 300.334(e), or if he
or she seeks to change an existing
permit, must follow the procedures
under § 300.334(c).
§ 300.336
Vessel identification.
(a) General. A vessel permitted under
this subpart must be marked for
identification purposes in accordance
with this section.
(b) Marking. Vessels must be marked
either:
(1) In accordance with vessel
identification requirements specified in
Federal fishery regulations issued under
the Magnuson-Stevens Act or under
other Federal fishery management
statutes; or
(2) In accordance with the following
identification requirements:
(i) A vessel must be marked with its
international radio call sign (IRCS), or,
if not assigned an IRCS, must be marked
(in order of priority) with its Federal,
state, or other documentation number
appearing on its high seas fishing permit
and, if a WCPFC Area Endorsement has
been issued for the vessel under
§ 300.212, that documentation number
must be preceded by the characters
‘‘USA’’ and a hyphen (that is, ‘‘USA-’’);
(ii) The markings must be displayed at
all times on the vessel’s side or
superstructure, port and starboard, as
well as on a deck;
(iii) The markings must be placed so
that they do not extend below the
waterline, are not obscured by fishing
gear, whether stowed or in use, and are
clear of flow from scuppers or overboard
discharges that might damage or
discolor the markings;
(iv) Block lettering and numbering
must be used;
(v) The height of the letters and
numbers must be in proportion to the
size of the vessel as follows: For vessels
25 meters (m) and over in length overall,
the height of letters and numbers must
be no less than 1.0 m; for vessels 20 m
but less than 25 m in length overall, the
height of letters and numbers must be
no less than 0.8 m; for vessels 15 m but
less than 20 m in length overall, the
height of letters and numbers must be
no less than 0.6 m; for vessels 12 m but
less than 15 m in length overall, the
height of letters and numbers must be
no less than 0.4 m; for vessels 5 m but
less than 12 m in length overall, the
height of letters and numbers must be
no less than 0.3 m; and for vessels under
5 m in length overall, the height of
letters and numbers must be no less
than 0.1 m;
(vi) The height of the letters and
numbers to be placed on decks must be
no less than 0.3 m;
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(vii) The length of the hyphen(s), if
any, must be half the height (h) of the
letters and numbers;
(viii) The width of the stroke for all
letters, numbers, and hyphens must be
h/6;
(ix) The space between letters and/or
numbers must not exceed h/4 nor be
less than h/6;
(x) The space between adjacent letters
having sloping sides must not exceed h/
8 nor be less than h/10;
(xi) The marks must be white on a
black background, or black on a white
background;
(xii) The background must extend to
provide a border around the mark of no
less than h/6; and
(xiii) The marks and the background
must be maintained in good condition at
all times.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 300.337 Requirements for Enhanced
Mobile Transceiver Units (EMTUs).
(a) Vessel position information. The
owner or operator of a vessel issued a
permit under this subpart, or for which
such permit is required, must have
installed on board the vessel a NMFS
type-approved enhanced mobile
transceiver unit (EMTU). The operator
or owner of the vessel must ensure that
the EMTU is operational and properly
reporting positions to NMFS as required
by this section, except when exempt
under paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this
section. If the vessel is also subject to
EMTU requirements in other parts of
this title, the more restrictive
requirements apply.
(b) Contact information and business
hours. With respect to the requirements
in this section, vessel owners and
operators should consult with the
divisional office of the NOAA Office of
Law Enforcement (OLE) in, or nearest,
the Region issuing the permit under this
subpart. The OLE VMS Helpdesk in
OLE headquarters office may also be
contacted.
(c) EMTU installation and
activation—(1) EMTU installation. The
vessel owner or operator shall obtain
and have installed on the fishing vessel,
by a qualified marine electrician and in
accordance with any instructions
provided by the VMS Helpdesk or OLE
divisional office, a NMFS type-approved
EMTU. The vessel owner and operator
shall authorize NMFS to receive and
relay transmissions from the EMTU. The
vessel owner and operator shall arrange
for a type-approved mobile
communications service to receive and
transmit position reports and email
communications from the EMTU to
NMFS. NMFS makes available lists of
type-approved EMTUs and mobile
communications service providers.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
Vessel owners must ensure that the
EMTU and communications service
hardware purchased is type-approved
for all fisheries and regions in which
their vessel will be operating.
(2) EMTU activation. When an EMTU
is installed or reinstalled or the mobile
communications service provider
changes, or if directed by NMFS, the
vessel owner and operator shall prior to
leaving port:
(i) Turn on the EMTU to make it
operational;
(ii) Submit a VMS Installation and
Activation Certification form, or an
activation report as directed by OLE, to
the OLE divisional office within or
nearest to the region issuing the permit
under this subpart; and
(iii) Receive verbal or written
confirmation from NMFS that
transmissions are being received
properly from the EMTU.
(d) EMTU operation. Unless otherwise
provided below, and subject to more
restrictive requirements where
applicable, the vessel owner or operator
shall continuously operate the EMTU so
that it provides to NMFS position
information automatically transmitted,
every hour or as directed by OLE.
(1) In-port exemption: The EMTU may
be powered down when the vessel will
remain at a dock or permanent mooring
for more than 72 consecutive hours and
after the notice required in paragraph
(d)(3) of this section is submitted. When
powering up the EMTU after the in-port
exemption, the vessel owner or operator
must submit the report required in
paragraph (d)(4) of this section at least
2 hours before leaving port or mooring.
(2) Long-term exemption: The EMTU
may be powered down if the vessel will
not operate on the high seas or in any
fishery that requires EMTU operation
for more than 30 consecutive days and
after the notice required in paragraph
(d)(3) of this section is submitted. When
powering up the EMTU from the longterm exemption, the vessel owner or
operator must submit the report
required in paragraph (d)(4) of this
section.
(3) Prior to each power-down of the
EMTU, under paragraph (d)(1) or (2) of
this section, the vessel owner or
operator must report to the OLE
divisional office during business hours,
via email or other means as directed by
OLE: The vessel’s name; the vessel’s
official number; the intent to power
down the EMTU; the reason for powerdown; the port where the vessel is
docked or area where it will be
operating; and the full name, telephone,
and email contact information for the
vessel owner or operator.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19627
(4) When powering up the EMTU, the
vessel owner or operator must report to
the OLE divisional office during
business hours, via email or other
means as directed by OLE: The fact that
the EMTU has been powered up; the
vessel’s name; the vessel’s official
number; port name; intended fishery;
and full name, telephone, and email
contact information for the vessel owner
or operator.
(5) If the EMTU is powered up after
a long-term or in-port exemption, the
vessel owner must receive email
confirmation from the OLE divisional
office that EMTU transmissions are
being received properly before leaving
port, entering the high seas, or entering
a fishery that requires EMTU operation.
(e) Failure of EMTU. If the vessel
owner or operator becomes aware that
the EMTU has become inoperable or
that transmission of automatic position
reports from the EMTU has been
interrupted, or if notified by NMFS or
the U.S. Coast Guard that automatic
position reports are not being received
from the EMTU or that an inspection of
the EMTU has revealed a problem with
the performance of the EMTU, the
vessel owner or operator shall comply
with the following requirements:
(1) If the vessel is at port, the vessel
owner or operator shall repair or replace
the EMTU and comply with the
requirements in paragraph (c)(2) of this
section before the vessel leaves port.
(2) If the vessel is at sea, the vessel
owner, operator, or designee shall
contact the OLE divisional office by
telephone or email at the earliest
opportunity during business hours and
identify the caller, vessel name, vessel
location, and the type of fishing
permit(s). The vessel operator shall
follow the instructions provided by the
OLE divisional office, which could
include: Ceasing fishing, stowing fishing
gear, returning to port, or submitting
periodic position reports at specified
intervals by other means. The vessel
owner or operator must repair or replace
the EMTU and comply with the
requirements in paragraph (c)(2) of this
section within 30 days or before the
vessel leaves port, whichever is sooner.
(f) Related VMS requirements. Unless
specified otherwise in the high seas
fishing permit, a vessel owner’s and
operator’s compliance with
requirements in part 300, 635, 660, or
665 of this title relating to the
installation, carrying, and operation of
EMTUs will satisfy the requirements of
this section, if the requirements are the
same or more restrictive than those in
this section and provided that:
(1) On the high seas, the EMTU is
operated continuously and position
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
19628
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
information is automatically transmitted
every hour;
(2) The EMTU is type-approved by
NMFS;
(3) The vessel owner or operator has
authorized NMFS to receive and relay
transmissions from the EMTU; and
(4) The requirements of paragraph (d)
of this section are complied with. If the
EMTU is owned by NMFS, the
requirement under paragraph (e) of this
section to repair or replace the EMTU
will be the responsibility of NMFS, but
the vessel owner and operator shall be
responsible for ensuring that the EMTU
complies with the requirements
specified in paragraph (c)(2) of this
section before the vessel leaves port.
(g) Costs. The vessel owner and
operator shall be responsible for all
costs associated with the purchase,
installation, operation, and maintenance
of the EMTU and for all charges levied
by vendors as necessary to ensure the
transmission of automatic position
reports to NMFS as required in
paragraph (c) of this section. However,
if the EMTU is being carried and
operated in compliance with the
requirements in part 300, 635, 660, or
665 of this title relating to the
installation, carrying, and operation of
EMTUs, the vessel owner and operator
shall not be responsible for any costs
that are the responsibility of NMFS
under those regulations.
(h) Tampering. The vessel owner and
operator shall ensure that the EMTU is
not tampered with, disabled, destroyed,
damaged or operated improperly, and
that its operation is not impeded or
interfered with.
(i) Inspection. The vessel owner and
operator shall make the EMTU,
including its antenna, connectors and
antenna cable, available for inspection
by authorized officers or by officers
conducting boarding and inspection
under a scheme adopted by an RFMO of
which the United States is a member.
(j) Access to data. As required under
fishery-specific regulations in other
parts of this title, the vessel owner and
operator shall make the vessel’s position
data, obtained from the EMTU or other
means, available to authorized officers
and to any inspector conducting a high
seas boarding and inspection pursuant
to a scheme adopted by an RFMO of
which the United States is a member.
(k) Communication devices. (1) In
cases of EMTU failure as specified
under paragraph (e) of this section, and
to facilitate communication with
management and enforcement
authorities regarding the functioning of
the EMTU and other purposes, the
vessel operator shall, while the vessel is
at sea, carry on board and continuously
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
monitor a two-way communication
device, in addition to the EMTU, that is
capable of real-time communication
with the OLE divisional office.
§ 300.338
Observers.
(a) Where observer coverage is not
otherwise required by other regulations
or relevant RFMO conservation and
management measures, NMFS may
select for at-sea observer coverage any
vessel that has been issued a high seas
fishing permit. A vessel so selected by
NMFS must carry an observer when
directed to do so.
(b) NMFS will contact a vessel owner,
in writing, when his or her vessel is
selected for observer coverage under
this section.
(c) A vessel shall not fish on the high
seas without taking an observer if NMFS
contacted the vessel owner under
paragraph (b) of this section, or if so
required as a condition of a permit
issued under this subpart or pursuant to
other legal authorities, unless the
requirement to carry an observer has
been waived under paragraph (d) of this
section.
(d) The vessel owner that NMFS
contacts under paragraph (b) of this
section must notify NMFS of his or her
next fishing trip that may take place on
the high seas before commencing the
fishing trip. NMFS will specify the
notification procedures and information
requirements, such as expected gear
deployment, trip duration and fishing
area, in its selection letter. Once notified
of a trip by the vessel owner, NMFS will
assign an observer for that trip or notify
the vessel owner that coverage pursuant
to this subpart is not required, given the
existing requirement for observer
coverage under other legal authorities.
(e) The owner, operator, and crew of
a vessel on which a NMFS-approved
observer is assigned must comply with
safety regulations at §§ 600.725 and
600.746 of this title and—
(1) Facilitate the safe embarkation and
debarkation of the observer.
(2) Provide the observer with
accommodations, food, and amenities
that are equivalent of those provided to
vessel officers.
(3) Allow the observer access to all
areas of the vessel necessary to conduct
observer duties.
(4) Allow the observer free and
unobstructed access to the vessel’s
bridge, working decks, holding bins,
weight scales, holds, and any other
space used to hold, process, weigh, or
store fish.
(5) Allow the observer access to
EMTUs, communications equipment,
and navigation equipment to verify
operation, obtain data, and use the
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
communication capabilities of the units
for official purposes.
(6) Allow the observer to inspect and
copy the vessel’s log, communications
logs, and any records associated with
the catch and disposition of fish for that
trip.
(7) Provide accurate vessel locations
by latitude and longitude upon request
by the observer.
(8) Provide access to sea turtle, marine
mammal, sea bird, or other specimens as
requested by the observer.
(9) Notify the observer in a timely
fashion when commercial fishing
activity is to begin and end.
(f) The permit holder, vessel operator,
and crew must cooperate with the
observer in the performance of the
observer’s duties.
(g) The permit holder, vessel operator,
and crew must comply with other terms
and conditions to ensure the effective
deployment and use of observers that
the Regional Administrator or Office
Director imposes by written notice.
§ 300.339
Transshipment on the high seas.
(a) In addition to any other applicable
restrictions on transshipment, including
those under parts 300 and 635 of this
title, the following requirements apply
to transshipments taking place on the
high seas:
(1) The owner or operator of a U.S.
vessel receiving or offloading fish on the
high seas shall provide a notice by fax
or email to the Regional Administrator
or the Office Director at least 36 hours
prior to any intended transshipment on
the high seas with the following
information: The vessels offloading and
receiving the transshipment (names,
official numbers, and vessel types); the
location (latitude and longitude to the
nearest tenth of a degree) of
transshipment; date and time that
transshipment is expected to occur; and
species, processed state, and quantities
(in metric tons) expected to be
transshipped. If another requirement for
prior notice applies, the more restrictive
requirement (i.e. a requirement for
greater advance notice and/or more
specific information regarding vessels,
location etc.) must be followed.
(2) U.S. high seas fishing vessels shall
report transshipments on the high seas
to the Regional Administrator or Office
Director within 15 calendar days after
the vessel first enters into port, using
the form obtained from the Regional
Administrator or Office Director. If there
are applicable transshipment reporting
requirements in other parts of this title,
the more restrictive requirement (e.g., a
reporting requirement of fewer than 15
calendar days) must be followed.
(b) [Reserved]
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 300.340
Prohibitions.
In addition to the prohibitions in
§ 300.4, it is unlawful for any person to:
(a) Use a high seas fishing vessel on
the high seas in contravention of
international conservation and
management measures.
(b) Fish on the high seas unless the
vessel has been issued, and has on
board, a valid permit issued under
§ 300.333(d).
(c) Fish on the high seas unless the
vessel has been issued, and has on
board, valid permits related to the
authorized fisheries noted on the high
seas fishing permit, as required under
§ 300.334(b).
(d) Operate a high seas fishing vessel
on the high seas that is not marked in
accordance with § 300.336.
