Reimbursement for Caskets and Urns for Burial of Unclaimed Remains in a National Cemetery, 19534-19538 [2015-08388]
Download as PDF
19534
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
rule is to warn mariners in waters where
72 COLREGS apply.
DATES: This rule is effective April 13,
2015 and is applicable beginning April
1, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commander Theron R. Korsak,
(Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of
the Judge Advocate General, Department
of the Navy, 1322 Patterson Ave. SE.,
Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC
20374–5066, telephone 202–685–5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C.
1605, the DoN amends 32 CFR part 706.
This amendment provides notice that
the DAJAG (Admiralty and Maritime
Law), under authority delegated by the
Secretary of the Navy, has certified that
USS CORONADO (LCS 4) is a vessel of
the Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot fully
comply with the following specific
provisions of 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a
naval ship: Annex I, paragraph 3(c),
pertaining to the task light’s horizontal
distance from the fore and aft centerline
of the vessel in the athwartship
direction. The DAJAG (Admiralty and
Maritime Law) has also certified that the
lights involved are located in closest
possible compliance with the applicable
72 COLREGS requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in
accordance with 32 CFR parts 296 and
701, that publication of this amendment
for public comment prior to adoption is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest since it is
based on technical findings that the
placement of lights on this vessel in a
manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel’s
ability to perform its military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Vessels.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the DoN amends part 706 of
title 32 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
PART 706—CERTIFICATIONS AND
EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE
INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR
PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA,
1972
1. The authority citation for part 706
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
2. Section 706.2 is amended in Table
Five by revising the entry for USS
CORONADO (LCS 4) to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:35 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
§ 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of
the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and
33 U.S.C. 1605.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrina Brown, Office of Field
Programs (41A), National Cemetery
*
*
*
*
*
Administration (NCA), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue
*
*
*
*
*
NW., Washington, DC 20420.
Telephone: (202) 461–6833 (this is not
TABLE FOUR
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
Horizontal
document published on July 2, 2014 (79
distance from
FR 37698), VA proposed revising its
the fore
and aft
regulations governing burial in national
Vessel
Number
centerline of
cemeteries to implement new authority
the vessel in
under section 2306 of title 38, United
the athwart
States Code (U.S.C.), to furnish a casket
ship direction
or urn for interment in a VA national
cemetery of the unclaimed remains of
*
*
*
*
*
veterans for whom VA cannot identify
USS COROa next-of-kin and determines that
NADO ..........
LCS 4
0.18 sufficient financial resources for the
furnishing of a casket or urn for burial
*
*
*
*
*
are not otherwise available. The 30-day
public comment period ended on
*
*
*
*
*
August 1, 2014. VA received fourteen
Approved: April 1, 2015.
comments from interested individuals
A.B. Fischer,
and organizations. To address some of
Captain, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant
those comments, as will be explained in
Judge Advocate, General (Admiralty and
detail below, VA added a new
Maritime Law).
paragraph (b) and redesignated
Dated: April 6, 2015.
proposed paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) as
N. A. Hagerty-Ford,
paragraphs (c), (d), and (e), respectively.
Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate
Eight commenters expressed support
General, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison
for the proposed amendment. We thank
Officer.
these individuals for taking the time to
[FR Doc. 2015–08422 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am]
review and comment on the rulemaking.
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
We make no changes to the regulation
based on these comments.
One commenter suggested that VA
contract with online providers of
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
caskets and urns to make bulk
AFFAIRS
purchases of caskets and urns, which
would then be shipped to individuals
38 CFR Part 38
who apply online. As discussed in the
preamble to the proposed rulemaking,
RIN 2900–AO99
VA considered the direct purchase
option but determined that would be a
Reimbursement for Caskets and Urns
less efficient and economical means of
for Burial of Unclaimed Remains in a
administering this benefit. Development
National Cemetery
of an online application portal and
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs. establishment of contractual
relationships with suppliers would
ACTION: Final rule.
require considerable time and would
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans
delay VA’s ability to timely provide this
Affairs (VA) National Cemetery
benefit as needs arise. The expense
Administration (NCA) amends its
required to contract and to build an
regulations to establish a new program
online portal would decrease the
to provide reimbursement for caskets
resources available to provide the
and urns for the interment of the
benefit itself. The commenter stated that
remains of veterans with no known
he felt the suggestion would allow for
next-of-kin and where sufficient
‘‘quality control.’’ As we indicated in
financial resources are not available for
the preamble to the proposed
this purpose.
rulemaking, unclaimed veteran remains
DATES: Effective date: The final rule is
are often in the custody of funeral
effective May 13, 2015. Applicability
homes or others who are authorized
date: The final rule applies to claims for under state law to dispose of unclaimed
reimbursement for burial receptacles for remains. 79 FR at 37699. Therefore, we
individuals who died on or after January believe they are likely familiar with
10, 2014.
procuring burial receptacles. We further
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
expect that those who will provide
caskets or urns will use the same
suppliers from whom they purchase
caskets and urns for the families they
serve in their normal course of business
and that the caskets and urns they
purchase will be of no lesser quality
than those provided for familyrequested funeral services. Further, as
we provide in redesignated
§ 38.628(c)(5), VA will visually inspect
the casket or urn when it is presented
at the national cemetery to ensure that
it corresponds to the description in the
invoice and meets NCA’s specifications,
which are intended to ensure safe
handling and integrity of veteran
remains. Accordingly, VA makes no
changes based on this comment.
Another commenter urged that we
implement this benefit so that it is ‘‘not
cumbersome to administer and is fair in
the time it takes to reimburse.’’ We
believe that the reimbursement program
we have outlined in our regulation
meets both of those criteria. The
commenter further suggested that VA
develop a form and process for eligible
veterans to ‘‘pre-order [and] get preauthorized’’ to assist them with advance
planning. Generally, VA encourages
veterans and their families to plan for
their burial needs. However, while such
a plan may include a stated desire to be
buried in a national cemetery, VA has
no authority to pre-determine eligibility
for burial or memorialization, because
eligibility decisions must be made based
on the law in effect at the time the
individual dies. If, upon the death of an
eligible veteran, VA is made aware of
the veteran’s wishes regarding burial,
VA will try to accommodate those
wishes to the fullest extent possible.