(e) With respect to the EMTU,
(1) Fail to install, activate, or
continuously operate a properly
functioning and type-approved EMTU
as required in § 300.337;
(2) Power-down or power-up the
EMTU without following the procedures
required in § 300.337;
(3) In the event of EMTU failure or
interruption, fail to repair or replace an
EMTU, fail to notify the appropriate
OLE divisional office and follow the
instructions provided, or otherwise fail
to act as required in § 300.337;
(4) Disable, destroy, damage or
operate improperly an EMTU installed
under § 300.337, attempt to do any of
the same, or fail to ensure that its
operation is not impeded or interfered
with, as provided in § 300.337;
(5) Fail to make an EMTU installed
under § 300.337 or the position data
obtained from it available for
inspection, as provided in § 300.337; or
(6) Fail to carry on board and monitor
communication devices as required in
§ 300.337(l);
(f) With respect to observers,
(1) Fail to provide to an observer, a
NMFS employee, or a designated
observer provider, information that has
been requested pursuant to § 300.338 or
§ 600.746 of this title, or fail to allow an
observer, a NMFS employee, or a
designated observer provider to inspect
any item described at § 300.338 or
§ 600.746 of this title;
(2) Fish without an observer when the
vessel is required to carry an observer
pursuant to § 300.338(c);
(3) Assault, oppose, impede,
intimidate, or interfere with an observer;
(4) Prohibit or bar by command,
impediment, threat, coercion,
interference, or refusal of reasonable
assistance, an observer from conducting
his or her duties as an observer; or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:39 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
(5) Tamper with or destroy samples or
equipment.
(g) Fail to submit a prior notice or a
report of a transshipment as provided in
§ 300.339(b) of this title.
(h) Fail to comply with reporting
requirements as provided in § 300.341.
§ 300.341
Reporting.
(a) General. The operator of any vessel
permitted under this subpart must
accurately maintain on board the vessel
a complete record of fishing activities,
such as catch, effort, and other data and
report high seas catch and effort
information to NMFS in a manner
consistent with the reporting
requirements of the authorized
fishery(ies) noted on the high seas
permit. Reports must include:
Identification information for vessel and
operator; operator signature; crew size;
whether an observer is aboard; target
species; gear used; dates, times,
locations, and conditions under which
fishing was conducted; species and
amounts of fish retained and discarded;
and details of any interactions with sea
turtles, marine mammals, or birds.
(1) The vessel owner and operator are
responsible for obtaining and
completing the reporting forms from the
Regional Administrator or Office
Director who issued the permit holder’s
high seas fishing permit. The completed
forms must be submitted to the same
Regional Administrator or Office
Director or, if directed by NMFS, to a
Science Center.
(2) Reports must be submitted within
the deadline provided for in the
authorized fishery or within 15 days
following the end of a fishing trip,
whichever is sooner. Contact
information for the Regional
Administrators and Science Center
Directors can be found on the NMFS
Web site.
(b) [Reserved].
PART 600—MAGNUSON-STEVENS
ACT PROVISIONS
4. The authority citation for part 600
continues to read as follows:
operating on the high seas must obtain
a permit issued pursuant to the High
Seas Fishing Compliance Act.
■ 5. In § 600.745, revise the first two
sentences in paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
§ 600.745 Scientific research activity,
exempted fishing, and exempted
educational activity.
(a) Scientific research activity.
Nothing in this part is intended to
inhibit or prevent any scientific research
activity conducted by a scientific
research vessel. Persons planning to
conduct scientific research activities on
board a scientific research vessel in the
EEZ or on the high seas are encouraged
to submit to the appropriate Regional
Administrator or Director, 60 days or as
soon as practicable prior to its start, a
scientific research plan for each
scientific activity. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES
6. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16
U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
7. In § 660.2, add paragraph (c) to read
as follows:
■
§ 660.2
5. In § 600.705, add paragraph (g) to
read as follows:
■
§ 600.705
Relation to other laws.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) High seas fishing activities.
Regulations governing permits and
requirements for fishing activities on the
high seas are set forth in 50 CFR part
300, subparts A and Q. Any vessel
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
Relation to other laws.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Fishing activities on the high seas
are governed by regulations of the High
Seas Fishing Compliance Act set forth
in 50 CFR part 300, subparts A and Q.
§ 660.708
[Amended]
8. In § 660.708, remove paragraph
(a)(1)(iii) and redesignate paragraph
(a)(1)(iv) as paragraph (a)(1)(iii).
■
PART 665—FISHERIES IN THE
WESTERN PACIFIC
9. The authority citation for part 665
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 561 and 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.
19629
10. In § 665.1, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
■
§ 665.1
Purpose and scope.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) General regulations governing
fishing by all vessels of the United
States and by fishing vessels other than
vessels of the United States are
contained in 50 CFR parts 300 and 600.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–08425 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19611-19629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08425]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Parts 300, 600, 660, and 665
[Docket No. 070516126-5292-03]
RIN 0648-AV12
International Affairs; High Seas Fishing Compliance Act;
Permitting and Monitoring of U.S. High Seas Fishing Vessels
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulatory changes to improve the administration
of the High Seas Fishing Compliance Act program and the monitoring of
U.S. fishing vessels operating on the high seas. The proposed rule
includes, for all U.S. fishing vessels operating on the high seas,
adjustments to permitting and reporting procedures. It also includes
requirements for the installation and operation of enhanced mobile
transceiver units for vessel monitoring, carrying observers on vessels,
reporting of transshipments taking place on the high seas, and
protection of vulnerable marine ecosystems. This proposed rule has been
prepared to minimize duplication and to be consistent with other
established requirements.
DATES: Written comments must be received by May 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on this action, identified by NOAA-NMFS-
2015-0052, may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-0052, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments. Mail: Mark Wildman, Trade and Marine Stewardship
Division, Office for International Affairs and Seafood Inspection,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
Comments must be submitted by one of the above methods to ensure
that the comments are received, documented, and considered by NMFS.
Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual,
or received after the end of the comment period may not be considered.
All comments received are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov without
change. All personal identifying information (such as name or address)
submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive or
protected information. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/
A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
proposed rule may be submitted to Mark Wildman, NMFS, Office for
International Affairs and Seafood Inspection (see address above) and by
email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Wildman, Trade and Marine
Stewardship Division, Office for International Affairs and Seafood
Inspection, NMFS (phone 301-427-8386 or email mark.wildman@noaa.gov).
[[Page 19612]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The purposes of the High Seas Fishing Compliance Act (HSFCA; 16
U.S.C. 5501 et seq.) are (1) to implement the Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Agreement to Promote
Compliance with International Conservation and Management Measures by
Fishing Vessels on the High Seas (Compliance Agreement) and (2) to
establish a system of permitting, reporting and regulation for vessels
of the United States fishing on the high seas. 16 U.S.C. 5501. ``High
seas'' is defined in the HSFCA and its implementing regulations as
waters beyond the territorial sea or exclusive economic zone (or the
equivalent) of any nation, to the extent that such territorial sea or
exclusive economic zone (or the equivalent) is recognized by the United
States. 16 U.S.C. 5502 (3); 50 CFR 300.11.
The HSFCA authorizes a system of permitting U.S. fishing vessels
that operate on the high seas to satisfy the obligation of Parties to
the Compliance Agreement (Parties) to require that fishing vessels
flying their flags obtain specific authorization to operate on the high
seas. The HSFCA requires the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to
establish conditions and restrictions on each permit issued under HSFCA
as necessary and appropriate to carry out the obligations of the United
States under the Compliance Agreement. 16 U.S.C. 5503 (d). At a
minimum, such conditions and restrictions must include the marking of
the permitted vessel in accordance with the FAO Standard Specifications
for the Marking and Identification of Fishing Vessels, and reporting of
fishing activities. Parties are also responsible for ensuring that
their authorized vessels do not undermine conservation and management
measures, including those adopted by international fisheries management
organizations, or by treaties or other international agreements.
Accordingly, the HSFCA prohibits the use of fishing vessels on the high
seas in contravention of international conservation and management
measures recognized by the United States. 16 U.S.C. 5505 (1). A list of
the international conservation and management measures recognized by
the United States is published by NMFS in the Federal Register from
time to time in consultation with the Secretary of State, as required
by section 5504(e) of the HSFCA. The last such notice was published on
May 19, 2011 (76 FR 28954). NMFS reinforces this prohibition by
requiring a high seas fishing permit for any vessel operating on the
high seas and, in that permit, authorizing only those activities that
would not undermine international conservation and management measures
recognized by the United States. The HSFCA also gives NMFS discretion
to impose permit terms and requirements pursuant to other applicable
law, such as the Endangered Species Act, the Marine Mammal Protection
Act, in addition to international conservation and management measures
recognized by the United States. See Turtle Island Restoration Network
v. National Marine Fisheries Service, 340 F.3d 969 (9th Cir. 2003).
Finally, the HSFCA authorizes NMFS to promulgate regulations ``as
may be necessary to carry out the purposes of the Agreement and [the
Act],'' including its permitting authorities. In promulgating such
regulations, NMFS shall ensure that ``[t]o the extent practicable, such
regulations shall also be consistent with regulations implementing
fishery management plans under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,'' 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., which
provides broad authority to establish measures for the conservation and
management of fisheries, id. 1853(b)(14).
Regulations implementing the HSFCA were first promulgated in 1996
(61 FR 11751, March 22, 1996). The initial regulations included
application and issuance procedures for high seas fishing permits.
Subsequent regulations promulgated in 1999 (64 FR 13, January 4, 1999)
specified how high seas fishing vessels must be marked for
identification purposes and required reporting by vessel owners and
operators of catch and fishing effort when fishing on the high seas.
An objective of this rulemaking is to codify NMFS' procedures for
review of its high seas fishing authorizations under environmental
laws, particularly the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Another objective of this proposed
rule is to improve the monitoring of U.S. fishing vessels operating on
the high seas. Improving such monitoring would enhance the U.S.
government's ability to ensure compliance with international
conservation and management measures with respect to U.S. fishing
vessels operating on the high seas. Furthermore, this proposed rule
adds a section describing how NMFS will, through high seas permit
conditions, address impacts to vulnerable marine ecosystems from bottom
fishing consistent with international conservation and management
measures recognized by the United States.
NMFS is proposing substantive changes to the HSFCA regulations at
50 CFR part 300, subpart B, and also redesignation of the regulations
as Subpart Q. Table 1 shows how the sections currently in Subpart B
would be redesignated in Subpart Q. The substance of the following
sections would not be changed: Sec. 300.10 (redesignated to 300.330)
and Sec. 300.13(a) (redesignated to 300.333(a)). Other sections are
new or would be modified per this rulemaking, as explained below.
Table 1--Redesignation of Sections in 50 CFR Part 300, Subpart B to
Subpart Q
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed subpart Q sections Current subpart B sections
------------------------------------------------------------------------
300.330 Purpose............................ 300.10.
300.331 Definitions........................ 300.11.
300.332 Issuing offices.................... 300.12.
300.333 Vessel permits..................... 300.13.
300.334 Fisheries authorized on the high New section.
seas.
300.335 Bottom fishing..................... New section.
300.336 Vessel identification.............. 300.14.
300.337 Requirements for Enhanced Mobile New section.
Transceiver Units.
300.338 Observers.......................... New section.
300.339 Transshipment on the high seas..... New section.
300.340 Prohibitions....................... 300.15.
300.341 Reporting.......................... 300.17.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 19613]]
Coordination With Other Laws
U.S. vessels fishing on the high seas are subject to the
requirements of multiple U.S. regulations and laws, depending on the
geographic area of the fishing activity, gear used, target fish
species, and other factors. Such vessels can be subject to regulations
that implement fishery management plans (FMPs) adopted pursuant to the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-
Stevens Act; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) and laws and regulations
implementing international fisheries agreements. Section 105 of the
HSFCA specifies that regulations should minimize duplication of license
application and reporting requirements contained in other regulations
applicable to U.S. vessels used for fishing on the high seas and, to
the extent practicable, such regulations must be consistent with
regulations implementing FMPs under the Magnuson-Stevens Act. 16 U.S.C.
5504 (d). Recognizing that the HSFCA requirements can overlap with
other requirements, this proposed rule has been prepared to minimize
duplication and to be consistent with other applicable requirements.
In addition to the HSFCA, the following FMPs and laws, and their
associated regulations, have provisions that may apply to U.S. vessels'
fishing activities on the high seas:
Fishery Ecosystem Plan for Pacific Pelagic Fisheries of
the Western Pacific Region and its amendments, 50 CFR part 665, subpart
F,
FMP for U.S. West Coast Fisheries for Highly Migratory
Species and its amendments, 50 CFR part 660, subpart K,
2006 Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species FMP
and its amendments, 50 CFR part 635,
Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of 1975, 16 U.S.C. 971 et
seq.,
Antarctic Marine Living Resources Convention Act of 1984,
16 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.,
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Convention Act of 1995, 16
U.S.C. 5601 et seq.,
South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988, 16 U.S.C. 973 et seq.,
Tuna Conventions Act of 1950, 16 U.S.C. 951 et seq.,
Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Convention
Implementation Act, 16 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.,
Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., and
Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
Any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States must
abide by the take prohibitions of, and all applicable regulations
implemented under, the ESA and the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA)
on U.S. territory, in U.S. waters, and on the high seas, which
includes, for the purposes of the MMPA and ESA, waters within foreign
nations' Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ) up to the seaward boundaries of
the territorial seas of such nations. For all authorized high seas
fisheries, NMFS issues permits only after a determination, in
accordance with section 7 of the ESA and in consultation within NMFS or
with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as appropriate, that the
authorization of the fishery on the high seas is not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of endangered and threatened
species. 16 U.S.C. 1536. Such consultations can result in permit
conditions to minimize impacts on threatened and endangered species.
Since 2009, fisheries on the high seas have been included in the
List of Fisheries published each year pursuant to the MMPA. 16 U.S.C.
1387(c)(1). The List of Fisheries classifies U.S. commercial fisheries
into one of three categories based on an estimated level of mortality
and serious injury of marine mammal stocks incidental to commercial
fishing operations. See 50 CFR 229.2. Category I and II fisheries are
those in which incidental injury or death of marine mammals is frequent
or occasional, respectively. Category II fisheries may also include
fisheries for which reliable information about the frequency of
incidental injury or mortality is lacking. Eligible commercial
fisheries not specifically identified in the list of fisheries are
deemed to be Category II fisheries until the next list of fisheries is
published. Category III fisheries are determined to have a remote
likelihood of, or no known, incidental mortality or serious injury of
marine mammals.
The majority of high seas fisheries are classified as Category II
because of the lack of information on the frequency of incidental
mortality and serious injury of marine mammals in the fisheries. Other
high seas fisheries are classified as Category I, II or III because
they are considered extensions of fisheries taking place within U.S.
waters and therefore are classified in the same category as those
fisheries. Owners of vessels with gear that fall within a Category I or
II fishery are required under the MMPA regulations, as described in 50
CFR 229.4 to 229.7, to (1) register with NMFS and obtain a marine
mammal authorization certificate to lawfully take a marine mammal
incidental to commercial fishing and (2) carry an observer if requested
by NMFS. MMPA regulations do not require owners of vessels or gear
engaged in a Category III fishery to register with NMFS, obtain a
marine mammal authorization certificate, or, except in limited
circumstances, carry an observer pursuant to MMPA regulations.
The owner or operator of a vessel participating in a commercial
fishery listed on the List of Fisheries, regardless of classification,
is required to report any injury or death of a marine mammal incidental
to commercial fishing operations to NMFS within 48 hours of returning
from a fishing trip. 50 CFR 229.6.