This regulation, however, is applicable
when a veteran dies without sufficient
funds available for burial and has no
known next-of-kin. Third parties, such
as public administrators, local coroners,
funeral directors or volunteer
organizations, who may have assumed
responsibility for the burial of these
unclaimed remains, will likely be
unaware of any wishes for burial
arrangements. However, even without
knowing the burial wishes of the
deceased veteran, by establishing a
means to reimburse these third parties
for the expense of a burial receptacle at
a time of need, VA will ensure that
these veterans receive an appropriate
burial in a national cemetery. VA will
make no changes based on this
comment.
VA received comments from a funeral
services trade association on two issues.
The first issue concerned our reference
to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
regulations that define ‘‘alternative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:35 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
container’’ which VA construed as
applicable to cremation urns. The
commenter stated that ‘‘alternative
container,’’ in the funeral industry, ‘‘is
the receptacle that the body is placed
into prior to cremation.’’ The
commenter also stated that plastic is
‘‘generally not deemed appropriate for
use as an urn.’’ The commenter then
suggested that we revise our regulation
to include wood or metal, in addition to
durable plastic, as an acceptable
material for urns subject to
reimbursement under § 38.628. We
reviewed the FTC regulation in light of
this feedback and believe that the
commenter’s statement that an
alternative container refers to a
receptacle for the body prior to
cremation is an accurate interpretation
of the FTC regulation, which states that
requiring the public to purchase a casket
for direct cremations is an unfair or
deceptive act or practice for a funeral
provider and requires funeral providers
to ‘‘make an alternative container
available for direct cremations.’’ See 16
CFR 453.4(a)(2). We wish to correct the
statement made in the preamble to the
proposed rule (see 79 FR at 37699).
However, we did not ‘‘base’’ the
definition of ‘‘urn’’ in § 38.628 on the
phrase ‘‘alternative container’’ (we did
use the definition of ‘‘casket’’ from the
FTC regulation) nor was ‘‘alternative
container’’ used elsewhere in the
proposed rulemaking. Our definition of
urn was developed using the elements
we felt necessary for a burial receptacle
that would ensure that the cremated
remains of veterans, in the absence of a
family member to make such
determinations, are laid to rest in a
consistently dignified manner. We have
decided that, for purposes of
reimbursement, an urn made of durable
plastic would be the minimum
requirement because we must ensure
that we use the finite resources at our
disposal to provide this benefit for as
many veterans, without family or
resources, as we can. We disagree with
the commenter’s assertion that durable
plastic is ‘‘generally not deemed
appropriate for use as an urn.’’ In fact,
many of the inurnments at national
cemeteries are of urns constructed of
durable plastic, so while the commenter
is correct that many families may
choose to place the remains in urns of
different construction, we can confirm
that many find a durable plastic urn to
be appropriate for the remains of their
loved one.
Regarding the commenter’s request
that we amend the regulation to include
other materials for urn construction,
although we stated in the preamble to
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19535
the proposed rulemaking that we do not
prohibit individuals or entities from
purchasing burial receptacles of higher
standard, such as a stronger gauge metal
for caskets, or wood or metal for urns,
this comment indicates that our
information was not sufficiently clear as
to the types of caskets and urns that
would be acceptable for reimbursement,
and therefore we are making changes to
the regulation to address the issue the
commenter raises, although we will not
be using the amendment suggested in
the comment.
Proposed § 38.628(b)(5), now
redesignated § 38.628(c)(5), was
intended to prescribe certain minimum
standards for caskets and urns that
would ensure that each veteran, in the
absence of a family member to make
burial decisions, is laid to rest in a
consistently dignified manner. We are
making changes to redesignated
paragraph (c)(5)(ii) to specifically
address the commenter’s concern by
stating that individuals or entities may
purchase and request reimbursement for
urns constructed of materials other than
durable plastic, including wood, metal,
or ceramic, even though reimbursement
will be limited to the average cost of a
durable plastic urn. In reviewing this
provision, we also noted that the casket
provision may be subject to
misinterpretation so we have amended
redesignated paragraph (c)(5)(i) to
clarify that the caskets must be of metal
construction, but may be of a thicker
gauge metal, even though
reimbursement will be limited to the
average cost of a casket of 20-gauge
metal construction. We note that these
changes will allow for only one
material, metal, for the construction of
caskets while urns may be constructed
of a variety of materials. As stated in the
proposed rulemaking, we established
minimum standards to ensure the burial
receptacles could withstand
disinterment and reinterment, should
that need arise. We explicitly require
metal caskets because we believe they
will endure the environmental
conditions of in-ground burial better
than other materials and keep the
remains intact. Urns may be inurned in
above-ground niches, so their
construction may not need to endure the
rigors of in-ground burial. For those that
will be inurned in the ground, we note
that an urn will include an interior
container for the cremated remains that
will help ensure their integrity if the
outer construction should fail.
While we have amended the language
regarding the construction of a casket or
an urn, we do not change the standard
used to calculate the maximum
reimbursement amount under
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
19536
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
redesignated paragraph (d). As stated in
the proposed rule, we established a
maximum reimbursement amount based
on the minimum construction standards
of either a casket or an urn. VA will
reimburse for the actual cost of a burial
receptacle, as shown on an invoice, up
to a maximum reimbursement amount
that is equal to the average cost of
receptacles meeting the minimum
standards for the fiscal year preceding
the calendar year of when a claim for
reimbursement is received. To ensure
that the edits to redesignated paragraph
(c) described above do not confuse how
we calculate the average cost, we will
state the minimum standards in
redesignated paragraph (d), which
establishes the maximum
reimbursement amount. We reiterate
here that VA will only reimburse for a
single casket or urn purchased on behalf
of any decedent and that, under
redesignated § 38.628(c)(5), the
cemetery director receiving the remains
will visually inspect the casket or urn
that is presented for burial or inurnment
to ensure that it matches the description
on the invoice submitted for payment.
Therefore, if, as the commenter
explained, the cremated remains are
moved from one container to another of
a different material, we will only
reimburse for the cost of the urn
presented for burial, subject to the
maximum reimbursement amount. Any
individual or entity seeking
reimbursement must ensure that the
invoice presented for payment is the
invoice for the burial receptacle
presented for burial.
The same commenter noted a second
issue regarding proposed paragraph
(b)(2), now redesignated paragraph
(c)(2), and the requirement that
individuals seeking reimbursement
certify that they cannot identify the
decedent’s next-of-kin and that VA’s
records do not identify the next-of-kin.
The commenter objected that, because
they do not have access to VA’s records,
they could not certify as to whether a
next-of-kin was identified there. The
commenter also added that funeral
homes are often faced with a dilemma
in which a deceased veteran’s next-ofkin is identified but is unwilling or
unable to assume responsibility for
burial arrangements. The commenter
suggested a clarification to reflect that
an applicant who provides a casket or
urn because of an uncooperative nextof-kin would still be entitled to
reimbursement. We acknowledge the
commenter’s concerns are valid.
As an initial matter, we have
determined that the required findings
that a veteran have no known next-ofkin or sufficient resources to furnish a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:35 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
casket or urn can be satisfied by the
applicant’s certification to that effect.
State and local laws governing the
disposition of unclaimed remains
require, generally, that a search be
performed to identify a decedent’s nextof-kin or authorized representative who
may assume responsibility for the final
disposition of the remains. VA believes
that it would be reasonable to rely on
the applicant’s certification that no
next-of-kin was identified as a result of
an independent search performed in
compliance with the legal requirements
of that jurisdiction. The intent of the
Dignified Burial and Other Veterans’
Benefits Improvement Act of 2012 (the
Act) is to assist individuals or entities
in possession of remains that are
unclaimed in providing for the final
disposition of those remains. Because
we believe that an additional search by
VA of its own records would be
duplicative of this process and could
potentially delay or even deter
individuals or entities from bringing
unclaimed veteran remains to VA for
burial, we find that reliance on the
applicant’s certification that no next-ofkin has been identified is reasonable.
Moreover, because laws related to the
disposition of unclaimed remains also
involve determinations of the
decedent’s indigency, VA will also
accept the applicant’s certification that,
based upon available information, there
are insufficient financial resources
available to furnish a burial receptacle.
Accordingly, we have added paragraph
(b) to state that we will rely on the
applicant’s certification. Proposed
paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) will now
become paragraphs (c), (d), and (e),
respectively, and we further amend
redesignated paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3)
to eliminate any requirement that an
individual or entity seeking
reimbursement must certify as to what
is in VA records.
In redesignated paragraph (c)(2), we
explicitly allow for the circumstance of
the ‘‘uncooperative next-of-kin,’’ as
described by the commenter. As we
stated in the preamble to the proposed
rule, we cannot compel an identified
next-of-kin of a deceased veteran who is
unwilling or unable to assume
responsibility for the deceased veteran’s
burial. We recognize that relevant state
and local laws include provisions
applicable to the type of situation
described by the commenter. These laws
often address the situation by allowing
individuals or entities in possession of
remains that are unclaimed to arrange
for burial after a defined period of time,
despite the existence of an
uncooperative relative who may have
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
means, but refuses to claim the
decedent’s remains or arrange for final
disposition. We therefore add a
provision to redesignated paragraph
(c)(2) to require the applicant to certify
that they have followed the relevant
state or local laws relating to the
disposition of remains. VA will accept
an applicant’s certification that an
identified next-of-kin is unwilling or
unable to assume responsibility for the
deceased veteran’s burial arrangements
as meeting the requirements that the
decedent has no next-of-kin and
insufficient resources to purchase the
casket or urn.
We received a comment suggesting
that we make provision for certain
veterans who died prior to January 10,
2014. The effective date was defined in
the authorizing statute and VA has no
authority to provide caskets or urns for
veterans who died prior to that date.
The commenter also suggested, in his
original comment and in a follow-up
comment, that we make changes to
regulatory provisions relating to our
definition of applicant. That provision
is beyond the scope of this rulemaking,
but VA is planning to address it in
another rulemaking soon. We make no
changes to this regulation based on
these comments.
One commenter questioned our
estimate on the number of applications
we anticipated we would receive under
this regulation. We estimated that we
would receive approximately 670
applications for reimbursement for a
burial receptacle purchased in 2014 and
that this number would decrease in
years to come. The commenter appears
to believe our estimate is too low, based
on estimates of the total number of
veterans who die yearly. Our estimate
uses the total annual number of veteran
deaths, but adjusts that number based
on VA statistics to determine the
number of veterans without a next-ofkin and where sufficient resources are
unavailable to furnish a casket or urn,
to determine the number that may need
to be furnished a burial receptacle under
this regulation. We make no changes
based on this comment.
In redesignated paragraph (d), we
indicate that we will publish an annual
notice providing the average cost of a
casket or urn that will be the maximum
allowable reimbursement amount for
each type of burial receptacle. In the
proposed rule, we indicated we would
pay these rates based on the year the
burial receptacle was purchased.
However, we have determined that it
will be more efficient to process
applications using the maximum
reimbursement amounts based on the
year in which the application is
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
received instead of the date the burial
receptacle was purchased. We have
changed paragraph (d) to indicate that
these maximum rates apply to
applications received for the purchase
of a burial receptacle in a given calendar
year and have deleted the reference to
the date of purchase.