Proposed Requirements for High Seas Fishing Vessels
The following sections provide further detail regarding proposed
requirements for the permit application process, enhanced mobile
transceiver units for vessel monitoring, observer coverage,
transshipment on the high seas, and protection of vulnerable marine
ecosystems on the high seas. A reference to the HSFCA would also be
added to 50 CFR parts 600 and 660, specifically Sec. 600.705 and Sec.
660.2, which list laws related to the Magnuson-Stevens Act, to alert
fishers who may be interested in fishing on the high seas to the
requirements in 50 CFR part 300. Also, a proposed revision of Sec.
600.745(a) would encourage any person who intends to conduct scientific
research on the high seas to obtain a Letter of Acknowledgement from
NMFS, as is currently done for such activities in U.S. waters.
Adjustments would also be made to other parts of CFR Title 50 because
of the redesignation of Subpart B to Subpart Q.
Definitions
Consistent with 16 U.S.C. 5502(4), NMFS proposes to revise the
definition of ``high seas fishing vessel'' in 50 CFR 300.331 by adding
the word ``and'' as underlined below to clarify that this term means
any vessel of the United States used or intended for use: (1) On the
high seas, (2) for the purpose of the commercial exploitation of living
marine resources, and (3) as a harvesting vessel, mother ship, or any
other support vessel directly engaged in a fishing operation. To
clarify the meaning of support vessels directly engaged in a fishing
operation, examples are included in the definition (vessels that
transship fish on the high seas, provide supplies or fuel on the high
seas to other fishing vessels, or conduct other activities in support
of, or in preparation for, fishing).
[[Page 19614]]
This rule proposes to revise the regulatory definition of
``international conservation and management measures'' by adding the
following sentence from the HSFCA definition: ``Such measures may be
adopted by global, regional, or sub-regional fisheries organizations,
subject to the rights and obligations of their members, or by treaties
or other international agreements.'' The change clarifies that
commitments made by the United States at international fisheries
management fora can be included in the term ``international
conservation and management measures'' to the extent necessary and
appropriate to carry out U.S. obligations under the Compliance
Agreement or for purposes of the HSFCA.
Definitions of bottom fishing, enhanced mobile transceiver unit,
transship, and vessel monitoring system would be added to the HSFCA
regulations and are discussed in the relevant sections below.
Issuing Offices
Section 300.12, redesignated as Sec. 300.332, would be revised to
specify that the Director of the NMFS Office for International Affairs
and Seafood Inspection, as well as Regional Administrators, may issue
high seas fishing permits for any authorized high seas fishery.
Vessel Permits
The permitting requirement under the HSFCA for vessels operating on
the high seas, currently set forth at Sec. 300.13 (redesignated as
Sec. 300.333), has been in effect since 1996. In general, any U.S.
vessel is eligible for a high seas fishing permit unless that vessel
had a permit from a foreign nation that was suspended and the
suspension has not expired or, during the 3 years prior to the
application date, the permit was withdrawn due to the vessel
undermining the effectiveness of an international conservation and
management measure.
High seas fishing permits are issued at any time of the year and
are valid for 5 years from the date of issuance, as provided in the
HSFCA. 16 U.S.C. 5503(f). For a permit to remain valid until its
expiration date, the vessel's U.S. Coast Guard documentation or state
registration must be kept current. A permit becomes immediately void
when the name of the owner or vessel changes or, in the event the
vessel is no longer eligible for U.S. documentation, such documentation
lapses or is revoked or denied, or the vessel is removed from such
documentation. Sec. 300.333(d)(4).
In developing this proposed rule, NMFS evaluated an option to rely
on fishery-specific permits for U.S. vessels operating on the high
seas, other than the HSFCA permit program, to authorize high seas
fishing activities. However, by continuing to require a separate high
seas fishing permit, in addition to any permit required for the
authorized high seas fishery in which the HSFCA permit applicant
intends to fish, NMFS is able to maintain a separate and more precise
record of vessels permitted to fish on the high seas and submit
information from this record to the FAO as required in the Compliance
Agreement. FAO compiles records of vessels authorized to fish on the
high seas from the Parties to the Compliance Agreement. The separate
high seas fishing permit, required under the existing regulations to be
carried on board the vessel, is also useful in demonstrating to any
domestic inspectors, any foreign inspectors operating under the
authority of a high seas boarding and inspection scheme adopted by an
RFMO to which the United States is party, or any foreign port
inspectors, that a vessel is authorized to fish on the high seas.
The proposed rule (Sec. 300.333(b)) provides that any high seas
fishing vessel engaging in fishing, as defined under Sec. 300.2, on
the high seas must have on board a valid permit issued under this
subpart. Under this new paragraph and the revised definition of high
seas fishing vessel, harvesting vessels, as well as vessels that are
involved in processing or transshipment of fish on the high seas in
fisheries where such activity is allowed, or providing supplies or fuel
on the high seas to a fishing vessel, must obtain a high seas fishing
permit prior to undertaking those activities.
Under proposed Sec. 300.333(c)(3), applicants would also need to
submit a color, bow-to-stern, side-view photograph of the vessel in its
current form and appearance legibly showing vessel name and
identification markings with each application. Vessel photographs would
be made available for use by NMFS, other agencies, RFMOs, and other
entities as an aid in identifying vessels authorized to fish on the
high seas.
In proposed Sec. 300.333(d), the existing timeframe for issuance
of permits would be amended in light of changes in the technology now
used to issue permits, which allow faster turnaround in permit
processing. Specifically, NMFS will issue HSFCA permits within 15 days
of receipt of a complete application and associated fees, rather than
30 days as provided in the existing HSFCA regulations. See Sec.
300.13(e).
Proposed Sec. 300.333(g) would clarify the need for high seas
permit renewal applicants to comply with all applicable reporting
requirements before a new permit would be issued.
The rule would also add, at Sec. 300.333(h), a reference to MMPA
requirements noting that high seas permits do not authorize vessels or
persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to take marine
mammals.
Section 300.333(i) of the proposed rule would allow NMFS to modify,
suspend, or revoke high seas permits if permitted activities impact
living marine resources in ways that were not foreseen or anticipated
at the time of permit issuance or are in contravention of an
international conservation and management measure or are in violation
of any provision of domestic law. Such flexibility is needed because
high seas fishing permits are valid by law for 5 years. In the event
that NMFS determines that a permit must be modified, suspended or
revoked, NMFS would provide written notification to the permit holder
at its address of record. A permit modification, suspension or
revocation under this section is not an enforcement-related permit
modification, suspension or revocation subject to the process and
procedures in subpart D of 15 CFR part 904.
Fisheries Authorized on the High Seas
NMFS issues high seas fishing permits only for fisheries where high
seas fishing activities have been analyzed in accordance with the ESA,
NEPA and other applicable law. Such analyses have been completed for
the following fisheries:
50 CFR part 300, subpart C--Eastern Pacific Tuna Fisheries
50 CFR part 300, subpart D--South Pacific Tuna Fisheries
50 CFR part 300, subpart G--Antarctic Marine Living
Resources
50 CFR part 635--Atlantic Highly Migratory Species
Fisheries
50 CFR part 660, subpart K--U.S. West Coast Fisheries for
Highly Migratory Species
50 CFR part 665, subpart F--Western Pacific Pelagic
Fisheries
South Pacific Albacore Troll Fishing
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries
Under existing regulations at 50 CFR 300.212, vessels that fish on
the high seas in the area of application of the Convention on the
Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the
Western and Central Pacific Ocean must have a valid Western and Central
Pacific Fisheries
[[Page 19615]]
Commission (WCPFC) Area Endorsement. Vessels must obtain or hold a
valid high seas fishing permit to be eligible to receive the WCPFC Area
Endorsement.
At the time of publication of this proposed rule, approximately 600
U.S. fishing vessels are permitted under the HSFCA to operate on the
high seas. These vessels are authorized to operate in one or more of
the above-authorized fisheries as specified on their high seas fishing
permits.
NMFS proposes a new section 300.334 that lists the fisheries
authorized on the high seas, provides for issuance of and changes to
high seas fishing permits for fisheries on the list, and provides for
changes to the list. Through these provisions, NMFS seeks to reinforce
U.S. vessels' compliance with all domestic requirements when they are
operating on the high seas.
Under proposed Sec. 300.334(a), applicants for high seas fishing
permits must identify in their application which of the authorized
fisheries from the list they plan to fish in. In addition, prior to
applying for a high seas permit, applicants would need to obtain any
permits or other types of authorizations required to participate in an
authorized fishery. As a condition of the HSFCA permit (once issued),
the holder must abide by all applicable requirements associated with
the underlying authorized fishery, as well as the terms and conditions
of the high seas fishing permit, the HSFCA regulations, and any other
applicable laws and regulations.
As noted earlier, high seas fishing permits are valid for five
years from date of issuance (Sec. 300.333(d)), and this proposed rule
would not alter the duration of validity. If, after receiving a permit,
the owner or operator of the vessel seeks to change the authorized
fisheries in which he or she operates on the high seas, he or she would
need to request in writing such a change from NMFS and obtain any
permits associated with the authorized fisheries. After confirming that
the applicant has been issued any other necessary permits, and meets
all other applicable criteria, NMFS would issue a new high seas fishing
permit per the process in Sec. 300.333(d) with the change in the
authorized fisheries. The revised permit would be valid for the
remainder of the original 5-year period.
Section 300.334(d) would provide that NMFS may add other fisheries
to the list of authorized fisheries after completing any needed
analyses under the ESA, NEPA, and other applicable law or policy. NMFS
would add fisheries to the list through rulemaking. While NMFS may
decide on its own to propose to add a fishery to the list, this
proposed rule would include procedures at Sec. 300.334(e) for a person
to request that NMFS consider adding a fishery. The request would need
to be in writing with a description of the species (target and
incidental) expected to be harvested, the anticipated amounts of
harvest and incidental catch, the approximate times when and places
where fishing would take place, approximate number and types of vessels
participating, or expected to participate, in the fishing activity, and
the type, size, and amount of gear to be used. The request would also
need to describe the specific area(s) that may be affected by the
fishing activities and any anticipated impacts on the environment,
including impacts on fish stocks, marine mammals, and species listed as
threatened or endangered under the ESA or their critical habitat. If
requested by NMFS, the applicant would be required to submit additional
supporting information for NMFS to make determinations under the ESA,
NEPA, or other applicable law or policy. Given the transboundary nature
of many high seas fisheries and the potential impact of newly
authorized high seas fisheries on domestic fishery management programs,
NMFS would work with relevant NMFS regional office(s) and consult with
Regional Fishery Management Council(s) to evaluate requests to
authorize new high seas fisheries and, as part of that process, would
publish a proposed rule in the Federal Register to gather public
comment on such requests. Information received during the comment
period may be considered by NMFS, working in conjunction with the
relevant NMFS regional office(s) and in consultation with Regional
Fishery Management Council(s), in its analysis to determine whether to
authorize the fishery. Based on the analysis and other relevant
considerations, NMFS would publish its determination in the Federal
Register whether to add the fishery to the list of authorized high seas
fisheries.
Section 300.334 (d), describes several factors that would be taken
into account when considering the deletion of a fishery from the list
of authorized fisheries including whether continuation of the fishery
would contravene international conservation and management measures
recognized by the United States or U.S. laws or regulations. For
example, NMFS would remove a fishery from the list if vessels of the
United States are no longer authorized to catch fish in the area of
competence of the relevant RFMO. Proposals to remove a fishery from the
list of authorized fisheries (i.e., de-authorize the fishery), as well
as any necessary changes to other regulations in this chapter and 50
CFR part 600, would be published in the Federal Register as a proposed
rule with an opportunity for public comment. NMFS would then publish
its final determination on deleting the fishery from the list of
fisheries in the Federal Register. In addition, NMFS would provide
notice of a deletion of an authorized fishery to those permit holders
that have the authorized fishery specified on their high seas fishing
permit and to the public via the NMFS Web site. Permit holders would no
longer be able to fish in high seas fisheries that are no longer
authorized, but may request authorization to fish in other, still
authorized, high seas fisheries. If requested, and as appropriate, NMFS
would void the original permit and issue the permit holder a revised
permit, valid for the remainder of the original 5 year period, for
operations in another authorized fishery.
Protecting Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems From Significant Adverse
Impacts of Bottom Fishing
Many RFMOs recognize the need to protect vulnerable marine
ecosystems (VMEs) located on the high seas from certain bottom fishing
practices and are taking steps for their protection. Through this
proposed rule, the United States would be similarly taking steps to
protect VMEs. The characteristics of VMEs are described in the FAO
International Guidelines for the Management of Deep-sea Fisheries in
the High Seas. These FAO Guidelines give examples of species groups,
communities and habitat forming species that may contribute to the
formation of VMEs, such as certain coldwater corals and hydroids, some
types of sponge dominated communities, and seep and vent communities
comprised of invertebrate and microbial species found nowhere else.
Examples of topographic, hydrophysical or geological features that
potentially support these and other species include seamounts, guyots,
banks, knolls, hills and hydrothermal vents.
The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), through annual
sustainable fisheries resolutions, calls upon States, both individually
and cooperatively through RFMOs, to ensure that bottom fishing
activities do not have significant adverse impacts on VMEs. The United
States has strongly promoted the adoption of measures to protect VMEs
by relevant RFMOs.
[[Page 19616]]
The UNGA resolutions call on RFMOs with competence over bottom
fishing activities or flag States in areas where RFMOs have not taken
action or areas where there are no relevant RFMOs to:
(1) Assess, on the basis of the best available scientific
information, whether individual bottom fishing activities would have
significant adverse impacts on VMEs, and to ensure that if significant
adverse impact is likely to occur, such activities are managed to
prevent such impacts or not authorized to proceed;
(2) Identify areas where VMEs occur or are likely to occur and
assess bottom fishing impacts on such ecosystems;
(3) Close such areas to bottom fishing unless conservation and
management measures have been established that prevent significant
adverse impacts to VMEs; and
(4) Cease bottom fishing activities in areas where, in the course
of fishing activities, VMEs are encountered and report these encounters
to a relevant authority.
In its International Guidelines for the Management of Deep-sea
Fisheries in the High Seas, the FAO identifies impacts as significantly
adverse if they compromise ecosystem integrity, such as ecosystem
structure or function, by impairing the ability of affected populations
to replace themselves, degrading the long-term natural productivity of
habitats, or causing, on a more than temporary basis, significant loss
of species richness, habitat or community types.
Several RFMOs have competence over bottom fishing activities. Four
of these RFMOs existed prior to the most recent publication in the
Federal Register of international conservation and management measures
recognized by the United States: Commission for the Conservation of
Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), Northeast Atlantic
Fisheries Commission (NEAFC), Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization
(NAFO), and Southeast Atlantic Fisheries Organization (SEAFO). Each of
these four bodies adopted conservation and management measures in
accordance with UNGA resolutions 61/105 and 64/72 related to protection
of VMEs. The United States is a member of CCAMLR and NAFO, and thus, is
obligated to abide by their conservation and management measures. The
United States recognizes the conservation and management measures
adopted by NEAFC and SEAFO under the HSFCA, and thus prohibits U.S.
fishing vessels from acting in contravention of them (76 FR 28954, May
19, 2011).