Finally, we are also updating
redesignated paragraph (e) to indicate
that we will reimburse those individuals
who have been waiting for the
publication of this final rule to submit
their applications at the reimbursement
rates for 2015. VA advised these
individuals to hold their receipts until
the publication of the final rule. Because
publication has been delayed, and they
could not submit those applications in
calendar year 2014, the current
maximum rates should apply. As
indicated in the notice published
elsewhere in this Federal Register, the
maximum reimbursement amounts for
2015 are $1,967 for a casket and $172
for an urn, which apply to all
applications received in calendar year
2015.
Based on the rationale set forth in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION to the
proposed rule and in this final rule, VA
is adopting the proposed rule as a final
rule with the changes as noted above to
new paragraph (b) and redesignated
paragraphs (c)(2), (c)(3), (c)(5), (d), and
(e).
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Effect of Rulemaking
Title 38 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, as revised by this final
rulemaking, represents VA’s
implementation of its legal authority on
this subject. Other than future
amendments to this regulation or
governing statutes, no contrary guidance
or procedures are authorized. All
existing or subsequent VA guidance
must be read to conform with this
rulemaking if possible or, if not
possible, such guidance is superseded
by this rulemaking.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, because the
number of claims and the amounts
involved are expected to be small. This
rule will only impact those third parties
and entities that choose to participate in
this program. Payments made under this
program are not intended as benefits but
to provide reimbursement for privately
purchased caskets and urns. We
estimate the average price of a burial
receptacle (and therefore the average
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:35 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
reimbursement) for 2014 will be less
than $2,000 for caskets and less than
$200 for urns. We also estimate that the
total number of reimbursements for
2014 will be 338 caskets and 332 urns.
Because the final rulemaking provides
for a reimbursement, the individual or
entity purchasing the burial receptacle
will recoup the purchase price, up to
the maximum rate established annually.
Generally this will result in the
individual or entity avoiding a financial
loss for having made the purchase. But,
because the reimbursement will not
exceed the purchase price of the burial
receptacle, the individual or entity will
not experience any gain. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this
rulemaking is exempt from the initial
and final regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This rule will have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(at 44 U.S.C. 3507) requires that VA
consider the impact of paperwork and
other information collection burdens
imposed on the public. Under 44 U.S.C.
3507(a), an agency may not collect or
sponsor the collection of information,
nor may it impose an information
collection requirement unless it
displays a currently valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) control
number. See also 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3)(vi).
This final rule will impose the
following new information collection
requirement. Section 38.628 will require
submission of new VA Form 40–10088
by individuals seeking reimbursement
from VA for the purchase of a casket or
urn for the remains of a veteran who has
no next-of-kin and where sufficient
resources are unavailable to furnish a
burial receptacle. The collection of
information is necessary for VA to
obtain information sufficient to
determine whether reimbursement is
appropriate. Information provided will
include proof that the requesting
individual purchased the burial
receptacle and that the burial receptacle
meets standards detailed in the
regulation, and the purchase price of the
receptacle. VA will use this information
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19537
to determine whether reimbursement is
appropriate and, if so, the appropriate
amount of the reimbursement.
As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (at 44 U.S.C.
3507(d)), VA submitted this information
collection to OMB for its review. OMB
approved this new information
collection requirement associated with
the final rule and assigned OMB control
number 2900–0799.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ which requires
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), as ‘‘any regulatory action
that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in this Executive Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this rule have been
examined and it has been determined
not to be a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866. VA’s
impact analysis can be found as a
supporting document at https://
www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is
published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its impact analysis are
available on VA’s Web site at https://
www1.va.gov/orpm/, by following the
link for ‘‘VA Regulations Published.’’
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
19538
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance program number and title for
this rule are 64.201, National
Cemeteries.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jose
D. Riojas, Chief of Staff, approved this
document on April 7, 2015, for
publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 38
Administrative practice and
procedure, Cemeteries, Veterans.
Dated April 8, 2015.
William F. Russo,
Acting Director, Office of Regulation Policy
& Management, Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs amends 38 CFR part 38 as set
forth below:
PART 38—NATIONAL CEMETERIES
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
1. The authority citation for part 38
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 107, 501, 512, 2306,
2402, 2403, 2404, 2408, 2411, 7105.
■
2. Add § 38.628 to read as follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 38.628. Reimbursement for caskets and
urns for unclaimed remains of veterans.
(a) VA will reimburse any individual
or entity for the actual cost of a casket
or an urn, purchased by the individual
or entity for the burial in a national
cemetery of an eligible veteran who died
on or after January 10, 2014, for whom
VA:
(1) Is unable to identify the veteran’s
next-of-kin; and
(2) Determines that sufficient
resources are otherwise unavailable to
furnish the casket or urn.
(b) For purposes of satisfying the
requirements of paragraph (a) of this
section, VA will rely entirely on the
requesting individual’s or entity’s
certification as required under
paragraphs (c)(2) and (3) of this section.
(c) An individual or entity may
request reimbursement from VA under
paragraph (a) of this section by
completing and submitting VA Form
40–10088, and supporting
documentation, in accordance with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:35 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
instructions on the form. Prior to
approving reimbursement VA must find
all of the following:
(1) The veteran is eligible for burial in
a VA national cemetery;
(2) The individual or entity has
certified that they cannot identify the
veteran’s next-of-kin, or that an
identified next-of-kin is unwilling or
unable to assume responsibility for the
deceased veteran’s burial arrangements,
and that the individual or entity has
followed applicable state or local law
relating to the disposition of unclaimed
remains;
(3) The individual or entity has
certified that, to the best of their
knowledge, sufficient resources are
otherwise unavailable to furnish the
casket or urn;
(4) The invoice presented by the
individual or entity clearly indicates the
purchase price of the casket or urn
purchased by the individual or entity;
and
(5) The invoice presented by the
individual or entity contains
information sufficient for VA to
determine, in conjunction with a visual
inspection, that the casket or urn meets
the following standards:
(i) Caskets must be of metal
construction of at least 20-gauge
thickness, designed for containing
human remains, sufficient to contain the
remains of the deceased veteran,
include a gasketed seal, and include
external fixed rails or swing arm
handles.
(ii) Urns must be of a durable
construction, such as durable plastic,
wood, metal, or ceramic, designed to
contain cremated human remains, and
include a secure closure to contain the
cremated remains.
(d) Reimbursement for a claim
received in any calendar year under
paragraph (a) of this section will not
exceed the average cost of a 20-gauge
metal casket or a durable plastic urn
during the fiscal year preceding the
calendar year of the claim, as
determined by VA and published
annually in the Federal Register.
(e) If, before July 2, 2014, an
individual or entity purchased a casket
or urn for burial in a VA national
cemetery of the remains of a veteran
who died after January 10, 2014, and the
burial receptacle is not at least a 20gauge metal casket or a durable plastic
urn, VA will reimburse the purchase
price of the burial receptacle, providing
all other criteria in this regulation are
met. The reimbursement amount will be
subject to the maximum reimbursement
amount calculated for 2015.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 2306, 2402, 2411)
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(The Office of Management and Budget
has approved the information collection
requirements under this section under
control number 2900–0799.)
[FR Doc. 2015–08388 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0701; FRL–9925–93–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; District
of Columbia; Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2008 Ozone, 2010
Nitrogen Dioxide, and 2010 Sulfur
Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality
Standards; Approval of Air Pollution
Emergency Episode Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving portions of
three State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submittals from the District of
Columbia (the District) pursuant to the
Clean Air Act (CAA). Whenever new or
revised national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) are promulgated,
the CAA requires states to submit a plan
for the implementation, maintenance,
and enforcement of such NAAQS. The
plan is required to address basic
program elements, including, but not
limited to, regulatory structure,
monitoring, modeling, legal authority,
and adequate resources necessary to
assure attainment and maintenance of
the standards. These elements are
referred to as infrastructure
requirements. The District has made
three separate submittals addressing the
infrastructure requirements for the 2008
ozone NAAQS, the 2010 nitrogen
dioxide (NO2) NAAQS, and the 2010
sulfur dioxide (SO2) NAAQS. One of the
submittals also includes the ‘‘Revised
Air Quality Emergency Plan for the
District of Columbia’’ for satisfying
EPA’s requirements for air quality
emergency episodes.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
May 13, 2015.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0701. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the electronic docket,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19534-19538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08388]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 38
RIN 2900-AO99
Reimbursement for Caskets and Urns for Burial of Unclaimed
Remains in a National Cemetery
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) National Cemetery
Administration (NCA) amends its regulations to establish a new program
to provide reimbursement for caskets and urns for the interment of the
remains of veterans with no known next-of-kin and where sufficient
financial resources are not available for this purpose.
DATES: Effective date: The final rule is effective May 13, 2015.
Applicability date: The final rule applies to claims for reimbursement
for burial receptacles for individuals who died on or after January 10,
2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrina Brown, Office of Field
Programs (41A), National Cemetery Administration (NCA), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420.
Telephone: (202) 461-6833 (this is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a document published on July 2, 2014 (79
FR 37698), VA proposed revising its regulations governing burial in
national cemeteries to implement new authority under section 2306 of
title 38, United States Code (U.S.C.), to furnish a casket or urn for
interment in a VA national cemetery of the unclaimed remains of
veterans for whom VA cannot identify a next-of-kin and determines that
sufficient financial resources for the furnishing of a casket or urn
for burial are not otherwise available. The 30-day public comment
period ended on August 1, 2014. VA received fourteen comments from
interested individuals and organizations. To address some of those
comments, as will be explained in detail below, VA added a new
paragraph (b) and redesignated proposed paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) as
paragraphs (c), (d), and (e), respectively.
Eight commenters expressed support for the proposed amendment. We
thank these individuals for taking the time to review and comment on
the rulemaking. We make no changes to the regulation based on these
comments.
One commenter suggested that VA contract with online providers of
caskets and urns to make bulk purchases of caskets and urns, which
would then be shipped to individuals who apply online. As discussed in
the preamble to the proposed rulemaking, VA considered the direct
purchase option but determined that would be a less efficient and
economical means of administering this benefit. Development of an
online application portal and establishment of contractual
relationships with suppliers would require considerable time and would
delay VA's ability to timely provide this benefit as needs arise. The
expense required to contract and to build an online portal would
decrease the resources available to provide the benefit itself. The
commenter stated that he felt the suggestion would allow for ``quality
control.'' As we indicated in the preamble to the proposed rulemaking,
unclaimed veteran remains are often in the custody of funeral homes or
others who are authorized under state law to dispose of unclaimed
remains. 79 FR at 37699. Therefore, we believe they are likely familiar
with procuring burial receptacles. We further
[[Page 19535]]
expect that those who will provide caskets or urns will use the same
suppliers from whom they purchase caskets and urns for the families
they serve in their normal course of business and that the caskets and
urns they purchase will be of no lesser quality than those provided for
family-requested funeral services. Further, as we provide in
redesignated Sec. 38.628(c)(5), VA will visually inspect the casket or
urn when it is presented at the national cemetery to ensure that it
corresponds to the description in the invoice and meets NCA's
specifications, which are intended to ensure safe handling and
integrity of veteran remains. Accordingly, VA makes no changes based on
this comment.
Another commenter urged that we implement this benefit so that it
is ``not cumbersome to administer and is fair in the time it takes to
reimburse.'' We believe that the reimbursement program we have outlined
in our regulation meets both of those criteria. The commenter further
suggested that VA develop a form and process for eligible veterans to
``pre-order [and] get pre-authorized'' to assist them with advance
planning. Generally, VA encourages veterans and their families to plan
for their burial needs. However, while such a plan may include a stated
desire to be buried in a national cemetery, VA has no authority to pre-
determine eligibility for burial or memorialization, because
eligibility decisions must be made based on the law in effect at the
time the individual dies. If, upon the death of an eligible veteran, VA
is made aware of the veteran's wishes regarding burial, VA will try to
accommodate those wishes to the fullest extent possible. This
regulation, however, is applicable when a veteran dies without
sufficient funds available for burial and has no known next-of-kin.