The UNGA resolutions call upon States to develop new RFMOs in areas
where no organization or arrangement with the competence to manage
bottom fisheries exists and to develop and agree to implement interim
measures until binding conservation measures can be implemented. The
United States participated in negotiations in the North and South
Pacific for the establishment of two new RFMOs with such competency. In
the North Pacific, a treaty, the Convention on the Conservation and
Management of High Seas Fisheries Resources in the North Pacific Ocean,
has been negotiated but has not yet entered into force. The United
States has signed the treaty and is undertaking the domestic process to
ratify the treaty. The participants have developed two sets of interim
measures for the protection of VMEs, one for the eastern and the other
for the western portion of the area where the treaty would apply.
In the South Pacific, the Convention on the Conservation and
Management of High Seas Fishery Resources in the South Pacific Ocean
entered into force on August 24, 2012, creating the South Pacific
Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO). While the United
States is not currently a party to the Convention, the United States
participates in the SPRFMO as a Cooperating non-Contracting Party, has
signed the treaty, and is undertaking the domestic process to ratify
it. SPRFMO adopted a conservation and management measure in January
2014 in accordance with UNGA resolutions 61/105 and 64/72.
Under Sec. 300.335 of this proposed rule, bottom fishing would
only be permitted on the high seas in accordance with international
conservation and management measures recognized by the United States.
Currently, CCAMLR, NAFO, NEAFC and SEAFO have such measures, as
discussed above. A person seeking to engage in bottom fishing not
subject to international conservation and management measures
recognized by the United States must request authorization of a new
high seas fishery as described in Sec. 300.334(e) and then, if the
fishery is authorized, obtain a high seas permit authorizing
participation in the fishery. See ``Fisheries Authorized on the High
Seas'' section above. NMFS may specify conditions in the permit to
mitigate adverse impacts on VMEs, which may include the types of
conditions that have been adopted in relevant RFMO measures recognized
by the United States. Procedures for permits under Sec. 300.333 and
changes to existing permits under Sec. 300.334 would be used for
bottom fishing permitting. Consistent with the FAO's International
Guidelines for the Management of Deep-sea Fisheries in the High Seas,
NMFS is proposing to define bottom fishing as fishing using gear that
is likely to contact the seafloor during the normal course of fishing
operations.
Vessel Identification
To clarify the type of vessel length used in determining the
required sizing of vessel markings, the word ``overall'' would be added
after ``length,'' in Sec. 300.336(b)(2)(v) in the proposed rule (Sec.
300.14(b)(2)(v) in the existing regulations). This revision to the
regulatory text is consistent with the FAO Standard Specifications for
the Marking and Identification of Fishing Vessels. No other changes to
this section are proposed.
Requirements for Enhanced Mobile Transceiver Units (EMTUs)
NMFS published a final rule for VMS type-approval on December 24,
2014. See 79 FR 77399. Those regulations are codified at 50 CFR part
600, subpart Q (national VMS regulations). As defined in the VMS type-
approval regulations, vessel monitoring system, or VMS, refers to a
satellite based surveillance system designed to monitor the location
and movement of vessels using onboard transceiver units that send
global positioning system location reports to a monitoring entity. An
enhanced mobile transceiver unit (EMTU) is a transceiver or
communications device, including antennae, dedicated message terminal
and display, and an input device such as a keyboard which is installed
on a fishing vessel, and is capable of supporting two-way
communication, messaging, and electronic forms transmission, and is an
example of the device that provides the vessel location reports as part
of a VMS.
Under Sec. 300.337 of this proposed rule, NMFS would require all
vessels permitted to operate on the high seas, or subject to those
permitting requirements, to have an installed and activated NMFS-type-
approved EMTU on board. NMFS will not issue or renew a high seas
fishing permit unless the vessel has an installed and activated NMFS-
type-approved EMTU that reports automatically to NMFS (Sec.
300.333(d)(2) and (g)).
NOAA's Office of Law Enforcement (OLE) currently type-approves
EMTUs and mobile communication services (MCS) associated with the EMTUs
based on requirements outlined in the national VMS regulations. OLE
periodically publishes a list of type-approved EMTUs and MCS in the
Federal Register. Vessel owners also would
[[Page 19617]]
need to comply with any other applicable VMS requirements set forth
under applicable fishery-and region-specific regulations and the
national VMS regulations. The owner or operator of the vessel would
need to work with a divisional office of the NOAA Office of Law
Enforcement, preferably the office in, or nearest, the NMFS Region that
is issuing the high seas fishing permit, to ensure that their EMTU
properly reports positions to NMFS.
This proposed rule would require the continuous operation of the
EMTU, with hourly transmission of position reports whenever a U.S.
vessel with a high seas permit is on the high seas. In addition, the
vessel must comply with any other position reporting requirements
applicable to the specific fisheries in which it is authorized to
participate. The proposed requirement will strengthen NMFS' ability to
ensure that U.S. high seas vessels do not undermine international
conservation and management measures recognized by the United States.
A vessel would be exempt from these requirements and could power
down the EMTU when the vessel remains at a dock or permanent mooring
for more than 72 consecutive hours (referred to as the in-port
exemption in the proposed rule) or when it participates in a domestic
fishery within the U.S. EEZ, for 30 or more consecutive days, and there
are no other applicable requirements for any EMTU or VMS unit operation
for those activities or fishery (referred to as the long-term exemption
in the proposed rule). Prior to powering down, the high seas permit
holder would be required to notify the OLE divisional office, via email
or other means as directed by the OLE divisional office, the following
information: The vessel's name; the vessel's official number; the
intent to power down the EMTU; the applicable exemption that allows for
power-down; and full name, telephone, and email contact information for
the vessel owner or operator. If the in-port exemption is being
invoked, the high seas permit holder must also include in the above
notification the name of the port where the vessel will be docked or at
permanent mooring and the amount of time the vessel is expected to
remain there. If the long-term exemption is being invoked, the high
seas permit holder must include information in the above notification
that describes the activities or fishery the vessel will be engaged in
and estimated duration.
When powering up the EMTU after an in-port exemption, the vessel
owner or operator would need to report to the OLE divisional office the
following information: That the EMTU has been powered up; the vessel's
name; the vessel's official number; port name; fishery where the vessel
intends to operate; and full name, telephone, and email contact
information for the vessel owner or operator. The vessel owner or
operator needs to make this report to the OLE divisional office, during
office hours, at least 2 hours before leaving port or mooring. When
powering up after a long-term exemption, the vessel owner or operator
would need to notify the OLE divisional office with the previously
described information, during office hours.
When powering up after either exemption, the vessel owner or
operator would need to receive email confirmation from the OLE
divisional office that EMTU transmissions are being properly received.
This confirmation would need to be received before leaving port, after
an in-port exemption, or before entering the high seas or a fishery
that requires EMTU operation, after a long-term exemption.
Many HSFCA-permitted vessels are already required to operate EMTUs
when at sea because they participate in fisheries with domestic EMTU
requirements. Satisfying those requirements would satisfy the proposed
HSFCA requirement, if the EMTU is operating at all times, providing
hourly position reports while on the high seas, and the EMTU activation
and power-down/power-up procedures are the same or are more restrictive
than these proposed HSFCA requirements. VMS requirements that currently
apply on the high seas include the following regulations:
Sec. 660.712(d) for longliners in the U.S. West Coast
fisheries for highly migratory species (HMS) (these units are owned and
installed by NMFS),
Sec. 665.19 for Western Pacific pelagic fisheries (these
units are owned and installed by NMFS),
Sec. 300.219 for Western and Central Pacific fisheries
for HMS,
Sec. 300.45 for South Pacific tuna fisheries,
Sec. 635.69 for Atlantic HMS fisheries, and
Sec. 300.116 for harvest of Antarctic marine living
resources.
High seas fishing vessels that would need to purchase, install,
activate, and operate EMTUs as a result of this proposed rule include
vessels other than longliners participating in the U.S. West Coast
fisheries for HMS, longline vessels less than 40 feet in length overall
in the Western Pacific pelagic fisheries, vessels in the Atlantic HMS
fisheries that do not use pelagic longline gear, and certain vessels in
the Atlantic HMS fisheries that use shark bottom longline and gillnet
gear.
In the case of failure of the EMTU while at sea, the vessel
operator, owner, or designee would be required to notify the OLE
divisional office and follow instructions provided, which could include
actions described under proposed Sec. 300.337(e)(2). The EMTU would
then need to be repaired or replaced and operating within 30 days or
before starting the next trip, whichever is sooner.
For communicating with enforcement authorities about the
functioning of the EMTU and other purposes, operators of vessels would
be required to carry on board and continuously monitor a two-way
communication device capable of real-time communication with the OLE
divisional office. The device must be capable of transmitting position
reports, or the vessel must have a separate device for transmitting
position reports, in the event the EMTU fails.
The vessel owner or operator would be responsible for all costs
associated with the purchase, installation and maintenance of the EMTU,
and for all charges levied by the vendors as necessary to ensure the
transmission of automatic position reports to NMFS. However, if the
EMTU is being carried and operated in compliance with the requirements
in 50 CFR part 300, 50 CFR part 660, or 50 CFR part 665 relating to the
installation, carrying, and operation of VMS units, the vessel owner
and operator would not be responsible for costs that are the
responsibility of NMFS under those regulations.
Vessel owners or operators who purchase an EMTU for the purpose of
complying with Federal VMS regulations such as those in this rule, if
finalized, may be eligible for a one-time reimbursement per vessel. See
73 FR 24955, May 6, 2008, for details.
Requirement for Observers
Observers provide NMFS with information on fishing effort and catch
of target species and non-target species, including protected species
(such as marine mammals, sea turtles, and seabirds) pursuant to various
legal authorities, including the Magnuson-Stevens Act, ESA, MMPA, the
implementing legislation of international or regional treaties to which
the United States is party, or regulations promulgated under those
statutes. An observer under this proposed rule is defined as any person
serving in the capacity of an observer employed by NMFS, either
directly or under contract with a third party, or certified as an
observer by NMFS
[[Page 19618]]
(Sec. 600.10). Under Sec. 300.338 of this proposed rule, NMFS would
require a vessel permitted pursuant to the HSFCA, if directed by NMFS,
to carry an observer during a fishing trip with operations on the high
seas. This requirement would not be invoked by NMFS if the vessel will
already be carrying an observer pursuant to other legal authorities.
While the vessel may be required to cover the costs of an observer
under other applicable laws, NMFS would fund the cost of the observer's
salary and benefits when placed on board pursuant to this rule. If and
when a mechanism is established whereby the fishing vessel could pay
these costs without any conflict of interest, the vessel could be
responsible for all or a portion of these costs.
Currently, there are different fishery-specific observer
requirements. In some fisheries authorized on the high seas, an
observer must be on board every fishing trip, such as on the Class 6
purse seine vessels (vessels with well volume carrying capacity in
excess of 425 cubic meters) operating in the Pacific tuna fisheries. In
others, such as the pelagic longline vessels in the Atlantic HMS
fisheries, only a portion of vessel trips are selected for observer
coverage. Certain fisheries on the high seas currently do not require
carrying an at-sea observer, such as the South Pacific albacore troll
fisheries, some Class 5 (vessels with well volume carrying capacity
between 319 and 425 cubic meters) and all Class 1 to 4 purse seine
vessels fishing in the U.S. West Coast Fisheries for Pacific HMS, some
longliners in the Western Pacific pelagic fishery, and vessels less
than 40 feet in length overall in the American Samoa longline fishery.
However, these and any other commercial HMS vessels are subject to
WCPFC observer deployment under WCPFC regulations for fishing trips
during which the vessel at any time enters or is within the WCPF
Convention Area.
This proposed rule would allow NMFS to place an observer on board a
high seas fishing vessel where observer coverage is not otherwise
required by other regulations or relevant RFMO conservation and
management measures. Such additional coverage would enhance NMFS'
ability to collect fishery dependent data needed for fishery
management. A vessel would be selected for observer deployment using a
sampling scheme to be developed by NMFS, based on the need to obtain
information on high seas activities.
The owner or operator of a vessel that is selected for observer
deployment under this rule would be required to notify NMFS before
commencing any fishing trip that takes place on the high seas. In the
letter to the vessel owner or operator informing him/her of the
selection for observer deployment, NMFS would specify notification
procedures and information requirements such as expected gear
deployment, trip duration, and fishing area. Requirements pertaining to
observer deployment, including the requirement to provide the observer
access to, for example, vessel communications and navigation equipment
and cooperate with observers are included in the proposed rule.
Observer safety requirements set forth at Sec. 600.746 would also
apply, as well as the associated prohibitions in Sec. 600.725(q)
through (u). These sections require vessels carrying observers to have
a valid U.S. Coast Guard Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety decal and
take other steps to ensure safe conditions aboard the vessel.
Transshipment on the High Seas
At-sea transshipment, defined in this proposed rule at Sec.
300.331 as offloading or receiving or otherwise transferring fish or
fish products from one fishing vessel to another, allows harvesting
vessels to continue operations for longer periods when they are in
waters far from ports. At-sea transshipment can also be used to obscure
the origin of illegally-caught fish so that the product can be placed
into commerce in contravention of regulations designed to eliminate
illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing practices. Unreported
and unregulated transshipments at sea can contribute to inaccurate
reporting of catches and can support IUU fishing activities. Improved
oversight of transshipment taking place on the high seas would promote
compliance with international conservation and management measures and
help deter IUU fishing.
The proposed definition of transship or transshipment would exclude
``net sharing,'' that is, the transfer of fish that have not yet been
loaded on board any fishing vessel from the purse seine net of one
fishing vessel to another fishing vessel. Fish would be considered to
be on board a fishing vessel once they are on a deck or in a hold, or
once they are first lifted out of the water by the vessel.
In those instances where transshipment on the high seas is not
prohibited under other legal authorities, this proposed rule requires
that U.S. high seas fishing vessels involved in transshipment on the
high seas have on board a high seas fishing permit (Sec. 300.333(b)).
The permitting requirement applies to both the vessel offloading the
fish or fish product and the vessel receiving the fish or fish product.
In addition to any other applicable requirements, under Sec.
300.339(b), the owner or operator of a U.S. vessel receiving or
offloading fish or fish product on the high seas must notify NMFS at
least 36 hours prior to each transshipment event, and submit a report
on the transshipment event within 15 days after the vessel first enters
into port, using the form obtained from the Regional Administrator or
Office Director who issued the high seas fishing permit.
The owner or operator of U.S. vessels receiving or offloading fish
on the high seas would need to include the following information in the
prior notification: The vessels participating in the transshipment
(names, official numbers, and vessel types); the location (latitude and
longitude to the nearest tenth of a degree) of transshipment, date and
time that transshipment is expected to occur, and species, processed
state, and quantities (in metric tons) expected to be transshipped.
Each transshipment would require a separate notice and report. As some
of the information might be known by only the receiving vessel operator
and some of the information might be known only by the offloading
vessel operator, the operators of both vessels may need to exchange
information regarding transshipment activities. In authorized fisheries
where equivalent or more restrictive domestic transshipment
notification and reporting regulations apply, fulfillment of such
regulations would satisfy the requirements under this proposed rule.
The following are examples of existing at-sea transshipment
restrictions and reporting requirements that already apply to high seas
fishing vessels (all citations are to 50 CFR):
Sec. 300.24(d) of the Eastern Pacific Tuna Fisheries
regulations prohibits the transshipment of purse seine caught tuna in
the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) Convention Area.