Third parties, such as public administrators, local coroners, funeral
directors or volunteer organizations, who may have assumed
responsibility for the burial of these unclaimed remains, will likely
be unaware of any wishes for burial arrangements. However, even without
knowing the burial wishes of the deceased veteran, by establishing a
means to reimburse these third parties for the expense of a burial
receptacle at a time of need, VA will ensure that these veterans
receive an appropriate burial in a national cemetery. VA will make no
changes based on this comment.
VA received comments from a funeral services trade association on
two issues. The first issue concerned our reference to the Federal
Trade Commission (FTC) regulations that define ``alternative
container'' which VA construed as applicable to cremation urns. The
commenter stated that ``alternative container,'' in the funeral
industry, ``is the receptacle that the body is placed into prior to
cremation.'' The commenter also stated that plastic is ``generally not
deemed appropriate for use as an urn.'' The commenter then suggested
that we revise our regulation to include wood or metal, in addition to
durable plastic, as an acceptable material for urns subject to
reimbursement under Sec. 38.628. We reviewed the FTC regulation in
light of this feedback and believe that the commenter's statement that
an alternative container refers to a receptacle for the body prior to
cremation is an accurate interpretation of the FTC regulation, which
states that requiring the public to purchase a casket for direct
cremations is an unfair or deceptive act or practice for a funeral
provider and requires funeral providers to ``make an alternative
container available for direct cremations.'' See 16 CFR 453.4(a)(2). We
wish to correct the statement made in the preamble to the proposed rule
(see 79 FR at 37699). However, we did not ``base'' the definition of
``urn'' in Sec. 38.628 on the phrase ``alternative container'' (we did
use the definition of ``casket'' from the FTC regulation) nor was
``alternative container'' used elsewhere in the proposed rulemaking.
Our definition of urn was developed using the elements we felt
necessary for a burial receptacle that would ensure that the cremated
remains of veterans, in the absence of a family member to make such
determinations, are laid to rest in a consistently dignified manner. We
have decided that, for purposes of reimbursement, an urn made of
durable plastic would be the minimum requirement because we must ensure
that we use the finite resources at our disposal to provide this
benefit for as many veterans, without family or resources, as we can.
We disagree with the commenter's assertion that durable plastic is
``generally not deemed appropriate for use as an urn.'' In fact, many
of the inurnments at national cemeteries are of urns constructed of
durable plastic, so while the commenter is correct that many families
may choose to place the remains in urns of different construction, we
can confirm that many find a durable plastic urn to be appropriate for
the remains of their loved one.
Regarding the commenter's request that we amend the regulation to
include other materials for urn construction, although we stated in the
preamble to the proposed rulemaking that we do not prohibit individuals
or entities from purchasing burial receptacles of higher standard, such
as a stronger gauge metal for caskets, or wood or metal for urns, this
comment indicates that our information was not sufficiently clear as to
the types of caskets and urns that would be acceptable for
reimbursement, and therefore we are making changes to the regulation to
address the issue the commenter raises, although we will not be using
the amendment suggested in the comment.
Proposed Sec. 38.628(b)(5), now redesignated Sec. 38.628(c)(5),
was intended to prescribe certain minimum standards for caskets and
urns that would ensure that each veteran, in the absence of a family
member to make burial decisions, is laid to rest in a consistently
dignified manner. We are making changes to redesignated paragraph
(c)(5)(ii) to specifically address the commenter's concern by stating
that individuals or entities may purchase and request reimbursement for
urns constructed of materials other than durable plastic, including
wood, metal, or ceramic, even though reimbursement will be limited to
the average cost of a durable plastic urn. In reviewing this provision,
we also noted that the casket provision may be subject to
misinterpretation so we have amended redesignated paragraph (c)(5)(i)
to clarify that the caskets must be of metal construction, but may be
of a thicker gauge metal, even though reimbursement will be limited to
the average cost of a casket of 20-gauge metal construction. We note
that these changes will allow for only one material, metal, for the
construction of caskets while urns may be constructed of a variety of
materials. As stated in the proposed rulemaking, we established minimum
standards to ensure the burial receptacles could withstand disinterment
and reinterment, should that need arise. We explicitly require metal
caskets because we believe they will endure the environmental
conditions of in-ground burial better than other materials and keep the
remains intact. Urns may be inurned in above-ground niches, so their
construction may not need to endure the rigors of in-ground burial. For
those that will be inurned in the ground, we note that an urn will
include an interior container for the cremated remains that will help
ensure their integrity if the outer construction should fail.
While we have amended the language regarding the construction of a
casket or an urn, we do not change the standard used to calculate the
maximum reimbursement amount under
[[Page 19536]]
redesignated paragraph (d). As stated in the proposed rule, we
established a maximum reimbursement amount based on the minimum
construction standards of either a casket or an urn. VA will reimburse
for the actual cost of a burial receptacle, as shown on an invoice, up
to a maximum reimbursement amount that is equal to the average cost of
receptacles meeting the minimum standards for the fiscal year preceding
the calendar year of when a claim for reimbursement is received. To
ensure that the edits to redesignated paragraph (c) described above do
not confuse how we calculate the average cost, we will state the
minimum standards in redesignated paragraph (d), which establishes the
maximum reimbursement amount. We reiterate here that VA will only
reimburse for a single casket or urn purchased on behalf of any
decedent and that, under redesignated Sec. 38.628(c)(5), the cemetery
director receiving the remains will visually inspect the casket or urn
that is presented for burial or inurnment to ensure that it matches the
description on the invoice submitted for payment. Therefore, if, as the
commenter explained, the cremated remains are moved from one container
to another of a different material, we will only reimburse for the cost
of the urn presented for burial, subject to the maximum reimbursement
amount. Any individual or entity seeking reimbursement must ensure that
the invoice presented for payment is the invoice for the burial
receptacle presented for burial.
The same commenter noted a second issue regarding proposed
paragraph (b)(2), now redesignated paragraph (c)(2), and the
requirement that individuals seeking reimbursement certify that they
cannot identify the decedent's next-of-kin and that VA's records do not
identify the next-of-kin. The commenter objected that, because they do
not have access to VA's records, they could not certify as to whether a
next-of-kin was identified there. The commenter also added that funeral
homes are often faced with a dilemma in which a deceased veteran's
next-of-kin is identified but is unwilling or unable to assume
responsibility for burial arrangements. The commenter suggested a
clarification to reflect that an applicant who provides a casket or urn
because of an uncooperative next-of-kin would still be entitled to
reimbursement. We acknowledge the commenter's concerns are valid.
As an initial matter, we have determined that the required findings
that a veteran have no known next-of-kin or sufficient resources to
furnish a casket or urn can be satisfied by the applicant's
certification to that effect. State and local laws governing the
disposition of unclaimed remains require, generally, that a search be
performed to identify a decedent's next-of-kin or authorized
representative who may assume responsibility for the final disposition
of the remains. VA believes that it would be reasonable to rely on the
applicant's certification that no next-of-kin was identified as a
result of an independent search performed in compliance with the legal
requirements of that jurisdiction. The intent of the Dignified Burial
and Other Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2012 (the Act) is to
assist individuals or entities in possession of remains that are
unclaimed in providing for the final disposition of those remains.
Because we believe that an additional search by VA of its own records
would be duplicative of this process and could potentially delay or
even deter individuals or entities from bringing unclaimed veteran
remains to VA for burial, we find that reliance on the applicant's
certification that no next-of-kin has been identified is reasonable.
Moreover, because laws related to the disposition of unclaimed remains
also involve determinations of the decedent's indigency, VA will also
accept the applicant's certification that, based upon available
information, there are insufficient financial resources available to
furnish a burial receptacle. Accordingly, we have added paragraph (b)
to state that we will rely on the applicant's certification. Proposed
paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) will now become paragraphs (c), (d), and
(e), respectively, and we further amend redesignated paragraphs (c)(2)
and (c)(3) to eliminate any requirement that an individual or entity
seeking reimbursement must certify as to what is in VA records.
In redesignated paragraph (c)(2), we explicitly allow for the
circumstance of the ``uncooperative next-of-kin,'' as described by the
commenter. As we stated in the preamble to the proposed rule, we cannot
compel an identified next-of-kin of a deceased veteran who is unwilling
or unable to assume responsibility for the deceased veteran's burial.
We recognize that relevant state and local laws include provisions
applicable to the type of situation described by the commenter. These
laws often address the situation by allowing individuals or entities in
possession of remains that are unclaimed to arrange for burial after a
defined period of time, despite the existence of an uncooperative
relative who may have means, but refuses to claim the decedent's
remains or arrange for final disposition. We therefore add a provision
to redesignated paragraph (c)(2) to require the applicant to certify
that they have followed the relevant state or local laws relating to
the disposition of remains. VA will accept an applicant's certification
that an identified next-of-kin is unwilling or unable to assume
responsibility for the deceased veteran's burial arrangements as
meeting the requirements that the decedent has no next-of-kin and
insufficient resources to purchase the casket or urn.
We received a comment suggesting that we make provision for certain
veterans who died prior to January 10, 2014. The effective date was
defined in the authorizing statute and VA has no authority to provide
caskets or urns for veterans who died prior to that date. The commenter
also suggested, in his original comment and in a follow-up comment,
that we make changes to regulatory provisions relating to our
definition of applicant. That provision is beyond the scope of this
rulemaking, but VA is planning to address it in another rulemaking
soon. We make no changes to this regulation based on these comments.
One commenter questioned our estimate on the number of applications
we anticipated we would receive under this regulation. We estimated
that we would receive approximately 670 applications for reimbursement
for a burial receptacle purchased in 2014 and that this number would
decrease in years to come. The commenter appears to believe our
estimate is too low, based on estimates of the total number of veterans
who die yearly. Our estimate uses the total annual number of veteran
deaths, but adjusts that number based on VA statistics to determine the
number of veterans without a next-of-kin and where sufficient resources
are unavailable to furnish a casket or urn, to determine the number
that may need to be furnished a burial receptacle under this
regulation. We make no changes based on this comment.
In redesignated paragraph (d), we indicate that we will publish an
annual notice providing the average cost of a casket or urn that will
be the maximum allowable reimbursement amount for each type of burial
receptacle. In the proposed rule, we indicated we would pay these rates
based on the year the burial receptacle was purchased. However, we have
determined that it will be more efficient to process applications using
the maximum reimbursement amounts based on the year in which the
application is
[[Page 19537]]
received instead of the date the burial receptacle was purchased. We
have changed paragraph (d) to indicate that these maximum rates apply
to applications received for the purchase of a burial receptacle in a
given calendar year and have deleted the reference to the date of
purchase.
Finally, we are also updating redesignated paragraph (e) to
indicate that we will reimburse those individuals who have been waiting
for the publication of this final rule to submit their applications at
the reimbursement rates for 2015. VA advised these individuals to hold
their receipts until the publication of the final rule. Because
publication has been delayed, and they could not submit those
applications in calendar year 2014, the current maximum rates should
apply. As indicated in the notice published elsewhere in this Federal
Register, the maximum reimbursement amounts for 2015 are $1,967 for a
casket and $172 for an urn, which apply to all applications received in
calendar year 2015.
Based on the rationale set forth in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
to the proposed rule and in this final rule, VA is adopting the
proposed rule as a final rule with the changes as noted above to new
paragraph (b) and redesignated paragraphs (c)(2), (c)(3), (c)(5), (d),
and (e).
Effect of Rulemaking
Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as revised by this
final rulemaking, represents VA's implementation of its legal authority
on this subject. Other than future amendments to this regulation or
governing statutes, no contrary guidance or procedures are authorized.