Sec. 300.112(k) requires U.S. flagged vessels that
receive or attempt to receive Dissostichus species from a harvesting
vessel at sea, regardless of whether such transshipment occurs in
waters under the jurisdiction of CCAMLR, to obtain from NMFS a
harvesting permit authorizing transshipment. CCAMLR conservation
measures also require advance notification for transshipment of
Antarctic marine living resources and other materials (e.g., bait,
fuel) in the CAMLR Convention area. All transshipments of Dissostichus
species must be reflected in the Dissostichus Catch Document regardless
of where the transshipment occurs.
[[Page 19619]]
Sec. 635.29(a) prohibits at-sea and in port transshipment
of any tuna or tuna-like species, or other highly migratory species,
regardless of where the fish were harvested. However, an owner or
operator of a vessel for which an Atlantic Tunas Purse Seine category
permit has been issued under Sec. 635.4 may transfer large, medium,
and giant bluefin tuna at sea from the net of the catching vessel to
another vessel for which an Atlantic Tunas Purse Seine category permit
has been issued, provided the amount transferred does not cause the
receiving vessel to exceed its currently authorized vessel allocation,
including incidental catch limits.
For U.S. West Coast fisheries for HMS, the operators of
any commercial fishing vessel and any recreational charter vessel
fishing for HMS in the management area must fill out information on the
date, transshipper, and amount transshipped on report forms provided by
the Western Regional Administrator or a state agency (Sec.
660.708(a)). Thus, the albacore trollers, pole and line vessels, and
other vessels that fish for HMS on the high seas are subject to this
reporting requirement.
For Western Pacific pelagic fisheries, regulations set
forth at Sec. 665.14(c) require operators of vessels receiving
transshipments to keep records and submit information on transshipments
that occur in the EEZ. Specifically, any person subject to the
requirements set forth in Sec. 665.801(e)--which pertains to longline
and other pelagic fishing within the EEZ or landing or transshipping
pelagic species within the EEZ--must maintain on board the vessel an
accurate and complete NMFS transshipment logbook containing report
forms provided by the Pacific Islands Regional Administrator. All
information specified on the forms must be recorded on the forms within
24 hours after the day of transshipment. Each form must be signed and
dated by the receiving vessel operator. The original logbook for each
day of transshipment activity must be submitted to the Pacific Islands
Regional Administrator within 72 hours of each landing of western
Pacific pelagic species.
For the WCPF Convention Area, NMFS regulations prohibit
transshipments at sea involving purse seine vessels in the WCPF
Convention Area as well as transshipments to and from purse seine
vessels of fish caught in the WCPF Convention Area and transshipped
outside the WCPF Convention Area. 50 CFR 300.216(b). However, net
sharing between purse seine vessels is allowed in the WCPF Convention
Area in limited circumstances. 50 CFR 300.216(c). For transshipments
that are not prohibited, owners and operators of each vessel involved
in a transshipment in the WCPF Convention Area or a transshipment of
fish caught in the Convention Area and transshipped anywhere are
required to complete a specific report form and to submit that form to
NMFS. 50 CFR 300.218(b). Vessels are required to notify the WCPFC when
such transshipment occurs on the high seas or when an emergency
transshipment that would otherwise be prohibited occurs. Notices for
high seas transshipments need to be submitted to the WCPFC at least 36
hours before the transshipment and notices for emergency transshipments
must be submitted within 12 hours after completion of the emergency
transshipment.
Prohibitions
The proposed rule would redesignate the existing prohibitions in
Sec. Sec. 300.15 to 300.340, and would add prohibitions to clarify
that a high seas vessel: Must have on board a valid permit; may not
fish on the high seas unless any and all permits related to the
authorized fisheries noted on the high seas permit are valid; must
follow new requirements related to the use of an EMTU; must follow new
requirements with respect to observers, must follow new reporting
requirements with respect to transshipments; and must follow reporting
requirements of the authorized fishery(ies) noted on the high seas
permit.
Penalties
NMFS proposes to remove the penalties section in the existing
regulations, as these penalties are adequately addressed in the HSFCA
itself and do not need to be repeated in these regulations.
Catch and Effort Reporting Requirements
The proposed rule would modify the catch and effort reporting
requirements to clarify the information that must be maintained on
board a vessel and reported to NMFS.
Under the proposed rule, the references to the regulations in the
existing version of Sec. 300.17 would be removed. The references to
the regulations of each authorized fishery would be provided in Sec.
300.334 instead. The vessel owner and operator would be responsible for
obtaining from their Regional Administrator the appropriate forms for
their authorized fishing activities and submitting the reports within
the deadlines of the authorized fisheries or within 15 days following
the end of a fishing trip, whichever is sooner. The reference in
current regulations to MSA confidentiality provisions in Sec.
300.17(c) would be deleted.
Scientific Research Activities
Existing regulations set forth at Sec. Sec. 600.512(a) and
600.745(a) encourage persons planning scientific research activities in
the U.S. EEZ using foreign vessels or U.S.-flagged vessels to submit
their research plan to the appropriate Regional Administrator or
Science Center Director and obtain a letter of acknowledgement. Under
the proposed rule, the phrase ``or on the high seas'' would be added in
Sec. 600.745(a) so that any person who would use a U.S. vessel for
research activities on the high seas would also be encouraged to submit
their research plan and obtain a letter of acknowledgement. The
scientific research plan should be submitted 60 days, or as soon as
practicable, prior to the start of the research activities. This is not
intended to inhibit or prevent any scientific research activity
conducted on the high seas, and is in addition to any requirements that
may apply to such research under RFMO conservation and management
measures or other applicable law.
Publication of International Conservation and Management Measures
HSFCA section 105(e) (16 U.S.C. 5504(e))requires the Secretary, in
consultation with the Secretary of State, to periodically publish in
the Federal Register a notice listing ``international conservation and
management measures recognized by the United States.'' The latest
listing was published on May 19, 2011 (76 FR 28954).
Request for Comments
NMFS is requesting comments on any of the requirements or analyses
described in the proposed rule. Furthermore, NMFS requests comments on
the following topics:
1. The time it takes to procure an EMTU and have it installed.
Currently, NMFS is considering requiring that vessel owners have an
EMTU installed and operational within 90 days of publication of the
final rule;
2. The number of hours and costs associated with having the EMTU
installed by a qualified marine electrician;
3. Current levels of transshipment on the high seas involving U.S.
vessels and the areas where the transshipments occur; and
[[Page 19620]]
4. The fisheries in state waters, territorial seas, or within the
EEZ in which high seas fishing vessels participate and details on how
vessels transit from the high seas to those fisheries.
Classification
This proposed rule is published under the authority of the High
Seas Fishing Compliance Act (16 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.). The NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with this and other applicable laws, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted,
would have on small entities. A description of the action, why it is
being considered, and the legal basis for this action are contained
above in the first few paragraphs of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section. The analysis follows. A copy of the analysis is available from
NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities
The proposed rule would apply to owners and operators of U.S.
fishing vessels operating on the high seas, including harvesting
vessels, refrigerated cargo vessels, and other vessels used to support
fishing. There are approximately 600 U.S. vessels permitted under the
HSFCA to fish on the high seas. The majority of these permitted vessels
are longliners, purse seiners, trollers, or pole and line vessels that
fish for highly migratory species. There are also small numbers of
gillnetting, squid jigging, hand or other lining, multipurpose, and
trawl vessels.
In this RFA analysis, an individual vessel is the proxy for each
business entity. Although a single business entity may own multiple
vessels, NMFS does not have a reliable means at this time to track
ownership of multiple vessels to a single business entity. Based on
limited financial information about the affected fishing vessels, NMFS
believes that all the affected fish harvesting businesses, except for
the Pacific tuna purse seine vessels, are small entities as defined by
the RFA; that is, they are independently owned and operated and not
dominant in their fields of operation, and have annual receipts of no
more than $20.5 million.
Projecting Reporting, Record-Keeping, and Other Compliance Requirements
For each element of the proposed rule, the analysis of impacts to
small entities is described below.
Permit Application Process. NMFS currently authorizes fisheries on
the high seas only after appropriate reviews are completed pursuant to
the ESA, MMPA, NEPA, and other applicable law. Applicants select from a
list of such authorized fisheries when applying for a high seas fishing
permit. The proposed rule would codify this procedure. Vessel owners
and operators apply for a high seas fishing permit every 5 years,
paying an application fee currently set at $129 and completing the
application form, which is estimated to take 30 minutes. The rule would
not change these burdens.
The proposed rule would be explicit about the requirement that
vessels harvesting or participating in operations on the high seas in
support of harvesting, such as transshipment and provision of supplies
or fuel, have on board a valid high seas fishing permit. NMFS expects
this aspect of the proposed rule to result in few additional
applications for high seas permits, if any, because transshipment of
fish on the high seas is prohibited in some fisheries and where it is
not prohibited, records show few instances of transshipment. NMFS is
not aware of any U.S. vessels that provide supplies or fuel to
harvesting vessels on the high seas.
The rule would require a photograph of the high seas fishing vessel
to be submitted with the permit application. The time necessary to
photograph the vessel, print or scan the photograph, and attach it to
the application is estimated to take 30 minutes per application.
The proposed rule would allow a person, which could include an
organization or a group of persons, to request NMFS add a fishery
authorized on the high seas. A request would need to include the
following information:
(a) The species (target and incidental) expected to be harvested
and the anticipated amounts of harvest and bycatch.
(b) The approximate times and places fishing will take place,
approximate number of vessels participating, and the type, size, and
amount of gear to be used.
(c) A description of the specific area that may be affected by the
fishing activities.
(d) A description of any anticipated impacts on the environment,
including impacts on fish stocks, marine mammals, species listed as
threatened or endangered under the ESA or their critical habitat.
(e) If requested by NMFS, any additional information necessary for
NMFS to conduct analyses under ESA, MMPA and NEPA.
Making the request to add an authorized fishery is expected to take
approximately 110 hours. This time would be spent gathering and
compiling the required information. NMFS does not expect such requests
on a regular basis. For the purposes of this IRFA, NMFS estimates that
one request might be submitted every 5 years. The impact from this
aspect of the proposed rule is not expected to be significant because
this is not a requirement, but an option for the public, and such
requests are expected to be made infrequently.
Installation and Operation of EMTUs. The proposed rule would
require the installation of EMTUs on all high seas fishing vessels. The
EMTU would need to be operated at all times, except when the vessel
will be at a dock or permanent mooring for more than 72 consecutive
hours, or when the vessel will not operate on the high seas or in any
fishery that requires EMTU operation for more than 30 consecutive days.
Notices prior to EMTU power-down and power-up would need to be provided
to NMFS.
Under the proposed rule, approximately 200 of the currently
permitted high seas fishing vessels would need to install an EMTU. The
remaining 400 or so vessels currently holding high seas fishing permits
are already subject to EMTU requirements and would not bear any
additional compliance costs as a result of this proposed rule.
The majority of the approximately 200 affected vessels would likely
be albacore trollers operating in the Pacific Ocean. These vessels have
generally not been subject to VMS requirements contained in other
regulations. The cost of compliance with this requirement includes the
cost of purchase, installation, maintenance, and operation of the EMTU.
The costs of purchase and installation are treated as one-time costs
because this analysis shows costs just in the near-term future. Table 2
summarizes the costs associated with the EMTU requirement in the
proposed rule. A description of the estimates and calculations used in
Table 2 is provided below the table.
[[Page 19621]]
Table 2--Estimated Costs of Compliance With EMTU Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description Cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMTU purchase............................... Up to $3,100.
Installation cost (one-time)................ $50-400 ($400 used for estimation).
Daily position report costs (Hourly, 24/day; $1.44.
$0.06/report *24 reports/day).
Annual position report cost per vessel...... $525/vessel.
($1.44/day * 365 days/year).................
Annual EMTU maintenance cost................ $50-100 ($100 used for estimation).
Total cost per vessel (Year 1; unit + $4025.
installation + position reports).
Total cost per vessel after reimbursement of $925.
EMTU cost (for eligible vessels only).
Cost per vessel (Year 2 and beyond; position $625/vessel.
reports and EMTU maintenance).
Number of affected vessels.................. 200.
Total cost (Year 1; total cost per vessel $805,000.
before reimbursement * number of affected
vessels).
Total cost (Year 2 and beyond; total cost $125,000.
per vessel * number of affected vessels).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Units would need to be installed by a qualified marine electrician.
Based on experience in other fisheries with EMTU requirements, NMFS
suggests that installation cost can range from $50 to $400, depending
on the vessel, proximity to the installer, and the difficulty of the
installation. For estimation purposes, $400 was used to calculate the
costs of compliance with this proposed rule. NMFS is interested in
receiving public comment on these values to refine estimates of the
economic impacts on the affected vessels.
The cost of transmitting data through the EMTU depends on the type
of EMTU installed and the communication service provider selected. For
the purposes of this rulemaking, NMFS is assuming the cost of EMTU
position data transmissions is approximately $0.06 per transmission.
This equates to $1.44 per day for the location reports, at a rate of
one transmission per hour. Providing position reports throughout the
year could cost a high seas fishing vessel $525 (365 days per year * 24
position reports per day * $0.06 = $525).
The EMTU may be powered down if the vessel would be at the dock or
mooring for more than 72 consecutive hours or if the vessel, for 30 or
more consecutive days, would not be operating on the high seas or
participating in a fishery that requires EMTU operation. A message
notifying NMFS of the power-down must be sent to NMFS prior to powering
down the unit and again when the EMTU will be powered back up. If an
EMTU is powered down for portions of the year, the actual annual cost
of transmitting position data would be less. Thus the annual costs of
EMTU operation could vary among individual vessels depending on the
number of days an EMTU may be powered down.
The cost of compliance for vessel owners is estimated to be $4,025
per vessel in the first year (Table 2). This is the cost of compliance
prior to receiving reimbursement for the cost of the EMTU.
Reimbursement funds of up to $3,100 per VMS unit would reduce the cost
to $925 per vessel, on average, for reimbursement-eligible vessels. The
cost of operating the EMTU in year two and beyond would include the
cost of sending position reports and maintenance and is estimated to be
$625.
Aside from the costs of purchase, installation, and operation of
EMTUs, vessel owners or operators would need to spend time purchasing a
unit, having it installed, and submitting an installation and
activation report form. These steps are estimated to take an average of
4 hours. The notices prior to power-down and powering back up the EMTU
are estimated to take 10 minutes each.
The compliance cost of obtaining, carrying on board, and monitoring
the required communication devices is expected to be zero, as NMFS
believes all affected small entities already carry and monitor such
devices.
Requirement to Carry an Observer. Under the proposed rule, a high
seas fishing vessel would be required to carry an observer for the
duration of a fishing trip, if so selected by NMFS. When an observer is
deployed pursuant to the proposed rule, NMFS would pay the cost of the
observer's salary and benefits. If and when a mechanism is established,
through a future rulemaking, whereby the fishing vessel could pay these
costs without any conflict of interest, the vessel could be responsible
for all or a portion of these costs. Most high seas fishing vessels are
already subject to requirements for carrying an observer. For example,
in the shallow-set and deep-set longline sectors of the Hawaii longline
fleet, 100 percent and approximately 20 percent of fishing trips,
respectively, are covered by observers. In authorized fisheries where
observers are placed on all participating vessels pursuant to other
regulations, the compliance cost of the proposed rule would be nil.
In high seas fisheries where only a portion of the high seas
fishing vessels are selected for observer coverage, the possibility of
being selected to carry an observer would increase under this proposed
rule. Vessels that are not already subject to any other observer
requirements could be selected to carry observers under the proposed
rule. This includes, but is not limited to, South Pacific albacore
trollers, purse seine vessels of Class 5 or smaller participating in
the Eastern Pacific tuna fisheries, and some longline vessels in
Western Pacific pelagic fisheries.
If a vessel is selected for observer coverage under this rule, the
vessel owner or operator would be required to provide NMFS a notice of
their next fishing trip. This notification is estimated to take 5
minutes and cost $1 in communication costs.
For trips on which an observer is deployed under this new
requirement, the affected entity would be at least responsible for the
costs associated with providing the observer with food, accommodations,
and medical facilities. These costs are expected to be $20 to $50 per
day. If the affected entity is also responsible for the cost of the
observer's salary and benefits because a mechanism is established
whereby the fishing vessel pays these costs, the range would be $250 to
$500 per day. Assuming a high seas fishing trip averages 20 days in
duration, the estimated cost of compliance for accommodating an
observer on a vessel would be between $400 and $1,000 if the entity is
responsible for only food, accommodations, and medical facilities, or
between $5,000 and $10,000 if the entity will also bear the cost of the
observer's salary and benefits.
Transshipment Notices and Reports. For owners and operators of
vessels involved in offloading or receiving a transshipment of fish or
fish product on the high seas, the proposed rule would
[[Page 19622]]
require vessel owners or operators to provide to NMFS notice of
transshipments at least 36 hours prior to any transshipment on the high
seas and to submit to NMFS reports of transshipment following the
transshipment events.
Transshipment is also regulated under other applicable law. For
example, in the Atlantic Ocean, transshipments are generally
prohibited, with some exceptions. In the Pacific Ocean, purse seine
vessels are prohibited from transshipping in some instances. NMFS is
aware that during 2006 to 2009, four to eight vessels offloaded
longline-caught fish each year and four to eight vessels received
longline-caught fish each year. It is likely that most of these
transshipments took place at sea by the Hawaii-based longline fleet,
but it is unknown how many of these transshipments took place on the
high seas. NMFS also has data on past transshipments on the high seas
involving a few U.S. albacore troll vessels.
Each transshipment notice is estimated to take about 15 minutes and
no more than $1 in communication costs to prepare and submit to NMFS.
Each transshipment report is estimated to take about 60 minutes and
$1 in communication costs for submitting each report to NMFS. Thus, for
each transshipment event on the high seas, the time burden is estimated
to be 1 hour and 15 minutes and cost $2 for each U.S. flagged vessel
involved in the transshipment.
Reporting Requirements. Existing regulations require submission of
high seas fishing logbooks. This proposed rule deletes that requirement
under the HSFCA, and instead, provides that owners and operators of
high seas fishing vessels would use the reporting forms developed for
their authorized fisheries to report high seas catch and effort
information. Given that the former reporting requirements would not be
changed in a substantive way, the associated compliance cost would be
unchanged.
The reporting requirements described above would amend an existing
collection of information, (OMB Control No. 0648-0304) and these
amendments are subject to approval by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Summary. The proposed rule would increase the cost of operating on
the high seas for all affected entities. Fulfillment of these
requirements is not expected to require any professional skills that
the vessel owners and operators do not already possess.
Significant Alternatives Considered
NMFS attempted to identify alternatives that would accomplish the
objectives of the rulemaking and minimize any significant economic
impact of the proposed rule on small entities.
The alternative of taking no action was rejected because it would
fail to achieve the objectives of the rulemaking.
NMFS evaluated an option to rely on existing permit programs, other
than the HSFCA permit program, to authorize high seas fishing
activities. However, by continuing to require the separate HSFCA
permit, NMFS is able to maintain a separate record of vessels permitted
to fish on the high seas, facilitating NMFS' ability to submit
information regarding U.S. high seas vessels to the FAO as required in
the Compliance Agreement. FAO compiles from the Parties to the
Compliance Agreement records of vessels authorized to fish on the high
seas. The separate HSFCA permit, required under the existing
regulations to be carried on board the vessel, is also useful in
demonstrating to any domestic inspectors, foreign inspectors operating
under the authority of a high seas boarding and inspection scheme
adopted by an RFMO to which the United States is party, or foreign port
inspectors, that a vessel is permitted to fish on the high seas.
With respect to the EMTU requirement, one alternative would be to
require EMTU operation at all times, which would provide NMFS the
ability to monitor a vessel's location at any time. However, NMFS is
aware that some vessels holding high seas fishing permits may remain in
the EEZ for extended periods and are not currently subject to EMTU
operation requirements while in the EEZ. Some of these vessels may also
dock their vessels and not engage in fishing for portions of the year.
This alternative is not preferred because the regulatory burden could
be minimized by providing some exemptions to the EMTU operation
requirement, such as exemptions to address the two circumstances
described above. The preferred alternative would maintain the ability
to monitor high seas fishing vessels yet minimize the regulatory
burden.
Another alternative would be to require EMTU operation only on the
high seas. However, allowing units to be powered down while a vessel is
in the EEZ of the U.S. or of another country would weaken the
effectiveness of using EMTU position information to monitor the
locations of high seas fishing vessels. For vessels that are highly
mobile and could operate at any time of the year, such as many high
seas fishing vessels, EMTUs are more effective if they remain in
operation at all times. Allowing power-downs whenever in the EEZ, aside
from the in-port and long-term exemptions provided in the proposed
rule, could also encourage non-compliance and result in large gaps in
NMFS' ability to monitor high seas fishing vessels. Thus, this
alternative is not preferred.
With respect to the requirement for prior notice of high seas
transshipments, one alternative would be to allow affected entities to
provide the notice of high seas transshipment to NMFS at least one
business day in advance of the transshipment, rather than 36 hours as
proposed. However, a shorter advance notice would reduce opportunities
for NMFS or the U.S. Coast Guard to observe transshipments in the event
they are able to meet the transshipping vessels at sea. For this
reason, this alternative is not preferred.
With respect to the transshipment reporting requirements, one
alternative would be to impose a different timeframe for submission of
the report. The report could be submitted more than 15 days after
completion of the transshipment. However, NMFS believes 15 days is a
reasonable timeframe, and that extending it further could lead to NMFS
not receiving transshipment reports in a timely manner and would not
support collection of complete information regarding authorized
fisheries.
Duplicative, Overlapping, and Conflicting Rules
The proposed rule has been prepared to be consistent with a number
of regulations. These include the following:
50 CFR part 300, subpart C--Eastern Pacific Tuna Fisheries
50 CFR part 300, subpart D--South Pacific Tuna Fisheries
50 CFR part 300, subpart G--Antarctic Marine Living Resources
50 CFR part 300, subpart O--Western and Central Pacific
Fisheries for Highly Migratory Species
50 CFR part 635--Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fisheries
50 CFR part 660, subpart K--Pacific Highly Migratory Species
Fisheries
50 CFR part 665, subpart F--Western Pacific Pelagic Fisheries
Below are some NMFS regulations that have the same or similar
regulatory goals and regulate the same classes of industry as the
proposed rule. Although the regulations and the proposed rule contain
the same or similar elements,
[[Page 19623]]
the proposed rule has been drafted so that an entity would need to
follow the more restrictive set of requirements with respect to EMTUs,
observers, and transshipment where applicable.
VMS EMTU requirements:
Sec. 300.45 (South Pacific Tuna Fisheries)
Sec. 300.116 (Antarctic Marine Living Resources)
Sec. 300.219 (Western and Central Pacific Fisheries for HMS)
Sec. 635.69 (Atlantic HMS)
Sec. 660.359 (Pacific Coast Groundfish Fisheries)
Sec. 660.712(d) (U.S. West Coast Fisheries for HMS)
Sec. 665.19 (Western Pacific Pelagic Fisheries)
Sec. 679.28 (Fisheries of the EEZ off Alaska)
Observer requirements:
Sec. 300.22 (Eastern Pacific Tuna Fisheries)
Sec. 300.43 (South Pacific Tuna Fisheries)
Sec. 300.113 (Antarctic Marine Living Resources)
Sec. 300.215 (Western and Central Pacific Fisheries for HMS)
Sec. 635.7 (Atlantic HMS)
Sec. 660.719 (U.S. West Coast Fisheries for HMS)
Sec. 665.808 (Western Pacific Pelagic Fisheries)
Transshipment notices and reporting requirements:
Sec. 300.46 (South Pacific Tuna Fisheries)
Sec. 300.112(k) (Antarctic Marine Living Resources)
Sec. 300.218 (Western and Central Pacific Fisheries for HMS)
Sec. 665.801 (Western Pacific Pelagic Fisheries)
Final rule (77 FR 71501, January 2, 2013) for the Western and
Central Pacific Fisheries for Highly Migratory Species
National Environmental Policy Act
As stated in NOAA's Administrative Order (NAO) 216-6 5.05b, an
action should be evaluated to determine whether it falls into a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant impact on the quality of the human environment, and thus,
is exempt from further environmental review under NEPA. That analysis
should determine if (1) a prior NEPA analysis for the ``same'' action
demonstrated that the action will not have significant impacts on the
quality of the human environment (considerations in determining whether
the action is the ``same'' as a prior action may include, among other
things, the nature of the action, the geographic area of the action,
the species affected, the season, the size of the area, etc.) or (2)
the action is likely to result in significant impacts, as defined in 40
CFR 1508.27 and NAO 216-6 Section 6.01b. NMFS analyzed the proposed
rule using these criteria and has preliminarily determined that this
proposed rule can be categorically excluded under 6.03c.3(i) of NAO
216-6. The provisions of the rule are administrative in nature and
facilitate monitoring of all high seas fishing vessels. The
requirements for the installation of VMS EMTUs on vessels, the carrying
of observers, and the prior notice and reporting of transshipments on
the high seas would facilitate monitoring of vessels and would not have
any impacts on the human environment. Moreover, the proposed rule also
includes procedures that incorporate reviews under ESA and NEPA prior
to any authorization of activities on the high seas.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains a collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). This requirement has been submitted to OMB for approval. The
current collection of information, under OMB Control No. 0648-0304,
includes a permit application, vessel marking requirements, and high
seas fishing effort and catch reporting. In addition to this collection
of information, the proposed rule includes new requirements listed
below.
The public reporting burden for each proposed requirement has been
estimated, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information per response.
The estimates are as follows:
Inclusion of a vessel photograph in the permit
application: 30 minutes.
Request for a fishery to be authorized on the high seas:
110 hours.
EMTU purchase and installation: 4 hour for purchase,
installation, and activation of the EMTU and submittal of the
installation and activation report.
Position reports: Automatically sent by the EMTU.
Notices of EMTU power-down and power-up: 10 minutes each.
Prior notice for high seas transshipments: 15 minutes.
Transshipment reporting: 1 hour.
Public comment is sought regarding: Whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Send comments on
these or any other aspects of the collection of information to Mark
Wildman, Office for International Affairs and Seafood Inspection at the
ADDRESSES above, and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to
(202) 395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects
50 CFR Part 300
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing vessels, Foreign relations,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Statistics.
50 CFR Part 600
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing vessels, Foreign relations,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Statistics.
50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaiian Natives, Indians, Northern Mariana Islands,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
50 CFR Part 665
Accountability measures, Annual catch limits, Fisheries, Fishing,
Western and central Pacific.
Dated: April 8, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR parts 300, 600, 660
and 665 are proposed to be amended as follows:
[[Page 19624]]
PART 300--INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 951 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16
U.S.C. 5501 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 2431 et seq., 31 U.S.C. 9701 et seq.
Subpart B--[Removed and Reserved]
0
2. Remove and reserve subpart B, consisting of Sec. 300.10 through
300.17.
0
3. Add subpart Q to read as follows:
Subpart Q--High Seas Fisheries
Sec.
300.330 Purpose.
300.331 Definitions.
300.332 Issuing offices.
300.333 Vessel permits.
300.334 Fisheries authorized on the high seas.
300.335 Bottom fishing.
300.336 Vessel identification.
300.337 Requirements for Enhanced Mobile Transceiver Units (EMTUs).
300.338 Observers.
300.339 Transshipment on the high seas.
300.340 Prohibitions.
300.341 Reporting.
Subpart Q--High Seas Fisheries
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.
Sec. 300.330 Purpose.
This subpart implements the High Seas Fishing Compliance Act of
1995 (Act), which requires the Secretary to license U.S. vessels
fishing on the high seas and to ensure that such vessels do not operate
in contravention of international conservation and management measures
recognized by the United States.
Sec. 300.331 Definitions.
In addition to the terms defined in section 300.2 and those in the
Act and the Agreement to Promote Compliance with International
Conservation and Management Measures by Fishing Vessels on the High
Seas, adopted by the Conference of the Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations on November 24, 1993 (Agreement),
the terms used in this subpart have the following meanings. If a term
is defined differently in section 300.2, the Act, or the Agreement, the
definition in this section shall apply.
Bottom fishing means fishing using gear that is likely to contact
the seafloor during the normal course of fishing operations.
Enhanced mobile transceiver unit (EMTU) is defined in Sec.
600.1500 of this chapter.
High seas means the waters beyond the territorial sea or exclusive
economic zone (or the equivalent) of any Nation, to the extent that
such territorial sea or exclusive economic zone (or the equivalent) is
recognized by the United States.
High seas fishing permit means a permit issued under this subpart.
High seas fishing vessel means any vessel of the United States used
or intended for use on the high seas for the purpose of the commercial
exploitation of living marine resources and as a harvesting vessel,
mothership, or any other support vessel directly engaged in a fishing
operation. Support vessels include vessels that process or transship
fish on the high seas; provide supplies, personnel or fuel on the high
seas to other fishing vessels; or conduct other activities in support
of, or in preparation for fishing.
International conservation and management measures means measures
to conserve or manage one or more species of living marine resources
that are adopted and applied in accordance with the relevant rules of
international law, as reflected in the 1982 United Nations Convention
on the Law of the Sea, and that are recognized by the United States.
Such measures may be adopted by global, regional, or sub-regional
fisheries organizations, subject to the rights and obligations of their
members, or by treaties or other international agreements.
Observer means any person serving in the capacity of an observer
employed by NMFS, either directly or under contract with a third party,
or certified as an observer by NMFS.
Office Director means the director of the NMFS Office for
International Affairs and Seafood Inspection.
Regional Administrator means any one of the Directors of a NMFS
regional office, defined under Sec. 300.2.
Transship or transshipment means offloading or receiving or
otherwise transferring fish or fish products from one fishing vessel to
another. Excluded from this definition is net sharing, which means the
transfer of fish that have not yet been loaded on board any fishing
vessel from the purse seine net of one vessel to another fishing
vessel. Fish shall be considered to be on board a fishing vessel once
they are on a deck or in a hold, or once they are first lifted out of
the water by the vessel.
Vessel monitoring system (VMS) is defined in Sec. 600.1500 of this
title.
Sec. 300.332 Issuing offices.
Any Regional Administrator or the Office Director may issue permits
required under this subpart. While applicants for permits may submit an
application to any Regional Administrator or the Office Director,
applicants are encouraged to submit their applications (with envelopes
marked ``Attn: HSFCA Permits'') to the Regional Administrator or the
Office Director with whom they normally interact on fisheries matters.