All existing or subsequent VA guidance must be read to conform with
this rulemaking if possible or, if not possible, such guidance is
superseded by this rulemaking.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612, because the number of claims and the amounts involved are expected
to be small. This rule will only impact those third parties and
entities that choose to participate in this program. Payments made
under this program are not intended as benefits but to provide
reimbursement for privately purchased caskets and urns. We estimate the
average price of a burial receptacle (and therefore the average
reimbursement) for 2014 will be less than $2,000 for caskets and less
than $200 for urns. We also estimate that the total number of
reimbursements for 2014 will be 338 caskets and 332 urns. Because the
final rulemaking provides for a reimbursement, the individual or entity
purchasing the burial receptacle will recoup the purchase price, up to
the maximum rate established annually. Generally this will result in
the individual or entity avoiding a financial loss for having made the
purchase. But, because the reimbursement will not exceed the purchase
price of the burial receptacle, the individual or entity will not
experience any gain. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this
rulemaking is exempt from the initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This rule will have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (at 44 U.S.C. 3507) requires
that VA consider the impact of paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the public. Under 44 U.S.C. 3507(a), an
agency may not collect or sponsor the collection of information, nor
may it impose an information collection requirement unless it displays
a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
See also 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3)(vi).
This final rule will impose the following new information
collection requirement. Section 38.628 will require submission of new
VA Form 40-10088 by individuals seeking reimbursement from VA for the
purchase of a casket or urn for the remains of a veteran who has no
next-of-kin and where sufficient resources are unavailable to furnish a
burial receptacle. The collection of information is necessary for VA to
obtain information sufficient to determine whether reimbursement is
appropriate. Information provided will include proof that the
requesting individual purchased the burial receptacle and that the
burial receptacle meets standards detailed in the regulation, and the
purchase price of the receptacle. VA will use this information to
determine whether reimbursement is appropriate and, if so, the
appropriate amount of the reimbursement.
As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (at 44 U.S.C.
3507(d)), VA submitted this information collection to OMB for its
review. OMB approved this new information collection requirement
associated with the final rule and assigned OMB control number 2900-
0799.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' which requires review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), as ``any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way
the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs,
the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
this Executive Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this rule have been examined and it has been determined
not to be a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
VA's impact analysis can be found as a supporting document at https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 hours after the rulemaking
document is published. Additionally, a copy of the rulemaking and its
impact analysis are available on VA's Web site at https://www1.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ``VA Regulations Published.''
[[Page 19538]]
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program number and title
for this rule are 64.201, National Cemeteries.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jose D.
Riojas, Chief of Staff, approved this document on April 7, 2015, for
publication.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 38
Administrative practice and procedure, Cemeteries, Veterans.
Dated April 8, 2015.
William F. Russo,
Acting Director, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of
the General Counsel, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs amends 38 CFR part 38 as set forth below:
PART 38--NATIONAL CEMETERIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
0
1. The authority citation for part 38 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 107, 501, 512, 2306, 2402, 2403, 2404,
2408, 2411, 7105.
0
2. Add Sec. 38.628 to read as follows:
Sec. 38.628. Reimbursement for caskets and urns for unclaimed remains
of veterans.
(a) VA will reimburse any individual or entity for the actual cost
of a casket or an urn, purchased by the individual or entity for the
burial in a national cemetery of an eligible veteran who died on or
after January 10, 2014, for whom VA:
(1) Is unable to identify the veteran's next-of-kin; and
(2) Determines that sufficient resources are otherwise unavailable
to furnish the casket or urn.
(b) For purposes of satisfying the requirements of paragraph (a) of
this section, VA will rely entirely on the requesting individual's or
entity's certification as required under paragraphs (c)(2) and (3) of
this section.
(c) An individual or entity may request reimbursement from VA under
paragraph (a) of this section by completing and submitting VA Form 40-
10088, and supporting documentation, in accordance with the
instructions on the form. Prior to approving reimbursement VA must find
all of the following:
(1) The veteran is eligible for burial in a VA national cemetery;
(2) The individual or entity has certified that they cannot
identify the veteran's next-of-kin, or that an identified next-of-kin
is unwilling or unable to assume responsibility for the deceased
veteran's burial arrangements, and that the individual or entity has
followed applicable state or local law relating to the disposition of
unclaimed remains;
(3) The individual or entity has certified that, to the best of
their knowledge, sufficient resources are otherwise unavailable to
furnish the casket or urn;
(4) The invoice presented by the individual or entity clearly
indicates the purchase price of the casket or urn purchased by the
individual or entity; and
(5) The invoice presented by the individual or entity contains
information sufficient for VA to determine, in conjunction with a
visual inspection, that the casket or urn meets the following
standards:
(i) Caskets must be of metal construction of at least 20-gauge
thickness, designed for containing human remains, sufficient to contain
the remains of the deceased veteran, include a gasketed seal, and
include external fixed rails or swing arm handles.
(ii) Urns must be of a durable construction, such as durable
plastic, wood, metal, or ceramic, designed to contain cremated human
remains, and include a secure closure to contain the cremated remains.
(d) Reimbursement for a claim received in any calendar year under
paragraph (a) of this section will not exceed the average cost of a 20-
gauge metal casket or a durable plastic urn during the fiscal year
preceding the calendar year of the claim, as determined by VA and
published annually in the Federal Register.
(e) If, before July 2, 2014, an individual or entity purchased a
casket or urn for burial in a VA national cemetery of the remains of a
veteran who died after January 10, 2014, and the burial receptacle is
not at least a 20-gauge metal casket or a durable plastic urn, VA will
reimburse the purchase price of the burial receptacle, providing all
other criteria in this regulation are met. The reimbursement amount
will be subject to the maximum reimbursement amount calculated for
2015.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 2306, 2402, 2411)
(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information
collection requirements under this section under control number 2900-
0799.)
[FR Doc. 2015-08388 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P