Sec. 300.333 Vessel permits.
(a) Eligibility. (1) Any vessel owner or operator of a high seas
fishing vessel is eligible to receive a permit for a fishery authorized
on the high seas under this subpart, unless the vessel was previously
authorized to be used for fishing on the high seas by a foreign nation,
and--
(i) The foreign nation suspended such authorization, because the
vessel undermined the effectiveness of international conservation and
management measures, and the suspension has not expired; or
(ii) The foreign nation, within the 3 years preceding application
for a permit under this section, withdrew such authorization, because
the vessel undermined the effectiveness of international conservation
and management measures.
(2) The restrictions in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (ii) of this
section do not apply if ownership of the vessel has changed since the
vessel undermined the effectiveness of international conservation and
management measures, and the new owner has provided sufficient evidence
to the Regional Administrator or Office Director demonstrating that the
owner and operator at the time the vessel undermined the effectiveness
of such measures have no further legal, beneficial, or financial
interest in, or control of, the vessel.
(3) The restrictions in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (ii) of this
section do not apply if it is determined by the Regional Administrator
or Office Director that issuing a permit would not subvert the purposes
of the Agreement.
(b) Applicability. Any high seas fishing vessel used for fishing,
as defined under Sec. 300.2, on the high seas must have on board a
valid permit issued under this subpart.
(c) Application. Permit application forms are available from the
NMFS Web site or from any Regional Administrator or the Office
Director. Failure to submit a complete and accurate application, along
with all other required documentation and the specified fee will
preclude issuance of a permit. To apply for a permit under this
subpart, the owner or operator of a high seas fishing vessel must
submit the following to a Regional Administrator or Office Director:
[[Page 19625]]
(1) A complete, accurate application form signed by the vessel
owner or operator.
(2) Information required under this section and Sec. 300.334(a).
(3) A color photograph showing an entire bow-to-stern side-view of
the vessel in its current form and appearance. The photograph must
clearly and legibly display the vessel name and identification
markings. If the vessel's form or appearance materially changes (such
as the vessel is painted another color, the vessel's identification
markings change, or the vessel undergoes a structural modification) the
vessel owner and operator must submit a new photograph of the vessel
within 15 days of the change.
(4) For vessels with state registration instead of U.S. Coast Guard
documentation, the applicant must supply additional vessel information
that NMFS may request.
(5) The fee specified in the application form. Payment by a
commercial instrument later determined to be insufficiently funded will
invalidate any permit. NMFS charges this fee to recover the
administrative expenses of permit issuance, and the amount of the fee
is determined in accordance with the procedures of the NOAA Finance
Handbook.
(d) Permit issuance and validity. (1) Except as provided for in
subpart D of 15 CFR part 904, and subject to paragraphs (a), (c), and
(d)(2) and (3), the Regional Administrator or Office Director will
issue a permit, which will include applicable conditions or
restrictions, within 15 days of receipt of a completed application and
payment of the appropriate fee.
(2) The Regional Administrator or Office Director will not issue a
permit unless an EMTU has been installed and activated on the vessel in
accordance with Sec. 300.337(c)(2).
(3) The Regional Administrator or Office Director will not issue a
permit unless the applicant holds a valid permit for the subject vessel
for U.S. domestic fisheries related to the authorized high seas
fishery.
(4) Except as otherwise provided, permits issued under this subpart
are valid for 5 years from the date of issuance. For a permit to remain
valid to its expiration date, the vessel's U.S. Coast Guard
documentation or state registration must be kept current. A permit
issued under this subpart is void when the vessel owner or the name of
the vessel changes, or in the event the vessel is no longer eligible
for U.S. documentation, such documentation is revoked or denied, or the
vessel is removed from such documentation.
(5) A permit issued under this subpart is not transferable or
assignable to another vessel or owner; it is valid only for the vessel
and owner to which it is issued.
(e) Display. A valid permit, or a copy thereof, issued under this
subpart must be on board any high seas fishing vessel while operating
on the high seas and available for inspection by an authorized officer.
(f) Change in application information. Any changes in vessel
documentation status or other permit application information must be
reported in writing to the Regional Administrator or Office Director
who issued the permit within 15 days of such changes.
(g) Renewal. Application for renewal of a permit prior to its
expiration is the responsibility of the permit holder and may be
completed per Sec. 300.333(c). The Regional Administrator or Office
Director will not consider a permit renewal application to be complete
until the permit holder satisfies all required fishing activity report
requirements under the permit and Sec. 300.342. The Regional
Administrator or Office Director will not issue a renewed permit unless
an EMTU has been activated on the vessel in accordance with Sec.
300.337(c)(2) and the applicant holds a valid permit for the subject
vessel for U.S. domestic fisheries related to the authorized high seas
fishery.
(h) Marine mammals and ESA-listed species. Permits issued under
this section do not authorize vessels or persons subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States to take marine mammals or ESA-listed
species. No marine mammals or ESA-listed species may be taken in the
course of fishing operations unless the taking is allowed under the
Marine Mammal Protection Act or the Endangered Species Act (ESA),
pursuant to regulations, an authorization, or permit granted by NMFS or
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
(i) Permit status changes. NMFS may modify, suspend, or revoke a
permit issued under this subpart if permitted activities may impact
living marine resources in ways that were not foreseen or anticipated
at the time of permit issuance; are in contravention of an
international conservation and management measure; or violate any
applicable law. NMFS will notify an affected permit holder of any
change in permit status by contacting the permit holder at the address
of record provided on the permit application or as updated pursuant to
paragraph (f) of this subsection.
Sec. 300.334 Fisheries authorized on the high seas.
(a) When applying for a permit under Sec. 300.333, the owner or
operator of a high seas fishing vessel must identify in the application
the authorized fisheries in which he or she intends to fish. More than
one authorized fishery may be selected. The following fisheries are
authorized on the high seas:
(1) 50 CFR part 300, Subpart C--Eastern Pacific Tuna Fisheries
(2) 50 CFR part 300, Subpart D--South Pacific Tuna Fisheries
(3) 50 CFR part 300, Subpart G--Antarctic Marine Living Resources
(4) 50 CFR part 635--Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fisheries
(5) 50 CFR part 660, Subpart K--U.S. West Coast Fisheries for Highly
Migratory Species
(6) 50 CFR part 665, Subpart F--Western Pacific Pelagic Fisheries
(7) South Pacific Albacore Troll Fishery
(8) Northwest Atlantic Fishery
(b) For each of the authorized fisheries specified on the high seas
fishing permit, the owner or operator of the high seas fishing vessel
must:
(1) Abide by the regulations, set forth in other parts of this
chapter and Chapter VI, governing those authorized fisheries while
operating on the high seas;
(2) Obtain and renew any appropriate permits or authorizations; and
(3) Notify the Regional Administrator or Office Director who issued
the permit immediately in the event that a species listed as threatened
or endangered under the ESA is taken incidental to the fishing
activities without authorization under a relevant incidental take
statement.
(c) Change in authorized fisheries. If a high seas fishing permit
holder elects to change the authorized fisheries specified on the
permit, he or she shall notify the Regional Administrator or Office
Director who issued the permit of the change(s) and shall obtain the
underlying permits for the authorized fisheries prior to engaging in
the fishery on the high seas. Per the process under Sec. 300.333(d),
the Regional Administrator or Office Director will then issue a revised
high seas fishing permit which will expire 5 years from the original
effective date.
(d) Revision of authorized fisheries list. Through rulemaking, NMFS
will add a fishery to, or delete a fishery from, the list in paragraph
(a) of this section. NMFS may add or delete fisheries from the list
after completing any analyses required under the Endangered Species
Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, National Environmental Policy Act,
and
[[Page 19626]]
other applicable laws. In taking such action, NMFS, in consultation
with the relevant Regional Fishery Management Council(s) where
appropriate, will consider, among other things, whether:
(1) The proposed fishing activities would detrimentally affect the
well-being of the stock of any regulated species of fish, marine
mammal, or species listed as threatened or endangered under the
Endangered Species Act;
(2) The proposed fishing activities would be inconsistent with
relevant fishery management plans and their implementing regulations or
other applicable law;
(3) Insufficient mechanisms exist to effectively monitor the
activities of vessels engaged in the proposed fishing activities; or
(4) The proposed fishing activities would contravene international
conservation and management measures recognized by the United States.
(e) Request for revision of authorized fisheries list. A person may
submit a written request to the Office Director to add a fishery to or
delete a fishery from the list. A request to delete a fishery from the
list of authorized fisheries must include the name of the fishery;
information that addresses considerations under paragraph (d) of this
section; and, if requested by NMFS, any additional information
necessary for NMFS to conduct analyses required under applicable laws.
A request to add a fishery to the list of authorized fisheries must
include the following information:
(1) The species (target and incidental) expected to be harvested
and the anticipated amounts of such harvest and bycatch;
(2) The approximate times and places when fishing is expected to
take place, the number and type of vessels expected to participate, and
the type, size, and amount of gear expected to be used;
(3) A description of the specific area that may be affected by the
fishing activities;
(4) A description of any anticipated impacts on the environment,
including impacts on fisheries, marine mammals, and species listed as
threatened or endangered under the ESA or their critical habitat;
(5) Other information that addresses considerations under paragraph
(d); and
(6) If requested by NMFS, any additional information necessary for
NMFS to conduct analyses required under applicable laws.
(7) Once all required information is received to proceed with
consideration of a request, NMFS will publish in the Federal Register a
proposed rule, noting receipt of the request to add an authorized
fishery, and inviting information and comments. Relevant information
received during the comment period may be considered by NMFS and, where
appropriate, the relevant Regional Fishery Management Council(s) to
analyze potential environmental impacts of the fisheries and develop
any conditions or restrictions. Based on its analysis, considerations
under paragraph (d) of this section, and other relevant considerations,
NMFS would publish its decision on the request in the Federal Register.
(f) Deletion of a fishery from the authorized fisheries list. NMFS
will delete (i.e., deauthorize) a fishery under paragraph (d) or (e) of
this section through publication of a final rule. NMFS will also
provide notice to affected permit holders by email at the address
provided to NMFS in the high seas permit application and by Registered
Mail. When a fishery is deleted from the list, any activities on the
high seas related to that fishery are prohibited as of the effective
date of the final rule. In addition, the high seas permit will be
voided unless the permit holder notifies NMFS that he or she elects to
change to another authorized high seas fishery or continue in any other
authorized fisheries noted on the permit. Once the applicant so
notifies NMFS and, if necessary, secures any underlying permits
necessary for participation in another authorized high seas fishery,
the Regional Administrator or Office Director will then issue a revised
high seas fishing permit per the process under Sec. 300.333(d). The
revised permit will expire 5 years from the original effective date.
Sec. 300.335 Bottom fishing.
(a) Bottom fishing may be permitted on the high seas when
authorized by international conservation and management measures
recognized by the United States. For bottom fishing activity not
subject to international conservation measures recognized by the United
States, a person who seeks to engage in such fishing must request
authorization of a new high seas fishery as described in Sec.
300.334(e), then if the fishery is authorized, must obtain all
applicable permits including a high seas fishing permit issued under
Sec. 300.333. NMFS may specify conditions in the permit to mitigate
adverse impacts on VMEs, which may include the types of conditions that
have been adopted in relevant RFMO measures recognized by the United
States.
(b) Permit. To be permitted under this section, the owner or
operator of a high seas fishing vessel must follow the procedures under
Sec. 300.334(e), or if he or she seeks to change an existing permit,
must follow the procedures under Sec. 300.334(c).
Sec. 300.336 Vessel identification.
(a) General. A vessel permitted under this subpart must be marked
for identification purposes in accordance with this section.
(b) Marking. Vessels must be marked either:
(1) In accordance with vessel identification requirements specified
in Federal fishery regulations issued under the Magnuson-Stevens Act or
under other Federal fishery management statutes; or
(2) In accordance with the following identification requirements:
(i) A vessel must be marked with its international radio call sign
(IRCS), or, if not assigned an IRCS, must be marked (in order of
priority) with its Federal, state, or other documentation number
appearing on its high seas fishing permit and, if a WCPFC Area
Endorsement has been issued for the vessel under Sec. 300.212, that
documentation number must be preceded by the characters ``USA'' and a
hyphen (that is, ``USA-'');
(ii) The markings must be displayed at all times on the vessel's
side or superstructure, port and starboard, as well as on a deck;
(iii) The markings must be placed so that they do not extend below
the waterline, are not obscured by fishing gear, whether stowed or in
use, and are clear of flow from scuppers or overboard discharges that
might damage or discolor the markings;
(iv) Block lettering and numbering must be used;
(v) The height of the letters and numbers must be in proportion to
the size of the vessel as follows: For vessels 25 meters (m) and over
in length overall, the height of letters and numbers must be no less
than 1.0 m; for vessels 20 m but less than 25 m in length overall, the
height of letters and numbers must be no less than 0.8 m; for vessels
15 m but less than 20 m in length overall, the height of letters and
numbers must be no less than 0.6 m; for vessels 12 m but less than 15 m
in length overall, the height of letters and numbers must be no less
than 0.4 m; for vessels 5 m but less than 12 m in length overall, the
height of letters and numbers must be no less than 0.3 m; and for
vessels under 5 m in length overall, the height of letters and numbers
must be no less than 0.1 m;
(vi) The height of the letters and numbers to be placed on decks
must be no less than 0.3 m;
[[Page 19627]]
(vii) The length of the hyphen(s), if any, must be half the height
(h) of the letters and numbers;
(viii) The width of the stroke for all letters, numbers, and
hyphens must be h/6;
(ix) The space between letters and/or numbers must not exceed h/4
nor be less than h/6;
(x) The space between adjacent letters having sloping sides must
not exceed h/8 nor be less than h/10;
(xi) The marks must be white on a black background, or black on a
white background;
(xii) The background must extend to provide a border around the
mark of no less than h/6; and
(xiii) The marks and the background must be maintained in good
condition at all times.
Sec. 300.337 Requirements for Enhanced Mobile Transceiver Units
(EMTUs).
(a) Vessel position information. The owner or operator of a vessel
issued a permit under this subpart, or for which such permit is
required, must have installed on board the vessel a NMFS type-approved
enhanced mobile transceiver unit (EMTU). The operator or owner of the
vessel must ensure that the EMTU is operational and properly reporting
positions to NMFS as required by this section, except when exempt under
paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this section. If the vessel is also
subject to EMTU requirements in other parts of this title, the more
restrictive requirements apply.
(b) Contact information and business hours. With respect to the
requirements in this section, vessel owners and operators should
consult with the divisional office of the NOAA Office of Law
Enforcement (OLE) in, or nearest, the Region issuing the permit under
this subpart. The OLE VMS Helpdesk in OLE headquarters office may also
be contacted.
(c) EMTU installation and activation--(1) EMTU installation. The
vessel owner or operator shall obtain and have installed on the fishing
vessel, by a qualified marine electrician and in accordance with any
instructions provided by the VMS Helpdesk or OLE divisional office, a
NMFS type-approved EMTU. The vessel owner and operator shall authorize
NMFS to receive and relay transmissions from the EMTU. The vessel owner
and operator shall arrange for a type-approved mobile communications
service to receive and transmit position reports and email
communications from the EMTU to NMFS. NMFS makes available lists of
type-approved EMTUs and mobile communications service providers. Vessel
owners must ensure that the EMTU and communications service hardware
purchased is type-approved for all fisheries and regions in which their
vessel will be operating.
(2) EMTU activation. When an EMTU is installed or reinstalled or
the mobile communications service provider changes, or if directed by
NMFS, the vessel owner and operator shall prior to leaving port:
(i) Turn on the EMTU to make it operational;
(ii) Submit a VMS Installation and Activation Certification form,
or an activation report as directed by OLE, to the OLE divisional
office within or nearest to the region issuing the permit under this
subpart; and
(iii) Receive verbal or written confirmation from NMFS that
transmissions are being received properly from the EMTU.
(d) EMTU operation. Unless otherwise provided below, and subject to
more restrictive requirements where applicable, the vessel owner or
operator shall continuously operate the EMTU so that it provides to
NMFS position information automatically transmitted, every hour or as
directed by OLE.
(1) In-port exemption: The EMTU may be powered down when the vessel
will remain at a dock or permanent mooring for more than 72 consecutive
hours and after the notice required in paragraph (d)(3) of this section
is submitted. When powering up the EMTU after the in-port exemption,
the vessel owner or operator must submit the report required in
paragraph (d)(4) of this section at least 2 hours before leaving port
or mooring.
(2) Long-term exemption: The EMTU may be powered down if the vessel
will not operate on the high seas or in any fishery that requires EMTU
operation for more than 30 consecutive days and after the notice
required in paragraph (d)(3) of this section is submitted. When
powering up the EMTU from the long-term exemption, the vessel owner or
operator must submit the report required in paragraph (d)(4) of this
section.
(3) Prior to each power-down of the EMTU, under paragraph (d)(1) or
(2) of this section, the vessel owner or operator must report to the
OLE divisional office during business hours, via email or other means
as directed by OLE: The vessel's name; the vessel's official number;
the intent to power down the EMTU; the reason for power-down; the port
where the vessel is docked or area where it will be operating; and the
full name, telephone, and email contact information for the vessel
owner or operator.
(4) When powering up the EMTU, the vessel owner or operator must
report to the OLE divisional office during business hours, via email or
other means as directed by OLE: The fact that the EMTU has been powered
up; the vessel's name; the vessel's official number; port name;
intended fishery; and full name, telephone, and email contact
information for the vessel owner or operator.
(5) If the EMTU is powered up after a long-term or in-port
exemption, the vessel owner must receive email confirmation from the
OLE divisional office that EMTU transmissions are being received
properly before leaving port, entering the high seas, or entering a
fishery that requires EMTU operation.
(e) Failure of EMTU. If the vessel owner or operator becomes aware
that the EMTU has become inoperable or that transmission of automatic
position reports from the EMTU has been interrupted, or if notified by
NMFS or the U.S. Coast Guard that automatic position reports are not
being received from the EMTU or that an inspection of the EMTU has
revealed a problem with the performance of the EMTU, the vessel owner
or operator shall comply with the following requirements:
(1) If the vessel is at port, the vessel owner or operator shall
repair or replace the EMTU and comply with the requirements in
paragraph (c)(2) of this section before the vessel leaves port.
(2) If the vessel is at sea, the vessel owner, operator, or
designee shall contact the OLE divisional office by telephone or email
at the earliest opportunity during business hours and identify the
caller, vessel name, vessel location, and the type of fishing
permit(s). The vessel operator shall follow the instructions provided
by the OLE divisional office, which could include: Ceasing fishing,
stowing fishing gear, returning to port, or submitting periodic
position reports at specified intervals by other means. The vessel
owner or operator must repair or replace the EMTU and comply with the
requirements in paragraph (c)(2) of this section within 30 days or
before the vessel leaves port, whichever is sooner.
(f) Related VMS requirements. Unless specified otherwise in the
high seas fishing permit, a vessel owner's and operator's compliance
with requirements in part 300, 635, 660, or 665 of this title relating
to the installation, carrying, and operation of EMTUs will satisfy the
requirements of this section, if the requirements are the same or more
restrictive than those in this section and provided that:
(1) On the high seas, the EMTU is operated continuously and
position
[[Page 19628]]
information is automatically transmitted every hour;
(2) The EMTU is type-approved by NMFS;
(3) The vessel owner or operator has authorized NMFS to receive and
relay transmissions from the EMTU; and
(4) The requirements of paragraph (d) of this section are complied
with. If the EMTU is owned by NMFS, the requirement under paragraph (e)
of this section to repair or replace the EMTU will be the
responsibility of NMFS, but the vessel owner and operator shall be
responsible for ensuring that the EMTU complies with the requirements
specified in paragraph (c)(2) of this section before the vessel leaves
port.
(g) Costs. The vessel owner and operator shall be responsible for
all costs associated with the purchase, installation, operation, and
maintenance of the EMTU and for all charges levied by vendors as
necessary to ensure the transmission of automatic position reports to
NMFS as required in paragraph (c) of this section. However, if the EMTU
is being carried and operated in compliance with the requirements in
part 300, 635, 660, or 665 of this title relating to the installation,
carrying, and operation of EMTUs, the vessel owner and operator shall
not be responsible for any costs that are the responsibility of NMFS
under those regulations.
(h) Tampering. The vessel owner and operator shall ensure that the
EMTU is not tampered with, disabled, destroyed, damaged or operated
improperly, and that its operation is not impeded or interfered with.
(i) Inspection. The vessel owner and operator shall make the EMTU,
including its antenna, connectors and antenna cable, available for
inspection by authorized officers or by officers conducting boarding
and inspection under a scheme adopted by an RFMO of which the United
States is a member.
(j) Access to data. As required under fishery-specific regulations
in other parts of this title, the vessel owner and operator shall make
the vessel's position data, obtained from the EMTU or other means,
available to authorized officers and to any inspector conducting a high
seas boarding and inspection pursuant to a scheme adopted by an RFMO of
which the United States is a member.
(k) Communication devices. (1) In cases of EMTU failure as
specified under paragraph (e) of this section, and to facilitate
communication with management and enforcement authorities regarding the
functioning of the EMTU and other purposes, the vessel operator shall,
while the vessel is at sea, carry on board and continuously monitor a
two-way communication device, in addition to the EMTU, that is capable
of real-time communication with the OLE divisional office.
Sec. 300.338 Observers.
(a) Where observer coverage is not otherwise required by other
regulations or relevant RFMO conservation and management measures, NMFS
may select for at-sea observer coverage any vessel that has been issued
a high seas fishing permit. A vessel so selected by NMFS must carry an
observer when directed to do so.
(b) NMFS will contact a vessel owner, in writing, when his or her
vessel is selected for observer coverage under this section.
(c) A vessel shall not fish on the high seas without taking an
observer if NMFS contacted the vessel owner under paragraph (b) of this
section, or if so required as a condition of a permit issued under this
subpart or pursuant to other legal authorities, unless the requirement
to carry an observer has been waived under paragraph (d) of this
section.
(d) The vessel owner that NMFS contacts under paragraph (b) of this
section must notify NMFS of his or her next fishing trip that may take
place on the high seas before commencing the fishing trip. NMFS will
specify the notification procedures and information requirements, such
as expected gear deployment, trip duration and fishing area, in its
selection letter. Once notified of a trip by the vessel owner, NMFS
will assign an observer for that trip or notify the vessel owner that
coverage pursuant to this subpart is not required, given the existing
requirement for observer coverage under other legal authorities.
(e) The owner, operator, and crew of a vessel on which a NMFS-
approved observer is assigned must comply with safety regulations at
Sec. Sec. 600.725 and 600.746 of this title and--
(1) Facilitate the safe embarkation and debarkation of the
observer.
(2) Provide the observer with accommodations, food, and amenities
that are equivalent of those provided to vessel officers.
(3) Allow the observer access to all areas of the vessel necessary
to conduct observer duties.
(4) Allow the observer free and unobstructed access to the vessel's
bridge, working decks, holding bins, weight scales, holds, and any
other space used to hold, process, weigh, or store fish.
(5) Allow the observer access to EMTUs, communications equipment,
and navigation equipment to verify operation, obtain data, and use the
communication capabilities of the units for official purposes.
(6) Allow the observer to inspect and copy the vessel's log,
communications logs, and any records associated with the catch and
disposition of fish for that trip.
(7) Provide accurate vessel locations by latitude and longitude
upon request by the observer.
(8) Provide access to sea turtle, marine mammal, sea bird, or other
specimens as requested by the observer.
(9) Notify the observer in a timely fashion when commercial fishing
activity is to begin and end.
(f) The permit holder, vessel operator, and crew must cooperate
with the observer in the performance of the observer's duties.
(g) The permit holder, vessel operator, and crew must comply with
other terms and conditions to ensure the effective deployment and use
of observers that the Regional Administrator or Office Director imposes
by written notice.
Sec. 300.339 Transshipment on the high seas.
(a) In addition to any other applicable restrictions on
transshipment, including those under parts 300 and 635 of this title,
the following requirements apply to transshipments taking place on the
high seas:
(1) The owner or operator of a U.S. vessel receiving or offloading
fish on the high seas shall provide a notice by fax or email to the
Regional Administrator or the Office Director at least 36 hours prior
to any intended transshipment on the high seas with the following
information: The vessels offloading and receiving the transshipment
(names, official numbers, and vessel types); the location (latitude and
longitude to the nearest tenth of a degree) of transshipment; date and
time that transshipment is expected to occur; and species, processed
state, and quantities (in metric tons) expected to be transshipped. If
another requirement for prior notice applies, the more restrictive
requirement (i.e. a requirement for greater advance notice and/or more
specific information regarding vessels, location etc.) must be
followed.
(2) U.S. high seas fishing vessels shall report transshipments on
the high seas to the Regional Administrator or Office Director within
15 calendar days after the vessel first enters into port, using the
form obtained from the Regional Administrator or Office Director. If
there are applicable transshipment reporting requirements in other
parts of this title, the more restrictive requirement (e.g., a
reporting requirement of fewer than 15 calendar days) must be followed.
(b) [Reserved]
[[Page 19629]]
Sec. 300.340 Prohibitions.
In addition to the prohibitions in Sec. 300.4, it is unlawful for
any person to:
(a) Use a high seas fishing vessel on the high seas in
contravention of international conservation and management measures.
(b) Fish on the high seas unless the vessel has been issued, and
has on board, a valid permit issued under Sec. 300.333(d).
(c) Fish on the high seas unless the vessel has been issued, and
has on board, valid permits related to the authorized fisheries noted
on the high seas fishing permit, as required under Sec. 300.334(b).
(d) Operate a high seas fishing vessel on the high seas that is not
marked in accordance with Sec. 300.336.
(e) With respect to the EMTU,
(1) Fail to install, activate, or continuously operate a properly
functioning and type-approved EMTU as required in Sec. 300.337;
(2) Power-down or power-up the EMTU without following the
procedures required in Sec. 300.337;
(3) In the event of EMTU failure or interruption, fail to repair or
replace an EMTU, fail to notify the appropriate OLE divisional office
and follow the instructions provided, or otherwise fail to act as
required in Sec. 300.337;
(4) Disable, destroy, damage or operate improperly an EMTU
installed under Sec. 300.337, attempt to do any of the same, or fail
to ensure that its operation is not impeded or interfered with, as
provided in Sec. 300.337;
(5) Fail to make an EMTU installed under Sec. 300.337 or the
position data obtained from it available for inspection, as provided in
Sec. 300.337; or
(6) Fail to carry on board and monitor communication devices as
required in Sec. 300.337(l);
(f) With respect to observers,
(1) Fail to provide to an observer, a NMFS employee, or a
designated observer provider, information that has been requested
pursuant to Sec. 300.338 or Sec. 600.746 of this title, or fail to
allow an observer, a NMFS employee, or a designated observer provider
to inspect any item described at Sec. 300.338 or Sec. 600.746 of this
title;
(2) Fish without an observer when the vessel is required to carry
an observer pursuant to Sec. 300.338(c);
(3) Assault, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with an
observer;
(4) Prohibit or bar by command, impediment, threat, coercion,
interference, or refusal of reasonable assistance, an observer from
conducting his or her duties as an observer; or
(5) Tamper with or destroy samples or equipment.
(g) Fail to submit a prior notice or a report of a transshipment as
provided in Sec. 300.339(b) of this title.
(h) Fail to comply with reporting requirements as provided in Sec.
300.341.
Sec. 300.341 Reporting.
(a) General. The operator of any vessel permitted under this
subpart must accurately maintain on board the vessel a complete record
of fishing activities, such as catch, effort, and other data and report
high seas catch and effort information to NMFS in a manner consistent
with the reporting requirements of the authorized fishery(ies) noted on
the high seas permit. Reports must include: Identification information
for vessel and operator; operator signature; crew size; whether an
observer is aboard; target species; gear used; dates, times, locations,
and conditions under which fishing was conducted; species and amounts
of fish retained and discarded; and details of any interactions with
sea turtles, marine mammals, or birds.
(1) The vessel owner and operator are responsible for obtaining and
completing the reporting forms from the Regional Administrator or
Office Director who issued the permit holder's high seas fishing
permit. The completed forms must be submitted to the same Regional
Administrator or Office Director or, if directed by NMFS, to a Science
Center.
(2) Reports must be submitted within the deadline provided for in
the authorized fishery or within 15 days following the end of a fishing
trip, whichever is sooner. Contact information for the Regional
Administrators and Science Center Directors can be found on the NMFS
Web site.
(b) [Reserved].
PART 600--MAGNUSON-STEVENS ACT PROVISIONS
0
4. The authority citation for part 600 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 561 and 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
5. In Sec. 600.705, add paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 600.705 Relation to other laws.
* * * * *
(g) High seas fishing activities. Regulations governing permits and
requirements for fishing activities on the high seas are set forth in
50 CFR part 300, subparts A and Q. Any vessel operating on the high
seas must obtain a permit issued pursuant to the High Seas Fishing
Compliance Act.
0
5. In Sec. 600.745, revise the first two sentences in paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
Sec. 600.745 Scientific research activity, exempted fishing, and
exempted educational activity.
(a) Scientific research activity. Nothing in this part is intended
to inhibit or prevent any scientific research activity conducted by a
scientific research vessel. Persons planning to conduct scientific
research activities on board a scientific research vessel in the EEZ or
on the high seas are encouraged to submit to the appropriate Regional
Administrator or Director, 60 days or as soon as practicable prior to
its start, a scientific research plan for each scientific activity. * *
*
* * * * *
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES
0
6. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., and
16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
0
7. In Sec. 660.2, add paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 660.2 Relation to other laws.
* * * * *
(c) Fishing activities on the high seas are governed by regulations
of the High Seas Fishing Compliance Act set forth in 50 CFR part 300,
subparts A and Q.
Sec. 660.708 [Amended]
0
8. In Sec. 660.708, remove paragraph (a)(1)(iii) and redesignate
paragraph (a)(1)(iv) as paragraph (a)(1)(iii).
PART 665--FISHERIES IN THE WESTERN PACIFIC
0
9. The authority citation for part 665 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
10. In Sec. 665.1, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 665.1 Purpose and scope.
* * * * *
(b) General regulations governing fishing by all vessels of the
United States and by fishing vessels other than vessels of the United
States are contained in 50 CFR parts 300 and 600.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-08425 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P